- 1Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
- 2Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel, Switzerland
The trachea is a long tube that enables air passage between the larynx and the bronchi. C-shaped cartilage rings on the ventral side stabilise the structure. On its esophagus-facing dorsal side, deformable smooth muscle facilitates the passage of food in the esophagus. While the symmetry break along the dorsal-ventral axis is well understood, the molecular mechanism that results in the periodic Sox9 expression pattern that translates into the cartilage rings has remained elusive. Here, we review the molecular regulatory interactions that have been elucidated, and discuss possible patterning mechanisms. Understanding the principles of self-organisation is important, both to define biomedical interventions and to enable tissue engineering.
1 Introduction
The trachea is a long (6 mm in mice, 10–15 cm in human), almost cylindrical tube that serves as a passage of air to the bronchial system Kishimoto and Morimoto (2021). Its wide diameter (1.5 mm in mice, 2–3 cm in human) poses little resistance to air flow. C-shaped cartilage rings on its ventral side prevent the collapse or obstruction of the tube (Figure 1A). Smooth muscle on the dorsal side allows for the expansion of the adjacent esophagus during the consumption of food or liquid. The separation into distinct domains that form cartilage and smooth muscles, and the subsequent emergence of cartilage rings reflects two separate symmetry breaks. While the first one is well understood, the molecular mechanism behind the second has remained elusive. In the following, we will discuss the regulatory interactions that are involved in these symmetry breaks.
FIGURE 1. Tracheal cartilage ring formation. (A) Cartilage rings (red) emerge in the mesenchyme on the ventral (V) side of the trachea. (B) Cross-section of the developing trachea. (C) Regulatory interactions that control the emergence of cartilage rings (CR) in the ventral and airway smooth muscle in the dorsal (D) tracheal mesenchyme. Black arrows indicate positive regulation, red arrows negative regulation. For details see text.
2 Dorsal-Ventral Polarity
The separation of cartilage and smooth muscles domains follows the already established dorsal-ventral polarity. Fibroblastic growth factor (FGF) from the cardiac mesoderm induces the Nkx2.1-expressing lung field on the ventral side of the mouse foregut Serls et al. (2005). Bone morphogenetic protein 4 (Bmp4) expression is restricted to the ventral foregut from early stages (E8.5) Li et al. (2008), and the BMP antagonist NOGGIN is secreted from the dorsally located notochord Fausett et al. (2014). BMP4 signalling surpresses SRY (sex determining region Y)-box transcription factor (Sox)2 expression in the ventral foregut Domyan et al. (2011). Mutual repression between NKX2.1, which is restricted to the ventral foregut endoderm, and SOX2, which is expressed in the dorsal foregut endoderm, defines the border between the trachea, and the future esophagus Que et al. (2007). NKX2.1 directly represses Efnb2, which establishes an EPH/EPHRIN boundary that results in the physical separation of tracheal and esophageal cells Lewis et al. (2022). Nkx2.1 null mice, and endodermal mutants for the BMP type I receptor genes Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b upregulate Sox2 and form a continuous ring of smooth muscle and no cartilage rings Que et al. (2007); Minoo et al. (1999); Yuan et al. (2000); Li et al. (2008); Domyan et al. (2011). Conditional ablation of Bmp4 from the foregut endoderm from E8.5 and from the mesenchyme by E9.5 does not prevent the ventral expression of Nkx2.1 at E9.5, but by E12.5 Nkx2.1 is absent, and expression of the cartilage marker Collagen Type II Alpha 1 Chain (Col2a1) is not observed Li et al. (2008).
Once the trachea has split from the future esophagus, it maintains the dorsal-ventral polarity, with Nkx2.1 expression restricted to the ventral side, and Sox2 and Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) expression higher on the dorsal side (Figure 1B). This polarity is observed also in mutants (Noggin null) that fail to split the tubes Que et al. (2006). The epithelial dorsal–ventral polarity translates into a mesenchymal polarity. Mesenchymal cells derived from the splanchnic mesoderm, positioned ventral to the developing tracheal tube express the transcription factor Sox9 as early as E10.5 Hines et al. (2013). From E11.5, dorsal mesenchymal cells express Acta2, a smooth muscle marker Hines et al. (2013). Removal of Sox9 or a key smooth muscle gene does not alter the expression domain of the other in the trachea Hines et al. (2013). The spatial restriction is thus not maintained by mutual repression between SOX9 and smooth muscle genes. Rather, signals from the tracheal epithelium appear important for the spatial restriction in the mesenchyme. Blockage of WNT secretion from the tracheal epithelium in Wls conditional mutants blocks Sox9 expression and results in smooth muscle formation also on the ventral side Snowball et al. (2015); Kishimoto et al. (2020). Epithelial WNT secretion thus seems to be required in translating the epithelial polarity to the mesenchyme. Canonical WNT signalling appears to be important in both layers as conditional removal of β-catenin in either the epithelium (Shh-Cre driven) or mesenchyme (Dermo1-Cre driven) results in loss of mesenchymal expression of the chondrogenic factor Tbx4 Kishimoto et al. (2020). In Shh null mice, the ventral restriction of Sox9 expression is lost, and until E13.5, Sox9 is transiently weakly expressed in a circumferential expression pattern on both the dorsal and ventral sides Park et al. (2010). Even though Shh is expressed more strongly dorsally, overexpression of Shh does not affect the relative cartilage and smooth muscle domains Sala et al. (2011). Addition of BMP4 or Noggin to lung explant cultures induces patches of cartilage formation and Sox9 and Bmp4 expression around the entire tracheal epithelium Park et al. (2010).
