CD44 variant exons induce chemoresistance by modulating cell death pathways

Cancer chemoresistance presents a challenge in oncology, often leading to treatment failure and disease progression. CD44, a multifunctional cell surface glycoprotein, has garnered attention for its involvement in various aspects of cancer biology. Through alternative splicing, CD44 can form isoforms with the inclusion of only standard exons, typical for normal tissue, or with the addition of variant exons, frequently expressed in cancer tissue and associated with chemoresistance. The functions of CD44 involved in regulation of cancer signaling pathways are being actively studied, and the significance of specific variant exons in modulating cell death pathways, central to the response of cancer cells to chemotherapy, begins to become apparent. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the association of CD44 variant exons/total CD44 with clinical outcomes of patients undergoing chemotherapy. The role of CD44 variant exons v6, v9 and others with a significant effect on patient chemotherapy outcomes by means of key cellular death pathways such as apoptosis, ferroptosis and autophagy modulation is further identified, and their impact on drug resistance is highlighted. An overview of clinical trials aimed at targeting variant exon-containing isoforms is provided, and possible directions for further development of CD44-targeted therapeutic strategies are discussed.

1 Introduction

Cancer ranks among the leading causes of death worldwide, claiming approximately 10 million lives in 2022, according to GLOBOCAN data (Bray et al., 2024). This disease is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of abnormal cells, their evasion of cellular checkpoints that generally regulate cell growth and death, and their invasion into surrounding tissues (Hanahan, 2022). The complexity and adaptability of cancer cells make the disease particularly challenging to treat. To date, chemotherapy is one of the most prevalent and effective methods in addition to surgery for the treatment of patients (Anand et al., 2023). Despite significant advancements in the development of chemotherapeutic agents, resistance to these treatments remains a major challenge. Chemoresistance has been observed for nearly all chemotherapeutic agents, including commonly used drugs such as doxorubicin, paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, and gemcitabine (Mollaei et al., 2021). This chemoresistance is multifaceted and can be attributed to several factors, with deficiencies in programmed cell death (PCD) being one of them (Sazonova et al., 2024).

CD44, a cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein, is known to regulate tumor progression and cancer-associated molecular signaling pathways. Notably, CD44 variant exon-containing isoforms, absent in norma and appearing during tumorigenesis due to alternative splicing, can interact with various cell membrane receptors/intracellular proteins, influencing signaling that promotes cell survival. A recent review indicates that CD44 (including CD44 variant exon containing isoforms) is involved in MAPK, Hippo and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways to name a few (Xu et al., 2024). Cell survival signaling is tightly interconnected with the sensitivity of cells to chemotherapeutic drugs. Consequently, through the regulation of cell death signaling pathways, CD44 variant exon containing isoforms may be presented as targets for selective modulation of chemosensitivity. However, how particular CD44 exons are involved in cell death pathways modulation is still under question. Hence, this review explores the association of CD44 variant exon expression with clinical outcomes of patients undergoing chemotherapy, highlights their role in key cell death pathways regulation, provides critical analysis of therapeutic substances and clinical studies targeting CD44 and discusses directions for further development of CD44 targeted therapeutic strategies.

Importantly, among the nine variant exons of CD44 (v2-v10), our review focuses on three exons—v3, v6, and v9—that are associated with patient survival following chemotherapy. The molecular mechanisms underlying these associations have been described in relation to their biological function both in vitro and in vivo (with the exception of v3). Although the expression levels of variant exons v7 and v10 have been shown to correlate with patient survival, the existing literature on the molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance for these exons is limited. As a result, we do not cover them in this review.

2 Molecular structure and functional Basis of CD44 and its splicing variants

CD44, a non-kinase cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein, was described in 1989 by Stamenkovic et al., and two main forms of the protein were identified–a lymphoid form present in hematopoietic cells and an epithelial form weakly expressed in normal epithelium and abundantly expressed in carcinomas (Stamenkovic et al., 1989). CD44 activity is modulated by interaction with its ligands, mainly with hyaluronan (HA) (Aruffo et al., 1990).

Research has identified that CD44 is encoded by a highly conserved gene on the short arm of human chromosome 11 (Screaton et al., 1992). Nineteen exons are involved in the genomic organization of this molecule. As a result of alternative splicing and posttranslational modifications, at least 21 predicted CD44 isoforms are generated with 8 experimentally confirmed isoforms with different molecular weight (in the range of 85–250 kDa) and function (Gaiteiro et al., 2022). The smallest isoform, alternatively named hematopoietic or standard isoform 4 (CD44s, isoform 4), is ubiquitously expressed in vertebrate cells of mesenchymal origin, including leukocytes, fibroblasts and neuronal cells (Chen et al., 2020; Naor et al., 2008) and is translated from the first five (exons 1-5 or s1-5) and the last four (exons 15–17 and 19 or s15–17 and s19) exons (Figure 1). On the contrary, nine variant exons (exons 6–14 or v2-v10), located in the middle of the CD44 gene can be alternatively spliced and assembled with exons contained in CD44s, resulting in the formation of a plethora of CD44 variant isoforms, typical of cells of epithelial origin and several carcinomas. The mechanisms by which variant isoforms of CD44 are formed by alternative splicing are described in detail in the recent review (Maltseva and Tonevitsky, 2023).

Figure 1

Figure 1. The genomic organization and protein structure of human CD44. CD44 human gene contains 19 exons. Alternative splicing results in the formation of CD44 standard and variant isoforms. CD44 protein consists of an intracellular and transmembrane domain, consisting of exons 18–19 and 17, and an extracellular domain, consisting of exons 1–16. Inclusion of variant exons (pink) to CD44 isoforms is observed during cancer progression and chemoresistance, with the latter being associated with variant exons v3, v6 and v9 (Created with Biorender.com).

At present, all CD44 isoforms belong to the type 1 transmembrane protein class and have a typical structure consisting of the extracellular domain (ECD), the transmembrane domain (TMD) and the cytoplasmic or intracellular domain (ICD) (Figure 1; Chen et al., 2020). The ECD, in turn, includes several regions necessary for sensoring, structural integrity and activation of CD44 protein. Firstly, the N-terminal ligand-binding motif or HA-binding domain (HABD), oriented into the extracellular matrix, is present in all isoforms of CD44 (both CD44s and CD44 variant isoforms), consists of constant exons 1-5 and forms a compactly-folded domain. HABD allows interaction with extracellular matrix components such as HA, osteopontin, fibronectin, collagen, growth factors, cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases in a glycosylation- and disulfide-bond reduction-dependent manner (Senbanjo and Chellaiah, 2017). Secondly, the variant region present in variant isoforms can vary significantly in length depending on what exons (6–14) are included in the mRNA after splicing (resulting, for example, in the formation of isoforms CD44v2-v10, CD44v3-v10, CD44v8-v10 or an isoform containing only one CD44v10 variant exon) and forms additional sites of interaction with growth factors and receptors on the plasma membrane, consequently expanding the functionality of CD44 (Liao et al., 2022). Lastly, the stem region is made up of exons 15 and 16. The TMD consists of exon 17 and contains a cysteine residue responsible for palmitoylation and consequent incorporation into lipid rafts of the cellular membrane. It also has been shown to provide a platform for CD44 oligomerization and coupling to adaptor proteins, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) or nonreceptor protein-tyrosine kinases for consequent CD44 activation and signaling (Sun et al., 2020). The ICD contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS) for outside-in-cell signaling, consisting of two clusters of basic amino acids (²⁹²RRRCGQKKK³⁰⁰) (Skandalis, 2023). CD44 ICD can be cleaved from the membrane by presenilin-γ-secretase and transported into the nucleus, where it can act as a transcription factor through binding to consensus sequences found in the promoter regions of genes, including CD44 itself.

3 The expression profile of CD44 splice variants in cancer

Insight on the expression profile of different splice variants of CD44 can be of use for better understanding of cancer-specific molecular fingerprints and choosing an optimal cancer targeting strategy. In this section we compile what is known on the CD44 isoforms/exons expression profile from tumor samples and cell lines of clinically relevant cancers, as well as conduct an independent analysis using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data on CD44 splice isoforms derived from the GEPIA2 database (Figure 2; Tang et al., 2019). It should be noted that apart from experimentally determined CD44 isoforms in NCBI and UniProt databases used in our analysis, additional predicted CD44 isoforms exist (Supplementary Figure S1; Maltseva and Tonevitsky, 2023; Tang et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2024).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Expression profile of CD44 splice variants in patients with several tumor types, including the most common and those associated with the highest mortality. Created by www.gepia2.com.

Below, we examine the results for several of the most common tumor types and those associated with the highest mortality rates (results for other tumor types can be found in Supplementary Figure S1). According to the GEPIA2 database (Figure 2), breast cancer (BRCA) patients predominantly express CD44 isoform 4 (CD44s), along with isoforms 1-3, which include exons v2-v10, and to a lesser extent, isoform 6 (CD44v10). Squamous cell lung cancer (LUSC) patients exhibit a similar expression profile to that of BRCA. Patients with colorectal (COAD), lung (LUAD), pancreatic (PAAD) and prostate (PRAD) cancers primarily express CD44s as well as isoforms 2 and 3, which include exons v3-v10. Notably, LUAD and PAAD patients also express isoform 6, which includes exon v10. Ovarian cancer patients (OV) tend to express CD44s and isoform 3 (CD44v8-v10), although it is worth noting that the expression levels are lower compared to those observed previously mentioned cancers.

According to literature, BRCA patients in accordance with TCGA data express isoforms 1–4 (Bànkfalvi et al., 1998; Tokue et al., 1998; Olsson et al., 2011; Table 1). Interestingly, in grade 1 invasive ductal carcinoma patients, more than 50% of tumor samples stain positive for CD44 variant exons v3, v5-v7 and v9 (CD44v3, CD44v5, CD44v6, CD44v7 and CD44v9), highlighting their potential as therapeutic targets for early grade ductal carcinoma (Bànkfalvi et al., 1998). However, as ductal carcinoma progresses to grades 2–3, an increase in tumor samples staining positive for CD44s and CD44v9 is observed, along with a decrease in samples staining positive for CD44v3, CD44v6 and CD44v7. This shift suggests that targeting CD44 variant exons becomes less feasible as the tumor advances (Bànkfalvi et al., 1998). Additionally, another study points to more than 50% of tumor samples stain positive for CD44v6, supporting its relevance (Tokue et al., 1998).

Table 1

Table 1. The incidence and frequency profile of CD44 variant exons expression in several tumor types, including the most common and those associated with the highest mortality.

Several studies on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have identified CD44v3, CD44v6 and CD44v10 in more than half of the patients with LUSC, whereas only CD44v6 and to a lesser extent CD44v3 are expressed in patients with LUAD (Tran et al., 1997; Table 1). These findings suggest that LUSC could potentially be targeted via several CD44 variant exons, while CD44 targeting in LUAD CD44 is predominantly restricted to CD44v3 (Tran et al., 1997). Additionally, in PAAD and PRAD patients, CD44v6 is expressed prominently. In PAAD, CD44v2 and CD44v3 are expressed to a lesser extent, whereas in PRAD, CD44v6 and CD44v9 are expressed. Notably, more than half of PRAD patients show positivity for CD44v6 and CD44v9 (Gotoda et al., 1998; Castella et al., 1996; Takahashi et al., 1998; Aaltomaa et al., 2001).

Research concerning CD44 splice variants expression profile has been conducted on TCGA patients and on colorectal cancer cell lines using TCGA RNA-seq data (Novosad et al., 2022; Everest-Dass et al., 2024). It was identified that CD44 isoforms 2, 3 and 4 are predominantly expressed in colorectal cancer patients at the mRNA expression levels (Novosad et al., 2022). Moreover, CD44v6 and CD44v8-v10 were shown to be positively expressed in approximately more than half of the colorectal cancer tumors (Boman et al., 2023; Table 1).

In ovarian cancer, only CD44v9 was shown to be identified in more than half of the patient tumors (Cannistra et al., 1995). This is in accordance with TCGA data, since OVCA patients express only CD44s and CD44 isoform 3.

Overall, the cancers analyzed exhibit distinct expression profiles of CD44 isoforms/variant exons, based on our findings and immunohistochemical data available in the literature. According to TCGA data (GEPIA2), three distinct groups can be characterized by their CD44 isoform expression pattern: 1) cancers expressing CD44 isoforms 1-4 and consequently variant exons v2-v10, 2) cancers expressing CD44 isoforms 2-4 and variant exons v3-v10, and 3) cancers expressing only CD44 isoforms 3–4 (variant exons v8-v10). Moreover, the results of immunohistochemical analyses of expression profiles of CD44 isoforms/variant exons in tumor samples closely align with TCGA data. Differences in the CD44 isoform/variant exon expression profiles underscore the need for tailored CD44-targeting approaches.

4 Chemotherapy and cell death pathways modulation

Cell death, a crucial aspect of the response to chemotherapy, can occur through various mechanisms, each influencing chemoresistance: during tumor progression, the balance between pro-cell death and anti-cell death regulators is shifted towards survival by various escape mechanisms (D’Amico and De Amicis, 2024). Recent advances in research have significantly expanded our understanding of cell death processes, introducing several new mechanisms. The Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has updated its guidelines to include these novel forms of cell death, reflecting the increasing complexity of the field (Galluzzi et al., 2018). Apart from well-known apoptosis and autophagy, types of cell death, such as ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death characterized by the accumulation of lipid peroxides, were included (Dixon and Olzmann, 2024).

Apoptosis, discovered in 1972, is a programmed and controlled process of cell self-destruction requiring specific cell signaling transduction (Wang et al., 2023). The use of anticancer drugs to induce cell death by apoptosis has been considered one of the most critical ways to kill cancer cells, partly due to the fact that it has been considered the only form of cell death. Many chemotherapy drugs are known to induce cellular death through apoptosis, including cisplatin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (Kaufmann and Earnshaw, 2000).

Ferroptosis is a nonapoptotic iron-dependent form of cell death driven by lipid peroxidation (Dixon et al., 2012). Ferroptosis has recently been proven to correlate with cancer therapy resistance. A plethora of studies have identified that regulation of ferroptosis could influence the efficacy of cancer treatment and reverse cancer therapy resistance (Friedmann Angeli et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2020). Some chemotherapy drugs have been found to induce ferroptosis, including cisplatin and gemcitabine (Zhou et al., 2024).

Autophagy is a biological process that allows cells to degrade and recycle proteins and organelles to maintain homeostasis and adapt to various stresses (Liu et al., 2023). Chemotherapeutic agents such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, cisplatin, doxorubicin and 5-FU are known to induce autophagy (Debnath et al., 2023). Moreover, research has shown that the stimulation of autophagy by paclitaxel and cisplatin prevents apoptosis of tumor cells and leads to cancer chemoresistance (Debnath et al., 2023; Li et al., 2021).

Overall, chemotherapy drugs commonly utilized in clinic have been shown to induce not only apoptosis, but additionally ferroptosis and autophagy. This may be useful in the sense that resistance to apoptosis is a widespread noted effect, and cells that are resistant to apoptosis remain sensitive to ferroptosis (dos Santos et al., 2023). Therefore, the combinational or seldom triggering of different cell death pathways may be helpful for chemoresistance alleviation.

According to a recent scoping review of clinical studies, the impact of CD44 expression on the efficacy of chemotherapy treatment primarily correlates with drugs such as 5-FU, cisplatin and docetaxel (Wu et al., 2024). These drugs are widely used to treat locally advanced or metastatic breast, colorectal, head and neck cancer, among others. However, how particular CD44 exons are involved in cell death pathways modulation is still under question. Hence, in our review, we focus on the effect exerted by variant exons that are alternative to independent isoforms since several isoforms structurally share the same exons and, therefore, could participate in similar exerted processes.

5 Total CD44 and chemotherapy resistance

5.1 Effect of total CD44 expression on chemotherapy treatment outcome/tumor response to chemotherapy in patients/animal studies

Firstly, the current section of our review will focus on total CD44 involvement in chemoresistance, since total CD44-mediated signaling may involve both standard and/or variant exon containing isoforms. Onwards, specific variant exons of CD44 will be discussed.

Overall, a significant negative effect of increased total CD44 expression on chemotherapy treatment outcome was observed across several types of cancers, including breast, colorectal and head and neck cancers measured typically through overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) values, as well as through response to chemotherapy (Wu et al., 2024). Notably, several studies have identified no correlation or even a positive correlation with response to chemotherapy treatment outcome, which underlines the ambiguity of CD44’s relationship with chemotherapy outcomes (Wu et al., 2024). Such differences may be due to the variation of CD44 variant isoforms amongst different cancer types and the difference in activated survival pathways. Varying CD44 isoform/variant exon detection methods may also contribute to these differences.

In addition, the association between total CD44 overexpression/knockdown and chemoresistance in vivo has been studied (Table 2). Research indicates that CD44 knockdown (CD44^kd) in prostate cancer xenografts significantly reduces tumor growth rate after continuous docetaxel treatment compared with control cells, suggesting that the combination of chemotherapy with CD44^kd can lead to a beneficial chemotherapy outcome (Hao et al., 2012).

Table 2

Table 2. The association of CD44 variant exon expression levels with tumor response to chemotherapy in animal studies.

Literature analysis demonstrated a predominantly negative relationship between total CD44 expression levels and the clinical outcome of patients. Moreover, CD44^kd cancer xenografts in vivo significantly reduce tumor growth rate after continuous chemotherapy administration. Thus, total CD44, despite the presence of both standard and variant isoforms, seems to be involved in chemotherapy resistance.

5.2 Total CD44 biological functions in relation to cell death pathways

The underlying mechanisms of total CD44 in chemotherapy resistance are quite diverse, possibly due to its combination of several variant exon-containing isoforms and the standard isoform (Table 3). It has been shown to influence key cell death signaling pathways, including apoptosis, ferroptosis and autophagy.

Table 3

Table 3. CD44 variant exon biological functions in relation to cell death pathways.

It was shown that CD44 is able to form a complex with receptor tyrosine-protein kinases 2 (ERBB2) (Ghatak et al., 2005). For instance, HA oligomers, inhibitors of HA interaction with CD44, were shown to prevent the assembly of phosphorylated ERBB2, CD44, ezrin, Hsp90/Cdc37 and p110a into a complex, which is then able to exert ERBB2 associated PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, promoting apoptosis resistance (Ghatak et al., 2005; Figure 3A). Such an interaction demonstrates the involvement of CD44 in growth factor receptor signaling promotion.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Schematic representation of total CD44 (CD44v and CD44s) involvement in cell death pathways. (A) CD44 is able to form an anti-apoptotic complex with ERBB2. CD44 binds ezrin, Vav2 and GAB1 at the ICD. ERBB2 recruits GRB2, Hsp70/Cdc37 and PI3K. The complex formation results in PI3K/Akt anti-apoptotic signaling promotion upon HA stimulation. (B) Binding of LMW-HA by CD44 leads to inhibitory phosphorylation of MST1/2 by PAR1b and consequent YAP activation, thereby promoting apoptosis inhibition and cell growth and proliferation activation. (C) Lipid raft associated CD44, CD147 and EGFR complex promotes EGFR signaling through the RAS-Erk downstream signaling proteins, conferring anti-apoptotic signaling. (D) Total CD44 is involved in the uptake of HA-bound iron, necessary for the function of iron-dependent proteins including nuclear demethylases. Nuclear demethylase PHF8, activated upon iron binding, promotes the expression of CD44 in a positive-feedback loop. (E) OPN-CD44-ITG-p38MAPK promotes autophagy. OPN-induced autophagy was inhibited by adding an ITG inhibitor RGD and/or anti-CD44 antibody; p38MAPK inhibitor SB203580 significantly attenuated autophagy by decreasing the expression levels of ATG4B, BECLIN1/ATG6, BNIP3 and VPS34 (not shown). (F) OPN-CD44-NF-κB promotes autophagy. NF-κB inhibitor BAY 1170–82 significantly inhibited the OPN-induced LC3-II expression and cell populations with CD44⁺/CD133⁺ expression profile (Created with BioRender.com).

Moreover, research on CD44 influence on cell death signaling pathways uncovered its involvement in the Hippo pathway. It was demonstrated that upon HA binding to CD44, CD44 clustering on the cellular membrane is initiated, stimulating the interaction of its intracellular domain with polarity-regulating kinase (PAR1b) (Ooki et al., 2019). Notably, it has been demonstrated that in normal tissues with increasing cell densities, CD44 is activated by high molecular weight (HMW)-HA, thereby initiating PAR1b phosphorylation process of mammalian STE20 like kinase 1 and 2 (MST1/2) and activation of Yes associated protein (YAP). Such a process results in the inhibition of cell growth. Similarly, merlin/neurofibromin-2 (Mer/NF2) also acts as a downstream effector, transferring signals from HA-CD44 activation. CD44 activation by HMW-HA reduces Mer phosphorylation, leading to its activation. Activated Mer has been shown to inhibit PI3K/Akt signaling (Ooki and Hatakeyama, 2020). Overall, in parallel with PAR1b, Mer acts as downstream effector molecules of the HA/CD44/Hippo pathway, modulating its activity. Since the Hippo pathway is an essential survival-associated signaling pathway, its’ inactivation promotes cell proliferation and decreases apoptosis, contributing to tumor initiation, progression and chemoresistance (Figure 3B).

Another pathway utilized by tumor cells to prevent apoptosis is signaling through the CD44/CD147/EGFR complex. On one hand, it was demonstrated that the knockdown of total CD44 leads to decreased EGFR activity levels, pointing to their functional linkage with one another (Grass et al., 2013). On the other hand, CD147 was shown to promote HA synthesis, thereby acting on CD44 activity levels through ligand interactions (Grass et al., 2013). The authors further demonstrated that the CD44/CD147/EGFR complex forms and promotes ERK activation through enhanced CD44-HA signaling in lipid rafts (Grass et al., 2013). While the impact of ERK activation on apoptosis was not directly analyzed, EGFR-Ras-ERK signaling is known to inhibit apoptosis and promote cell survival, thereby implying yet another case of CD44 apoptosis regulation through the interaction with cell membrane receptors (Figure 3C; Ullah et al., 2022).

Apart from apoptosis resistance, total CD44 may be involved in ferroptosis resistance. Müller et al. described a novel mechanism involving hyaluronan-bound iron transfer into the cell via CD44, influencing gene expression regulation (Müller et al., 2020; Figure 3D). The authors demonstrated that LMW-HA bound by iron is internalized intracellularly in complex with CD44 by endocytosis. Similar to transferrin-bound iron, CD44-HA-bound iron is further released into the cytoplasm upon acidification of the endosome and can then be transferred into specific cellular compartments. In particular, CD44-HA-bound iron increases the nuclear iron pool and reduces the histone mark H3K9me2 in an iron-dependent manner (Müller et al., 2020). This leads to the upregulation of genes, including CD44 itself. While no current studies suggest that CD44-mediated iron flux directly contributes to chemoresistance, a potential link may exist. Additionally, the impact of different CD44 isoforms on the CD44-HA-iron feedback loop remains unclear.

Total CD44 is additionally known to regulate autophagy in cancer cells. For instance, autophagy was shown to promote a CD44^high/CD24^low phenotype in breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) – such a cell expression profile was identified in a smaller portion of cells upon knockdown of several autophagy initiating proteins (ATG8/LC3B and ATG12) (Cufí et al., 2011). Moreover, the treatment of CD44^high/CD24^low cells with an autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) was shown to shift the cancer cell phenotype to the opposite (CD44^low/CD24^high) (Cufí et al., 2011). Additionally, the CD44 ligand osteopontin (OPN) has been implicated in autophagy induction. In vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), OPN was shown to trigger autophagosome formation (Kariya and Kariya, 2022). This process was inhibited by an integrin (ITG) inhibitor (RGD peptide) or anti-CD44 antibody, highlighting the importance of CD44 and RDG motif-containing integrins in autophagy initiation (Figure 3E). In another study, OPN activation was shown to stimulate NF-κB, ERK, and STAT3 signaling pathways (Figure 3F; Zheng et al., 2012). Thus, literature suggests that total CD44 and its ligands are linked with autophagy initiation and the stemness properties of tumor cells, thereby promoting resistance to administered therapy.

Overall, the mechanisms responsible for total CD44 mediation of cell death pathways are diverse. They include the influence of apoptosis resistance through ERBB2 complex, CD147 and CD44 interaction with LMW-HA. Currently, no research highlights that iron flux mediated by CD44 significantly contributes to chemoresistance, but there may be an association. Whether different CD44 isoforms alter their expression patterns within the CD44-HA bound iron positive feedback loop remains unclear. Further studies are required to clarify these possible associations and their relationship with chemoresistance. Lastly, total CD44 was shown to promote autophagy and chemoresistance in several cancers through OPN-CD44-ITG-p38MAPK and OPN-CD44-NF-κB signaling. Thus, targeting both cell death pathways and total CD44 signaling may offer a promising approach to overcoming chemoresistance in various cancers. However, it should be mentioned that additional research comparing the effect of standard and variant isoforms in mediating cell death signaling may be necessary for further precision in targeting chemoresistant cells.

5.3 Total CD44 therapeutic strategies and clinical implications

Several approaches targeting total CD44 (including variant and standard isoforms) for chemotherapy resistance alleviation have been developed and analyzed in vivo (Table 4). Some approaches for CD44-exerted chemoresistance treatment entail using CD44-targeting gene therapies, delivery systems and cell therapies. Regarding gene therapy strategies, complementary DNA (cDNA) vaccine to CD44 variant isoforms, but not CD44s, demonstrated decreased tumor growth, aggressiveness and metastasis in breast cancer xenografts (Wallach-Dayan et al., 2008). It was identified that the cDNA vaccine induced the production of antibodies recognizing CD44 variant isoforms (Wallach-Dayan et al., 2008). In addition, several studies revealed the beneficial effect of CD44-targeting with micro-RNA (miRNA). MiR-199a overexpression in CD44⁺ cancer-initiating cells (CICs) in ovarian cancer xenografts significantly decreased tumor volume (Cheng et al., 2012). Additionally, it was identified that a more significant percentage of apoptotic cells is formed with miR-199a overexpression. Similar effects were observed with the overexpression of miR-24a and miR-34a in gastric and esophageal cancer xenografts (Jang et al., 2016; Zuo et al., 2018). Overall, the data surrounding gene therapy approaches seems promising regarding cancer patient treatment, but they should be cautiously studied since they can carry the risk of off-target effects.

Table 4

Table 4. Summary of in vivo studies using CD44-targeted therapy.

Moreover, CD44 variant isoforms can be helpful for tumor cell targeting (cell therapies) and chemotherapy delivery due to their overexpression in tumor tissue. Anti-CD44 variant isoforms micelles, incorporating cisplatin, have shown success in decreasing the tumor volume of oral cancer xenografts by more than 50% (Wang et al. (2016a)). In addition, CD44-targeted and pH-sensitive doxorubicin-loaded micelles have exerted selective cytotoxic effects in breast cancer xenografts, resulting in apoptosis induction (Yang et al., 2021). A recently developed method for tumor cell targeting is therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, successfully applied for CD44⁺ tumor cell elimination. For instance, CD44⁺ hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts treated with CD44-CAR T cells demonstrated a significant decrease in tumor volume in comparison with mock T and normal T cells; CD44 tumor volumes were unchanged in comparison with CD44-CAR T, mock T and normal T cells (Wang et al., 2020).

Even though preclinical research data suggest that total CD44 play a significant role in the chemoresistance of cancer patients, there is a limited amount of conducted clinical studies regarding total CD44 targeted therapies (Table 5). They include therapeutic approaches such as using antibodies/peptides or pharmacological inhibitors.

Table 5

Table 5. Clinical trials aimed at targeting CD44 for overcoming chemoresistance. Retrieved from clinicaltrials.org and umin.ac.jp/ctr.

Anti-total-CD44 targeting approaches with modest/insufficient effect have been noted (NCT01358903): an anti-CD44 antibody RO5429083 (alternatively named RG7356) was tested in metastatic and/or locally advanced CD44-expressing malignant solid tumors (Menke-van der Houven van Oordt et al., 2016). The developed antibodies demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, however, clinical efficacy was identified to be modest–the best response to chemotherapy was stabilization of disease progression identified in 21% of patients. Some promising clinical trials have also been conducted (NCT00083928 and NCT01553851). A6 peptide, a short amino acid sequence targeting the HA-binding domain of CD44, performed well in increasing the time to progression of patients with ovarian cancer: half of the patients with asymptomatic biochemical recurrence experienced periods of stable disease for at least 4 cycles of administered A6 peptide therapy (Ghamande et al., 2008). Moreover, trametinib (conversely named GSK1120212) was shown to decrease Ras/MEK/ERK pathway activation and CD44 expression, resulting in a beneficial clinical response in patients (the effect was seen in 11 out of 17 patients), a decrease in tumor volume and tumor downstaging (Figure 4; Uppaluri et al., 2017).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Clinical trials aimed at targeting total CD44 (Created with bioRender.com). (A) Antibodies/peptides. (B) Pharmacological inhibitors.

6 CD44 variant exon 3 and chemoresistance

6.1 Effect of CD44 variant exon v3 expression on chemotherapy treatment outcome/tumor response to chemotherapy in patients/animal studies

CD44v3 seems to be the least studied variant exon out of the group of clinically relevant exons (Table 6). Concerning the correlation of expression levels with clinical outcomes of patients, it was demonstrated that high protein expression levels of CD44v3 exert chemoradiotherapy resistance in a study with nasopharyngeal patients (Sagawa et al., 2016). There seem to be no studies examining the association between CD44v3-containing isoforms overexpression/knockdown and chemoresistance in vivo. Nevertheless, the biological effect of CD44v3 has been studied in vitro.

Table 6

Table 6. The association of CD44 variant/only constant exon expression levels with clinical outcomes of cancer patients.

6.2 CD44 variant exon v3 biological functions in relation to cell death pathways

The biological effects exerted by variant exons of CD44 with significant clinical association concerning cell death pathways are summarized in Table 3. They will be covered in detail in the upcoming sections of our review.

The study of a particular exon’s functional role is quite tricky. Such methods as overexpression/knockdown of particular CD44 isoforms, which typically contain more than one variant exon, are widely applied. Indeed, we are not the first to review the involvement of CD44 variant exons in chemoresistance induction through apoptosis regulation (Wang et al., 2018). However, Wang et al. primarily focus on variant exon v6. In our review, we outline what is known to date about all clinically relevant variant exons regarding cell death mechanisms, including apoptosis, ferroptosis and autophagy.

Firstly, CD44 has been shown to bind some metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of endopeptidases that hydrolyze components of the extracellular matrix (Hassn Mesrati et al., 2021). Specifically, CD44v3 containing isoforms were identified to recruit the active form of MMP-7 and the precursor of HB-endothelial growth factor (HB-EGF) at its extracellular domain. This is possible due to HB-EGF binding of HS-rich sites in variant exon v3 of CD44 (Yu et al., 2002). Such an interaction allows the presentation of mature HB-EGF to membrane receptors, such as ERBB4, and thus the promotion of cell survival (Figure 5A; Yu et al., 2002). The mechanism through which CD44 forms complexes at the cellular membrane with additional receptors is quite often utilized by cancer cells and seems to be successful in the promotion of cell death resistance.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Schematic representation of CD44 variant exon v3 interaction with cellular receptors/intracellular proteins involved in cell death signaling. (A) CD44v3 containing isoforms recruit MMP7 and inactive HB-EGF, leading to consequent cleavage, activation and presentation of HB-EGF to ERBB4, thereby promoting anti-apoptotic signaling. (B) CD44v3 containing isoforms form a complex with ERBB2, Vav2 and Grb2 and promote anti-apoptotic Ras-MAPK signaling. (C) The ICD of CD44v3 containing isoforms promotes the formation of Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog complex and its consequent shift to the nucleus. The intranuclear Oct4/Sox2/Nanog complex promotes the expression of miR-302a and miR-302b, promoting anti-apoptotic signaling. (D) CD44v3 promotes antiapoptotic signaling through PI3K/STAT3 pathway. (E) CD44v6 containing isoforms activate c-Met anti-apoptotic signaling: upon binding of HGF, CD44v6 form dimeric complexes (not shown in figure) that are able to laterally diffuse through the plasma membrane for rapid interaction with c-Met with the formation of an active trimeric complex (Created with BioRender.com).

Moreover, CD44v3-containing isoforms were shown to promote ovarian tumor growth through ERBB2 signaling. It was identified that the ICD of CD44v3-containing isoforms interacts with adaptor proteins Vav2 and growth factor receptor bound protein 2 (Grb2) (Bourguignon et al., 2001), thus promoting coupling of ERBB2 and CD44v3-containing isoforms to Ras and the promotion of its signaling (Bourguignon et al., 2001; Figure 5B). This interaction is similar to that of total CD44 and ERBB2, but the mechanisms of apoptosis promotion vary. This points to a nonuniform response of tumor cells from different cancers upon interaction of CD44 with the same receptor.

Additionally, CD44v3 was shown to promote apoptosis resistance through epigenetic regulatory mechanisms. For instance, in CSCs with a CD44v3^high/ALDH1^high phenotype, master transcriptional factors Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog were detected to be overexpressed at the mRNA and protein levels (Bourguignon et al., 2012). Interestingly, upon activation of CD44v3-containing isoforms by HA in such cells, CD44v3-associated Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog physical complex formation and dislocation of Oct4/Sox2/Nanog to the nucleus was observed (Bourguignon et al., 2012). Upon nuclear localization, Oct4/Sox2/Nanog was identified to bind the miR-302 cluster promoter region, enhancing the production of miR-302a and miR-302b expression. SiRNA-mediated knockdown of these factors blocked HA-mediated Oct4/Sox2/Nanog binding to the miR-302 cluster promoter and decreased HA-induced antiapoptotic IAP protein expression, promoting chemosensitivity to cisplatin (Bourguignon et al., 2012). Thus, these finding indicate the ability of CD44v3 to utilize regulatory mechanisms not only at the protein level, but also epigenetically.

Further investigations into the role of CD44v3 in apoptosis regulation unveiled that the knockdown of CD44v3-containing isoforms mediates the reduction of PI3K, pAKT, pERK, pSTAT3 and Bcl2 protein levels, triggering apoptotic signaling and G0/G1 phase arrest in bladder cancer cells (Anand et al., 2019). Combinational treatment of cisplatin and doxorubicin with 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU), an HA synthesis inhibitor, significantly decreased cell viability compared to cisplatin or doxorubicin alone, suggesting that the HA/CD44v3 axis is of importance in apoptotic signaling regulation (Figure 5D; Anand et al., 2019).

As mentioned previously, CD44v3 encodes a heparan sulphate (HS) side-chain attachment motif, allowing HS-bound CD44v3 to bind growth factors including hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and to present them to a number of cell membrane receptors including the mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor (c-Met) (van der Voort et al., 1999). A significant pathway of c-Met signaling is the PI3K/Akt signaling axis primarily responsible for the cell survival response: the p85 subunit of PI3K can bind either directly to c-Met or indirectly through GAB1, which in turn promotes anti-apoptotic signaling through AKT (Xiao et al., 2001). Thus, these findings underline the importance of HS motifs and their utilization by CD44v3-containing isoforms to promote antiapoptotic signaling.

Overall, CD44v3-containing isoforms contribute to apoptosis resistance through several mechanisms, including the c-Met and ERBB2 receptors, epigenetic regulation employing miR-302 cluster upregulation and MMPs. Further research on these pathways will facilitate the development of targeted therapies to overcome chemoresistance and improve cancer treatment outcomes.

6.3 CD44 variant exon v3 therapeutic strategies and clinical implications

Despite the relatively large number of molecular mechanisms of resistance in which CD44v3 partakes, there seem to be practically no antibodies or clinical trials aimed at targeting CD44v3. A novel monoclonal antibody, C44Mab-6, was recently established (Suzuki et al., 2023). One advantage of such antibodies is the area of recognition of CD44v3-containing isoforms. For instance, compared with previously established anti-CD44v3 antibodies (clone 3G5), C44Mab-6 recognizes a peptide sequence excluding an HS-modified sequence in the CD44 variant-3-encoded region, indicating that C44Mab-6 antibodies recognition of CD44v3 is not influenced by HS modifications (Suzuki et al., 2023). This may be useful for CD44v3 targeting, increasing the selectivity of such antibodies. The authors mention that further testing of C44Mab-6 in vivo is reckoned.

Apart from the development of the antibodies mentioned above, it does not appear that other antibodies have been synthesized and tested in clinical settings. Thus, further research is necessary to determine the relevance of CD44v3 inhibition, considering the small number of studies regarding the analysis of its clinical relevance.

7 CD44 variant exon v6 and chemoresistance

7.1 Effect of CD44 variant exon v6 expression on chemotherapy treatment outcome and survival of patients and tumor response to chemotherapy in animal studies

One of the most widely and thoroughly studied variant exons concerning the clinical outcome of patients and biological effect is CD44v6 (Table 6). Several studies unveiled the prognostic significance of CD44v6 in nasopharyngeal, esophageal (in combination with c-Met expression) and tongue cancer (Hara et al., 2019; Sagawa et al., 2016; Yanamoto et al., 2014). High protein expression levels of CD44v6 significantly correlated with poor disease-specific survival (DSS) and OS of patients treated with cisplatin/carboplatin-based chemotherapy, as well as with tumor recurrence after chemotherapy treatment in colorectal cancer patients (Lv et al., 2016).

In addition, the association between CD44v6 overexpression/knockdown and chemoresistance in vivo has been studied (Table 2). Research indicates that CD44v6^kd in prostate and colon cancer xenografts demonstrated a significant decrease in tumor growth and practically complete impalpability by the end of docetaxel administration and in folinic acid, 5-FU and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)-resistant cells (Ni et al., 2020; Ghatak et al., 2021).

Overall, the implemented literature analysis, although not comprehensive, pointed to a relationship between variant exon CD44v6 high expression levels and worse chemotherapy treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Cancer xenografts confirmed the negative relationship of CD44v6 expression level with worse chemotherapy efficacy in vivo. The results demonstrate that CD44v6 may be involved in chemotherapy resistance, and further research into its molecular mechanisms is needed.

7.2 CD44 variant exon v6 biological functions in relation to cell death pathways

The ongoing investigation into the role of CD44 variant exon v6 in cellular death pathways across various cancer types may not yet provide a comprehensive understanding for all cancers. To date, CD44v6 is the most studied variant exon out of the other clinically variant exons. It has been shown to influence apoptosis and autophagy.

One of the pioneering studies on CD44v6 involvement in apoptosis revealed that CD44 exon v6 containing isoforms exhibit antiapoptotic properties through colocalizing, interacting with and blocking FAS trimerization (Figure 6A; Mielgo et al., 2006). Notably, cells, constitutively expressing FASR and being sensitive to apoptosis with the addition of FASL or FAS-crosslinking antibodies, become resistant to apoptosis with the transfection of CD44 variant isoforms. It was demonstrated that blocking the CD44v6 exon with anti-CD44v6 antibodies (clone VFF18) in cancer cells results in their sensitization to apoptosis, thereby underscoring CD44v6’s role in the promotion of antiapoptotic signaling. The authors further propose that CD44 variant isoforms may interact with the pre-ligand assembly domain of FASR and prevent its trimerization, which is necessary for FASL binding (Mielgo et al., 2006). Thus, CD44v6-containing isoforms employ regulatory mechanisms acting directly on the extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Schematic representation of CD44 variant exon v6 interaction with cellular receptors/intracellular proteins involved in cell death signaling. (A) The interference of CD44v6 containing isoforms in apoptosis induction through the extrinsic pathway possibly by blocking the trimerization of FASR, necessary for FASL interaction. (B) CD44v6 containing isoforms activate c-Met anti-apoptotic signaling: upon binding of HGF, CD44v6 form dimeric complexes (not shown in figure) that are able to laterally diffuse through the plasma membrane for rapid interaction with c-Met with the formation of an active trimeric complex. (C) CD44v6 ICD forms a complex with TG2 and ERK1/2 promoting anti-apoptotic signaling. (D) CD44v6 containing isoforms stimulate autophagy induction through increasing the levels of BECN1, one of the key players in autophagic vesicle extension (Created with BioRender.com).

Moreover, research indicates that CD44v6 interacts with the mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor c-Met and inhibits apoptosis through two primary mechanisms: 1) presentation of HGF to c-Met or 2) by direct interaction of c-Met or HGF with the variant exon domain of CD44v6 (Figure 6B). Based on current studies, the function of CD44v6 in c-Met activation is of dual nature. Firstly, the ectodomain of CD44v6-containing isoforms is necessary for c-Met activation through the binding and presentation of HGF. Secondly, the cytoplasmic domain of CD44v6-containing isoforms is linked to ERM proteins and the cytoskeleton and is required for RAS activation (Hasenauer et al., 2013). Overall, CD44v6-c-Met interaction promotes apoptosis through PI3K/Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways (Jung et al., 2011). Notably, studies indicate that upon the addition and interaction of HGF with CD44v6 expressing cancer cells, there is an increase in the number of CD44-HGF-bound dimers and in the diffusion coefficient in the plasma membrane of such complexes (Tannoo et al., 2024). The latter process is favorable for rapid interaction with and activation of c-Met, resulting in the formation of a CD44v6-c-Met tertiary complex (Tannoo et al., 2024). Therefore, tumor cells expressing CD44v6-containing isoforms utilize variant exon v6 for binding of growth factors and their presentation to cell membrane receptors (or even directly interacting with them), promoting anti-apoptotic signaling initiation.

Moreover, the formation of a CD44v6/transglutaminase 2 (TG2)/ERK1/2 protein complex was shown to promote cancer cell growth and resistance to apoptosis (Chen et al., 2023). It was identified that TG2 knockdown leads to decreased levels of CD44v6 and reduced ERK1/2 activity and expression (Chen et al., 2023). Furthermore, TG2 and CD44v6 were found to form complexes with ERK1/2, as well as with each other. In the interaction involving TG2 and CD44v6-containing isoforms, the cytoplasmic domain of CD44 plays a critical role in maintaining the stability of the complex (Chen et al., 2023). Importantly, CD44v6-knockdown xenografts displayed a significant decrease in tumor growth, accompanied by reduced CD44v6 and ERK1/2 levels, thereby utilizing yet another cooperative mechanism with binding partners for anti-apoptotic signaling promotion (Figure 6C; Chen et al., 2023).

Furthermore, overexpression of CD44 isoforms containing CD44v6 (CD44v6-overexpressing cells) demonstrated an increase in resistance to 5-FU in colorectal cancer cells (Lv et al., 2016). An increase in BECN1 expression under treatment by 5-FU in CD44v6-overexpressing cells was identified, and treatment of CD44v6-overexpressing cells with 5-FU and an autophagy inhibitor quinacrine (QC) resulted in an increase of CD44v6-overexpressing cell’s sensitivity to the combination of 5-FU and QC, indicating that CD44v6 promotes autophagy resistance. In another study, the knockdown of CD44v6 containing isoforms in colorectal cancer cells resulted in a significant decrease in BECN1 levels, further validating the results obtained in the previously mentioned study (Wang et al., 2019; Figure 6D).

Thus, the role of CD44v6 in apoptosis resistance, autophagy promotion, and consequent chemoresistance attenuation is complex, and it is involved in modulating several signaling pathways and interactions. CD44v6-containing isoforms contribute to apoptosis resistance through mechanisms involved in both direct apoptosis regulation via FASR and indirect apoptosis influence through the c-Met receptor. Additionally, CD44v6-containing isoforms were shown to promote autophagy in several cancers. These interactions underline the complexity of CD44’s functions responsible for cancer progression and resistance to treatment. The development of targeted therapeutic drugs for overcoming chemoresistance greatly depends on understanding CD44 variant exon-containing isoforms manipulation of cell survival signaling pathways.

7.3 CD44 variant exon v6 therapeutic strategies and clinical implications

Given the seemingly promising role of CD44v6-containing isoforms in cancer chemoresistance demonstrated in preclinical studies, several approaches targeting CD44v6 for chemotherapy resistance alleviation have been developed and analyzed in vivo (Table 4). These strategies aim to disrupt CD44-mediated signaling, enhance cell death induction and, as a result, overcome chemoresistance.

Some approaches for CD44v6-exerted chemoresistance treatment entail the use of anti-CD44v6 antibodies/peptides or pharmacological inhibitors. For instance, CD44v6 targeting peptides Hv6pep, developed with the inclusion of 3 amino acids necessary for v6 interaction with coreceptors, induced a significant tumor growth reduction upon xenograft injection. Notably, the anti-CD44v6 peptide was more effective in tumor growth inhibition than inhibitors of CD44v6 interactions with coreceptors c-Met and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) (Matzke-Ogi et al., 2016). A recently developed method for tumor cell targeting is therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, successfully applied for CD44v6 tumor cell elimination. For instance, the developed CD44v6-CAR T cells demonstrated antitumor effects and significantly prolonged survival (median survival of 27 and 37 days in CD19-CAR and CD44v6-CAR treated groups) of mice with ovarian cancer tumors (Porcellini et al., 2020). Thus, CD44v6-expressing isoforms are helpful for selective and direct tumor cell annihilation and precise drug delivery to chemoresistant cells.

Even though preclinical research data and several case reports suggest that CD44v6-containing isoforms play a significant role in the chemoresistance of cancer patients, there is a limited amount of conducted clinical studies regarding CD44v6-targeted therapies (Table 5). Cases of insufficiently effective anti-CD44v6 targeting approaches have been noted (NCT01358903, NCT01358903 and NCT02254018).

An anti-CD44v6 antibody, bivatuzumab, in combination with mertansine, was tested in studies targeting recurrent or metastatic breast cancer and advanced head and neck carcinoma (Figure 7; Koppe et al., 2004; Riechelmann et al., 2008; Ishimoto et al., 2011). In the cases of both metastatic breast cancer and advanced head and neck carcinoma, bivatuzumab was shown to target CD44v6, although not only on tumorous tissue, but additionally on skin keratinocytes - cells strongly expressing CD44v6. In the head and neck carcinoma study, one patient developed stable disease during the treatment phase, but a patient’s drug-related severe skin toxicity caused the study termination due to their death. Lastly, phase I/II clinical studies aimed at targeting CD44v6 with CAR T cells (NCT04430595, NCT04427449 and NCT04097301) and with pharmacological inhibitor AMC303 (NCT03009214) have demonstrated exemplary safety, and further analysis with respect to clinical effect is expected (Figure 7).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Clinical trials aimed at targeting CD44v6 containing isoforms (Created with bioRender.com).

8 CD44 variant exon 9 and chemoresistance

8.1 Effect of CD44 variant exon v9 expression on chemotherapy treatment outcome/tumor response to chemotherapy in patients/animal studies

Another frequently studied variant exon is CD44v9, which was shown to be associated with poor RFS and DSS of the upper urinary tract and urothelial cancer patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemotherapy, as well as non-chemoradioselected advanced head and neck cancer patients (Aso et al., 2015; Hagiwara et al., 2016; Hagiwara et al. 2018; Table 6). Moreover, the association between CD44v9-containing isoforms overexpression/knockdown and chemoresistance in vivo has been studied (Table 2). Chemoresistance elevation in CD44v9-overexpressing gastric cancer xenografts was averted in the 5-FU and sulfasalazine (SAS)-treated groups, demonstrating tumor volume shrinkage when compared to both the control group and 5-FU group on days 21 and 28 (Miyoshi et al., 2018).

Overall, the implemented literature analysis pointed to a relationship between variant exon CD44v9 high expression levels and worse chemotherapy treatment outcomes of cancer patients. Cancer xenografts confirmed the negative relationship of variant exon v9 expression level with worse chemotherapy efficacy in vivo. The results demonstrate that CD44v9, in addition to CD44v6, may be important in chemotherapy resistance occurrence.

8.2 CD44 variant exon v9 biological functions in relation to cell death pathways

To date, CD44v9, alongside CD44v6, is a frequently studied variant exon compared to other clinically variant exons. It has been shown to influence apoptosis and, to a greater extent, ferroptosis in cancer cells (Table 3).

For instance, CD44v9-containing isoforms transfected to cancer cells demonstrated that CD44v9-overexpressing cells were significantly more resistant to apoptosis than CD44v3 and CD44s (Mielgo et al., 2006). However, blocking of CD44v9-containing isoforms with anti-CD44v9 antibodies (clone FW11.24) demonstrated their inability to restore the potential of cells to undergo apoptosis (Figure 6A; Mielgo et al., 2006). Therefore, we conclude that the noted effects may be explained by several reasons: 1) the antibodies used in the study do not properly bind to and interact with CD44v9, therefore apoptosis restoration was not detected and 2) this mechanism may be more supportive, rather than being a major one.

Research conducted by Ishimoto et al. elucidated the interplay between CD44v9-containing isoforms and cystine-glutamate transporter xCT, a key player in glutathione (GSH) synthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) inactivation and ferroptosis regulation (Koppula et al., 2021). Their findings indicate that CD44 variant exons v8-v10 in gastrointestinal cancer (or CD44v9-containing isoforms in other types of cancers) interact with and stabilize the cystine transporter xCT, preventing it from being internalized and degraded as well as enhancing its capacity for downstream GSH synthesis and defense against ROS (Figure 8; Ishimoto et al., 2011). Interestingly, with the introduction of a S301A mutation containing consensus motifs for an N-linked glycosylation site in the variant region of CD44 (CD44v8-v10), CD44 variant isoforms failed to interact with xCT, thus underlining the importance of posttranslational modifications for CD44v9/membrane proteins interactions (Ishimoto et al., 2011). The precise molecular mechanisms underlying this interaction and stabilization are still under investigation but are thought to involve direct protein-protein interactions and possibly glycosylation-dependent processes.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Schematic representation of CD44 variant exon v9 involvement in cell death pathways regulation. CD44v9 containing isoforms interact with and stabilize the xCT transporter, a key player in GSH synthesis and ferroptosis regulation. OTUB1 and MUC1-C provide additional stability of CD44-xCT complex (Created with BioRender.com).

Additional stability and degradation escape of CD44v9-xCT complex is carried out through interaction with ubiquitin thioesterase/otubain-1 (OTUB1), a deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB) that plays a vital role in regulating protein stability by removing ubiquitin molecules from target proteins, thereby preventing their degradation by the proteasome and as a result mediating ferroptosis (Liu et al., 2019; Figure 4A). OTUB1 has been shown to directly interact with and stabilize the xCT transporter: knockdown of OTUB1 led to growth suppression of mice tumor xenografts and reduced activation of ferroptosis (Liu et al., 2019). Interestingly, CD44 demonstrated the ability to stabilize xCT and OTUB1 interaction in an OTUB1-dependent manner. Moreover, the N-terminal domain of xCT is required for interacting with OTUB1, whereas the C-terminal domain of xCT is critical for binding CD44 (Liu et al., 2019). Although the direct interaction of CD44 and OTUB1 is much lower in comparison to OTUB1-xCT interaction, nevertheless, this three-protein complex is thought to stabilize xCT more effectively, possibly further enhancing chemoresistance.

Another player involved in CD44v9-xCT complex stabilization is mucin 1 (MUC1) – a transmembrane glycoprotein commonly overexpressed in a plethora of cancers including lung, colon, breast, pancreatic and ovarian cancers (Chen et al., 2021; Figure 4A). Hasegawa et al. uncovered the interaction between the oncogenic MUC1 C-terminal subunit (MUC1-C) and the CD44-xCT complex: it was demonstrated that MUC1-C extracellularly interacts with and stabilizes the xCT transporter and additionally interacts intracellularly with CD44 ICD (Hasegawa et al., 2016). It was demonstrated that treatment of MUC1-C^high cells with ferroptosis inducer/xCT inhibitor erastin was ineffective in ferroptosis execution; consequent receptor silencing led to the consecution of erastin-induced ferroptotic cell death (Hasegawa et al., 2016), uncovering an additional pathway for ferroptosis modulation.

Overall, CD44v9-containing isoforms contribute to ferroptosis resistance through mechanisms involved in cysteine metabolism, which is necessary for ferroptosis initiation. Additionally, apoptosis regulation has also been observed. Further research on these pathways will facilitate the development of CD44v9-targeted therapies to overcome chemoresistance and improve cancer treatment outcomes.

8.3 CD44v9 therapeutic strategies and clinical implications

Some approaches for CD44v9-exerted chemoresistance treatment entail the use of pharmacological inhibitors (Table 4). The sensitizing effect of SAS, a CD44v9-xCT signaling inhibitor, combined with cisplatin has been studied in pancreatic, hepatocellular and metastatic bladder cancer xenografts (Wada et al., 2018; Ogihara et al., 2019). It was demonstrated that combination treatment of xenografts with high expression of isoforms containing CD44v9 with SAS and cisplatin significantly decreased tumor growth and the number of tumor nodules compared to control cells, cisplatin alone and SAS alone. The current results indicate that such approaches may be useful for targeting CD44 variant isoforms to modulate chemoresistance and suggest alternatives/additives to standard chemotherapy regimens.

Notably, several cases have been reported surrounding the effect of CD44v9 expression on patient response to chemotherapy. For instance, in one study a patient treated with SAS for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), was further diagnosed with pT1 bladder cancer and underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) (Takayama et al., 2016). They were further treated with MVAC and chemoradiotherapy due to the progression of the disease. With the appearance of a metastatic brain tumor, they underwent several courses of treatment with cisplatin and gemcitabine, and target lesions were classified as “complete response” shortly after the start of treatment. Interestingly, anti-CD44v9 staining of tumor tissue before TURBT and resected metastatic brain tumor unveiled a high expression and the absence of CD44v9 positive cells respectively, thus possibly attributing to the good clinical course outcome (Takayama et al., 2016).

In another study, a patient with prostate cancer underwent carboplatin-based chemotherapy (Takayama et al., 2016). During its administration, they were diagnosed with RA and PSA levels elevation was detected. Thus, alongside standard chemotherapy, SAS was administered, and surprisingly, PSA levels significantly decreased (by more than 50%) in just 2 weeks (Takayama et al., 2016). It should be noted that PSA levels further increased, although neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels remained practically the same. Moreover, the prostate cancer tissue of the patient derived from needle biopsy and stained for CD44v9 demonstrated respective high expression levels, pointing to elevated resistance to chemotherapy (Takayama et al., 2016). Thus, CD44v9 expression levels may be of importance for favorable chemotherapy outcomes.

Moreover, clinical trials have been conducted regarding the targeting of CD44v9-containing isoforms (EPOC1205 and EPOC1407) (Figure 9). A CD44v9 pharmacological inhibitor SAS demonstrated a substantial decrease in CD44 variant isoform expressing cells by more than 10% in half of the patients and a reduction of intratumoral GSH levels in 70% of patients after its administration in combination with CDDP in advanced gastric cancer. However, only three out of eleven patients achieved the stabilization of disease, questioning the efficacy of such treatment. Another study demonstrated the insufficient efficacy of SAS in combination with cisplatin on advanced gastric patients clinical parameters–obtained objective response was not detected (EPOC1407) (Uppaluri et al., 2017; Shitara et al., 2017; Table 5). Moreover, one out of four patients achieved the stabilization of disease for more than 4 months. Thus, the effects of CD44v9 targeting by SAS are under question.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Clinical trials aimed at targeting CD44v9 containing isoforms (Created with bioRender.com).

9 Conclusion and perspectives

The interconnection of CD44 variant exons and total CD44 with cell death pathways execution and consequent chemotherapy resistance was explored in this review. Following the association of clinical parameters and prognostic potential of cancer patients with CD44 expression, it was identified that high levels of variant exons v3, v6, v7, v9 and v10 are significantly associated with shorter progression-free, disease-free and overall survival, whereas CD44 variant exons v4, v5 and CD44s had no association (Table 6). The studies with overexpression and knockdown of CD44 variant isoforms confirmed these associations for CD44 variant exons v6 and v9, as well as total CD44 with the help of in vivo experiments (Table 2).

To date, variant exon CD44v6 containing isoforms effect on chemoresistance has been studied the most out of all variant exon containing isoforms of CD44. CD44v6 can modulate apoptosis and autophagy resistance through growth factor presentation and direct interaction with coreceptors on the cytoplasmic membrane, thus being a promising cell death-potentiating therapeutic target (Table 3). As seen in Table 5, clinical studies predominantly aim to target cells with high expression levels of CD44v6-containing isoforms. Current clinical studies include both ineffective and ongoing therapies. Ineffective therapy was observed for antibodies targeting CD44v6, but a pharmacological inhibitor AMC303 and anti-CD44v6 CAR-T cells have demonstrated exemplary safety. Further analysis concerning clinical effects is expected.

Another commonly studied variant exon is CD44v9. CD44v9 is predominantly involved in ferroptosis regulation, a recently discovered type of cell death (Table 3). Modulating the CD44v9-ferroptosis axis is relevant for patients resistant to classical cell death pathways such as apoptosis. In addition, cancer cells were shown to have increasing levels of intracellular iron, thereby making ferroptosis induction a potential targeting approach. Interestingly, CD44 was shown to be involved in HA-bound iron uptake and consequent expression self-potentiation. This may be important for drug resistance alleviation since increased iron uptake sensitizes cells to ferroptosis. Some clinical studies have shown positive outcomes with the addition of SAS to standard therapy (mainly to cisplatin), whereas others point to an absence of results (Table 5). Clinical studies surrounding CD44v9 targeting include trials with not so prominent effects on patient survival outcomes, although at the tumor cellular level, there is a decrease in CD44v9⁺ cells. Nevertheless, the mentioned studies suggest that the development of alternative CD44v9-targeting approaches may be relevent. Currently, existing trials aim to target CD44v9 only with a pharmacological inhibitor of CD44v9-xCT complex SAS.

CD44v3, the least studied variant exon of CD44 concerning clinical outcomes of patients, is involved in apoptotic cell death pathway regulation through a surprisingly large number of molecular mechanisms (Table 3). Such mechanisms include growth factor binding and presentation to receptors on the plasma membrane with the help of HS moieties and the engagement of epigenetic signaling. No therapeutic substances targeting CD44v3 have been tested in clinical settings, and we propose that this may be due to the complex nature of the CD44v3 structure. Notably, a recent study has established a novel monoclonal antibody, C44Mab-6, that recognizes a peptide sequence excluding an HS-modified sequence in the CD44 variant-3-encoded region. Testing this antibody in vivo and in clinical settings may be a promising approach.

Studies have also been conducted regarding the total CD44 effect on chemotherapy resistance. Total CD44 is involved in several cell death-modulating signaling pathways either by direct interaction with receptor proteins on the plasma membrane or through the changes in its signaling pathways upon interaction with its ligands (Table 3). A distinctive feature of total CD44 is its inclusion of standard and variant isoforms. Studies on chemotherapy treatment outcomes of patients point to a predominant involvement of CD44 variant isoforms, but not CD44s, in chemoresistance. Additionally, clinical trials with total CD44 targeted therapies have shown success in ovarian and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas and the lack of success in a study that included metastatic and/or locally advanced CD44-expressing malignant solid tumors (Table 5). This may indicate that total CD44 targeting may be successful for several individual cancers but generally seems ineffective over several cancers. Thus, the biological effect of total CD44 may be exerted due to CD44 variant exon-containing isoforms, and we believe that their targeting may be more beneficial for targeting chemoresistant cancer cells.

Importantly, CD44 has been identified as the most common CSC marker, and is tightly associated with stemness properties of CSCs. This topic has been extensively reviewed, including in several recent publications (Jaggupilli and Elkord, 2012; Skandalis et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2015). Generally, CSCs are known to have the capacity to self-renew and differentiate, and to exhibit resistance to drug and radiation (Wang et al., 2018). Surprisingly, not only CD44 variant isoforms, but also CD44s have been identified as CSC markers in prostate, colon, gastric, pancreatic, ovarian and breast cancers (Bhattacharya et al., 2018; Kimura et al., 2013; Lau et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014; Todaro et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2019). This data once again underscores the functional complexity of CD44 splice variants not only in tumor cells, but also in CSCs. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of cell death resistance mentioned in our review, for total CD44 as well as CD44v3, CD44v6 and CD44v9 were demonstrated to be the same in CSCs. However, other mechanisms may exist that have not yet been described in the current literature. Additionally, the CD44 isoforms that serve as CSC markers in a particular tumor may not necessarily be the predominant isoforms expressed throughout the entire tumor. At the same time, therapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming resistance usually target the predominantly expressed isoforms, which additionally have prognostic value. While such strategies can effectively overcome the resistance of the majority of tumor cells, they may fail to address CSCs, potentially leading to tumor recurrence or metastasis. Therefore, therapies aimed at suppressing CD44 in CSCs, or combination therapies targeting both the predominant tumor isoforms and CSC-specific marker may prove more effective in overcoming resistance and preventing recurrence or metastasis.

With that being said, despite the fact that there are studies aiming to target CD44, the results of clinical studies to date are ambiguous. This can be due to several reasons, one being the high variability of CD44 across different cancers. Indeed, besides variant exons, CD44 with only constant exons is expressed at reasonably high levels in tumor tissues. Since several developing therapeutic substances target total CD44, including both CD44s and variant isoforms, this can possibly lead to nonsignificant targeted therapy outcomes. Further research is necessary for precise and effective therapeutic substance development. We propose that targeting proteins involved in exon alternative splicing may possibly be the solution. The mechanisms by which variant isoforms of CD44 are formed by alternative splicing are described in detail in the recent review (Maltseva and Tonevitsky, 2023). For instance, splicing factor SRSF1, promoting the switch from variant isoforms to CD44s, was shown to inhibit autophagy (Bangming et al., 2024). Therefore, modulation of splicing factors’ activity may allow the evasion of high variability of CD44 proteins and enhance cell death pathways. However, it is undoubtedly important to remember that splicing factors have many targets, and it is important to test the overall effect of their activity modulation on cells. For this reason, an approach aimed at inhibiting not the activity of the splicing factors but the efficiency of their binding to CD44 mRNA, e.g., using splicing-switch oligonucleotides (Maltseva and Tonevitsky, 2023), may be even more promising and have fewer side effects.

In conclusion, CD44 isoforms containing variant exons play an intricate role in cancer chemoresistance by selectively modulating key cellular death pathways, including apoptosis, autophagy and ferroptosis. The results of completed clinical studies targeting CD44 isoforms containing variable exons are ambiguous. Therefore, the need to understand the role of CD44 in the mechanisms of chemoresistance remains. A deeper understanding could allow the creation of a more targeted therapeutic drug that specifically targets tumor cells and improves patient outcomes in cancer treatment.

Author contributions

MY: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. ES: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. DM: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. AT: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was performed within the framework of the Basic Research Program at Higher School of Economics University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2025.1508577/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1 | Expression profile of CD44 splice variants (both experimentally confirmed and predicted isoforms) in cancer patients. Created by www.gepia2.com.

References

Aaltomaa, S., Lipponen, P., Ala-Opas, M., and Kosma, V.-M. (2001). Expression and prognostic value of CD44 standard and variant v3 and v6 isoforms in prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 39 (2), 138–144. doi:10.1159/000052428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anand, U., Dey, A., Chandel, A. K. S., Sanyal, R., Mishra, A., Pandey, D. K., et al. (2023). Cancer chemotherapy and beyond: current status, drug candidates, associated risks and progress in targeted therapeutics. Genes. Dis. 10 (4), 1367–1401. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2022.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anand, V., Khandelwal, M., Appunni, S., Gupta, N., Seth, A., Singh, P., et al. (2019). CD44 splice variant (CD44v3) promotes progression of urothelial carcinoma of bladder through Akt/ERK/STAT3 pathways: novel therapeutic approach. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 145 (11), 2649–2661. doi:10.1007/s00432-019-03024-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ariza, A., Mate, J. L., Isamat, M., López, D., Von Uexküll-Güldeband, C., Rosell, R., et al. (1995). Standard and variant CD44 isoforms are commonly expressed in lung cancer of the non-small cell type but not of the small cell type. J. Pathol. 177 (4), 363–368. doi:10.1002/path.1711770406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aruffo, A., Stamenkovic, I., Melnick, M., Underhill, C. B., and Seed, B. (1990). CD44 is the principal cell surface receptor for hyaluronate. Cell. 61 (7), 1303–1313. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90694-A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aso, T., Matsuo, M., Kiyohara, H., Taguchi, K., Rikimaru, F., Shimokawa, M., et al. (2015). Induction of CD44 variant 9-expressing cancer stem cells might attenuate the efficacy of chemoradioselection and worsens the prognosis of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. PLoS One 10 (3), e0116596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116596

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bangming, J., Pan, T., and Zhu, J. (2024). MEN1-mediated CD44 alternative splicing depression is required for ferroptosis during lung cancer suppression. Res. Sq.

Google Scholar

Bànkfalvi, À., Terpe, H. J., Breukelmann, D., Bier, B., Rempe, D., Pschadka, G., et al. (1998). Gains and losses of CD44 expression during breast carcinogenesis and tumour progression. Histopathology 33 (2), 107–116. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.1998.00472.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, R., Mitra, T., Ray Chaudhuri, S., and Roy, S. S. (2018). Mesenchymal splice isoform of CD44 (CD44s) promotes EMT/invasion and imparts stem-like properties to ovarian cancer cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 119 (4), 3373–3383. doi:10.1002/jcb.26504

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boman, B. M., Viswanathan, V., Facey, C. O. B., Fields, J. Z., and Stave, J. W. (2023). The v8-10 variant isoform of CD44 is selectively expressed in the normal human colonic stem cell niche and frequently is overexpressed in colon carcinomas during tumor development. Cancer Biol. Ther. 24 (1), 2195363. doi:10.1080/15384047.2023.2195363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourguignon, L. Y. W., Wong, G., Earle, C., and Chen, L. (2012). Hyaluronan-CD44v3 interaction with oct4-sox2-nanog promotes miR-302 expression leading to self-renewal, clonal formation, and cisplatin resistance in cancer stem cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (39), 32800–32824. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.308528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourguignon, L. Y. W., Zhu, H., Chu, A., Iida, N., Zhang, L., and Hung, M.-C. (1997). Interaction between the adhesion receptor, CD44, and the oncogene product, p185HER2, promotes human ovarian tumor cell activation. J. Biol. Chem. 272 (44), 27913–27918. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.44.27913

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourguignon, L. Y. W., Zhu, H., Zhou, B., Diedrich, F., Singleton, P. A., and Hung, M.-C. (2001). Hyaluronan promotes CD44v3-vav2 interaction with grb2-p185HER2 and induces Rac1 and Ras signaling during ovarian tumor cell migration and growth. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (52), 48679–48692. doi:10.1074/jbc.M106759200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74 (3), 229–263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cannistra, S. A., Abu-Jawdeh, G., Niloff, J., Strobel, T., Swanson, L., Andersen, J., et al. (1995). CD44 variant expression is a common feature of epithelial ovarian cancer: lack of association with standard prognostic factors. J. Clin. Oncol. 13 (8), 1912–1921. doi:10.1200/JCO.1995.13.8.1912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castella, E. M., Ariza, A., Ojanguren, I., Mate, J. L., Roca, X., Fernández-Vasalo, A., et al. (1996). Differential expression of CD44v6 in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: an immunohistochemical study. Virchows Arch. 429–429 (4–5), 191–195. doi:10.1007/BF00198333

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, K.-L., Li, D., Lu, T.-X., and Chang, S.-W. (2020). Structural characterization of the CD44 stem region for standard and cancer-associated isoforms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (1), 336. doi:10.3390/ijms21010336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, W., Zhang, Z., Zhang, S., Zhu, P., Ko, J. K.-S., and Yung, K. K.-L. (2021). MUC1: structure, function, and clinic application in epithelial cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (12), 6567. doi:10.3390/ijms22126567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Adhikary, G., Newland, J. J., Xu, W., Keillor, J. W., Weber, D. J., et al. (2023). Transglutaminase 2 binds to the CD44v6 cytoplasmic domain to stimulate CD44v6/ERK1/2 signaling and maintain an aggressive cancer phenotype. Mol. Cancer Res. 21 (9), 922–932. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-23-0051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, W., Liu, T., Wan, X., Gao, Y., and Wang, H. (2012). MicroRNA-199a targets CD44 to suppress the tumorigenicity and multidrug resistance of ovarian cancer-initiating cells. FEBS J. 279 (11), 2047–2059. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08589.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cufí, S., Vazquez-Martin, A., Oliveras-Ferraros, C., Martin-Castillo, B., Vellon, L., and Menendez, J. A. (2011). Autophagy positively regulates the CD44+/CD24-/low breast cancer stem-like phenotype. Cell. Cycle 10 (22), 3871–3885. doi:10.4161/cc.10.22.17976

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

D’Amico, M., and De Amicis, F. (2024). Challenges of regulated cell death: implications for therapy resistance in cancer. Cells 13 (13), 1083. doi:10.3390/cells13131083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dasari, S., and Bernard Tchounwou, P. (2014). Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 740, 364–378. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Debnath, J., Gammoh, N., and Ryan, K. M. (2023). Autophagy and autophagy-related pathways in cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (8), 560–575. doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00585-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dixon, S. J., Lemberg, K. M., Lamprecht, M. R., Skouta, R., Zaitsev, E. M., Gleason, C. E., et al. (2012). Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 149 (5), 1060–1072. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dixon, S. J., and Olzmann, J. A. (2024). The cell biology of ferroptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (6), 424–442. doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00703-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

dos Santos, A. F., Fazeli, G., Xavier da Silva, T. N., and Friedmann Angeli, J. P. (2023). Ferroptosis: mechanisms and implications for cancer development and therapy response. Trends Cell. Biol. 33 (12), 1062–1076. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2023.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elisabetta, Z., Vianello, F., Ruzza, A., Palazzo, A., Brillo, V., Celotti, I., et al. (2024). The role of transglutaminase 2 in cancer: an update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25 (5), 2797. doi:10.3390/ijms25052797

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Everest-Dass, A., Nersisyan, S., Maar, H., Novosad, V., Schröder-Schwarz, J., Freytag, V., et al. (2024). Spontaneous metastasis xenograft models link CD44 isoform 4 to angiogenesis, hypoxia, EMT and mitochondria-related pathways in colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 18 (1), 62–90. doi:10.1002/1878-0261.13535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Friedmann Angeli, J. P., Krysko, D. V., and Conrad, M. (2019). Ferroptosis at the crossroads of cancer-acquired drug resistance and immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19 (7), 405–414. doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0149-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gaiteiro, C., Soares, J., Relvas-Santos, M., Peixoto, A., Ferreira, D., Paulo, P., et al. (2022). Glycoproteogenomics characterizes the CD44 splicing code associated with bladder cancer invasion. Theranostics 12 (7), 3150–3177. doi:10.7150/thno.67409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galluzzi, L., Vitale, I., Aaronson, S. A., Abrams, J. M., Adam, D., Agostinis, P., et al. (2018). Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell. Death Differ. 25 (3), 486–541. doi:10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghamande, S. A., Silverman, M. H., Huh, W., Behbakht, K., Ball, G., Cuasay, L., et al. (2008). A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of clinical activity and safety of subcutaneous Å6 in women with asymptomatic CA125 progression after first-line chemotherapy of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 111 (1), 89–94. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghatak, S., Hascall, V. C., Markwald, R. R., and Misra, S. (2021). FOLFOX therapy induces feedback upregulation of CD44v6 through YB-1 to maintain stemness in colon initiating cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2), 753. doi:10.3390/ijms22020753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghatak, S., Misra, S., and Toole, B. P. (2005). Hyaluronan constitutively regulates ErbB2 phosphorylation and signaling complex formation in carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (10), 8875–8883. doi:10.1074/jbc.M410882200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gotoda, T., Matsumura, Y., Kondo, H., Saitoh, D., Shimada, Y., Kosuge, T., et al. (1998). Expression of CD44 variants and its association with survival in pancreatic cancer. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 89 (10), 1033–1040. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00493.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grass, G. D., Tolliver, L. B., Bratoeva, M., and Toole, B. P. (2013). CD147, CD44, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway cooperate to regulate breast epithelial cell invasiveness. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (36), 26089–26104. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.497685

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Xu, B., Han, Q., Zhou, H., Xia, Y., Gong, C., et al. (2018). Ferroptosis: a novel anti-tumor action for cisplatin. Cancer Res. Treat. 50 (2), 445–460. doi:10.4143/crt.2016.572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hagiwara, M., Kikuchi, E., Kosaka, T., Mikami, S., Saya, H., and Oya, M. (2016). Variant isoforms of CD44 expression in upper tract urothelial cancer as a predictive marker for recurrence and mortality. Urologic Oncol. Seminars Orig. Investigations 34 (8), 337.e19–e26. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hagiwara, M., Kikuchi, E., Tanaka, N., Kosaka, T., Mikami, S., Saya, H., et al. (2018). Variant isoforms of CD44 involves acquisition of chemoresistance to cisplatin and has potential as a novel indicator for identifying a cisplatin-resistant population in urothelial cancer. BMC Cancer 18 (1), 113. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-3988-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hanahan, D. (2022). Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 12 (1), 31–46. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, J., Madigan, M. C., Khatri, A., Power, C. A., Hung, T. T., Beretov, J., et al. (2012). In vitro and in vivo prostate cancer metastasis and chemoresistance can Be modulated by expression of either CD44 or CD147. PLoS One 7 (8), e40716. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hara, T., Makino, T., Yamasaki, M., Tanaka, K., Miyazaki, Y., Takahashi, T., et al. (2019). Effect of c-met and CD44v6 expression in resistance to chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 26 (3), 899–906. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-07126-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasegawa, M., Takahashi, H., Rajabi, H., Alam, M., Suzuki, Y., Yin, L., et al. (2016). Functional interactions of the cystine/glutamate antiporter, CD44v and MUC1-C oncoprotein in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 7 (11), 11756–11769. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasenauer, S., Malinger, D., Koschut, D., Pace, G., Matzke, A., von Au, A., et al. (2013). Internalization of met requires the Co-receptor CD44v6 and its link to ERM proteins. PLoS One 8 (9), e62357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hassn Mesrati, M., Syafruddin, S. E., Mohtar, M. A., and Syahir, A. (2021). CD44: a multifunctional mediator of cancer progression. Biomolecules 11 (12), 1850. doi:10.3390/biom11121850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Horibe, S., Kawauchi, S., Tanahashi, T., Sasaki, N., Mizuno, S., and Rikitake, Y. (2018). CD44v-dependent upregulation of xCT is involved in the acquisition of cisplatin-resistance in human lung cancer A549 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 507 (1–4), 426–432. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishimoto, T., Nagano, O., Yae, T., Tamada, M., Motohara, T., Oshima, H., et al. (2011). CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc− and thereby promotes tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 19 (3), 387–400. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jaggupilli, A., and Elkord, E. (2012). Significance of CD44 and CD24 as cancer stem cell markers: an enduring ambiguity. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 708036–708111. doi:10.1155/2012/708036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jang, E., Kim, E., Son, H. Y., Lim, E. K., Lee, H., Choi, Y., et al. (2016). Nanovesicle-mediated systemic delivery of microRNA-34a for CD44 overexpressing gastric cancer stem cell therapy. Biomaterials 105, 12–24. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, M., Tussey, L., Athanasou, N., and Jackson, D. G. (2000). Heparan sulfate proteoglycan isoforms of the CD44 hyaluronan receptor induced in human inflammatory macrophages can function as paracrine regulators of fibroblast growth factor action. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (11), 7964–7974. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.11.7964

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jung, T., Gross, W., and Zöller, M. (2011). CD44v6 coordinates tumor matrix-triggered motility and apoptosis resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (18), 15862–15874. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.208421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kariya, Y., and Kariya, Y. (2022). Osteopontin in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Int. J. Transl. Med. 2 (3), 419–447. doi:10.3390/ijtm2030033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kashyap, T., Pramanik, K. K., Nath, N., Mishra, P., Singh, A. K., Nagini, S., et al. (2018). Crosstalk between Raf-MEK-ERK and PI3K-Akt-GSK3β signaling networks promotes chemoresistance, invasion/migration and stemness via expression of CD44 variants (v4 and v6) in oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 86, 234–243. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaufmann, S. H., and Earnshaw, W. C. (2000). Induction of apoptosis by cancer chemotherapy. Exp. Cell. Res. 256 (1), 42–49. doi:10.1006/excr.2000.4838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kimura, Y., Goi, T., Nakazawa, T., Hirono, Y., Katayama, K., Urano, T., et al. (2013). CD44variant exon 9 plays an important role in colon cancer initiating cells. Oncotarget 4 (5), 785–791. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koppe, M., Schaijk, F. v., Roos, J., Leeuwen, P. v., Heider, K. H., Kuthan, H., et al. (2004). Safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biodistribution of 186 Re-labeled humanized monoclonal antibody BIWA 4 (bivatuzumab) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 19 (6), 720–729. doi:10.1089/cbr.2004.19.720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koppula, P., Zhuang, L., and Gan, B. (2021). Cystine transporter SLC7A11/xCT in cancer: ferroptosis, nutrient dependency, and cancer therapy. Protein Cell. 12 (8), 599–620. doi:10.1007/s13238-020-00789-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lau, W. M., Teng, E., Chong, H. S., Lopez, K. A. P., Tay, A. Y. L., Salto-Tellez, M., et al. (2014). CD44v8-10 is a cancer-specific marker for gastric cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 74 (9), 2630–2641. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. S., Qi, Y., and Im, W. (2015). Effects of N-glycosylation on protein conformation and dynamics: protein Data Bank analysis and molecular dynamics simulation study. Sci. Rep. 5 (1), 8926. doi:10.1038/srep08926

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Liu, J., Xu, Y., Wu, R., Chen, X., Song, X., et al. (2021). Tumor heterogeneity in autophagy-dependent ferroptosis. Autophagy 17 (11), 3361–3374. doi:10.1080/15548627.2021.1872241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Hao, X., Qin, J., Tang, W., He, F., Smith, A., et al. (2014). Antibody against CD44s inhibits pancreatic tumor initiation and postradiation recurrence in mice. Gastroenterology 146 (4), 1108–1118. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, C., Wang, Q., An, J., Chen, J., Li, X., Long, Q., et al. (2022). CD44 glycosylation as a therapeutic target in oncology. Front. Oncol. 12, 883831. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.883831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., Yao, S., Yang, H., Liu, S., and Wang, Y. (2023). Autophagy: regulator of cell death. Cell. Death Dis. 14 (10), 648. doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06154-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, T., Jiang, L., Tavana, O., and Gu, W. (2019). The deubiquitylase OTUB1 mediates ferroptosis via stabilization of SLC7A11. Cancer Res. 79 (8), 1913–1924. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Longley, D. B., Harkin, D. P., and Johnston, P. G. (2003). 5-Fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 (5), 330–338. doi:10.1038/nrc1074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lv, L., Liu, H. G., Dong, S. Y., Yang, F., Wang, Q. X., Guo, G. L., et al. (2016). Upregulation of CD44v6 contributes to acquired chemoresistance via the modulation of autophagy in colon cancer SW480 cells. Tumor Biol. 37 (7), 8811–8824. doi:10.1007/s13277-015-4755-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maltseva, D., and Tonevitsky, A. (2023). RNA-binding proteins regulating the CD44 alternative splicing. Front. Mol. Biosci. 10, 1326148. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1326148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Masuko, K., Okazaki, S., Satoh, M., Tanaka, G., Ikeda, T., Torii, R., et al. (2012). Anti-tumor effect against human cancer xenografts by a fully human monoclonal antibody to a variant 8-epitope of CD44R1 expressed on cancer stem cells. PLoS One 7 (1), e29728. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matzke-Ogi, A., Jannasch, K., Shatirishvili, M., Fuchs, B., Chiblak, S., Morton, J., et al. (2016). Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in pancreatic cancer models by interference with CD44v6 signaling. Gastroenterology 150 (2), 513–525. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. W., Gomez-Roca, C., van Herpen, C., Coveler, A. L., Mahalingam, D., Verheul, H. M. W., et al. (2016). First-in-human phase I clinical trial of RG7356, an anti-CD44 humanized antibody, in patients with advanced, CD44-expressing solid tumors. Oncotarget 7 (48), 80046–80058. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.11098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mielgo, A., van Driel, M., Bloem, A., Landmann, L., and Günthert, U. (2006). A novel antiapoptotic mechanism based on interference of Fas signaling by CD44 variant isoforms. Cell. Death Differ. 13 (3), 465–477. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miyoshi, S., Tsugawa, H., Matsuzaki, J., Hirata, K., Mori, H., Saya, H., et al. (2018). Inhibiting xCT improves 5-fluorouracil resistance of gastric cancer induced by CD44 variant 9 expression. Anticancer Res. 38 (11), 6163–6170. doi:10.21873/anticanres.12969

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mollaei, M., Hassan, Z. M., Khorshidi, F., and Langroudi, L. (2021). Chemotherapeutic drugs: cell death- and resistance-related signaling pathways. Are they really as smart as the tumor cells? Transl. Oncol. 14 (5), 101056. doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Müller, S., Sindikubwabo, F., Cañeque, T., Lafon, A., Versini, A., Lombard, B., et al. (2020). CD44 regulates epigenetic plasticity by mediating iron endocytosis. Nat. Chem. 12 (10), 929–938. doi:10.1038/s41557-020-0513-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naor, D., Wallach-Dayan, S. B., Zahalka, M. A., and Sionov, R. V. (2008). Involvement of CD44, a molecule with a thousand faces, in cancer dissemination. Semin. Cancer Biol. 18 (4), 260–267. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ni, J., Cheung, B. B., Beretov, J., Duan, W., Bucci, J., Malouf, D., et al. (2020). CD44 variant 6 is associated with prostate cancer growth and chemo-/radiotherapy response in vivo. Exp. Cell. Res. 388 (2), 111850. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Novosad, V. O., Polikanova, I. S., Tonevitsky, E. A., and Maltseva, D. V. (2022). Expression of CD44 isoforms in tumor samples and cell lines of human colorectal cancer. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 173 (1), 155–159. doi:10.1007/s10517-022-05512-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogihara, K., Kikuchi, E., Okazaki, S., Hagiwara, M., Takeda, T., Matsumoto, K., et al. (2019). Sulfasalazine could modulate the CD44v9-xCT system and enhance cisplatin-induced cytotoxic effects in metastatic bladder cancer. Cancer Sci. 110 (4), 1431–1441. doi:10.1111/cas.13960

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olsson, E., Honeth, G., Bendahl, P.-O., Saal, L. H., Gruvberger-Saal, S., Ringnér, M., et al. (2011). CD44 isoforms are heterogeneously expressed in breast cancer and correlate with tumor subtypes and cancer stem cell markers. BMC Cancer 11 (1), 418. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-11-418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ooki, T., and Hatakeyama, M. (2020). Hyaluronan degradation promotes cancer via hippo-YAP signaling: an intervention point for cancer therapy. BioEssays 42 (7), e2000005. doi:10.1002/bies.202000005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ooki, T., Murata-Kamiya, N., Takahashi-Kanemitsu, A., Wu, W., and Hatakeyama, M. (2019). High-molecular-weight hyaluronan is a Hippo pathway ligand directing cell density-dependent growth inhibition via PAR1b. Dev. Cell. 49 (4), 590–604. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porcellini, S., Asperti, C., Corna, S., Cicoria, E., Valtolina, V., Stornaiuolo, A., et al. (2020). CAR T cells redirected to CD44v6 control tumor growth in lung and ovary adenocarcinoma bearing mice. Front. Immunol. 11, 99. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riechelmann, H., Sauter, A., Golze, W., Hanft, G., Schroen, C., Hoermann, K., et al. (2008). Phase I trial with the CD44v6-targeting immunoconjugate bivatuzumab mertansine in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 44 (9), 823–829. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.10.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ross, J. S., Sheehan, C. E., Williams, S. S., Malfetano, J. H., Szyfelbein, W. M., and Kallakury, B. V. S. (2001). Decreased CD44 standard form expression correlates with prognostic variables in ovarian carcinomas. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 116 (1), 122–128. doi:10.1309/KUK0-1M3D-LGNE-THXR

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sagawa, K., Uwa, N., Daimon, T., Sakagami, M., and Tsujimura, T. (2016). Expression of CD44 variant isoforms, CD44v3 and CD44v6, are associated with prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Laryngol. Otol. 130 (9), 843–849. doi:10.1017/S0022215116008525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sazonova, E. V., Yapryntseva, M. A., Pervushin, N. V., Tsvetcov, R. I., Zhivotovsky, B., and Kopeina, G. S. (2024). Cancer drug resistance: targeting proliferation or programmed cell death. Cells 13 (5), 388. doi:10.3390/cells13050388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Screaton, G. R., V Bell, M., Jackson, D. G., Cornelis, F. B., Gerth, U., and Bell, J. I. (1992). Genomic structure of DNA encoding the lymphocyte homing receptor CD44 reveals at least 12 alternatively spliced exons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89 (24), 12160–12164. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.24.12160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Senbanjo, L. T., and Chellaiah, M. A. (2017). CD44: a multifunctional cell surface adhesion receptor is a regulator of progression and metastasis of cancer cells. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 5, 18. doi:10.3389/fcell.2017.00018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, Q., Li, X., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., and He, X. (2024). FLIBase: a comprehensive repository of full-length isoforms across human cancers and tissues. Nucleic Acids Research 52 (D1), D124–D133. doi:10.1093/nar/gkad745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shitara, K., Doi, T., Nagano, O., Fukutani, M., Hasegawa, H., Nomura, S., et al. (2017). Phase 1 study of sulfasalazine and cisplatin for patients with CD44v-positive gastric cancer refractory to cisplatin (EPOC1407). Gastric Cancer 20 (6), 1004–1009. doi:10.1007/s10120-017-0720-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skandalis, S. S., Karalis, T. T., Chatzopoulos, A., and Karamanos, N. K. (2019). Hyaluronan-CD44 axis orchestrates cancer stem cell functions. Cell. Signal 63, 109377. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skandalis, S. S. (2023). CD44 intracellular domain: a long tale of a short tail. Cancers (Basel) 15 (20), 5041. doi:10.3390/cancers15205041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stamenkovic, I., Amiot, M., Pesando, J. M., and Seed, B. (1989). A lymphocyte molecule implicated in lymph node homing is a member of the cartilage link protein family. Cell. 56 (6), 1057–1062. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90638-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, F., Schroer, C. F. E., Palacios, C. R., Xu, L., Luo, S.-Z., and Marrink, S. J. (2020). Molecular mechanism for bidirectional regulation of CD44 for lipid raft affiliation by palmitoylations and PIP2. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16 (4), e1007777. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suzuki, H., Kitamura, K., Goto, N., Ishikawa, K., Ouchida, T., Tanaka, T., et al. (2023). A novel anti-CD44 variant 3 monoclonal antibody C44Mab-6 was established for multiple applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (9), 8411. doi:10.3390/ijms24098411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takahashi, S., Kimoto, N., Orita, S., Cui, L., Sakakibara, M., and Shirai, T. (1998). Relationship between CD44 expression and differentiation of human prostate adenocarcinomas. Cancer Lett. 129 (1), 97–102. doi:10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00088-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takayama, T., Kubo, T., Morikawa, A., Morita, T., Nagano, O., and Saya, H. (2016). Potential of sulfasalazine as a therapeutic sensitizer for CD44 splice variant 9-positive urogenital cancer. Med. Oncol. 33 (5), 45. doi:10.1007/s12032-016-0760-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanaka, K., Osada, H., Murakami-Tonami, Y., Horio, Y., Hida, T., and Sekido, Y. (2017). Statin suppresses Hippo pathway-inactivated malignant mesothelioma cells and blocks the YAP/CD44 growth stimulatory axis. Cancer Lett. 385, 215–224. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2016.10.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, Z., Kang, B., Li, C., Chen, T., and Zhang, Z. (2019). GEPIA2: an enhanced web server for large-scale expression profiling and interactive analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (W1), W556–W560. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tannoo, R. M., Richert, L., Koschut, D., Tomishige, N., Treffert, S. M., Kobayashi, T., et al. (2024). Quantitative live imaging reveals a direct interaction between CD44v6 and MET in membrane domains upon activation with both MET ligands, HGF and internalin B. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembr. 1866 (1), 184236. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2023.184236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thanee, M., Padthaisong, S., Suksawat, M., Dokduang, H., Phetcharaburanin, J., Klanrit, P., et al. (2021). Sulfasalazine modifies metabolic profiles and enhances cisplatin chemosensitivity on cholangiocarcinoma cells in in vitro and in vivo models. Cancer Metab. 9 (1), 11. doi:10.1186/s40170-021-00249-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Todaro, M., Gaggianesi, M., Catalano, V., Benfante, A., Iovino, F., Biffoni, M., et al. (2014). CD44v6 is a marker of constitutive and reprogrammed cancer stem cells driving colon cancer metastasis. Cell. Stem Cell. 14 (3), 342–356. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tokue, Y., Matsumura, Y., Katsumata, N., Watanabe, T., Tarin, D., and Kakizoe, T. (1998). CD44 variant isoform expression and breast cancer prognosis. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 89 (3), 283–290. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00560.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tran, T. A., Kallakury, B. V. S., Sheehan, C. E., and Ross, J. S. (1997). Expression of CD44 standard form and variant isoforms in non-small cell lung carcinomas. Hum. Pathol. 28 (7), 809–814. doi:10.1016/S0046-8177(97)90154-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ullah, R., Yin, Q., Snell, A. H., and Wan, L. (2022). RAF-MEK-ERK pathway in cancer evolution and treatment. Semin. Cancer Biol. 85, 123–154. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.05.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uppaluri, R., Winkler, A. E., Lin, T., Law, J. H., Haughey, B. H., Nussenbaum, B., et al. (2017). Biomarker and tumor responses of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma to trametinib: a phase II neoadjuvant window-of-opportunity clinical trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 23 (9), 2186–2194. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van der Voort, R., Taher, T. E., Wielenga, V. J., Spaargaren, M., Prevo, R., Smit, L., et al. (1999). Heparan sulfate-modified CD44 promotes hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-induced signal transduction through the receptor tyrosine kinase c-met. J. Biol. Chem. 274 (10), 6499–6506. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.10.6499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wada, F., Koga, H., Akiba, J., Niizeki, T., Iwamoto, H., Ikezono, Y., et al. (2018). High expression of CD44v9 and xCT in chemoresistant hepatocellular carcinoma: potential targets by sulfasalazine. Cancer Sci. 109 (9), 2801–2810. doi:10.1111/cas.13728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wallach-Dayan, S. B., Rubinstein, A. M., Hand, C., Breuer, R., and Naor, D. (2008). DNA vaccination with CD44 variant isoform reduces mammary tumor local growth and lung metastasis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7 (6), 1615–1623. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Hu, C., Jiang, J., Li, Y., et al. (2023). ROS-induced lipid peroxidation modulates cell death outcome: mechanisms behind apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi:10.1007/s00204-023-03476-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Ye, X., Ju, Y., Cai, Z., Wang, X., Du, P., et al. (2016a). Minicircle DNA-mediated CAR T cells targeting CD44 suppressed hepatocellular carcinoma both in vitro and in vivo,” Onco Targets Ther., vol. Volume 13, pp. 3703–3716. doi:10.2147/OTT.S247836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., Miura, Y., Tsuchihashi, K., Miyano, K., Nagano, O., Yoshikawa, M., et al. (2016b). Eradication of CD44-variant positive population in head and neck tumors through controlled intracellular navigation of cisplatin-loaded nanomedicines. J. Control. Release 230, 26–33. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.03.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q.-X., Lv, L., Ye, D. R., Sun, Y. H., Pan, X. X., Bhandari, A., et al. (2019). Downregulation of CD44v6 enhances chemosensitivity by promoting apoptosis and inhibiting autophagy in colorectal cancer HT29 cells. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 49 (4), 481–487.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Zhao, K., Hackert, T., and Zöller, M. (2018). CD44/CD44v6 a reliable companion in cancer-initiating cell maintenance and tumor progression. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 6, 97. doi:10.3389/fcell.2018.00097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Yu, C., Luo, M., Cen, C., Qiu, J., Zhang, S., et al. (2020). Ferroptosis in cancer treatment: another way to rome. Front. Oncol. 10, 571127. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.571127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Z., Lu, J., Loo, A., Ho, N., Nguyen, D., Cheng, P. Y., et al. (2024). Role of CD44 in chemotherapy treatment outcome: a scoping review of clinical studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25 (6), 3141. doi:10.3390/ijms25063141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, G.-H., Jeffers, M., Bellacosa, A., Mitsuuchi, Y., Vande Woude, G. F., and Testa, J. R. (2001). Anti-apoptotic signaling by hepatocyte growth factor/Met via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 (1), 247–252. doi:10.1073/pnas.011532898

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Y., Bai, Z., Lan, T., Fu, C., and Cheng, P. (2024). CD44 and its implication in neoplastic diseases. MedComm (Beijing) 5 (6), e554. doi:10.1002/mco2.554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Y., Zuo, X., and Wei, D. (2015). Concise review: emerging role of CD44 in cancer stem cells: a promising biomarker and therapeutic target. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 4 (9), 1033–1043. doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yanamoto, S., Yamada, S. I., Takahashi, H., Naruse, T., Matsushita, Y., Ikeda, H., et al. (2014). Expression of the cancer stem cell markers CD44v6 and ABCG2 in tongue cancer: effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on local recurrence. Int. J. Oncol. 44 (4), 1153–1162. doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, M.-C., Wang, H.-C., Hou, Y.-C., Tung, H.-L., Chiu, T.-J., and Shan, Y.-S. (2015). Blockade of autophagy reduces pancreatic cancer stem cell activity and potentiates the tumoricidal effect of gemcitabine. Mol. Cancer 14 (1), 179. doi:10.1186/s12943-015-0449-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S., Chen, W., Li, W., Song, J., Gao, Y., Li, X., et al. (2021). CD44-targeted pH-responsive micelles for enhanced cellular internalization and intracellular on-demand release of doxorubicin. Artif. Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 49 (1), 173–184. doi:10.1080/21691401.2021.1884085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, W.-H., Woessner, J. F., McNeish, J. D., and Stamenkovic, I. (2002). CD44 anchors the assembly of matrilysin/MMP-7 with heparin-binding epidermal growth factor precursor and ErbB4 and regulates female reproductive organ remodeling. Genes. Dev. 16 (3), 307–323. doi:10.1101/gad.925702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zeng, Y., Wodzenski, D., Gao, D., Shiraishi, T., Terada, N., Li, Y., et al. (2013). Stress-response protein RBM3 attenuates the stem-like properties of prostate cancer cells by interfering with CD44 variant splicing. Cancer Res. 73 (13), 4123–4133. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Brown, R. L., Wei, Y., Zhao, P., Liu, S., Liu, X., et al. (2019). CD44 splice isoform switching determines breast cancer stem cell state. Genes. Dev. 33 (3–4), 166–179. doi:10.1101/gad.319889.118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Chang, B., and Liu, J. (2013). CD44 standard form expression is correlated with high-grade and advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma but not prognosis. Hum. Pathol. 44 (9), 1882–1889. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2013.02.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, S., Chen, C., Chang, K., Karnad, A., Jagirdar, J., Kumar, A. P., et al. (2016). CD44 expression level and isoform contributes to pancreatic cancer cell plasticity, invasiveness, and response to therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 22 (22), 5592–5604. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Tian, C., Meng, Y., Qin, Y. W., Du, Y. H., Du, J., et al. (2012). Osteopontin stimulates autophagy via integrin/CD44 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 227 (1), 127–135. doi:10.1002/jcp.22709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Q., Meng, Y., Li, D., Yao, L., Le, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2024). Ferroptosis in cancer: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 9 (1), 55. doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01769-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, S., Zhang, Q., Sun, X., Zeh, H. J., Lotze, M. T., Kang, R., et al. (2017). HSPA5 regulates ferroptotic cell death in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 77 (8), 2064–2077. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1979

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zuo, J., Zhu, K., Wang, Y., and Yu, Z. (2018). MicroRNA-34a suppresses invasion and metastatic in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating CD44. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 443 (1–2), 139–149. doi:10.1007/s11010-017-3218-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glossary

5-FU 5-fluorouracil

ATG Autophagy-related protein

CD44^kd CD44 knockdown

CD44v2 CD44 variant exon v2

CD44v3 CD44 variant exon v3

CD44v5 CD44 variant exon v5

CD44v6 CD44 variant exon v6

CD44v7 CD44 variant exon v7

CD44v9 CD44 variant exon v9

c-Met Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor

CQ Chloroquine

DSS Disease-specific survival

DUB Deubiquitinating enzyme

ECD Extracellular domain

EGF Endothelial growth factor

ERBB2 Receptor tyrosine-protein kinases 2

FOLFOX Folinic acid, 5-FU and oxaliplatin

GSH Reduced glutathione

HA Hyaluronan

HABD HA-binding domain

HGF Hepatocyte growth factor

HMW High molecular weight

HS Heparan sulfate

ICD Intracellular domain

IHC Immunohistochemistry

ITG Integrin

LC3 Microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3

Mer/NF2 Merlin/neurofibromin-2

MMPs Metalloproteinases

MST1/2 Mammalian STE20-like kinase 1 and 2

mTOR Mammalian target of rapamycin

MUC1 Mucin 1

MUC1-C Mucin 1 C-terminal subunit

NCCD Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death

NLS Nuclear localization signal

NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer

NSE Neuron-specific enolase

OPN Osteopontin

OS Overall survival

OTUB1 Ubiquitin thioesterase/otubain-1

PAAD pancreatic cancer

PAR1b Polarity-regulating serine/threonine kinase

PCD Programmed cell death

PHF8 PHD finger protein 8

PRAD prostate cancer

PSA Prostate antigen

QC Quinacrine

RA Rheumatoid arthritis

RFS Recurrence-free survival

RNA-seq RNA sequencing

ROS Reactive oxygen species

RTKs Receptor tyrosine kinases

SAS Sulfasalazine

SMCs Smooth muscle cells

TCGA The Cancer Genome Atlas

TG2 Transglutaminase 2

TMD Transmembrane domain

TURBT Transurethral resection of bladder tumor

VEGFR-2 Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2

YAP Yes-associated protein