MINI REVIEW article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 17 September 2024

Sec. Molecular and Cellular Pathology

Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1466491

Mast cells: a double-edged sword in inflammation and fibrosis

  • 1. Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Tonifying Kidney and Anti-senescence, Department of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

  • 2. The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China

Abstract

As one of the key components of the immune system, mast cells are well known for their role in allergic reactions. However, they are also involved in inflammatory and fibrotic processes. Mast cells participate in all the stages of acute inflammatory responses, playing an immunomodulatory role in both innate and adaptive immunity. Mast cell-derived histamine, TNF-α, and IL-6 contribute to the inflammatory processes, while IL-10 mediates the suppression of inflammation. Crosstalk between mast cells and other immune cells is also involved in the development of inflammation. The cell–cell adhesion of mast cells and fibroblasts is crucial for fibrosis. Mast cell mediators, including cytokines and proteases, play contradictory roles in the fibrotic process. Here, we review the double-edged role of mast cells in inflammation and fibrosis.

1 Introduction

Mast cells (MCs) are important components of the innate and adaptive immune system (Tikoo et al., 2018). MCs are found in almost all kinds of tissues and organs, especially at sites close to the external environments, such as mucosal membranes, the skin, and perivascular areas, acting as sentinels (Piliponsky and Romani, 2018). The role of MCs has been widely investigated in allergic diseases such as urticaria, asthma, and rhinitis. It has been reported that the mediators released by activated MCs are crucial in allergic diseases (Anastasia et al., 2024). A protective role of mast cells in allergic responses has been reported recently (Thomas et al., 2023; Esther et al., 2023). These studies show the biphasic role of MCs in allergy. Because MCs are also demonstrated to be involved in inflammation and fibrosis (Ribatti et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2023), we will discuss the activating and inhibitory effects of MCs in these processes.

Using single-cell transcriptomics analysis, scientists proved that MCs derived from CD34+ pluripotent progenitor cells reside in the bone marrow (Wu et al., 2022). Mast cell progenitors leave the bone marrow and migrate into peripheral tissue, where they finish the process of maturation (Tahereh et al., 2022). Stem cell factor (SCF), which is the ligand of CD117, plays an important role in almost every stage of MC differentiation (Terhorst-Molawi et al., 2023). Mature MCs express a variety of stimulatory and inhibitory receptors on the cell surface (Daniel et al., 2019). Once activated through stimulatory receptors, MCs might release granules that contain a variety of mediators, including preformed mediators, newly synthesized lipid mediators, cytokines, and chemokines (Petri and Ilze, 2017). Due to the diversity of mediators in different MC subtypes, human mast cells are divided into two major subtypes: mast cells whose granules contain mostly tryptase (MC_T) and mast cells whose granules contain tryptase and chymase (MC_TC) (Baba et al., 2017). However, an intermediate phenotype linked to both MC_T and MC_TC was observed in human airway tissues (Dwyer et al., 2021). Another study identified six mast cell clusters in different human tissues (Tauber et al., 2023). These studies showed the natural diversity and heterogeneity of mast cells.

2 Mast cells in acute inflammatory responses

2.1 Mast cells in innate immunity

MCs are involved in innate inflammatory responses such as bacterial infection, venom damage, and tissue injury (Chompunud Na Ayudhya et al., 2020). MCs express a variety of stimulatory receptors that function in innate immunity (Daniel et al., 2019). Agonists of toll-like receptors and Mas-related G protein-coupled receptors (MRGPR), complement anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, and endogenous peptides are involved in mast cell activation (Cho et al., 2021; Roy et al., 2021; Laumonnier et al., 2023). Unlike the adaptive signals, the innate stimuli lead to the release of small and spherical granules rapidly through the activation of MCs. Those small granules induce local and transient inflammation in innate inflammatory responses (Gaudenzio et al., 2016). Previous studies showed that the activation of MRGPRX2 enhanced the clearance of Staphylococcus aureus from infected mouse skin (Arifuzzaman et al., 2019). MCs were also demonstrated to protect against snake and honeybee toxins by releasing proteases (Yuki et al., 2023). In addition, substance P (SP) could activate Mrgprb2 and mediate thermal hyperalgesia and non-histaminergic itch (Green et al., 2019; Meixiong et al., 2019). These studies revealed the proinflammatory role of MCs in innate immunity.

A series of three successive phases had been described in the acute inflammatory responses (Aller et al., 2004). MCs were shown to be involved in all three stages (Figure 1) (Aller et al., 2019). The first phase of acute inflammation is the nervous phase, which manifests as vascular permeability changes through sensory and motor alterations. The activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axes and sympathetic nervous system was observed in acute tissue injury. In the immediate phase of inflammation, crosstalk of MCs and sensory nerves was crucial (Toyoshima and Okayama, 2022). Activation of the neuroendocrine system induces the release of activating signals, including adenosine, corticotrophin-releasing hormone, and substance P. Those stimuli could activate MCs. Activated MCs then release mediators such as histamine, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and prostacyclin, which increase vascular permeability and smooth muscle contraction. In addition, histamine, tryptase, and nerve growth factors released by MCs could stimulate nerve fibers and amplify the inflammatory courses.