In summary, the separation of the smooth muscle and cartilage domains along the dorsal-ventral axis is controlled by the already existing embryonic dorsal-ventral polarity. The dorsal-ventral polarity is first induced along the epithelial tube, and later translated to the mesenchyme via diffusible morphogens.
3 Emergence of Periodic Patterns Along the Trachea
The positions of the future cartilage rings in the ventral tracheal mesenchyme first become apparent between embryonic day (E)12.75 and E13 as periodic patterns in Sox9 and type II collagen (Col2a1) expression Miller et al. (2004); Elluru et al. (2009); Park et al. (2010); Sala et al. (2011); Hines et al. (2013); Turcatel et al. (2013); Boucherat et al. (2014); Young et al. (2020). Lineage tracing experiments with Col2a1-mTmG mice show that Col2a1-expressing cells do not transdifferentiate into non-cartilage cells Young et al. (2020). Rather, the Col2a1-expressing cells condense in the cartilage rings, and the intervening space becomes filled by other mesenchymal cells. The Col2a1 gene encodes the pro-alpha1 (II) chain component of type II collagen, which is primarily found in cartilage. At E11.5, collagen type II is restricted to the lamina propria on the ventral side of the trachea Sala et al. (2011). By E12.5, collagen type II has spread into the ventral mesenchyme, but no staining is observed in the ventral half of the ventral mesenchyme. By E13.5, collagen type II-positive condensations are observed. At the same time, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) is found mainly on the boundary of the cartilage condensations and at lower levels between the condensations, and is largely absent from the condensations Yoshida et al. (2020). Expression of the SHH receptor Ptch1 appears to be restricted to the nascent cartilage condensations from E13.5 Miller et al. (2004). In parallel, the expression of Shh assumes a periodic pattern on the ventral, but not on the dorsal side of the tracheal epithelial tube Sala et al. (2011). Around E13.5 or slightly after, Tbx5 disappears from the cartilage condensations Tiozzo et al. (2009); Arora et al. (2012). From E14.5, Fgf10 expression becomes restricted in between the nascent cartilage condensations, but its receptor Fgfr2b remains uniformly expressed in the epithelial tube Sala et al. (2011). The cartilage condensations secrete BMP4 by E17.5 Park et al. (2010); it is not known at what time the spatial restriction of Bmp4 emerges.
4 Mutants Without Cartilage Rings
Functional genetics can help to identify the components of the core mechanism as their null mutations should result in the loss of cartilage rings. In the following, we will focus on mutants that do not show any periodic Sox9/Col2a1 expression patterns or tracheal cartilage ring formation, even though the trachea forms with correct dorsal-ventral polarity. This analysis thus necessarily excludes potential core components that are involved also in processes upstream of periodic pattern formation as their contribution to periodic patterning cannot be evaluated by this approach. The following mouse mutants have so far been reported that lack tracheal cartilage rings, even though the trachea forms with correct dorsal-ventral polarity: Shh null Miller et al. (2004); Park et al. (2010), Sox9 null Hines et al. (2013); Turcatel et al. (2013), mesenchymal Mek1/Mek2 removal Boucherat et al. (2014), and endodermal Wls removal Snowball et al. (2015). Finally, in mouse double mutants of R-spondin2 and lipoprotein receptor related protein 6 (Rspo2Tg/Tg;Lrp6−/−) tracheal rings were absent on the shortened tracheal structure Bell et al. (2008), and Dermo1-Cre-driven conditional removal of β-catenin, a core component of canonical WNT signalling, result in loss of mesodermal Tbx4, impaired mesenchymal growth, and lack of cartilage rings at E16.5 Kishimoto et al. (2020). A mutation in human FGFR2 (S351C) prevents visible tracheal ring formation, but the cartilaginous tracheal sleeve still forms Gonzales et al. (2005). Alternative mRNA splicing in one of the extracellular immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains results in different FGF receptor isoforms, known as FGFR (IIIb), and FGFR (IIIc) Johnson and Williams (1993). The isoforms differ in their ligand specificity and expression pattern. FGFR2(IIIb) is produced predominantly in epithelial cells and binds to FGF7 and FGF10, while FGFR2(IIIc) is found in the mesenchyme. Fgfr2b and Fgf10 null mice have a different phenotype from that reported for human FGFR2 (S351C) in that they develop shorter tracheas with 6–8 distorted cartilage rings Min et al. (1998); Sekine et al. (1999); Sala et al. (2011), suggesting that the phenotype of human FGFR2 (S351C) results from defects in the mesenchymal isoform. Ectopic mesenchymal expression of FgfR2b in FgfR2c heterozygous mouse mutants results in overgrowth of the tracheal rings and absence of noncartilaginous mesenchyme Tiozzo et al. (2009).
BMP4 and its antagonist NOGGIN can both rescue cartilage formation as well as Sox9 and Bmp4 expression in Shh null lung explants, but cartilage formation is then no longer restricted to the ventral side; it has not been reported whether periodic patterns are obtained Park et al. (2010). BMP4 and Noggin induce additional cartilage formation also in wildtype lungs, and cartilage then forms also on the dorsal side. In Bmp4 conditional mutants, Nkx2.1 is restricted to the ventral side at E9.5, but is lost by E12.5, and no Col2a1 expression and cartilage ring formation is observed Li et al. (2008). Mice with inactivated Bmpr1b and Sox2, and a SHH-driven endodermal conditional knockout of Bmpr1a develop a ventral NKX2.1 domain that forms disorganized isolated cartilage pieces/nodules, but not rings at later stages Domyan et al. (2011). Epithelial BMP signalling thus appears not to be necessary for the emergence of the periodic cartilage pattern. It is unclear whether mesenchymal BMP signalling is required for periodic cartilage formation as a combined mesenchymal knockout of Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b has so far not been reported.
While perturbations in many other pathways affect tracheal ring formation or tracheal growth, no other pathway has been described that is necessary for cartilage ring formation once the tracheal mesenchyme has emerged Iber (2021).
5 Control of Cartilage Ring Formation
SOX9 controls all steps of the cartilage differentiation process, and is a necessary factor for cartilage ring formation such that cartilage rings are absent in mesenchymal Sox9 knockout mice Hines et al. (2013); Turcatel et al. (2013). If doxycycline-driven Sox9 removal is stopped at E13.5, then some cartilage nodules are observed by E18.5 in the most proximal part Turcatel et al. (2013). Progressively more distal nodules are observed if doxycycline induction is stopped already at E12.5 or E11.5 Turcatel et al. (2013). Secretion of endodermal WNT via WLS is required for mesenchymal Sox9 expression Snowball et al. (2015), and Sox9 expression appears strongly reduced or absent in Rspo2Tg/Tg mutant tracheal mesenchyme Bell et al. (2008). More generally, epithelial WNT ligands including WNT7b and WNT5a activate WNT/β-catenin in the mesenchyme of the developing trachea to influence expression of chondrogenic factors including Tbx4, Tbx5, Msx1, Msx2, Sox9, and Col2a1 Snowball et al. (2015); Kishimoto et al. (2020). SHH signalling induces the expression of Wnt5a and its receptor Ror2, and ablation of Wnt5a or its receptor Ror2 results in shorter trachea with fewer cartilage rings Li et al. (2002); Oishi et al. (2003). Deletion of Wnt7b, expressed by the respiratory epithelium and known to mediate Wnt/β-catenin signaling, does not affect trachea length or width, but results in incomplete cartilaginous rings Rajagopal et al. (2008). Deletion of Wnt4 does not affect tracheal length, but results in 12 distorted rather than 14 tracheal rings, and results in reduced Sox9 and increased Fgf10 expression at 13.5 Caprioli et al. (2015).
SOX9 is a direct regulator of Col2a1 expression (Figure 1C), a necessary factor for cartilage formation Rockich et al. (2013); Boucherat et al. (2014). Despite the direct regulation, the expression of Sox9 and Col2a1 is largely independently regulated. Thus, Col2a1 rings emerge in Tbx4/Tbx5 conditional mutants even though Sox9 expression is rather weak, and Sox9 rings are barely visible Arora et al. (2012). Vice versa, Col2a1 is absent in Shh null mice, even though Sox9 is expressed until E13.5 Park et al. (2010). While Sox9 is weakly expressed in Shh null mice until E13.5, the ventral restriction of Sox9 expression is lost, and Sox9 expression is completely lost by E15 Pepicelli et al. (1998); Park et al. (2010). One group reported disorganised cartilage ring formation in Shh null mice Pepicelli et al. (1998), but other groups failed to observe cartilage rings Park et al. (2010); Miller et al. (2004).
A study in chondrocytes showed that SOX9-GLI directly and cooperatively regulate many genes such as Sox9, Col2a1, Ptch1, Gli1, Gli2, Fgfr3, Igf1r, and Bmp6 Tan et al. (2018). SHH signalling may thus engage in a positive feedback with SOX9. SHH signalling represses Fgf10 expression, and Fgf10 disappears from the mesenchymal condensations by E14.5 Bellusci et al. (1997); Park et al. (1998); Abler et al. (2009). In the absence of Sox9, the expression of Fgf10, Tbx4, and Tbx5 remains uniform Turcatel et al. (2013). Conditional removal of Tbx4, and Tbx5 has similar effects on trachea development as removal of Fgf10, but, even though TBX4/5 promote Fgf10 expression Cebra-Thomas et al. (2003); Sakiyama et al. (2003), they appear to act also independently of FGF10 during trachea development Arora et al. (2012). Bmp4, Wnt2/2b, and Sox9 are strongly reduced in Tbx4/5 conditional mutants, but Col2a1 levels appear normal.
Mesenchymal removal of Mek1/Mek2 results in a thinner trachea with continuous, but lower Sox9 expression at E14.5 and without cartilage rings by E18.5 Boucherat et al. (2014). Epithelial removal of Mek1/Mek2 results in a shorter trachea with fewer cartilage rings. Culturing lung explants with PD0325901, an inhibitor for MEK, results in increased Col2a1 expression and a widening of the cartilage condensations, but has no impact on Sox9 expression Yoshida et al. (2020). This is consistent with reports in other systems that show that mesenchymal phosphorylated ERK (a kinase downstream of MEK) opposes cartilage formation Oh et al. (2000); Ibarra et al. (2021). The differences between the culture experiments and the mesenchymal knockouts likely reflect differences in dosage and spatial restriction.
Despite its importance for cartilage ring formation, the upstream regulators of the MEK/ERK cascasde have remained elusive. FGFs signal via ERK, and overexpression of Fgf18 results in abnormal tracheal cartilage formation Elluru et al. (2009), but the knockout of Fgf18 does not result in a tracheal phenotype Usui et al. (2004). The FGF10 receptor, FGFR2b, is restricted to the tracheal epithelium Sala et al. (2011), and can therefore not trigger mesenchymal ERK activation. BMP4 appears to be the main inducer of ERK1/2 activation in the E9.25 ventral endoderm and mesoderm Li et al. (2008), but it is not known whether it remains so also at later stages when mesenchymal condensations form (E12.5-E13.5). A cell culture study concluded that BMP2 induces Sox9 transcription mainly via p38 MAP Kinase (MAPK), while regulating SOX9 transcription factor activity via pSMAD1/5/8 and p38 Pan et al. (2008). A number of other mechanisms has been found to activate ERK in other contexts. For one, mesenchymal WNT signalling has recently been shown to activate pERK in the cranial mesenchyme, which then blocks Sox9 and Col2a expression and cartilage formation Ibarra et al. (2021). Non-canonical SHH signaling has been suggested to trigger calcium-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) activation Robbins et al. (2012); Carballo et al. (2018). ERK may also respond to pressure and/or curvature, as reported for the lung epithelium Hirashima and Matsuda (2021). In epithelial cells from the mammary gland, ERK activity has been found sensitive to the stiffness of the surrounding matrix Farahani et al. (2021). Whether any of this plays a role in the tracheal mesenchyme is not known.
