Insulin-like peptide 8 (Ilp8) regulates female fecundity in flies

Introduction: Insulin-like peptides (Ilps) play crucial roles in nearly all life stages of insects. Ilp8 is involved in developmental stability, stress resistance and female fecundity in several insect species, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Here we report the functional characterization of Ilp8s in three fly species, including Bactrocera dorsalis, Drosophila mercatorum and Drosophila melanogaster.

Methods: Phylogenetic analyses were performed to identify and characterize insect Ilp8s. The amino acid sequences of fly Ilp8s were aligned and the three-dimensional structures of fly Ilp8s were constructed and compared. The tissue specific expression pattern of fly Ilp8s were examined by qRT-PCR. In Bactrocera dorsalis and Drosophila mercatorum, dsRNAs were injected into virgin females to inhibit the expression of Ilp8 and the impacts on female fecundity were examined. In Drosophila melanogaster, the female fecundity of Ilp8 loss-of-function mutant was compared with wild type control flies. The mutant fruit fly strain was also used for sexual behavioral analysis and transcriptomic analysis.

Results: Orthologs of Ilp8s are found in major groups of insects except for the lepidopterans and coleopterans, and Ilp8s are found to be well separated from other Ilps in three fly species. The key motif and the predicted three-dimensional structure of fly Ilp8s are well conserved. Ilp8 are specifically expressed in the ovary and are essential for female fecundity in three fly species. Behavior analysis demonstrates that Ilp8 mutation impairs female sexual attractiveness in fruit fly, which results in decreased mating success and is likely the cause of fecundity reduction. Further transcriptomic analysis indicates that Ilp8 might influence metabolism, immune activity, oocyte development as well as hormone homeostasis to collectively regulate female fecundity in the fruit fly.

Discussion: Our findings support a universal role of insect Ilp8 in female fecundity, and also provide novel clues for understanding the modes of action of Ilp8.

Introduction

The insulin signaling pathway is highly conserved among metazoans, which plays crucial roles in metabolic homeostasis, growth control, reproduction and lifespan (Chowanski et al., 2021). Orthologs of insulin, known as insulin-like peptides (Ilps) have been identified in insects and the number of the members in the Ilp family are quite variable among different species (Wu and Brown, 2006). In two dipteran species, fruit fly and mosquito, eight Ilps have been characterized in each (Riehle et al., 2006; Nässel et al., 2015). Four genes encoding Ilps are found in the genome of red flour beetle (Li et al., 2008), while only three Ilp genes have been isolated in the locusts (Badisco et al., 2008; Veenstra et al., 2021). Interestingly, approximate thirty-eight Ilps have been found in silkworm (Aslam et al., 2011; Mizoguchi and Okamoto, 2013). Despite the diversified number and type of Ilps, the core components and signal transduction modes of the Ilp signaling pathways are well conserved in the insects (Erion and Sehgal, 2013; Kannan and Fridell, 2013; Nässel and Vanden, 2016; Semaniuk et al., 2021).

Studies using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, have made significant contributions to our understanding of how insect Ilps perform such diversified and critical functions (Chowanski et al., 2021). Among the eight Drosophila insulin like peptides (dIlps), dIlp1-6 are believed to act through the same insulin receptor (Nässel and Vanden, 2016), and dIlp7 is recognized by the leucine rich repeat containing G protein receptor Lgr4 (Imambocus et al., 2021). The functions of dIlp1-7 are centered on sensing and responding to nutrition status to meet the metabolic demands in nearly all life stages (Nässel and Vanden, 2016; Chowanski et al., 2021). However, the latest member of dIlps, dIlp8, seems to regulate distinct processes independent of other Ilps (Colombani et al., 2012; Garelli et al., 2012). Recent studies have revealed a unique role of dIlp8 in coordinating larval tissue growth with the onset of metamorphosis (Gontijo and Garelli, 2018). In response to various growth perturbations, fly larval imaginal disc cells produce dIlp8 to communicate the abnormal status with a subset of Lgr3-expressing neurons in the larval brain (Colombani et al., 2015; Garelli et al., 2015; Vallejo et al., 2015). Activation of the dIlp8-Lgr3 pathway eventually leads to a reduction in ecdysone hormone production in the larval endocrine prothoracic gland, thus delaying the onset of metamorphosis (Jaszczak et al., 2016). Current model indicates that dIlp8 signaling extends the larval growth period to allow the regeneration of damaged tissues, and simultaneously slows down the growth rates of healthy tissues to guarantee proportionate development (Gontijo and Garelli, 2018; DaCrema et al., 2021). A role of dIlp8 as interorgan signaling molecule has also been found in the pupae stage during metamorphosis (Ray and Lakhotia, 2019; Heredia et al., 2021).

In contrast to the extensive analysis of the dIlp8-Lgr3 signaling cascade during development, the physiological roles of dIlp8 are less studied. A recent study showed that fly tumor cells secret dIlp8 to suppresses food intake through inhibiting the expression of orexigenic neuropeptides (Yeom et al., 2021). Manipulation of dIlp8 expression level in adult flies increases resistance to starvation, no matter whether dIlp8 is mutated or over-expressed (Liao and Nässel, 2020). The dIlp8 mutant flies display ovulation defect and reduction of female fecundity (Liao and Nässel, 2020). Orthologs of dIlp8 have been described under the name of gonadulin in several insect species, as RNA sequencing analyses suggest that they are highly expressed in the gonads (Veenstra, 2020; Leyria et al., 2022). Knock-down of Ilp8/gonadulin expression by RNAi leads to oocyte growth inhibition in the migratory locust (Veenstra et al., 2021) as well as ovulation defect in the kissing bug (Leyria et al., 2022). These observations suggest that Ilp8 might be generally involved in regulation of insect metabolism and reproduction, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

Here we report the identification and characterization of Ilp8s in three fly species. Our results demonstrate that although the primary amino acid sequences of Ilp8s are variable, the predicted three-dimensional structure and expression pattern are conserved. We provide evidence that Ilp8s are crucial for female fecundity in all three fly species and show for the first time that Ilp8 regulates female sexual attractiveness during the mating process in the fruit fly.

Results

Identification and characterization of fly Ilp8s

When currently available genomic and transcriptomic data were analyzed, genes encoding orthologs of Ilp8s were found in major groups of insects except for the lepidopterans and coleopterans (Figure 1A; Supplementary Data Sheet S1). The amino acid sequences of Ilps in three dipteran insects, the fruit fly (D. melanogaster), the fruit fly’s distantly related species Drosophila mercatorum, and the oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis) were isolated (Supplementary Data Sheet S1) for further analysis. There are 8 Ilps in fruit fly (dIlp1-8), while a total of 6 Ilps are identified in D. mercatorum (DrIlps) and 7 Ilps are found in B. dorsalis (BdIlps). When a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed, the Ilp8s were found to be well separated from other Ilps in these three species (Figure 1B).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic analyses of insect Ilp8s. (A) Cladogram shows that orthologs of Ilp8s are found in major groups of insects (red dots) except for the lepidopterans and coleopterans (white dots). (B) Phylogenetic tree of Ilps in D. melanogaster, D. mercatorum and B. dorsalis. The Ilp8 cluster is well separated from the other fly Ilps. The neighbor-joining tree was generated using MEGA 7.0 with 1,000 bootstrap test. Bootstrap values are indicated at each branch. The scale bar represents the branch length.

Fairly large variations were noticed when the amino acid sequences of Ilp8 in representative insect species were compared with each other (Figure 2A), which is consistent with previous reports (Gontijo and Garelli, 2018; Veenstra, 2020). Among three fly species, sequence alignment showed that DrIlp8 and BdIlp8 shares 54.93% and 53.42% identities with dIlp8, respectively (Table 1). The insulin peptides are normally hydrolyzed into two polypeptide chains (A chain and B chain), which are then linked together by two disulfide bonds to form the mature product (Steiner et al., 2009). A motif of six cysteine residues crucial for the formation of disulfide bridges is the key signature of Ilps (Nili et al., 2012). These six cysteine residues were found to be highly conserved in the fly Ilp8 peptides (Figure 2A). When three-dimensional structure models of the fly Ilp8s were generated, a conserved tertiary structure was evident (Figures 2B–D). Fly Ilp8s were predicated to contain two alpha helices and an intrachain disulfide bond in the A chain, and a long alpha helix in the B chain. The A chain and B chain of fly Ilp8s are likely connected via two interchain disulfide bonds (Figures 2B–D). Amino acid sequence alignment indicates that the Lgr3 receptor is also quite conserved in these fly species (Supplementary Figure S1). The similarity of signature motif, predictive structure and receptor sequence among the fly Ilp8 peptides suggest that they might function in conserved fashions.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. The sequence and structure homology of fly Ilp8s. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of fly Ilp8s. The six conserved cysteine residues are highlighted in green, and other conserved residues are visualized by different colors. The fragments corresponding to the A chain and B chain of mature Ilp8s are labeled with curly braces. (B–D) The predictive three-dimensional structure models of the D. melanogaster (B), D. mercatorum (C) and B. dorsalis (D) mature Ilp8 peptides. The structure is colored as follows: A chain in green, B chain in light blue and disulfide bonds between cystine residues in yellow.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Sequence similarity of fly Ilp8s.

Fly Ilp8s are primarily expressed in the ovary

Most Ilps are produced by neuroendocrine cells, but Ilp8s are primarily expressed in gonads in various insect species (Veenstra, 2020). When examined by real-time quantitative PCR, both DrIlp8 and BdIlp8 were found to be expressed in the adult females at significantly higher level than that in males (Figures 3A, B). Based on the sexual dimorphic expression profile, the distribution of Ilp8 in different tissues were further examined in female flies. In D. mercatorum, Ilp8 was expressed at a very high level in the ovary, with very low levels in the head, thorax, midgut and abdomen (Figure 3C). Similarly, the expression level of BdIlp8 in the ovary was significantly higher than that in other tissues in B. dorsalis (Figure 3D). The enriched expression in ovary indicates that Ilp8 might be involved in female reproduction, which was further tested by dsRNA knock-down experiments.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Fly Ilp8s are primarily expressed in the ovary. (A) The mRNA level of DrIlp8 was significantly higher in the females (Welch’s t-test, p < .05). (B) The mRNA level of BdIlp8 was significantly higher in the females (Welch’s t-test, p < .001). (C) Distribution of DrIlp8 transcripts in different tissues. Head (H), thorax without midgut (TW), ovary (OV), midgut (MG) and abdomen without midgut and ovary (AW) were included. The mRNA level of DrIlp8 was significantly higher in the ovary (p < .0001). (D) The mRNA level of BdIlp8 was significantly higher in the ovary (p = .0003). Different letters indicate significant differences between groups using Welch’s ANOVA test with Turkey multiple comparisons (C,D).

Fly Ilp8s are required for female fecundity

Specific dsRNAs targeting DrIlp8 and BdIlp8 (Supplementary Figure S2A; Supplementary Data Sheet S2) were synthesized and injected into female flies, and dsRNA against eGFP was used as control. The mRNA level of DrIlp8 was strongly downregulated to 14% of the control group after dsRNA injection (Figure 4A). When the number of eggs laid by female flies was calculated, a drastic reduction of fecundity was observed (Figure 4B). Similarly, inhibiting BdIlp8 expression by dsRNA (Figure 4C) also significantly impaired the fecundity (Figure 4D). Thus, Ilp8 are required for female fecundity in both D. mercatorum and B. dorsalis.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Fly Ilp8s are required for female fecundity. (A) The DrIlp8 mRNA level was downregulated after dsDrIlp8 injection (Welch’s t-test, p < .001). (B) The number of eggs laid by single young mated female flies in a period of 24 h was significantly reduced after dsDrIlp8 treatment (Welch’s t-test, p < .001). (C) The BdIlp8 mRNA level was downregulated after dsBdIlp8 injection (Welch’s t-test, p < .001). (D) The number of eggs laid by single young mated female flies in a period of 24 h was significantly reduced after dsBdIlp8 treatment (Welch’s t-test, p < .01). Values and error bars represent the mean and SEM of three independent biological replicates.

Fruit fly Ilp8 regulates female sexual attractiveness

The model insect fruit fly was further utilized to investigate the role and mode of action of Ilp8 during reproduction. When examined by qRT-PCR, dIlp8 was found to be expressed at a significantly higher level in adult females than in males (Figure 5A). Examination of tissue expression profiles showed that dIlp8 was expressed at a very high level in the ovary, with very low levels in the head, thorax, midgut and abdomen (Figure 5B). The expression pattern of dIlp8 was visualized using a GFP reporter line (Supplementary Figure S2B), in which the expression of GFP is under control of the endogenous genomic regulatory elements of dIlp8 (Garelli et al., 2012). Strong green fluorescence was found in the abdomen of female flies, which was mainly restricted in the ovaries (Figure 5C). At a closer observation, GFP was found in the follicle cells surrounding late stage oocytes, as well as in the corpus luteum which consists of follicle cells trimmed and left over after ovulation (Figure 5D). The expression of dIlp8 in female flies was found to be downregulated after successful mating (Supplementary Figure S2C). The reproduction organ specific and mating status responsive expression pattern of dIlp8 is suggestive for its involvement in female reproduction.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. The expression pattern of fruit fly Ilp8. (A) The mRNA level of dIlp8 was significantly higher in the females (Welch’s t-test, p < .001). (B) The expression of dIlp8 was highly elevated in the ovary (Welch’s ANOVA test, p < .0001). Different letters indicate significant differences between groups using Welch’s ANOVA test with Turkey multiple comparisons. (C) The dIlp8-GFP reporter was mainly activated in the ovary. (D) The dIlp8-GFP reporter were expressed in the follicle cells surrounding late stage oocytes and in the corpus luteum.

The role of dIlp8 in female fecundity was tested using the loss-of-function mutant strain dIlp8^MI00727 (Garelli et al., 2012). The dIlp8^MI00727 homozygous (dIlp8^−/−) females laid significantly fewer number of eggs than wild type flies (Figure 6A). However, no obvious developmental defects were observed in the ovary of dIlp8^−/− virgin females (Supplementary Figures S2D, E), indicating that dIlp8 likely impacts female fecundity without modulating reproduction system development. Mutation of both dIlp8 and its receptor Lgr3 resulted in reduction of the number of progenies produced by female flies (Figure 6B), implicating that the dIlp8-Lgr3 signaling cascade operates in female fecundity regulation. We noticed that the abdomen of dIlp8^−/− females are often swollen when rearing with wild type males for 2 weeks, which is likely due to enlargement of the ovaries (Figure 6C). In dIlp8^−/− flies, the number of stage-14 mature oocytes that were retained in the ovary was higher than that of the wild type flies (Figure 6D). These observations suggest that dIlp8^−/− flies are defective in ovulation, which may contribute to the decrease of fecundity.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. dIlp8 regulates female fecundity and sexual attractiveness. (A) dIlp8^−/− females laid significantly fewer eggs than wild type flies (Welch’s t-test, p < .01). (B) dIlp8^−/− and Lgr3^−/− females produced significantly decreased number of progenies than wild type flies (Welch’s ANOVA test). (C) dIlp8^−/− females showed much larger ovary than wild type files (Welch’s t-test, p < .001). (D) dIlp8^−/− females retained significantly increased amount of stage 14 mature eggs (Welch’s t-test, p < .001). (E) Set up of the courtship chambers. (F) The dIlp8^−/− females were less attractive than wild type flies as shown by screenshots from supplemental videos. (G) Sexual attractiveness of dIlp8^−/− females were significantly reduced (Welch’s t-test, p < .005). Three biological replicates were included, and each replicate group contains ten pairs of flies.

Our finding that dIlp8 might modulate ovulation is consistent with previous study (Liao and Nässel, 2020), but the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. It has been shown that successful mating with males strongly stimulates ovulation in female flies (Rubinstein and Wolfner, 2013). The potential role of dIlp8 in mating success was further examined by behavior analysis. Pairs of single virgin female and healthy male were individually placed in courtship chambers and the courtship processes were videotaped for analysis (Figure 6E). Unexpectedly, the sexual attractiveness of dIlp8^−/− female flies were severely weakened, evidenced by the reduced tendency of males to initiate courtship (Figures 6F, G). These observations indicate that dIlp8^−/− female flies are sexually less attractive, which result in decreased mating success followed by ovulation defects and fecundity reduction. After knocking-down DrIlp8 by dsRNA in D. mercatorum, the attractiveness of female flies was reduced but the difference was not statistically significant (Supplementary Figures S3A, B). It is possible that DrIlp8 is not crucial for female attractiveness in D. mercatorum, but we believe that the efficiency of RNAi needs to be further increased to settle the dispute. Ultimately, generation and examination of DrIlp8 and BdIlp8 loss-of-function mutants will provide direct evidence regarding the role of Ilp8 in female fecundity and sexual attractiveness.

Transcriptomic analysis of dIlp8 mutant females

To get a more comprehensive view of the effects upon loss of dIlp8, transcriptomic analysis was performed to compare the changes of gene expression between dIlp8^−/− and wild type virgin females. A total of 667 genes were differentially expressed in dIlp8^−/− flies (Supplementary Data Sheet S3), among which 410 genes were downregulated and 257 genes were upregulated (Figure 7A). The mRNA level of various representative genes (JHe, JHedup, Nep2, Jon99cii, Ilp3, DptA, Def and edin) were examined by qRT-PCR, and the change of the abundances of these transcripts were consistent with the RNA-seq results (Figure 7B). Further analysis found that loss of dIlp8 strongly influenced the following biological processes: lysosome-related catabolism, defense mechanisms, insect hormone metabolism and oocyte development (Figures 7C–F; Supplementary Figures S3C). Thus, it appears that various developmental, physiological and metabolic factors related with female fecundity are mis-expressed in dIlp8^−/− flies. In D. mercatorum and B. dorsalis, several genes including DrJon99cii, BdNep2 and BdWbl were affected in a similar fashion after knocking-down Ilp8 by dsRNA (Supplementary Figures S3D–F). These observations imply that Ilp8 might modulate female fecundity through similar pathways in these fly species.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. RNA-seq analysis of dIlp8 mutant fly. (A) Volcano plot of differently expressed genes in dIlp8^−/− virgin females. A total of 667 genes were differentially expressed, among which 410 genes were downregulated (green dots) and 257 genes were upregulated (red dots). (B) The mRNA levels of representative DEGs were examined by qRT-PCR (red columns) and compared with the RNA-seq data (blue columns). (C) Heatmap of the innate immune signaling pathway. (D) Heatmap of genes with known roles in female fertility. (E) Heatmap of genes involved in steroid hormones biosynthesis. (F) Heatmap of metabolism genes. The expression level of all genes was normalized by zero-to-one method.

Discussion

Our present results suggest that Ilp8s are functionally conserved among three fly species. Despite the significant differences of the amino acid sequences, the predicted structure, the expression pattern and the role in female fecundity of Ilp8 in three fly species are very consistent. We provided further evidence to demonstrate a novel role of dIlp8 in female sexual attractiveness which likely underlies the observed ovulation and fecundity defects in the dIlp8 mutants. Given that dIlp8 are specifically expressed in the follicle cells of late stage oocytes, it is tempting to speculate that dIlp8 might serve as an interorgan communication signal to coordinate the sexual behavior with oocyte development. Mutation of dIlp8 leads to mis-regulation of genes involved in various biological aspects, including the steroid hormones biosynthesis and metabolism pathways. It has been shown that the dIlp8-Lgr3 signaling circuit triggers hormonal responses and impacts the activity of several crucial insect hormones such as insulin, prothoracicotropic hormone and ecdysone in the larval stage (Garelli et al., 2012; Garelli et al., 2015; Vallejo et al., 2015). In the adult stage, the steroid hormones (Soller et al., 1999; Bilen et al., 2013; Chiang et al., 2016) as well as the insulin pathway (Fedina et al., 2012; Kuo et al., 2012; Lebreton et al., 2015; Fedina et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2018) have important influence on female sexual attractiveness. Whether dIlp8 affects the activity of these pathways in a similar fashion and whether dIlp8 regulates female attractiveness through these pathways will be further investigated.

In female fruit flies, ovary development and maturation are tightly controlled by varying environmental and physiological conditions, which are sensed and processed by organs such as brain, gut and fat body (Drummond-Barbosa, 2019). These tissues employ metabolites, hormones, and other factors to regulate ovary development, but how ovary provides feedback to other organs is still poorly understood (Drummond-Barbosa, 2019; Okamoto and Watanabe, 2022). It has been known for a long time that the steroid hormone ecdysone is primarily produced by the ovary in adult female flies (Bownes and Smith, 1984), but the target organs and modes of action of ovary generated ecdysone have only began to be identified recently (Sieber and Spradling, 2015; Ameku and Niwa, 2016; Baron et al., 2018; Ahmed et al., 2020; Zipper et al., 2020). Whether ovary can utilize Ilp8 as another signaling molecule to ensure successful reproduction needs further explorations.

The dIlp8-Lgr3 pathway plays crucial role in coordinating imaginal tissue growth with developmental transitions (Gontijo and Garelli, 2018). In response to growth perturbations, the Ilp8-Lgr3 pathway adjusts developmental timing to allow regeneration of damaged tissues and to coordinate growth of body parts (Colombani et al., 2012; Garelli et al., 2012; Garelli et al., 2015; Vallejo et al., 2015). Such error sensing and repairing mechanisms ensures developmental stability when facing accidental as well as stochastic perturbations. It has been known for decades that similar regeneration promoting and growth coordinating mechanism exists among cockroaches, moths and flies, which represent distinct insect development modes (Stock’and O'Farrell, 1954; Madhavan and Schneiderman, 1969; Dewes, 1973; Kunkel, 1977; Simpson et al., 1980; Poodry and Woods, 1990; Smith-Bolton et al., 2009; Jaszczak and Halme, 2016). Whether the Ilp8-Lgr3 pathway is commonly used in different insect species to safeguard development stability remains an open question. Our finding that Lgr3 mutant shows similar female fecundity defect indicates that the same signal transduction cascade might be utilized in the adulthood for a novel purpose. Interestingly, it has been shown that activation of a subset of neurons expressing Lgr3 in the adult females reduces their sexual receptivity to male courtship and also leads to decreased fecundity (Meissner et al., 2016). It is possible that the Ilp8-Lgr3 signaling plays a dosage sensitive role in female fecundity.

It is interesting to notice that orthologs of Ilp8 could be found in major groups of insects except for the moths, butterflies and bettles (Figure 1A; Supplementary Table S1). We suspect that one or more members of the remarkably expanded Ilp family in moths and bettles may have evolved to replace the functions of Ilp8. However, it seems difficult to interpret the absence of Ilp8 and Lgr3 in mosquitoes (Gontijo and Garelli, 2018). The symbol of Ilp8 has been assigned to an Ilp gene in Aedes aegypti (Ling et al., 2017), but sequence similarity analysis indicates it is likely an ortholog of dIlp1. In A. aegypti, both Ilp7 and Ilp8 regulate ovarian development, but they are specifically expressed in the head without detectable expression in the ovary (Ling et al., 2017). The ortholog of Ilp8 receptor Lgr3 is also absent in A. aegypti (Brown et al., 2008). Clearly, more work is required to understand the multifaceted functions and the evolution of the Ilp8-Lgr3 pathway in insects.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing

The D. melanogaster stocks w¹¹¹⁸ (#3605), Canton S (#64349) and dIlp8^MI00727 (#33079) were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. The Lgr3^KO mutant (Lgr3^−/−, Deng et al., 2019) is a gift from Dr. Yi Rao. The w¹¹¹⁸ strain was used to examine dIlp8 expression pattern (Figures 5A,B) and used as control in female fecundity (Figure 6) as well as transcriptomic analysis (Figure 7). The Canton S males were used in female fecundity assays (Figure 6). The D. mercatorum strain (#1525.49) was obtained from the National Drosophila Species Stock Center at Cornell University. Both D. melanogaster and D. mercatorum stocks were maintained on standard fly food in 25°C incubators as described previously (Wang et al., 2019; Mo et al., 2020). The B. dorsalis stock flies were originally collected from a citrus orchard in Yunnan Province of China in 2020 and have been reared for several generations in the laboratory. Adult flies of B. dorsalis were held in 40 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm cages and had free access to a solid artificial diet (Xu et al., 2015). The B. dorsalis insects were maintained at 25 ± 1°C, 65 ± 5% relative humidity and a 14:10 h (light: dark) photoperiod.

Bioinformatic analyses

The sequences of fly Ilp peptides (Supplementary Data Sheet S1) were aligned with MAFFT version 7 (Katoh et al., 2019) and edited manually by BioEdit. A molecular phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor joining method using a Poisson model with a bootstrap of 1,000 replicates in MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016). The three-dimensional structure models of the fly Ilp8 peptides were constructed by Alpha Fold Colab (https://colab.research.google.com/github/sokrypton/ColabFold/blob/main/AlphaFold2.ipynb, number of recycles = 3).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Whole flies were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen before homogenate were prepared. Three days old virgin females and males of D. mercatorum were used to examine the expression of DrIlp8 in whole flies (Figure 3A), and 10 days old B. dorsalis virgin females and males were used to examine BdIlp8 expression pattern (Figure 3B). Three days old virgin females and males of w¹¹¹⁸ fruit flies (Figure 5A) were used to examine dIlp8 expression in the whole body. For the tissue-specific gene expression analysis, tissues of fly head (H), thorax without midgut (TW), ovary (OV), midgut (MG) and abdomen without midgut and ovary (AW) were dissected in cold PBS and collected. Three days old virgins of D. mercatorum (Figure 3C) and w¹¹¹⁸ fruit flies (Figure 5B) were collected for tissue sampling. Ten days old B. dorsalis virgin females were used to examine the tissue specific expression pattern of BdIlp8 (Figure 3D).

Total RNAs were extracted using the TianGen RNA isolation kit (TianGen, Beijing, China). The quantity and quality of RNA were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and the Nanodrop 2000 micro-spectrophotometer (Thermo, United States). Equal amounts (1 μg) of RNA were used as the template in the reverse transcription reaction using the HiScript III All-in-one RT SuperMix Perfect for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments were carried out in an ABI QuantStudio 6 Flex platform (Thermo, United States) using the Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Reactions were performed in a 10 μl mixture containing 5 μl Master Mix, 2 pmol of each primer, 1 μl cDNA sample and nuclease-free water. The sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR were listed in Supplementary Data Sheet S2. The mRNA levels were normalized to the internal reference gene GAPDH (for D. mercatorum) and Rpl32 (for D. melanogaster and B. dorsalis) using the 2^−ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001; Cao et al., 2021).

RNA interference

The DNA fragments covering the target region were amplified from Ilp8 mRNAs by RT-PCR, and T7 promoter sequences were added onto the primers (Supplementary Data Sheet S2). The DNA fragments were purified and sequenced before used as the templates to generate dsRNAs. Double strand RNA (dsRNA) against D. mercatorum and B. dorsalis Ilp8 were generated using the T7 RiboMAX™ Express RNAi System (Promega, United States). The length of dsRNA is 395bp for DrIlp8 and 341bp for BdIlp8 (Supplementary Figure S2A). The dsRNAs were purified and examined by gel electrophoresis, and the concentrations were quantified using Nanodrop. The dsRNA against eGFP (enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein) was used as control. The dsRNAs were diluted to 1 μg/μl for microinjection. Three days old virgin females of D. mercatorum were anesthetized by carbon dioxide, and 200 ng dsRNA was injected into the ventral abdomen of each fly. Ten days old virgin females of B. dorsalis were immobilized on ice, and 1 μg of dsRNA was injected into the ventral abdomen of each insect. A total of fifty flies were used for each dsRNA treatment. The expression level of Ilp8 was examined by qRT-PCR at 24 h after dsRNA injection in D. mercatorum, and at 48 h after dsRNA injection in B. dorsalis.

Imaging

Female fruit flies were dissected in cold PBS, and ovaries were washed two times with PBS. Figures were captured under stereo microscope equipped with fluorescence adapter SFA-LFS-GR (Nightsea, United States) and an inverted fluorescence microscope (AMG EVOS, ThermoFisher, United States).

Fecundity and sexual behavior measurements

Fecundity was measured by calculating the number of eggs produced by young mated female flies over a 24-h laying period. One virgin female was kept with two healthy males for 3 days before transferred to a new vial without anesthesia. The flies were removed from the vials and the number of eggs was recorded per 24 h (Figures 4B, 4D, 6A). For D. melanogaster studies, the number of progenies produced by single young female flies in a period of 3 days after mating with two healthy males were counted (Figure 6B).

To examine the sexual behavior of fruit flies, one virgin female was crossed with one male in a courtship chamber. The mating processes were recorded for 2 h and the mating behaviors were manually analyzed. Three biological replicates were included, and each replicate group contains ten pairs of flies.

Statistics

Graphpad prism 8.0.2 (GraphPad Software, United States, www.graphpad.com) was used for statistical analyses. Values and error bars represent the mean and SEM of independent biological repeats. Experimental data with just two groups were analyzed using the Student’s or Welch t-test. Experimental data with more than three groups were analyzed by Welch one-way ANOVA test with Tukey HSD multiple comparison.

RNA sequencing

Total RNAs were extracted from three replicates group of 3 days old virgin females of w¹¹¹⁸ and dIlp8^−/− stocks. The quantity and quality of RNA have been assessed by Nanodrop, Qubit 2.0 and Agilent 2100. Magnetic beads with oligo (dT) were performed to enrich Poly (A) mRNA from total RNA. The cDNA library was constructed using the Paired-End Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States) followed the manufacturer’s instructions. To ensure quality control, Qubit 2.0, Agilent 2100 and quantitative Real-Time PCR were performed, and then the transcriptome sequencing was carried out using IlluminaHiSeq 6000 with PE100 approach (Biomarker Technology Corporation, Beijing, China). The clean reads were filtered from raw data by removing adaptor sequence, primer reads and low-quality bases. We use the longest isoform to represent a gene for downstream analysis. The reads of each sample were mapped to the reference genome of D. melanogaster. The gene abundance was represented by PKM value. DEG screening in sample group was conducted with the DEGseq package. False discovery rate (FDR) value ≤ .01 and fold change (FC) ≥ 2 in the Benjamini and Hochberg method were chosen as DEGs.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) SRR22543184, SRR22543185, SRR22543186, SRR22543187, SRR22543188 and SRR22543189.

Author contributions

HL: data curation; formal analysis; investigation; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. XL: data curation; formal analysis; investigation. NL: data curation; formal analysis; methodology. TL: methodology; project administration; supervision. JZ: conceptualization; data curation; funding acquisition; project administration; writing—review and editing.

Funding

This work was funded by the Research and Application of Industrial Technology System for Organic Agriculture in Yunnan Plateau (202202AE090029-05 to J.Z), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970478 to J.Z).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Xiangge Du and Dr. Ming Dong for fly stocks. We thank the Core Facility of Drosophila Resource and Technology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for providing fly stocks and reagents.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1103923/full#supplementary-material

References

Ahmed, S. M. H., Maldera, J. A., Krunic, D., Paiva-Silva, G. O., Pénalva, C., Teleman, A. A., et al. (2020). Fitness trade-offs incurred by ovary-to-gut steroid signalling in Drosophila. Nature 584, 415–419. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2462-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ameku, T., and Niwa, R. (2016). Mating-induced increase in germline stem cells via the neuroendocrine system in female Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006123. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aslam, A. F., Kiya, T., Mita, K., and Iwami, M. (2011). Identification of novel bombyxin genes from the genome of the silkmoth Bombyx mori and analysis of their expression. Zool. Sci. 28, 609–616. doi:10.2108/zsj.28.609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Badisco, L., Claeys, I., VanHiel, M., Clynen, E., Huybrechts, J., Vandersmissen, T., et al. (2008). Purification and characterization of an insulin-related peptide in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria: immunolocalization, cDNA cloning, transcript profiling and interaction with neuroparsin. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 40, 137–150. doi:10.1677/JME-07-0161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baron, A., Denis, B., and Wicker-Thomas, C. (2018). Control of pheromone production by ovaries in Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 109, 138–143. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2018.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bilen, J., Atallah, J., Azanchi, R., Levine, J. D., and Riddiford, L. M. (2013). Regulation of onset of female mating and sex pheromone production by juvenile hormone in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110, 18321–18326. doi:10.1073/pnas.1318119110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bownes, M., and Smith, T. (1984). Ecdysteroids in adult males and females of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 30, 823–830. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(84)90019-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, M. R., Clark, K. D., Gulia, M., Zhao, Z., Garczynski, S. F., Crim, J. W., et al. (2008). An insulin-like peptide regulates egg maturation and metabolism in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105, 5716–5721. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800478105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Y., Li, B., Chen, N., Yang, D., Li, L., and Liu, T. (2021). Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) subjected to various phytosanitary treatments. Insects 12, 945. doi:10.3390/insects12100945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chiang, Y. N., Tan, K. J., Chung, H., Lavrynenko, O., Shevchenko, A., and Yew, J. Y. (2016). Steroid hormone signaling is essential for pheromone production and oenocyte survival. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006126. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chowanski, S., Walkowiak-Nowicka, K., Winkiel, M., Marciniak, P., Urbanski, A., and Pacholska-Bogalska, J. (2021). Insulin-like peptides and cross-talk with other factors in the regulation of insect metabolism. Front. Physiol. 12, 701203. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.701203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colombani, J., Andersen, D. S., Boulan, L., Boone, E., Romero, N., Virolle, V., et al. (2015). Drosophila Lgr3 couples organ growth with maturation and ensures developmental stability. Curr. Biol. 25, 2723–2729. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colombani, J., Andersen, D. S., and Léopold, P. (2012). Secreted peptide dIlp8 coordinates Drosophila tissue growth with developmental timing. Science 336, 582–585. doi:10.1126/science.1216689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

DaCrema, D., Bhandari, R., Karanja, F., Yano, R., and Halme, A. (2021). Ecdysone regulates the Drosophila imaginal disc epithelial barrier, determining the length of regeneration checkpoint delay. Development 148, dev195057. doi:10.1242/dev.195057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deady, L. D., Shen, W., Mosure, S. A., Spradling, A. C., and Sun, J. (2015). Matrix metalloproteinase 2 is required for ovulation and corpus luteum formation in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004989. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004989

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, B., Li, Q., Liu, X., Cao, Y., Li, B., Qian, Y., et al. (2019). Chemoconnectomics: Mapping chemical transmission in Drosophila. Neuron 101, 876–893. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dewes, E. (1973). Regeneration in transplanted halves of male genital disks and its influence upon duration of development in Ephestia kühniella Z. Wilhelm Roux. Arch. Entwickl. Mech. Org. 172, 349–354. doi:10.1007/BF00577885

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dow, M. A. (1976). The genetic basis of receptivity of yellow mutant Drosophila melanogaster females. Behav. Genet. 6, 141–143. doi:10.1007/BF01067144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drapeau, M. D., Cyran, S. A., Viering, M. M., Geyer, P. K., and Long, A. D. (2006). A cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success. Genetics 17, 1009–1030. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.045666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drummond-Barbosa, D. (2019). Local and physiological control of germline stem cell lineages in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 213, 9–26. doi:10.1534/genetics.119.300234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erion, R., and Sehgal, A. (2013). Regulation of insect behavior via the insulin-signaling pathway. Front. Physiol. 4, 353. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fedina, T. Y., Arbuthnott, D., Rundle, H. D., Promislow, D. E. L., and Pletcher, S. D. (2017). Tissue-specific insulin signaling mediates female sexual attractiveness. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006935. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fedina, T. Y., Kuo, T. H., Dreisewerd, K., Dierick, H. A., Yew, J. Y., and Pletcher, S. D. (2012). Dietary effects on cuticular hydrocarbons and sexual attractiveness in Drosophila. PLoS One 7, e49799. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049799

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujinaga, D., Shiomi, K., Yagi, Y., Kataoka, H., and Mizoguchi, A. (2019). An insulin-like growth factor-like peptide promotes ovarian development in the silkmoth Bombyx mori. Sci. Rep. 9, 18446. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54962-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garelli, A., Gontijo, A. M., Miguela, V., Caparros, E., and Dominguez, M. (2012). Imaginal discs secrete insulin-like peptide 8 to mediate plasticity of growth and maturation. Science 336, 579–582. doi:10.1126/science.1216735

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garelli, A., Heredia, F., Casimiro, A. P., Macedo, A., Nunes, C., Garcez, M., et al. (2015). DIlp8 requires the neuronal relaxin receptor Lgr3 to couple growth to developmental timing. Nat. Commun. 6, 8732. doi:10.1038/ncomms9732

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gontijo, A. M., and Garelli, A. (2018). The biology and evolution of the dIlp8-lgr3 pathway: A relaxin-like pathway coupling tissue growth and developmental timing control. Mech. Dev. 154, 44–50. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2018.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heredia, F., Volonte, Y., Pereirinha, J., Fernandez-Acosta, M., Casimiro, A. P., Belem, C. G., et al. (2021). The steroid-hormone ecdysone coordinates parallel pupariation neuromotor and morphogenetic subprograms via epidermis-to-neuron dIlp8-Lgr3 signal induction. Nat. Commun. 12, 3328. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23218-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imambocus, B. N., Zhou, F., Formozov, A., Wittich, A., Tenedini, F. M., Hu, C., et al. (2021). A neuropeptidergic circuit gates selective escape behavior of Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 32, 149–163.e8. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jaszczak, J. S., and Halme, A. (2016). Arrested development: Coordinating regeneration with development and growth in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 40, 87–94. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2016.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jaszczak, J. S., Wolpe, J. B., Bhandari, R., Jaszczak, R. G., and Halme, A. (2016). Growth coordination during Drosophila melanogaster imaginal disc regeneration is mediated by signaling through the relaxin receptor Lgr3 in the prothoracic gland. Genet 204, 703–709. doi:10.1534/genetics.116.193706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kannan, K., and Fridell, Y. C. (2013). Functional implications of Drosophila insulin-like peptides in metabolism, aging, and dietary restriction. Front. Physiol. 4, 288. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karanja, F., Sahu, S., Weintraub, S., Bhandari, R., Jaszczak, R., Sitt, J., et al. (2022). Ecdysone exerts biphasic control of regenerative signaling, coordinating the completion of regeneration with developmental progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2115017119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2115017119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katoh, K., Rozewicki, J., and Yamada, K. D. (2019). MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform 20, 1160–1166. doi:10.1093/bib/bbx108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874. doi:10.1093/molbev/msw054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kunkel, J. G. (1977). Cockroach molting. II. The nature of regeneration-induced delay of molting hormone secretion. Biol. Bull. 153, 145–162. doi:10.2307/1540698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, T. H., Fedina, T. Y., Hansen, I., Dreisewerd, K., Dierick, H. A., Yew, J. Y., et al. (2012). Insulin signaling mediates sexual attractiveness in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002684. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002684

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lebreton, S., Trona, F., Borrero-Echeverry, F., Bilz, F., Grabe, V., Becher, P. G., et al. (2015). Feeding regulates sex pheromone attraction and courtship in Drosophila females. Sci. Rep. 10, 13132. doi:10.1038/srep13132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leyria, J., Philip, R., Orchard, I., and Lange, A. B. (2022). Gonadulin: A newly discovered insulin-like peptide involved in ovulation and oviposition in Rhodnius prolixus, a vector of chagas disease. Insect biochem. Mol. Biol. 150, 103848. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2022.103848

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, B., Predel, R., Neupert, S., Hauser, F., Tanaka, Y., Cazzamali, G., et al. (2008). Genomics, transcriptomics, and peptidomics of neuropeptides and protein hormones in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Genome Res. 18, 113–122. doi:10.1101/gr.6714008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, S., and Nässel, D. R. (2020). Drosophila insulin-like peptide 8 (dIlp8) in ovarian follicle cells regulates ovulation and metabolism. Front. Endocrinol. 11, 461. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, W. S., Yeh, S. R., Fan, S. Z., Chen, L. Y., Yen, J. H., Fu, T. F., et al. (2018). Insulin signaling in female Drosophila links diet and sexual attractiveness. Faseb. J. 32, 3870–3877. doi:10.1096/fj.201800067R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ling, L., Kokoza, V. A., Zhang, C., Aksoy, E., and Raikhel, A. S. (2017). Microrna-277 targets insulin-like peptides 7 and 8 to control lipid metabolism and reproduction in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114, E8017–E8024. doi:10.1073/pnas.1710970114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Livak, K. J., and Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Madhavan, K., and Schneiderman, H. (1969). Hormonal control of imaginal disc regeneration in Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera). Biol. Bull. 137, 321–331. doi:10.2307/1540104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meissner, G. W., Luo, S. D., Dias, B. G., Texada, M. J., and Baker, B. S. (2016). Sex-specific regulation of Lgr3 in Drosophila neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113, E1256–E1265. doi:10.1073/pnas.1600241113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mizoguchi, A., and Okamoto, N. (2013). Insulin-like and IGF-like peptides in the silkmoth Bombyx mori: Discovery, structure, secretion, and function. Front. Physiol. 4, 217. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mo, D., Chen, Y., Jiang, N., Shen, J., and Zhang, J. (2020). Investigation of isoform specific functions of the V-ATPase a subunit during Drosophila wing development. Front. Genet. 10, 723. doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nässel, D. R., Liu, Y., and Luo, J. (2015). Insulin/IGF signaling and its regulation in Drosophila. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 221, 255–266. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.11.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nässel, D. R., and Vanden, B. J. (2016). Insulin/IGF signaling in Drosophila and other insects: Factors that regulate production, release and post-release action of the insulin-like peptides. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73, 271–290. doi:10.1007/s00018-015-2063-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nili, M., Mukherjee, A., Shinde, U., David, L., and Rotwein, P. (2012). Defining the disulfide bonds of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 by tandem mass spectrometry with electron transfer dissociation and collision-induced dissociation. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 1510–1519. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.285528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okamoto, N., and Watanabe, A. (2022). Interorgan communication through peripherally derived peptide hormones in Drosophila. Fly. (Austin) 16, 152–176. doi:10.1080/19336934.2022.2061834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poodry, C. A., and Woods, D. F. (1990). Control of the developmental timer for Drosophila pupariation. Roux. Arch. Dev. Biol. 199, 219–227. doi:10.1007/BF01682081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ray, M., and Lakhotia, S. C. (2019). Activated Ras/JNK driven dIlp8 in imaginal discs adversely affects organismal homeostasis during early pupal stage in Drosophila, a new checkpoint for development. Dev. Dyn. 248, 1211–1231. doi:10.1002/dvdy.102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riehle, M. A., Fan, Y., Cao, C., and Brown, M. R. (2006). Molecular characterization of insulin-like peptides in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti: expression, cellular localization, and phylogeny. Peptides 27, 2547–2560. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2006.07.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rubinstein, C. D., and Wolfner, M. F. (2013). Drosophila seminal protein ovulin mediates ovulation through female octopamine neuronal signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110, 17420–17425. doi:10.1073/pnas.1220018110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Semaniuk, U., Strilbytska, O., Malinovska, K., Storey, K. B., Vaiserman, A., Lushchak, V., et al. (2021). Factors that regulate expression patterns of insulin-like peptides and their association with physiological and metabolic traits in Drosophila. Insect biochem. Mol. Biol. 135, 103609. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2021.103609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sieber, M. H., and Spradling, A. C. (2015). Steroid signaling establishes a female metabolic state and regulates SREBP to control oocyte lipid accumulation. Curr. Biol. 25, 993–1004. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simpson, P., Berreur, P., and Berreur-Bonnenfant, J. (1980). The initiation of pupariation in Drosophila: Dependence on growth of the imaginal discs. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 57, 155–165. doi:10.1242/dev.57.1.155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith-Bolton, R. K., Worley, M. I., Kanda, H., and Hariharan, I. K. (2009). Regenerative growth in Drosophila imaginal discs is regulated by wingless and Myc. Dev. Cell. 16, 797–809. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soller, M., Bownes, M., and Kubli, E. (1999). Control of oocyte maturation in sexually mature Drosophila females. Dev. Biol. 208, 337–351. doi:10.1006/dbio.1999.9210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Steiner, D. F., Park, S. Y., Støy, J., Philipson, L. H., and Bell, G. I. (2009). A brief perspective on insulin production. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 4, 189–196. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01106.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stock’, A., O'Farrell, A. F., and Stock, A. (1954). Regeneration and the moulting cycle in Blattella germanica L. II. Simultaneous regeneration of both metathoracic legs. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 7, 525–536. doi:10.1071/bi9540525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vallejo, D. M., Juarez-Carreno, S., Bolivar, J., Morante, J., and Dominguez, M. (2015). A brain circuit that synchronizes growth and maturation revealed through dIlp8 binding to Lgr3. Science 350, C6767. doi:10.1126/science.aac6767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Veenstra, J. A. (2020). Arthropod IGF, relaxin and gonadulin, putative orthologs of Drosophila insulin-like peptides 6, 7 and 8, likely originated from an ancient gene triplication. PeerJ 8, E9534. doi:10.7717/peerj.9534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Veenstra, J. A., Leyria, J., Orchard, I., and Lange, A. B. (2021). Identification of gonadulin and insulin-like growth factor from migratory locusts and their importance in reproduction in Locusta migratoria. Front. Endocrinol. 12, 693068. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.693068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, A., Du, Z., Luo, X., Zhang, F., Zhang, J., and Li, H. (2019). The conserved mitochondrial genomes of Drosophila mercatorum (Diptera: Drosophilidae) with different reproductive modes and phylogenetic implications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1, 912–918. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Q., and Brown, M. R. (2006). Signaling and function of insulin-like peptides in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, K. K., Yang, W. J., Tian, Y., Wu, Y. B., and Wang, J. J. (2015). Insulin signaling pathway in the oriental fruit fly: The role of insulin receptor substrate in ovarian development. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 15, 125–133. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.11.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yeom, E., Shin, H., Yoo, W., Jun, E., Kim, S., Hong, S. H., et al. (2021). Tumour-derived dIlp8/INSL3 induces cancer anorexia by regulating feeding neuropeptides via Lgr3/8 in the brain. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 172–183. doi:10.1038/s41556-020-00628-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zipper, L., Jassmann, D., Burgmer, S., Görlich, B., and Reiff, T. (2020). Ecdysone steroid hormone remote controls intestinal stem cell fate decisions via the PPARγ-homolog Eip75B in Drosophila. elife 9, e55795. doi:10.7554/eLife.55795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar