Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem. Eng., 11 January 2022
Sec. Sustainable Process Engineering
This article is part of the Research Topic Optimization Methods for Biorefineries and Bio-based Supply Chains View all 7 articles

Synthesis of Hydrophilic Derivative Surfactants From Algae-Derived Unsaponifiable Lipids

Gina FioroniGina FioroniRui KatahiraRui KatahiraStefanie Van WychenStefanie Van WychenSteven M. RowlandSteven M. RowlandEarl D. ChristensenEarl D. ChristensenTao DongTao DongPhilip T. PienkosPhilip T. PienkosLieve M. L. Laurens
Lieve M. L. Laurens*
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, United States

In the context of decarbonizing the economy, the utilization of biologically sourced feedstocks to produce replacements for petroleum-derived materials is becoming more urgent. Improving renewable biomass production and utilization is imperative for commercializing future biorefineries. Algae-derived biomass is a particularly promising feedstock thanks to its attractive oil content and composition; specifically, the high-value products in the unsaponifiable lipids have not been included in a conversion process. Here we demonstrate surfactant synthesis from a complex oil fraction as the hydrophobic donor moieties, yielding products that are similar to commercially available surfactants such as the linear alkyl benzene sulfonates. Unsaponifiable lipids extracted from algae were derivatized to non-ionic surfactants using a green chemical synthesis route based on a double esterification with succinic acid and polyethylene glycol. The in-depth molecular and structural surfactant characterization is included and indicates that the resulting properties fall between those of pure cholesterol and phytol used as surrogates for the reaction synthesis demonstration. This is the first demonstration of an effective and potentially high-value synthesis of functional surfactants with properties that can be tailored based on the relative composition of the resulting hydrocarbon alcohol components in the mixture. This novel green chemistry synthesis approach provides a route to high-value product synthesis from algae.

Introduction

A recent drive to decarbonize the economy has seen a push, primarily driven by consumers, to replace petrochemical surfactants and detergents with biobased alternatives. Similar to the growth of the petrochemical industry, the oleochemicals industry has seen tremendous growth in the use of biobased oils as the donor for the hydrophobic moiety in renewable surfactants. In particular, commercially available linear alkyl benzene sulfonate surfactants represent a large proportion of the non-ionic surfactants market, with diverse applications that are currently dominated by petroleum-derived products (Kjellin and Johansson, 2010; Pleissner et al., 2014; Laurens et al., 2017). To make a market impact with alternative biobased non-ionic surfactants, it is critical that both the surfactant properties and molecular composition approximate the target application. Furthermore, the biological feedstock for the hydrophobic moieties of the surfactants should be sustainably sourced, chemically well-characterized, and abundantly available. One such feedstock is algal biomass, derived from single-celled photosynthetic organisms, whose chemical composition can be optimized and tuned to provide a sustainable source of oleochemicals (Koutinas et al., 2014; Laurens et al., 2017).

A fraction of algae oils—the unsaponifiable lipids—comprise high-value oleochemical precursors that can be isolated but have not yet been exploited in conversion pathways to biofuels and biobased products. Removing the unsaponifiable fraction of the lipids, including the pigments, sterols, phytol, and other products, not only provides a feedstock for biobased product development, but also aids with the downstream catalytic upgrading of the fatty acid fraction to renewable diesel and jet fuels of the future (Kruger et al., 2017). Sterols and phytol are present in algal oil and are not ideal fuel precursor molecules, as they require significant amounts of hydrogen for hydrotreating and cracking to convert to hydrocarbons of the appropriate chain length for renewable diesels or jet fuel (Davis et al., 2014; Wagner et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2015; Laurens et al., 2015).

Renewable surfactants can be synthesized through ethoxylation of the alcohol group in phytol and the free sterols. This process can be relatively toxic and is not straightforward because steric hindrance reduces the reactivity of these secondary hydroxyl groups compared to primary alcohols (Johansson and Svensson, 2001; Folmer, 2003). An alternative, novel synthesis route has been developed that uses a green chemical approach based on consecutive double esterification of a hydrophobic moiety with at least an accessible hydroxyl donor, with succinic acid and polyethylene glycol to create non-ionic surfactants (Lim and Chung, 2011). The hydrophobic donor molecules can be diverse, ranging from fatty acids to complex sterols. The polyethylene glycol chain that is attached to the sterol can be varied in chain length to adjust the final surfactant properties.

Unsaponifiable lipids, including sterols, are ideally suited to be the hydrophobic donors to a biobased surfactant synthesis pathway. The unsaponifiable lipids in algae are a complex mixture, with most of the products assigned to the sterol or phytol class of compounds, both ideal hydrophobic constituents for potentially high-value bio-derived surfactants. The unsaponifiables are usually isolated after a strong alkaline treatment, which saponifies all the fatty-acid-derived lipids, rendering the fatty acids water-soluble, and phytol and sterols can either be purified for further use or used as a mixture with the phytol fraction retained for derivatization of the hydroxyl groups to form amphiphilic, non-ionic surfactants. Surfactants produced from sterols can be utilized in many different commercial products, including cosmetics and soaps (Folmer, 2003; Kjellin and Johansson, 2010; Urbin et al., 2014).