FIGURE 1

In the later phase of inflammation, also called the immune phase, cytokines released by MCs contribute to the recruitment and maturation of other immune cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils. In this stage, MCs mainly play immunoregulatory roles in innate and adaptive immunity. Focusing on innate inflammation, MCs have been shown to contribute to macrophage recruitment and polarization by releasing cytokines such as monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) (Elieh Ali Komi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). MCs can also modulate neutrophils and dendritic cells. In the process of tissue injury, perivascular MCs were demonstrated to induce neutrophil recruitment and activation through the release of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-17a (Jan et al., 2021; Katia et al., 2013; Régis et al., 2022). Moreover, during bacterial infection, MC-derived leukotriene B4 (LTB4) contributed to host defense by mediating early neutrophil influx and bacterial clearance (Van Bruggen et al., 2023). Similarly, MC-derived TNF-α and IL-6 were shown to promote the migration and maturation of dendritic cells (Jan et al., 2015; Dudeck et al., 2019). Furthermore, MC-derived IL-4 mediated dendritic cell activation at the site of inflammation (Friedel et al., 2024). These results show that mast cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells comprise an important barrier of innate immunity.

Finally, in the last phase of acute inflammation, referred to as the endocrine phase, MCs could influence the microenvironment by inducing fibrogenesis and angiogenesis. MC-derived transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, VEGF, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) are involved in this stage (Kyritsi et al., 2021). Those mediators are also essential in chronic inflammation and fibrosis.

2.2 Mast cells in adaptive immunity

MCs are believed to be a critical bridge in the transition from innate to adaptive immunity (Cardamone et al., 2016). MCs express high-affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptors and several low-affinity IgG receptors on the cell surface (Daniel et al., 2019). These receptors allow antibodies to enroll MCs into immune responses in the presence of antigens. The role of MCs has been widely investigated in IgE-induced anaphylaxis (Dispenza et al., 2023). IgE and the high-affinity IgE receptors on MCs were also shown to be crucial for acquired resistance to honeybee venom (Marichal et al., 2013). In addition, the crosstalk between MCs and adaptive immune cells, including B cells and T cells, was essential for adaptive immunity.

MCs have been found to induce the activation and differentiation of B cells both in mouse models and humans (Breitling et al., 2017; Rurik et al., 2021). Direct cell–cell contact was reported between MCs and B cells. The CD40-CD40L interaction play- a key role in MC-mediated B-cell activation (Gwan Ui et al., 2015; Viviana et al., 2020). In addition, MC-derived IL-6 was involved in B cell differentiation and immunoglobulin A (IgA) secretion (Merluzzi et al., 2010; Valeri et al., 2021). Because B-cell-derived IgE could re-activate MCs and result in more mediator release, MC-B-cell interaction might exaggerate the adaptive inflammatory responses.

Human MCs were shown to release chemokines such as chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL)3 and CCL5 to recruit cytotoxic cells, including CD8+T cells, during virus infection (Yana et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2023). MC-derived LTB4 and TNF-α were crucial for the amplifying of CD8+ T cells dominated adaptive immunity (Jan et al., 2015; Bodduluri et al., 2018). MCs were shown to be capable of antigen presentation via major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules to CD8+T cells (R et al., 1996). This crosstalk proved to be important in regulating CD8+T-cell proliferation, cytokine secretion, and cytotoxic activity. MCs were demonstrated to express costimulatory molecules OX40L for T-cell activation in human skin (Marta et al., 2014). Similarly, MCs are involved in the recruitment, activation, and differentiation of CD4+ T cells. Most of the modulating function of MCs on CD4+ T cells depends on the expression of MHC class Ⅱ molecules and OX40L (Sahar et al., 2017). TNF-α and IL-6 are also crucial in establishing synaptic contacts (Nicolas et al., 2013). Interestingly, evidence showed that MCs treated with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)+ could mediate CD4+ T-cell differentiation independently of MHC II and T-cell receptor signaling machinery (Hector et al., 2018).

In addition to the roles of initiator and effector in innate immunity, MCs are also important in the host’s transition from innate to adaptive immunity. The crosstalk between MCs and other immune cells indicated the immunomodulatory ability of MCs. The immunomodulatory ability might be more important than the effector-cell function under given circumstances. Further exploration is needed to understand how to regulate MCs in inflammatory processes.

2.3 Role of mast cells in the suppression of inflammatory responses

MCs were demonstrated to be suppressors of inflammatory responses. The anti-inflammatory role of MCs is partially dependent on the release of IL-10. Using three different types of MC-deficient mice and mice with ablated MC-derived IL-10, researchers showed that MC-derived IL-10 could limit inflammation and tissue pathology in contact hypersensitivity (Reber et al., 2017). In another study using IL-33 for the activation of synovial MCs, researchers found that the production of IL-10 and histamine was elevated, resulting in the suppression of monocyte-mediated disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (Rivellese et al., 2015). MC-derived IL-10 also functions in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). MC-derived IL-10 significantly reduced GVHD by decreasing conventional T-cell proliferation. This immunosuppressive ability was independent of Tregs (Leveson-Gower et al., 2013). In experimental murine myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), MC-derived IL-10 enhanced the immunosuppressive function of Treg and played a protective role in MPO-related inflammation (Gan et al., 2012; Gan et al., 2016).

In addition to IL-10, the immunosuppressive function of MCs also depends on the crosstalk of MCs and regulatory T cells. IL-9 produced by Treg is important in MC recruitment and activation, which then mediate regional immune suppression in tolerant allografts. MC-deficient mice are not capable of establishing long-term allograft tolerance (Li-Fan et al., 2006). In addition, MC-derived IL-2 is involved in suppressing chronic allergic dermatitis by promoting Treg expansion (Keith et al., 2023). MCs are also crucial for the resistance of streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus by promoting Treg-mediated immunological tolerance (Carlos et al., 2015).

Although many studies have discussed the proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory roles of MCs, it is still unclear which signals mediate the immunosuppressive function of MCs. One study showed that the MC stabilizer disodium cromoglycate inhibited MC degranulation without affecting IL-10 production and resulted in the protection of AAV disease activity (Gan et al., 2016). This study suggested that some medications might limit the deleterious function and retain the protective ability of MCs. Perhaps there will be more targeted treatments that regulate the function of MCs in inflammatory processes in the future.

3 Mast cells and fibrosis

3.1 Mast cells in the activation of fibroblasts

The transition of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts was shown to induce excessive deposition of extracellular matrix and then cause fibrosis in different tissues and organs (Younesi et al., 2024). Crosstalk between MCs and fibroblasts has been investigated in recent decades (Figure 2). One study showed that co-culture of dermal fibroblasts with human MC significantly enhanced contraction of the three-dimensional collagen lattices; the addition of antibodies against stem cell factor (SCF) and c-kit resulted in the inhibition of gel contraction. Nevertheless, adding the supernatants of MCs to cultured fibroblasts did not enhance the speed of gel contraction, which indicates the importance of cell–cell contact (Yamamoto et al., 2000). Several studies showed cell adhesion between MCs and fibroblasts (Yaksh et al., 2019; Pincha et al., 2018). Murine MCs adhere to fibroblasts through SCF-KIT interaction (Adachi et al., 1992), while the adhesion of human MCs and fibroblasts depends on the expression of the cell adhesion molecule (CADM)1-kit mechanism (Moiseeva et al., 2013). This cell–cell adhesion is the foundation of contact-dependent cell communication.

FIGURE 2

In addition to the contact-dependent cell communication, mediators released by both cells are crucial in the MC-fibroblast crosstalk. It is believed that fibroblasts triggered MC activation through the production of SCF (Luo et al., 2022). Meanwhile, several MC-derived mediators, such as TGF-β, are involved in activating fibroblasts. TNF-α was shown to be crucial for the MC-fibroblast interaction in myocardial fibrosis (Zhang et al., 2011). MC-derived IL-13/IL-4 is involved in disease progression in myelofibrosis (Melo-Cardenas et al., 2022). MCs could release IL-33, which stimulates fibroblasts and enhances collagen expression (Wulff et al., 2019). MC tryptase was demonstrated to induce lung fibroblast migration via protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) activation (Bagher et al., 2018). In addition, MC tryptase was shown to promote inflammatory bowel disease-induced intestinal fibrosis through the PAR-2/Akt/mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway of fibroblasts (Liu et al., 2021). MC chymase was found to promote fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis through the activation of the TGF-β1/Smads signaling pathway (Chen et al., 2017). Chymase was also shown to be a major source of angiotensin II (Ang II) production (Ahmad and Ferrario, 2018), and Ang II was widely investigated for its pro-fibrosis role in different diseases (Lv et al., 2021).

3.2 Mast cells in the inhibition of fibrosis

An antifibrotic role of MCs was also observed in several studies. One study observed the difference between the unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model in W/Wv mice and the UUO model in the wild type. Higher levels of renal interstitium fibrosis, more infiltrating immune cells, and higher tissue levels of TGF-β1 were observed in MC-deficient mice, which indicated the protective role of MCs in renal fibrosis. A possible explanation of the protective role of MCs was that MC-derived heparin could inhibit TGF-β1 production (Kim et al., 2009; Beghdadi et al., 2013). As mentioned above, MCs could produce anti-inflammatory mediators, including IL-10 and IL-33 (Stephen et al., 2020). IL-10 has been shown to attenuate cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation (Verma et al., 2017). Another study observed that IL-33 impaired fibroblast migration and gel contraction in age-related macular degeneration (Theodoropoulou et al., 2015). Because IL-33 has been reported for its profibrotic role in diseased states, the function of IL-33 in fibrosis might be contradictory. Another MC mediator was proved to be both profibrotic and antifibrotic. MC chymase was shown to protect against renal fibrosis by activating matrix metalloproteinases and degrading interstitial deposits of fibronectin (Beghdadi et al., 2013; MacColl and Khalil, 2015).

3.3 Confounding factors of mast cells in fibrosis

Unlike the role of MCs in the inflammatory process, the role of MCs in fibrosis is more complicated. The anti-inflammatory function of MCs is mostly mediated by IL-10 and crosstalk between MCs and regular T cells. However, in fibrotic processes, both a profibrotic and antifibrotic role can be observed in a specific MC-derived mediator. In addition, results from cell culture and animal models are often contradictory. One explanation is that some of the MC-deficient animal models are not appropriate for the study under the given circumstances. Some reactions have been demonstrated to be induced by the other consequences of the genetic mutation instead of the absence of MCs (ChmelaÅ™ et al., 2016). The different types of stimuli may also be responsible for the paradoxical results. The reactions of MCs are not consistent for acute tissue injury and chronic tissue damage. One study investigated the role of MCs in both the early and late phases in murine models of acute and chronic renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). MCs were found to promote fibrosis in the acute phase of IRI but not in the chronic phase of the disease (Danelli et al., 2017). Moreover, the most widely used MC stabilizers, disodium cromoglycate and ketotifen, can inhibit IgE-mediated MC degranulation but have no impact on mediators independently of degranulation. A high concentration of disodium cromoglycate has an effect beyond its inhibition on MCs (Oka et al., 2012). This makes targeting the antifibrotic effects of MCs more challenging.

4 Conclusion

The heterogeneity and diversity of mediators make the role of MCs contradictory in inflammation and fibrosis. For further research, animal models should be carefully selected to eliminate the effect of MCs. Using two or more MC-deficient animal models, as well as MC-engrafted methods, will be more precise than using one single animal model. In addition, most research animal models are designed for acute injury; perhaps an animal model of chronic damage may reflect the functions of MCs in chronic inflammation and fibrosis more exactly. Moreover, the specificity of MC stabilizers is not satisfactory; targeting a single mediator of MCs will be more important in research and clinical applications.

Statements

Author contributions

XW: conceptualization, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. PZ: data curation, writing–review and editing. YT: writing–review and editing. YC: writing–review and editing. EZ: supervision, validation, writing–review and editing. KG: conceptualization, supervision, validation, writing–original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82104750 AND 82274432).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AdachiS.EbiY.NishikawaS.HayashiS.YamazakiM.KasugaiT.et al (1992). Necessity of extracellular domain of W (C-kit) receptors for attachment of murine cultured mast cells to fibroblasts. Blood79 (3), 650–656. 10.1182/blood.v79.3.650.650

  • 2

    AhmadS.FerrarioC. M. (2018). Chymase inhibitors for the treatment of cardiac diseases: a patent review (2010-2018). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat.28 (11), 755–764. Epub 20181010. 10.1080/13543776.2018.1531848

  • 3

    AllerM. A.AriasA.AriasJ. I.AriasJ. (2019). Carcinogenesis: the cancer cell-mast cell connection. Inflamm. Res.68 (2), 103–116. Epub 20181120. 10.1007/s00011-018-1201-4

  • 4

    AllerM. A.AriasJ. L.NavaM. P.AriasJ. (2004). Posttraumatic inflammation is a complex response based on the pathological expression of the nervous, immune, and endocrine functional systems. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood)229 (2), 170–181. 10.1177/153537020422900206

  • 5

    AnastasiaN. P.MaximS. S.BorisV. C.MariaA. C. (2024). The role played by autophagy in fcεri-dependent activation of mast cells. Cells13 (8), 690. 10.3390/cells13080690

  • 6

    ArifuzzamanM.MobleyY. R.ChoiH. W.BistP.SalinasC. A.BrownZ. D.et al (2019). Mrgpr-mediated activation of local mast cells clears cutaneous bacterial infection and protects against reinfection. Sci. Adv.5 (1), eaav0216. Epub 20190102. 10.1126/sciadv.aav0216

  • 7

    BabaS.KondoK.SuzukawaM.OhtaK.YamasobaT. (2017). Distribution, subtype population, and ige positivity of mast cells in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.119 (2), 120–128. Epub 20170619. 10.1016/j.anai.2017.05.019

  • 8

    BagherM.Larsson-CallerfeltA. K.RosmarkO.HallgrenO.BjermerL.Westergren-ThorssonG. (2018). Mast cells and mast cell tryptase enhance migration of human lung fibroblasts through protease-activated receptor 2. Cell Commun. Signal16 (1), 59. Epub 20180915. 10.1186/s12964-018-0269-3

  • 9

    BeghdadiW.MadjeneL. C.ClaverJ.PejlerG.BeaudoinL.LehuenA.et al (2013). Mast cell chymase protects against renal fibrosis in murine unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int.84 (2), 317–326. Epub 20130320. 10.1038/ki.2013.98

  • 10

    BodduluriS. R.MathisS.MaturuP.KrishnanE.SatpathyS. R.ChiltonP. M.et al (2018). Mast cell-dependent Cd8(+) T-cell recruitment mediates immune surveillance of intestinal tumors in apc(min/+) mice. Cancer Immunol. Res.6 (3), 332–347. Epub 20180130. 10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-17-0424

  • 11

    BreitlingS.HuiZ.ZabiniD.HuY.HoffmannJ.GoldenbergN. M.et al (2017). The mast cell-B cell Axis in lung vascular remodeling and pulmonary hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.312 (5), L710-L721–l21. Epub 20170224. 10.1152/ajplung.00311.2016

  • 12

    CardamoneC.ParenteR.FeoG. D.TriggianiM. (2016). Mast cells as effector cells of innate immunity and regulators of adaptive immunity. Immunol. Lett.178, 10–14. Epub 20160705. 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.07.003

  • 13

    CarlosD.YaochiteJ. N.RochaF. A.TosoV. D.MalmegrimK. C.RamosS. G.et al (2015). Mast cells control insulitis and increase Treg cells to confer protection against stz-induced type 1 diabetes in mice. Eur. J. Immunol.45 (10), 2873–2885. Epub 20150814. 10.1002/eji.201545498

  • 14

    ChenH.XuY.YangG.ZhangQ.HuangX.YuL.et al (2017). Mast cell chymase promotes hypertrophic scar fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis by activating TGF-β1/Smads signaling pathway. Exp. Ther. Med.14 (5), 4438–4442. Epub 20170831. 10.3892/etm.2017.5082

  • 15

    ChenY.GriffithsC. E. M.Bulfone-PausS. (2023). Exploring mast cell-Cd8 T cell interactions in inflammatory skin diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24 (2), 1564. Epub 20230113. 10.3390/ijms24021564

  • 16

    ChmelařJ.ChatzigeorgiouA.ChungK. J.PrucnalM.VoehringerD.RoersA.et al (2016). No role for mast cells in obesity-related metabolic dysregulation. Front. Immunol.7, 524. Epub 20161124. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00524

  • 17

    ChoK. A.ChoiD. W.ParkM.KimY. H.WooS. Y. (2021). Toll-like receptor 7 (Tlr7) mediated transcriptomic changes on human mast cells. Ann. Dermatol33 (5), 402–408. Epub 20210908. 10.5021/ad.2021.33.5.402

  • 18

    Chompunud Na AyudhyaC.RoyS.ThapaliyaM.AliH. (2020). Roles of a mast cell-specific receptor Mrgprx2 in host defense and inflammation. J. Dent. Res.99 (8), 882–890. Epub 20200511. 10.1177/0022034520919107

  • 19

    DanelliL.MadjeneL. C.Madera-SalcedoI.GautierG.PacreauE.BenM. S.et al (2017). Early phase mast cell activation determines the chronic outcome of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Immunol.198 (6), 2374–2382. Epub 20170206. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601282

  • 20

    DanielE. A. K.StefanW.LeonardB. (2019). Mast cell biology at molecular level: a comprehensive review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.58 (3), 342–365. 10.1007/s12016-019-08769-2

  • 21

    DispenzaM. C.MetcalfeD. D.OliveraA. (2023). Research advances in mast cell biology and their translation into novel therapies for anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract.11 (7), 2032–2042. Epub 20230321. 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.015

  • 22

    DudeckJ.FroebelJ.KotrbaJ.LehmannC. H. K.DudziakD.SpeierS.et al (2019). Engulfment of mast cell secretory granules on skin inflammation boosts dendritic cell migration and priming efficiency. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.143 (5), 1849–1864. Epub 20181017. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.052

  • 23

    DwyerD. F.Ordovas-MontanesJ.AllonS. J.BuchheitK. M.VukovicM.DerakhshanT.et al (2021). Human airway mast cells proliferate and acquire distinct inflammation-driven phenotypes during type 2 inflammation. Sci. Immunol.6 (56), eabb7221. 10.1126/sciimmunol.abb7221

  • 24

    Elieh Ali KomiD.ShafaghatF.ChristianM. (2020). Crosstalk between mast cells and adipocytes in physiologic and pathologic conditions. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.58 (3), 388–400. 10.1007/s12016-020-08785-7

  • 25

    EstherB. F.NathanielD. B.JaimeL. C.BrunaG. C. L.MahdiehG.FernandoC.et al (2023). Immune sensing of food allergens promotes avoidance behaviour. Nature620 (7974), 643–650. 10.1038/s41586-023-06362-4

  • 26

    FriedelJ.PierreS.KolbingerA.SchäufeleT. J.AlirajB.WeigertA.et al (2024). Mast cell-derived interleukin-4 mediates activation of dendritic cell during toll-like receptor 2-mediated inflammation. Front. Immunol.15, 1353922. Epub 20240430. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1353922

  • 27

    GanP. Y.O'SullivanK. M.OoiJ. D.AlikhanM. A.OdobasicD.SummersS. A.et al (2016). Mast cell stabilization ameliorates autoimmune anti-myeloperoxidase glomerulonephritis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.27 (5), 1321–1333. Epub 20150915. 10.1681/asn.2014090906

  • 28

    GanP. Y.SummersS. A.OoiJ. D.O'SullivanK. M.TanD. S.MuljadiR. C.et al (2012). Mast cells contribute to peripheral tolerance and attenuate autoimmune vasculitis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.23 (12), 1955–1966. Epub 20121108. 10.1681/asn.2012060572

  • 29

    GaudenzioN.SibilanoR.MarichalT.StarklP.ReberL. L.CenacN.et al (2016). Different activation signals induce distinct mast cell degranulation strategies. J. Clin. Invest126 (10), 3981–3998. Epub 20160919. 10.1172/jci85538

  • 30

    GreenD. P.LimjunyawongN.GourN.PundirP.DongX. (2019). A mast-cell-specific receptor mediates neurogenic inflammation and pain. Neuron101 (3), 412–420. Epub 20190124. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.012

  • 31

    GuoX.SunM.YangP.MengX.LiuR. (2023). Role of mast cells activation in the tumor immune microenvironment and immunotherapy of cancers. Eur. J. Pharmacol.960, 176103. Epub 20231016. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176103

  • 32

    Gwan UiH.Ji YeunL.Nam GooK.Joo-HoS.Jai YoulR. (2015). Ige and iga produced by ox40-ox40l or Cd40-Cd40l interaction in B cells-mast cells Re-activate fcεri or fcαri on mast cells in mouse allergic asthma. Eur. J. Pharmacol.754 (0), 199–210. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.02.023

  • 33

    HectorR. C. B.TimmH.HirofumiU.VirginiaC.KoichiroM.YeqiN.et al (2018). Mast cells regulate Cd4(+) T-cell differentiation in the absence of antigen presentation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.142 (6), 1894–1908.e7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.038

  • 34

    JanD.JohannaK.RolandI.AaronH.MartinV.Vasileia IsminiA.et al (2021). Directional mast cell degranulation of tumor necrosis factor into blood vessels primes neutrophil extravasation. Immunity54 (3), 468–483.e5. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.12.017

  • 35

    JanD.ShanawazM. G.ChristianH. K. L.AnjaH.NadjaS.SergeiA. N.et al (2015). Mast-cell-derived tnf amplifies Cd8(+) dendritic cell functionality and Cd8(+) T cell priming. Cell Rep.13 (2), 399–411. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.078

  • 36

    KatiaD. F.AnneD.MikeH.EmmaN.NicovR.KarinH.et al (2013). Mast cell and macrophage chemokines cxcl1/cxcl2 control the early stage of neutrophil recruitment during tissue inflammation. Blood121 (24), 4930–4937. 10.1182/blood-2013-02-486217

  • 37

    KeithY. H.EgawaG.HondaT.KabashimaK. (2023). Mast cells in type 2 skin inflammation: maintenance and function. Eur. J. Immunol.53 (8), e2250359. Epub 20230407. 10.1002/eji.202250359

  • 38

    KimD.MoonS.JungY.LeeA.KangK.LeeT.et al (2009). Mast cells decrease renal fibrosis in unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int.75 (10), 1031–1038. 10.1038/ki.2009.1

  • 39

    KyritsiK.KennedyL.MeadowsV.HargroveL.DemievilleJ.PhamL.et al (2021). Mast cells induce ductular reaction mimicking liver injury in mice through mast cell-derived transforming growth factor beta 1 signaling. Hepatology73 (6), 2397–2410. Epub 20210419. 10.1002/hep.31497

  • 40

    LaumonnierY.KorkmazR.NowackaA. A.KöhlJ. (2023). Complement-mediated immune mechanisms in allergy. Eur. J. Immunol.53 (10), e2249979. Epub 20230709. 10.1002/eji.202249979

  • 41

    Leveson-GowerD. B.SegaE. I.KalesnikoffJ.FlorekM.PanY.PieriniA.et al (2013). Mast cells suppress murine gvhd in a mechanism independent of Cd4+Cd25+ regulatory T cells. Blood122 (22), 3659–3665. Epub 20130912. 10.1182/blood-2013-08-519157

  • 42

    Li-FanL.EvanF. L.DavidC. G.KathyA. B.MichaelW. G.KarinaP.-L.et al (2006). Mast cells are essential intermediaries in regulatory T-cell tolerance. Nature442 (7106), 997–1002. 10.1038/nature05010

  • 43

    LiuB.YangM. Q.YuT. Y.YinY. Y.LiuY.WangX. D.et al (2021). Mast cell tryptase promotes inflammatory bowel disease-induced intestinal fibrosis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.27 (2), 242–255. 10.1093/ibd/izaa125

  • 44

    LuoY.ZhangH.YuJ.WeiL.LiM.XuW. (2022). Stem cell factor/mast cell/ccl2/monocyte/macrophage Axis promotes coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis and cardiac fibrosis by increasing ly6c(high) monocyte influx and fibrogenic mediators production. Immunology167 (4), 590–605. Epub 20220823. 10.1111/imm.13556

  • 45

    LvS. L.ZengZ. F.GanW. Q.WangW. Q.LiT. G.HouY. F.et al (2021). Lp-Pla2 inhibition prevents Ang ii-induced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis by blocking macrophage Nlrp3 inflammasome activation. Acta Pharmacol. Sin.42 (12), 2016–2032. Epub 20210705. 10.1038/s41401-021-00703-7

  • 46

    MacCollE.KhalilR. A. (2015). Matrix metalloproteinases as regulators of vein structure and function: implications in chronic venous disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.355 (3), 410–428. Epub 20150828. 10.1124/jpet.115.227330

  • 47

    MarichalT.StarklP.ReberL. L.KalesnikoffJ.OettgenH. C.TsaiM.et al (2013). A beneficial role for immunoglobulin E in host defense against honeybee venom. Immunity39 (5), 963–975. Epub 20131024. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.005

  • 48

    MartaB.FedericaZ.AlfredoR.PatrickK.VladimirE. E.AmosG.et al (2014). Abnormal interactions between perifollicular mast cells and Cd8+ T-cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of alopecia areata. PLoS One9 (5), e94260. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094260

  • 49

    MeixiongJ.AndersonM.LimjunyawongN.SabbaghM. F.HuE.MackM. R.et al (2019). Activation of mast-cell-expressed mas-related G-protein-coupled receptors drives non-histaminergic itch. Immunity50 (5), 1163–1171. Epub 20190423. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.013

  • 50

    Melo-CardenasJ.BezavadaL.CrawfordJ. C.GurbuxaniS.CottonA.KangG.et al (2022). Il-13/Il-4 signaling contributes to fibrotic progression of the myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood140 (26), 2805–2817. 10.1182/blood.2022017326

  • 51

    MerluzziS.FrossiB.GriG.ParussoS.TripodoC.PucilloC. (2010). Mast cells enhance proliferation of B lymphocytes and drive their differentiation toward iga-secreting plasma cells. Blood115 (14), 2810–2817. Epub 20100125. 10.1182/blood-2009-10-250126

  • 52

    MoiseevaE. P.RoachK. M.LeylandM. L.BraddingP. (2013). Cadm1 is a key receptor mediating human mast cell adhesion to human lung fibroblasts and airway smooth muscle cells. PLoS One8 (4), e61579. Epub 20130419. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061579

  • 53

    NicolasG.CamilleL.SalvatoreV.EricE. (2013). Human mast cells drive memory Cd4+ T cells toward an inflammatory il-22+ phenotype. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.131 (5), 1400–1407. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.029

  • 54

    OkaT.KalesnikoffJ.StarklP.TsaiM.GalliS. J. (2012). Evidence questioning cromolyn's effectiveness and selectivity as a 'mast cell stabilizer' in mice. Lab. Invest92 (10), 1472–1482. Epub 20120820. 10.1038/labinvest.2012.116

  • 55

    PetriT. K.IlzeB. (2017). Mast cells in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease - activators and actions. Eur. J. Pharmacol.816 (0), 37–46. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.10.013

  • 56

    PiliponskyA.RomaniL. (2018). The contribution of mast cells to bacterial and fungal infection immunity. Immunol. Rev.282 (1), 188–197. 10.1111/imr.12623

  • 57

    PinchaN.HajamE. Y.BadarinathK.BattaS. P. R.MasudiT.DeyR.et al (2018). Pai1 mediates fibroblast-mast cell interactions in skin fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest128 (5), 1807–1819. Epub 20180326. 10.1172/jci99088

  • 58

    ReberL. L.SibilanoR.StarklP.RoersA.GrimbaldestonM. A.TsaiM.et al (2017). Imaging protective mast cells in living mice during severe contact hypersensitivity. JCI Insight2 (9), e92900. Epub 20170504. 10.1172/jci.insight.92900

  • 59

    RégisJ.Idaira MaríaG.-F.TamaraG.JonathonA. C.MonjaS.LauraV.-M.et al (2022). Neutrophil breaching of the blood vessel pericyte layer during diapedesis Requires mast cell-derived il-17a. Nat. Commun.13 (1), 7029. 10.1038/s41467-022-34695-7

  • 60

    RibattiD.TammaR.AnneseT. (2020). Mast cells and angiogenesis in multiple sclerosis. Inflamm. Res.69 (11), 1103–1110. Epub 20200817. 10.1007/s00011-020-01394-2

  • 61

    RivelleseF.SuurmondJ.HabetsK.DorjéeA. L.RamamoorthiN.TownsendM. J.et al (2015). Ability of interleukin-33- and immune complex-triggered activation of human mast cells to down-regulate monocyte-mediated immune responses. Arthritis Rheumatol.67 (9), 2343–2353. 10.1002/art.39192

  • 62

    RM.NJ. T.EA. R.SN. A.JD. P. (1996). Mast cells process bacterial ags through a phagocytic route for class I mhc presentation to T cells. J. Immunol.156 (4), 1490–1496. 10.4049/jimmunol.156.4.1490

  • 63

    RoyS.Chompunud Na AyudhyaC.ThapaliyaM.DeepakV.AliH. (2021). Multifaceted Mrgprx2: new insight into the role of mast cells in health and disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.148 (2), 293–308. Epub 20210504. 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.049

  • 64

    RurikJ. G.AghajanianH.EpsteinJ. A. (2021). Immune cells and immunotherapy for cardiac injury and repair. Circ. Res.128 (11), 1766–1779. Epub 20210527. 10.1161/circresaha.121.318005

  • 65

    SaharL.-E.BrantR. W.QuangT. L.AndreaL. P.MasoudH. M.JudithA. W.et al (2017). Human mast cells present antigen to autologous Cd4(+) T cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.141 (1). 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.048

  • 66

    StephenJ. G.NicolasG.MindyT. (2020). Mast cells in inflammation and disease: recent progress and ongoing concerns. Annu. Rev. Immunol.38 (0), 49–77. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-071719-094903

  • 67

    TaherehD.JoshuaA. B.DanielF. D. (2022). Defining mast cell differentiation and heterogeneity through single-cell transcriptomics analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.150 (4), 739–747. 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.011

  • 68

    TauberM.BassoL.MartinJ.BostanL.PintoM. M.ThierryG. R.et al (2023). Landscape of mast cell populations across organs in mice and humans. J. Exp. Med.220 (10), e20230570. Epub 20230718. 10.1084/jem.20230570

  • 69

    Terhorst-MolawiD.HawroT.GrekowitzE.KieferL.MerchantK.AlvaradoD.et al (2023). Anti-kit antibody, barzolvolimab, reduces skin mast cells and disease activity in chronic inducible urticaria. Allergy78 (5), 1269–1279. Epub 20221203. 10.1111/all.15585

  • 70

    TheodoropoulouS.CoplandD. A.LiuJ.DickA. D. (2015). Role of interleukin 33/st2 Axis in the immune-mediated pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Lancet385 (Suppl. 1), S97. 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60412-3

  • 71

    ThomasP.RebeccaB.RobinT.FuweiS.DanielP.CandiceF.et al (2023). Mast cells link immune sensing to antigen-Avoidance behaviour. Nature620 (7974), 634–642. 10.1038/s41586-023-06188-0

  • 72

    TikooS.BarkiN.JainR.ZulkhernainN. S.BuhnerS.SchemannM.et al (2018). Imaging of mast cells. Immunol. Rev.282 (1), 58–72. Epub 2018/02/13. 10.1111/imr.12631

  • 73

    ToyoshimaS.OkayamaY. (2022). Neuro-allergology: mast cell-nerve cross-talk. Allergol. Int.71 (3), 288–293. Epub 20220607. 10.1016/j.alit.2022.04.002

  • 74

    ValeriV.TononS.VibhushanS.GulinoA.BelmonteB.AdoriM.et al (2021). Mast cells crosstalk with B cells in the gut and sustain iga response in the inflamed intestine. Eur. J. Immunol.51 (2), 445–458. Epub 20201014. 10.1002/eji.202048668

  • 75

    Van BruggenS.JarrotP. A.ThomasE.SheehyC. E.SilvaC. M. S.HsuA. Y.et al (2023). Nlrp3 is essential for neutrophil polarization and chemotaxis in response to leukotriene B4 gradient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.120 (35), e2303814120. Epub 20230821. 10.1073/pnas.2303814120

  • 76

    VermaS. K.GarikipatiV. N. S.KrishnamurthyP.SchumacherS. M.GrisantiL. A.CiminiM.et al (2017). Interleukin-10 inhibits bone marrow fibroblast progenitor cell-mediated cardiac fibrosis in pressure-overloaded myocardium. Circulation136 (10), 940–953. Epub 20170630. 10.1161/circulationaha.117.027889

  • 77

    VivianaV.SilviaT.ShamilaV.AlessandroG.BeatriceB.MonikaA.et al (2020). Mast cells crosstalk with B cells in the gut and sustain iga response in the inflamed intestine. Eur. J. Immunol.51 (2), 445–458. 10.1002/eji.202048668

  • 78

    WuC.BoeyD.BrilO.GrootensJ.VijayabaskarM. S.SoriniC.et al (2022). Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the identity and regulators of human mast cell progenitors. Blood Adv.6 (15), 4439–4449. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022006969

  • 79

    WulffB. C.PappaN. K.WilgusT. A. (2019). Interleukin-33 encourages scar formation in murine fetal skin wounds. Wound Repair Regen.27 (1), 19–28. Epub 20181123. 10.1111/wrr.12687

  • 80

    YakshT. L.EddingerK. A.KokubuS.WangZ.DiNardoA.RamachandranR.et al (2019). Mast cell degranulation and fibroblast activation in the morphine-induced spinal mass: role of mas-related G protein-coupled receptor signaling. Anesthesiology131 (1), 132–147. 10.1097/aln.0000000000002730

  • 81

    YamamotoT.HartmannK.EckesB.KriegT. (2000). Mast cells enhance contraction of three-dimensional collagen lattices by fibroblasts by cell-cell interaction: role of stem cell factor/C-kit. Immunology99 (3), 435–439. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00973.x

  • 82

    YanaH.FrankS.MaxL.MarcusM.MelbaM. (2021). Mast cells modulate antigen-specific Cd8(+) T cell activation during lcmv infection. Front. Immunol.12 (0), 688347. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.688347

  • 83

    YounesiF. S.MillerA. E.BarkerT. H.RossiF. M. V.HinzB. (2024). Fibroblast and myofibroblast activation in normal tissue repair and fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.25 (8), 617–638. Epub 20240408. 10.1038/s41580-024-00716-0

  • 84

    YukiF.TatsuroN.TokoM.AkaneH.KosukeA.TakahisaM. (2023). Mast cell-derived prostaglandin D(2) limits the subcutaneous absorption of honey bee venom in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.120 (22), e2300284120. 10.1073/pnas.2300284120

  • 85

    ZhangW.ChanceyA. L.TzengH. P.ZhouZ.LavineK. J.GaoF.et al (2011). The development of myocardial fibrosis in transgenic mice with targeted overexpression of tumor necrosis factor requires mast cell-fibroblast interactions. Circulation124 (19), 2106–2116. Epub 20111024. 10.1161/circulationaha.111.052399

  • 86

    ZhangX.LiJ.LuoS.WangM.HuangQ.DengZ.et al (2020). Ige contributes to atherosclerosis and obesity by affecting macrophage polarization, macrophage protein network, and foam cell formation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.40 (3), 597–610. Epub 20200130. 10.1161/atvbaha.119.313744

Summary

Keywords

mast cell, inflammation, fibrosis, fibroblast, innate immunity, adaptive immunity

Citation

Wang X, Zhang P, Tang Y, Chen Y, Zhou E and Gao K (2024) Mast cells: a double-edged sword in inflammation and fibrosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:1466491. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1466491

Received

19 July 2024

Accepted

26 August 2024

Published

17 September 2024

Volume

12 - 2024

Edited by

Katarzyna Nazimek, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Poland

Reviewed by

Gregorio Gomez, University of Houston, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Kun Gao,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics