Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem., 09 January 2019
Sec. Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry
This article is part of the Research Topic Nonferrous Nanomaterials & Composites for Energy Storage and Conversion View all 48 articles

Improved Electrochemical Performance of Surface Coated LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 With Polypyrrole

\r\nZhaoyong Chen*Zhaoyong Chen1*Kaifeng CaoKaifeng Cao1Huali Zhu,Huali Zhu2,3Xiaolong GongXiaolong Gong1Qiming LiuQiming Liu1Junfei DuanJunfei Duan1Lingjun LiLingjun Li1
  • 1College of Materials Science and Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China
  • 2College of Physics and Electronic Science, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China
  • 3Department of Chemistry, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States

Nickel-rich ternary layered oxide (LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2, LNCA) cathodes are favored in many fields such as electric vehicles due to its high specific capacity, low cost, and stable structure. However, LNCA cathode material still has the disadvantages of low initial coulombic efficiency, rate capability and poor cycle performance, which greatly restricts its commercial application. To overcome this barrier, a polypyrrole (PPy) layer with high electrical conductivity is designed to coat on the surface of LNCA cathode material. PPy coating layer on the surface of LNCA successfully is realized by means of liquid-phase chemical oxidation polymerization method, and which has been verified by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). PPy-coated LNCA (PL-2) exhibits satisfactory electrochemical performances including high reversible capacity and excellent rate capability. Furthermore, the capability is superior to pristine LNCA. So, it provides a new structure of conductive polymer modified cathode materials with good property through a mild modification method.

Introduction

Rechargeable lithium ion batteries (LIBs) (Zheng et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018a,b) have been applied successfully to electric vehicles (EVs) (Xu et al., 2015) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) (Goodenough and Park, 2013; Choi and Aurbach, 2016; Chen et al., 2017), which brings a great convenience and reduces exhaust emissions. However, the unsatisfied performance of cathode materials in LIBs, limits its extensive application in EVs and HEVs in the future, including low energy density, poor cycling performance et al. (Thackeray et al., 2012; Goodenough and Kim, 2014) Therefore, it is expected that the cycling performance and rate capability would be greatly improved.

LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 (LNCA) produced by substituting Co and Al for Ni in LiNiO2 has been considered as a promising cathode material because of it has higher capacity and lower price than LiCoO2 (Delmas et al., 1993; Levi et al., 1999; Cao et al., 2004). Nonetheless, the LNCA undergoes drastic capacity fading and poor cyclability due to the increase in interfacial resistance on the surface of cathode (Amine et al., 2001; Itou and Ukyo, 2005), micro-cracks generated in the particles (Watanabe et al., 2014a,b), and formation of NiO-like rock-salt domains (Abraham et al., 2002, 2003; Hayashi et al., 2014). Currently, an effective method to enhance the electrochemical properties of LNCA is to modify its surface with some stable coating layer like oxides(Cho and Cho, 2010; Cho et al., 2013; Lai et al., 2016; Dai et al., 2016a,b; Yan et al., 2017), phosphates(Kim and Cho, 2007; Lee et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2014), fluoride (Kim et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2016), and other cathode material (Liu et al., 2012; Du et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2017), etc. These coating layers can inhibit effectively side reactions between electrode and electrolyte. However, the coating materials impede the diffusion of lithium ions and electronic transmission in a degree.

Recently, conducting polymers have been investigated as additives to improve the electrode performance (Chen et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2013; Ramkumar and Minakshi, 2015, 2016a; Ramkumar and Sundaram, 2016b) because the polymer can provide a high electrical conductivity for the active materials. Nonetheless, polypyrrole (PPy) modified LNCA cathode material via liquid-phase chemical oxidation polymerization method has been not reported yet. In order to improve the conductivity and initial coulombic efficiency of LNCA, we have demonstrated that an ultrathin ppy layer can enhance the electrical conductivity of LNCA via a liquid-phase chemical oxidation polymerization method using ammonium persulphate as oxidant, the ppy layer is highly conductive and contributes to the fast electron transportation on the surface of LNCA particles. So, the ppy coated LNCA reaches a high electrochemical capacity of 206.6 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C with coulombic efficiency of 91% and the optimized sample maintains 195.1 mAh g−1 with 88.9% capacity retention after 100 cycles at a current density of 1 C with the voltage of 2.75–4.3 V vs. Li/Li+ at room temperature, because the PPy reduces the interfacial impedance of the cathode material and provides high electrochemical reaction kinetics, leading to a superior structural stability during lithiation and delithiation cycling.

Experimental

Material Synthesis

LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 (LNCA) powder was prepared by mixing Ni0.80Co0.15Al0.05(OH)2 and LiOH·H2O (99%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent) at molar ratio of 1:1.05 and firing at 450°C for 5 h, subsequently calcining at 750°C for 12 h in O2 flow. After sieving, powders with an average particle size of 10 μm were used for further experiments.

PPy-coated LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 was prepared by wet chemical method in Figure 1 Desired amounts of pyrrole monomer (AR, 99%) and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) as doping agent and 2 g LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 powder were ultrasonically dispersed in 100 ml deionized water. The aqueous solution of ammonium persulfate (AR, 99%) was slowly added as an oxidizing agent, and the concentration of ammonium persulfate was 0.06 M. The molar ratio of pyrrole monomer to oxidant and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate was 1:1, 1:1.5, respectively. The mixture was kept in ice-bath for 12 h under magnetically stirring and polymerized on the surface of the LNCA. The PPy coated samples were filtered, washed with deionized water and ethanol for several times, and finally dried under vacuum at 80°C for overnight. Finally, the PPy coated samples (PL-1, PL-2, and PL-5 corresponding to 1 wt, 2 wt, and 5 wt% PPy) were obtained.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Schematic view of PPy coated LNCA architecture with high electrical conductivity and the synthetic process.

Material Characterization

Crystal structures of the prepared LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 (LNCA) and PPy coated LNCA were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA in the 2θ range from 10° to 90°. The morphology was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, FEI QUANTA 250). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) were carried out on a JEOL JEM-2100 instrument.

Electrode Preparation and Electrochemical Measurements

For electrochemical tests, the cathode materials were tested using a coin type cell (2025). The working electrode was prepared by pressing a powder mixture of the sample (PPy-NCA or pristine LNCA), Super P conductive carbon black and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) with a weight ratio of 80:10:10 and coated onto an aluminum foil and dried at 120°C in vacuum. Two electrode button cells (half cells) were assembled in an argon filled glove box using fresh lithium foil as the counter electrode, The electrolyte was 1 M LiPF6 dissolved in ethyl carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 in volume) and the separator was Cellgard 2400 membrane. The charged / discharged measurements on a LAND battery-testing instrument within 2.75–4.3 V vs. Li/Li+ at 25°C. For cycling tests, the cells were cycled at the rate of 1 C (1 C rate is defined as 180 mAh g−1). The rate capability was measured at rates of 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, 3 C, and 5 C. A cyclic voltammogram (CV) test was conducted between 2.75 and 4.3 V at a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 using a CHI 660E electrochemical work station. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the cells was conducted using the CHI 660E electrochemical measurement system in a frequency range from 1 mHz to 100 kHz.

The electrodes after many cycles were prepared by disassembling coin cells fully discharged to 2.75 V and rinsed with dimethyl carbonate (DMC) several times in the glovebox, in order to investigate that the microstructure and morphology of cathode materials after long-term cycles.

Results and Discussion

Structural Characterization

Figure 2a shows the XRD pattern of pristine LNCA and PL-2 samples (PL-1 and PL-5 is shown Figure S1). The diffraction peaks of both samples are well indexed in terms of R-3m structure of hexagonal α-NaFeO2, which match well with those of the standard XRD patterns for (Li0.99 Ni0.01) (Ni0.798 Co0.202) O2 (PDF#: 87-1562). It should be noted that the pair reflections (006)/(102) and (018)/(110) are well-split for all samples, demonstrating the good hexagonal ordering and layered characteristics (Ohzuku et al., 1993). The intensity ratio of the (003) and (104) lines in the XRD patterns is more than 1.4 for all samples, indicating the suppressed cation mixing at a degree (Yang et al., 2014).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. XRD and FTIR pattern and SEM images of pristine LNCA and PL-2 cathode material: (a) XRD pattern of pristine LNCA and PL-2 cathode material, (b) The FTIR spectra of pristine LNCA, PPy, and PPy-coated LNCA, (c) pristine LNCA morphology, (d) PL-2 samples exhibiting obscure fringes which are related to the coating of the ultrathin PPy layer.

The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of pristine LNCA, PPy, and PPy-coated LNCA are shown in Figure 2b. It is found that the PPy-coated LNCA has typical absorption peaks of PPy. The band at 1,541 cm−1 is due to aromatic C=C in PPy. C=N shows peaks around 1,193 cm−1. Obviously, the PPy-coated LNCA sample has a stronger absorption peak than pristine LNCA at the position of C=C and C=N spectra. The region of the C–H in-plane deformation vibration situated at 1,043 cm−1 are observed at the position of PPy-LNCA spectra(Blinova et al., 2007). The results demonstrate that the PPy is successfully coated onto the surface of LNCA particles.

The surface morphology of the pristine LNCA and PL-2 samples are shown in Figure 2. Apparently, the spherical morphology of the pristine LNCA is well-retained, and the estimated average particles diameter of the LNCA (Figure 2c) is around 8 μm. Furthermore, a fuzzy layer was obviously observed in the surface of LNCA in Figure 2d, which may be PPy films grown by liquid-phase chemical oxidation polymerization method. And it is in accordance with the above-mentioned FTIR results.

The TEM (Figures 3a,d) and HRTEM (Figures 3b,e) images combined with the corresponding selected-area fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern (Figures 3c,f) further confirm that the spherical morphology of the LNCA is composed of a well crystallized layered structure. As can be seen from Figures 3a,c, pristine LNCA particles exhibit a smooth surface and show a highly ordered lattice.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. TEM images: (a), (d), HRTEM images: (b), (e) of pristine LNCA, PL-2, respectively and corresponding FFT images(c and f) from the selected region.

Bright and dark zones of a few nanometers wide are based on the inset of Figure 3b. The electron diffraction spots obtained after Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) were calculated and the crystal surface spacing was 0.236 nm, which was deduced to be the inter-planar spacing of the (006) plane of the layered structure. HRTEM images in Figure 3e shows that a nanoscale PPy film layer with a thickness of 10~12 nm is clearly seen on the surface of LNCA particles. It should be noted that the PPy layer is highly conductive, contributing a lot to the improvement of rate capacity of the LNCA cathode material. As depicted in Figure 3f, corresponding selected-area fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern (in region 4 of Figure 3e) further confirm that the bulk of PL-2 still maintain the ordered layered structure. According to the results of SEM, TEM and HRTEM, it is concluded that a PPy nano layer is successfully coated on the surface of LNCA cathode materials.

Electrochemical Performance

The electrochemical performance of pristine LNCA cathode materials and PL-2 are evaluated and shown in Figure 4. The electrochemical performance of PL-1, PL-5 samples are presented in the ESI (Figures S2S4). The initial charge/discharge profiles at 0.1 C rate are shown in Figure 4a. The pristine LNCA cathode materials deliver a discharge capacity of 189.5 mAh g−1 with an initial coulombic efficiency of 85.9%. However, for the PL-2 cathode materials, the discharge capacity approaches 206.6 mAh g−1, with an initial coulombic efficiency of 91%. The rate capability combined with corresponding charge/discharge profiles at various rates (Figures 4c,d) shows a superiority of PL-2, achieving higher rate capabilities than pristine LNCA. The voltage and discharge capacity of the cells gradually decrease with an increase of discharge current density due to the effect of ohmic polarization and interphase resistances caused by the side reaction on the interface between LNCA cathode and electrolytes. However, the higher discharge capacities of PL-2 are 163.5 mAh g−1 at 5 C, more than 146.2 mAh g−1 of pristine LNCA in Figure 4b. These test results indicate that PPy coating greatly reduces the electrode resistance of the cathode material and provides high electrochemical reaction kinetics, which ensured less discharge potential drop during high-rate cycling.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. (a) Initial charge/discharge profiles at 0.1 C in the voltage range of 2.75–4.3 V, (b) rate performance, (c,d) initial charge/discharge profiles at various rates of pristine LNCA and PL-2.

Figure 5 shows the cycling performance and electrochemical impedance spectra of pristine LNCA and PL-2 samples. As observed, the discharge capacities of both samples decrease with the increasing of the cycle number. As can be seen from Figure 5a, the capacity retention of the PL-2 sample is 88.9% after the 100 th cycle at 1 C rate between 2.75 and 4.3 V, while the prestine LNCA material exhibits 71.6% capacity retention after 100 cycles. For the PL-2 sample, corresponding to the initial discharge profiles evolution during cycling of both samples in Figures 5b,d, the cycle performance is much improved. It is definitely demonstrated that the PL-2 show better structure stability than pristine LNCA. The poor cycling performances of the pristine LNCA can be attributed to its vigorous surface reactivity with electrolyte, where the harmful interfacial side reactions suppress lithium ion diffusion.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. (a) Cycling performance at 1.0 C rate in the voltage range of 2.75–4.3 V, (b,d) initial discharge profiles evolution during cycling of pristine LNCA and PL-2. (c) Comparison of the electrochemical impedance spectra (inset is a magnified view of the high frequency region and equivalent circuit diagram) of the pristine and PL-2 charged to 4.3 V vs. Li/Li+.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements are used to elucidate the beneficial effect of the PPy coating layer for LNCA material. As can be seen from Figure 5c, the depressed semicircle in the high frequency region is related to the surface film impedance of the active cathode material (Wu et al., 2017). A magnified view of the high frequency region curve and equivalent circuit diagram are shown in the inset. The Li+ ionmigration resistance (Rsei) and the charge transfer resistance (Rct) of different samples is listed in Table 1. Obviously, it is easy to conclude that PL-2 material has smaller electrochemical impedance compared to the pristine sample before cycling. The mid frequency region responds to the charge transfer impedance. It indicates that PPy coating reduces the charge transfer resistance of the material due to the high electrical conductivity of the PL-2 sample, which facilitates transfer of electrons from the conductive agent and current collector to the cathode material and the electrode materials are transfer to each other.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The Li+ ion migration resistance (Rsei) and the charge transfer resistance (Rct) of different samples.

To investigate the degree of the electrochemical reversibility, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of LNCA and PL-2 between 2.75 and 4.3 V vs. Li/Li+ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 are depicted in Figure 6. Obviously, three pairs of reduction and oxidation peaks are observed in all the both samples. Meanwhile, according to the nickel-rich material phase transition process, caused by phase transitions of hexagonal phase to monoclinic phase (H1 to M), monoclinic phase to hexagonal phase (M to H2) and hexagonal phase to hexagonal phase (H2 to H3) during the charge-discharge process(Li et al., 1993; Xie et al., 2015). The first cycle are significantly different from those for the following cycles, because of the irreversible electrochemical reaction during the first discharge cycle. However, no obvious alteration is observed between the second cycle and the third cycle, suggesting the good reversibility of lithium insertion and extraction reactions. As can be seen from the Figures 6a,b, the peak position of PL-2 material shifted is smaller than LNCA. This illustrates that the PPy materials possess lower activation energy and higher electrical conductivity for the active materials. Therefore, PPy coated layer is beneficial to reducing the electrochemical polarization as well as improving the electrochemical performance.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. (a,b) the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of LNCA and PL-2 between 2.75 and 4.3 V vs. Li/Li+ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1.

In order to study the structural evolution of bare LNCA and PL-2 samples upon cycling, HRTEM and FFT imaging is performed. Figure 7a present the HRTEM images of the bare LNCA sample after the 100 th cycle, while Figures 7b,c present the HRTEM images of the PL-2 sample after the 100 th cycle, As can be seen from Figure 7a, the distortion region is observed over distances of ca. 10 nm from the surface of the LNCA material after 100 th cycle. The FFT in the inset of Figure 7a exhibits a spinel-like phase (space group Fd-3m). The formation of spinel-like phase in the surface region of the cycled LNCA sample is attributed to the migration of TM ions to the Li sites without breaking down the lattice.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. HRTEM images of: (a) the LNCA material after 100th cycle; (b,c) PL-2 sample after the 100th cycle; The index marked by subscript R and F is related to the rhombohedral (R-3m) phase and cubic (Fd-3m) phase. XRD pattern and SEM images of pristine LNCA and PL-2 cathode material during the charge and discharge cycles. XRD pattern of: (d) the pristine LNCA and PL-2 cathode material after 100th cycle; SEM images of: (e) the LNCA material after 100th cycle; (f) PL-2 sample after the 100th cycle.

Figures 7b,c show the HRTEM and corresponding FFT results of the PL-2 sample. We have found that the surface region of the cycled PL-2 sample still remains in the rhombohedral phase. This is also consistent with the cycling performances and electrochemical reversibility (Figures 5a, 6). This observation likely indicates that the phase transition from layered to spinel can be suppressed by this PPy coated layer.

Furthermore, the XRD pattern and SEM images of pristine LNCA and PL-2 cathode material during the charge and discharge cycles are presented in the Figures 7d–f. According to the XRD pattern, the peaks of the both samples are basically similar. It is demonstrated that the cycled PL-2 sample still remains as the rhombohedral phase. According to SEM images of pristine LNCA and PL-2 cathode material after the charge and discharge cycles, the morphology of the pristine LNCA particles has obvious collapse, resulting in decrease of capacity in process of charge and discharge. However, the PL-2 cathode material still remains the spherical morphology after cycles. This likely indicates that the PPy maintains the structural stability of cathode material during the cycles.

Conclusion

In summary, we have successfully synthesized a PPy-coated LNCA cathode material via Liquid-phase chemical oxidation polymerization method. According to the results of XRD, HRTEM, and FTIR, PPy was uniformly dispersed on the surface of the LNCA cathode material without changing its structure. Furthermore, the PPy coated LNCA cathode material shows excellent rate capability and capacity retention at 1, 3, and 5 C rates, indicating a good kinetics characteristic and the effectiveness of surface coating for protecting cathode materials from the side reaction between electrode and electrolyte. Meanwhile, the PPy-coated LNCA showed an improved coulombic efficiency compared with the pristine one. Therefore, as a highly Li-ions and electrons conductive material, the PPy coating shows great potential in surface modification and is expected to improve performance for other types cathode materials of LIBs.

Author Contributions

ZC and KC conceived and designed the study; KC and ZC prepared all materials. KC and HZ conducted SEM experiments. XG and QL conducted XRD, FTIR experiments. ZC and KC analyzed the data. KC wrote the manuscript and LL, JD commented on it. ZC supervised the implementation of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the financial support from Project funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51874048), the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (Grant No. 51604042 and Grant No. 21601020). This project was supported by the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province (Grant No. 16A001), and Science and Technology Plan Changsha (Grant No. kq1701076).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00648/full#supplementary-material

XRD pattern and electrochemical performance of samples in different PPy amounts (1wt%, 2wt%, 5wt%). XRD patterns of the bare LNCA, PPy coated LNCA material: PL-1, PL-2, and PL-5 samples. The initial charge/discharge profiles at 0.1 C rate of pristine LNCA cathode materials and PPy coated LNCA material: PL-1, PL-2, and PL-5 samples. The rate performance profiles and cycling performance profiles at 1 C rate of pristine LNCA cathode materials and PPy coated LNCA material: PL-1, PL-2, and PL-5 samples.

References

Abraham, D. P., Twesten, R. D., Balasubramanian, M., Kropf, J., Fischer, D., Mcbreen, J., et al. (2003). Microscopy and spectroscopy of lithium nickel oxide-based particles used in high power lithium-ion cells. J.Electrochem. Soc. 150, A1450–A1456. doi: 10.1149/1.1613291

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abraham, D. P., Twesten, R. D., Balasubramanian, M., Petrov, I., Mcbreen, J., and Amine, K. (2002). Surface changes on LiNi0.22 particles during testing of high-power lithium-ion cells. Electrochem. Commun. 4, 620–625. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00388-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amine, K., Chen, C. H., Liu, J., Hammond, M., Jansen, A., Dees, D., et al. (2001). Factors responsible for impedance rise in high power lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 97–98, 684–687. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00701-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blinova, N. V., Stejskala, J., Prokeš, J., and Omastov,á, M. (2007). Polyaniline and polypyrrole: a comparative study of the preparation. Eur. Polymer J. 43, 2331–2341. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.03.045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, H., Xia, B., Xu, N., and Zhang, C. (2004). Structural and electrochemical characteristics of Co and Al co-doped lithium nickelate cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Comp. 376, 282–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.01.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Xu, M., Zhu, H., Xie, T., Wang, W., and Zhao, Q. (2013). Enhanced electrochemical performance of polyacene coated LiMn2O3.95F0.05 for lithium ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 286, 177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Yan, X., Xu, M., Cao, K., Zhu, H., Li, L., et al. (2017). Building honeycomb-like hollow microsphere architecture in a bubble template reaction for high-performance Li-rich layered oxide cathode materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 30617–30625. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b07542

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cho, Y., and Cho, J. (2010). Significant improvement of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathodes at 60°C by SiO2 dry coating for li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, A625–A629. doi: 10.1149/1.3363852

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cho, Y., Lee, Y. S., Park, S. A., Lee, Y., and Cho, J. (2013). LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode materials prepared by TiO2 nanoparticle coatings on Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05(OH)2 precursors. Electrochim. Acta. 56, 333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.08.074

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, J. W., and Aurbach, D. (2016). Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1:16013. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dai, G., Du, H., Wang, S. S., Cao, J., Yu, M., Chen, Y., et al. (2016a). Improved electrochemical performance of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 with ultrathin and thickness-controlled TiO2 shell via atomic layer deposition technology. RSC Adv. 6, 100841–100848. doi: 10.1039/C6RA21903A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dai, G., Yu, M., Shen, F., Cao, J., Ni, L., Chen, Y., et al. (2016b). Improved cycling performance of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 / Al2O3 with core-shell structure synthesized by a heterogeneous nucleation-and-growth process. Ionics 22, 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11581-016-1750-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delmas, C., Saadoune, I., and Rougier, A. (1993). The cycling properties of the LixNi1−−yCoyO2 electrode. J. Power Sources 44, 595–602. doi: 10.1016/0378-7753(93)80208-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, K., Huang, J., Cao, Y., Peng, Z., and Hu, G. (2013). Study of effects on LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode by LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 coating for lithium ion batteries. J. Alloys Comp. 574, 377–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.134

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goodenough, J. B., and Kim, Y. (2014). Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries †. Chem. Mater. 22, 587–603. doi: 10.1021/cm901452z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goodenough, J. B., and Park, K. S. (2013). The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1167–1176. doi: 10.1021/ja3091438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hayashi, T., Okada, J., Toda, E., Kuzuo, R., Oshimura, N., Kuwata, N., et al. (2014). Degradation mechanism of LiNi0.82Co0.15Al0.03O2 positive electrodes of a lithium-ion battery by a long-term cycling test. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A1007–A1011. doi: 10.1149/2.056406jes

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, B., Li, X., Wang, Z., and Guo, H. (2014). A facile process for coating amorphous FePO4 onto LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 and the effects on its electrochemical properties. Mat. Lett. 131, 210–213. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Itou, Y., and Ukyo, Y. (2005). Performance of LiNiCoO2 materials for advanced lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 146, 39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.091

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. B., Park, B. C., Myung, S. T., Amine, K., Prakash, J., and Sun, Y. K. (2008). Electrochemical and thermal characterization of AlF3 -coated Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05 ]O2 cathode in lithium-ion cells. J Power Sources 179, 347–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.109

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, Y., and Cho, J. (2007). Lithium-reactive Co3(PO4)2 nanoparticle coating on high-capacity LiNi0.8Co0.16Al0.04O2 cathode material for lithium rechargeable batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, 85–89. doi: 10.1149/1.2716556

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, Y. Q., Xu, M., Zhang, Z. A., Gao, C. H., Wang, P., and Yu, Z. Y. (2016). Optimized structure stability and electrochemical performance of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 by sputtering nanoscale ZnO film. J. Power Sources, 309, 20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.079

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, D. J., Scrosati, B., and Sun, Y. K. (2011). Ni3(PO4)2 -coated Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O2 lithium battery electrode with improved cycling performance at 55 °C. J. Power Sources 196, 7742–7746. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, S. H., Chong, S. Y., Amine, K., and Sun, Y. K. (2013). Improvement of long-term cycling performance of Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O2 by AlF3 coating. J. Power Sources 234, 201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levi, E., Levi, M. D., Salitra, G., Aurbach, D., Oesten, R., Heider, U., et al. (1999). Electrochemical and in-situ XRD characterization of LiNiO2 and LiCo0.2Ni0.8O2 electrodes for rechargeable lithium cells. Solid State Ionics 126, 97–108. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00118-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Reimers, J. N., and Dahn, J. R. (1993). In situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studies of Li1−−xNiO2. Solid State Ionics 67, 123–130. doi: 10.1016/0167-2738(93)90317-V

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Hu, G., Du, K., Peng, Z., Cao, Y., and Liu, Q. (2012). Synthesis and characterization of LiCoO2 -coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode materials. Mater. Lett. 83, 11–13. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.05.100

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Tang, X., Qin, M., Li, G., Deng, J., and Huang, X. (2016). FeF3 -coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode materials with improved electrochemical properties. Mater. Lett. 185, 96–99. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.08.112

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, X., Li, X., Wang, Z., Guo, H., Yan, G., and Yin, X. (2014). A modified co-precipitation process to coat LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 onto LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 for improving the electrochemical performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 297, 182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.121

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohzuku, T., Ueda, A., and Nagayama, M. (1993). Electrochemistry and structural chemistry of LiNiO2 (R/3m) for 4 volt secondary lithium cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 1862–1870. doi: 10.1149/1.2220730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramkumar, R., and Minakshi, M. (2015). Fabrication of ultrathin CoMoO(4) nanosheets modified with chitosan and their improved performance in energy storage device. Dalton Trans. 44, 6158–6168. doi: 10.1039/c5dt00622h

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramkumar, R., and Minakshi, M. (2016a). A biopolymer gel-decorated cobalt molybdate nanowafer: effective graft polymer cross-linked with an organic acid for better energy storage. N. J. Chem. 40, 2863–2877. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ02799C

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramkumar, R., and Sundaram, M. M. (2016b). Electrochemical synthesis of polyaniline cross-linked NiMoO4 nanofibre dendrites for energy storage devices. New J. Chem. 40, 7456–7464. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ00521G

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., and Isaacs, E. D. (2012). Electrical energy storage for transportation—approaching the limits of, and going beyond, lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7854–7863. doi: 10.1039/C2EE21892E

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, S., Kinoshita, M., Hosokawa, T., Morigaki, K., and Nakura, K. (2014a). Capacity fade of LiAlyNi1−x−yCoxO2cathode for lithium-ion batteries during accelerated calendar and cycle life tests (surface analysis of LiAlyNi1−x−yCoxO2cathode after cycle tests in restricted depth of discharge ranges). J. Power Sources. 258, 210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, S., Kinoshita, M., Hosokawa, T., Morigaki, K., and Nakura, K. (2014b). Capacity fading of LiAlyNi1−−x−−yCoxO2 cathode for lithium-ion batteries during accelerated calendar and cycle life tests (effect of depth of discharge in charge–discharge cycling on the suppression of the micro-crack generation of LiAlyNi1−−x−−yCoxO2 particle). J. Power Sources. 260, 50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.103

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, C., Fang, X., Guo, X., Mao, Y., Ma, J., Zhao, C., et al. (2013). Surface modification of Li1.2Mn0.54Co0.13Ni0.13O2 with conducting polypyrrole. J. Power Sources 231, 44–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.138

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, X., Xiang, Y., Peng, Q., Wu, X., Li, Y., Tang, F., et al. (2017). Green-low-cost rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries using hollow porous spinel ZnMn2O4 as the cathode material. J. Mater. Chem. A. 5, 17990–17997. doi: 10.1039/c7ta00100b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, H., Du, K., Hu, G., Duan, J., Peng, Z., Zhang, Z., et al. (2015). Synthesis of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 with 5-sulfosalicylic acid as a chelating agent and its electrochemical properties. J. Mater. Chem. A. 3, 20236–20243. doi: 10.1039/C5TA05266A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, M., Chen, Z., Li, L., Zhu, H., Zhao, Q., Xu, L., et al. (2015). Highly crystalline alumina surface coating from hydrolysis of aluminum isopropoxide on lithium-rich layered oxide. J. Power Sources 281, 444–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, X., Chen, L., Shah, S. A., Liang, J., and Liu, Z. (2017). The effect of Co3O4 and LiCoO2 cladding layer on the high rate and storage property of high nickel material LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 by simple one-step wet coating method. Electrochim. Acta 249, 179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X., Wang, D., Yu, R., Bai, Y., Shu, H., Ge, L., et al. (2014). Suppressed capacity/voltage fading of high-capacity lithium-rich layered materials via the design of heterogeneous distribution in the composition. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2, 3899–3911. doi: 10.1039/C3TA14513A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Luo, F., Wang, J. H., and Guo, Y. Z. (2014). Surface coating and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode in lithium-ion cells. Adv. Mater. Res. 1058, 317–320. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1058.317

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Luo, L., Zhao, B., Luo, H., Han, X., et al. (2018a). Harnessing the concurrent reaction dynamics in active Si and Ge to achieve high performance of lithium-ion batteries. Energ Environ. Sci. 11, 669–681. doi: 10.1039/C8EE00239H

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Liu, Z., Zhao, B., Cheng, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, H. H., et al. (2018b). Design and understanding of dendritic mixed-metal hydroxide nanosheets@N-doped carbon nanotube array electrode for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. Energy Storage Mater. 16, 632–645. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.06.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Wang, Z., Guo, H., and Li, X. (2017). Enhanced electrochemical properties of LiNiO2-based cathode materials by nanoscale manganese carbonate treatment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 403, 426–434. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.089

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Z., Zao, Y., Zhang, Q., Cheng, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, K., et al. (2018). Robust Erythrocyte-like Fe2O3@carbon with Yolk-shell Structures as High-performance anode for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 347, 563–573. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: nickel-rich layered oxide, polypyrrole coating, cathode materials, conductive polymer, lithium-ion batteries

Citation: Chen Z, Cao K, Zhu H, Gong X, Liu Q, Duan J and Li L (2019) Improved Electrochemical Performance of Surface Coated LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 With Polypyrrole. Front. Chem. 6:648. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00648

Received: 31 August 2018; Accepted: 12 December 2018;
Published: 09 January 2019.

Edited by:

Qiaobao Zhang, Xiamen University, China

Reviewed by:

Xianwen Wu, Jishou University, China
Shan Ji, Jiaxing University, China
Huanan Duan, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Manickam Minakshi, Murdoch University, Australia

Copyright © 2019 Chen, Cao, Zhu, Gong, Liu, Duan and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhaoyong Chen, chenzhaoyongcioc@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.