Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 03 June 2021
Sec. Molecular and Cellular Oncology
This article is part of the Research Topic Cancer Cell Reprogramming: Impact on Carcinogenesis and Cancer Progression View all 26 articles

Conditional Cell Reprogramming in Modeling Digestive System Diseases

  • 1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 3Department of Pathology, Center for Cell Reprogramming, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
  • 4Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
  • 5Departments of Pathology and Urology, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
  • 6James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States

Digestive diseases have become an important source of morbidity and mortality. The considerable financial and health burdens caused by digestive diseases confirm the importance of extensive research to better understand and treat these diseases. The development of reliable preclinical models is essential for understanding the pathogenesis of digestive diseases and developing treatment and prevention methods. However, traditional established cell lines and animal models still have many limitations in the study of the digestive system. Conditional reprogramming (CR) cell culture is a newly developed primary technology that uses irradiated Swiss-3T3-J2 mouse fibroblast cells and the Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y-27632 to rapidly and efficiently generate many cells from diseased and normal tissues. CR cells (CRCs) can be reprogrammed to maintain a highly proliferative state and recapitulate the histological and genomic features of the original tissue. Moreover, after removing these conditions, the phenotype was completely reversible. Therefore, CR technology may represent an ideal model to study digestive system diseases, to test drug sensitivity, to perform gene profile analysis, and to undertake xenograft research and regenerative medicine. Indeed, together with organoid cultures, CR technology has been recognized as one of the key new technologies by NIH precision oncology and also used for NCI human cancer model initiatives (HCMI) program with ATCC. In this article, we review studies that use CR technology to conduct research on diseases of the digestive system.

Introduction

The digestive system involves the gastrointestinal tract, including the oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, stomach, small and large intestines, as well as auxiliary organs, namely, the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas. The digestive system is a continuous anatomical structure that can swallow, digest, absorb food nutrients, and expel the remaining waste. It also mediates interactions between the host and resident bacteria (Matuchansky and Beauchant, 1982). Digestive system diseases (including infections, inflammation, and cancers) have become important sources of morbidity and mortality. Globally, the burden of digestive system diseases is increasing annually (GBD 2017 Pancreatic Cancer Collaborators, 2019; GBD 2017 Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborators, 2020; GBD 2017 Oesophageal Cancer Collaborators, 2020). Colorectal and stomach cancers are the third and fourth most common malignancies worldwide, each accounting for approximately 800,000 victims per year (Siegel and Miller, 2020). Other common benign digestive system diseases, such as acute and chronic gastroenteritis caused by bacteria or other pathogens, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and functional gastrointestinal disorders, not only cause pain, disability and even death but also carry an enormous financial burden to both families and society. Indeed, the direct costs for care of patients with IBD singly were estimated to be €4.6–5.6 billion annually in Europe, and the incidence of IBD is still increasing steadily in Western countries (Burisch et al., 2013). The enormous financial and health burdens resulting from digestive system diseases confirm the importance of great research efforts to better understand and treat these diseases.

Developing reliable preclinical models that can accurately recapitulate the complex physiology and pathophysiology of different digestive system organs is essential to understand the developmental processes and mechanisms of diverse disorders of the digestive system organs, such as infection, inflammation, and cancer, to develop drug therapy. Conventionally, traditional established cell lines cultured in 2-dimensional (2D) or animal models have been widely used as digestive system models. Although these models have significantly contributed to the development of digestive system research, they still have many limitations. Only 1–10% of cell lines (depending on the source tissue and disease progression status) can be successfully established to be transformed immortalized or cancerous cell lines, and most primary cells, especially normal cells, are hard to culture because of their limited life span (Giard et al., 1973). More importantly, after being artificially cultured on glass or plastic plates with undefined medium for the long term, the genes of the established cell lines have undergone tremendous changes, making it impossible to recapitulate the complex characteristics of the primary tissue. Therefore, the results obtained in 2D cultures may not represent the true host response (Gillet et al., 2013). Animal models, especially recently emerged engineered mouse models and primary patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), may overcome the limitations of cell lines and better mimic human disease and treatment response (Ito et al., 2018). However, the application of animal models might be limited by high costs, low throughput, and technical challenges; more importantly, differences in specific species cause inaccurate recapitulation of biological and therapeutic responses. Recently, in vitro three-dimensional (3D) organoid culture techniques for various cell types, such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells, and immortalized cell lines, have been successfully developed (Kretzschmar and Clevers, 2016; Sato et al., 2009). Three-dimensional organoid models contain multicellular organ structures, which are thought to closely mimic complex original structures and functions. They can also be maintained for a long time and are easily manipulated (Clevers, 2016). Digestive system organoids have been established using cells from the stomach, small intestine, colon, and other organs (Pan et al., 2018). Organoids have advantages in understanding the mechanisms and biological processes of digestive diseases (such as cancer, infectious disease, and IBD), thereby helping to promote the development of personalized and regenerative medicine. However, they are not suitable for high-throughput screening because in general, 28–42 days are needed to grow enough cells (Xinaris, 2019). There is still an urgent need for a single model of the digestive system that is fast, easy to execute, and easily successful.

Recently, Liu et al. (2017) developed a new primary cell culture technology, called conditional reprogramming (CR), using irradiated Swiss-3T3-J2 mouse fibroblast cells and Y-27632, a Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, to rapidly and efficiently generate indefinite epithelial cells (Figure 1). Cells processed by this method are called conditionally reprogrammed cells (CRCs). The CR method can rapidly and efficiently generate large numbers of primary epithelial cells from different tissues, such as fresh or cryopreserved surgical specimens, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), core biopsies, and PDX tissues (Palechor-Ceron et al., 2019). CRCs can be reprogrammed to maintain a highly proliferative state, known as “reprogrammed stem-like” (Suprynowicz et al., 2012), and recapitulate the histological characteristics and genomic characteristics of the original tissue (Alamri et al., 2016). Moreover, after removing these conditions, the phenotype is completely reversible (Liu et al., 2012, 2020). Therefore, CR technology might be an ideal model to study digestive system diseases, to test drug sensitivity, to perform gene profile analysis, and in xenograft research and regenerative medicine. In this article, we review studies that use CR technology for digestive system disease research (Table 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. CRC development processes. Tissue samples can be obtained from surgical core biopsies, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or patient-derived xenograft (PDX). The tissue is then cut into small pieces and digested to produce primary cells. Then the primary cells were co-cultured with irradiated J2 feeder cells and ROCK inhibitor to obtain CR cells.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of the model systems for digestive system diseases.

Development of CR Technology

The in vitro life spans of primary cells, including normal human epithelial cells and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), are very short, which is an obstacle to research (Reubinoff et al., 2000). Different efforts have been made to optimize the cultivation of primary cells. Initially, H Green developed a keratinocyte/feeder coculture system. By using lethally irradiated feeder cells at the correct density, keratinocytes can be continuously propagated (Rheinwald and Green, 1975). The method was further developed by adding an epidermal growth factor (Stanley and Dahlenburg, 1984). Y-27632 was initially proven to significantly improve the cloning efficiency of human embryonic stem (ES) cells (Watanabe et al., 2007), and a study found that using Y-27632 during primary culture can effectively prepare large numbers of human epithelial stem cells from various primitive epithelial tissues (Terunuma et al., 2010). Sandra et al. also reported that treatment of primary keratinocytes with Y-27632 can greatly improve the proliferation and immortality of these cells (Chapman et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012). More importantly, immortalized cells showed typical characteristics of primary keratinocytes. Later, Liu and colleagues proved that the combination of Y-27632 and fibroblast cells, called CR technology, can induce indefinite proliferation of many epithelial and nonkeratinocyte normal cells and tumor cells in vivo (Liu et al., 2012, 2017; Tricoli et al., 2018). The CR method has been shown to be rapid and efficient in the establishment of cell cultures capable of unlimited growth from normal and cancer tissues. Most importantly, CRCs maintain the developmental potential of the original tissue and can restore the differentiation ability of the cells after these conditions are removed. Additionally, the CR method can rapidly generate cultures from small biopsy specimens and cryopreserved tissue. Recently, the technology has been modified and can be used to cultivate cells from the skin, prostate, lung, breast, kidney, and even neuroendocrine and endocrine tissues (Gao et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017; Palechor-Ceron et al., 2019; Timofeeva et al., 2017; Urbaniak et al., 2019). Therefore, the CR method has potential applications in basic research and diagnosis, treatment, and regenerative medicine.

Application in Digestive Diseases Research

Modeling Diseases

CRCs have been established quickly and efficiently from a variety of human normal and tumor specimens, including the colon. There is no need to use exogenous viruses or genetic manipulation. CRCs can maintain the characteristics of their primary tissues. After removing these conditions, the differentiation ability of the cells can be restored, and they can be grown in 2D and 3D systems, making CR an ideal in vitro model of digestive diseases. Emily C et al. applied CR technology to establish a 2D monolayer model of mouse intestinal epithelial cells (IEC monolayers) from both wild-type and genetic mouse models. IEC monolayers can form epithelial colonies and maintain their genetic characteristics during the long passage process. They can also form 3D spheres in medium, including Matrigel (Moorefield et al., 2018). This study indicates that CR technology could be used to culture numerous genotype-specific mouse small intestinal epithelial cells for further functional studies. Recently, using CR technology, Su et al. successfully isolated human primary hepatocytes from fresh liver tissues of patients of different ages and with different hepatic diseases. They achieved a high success rate in the long-term culture of primary hepatocytes in vitro with various hepatic diseases (Su et al., 2019b). They also established a primary human hepatocyte culture with liver function from patients with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (Su et al., 2019a). Therefore, the study showed that the use of CR technology in patient-derived hepatic cell culture can be a valuable and viable model for studying mechanisms related to hepatic diseases. Using CR technology, a group of well-differentiated porcine pancreatic ductal epithelial cells with bicarbonate secretion capacity have been established, which will improve our knowledge of pancreatic physiology and bicarbonate secretion mechanisms (O’Malley et al., 2018). For the establishment of preclinical cancer models, it is essential to obtain enough tumor tissues. However, tissue samples can only be obtained from many advanced cancer patients through fine-needle or core needle biopsy. Research by Lee et al. (2019, 2021) showed that CR technology can be used to establish pancreatic cancer cell lines through biopsies guided by endoscopic ultrasound. CRCs from pancreatic cancer tissues have the same genetic characteristics as those from the primary tumor and can be used for genomic research and drug sensitivity studies and can identify new diagnostic and therapeutic targets for pancreatic cancer (Lee et al., 2019, 2021). The PDX model has become an important tool for translational research, but there are some limitations, including unsustainable in vitro growth. Researchers used CR technology to successfully generate and amplify stable cell lines from PDX tumors of human bladder, lung, and ovaries without compromising the basic biological characteristics of the model (Borodovsky et al., 2017). Therefore, CR technology can be used for in vitro amplification of PDX cells for subsequent studies. CR cells can be produced from organoid and xenograft tissues and can also form CR cell-derived xenograft (CDX) tumors and be cultured in spheres or organoids (Timofeeva et al., 2017; Moorefield et al., 2018; Mondal et al., 2019; Palechor-Ceron et al., 2019), demonstrating that these three platforms can work together to provide platforms for digestive system disease study.

Precision Medicine and Drug Discovery

Precision medicine is a newly developed method for the treatment and prevention of diseases based on the patients’ biological information and their clinical signs and symptoms (Collins and Varmus, 2015). Recently, in oncology, the treatment and classification of cancer have changed due to genetic testing. Targeted therapy is a treatment method that uses drugs to target specific genes and proteins related to the survival and growth of cancer cells, and this is the foundation of precision medicine. Targeted therapy is a rapidly developing field of cancer research. Researchers are studying many new targets and drugs through basic and clinical research (Baudino, 2015). Although the outcomes of certain cancer patients, including patients with lung and breast cancers, have been greatly improved due to targeted therapies (Gu et al., 2016; Hirsch et al., 2017), the results of evaluating new targeted drugs in digestive system cancer clinical trials are usually frustrating. In the past 20 years, targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancer has made little progress (Narita and Muro, 2017; Aslan et al., 2018; DeLeon et al., 2018; Dzunic et al., 2019). A particular limitation in identifying new and effective targets and drugs for digestive system cancers is that the results are only based on studies in long-term cultured cell lines or xenograft models (Garnett et al., 2012); thus, the results of most clinical trials are usually disappointing. Currently, the use of patient-derived models with the advantages of stable genotype, high-throughput screening, immortality, and xenotransplantation is urgently needed for target discovery and drug screening. CR technology can be used in primary cell cultures from normal and tumor tissues of different species and to maintain the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics and intratumoural heterogeneity of the primary tissues. CR cells can also be cultured in PDX models and 3D conditions. Therefore, CR technology provides a new platform for evaluating the effectiveness and toxicity of new drugs and developing individualized treatment plans in digestive system diseases. Recently, Alamri et al. used CR technology to cultivate CRCs from primary tissue of low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and used them to detect candidate therapeutic pathways. They demonstrated that the amphiregulin-mechanistic target of rapamycin-protein kinase B (AKT; AKT1) pathway was activated in MECs and that the growth of MECs could be inhibited by MK2206 (allosteric AKT inhibitor) in 2D and 3D cultures (Alamri et al., 2018). The CR technique was used for the first time to determine the important role of the MYC-ERCC3 interaction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and triptolide (a covalent ERCC3 inhibitor) was found to be a potential treatment target in MYC-dependent PDAC (Beglyarova et al., 2016). Another group used PDAC cell lines and CR-cultured primary cells to identify the role of the low-immunogenicity anti-mesothelin immunotoxin RG7787 in pancreatic cancer (Hollevoet et al., 2014). Wang et al. established a novel individualized CR system (termed i-CR) from colorectal cancer tissues. By high-throughput i-CR drug screening, they discovered that inhibition of the EGFR and MEK or CDK4/6 pathways exerted a synergistic inhibitory effect against colorectal cancer and supersynergistic effects when EGFR, MEK, and CDK4/6 inhibitors were used simultaneously. Their study showed that the novel i-CR system combined with PDX models will enable individualization of therapy and drug discovery (Wang et al., 2020). Using CRCs from colorectal cancer patients, Kim et al. (2018) found that ATP6V0C encoding lysosomal V-ATPase V0 subunit C and IDF-11774 (a new clinical drug candidate for the treatment of colorectal cancer) are synthetically lethal and that this effect was associated with the expression of B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and PIK3CA mutations. Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare salivary adenocarcinoma and has a high rate of metastasis. Currently, we still do not have a research model suitable for this disease (Bradley, 2017). Chen et al. (2017) successfully cultured ACC cells from two separate ACC PDX tumors using modified CR medium conditions (which can maintain the characteristic MYB translocation). They also developed a method to rapidly verify the ability of cultured CR cells to metastasize in vivo using zebrafish. Using the CR/zebrafish model, they identified regorafenib as a potential drug for this cancer. In another study using CR technology, Panaccione et al. (2016) found that ACC features previously unidentified CD133+ cells with neural stem characteristics. These cells were driven by FABP7, NOTCH1, and SOX10 expression. They also found that these cells were sensitive to Notch inhibition, which may provide a new target for the treatment of ACC. In addition, some groups have used patient-derived CRCs from other cancers for comprehensive drug testing (Saeed et al., 2017; Kettunen et al., 2019). A recently published article explored the clinical feasibility of using CRC to guide chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer. They generated CRC cells and paired them with a PDX mouse model of primary colorectal tumor cells to establish the correlation between drug sensitivity in vitro and the patient’s clinical response. They showed that the use of CRC screening chemical drug screening is comparable to the PDX model. More importantly, it was shown to be highly consistent with the clinical results of the enrolled colorectal cancer patients (Li et al., 2021). Therefore, we believe that this technology will be used for high-throughput drug screening of digestive system diseases, especially digestive system tumors. Su et al. (2019a) established CRCs from fresh human liver tissues and determined that the cells still reserve 1A1, 2C9, and CYP3A4 activities. CYPs are essential for drug metabolic enzymes in the human body. Therefore, CRCs from primary normal cells might be used as a model for evaluating drug toxicity and metabolism.

Regenerative Medicine

Regenerative medicine is a science and technology that uses biological and engineering methods to create lost or functionally damaged tissues and organs to establish their normal function. The field mainly includes cell therapy, immunomodulatory therapy (separate administration or secretion by injection of cells and regeneration of bioactive molecules), and tissue engineering (transplantation of organs and tissues grown in the laboratory). This technology provides new treatments for patients suffering from clinical problems such as end-stage organ failure and serious injuries (Atala, 2012). In recent years, stem cells, including adult stem cells (ASCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and embryonic stem cells (ESCs), have been studied intensely to explore their value in regenerative medicine (Riazi et al., 2009). However, there is some difficulty in efficiently inducing the functional differentiation of stem cells. CR technology can generate cells from very few donor tissues and can rapidly expand them in vitro in large quantities; more importantly, the cells can be well differentiated into the native cell type after CR conditions are eliminated. Therefore, CR technology has application potential in the field of regenerative medicine. Using CR-cultured cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine has aroused great interest among scientists. Cells can be cultured using CR technology and engineered methodologies, particularly 3D scaffold materials, to generate tissues that exquisitely recapitulate their original structures and functions. Another method of using CR technology for regeneration is to promote their maturation into functional tissues and then implant them in the host. Hamilton et al. implanted a combination of airway epithelial CR cells and a fibroblast-containing graft in a rabbit model of revascularization, featuring decellularized tracheal stents and implanted structures with the function of revascularization. They found keratin-positive cells throughout the scaffold (Hamilton et al., 2019). Their research showed that CR cells can improve the repair of host epithelium and/or directly promote mucosal regeneration, which can be used in regenerative medicine. One study showed that CR technology can indefinitely expand normal oesophageal epithelial cells from endoscopic biopsy samples of pediatric patients (Jensen et al., 2017). Therefore, the cells can be combined with synthetic or natural scaffolds to provide treatment options for patients with defects, trauma, or diseases. Having a large number of cells will help to construct a fully regenerated oesophageal epithelial cell cavity to help promote the regeneration of the remaining cell types. Therefore, rapid amplification of patient-derived cells with stable genetic characteristics based on CR technology will meet the unmet needs of tissue engineering for personalized regenerative medicine in digestive system disease. Further research in these subfields may lead to the development of treatment options to use different types of CR cells in regenerative medicine for human digestive system diseases.

Others

Biobanks play vital roles in innovative clinical medicine and translational biomedical research. The latest scientific advances in cryopreservation have made it possible to establish living biobanks, which enable long-term collection and storage of viable functional tissues and proliferating cell types (Li et al., 2020). The ability to quickly and efficiently build a stable CRC from normal and diseased tissue provides an exciting opportunity to build a living biobank (Liu et al., 2012; Coppola et al., 2019). Our team proposed establishing the Next Generation Living Biobank (NGLB), which collects and stores tissues from surgery, core needle or fine-needle biopsy, and cells from scrub or liquid, such as urine and blood. Corresponding omics (e.g., genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) and clinical information should be gathered together. At the same time, CR technology is being used to grow large numbers of cells to meet the needs of disease modeling, drug discovery, and regenerative medicine in the future (Palechor-Ceron et al., 2019). Compared with traditional living biobanks, NGLB enables us to use CR technology to generate cells in rare diseases for which cell lines or cell models are not currently available (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Applications of CR technology in digestive system diseases.

Limitations of CR Technology

The results of CR technology studies have proven that it may play an important role in digestive system disease. However, some limitations need improvement. The CR method cannot lack stromal components such as matrix, vascular immune, or endothelial cells. Therefore, we were unable to analyze the effect of stromal cells on tumor cell growth and their response to therapeutic agents (Liu et al., 2017). However, CR technology can be cultured in 3D organoids, and there are already several models that combine 3D organoid systems and stromal cells. In the future, it is necessary to establish models that integrate multiple stromal cell types into the 3D culture system with CR technology to check direct epithelial/matrix interactions (Liu et al., 2017). Another limitation is the inability to distinguish tumors from normal epithelial cells because the CR method allows normal and tumor epithelial cells to grow outward. Normal cells sometimes replicate more than tumor cells, so normal cells eventually surpass culture. However, the standard CR method has some modifications and may be a selective expansion of tumor cells in vitro (Wang et al., 2020). Despite these limitations, CR technology still has very good application prospects in digestive system diseases. There is no a single perfect model for biomedical research including in vitro or ex vivo cell cultures and in vivo animal assays since every method or system have its own unique properties, advantages and limitations/disadvantages. One chooses a model which is appropriate for his/her specific question. In many cases, scientists or researchers must choose combination of the technologies at variety of levels from molecules, cells, organs, to individual or population for their research purpose. For example, combination of CRC (2D), organoids (3D) and PDX (in vivo) is highly recommended from NCI (National Cancer Institute) to establish patient-derived model repository.

Conclusion

The development of CR technology creates exciting possibilities for digestive system research. The CR method can quickly and efficiently establish cell cultures from normal and diseased tissues. Most importantly, CRCs maintain the developmental potential of the original tissue and can restore the differentiation ability of the cells after removing these conditions. Additionally, it can quickly generate cultures from small biopsies and cryopreserved tissues. CR cells can also be produced from xenografts and organoid tissues. It can also form CDX tumors and be cultured in spheroids or organoids. Therefore, CR technology might be an ideal in vitro model for digestive system diseases and could facilitate precision medicine and drug discovery (Figure 2). Future studies using CR technology will also aid in tissue engineering for personalized regenerative medicine and provide an exciting opportunity to build a living biobank for digestive system disease. The use of CR technology has created great opportunities for the advancement of diagnosis, development of new treatments, and prevention of digestive system disease.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Applications of CR technology in human digestive system diseases. CR technology can quickly generate cultures from fresh and cryopreserved normal and diseased human tissue samples obtained through surgery, core biopsy, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Therefore, CR technology can be used as an ideal in vitro model for digestive system diseases and facilitate precision medicine and drug discovery. It will also aid in tissue engineering for personalized regenerative medicine and provides an exciting opportunity to build a living biobank for digestive system disease.

Author Contributions

XL had the idea for the article and revised the manuscript. RZ and RL performed the literature search and drafted the manuscript. TA revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by internal support from HPV Vaccine Royalty in Center for Cell Reprogramming/Department of Pathology, Georgetown University Medical Center. The funders had no role in the data analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript, and Henan Natural Science Foundation (202300410383).

Conflict of Interest

Several patents for conditional reprogramming technology has been awarded to Georgetown University by the United States Patent Office. The license for this technology has been given to a Maryland-based start-up company for commercialization. The inventor, XL and Georgetown University receive potential royalties and payments from the company. Several organizations and companies (Propagenix, ATCC, STEMCELL Technologies, etc.) are selling CR cells, media and related reagents.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Alamri, A. M., Kang, K., Groeneveld, S., Wang, W., Zhong, X., Kallakury, B., et al. (2016). Primary cancer cell culture: mammary-optimized vs conditional reprogramming. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 23, 535–554. doi: 10.1530/erc-16-0071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alamri, A. M., Liu, X., Blancato, J. K., Haddad, B. R., Wang, W., Zhong, X., et al. (2018). Expanding primary cells from mucoepidermoid and other salivary gland neoplasms for genetic and chemosensitivity testing. Dis. Model. Mech. 11:dmm031716.

Google Scholar

Aslan, M., Shahbazi, R., Ulubayram, K., and Ozpolat, B. (2018). Targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer and hurdles ahead. Anticancer Res. 38, 6591–6606. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atala, A. (2012). Regenerative medicine strategies. J. Pediatr. Surg. 47, 17–28.

Google Scholar

Baudino, T. A. (2015). Targeted cancer therapy: the next generation of cancer treatment. Curr. Drug. Discov. Technol. 12, 3–20. doi: 10.2174/1570163812666150602144310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beglyarova, N., Banina, E., Zhou, Y., Mukhamadeeva, R., Andrianov, G., Bobrov, E., et al. (2016). Screening of conditionally reprogrammed patient-derived carcinoma cells identifies ercc3-myc interactions as a target in pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer. Res. 22, 6153–6163. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borodovsky, A., McQuiston, T. J., Stetson, D., Ahmed, A., Whitston, D., Zhang, J., et al. (2017). Generation of stable PDX derived cell lines using conditional reprogramming. Mol. Cancer 16:177.

Google Scholar

Bradley, P. J. (2017). Adenoid cystic carcinoma evaluation and management: progress with optimism! Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 25, 147–153. doi: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000347

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burisch, J., Jess, T., Martinato, M., and Lakatos, P. L. (2013). The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe. J. Crohns Colitis 7, 322–337.

Google Scholar

Chapman, S., Liu, X., Meyers, C., Schlegel, R., and McBride, A. A. (2010). Human keratinocytes are efficiently immortalized by a Rho kinase inhibitor. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 2619–2626. doi: 10.1172/jci42297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, C., Choudhury, S., Wangsa, D., Lescott, C. J., Wilkins, D. J., Sripadhan, P., et al. (2017). A multiplex preclinical model for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland identifies regorafenib as a potential therapeutic drug. Sci. Rep. 7:11410.

Google Scholar

Clevers, H. (2016). Modeling development and disease with organoids. Cell 165, 1586–1597. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collins, F. S., and Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 793–795. doi: 10.1056/nejmp1500523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coppola, L., Cianflone, A., Grimaldi, A. M., Incoronato, M., Bevilacqua, P., Messina, F., et al. (2019). Mirabelli, Biobanking in health care: evolution and future directions. J. Transl. Med. 17:172.

Google Scholar

DeLeon, T. T., Ahn, D. H., Bogenberger, J. M., Anastasiadis, P. Z., Arora, M., Ramanathan, R. K., et al. (2018). Novel targeted therapy strategies for biliary tract cancers and hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol. 14, 553–566. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dzunic, M., Petkovic, I., Cvetanovic, A., Vrbic, S., and Pejcic, I. (2019). Current and future targets and therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. J. BUON 24, 1785–1792.

Google Scholar

Gao, B., Huang, C., Kernstine, K., Pelekanou, V., Kluger, Y., Jiang, T., et al. (2017). Non-malignant respiratory epithelial cells preferentially proliferate from resected non-small cell lung cancer specimens cultured under conditionally reprogrammed conditions. Oncotarget 8, 11114–11126. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garnett, M. J., Edelman, E. J., Heidorn, S. J., Greenman, C. D., Dastur, A., Lau, K. W., et al. (2012). Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483, 570–575.

Google Scholar

GBD 2017 Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborators (2020). The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 17–30.

Google Scholar

GBD 2017 Oesophageal Cancer Collaborators (2020). The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 582–597.

Google Scholar

GBD 2017 Pancreatic Cancer Collaborators (2019). The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 934–947.

Google Scholar

Giard, D. J., Aaronson, S. A., Todaro, G. J., Arnstein, P., Kersey, J. H., Dosik, H., et al. (1973). In vitro cultivation of human tumors: establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 51, 1417–1423. doi: 10.1093/jnci/51.5.1417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gillet, J. P., Varma, S., and Gottesman, M. M. (2013). The clinical relevance of cancer cell lines. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 105, 452–458. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gu, G., Dustin, D., and Fuqua, S. A. (2016). Targeted therapy for breast cancer and molecular mechanisms of resistance to treatment. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 31, 97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2016.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamilton, N. J. I., Hynds, R. E., Gowers, K. H. C., Tait, A., Butler, C. R., Hopper, C., et al. (2019). Using a three-dimensional collagen matrix to deliver respiratory progenitor cells to decellularized trachea in vivo. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 25, 93–102. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2018.0241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirsch, F. R., Scagliotti, G. V., Mulshine, J. L., Kwon, R., Curran, W. J. Jr., Wu, Y. L., et al. (2017). Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments. Lancet 389, 299–311. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30958-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hollevoet, K., Mason-Osann, E., Liu, X. F., Imhof-Jung, S., Niederfellner, G., and Pastan, I. (2014). In vitro and in vivo activity of the low-immunogenic antimesothelin immunotoxin RG7787 in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 2040–2049. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-14-0089-t

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ito, R., Takahashi, T., and Ito, M. (2018). Humanized mouse models: application to human diseases. J. Cell. Physiol. 233, 3723–3728. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jensen, T. J., Foster, C., Sayej, W., and Finck, C. M. (2017). Conditional reprogramming of pediatric human esophageal epithelial cells for use in tissue engineering and disease investigation. J. Vis. Exp. 121:55243.

Google Scholar

Kettunen, K., Boström, P. J., Lamminen, T., Heinosalo, T., West, G., Saarinen, I., et al. (2019). Personalized drug sensitivity screening for bladder cancer using conditionally reprogrammed patient-derived cells. Eur. Urol. 76, 430–434. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, B. K., Nam, S. W., Min, B. S., Ban, H. S., Paik, S., Lee, K., et al. (2018). Bcl-2-dependent synthetic lethal interaction of the IDF-11774 with the V0 subunit C of vacuolar ATPase (ATP6V0C) in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 119, 1347–1357. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0289-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kretzschmar, K., and Clevers, H. (2016). Organoids: modeling development and the stem cell niche in a dish. Dev. Cell 38, 590–600. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. S., Kim, E., Lee, J., Park, S. J., Hwang, H. K., Park, C. H., et al. (2021). Profiling of conditionally reprogrammed cell lines for in vitro chemotherapy response prediction of pancreatic cancer. EBioMedicine 65:103218. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. S., Lee, J. S., Lee, J., Kim, E. K., Kim, H., Chung, M. J., et al. (2019). Establishment of pancreatic cancer cell lines with endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy via conditionally reprogrammed cell culture. Cancer Med. 8, 3339–3348. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Wang, M., and Zhou, J. (2020). Brain organoids: a promising living biobank resource for neuroscience research. Biopreserv. Biobank. 18, 136–143. doi: 10.1089/bio.2019.0111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Guo, D., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Sun, T., Li, Z., et al. (2021). Rapid screening for individualized chemotherapy optimization of colorectal cancer: a novel conditional reprogramming technology-based functional diagnostic assay. Transl. Oncol. 14:100935. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Ju, L., Cheng, S., Wang, G., Qian, K., Liu, X., et al. (2020). Conditional reprogramming: modeling urological cancer and translation to clinics. Clin. Transl. Med. 10:e95.

Google Scholar

Liu, X., Krawczyk, E., Suprynowicz, F. A., Palechor-Ceron, N., Yuan, H., Dakic, A., et al. (2017). Conditional reprogramming and long-term expansion of normal and tumor cells from human biospecimens. Nat. Protoc. 12, 439–451. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., and Mondal, A. M. (2020). Conditional cell reprogramming for modeling host-virus interactions and human viral diseases. J. Med. Virol. 92: 2440–2452. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26093

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Ory, V., Chapman, S., Yuan, H., Albanese, C., and Kallakury, B., et al. (2012). ROCK inhibitor and feeder cells induce the conditional reprogramming of epithelial cells. Am. J. Pathol. 180, 599–607.

Google Scholar

Matuchansky, C., and Beauchant, M. (1982). [The digestive system and pancreas in 1982]. Biomed. Pharmacother. 36, 407–414.

Google Scholar

Mondal, A. M., Ma, A. H., Li, G., Krawczyk, E., Yuan, R., Lu, J., et al. (2019). Fidelity of a PDX-CR model for bladder cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 517, 49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.06.165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moorefield, E. C., Blue, R. E., Quinney, N. L., Gentzsch, M., and Ding, S. (2018). Generation of renewable mouse intestinal epithelial cell monolayers and organoids for functional analyses. BMC Cell. Biol. 19:15. doi: 10.1186/s12860-018-0165-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Narita, Y., and Muro, K. (2017). Challenges in molecular targeted therapy for gastric cancer: considerations for efficacy and safety. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 16, 319–327.

Google Scholar

O’Malley, Y., Rotti, P. G. I, Thornell, M., Vanegas Calderón, O. G., Febres-Aldana, C., and Durham, K., et al. (2018). Development of a polarized pancreatic ductular cell epithelium for physiological studies. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 125, 97–106.

Google Scholar

Palechor-Ceron, N., Krawczyk, E., Dakic, A., Simic, V., Yuan, H., Blancato, J., et al. (2019). Conditional reprogramming for patient-derived cancer models and next-generation living biobanks. Cells 8:1327. doi: 10.3390/cells8111327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, Y., Zhao, S., and Cao, Z. (2018). Organoid models of gastrointestinal neoplasms: origin, current status and future applications in personalized medicine. Genes Dis. 5, 323–330. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Panaccione, A., Chang, M. T., Carbone, B. E., Guo, Y., Moskaluk, C. A., Virk, R. K., et al. (2016). NOTCH1 and SOX10 are essential for proliferation and radiation resistance of cancer stem-like cells in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 2083–2095. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reubinoff, B. E., Pera, M. F., Fong, C. Y., Trounson, A., and Bongso, A. (2000). Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 399–404. doi: 10.1038/74447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rheinwald, J. G., and Green, H. (1975). Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell 6, 331–343. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(75)80001-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riazi, A. M., Kwon, S. Y., and Stanford, W. L. (2009). Stem cell sources for regenerative medicine. Methods Mol. Biol. 482, 55–90. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-060-7_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saeed, K., Rahkama, V., Eldfors, S., Bychkov, D., Mpindi, J. P., Yadav, B., et al. (2017). Comprehensive drug testing of patient-derived conditionally reprogrammed cells from castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 71, 319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.04.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sato, T., Vries, R. G., Snippert, H. J., van de Wetering, M., Barker, N., Stange, D. E., et al. (2009). Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265. doi: 10.1038/nature07935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siegel, R. L., and Miller, K. D. (2020). Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70, 7–30.

Google Scholar

Stanley, M. A., and Dahlenburg, K. (1984). The effect of choleragen and epidermal growth factor on proliferation and maturation in vitro of human ectocervical cells. In Vitro 20, 144–151. doi: 10.1007/bf02626655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, S., Di Poto, C., Kroemer, A. H., Cui, W., Roy, R., Liu, X., et al. (2019a). Establishment of ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency-derived primary human hepatocyte with hepatic functions. Exp. Cell. Res. 384:111621. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, S., Di Poto, C., Roy, R., Liu, X., Cui, W., Kroemer, A., et al. (2019b). Long-term culture and characterization of patient-derived primary hepatocytes using conditional reprogramming. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 244, 857–864. doi: 10.1177/1535370219855398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suprynowicz, F. A., Upadhyay, G., Krawczyk, E., Kramer, S. C., Hebert, J. D., Liu, X., et al. (2012). Conditionally reprogrammed cells represent a stem-like state of adult epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 20035–20040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213241109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Terunuma, A., Limgala, R. P., Park, C. J., Choudhary, I., and Vogel, J. C. (2010). Efficient procurement of epithelial stem cells from human tissue specimens using a Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor Y-27632. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 1363–1368. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Timofeeva, O. A., Palechor-Ceron, N., Li, G., Yuan, H., Krawczyk, E., Zhong, X., et al. (2017). Conditionally reprogrammed normal and primary tumor prostate epithelial cells: a novel patient-derived cell model for studies of human prostate cancer. Oncotarget 8, 22741–22758. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tricoli, L., Naeem, A., Parasido, E., Mikhaiel, J. P., Choudhry, M. U., and Berry, D. L. I (2018). Characterization of the effects of defined, multidimensional culture conditions on conditionally reprogrammed primary human prostate cells. Oncotarget 9, 2193–2207. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urbaniak, A., Jousheghany, F., Yuan, Y., Piña-Oviedo, S., Huczyński, A., Delgado, M., et al. (2019). The response of phyllodes tumor of the breast to anticancer therapy: an in vitro and ex vivo study. Oncol. Lett. 18, 5097–5106.

Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Liao, H., Zheng, T., Wang, J., Guo, D., Lu, Z., et al. (2020). Conditionally reprogrammed colorectal cancer cells combined with mouse avatars identify synergy between EGFR and MEK or CDK4/6 inhibitors. Am. J. Cancer Res. 10, 249–262.

Google Scholar

Watanabe, K., Ueno, M., Kamiya, D., Nishiyama, A., Matsumura, M., Wataya, T., et al. (2007). A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 681–686. doi: 10.1038/nbt1310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xinaris, C. (2019). Organoids for replacement therapy: expectations, limitations and reality. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 24, 555–561. doi: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: conditional cell reprogramming, digestive system diseases, cell model, CR technology, cell culture technology

Citation: Zhao R, Li R, An T and Liu X (2021) Conditional Cell Reprogramming in Modeling Digestive System Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:669756. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.669756

Received: 19 February 2021; Accepted: 27 April 2021;
Published: 03 June 2021.

Edited by:

Ira Ida Skvortsova, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria

Reviewed by:

Komal S. Rathi, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
Kyoung-Ho Pyo, Yonsei University, South Korea

Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Li, An and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xuefeng Liu, eHVlZmVuZy5saXVAZ2VvcmdldG93bi5lZHU=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.