Interestingly, upon conditional removal of Myorcardin, the cartilage rings fail to expand towards the dorsal side, and the trachael lumen is reduced Young et al. (2020). Considering that smooth muscles and peristalsis are undetectable, and the expression of two BMP inhibitors is decreased and pSMAD signalling is increased in the mutants, this could be the consequence of either mechanical and/or signalling defects.
In summary, WNT signalling (WLS, R-spondin2/LRP6) is essential for mesenchymal Sox9 expression, and SOX9 is essential for cartilage formation. Sox9 is still expressed weakly in Shh and mesenchymal Mek1/Mek2 mutants, but fails to organise into rings. As such, SHH and MEK1/2 are either part of the core mechanism that results in periodic Sox9 patterning, or periodic patterning fails because Sox9 expression is too weak in those mutants. Myocardin, a master regulatory of smooth muscle differentiation, is necessary for the dorsal expansion of the nascent cartilage rings to their characteristic C-shape. But what leads to the periodic Sox9 pattern?
6 Candidate Mechanisms for Periodic Pattern Formation
A wide range of chemical and/or mechanical instabilities can result in biological pattern formation. The Swift-Hohenberg equation has been shown to recapitulate the complex tracheal cartilage pattern also at the tracheobranchial juncture, if coupled with a gradient to achieve the correct stripe orientation Kingsley et al. (2018). While the Swift-Hohenberg equation can be derived from fundamental equations for the Rayleigh-Benard convection in an heated fluid Swift and Hohenberg (1977), it has remained difficult to find a mechanistic explanation for the forth-order spatial derivative in biology Oza et al. (2016). Given its patterning versatility, Turing mechanisms Turing (1952) (Figure 2A) have been proposed for a large number of biological patterning processes, including tracheal cartilage ring formation Sala et al. (2011); Kingsley et al. (2018). While the mathematical properties of Turing mechanisms are well understood Murray (2003), and Turing patterns have been confirmed in chemical reaction systems Horvath et al. (2009), the molecular mechanism behind biological Turing mechanisms remains unknown. The experimental validation of proposed molecular implementations of Turing mechanisms remains impossible as kinetic parameters cannot be measured reliably in biological tissues and pattern likeness is insufficient proof. As such, only the experimental rejection of Turing mechanisms is possible to date. A well-known example are the stripes in the Drosophila blastoderm, which were initially accounted to a Turing mechanism, but have since been shown to result from cross-repressive transcription factor cascades downstream of opposing morphogen gradients Meinhardt (1986); Lacalli et al. (1988); Akam (1989); Jaeger (2011). In many other complex, stereotypic patterning systems, Turing models have remained the only candidate mechanism that is consistent with the experimental data. In its simplest form, Turing patterns require a negative feedback between at least two components that diffuse at different speed. Turing patterns can be obtained also with a single morphogen or growth factor if its binding to the cell-bound receptor upregulates the receptor concentration (Figure 2A), as is the case for SHH, FGF10, and BMP Menshykau et al. (2012); Badugu et al. (2012); Celliere et al. (2012); Kurics et al. (2014); Menshykau et al. (2014). Candidate networks for Turing models that yield periodic cartilage patterns have been studied extensively in limb development, where the cartilage condensations mark future digits and phalanges Iber and Germann (2014). The patterns in wildtype and perturbed conditions could be explained with a variety of biological mechanisms, including a 3-node network composed of BMP, SOX9, and WNT Raspopovic et al. (2014), a negative feedback between TGF-β and either the extracellular matrix (ECM) or TGF-β antagonists Zhu et al. (2010), and the interaction between BMPs and its receptor Badugu et al. (2012). These mechanisms have so far not been explored in the trachea. Mesodermal β-catenin appears necessary also for tracheal Sox9 expression Kishimoto et al. (2020), but this makes it difficult to assess the role of WNT signalling in the subsequent periodic patterning of SOX9. In case of a ligand-receptor-based Turing mechanism, the receptor would have to be upregulated in the tracheal cartilage condensations. This has indeed been reported for the SHH receptor PTCH1 Miller et al. (2004). The expression patterns of Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b are not known. Unlike in lung branching morphogenesis Menshykau et al. (2014); Kurics et al. (2014), FGF10 is unlikely to be part of the core Turing mechanism as its receptor remains uniformly expressed in the tracheal epithelium, and periodic collagen type II patterns are still observed in Fgf10 mice, if delayed and less uniformly shaped compared to the wildtype Sala et al. (2011). In case of a SHH-based ligand-receptor-based Turing mechanism, uniform SHH signalling on the dorsal side of the trachea could be explained with the higher Shh expression levels Que et al. (2009) that can take the regulatory system out of Turing parameter space and thereby ensure uniform patterns Kurics et al. (2014). The one-day patterning delay observed in Fgf10 null mice Sala et al. (2011) may then reflect a delay in the ventral downregulation of Shh expression. Apart from chemical signalling, cell-cell interactions can also result in Turing instabilities Watanabe and Kondo (2015). Given the movement and aggregation of Col2a1-expressing cells Young et al. (2020), the periodic pattern could, in principle, also arise from chemotaxis Keller and Segel (1971); Hillen and Painter (2009) (Figure 2B), or differential adhesion of cartilage progenitors in the ventral mesenchyme, though additional mechanisms would need to be in place to ensure reproducible stripe formation from noisy initial conditions Armstrong et al. (2006); Canty et al. (2017); Carrillo et al. (2019) (Figure 2C). Finally, differential growth of the ventral epithelium and mesenchyme (Figure 2D) could result in periodic patterning Sultan and Boudaoud (2008); Marin-Riera et al. (2018); Carrillo et al. (2019); Tozluoglu and Mao (2020). Expansion of a thin, incompressible layer with elastic modulus EEpi and thickness h relative to a thick, incompressible substrate with modulus EMes results in buckling with wavelength
FIGURE 2. (A) Repetitive patterns can emerge via a Turing mechanism when two regulatory factors that diffuse at different speeds engage in a negative feedback Turing (1952). In case of the ligand-receptor based Turing mechanism, the binding of the rapidly diffusing ligand (L) to the slowly diffusing receptor (R) results in up-regulation of the receptor and removal of the ligand. This system can be modelled with two coupled partial differential reaction diffusion equations. This system can yield a large variety of patterns, dependent on the reaction parameters and the tissue geometry. (B) Chemotaxis can result in periodic patterning when motile cells (C) produce and consume the diffusible chemoattractant or chemorepellent (L), as modelled for instance by the Keller-Segel model Keller and Segel (1971). (C) Differential adhesion between the blue and the red cells can result in periodic pattern formation. The mixture of cells is dependent on their relative surface tension (CT1 for the red, CT2 for the blue population). This results in three different relative surface tensions (T1 between red cells, T2 between blue and T12 between the two populations) Canty et al. (2017). To achieve separation in the displayed form CT1 must be larger than CT2 and T1 larger than T12 which is larger than T2. (D) Differential growth of two adjacent tissue layers can result in buckling. The wavelength λ of the periodic pattern depends on the thickness, h, of the expanding epithelial layer (blue layer), and the relative Young modulus EEpi/EMes of epithelium (blue) and mesenchyme (red) Sultan and Boudaoud (2008).
7 Conclusion and Outlook
Despite the simplicity of the pattern and the importance of the structure, tracheal cartilage ring formation remains poorly understood. Conditional mutants in combination with explant cultures, organoids, quantitative imaging, and mathematical modelling may help to unravel this patterning mechanism.
Author Contributions
DI wrote the text; MM created the figures.
Funding
This work was funded by SNF Sinergia grant CRSII5_170930 to DI. Open access funding provided by ETH Zürich.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the CoBi group for discussions.
References
Abler, L. L., Mansour, S. L., and Sun, X. (2009). Conditional Gene Inactivation Reveals Roles for Fgf10 and Fgfr2 in Establishing a normal Pattern of Epithelial Branching in the Mouse Lung. Dev. Dyn. 238, 1999–2013. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22032
Akam, M. (1989). Drosophila Development: Making Stripes Inelegantly. Nature 341, 282–283. doi:10.1038/341282a0
Armstrong, N. J., Painter, K. J., and Sherratt, J. A. (2006). A Continuum Approach to Modelling Cell-Cell Adhesion. J. Theor. Biol. 243, 98–113. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.030
Arora, R., Metzger, R. J., and Papaioannou, V. E. (2012). Multiple Roles and Interactions of Tbx4 and Tbx5 in Development of the Respiratory System. Plos Genet. 8, e1002866. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002866
Badugu, A., Kraemer, C., Germann, P., Menshykau, D., and Iber, D. (2012). Digit Patterning during Limb Development as a Result of the Bmp-Receptor Interaction. Sci. Rep. 2, 991. doi:10.1038/srep00991
Bell, S. M., Schreiner, C. M., Wert, S. E., Mucenski, M. L., Scott, W. J., and Whitsett, J. A. (2008). R-Spondin 2 Is Required for normal Laryngeal-Tracheal, Lung and Limb Morphogenesis. Development 135, 1049–1058. doi:10.1242/dev.013359
Bellusci, S., Grindley, J., Emoto, H., Itoh, N., and Hogan, B. L. (1997). Fibroblast Growth Factor 10 (Fgf10) and Branching Morphogenesis in the Embryonic Mouse Lung. Development 124, 4867–4878. doi:10.1242/dev.124.23.4867
Boucherat, O., Nadeau, V., Bérubé-Simard, F.-A., Charron, J., and Jeannotte, L. (2014). Crucial Requirement of Erk/mapk Signaling in Respiratory Tract Development. Development 141, 3197–3211. doi:10.1242/dev.110254
Canty, L., Zarour, E., Kashkooli, L., François, P., and Fagotto, F. (2017). Sorting at Embryonic Boundaries Requires High Heterotypic Interfacial Tension. Nat. Commun. 8, 157. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00146-x
Caprioli, A., Villasenor, A., Wylie, L. A., Braitsch, C., Marty-Santos, L., Barry, D., et al. (2015). Wnt4 Is Essential to normal Mammalian Lung Development. Dev. Biol. 406, 222–234. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.017
Carballo, G. B., Honorato, J. R., de Lopes, G. P. F., and Spohr, T. C. L. d. S. e. (2018). A Highlight on Sonic Hedgehog Pathway. Cell Commun. Signal 16, 11. doi:10.1186/s12964-018-0220-7
Carrillo, J. A., Murakawa, H., Sato, M., Togashi, H., and Trush, O. (2019). A Population Dynamics Model of Cell-Cell Adhesion Incorporating Population Pressure and Density Saturation. J. Theor. Biol. 474, 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.04.023
Cebra-Thomas, J. A., Bromer, J., Gardner, R., Lam, G. K., Sheipe, H., and Gilbert, S. F. (2003). T-box Gene Products Are Required for Mesenchymal Induction of Epithelial Branching in the Embryonic Mouse Lung. Dev. Dyn. 226, 82–90. doi:10.1002/dvdy.10208
Cellière, G., Menshykau, D., and Iber, D. (2012). Simulations Demonstrate a Simple Network to Be Sufficient to Control branch point Selection, Smooth Muscle and Vasculature Formation during Lung Branching Morphogenesis. Biol. Open 1, 775–788. doi:10.1242/bio.20121339
Domyan, E. T., Ferretti, E., Throckmorton, K., Mishina, Y., Nicolis, S. K., and Sun, X. (2011). Signaling through Bmp Receptors Promotes Respiratory Identity in the Foregut via Repression of Sox2. Development 138, 971–981. doi:10.1242/dev.053694
Elluru, R. G., Thompson, F., and Reece, A. (2009). Fibroblast Growth Factor 18 Gives Growth and Directional Cues to Airway Cartilage. Laryngoscope 119, 1153–1165. doi:10.1002/lary.20157
Farahani, P. E., Lemke, S. B., Dine, E., Uribe, G., Toettcher, J. E., and Nelson, C. M. (2021). Substratum Stiffness Regulates Erk Signaling Dynamics through Receptor-Level Control. Cel. Rep. 37, 110181. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110181
Fausett, S. R., Brunet, L. J., and Klingensmith, J. (2014). Bmp Antagonism by Noggin Is Required in Presumptive Notochord Cells for Mammalian Foregut Morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 391, 111–124. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.02.008
Gonzales, M., Heuertz, S., Martinovic, J., Delahaye, S., Bazin, A., Loget, P., et al. (2005). Vertebral Anomalies and Cartilaginous Tracheal Sleeve in Three Patients with Pfeiffer Syndrome Carrying the S351c Fgfr2 Mutation. Clin. Genet. 68, 179–181. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00477.x
Hillen, T., and Painter, K. J. (2009). A User's Guide to PDE Models for Chemotaxis. J. Math. Biol. 58, 183–217. doi:10.1007/s00285-008-0201-3
Hines, E. A., Jones, M.-K. N., Verheyden, J. M., Harvey, J. F., and Sun, X. (2013). Establishment of Smooth Muscle and Cartilage Juxtaposition in the Developing Mouse Upper Airways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 19444–19449. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313223110
Hirashima, T., and Matsuda, M. (2021). Erk-mediated Curvature Feedback Regulates Branching Morphogenesis in Lung Epithelial Tissue. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2021.07.11.451982
Horváth, J., Szalai, I., and De Kepper, P. (2009). An Experimental Design Method Leading to Chemical Turing Patterns. Science 324, 772–775. doi:10.1126/science.1169973
Ibarra, B., Beatriz, A., Machen, C., Radhika, P., and Atit, (2021). Wnt-Dependent Activation of ERK Mediates Repression of Chondrocyte Fate during Calvarial Development. J. Developm. Biol. 9 (3), 23. doi:10.3390/jdb9030023
Iber, D., and Germann, P. (2014). How Do Digits Emerge? - Mathematical Models of Limb Development. Birth Defect Res. C 102, 1–12. doi:10.1002/bdrc.21057
Iber, D. (2021). The Control of Lung Branching Morphogenesis in Current Topics in Developmental Biology Editors M. Affolter. Academic Press 143, 205–237. doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2021.02.002
Jaeger, J. (2011). The gap Gene Network. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 243–274. doi:10.1007/s00018-010-0536-y
Johnson, D. E., and Williams, L. T. (1993). Structural and Functional Diversity in the Fgf Receptor Multigene Family. Adv. Cancer Res. 60, 1–41. doi:10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60821-0
Keller, E. F., and Segel, L. A. (1971). Model for Chemotaxis. J. Theor. Biol. 30, 225–234. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90050-6
Kingsley, E. P., Eliason, C. M., Riede, T., Li, Z., Hiscock, T. W., Farnsworth, M., et al. (2018). Identity and novelty in the Avian Syrinx. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 10209–10217. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804586115
Kishimoto, K., and Morimoto, M. (2021). Mammalian Tracheal Development and Reconstruction: Insights from In Vivo and In Vitro Studies. Development 148, dev198192. doi:10.1242/dev.198192
Kishimoto, K., Furukawa, K. T., Luz-Madrigal, A., Yamaoka, A., Matsuoka, C., Habu, M., et al. (2020). Bidirectional Wnt Signaling between Endoderm and Mesoderm Confers Tracheal Identity in Mouse and Human Cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 4159. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17969-w
Kurics, T., Menshykau, D., and Iber, D. (2014). Feedback, Receptor Clustering, and Receptor Restriction to Single Cells Yield Large Turing Spaces for Ligand-Receptor-Based Turing Models. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 90, 022716. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.022716
Lacalli, T. C., Wilkinson, D. A., and Harrison, L. G. (1988). Theoretical Aspects of Stripe Formation in Relation to drosophila Segmentation. Development 104, 105–113. doi:10.1242/dev.104.1.105
Lewis, A. E., Kuwahara, A., Franzosi, J., and Bush, J. O. (2022). Tracheal Separation Is Driven by Nkx2-1-Mediated Repression of Efnb2 and Regulation of Endodermal Cell Sorting. Cel Rep. 38, 110510. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110510
Li, C., Xiao, J., Hormi, K., Borok, Z., and Minoo, P. (2002). Wnt5a Participates in Distal Lung Morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 248, 68–81. doi:10.1006/dbio.2002.0729
Li, Y., Gordon, J., Manley, N. R., Litingtung, Y., and Chiang, C. (2008). Bmp4 Is Required for Tracheal Formation: a Novel Mouse Model for Tracheal Agenesis. Dev. Biol. 322, 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.021
Marin-Riera, M., Moustakas-Verho, J., Savriama, Y., Jernvall, J., and Salazar-Ciudad, I. (2018). Differential Tissue Growth and Cell Adhesion Alone Drive Early Tooth Morphogenesis: An Ex Vivo and In Silico Study. Plos Comput. Biol. 14, e1005981. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005981
Meinhardt, H. (1986). Hierarchical Inductions of Cell States: a Model for Segmentation in drosophila. J. Cel Sci Suppl. 1986, 357–381. doi:10.1242/jcs.1986.supplement_4.20
Menshykau, D., Kraemer, C., and Iber, D. (2012). Branch Mode Selection during Early Lung Development. Plos Comput. Biol. 8, e1002377. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002377
Menshykau, D., Blanc, P., Unal, E., Sapin, V., and Iber, D. (2014). An Interplay of Geometry and Signaling Enables Robust Lung Branching Morphogenesis. Development 141, 4526–4536. doi:10.1242/dev.116202
Miller, L.-A. D., Wert, S. E., Clark, J. C., Xu, Y., Perl, A.-K. T., and Whitsett, J. A. (2004). Role ofSonic Hedgehog in Patterning of Tracheal-Bronchial Cartilage and the Peripheral Lung. Dev. Dyn. 231, 57–71. doi:10.1002/dvdy.20105
Min, H., Danilenko, D. M., Scully, S. A., Bolon, B., Ring, B. D., Tarpley, J. E., et al. (1998). Fgf-10 Is Required for Both Limb and Lung Development and Exhibits Striking Functional Similarity to drosophila Branchless. Genes Dev. 12, 3156–3161. doi:10.1101/gad.12.20.3156
Minoo, P., Su, G., Drum, H., Bringas, P., and Kimura, S. (1999). Defects in Tracheoesophageal and Lung Morphogenesis inNkx2.1(−/−) Mouse Embryos. Dev. Biol. 209, 60–71. doi:10.1006/dbio.1999.9234
Murray, J. D. (2003). “Mathematical Biology,” in : Mathematical Biology: II. Spatial Models and Biomedical Applications. 3rd edition (Springer), 2.
Oh, C.-D., Chang, S.-H., Yoon, Y.-M., Lee, S.-J., Lee, Y.-S., Kang, S.-S., et al. (2000). Opposing Role of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Subtypes, Erk-1/2 and P38, in the Regulation of Chondrogenesis of Mesenchymes. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5613–5619. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.8.5613
Oishi, I., Suzuki, H., Onishi, N., Takada, R., Kani, S., Ohkawara, B., et al. (2003). The Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Ror2 Is Involved in Non-canonical Wnt5a/jnk Signalling Pathway. Genes Cells 8, 645–654. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00662.x
Oza, A. U., Heidenreich, S., and Dunkel, J. (2016). Generalized swift-hohenberg Models for Dense Active Suspensions. Eur. Phys. J. E 39, 97. doi:10.1140/epje/i2016-16097-2
Pan, Q., Yu, Y., Chen, Q., Li, C., Wu, H., Wan, Y., et al. (2008). Sox9, a Key Transcription Factor of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Induced Chondrogenesis, Is Activated through Bmp Pathway and a Ccaat Box in the Proximal Promoter. J. Cel. Physiol. 217, 228–241. doi:10.1002/jcp.21496
Park, W. Y., Miranda, B., Lebeche, D., Hashimoto, G., and Cardoso, W. V. (1998). Fgf-10 Is a Chemotactic Factor for Distal Epithelial Buds during Lung Development. Dev. Biol. 201, 125–134. doi:10.1006/dbio.1998.8994
Park, J., Zhang, J. J. R., Moro, A., Kushida, M., Wegner, M., and Kim, P. C. W. (2010). Regulation of Sox9 by Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) Is Essential for Patterning and Formation of Tracheal Cartilage. Dev. Dyn. 239, 514–526. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22192
Pepicelli, C. V., Lewis, P. M., and McMahon, A. P. (1998). Sonic Hedgehog Regulates Branching Morphogenesis in the Mammalian Lung. Curr. Biol. 8, 1083–1086. doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70446-4
Que, J., Choi, M., Ziel, J. W., Klingensmith, J., and Hogan, B. L. M. (2006). Morphogenesis of the Trachea and Esophagus: Current Players and New Roles for Noggin and Bmps. Differentiation 74, 422–437. doi:10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00096.x
Que, J., Okubo, T., Goldenring, J. R., Nam, K.-T., Kurotani, R., Morrisey, E. E., et al. (2007). Multiple Dose-dependent Roles for Sox2 in the Patterning and Differentiation of Anterior Foregut Endoderm. Development 134, 2521–2531. doi:10.1242/dev.003855
Que, J., Luo, X., Schwartz, R. J., and Hogan, B. L. M. (2009). Multiple Roles for Sox2 in the Developing and Adult Mouse Trachea. Development 136, 1899–1907. doi:10.1242/dev.034629
Rajagopal, J., Carroll, T. J., Guseh, J. S., Bores, S. A., Blank, L. J., Anderson, W. J., et al. (2008). Wnt7b Stimulates Embryonic Lung Growth by Coordinately Increasing the Replication of Epithelium and Mesenchyme. Development 135, 1625–1634. doi:10.1242/dev.015495
Raspopovic, J., Marcon, L., Russo, L., and Sharpe, J. (2014). Digit Patterning Is Controlled by a Bmp-Sox9-Wnt Turing Network Modulated by Morphogen Gradients. Science 345, 566–570. doi:10.1126/science.1252960
Robbins, D. J., Fei, D. L., and Riobo, N. A. (2012). The Hedgehog Signal Transduction Network. Sci. Signal. 5, re6. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002906
Rockich, B. E., Hrycaj, S. M., Shih, H. P., Nagy, M. S., Ferguson, M. A. H., Kopp, J. L., et al. (2013). Sox9 Plays Multiple Roles in the Lung Epithelium during Branching Morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E4456–E4464. doi:10.1073/pnas.1311847110
Sakiyama, J.-i., Yamagishi, A., and Kuroiwa, A. (2003). Tbx4-Fgf10system Controls Lung Bud Formation during Chicken Embryonic Development. Development 130, 1225–1234. doi:10.1242/dev.00345
Sala, F. G., Del Moral, P.-M., Tiozzo, C., Alam, D. A., Warburton, D., Grikscheit, T., et al. (2011). Fgf10 Controls the Patterning of the Tracheal Cartilage Rings via Shh. Development 138, 273–282. doi:10.1242/dev.051680
Sekine, K., Ohuchi, H., Fujiwara, M., Yamasaki, M., Yoshizawa, T., Sato, T., et al. (1999). Fgf10 Is Essential for Limb and Lung Formation. Nat. Genet. 21, 138–141. doi:10.1038/5096
Serls, A. E., Doherty, S., Parvatiyar, P., Wells, J. M., and Deutsch, G. H. (2005). Different Thresholds of Fibroblast Growth Factors Pattern the Ventral Foregut into Liver and Lung. Development 132, 35–47. doi:10.1242/dev.01570
Snowball, J., Ambalavanan, M., Whitsett, J., and Sinner, D. (2015). Endodermal Wnt Signaling Is Required for Tracheal Cartilage Formation. Dev. Biol. 405, 56–70. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.06.009
Sultan, E., and Boudaoud, A. (2008). The Buckling of a Swollen Thin Gel Layer Bound to a Compliant Substrate. ASME. J. Appl. Mech. 75 (5), 051002. doi:10.1115/1.2936922
Swift, J., and Hohenberg, P. C. (1977). Hydrodynamic Fluctuations at the Convective Instability. Phys. Rev. A. 15, 319–328. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.15.319
Tan, Z., Niu, B., Tsang, K. Y., Melhado, I. G., Ohba, S., He, X., et al. (2018). Synergistic Co-regulation and Competition by a Sox9-Gli-Foxa Phasic Transcriptional Network Coordinate Chondrocyte Differentiation Transitions. Plos Genet. 14, e1007346. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007346
Tiozzo, C., Langhe, S. D., Carraro, G., Alam, D. A., Nagy, A., Wigfall, C., et al. (2009). Fibroblast Growth Factor 10 Plays a Causative Role in the Tracheal Cartilage Defects in a Mouse Model of Apert Syndrome. Pediatr. Res. 66, 386–390. doi:10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181b45580
Tozluoglu, M., and Mao, Y. (2020). On Folding Morphogenesis, a Mechanical Problem. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 375, 20190564. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0564
Turcatel, G., Rubin, N., Menke, D. B., Martin, G., Shi, W., and Warburton, D. (2013). Lung Mesenchymal Expression of Sox9plays a Critical Role in Tracheal Development. BMC Biol. 11, 117. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-11-117
Turing, A. M. (1952). The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B237, 37–72.
Usui, H., Shibayama, M., Ohbayashi, N., Konishi, M., Takada, S., and Itoh, N. (2004). Fgf18 Is Required for Embryonic Lung Alveolar Development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 322, 887–892. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.198
Watanabe, M., and Kondo, S. (2015). Fish Pigmentation. Comment on ”local Reorganization of Xanthophores fine-tunes and Colors the Striped Pattern of Zebrafish. Science 348, 297. doi:10.1126/science.1261947
Yoshida, T., Matsuda, M., and Hirashima, T. (2020). Incoherent Feedforward Regulation via Sox9 and Erk Underpins Mouse Tracheal Cartilage Development. Front. Cel Dev. Biol. 8, 585640. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.585640
Young, R. E., Jones, M. K., Hines, E. A., Li, R., Luo, Y., Shi, W., et al. (2020). Smooth Muscle Differentiation Is Essential for Airway Size, Tracheal Cartilage Segmentation, but Dispensable for Epithelial Branching. Dev. Cel. 53, 73–85.e5. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.001
Yuan, B., Li, C., Kimura, S., Engelhardt, R. T., Smith, B. R., and Minoo, P. (2000). Inhibition of Distal Lung Morphogenesis innkx2.1(?/?) Embryos. Dev. Dyn. 217, 180–190. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0177(200002)217:2<180::aid-dvdy5>3.0.co;2-3
Keywords: trachea, cartilage rings, symmetry break, SOX9, Turing pattern, chemotaxis, differential adhesion, differential growth
Citation: Iber D and Mederacke M (2022) Tracheal Ring Formation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:900447. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.900447
Received: 20 March 2022; Accepted: 05 April 2022;
Published: 25 April 2022.
Edited by:
David M. Holloway, British Columbia Institute of Technology, CanadaReviewed by:
Shigeru Kondo, Osaka University, JapanCopyright © 2022 Iber and Mederacke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dagmar Iber, iberd@ethz.ch