- 1Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain
- 2Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France
The fasciculus retroflexus is an important fascicle that mediates reward-related behaviors and is associated with different psychiatric diseases. It is the main habenular efference and constitutes a link between forebrain regions, the midbrain, and the rostral hindbrain. The proper functional organization of habenular circuitry requires complex molecular programs to control the wiring of the habenula during development. However, the mechanisms guiding the habenular axons toward their targets remain mostly unknown. Here, we demonstrate the role of the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurons (substantia nigra pars compacta and ventral tegmental area) as an intermediate target for the correct medial habenular axons navigation along the anteroposterior axis. These neuronal populations are distributed along the anteroposterior trajectory of these axons in the mesodiencephalic basal plate. Using in vitro and in vivo experiments, we determined that this navigation is the result of netrin 1 attraction generated by the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurons. This attraction is mediated by the receptor deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC), which is strongly expressed in the medial habenular axons. The increment in our knowledge on the fasciculus retroflexus trajectory guidance mechanisms opens the possibility of analyzing if its alteration in mental health patients could account for some of their symptoms.
Introduction
The habenulae (Hb), located in the dorsal part of prosomere 2 (p2), is constituted by two main nuclei, the medial and the lateral habenulae (mHb and lHb, respectively; Andres et al., 1999). Transcriptomic analysis unveiled a concise subdivision of the mHb in different subnuclei and a not-so-precise transcript subdivision of the lHb subnuclei (Wagner et al., 2016). The mHb axons project almost exclusively and in a topographic manner to the interpeduncular (IP) nucleus in rhombomere 1 (r1). These axons constitute the core of the fasciculus retroflexus (fr; Herkenham and Nauta, 1979; Contestabile and Flumerfelt, 1981). In turn, the IP innervates secondary targets, including the median raphe, ventral tegmental area (VTA), and dorsal tegmental nuclei (Shibata and Suzuki, 1984). The main efferents of lHb are the VTA (Araki et al., 1988; Brinschwitz et al., 2010), the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), the raphe complex (Wang and Aghajanian, 1977), and the locus coeruleus (Herkenham and Nauta, 1979). These lHb axons form the shield portion of the bundle around the mHb fibers (Bianco and Wilson, 2009; Schmidt et al., 2014; Ichijo and Toyama, 2015).
In zebrafish, it has been functionally related with learning, social behavior, and attention (Nakajo et al., 2020; Okamoto et al., 2021); decision making (Cherng et al., 2020); aversive reactions (Amo et al., 2014); fear and anxiety (Agetsuma et al., 2010; Jesuthasan, 2012; Okamoto et al., 2012; Mathuru and Jesuthasan, 2013); and helpless behavior (Lee et al., 2010). In mammals, there are a wide variety of functional studies of this system, using lesions, electrical stimulations (Klemm, 2004; Lecourtier and Kelly, 2005, 2007), and optogenetics to unravel its functions in reward-related behaviors (see, for a review, Hikosaka et al., 2008; Hikosaka, 2010; Batalla et al., 2017; Fakhoury, 2018). Among the different identified functions, we could mention the negative reward prediction error (Matsumoto and Hikosaka, 2007, 2009; Salas et al., 2010), reward- and aversion-related processes (Hong and Hikosaka, 2008; Koppensteiner et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017; Otsu et al., 2018; Li et al., 2021), brain stimulation reward (Morissette and Boye, 2008; Fakhoury et al., 2016), and locomotor activity (Gifuni et al., 2012; Otsu et al., 2018). In humans, it has been related to depression, drug addiction, and Parkinson disease (Benarroch, 2015; Fakhoury, 2017; Vickstrom et al., 2020). However, the molecular mechanisms controlling the complex pathfinding decisions of the Hb axons remain poorly understood.
We described the fr trajectory in the prosomeric paradigm context (see Figures 1, 3 of Moreno-Bravo et al., 2016). This precise anatomic interpretation of the axon path was a prerequisite to understanding which mechanisms are involved in the guidance of these axons. Contrary to the previous bibliographic references, where the fr is considered a straight fascicle, we suggested a complex axonal trajectory. The Hb subnuclei specification and differentiation has been related with the Wnt signaling (Guglielmi et al., 2020). Focusing on the mHb, the first step of the mHb axons is to grow dorsoventrally, presumably repulsed by semaphorins from the diencephalic alar plates (Funato et al., 2000; Sahay et al., 2003; Kantor et al., 2004) and then attracted by a netrin 1–deleted in colorectal cancer (Ntn1–Dcc) interaction from the ventral region (Funato et al., 2000). Once they arrive at the thalamic tegmentum, they are repulsed by the floor plate through a Robo1–Slit2 interaction (Moreno-Bravo et al., 2016). The axons turn caudalward toward the IP, at r1, following a long pathway through the mesodiencephalic basal plates. The mechanism involved in this last trajectory is unknown and constitutes the main objective of this work. The selective innervation of the IP subnuclei has been related to neuropilin 1 and semaphorins (Kuan et al., 2007).
Figure 1. Longitudinal navigation of habenular axons through the SNc and VTA. (A,B) DiI fr labeling and TH immunochemistry in E15.5 brain sagittal section. We differentiated the defasciculated lHb crossing the SNc and the compacted mHb axons in contact with the pial surface underneath the SNc to reach their target in r1. B is a higher magnification of A. (C,D) E15.5 brain sagittal section labeled against DCC and TH. DCC specifically labeled the mHb axons, which navigate underneath the SNc. D is a higher magnification of C. The white dotted lines define the boundaries between different neuromeres (p2, p1, Mb, Ist, and r1). Abbreviations: Ist, isthmus; lHb fr, lateral habenular axons of the fasciculus retroflexus; Mb, midbrain; mHb fr, medial habenular axons of the fasciculus retroflexus; p1, prosomere 1 (pretectum); p2, prosomere 2 (thalamus); SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; r1, rhombomere 1; fr, fasciculus retroflexus. Scale bar: 100 μm in A and C and 50 μm in B and D.
Different axonal projections travel long distances to reach their final targets using highly stereotyped patterns. In some axonal tracts, such as the thalamocortical projections, the pioneer axons use intermediate targets for their correct guidance (Chédotal and Richards, 2010; Kolodkin and Tessier-Lavigne, 2011; Garel and López-Bendito, 2014; Squarzoni et al., 2015; de Ramon Francàs et al., 2017). These intermediate targets are strategically placed along the pathway and produce signals required for the correct navigation of growing axons. Thus, a complex trajectory is divided in simpler and shorter ones, in which the axons navigate from one intermediate target to another. We postulated, as the principal hypothesis of our work, that the mesodiencephalic neuronal populations (SNc and VTA; Smits et al., 2006) play a role as an intermediate target for the mHb axons, directing them caudally toward their final destination.
Once we demonstrated its role, we identified Ntn1 as the main attractive molecule. This secreted molecule is expressed in the SNc and VTA (Livesey and Hunt, 1997; Li et al., 2014; Brignani et al., 2020). In our work, we have demonstrated that Ntn1 is responsible for the correct guidance of the mHb axons toward their final target and that SNc and VTA are intermediate targets in their navigation.
Materials and Methods
Mouse Strains
The day when the vaginal plug was detected was considered as embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5). All mouse manipulation and experimental procedures were performed according to the directives of the Spanish and European Union governments, and the protocols were approved by the Universidad Miguel Hernández OIR Committee (2016/VSC/PEA/00190).
Dcc, Ntn1, and Gli2 Mutant Mice
The Gli2–/– (n = 20), DCC–/– (n = 18), and Ntn1–/– (n = 10) mouse strains were genotyped as previously described (Fazeli et al., 1997; Mo et al., 1997; Dominici et al., 2017).
In situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry
For In situ Hybridization (ISH), mouse embryo brains were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Paraffin sections were hybridized with the following digoxigenin-labeled probes: Ntn1 (O. Reiner). Paraffin or vibratome sections were used for αDCC Immunohistochemistry (IHC) (1:100; Santa Cruz #sc-6535), α-tyrosine hydroxylase (αTH; 1:1,000; Institute Jacques Boy cat. no. 268020234), αNTN1 (1:500; RD Systems MAB1109), and αROBO3 (kindly provided by Dr. Fujio Murakami, Osaka University, and 1:300; AF3076/R&D Systems). In both cases, the protocols were performed as previously described (Moreno-Bravo et al., 2014).
Open Neural Tube Explant Technique
The Open Neural Tubes (ONTs) were performed as described previously by Moreno-Bravo et al. (2014). Briefly, neural tubes of E12.5 or E13.5 embryos were dissected and opened along the dorsal midline, and the telencephalic vesicles and hypothalamus regions were removed. The fr developing area was kept intact. Finally, the dissected explants were cultured like an open book with the ventricular surface looking upwards on a polycarbonate membrane (Millicell PICMORG50).
Ectopic Implantation of SNc in ONT Experiments
Parasagittal vibratome slices (250 μm) of E14.5 green fluorescent protein (GFP) mouse brains were used as donors. We removed the piece of tissue corresponding with the SNc for the experimental side and a piece of the prosomere 1 (p1) alar plate for controls; this control region was selected due to its non-attractive effect for Hb axons (Funato et al., 2000). We inserted the tissue graft in the basal plate of the p2 in the ONTs. These ONTs were cultured by contacting a polycarbonate membrane (Millicell PICMORG50) for 48 h.
For blocking assays, we used αDCC (AF5 clone/Ab16793/Abcam), 3 μg/ml, or a control mouse IgG was added to the culture media.
Overexpression of Ntn1 in ONT Experiments
COS7 cells were transfected by lipofection (Lipofectamine 2000 reagent, Invitrogen) Ntn1 or control GFP-expressing vector (PCX-GFP) and cultured for 48 h. Aggregates of COS7 transfected cells were prepared by embedding transfected cells in Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United States). Cell aggregates were cut to an appropriate size and added in p2.
Axonal Tracing
For axonal tracing, the embryonic brains and ONTs were fixed for 1 h in 4% PFA. Small DiI crystals (1,1′-dioctadecyl 3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate; Molecular Probes) were inserted into the Hb nuclei. The labeled brains and ONTs were incubated at 37°C in 4% PFA until the tracers had diffused sufficiently.
ONT Immunochemistry
After the culture, the ONTs were fixed in 4% PFA for 3 h. Next, they were washed for several hours in PBS containing 1% Triton-X (PBS-T). Then the tissue was blocked for at least 2 h with PBS-T and albumin bovine serum (BSA, #A2153-50G Sigma) at 0.1% and 10% lysine 1 M. Next, it was incubated for 2–3 days at 4°C temperature in PBS-T and BSA (0.1%) and sodium azide (0.01%) with different primary antibodies: αDCC IHC (1:100; Santa Cruz #sc-6535), αGFP (1:1,000; Aves Labs GFP-1020), and αTH (1:1,000; Institute Jacques Boy cat. no. 268020234). After overnight washing in PBS-T, the secondary fluorescent antibodies were also incubated in PBS-T overnight, and it was followed by overnight washes in PBS-T. ONTs were counterstained with DAPI diluted in PBS at 0.001% and incubated for 10 min at room temperature and visualized on a Leica confocal microscope DM5500-Q.
For quantification of axon behavior in the ONT ectopic tissue and cell aggregate assays, the cultures were classified as having a “normal trajectory” when less than six axons were reoriented toward the ectopic source. The cases where more than six axons were reoriented were considered as a “modified trajectory.” For these experiments, statistical analysis was performed with the chi-square test using the GraphPad Prism software.
Whole-Mount Immunostaining and Clearing Procedure (iDISCO)
Whole-mount brains were immunostained and cleared following the protocol described (Belle et al., 2017). Briefly, after dehydration in methanol, the samples were bleached using 6% hydrogen peroxide solution in 100% methanol O/N at 4°C. Samples were blocked using PBS-GT, i.e., PBS containing 0.2% gelatin (Prolabo) and 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) O/N at RT, and then incubated in agitation for 7 days at 37°C with αROBO3 (1:300, R&D Systems AF3076), αTH antibody (1:1000, Abcam AB152), and αNTN1 (1:500, R&D Systems MAB1109). This was followed by six washes for 30 min in PBS-GT at RT and incubation with the secondary antibody O/N at 37°C. The clearing was achieved through methanol, dichloromethane (Sigma-Aldrich #270997), and dibenzyl ether (Sigma-Aldrich #108014) as described by Belle et al. (2017).
Image Processing
3D imaging was performed with a light-sheet fluorescence microscope (Ultramicroscope II, LaVision BioTec) using the ImSpector Pro software (LaVision BioTec). The image stacks were processed using the Imaris x64 software (Bitplane) to generate surface contour using a “normal shading” function based on Robo3 staining to visualize the fr organization in 3D, and static 3D pictures for Robo3, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and Ntn1 were generated using the “snapshot” tool.
Results
The fr Trajectory Through the SNc and VTA
As described above, once the mHb axons contact the p2 floor plate, they avoid it, bend, and navigate caudalward through the basal plate. In order to study the longitudinal trajectory of the fr, we labeled with a DiI crystal the Hb nuclei (mHb and lHb) in the embryonic stage (E)15.5 brain, the developmental stage when the tracts are already bended caudally. With the aim to describe the fr close contact with the SNc and VTA, we performed sagittal sections of the DiI-labeled embryo and revealed the presence of the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic populations with a specific antibody against TH (Figures 1A,B). We observed a dense fasciculated tract approaching the floor plate just rostral to the SNc and VTA (Figure 1A). As the fibers started to bend caudally, they behaved in two different ways. On the one hand, a group of fibers defasciculated from the main tract and navigated into the SNc; these should correspond to lHb axons. On the other hand, the rest of the tract kept tightly fasciculated and navigated caudally adjacent to the pial surface; these should coincide with mHb axons (Figure 1B).
To confirm the origin of the fasciculated fibers, we analyzed the distribution of the DCC receptor, specifically expressed by the mHb (Braisted et al., 2000; Schmidt et al., 2014). The double staining showed that the mHb axons bended caudally and navigated by fasciculating in close contact with the SNc and VTA and the pial surface (Figures 1C,D). Thus, the DiI-positive and DCC-negative axons must correspond to lHb fr (compare Figures 1B,D).
Our observation about the mHb axon distribution in relation to the SNc and VTA suggests that these populations could play a pivotal role in mHb axon guidance. These neurons should expose axonal cues to attract mHb axons and cause the bending of the axons toward caudal regions.
The mHb Axons Are Disoriented in SNc and VTA Absence
In order to test our hypothesis, we decided to study the effect generated by the absence of the SNc and VTA in the development of the fr. For this purpose, we selected the Gli2-knockout transgenic model, which lacks the function of one of the secondary messengers of the Shh pathway (Mo et al., 1997). The result of this genetic alteration is the disruption in the differentiation program of basal plate neuronal fates. One of the most affected neuronal populations are the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurons (Matise et al., 1998). Nevertheless, all the ventral neuronal structures are affected. At E13.5, in midbrain coronal sections, the SNc and VTA were identified by the immunohistochemistry labeling of TH (Figure 2A), and the mHb fr axons are located adjacent to the pial surface, beneath the SNc (Figure 2B). In the Gli2–/–, no TH-positive neurons were observed, and the mHb fr axons were also non-detectable as a compact superficial tract (Figures 2C,D). Later in development, at E18.5, the SNc and the VTA are further developed and displayed their full extension (Figure 2E), and the mHb fr axons are located superficially to both dopaminergic populations (Figure 2F). In the mutant embryo, no dopaminergic neurons were identified in the mesodiencephalon (Figure 2G), and the mHb fr axons displayed an abnormal behavior, with a midline cross of the left tract over the right side, far away from the superficial side of the midbrain (Figure 2H). In sagittal sections, we were able to observe the complete trajectory of the mHb fr tract, from the mHb, located in the diencephalic p2, into the IP nucleus in r1 (Figure 2I). In the mutant, the mHb tract displayed an aberrant trajectory, and the axons turned rostrally and penetrated into the hypothalamic territory (Figure 2J).
Figure 2. Drastic alteration in the fr trajectory in the Gli2–/– mutant. Transversal sections of wild-type E13.5 (A,B) and E18.5 (E,F) brains and Gli2–/– E13.5 (C,D) and E18.5 (G,H) brains labeled against TH and DCC. In the wild type, the SNc and VTA are identified as well as the mHb fr in the pial surface. In the mutant, the SNc is not detectable (C,G), and the fr is misoriented and crosses the midline in an abnormal position (arrowhead in H). Sagittal sections of wild-type (I) and Gli2–/– (J) E18.5 brains labeled against DCC. In the wild type, the mHb fr is observed in all its length, from the Hb into r1. In the mutant brain, we detected the fr abnormal rostral bending into the hypothalamic territory. In this mutant model, the SNc and VTA are not generated. The mHb fr displayed an abnormal trajectory into rostral territories. 3D lateral view of E16.5 wild-type brain (K) and Gli2–/– mutant (L) labeled for TH and ROBO3 with the iDISCO protocol. This 3D view allowed us to follow the trajectory of the mHb fr tract by the specific ROBO3 labeling and its relation with the dopaminergic populations by TH. In the wild type (K), the mHb fr reached its target; meanwhile, in the mutant (L), we clearly observed the tract misrouting into the hypothalamic territory and the absence of the dopaminergic populations in the mesodiencephalic territory. A frontal section to the midbrain in the wild type obtained from the reconstructed sample; the relation of the mHb fr with the dopaminergic populations is displayed (M). In the mutant embryo, a section of a similar section plane but in a more anterior position displays the mHb fr in its initial location and how it finally enters into the hypothalamic territory (N). Abbreviations: A13, A13 dopaminergic population; Hb, habenula; Hyp, hypothalamus; Lc, locus coeruleus; mHb fr, medial habenular axons of the fasciculus retroflexus; ob, olfactory bulb; r1; rhombomere 1; SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; VTA, ventral tegmental area. Scale bar: 200 μm.
To illustrate this dramatic phenotype, we performed an iDISCO protocol on wild-type and Gli2–/– E16.5 brains. We labeled the dopaminergic populations and the fr mHb axons (Figures 2K–N). The resulting 3D view allowed us to display the relation between the fr and the SNc and VTA in the wild type (Figure 2K and Supplementary Video 1); the fr spatial relation with the dopaminergic neurons was revealed by the distribution of the ROBO3 protein (a specific marker of mHb axons; Belle et al., 2014; Figure 2M). In Gli2–/–, the 3D view illustrated the TH distribution alterations; in the mesodiencephalic domain, the absence of dopaminergic neurons is almost complete (Figure 2L and Supplementary Video 2). This view also allowed us to show the mHb fr striking misdirection toward rostral domains; no single axon was detected toward their caudal target (Figure 2N and Supplementary Video 2). The misrouted tract seems related to an enlarged A13 dopaminergic population located in the prethalamic territory.
The SNc and VTA Attract Hb Axons
We next focused on demonstrating the possible attractive role of SNc and VTA on mHb axons. We developed an in vitro assay where SNc explants from a GFP+/– mouse brain were ectopically placed in an organotypic neural tube culture (ONTs, Moreno-Bravo et al., 2014). As control, we used p1 alar plate explants (Figure 3A). The GFP-positive tissue was located in the basal plate of p2, adjacent and rostral to the point where the fr bends caudalward (Figure 3A). We confirmed that our experimental tissue corresponded mainly to the SNc (being the donor tissue extracted from a parasagittal section, the VTA’s presence must be residual) by immunostaining it against TH and GFP (Figures 3B–D). In order to affect the descending fr axons, the experiments were performed in ONTs at E12.5.
Figure 3. Ectopic SNc guides the mHb axons to rostral regions. (A) Schematic representation of the ectopic tissue implantation experiment in E12.5 ONTs. The stage was selected to affect the descending fibers toward the diencephalic basal plate. The ectopic tissue is obtained from an E14.5 GFP donor. The control (p1 alar plate) and the experimental tissues (SNc) were implanted in the basal plate of the p2. Basal and floor plates are delimited by continuous lines. The floor plate is on the left and caudal to the bottom. (B–D) Characterization of the experimental ectopic tissue, labeled against GFP (B) and TH (C) to check the correct SNc isolation. D is the merged image of B and C. (E–G) Control side (E) and experimental (F) side. The ONTs with the ectopic tissue were cultured for 48 h and subjected to IHC for GFP and DCC. Placing the ectopic SNc in the ventral region of p2 reoriented the mHb axons of the fr. This effect is not observed in the control and when we implanted SNc and added the blocking DCC antibody (AF5). (H) Quantification indicating the percentage of experiments with a normal or modified trajectory mHb fr. *p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Hb, habenula; Hyp, hypothalamus; Mb, midbrain; p1, prosomere 1 (pretectum); p2, prosomere 2 (thalamus); p3, prosomere 3 (prethalamus); SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; r1, rhombomere 1; fr, fasciculus retroflexus. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Whereas the control tissue did not affect the Hb axon trajectory (Figure 3E), the ectopic SNc reoriented the mHb axons, modifying their direction toward rostral regions (Figure 3F). In order to quantify the misorientation of the tract, we considered as aberrant behavior the misrouting of more than six axons. This aberrant behavior was observed in 25% of control experiments and in 100% of ectopic SNc experiments (n = 8 for control and ectopic SNc; p < 0.01; Figure 3H). Thus, the SNc neurons are able to display an attractive role to the mHb and lHb fr axons.
The fact that the mHb axons strongly express the DCC receptor prompted us to test the possible role of this molecule in the phenomenon observed. We blocked DCC receptor activity through the blocking antibody AF5 (Bennett et al., 1997). The mHb axons on ONTs with the blocking treatment did not respond to the effect of the ectopic SNc; the aberrant behavior was observed in 37.5% of the experiments (n = 9 for SNc + AF5 and n = 8 for ectopic SNc; p < 0.01; Figures 3G,H).
The SNc and VTA Express Ntn1 and Locally Secrete Its Protein
The DCC receptor-specific location in the mHb axons and the effect produced by the blocking antibody AF5 experiments prompted us to carefully analyze the expression of the DCC ligand (Keino-Masu et al., 1996) Ntn1 in the SNc and VTA.
We followed the distribution of SNc and VTA neurons and Ntn1 expression pattern in the mesodiencephalic basal plate during development. At E12.5, when the fr tract is developing, we found that Ntn1 was expressed not only in the floor and basal plate ventricular layer but also in the basal plate mantle layer in coincidence with the dopaminergic neuron location (Figure 4A). These dopaminergic neurons of the future SNc and the VTA are already detectable (Figure 4B). At E15.5, the Ntn1 distribution in the mantle layer (Figure 4C) largely coincides with the well-developed SNc and VTA locations (Figure 4D). Recent publications demonstrated that the NTN1 protein has been located in axonal projections and not in the area surrounding the soma of the Ntn1-expressing neurons (Dominici et al., 2017; Varadarajan et al., 2017; Moreno-Bravo et al., 2019; Brignani et al., 2020). We studied the distribution of the NTN1 protein in relation to the TH-positive cells of the SNc and VTA, at the time point when the fr is bending (Figures 4E–G). Both proteins colocalize; thus, in this particular area, our data suggest that the protein is secreted in the surrounding area where it is produced. The axons from the tectospinal tract and the fr also appeared positive (Figure 4F).
Figure 4. Ntn1 and NTN1 in the SNc and VTA. (A,B) Adjacent coronal paraffin section of a unique E12.5 brain. (A) In situ hybridization for Ntn1. (B) IHC against TH. (C,D) Adjacent coronal paraffin section of a E15.5 brain. (C) In situ hybridization for Ntn1. (D) IHC against TH. (E–G) Midbrain coronal section of a E13.5 brain with fluorescent immunohistochemistry against NTN1 and TH. Both protein and mRNA are localized in the SNc and VTA. (F,G) are the single channels of (E). Abbreviations: SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; fr, fasciculus retroflexus; tst, tectospinal tract; VTA, ventral tegmental area. Scale bar: 200 and 100 μm in (E–G).
Ntn1 Plays a Role in fr Guidance
We compared in E13.5 the mRNA and protein distribution in the wild type and Gli2–/– mutant, in order to check if the phenotype observed could be due to an alteration in the Ntn1 expression pattern or in the NTN1 protein distribution. In a E13.5 frontal section to the midbrain, as previously shown, the distribution of the Ntn1 mRNA observed in the wild type corresponds with the SNc and VTA locations (Figure 5A). This mRNA distribution was compared with NTN1 and TH protein distributions processed by the iDISCO protocol (Figure 5B). This technique was applied to improve our detection range due to the low NTN1 protein level in the mutant embryo. The Ntn1 expression is severely affected in the mutant, with a complete absence of Ntn1 in the mantle layer, and a small ventricular expression is maintained (arrow in Figure 5C). A faint labeling of the NTN1 protein was also detected in the floor plate ventricular layer (arrow in Figure 5D). Therefore, the phenotype observed in the Gli2–/– mutant could be due to the alteration in the Ntn1 expression. The rostral misroute of the fr in the Gli2–/–, as mentioned above, appears related to an enlarged A13 dopaminergic nucleus. This population contains the NTN1 protein localized with TH (Figures 5E,F), which could explain the direction of the tract in this mutant.
Figure 5. Ntn1 mRNA and NTN1 protein distribution in E13.5 wild type and Gli2–/– mutant. (A,B) Midbrain coronal sections of E13.5 wild-type brains labeled with Ntn1 in situ hybridization (A) and light-sheet fluorescence microscopy images with NTN1 and TH in toto IHC (B). (C–F) Coronal sections of E13.5 Gli2–/– brains labeled with Ntn1 in situ hybridization (C) and with NTN1 and TH IHC by the iDISCO protocol (D–F). Midbrain level in (C,D) and diencephalic level in (E,F). Abbreviations: A13, A13 dopaminergic population; SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; VTA, ventral tegmental area. Scale bar: 200 μm.
To test the possible direct role of Ntn1 in the rtf caudal bending, we placed Ntn1-expressing cells in ONTs, similar to the experiments described above, and GFP-expressing control cells (Figure 6A). The control cells did not affect the mHb axon trajectory (Figure 6B); the Ntn1-expressing cells reoriented the fr tract, modifying their direction toward the rostral region where the cells were located (Figure 6C). In order to quantify the misorientation of the tract, we considered as aberrant behavior the misrouting of more than six axons. This aberrant behavior was observed in 11.11% of control experiments and in 80% of Ntn1-expressing cell experiments (n = 9 for control and 10 for Ntn1-expressing cells; p < 0.01; Figure 6D).
Figure 6. Ectopic Ntn1-expressing cells attract the mHb rostrally in ONTs. (A) Schematic representation of the transfected cells’ location in E12.5 ONTs. Basal and floor plates are delimited by continuous lines. The floor plate is on the left and caudal to the bottom. (B) Characterization of the control experiment with GFP transfected cells labeled against GFP and DCC; the fr axons maintained their normal trajectory. (C) Characterization of the experiment with Ntn1-expressing cells labeled against GFP and DCC; the mHb axons are redirected toward the cells located in the rostral diencephalon. (D) Quantification indicating the percentage of experiments with a normal or modified trajectory mHb fr. *p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Hb, habenula; Hyp, hypothalamus; Mb, midbrain; p1, prosomere 1 (pretectum); p2, prosomere 2 (thalamus); p3, prosomere 3 (prethalamus); r1, rhombomere 1; fr, fasciculus retroflexus. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Therefore, Ntn1 expression is sufficient to direct the fr caudal bending. Alterations in this expression produced aberrant trajectories of the tract.
The fr Phenotype in Ntn1 and DCC Mutant Mice
The compelling evidence obtained in our in vitro assays induced us to analyze in vivo the Ntn1–DCC system’s role in fr development. We studied the mHb axon behavior in the Ntn1 mutant mice (Dominici et al., 2017).
With the aim to elucidate the mHb axonal behavior observed, we analyzed sagittal and frontal sections of E16.5 Ntn1–/– embryos labeled against DCC for the mHb fr and TH for the SNc and VTA. In sagittal sections, comparing the wild-type (Figure 7A) and the Ntn1–/– (Figure 7B) E16.5 brains, we detected an abnormal bending of the mHb axons toward caudal positions. They invaded the basal plate of the pretectal prosomere, demonstrating their non-attraction to the Ntn1-deprived SNc and VTA. Some axons displayed abnormal bending toward different directions including the roof plate (as described in Belle et al., 2014). To illustrate the spatial relation between these structures, we analyzed frontal sections contrasting wild types and mutants. In the wild type (Figures 7C,D), the mHb components of the fr tract approximate to the SNc and VTA pial locations before bending caudally; meanwhile, in the mutant brains (Figures 7E,F), the SNc and VTA displayed an abnormal neuronal distribution (described in Brignani et al., 2020), and the mHb fr appeared partially defasciculated and unable to reach the pial surface underneath the SNc and VTA.
