ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 04 September 2024

Sec. Molecular and Cellular Pathology

Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1461547

First-trimester predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes—a base for implementation of strategies to prevent cardiovascular disease development

  • 1. Department of Molecular Biology and Cell Pathology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia

  • 2. Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia

Abstract

Introduction:

This study aimed to establish efficient, cost-effective, and early predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes based on the combinations of a minimum number of miRNA biomarkers, whose altered expression was observed in specific pregnancy-related complications and selected maternal clinical characteristics.

Methods:

This retrospective study included singleton pregnancies with gestational hypertension (GH, n = 83), preeclampsia (PE, n = 66), HELLP syndrome (n = 14), fetal growth restriction (FGR, n = 82), small for gestational age (SGA, n = 37), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, n = 121), preterm birth in the absence of other complications (n = 106), late miscarriage (n = 34), stillbirth (n = 24), and 80 normal term pregnancies. MiRNA gene expression profiling was performed on the whole peripheral venous blood samples collected between 10 and 13 weeks of gestation using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Results:

Most pregnancies with adverse outcomes were identified using the proposed approach (the combinations of selected miRNAs and appropriate maternal clinical characteristics) (GH, 69.88%; PE, 83.33%; HELLP, 92.86%; FGR, 73.17%; SGA, 81.08%; GDM on therapy, 89.47%; and late miscarriage, 84.85%). In the case of stillbirth, no addition of maternal clinical characteristics to the predictive model was necessary because a high detection rate was achieved by a combination of miRNA biomarkers only [91.67% cases at 10.0% false positive rate (FPR)].

Conclusion:

The proposed models based on the combinations of selected cardiovascular disease-associated miRNAs and maternal clinical variables have a high predictive potential for identifying women at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes; this can be incorporated into routine first-trimester screening programs. Preventive programs can be initiated based on these models to lower cardiovascular risk and prevent the development of metabolic/cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases because timely implementation of beneficial lifestyle strategies may reverse the dysregulation of miRNAs maintaining and controlling the cardiovascular system.

1 Introduction

MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs (18–25 nucleotides) that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level (Lai, 2002; Bartel, 2004). Increased miRNA expression results in the degradation of mRNAs or blockage of translation of potential target genes. Conversely, upregulation of potential target genes results from decreased miRNA levels. An altered miRNA expression profile usually contributes to the pathophysiology of the disease and may be used for the diagnosis and/or the assessment of prognosis of the disease (Piletič and Kunej, 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Condrat et al., 2020).

Recently, we observed an altered expression profile of miRNAs that play a role in homeostasis and maintenance of the cardiovascular system and the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in women at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (Hromadnikova et al., 2022d; Hromadnikova et al., 2023a). Initially, we proposed early predictive models for gestational hypertension (GH) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022a), preeclampsia (PE) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022a), HELLP syndrome (Hromadnikova et al., 2023a), fetal growth restriction (FGR) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022b), small for gestational age (SGA) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022b), preterm delivery in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications (Hromadnikova et al., 2022c), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022d), miscarriage or stillbirth (Hromadnikova et al., 2023c) based only on miRNA biomarkers.

Afterwards, we identified multiple independent risk factors predisposing to the development of pregnancy-related complications such as maternal age and body mass index (BMI) at early stages of gestation, nulliparity, confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune disease, infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technology, presence of chronic hypertension, presence of thrombophilia gene mutations, history of pregnancy-related complications (PE, HELLP, SGA, FGR, and preterm birth) in previous pregnancy (ies), history of miscarriage (before 20 gestational weeks), and occurrence of diabetes mellitus in first-degree relatives (Hromadnikova et al., 2024; Hromadnikova et al., 2023a; Hromadnikova et al., 2023b; Hromadnikova et al., 2022e; Hromadnikova et al., 2022d; Hromadnikova et al., 2023c).

Subsequently, we involved these maternal clinical characteristics in miRNA-based predictive models, which increased the detection rate of pregnancies at high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (Hromadnikova et al., 2024; Hromadnikova et al., 2023a; Hromadnikova et al., 2023b; Hromadnikova et al., 2022e; Hromadnikova et al., 2022d; Hromadnikova et al., 2023c). In addition, we added first-trimester screening for PE and/or FGR and spontaneous preterm birth, both determined using the FMF algorithm (Tan et al., 2018), to the predictive models for GH, PE, HELLP syndrome, FGR, SGA, and GDM, as these two independent variables slightly increased the detection rates.

Currently, we focused on the development of efficient, cost-effective, early predictive models for identifying adverse pregnancy outcomes based on a selection of six miRNAs (miR-181a-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-574-3p, miR-1-3p, and miR-16-5p), whose altered expression was a common phenomenon shared between multiple pregnancy-related complications (Table 1). These miRNAs were combined with maternal clinical characteristics previously identified as the risk factors for a complicated gestational course (Table 2).

TABLE 1

GHPEHELLPFGRSGAPretem delivery (PPROM or PTB) No other complicationsGDM on therapyPregnancy loss
Late miscarriageStillbirth
miR-181a-5p+++++++
miR-20a-5p+++++
miR-146a-5p+++++++
miR-574-3p+++
miR-1-3p++++
miR-16-5p++++

MiRNA altered expression profile during early gestational stages - common sign of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

GH, gestational hypertension; PE, preeclampsia; FGR, fetal growth restriction; SGA, small for gestational age; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PPROM, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes; PTB, spontaneous preterm birth; HELLP, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome.

TABLE 2

Variables involved in prediction modelsGHPEHELLPFGRSGAPreterm deliveryaGDMLate miscarriage
Maternal age at early gestational stages+++++++++
BMI at early gestational stages+++++++++
Nulliparity+++
Confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune disease++++++
Chronic hypertension in anamnesis+
Family history of diabetes mellitus (first-degree relatives only)+
Current pregnancy conceived after ART techniques (IVF/ICSI/other)+++++++++
Trombophilia gene mutations+++
History of miscarriage (spontaneous loss of pregnancy before 20 weeks of gestation)++
History of HELLP and/or PE++
History of SGA or FGR+
History of preterm birth+
Presence of non-autoimmune hypothyroidism+
Presence of uterine fibroids or abnormal shaped womb+
Predictive Model I-Number of Variables56673538
Screen-positive for PE and/or FGR by FMF algorithm++++++++
Screen-positive for preterm birth by FMF algorithm++NAb+++NAc
Predictive Model II-Number of Variables (Model I + FMF screening results)78795779

Maternal clinical characteristics representing risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes involved in first-trimester predictive models.

GH, gestational hypertension; PE, preeclampsia; HELLP, haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome; FGR, fetal growth restriction; SGA, small-for-gestational-age; PTB, spontaneous preterm birth; PPROM, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; ART, assisted reproductive technology; IVF, in vitro fertilization; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; FMF, Fetal Medicine Foundation. Bold values highlight the final number of variables used in Predictive Model I and Predictive Model II.

a

PPROM, or PTB, with no other complications; NA, not analysed in model.

b

low number of patients with appropriate data.

c

no occurrence of preterm birth in this group of pregnancies; ++, maternal clinical variables used in prediction model I for GDM.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Patients cohort

This study included pregnancies diagnosed with gestational hypertension (n = 83), preeclampsia (n = 66), HELLP syndrome (n = 14), fetal growth restriction (n = 82), small for gestational age (n = 37), preterm birth [spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM)] in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications (n = 106), gestational diabetes mellitus requiring administration of appropriate therapy (n = 20), late miscarriage (n = 34), and stillbirth (n = 24) together with reference group (normal term pregnancies, n = 80).

2.1.1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The selection of maternal-age-matched, and gestational-age-matched at sampling (weeks) normal term pregnancies ensured the homogeneity and comparability between the studied groups.

Pilot and validation studies were performed. Sample size calculation was used to calculate the minimal required sample size of subjects for analyses.

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments. All the included patients provided informed consent for participation in the study. The Ethics Committee of the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, granted initial approval for this study (Implication of placental-specific miRNAs in maternal circulation for diagnosis and prediction of pregnancy-related complications, date of approval: 7 April 2011). Ongoing approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University (Long-term monitoring of complex cardiovascular profiles in mother, fetus, and offspring descending from pregnancy-related complications, date of approval: 27 March 2014) and the Ethics Committee of the Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Charles University (Long-term monitoring of complex cardiovascular profiles in mother, fetus, and offspring descending from pregnancy-related complications, date of approval: 28 May 2015, number of approval: 1/4/2015). Informed consent is a complex process as it involves attaining consent for collecting peripheral blood samples at the beginning of pregnancy. In addition, it also includes gaining consent for collecting peripheral blood samples at the onset of pregnancy-related complications and collecting placental samples during childbirth in case of the onset of pregnancy-related complications.

2.2 Collection and processing of samples

Collection and processing of samples, reverse transcription (RT), and real-time PCR analyses were performed as previously described (Hromadnikova et al., 2022a; Hromadnikova et al., 2022b; Hromadnikova et al., 2022c; Hromadnikova et al., 2022d; Hromadnikova et al., 2022e; Hromadnikova et al., 2023a; Hromadnikova et al., 2023b; Hromadnikova et al., 2023c; Hromadnikova et al., 2024).

Briefly, total RNA enriched for small RNAs was isolated from whole peripheral venous blood (EDTA) using a mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, United States of America). mRNAs of miRNAs of interest were reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using miRNA-specific stem loop primers and TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, United States of America). Reverse transcription was performed in a total reaction volume of 10 µL.

Subsequently, 3 µL of cDNA was mixed in a total reaction volume of 15 µL with specific primers, TaqMan MGB probes (the components of TaqMan MicroRNA Assays), and the components of the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, United States of America). Real-time RT-qPCR was performed on a 7,500 Real-Time PCR System under standard TaqMan PCR conditions described in the TaqMan guidelines. The miRNA gene expression was determined using the comparative Ct method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). The normalization factor (Vandesompele et al., 2002) (geometric mean of Ct values of selected endogenous controls: RNU58A and RNU38B) was used to normalize the miRNA gene expression data.

2.3 Criteria for the MiRNA selection

In total, 29 miRNAs were screened at early stages of gestation in pregnancies at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The set involved the following miRNAs: miR-1-3p, miR-16-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-92a-3p, miR-100-5p, miR-103a-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-130b-3p, miR-133a-3p, miR-143-3p, miR-145-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-210-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-342-3p, miR-499a-5p, and miR-574-3p. Only the most frequently dysregulated miRNAs (miR-181a-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-574-3p, miR-1-3p, and miR-16-5p) were selected for the cost-effective early predictive models for adverse obstetric outcomes (Table 1; Table 3). Other miRNAs showed either no altered expression or were dysregulated in no more than two pregnancy-related complications.

TABLE 3

Assay name (the manufacturer)Assay ID (the manufacturer)miRBase IDNCBI Location ChromosomeMature miRNA sequence
hsa-miR-1002222hsa-miR-1-3pChr20: 62554306–62554376 [+]5′-UGG​AAU​GUA​AAG​AAG​UAU​GUA​U-3′
hsa-miR-16000391hsa-miR-16-5pChr13: 50048973–50049061 [-]5′-UAG​CAG​CAC​GUA​AAU​AUU​GGC​G- 3′
hsa-miR-20a000580hsa-miR-20a-5pChr13: 91351065–91351135 [+]5′-UAA​AGU​GCU​UAU​AGU​GCA​GGU​AG-3′
hsa-miR-146a000468hsa-miR-146a-5pChr5: 160485352–160485450 [+]5′-UGA​GAA​CUG​AAU​UCC​AUG​GGU​U-3′
hsa-miR-181a000480hsa-miR-181a-5pChr1: 198859044–198859153 [-]5′-AAC​AUU​CAA​CGC​UGU​CGG​UGA​GU-3′
hsa-miR-574-3p002349hsa-miR-574-3pChr4: 38868032–38868127 [+]5′-CAC​GCU​CAU​GCA​CAC​ACC​CAC​A-3′

Characteristics of selected MiRNAs.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes were constructed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). ROC curves displayed the areas under the curves (AUC), the cut-off points associated with sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-), and sensitivities at 10.0% false positive rate (FPR) (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Initially, all independent variables (selected miRNAs and maternal clinical characteristics) and dependent variables (diagnoses, for example preeclampsia – 1, normal term pregnancies - 0) were entered into the logistic regression models for particular pregnancy-related complications. Subsequent ROC curve analyses were applied (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium), where the predictive probabilities gained from logistic regression analyses were saved and next used as the new variables and the diagnoses (for example preeclampsia – 1, normal term pregnancies - 0) acted as the classification variables in ROC curve analyses.

2.5 Analysis of MiRNA-target interactions

The miRWalk database (http://mirwalk.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/) and disease ontology module (http://mirwalk.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/diseases/) were used to provide information on the predicted and/or validated targets of miRNAs. Pregnancy-related complications, such as preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, placental insufficiency, and GDM were available in the miRWalk database. The only common targets associated with pregnancy-related complications, cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, hypertension, atherosclerosis, prediabetes syndrome, and diabetes mellitus), and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, systolic and diastolic heart failure, and heart, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular diseases as a whole) were reported.

3 Results

3.1 The cost-effective first-trimester predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes

The cost-effective first-trimester predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes were based on the combinations of a minimum number of miRNA biomarkers with jointly altered expression during the early gestational stages. In addition, maternal clinical characteristics identified as the risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes were added into the predictive models.

Several miRNAs of the six joint miRNAs were dysregulated at the early gestational stages in pregnancies with various adverse pregnancy outcomes (GH: 1 miRNA; PE: 4 miRNAs; HELLP syndrome: 3 miRNAs; FGR: 5 miRNAs; SGA: 4 miRNAs; GDM on therapy: 1 miRNA; late miscarriage: 4 miRNAs; stillbirth: six miRNAs; and preterm delivery in the absence of the above-mentioned pregnancy-related complications: two miRNAs).

The combinations of these miRNAs correctly predicted the occurrence of various adverse pregnancy outcomes in a portion of cases at 10.0% FPR (GH: 22.89% cases; PE: 48.48% cases; HELLP syndrome: 57.14% cases; FGR: 37.80% cases; SGA: 75.68% cases; GDM on therapy: 20.0% cases; late miscarriage: 52.94% cases; stillbirth: 91.67% cases; and preterm delivery in the absence of the above-mentioned pregnancy-related complications: 27.36% cases) (Table 4).

TABLE 4

AUC95% CIp- valueSensitivityCriterionYouden index JYouden index associated CriterionSensitivity95%CISpecificity95%CI+LR95%CI-LR95%CI
(At 10% FPR)
Predictive Model for GH (Hromadnikova et al. 2024)
1 miRNA only (miR-181a-5p)0.6490.570–0.722<0.00122.89%>0.52160.2645>0.261861.45%50.1–71.965.00%53.5–75.31.761.2–2.50.590.4–0.8
1 miRNA +5 maternal clinical characteristics0.8580.794–0.907<0.00162.65%>0.63990.5577>0.431479.52%69.2–87.676.25%65.4–85.13.352.2–5.00.270.2–0.4
1 miRNA +7 maternal clinical characteristics0.8940.837–0.937<0.00169.88%>0.56920.6627>0.695566.27%55.1–76.3100.0%95.5–100.0--0.340.2–0.5
Predictive Model for PE
4 miRNAs only (miR-181a-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-574-3p)0.7150.634–0.786<0.00148.48%>0.54440.3973>0.550448.48%36.0–61.191.25%82.8–96.45.542.6–11.70.560.4–0.7
4 miRNAs +6 maternal clinical characteristics0.9020.842–0.945<0.00178.79%>0.45620.7004>0.465778.79%67.0–87.991.25%82.8–96.49.004.4–18.50.230.1–0.4
4 miRNAs +8 maternal clinical characteristics0.9340.880–0.968<0.00183.33%>0.37070.7905>0.533180.30%68.7–89.198.75%93.2–100.064.249.1–452.20.200.1–0.3
Predictive Model for HELLP
3 miRNAs only (miR-181a-5p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-1-3p)0.8950.814–0.949<0.00157.14%>0.18620.6446>0.116185.71%57.2–98.278.75%68.2–87.14.032.5–6.50.180.05–0.7
3 miRNAs +6 maternal clinical characteristics0.9700.912–0.994<0.00185.71%>0.11060.8161>0.085592.86%66.1–99.888.75%79.7–94.78.254.4–15.50.0080.01–0.5
3 miRNAs +7 maternal clinical characteristics0.9690.911–0.994<0.00192.86%>0.11160.8786>0.170492.86%66.1–99.895.00%87.7–98.618.577.1–48.80.0750.01–0.5
Predictive Model for FGR
5 miRNAs only (miR-181a-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-574-3p, and miR-16-5p)0.6800.602–0.751<0.00137.80%>0.61850.3409>0.691936.59%26.2–48.097.50%91.3–99.714.633.6–59.20.650.5–0.8
5 miRNAs +7 maternal clinical characteristics0.8150.747–0.872<0.00158.54%>0.59950.5326>0.489669.51%58.4–79.283.75%73.8–91.14.282.5–7.20.360.3–0.5
5 miRNAs +9 maternal clinical characteristics0.8600.797–0.909<0.00173.17%>0.50020.6701>0.606669.51%58.4–79.297.50%91.3–99.727.807.0–110.10.310.2–0.4
Predictive Model for SGA (Hromadnikova et al., 2023b)
4 miRNAs only (miR-181a-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-1-3p)0.8680.792–0.923<0.00175.68%>0.36640.6568>0.366475.68%58.8–88.290.00%81.2–95.67.573.8–15.00.270.2–0.5
4 miRNAs +3 maternal clinical characteristics0.8700.795–0.925<0.00170.27%>0.38440.6443>0.330975.68%58.8–88.288.75%79.7–94.76.733.5–12.80.270.2–0.5
4 miRNAs +5 maternal clinical characteristics0.9220.858–0.964<0.00181.08%>0.31090.7253>0.284483.78%68.0–93.888.75%79.7–94.77.454.0–14.00.180.09–0.4
Predictive Model for GDM on therapy
1 miRNA only (miR-20a-5p)0.7090.610–0.796<0.00120.00%>0.28650.3625>0.1343100.00%83.2–100.036.25%25.8–47.81.571.3–1.90-
1 miRNA +3 maternal clinical characteristics0.9490.886–0.983<0.00178.95%>0.26050.7447>0.167489.47%66.9–98.785.00%75.3–92.05.963.5–10.30.120.03–0.5
1 miRNA +7 maternal clinical characteristics0.9570.896–0.987<0.00189.47%>0.20390.7947>0.203989.47%66.9–98.790.00%81.2–95.68.954.6–17.60.120.03–0.4
Predictive Model for Late Miscarriage
4 miRNAs only (miR-181a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-16-5p, and miR-1-3p)0.8280.746–0.892<0.00152.94%>0.36830.5140>0.259867.65%49.5–82.683.75%73.8–91.14.162.4–7.20.390.2–0.6
4 miRNAs +8 maternal clinical characteristics0.9360.874–0.973<0.00184.85%>0.20050.7807>0.389281.82%64.5–93.096.25%89.4–99.221.827.1–67.00.190.09–0.4
4 miRNAs +9 maternal clinical characteristics0.9350.873–0.973<0.00184.85%>0.19670.7735>0.247184.85%68.1–94.992.50%84.4–97.211.315.2–24.80.160.07–0.4
Predictive Model for Stillbirth
6 miRNAs only (miR-181a-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-574-3p, miR-16-5p, and miR-1-3p)0.9670.912–0.992<0.00191.67%>0.06020.9167>0.273791.67%%73.0–99.0100.00%95.5–100.0--0.0830.02–0.3
Predictive Model for Preterm Delivery (PTB or PPROM) in the Absence of Other Pregnancy-Related Complications
2 miRNAs only (miR-16-5p and miR-146a-5p)0.6310.557–0.700<0.00127.36%>0.68040.2212>0.657039.62%30.3–49.682.50%72.4–90.12.261.3–3.80.730.6–0.9
2 miRNAs +5 maternal clinical characteristics0.7400.670–0.801<0.00145.28%>0.59300.3934>0.601044.34%34.7–54.395.00%87.7–98.68.873.3–23.60.590.5–0.7
2 miRNAs +7 maternal clinical characteristics0.7660.698–0.825<0.00151.89%>0.58040.4252>0.576953.77%43.8–63.588.75%79.7–94.74.782.5–9.10.520.4–0.6

Predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes based on the combinations of MiRNA biomarkers with jointly altered expression during early gestational stages and maternal clinical variables representing risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

GH, gestational hypertension; PE, preeclampsia; HELLP, haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome; FGR, fetal growth restriction; SGA, small-for-gestational-age; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PTB, spontaneous preterm birth; PPROM, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

Predictive models based on the combinations of these miRNAs and selected maternal clinical characteristics identified as the risk factors for appropriate adverse pregnancy outcomes in our previous studies showed higher detection rates at 10.0% FPR (GH, 62.65%; PE, 78.79%; HELLP syndrome, 85.71%; FGR, 58.54%; SGA, 70.27%; GDM on therapy, 78.95%; late miscarriage, 84.85%; and preterm delivery in the absence of the above-mentioned pregnancy-related complications, 45.28%) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022d; Hromadnikova et al., 2022e; Hromadnikova et al., 2023a; Hromadnikova et al., 2023b; Hromadnikova et al., 2023c; Hromadnikova et al., 2024) (Table 4). In the case of stillbirth, maternal clinical characteristics need not be added to the predictive model because the detection rate of cases was high only when using a combination of appropriate miRNAs.

More advanced predictive models, which included the results of first-trimester screening for PE and/or FGR and spontaneous preterm birth using the FMF algorithm, increased the detection rates of various adverse pregnancy outcomes at 10.0% FPR (GH: 69.88% cases; PE: 83.33% cases; HELLP syndrome: 92.86% cases; FGR: 73.17% cases; SGA: 81.08% cases; GDM on therapy: 89.47% cases; and preterm delivery in the absence of the above-mentioned pregnancy-related complications: 51.89% cases). In the case of late miscarriage, the detection rate remained the same at a FPR of 10.0% (84.85%) (Table 4).

3.2 Mutual comparison of individual first-trimester predictive models

Only one of six joint miRNAs (miR-181a-5p) was dysregulated at the early gestational stages in pregnancies developing GH. MiR-181a-5p was upregulated in 22.89% of cases with 10.0% FPR (Hromadnikova et al., 2022a). A predictive model based on a combination of the first-trimester expression profile of miR-181a-5p and five maternal clinical characteristics (maternal age and BMI at early gestational stages, nulliparity, confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune disease, and infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technology) reached a detection rate of 62.65% for GH cases at 10.0% FPR (Hromadnikova et al., 2024). A more advanced GH predictive model based on the combination of the first-trimester expression profile of miR-181a-5p and seven maternal clinical characteristics (adding the results gained from the first-trimester screening for PE and/or FGR and spontaneous preterm birth, both using the FMF algorithm) slightly increased the detection rate to 69.88% cases at 10.0% FPR (Hromadnikova et al., 2024). The predictive power for GH can only be improved using this approach.

Previously demonstrated PE predictive models based on the combinations of only six miRNAs (AUC 0.730, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022a) or only eight miRNAs (AUC 0.815, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova, 2023a) reached detection rates of 48.48% and 53.03%, respectively, at 10.0% FPR. Expanding the models based on miRNA expression profiles for the same selected maternal clinical characteristics representing risk factors for PE increased the predictive power significantly: six miRNAs +6 clinical variables (78.79% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.903, p < 0.001), eight miRNAs +6 clinical variables (77.27% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.931, p < 0.001), six miRNAs +8 clinical variables (84.85% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.939, p < 0.001), eight miRNAs +8 clinical variables (84.85% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.950, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2024). The PE predictive model based on four out of six miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes and the same maternal clinical characteristics (six variables or eight variables) reached a similar detection power (78.79% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.902, p < 0.001; 83.33% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.934, p < 0.001) as the similar models with a higher number of miRNA biomarkers and may be considered as the most cost-effective first-trimester predictive model for PE irrespective of disease severity and time of disease onset.

The HELLP syndrome predictive model previously demonstrated by our group based on the combination of six miRNAs (AUC 0.903, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2023a; Hromadnikova, 2022f) reached a detection rate of 78.57% at 10.0% FPR. When this model was expanded for the same selected maternal clinical characteristics representing risk factors for HELLP syndrome, the predictive power significantly increased: six miRNAs +6 clinical variables (85.71% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.979, p < 0.001) and six miRNAs +7 clinical variables (92.86% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.975, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2023a; Hromadnikova, 2022f). The HELLP syndrome predictive model based on three out of six miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes and the same maternal clinical characteristics (six variables or seven variables) reached similar detection power (85.71% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.970, p < 0.001; 92.86% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.969, p < 0.001) as similar models with six miRNA biomarkers and may be considered the most cost-effective first-trimester predictive model for HELLP syndrome.

Previously demonstrated FGR predictive models by our group based on the combinations of only seven miRNAs (AUC 0.725, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022b) or 10 miRNAs (AUC 0.774, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova, 2023a) reached a detection rate of 42.68% cases and 40.24% cases at 10.0% FPR. With the expansion with the same selected maternal clinical characteristics representing risk factors for FGR the models showed significantly increased predictive power: seven miRNAs +7 clinical variables (64.63% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.840, p < 0.001), 10 miRNAs +7 clinical variables (65.85% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.855, p < 0.001), seven miRNAs +9 clinical variables (74.39% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.887, p < 0.001), 10 miRNAs +9 clinical variables (78.05% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.896, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2023b). The FGR predictive models based on five out of six miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes and the same maternal clinical characteristics (seven variables or nine variables) reached a slightly lower detection power (58.54% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.815, p < 0.001; 73.17% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.860, p < 0.001) than similar models with a higher number of miRNA biomarkers. However, it may still be considered the most cost-effective first-trimester predictive models for FGR, irrespective of disease severity and time of disease onset.

Similarly, the most cost-effective first-trimester predictive model for SGA, which had already been presented, is based on the combination of four out of six miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes and five maternal clinical characteristics (81.08% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.922, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2023b). Another SGA predictive model containing eight miRNAs and five maternal clinical characteristics showed a slightly higher detection rate (89.19% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.956, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2023b). The combination of only four miRNAs (75.68% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.868, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022b) or the combination of only eight miRNAs (83.78% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.926, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova, 2023a) substantially impacted the SGA detection rate. The implementation of maternal clinical variables slightly increased the SGA detection rate.

A previously demonstrated predictive model for GDM requiring the administration of appropriate therapy by our group based on the combination of only three miRNAs (AUC 0.731, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022d; Hromadnikova 2023b) reached a detection rate of 30.0% cases at 10.0% FPR. When this model was extended to the same selected maternal clinical characteristics representing risk factors for GDM, the predictive power was significantly increased: 3 miRNAs +3 clinical variables (78.95% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.949, p < 0.001) and 3 miRNAs +7 clinical variables (89.47% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.957, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022d). The predictive model for GDM requiring administration of appropriate therapy based on 1 out of six miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes and the same maternal clinical characteristics (3 variables or seven variables) reached the same detection power (78.95% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.949, p < 0.001; 89.47% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.957, p < 0.001) as the similar models with a higher number of miRNA biomarkers and may be considered as the most cost-effective first-trimester predictive model for GDM requiring administration of appropriate therapy.

A previously demonstrated predictive model for late miscarriage by our group, based on the combination of only six miRNAs (AUC 0.941, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2023c), reached a detection rate of 79.41% at 10.0% FPR. Four of these miRNAs, dysregulated at early gestational stages in pregnancies affected by late miscarriage, were common to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The combination of only these four miRNAs was insufficient to predict the occurrence of late miscarriage (52.94% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.828, p < 0.001). The predictive model based on four miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes was further expanded to include maternal clinical characteristics (maternal age and BMI at early gestational stages, confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune disease, infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technology, presence of non-autoimmune hypothyroidism, presence of uterine fibroids or abnormal-shaped womb, history of miscarriage(s) in previous gestation(s), and presence of thrombophilia gene mutations) to increase the detection power of late miscarriage. Since the predictive power for late miscarriage significantly increased, this model can also be utilized as a cost-effective model (84.85% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.936, p < 0.001). Alternatively, this model may be extended to the results of first-trimester screening for PE and/or FGR using the FMF algorithm; however, the detection rate of pregnancies with late miscarriage remained the same as that of the model without this variable (84.85% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.935, p < 0.001).

Predictive models based on the combinations of only two miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes (91.67% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.951, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova, 2022f; Hromadnikova et al., 2023a) or six miRNAs commonly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (91.67% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.967, p < 0.001) were sufficient to predict the later occurrence of stillbirth cost-effectively. Maternal clinical characteristics were not included in the stillbirth predictive models. A previously introduced predictive model for stillbirth based on a combination of 11 dysregulated miRNAs at the early gestational stages achieved a slightly higher detection power (95.83% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.986, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova, 2022f; Hromadnikova et al., 2023a).

Previously demonstrated predictive models for preterm delivery (PPROM or PTB) in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications by our group, based on the combinations of six miRNAs (AUC 0.812, p < 0.001) or 12 miRNAs (AUC 0.818, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022c; Hromadnikova, 2023a), reached a detection rate of 52.83% at 10.0% FPR. Extension of the models based on miRNA expression profiles for the same selected maternal clinical characteristics representing risk factors for preterm delivery in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications increased the predictive power significantly: six miRNAs +5 clinical variables (69.81% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.874, p < 0.001), 12 miRNAs +5 clinical variables (66.98% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.877, p < 0.001), six miRNAs +7 clinical variables (71.70% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.879, p < 0.001), 12 miRNAs +7 clinical variables (73.58% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.887, p < 0.001) (Hromadnikova et al., 2022e). The predictive models based on two out of six miRNAs common to adverse pregnancy outcomes and the same maternal clinical characteristics (five variables or seven variables) reached significantly lower detection power (45.28% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.740, p < 0.001; 51.89% cases at 10.0% FPR, AUC 0.766, p < 0.001) and cannot be considered as optimal cost-effective first-trimester predictive models for preterm delivery in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications.

3.3 Analysis of MiRNA-target interactions

Numerous predicted and/or validated targets of miRNAs that predict the occurrence of PE have been associated with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (Figures 1A, B). In case of HELLP syndrome, only one common target (CD40LG, the gene encoding the CD40 ligand) associated with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases was identified (Figure 2). Placental insufficiency, usually manifested clinically as preeclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction, has several common miRNA targets associated with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (Figure 3). MiR-20a-5p, a biomarker used solely to predict the occurrence of GDM requiring appropriate therapy, also showed several common targets associated with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (Figure 4).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 4

4 Discussion

Currently, no first-trimester predictive algorithm for GH, HELLP syndrome, SGA, GDM, late miscarriage, and stillbirth is available. Novel efficient cost-effective modalities for predicting these pregnancy-related complications at the early gestational stages have been proposed. The proposed approach is based on the combinations of selected maternal clinical characteristics and a minimum number of miRNA biomarkers, which play key roles in cardiovascular system maintenance and control and pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases and whose altered expression was also observed at early gestational stages in pregnancies with adverse outcomes.

At present, the first-trimester algorithm used by the majority of fetal medicine centres developed by the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) calculates the risks for the development of early PE (before 34 gestational weeks) and FGR (before 37 gestational weeks). The risks are calculated on the basis of knowledge of maternal history, BMI, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PIGF), and mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) (O´Gorman et al., 2016; O´Gorman et al., 2017; The Fetal Medicine Foundation, 2023; Tan et al., 2018; Mazer Zumaeta et al., 2020). Using the predictive models based on six miRNA biomarkers and selected maternal clinical characteristics, the detection rate of PE increased 2.50 times and the detection rate of FGR 2.61 times when compared with the first-trimester screening for PE and/or FGR using the FMF algorithm. Moreover, using the proposed approach any subtype of PE and FGR regardless of the severity of the disease (mild and severe PE) and time of disease onset can be detected.

In addition, we demonstrated that numerous predicted and/or validated targets of miRNAs used to predict the occurrence of pregnancy-related complications in the first trimester of gestation were associated with several cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.

Pregnancy-related complications have been reported to be associated with the increased risk of later development of diabetes mellitus (Ray et al., 2005; Libby et al., 2007; Lykke et al., 2009; Männistö et al., 2013; Thilaganathan, 2016; Thilaganathan, 2017), metabolic syndrome (Yang et al., 2015; Udenze, 2016), hypertension (Bellamy et al., 2007; Craici et al., 2008; Lykke et al., 2009; Männistö et al., 2013; Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013; Veerbeek et al., 2015; Thilaganathan, 2016; Thilaganathan, 2017), kidney diseases (Männistö et al., 2013), atherosclerosis (Haukkamaa et al., 2009; McDonald et al., 2013), ischemic heart disease (Irgens et al., 2001; Garovic and Hayman, 2007; Bellamy et al., 2007; Craici et al., 2008; Mongraw-Chaffin et al., 2010; Borna et al., 2012; Berks et al., 2013; Männistö et al., 2013), myocardial infarction (Garovic and Hayman, 2007; Mongraw-Chaffin et al., 2010; Männistö et al., 2013; Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013; Thilaganathan, 2016; Thilaganathan, 2017), heart failure (Männistö et al., 2013; Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013; Thilaganathan, 2016; Thilaganathan, 2017), stroke (Irgens et al., 2001; Bellamy et al., 2007; Craici et al., 2008; Mongraw-Chaffin et al., 2010; Berks et al., 2013; Männistö et al., 2013; Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013; Thilaganathan, 2016; Thilaganathan, 2017) and deep venous thrombosis in mothers (Bellamy et al., 2007; Craici et al., 2008; Lykke et al., 2009).

Based on this evidence, we suggest initiating preventive programs for pregnancies at risk of developing pregnancy-related complications as early as possible with the aim of lowering cardiovascular risk and the consequent development of metabolic, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular diseases. The dysregulation of miRNAs involving in cardiovascular system maintenance and control may still be reversible via the timely implementation of beneficial lifestyle strategies.

Consecutive large-scale retrospective and prospective analyses are needed to verify the reliability of predictive models based on the combinations of the minimum number of miRNA biomarkers common to adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal clinical characteristics to differentiate between pregnancies with normal and abnormal courses of gestation at early gestational stages. Gynecologists and obstetricians could have a feasible, cost-effective way of identifying pregnancies at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes at disposal at early gestational stages if satisfactory discrimination power could be achieved.

The dysregulated miRNAs associated with cardiovascular system maintenance and control may be reversed back to normal via the timely implementation of beneficial lifestyle strategies, which may reduce or delay potential cardiovascular risk in mothers.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Ethics Committee of the Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Charles University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

IH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. KK: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. LK: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Charles University Research Program Cooperatio - Mother and Childhood Care (no. 207035) and a research grant SVV (no. 260645).

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Institute for the Care of Mother and Child for their assistance with the collection of the patient biological samples.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology (2018). ACOG practice bulletin No. 200: early pregnancy loss. Obstet. Gynecol.132, e197–e207. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002899

  • 2

    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics (2002). ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet. Gynecol.99, 159–167. 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01747-1

  • 3

    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics (2020). Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. Obstet. Gynecol.135, e237–e260. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891

  • 4

    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics (2021). ACOG practice bulletin, number 227. Fetal growth restriction. Obstet. Gynecol.137, e16–e28. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004251

  • 5

    American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSociety for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in collaboration withMetzT. D.BerryR. S.FrettsR. C.ReddyU. M.et al (2020). Obstetric Care Consensus #10: management of Stillbirth: (replaces practice bulletin number 102, March 2009). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.222, B2–B20. 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.017

  • 6

    American Diabetes Association (2009). Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. Care32, S62–S67. 10.2337/dc09-S062

  • 7

    AudibertF.FriedmanS. A.FrangiehA. Y.SibaiB. M. (1996). Clinical utility of strict diagnostic criteria for the HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.175, 460–464. 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70162-x

  • 8

    BartelD. P. (2004). MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell116, 281–297. 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5

  • 9

    BartonJ. R.SibaiB. M. (2004). Diagnosis and management of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome. Clin. Perinatol.31, 807–833. 10.1016/j.clp.2004.06.008

  • 10

    BellamyL.CasasJ. P.HingoraniA. D.WilliamsD. J. (2007). Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ335, 974. 10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BE

  • 11

    BerksD.HoedjesM.RaatH.DuvekotJ. J.SteegersE. A.HabbemaJ. D. (2013). Risk of cardiovascular disease after pre-eclampsia and the effect of lifestyle interventions: a literature-based study. BJOG120, 924–931. 10.1111/1471-0528.12191

  • 12

    BornaS.NeamatipoorE.RadmanN. (2012). Risk of coronary artery disease in women with history of pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and LBW. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med.25, 1114–1116. 10.3109/14767058.2011.624218

  • 13

    CondratC. E.ThompsonD. C.BarbuM. G.BugnarO. L.BobocA.CretoiuD.et al (2020). miRNAs as biomarkers in disease: latest findings regarding their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Cells9, 276. 10.3390/cells9020276

  • 14

    CraiciI. M.WagnerS. J.HaymanS. R.GarovicV. D. (2008). Pre-eclamptic pregnancies: an opportunity to identify women at risk for future cardiovascular disease. Womens. Health. (Lond).4, 133–135. 10.2217/17455057.4.2.133

  • 15

    GarovicV. D.HaymanS. R. (2007). Hypertension in pregnancy: an emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Nephrol.3, 613–622. 10.1038/ncpneph0623

  • 16

    GoldenbergR. L.CulhaneJ. F.IamsJ. D.RomeroR. (2008). Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet371, 75–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4

  • 17

    HaukkamaaL.MoilanenL.KattainenA.LuotoR.KahonenM.LeinonenM.et al (2009). Pre-eclampsia is a risk factor of carotid artery atherosclerosis. Cerebrovasc. Dis.27, 599–607. 10.1159/000216834

  • 18

    HromadnikovaI. (2022f). Czech national patent application No. PV 2022-505.

  • 19

    HromadnikovaI. (2023a). Czech national patent No. 309639.

  • 20

    HromadnikovaI. (2023b). Czech national patent No. 309886.

  • 21

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2022a). Cardiovascular disease-associated microRNA dysregulation during the first trimester of gestation in women with chronic hypertension and normotensive women subsequently developing gestational hypertension or preeclampsia with or without fetal growth restriction. Biomedicines10, 256. 10.3390/biomedicines10020256

  • 22

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2022b). First-trimester screening for fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age pregnancies without preeclampsia using cardiovascular disease-associated microRNA biomarkers. Biomedicines10, 718. 10.3390/biomedicines10030718

  • 23

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2022c). First trimester prediction of preterm delivery in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications using cardiovascular-disease associated microRNA biomarkers. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 3951. 10.3390/ijms23073951

  • 24

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2022d). Cardiovascular disease-associated microRNAs as novel biomarkers of first-trimester screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 10635. 10.3390/ijms231810635

  • 25

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2022e). Novel first-trimester prediction model for any type of preterm birth occurring before 37 gestational weeks in the absence of other pregnancy-related complications based on cardiovascular disease-associated microRNAs and basic maternal clinical characteristics. Biomedicines10, 2591. 10.3390/biomedicines10102591

  • 26

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2023a). First-trimester screening for HELLP syndrome-Prediction model based on microRNA biomarkers and maternal clinical characteristics. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 5177. 10.3390/ijms24065177

  • 27

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2023b). First trimester prediction models for small-for- gestational age and fetal growth restricted fetuses without the presence of preeclampsia. Mol. Cell. Probes.72, 101941. 10.1016/j.mcp.2023.101941

  • 28

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2023c). First-trimester screening for miscarriage or stillbirth-Prediction model based on microRNA biomarkers. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 10137. 10.3390/ijms241210137

  • 29

    HromadnikovaI.KotlabovaK.KroftaL. (2024). First trimester prediction model for gestational hypertension and any subtype of preeclampsia based on cardiovascular disease associated microRNAs and maternal clinical characteristics. Under Rev. Ann. Med.

  • 30

    Hypertension in pregnancy (2013). Report of the American college of obstetricians and gynecologists’ task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol.122, 1122–1131. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88

  • 31

    International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, MetzgerB. E.GabbeS. G.PerssonB.BuchananT. A.CatalanoP. A.DammP.et al (2010). International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes. Care33, 676–682. 10.2337/dc09-1848

  • 32

    IrgensH. U.ReisaeterL.IrgensL. M.LieR. T. (2001). Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ23, 1213–1217. 10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1213

  • 33

    LaiE. C. (2002). Micro RNAs are complementary to 3' UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nat. Genet.30, 363–364. 10.1038/ng865

  • 34

    LeenersB.Neumaier-WagnerP. M.KuseS.MützeS.Rudnik-SchönebornS.ZerresK.et al (2011). Recurrence risks of hypertensive diseases in pregnancy after HELLP syndrome. J. Perinat. Med.39, 673–678. 10.1515/jpm.2011.081

  • 35

    LibbyG.MurphyD. J.McEwanN. F.GreeneS. A.ForsythJ. S.ChienP. W.et al (2007). Pre-eclampsia and the later development of type 2 diabetes in mothers and their children: an intergenerational study from the Walker cohort. Diabetologia50, 523–530. 10.1007/s00125-006-0558-z

  • 36

    LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods25, 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

  • 37

    LykkeJ. A.Langhoff-RoosJ.SibaiB. M.FunaiE. F.TricheE. W.PaidasM. J. (2009). Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the mother. Hypertension53, 944–951. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130765

  • 38

    MalmströmO.MorkenN. H. (2018). HELLP syndrome, risk factors in first and second pregnancy: a population-based cohort study. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.97, 709–716. 10.1111/aogs.13322

  • 39

    MännistöT.MendolaP.VääräsmäkiM.JärvelinM. R.HartikainenA. L.PoutaA.et al (2013). Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation127, 681–690. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.128751

  • 40

    MartinJ. N.Jr.BlakeP. G.PerryK. G.Jr.McCaulJ. F.HessL. W.MartinR. W. (1991). The natural history of HELLP syndrome: patterns of disease progression and regression. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.164, 1500–1509. 10.1016/0002-9378(91)91429-z

  • 41

    MartinJ. N.Jr.RoseC. H.BrieryC. M. (2006). Understanding and managing HELLP syndrome: the integral role of aggressive glucocorticoids for mother and child. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.195, 914–934. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.044

  • 42

    Mazer ZumaetaA.WrightA.SyngelakiA.MaritsaV. A.Da SilvaA. B.NicolaidesK. H. (2020). Screening for pre-eclampsia at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: use of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor or both. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol.56, 400–407. 10.1002/uog.22093

  • 43

    McDonaldS. D.RayJ.TeoK.JungH.SalehianO.YusufS.et al (2013). Measures of cardiovascular risk and subclinical atherosclerosis in a cohort of women with a remote history of preeclampsia. Atherosclerosis229, 234–239. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.020

  • 44

    Mongraw-ChaffinM. L.CirilloP. M.CohnB. A. (2010). Preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease death: prospective evidence from the child health and development studies cohort. Hypertension56, 166–171. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.150078

  • 45

    MoutquinJ. M.Milot RoyV.IrionO. (1996). Preterm prevention: effectivenss of current strategies. J. Soc. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can.18, 571–588. 10.1016/S0849-5831(16)30300-7

  • 46

    O'GormanN.WrightD.PoonL. C.RolnikD. L.SyngelakiA.de AlvaradoM.et al (2017). Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol.49, 756–760. 10.1002/uog.17455

  • 47

    O'GormanN.WrightD.SyngelakiA.AkolekarR.WrightA.PoonL. C.et al (2016). Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks gestation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.214, 103.e1–103.e12. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034

  • 48

    PiletičK.KunejT. (2016). MicroRNA epigenetic signatures in human disease. Arch. Toxicol.90, 2405–2419. 10.1007/s00204-016-1815-7

  • 49

    RayJ. G.VermeulenM. J.SchullM. J.RedelmeierD. A. (2005). Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet366, 1797–1803. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67726-4

  • 50

    RomeroR.EspinozaJ.KusanovicJ. P.GotschF.HassanS.ErezO.et al (2006). The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG113, 17–42. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x

  • 51

    SibaiB. M. (2004). Imitators of severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. Clin. Perinatol.31, 835–852. 10.1016/j.clp.2004.06.007

  • 52

    TanM. Y.SyngelakiA.PoonL. C.RolnikD. L.O'GormanN.DelgadoJ. L.et al (2018). Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Obstet. Gynecol.52, 186–195. 10.1002/uog.19112

  • 53

    The Fetal Medicine Foundation (2023). Stratification of pregnancy management 11–13 Weeks’ gestation. Available at: https://courses.fetalmedicine.com/fmf/show/861?locale=en (Accessed February 27, 2023).

  • 54

    ThilaganathanB. (2016). Association of higher maternal blood pressure with lower infant birthweight: placental cause or cardiovascular effect?Hypertension67, 499–500. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06880

  • 55

    ThilaganathanB. (2017). Placental syndromes: getting to the heart of the matter. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol.49, 7–9. 10.1002/uog.17378

  • 56

    UdenzeI. C. (2016). Association of pre-eclampsia with metabolic syndrome and increased risk of cardiovascular disease in women: a systemic review. Niger. J. Clin. Pract.19, 431–435. 10.4103/1119-3077.180055

  • 57

    VandesompeleJ.De PreterK.PattynF.PoppeB.Van RoyN.De PaepeA.et al (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome. Biol.3, RESEARCH0034. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034

  • 58

    VeerbeekJ. H.HermesW.BreimerA. Y.van RijnB. B.KoenenS. V.MolB. W.et al (2015). Cardiovascular disease risk factors after early-onset preeclampsia, late-onset preeclampsia, and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Hypertension65, 600–606. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04850

  • 59

    WangJ.ChenJ.SenS. (2016). MicroRNA as biomarkers and diagnostics. J. Cell. Physiol.231, 25–30. 10.1002/jcp.25056

  • 60

    WeinsteinL. (1982). Syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count: a severe consequence of hypertension in pregnancy. 1982. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.193, 859; discussion 860. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.113

  • 61

    YangJ. J.LeeS. A.ChoiJ. Y.SongM.HanS.YoonH. S.et al (2015). Subsequent risk of metabolic syndrome in women with a history of preeclampsia: data from the Health Examinees Study. J. Epidemiol.25, 281–288. 10.2188/jea.JE20140136

Summary

Keywords

first-trimester screening, cardiovascular risk, miRNA, predictive models, preventive program, risk factors

Citation

Hromadnikova I, Kotlabova K and Krofta L (2024) First-trimester predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes—a base for implementation of strategies to prevent cardiovascular disease development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:1461547. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1461547

Received

08 July 2024

Accepted

26 August 2024

Published

04 September 2024

Volume

12 - 2024

Edited by

Rajesh Kumar Manne, Duke University, United States

Reviewed by

Ramesh Butti, National Centre for Cell Science, India

Ling Bai, Duke University, United States

Naresh Damuka, Wake Forest University, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Ilona Hromadnikova,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics