- Centre for Trophoblast Research, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Abnormal uptake or metabolism of folate increases risk of human pregnancy complications, though the mechanism is unclear. Here, we explore how defective folate metabolism influences early development by analysing mice with the hypomorphic Mtrrgt mutation. MTRR is necessary for methyl group utilisation from folate metabolism, and the Mtrrgt allele disrupts this process. We show that the spectrum of phenotypes previously observed in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at embryonic day (E) 10.5 is apparent from E8.5 including developmental delay, congenital malformations, and placental phenotypes. Notably, we report misalignment of some Mtrrgt conceptuses within their implantation sites from E6.5. The degree of misorientation occurs across a continuum, with the most severe form visible upon gross dissection. Additionally, some Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses display twinning. Therefore, we implicate folate metabolism in blastocyst orientation and spacing at implantation. Skewed growth likely influences embryo development since developmental delay and heart malformations (but not defects in neural tube closure or trophoblast differentiation) associate with severe misalignment of Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses. Typically, the uterus is thought to guide conceptus orientation. To investigate a uterine effect of the Mtrrgt allele, we manipulate the maternal Mtrr genotype. Misaligned conceptuses were observed in litters of Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, and Mtrrgt/gt mothers. While progesterone and/or BMP2 signalling might be disrupted, normal decidual morphology, patterning, and blood perfusion are evident at E6.5 regardless of conceptus orientation. These observations argue against a post-implantation uterine defect as a cause of conceptus misalignment. Since litters of Mtrr+/+ mothers display conceptus misalignment, a grandparental effect is explored. Multigenerational phenotype inheritance is characteristic of the Mtrrgt model, though the mechanism remains unclear. Genetic pedigree analysis reveals that severe conceptus skewing associates with the Mtrr genotype of either maternal grandparent. Moreover, the presence of conceptus skewing after embryo transfer into a control uterus indicates that misalignment is independent of the peri- and/or post-implantation uterus and instead is likely attributed to an embryonic mechanism that is epigenetically inherited. Overall, our data indicates that abnormal folate metabolism influences conceptus orientation over multiple generations with implications for subsequent development. This study casts light on the complex role of folate metabolism during development beyond a direct maternal effect.
Introduction
Maternal folate deficiency in humans is associated with increased risk of congenital malformations (MRC Vitamin Study Research Group, 1991) and pregnancy complications, such as placental abruption, hemorrhage, and preeclampsia (Wen et al., 2008). These complications potentially lead to increased risk of spontaneous abortion, miscarriage, or pre-term birth (Bukowski et al., 2009). Yet, how folate metabolism functions in pregnancy establishment is not well understood. Folate, a vitamin that underpins one-carbon metabolism, is required for thymidine synthesis (Stover, 2004) and transfer of one-carbon methyl groups for cellular methylation reactions (Ducker and Rabinowitz, 2017). Therefore, folate is required for rapid cell division and epigenetic regulation of gene expression, which are both important for feto-placental development.
At implantation, human and mouse blastocysts embed into the uterine wall to improve fetal access to maternal resources. Mouse litters consist of 5–20 embryos that must be optimally spaced and oriented within the uterus for ideal growth. Spacing mechanisms are not well understood but likely involve mechanical forces generated by the uterus and cross talk between blastocysts and the uterine epithelium (Chen et al., 2013; Flores et al., 2020). The orientation of the developing mouse conceptus aligns with the antimesometrial-mesometrial axis of the decidual swelling, such that the placenta of each conceptus forms on the mesometrial side of the uterus (Smith, 1985). For normal alignment to occur, mouse blastocysts attach to the antimesometrial uterine epithelium via the mural trophectoderm (opposes the inner cell mass (ICM)) by embryonic day (E) 4.5 and invade into the decidualizing endometrium (Smith, 1985; Cross et al., 1994). In contrast, human blastocysts attach to the uterus via the polar trophectoderm (cells that contact the ICM) (Hertig et al., 1956). In mouse, the polar trophectoderm forms the ectoplacental cone (EPC) and extra-embryonic ectoderm, which together consist of progenitor populations of the mature placenta (Simmons and Cross, 2005; Watson and Cross, 2005). The base of the EPC abuts the chorion and the tip of the EPC extends upwards through the mesometrial decidua. The embryo forms below the chorion on the antimesometrial side of the implantation site. The maternal and embryonic factors required to establish normal conceptus orientation are not well studied, though it is likely determined by blastocyst orientation at implantation (Kirby et al., 1967; Red-Horse et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2013) and/or signals from the maternal decidua during post-implantation development (Alexander et al., 1996; Daikoku et al., 2011; Winterhager et al., 2013; Cha et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). Furthermore, the extent to which deviation from normal conceptus alignment influences embryo and placenta development is not well understood.
Whether folate metabolism plays a role in implantation, spacing, and/or orientation remains unclear. Several mouse models of defective folate uptake, transport or metabolism suggest involvement of folate metabolism in early pregnancy. For instance, dietary folate deficiency in mice is associated with sub-fertility, increased embryonic lethality attributed to defects in decidualization (Gao et al., 2012; Geng et al., 2015), and low weight placentas with shallow trophoblast invasion (Pickell et al., 2009). During its metabolism, folate is converted to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate by methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). Methionine synthase (MTR) then catalyzes the transfer of the methyl group from 5-methyltetrahydrofolate to homocysteine to produce methionine (Shane and Stokstad, 1985). Methionine is the precursor of S-adenosylmethionine, the methyl donor of all methylation reactions (Ducker and Rabinowitz, 2017). Importantly, methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) ensures progression of both folate and methionine cycles by continued activation of MTR through reductive methylation of its vitamin B12 co-factor (Yamada et al., 2006). Mutations in human MTHFR, MTR, and MTRR genes are linked to pregnancy complications (Ren and Wang, 2006; Furness et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015), yet the mechanism of one-carbon metabolism in blastocyst spacing and conceptus orientation requires further study. Mutations in mouse genes associated with folate uptake or metabolism display gross placental phenotypes (e.g., Slc19a1−/−, Mthfr−/− and Mtrrgt/gt) or are yet-to-be assessed for defects beyond the embryo proper (e.g., Folbp1−/−, Folbp2−/−, Slc46a1−/−, and Mtr−/−) (Piedrahita et al., 1999; Swanson et al., 2001; Elmore et al., 2007; Gelineau-van Waes et al., 2008; Pickell et al., 2009; Salojin et al., 2011; Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Nevertheless, many of these mutations cause embryonic lethality by E10.5, a telltale sign of severe defects in placentation (Watson and Cross, 2005).
We previously reported the Mtrrgt knockdown mutation generated through a gene-trap (gt) insertion into the mouse Mtrr locus (Elmore et al., 2007; Padmanabhan et al., 2013). The Mtrrgt allele sufficiently disrupts one-carbon metabolism by significantly reducing MTR activity (Elmore et al., 2007). Indeed, Mtrrgt/gt mice exhibit characteristics similar to clinical indicators of human folate deficiency (Krishnaswamy and Madhavan Nair, 2001) including plasma hyperhomocysteinaemia, macrocytic anemia in adulthood, and a wide spectrum of developmental phenotypes at E10.5 including failure of neural tube closure (Elmore et al., 2007; Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Padmanabhan et al., 2018). Therefore, the Mtrrgt mutation is a robust model to assess the effects of abnormal folate metabolism. Besides neural tube closure defects, other developmental phenotypes observed in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5 are growth restriction, developmental delay, cardiac malformations, and placenta phenotypes (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). While the molecular mechanism and developmental timing of these phenotypes is currently unclear, alterations in genome-wide DNA methylation associated with gene misexpression are apparent in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5 (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Bertozzi et al., 2021; Blake et al., 2021). This result implicates an epigenetic mechanism.
Interestingly, the Mtrrgt mouse line also displays transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of developmental phenotypes (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is a non-conventional mode of inheritance caused by environmental stressors and/or metabolic disruption present only in the F0 generation that results in phenotypes at least up to the F3 generation (Blake and Watson, 2016). The mechanism of mammalian transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is not well understood. It is hypothesized that an epigenetic factor(s) is inherited via the germline in a manner that is independent of DNA mutation (Blake and Watson, 2016), yet it is difficult to tease apart the effects of the uterine environment from those intrinsic to the germline. In the case of the Mtrrgt mouse line, an Mtrrgt allele in either maternal grandparent (i.e., the F0 generation) is sufficient to disrupt germ cell DNA methylation (Blake et al., 2021) and cause growth defects and congenital malformations at E10.5 in the wildtype grandprogeny, in some cases up to the F4 wildtype generation (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). This phenomenon occurs when the F1 generation and all subsequent generations are wildtype for the Mtrr gene and display normal folate metabolism (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Padmanabhan et al., 2018). While robust genetic pedigree analysis and embryo transfer experiments showed that congenital malformations occurred independent of the uterine environment (Padmanabhan et al., 2013), the specific mechanism of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is yet-to-be determined in this and other models.
The overall study aim is to understand how defective folate metabolism due to the Mtrrgt mutation influences early development and the uterine- and embryo-specific effects involved. Notably, we observe a spectrum of conceptus misalignment from E6.5. The most severe form of this phenotype is visible at gross dissection as “eccentric placenta development” and associates with specific embryonic defects at midgestation. This finding has implications for the origin of some congenital malformations associated with folate deficiency. Misalignment occurred alongside twinning, which links folate metabolism to blastocyst orientation and spacing at implantation. To better understand the mechanisms behind conceptus misalignment, we investigate a maternal effect of the Mtrrgt allele. Data collected from histological analyses, highly controlled genetic pedigrees, and embryo transfer experiments reveal that severe conceptus misalignment occurs independent of the peri- and/or post-implantation uterus. This result differs from other mouse models displaying skewed growth. Instead, our data supports an embryo-specific defect as a cause of conceptus misorientation that is epigenetically inherited from either Mtrr+/gt maternal grandparent. Overall, we propose that defective folate metabolism disrupts blastocyst orientation and spacing over multiple generations, with implications for subsequent feto-placental development and a mechanism beyond a direct maternal effect.
Materials and Methods
Ethics
All experiments were performed in accordance with UK Home Office regulations under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012 and underwent review by the University of Cambridge Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body.
Mice
The Mtrrgt mouse line was generated as previously described (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Briefly, a gene-trap (gt) vector was inserted into intron 9 of the Mtrr gene. Upon germline transmission, the Mtrrgt allele was backcrossed to C57Bl/6J mice for eight generations (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). C57Bl/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratory), which are wildtype for the Mtrr gene, were used as controls and were bred in house separately from the Mtrrgt mouse line. All mice were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with a 12-h light/dark cycle, and fed a standard chow (Rodent No. 3 chow; Special Diet Services, Essex, United Kingdom) ad libitum from weaning (includes folic acid at 2.99 mg/kg of diet, methionine at 0.37%, choline at 1422.4 mg/kg of diet, and vitamin B12 at 19.2 μg/kg of diet). Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses were derived from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses unless otherwise stated. For assessment of maternal effect, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt female mice derived from Mtrr+/gt intercrosses were mated with C57Bl/6J males, and the resulting litters were dissected at E6.5. For assessment of maternal grandparental effect, F0 Mtrr+/gt male or female mice were crossed with a C57Bl/6J mate. Their F1 Mtrr+/+ daughters were mated with C57Bl/6J males to generate F2 Mtrr+/+ progeny for dissection at E10.5 or for littering out. F2 Mtrr+/+ females were mated with C57Bl/6J males to generate F3 Mtrr+/+ progeny for dissection at E10.5 or littering out. F3 Mtrr+/+ females were mated with C57Bl/6J males to generate F4 Mtrr+/+ conceptuses for dissection at E10.5.
Genotyping
DNA samples were obtained from ear tissue or yolk sac for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping of the Mtrrgt allele or sex as reported previously (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Tunster, 2017).
Dissections and Phenotyping
Noon of the day that the vaginal plug was detected was considered E0.5. Pregnant female mice were euthanized via cervical dislocation. Dissections were performed in cold 1x phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Each conceptus was individually scored for phenotypes (see below). Whole implantation sites at E6.5, or placentas and embryos separately at E8.5, E10.5, E14.5, and E18.5 were weighed, photographed, and either snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular analysis or fixed in 10% natural-buffered formalin (Cat. No. HT501128; Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C overnight and paraffin embedded for sectioning using standard protocols.
A rigorous phenotyping regime was performed as previously described (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Briefly, conceptuses were defined as “phenotypically normal” if they displayed 6–12 somite pairs at E8.5 and 30–40 somite pairs at E10.5 (according to e-Mouse Atlas Project; http://www.emouseatlas.org) and displayed no growth defect or gross abnormalities. For analysis at E10.5 only, an embryo was growth restricted if its crown-rump length was less than two standard deviations from the control C57Bl/6J mean crown-rump length. Growth restricted embryos also displayed normal somite pair counts and no other phenotype. At E8.5 and E10.5, developmentally delayed conceptuses exhibited <6 somite pairs or <30 somite pairs, respectively, but were otherwise normal for the developmental stage indicated by the somite pair counts. Severely affected conceptuses displayed one or more abnormality with appreciation for the developmental stage (e.g., somite pair count), as some of these embryos were also developmentally delayed. Abnormalities included: 1) delay neural tube closure whereby the length of the neural plate that adhered to form a tube was shorter than expected for the somite stage at E8.5, or failure of neural tube closure within the cranial or spinal cord region at E10.5, 2) heart defects (E10.5 only) including heart looping defect, pericardial edema, or hemorrhage, 3) placenta defects including failure of chorioallantoic attachment or eccentrically located placentas, or 4) “twinning” whereby two or more conceptuses shared a single implantation site. An implantation site that consisted of a decidual swelling with an ill-defined mass of fetal-derived cells was categorized as a resorption and considered dead. Conceptuses were allocated a phenotypic category based on their most severe phenotype and were only counted once.
Embryo Transfer
Embryo transfer experiments were performed and analyzed as previously described in detail (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Briefly, using M2 media (Cat. No. M7167; Sigma-Aldrich), pre-implantation wildtype embryos were flushed at E3.25 from the oviducts and uteri of Mtrr+/+ females (derived from one Mtrr+/gt parent) mated with C57Bl/6J males. Donor females were not superovulated. After a brief embryo culture period to prepare the recipient females, embryos were surgically transferred into the uteri of E2.5 pseudopregnant [C57Bl/6J × DBA/2] F1 hybrid (B6D2F1) females (Charles River). Control C57Bl/6J embryos were similarly transferred. Donor and recipient females were 7–10 weeks old. Embryos were transferred regardless of appearance and litters were never pooled. Transferred embryos were dissected at E10.5, the timing of which corresponded to the staging of the recipient female (Ueda et al., 2003), and scored for phenotypes as above.
Immunohistochemistry
Whole implantation sites or placentas were carefully oriented in paraffin for transverse sectioning at 5 μm for conceptuses at E6.5 and 7 μm for conceptuses at E8.5. Tissue sections that were centrally located were selected for analysis, and deparaffinized in xylene (Cat. No. IS8126; Thermo Fisher Scientific) before rehydration in descending concentrations of ethanol. Hematoxylin (Cat No. MHS32; Sigma-Aldrich) and eosin (Cat No. 861006; Sigma-Aldrich) staining of histological sections was performed using standard protocols. For immunohistochemistry staining, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched using 3% H2O2 (Cat No. H/1750/15; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Antigen retrieval was performed by treatment of tissue sections with porcine trypsin tablets (Cat No. T7168-20TAB; Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min at room temperature. Tissue sections were first washed with 1× PBST (1× PBS with 20% Tween20) and then in blocking serum (5% serum, Cat. No. D9663; Sigma-Aldrich), 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Cat. No. A4503; Sigma-Aldrich) in 1× PBST for 1 h. Sections were exposed to primary antibodies diluted in blocking serum overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies and dilutions used were: 1:300 rabbit polyclonal anti-COX2 (Cat. No. ab15191, RRID:AB_2085144; abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), 1:100 rabbit anti-MTRR (Cat. No. 26944-1-AP, RRID:AB_2880694; Proteintech Europe, Manchester, United Kingdom), and 1:150 rabbit anti-PGR (Cat. No. ab63605, RRID:AB_1142326; abcam). After thorough washing in 1× PBST, tissue sections were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with donkey anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Cat. No. ab6802, RRID:AB_955445; abcam) diluted to 1:300 in blocking serum. Peroxidase substrate reactions were conducted with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromagen substrate kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cat. No. ab64238; abcam). Tissue sections were counterstained with haematoxylin and coverslip mounted using DPX mountant (Cat. No. 360294; VWR).
In Situ Hybridization
In situ hybridisation probes were generated with gene-specific primer sets (Supplementary Table S1) that contained T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG) attached to each reverse primer and T3 RNA polymerase promoter sequence (AATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGG) attached to each forward primer (Outhwaite et al., 2019). Probe synthesis of digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled anti-sense and sense probes was performed via PCR using DIG RNA labelling Mix (Cat. No. 11277073910; Roche, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The in situ hybridization protocol was performed as previously described (Simmons et al., 2008) with the following alteration: paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used and thus, an initial dewaxing/rehydration step was added.
Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)
RNA was extracted from whole implantation sites at E6.5 using Trizol (Cat. No. T9424; Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesised using RevertAid H Minus reverse transcriptase (Cat. No. EP0452; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and random hexamer primer (Cat. No. SO142; Thermo Fisher Scientific) using 1–2 μg of RNA in a 20-μl reaction according to manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification was performed using MESA Green qPCR MasterMix for SYBR assay (Cat. No. RT-SY2X-03+WOUN; Eurogentec, Ltd.) on a DNA Engine Opticon2 thermocycler (Bio-Rad). Experiments were conducted with technical duplicates or triplicates and using at least four biological replicates. Transcript levels were normalised to Polr2a (Solano et al., 2016) and analyzed using the ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Transcript levels in C57Bl/6J tissue were controls (normalized to 1). For primer sequences, see Supplementary Table S1.
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (La Jolla, CA, United States). Parametric data was analyzed by unpaired t test or one-way ANOVA. Non-parametric data was analyzed by Mann Whitney test. Correlations were analyzed by linear regression or Fisher’s exact test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Software and Imaging
Primer sequences were designed using the NCBI primer design tool (Ye et al., 2012). Conceptuses were dissected using a Zeiss SteReo Discovery V8 microscope and photographed with an AxioCam MRc5 camera and AxioVision 4.7.2 software (Carl Zeiss). Tissue sections were scanned using a NanoZoomer (Hamamatsu Photonics, United Kingdom) and viewed using NDP Scan 2.7 software (Hamamatsu Photonics). Images were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States). Graphs were generated using Graphpad Prism 8 software.
Results
Mtrrgt/gt Conceptuses Exhibit Developmental Phenotypes at E8.5
To better understand the effects of the Mtrrgt/gt mutation on early mouse development, we first determined where MTRR enzyme functions in the conceptus by performing immunohistochemistry on histological sections of whole C57Bl/6J implantation sites at E8.5. MTRR protein was widely expressed in wildtype embryonic and extra-embryonic cell types including the yolk sac, amnion, allantois, and trophoblast progenitors (i.e., the chorion and EPC) at E8.5 (Figures 1A–C). This expression pattern was consistent with other folate metabolic enzymes and transporters at E8.5 (Cherukad et al., 2012). While expressed throughout the mesometrial and lateral decidua (Figure 1A), the antimesometrial decidua displayed striped MTRR expression in the primary and secondary decidual zones at E8.5 (Figure 1C) suggesting regionalized expression in the decidua. Overall, the broad expression of MTRR protein in wildtype conceptuses at E8.5 suggested a potential mechanistic role of folate metabolism in early feto-placental development and decidualization. Mtrrgt/gt embryos and placentas at midgestation display a substantial decrease in wildtype Mtrr transcript levels (6–24% of control levels) as determined by RT-qPCR (Padmanabhan et al., 2013), emphasizing the knockdown effect of the Mtrrgt allele.
FIGURE 1. Spectrum of phenotypes observed in Mtrrgt/gt mouse conceptuses at E8.5 and E10.5. (A–C) MTRR protein expression (brown) in a wildtype C57Bl/6J implantation site at E8.5. DNA, blue. Boxed regions in (A) shown at higher magnification in (B,C). N = 5 implantation sites, three technical replicates. Dashed line, boundary between EPC and P-TGCs. (D) Graph depicting the frequency of phenotypes per litter at E8.5 from C57Bl/6J control crosses and Mtrrgt/gt crosses. Each bar represents one litter. Grey, phenotypically normal; black, resorption; yellow, developmental delay (<6 somite pairs); pink, severely affected. See also Table 1. (E–H) Images of (E) C57Bl/6J and (F–H) Mtrrgt/gt embryos captured at E8.5 from (E,F) phenotypically normal (PN), (G) developmentally delayed (DD), or (H) severely affected (SA) conceptuses. The Mtrrgt/gt embryo in (H) displays a neural tube with delayed closure. Yellow bar indicates the length of neural plate that has closed into a tube. (I–N) Images of (I) phenotypically normal (PN) C57Bl/6J embryos at E10.5 and (J–N) severely affected Mtrrgt/gt embryos at E10.5 displaying (J–L) neural tube closure defects (pink arrowhead) in the (J,L) spinal cord region or (K) cranial region, or (L–N) heart malformations including (L) hemorrhage, (M) pericardial edema, or (N) an enlarged heart. Box depicts region of higher magnification directly below. (O–U) Images of placentas from (O,R) C57Bl/6J and (P,Q,S–U) Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses (O–Q) at E8.5 and (R–U) at E10.5 that were phenotypically normal (PN) or eccentrically located (EP). Dashed line, approximate outline of chorion. Black arrowhead, region of allantois attachment. Scale bars: (A,O–U) 1 mm, (B,C) 250 μm, (E–H): 500 μm, (I–N) low magnification, 500 μm, high magnification, 100 μm. Al, allantois; Am, amnion; AMD, antimesometrial decidua; Ch, chorion; Cr, cranial; De, decidua; Em, embryo proper; EnH, enlarged heart; EP, eccentric placenta (severe conceptus misalignment); EPC, ectoplacental cone; Hem, hemorrhage; Ht, heart defect; MD, mesometrial decidua; NTD, neural tube defect; PDZ, primary decidual zone; PE, pericardial edema; P-TGCs, parietal trophoblast giant cells; SC, spinal cord; SDZ, secondary decidual zone; sp, somite pairs; YS, yolk sac.
Next, to explore the extent of developmental disruption caused by the Mtrrgt/gt mutation before E10.5, rigorous phenotype assessment of Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses was performed at E8.5. Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses derived from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses were scored for gross abnormalities (N = 50 conceptuses from six litters). C57Bl/6J conceptuses, which are genetically wildtype for Mtrr and bred separately from the Mtrrgt mouse line, were used as controls (N = 43 conceptuses from five litters). This is because the Mtrrgt allele was backcrossed into the C57Bl/6J mouse strain and Mtrr+/+ conceptuses derived from Mtrr+/gt intercrosses display multigenerational inheritance of developmental phenotypes (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Similar to E10.5 (Padmanabhan et al., 2013), Mtrrgt/gt litter sizes and resorption rates were consistent with controls at E8.5 (Figure 1D; Table 1). Allocation to a phenotypic category depended upon the most severe phenotype exhibited by each conceptus (see methods). The majority of C57Bl/6J conceptuses at E8.5 were phenotypically normal (79.1% of conceptuses), displaying 6–12 somite pairs and no other obvious abnormalities (Figures 1D,E; Table 1). Nearly all other C57Bl/6J conceptuses were resorbed (18.6% of conceptuses; Figure 1D; Table 1), appearing as decidual swellings with an ill-defined mass of fetal-derived cells. In contrast, only 42.0% of Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E8.5 were phenotypically normal upon gross inspection (Figures 1D,F; Table 1; p = 0.009). The remaining Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses were either resorbed (8.0% of conceptuses; Figure 1D; Table 1), or exhibited one or more developmental phenotype (Figures 1D,G,H; Table 1). These phenotypes included developmental delay, defined as embryos with <6 somite pairs yet otherwise normal for the developmental stage (30.0% of conceptuses; p = 0.032; Figures 1D,G; Table 1), or severe abnormalities (20.0% of conceptuses; p = 0.0013; Figures 1D,H; Table 1). Defects that were considered severe were delay of neural tube closure (10% of conceptuses; Table 1) whereby the length of the neural plate that formed a tube was shorter than expected based on somite pair count at E8.5 (Figure 1H) and might lead to failure of neural tube closure by E10.5 (Figures 1I–L), and/or placenta phenotypes whereby chorioallantoic attachment was absent (4% of conceptuses) or the placenta was eccentrically located (12% of conceptuses; Figures 1P,Q; Table 1). In contrast, C57Bl/6J conceptuses at E8.5 infrequently displayed developmental delay (2.3% of conceptuses; Table 1) and severe abnormalities were undetected (Figures 1D,I,O; Table 1). The phenotypes in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E8.5 were similar to those observed at E10.5 (Figures 1J,K), though gross heart defects including hemorrhage, enlargement, and pericardial edema observed at E10.5 (Figures 1L–N) (Padmanabhan et al., 2013) were not observed at E8.5. A more detailed assessment of the heart at E8.5 is required in the future. Overall, some developmental phenotypes caused by the Mtrrgt mutation likely originate prior to or at E8.5 (e.g., neural tube closure defects and placenta defects) while others do not become apparent until after E8.5 (e.g., heart defects).
A Low Frequency of Twinning Occurs in Mtrrgt/gt Conceptuses Throughout Gestation
During the phenotypic assessment of Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses, we also observed a low frequency of dizygotic twinning that was apparent from E6.5 to E18.5 (0.7–2.3% of implantation sites, N = 118–308 sites (stage specific)) (Figures 2A,B). Twinning occurred when at least two conceptuses occupied a single decidual swelling. This phenotype was never detected in C57Bl/6J controls (N = 314 conceptuses). The occurrence of male and female embryos together in a single implantation site indicated dizygosity and suggested that twinning in the Mtrrgt mouse line likely resulted from poor blastocyst spacing at implantation. However, similar to controls, Mtrrgt/gt implantation sites were generally evenly spaced along the length of Mtrrgt/gt uteri (Figure 2C) rather than clustered together as is observed when there is a major uterine defect (Lu et al., 2013; Flores et al., 2020). Also, no more than one twinned implantation site was usually observed per Mtrrgt/gt litter (this study; Padmanabhan et al., 2013) indicating incomplete phenotype penetrance. Therefore, a uterine-specific defect was unlikely. Instead, we hypothesise that twinning caused by the Mtrrgt/gt mutation reflected an embryo-specific defect.
FIGURE 2. Twinning observed in Mtrrgt/gt mouse conceptuses across gestation. (A,B) Images depicting twinning at specific stages of development. (A) Histological sections of a C57Bl/6J implantation site at E6.5 with a single conceptus (dashed outline, left-hand image) and of an implantation site at E6.5 with two conceptuses (dashed outlines, right-hand image) derived from Mtrr+/gt mother (Mtrr+/gt mat) and C57Bl/6J father. Scale bar, 250 μm. (B) Whole placentas from singleton C57Bl/6J conceptuses (left-hand images) and twinned Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses (right-hand images) at E10.5, E14.5 and E18.5. Placentas viewed from the fetal-facing chorionic plate. Black dotted line, approximate outline of labryinth; black arrowhead, allantois attachment site; white arrow indicates where the placentas at E18.5 are fused. De, decidua; P, placenta; Fet, fetus. Scale bars, 1 mm. (C) Dissected uteri at E6.5 showing normal conceptus spacing in C57Bl/6J and Mtrrgt/gt litters. Grey arrowheads, individual implantation sites. Yellow arrowhead, cervix.
Mtrrgt/gt Mutation Causes Skewed Orientation of the Entire Conceptus
Given the high frequency of gross placental phenotypes identified in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E8.5 and E10.5 (Padmanabhan et al., 2013), the placenta was assessed further. No placental phenotypes were detected in C57Bl/6J control conceptuses at E8.5 or E10.5 (Table 1; Figures 1O,R) (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). However, Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses showed two distinct gross placental phenotypes. The first defect was failure of the allantois to contact and attach to the chorion (E8.5: 4.0% of conceptuses (Table 1); E10.5: 0.3% of conceptuses (Padmanabhan et al., 2013)), which prevents subsequent placental formation and causes embryonic lethality (Cross et al., 2003). The cause of this chorioallantoic attachment defect was unclear and it was not considered further here. The second phenotype was an eccentric placenta whereby the region of allantoic attachment appeared askew within the implantation site (E8.5: 12.0% of conceptuses (Table 1; Figures 1P,Q); E10.5: 5.8% of conceptuses (Figures 1S–U) (Padmanabhan et al., 2013)). Declining phenotypic frequencies during gestation suggested that the phenotype normalized or some Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses with these placental defects underwent lethality between E8.5 and E10.5.
To better understand the eccentric placenta phenotype in greater detail, we examined centrally located transverse histological sections of C57Bl/6J and Mtrrgt/gt placentas at E8.5 after chorioallantoic attachment was complete (Cross et al., 2003). In all C57Bl/6J and Mtrrgt/gt placental sections assessed, the allantois was attached in a normal manner in the center of the chorion. However, a proportion of Mtrrgt/gt placentas displayed trophoblast compartments (including the chorion and EPC) that were noticeably askew within their decidual swellings (Figures 3A–C). The degree of skewed growth was determined by measuring the angle between the midline of the decidual swelling and the midline of the chorion or EPC (Figures 3A–C). In Mtrrgt/gt placentas, the angles of chorion and EPC skewing were proportionate with an average angle of 10.2° ± 10.5° (mean ± s.d.) and 8.3° ± 15.9°, respectively (Figures 3D–F). These values showed an increased trend compared to C57Bl/6J conceptuses (chorion: 2.4° ± 4.5° (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.020); EPC: 0.3° ± 1.0°, p = 0.143; Figures 3D,E). Given the proportionality of chorion and EPC misalignment (Figure 3F), we hypothesized that the skewed orientation extended to the entire Mtrrgt/gt conceptus. Inter-individual variability of chorion/EPC skewing between Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses was apparent (Figures 3D,E) suggesting skewing occurred along a spectrum of severity. Therefore, we defined a chorion or EPC as “skewed” when its angle was >2 s.d. above the control mean (chorion: >11.4°; EPC: >2.4°; Figures 3D,E). Using this definition, 50.0% (6/12) of Mtrrgt/gt trophoblast compartments at E8.5 were skewed compared to only 14.3% (2/14) in C57Bl/6J conceptuses (Figures 3D,E). Given the spectrum of phenotypic severity, we propose that the eccentrically-located placenta phenotype identified during gross dissection likely denotes the extreme end of the skewed conceptus orientation spectrum. Moreover, less severe conceptus skewing was likely unappreciated during gross dissection.
FIGURE 3. Mtrrgt/gt mouse conceptuses at E8.5 demonstrate misaligned orientation with incomplete penetrance. (A–C) Histological sections of placentas at E8.5 from (A) a C57Bl/6J conceptus and (B,C) Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses with (B) aligned or (C) skewed orientation. Ectoplacental cone (EPC, outer boundary indicated by dashed line) is depicted by Tpbpa mRNA expression (purple) as determined via in situ hybridization. Black dotted line, bisection of placenta. Green dotted line, bisection of the chorion. Blue dotted line, bisection of the EPC. The angle between the line bisecting the placenta and the chorion or EPC is shown. (D,E) Data showing the average (mean ± s.d.) (D) chorion angle or (E) EPC angle in C57Bl/6J (C57) controls and Mtrrgt/gt (gt/gt) conceptuses at E8.5 (N = 9–12 conceptuses/group). Conceptuses with chorion or EPC angles >2 s.d. above the control mean (black dashed line [chorion = 11.4°; EPC = 2.4°]) were defined as skewed and represented as red data points. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, *p = 0.028. (F) Linear regression analysis between chorion and EPC angles for C57Bl/6 conceptuses (C57; N = 10 conceptuses) and Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses (gt/gt; N = 9 conceptuses). (G–J) Venn diagrams depicting overlap between severe conceptus misalignment (SCM) in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5 with embryonic phenotypes including (G) fetal growth restriction, (H) developmental delay, (I) heart malformations, and (J) neural tube closure defects in the spinal cord or in the cranial region. N values in top right of panel indicate total number of Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses assessed. Fisher’s exact test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (K,L) Images of embryos (top panel) and placentas (bottom panel) from the same conceptus at E10.5 that belong to the phenotypic groups indicated in (G–J). Phenotypically normal embryos and placentas from C57Bl/6J and Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5 are also shown. The heart defect shown is pericardial edema (yellow arrowhead). The neural tube defect shown is an open neural tube in the cranial region (pink arrowhead) and both images show the same embryo in different orientations. Black arrowheads, allantois attachment site in placenta. Dotted line indicates approximate outline of labyrinth/chorion. Scale bars: (A–C) 500 μm, (K,L) 1 mm. Ch, chorion; DD, developmental delay; EPC, ectoplacental cone; FGR, fetal growth restriction; Ht, heart defect; MD, mesometrial decidua; NTD, neural tube defect; PN, phenotypically normal; P-TGCs, parietal trophoblast giant cells; SCM, severe conceptus misalignment; UL, uterine lumen remnant.
Embryonic Phenotypes Associate With Skewed Orientation in Mtrrgt/gt Conceptuses at E10.5
To determine whether embryonic phenotypes were associated with conceptus misalignment, we assessed our phenotyping data from Mtrrgt/gt conceptus dissections at E10.5 (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Padmanabhan et al., 2017) for overlap between severe conceptus skewing (denoted as “eccentric placenta development” during gross dissection in this study and “eccentric chorioallantoic attachment” in a previous study (Padmanabhan et al., 2013)) and embryo growth defects or congenital malformations. Refer to our other published work for a full assessment of the individual phenotypic outcomes in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5 (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Padmanabhan et al., 2017). We selected E10.5 for the time point of assessment due to the size of this data set (>215 Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5) and because the detrimental effects of misaligned orientation on development might be more apparent at this stage. A caveat of this analysis was that only severe conceptus skewing was assessed using these criteria. While severe skewing did not associate with fetal growth restriction (5/15 misaligned Mtrrgt/gt embryos with 30–40 somite pairs had crown-rump lengths <2 s.d. of control mean, Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.193; Figures 3G,K,L), there was a correlation with developmental delay (9/18 misaligned Mtrrgt/gt embryos had <30 somite pairs, Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.003; Figures 3H,K,L). Separately, we observed that conceptuses with severe skewing showed an association with heart malformations including pericardial edema or reversed heart looping (9/18 of misaligned Mtrrgt/gt embryos had a heart abnormality; Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.0001; Figures 3I,K,L). Yet, none of the 18 Mtrrgt/gt embryos that failed to close their neural tube in either the cranial region (Figure 3L) or spinal cord region by E10.5 (Padmanabhan et al., 2013) displayed severe skewing (Figure 3J) indicating a lack of correlation between phenotypes. While a causal relationship is yet-to-be established, it is possible that skewed conceptus orientation might influence the rate of embryonic development and/or heart formation.
Skewed Orientation Does Not Alter Trophoblast Differentiation of Mtrrgt/gt Conceptuses at E8.5
To explore whether skewed conceptus orientation altered the development of the trophoblast population, we performed in situ hybridization to detect the expression of key chorion and EPC trophoblast marker genes (Simmons et al., 2008). Histological sections of C57Bl/6J control (N = 6 placentas) and Mtrrgt/gt placentas (N = 14 placentas) were assessed at E8.5. Mtrrgt/gt placentas were subdivided into those with aligned and skewed orientation. Trophoblast marker gene expression of Tpbpa (EPC marker), Hand1 (sinusoidal TGC progenitor and P-TGCs), Syna (syncytiotrophoblast-I progenitors) and Gcm1 (syncytiotrophoblast-II progenitors) was present in all Mtrrgt/gt placentas assessed, regardless of the degree of skewing (Figures 3A–C, 4A–L). These data indicated that the trophoblast populations were present and patterned in Mtrrgt/gt placentas, and thus their formation was not greatly affected by skewed conceptus growth. However, Prl7b1 mRNA expression (invasive trophoblast cell marker) was reduced in Mtrrgt/gt placentas with skewed orientation. The few Prl7b1+ cells that were present were located in the lateral decidua rather than in the mesometrial decidua (Figures 4M–O). Mislocalization of invasive trophoblast cells might have significant implications for uterine spiral artery remodelling and placental function, and should be explored in future studies.
FIGURE 4. Early trophoblast differentiation occurs in Mtrrgt/gt mouse conceptuses at E8.5 regardless of misalignment. Analysis of trophoblast gene marker expression (purple) via in situ hybridization in C57Bl/6J (N = 6) and Mtrrgt/gt (N = 14) placentas at E8.5. Mtrrgt/gt placentas with aligned and skewed orientation are shown. Trophoblast markers included (A–C) Hand1 (widespread trophoblast marker including sinusoidal TGC progenitors of the apical chorion), (D–F) Syna (indicates syncytiotrophoblast-I progenitors), (G–L) Gcm1 (indicates syncytiotrophoblast-II progenitors; branch point initiation sites indicated by clusters of Gcm1+ cells [black arrowheads]), and (M–O) Prl7b1 (invasive trophoblast cells; white arrowheads indicate mislocated Prl7b1+ cells). Dotted line indicates outer boundary of the ectoplacental cone. High magnification images in (J–L) represent boxed regions in (G–I), respectively. Scale bars: (A–C) 1 mm, (D–F) 125 μm, (G–I) 250 μm, (J–L) 50 μm, (M–O) 500 μm. Al, allantois; Ch, chorion; EPC, ectoplacental cone; MD, mesometrial decidua; UL, uterine lumen remnant.
Mtrrgt/gt Conceptus Misalignment Is Not Associated With Decidual Blood Sinus Area at E8.5
To better understand the cause of conceptus misalignment, we investigated a potential maternal effect of the Mtrrgt allele. Another model of skewed EPC growth exhibits dilated decidual blood sinuses (Winterhager et al., 2013). This association suggested that defects in the perfusion or structure of the maternal decidua might lead to skewed orientation of conceptus growth. Therefore, we measured the combined blood sinus area in the lateral and mesometrial decidual regions in centrally located transverse histological sections of C57Bl/6J and Mtrrgt/gt implantation sites at E8.5 (N = 6–12 placentas/group). Notably, the Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses were derived from an Mtrrgt/gt mother and father. Both aligned and skewed Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses were separately considered. The average proportion of the decidua attributed to blood sinuses was similar in C57Bl/6J, Mtrrgt/gt aligned, and Mtrrgt/gt skewed placentas (p = 0.259; Figure 4, Figures 5A–D). Furthermore, there was no correlation between decidual blood sinus area and chorion angle (p > 0.30; Supplementary Figure S2A) or EPC angle (p > 0.14; Figure 5E) in either Mtrrgt/gt group assessed compared to controls. Next, we examined whether left-right asymmetry in blood sinus area was evident and potentially guided the direction of conceptus misalignment. To do this, the ratio of right:left decidua blood sinus area was calculated. Like the controls, decidual blood sinus area was similar on the right and left sides of Mtrrgt/gt implantation sites, and was independent of whether conceptus skewing occurred (p = 0.605; Figure 5F). For each implantation site, the angle and direction of conceptus skewing was then compared to right-left decidual blood sinus ratio. Using histological sections of individual implantation sites, the chorion or EPC angle was classified as positive if it was skewed to the right and negative if it was skewed to the left. This value was plotted against the ratio of right:left decidual blood sinus area for that site (Figure 5G and Supplementary Figure S2B). In this model, a line-of-best-fit sloping downwards towards the right would indicate that the chorion/EPC angled away from the greater blood sinus area, and a slope upwards towards the right would indicate that the chorion/EPC angled towards the greater blood sinus area. In C57Bl/6J controls, chorion and EPC skewing was absent regardless of whether the blood sinus area was greater on the right or left (Figure 5G and Supplementary Figure S2B). Similarly in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses, there was no statistically significant relationship between blood sinus size and the direction of chorion or EPC growth (p > 0.37; Figure 5G and Supplementary Figure S2B). These data suggested that the volume of maternal blood perfused into the implantation site was unlikely related to the orientation of Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E8.5.
FIGURE 5. Mouse conceptus skewing does not correlate with decidual blood sinus area. (A–C) Histological sections of (A) C57Bl/6J and (B,C) Mtrrgt/gt placentas at E8.5. Ectoplacental cones were stained for Tpbpa via in situ hybridization. DNA, pink. Bottom panel represents higher magnification of boxed region in top panel. Placentas with (A,B) aligned and (C) skewed orientation are shown. N = 6–12 placentas/group were assessed. Black dashed line bisects the placenta. Blue dashed line bisects the EPC. Green dashed line bisects the chorion. Skewing angles are indicated for chorion (green) and EPC (blue). De, decidua; DBS, decidual blood sinus. Scale bars: top panel, 500 μm; bottom panel, 100 μm. (D) Graph showing average area of decidual blood sinuses (mean ± s.d.) per total decidua area assessed in histological sections of C57Bl/6J (grey bar) and Mtrrgt/gt (black and blue bars) placentas at E8.5. Aligned (Al) and skewed (Sk) placentas are represented (N = 6–12 placentas/group, with at least three sections assessed per placenta). One-way ANOVA, p = 0.2586. (E) Linear regression analyses of decidua blood sinus area in relation to EPC angle for C57Bl/6J and Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses. Aligned and skewed Mtrrgt/gt placentas were considered separately (N = 6–12 placentas/group). (F) Data depicting the ratio of decidua blood sinus area on the right and left sides of implantation sites from C57Bl/6J (C57) and Mtrrgt/gt (gt/gt) conceptuses at E8.5. Data represented as mean ± sd. Aligned (Al) and skewed (Sk) placentas were considered separately (N = 6–12 placentas/group). Dashed red line indicates a ratio of 1. One-way ANOVA, p = 0.6050. (G) Linear regression analysis to determine whether conceptus skewing occurred towards or away from the greatest decidual blood sinus area. The EPC angle and the ratio of right:left decidua blood sinus area were compared in C57Bl/6J and Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E8.5 (N = 6–12 conceptuses/group). Aligned (grey or black dots) and skewed (blue dots) conceptuses are shown. Dashed red line, right:left blood sinus area ratio of 1. Dashed grey line, line of best fit. See also Supplementary Figures 2A,B.
Conceptus Misalignment Is Associated With the Mtrr Genotype of the Maternal Grandparents
To more directly consider a maternal effect on conceptus alignment, we manipulated the maternal Mtrr genotype in highly controlled genetic pedigrees and assessed the frequency of conceptus skewing. To do this, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, and Mtrrgt/gt females were mated to C57Bl/6J control males. Implantation sites were dissected at E6.5 (N = 31–41 conceptuses/maternal genotype from four litters) and assessed for conceptus skewing and defects in decidualization (see below). C57Bl/6J intercrosses were used as controls. The average litter size was significantly different between the pedigrees (Figure 6A; One-way ANOVA, p = 0.0351) with greatest difference between litters from Mtrr+/gt females (10.3 ± 1.0 conceptuses/litter [mean ± s.d.]) and Mtrrgt/gt females (7.8 ± 1.7 conceptuses/litter, Dunn’s multiple comparison, p < 0.05). To assess the extent of conceptus skewing caused by the maternal Mtrrgt genotype at E6.5, centrally located transverse histological sections of implantation sites at E6.5 were examined (N = 7–10 implantation sites/group). In a manner similar to the analysis at E8.5 (Figures 3A–C), the angle between the midlines of the implantation site and the entire conceptus was measured (Figures 6B,C). Most C57Bl/6J conceptuses were aligned along the mesometrial-antimesometrial axis with an average angle of 0.3° ± 0.9° (mean ± s.d.; Figures 6B,C). In contrast, conceptuses derived from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt females showed average angles that were greater than controls (Mtrr+/+ mothers: 4.7° ± 5.8°; Mtrr+/gt mothers: 4.2° ± 5.7°; Mtrrgt/gt mothers: 6.2° ± 6.7°; Figure 6B). Statistical significance was not reached due to high inter-individual variability (Figure 6B). However, similar to our observations in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E8.5 (Figures 3D,E), skewing at E6.5 (regardless of maternal Mtrr genotype) occurred across a spectrum of severity (Figure 6B). Therefore, we similarly defined a conceptus at E6.5 as “skewed” when it had an angle >2 s.d. above the control mean (i.e., >2.2°). Using this definition, only 11% (1/9) of C57Bl/6J conceptuses were skewed compared to 60% (6/10), 44% (4/9), and 57% (4/7) of conceptuses with Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, and Mtrrgt/gt mothers, respectively (Figure 6B). Altogether, these data provided evidence that skewed conceptus growth was established earlier than E6.5, potentially at implantation. Furthermore, there was a similar frequency of misaligned conceptuses derived from Mtrr+/+ mothers as from Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt mothers, implicating the Mtrr+/gt maternal grandparents in the inheritance of this phenotype. Multigenerational inheritance of developmental phenotypes was previously reported in the Mtrrgt model in other contexts (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Padmanabhan et al., 2017; Padmanabhan et al., 2018) and will be explored further below.
FIGURE 6. The effect of maternal Mtrrgt genotype on mouse conceptus skewing at E6.5. (A) Litter parameters at E6.5 obtained when manipulating the maternal Mtrrgt genotype. N = 4 litters/cross with 31–41 conceptuses/cross. Litter sizes: Ordinary one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0351, aDunn multiple comparison test: Mtrr+/gt versus Mtrrgt/gt, p < 0.05. Pedigree key: circle, female; squares, males; blue outline, C57Bl/6J mouse strain; black outline, Mtrrgt mouse strain; white fill, Mtrr+/+; half black/half white, Mtrr+/gt; black fill, Mtrrgt/gt. (B) Graph depicting the average angle of alignment at E6.5 in conceptuses derived from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, or Mtrrgt/gt mothers and C57Bl/6J fathers. White dots, aligned conceptuses. Red dots, conceptuses with angles >2 s.d. above the control mean (indicated by dashed black line). N = 7–10 conceptuses/group. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, p = 0.1438. (C) H&E stained histological sections of implantation sites at E6.5 derived from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, or Mtrrgt/gt mothers and C57Bl/6J fathers (N = 7–10 conceptuses/group). Black dashed line bisects the implantation site. Green dashed line bisects conceptus. Angles indicate the degree of conceptus skewing. Right-hand panel indicates higher magnification of boxed region in left-hand panel. Scale bars, low magnification, 500 μm; high magnification, 250 μm. AMD, antimesometrial decidua; EPC, ectoplacental cone; Epi, epiblast; ExE, extra-embryonic ectoderm; MD, mesometrial decidua. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of relative RNA levels (mean ± s.d.) of the wildtype (wt) Mtrr transcripts and total Mtrr transcripts (wt + gene-trapped transcripts) in whole implantation sites at E6.5 derived from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt mothers and C57Bl/6J fathers. N = 5–7 implantation sites/group. Values were relative to C57Bl/6J (normalized to 1). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. (E) Left-hand graph: average weights of whole implantation sites at E6.5 (mean ± s.d.) derived from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, or Mtrrgt/gt mothers and C57Bl/6J fathers. N = 30–42 conceptuses/group. Alignment not determined. Maternal genotypes are indicated. One-way ANOVA, p = 0.114. Right-hand graph: conceptus weights from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, and Mtrrgt/gt mothers were pooled and divided into aligned orientation (white dots, N = 20 conceptuses) and skewed orientation (red dots; N = 14 conceptuses). Independent t test, p = 0.392. (F) Implantation site shape as determined by the ratio of decidua length (along the mesometrial-antimesometrial axis) and width (along the lateral axis). Maternal genotypes are indicated. Aligned (Al) and skewed (Sk) conceptuses were considered separately (N = 3–8 implantation sites/group). Data presented as mean ± sd. One-way ANOVA, p = 0.1371. (G) Linear regression analysis between conceptus angle and decidua length:width ratio for conceptuses at E6.5 derived from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, and Mtrrgt/gt mothers (N = 7–10 conceptuses/group). White dots, aligned conceptuses; red dots, skewed conceptuses; black line, line of best fit.
Gross Decidual Morphology Is Unchanged by Maternal Mtrrgt Allele
Other studies showed that skewed conceptus orientation might result from abnormal decidual remodeling and signaling (Alexander et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2014). Therefore, we assessed the effects of the maternal Mtrrgt mutation on decidualization. First, to understand the degree of Mtrr knockdown caused by the Mtrrgt allele in the decidua, wildtype Mtrr transcript levels were determined via RT-qPCR in whole implantation sites at E6.5 as a proxy for decidual cells (N = 5–7 whole implantation sites/group). Implantation sites at E6.5 consist largely of decidualized stroma with a relatively low contribution by fetal-derived cells. This experiment was important because the extent of wildtype Mtrr gene knockdown in Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt cells is tissue specific (Elmore et al., 2007; Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Sowton et al., 2020). As expected, implantation sites from Mtrr+/+ mothers displayed a similar level of wildtype Mtrr transcripts as C57Bl/6J controls (98.0% of control levels; Figure 6D). Furthermore, this level was reduced to 62.0 and 6.0% of controls in implantation sites from Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt mothers, respectively (p < 0.0001; Figure 6D), and was within the range observed in other Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt tissues (Elmore et al., 2007; Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Sowton et al., 2020). Total Mtrr transcript levels (includes Mtrr+ and Mtrrgt RNA) were similar across all maternal genotypes (p = 0.4941; Figure 6D) indicating that transcriptional compensation for wildtype Mtrr deficiency did not occur.
Next, gross decidual morphology was assessed in histological sections of implantation sites at E6.5. The extent of decidualization was unaffected by a maternal Mtrrgt allele at E6.5 since the average implantation site weight did not differ between control and Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, or Mtrrgt/gt mothers (Figure 6E; p = 0.114). Furthermore, implantation site weight was similar between aligned and skewed conceptuses regardless of genotype (Figure 6E; p = 0.393), and there was no apparent correlation between implantation site weight and degree of conceptus skewing (Supplementary Figures S1A,B). No litter size effect on implantation site weight at E6.5 was observed (Supplementary Figure S1C). Typically, an implantation site is ellipsoid with the mesometrial-antimesometrial axis (length) showing a longer dimension than the lateral axis (width). A rounder implantation site might indicate defective decidualization (Alexander et al., 1996). Centrally located transverse sections of implantation sites from C57Bl/6J mothers and from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, or Mtrrgt/gt mothers with aligned or skewed conceptuses (N = 3–8 implantation sites/group) were measured along both axes. No significant differences in decidua length:width ratios were observed in implantation sites from any maternal genotypic group compared to controls regardless of skewing (p = 0.137; Figure 6F). Furthermore, there was no association between degree of conceptus skewing and implantation site dimensions (p > 0.39; Figure 6G). When lateral decidual cell density was quantified by nuclear counts in implantation sites containing skewed conceptuses derived from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, or Mtrrgt/gt mothers (N = 4–9 implantation sites/group), there was no significant difference compared to C57Bl/6J conceptuses (p = 0.170; Supplementary Figures 2C,D). Altogether, gross decidual morphology was unaffected by a maternal Mtrrgt allele.
Signaling Pathways in Decidua Are Potentially Disrupted by the Mtrrgt Mutation
Next, we explored the effects of maternal Mtrrgt allele on the molecular regulation of decidualization. Molecular markers of decidualization were assessed by RT-qPCR in whole implantation sites at E6.5 from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, and Mtrrgt/gt mothers (N = 5–7 sites/group). Progesterone receptor (PGR) (Lydon et al., 1995) and its downstream effectors NR2F2 (Wetendorf and DeMayo, 2012) and BMP2 (Lee et al., 2007) are indispensable for decidualization. While Pgr and Nr2f2 mRNA expression was significantly reduced in the implantation sites from Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt mothers compared to C57Bl/6J and Mtrr+/+ mothers (p < 0.0012; Figure 7A), transcript levels of downstream targets of PGR signalling including Hand2 and Hoxa10 (Lim et al., 1999; Okada et al., 2014) were within the normal range (p = 0.4132 and p = 0.0796, respectively; Figure 7A). The degree of conceptus skewing was unknown in the samples assessed since each implantation site was snap frozen immediately after dissection, whereas analysis of conceptus alignment at this stage was determined in histological sections. However, immunohistochemistry suggested subtly lower PGR protein levels in both Mtrrgt/gt aligned and skewed conceptuses compared to C57Bl/6J controls (Figure 7B) though this decrease in protein expression might be insufficient to alter downstream effectors. Future studies should include protein quantification of PGR and downstream targets. Notably, Bmp2 transcripts were significantly decreased in implantation sites from all three Mtrr maternal genotypes relative to controls (p = 0.0001; Figure 7A). Low Bmp2 transcript levels in Mtrr+/+ conceptuses derived from Mtrr+/+ mothers that associated with normal Pgr transcripts (Figure 7A) and normal decidualization (Supplementary Figures 2C,D) suggested that potential BMP2 signalling defects might occur independent of progesterone signalling and decidualization defects. Further experiments are required to elucidate the specific role of BMP2 signalling in the establishment of conceptus orientation.
FIGURE 7. Maternal and grandparental Mtrrgt allele might affect molecular signaling in mouse decidua at E6.5. (A) RT-qPCR analysis of decidualization gene markers in whole implantation sites at E6.5 derived from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt or Mtrrgt/gt mothers (N = 5–7 sites/group). Data presented as mean ± s.d., relative to C57Bl/6J controls (normalized to 1). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (B) Progesterone receptor (PGR) immunostaining in implantation sites at E6.5 derived from C57Bl/6J mothers and aligned and skewed conceptuses from Mtrrgt/gt mothers. N = 3 sites/genotype were assessed. (C) COX2 immunostaining (brown) in implantation sites at E6.5 derived from C57Bl/6J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, or Mtrrgt/gt mothers and C57Bl/6J fathers. N = 2–5 sites/maternal genotype were assessed. DNA, blue. Both aligned and skewed conceptuses are shown. In panels (B,C), the degree of skewing is indicated by green dotted line that bisects the conceptus compared to black dotted line that bisects the decidual swelling. (D) No primary antibody control in a skewed Mtrrgt/gt implantation site at E6.5. DNA, blue. (E) COX2 immunostaining (brown) in an aligned C57Bl/6J placenta and skewed Mtrrgt/gt placenta at E8.5. N = 6 sites/genotype. DNA, blue. (B–E) Boxed area indicates region of higher magnification in adjacent panel. Black dotted line bisects the implantation site. Green dotted line bisects the conceptus (E6.5) or chorion (E8.5). Maternal genotype is indicated. Scale bars: (B) 500 μm, (C) top, 1 mm; bottom, 500 μm, (D) left, 1 mm; top right, 500 μm; bottom right, 100 μm, (E) 1 mm. Ch, chorion; De, decidua; EPC, ectoplacental cone (dashed line indicates boundary); MD, mesometrial decidua; UL, uterine lumen remnant.
Decidual COX2 Expression Is Normal in Implantation Sites With Skewed Orientation
When the gene encoding for COX2 protein is knocked out, defects in implantation and decidualization result (Lim et al., 1999). COX2 is important for prostaglandin synthesis and is initially expressed in the decidua adjacent to the implanting embryo at E4.5 followed by restricted expression in the mesometrial decidua by E5.5 and at E7.5 (Chakraborty et al., 1996). Aberrant COX2 expression was also observed in other models of conceptus misorientation (Daikoku et al., 2011; Cha et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). Therefore, we investigated COX2 protein expression in the decidua at E6.5 from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt, and Mtrrgt/gt mothers (mated to C57Bl/6J males), and at E8.5 from Mtrrgt/gt mothers (mated to Mtrrgt/gt males), particularly in association with aligned and skewed conceptus orientation. Within centrally located transverse histological sections, COX2 immunostaining in C57Bl/6J controls was restricted to the mesometrial decidua above the tip of the EPC, in line with the antimesometrial-mesometrial axis (Figures 7C,E). A similar pattern was observed in implantation sites from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt mothers, regardless of the extent of conceptus skewing (Figure 7C). Strikingly, the most skewed Mtrrgt/gt conceptus at E8.5 showed normal mesometrial decidual patterning of COX2 even though the EPC was more laterally located (Figure 7E). These data suggested that general decidual patterning was established and that COX2 expression did not dictate conceptus orientation in the Mtrrgt model.
Conceptus Skewing Is Transgenerationally Inherited in the Mtrrgt Mouse Line
Since conceptus skewing was apparent from E6.5 in Mtrr+/+ conceptuses derived from Mtrr+/+ parents and Mtrr+/gt grandparents (Figures 6B,C, 7A), we explored a multigenerational effect on conceptus orientation. The Mtrrgt mouse line is known for its multigenerational effects on development specifically through the maternal grandparental lineage (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Blake et al., 2021). To this end, we reanalyzed our published phenotype data set at E10.5 whereby several genetic pedigrees were established to rigorously assess the phenotypic effects of a maternal grandparental Mtrrgt allele on the subsequent wildtype generations (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Padmanabhan et al., 2017). Additional litters were included where possible. The frequency of the phenotype previously referred to as “eccentric chorioallantoic attachment” (Padmanabhan et al., 2013) and re-characterised in this study as severe conceptus skewing was used as an indicator of conceptus misalignment. While assessing severe misalignment alone does not give a full picture of the extent of skewing in these pedigrees, the number of conceptuses assessed (N = 86–308 conceptuses/pedigree) allowed for statistical analysis. The breeding scheme was as follows (Figure 8): An F0 Mtrr+/gt female or male mouse was crossed with a control C57Bl/6J mate. Their wildtype adult daughters (i.e., the F1 generation) were selected for mating with a C57Bl/6J male and the wildtype grandprogeny (i.e., the F2 generation) were dissected and assessed at E10.5. Continuing a similar mating scheme allowed us to also assess the wildtype F3 and F4 generations. C57Bl/6J crosses were analyzed as a control.
FIGURE 8. Severe conceptus misalignment is transgenerationally inherited in the Mtrrgt mouse line via the maternal grandparental lineage. (A–K) Frequency of severe conceptus misalignment at E10.5 caused by the (C–F) Mtrr+/gt maternal grandmother (MGM) or (H–K) Mtrr+/gt maternal grandfather (MGF) compared to (A) C57Bl/6J conceptuses. (B) Mtrrgt/gt and (G) Mtrr+/gt paternal pedigrees were also assessed. (L–N) Frequency of severe conceptus misalignment at E10.5 after the transfer of wildtype pre-implantation embryos derived from (M) an Mtrr+/gt MGM and Mtrr+/+ mother (T-MGM) or (N) an Mtrr+/gt MGF and Mtrr+/+ mother (T-MGF) into a B6D2F1 pseudopregnant recipient female. (L) C57Bl/6J embryos were transferred as a control. This experiment was originally performed in (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Data is displayed as the average number of phenotypically affected conceptuses/litter (±s.e.m.) followed by the percentage of total conceptuses assessed in brackets. Independent t test compared to respective C57Bl/6J controls, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Pedigree key: circle, female; squares, males; blue outline, C57Bl/6J mouse strain; red outline, B6D2F1 mouse strain; black outline, Mtrrgt mouse strain; white fill, Mtrr+/+; black fill, Mtrrgt/gt; half black/half white, Mtrr+/gt.
Overall, a low frequency of severe conceptus skewing was observed in the F2 Mtrr+/+ progeny of the Mtrr+/gt maternal grandmother (MGM) pedigree (5.1% of conceptuses, p < 0.01; Figure 8C) and the Mtrr+/gt maternal grandfather (MGF) pedigree (2.0% of conceptuses, p < 0.05; Figure 8H). This phenotype was not observed in the controls (Figure 8A). Notably, when the Mtrr genotype of the F1 female was altered (e.g., F1 Mtrr+/+ or F1 Mtrr+/gt females), there was no impact on the frequency of severe skewing in the F2 Mtrr+/+ progeny in either pedigree (MGM: Figure 8C versus Figure 8D; MGF: Figure 8H versus Figure 8I). This result indicated that the Mtrrgt genotype in the maternal grandparent was most important for conceptus misalignment, an observation consistent with other phenotypes (Padmanabhan et al., 2013).
There was a negligible paternal effect of the Mtrrgt allele on conceptus misalignment since this phenotype was rare in the direct offspring of an Mtrr+/gt male (0.7% of conceptuses, p = 0.183 compared to controls; Figures 8A,G). Since Mtrr+/gt males were derived from Mtrr+/gt parents (Figure 8G), this result also emphasized that a paternal grandparental effect was unlikely. Importantly, an Mtrrgt allele in a male was sufficient to cause conceptus misalignment in the F2 Mtrr+/+ grandprogeny via his F1 Mtrr+/+ daughters (Figure 8H), and highlighted the potential importance of the F1 uterine environment (see below). Since Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5 derived from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses showed a similar frequency of skewing (5.8% of conceptuses, p < 0.001) as F2 Mtrr+/+ conceptuses from the MGM pedigree (Figure 8B versus Figure 8C), the mechanism was likely due to Mtrr deficiency in one (or both) maternal grandparent. Notably, the frequency of skewing was greater in F2 Mtrr+/+ progeny when derived from an Mtrr+/gt MGM compared to an Mtrr+/gt MGF (Figure 8C versus Figure 8H) suggesting that the causative mechanism might be different when initiated via the F0 oocyte versus the F0 sperm, as was previously hypothesized (Blake et al., 2021). In further support of this hypothesis, we observed that severe conceptus misalignment occurred until at least until the F4 wildtype generation when derived from an F0 Mtrr+/gt female (Figures 8E,F) yet only until the F3 wildtype generation when derived from an F0 Mtrr+/gt male (Figures 8J,K). Phenotypic inheritance to the F3 generation and beyond indicates transgenerational epigenetic inheritance as a mechanism for conceptus misalignment in both pedigrees (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Blake and Watson, 2016). Of note, the resolution of a transgenerationally-inherited phenotype (e.g., conceptus misalignment in the MGF pedigree) has not been previously reported in the Mtrrgt model. Overall, the effects of abnormal folate metabolism caused by the Mtrrgt mutation persisted for several wildtype generations with detrimental effects on conceptus alignment.
Severe Conceptus Misalignment in the Mtrrgt Model Might Be Independent of the Uterus
Lastly, to determine whether the uterine environment influenced conceptus alignment, a published embryo transfer experiment was reanalyzed (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). In this case, pre-implantation F2 Mtrr+/+ embryos were collected at E3.25 from the oviducts and uteri of F1 Mtrr+/+ females (MGM or MGF pedigree) and transferred into the normal uteri of B6D2F1 pseudopregnant females (Figures 8M,N). C57Bl/6J embryos were transferred as a control (Figure 8L). The transferred embryos were allowed to implant and conceptuses were dissected at E10.5 for phenotypic analysis (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). Our hypothesis was if severe conceptus misalignment was absent at E10.5 after embryo transfer, then an abnormal uterine environment in the original F1 Mtrr+/+ donor female was the cause of this phenotype. However, if severe misalignment was observed in the transferred conceptuses, then the defect occurred independent of the peri- or post-implantation uterine environment. We reported that some of the developmental phenotypes observed in F2 Mtrr+/+ conceptuses persisted after embryo transfer including congenital malformations (mechanism independent of F1 uterine environment) but not fetal growth restriction or developmental delay, which were rescued (mechanism dependent on F1 uterine environment) (Padmanabhan et al., 2013).
Here, our analysis revealed that severe conceptus misalignment persisted after embryo transfer suggesting that this phenotype occurred independent of the F1 Mtrr+/+ uterine environment (Figures 8L–N) (Padmanabhan et al., 2013). The percentage of transferred F2 Mtrr+/+ conceptuses that were affected was similar to the non-transferred F2 Mtrr+/+ conceptuses (Figures 8M,N versus Figures 8C,H). While the phenotypic frequency did not reach statistical significance, this was likely due to the low number of transferred embryos analyzed (N = 36–60 embryos from six to nine litters; Figures 8M,N). None of the transferred C57Bl/6J control conceptuses exhibited severe skewing (Figure 8L) indicating that the embryo transfer protocol itself was not responsible for this phenotype. Overall, we propose that conceptus misalignment in the Mtrrgt model occurred independent of a peri- and/or post-implantation uterine environment effect. Alternatively, a defect intrinsic to the embryo is likely.
Discussion
We have shown here that abnormal folate metabolism due to the Mtrrgt mutation in mice influences conceptus orientation and spacing within the uterus. These phenotypes have implications for subsequent embryo and placenta development. Our data highlight the complexity of phenotype establishment associated with abnormal folate metabolism, with the mechanism acting beyond a direct maternal effect. We propose that conceptus misalignment and twinning are caused by an embryo-specific defect rather than a defect in the peri-/post-implantation uterine environment. We also implicate the Mtrrgt genotype of either maternal grandparent as the initial effector of conceptus misalignment, which persists at least until the wildtype great grandprogeny generation and exemplifies a transgenerationally inherited phenotype. In general, the mechanism of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is not well understood and will take additional studies to elucidate.
Given the evidence presented here, conceptus misalignment can negatively impact embryo and placenta development. The degree of skewing occurred over a continuum, though whether minor skewing is harmful to development is currently unclear as we were only able to assess the consequences of severe skewing. Even though normal trophoblast lineage patterning (Simmons et al., 2008) occurred in severely skewed Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E8.5, an improperly oriented placenta would likely have insufficient access to maternal blood for normal feto-placental development as supported by the mislocalisation of spiral artery-remodeling Prl7b1+ trophoblast cells. Severe conceptus skewing at E10.5 was also associated with embryonic developmental delay and heart malformations. Others have proposed the placenta-heart axis whereby that primary placental phenotype can result in secondary cardiovascular abnormalities (Barak et al., 1999; Hemberger and Cross, 2001; Perez-Garcia et al., 2018), and vice versa (Outhwaite et al., 2019). Whether this phenomenon occurs in skewed conceptuses is unclear and requires more careful consideration of heart development in the Mtrrgt model from earlier stages and investigation by conditional mutation or tetraploid aggregation experiments that isolate the consequences of heart-only or placenta-only knockdown of Mtrr. Notably, neural tube defects, which are associated with maternal folate deficiency in humans (MRC Vitamin Study Research Group, 1991) and occur in the Mtrrgt/gt embryos at E10.5 with incomplete penetrance (Padmanabhan et al., 2013), did not correlate with conceptus misalignment in our study suggesting a different causative mechanism.
Dizygotic twinning is a rare event in mice (De Clercq et al., 2019) with few reports of this phenomenon in the literature. While the cause is currently unknown, we hypothesize that dizygotic twinning is independent of the number of ovulations and results from poor blastocyst spacing prior to implantation. Thereafter, twinned embryos with overlapping development share one decidual swelling and display placental fusion as gestation progresses, similar to observations in other studies (De Clercq et al., 2019; Lopez-Tello and Sferruzzi-Perri, 2021). Blastocyst spacing in the mouse uterus is not well understood, yet it is a highly regulated event requiring mechanical processes in the uterus (e.g., muscular contractions and ciliary movement) and molecular signaling (e.g., LIF, ephrin A) between the uterus and blastocyst (Chen et al., 2013; Shi et al., 2014; Flores et al., 2020; Fujiwara et al., 2020). Manipulation of one uterine parameter typically leads to irregular spacing and clustering of an entire litter (Lu et al., 2013; Shi et al., 2014; Flores et al., 2020). For example, excessive intrauterine fluid results in crowding of implantation sites likely due to the disruption of physical and chemical interactions between the uterine epithelium and blastocysts (Lu et al., 2013). However, twinning is infrequently observed in this model (Lu et al., 2013). Since the frequency of twinning within and between Mtrrgt/gt litters was low and the general spacing of Mtrrgt/gt litters was otherwise normal, we propose an embryo-specific defect rather than a uterine-specific defect. Embryo-specific factors that affect uterine spacing are largely unknown (Chen et al., 2013). It is hypothesized that signals from a blastocyst (e.g., estrogen, prostaglandin, ephrin A) might initiate or maintain uterine events/molecular profiles required for optimal blastocyst spacing and implantation (Chen et al., 2013; Fujiwara et al., 2020). However, further experiments are required to better understand whether inequitable disruption of signaling among embryos of one litter can lead to poor spacing at a localized level (e.g., twinning). Additionally, it is unclear whether blastocysts secrete/receive inhibitory signals to/from neighboring blastocysts to maintain optimal uterine distance for fetal growth. Notably, other models of conceptus misalignment display extensive embryo spacing defects (Daikoku et al., 2011; Cha et al., 2014), yet it is unclear whether disrupted blastocyst signaling and/or poor responsiveness of the blastocyst to maternal signals is a common mechanism between twinning and orientation phenotypes.
The establishment of conceptus orientation is highly prescribed and depends on mesometrial-anti-mesometrial orientation in the uterus, ICM orientation within the blastocyst, and directional growth of the conceptus within the decidua (Chen et al., 2013). While the cellular and molecular events involved in embryo positioning largely remain unknown (Chen et al., 2013), factors intrinsic to the uterus are best studied. For instance, aberrant formation of uterine crypts misorient the blastocyst at implantation (Daikoku et al., 2011; Cha et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014), decidualization defects associate with misalignment of conceptuses post-implantation (Alexander et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2014), and disorganization of the decidual vasculature network and increased blood perfusion misdirects trophoblast invasion resulting in skewed growth (Winterhager et al., 2013). The establishment of signaling gradients in decidua (e.g., WNT5) (Daikoku et al., 2011; Cha et al., 2014; Goad et al., 2017) and the responsiveness of the conceptus to these signals are also important for conceptus alignment. We observed low Bmp2 mRNA expression in implantation sites of litters known to display conceptus skewing. However, a causative relationship was not established and it is unclear whether low Bmp2 transcripts translate into low BMP2 protein levels or signaling activity. Further experiments are required to better understand the significance of this finding in the context of conceptus misalignment.
While the uterine-specific mechanisms indicated above are yet-to-be explored in detail in the Mtrrgt model, evidence presented here argues against a uterine defect as the main cause of conceptus misalignment. For instance, normal morphology and patterning of Mtrrgt/gt decidua was observed, and skewed F2 Mtrr+/+ conceptuses were present after embryo transfer into a control uterus. As performed, the embryo transfer experiment ruled out an effect of the peri- and/or post-implantation stage uterus on conceptus alignment. However, based on the timing of the transfer into the recipient uterus, the F2 Mtrr+/+ embryos might be exposed to abnormal factors in the oviductal/uterine fluid of the donor F1 Mtrr+/+ females that might cause incorrect orientation at and after implantation. These factors are currently unknown but might be hormonal (Chen et al., 2013) and the effects would need to be long lasting and/or irreversible. To more definitively eliminate a uterine effect as a causative factor in embryo misalignment, additional embryo transfer experiments should be performed: 1) The transfer of C57Bl/6J embryos (at E3.25) into an F1 Mtrr+/+ uterus or Mtrrgt/gt uterus. Normal conceptus alignment would indicate no involvement of the peri- and/or post-implantation uterine environment. 2) The transfer of F2 Mtrr+/+ embryos at an earlier developmental stage (e.g., two-cell stage) or after in vitro fertilization into a control uterus. In this case, the effects of the oviductal fluid on conceptus alignment would be taken into account.
As an alternative to a defective uterine environment, a mechanistic defect intrinsic to the embryo might cause conceptus misalignment in the Mtrrgt model. Under normal circumstances, mouse blastocysts attach to the uterine epithelium via adhesion molecules (e.g., integrins, L-selectins) expressed on the mural trophectoderm (Cross et al., 1994; Red-Horse et al., 2004) so that the embryonic-abembryonic axis is parallel to the mesometrial-antimesometrial axis (Smith, 1985). How the blastocyst attaches to the uterine epithelium to establish a correct orientation is not well understood. One hypothesis is that the blastocyst might attach in any orientation and then roll along the uterine epithelium into the correct orientation (Kirby et al., 1967; Red-Horse et al., 2004). Otherwise, it was proposed that ICM cells might mobilise within the blastocyst to properly align in the implantation site after trophectoderm adhesion to the uterine epithelium (Kirby et al., 1967; Meilhac et al., 2009; Morris et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2013). Therefore, critical adhesion molecules on the outer membrane of the mural trophectoderm, the inner membrane of the trophectoderm, or the ICM of Mtrr blastocysts should be examined for regional expansion or misexpression as a cause for skewed growth. The occurrence of normal litter sizes from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses at midgestation (this study; Padmanabhan et al., 2013) suggests that implantation of Mtrrgt/gt blastocysts is achieved regardless of this hypothetical adhesion defect. Alternatively, normal blastocyst orientation at implantation might be followed by unresponsiveness of some Mtrr conceptuses to cytokine signals from the decidua (e.g., WNTs, FGFs, BMPs) that guide mesometrial-antimesometrial alignment (Red-Horse et al., 2004; Daikoku et al., 2011; Cha et al., 2014; Goad et al., 2017). Further studies are required to elucidate the specific embryocentric mechanisms and molecular pathways involved in conceptus orientation, and how they are influenced by abnormal folate metabolism. Since MTRR enzyme is required for the transmission of methyl groups for methylation reactions in the cell (Shane and Stokstad, 1985), it is possible that epigenetic regulation of crucial genes required for conceptus orientation is disrupted in skewed Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses. Candidate genomic regions will be revealed by future whole methylome and transcriptome analyses in early embryos and uterine tissue.
It is unclear whether the phenotypes that underlie genetic disruption of abnormal folate metabolism (e.g., the Mtrrgt allele) are similar to maternal dietary folate deficiency, and what mechanistic parallels can be drawn between these two models. Although Mtrrgt/gt mice recapitulate developmental phenotypes (e.g., neural tube defects) and anemia observed in humans with folate deficiency (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Ducker and Rabinowitz, 2017; Padmanabhan et al., 2018), diet-induced folate-deficient mice do not unless they are challenged with genetic insufficiency or viral infection (Heid et al., 1992; Koury and Horne, 1994; Burgoon et al., 2002; Burren et al., 2008). Uterine structure at implantation and the frequency of blastocyst implantation are likely unaffected by pre-conceptual dietary folate deficiency in female mice (Gao et al., 2012), though post-implantation decidualization and deciduoma formation might be inhibited (Geng et al., 2015). Decidualization was normal in Mtrrgt/gt mice at E6.5 (this study). Conceptus misalignment and twinning are yet-to-be reported in studies of folate deficiency or in other genetic mouse models where folate uptake or metabolism is disrupted leading to embryonic defects or lethality in early to mid-gestation (Piedrahita et al., 1999; Swanson et al., 2001; Gelineau-van Waes et al., 2008; Pickell et al., 2009; Salojin et al., 2011). Therefore, it is currently unclear whether these phenotypes are specific to the Mtrrgt model or a more general disruption of folate uptake/metabolism. Additional experiments should be performed to determine whether dietary supplementation of Mtrrgt/gt mice prevents the developmental phenotypes and/or conceptus misalignment observed.
Importantly, severe conceptus skewing at E10.5 in the Mtrrgt model exhibits a pattern of transgenerational inheritance. This non-conventional mode of inheritance is typically caused by exposure to an environmental stressor or metabolic disruption only in the initiating F0 generation and occurs independent of DNA base-sequence mutations (Blake and Watson, 2016). The Mtrrgt mouse line is a known model of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance as several embryonic phenotypes are inherited by the wildtype grandprogeny and great grandprogeny when either maternal grandparent is a carrier for the Mtrrgt mutation (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Blake et al., 2021). While the mechanism of epigenetic inheritance of phenotypes is unknown in the Mtrrgt model and other mammalian multigenerational models, it is particularly difficult to explore when the phenomenon occurs via the maternal lineage. This is because defects in the maternal physiology and uterine environment are difficult to tease apart from abnormal germ cell factors (Watson and Rakoczy, 2016). For this reason, we utilized embryo transfer experiments to eliminate potential mechanistic effects of the peri/post-implantation uterine environment.
While an epigenetic mechanism is the most likely cause of this transgenerational effect, folate metabolism is required for cellular methylation and thymidine synthesis (Ducker and Rabinowitz, 2017). Therefore, disruption of folate metabolism potentially implicates both epigenetic and genetic instability. Notably, thymidine synthesis is likely unaffected by the Mtrrgt mutation since de novo mutations, which might transpire from low thymidine levels resulting in uracil misincorporation into DNA (Blount et al., 1997), occur at a similar frequency in C57Bl/6J control and Mtrrgt/gt mice (Blake et al., 2021). Therefore, we conclude that the wide range of phenotypes observed over multiple generations in the Mtrrgt model is not the result of genetic instability. Alternatively, considerable alteration in patterns of DNA methylation was identified in adult germ cells and somatic tissues of the Mtrrgt model, with some methylation changes associated with gene misexpression (Padmanabhan et al., 2013; Bertozzi et al., 2021; Blake et al., 2021). The range of developmental phenotypes observed in the Mtrrgt model (this study, Padmanabhan et al., 2013) suggests that this epigenetic instability occurs stochastically in each affected individual, ultimately leading to disruption of different genetic pathways and different phenotypes (Blake and Watson, 2016). This proposed stochasticity of inter-individual epigenetic changes might explain incomplete penetrance of the conceptus misorientation (and other phenotypes).
How abnormal epigenetic patterns are inherited is not well understood since they must circumvent reprogramming that occurs between generations or be reconstructed in the next generation (Jablonka, 2013; Blake and Watson, 2016). Altered patterns of DNA methylation and histone modifications, or misexpression of small non-coding RNA in germ cells are proposed candidates of epigenetic inheritance (Chen et al., 2016; Sharma et al., 2016; Blake et al., 2021; Lismer et al., 2021) and are currently being explored in the Mtrrgt model and other models of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. While there is no evidence of abnormal mitochondrial function in Mtrrgt/gt livers (Sowton et al., 2020) or of small nucleotide polymorphisms in genes important for mitochondrial function in Mtrrgt/gt embryos with congenital malformations (Blake et al., 2021), oocyte mitochondria from F0 Mtrr+/gt or F1 Mtrr+/+ females are yet-to-be assessed for defects. Notably, we discerned a greater frequency and later resolution of conceptus misalignment in wildtype conceptuses derived from an Mtrr+/gt maternal grandmother versus an Mtrr+/gt maternal grandfather. This observation might hold clues for future mechanistic exploration including the identification of different initiating factors in an F0 oocyte versus an F0 spermatozoon.
The association between folate metabolism and conceptus alignment has implications for early pregnancy loss associated with folate deficiency in humans, and for culture conditions involved in assisted reproductive technologies. Our study reinforces the importance of folate in healthy pregnancies, yet emphasizes that the role of folate metabolism during development is more complex than a direct uterine effect. Pre-conceptual supplementation of folic acid should be considered. Since conceptus skewing occurred several wildtype generations after the initial metabolic disruption, it is possible that unexplained pregnancy loss in humans might be associated with folate deficiency in the grandparental generation. This conclusion emphasizes the importance of folate fortification programs, which might take more than one generation to show the full effects.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the UK Home Office under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012 and underwent review by the University of Cambridge Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body.
Author Contributions
EW: conceptualization, experimental design, and funding acquisition. KM, JR, and EW: dissections, phenotyping, and histology preparation. KM: RNA isolation and RT-qPCR. AW, KM, JR, and XT: histological staining, immunostaining and in situ hybridization. AW, KM, and EW: data analysis. AW and EW: data interpretation and manuscript writing. AW, EW, and KM: manuscript editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was funded by the Lister Research Prize from the Lister Institute for Preventative Medicine (to EW). KM was supported by a Newnham College (Cambridge) studentship and an A.G. Leventis award. JR was supported by a Newton International Fellowship.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank Simon Tunster for technical advice, and Claire Senner for critical discussion of the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.723978/full#supplementary-material
References
Alexander, C. M., Hansell, E. J., Behrendtsen, O., Flannery, M. L., Kishnani, N. S., Hawkes, S. P., et al. (1996). Expression and Function of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors at the Maternal-Embryonic Boundary During Mouse Embryo Implantation. Development 122 (6), 1723–1736. doi:10.1242/dev.122.6.1723
Barak, Y., Nelson, M. C., Ong, E. S., Jones, Y. Z., Ruiz-Lozano, P., Chien, K. R., et al. (1999). PPARγ Is Required for Placental, Cardiac, and Adipose Tissue Development. Mol. Cel. 4 (4), 585–595. doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80209-9
Bertozzi, T. M., Becker, J. L., Blake, G. E. T., Bansal, A., Nguyen, D. K., Fernandez-Twinn, D. S., et al. (2021). Variably Methylated Retrotransposons Are Refractory to a Range of Environmental Perturbations. Nat. Genet. 53 (8), 1233–1242. doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00898-9
Blake, G. E. T., Zhao, X., Yung, H. w., Burton, G. J., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., Hamilton, R. S., et al. (2021). Defective Folate Metabolism Causes Germline Epigenetic Instability and Distinguishes Hira as a Phenotype Inheritance Biomarker. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 3714. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24036-5
Blake, G. E., and Watson, E. D. (2016). Unravelling the Complex Mechanisms of Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 33, 101–107. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.06.008
Blount, B. C., Mack, M. M., Wehr, C. M., MacGregor, J. T., Hiatt, R. A., Wang, G., et al. (1997). Folate Deficiency Causes Uracil Misincorporation into Human DNA and Chromosome Breakage: Implications for Cancer and Neuronal Damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94 (7), 3290–3295. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.7.3290
Bukowski, R., Malone, F. D., Porter, F. T., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Hankins, G. D. V., et al. (2009). Preconceptional Folate Supplementation and the Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: A Cohort Study. Plos Med. 6 (5), e1000061. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000061
Burgoon, J. M., Selhub, J., Nadeau, M., and Sadler, T. W. (2002). Investigation of the Effects of Folate Deficiency on Embryonic Development Through the Establishment of a Folate Deficient Mouse Model. Teratology 65 (5), 219–227. doi:10.1002/tera.10040
Burren, K. A., Savery, D., Massa, V., Kok, R. M., Scott, J. M., Blom, H. J., et al. (2008). Gene-environment Interactions in the Causation of Neural Tube Defects: Folate Deficiency Increases Susceptibility Conferred by Loss of Pax3 Function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17 (23), 3675–3685. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn262
Cha, J., Bartos, A., Park, C., Sun, X., Li, Y., Cha, S.-W., et al. (2014). Appropriate Crypt Formation in the Uterus for Embryo Homing and Implantation Requires Wnt5a-ROR Signaling. Cel. Rep. 8 (2), 382–392. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.027
Chakraborty, I., Das, S. K., Wang, J., and Dey, S. K. (1996). Developmental Expression of the Cyclo-Oxygenase-1 and Cyclo-Oxygenase-2 Genes in the Peri-Implantation Mouse Uterus and Their Differential Regulation by the Blastocyst and Ovarian Steroids. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 16 (2), 107–122. doi:10.1677/jme.0.0160107
Chen, Q., Yan, M., Cao, Z., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Shi, J., et al. (2016). Sperm tsRNAs Contribute to Intergenerational Inheritance of an Acquired Metabolic Disorder. Science 351 (6271), 397–400. doi:10.1126/science.aad7977
Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., Elad, D., Jaffa, A. J., Cao, Y., Ye, X., et al. (2013). Navigating the Site for Embryo Implantation: Biomechanical and Molecular Regulation of Intrauterine Embryo Distribution. Mol. Aspects Med. 34 (5), 1024–1042. doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.07.017
Cherukad, J., Wainwright, V., and Watson, E. D. (2012). Spatial and Temporal Expression of Folate-Related Transporters and Metabolic Enzymes During Mouse Placental Development. Placenta 33 (5), 440–448. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2012.02.005
Cross, J. C., Simmons, D. G., and Watson, E. D. (2003). Chorioallantoic Morphogenesis and Formation of the Placental Villous Tree. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 995, 84–93. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03212.x
Cross, J., Werb, Z., and Fisher, S. (1994). Implantation and the Placenta: Key Pieces of the Development Puzzle. Science 266 (5190), 1508–1518. doi:10.1126/science.7985020
Daikoku, T., Cha, J., Sun, X., Tranguch, S., Xie, H., Fujita, T., et al. (2011). Conditional Deletion of Msx Homeobox Genes in the Uterus Inhibits Blastocyst Implantation by Altering Uterine Receptivity. Develop. Cel. 21 (6), 1014–1025. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.010
De Clercq, K., Persoons, E., Napso, T., Luyten, C., Parac-Vogt, T. N., Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N., et al. (2019). High-resolution Contrast-Enhanced microCT Reveals the True Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Murine Placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116 (28), 13927–13936. doi:10.1073/pnas.1902688116
Ducker, G. S., and Rabinowitz, J. D. (2017). One-Carbon Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cel. Metab. 25 (1), 27–42. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009
Elmore, C. L., Wu, X., Leclerc, D., Watson, E. D., Bottiglieri, T., Krupenko, N. I., et al. (2007). Metabolic Derangement of Methionine and Folate Metabolism in Mice Deficient in Methionine Synthase Reductase. Mol. Genet. Metab. 91 (1), 85–97. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.02.001
Flores, D., Madhavan, M., Wright, S., and Arora, R. (2020). Mechanical and Signaling Mechanisms that Guide Pre-implantation Embryo Movement. Development 147 (24), dev193490. doi:10.1242/dev.193490
Fujiwara, H., Ono, M., Sato, Y., Imakawa, K., Iizuka, T., Kagami, K., et al. (2020). Promoting Roles of Embryonic Signals in Embryo Implantation and Placentation in Cooperation with Endocrine and Immune Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (5), 1885. doi:10.3390/ijms21051885
Furness, D. L. F., Fenech, M. F., Khong, Y. T., Romero, R., and Dekker, G. A. (2008). One-carbon Metabolism Enzyme Polymorphisms and Uteroplacental Insufficiency. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199 (3), 276.e1–276.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.020-
Gao, R., Ding, Y., Liu, X., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Long, C., et al. (2012). Effect of Folate Deficiency on Promoter Methylation and Gene Expression of Esr1, Cdh1 and Pgr, and its Influence on Endometrial Receptivity and Embryo Implantation. Hum. Reprod. 27 (9), 2756–2765. doi:10.1093/humrep/des187
Gelineau-van Waes, J., Heller, S., Bauer, L. K., Wilberding, J., Maddox, J. R., Aleman, F., et al. (2008). Embryonic Development in the Reduced Folate Carrier Knockout Mouse Is Modulated by Maternal Folate Supplementation. Birth Defect Res. A. 82 (7), 494–507. doi:10.1002/bdra.20453
Geng, Y., Gao, R., Chen, X., Liu, X., Liao, X., Li, Y., et al. (2015). Folate Deficiency Impairs Decidualization and Alters Methylation Patterns of the Genome in Mice. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 21 (11), 844–856. doi:10.1093/molehr/gav045
Goad, J., Ko, Y.-A., Kumar, M., Syed, S. M., and Tanwar, P. S. (2017). Differential Wnt Signaling Activity Limits Epithelial Gland Development to the Anti-mesometrial Side of the Mouse Uterus. Develop. Biol. 423 (2), 138–151. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.01.015
Heid, M. K., Bills, N. D., Hinrichs, S. H., and Clifford, A. J. (1992). Folate Deficiency Alone Does Not Produce Neural Tube Defects in Mice. J. Nutr. 122 (4), 888–894. doi:10.1093/jn/122.4.888
Hemberger, M., and Cross, J. C. (2001). Genes Governing Placental Development. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 12 (4), 162–168. doi:10.1016/s1043-2760(01)00375-7
Hertig, A. T., Rock, J., and Adams, E. C. (1956). A Description of 34 Human Ova Within the First 17 Days of Development. Am. J. Anat. 98 (3), 435–493. doi:10.1002/aja.1000980306
Jablonka, E. (2013). Epigenetic Inheritance and Plasticity: The Responsive Germline. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 111 (2-3), 99–107. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.08.014
Kim, J. H., Jeon, Y. J., Lee, B. E., Kang, H., Shin, J. E., Choi, D. H., et al. (2013). Association of Methionine Synthase and Thymidylate Synthase Genetic Polymorphisms with Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Fertil. Sterility 99 (6), 1674–1680. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.108
Kirby, D. R. S., Potts, D. M., and Wilson, I. B. (1967). On the Orientation of the Implanting Blastocyst. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 17 (3), 527–532. doi:10.1242/dev.17.3.527
Koury, M. J., and Horne, D. W. (1994). Apoptosis Mediates and Thymidine Prevents Erythroblast Destruction in Folate Deficiency Anemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91 (9), 4067–4071. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.9.4067
Krishnaswamy, K., and Nair, K. M. (2001). Importance of Folate in Human Nutrition. Br. J. Nutr. 85 (2), S115–S124. doi:10.1079/bjn2000303
Lee, K. Y., Jeong, J.-W., Wang, J., Ma, L., Martin, J. F., Tsai, S. Y., et al. (2007). Bmp2 Is Critical for the Murine Uterine Decidual Response. Mol. Cell Biol. 27 (15), 5468–5478. doi:10.1128/MCB.00342-07
Lim, H., Ma, L., Ma, W.-g., Maas, R. L., and Dey, S. K. (1999). Hoxa-10Regulates Uterine Stromal Cell Responsiveness to Progesterone During Implantation and Decidualization in the Mouse. Mol. Endocrinol. 13 (6), 1005–1017. doi:10.1210/mend.13.6.0284
Lismer, A., Dumeaux, V., Lafleur, C., Lambrot, R., Brind’Amour, J., Lorincz, M. C., et al. (2021). Histone H3 Lysine 4 Trimethylation in Sperm Is Transmitted to the Embryo and Associated with Diet-Induced Phenotypes in the Offspring. Develop. Cel. 56 (5), 671–686. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2021.01.014
Livak, K. J., and Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25 (4), 402–408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Lopez-Tello, J., and Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N. (2021). Fused Placentas: Till Birth Do Us Part. Placenta 103, 177–179. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2020.10.036
Lu, S., Peng, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Cao, Q., Li, R., et al. (2013). Excessive Intrauterine Fluid Cause Aberrant Implantation and Pregnancy Outcome in Mice. PLoS One 8 (10), e78446. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078446
Lydon, J. P., DeMayo, F. J., Funk, C. R., Mani, S. K., Hughes, A. R., Montgomery, C. A., et al. (1995). Mice Lacking Progesterone Receptor Exhibit Pleiotropic Reproductive Abnormalities. Genes Dev. 9 (18), 2266–2278. doi:10.1101/gad.9.18.2266
Meilhac, S. M., Adams, R. J., Morris, S. A., Danckaert, A., Le Garrec, J.-F., and Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2009). Active Cell Movements Coupled to Positional Induction Are Involved in Lineage Segregation in the Mouse Blastocyst. Develop. Biol. 331 (2), 210–221. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.036
Morris, S. A., Teo, R. T. Y., Li, H., Robson, P., Glover, D. M., and Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2010). Origin and Formation of the First Two Distinct Cell Types of the Inner Cell Mass in the Mouse Embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (14), 6364–6369. doi:10.1073/pnas.0915063107
MRC Vitamin Study Research Group (1991). Prevention of Neural Tube Defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet 338 (8760), 131–137. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90133-a
Okada, H., Tsuzuki, T., Shindoh, H., Nishigaki, A., Yasuda, K., and Kanzaki, H. (2014). Regulation of Decidualization and Angiogenesis in the Human Endometrium: Mini Review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 40 (5), 1180–1187. doi:10.1111/jog.12392
Outhwaite, J. E., Patel, J., and Simmons, D. G. (2019). Secondary Placental Defects in Cxadr Mutant Mice. Front. Physiol. 10, 622. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00622
Padmanabhan, N., Jia, D., Geary-Joo, C., Wu, X., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., Fung, E., et al. (2013). Mutation in Folate Metabolism Causes Epigenetic Instability and Transgenerational Effects on Development. Cell 155 (1), 81–93. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.002
Padmanabhan, N., Menelaou, K., Gao, J., Anderson, A., Blake, G. E. T., Li, T., et al. (2018). Abnormal Folate Metabolism Causes Age‐, Sex‐ and Parent‐of‐origin‐specific Haematological Defects in Mice. J. Physiol. 596 (18), 4341–4360. doi:10.1113/JP276419
Padmanabhan, N., Rakoczy, J., Kondratowicz, M., Menelaou, K., Blake, G. E. T., and Watson, E. D. (2017). Multigenerational Analysis of Sex-specific Phenotypic Differences at Midgestation Caused by Abnormal Folate Metabolism. Environ. Epigenet. 3 (4), dvx014. doi:10.1093/eep/dvx014
Perez-Garcia, V., Fineberg, E., Wilson, R., Murray, A., Mazzeo, C. I., Tudor, C., et al. (2018). Placentation Defects Are Highly Prevalent in Embryonic Lethal Mouse Mutants. Nature 555 (7697), 463–468. doi:10.1038/nature26002
Pickell, L., Li, D., Brown, K., Mikael, L. G., Wang, X.-L., Wu, Q., et al. (2009). Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Deficiency and Low Dietary Folate Increase Embryonic Delay and Placental Abnormalities in Mice. Birth Defect Res. A: Clin. Mol. Teratology 85 (6), 531–541. doi:10.1002/bdra.20575
Piedrahita, J. A., Oetama, B., Bennett, G. D., van Waes, J., Kamen, B. A., Richardson, J., et al. (1999). Mice Lacking the Folic Acid-Binding Protein Folbp1 Are Defective in Early Embryonic Development. Nat. Genet. 23 (2), 228–232. doi:10.1038/13861
Red-Horse, K., Zhou, Y., Genbacev, O., Prakobphol, A., Foulk, R., McMaster, M., et al. (2004). Trophoblast Differentiation During Embryo Implantation and Formation of the Maternal-Fetal Interface. J. Clin. Invest. 114 (6), 744–754. doi:10.1172/JCI2299110.1172/jci200422991
Ren, A., and Wang, J. (2006). Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase C677T Polymorphism and the Risk of Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Meta-Analysis. Fertil. Sterility 86 (6), 1716–1722. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.052
Salojin, K. V., Cabrera, R. M., Sun, W., Chang, W. C., Lin, C., Duncan, L., et al. (2011). A Mouse Model of Hereditary Folate Malabsorption: Deletion of the PCFT Gene Leads to Systemic Folate Deficiency. Blood 117 (18), 4895–4904. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-04-279653
Shane, B., and Stokstad, E. L. R. (1985). Vitamin B12-Folate Interrelationships. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 5, 115–141. doi:10.1146/annurev.nu.05.070185.000555
Sharma, U., Conine, C. C., Shea, J. M., Boskovic, A., Derr, A. G., Bing, X. Y., et al. (2016). Biogenesis and Function of tRNA Fragments During Sperm Maturation and Fertilization in Mammals. Science 351 (6271), 391–396. doi:10.1126/science.aad6780
Shi, D., Komatsu, K., Hirao, M., Toyooka, Y., Koyama, H., Tissir, F., et al. (2014). Celsr1 Is Required for the Generation of Polarity at Multiple Levels of the Mouse Oviduct. Development 141 (23), 4558–4568. doi:10.1242/dev.115659
Simmons, D. G., and Cross, J. C. (2005). Determinants of Trophoblast Lineage and Cell Subtype Specification in the Mouse Placenta. Develop. Biol. 284 (1), 12–24. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.010
Simmons, D. G., Natale, D. R. C., Begay, V., Hughes, M., Leutz, A., and Cross, J. C. (2008). Early Patterning of the Chorion Leads to the Trilaminar Trophoblast Cell Structure in the Placental Labyrinth. Development 135 (12), 2083–2091. doi:10.1242/dev.020099
Smith, L. J. (1985). Embryonic axis Orientation in the Mouse and its Correlation with Blastocyst Relationships to the Uterus. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 89, 15–35. doi:10.1242/dev.89.1.15
Solano, M. E., Thiele, K., Kowal, M. K., and Arck, P. C. (2016). Identification of Suitable Reference Genes in the Mouse Placenta. Placenta 39, 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2015.12.017
Sowton, A. P., Padmanabhan, N., Tunster, S. J., McNally, B. D., Murgia, A., Yusuf, A., et al. (2020). Mtrr Hypomorphic Mutation Alters Liver Morphology, Metabolism and Fuel Storage in Mice. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 23, 100580. doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2020.100580
Stover, P. J. (2004). Physiology of Folate and Vitamin B12in Health and Disease. Nutr. Rev. 62 (6 Pt 2), S3–S12. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00070.x
Swanson, D. A., Liu, M.-L., Baker, P. J., Garrett, L., Stitzel, M., Wu, J., et al. (2001). Targeted Disruption of the Methionine Synthase Gene in Mice. Mol. Cel. Biol. 21 (4), 1058–1065. doi:10.1128/MCB.21.4.1058-1065.2001
Tunster, S. J. (2017). Genetic Sex Determination of Mice by Simplex PCR. Biol. Sex. Differ. 8 (1), 31. doi:10.1186/s13293-017-0154-6
Ueda, O., Yorozu, K., Kamada, N., Jishage, K.-i., Kawase, Y., Toyoda, Y., et al. (2003). Possible Expansion of "Window of Implantation" in Pseudopregnant Mice: Time of Implantation of Embryos at Different Stages of Development Transferred into the Same Recipient. Biol. Reprod. 69 (3), 1085–1090. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.103.017608
Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Ji, W., Qin, H., Wu, H., Xu, D., et al. (2015). Analysis of MTR and MTRR Polymorphisms for Neural Tube Defects Risk Association. Medicine (Baltimore) 94 (35), e1367. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000001367
Watson, E. D., and Cross, J. C. (2005). Development of Structures and Transport Functions in the Mouse Placenta. Physiology 20, 180–193. doi:10.1152/physiol.00001.2005
Watson, E. D., and Rakoczy, J. (2016). Fat Eggs Shape Offspring Health. Nat. Genet. 48 (5), 478–479. doi:10.1038/ng.3554
Wen, S. W., Zhou, J., Yang, Q., Fraser, W., Olatunbosun, O., and Walker, M. (2008). Maternal Exposure to Folic Acid Antagonists and Placenta-Mediated Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 179 (12), 1263–1268. doi:10.1503/cmaj.080859
Wetendorf, M., and DeMayo, F. J. (2012). The Progesterone Receptor Regulates Implantation, Decidualization, and Glandular Development via a Complex Paracrine Signaling Network. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 357 (1-2), 108–118. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2011.10.028
Winterhager, E., Gellhaus, A., Blois, S. M., Hill, L. A., Barr, K. J., and Kidder, G. M. (2013). Decidual Angiogenesis and Placental Orientation Are Altered in Mice Heterozygous for a Dominant Loss-Of-Function Gja1 (Connexin43) Mutation1. Biol. Reprod. 89 (5), 111. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.113.111690
Yamada, K., Gravel, R. A., Toraya, T., and Matthews, R. G. (2006). Human Methionine Synthase Reductase Is a Molecular Chaperone for Human Methionine Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103 (25), 9476–9481. doi:10.1073/pnas.0603694103
Ye, J., Coulouris, G., Zaretskaya, I., Cutcutache, I., Rozen, S., and Madden, T. L. (2012). Primer-BLAST: A Tool to Design Target-specific Primers for Polymerase Chain Reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 134. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-134
Keywords: MTRR, trophoblast, decidua, grandparental effect, twinning, transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, conceptus misalignment
Citation: Wilkinson AL, Menelaou K, Rakoczy J, Tan XS and Watson ED (2021) Disruption of Folate Metabolism Causes Poor Alignment and Spacing of Mouse Conceptuses for Multiple Generations. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:723978. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.723978
Received: 11 June 2021; Accepted: 16 November 2021;
Published: 10 December 2021.
Edited by:
Nicholas Daniel Edward Greene, University College London, United KingdomReviewed by:
Pei-Shan Hou, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, TaiwanHongmei Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Copyright © 2021 Wilkinson, Menelaou, Rakoczy, Tan and Watson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Erica D. Watson, ZWR3MjNAY2FtLmFjLnVr