Figure 7. The fr phenotype in Ntn1–/–. Sagittal section of E16.5 wild-type (A) and Ntn1–/– (B) brains stained with αDCC. The mHb fr in the mutant displayed an abnormal trajectory; a bunch of these fibers followed the normal path until the basal plate. At that point, they bended caudally toward caudal positions. The dotted line in A indicates the section plane in C–F. Coronal sections of a E16.5 wild type (C,D) and Ntn1–/– (E,F) labeled for TH and DCC. In the mutant, the SNc presented an abnormal distribution, and the mHb fr was defasciculated and occupied a dorsal position. Abbreviations: mHb fr, medial habenular axons of the fasciculus retroflexus; SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Once we analyzed the role of the signaling molecule, we decided to check the phenotype of its receptor loss of function. We labeled the Hb with DiI of E13.5 DCC+/– and DCC–/– ONTs. In contrast with the heterozygous ones (Figure 8A), the vast majority of mutant mHb axons were stalled in the p2 basal plate, unable to bend caudally. Some of them, together with the lHb, bended in an abnormal distance of the floor plate (Figure 8B). This result coincides with the variable phenotype shown by Belle et al. (2014). At E15.5, we confirmed, by ROBO3 staining, that the mHb dorsoventral axonal navigation reached the p2 tegmentum (arrow in Figures 8C,E). In caudal sections, we were unable to detect the mHb fr (Figure 8D), despite Belle et al. (2014) showing its presence, where the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurons were present (Figure 8F). In the absence of DCC, the Ntn1 secreted by the SNc and VTA did not properly attract the mHb axons.
Figure 8. The fr phenotype in DCC mutant. (A,B) Top view of E13.5 ONTs of DCC+/– (A) and DCC–/– (B) mutant embryos labeled with DiI in the Hb. The white dotted lines define the boundaries between different neuromeres (p2, p1, and Mb). The floor plate is on the left and caudal to the bottom. (C–F) Adjacent coronal paraffin sections of an E15.5 DCC–/– specimen at comparable section levels. IHC against ROBO3 (E,F) and TH (G,H). The arrows in (C,E) show the localization of the fr in a DCC–/– mutant. Abbreviations: fp, floor plate; lHb fr, lateral habenular axons of the fasciculus retroflexus; Mb, midbrain; mHb fr, medial habenular axons of the fasciculus retroflexus; mtg, mammillotegmental tract; p1, prosomere 1 (pretectum); p2, prosomere 2 (thalamus); SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta. Scale bar: 50 μm in (A,B) and 200 μm in C–F.
In summary, the phenotype observed in both mutants was similar and confirmed the data obtained in the in vitro approaches.
Discussion
The fr pathfinding mechanisms have been largely neglected until the last years. The reinterpretation of the fr trajectory under the prosomeric model has opened the possibility of properly understanding the behavior of this tract (Moreno-Bravo et al., 2016). Among the different key decision points adopted by the Hb axons during their trajectory, one of the most elusive has been the caudal bending in the basal p2. To address this question, we planned to identify the signal and the source involved in this particular fr navigation event. Considering the neuronal populations that surround the tract, we identified the SNc and VTA as potential candidates. Our in vitro and in vivo approaches have allowed us to prove the role of the SNc and VTA as the source of the attractive signal and Ntn1 as the attractive molecule for the mHb axons through the DCC receptor.
Relations of the Hb Axons and the SNc and VTA
Axonal projections extend throughout extensive regions following a stereotyped pattern to reach their final target. To simplify these complex trajectories, the axons may use different intermediate targets to reach their destination. Then, a long and complex trajectory is the result of shorter and simpler individual steps (Bielle and Garel, 2013).
The navigating axons find specific cues located at decision points where the direction of growth is determined. The correct distribution, in time and space, of these guidance cues is essential for the correct wiring of the axonal systems. In the case of the fr, we reinterpreted its trajectory in the context of the prosomeric model paradigm. This interpretation allowed us to describe a key decision point: the arrival to the p2 basal plate where the axons bend caudally by navigating longitudinally until its final targets (Moreno-Bravo et al., 2016). Following this interpretation, we selected the SNc and VTA as candidate territories to control this decision point.
The fr is highly related with the SNc. In fact, the SNc is a direct target of the lHb axons. The mHb axons navigate longitudinally in contact with the pial surface underneath this neuronal population. It is known that this relation is reciprocal; the lHb axons are necessary for the correct navigation of the dopaminergic mesohabenular projection, a SNc axonal tract to the lHb (Schmidt et al., 2014).
SNc and VTA Direct the mHb Axons
An important datum that supported our selection is the birth timing of the SNc and VTA, from E11.5 onward (Abeliovich and Hammond, 2007). This event occurs simultaneously with the fr caudal bending (Moreno-Bravo et al., 2016).
First of all, we demonstrated in vitro the role of SNc and VTA in directing the mHb axons. Ectopic SNc explants placed in ONTs were able to redirect the tract and force the rostral bending of the mHb axons.
The mHb axons specifically express the DCC receptor (Quina et al., 2009; Schmidt et al., 2014); it has been proposed that this receptor is involved in the initial dorsoventral trajectory of the fr tract (Funato et al., 2000). Thus, we decided to test if this receptor was also involved in the SNc and VTA signaling in our in vitro system; the blockage of the receptor with the AF5 antibody prevented the redirection of the mHb axons by the ectopic SNc. This preliminary result prompted us to check the role of Ntn1, the specific attractive ligand of DCC (Keino-Masu et al., 1996).
Ntn1–DCC Mechanism Has a Complex Role in the Guidance of mHb
The Ntn1 expression pattern analysis shows a precise and interesting presence along the territories crossed by the tract. Ntn1 is distributed homogeneously in the ventricular layer of the floor plate all along the neural tube. We also detected a strong expression in the mantle layer of the diencephalon and mesencephalon coincident with the SNc and VTA location. The presence of this Ntn1-positive population generates a strong caudal source of attractive signal for the mHb axons. Furthermore, this Ntn1 expression in the SNc and VTA and the normal distribution of dopaminergic neurons generate a more abundant presence in the caudal part of this population. The summation of these two effects must be responsible for the caudal bending of the tract.
Netrin 1 is an extracellular matrix protein involved in cell adhesion, and its role as a diffusible cue is in doubt (Dominici et al., 2017; Varadarajan et al., 2017). In the hindbrain, NTN1 in the floor plate is not sufficient to attract commissural axons; the presence of NTN1 in the basal ventricular layer is necessary for their correct axonal guidance (Moreno-Bravo et al., 2019). We could extrapolate that the NTN1 presence in postmitotic dopaminergic neurons of the SNc and VTA in the mesodiencephalon is necessary, as an intermediate target, for the fr. Once it reaches the diencephalic floor plate, the NTN1 source from the SNc and VTA attracts the mHb axons caudally.
Recently, it has been indicated (Dominici et al., 2017; Varadarajan et al., 2017; Moreno-Bravo et al., 2019; Brignani et al., 2020) that the NTN1 protein can been located in axonal projections or concentrated in the pial surface and not in the area of the soma of the Ntn1-expressing neurons. The NTN1 presence in the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic neurons has been recently demonstrated in adult brains, and we have proved it during development (Dominici et al., 2017; Jasmin et al., 2020). Nevertheless, other authors have also described the NTN1 production by dopaminergic neurons of the developing SNc and VTA (Livesey and Hunt, 1997; Li et al., 2014; Brignani et al., 2020). Furthermore, in the Netrin1bGal hypomorph (Serafini et al., 1996), the mutant allele generates a fusion protein between NTN1 and BGAL. This fusion protein is trapped in endosomes, and it is not secreted (Serafini et al., 1996; Dominici et al., 2017). Ventricular and floor plate cells that express Ntn1 are positive for the fused protein (Figures 1D,E in Dominici et al., 2017).
Netrin 1 produced by the floor plate participates in chemotaxis actions, attracting axons. Meanwhile, NTN1 produced by the ventricular layer is involved in haptotaxis processes, directing axons by close-contact interactions (Dominici et al., 2017; Varadarajan et al., 2017; Moreno-Bravo et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019). The fact that SNc and VTA are floor plate derivatives (Joksimovic et al., 2009) postulates their NTN1 as a chemotactic effector as we demonstrated in our ectopic transplants in ONTs. The mHb fr axons were strongly derailed by the presence of the ectopic source.
The location of ectopic SNc in our in vitro experiments must have remodeled the existing Ntn1 location and produced the redirection observed. To prove the direct role of Ntn1, we placed Ntn1-expressing cells in the ONTs. They were able to mimic the phenomenon observed, and therefore, Ntn1 is necessary and sufficient to direct the mHb axons along the longitudinal axis.
Once we proved in vitro the Ntn1–DCC interaction in the mHb axons, we decided to confirm in vivo the results obtained. We analyzed Ntn1 and DCC loss-of-function mice strains. First of all, we were puzzled by the fact that we found some mHb axons navigating ventrally from the Hb into the p2 basal plate, a phenomenon also observed by Schmidt et al. (2014). This behavior could be due to the fact that the thalamic and pretectal alar plates are impermissible to the Hb axon entrance by the interactions of Nrp2, Sema3F, and Sema5a, among others (Funato et al., 2000; Sahay et al., 2003; Kantor et al., 2004). Therefore, the ventral growth of the Hb axons is not only toward the repulsive direction. Nevertheless, it was postulated by Funato et al. (2000) that Ntn1–DCC is the attractive mechanism responsible for the initial dorsoventral trajectory of the mHb axons, but this mechanism is not common for all mHb axons.
In the Ntn1 mutant, a small number of axons are directed in bizarre directions, even parallel to the pretectal roof plate (as observed by Belle et al., 2014). The main tract is able to move ventrally, but it turns caudally as soon as the axons enter in the diencephalic basal plate far away from the floor plate. In the DCC mutant, the phenotype is even stronger; the vast majority of fr axons remain stalled as soon as they enter the thalamic basal plate. Only a few axons are able to turn caudally in an ectopic position (Belle et al., 2014).
It is interesting to discuss that the DCC-positive mHb axons are attracted by the Ntn1-positive SNc and VTA but are not able to penetrate in its territory. Meanwhile, DCC-negative lHb axons are able to innervate the SNc neurons. This fact must be due to the presence of close-contact inhibitory signals for the mHb axons that do not affect the lHb fibers. We cannot discard the presence of additional attractive signals for the lHb axons.
To summarize, the role of SNc and VTA as intermediate targets is to orchestrate the accurate Ntn1 location. This distribution, in the correct temporospatial moment, generates the necessary signal for the caudal bending of the DCC-expressing fr mHb axons. Future experiments will be needed to unveil the mechanisms involved in the mHb axon arrival to the r1 and their characteristic crisscross of the floor plate as they innervate the IP nucleus. It is important to underline that the understanding of the developing processes needed for the correct wiring of the limbic system will allow us to detect possible alterations in human brains. Small alterations in this connectivity could account for the symptoms observed in mental diseases associated with the Hb complex.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Universidad Miguel Hernández OIR Committee (2016/VSC/PEA/00190).
Author Contributions
All authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. JM-B, SM, DE, and EP conceived and designed the experiments. VC, JM-B, AA-C, MM, BA, and FA-G performed the experiments. JM-B, DE, and EP analyzed the data. JM-B and EP wrote the article. SM, EP, DE, GL-B, and AC obtained funding.
Funding
This work was supported by MINECO/AEI/FEDER (BFU2013-48230) to EP and DE; MINECO/AEI/FEDER (SAF2017-83702-R), GVA (PROMETEO/2018/041), ISCIII (“RD16/001/0010”), co-funded by ERDF/ESF, “Investing in your future,” and FTPGB (FTPGB18/SM) to SM; MECD (FPU16/03853) to VC; Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (RYC2018-023868-I) to JM-B; and Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities PGC2018/096631-B-I00 to GL-B. The Institute of Neurosciences is a “Centre of Excellence Severo Ochoa.”
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank O. Reiner for providing the Ntn1 probe, M. Tessier-Lavigne for providing the Ntn1 functional construct, and A. Nieto for the PCX-GFP-expressing vector. We are also grateful to E. Domiguez for statistical advice.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.682067/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Video 1 | Video generated by Imaris of a E16.5 wild-type brain with fluorescent IHC for TH (white) and Robo3 (magenta) by the iDISCO protocol. The arrow indicates the caudal bending of the fr trajectory. Abbreviations: Hb, habenula; Lc, locus coeruleus; mHb fr, medial habenula fasciculus retroflexus; ob, olfactory bulb; SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; VTA, ventral tegmental area.
Supplementary Video 2 | Video generated by Imaris of a E16.5 Gli2–/– brain with fluorescent IHC for TH (white) and Robo3 (magenta) by the iDISCO protocol. The arrow indicates the rostral abnormal bending of the fr trajectory in this mutant. Abbreviations: Hb, habenula; Lc, locus coeruleus; mHb fr, medial habenula fasciculus retroflexus; ob, olfactory bulb.
References
Abeliovich, A., and Hammond, R. (2007). Midbrain dopamine neuron differentiation: factors and fates. Dev. Biol. 304, 447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.032
Agetsuma, M., Aizawa, H., Aoki, T., Nakayama, R., Takahoko, M., Goto, M., et al. (2010). The habenula is crucial for experience-dependent modification of fear responses in zebrafish. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1354–1356. doi: 10.1038/nn.2654
Amo, R., Fredes, F., Kinoshita, M., Aoki, R., Aizawa, H., Agetsuma, M., et al. (2014). The habenulo-raphe serotonergic circuit encodes an aversive expectation value essential for adaptive active avoidance of danger. Neuron 84, 1034–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.035
Andres, K. H., von Düring, M., and Veh, R. W. (1999). Subnuclear organization of the rat habenular complexes. J. Comp. Neurol. 407, 130–150. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990428)407:1<130::aid-cne10>3.0.co;2-8
Araki, M., McGeer, P. L., and Kimura, H. (1988). The efferent projections of the rat lateral habenular nucleus revealed by the PHA-L anterograde tracing method. Brain Res. 441, 319–330. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91410-2
Batalla, A., Homberg, J. R., Lipina, T. V., Sescousse, G., Luijten, M., Ivanova, S. A., et al. (2017). The role of the habenula in the transition from reward to misery in substance use and mood disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 80, 276–285. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.019
Belle, M., Godefroy, D., Couly, G., Malone, S. A., Collier, F., Giacobini, P., et al. (2017). Tridimensional visualization and analysis of early human development. Cell 169, 161–173.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.008
Belle, M., Godefroy, D., Dominici, C., Heitz-Marchaland, C., Zelina, P., Hellal, F., et al. (2014). A simple method for 3D analysis of immunolabeled axonal tracts in a transparent nervous system. Cell Rep. 9, 1191–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.037
Benarroch, E. E. (2015). Habenula: recently recognized functions and potential clinical relevance. Neurology 85, 992–1000. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001937
Bennett, K. L., Bradshaw, J., Youngman, T., Rodgers, J., Greenfield, B., Aruffo, A., et al. (1997). Deleted in colorectal carcinoma (DCC) binds heparin via its fifth fibronectin type III domain. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26940–26946. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.43.26940
Bianco, I. H., and Wilson, S. W. (2009). The habenular nuclei: a conserved asymmetric relay station in the vertebrate brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1005–1020. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0213
Bielle, F., and Garel, S. (2013). “Neuronal migration of guide post cells,” in The Comprehensive developmental Neuroscience: Cellular Migration and Formation of Neuronal Connections”, eds J. L. Rubenstein and P. Rakic (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 457–478. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397266-8.00037-5
Braisted, J. E., Catalano, S. M., Stimac, R., Kennedy, T. E., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Shatz, C. J., et al. (2000). Netrin-1 promotes thalamic axon growth and is required for proper development of the thalamocortical projection. J. Neurosci. 20, 5792–5801. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.20-15-05792.2000
Brignani, S., Raj, D., Schmidt, E., Düdükcü, Ö, Adolfs, Y., De Ruiter, A. A., et al. (2020). Remotely produced and axon-derived netrin-1 instructs GABAergic neuron migration and dopaminergic substantia nigra development. Neuron 107, 684–702.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.037
Brinschwitz, K., Dittgen, A., Madai, V. I., Lommel, R., Geisler, S., and Veh, R. W. (2010). Glutamatergic axons from the lateral habenula mainly terminate on GABAergic neurons of the ventral midbrain. Neuroscience 168, 463–476. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.050
Chédotal, A., and Richards, L. J. (2010). Wiring the brain: the biology of neuronal guidance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2:a001917. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001917
Cherng, B. W., Islam, T., Torigoe, M., Tsuboi, T., and Okamoto, H. (2020). The dorsal lateral habenula-interpeduncular nucleus pathway is essential for left-right-dependent decision making in Zebrafish. Cell Rep. 32:108143. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108143
Contestabile, A., and Flumerfelt, B. A. (1981). Afferent connections of the interpeduncular nucleus and the topographic organization of the habenulo-interpeduncular pathway: an HRP study in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 196, 253–270. doi: 10.1002/cne.901960206
de Ramon Francàs, G., Zuñiga, N. R., and Stoeckli, E. T. (2017). The spinal cord shows the way - How axons navigate intermediate targets. Dev. Biol. 432, 43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.12.002
Dominici, C., Moreno-Bravo, J. A., Puiggros, S. R., Rappeneau, Q., Rama, N., Vieugue, P., et al. (2017). Floor-plate-derived netrin-1 is dispensable for commissural axon guidance. Nature 545, 350–354. doi: 10.1038/nature22331
Fakhoury, M. (2017). The habenula in psychiatric disorders: more than three decades of translational investigation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 83, 721–735. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.010
Fakhoury, M. (2018). The dorsal diencephalic conduction system in reward processing: spotlight on the anatomy and functions of the habenular complex. Behav. Brain Res. 348, 115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.04.018
Fakhoury, M., Rompré, P. P., and Boye, S. M. (2016). Role of the dorsal diencephalic conduction system in the brain reward circuitry. Behav. Brain Res. 296, 431–441. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.038
Fazeli, A., Dickinson, S. L., Hermiston, M. L., Tighe, R. V., Steen, R. G., Small, C. G., et al. (1997). Phenotype of mice lacking functional Deleted in colorectal cancer (Dcc) gene. Nature 386, 796–804. doi: 10.1038/386796a0
Funato, H., Saito-Nakazato, Y., and Takahashi, H. (2000). Axonal growth from the habenular nucleus along the neuromere boundary region of the diencephalon is regulated by semaphorin 3F and netrin-1. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 16, 206–220. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2000.0870
Garel, S., and López-Bendito, G. (2014). Inputs from the thalamocortical system on axon pathfinding mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 27, 143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.03.013
Gifuni, A. J., Jozaghi, S., Gauthier-Lamer, A. C., and Boye, S. M. (2012). Lesions of the lateral habenula dissociate the reward-enhancing and locomotor-stimulant effects of amphetamine. Neuropharmacology 63, 945–957. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.032
Guglielmi, L., Bühler, A., Moro, E., Argenton, F., Poggi, L., and Carl, M. (2020). Temporal control of Wnt signaling is required for habenular neuron diversity and brain asymmetry. Development (Cambridge, England) 147:dev182865. doi: 10.1242/dev.182865
Herkenham, M., and Nauta, W. J. (1979). Efferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 187, 19–47. doi: 10.1002/cne.90187010
Hikosaka, O. (2010). The habenula: from stress evasion to value-based decision-making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 503–513. doi: 10.1038/nrn2866
Hikosaka, O., Sesack, S. R., Lecourtier, L., and Shepard, P. D. (2008). Habenula: crossroad between the basal ganglia and the limbic system. J. Neurosci. 28, 11825–11829. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3463-08.2008
Hong, S., and Hikosaka, O. (2008). The globus pallidus sends reward-related signals to the lateral habenula. Neuron 60, 720–729. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.035
Ichijo, H., and Toyama, T. (2015). Axons from the medial habenular nucleus are topographically sorted in the fasciculus retroflexus. Anat. Sci. Int. 90, 229–234. doi: 10.1007/s12565-014-0252-z
Jasmin, M., Ahn, E. H., Voutilainen, M. H., Fombonne, J., Guix, C., Viljakainen, T., et al. (2020). Netrin-1 and its receptor DCC modulate survival and death of dopamine neurons and Parkinson’s disease features. EMBO J. 40:e105537. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105537
Jesuthasan, S. (2012). Fear, anxiety, and control in the zebrafish. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 395–403. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20873
Joksimovic, M., Anderegg, A., Roy, A., Campochiaro, L., Yun, B., Kittappa, R., et al. (2009). Spatiotemporally separable Shh domains in the midbrain define distinct dopaminergic progenitor pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 19185–19190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904285106
Kantor, D. B., Chivatakarn, O., Peer, K. L., Oster, S. F., Inatani, M., Hansen, M. J., et al. (2004). Semaphorin 5A is a bifunctional axon guidance cue regulated by heparan and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. Neuron 44, 961–975. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.002
Keino-Masu, K., Masu, M., Hinck, L., Leonardo, E. D., Chan, S. S., Culotti, J. G., et al. (1996). Deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) encodes a netrin receptor. Cell 87, 175–185. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81336-7
Klemm, W. R. (2004). Habenular and interpeduncularis nuclei: shared components in multiple-function networks. Med. Sci. Monit. 10, RA261–RA273.
Kolodkin, A. L., and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2011). Mechanisms and molecules of neuronal wiring: a primer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:a001727. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001727
Koppensteiner, P., Galvin, C., and Ninan, I. (2016). Development- and experience-dependent plasticity in the dorsomedial habenula. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 77, 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2016.10.006
Kuan, Y. S., Yu, H. H., Moens, C. B., and Halpern, M. E. (2007). Neuropilin asymmetry mediates a left-right difference in habenular connectivity. Development (Cambridge, England) 134, 857–865. doi: 10.1242/dev.02791
Lecourtier, L., and Kelly, P. H. (2005). Bilateral lesions of the habenula induce attentional disturbances in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30, 484–496. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300595
Lecourtier, L., and Kelly, P. H. (2007). A conductor hidden in the orchestra? Role of the habenular complex in monoamine transmission and cognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 31, 658–672. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.01.004
Lee, A., Mathuru, A. S., Teh, C., Kibat, C., Korzh, V., Penney, T. B., et al. (2010). The habenula prevents helpless behavior in larval zebrafish. Curr. Biol. CB 20, 2211–2216. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.025
Li, J., Duarte, T., Kocabas, A., Works, M., McConnell, S. K., and Hynes, M. A. (2014). Evidence for topographic guidance of dopaminergic axons by differential Netrin-1 expression in the striatum. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 61, 85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2014.05.003
Li, J., Fan, R., Liu, X., Shen, X., Liu, X., and Zhao, H. (2021). The convergence of aversion and reward signals in individual neurons of the mice lateral habenula. Exp. Neurol. 339:113637. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113637
Livesey, F. J., and Hunt, S. P. (1997). Netrin and netrin receptor expression in the embryonic mammalian nervous system suggests roles in retinal, striatal, nigral, and cerebellar development. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 8, 417–429. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1997.0598
Mathuru, A. S., and Jesuthasan, S. (2013). The medial habenula as a regulator of anxiety in adult zebrafish. Front. Neural Circ. 7:99. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00099
Matise, M. P., Epstein, D. J., Park, H. L., Platt, K. A., and Joyner, A. L. (1998). Gli2 is required for induction of floor plate and adjacent cells, but not most ventral neurons in the mouse central nervous system. Development 125, 2759–2770. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.15.2759
Matsumoto, M., and Hikosaka, O. (2007). Lateral habenula as a source of negative reward signals in dopamine neurons. Nature 447:1111. doi: 10.1038/nature05860
Matsumoto, M., and Hikosaka, O. (2009). Representation of negative motivational value in the primate lateral habenula. Nat. Neurosci. 12:77. doi: 10.1038/nn.2233
Mo, R., Freer, A. M., Zinyk, D. L., Crackower, M. A., Michaud, J., Heng, H. H., et al. (1997). Specific and redundant functions of Gli2 and Gli3 zinc finger genes in skeletal patterning and development. Development (Cambridge, England) 124, 113–123. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.1.113
Moreno-Bravo, J. A., Martinez-Lopez, J. E., Madrigal, M. P., Kim, M., Mastick, G. S., Lopez-Bendito, G., et al. (2016). Developmental guidance of the retroflex tract at its bending point involves Robo1-Slit2-mediated floor plate repulsion. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 665–678. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0932-4
Moreno-Bravo, J. A., Perez-Balaguer, A., Martinez-Lopez, J. E., Aroca, P., Puelles, L., Martínez, S., et al. (2014). Role of Shh in the development of molecularly characterized tegmental nuclei in mouse rhombomere 1. Brain Struct. Funct. 219, 777–792. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0534-6
Moreno-Bravo, J. A., Roig Puiggros, S., Mehlen, P., and Chédotal, A. (2019). Synergistic activity of floor-plate- and ventricular-zone-derived netrin-1 in spinal cord commissural axon guidance. Neuron 101, 625–634.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.024
Morissette, M. C., and Boye, S. M. (2008). Electrolytic lesions of the habenula attenuate brain stimulation reward. Behav. Brain Res. 187, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.08.021
Nakajo, H., Tsuboi, T., and Okamoto, H. (2020). The behavioral paradigm to induce repeated social defeats in zebrafish. Neurosci. Res. 161, 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2019.11.004
Okamoto, H., Agetsuma, M., and Aizawa, H. (2012). Genetic dissection of the zebrafish habenula, a possible switching board for selection of behavioral strategy to cope with fear and anxiety. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 386–394. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20913
Okamoto, H., Cherng, B. W., Nakajo, H., Chou, M. Y., and Kinoshita, M. (2021). Habenula as the experience-dependent controlling switchboard of behavior and attention in social conflict and learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 68, 36–43. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2020.12.005
Otsu, Y., Lecca, S., Pietrajtis, K., Rousseau, C. V., Marcaggi, P., Dugué, G. P., et al. (2018). Functional principles of posterior septal inputs to the medial habenula. Cell Rep. 22, 693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.064
Quina, L. A., Wang, S., Ng, L., and Turner, E. E. (2009). Brn3a and Nurr1 mediate a gene regulatory pathway for habenula development. J. Neurosci. 29, 14309–14322. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2837-05.2005
Sahay, A., Molliver, M. E., Ginty, D. D., and Kolodkin, A. L. (2003). Semaphorin 3F is critical for development of limbic system circuitry and is required in neurons for selective CNS axon guidance events. J. Neurosci. 23, 6671–6680.
Salas, R., Baldwin, P., de Biasi, M., and Montague, P. R. (2010). BOLD responses to negative reward prediction errors in human habenula. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4:36. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00036
Schmidt, E. R. E., Brignani, S., Adolfs, Y., Lemstra, S., Demmers, J., Vidaki, M., et al. (2014). Subdomain-mediated axon-axon signaling and chemoattraction cooperate to regulate afferent innervation of the lateral habenula. Neuron 83, 372–387. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.036
Serafini, T., Colamarino, S. A., Leonardo, E. D., Wang, H., Beddington, R., Skarnes, W. C., et al. (1996). Netrin-1 is required for commissural axon guidance in the developing vertebrate nervous system. Cell 87, 1001–1014. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81795-x
Shibata, H., and Suzuki, T. (1984). Efferent projections of the interpeduncular complex in the rat, with special reference to its subnuclei: a retrograde horseradish peroxidase study. Brain Res. 296, 345–349. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90071-4
Smits, S. M., Burbach, J. P., and Smidt, M. P. (2006). Developmental origin and fate of meso-diencephalic dopamine neurons. Progress Neurobiol. 78, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.12.003
Squarzoni, P., Thion, M. S., and Garel, S. (2015). Neuronal and microglial regulators of cortical wiring: usual and novel guideposts. Front. Neurosci. 9:248. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00248
Varadarajan, S. G., Kong, J. H., Phan, K. D., Kao, T. J., Panaitof, S. C., Cardin, J., et al. (2017). Netrin1 produced by neural progenitors, not floor plate cells, is required for axon guidance in the spinal cord. Neuron 94, P790–P799. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.007
Vickstrom, C. R., Liu, X., Liu, S., Hu, M.-M., Mu, L., Hu, Y., et al. (2020). Role of endocannabinoid signaling in a septohabenular pathway in the regulation of anxiety- and depressive-like behavior. Mol. Psychiatry doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00905-1
Wagner, F., French, L., and Veh, R. W. (2016). Transcriptomic-anatomic analysis of the mouse habenula uncovers a high molecular heterogeneity among neurons in the lateral complex, while gene expression in the medial complex largely obeys subnuclear boundaries. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 39–58. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0891-9
Wang, D., Li, Y., Feng, Q., Guo, Q., Zhou, J., and Luo, M. (2017). Learning shapes the aversion and reward responses of lateral habenula neurons. ELife 6:e23045. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23045
Wang, R. Y., and Aghajanian, G. K. (1977). Physiological evidence for habenula as major link between forebrain and midbrain raphe. Science 197, 89–91. doi: 10.1126/science.194312)
Keywords: habenula, fasciculus retroflexus, netrin 1, DCC, axon guidance, substantia nigra pars compacta, ventral tegmental area
Citation: Company V, Andreu-Cervera A, Madrigal MP, Andrés B, Almagro-García F, Chédotal A, López-Bendito G, Martinez S, Echevarría D, Moreno-Bravo JA and Puelles E (2021) Netrin 1-Mediated Role of the Substantia Nigra Pars Compacta and Ventral Tegmental Area in the Guidance of the Medial Habenular Axons. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:682067. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.682067
Received: 17 March 2021; Accepted: 16 April 2021;
Published: 08 June 2021.
Edited by:
Florencia Cavodeassi, St George’s, University of London, United KingdomReviewed by:
Mónica Folgueira, University of A Coruña, SpainMatthias Carl, University of Trento, Italy
Copyright © 2021 Company, Andreu-Cervera, Madrigal, Andrés, Almagro-García, Chédotal, López-Bendito, Martinez, Echevarría, Moreno-Bravo and Puelles. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Eduardo Puelles, epuelles@umh.es; Juan A. Moreno-Bravo, juan.moreno@umh.es