Abstract
Engineered cardiac tissues (ECTs) are 3D physiological models of the heart that are created and studied for their potential role in developing therapies of cardiovascular diseases and testing cardio toxicity of drugs. Recreating the microenvironment of the native myocardium in vitro mainly involves the use of cardiomyocytes. However, ECTs with only cardiomyocytes (CM-only) often perform poorly and are less similar to the native myocardium compared to ECTs constructed from co-culture of cardiomyocytes and nonmyocytes. One important goal of co-culture tissues is to mimic the native heart’s cellular composition, which can result in better tissue function and maturity. In this review, we investigate the role of nonmyocytes in ECTs and discuss the mechanisms behind the contributions of nonmyocytes in enhancement of ECT features.
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States (Benjamin et al., 2019). Despite improvements in acute treatment of cardiovascular disease, the incidence of heart failure is increasing (Cahill and Kharbanda, 2017; Lesyuk et al., 2018). Available therapies for heart failure include invasive procedures such as heart transplant or the implantation of a mechanical assist device as a bridge to transplant; non-invasive therapies include drugs aimed at improving contractility (Gheorghiade et al., 2016). Meanwhile, alternative therapies are being investigated to repair and regenerate the damaged myocardium to restitute its function; these alternative therapies under investigation include small molecules, growth factors, gene (lentiviral, adenoviral, and adeno-associated viral vectors (AAVs) and cell therapies (Talman and Kivelä, 2018; Kieserman et al., 2019). Challenges with the clinical translation of novel therapies for the heart indicate an incomplete understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms involved. Tissue engineering technologies are emerging as a method to overcome these hurdles and develop human-specific models of the myocardium. Engineered tissues may allow mechanistic study of the cellular interactions that enhance cardiac function (Bursac et al., 2010). Human engineered cardiac tissues (hECTs) can serve to bridge the gap between current animal models, providing a species-specific model of human myocardium, and also overcomes limitations of the 2D culture systems (Vunjak Novakovic et al., 2014; Greenberg et al., 2018). Human pluripotent stem cells now provide a nearly limitless supply of differentiated human cardiomyocytes (CMs) (Lian et al., 2012; Bhattacharya et al., 2014), and use of these cells to create 3-D hECTs allows direct measurement of twitch force and related characteristics of cardiac muscle contractility, with extended time in culture (Turnbull et al., 2014).
There has been a rapid growth in the field of tissue engineering with constant improvements for the fabrication of a structural and functional mature model of human myocardium (Ruan et al., 2015; Feric and Radisic, 2016; Shadrin et al., 2017; van den Akker et al., 2018; Ronaldson-Bouchard et al., 2019). Their utility as in vitro test tools have been demonstrated by their application for drug screening (Feric et al., 2019; Keung et al., 2019). However, the engineered cardiac tissues (ECTs) are immature and mostly resemble the fetal heart. While techniques such as electrical stimulation, mechanical stress, and longer time in culture improve tissue maturity, ECTs are not as mature as adult myocardium (Mahowald et al., 2009; Nunes et al., 2013; Schwach and Passier, 2019). Human induced-pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived CMs are widely used in cardiac tissue engineering. However, these cells have immature fetal-like characteristics in terms of gene expression, sarcomere organization, force of contraction, and action potentials (Yang et al., 2014; Veerman et al., 2015). Most of the technologies in cardiac tissue engineering have involved the use of CMs (from neonatal rat hearts or derived from pluripotent stem cells), with little or no contribution of other nonmyocyte cells. While these approaches have contributed to great advances in the field, the contribution of nonmyocytes requires more attention. Understanding the intercellular signaling within the myocardium is a relevant aspect in the development of new therapies with impact on cardiac function.
Incorporating non-CMs can make the cellular composition of the tissues better mimic natural myocardium. The heart is composed of multiple cell types. The reported cellular composition differs based on the methods used to identify the cell types and quantify their abundance. Using flow cytometry and immunohistochemical analysis, Pinto et al. (2016) found that around 31% of cells in a mouse heart are CMs; the non-CM population of the heart includes approximately 60% endothelial cells (ECs), 5–10% hematopoietic-derived cells, and fibroblasts (FBs) under 20%. Furthermore, using single nuclear RNA-sequencing of samples from human donors, Tucker et al. (2020) identified nine major cell types with CMs making up 35.9% of the total population. An intricate network of interactions between the distinct non-CM cell types and CMs support cardiac homeostasis (Hirsch et al., 2014; Dunn and Palecek, 2018; Colliva et al., 2020).
While most therapies aimed at improving the contractile function of the heart focus on the CMs, the role of nonmyocytes is not negligible and requires further study, with better understanding of their functional interplay (Tian and Morrisey, 2012; Gambardella et al., 2017). Advancing the maturation of ECTs is an ongoing area of research. Consequently, multiple studies have investigated the effect of CM co-culture with different nonmyocyte cell types. In this review, we explore the contribution of nonmyocytes in cardiac tissue engineering (Figure 1A).
FIGURE 1
Fibroblasts
Cardiac fibroblasts (FBs) play an important role in extracellular matrix (ECM) modulation and also have an effect on cardiac function; cardiac FB–CM heterocellular coupling influences electrical conduction in the heart; gap junctions and intercellular calcium signaling participate in this cell–cell communication (Doppler et al., 2017). In multiple studies, the inclusion of FBs in tissue fabrication improved electrophysiological properties of engineered tissues (Radisic et al., 2008; Liau et al., 2011; Matsuura et al., 2011; Saini et al., 2015; Iwamiya et al., 2016; Navaei et al., 2016; Ronaldson-Bouchard et al., 2018; Beauchamp et al., 2020). Cardiac spheroids with human embryonic cardiac FBs constructed by Beauchamp et al. (2020) demonstrated higher rate of contraction compared to spheroids with only hiPSC-CMs; adding the fibroblasts did not induce any arrythmogenic effects. Co-culture of fibroblast with CMs results in higher synchronous tissue contractions compared to tissues with only CMs (Matsuura et al., 2011; Iwamiya et al., 2016; Navaei et al., 2016). Navaei et al. (2016) found denser and more uniform organization of F-actin fibers in co-culture tissues that exhibited higher synchronous contraction, suggesting that cytosketelon organization may play a role in promoting synchronicity (Figure 1B). Radisic et al. (2008) reported higher amplitude of contraction in tissues from both concurrent neonatal rat CM-FB co-culture and tissues pre-treated with fibroblasts; for pre-treatment, fibroblasts were cultured on the scaffold prior to the addition of CMs; the pre-treatment group displayed lower excitation threshold and higher amplitude of contractions, out-performing CM-only ECTs and ECTs made from concurrent culture of cardiomycoytes and fibroblasts. Futhermore, fibroblast co-culture enhances structural maturation of ECTs. CMs become elongated and exhibit better alignment and cell-based network formation in co-culture (Nichol et al., 2008; Radisic et al., 2008; Saini et al., 2015; Beauchamp et al., 2020). In addition to improving morphology, Nichol et al. (2008) observed 53% less neonatal rat CM apoptosis, and Iwamiya et al. (2016) found a substantial increase in mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived CM proliferation resulting from the inclusion of fibroblasts in tissue fabrication. Fibroblast co-culture enhances the expression of cardiac markers in CMs (Radisic et al., 2008; Matsuura et al., 2011; Saini et al., 2015; Navaei et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017; Ronaldson-Bouchard et al., 2018). Despite the noted benefits of fibroblasts in ECTs, the source and the age of fibroblast play an important role on how fibroblasts affect the tissues. Li et al. (2017) found that tissues with adult murine fibroblasts displayed slower conduction velocity, higher stiffness, and decreased calcium transient amplitude compared to those with murine fetal fibroblasts; in this case, the adult fibroblasts induced pro-fibrotic effects on the engineered tissue. Indeed, fibroblasts play a role in pathologic fibrotic remodeling of the heart, and they have been included in ECT to model cardiac fibrosis, with the addition of TGFβ as a trigger for fibrosis (Sadeghi et al., 2017; Mastikhina et al., 2020) and by modulating the CM:FB ratio, where 3:1 models normal myocardium and 1:3 is fibrotic (Wang et al., 2019).
Endothelial Cells
Through intercellular communication, ECs, among other functions, influence cardiac performance and remodeling; small molecules and peptides secreted by ECs play a critical role in CM contractility (Brutsaert, 2003; Segers et al., 2018; Talman and Kivelä, 2018). One of the goals of EC co-culture in tissue engineering is to create vasculature. ECs are capable of forming capillary-like structures in ECTs when co-cultured with CMs (Narmoneva et al., 2004; Sekine et al., 2008; Garzoni et al., 2009). These structures enhance CM organization and support long-term survival in engineered tissues (Narmoneva et al., 2004; Garzoni et al., 2009). Sekine et al. (2008) reported the formation of greater number of capillaries in EC co-culture tissues compared to neonatal rat CM-only; after transplantation onto infarcted rat heart, capillaries from the tissues spread into host heart and connected with host capillaries, this was accompanied by recovery of cardiac function, documented by improvement in fractional shortening and reduced fibrosis in the surrounding host myocardium; achieving vascularization after engraftment is relevant when aiming to restore blood flow in compromised areas of the ischemic heart. In the presence of vascular structures formed by ECs, co-culture tissues have better contractile properties (Narmoneva et al., 2004; Garzoni et al., 2009). Compared to CM-only tissues and tissues made from simultaneous EC and CM co-culture, Narmoneva et al. (2004) found significantly larger areas of synchronized contraction in tissues containing mouse CMs that were seeded on preformed EC vascular networks. However, there are studies that reported no significant difference in electrophysiological properties such as QT and RR intervals (Giacomelli et al., 2017), force generation, and calcium transients of hPSC-CMs (Burridge et al., 2014) between EC co-culture and hPSC-CM-only tissues. In terms of gene expression, Giacomelli et al. (2017) observed that addition of ECs results in upregulation of genes associated with sarcomere structure, ion channel, and Ca2+-handling. Burridge et al. (2014) also reported significant increase in the expression of the voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ ion channel Cav1.2 and higher expression (although not significant) of hESC-CM structural genes. ECs also support maturation of hiPSC-CMs in co-culture tissues through the secretion of endothelin-1 (EDN1) and nitric oxide (NO) (Giacomelli et al., 2020). Furthermore, ECs in ECTs may promote the expression of gap junction protein connexin-43 (Cx43) (Narmoneva et al., 2004; Giacomelli et al., 2020). While Hussain et al. (2013) reported no visible Cx43 in neonatal rat-CM-EC co-culture tissues, using immunostaining, Narmoneva et al. (2004) observed notably higher Cx43 expression in mouse CM-ECs co-culture tissues, indicating the presence of junctions not only between CMs but also between ECs and CMs. The differences in findings may be due to the varying methodology used in these studies. Nevertheless, there is strong evidence to suggest that ECs have a positive impact on CM survival and proliferation in co-culture tissues (Narmoneva et al., 2004; Caspi et al., 2007; Tulloch et al., 2011). In co-culture tissues, Caspi et al. (2007) observed a significantly higher percentage of proliferating CMs, shown by immunostaining for Ki67, compared to CM-only tissues. CM proliferation may be stimulated by mitogens derived from ECs, as suggested by findings from Tulloch et al. (2011) where there was an increase in DNA synthesis rates in EC co-culture tissues under all tested conditions: no stress, systolic stress, and cyclic stress.
Endothelial And Smooth Muscle Cells Co-Culture
Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) play an important role in the heart; they regulate the tone of blood vessels (Brozovich et al., 2016), and at the molecular level, SMCs affect gap junctions and the expression of Cx43 in CM (Zhou et al., 2020). Transplantation of SMC, EC, and CM co-cultures improves heart function after myocardial infarction (MI) in animal models (Ye et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2018). Gao et al. (2018) found exomes released by tri-culture tissues reduced hiPSC-CM apoptosis; after transplantation of these tissue onto infarcted swine heart, improvements in left ventricular (LV) wall stress, infarct size, and vascular density was observed; these tissues also prevented the reduction in phosphorylation of the sarcomere proteins ENH2 and cTnI after MI. Reduced phosphorylation of sarcomere proteins may be induced by MI (Peng et al., 2014), and it correlates with poor contractility (van der Velden et al., 2004); therefore, stopping phosphorylation reduction may improve heart function after MI. Stromal cells, which have the potential to differentiate into SMCs (Vater et al., 2011), also show enhancement in tissue properties when co-cultured with ECs and CMs (Kreutziger et al., 2011; Tulloch et al., 2011; Burridge et al., 2014; Giacomelli et al., 2020). Tulloch et al. (2011) reported significant increase in vascular structure formation after the addition of human marrow stromal cells in EC-hESC-CM co-culture tissues. Similarly, Kreutziger et al. (2011) observed vessel formation after transplantation of stromal cell co-culture tissue onto uninjured rat heart; stromal cells in these tissues produce ECM components such as fibrillar collagen, hyaluronan, and versican. Furthermore, studies involving co-culture of mural cells show positive impact on vessel formation (Caspi et al., 2007; Masumoto et al., 2016). Caspi et al. (2007) found α-smooth muscle actin positive cells derived from embryonic mouse fibroblasts that integrated into the blood vessels in the tissues. These findings indicate that stromal cells play a crucial role in the formation of vasculature in ECTs. In addition to the formation of graft-derived vasculature after tissue engraftment onto rat heart, Masumoto et al. (2016) found indications of hiPSC-CM sarcomere maturation and better alignment facilitated by mural cells. For translational purposes, Ishigami et al. (2018) produced clinical-scaled engineered cardiac sheets composed of iPSC-CM, EC, and mural cells; these were transplanted onto the heart of mini-pigs after myocardial infarction, resulting in functional and structural improvements. Since all mentioned studies include ECs in the co-culture tissues, the role of SMCs in the observed tissue improvements requires further investigation.
Fibroblast and Endothelial Cell Co-Culture
As previously described, tissues from CM-EC and CM-FB co-cultures have better properties than CM-only tissues. Here, we discuss the impact of CM-FB-EC co-cultures in ECTs. Compared to tissues with neither FBs nor ECs, tri-culture tissues have enhanced contractile function (Naito et al., 2006; Giacomelli et al., 2020). Giacomelli et al. (2020) observed longer contraction duration and higher contraction amplitude in tri-culture tissues; along with electrophysiological maturation, tri-culture tissues also displayed sarcomeric maturation relative to hiPSC-derived CM-EC and CM-FB co-cultures (Figure 1C). Multiple studies revealed that tri-culture enhances the formation of vessel-like structures (Naito et al., 2006; Caspi et al., 2007; Stevens et al., 2009; Lesman et al., 2010; Kreutziger et al., 2011; Tulloch et al., 2011). Higher level of vasculature in tri-cultures suggests ECs promote vasculature regardless of the inclusion of FBs. Vasculature formation may improve ECT features. Stevens et al. (2009) created tissues from co-culture of hESC-CMs with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) that developed significantly more vessel structures and collagen content (Figures 1D–F) than CM-only tissues; these tri-culture tissues displayed passive mechanical properties with greater resemblance to native myocardium (neonatal pig and rat cardiac tissue), and transplantation onto naïve rat heart resulted in improved CM survival and larger graft formation. The vessels in tri-culture tissues can function after transplantation and are perfused by host circulation (Stevens et al., 2009; Lesman et al., 2010). Furthermore, the presence of FBs in the tri-culture improves EC survival and proliferation (Caspi et al., 2007). Despite the noted benefits of including FBs and ECs in ECTs, the methods and cellular composition used to create co-culture tissues may affect ECT features. For example, Iyer et al. (2009) constructed tissues from simultaneous co-culture of murine CMs, ECs, and FBs that failed to exhibit contractile activity, while the CM-only tissues displayed superior functions; however, CMs seeded on preformed networks of ECs and FBs resulted in contractile tissues.
Mechanisms
The co-culture of nonmyocytes and CMs in ECTs enhanced many tissue properties (Table 1). Here, we describe potential mechanisms behind the observed tissue improvements (Figure 1A). As discussed earlier, multiple studies reported better electrophysiological properties in tissues containing FBs compared to CM-only tissues. In FB-CM tissues, enhanced contractility may be due to a higher expression of Cx43, which allows ions and solutes to pass between cells (Saini et al., 2015). In addition to increased Cx43 expression, FBs support maturation of CMs via cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate) signaling (Giacomelli et al., 2020). FBs also promote CM proliferation; Iwamiya et al. (2016) found that mouse neonatal cardiac FBs in ECTs expressed vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and treatment of mouse ESC- derived CMs with VCAM-1 increased CM population in monoculture; therefore, it is likely that FBs enhance CM proliferation through VCAM-1 signaling. Furthermore, FBs affect CM morphology in ECTs via matrix metalloprotease-2 (MMP-2) expression; Nichol et al. (2008) observed significant higher expression of MMP-2 in FB co-culture tissues that exhibited greater neonatal rat CM alignment, and inhibition of MMP-2 eliminated the increased alignment in co-culture tissues.
TABLE 1
Summary of the effects of non-cardiomyocytes on engineered cardiac tissues.
CM, cardiomyocytes, Fib, fibroblasts, EC, endothelial cells. aEffect observed in pre-culture, but not in co-culture (Iyer et al., 2009). bEffect observed with the addition of cardiac fibroblasts, but not with dermal fibroblasts (Iwamiya et al., 2016). cIncrease by culture day 5, with gradual decrease to 0 Hz by day 14 (Saini et al., 2015). dThis includes stromal cells in addition to CM + Fib + EC (Kreutziger et al., 2011; Tulloch et al., 2011).
A notable feature of EC co-culture tissues is the presence of vascular networks. ECs form blood vessels through angiogenesis; in spheroids, angiogenic sprouting is stimulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Garzoni et al., 2009). Increased vasculature formation in co-culture correlates with the greater production of VEGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (Sekine et al., 2008). Caspi et al. (2007) found that addition of mouse embryonic fibroblasts significantly increases endothelial vessel network formation, along with the expression of VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-B, and angiopoietin 1 (Ang-1); VEGF may also be responsible for the enhanced EC viability observed in co-culture tissues. Furthermore, a study with neonatal rat ventricular myocytes in 2D cell culture demonstrated that VEGF promotes the expression of Cx43 (Pimentel et al., 2002). However, Narmoneva et al. (2004) observed no change in apoptosis or Cx43 expression when ECs and mouse CMs were co-cultured with and without neutralizing VEGF antibody. Although the differences in findings may be due to the distinct methods used in these studies, it suggests that VEGF-related mechanism in ECTs requires further investigation.
Two methods of engineered tissue culture, (1) concurrent co-culture and (2) CMs seeded on pre-culture of nonmyocytes (pre-culture or pre-treatment), with similar cellular composition result in strikingly different ECTs. Compared to concurrent co-culture, the pre-culture group exhibited better contractile properties, along with enhancement of other features, in tissues with FBs (Radisic et al., 2008), ECs (Narmoneva et al., 2004), or both (Iyer et al., 2009). Pre-culture of the nonmyocyte cells before seeding CMs may have allowed them to deposit greater ECM components, enabling better CM attachment and survival (Radisic et al., 2008; Iyer et al., 2009). Radisic et al. (2008) found increased expression of prolyl-4-hydroxylase, which plays a crucial role in collagen synthesis (Pihlajaniemi et al., 1991), in pre-culture group with FBs, suggesting enhanced collagen deposition by FBs in pre-culture tissues. The favorable environment created by the pre-culture of nonmyocytes through ECM deposition likely improved tissue function in these studies.
Summary and Perspectives
While there is evidence of beneficial effects from including non-CMs in the cellular mix of ECT fabrication; in some instances, non-CMs were not beneficial or contributed to model disease. The heterogeneity of results points to the need to further investigate cardiac cell–cell interactions to achieve the ideal ECT of multicellular composition that reliably mimics the native myocardium. Our perspective is the fabrication ECT containing iPSC-CM and iPSC derived nonmyocytes (FBs, ECs, and SMCs) at different ratios; maintaining the iPSC-CM at 70% or more of the cellular composition (Sekine et al., 2008; Giacomelli et al., 2017, 2020; Wang et al., 2019). Investigating different cell compositions will allow identification of the ratio needed to yield ECTs with optimal structure and function. Eventually, these cell mixtures could be tested in the development of bio-inks for 3D printing (de Santis et al., 2021). Additional strategies include treatment of the nonmyocyte population to harness their potential benefits. For example, treatment of fibroblasts with TGFβ inhibitors to prevent their transition into myofibroblast (Figtree et al., 2017; Cáceres et al., 2018), and thus avoid the pathologic fibrotic phenotype. Also, cell preconditioning can be applied to exploit their autocrine effects; Borosch et al. (2017) found that extracellular vesicles derived from hypoxia-treated fibroblasts favored cell migration and significantly enhanced scratch area reduction. Fabrication of ECT with a diverse combination of hiPSC-derived cell types provides a platform to systematically interrogate human cell–cell crosstalk and advance our understanding of cell–cell interaction in the human heart. The application of ECT in the clinical setting requires further pre-clinical testing in large animal models, overcoming challenges for the fabrication of larger engineered tissues while maintaining cell survival for engraftment and enhanced function.
Conclusion
Engineered cardiac tissue have translational potential which can be broadly divided into two applications. The first is as surrogate of human myocardium that may serve as a platform for modeling heart disease and investigate novel therapies; for this end, the use of iPSCs furthermore provides the opportunity to apply the ECT for personalized medicine. The second, for transplant, is to repair damaged myocardium. Every effort to produce ECTs that better represent the native myocardium will be beneficial to both applications.
Studies show nonmyocytes contribute to structural and functional maturity of ECTs. However, the studies discussed in this review used an extensive variety of cell types and composition. They also collected a wide range of data, thus making it difficult to find multiple studies with similar methodologies and objectives. Studies often report the observed effect of nonmyocytes on engineered tissues without experimentally identifying the mechanisms. Therefore, the mechanisms behind the interactions between non-CMs and CMs in engineered tissue remain largely unexplored. Further investigations with CMs and nonmyocyte cells from a single source would reduce the variability in methods and help reveal mechanisms that may aid in the development of better tissues and therapies for cardiovascular disease.
Statements
Author contributions
Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
We acknowledge funding from National Institutes of Health/NHLBI K01-HL133424, R03-HL154286, and R25-HL145817.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BeauchampP.JacksonC. B.OzhathilL. C.AgarkovaI.GalindoC. L.SawyerD. B.et al (2020). 3D Co-culture of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes with cardiac fibroblasts improves tissue-like features of cardiac spheroids.Front. Mol. Biosci.7:14. 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00014
2
BenjaminE. J.MuntnerP.AlonsoA.BittencourtM. S.CallawayC. W.CarsonA. P.et al (2019). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update: a report from the american heart association.Circulation139e56–e66. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659
3
BhattacharyaS.BurridgeP. W.KroppE. M.ChuppaS. L.KwokW.-M.WuJ. C.et al (2014). High efficiency differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyocytes and characterization by flow cytometry.J. Vis. Exp.91:52010. 10.3791/52010
4
BoroschS.DahmenE.BeckersC.StoppeC.BuhlE. M.DeneckeB.et al (2017). Characterization of extracellular vesicles derived from cardiac cells in an in vitro model of preconditioning.J. Extracell. Vesicles6:1390391. 10.1080/20013078.2017.1390391
5
BrozovichF. V.NicholsonC. J.DegenC. V.GaoY. Z.AggarwalM.MorganK. G. (2016). Mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle contraction and the basis for pharmacologic treatment of smooth muscle disorders.Pharmacol. Rev.68476–532. 10.1124/pr.115.010652
6
BrutsaertD. L. (2003). Cardiac endothelial-myocardial signaling: its role in cardiac growth, contractile performance, and rhythmicity.Physiol. Rev.8359–115. 10.1152/physrev.00017.2002
7
BurridgeP. W.MetzlerS. A.NakayamaK. H.AbilezO. J.SimmonsC. S.BruceM. A.et al (2014). Multi-cellular interactions sustain long-term contractility of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Am. J. Transl. Res.6724–735.
8
BursacN.KirktonR. D.McSpaddenL. C.LiauB. (2010). Characterizing functional stem cell–cardiomyocyte interactions.Regen. Med.587–105. 10.2217/rme.09.69
9
CáceresR. A.ChavezT.MaestroD.PalancaA. R.BoladoP.MadrazoF.et al (2018). Reduction of cardiac TGFβ-mediated profibrotic events by inhibition of Hsp90 with engineered protein.J. mol. Cell. Cardiol.12375–87. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.08.016
10
CahillJ. T.KharbandaK. R. (2017). Heart failure after myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention:mechanisms,incidence and identification of patients at risk.World J. Cardiol.9407–415. 10.4330/wjc.v9.i5.407
11
CaspiO.LesmanA.BasevitchY.GepsteinA.ArbelG.HabibI. H. M.et al (2007). Tissue engineering of vascularized cardiac muscle from human embryonic stem cells.Circ. Res.100263–272. 10.1161/01.RES.0000257776.05673.ff
12
CollivaA.BragaL.GiaccaM.ZacchignaS. (2020). Endothelial cell–cardiomyocyte crosstalk in heart development and disease.J. Physiol.5982923–2939. 10.1113/JP276758
13
de SantisM. M.AlsafadiH. N.TasS.BölükbasD. A.PrithivirajS.Da SilvaI. A. N.et al (2021). Extracellular-matrix-reinforced bioinks for 3D bioprinting human tissue.Adv. Mater. (Weinheim)33:e2005476. 10.1002/adma.202005476
14
DopplerS. A.CarvalhoC.LahmH.DeutschM.-A.DreßenM.PulucaN.et al (2017). Cardiac fibroblasts: more than mechanical support.J. Thorac. Dis.9(Suppl. 1)S36–S51. 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.122
15
DunnK. K.PalecekS. P. (2018). Engineering scalable manufacturing of high-quality stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for cardiac tissue repair.Front. Med.5:110. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00110
16
FericN. T.PallottaI.SinghR.BogdanowiczD. R.GustiloM.ChaudharyK.et al (2019). Engineered cardiac tissues generated in the BiowireTM II: a platform for human-based drug discovery.Toxicol. Sci.17289–97. 10.1093/toxsci/kfz168
17
FericN. T.RadisicM. (2016). Maturing human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in human engineered cardiac tissues.Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.96110–134. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.04.019
18
FigtreeG. A.BubbK. J.TangO.KizanaE.GentileC. (2017). Vascularized cardiac spheroids as novel 3D in vitro models to study cardiac fibrosis.Cells Tissues Organs204:191. 10.1159/000477436
19
GambardellaJ.TrimarcoB.IaccarinoG.SorrientoD. (2017). Cardiac nonmyocyte cell functions and crosstalks in response to cardiotoxic drugs.Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2017:1089359. 10.1155/2017/1089359
20
GaoL.GregorichZ. R.ZhuW.MattapallyS.OdukY.LouX.et al (2018). Large cardiac muscle patches engineered from human induced-pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiac cells improve recovery from myocardial infarction in Swine.Circulation1371712–1730. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030785
21
GarzoniL. R.RossiM. I. D.de BarrosA. P. D. N.GuaraniV.KeramidasM.BalottinL. B. L.et al (2009). Dissecting coronary angiogenesis: 3D co-culture of cardiomyocytes with endothelial or mesenchymal cells.Exp. Cell Res.3153406–3418. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.09.016
22
GheorghiadeM.LarsonC. J.ShahS. J.GreeneS. J.ClelandJ. G. F.ColucciW. S.et al (2016). Developing new treatments for heart failure: focus on the heart.Circ. Heart Fail.9:e002727. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002727
23
GiacomelliE.BellinM.SalaL.Van MeerB. J.TertoolenL. G. J.OrlovaV. V.et al (2017). Three-dimensional cardiac microtissues composed of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells co-differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells.Development (Cambridge)1441008–1017. 10.1242/dev.143438
24
GiacomelliE.MeravigliaV.CampostriniG.CochraneA.CaoX.van HeldenR. W. J.et al (2020). Human-iPSC-derived cardiac stromal cells enhance maturation in 3D cardiac microtissues and reveal non-cardiomyocyte contributions to heart disease.Cell Stem Cell26862–879.e11. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.05.004
25
GreenbergM. J.DailyN. J.WangA.ConwayM. K.WakatsukiT. (2018). Genetic and tissue engineering approaches to modeling the mechanics of human heart failure for drug discovery.Front. Cardiovasc. Med.5:120. 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00120
26
HirschE.NagaiR.ThumT. (2014). Heterocellular signalling and crosstalk in the heart in ischaemia and heart failure.Cardiovas. Res.102191–193. 10.1093/cvr/cvu073
27
HussainA.CollinsG.YipD.ChoC. H. (2013). Functional 3−D cardiac co−culture model using bioactive chitosan nanofiber scaffolds.Biotechnol. Bioeng.110637–647. 10.1002/bit.24727
28
IshigamiM.MasumotoH.IkunoT.AokiT.KawatouM.MinakataK.et al (2018). Human iPS cell-derived cardiac tissue sheets for functional restoration of infarcted porcine hearts.PLoS One13:e0201650. 10.1371/journal.pone.0201650
29
IwamiyaT.MatsuuraK.MasudaS.ShimizuT.OkanoT. (2016). Cardiac fibroblast-derived VCAM-1 enhances cardiomyocyte proliferation for fabrication of bioengineered cardiac tissue.Regen. Ther.492–102. 10.1016/j.reth.2016.01.005
30
IyerR. K.ChiuL. L. Y.RadisicM. (2009). Microfabricated poly(ethylene glycol) templates enable rapid screening of triculture conditions for cardiac tissue engineering.J. biomed. Mater. Res. A89A616–631. 10.1002/jbm.a.32014
31
KeungW.ChanP. K.BackerisP.LeeE. K.WongN.WongG. K.et al (2019). Human cardiac ventricular organoid chambers and tissue strips from pluripotent stem cells as a two-tiered assay for inotropic responses: a blinded validation.J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods99:106595. 10.1016/j.vascn.2019.05.174
32
KiesermanJ. M.MyersV. D.DubeyP.CheungJ. Y.FeldmanA. M. (2019). Current landscape of heart failure gene therapy.J. Am. Heart Assoc.8:e012239. 10.1161/JAHA.119.012239
33
KreutzigerK. L.MuskheliV.JohnsonP.BraunK.WightT. N.MurryC. E. (2011). Developing vasculature and stroma in engineered human myocardium.Tissue Eng. Part A171219–1228. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0557
34
LesmanA.HabibM.CaspiO.GepsteinA.ArbelG.LevenbergS.et al (2010). Transplantation of a tissue-engineered human vascularized cardiac muscle.Tissue engineering Part A.16115–125. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0130
35
LesyukW.KrizaC.Kolominsky-RabasP. (2018). Cost-of-illness studies in heart failure: a systematic review 2004-2016.BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.18:74. 10.1186/s12872-018-0815-3
36
LiY.AsfourH.BursacN. (2017). Age-dependent functional crosstalk between cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes in a 3D engineered cardiac tissue.Acta Biomater.55120–130. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.027
37
LianX.HsiaoC.WilsonG.ZhuK.HazeltineL. B.AzarinS. M.et al (2012). Robust cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells via temporal modulation of canonical Wnt signaling.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10910759–10760. 10.1073/pnas.1200250109
38
LiauB.ChristoforouN.LeongK. W.BursacN. (2011). Pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac tissue patch with advanced structure and function.Biomaterials329180–9187. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.050
39
MahowaldG. K.BaronJ. M.MahowaldM. A.KulkarniS.BredemeyerA. L.BassingC. H.et al (2009). Aberrantly resolved RAG-mediated DNA breaks in Atm-deficient lymphocytes target chromosomal breakpoints in cis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10618339–18344. 10.1073/pnas.0902545106
40
MastikhinaO.MoonB.-U.WilliamsK.HatkarR.GustafsonD.MouradO.et al (2020). Human cardiac fibrosis-on-a-chip model recapitulates disease hallmarks and can serve as a platform for drug testing.Biomaterials233:119741. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119741
41
MasumotoH.NakaneT.TinneyJ. P.YuanF.YeF.KowalskiW. J.et al (2016). The myocardial regenerative potential of three-dimensional engineered cardiac tissues composed of multiple human iPS cell-derived cardiovascular cell lineages.Sci. Rep.6:29933. 10.1038/srep29933
42
MatsuuraK.MasudaS.HaraguchiY.YasudaN.ShimizuT.HagiwaraN.et al (2011). Creation of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac cell sheets.Biomaterials327355–7362. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.042
43
NaitoH.MelnychenkoI.DidiéM.SchneiderbangerK.SchubertP.RosenkranzS.et al (2006). Optimizing engineered heart tissue for therapeutic applications as surrogate heart muscle.Circulation114I72–I78. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001560
44
NarmonevaD. A.VukmirovicR.DavisM. E.KammR. D.LeeR. T. (2004). Endothelial cells promote cardiac myocyte survival and spatial reorganization: implications for cardiac regeneration.Circulation110962–968. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140667.37070.07
45
NavaeiA.TruongD.HeffernanJ.CuttsJ.BrafmanD.SirianniR. W.et al (2016). PNIPAAm-based biohybrid injectable hydrogel for cardiac tissue engineering.Acta Biomater.3210–23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.019
46
NicholJ. W.EngelmayrG. C.ChengM.FreedL. E. (2008). Co-culture induces alignment in engineered cardiac constructs via MMP-2 expression.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.373360–365. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.06.019
47
NunesS. S.MiklasJ. W.LiuJ.Aschar-SobbiR.XiaoY.ZhangB.et al (2013). Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Nat. Methods10781–787. 10.1038/nmeth.2524
48
PengY.GregorichZ. R.ValejaS. G.ZhangH.CaiW.ChenY.-C.et al (2014). Top-down proteomics reveals concerted reductions in myofilament and z-disc protein phosphorylation after acute myocardial infarction.Mol. Cell. Proteomics132752–2764. 10.1074/mcp.M114.040675
49
PihlajaniemiT.MyllyläR.KivirikkoK. I. (1991). Prolyl 4-hydroxylase and its role in collagen synthesis.J. Hepatol.13S2–S7. 10.1016/0168-8278(91)90002-S
50
PimentelR. C.YamadaK. A.KléberA. G.SaffitzJ. E. (2002). Autocrine regulation of Myocyte Cx43 expression by VEGF.Circ. Res.90671–677. 10.1161/01.RES.0000014823.75393.4D
51
PintoA. R.IlinykhA.IveyM. J.KuwabaraJ. T.D’AntoniM. L.DebuqueR.et al (2016). Revisiting cardiac cellular composition.Circ. Res.118400–409. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307778
52
RadisicM.ParkH.MartensT. P.Salazar-LazaroJ. E.GengW.WangY.et al (2008). Pre-treatment of synthetic elastomeric scaffolds by cardiac fibroblasts improves engineered heart tissue.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A86A713–724. 10.1002/jbm.a.31578
53
Ronaldson-BouchardK.MaS. P.YeagerK.ChenT.SongL.SirabellaD.et al (2018). Advanced maturation of human cardiac tissue grown from pluripotent stem cells.Nature556239–243. 10.1038/s41586-018-0016-3
54
Ronaldson-BouchardK.YeagerK.TelesD.ChenT.MaS.SongL.et al (2019). Engineering of human cardiac muscle electromechanically matured to an adult-like phenotype.Nat. Protoc.142781–2817. 10.1038/s41596-019-0189-8
55
RuanJ. L.TullochN. L.SaigetM.PaigeS. L.RazumovaM. V.RegnierM.et al (2015). Mechanical stress promotes maturation of human myocardium from pluripotent stem cell-derived progenitors.Stem Cells332148–2157. 10.1002/stem.2036
56
SadeghiA. H.ShinS. R.DeddensJ. C.FrattaG.MandlaS.YazdiI. K.et al (2017). Engineered 3D cardiac fibrotic tissue to study fibrotic remodeling.Adv. Healthc. Mater.6:1601434. 10.1002/adhm.201601434
57
SainiH.NavaeiA.Van PuttenA.NikkhahM. (2015). 3D Cardiac microtissues encapsulated with the co-culture of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts.Adv. Healthc. Mater.41961–1971. 10.1002/adhm.201500331
58
SchwachV.PassierR. (2019). Native cardiac environment and its impact on engineering cardiac tissue.Biomater. Sci.73566–3580. 10.1039/c8bm01348a
59
SegersV. F. M.BrutsaertD. L.De KeulenaerG. W. (2018). Cardiac remodeling: endothelial cells have more to say than just no.Front. Physiol.9:382. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00382
60
SekineH.ShimizuT.HoboK.SekiyaS.YangJ.YamatoM.et al (2008). Endothelial cell coculture within tissue-engineered cardiomyocyte sheets enhances neovascularization and improves cardiac function of ischemic hearts.Circulation118S145–S152. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.757286
61
ShadrinI. Y.AllenB. W.QianY.JackmanC. P.CarlsonA. L.JuhasM. E.et al (2017). Cardiopatch platform enables maturation and scale-up of human pluripotent stem cell-derived engineered heart tissues.Nat. Commun.8:1825. 10.1038/s41467-017-01946-x
62
StevensK. R.KreutzigerK. L.DuprasS. K.KorteF. S.RegnierM.MuskheliV.et al (2009). Physiological function and transplantation of scaffold-free and vascularized human cardiac muscle tissue.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10616568–16573. 10.1073/pnas.0908381106
63
TalmanV.KiveläR. (2018). Cardiomyocyte—endothelial cell interactions in cardiac remodeling and regeneration.Front. Cardiovasc. Med.5:101. 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00101
64
TianY.MorriseyE. E. (2012). Importance of myocyte-nonmyocyte interactions in cardiac development and disease.Circ. Res.1101023–1034. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.243899
65
TuckerN. R.ChaffinM.FlemingS. J.HallA. W.ParsonsV. A.BediK. C.et al (2020). Transcriptional and cellular diversity of the human heart.Circulation142466–482. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045401
66
TullochN. L.MuskheliV.RazumovaM. V.KorteF. S.RegnierM.HauchK. D.et al (2011). Growth of engineered human myocardium with mechanical loading and vascular coculture.Circ. Res.10947–59. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.237206
67
TurnbullI. C.KarakikesI.SerraoG. W.BackerisP.LeeJ. J.XieC.et al (2014). Advancing functional engineered cardiac tissues toward a preclinical model of human myocardium.FASEB J.28644–654. 10.1096/fj.13-228007
68
van den AkkerF.VrijsenK. R.DeddensJ. C.BuikemaJ. W.MokryM.van LaakeL. W.et al (2018). Suppression of T cells by mesenchymal and cardiac progenitor cells is partly mediated via extracellular vesicles.Heliyon4:e00642. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00642
69
van der VeldenJ.MerkusD.KlarenbeekB. R.JamesA. T.BoontjeN. M.DekkersD. H.et al (2004). Alterations in myofilament function contribute to left ventricular dysfunction in pigs early after myocardial infarction.Circ. Res.95e85–e95. 10.1161/01.RES.0000149531.02904.09
70
VaterC.KastenP.StiehlerM. (2011). Culture media for the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells.Acta Biomater.7463–477. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.037
71
VeermanC. C.KosmidisG.MummeryC. L.CasiniS.VerkerkA. O.BellinM. (2015). Immaturity of human stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes in culture: fatal flaw or soluble problem?Stem Cells Dev.241035–1052. 10.1089/scd.2014.0533
72
Vunjak NovakovicG.EschenhagenT.MummeryC. (2014). Myocardial tissue engineering: in vitro models.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.4:a014076. 10.1101/cshperspect.a014076
73
WangE. Y.RafatianN.ZhaoY.LeeA.LaiB. F. L.LuR. X.et al (2019). Biowire model of interstitial and focal cardiac fibrosis.ACS Cent. Sci.51146–1158. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00052
74
YangX.PabonL.MurryC. E. (2014). Engineering adolescence: maturation of human pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes.Circ. Res.114511–523. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.300558
75
YeL.ChangY.-H.XiongQ.ZhangP.ZhangL.SomasundaramP.et al (2015). Cardiac repair in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiovascular cells.Cell Stem Cell16:102. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.12.003
76
ZhouE.ZhangT.BiC.WangC.ZhangZ. (2020). Vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic transition regulates gap junctions of cardiomyocyte.Heart Vessels351025–1035. 10.1007/s00380-020-01602-3
Summary
Keywords
engineered cardiac tissues, 3D physiological models, cardiomyocytes, nonmyocytes, cell-cell interactions, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes
Citation
Munawar S and Turnbull IC (2021) Cardiac Tissue Engineering: Inclusion of Non-cardiomyocytes for Enhanced Features. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:653127. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.653127
Received
13 January 2021
Accepted
31 March 2021
Published
25 May 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Giovanna Orsini, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy
Reviewed by
Jong-Kook Lee, Osaka University, Japan; Robert S. Kellar, Northern Arizona University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Munawar and Turnbull.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Irene C. Turnbull, irene.turnbull@mssm.edu
This article was submitted to Stem Cell Research, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.