Previously reported mass spectral analysis indicates that there are over 20 different sterols identified in different species of algae (Ryckebosch et al., 2014; Ahmed et al., 2015). The wide range of sterols present indicates significant molecular and metabolic flexibility of algae in their native isoprenoid metabolism and opens a wide range of coproduct development options for the valorization of sterols, though the complexity of the mixtures ensures difficulties in developing coproducts based on pure compounds. The compounds we identified fall within two major classes: 28-carbon 4-desmethylsterols and 29-carbon 4-desmethylsterols. Within the 28-carbon group, the spectra either more closely resemble campesterol (molecular weight 472) or ergosterol (molecular weight 468). Within the 29-carbon group, the spectra could be grouped into compounds with a molecular weight of 484 (e.g., stigmasterol, fucosterol, Δ5-avenasterol) or those with a molecular weight of 486 (sitosterol or Δ7-stigmastenol). This complexity of sterols in algal lipids should not impact the value of surfactant feedstocks when used without isolating single components, as long as the surfactant product specifications are met since many commercially available surfactants (e.g., linear alkyl benzene sulfonates) are often mixtures of compounds (Ashford, 2011).

The objective of the work described here is to demonstrate the effective synthesis and in-depth characterization of novel biobased surfactants from a complex mixture of hydroxyl-containing unsaponifiable lipids extracted from algal biomass in a process-relevant manner. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the use of unsaponifiable lipids from photosynthetic algae as the feedstock for the synthesis of biobased surfactants.

Materials and Methods

Biomass and Chemicals

Unless stated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich at purities of 95% or higher; specifically, 95% pure cholesterol (C75209); 97% mixture of phytol isomers, 1:2 cis:trans isomer mixed phytol (139912); polyethylene glycol (PEG) with average molecular weight of 1,000 Da (8074881000); and succinic anhydride (8006830100).

Algal biomass from Scenedesmus acutus (LRB-AP 0401) was kindly provided by Dr. J. McGowen at the Arizona Center for Algae Technology and Innovation (AzCATI) at Arizona State University. In brief, biomass was cultivated in a controlled fashion in outdoor flat-panel (650-L) photobioreactors in nitrate-deplete cultivation media. Cultivation time after reaching nutrient-deplete conditions depended on final target biomass composition desired—in this case 6 days for lipid accumulation under nutrient-deplete conditions to reach the targets of high carbohydrate and lipid content (Laurens et al., 2014). Harvesting the biomass was accomplished using centrifugation (Alfa Laval, Lund, Sweden), and the material was frozen until needed. The biomass composition consisted of 30.8 ± 0.4% lipids (measured as fatty acid methyl esters through direct transesterification) and 44.2 ± 1.4% total carbohydrates, measured as described in Laurens et al. (2014).

Lipid and Unsaponifiables Extraction

For crude lipid extraction from algal biomass, triplicate samples of 20 ml of 10% (w/v) algal slurry of S. acutus biomass, acidified with sulfuric acid to 1% w/v, was added to three 50-ml glass tubes, for a total of 60 ml of slurry extracted. Tubes were capped after adding a stir bar, and the pretreatment program was run at 150°C for 15 min. After pretreatment, the slurry was allowed to cool before being transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask for extraction. Hexanes were added to the slurry in a 1:1 v/v ratio and allowed to extract overnight at room temperature. The hexane was removed from the slurry and placed into a separate vessel for drying. Two more hexane extractions were performed, each for 1 h. The hexane extracts were dried down under nitrogen and a final weight of the oil was recorded: approximately 1.3 g combined from triplicate pretreatment samples.

To isolate the unsaponifiables, the resulting algal oil was saponified following a standard AOCS method, minimally modified (American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2009). In brief, approximately 1 g of oil was transferred into a glass tube with 1.5 ml of KOH (60 g/40 ml) and 12.5 ml of ethanol. The mixture was heated at 80°C for 90 min in a hot block, mixing every 10 min, and contents were transferred to a separatory funnel while still warm. The mixture was first washed with 18.75 ml of diethyl ether and 18.75 ml of deionized water. The aqueous layer was then drained and saved. The organic layer was rinsed again with 12.5 ml of deionized water. The aqueous phases were combined, and the organic phase was collected in a separate vessel. The combined aqueous phases were placed back in a separatory funnel and washed with 18.75 ml of diethyl ether to ensure complete extraction; the aqueous phase was then discarded. The organic phases were combined and washed with 7.5 ml of 0.5-M KOH to remove any additional free fatty acids. The KOH layer was then drained off, and the organic phase was washed with 7.5 ml of deionized water. The KOH and water washes were repeated two additional times. The organic layer was then washed with approximately 100 ml of deionized water in 10-ml increments to ensure all salts were removed. The organic layer was dried down under nitrogen, and a gravimetric yield was recorded as total unsaponifiables, which were then used in the surfactant synthesis methods as described below. An oil yield of 22% (on a dry weight biomass basis) was obtained from the dilute acid pretreatment described above. The unsaponifiables fraction was 4.5% of the extracted oil. This fraction was dried under nitrogen stored in the freezer (−20°C) until use.

Gas Chromatography of Unsaponifiables

The extracted unsaponifiables were brought up in the appropriate amount of chloroform prior to derivatization for gas chromatography (GC). A total of 75 μl of the dissolved extract was transferred to a 300-μl insert vial, and 25 μl of 1:1 (v/v) BSTFA (1% TMCS):pyridine was added to derivatize the extracted sterols. Standards were also prepared by adding 25 μl of 1:1 (v/v) BSTFA (1% TMCS):pyridine and 5 μl of ∼1 mg/ml 5α-cholestane (internal standard). The internal standard was also spiked into the samples before they were analyzed per the methods described above, to determine extraction efficiency.

All samples were analyzed by GC-flame ionization detection and GC-mass spectrometry (MS) (for identification only). Analysis was performed using an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph with an Agilent flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA). Using a pulsed (hold time 0.2 min, 60 psi) splitless injection, 1 µl was introduced onto a 30 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter (ID), 0.25-µm film thickness HP-5MS capillary column (J&W Scientific Inc., Folsom, CA) at 350°C. The helium flow was kept constant at 1 ml/min with an oven gradient as follows: The initial column temperature of 50°C was held for 3 min and then increased by 10°C/min to 270°C for 10 min, after which the temperature was increased to 325°C at 20°C/min and held for 15 min for a total run time of 52.75 min.

Synthesis of Carboxyethyl Derivatives of Cholesterol, Phytol, and Unsaponifiables

The general synthesis scheme for hydrophilic derivatives of sterols was carried out following a previously published procedure (Figure 1) (Lim and Chung, 2011). Cholesterol (5 g), succinic anhydride (1.5 eq., 1.94 g), and dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (0.02 eq., 0.031 g) were dissolved in 25 ml of toluene. The solution was stirred and refluxed until complete by thin-layer chromatography (about 6 h). The solution was then cooled, and 40 ml of hexane was added to precipitate the product. The resulting solid was removed by vacuum filtration and recrystallized in ethanol (20 ml) overnight in the freezer to afford pure carboxyethyl derivative cholesterol-succinic anhydride (SA) (6.18 g, 98.4% yield). Phytol-SA was prepared in the same manner as cholesterol-SA. However, the desired pure phytol-SA was recovered as a very viscous white liquid from the liquid fraction of the mixture, with the solid portion of the undesired byproducts from the reaction being filtered off (6.2439 g, 94.4% yield). Mixed-algae unsaponifiables-SA was prepared in the same manner as cholesterol-SA. Confirmation of the synthesis products by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) revealed a mixed product; however, the characteristic carbonyl protons were present, indicating that the succinic anhydride had successfully been added. This product was used crude in the next step. All calculations and yields were based off of cholesterol as the molecular weight.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Synthesis reaction scheme used in this work for carboxyethyl-PEG derivatives of hydroxylated hydrophobic moiety donors (shown here with cholesterol and succinic anhydride).

Synthesis of Carboxyethyl Polyethylene Glycol Derivatives of Cholesterol, Phytol, and Unsaponifiables

To synthesize cholesterol-SA-PEG, polyethylene glycol (PEG 1000, 3 eq., 7.9015 g), dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (1.25 eq., 0.5306 g), and DMAP (0.06 eq., 0.02 g) were dissolved in 40 ml of dichloromethane in a round-bottom flask. Cholesterol-SA (1.0313 g) dissolved in 40 ml of dichloromethane was added dropwise. The appearance of the precipitated dicyclohexylurea byproduct was noted after about 5 ml of the cholesterol-SA solution was added. After completion of the reaction, the dicyclohexylurea was removed by filtration and the filtrate was washed with 100 ml of a 5% NaCl2 solution. The solution was evaporated under vacuum to produce a white solid. The crude product was dissolved in 20 ml of 3:1 hexane:isopropanol (IPA) at 40°C and then stored in the freezer overnight to recrystallize. Pure cholesterol-SA-PEG was recovered via vacuum filtration (2.839 g, 90.5% yield; overall yield for two steps: 89.1%). Phytol-SA-PEG was prepared in the same manner as cholesterol 1,000, with an overall yield for two steps of 99.9%. Unsaponifiables-SA-PEG was prepared in the same manner as cholesterol-SA-PEG. The unsaponifiables-SA-PEG was used without further purification. Overall yield for two steps based on cholesterol molecular weight was 65.1%.

Characterization by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR Spectrometry

NMR spectra were acquired in CDCl3 at 25°C on a Bruker AVANCE 400-MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5-mm BBO probe. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm. 1H-NMR spectra were recorded with a relaxation delay of 1.0 s and an acquisition time of 4.09 s. The acquisition parameters for 13C-NMR included a 90° pulse width, a relaxation delay of 1.0 s, and an acquisition time of 1.36 s. Tetramethylsilane was used as a reference.

Characterization by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization, Electrospray Ionization, and Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry

A Bruker 7T solariX Fourier-transform (FT) ion cyclotron resonance (ICR)-MS (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) was utilized for ultrahigh-resolution mass spectral analysis. The mass resolving power (m/Δm50%) was at least 100,000 at m/z 400 during calibration. For matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI)-MS, the sample was dissolved in organic solvent (acetonitrile:water) at approximately 0.1 wt% concentration and spotted at 2 µl on a ground stainless steel MTP 384 MALDI target plate (#8280784, Bruker). Laser ionization was initiated with a Nd:YAG laser, 355 nm, set between 12 and 60% relative laser power and <50-μm beam diameter. Approximately 2 µl of α-cyano-hydroxy-cinnamic acid (HCCA) matrix was spotted on top of the dried surfactant sample prior to data collection. Mass spectra were collected in positive ion mode, and 50 time domain transient scans were co-added for each sample prior to fast FT and frequency to m/z conversion. The mass spectrometer was internally calibrated to achieve sub-ppm mass measurement accuracy on NaTFA in positive ion mode (−0.086 ppm at m/z 702.863262; 0.138 ppm at m/z 1,246.762494) and tuned for m/z 100–1,500 detection, at 0.7 ms ion time of flight in transfer optics.

For both electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI), 25 2.9-s time-domain signals were co-added. The unsaponifiables sample was dissolved in chloroform and diluted to 2 mg/ml. The sample was further diluted to 10–20 µg/ml prior to mass spectral analysis. ESI was conducted in 90:10 methanol:chloroform with 1% formic acid and 100 µg/ml of sodium trifluoroacetate. The ion source was operated under the following conditions: ESI capillary at 4,500 V, deflector plate at −500 V, nebulizer gas at 1 bar, dry temperature of 200°C, and dry gas at 4 L/min. APCI was conducted in hexane with the following source conditions: corona discharge 4,000 V, deflector plate −500 V, nebulizer gas 2 bar, vaporizer temperature 370°C, dry gas 3.5 L/min, and dry temperature of 220°C. The three most abundant sterol peaks (m/z = 395.3669, 397.3825, and 383.3669) were mass-selected and fragmented prior to MS analysis. Fragmentation was conducted with collision induced dissociation (CID) in argon at 15-V fragmentation energy. MS/MS results were compared to published literature and indicate the presence of stigmasterol, and campesterol. Peak lists were generated with a noise threshold of 10 standard deviations above the root mean square of the noise. Molecular formula assignments were generated with a custom script written in R programming language (R Development Core Team, 2013). Plots of double bond equivalents (DBE) and mass spectra were also plotted in R with the use of the ggplot2 library.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed using a TA Instruments Q2000 DSC instrument calibrated with indium metal. Samples were analyzed by sealing them in aluminum samples pans and heating at 5°C/min up to 60°C, followed by cooling to −20°C and then heating again to 60°C.

Determination of Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance

The hydrophobic-lipophobic balance (HLB) is a measure of the degree to which a surfactant is hydrophilic or lipophilic. The HLB scale classifying surfactant function ranges between 0 and 18, with <6 indicating a hydrophobic surfactant, 6–9 water-dispersible surfactants, and >9 as increasingly hydrophilic surfactant properties. HLB was determined by using a previously published method (Dehghan-Noudeh et al., 2005). A set of standard solutions with a known HLB was made from Span 80, Tween 80, and paraffin oil according to Supplementary Tables S4, S5. A sample containing paraffin oil and 0.5 wt% of each surfactant was also made and compared to the standard solutions. Each of the solutions was placed into a 15-ml centrifuge tube and spun at room temperature for 4 min at 1,500 rpm. The tubes were removed, and the aqueous layer was measured using the graduations on the centrifuge tubes. The measurement was repeated four times for each solution and the average was calculated.

Results and Discussion

Extraction and Characterization of Algae Unsaponifiable Lipids

To test the feasibility of creating a novel hydrophobic feedstock and characterize the hydrophobic donors for the renewable surfactant process, we extracted crude lipids in a process-relevant manner from algal biomass derived from the alga S. acutus. The biomass was subjected to a conversion process based on a dilute acid pretreatment followed by hexane-based lipid extraction, as described in the methods section (Dong et al., 2015). The lipids were subsequently saponified, creating a fatty-acid-rich fraction for fuel synthesis (>90% of the lipids) and an unsaponifiables fraction (∼4% of the lipids) containing the pigments; sterols; phytol; an aliphatic diterpene alcohol, usually bound to the hydrophilic headgroup of chlorophyll pigments; and other minor hydrocarbons. Three independent quantitative preparations of unsaponifiables from three respective biomass sources of S. acutus yielded 4.25 ± 0.03% on a lipid basis. GC-MS analysis was able to discern at least seven different sterols in S. acutus biomass, with stigmasterol (Δ7-avenasterol) being the predominant species (>34% of the total sterols), which together accounted for 35.7 ± 0.8% of the unsaponifiables fraction. Phytol accounted for 33.5 ± 1.4% of the unsaponifiables, and thus together with sterols, represents 69.1 ± 2.1% of the total fraction. A gas chromatogram is included to visualize the separation of the different sterols or general sterol categories for the predominant peaks identified (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Annotated gas chromatogram of sterols identified in Scenedesmus algal biomass; (1) MW 397, 28-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to ergosterol; (2) MW 411, 29-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- triple unsaturated, (3) MW 401, 28-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to campesterol or ergosta-7-en-3β-ol; (4) MW 397, 28-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to ergosterol; (5) MW 413, 29-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to stigmasterol, fucosterol, or Δ5-avenasterol; (6) MW 415, 29-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to sitosterol or Δ7-stigmastenol; (7) MW 397, 28-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to ergosterol; (8) MW 415, 29-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to sitosterol or Δ7-stigmastenol; (9) MW 401, 28-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to campesterol or ergosta-7-en-3β-ol; (10) MW 413, 29-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to stigmasterol, fucosterol, or Δ5-avenasterol; (11) MW 401, 3β-(trimethylsiloxy)-5.Xi.-Egost-7-ene; (12) MW 415, 29-carbon 4-desmethylsterols- similar to sitosterol or Δ7-stigmastenol; (13) MW 415, 3β-(trimethylsiloxy)-5.Xi.-Stigmast-7-ene, IS = internal standard, cholestanol was included as an internal, non-native, standard for recovery calculations, and SS = surrogate standard, dihydrocholesterol.

To better understand the complex molecular composition of the unsaponifiable lipids from algae, we carried out a detailed high-resolution MS study by FT-ICR MS with both positive-ion ESI and APCI. In Figure 3, the mass spectra are shown alongside plots of DBE values against the number of carbon atoms, solely for the oxygenated species (those compounds containing between 1 and 3 oxygen atoms) identified in the ESI and APCI data. Here we see that by ESI (Figures 3A,C), phytol (C20 and DBE = 1) is the most abundant signal observed, with smaller signals from oxygenated pigments (xanthophylls) and sterols. APCI (Figures 3B,D) reveals a more complete picture of sterol composition, with the most abundant peaks corresponding to stigmasterol, sitosterol, and campesterol. A total of 12 unique sterols were identified and confirmed by MS/MS analysis. In total, 12 sterols were unambiguously characterized with assigned formulae corresponding to known sterols (Table 1). Figures 3C,D shows the phytol, sterol, and pigment regions in green, blue, and red boxes, respectively, superimposed on plot of DBE vs. carbon number. The most abundant signals observed by ESI and APCI belong to these three classes; however, there are many compounds that fall outside of these structural boundaries. Compounds that likely contribute to other observed signals are aliphatic and cyclic alcohols, as well as phenols and polyphenols such as fat-soluble vitamins (Sánchez-Machado et al., 2002; Ryckebosch et al., 2014). These compounds likely have hydroxyl donors that also participate in the reactions that lead to incorporation with the hydrophilic polymer backbone, and will therefore contribute to the overall properties of the synthesized surfactants.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. FT-ICR mass spectra of the unsaponifiable compounds by ESI (A) and APCI (B). Plots of DBE vs. number of carbon atoms for the O1–O3-containing compounds by ESI (C) and hydrocarbon-O2 compounds by APCI (D). Ions observed in APCI are [M + H–H2O]+ ions and were verified by analysis of sterol standards. Phytol, sterol, and pigment regions are indicated in green, blue, and red boxes, respectively, in (C) and (D).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Summary of identified and confirmed sterols in S. acutus unsaponifiable lipids, selected based on agreement with previously published literature Toivo et al. (2001), Fernandes (2007), Ryckebosch et al. (2014), Ahmed et al. (2015).

Synthesis and Characterization of Succinic Anhydride-PEG Derivatives and Structural Confirmation

Because the GC analysis indicated close to 70% of the unsaponifiables consisted of phytol and sterol derivatives, we utilized cholesterol and pure phytol isomers to test the synthesis and account for the surfactant properties from pure component synthesized products. The reaction scheme in Figure 1 shows cholesterol as the hydrophobic moiety’s hydroxyl donor, while phytol is expected to behave in the same manner by reacting the secondary alcohol for the sequential esterification with succinic anhydride. The unsaponifiables are complex, as described earlier, and will likely cause the heterogeneous incorporation of different donors, which will inevitably define the product quality and surfactant properties.

Synthesized surfactants and their intermediates derived from cholesterol, phytol, and unsaponifiables were extensively characterized by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR to determine chemical structure and completeness of the reaction. The intermediate products were also characterized, and data are summarized in the supplemental information (Supplementary Figures S1–S5, with Supplementary Figures S1, S2 showing the 1H-NMR and Supplementary Figures S3–S5 the 13C-NMR data).

The unsaponifiables, subjected to an identical synthesis reaction as the pure component cholesterol and phytol products, produced an unsaponifiables-SA-PEG complex that shows the same functional groups incorporated. Figure 4 shows 1H-NMR spectra series from the sterol mixture. Ha and Hb in the extracted sterol mixture appear in the wide range of 4.98–5.28 and 3.47–4.13 ppm, respectively, suggesting that the sterol mixture contains both types of cholesterol and diterpene alcohol like phytol. As shown in Figure 4E, in the reaction product of sterol mixture-succinate with PEG, Ha and Hb in sterol moiety appear at peak 5.28 and 4.55, respectively. Methylene protons in succinate moiety (Hc) and in PEG moiety (He) appear at 2.5–2.65 and 3.41–3.76 ppm, respectively. The most characteristic peak at 4.18 ppm (Hd) is assigned to the terminal methylene proton of PEG coupled with sterol-SA. The chemical shifts of these peaks and spectrum pattern are consistent with those in cholesterol-succinate-PEG and phytol-SA-PEG. All 1H-NMR data indicate that the obtained reaction product is an ester complex of primarily sterol and phytol-SA-PEG derivatives, and likely several uncharacterized hydroxylated compounds serving as additional reactants, which were found to be minor contributors in the mass spectrometry analysis. The intermediates and final products were also characterized by 13C-NMR, and the data are included in supplemental information (Supplementary Figures S3–S5). The extensive NMR characterization supports completeness of the reaction and confirms the structure of the carboxyethyl-PEG- (or SA-PEG)-derived surfactants.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. 1H-NMR spectra of (A) sterol mixture, (B) succinic anhydride, (C) PEG, (D) unsaponifiables-SA, and (E) unsaponifiables-SA-PEG.

Molecular Elucidation by MALDI-FT-ICR-MS

To elucidate the incorporation of unsaponifiables into the surfactant, PEG, phytol-SA-PEG, cholesterol-SA-PEG, and the unsaponifiables-SA-PEG were analyzed by MALDI FT-ICR MS. Figure 5 shows the broadband mass spectra from the four samples. We observe a shift to greater m/z values with derivatization of the lipid-derived tails, which is due to the incorporation of the hydrophobic moieties (cholesterol, phytol, and other unsaponifiables). A complete list of observed ions for phytol-succinate-PEG and cholesterol-succinate-PEG is provided as supplemental information (Supplementary Tables S1, S.2). These spectra confirm that phytol and cholesterol incorporate into the PEG-succinate head, as shown by NMR. By comparison, we see that the spectrum for the unsaponifiables-SA-PEG is far more complex than the phytol and cholesterol counterparts. This indicates a heterogeneous incorporation of hydrophobic moieties from the unsaponifiable sample. This is not surprising, considering the diversity of compounds observed by ESI- and APCI-FT-ICR MS. Despite the complexity of the unsaponifiables, the polydispersity (Mn/Mw) of the resultant surfactant polymer is not much greater than the PEG 1000 used for synthesis, indicating a relatively narrow range of synthesis products. The data obtained by mass spectrometry were confirmed by size exclusion chromatography, with a similar molecular weight distribution (Supplementary Figure S6; Supplementary Table S3).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Summary of MALDI-FT-ICR-MS of surfactants synthesized from phytol, cholesterol, and S. acutus unsaponifiables. Top to bottom are PEG 1000, phytol-SA-PEG, cholesterol-SA-PEG, and unsaponifiables-SA-PEG. Bimodal distributions are observed in the reacted surfactant samples, where the lower m/z distribution corresponds to unreacted PEG 1000. The respective calculated molecular weight distribution is included; Mn = number average, Mw = weight average, and Mz = Z average.

By MALDI-MS, we were able to identify both the phytol- and stigmasterol-functionalized PEG-SA surfactants in the unsaponifiable-reacted surfactant sample. However, the relative abundance for the phytol-SA-PEG was surprisingly low, given its high concentration in the starting sample. Likewise, we were unable to adequately identify other sterol-SA-PEG signals, which indicates that other compounds in the unsaponifiable sample may be incorporating into the surfactant with greater efficiency than the sterols and phytol. This may indicate the presence of more reactive phenolic or polyphenolic compounds within the unsaponifiable sample. Alternatively, the ionization efficiency of the phytol and sterol-SA-PEG may be lower than that of other products, making them underrepresented in the mass spectrum. Future work is needed to better understand the heterogeneous incorporation of mixed samples from algae lipids.

DSC Analysis

DSC, based on a heat-cool-heat cycle, was used to look for any polymorphic behavior of the material, as well as to erase the thermal history of the sample on the first heat. For the heat-cool-heat cycles, no polymorphism was noted, and the melting point overlaid on both heat cycles, indicating a stable crystal structure. Figure 6 contains the thermograms for all three products. The melting points of all three are similar, and as would be expected, the melting of the mixed product falls between that of cholesterol and phytol, which is consistent with the respective composition of the unsaponifiables fraction. The calculated melting point for cholesterol-SA-PEG product was 41.1°C, for phytol-SA-PEG 34.2°C, and for the unsaponifiables-SA-PEG 39.3°C. The intermediate melting temperature for the unsaponifiable lipid derivatives makes sense, as this was a mixture of different components that contribute to the final product properties. This also supports the concept that the respective composition of the hydrophobic moieties will be a determining factor toward the final surfactant properties.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. Differential scanning calorimetry profiles of each of the final products: carboxyethyl esters of cholesterol, phytol, and unsaponifiable surfactant derivatives, shown as succinic anhydride-PEG esters.

Surfactant Properties by HLB Measurements

HLB measurements were selected as the primary surfactant property metric that can help identify the suitability of the novel surfactant. This measurement gives information on the relative solubility of oil-in-water emulsions, and the value, though approximate, gives a general idea on the type of surfactant applications that could be met with the products. Figure 7 shows a photo of the centrifuge tubes for the samples as a visual comparison. As described for the DSC measurements, the respective properties for the phytol and cholesterol derivatives are predictive of the properties of the unsaponifiables surfactant mixtures. The HLB of the algae-derived mixed 1000 PEG surfactant was the same as phytol, which came in just above standard #4, having an HLB value of 9.65. This indicates that a water-oil emulsifier that is water-soluble was produced with reasonable detergency. For comparison, the linear alkyl benzene sulfonate dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid has an HLB value of 11.7 (chemical database reference CAS 69669-44-9). Surfactants in this range can typically be used in cosmetic, food, and pharmaceutical applications. If a slightly different HLB value is desired, the PEG chain length could be modified. Also, this surfactant could be blended with another surfactant with a known HLB to produce a final surfactant blend with the exact HLB desired.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 7. Visualization of (A) HLB measurement of cholesterol-SA-PEG, (B) unsaponifiables-SA-PEG, and (C) phytol-SA-PEG.

Conclusion

We demonstrate here for the first time the synthesis of renewable surfactants from the algae unsaponifiable lipid fraction, using an alternative, green, and less reactive (flammable and explosive) chemical approach to ethoxylation. The synthesis reaction is based on the sequential esterification of succinic anhydride and polyethylene glycol of the hydroxyl functional groups of novel hydrophobic moieties. The valorization of the unsaponifiable fraction, isolated from an algae lipids process stream, is an effective route to support the overall biorefinery process economics, while simultaneously improving the hydrotreating properties of the remaining fatty acid stream toward biofuel production. Although reagents and solvents used in this initial synthesis were primarily petroleum-derived, future iterations of this process could incorporate bio-derived components, such as succinate produced by fermentation of algal sugars from combined algal processing, to further reduce fossil carbon utilization, or overall carbon intensity. Future research should focus on life cycle analyses to identify areas where carbon intensity of surfactant synthesis can be further reduced.

The unsaponifiable lipid products were characterized in great detail based on ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry, which revealed a unique and highly complex mixture of hydrophobic donors, primarily derived from the diterpenoid hydrocarbon biosynthetic pathways to the surfactant synthesis reaction chemistry. This in-depth profiling supports the surfactant property characterization and the identified carboxy-ethyl esterified products by NMR. Although the resulting surfactants are mixed components, from the detailed molecular and spectroscopic profiling it appears that the respective molecular composition of the sterols does not determine surfactant properties, and the primary determination of properties may be the balance between the bulk constituents: sterols and phytols. A more detailed study of the respective synthetic reaction rates of the individual components in the unsaponifiable lipids and the utilization of additional surfactant hydrophilic donors is ongoing in our laboratory and will be reported on in future manuscripts.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

LL, GF, EC, TD, and PP contributed to the design of the study. GF carried out all chemical synthesis reactions and hydrophilic lipophilic balance analysis, SVW performed the chemical extraction and analysis of the unsaponifiable lipids, TD contributed to the extraction of lipids and unsaponifiables, SR performed the high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis, RK performed NMR analysis, and EC performed size exclusion chromatography and differential scanning calorimetry. GF and LL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. EC, SR, SVW, and TD wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version. LL secured funding and conceived the original concept of algae lipid valorization to biobased products.

Funding

This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the United States Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the United States Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office, WBS 1.3.2.001. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the United States Government. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Paris Spinelli for providing the extracted lipids and unsaponifiable fraction from the algae and to Oliver Palardy for establishing the original GC/MS methodology.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fceng.2021.768382/full#supplementary-material

References

Ahmed, F., Zhou, W., and Schenk, P. M. (2015). Pavlova Lutheri Is a High-Level Producer of Phytosterols. Algal Res. 10, 210–217. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2015.05.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

American Oil Chemists’ Society (2009). “AOCS Official Method Ca 6b-53,” in Unsaponifiable Matter (Urbana, IL: AOCS Press, Wiley).

Google Scholar

Ashford, R. D. (2011). Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals. Third Edition. Cornwall, England: Wavelength Publications.

Google Scholar

Davis, R., Kinchin, C. M., Markham, J., Tan, E. C. D., Laurens, L. M. L., Sexton, D., et al. (2014). Process Design and Economics for the Conversion of Algal Biomass to Biofuels: Algal Biomass Fractionation to Lipid- and Carbohydrate-Derived Fuel Products. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Google Scholar

Dehghan-Noude, G., Housaindokht, M., and Bazzaz, B. S. (2005). Isolation, Characterization, and Investigation of Surface and Hemolytic Activities of a Lipopeptide Biosurfactant Produced by Bacillus Subtilis ATCC 6633. J. Microbiol. 43, 272–276.

Google Scholar

Dong, T., Knoshaug, E. P., Davis, R., Laurens, L. M. L., Van Wychen, S., Pienkos, P. T., et al. (2016). Combined Algal Processing: A Novel Integrated Biorefinery Process to Produce Algal Biofuels and Bioproducts. Algal Res. 19, 316–323. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2015.12.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernandes, P., and Cabral, J. M. S. (2007). Phytosterols: Applications and Recovery Methods. Bioresour. Techn. 98, 2335–2350. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Folmer, B. M. (2003). Sterol Surfactants: from Synthesis to Applications. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 103, 99–119. doi:10.1016/s0001-8686(01)00100-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johansson, I., and Svensson, M. (2001). Surfactants Based on Fatty Acids and Other Natural Hydrophobes. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interf. Sci. 6, 178–188. doi:10.1016/s1359-0294(01)00076-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kjellin, M., and Johansson, I. (2010). Surfactants from Renewable Resources. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470686607

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koutinas, A. A., Chatzifragkou, A., Kopsahelis, N., Papanikolaou, S., and Kookos, I. K. (2014). Design and Techno-Economic Evaluation of Microbial Oil Production as a Renewable Resource for Biodiesel and Oleochemical Production. Fuel 116, 566–577. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kruger, J. S., Christensen, E. D., Dong, T., Van Wychen, S., Fioroni, G. M., Pienkos, P. T., et al. (2017). Bleaching and Hydroprocessing of Algal Biomass-Derived Lipids to Produce Renewable Diesel Fuel. Energy Fuels 31, 10946–10953. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01867

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laurens, L. M. L., Van Wychen, S., McAllister, J. P., Arrowsmith, S., Dempster, T. A., McGowen, J., et al. (2014). Strain, Biochemistry, and Cultivation-dependent Measurement Variability of Algal Biomass Composition. Anal. Biochem. 452, 86–95. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2014.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laurens, L. M. L., Nagle, N., Davis, R., Sweeney, N., Van Wychen, S., Lowell, A., et al. (2015). Acid-catalyzed Algal Biomass Pretreatment for Integrated Lipid and Carbohydrate-Based Biofuels Production. Green. Chem. 17, 1145–1158. doi:10.1039/c4gc01612b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laurens, L. M. L., Markham, J., Templeton, D. W., Christensen, E. D., Van Wychen, S., Vadelius, E. W., et al. (2017). Development of Algae Biorefinery Concepts for Biofuels and Bioproducts; a Perspective on Process-Compatible Products and Their Impact on Cost-Reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1716–1738. doi:10.1039/c7ee01306j

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, J. C., and Chung, D.-W. (2011). Study on the Synthesis and Characterization of Surface Activities of Hydrophilic Derivatives of β-sitosterol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 125, 888–895. doi:10.1002/app.36259

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pleissner, D., Lau, K. Y., Zhang, C., Lin, C. S. K., and Lin, K. (2014). Plasticizer and Surfactant Formation from Food-Waste- and Algal Biomass-Derived Lipids. ChemSusChem 8, 1686–1691. (in press). doi:10.1002/cssc.201402888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Development Core Team (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.

Google Scholar

Ryckebosch, E., Bruneel, C., Termote-Verhalle, R., Muylaert, K., and Foubert, I. (2014). Influence of Extraction Solvent System on Extractability of Lipid Components from Different Microalgae Species. Algal Res. 3, 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2013.11.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez-Machado, D. I., López-Hernández, J., and Paseiro-Losada, P. (2002). High-performance Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Alpha-Tocopherol in Macroalgae. J. Chromatogr. A. 976, 277–284. doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00934-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toivo, J., Phillips, K., Lampi, A.-M., and Piironen, V. (2001). Determination of Sterols in Foods: Recovery of Free, Esterified, and Glycosidic Sterols. J. Food Compost. Anal. 14, 631–643. doi:10.1006/jfca.2001.1019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urbin, S., Scheibel, J. J., Vinson, P. K., Depa, P. K., Reilman, R. T., and Steffey, M. P. (2014). Detergent Compositions Comprising Sustainable Surfactant Systems Comprising Isoprenoid-Derived Surfactants. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 20140148375 A1.

Google Scholar

Wagner, J. L., Ting, V. P., and Chuck, C. J. (2014). Catalytic Cracking of Sterol-Rich Yeast Lipid. Fuel 130, 315–323. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.048

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: oleochemicals, sterols, phytol, biobased surfactants, algae

Citation: Fioroni G, Katahira R, Van Wychen S, Rowland SM, Christensen ED, Dong T, Pienkos PT and Laurens LML (2022) Synthesis of Hydrophilic Derivative Surfactants From Algae-Derived Unsaponifiable Lipids. Front. Chem. Eng. 3:768382. doi: 10.3389/fceng.2021.768382

Received: 31 August 2021; Accepted: 17 December 2021;
Published: 11 January 2022.

Edited by:

Edwin Zondervan, University of Twente, Netherlands

Reviewed by:

Meei Mei N. Gui, Queen’s University Belfast, United Kingdom
Matthijs Ruitenbeek, Dow Benelux, Netherlands
Manishkumar S. Tiwari, SKVM’s NMIMS University, India
Hitesh Pawar, Institute of Chemical Technology, India

Copyright © 2022 Fioroni, Katahira, Van Wychen, Rowland, Christensen, Dong, Pienkos and Laurens. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lieve M. L. Laurens, Lieve.Laurens@nrel.gov

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.