Xiaobo Zhu
Yau Tsz Chan
Patrick S. H. Yung1,2
Yangzi Jiang- 1Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- 2Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- 3School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
There is emerging awareness that subchondral bone remodeling plays an important role in the development of osteoarthritis (OA). This review presents recent investigations on the cellular and molecular mechanism of subchondral bone remodeling, and summarizes the current interventions and potential therapeutic targets related to OA subchondral bone remodeling. The first part of this review covers key cells and molecular mediators involved in subchondral bone remodeling (osteoclasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes, bone extracellular matrix, vascularization, nerve innervation, and related signaling pathways). The second part of this review describes candidate treatments for OA subchondral bone remodeling, including the use of bone-acting reagents and the application of regenerative therapies. Currently available clinical OA therapies and known responses in subchondral bone remodeling are summarized as a basis for the investigation of potential therapeutic mediators.
Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) affects all tissues in diarthrodial joints, including articular cartilage, subchondral cortical bone, subchondral trabecular bone, and synovium, and the resultant pathological changes lead to pain, stiffness and dysfunction of the joint. Although articular cartilage loss and degeneration has long been considered the main cause of OA, and many therapies are designed to preserve articular cartilage, growing evidence suggests that the integrity and remodeling process of subchondral bone in OA joints, as an adaptation to cartilage degradation to maintain joint tissue homeostasis, also play an important role in OA physiopathology. Understanding the mechanism of subchondral bone remodeling in OA may provide insights for the design of future therapies to tackle OA at its early stage. This review will cover the structure and function of subchondral bone; describe the key regulatory factors and pathological changes of subchondral bone in OA joints; present the potential cellular and molecular therapeutic targets in subchondral bone remodeling and related current therapies, and possible strategies for future therapeutic design.
Subchondral Bone in OA
Structure and Function of Subchondral Bone
Articular cartilage is the hyaline connective tissue that covers the ends of bones in the diarthrodial joint, and it serves to absorb shock from joint movement. Articular cartilage has an aneural, avascular, and alymphatic structure composed of 65–80% water, 20–40% extracellular matrix (ECM), and 1–5% chondrocytes. The major components of ECM are collagens (mainly collagen type II) and proteoglycans (Carballo et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017). Articular cartilage presents zonal structures from the articular surface (superficial, middle, and deep zones) to the conjunction area of subchondral bone (calcified zone), and the cell density and morphology differ in each zone (Jiang et al., 2017).
Subchondral bone refers to the bone tissue underlying the calcified cartilage and tidemark (Figure 1), including both subchondral cortical plate and subchondral trabecular bone. Subchondral bone plate is a thin layer of cortical bone lying immediately beneath the calcified cartilage. The physiological properties of the cortical plate are similar to the cortical bone located at other skeletal sites, providing mechanical strength to support the overlying articular cartilage, although the cortical plate is less stiff in comparison to diaphyseal cortical bone (Elastic modulus: 1.372 vs. 14 GN/m2) (Brown and Vrahas, 1984; Burr and Gallant, 2012). Underneath the cortical bone plate lies the subchondral trabecular bone, which is more porous and metabolically active compared to the cortical plate. The trabeculae in the cancellous bone have a unique structural network that adjusts to local mechanical influences (Figure 1A).
Figure 1. Alterations of subchondral bone during OA progression. (A) Located at the ends of bones, articular cartilage provides a low friction surface for weight bearing and joint movement, and is made up of four zones: superficial zone, middle zone, deep zone, and calcified zone. In the healthy joint, the thin layer of calcified zone/cartilage (yellow) present at the bottom of the articular cartilage is separated from the upper three zones by the histological marker termed tidemark. Subchondral bone is the bone tissue lying beneath the calcified cartilage, and includes both the subchondral cortical plate and subchondral trabecular bone, although there is no precise distinction for the differences between these two structures. (Inset) Depiction of the mineralized rod and plate structures in the trabecular bone. (B) In early OA, when the cartilage is still intact, the thickness of subchondral cortical plate is decreased due to elevated rate of bone remodeling. At the same time, bone loss also occurs in the subchondral trabecular bone. (Inset) A drastic loss of rod-like trabeculae and mild thickening of plate-like trabeculae is also detected in early OA. (C) In late OA, when degenerative changes are evident in articular cartilage, the thickness of the subchondral plate is increased, and the subchondral trabecular bone becomes sclerotic. Other periarticular bone changes, such as the formation of osteophytes (blue arrows) also occurs at this stage. The amount of calcified cartilage expands and penetrates into the upper hyaline articular cartilage, with the tidemark duplicated or disrupted. (Inset) The drastic loss of rod-like trabeculae and thickening of plate-like trabeculae continue in late OA. Inset figures depicting structure of trabecular plate and rod are reprinted with permission from Chen et al. (2018).
The osteochondral unit in the joint, which transfers load during joint movement, consists of articular cartilage, calcified cartilage and subchondral cortical and trabecular bone (Lories and Luyten, 2011; Goldring and Goldring, 2016). The normal subchondral cortical plate has a dense structure to support articular cartilage, and there are canals (10–160 mm in diameter) in the cortical plate, allowing the exchange of nutrients and molecules between cartilage and bone (Duncan et al., 1987; Clark, 1990; Bian et al., 2016).
Articular cartilage stress distribution changes with subchondral bone expansion, and even a 1–2% incremental increase in the size of the subchondral bone could significantly increase stress to articular cartilage, as estimated by a recent human tibia data based computer-simulated model (Zhen et al., 2013). Upon injury or degeneration, the integrity of the osteochondral unit is breached, and the crosstalk between cartilage and subchondral bone is increased; the osteochondral unit is consequently altered and reshaped by the dynamic mechanical environment and biological microenvironment. Recently, Chen et al. (2020) reported a horizontal fissure at the osteochondral interface in obese OA patients, characterized by irregular cartilage erosion, fibro-granulation tissue infiltration, presence of free cartilage/bone debris and rupture of microcapillaries at the interface within the osteochondral unit. This represents a new type of OA pathological features, where neurovascular invasions were also identified in the degenerative osteochondral tissues (Li et al., 2013) (Figures 1B, 2A).
Figure 2. Cellular targets in subchondral bone remodeling. (A) Subchondral bone remodeling in OA (as illustrated in the knee). Cells and cellular structures depicted include MSCs (B), osteoclasts (C), osteoblasts (D), osteocytes (E), and blood vessels and nerves (F). Increased osteoclast-mediated subchondral bone resorption (depicted by the large lacuna formed) at the onset of OA results in the release of growth factors previously embedded in bone ECM into the subchondral bone marrow. Subsequent actions of these factors, such as TGFβ contribute to angiogenesis, nerve innervation, and recruitment of MSCs and osteoprogenitors. These cellular processes together lead to activated bone formation, uncoupled bone remodeling, and disruption of the subchondral bone architecture. These alterations in the subchondral bone impair its mechanical properties of subchondral bone, such as load dissipation, and contribute to degeneration of articular cartilage. Current therapeutics, potential targets and potential therapies for subchondral bone remodeling are shown for: (B) MSCs, (C) osteoclasts, (D) osteoblasts, (E) osteocytes, and (F) blood vessels and nerves.
Subchondral Bone in OA Joints
In OA joints, subchondral bone undergoes remarkable changes in both composition and structural organization, and has adverse effects on the overlying articular cartilage (Figure 1). With a bone scan (99mTc pyrophosphate) and tetracycline labeling, Radin et al. (1984) provided early direct evidence that subchondral bone remodeling was significantly enhanced in response to mechanical loading in a rabbit model of hindlimb loading, and it preceded the fibrillation of the overlying articular cartilage (Radin et al., 1984). More histopathological features in osteoarthritic subchondral bone were then identified and discussed, including microdamage, bone marrow edema/lesions and bone cysts (Goldring and Goldring, 2016).
“Bone marrow edema” was termed and used about three decades ago, when Wilson et al. (1988) detected and localized regions of increased signal intensity in the subchondral bone of OA patients, with MRI based fluid-sensitive magnetic resonance sequences. However, histological examination of the subchondral bone in the anatomical edema sites revealed that local fat necrosis, marrow fibrosis and vascular changes were associated with microfractures of the trabecular bone, but not associated with edema (Leydet-Quilici et al., 2010). In current practice, people termed this pathological feature as bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in subchondral bone. Today, the different types and stages of BMLs can be identified by the radiological response to two MRI sequences, the fast spin-echo proton density (PDFS)-weighted and T1-weighted spin echo. Two major types of BMLs were designated based on the MRI readouts: BML1 represents an early-stage of the structural alteration in subchondral bone, which is detectable only by PDFS sequence, and BML2 is considered as a relatively more degenerative stage in the lesion sites, which is detectable by both PDFS and T1 sequence (Muratovic et al., 2016). Therefore, it appears that BMLs are correlated to the severity of OA progression (Taljanovic et al., 2008; Tanamas et al., 2010).
Subchondral bone cyst, also known as intra-osseous lesion, is another pathological feature often found in the load-bearing regions of the arthritic joints, but the exact pathogenesis of cyst formation is still unclear. Mechanical instability and overload may be the major cause. McErlain et al. (2012) created mechanically unstable OA models in rat knees by anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) and partial medial meniscectomy (MMX); 75% of the knees developed subchondral bone cysts in 4 weeks, and all knees had subchondral bone cysts in 12 weeks. Moreover, enhanced bone turnover was also identified in human OA subchondral bone. Chen et al. (2015) examined cellular composition of human OA subchondral bone cysts and showed that the number of osteoclasts, osteoprogenitors (osterix+), osteoblasts (osteocalcin+, OCN+), and SOX9+ cells were higher in bone cyst sites than those in peri-cyst sites, suggesting enhanced bone turnover and abnormal bone remodeling.
Recently, the fine microarchitecture alterations of OA subchondral trabecular bone have been imaged and analyzed by advanced high-resolution micro-CT and MRI imaging systems. Liu et al. (2008) examined 71 human trabecular bone samples, and found that healthy trabecular bone consists of a network of rod-like and plate-like trabeculae microstructure (Figure 1A, right panel). Healthy subchondral trabecular bone displayed an even distribution of rod-like and plate-like trabeculae, and in human OA tibial plateau, a dramatic loss of rod-like trabeculae and thickening of plate-like trabeculae were identified using a novel microstructural analysis method, based on individual trabecula segmentation (Figures 1B,C, right panels) (Chen et al., 2018). Interestingly, in the same study, Chen et al. (2018) discovered that subchondral trabecular bone underneath the intact cartilage shared a similar phenotype with that underneath the severely damaged cartilage, which implied that the alterations of subchondral bone in early OA could precede cartilage degeneration.
Subchondral Bone Remodeling in OA
Alterations in OA subchondral bone represent their adaptation to the changes of local biomechanical and biological signals, and are mediated by different types of bone cells (Goldring, 2009). These cell-regulatory adaptations conform to Wolff's law that the distribution and material properties of bone are dynamically determined by the applied load (Frost, 1994). Accordingly, when bone is subjected to increased loading, a number of bone properties change, including an expanding subchondral bone cross-sectional area, changes in bone mass, and remodeling of the trabeculae network (Teichtahl et al., 2015). Adult skeleton is constantly renewed during lifetime by bone remodeling, whereby mature bone tissue is removed from the skeleton (bone resorption) and new bone tissue is formed (bone formation). Bone remodeling controls the reshaping or replacement of bone following injuries, and this principle also applies to the subchondral bone, where increased bone resorption and alterations in its microarchitecture have been identified in both rheumatoid arthritis and OA (Li et al., 2014). Osteoclasts, mononuclear cells, osteoblasts, and osteocytes are the major cell types that participate in bone remodeling (Sims et al., 2015).
Cells in Subchondral Bone Remodeling
Osteoclasts and Osteoclastogenesis in Subchondral Bone Resorption
Osteoclasts (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase positive, TRAP+) are multinucleated cells that originate from bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells (TRAP−), and are the major cell type responsible for bone resorption (Teitelbaum, 2000; Katsimbri, 2017). During osteoclastogenesis, progenitor cells (TRAP−) are recruited to specific sites on bone surface, and differentiate to pre-osteoclast (TRAP+, mononucleated cells) and fuse to form multinucleated mature osteoclasts. Mature osteoclasts form a sealing zone on bone surface, and release hydrogen ions and catalytic enzymes for bone dissolution.
Osteoclasts are involved in arthritic bone diseases (Schett et al., 2005). Interestingly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from OA patients showed a higher level of osteoclastogenesis. Durand et al. (2013) isolated PBMCs from 140 OA patients, which were differentiated into osteoclasts for 3 weeks. OA-PBMCs generated more osteoclasts, and showed higher bone resorption rate when cultured on top of bovine cortical bone slides, compared to healthy controls (Durand et al., 2013). RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, also known as osteoprotegerin ligand, osteoclast differentiation factor), exerts its function by binding to its receptor RANK on the surface of osteoclast precursors, and is one of the key regulators of osteoclastogenesis (Borciani et al., 2020). Increased osteoclast population was also observed in subchondral bone plates of OA patients (Jaiprakash et al., 2012).
The remodeling events in the subchondral bone in OA are not uniform across the joint because of different load-bearing conditions, and the remodeling rates may also vary with disease progression. For instance, active bone remodeling was found in bone cysts, but not in non-cyst areas, where the cyst cavity was created by activated osteoclasts, and bone formation was enhanced by osteoprogenitors (Osterix+) and osteoblasts (OCN+) (Chen et al., 2015). The high rate of subchondral bone resorption in OA is probably caused by increased osteoclast population and activity, and decreased cell apoptosis in a resorption cycle (Jaiprakash et al., 2012).
One of the key enzymes expressed by osteoclasts for bone resorption is cathepsin K (CTSK). Ctsk knockout mice (Ctsk−/−) maintained cartilage volume and structure in OA surgical model of destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM model), although the TRAP+ osteoclast population in subchondral bone was increased in both wild type and Ctsk−/− mice (Soki et al., 2018), and the subchondral bone was also preserved in OA Ctsk−/− mice (Soki et al., 2018).
Mononuclear Cells in Subchondral Bone Reversal Phase
There is a reversal phase in bone remodeling cycle between bone resorption and bone formation, and so far little is known about it (Jensen et al., 2014; Sims and Martin, 2020). Reversal phase is a step to prepare the bone surface for bone formation, including clearing away the resorption debris and stimulating MSC proliferation, lineage commitment toward pre-osteoblast, differentiation and migration. Mononuclear cells are observed on the newly-resorbed bone surface, and are believed as the key cellular players in reversal phase, thus termed as reversal cells. These mononuclear cells are thought to be originated from hemopoietic-lineage mononuclear phagocytes, and with the possibility from osteoblast-lineage cells (Tran Van et al., 1982; Delaisse, 2014; Sims et al., 2015). The exact role of reversal cells is still under investigation, however, it is possible that the reversal phase might be the key therapeutic window to regulate subchondral bone remodeling in OA.
Osteoblasts, Osteoblastogenesis, and Subchondral Bone Sclerosis
Osteoblasts are differentiated from mesenchymal cells, and undergo four maturational stages - preosteoblasts, osteoblasts, bone-lining cells, and osteocytes, and contribute to bone formation (Clarke, 2008; Katsimbri, 2017). In OA, osteoblast phenotype and cell activity shift in the subchondral bone. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, releasing of RANKL (Kwan Tat et al., 2008), OCN, transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) (Abed et al., 2017), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) (Hilal et al., 1998), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Corrado et al., 2013) are elevated in OA subchondral bone osteoblasts compared to normal osteoblasts, and the elevation of biofactors also induces a cascade of down-stream events, including sclerosis (Wang et al., 2013), osteoclastogenesis, and angiogenesis.
One of the most pronounced alterations in OA subchondral bone is sclerosis, which is usually found in the late stage of OA. A sclerotic subchondral bone has several structural characteristics, including the increased bone volume and density, thickening of subchondral bone plate, increased trabecular thickness, and decreased trabecular separation (Figure 1C). The microarchitecture of sclerotic subchondral trabeculae is transformed from rod-like into more plate-like (Figure 1C, right panel) (Li et al., 2013). Importantly, although bone volume and density are increased in sclerotic subchondral bone, the degree of mineralization is inadequate. The material stiffness of OA subchondral bone is therefore decreased, which may exaggerate cartilage degeneration upon joint loading (Li and Aspden, 1997). One possible explanation for subchondral bone sclerosis is that OA subchondral bone is actively being remodeled, and there is active recruitment of bone marrow and subchondral bone-resident progenitor cells and their induction toward osteogenesis; however, new bone formation and maturation are significantly impaired by the OA microenvironment (Bianco et al., 2018). Specifically, the mineralization ability of osteoblasts is reduced in the OA sclerotic subchondral cortical plate and trabecular bone tissues (Sanchez et al., 2008). The exact pathological mechanism is still under investigation. One of the possible reason is that OA sclerotic subchondral bone osteoblasts produce abnormal collagen type I (COL1), and both an aberrant formation of collagen type I homotrimer and a higher ratio of COL1A1 to COL1A2 have been reported (Bailey et al., 2002; Couchourel et al., 2009). Hypomineralization has also been found in OA sclerotic subchondral bone. One of the underlying molecular mechanisms is the elevated expression level of TGFβ in human OA subchondral bone osteoblasts, which may induce the expression of dickkopf-2 (DKK2), an inhibitor of mineralization (Chan et al., 2011). Recently, Sanchez et al. (2018) compared the secretome from human osteoblasts isolated from non-sclerotic and sclerotic areas, and identified 12 proteins about normal osteoblast function and mineralization that were significantly reduced in the osteoblasts from sclerotic subchondral bone.
Osteocytes
The role of osteocytes in OA subchondral bone is incompletely understood. As terminally differentiated osteoblasts embedded in bone matrix, osteocytes function as one type of mechanosensing cells (Robling and Bonewald, 2020), via mechanoloading-sensitive expression of RANKL to regulate osteoclastogenesis (Tatsumi et al., 2007; Nakashima et al., 2011; Xiong et al., 2011). Recent studies have also revealed a critical role for osteocyte-intrinsic TGFβ signaling in remodeling their surrounding bone matrix, a process termed perilacunar/canalicular remodeling (PLR), by which osteocytes sense the mechanical alterations, and resorb surrounding bone matrix by producing matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), cathepsin and other proteolytic enzymes dynamically (Dole et al., 2017). Breakdown of PLR in subchondral bone osteocytes could induce an OA-like phenotype, even in the non-injured knee (Mazur et al., 2019), suggesting the important role of osteocytes in subchondral bone.
Bone Extracellular Matrix
Bone ECM is produced by osteoblasts, and compositionally consists of mineral, water, collagen and noncollagenous proteins and lipids; the proportion of each component varies depending on species, age and site (Boskey and Robey, 2013). The osteoid matrix located at the endosteum of the bone is the newly secreted unmineralized matrix which then undergoes mineralization during osteogenesis, and collagen type I serves as the scaffold for the deposition of hydroxyapatite crystals in osteoid mineralization. The mechanical properties of bone are a function of the hardness of the mineralized ECM and the flexibility of organic components of the ECM. Bone ECM is the body's reservoir of minerals, macromolecules, and bioactive factors. It is the primary source of calcium, phosphate, and magnesium ions for maintenance of general physiological functions, including the maintenance of bone homeostasis. Bioactive factors are released into the marrow microenvironment upon bone resorption, and subsequently contribute to the recruitment and differentiation of stem/progenitor cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), during bone formation (Crane and Cao, 2014). For instance, bone matrix-derived IGF1 could stimulate osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs by activating mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), thus maintaining proper bone microarchitecture and mass (Xian et al., 2012). TGFβs are also abundant in bone ECM (TGFβ1, 188 ng/g; TGFβ2, 14 ng/g) (Hering et al., 2001), and activation of the TGFβ signaling pathway has been confirmed in OA subchondral bone, resulting in recruitment of MSCs and enhancement of bone formation (Zhen et al., 2013). In this manner, the subchondral bone ECM also participates in the regulation of bone homeostasis during OA bone remodeling.
Current and Potential Therapies for OA Subchondral Bone Remodeling
The subchondral cortical bone and subchondral cancellous bone respond differently at early and late stages of OA (Figure 1) (Burr and Gallant, 2012; Goldring and Goldring, 2016). Subchondral bone plate thickness decreased at the early stage of OA (Intema et al., 2010), and elevation of bone resorption markers are found in the progressive OA patients (Bettica et al., 2002; Bolbos et al., 2008), accompanied by cartilage degeneration and enhanced vascularization in the subchondral bone (Bellido et al., 2010). At late stage of OA, subchondral sclerosis was reported with a 15% increase in bone mineral density and up to 30% increase in bone volume, accompanied by reduced mineralization (Hannan et al., 1993; Arden et al., 1996; Sanchez et al., 2008). Although there is no specific therapeutic treatment designed for subchondral bone remodeling, several bone-acting reagents are being investigated and pursued for their potential in regulating subchondral bone in OA patients (Figure 2).
Inhibiting Osteoclasts in Subchondral Bone
Bisphosphonates
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly used prescription drug for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. BP binds to bone calcium and is released from the acidified bone surface, which is taken up by osteoclasts, and inhibits osteoclast activity by inducing osteoclast apoptosis (Coxon et al., 2008; Rogers et al., 2011). BPs have the potential to be used as OA subchondral bone regulating agents. For example, alendronate and zoledronate were reported to relieve subchondral bone pathological changes, thus effectively protecting the articular cartilage in OA animal models (Zhu et al., 2013; Lampropoulou-Adamidou et al., 2014). Clinically, the therapeutic effect of BPs for OA patients is controversial (Laslett et al., 2012; Cai et al., 2020). One up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving 3,013 patients showed that BPs did not significantly improve OA in pain and structural and functional aspects compared to placebo (Vaysbrot et al., 2018). However, BPs may be suitable for OA patients with high bone turnover (Vaysbrot et al., 2018). A recent report by Hayes et al. (2020) suggested an early preventive effect of BPs for a subpopulation of OA patients (Hayes et al., 2020). Hayes et al. (2020) identified 346 BP responsive end-users from 1,977 eligible women, and in this cluster of patients, administration of BPs showed a protective effect against radiographic knee OA progression. The administration of BPs was particularly effective as early prevention for non-overweight patients, but less effective for those with more advanced disease or with higher weight-bearing stress (Hayes et al., 2020). These results suggest that BPs have the potential to be used as a prevention intervention for some early OA patients by regulating subchondral bone remodeling. Apart from subchondral bone, certain type of BPs, such as chlodronate, was also shown to have a protective effect on cartilage, acting via a purinergic receptor pathway (Rosa et al., 2014).
Calcitonin
Calcitonin is a 32-amino acid hormone produced by parafollicular cells of the thyroid gland that can inhibit osteoclast activity in bone. Similar to BPs, calcitonin also shows the capacity to prevent the loss of subchondral trabecular bone in an animal model (Behets et al., 2004), and exhibits chondro-protective effect in animal OA models (Wen et al., 2016). However, a recent Phase III clinical trial reported that the administration of calcitonin did not provide reproducible improvements on joint space width and pain relief (Karsdal et al., 2015). Moreover, due to the risk of cancer with long-term use of calcitonin, the European Medicines Agency concluded that the benefits of calcitonin could not outweigh their risks in the treatment of osteoporosis (European Medicines Agency, 2020). The application of calcitonin in OA subchondral bone remodeling should be further investigated and assessed.
Estrogen
Estrogen is important for bone development and health, and it regulates bone homeostasis by inhibiting osteoclast activation and inducing osteoclast apoptosis. Although estrogen has not been specifically subjected to randomized clinical trial for OA, some promising results provide support that estrogen has the potential to regulate OA-associated subchondral bone remodeling. One cross-sectional clinical study reported that elderly women with estrogen administration had a lower prevalence of knee OA–related subchondral bone attrition and subchondral bone edema-like lesions than those without estrogen administration (Carbone et al., 2004). Another cross-sectional study involving 4,366 white women found that estrogen replacement therapy can result in a lower risk of hip OA (Nevitt et al., 1996). Therefore, estrogen, estrogenic compounds, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) may also be suitable for OA prevention in the postmenopausal patient cluster. There are also additional animal studies supporting this concept. Raloxifene (RAL), a commonly used drug for postmenopausal osteoporosis, could inhibit subchondral bone resorption, improve subchondral bone micro-architecture, and retard patellofemoral joint OA progression in ovariectomized rats (Bei et al., 2020). Another anti-postmenopausal osteoporosis drug, Tibolone, was also evidenced to increase serum ALP level and attenuated the development of knee OA in ovariectomized rats (Yang et al., 2014).
Regulating Osteogenesis
Strontium Ranelate
Strontium ranelate (SrR), a bone-acting agent that has long been used as an anti-osteoporosis drug, was recently tested in clinic as a potential disease-modifying OA drug (DMOAD) to target subchondral bone. Strontium is a chemical analog of calcium that binds to bone and can enhance pre-osteoblast maturation, stimulate OPG production in osteoblasts, and inhibit osteoclast formation by regulating RANKL (Atkins et al., 2009; Tat et al., 2011). Interestingly, it was also found that SrR could enhance the cartilage matrix production rate of human chondrocytes in vitro (Henrotin et al., 2001).
A Phase III large international study, the SEKOIA trial (ISRCTN41323372), consisting of 1,371 OA patients over 50 years old with joint space width 2.5–5 mm who were treated with 1 g/day (n = 558), 2 g/day (n = 566), or placebo (n = 559) of SrR, reported structural and beneficial effects in the 1 g and 2 g /day groups, and symptomatic benefits in the 2 g/day group at 3 years (Reginster et al., 2013). Further follow-up also indicated improvement in pain and physical functions (Bruyere et al., 2014). The significance of the findings from this trial is the direct support of the possibility to target subchondral bone as early OA intervention. The remaining concerns of this drug are its side effects on the cardiovascular system that limit its applications, and the unclear patient subpopulation profile to identify proper responders.
Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone, Teriparatide
Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH or teriparatide) has anabolic effects on bone formation by acting on osteoblasts, and has been approved to treat osteoporosis. In addition, emerging evidence suggested that PTH and parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP) could directly influence articular cartilage homeostasis and bone growth (Chang et al., 2009; Sampson et al., 2011). Currently, there is no completed randomized clinical trial for treating OA with teriparatide. A Phase II clinical trial is under way to study the chondroprotective effect of teriparatide on participants with knee OA (NCT03072147), and the results on subchondral bone will be very relevant.
Osteocytes
No current therapy is available to specifically target osteocytes.
Other Components: Vascularization, Innervation
No current therapy is available.
Future Therapeutic Targets
Therapeutic Target: Inhibiting Osteoclasts
Cathepsin K Inhibitor
CTSK is an osteolytic protease involved in bone resorption and cartilage degradation by degrading bone matrix proteins. In OA, as subchondral bone remodeling exhibits aberrantly activated bone resorption, the CTSK pathway has been considered a potential therapeutic target. Administration of the CTSK inhibitor, SB-553484, delayed OA progression in a canine model (Connor et al., 2009). Another novel selective CTSK inhibitor, MIV-711, was recently developed for OA treatment, and showed promising protection against subchondral bone loss (both plate and trabecular bone) and partial alleviation of cartilage deterioration in early OA in rabbit and canine OA models (Lindstrom et al., 2018). In a Phase II clinical trial of MIV-711, although there was no impact on pain relief, effective reduction of bone resorption and cartilage volume loss was observed (Conaghan et al., 2020). Odanacatib is the only candidate CTSK inhibitor for human use, which is supported by the results from Phase III clinical trials, and exhibits high therapeutic efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients (Mcclung et al., 2019). However, the pharmaceutical company has discontinued development of Odanacatib due to adverse cardio-cerebrovascular effects and other concerns (Mullard, 2016).
Therapeutic Target: Regulating Osteoblasts
TGFβ
TGFβ signaling is one of the key pathways that regulate bone development and remodeling (Kegelman et al., 2020). A high level of TGFβ1 activation was found in both human and mouse OA subchondral bone, which led to subchondral bone abnormality, including increased number of osteoblastic cells, enhanced subchondral bone sclerosis, and angiogenesis. Inhibition of TGFβ1 pathway via blocking TGFβ1 receptor (SB-505124) or neutralizing TGFβ1 in subchondral bone with neutralizing antibody (1D11) attenuated OA progression and rescued both articular cartilage from degeneration and subchondral bone from sclerosis (Zhen et al., 2013). Interestingly, researchers from the same group also reported that halofuginone, a natural quinazolinone alkaloid found in the Chinese herb Dichroa febrifuga, showed similar TGFβ1 inhibition effects in OA mouse models (Cui et al., 2016), suggesting that halofuginone may have potential therapeutic effect on regulating subchondral bone in OA. Another Chinese herbal extract isolated from the plant Artemisia annua, Artesunate, also inhibited subchondral bone TGFβ/Smad signaling pathway and restored the coupled bone remodeling in an ACLT-induced mice OA model (Li et al., 2019) (Table 1).
Table 1. Potential targets of subchondral bone remodeling for OA under investigation.
Wnt
Canonical signaling via β-catenin is involved in bone remodeling and regulates joint development and disease, including subchondral bone (Huang et al., 2018). Activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been found in OA subchondral bone, and inhibition of Wnt in osteoblasts by overexpression of its natural antagonist Dkk1, decreased OA phenotype, suggesting Wnt signaling as a possible pharmacological target for subchondral bone remodeling in OA (Funck-Brentano et al., 2014).
mTORC1
A newly discovered subchondral bone regulator is the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), a crucial element of the mTOR pathway. mTORC1 is overactivated in pre-osteoblasts in OA subchondral bone in both human and mice models. Lin et al. (2019) demonstrated that mTORC1 activation in pre-osteoblasts resulted in aberrant subchondral bone formation, and specific inhibition of mTORC1 pathway in pre-osteoblast could alleviate subchondral bone sclerosis and cartilage deterioration. Pharmacologic inhibition of mTOR pathway could be a possible target option for early stage OA treatment by regulating subchondral bone remodeling (Chan et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2019).
Other Chinese Herbs
Cai et al. (2018) reported that Magnoflorine, an herbal extract from Pachygone ovata, stimulated osteoblast proliferation and mineralization in vitro (25 μg /ml), and attenuated the degeneration of cartilage in early stage OA in a guinea pig spontaneous OA model. The drug delivery method consisted of 50 ng purified magnoflorine mixed with 2 μl hyaluronic acid gel to achieve sustained drug release in situ (Cai et al., 2018).
Therapeutic Target: Osteocytes
Apart from osteoblasts and osteoclasts, emerging evidence suggests that the matrix-embedded osteocytes also play essential roles in bone remodeling, particularly in arthritic subchondral bone. Tu et al. (2019) reported that osteocytes in subchondral bone expressed high level of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) during the development of OA in a spontaneous OA model (STR/Ort mice), where there was no significant changes in the number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive osteoclasts, supporting the importance of osteocytes in early OA subchondral bone remodeling. Specifically, in this STR/Ort mice OA model, the high level of COX-2 expression in osteocytes gave rise to abnormal subchondral bone formation, and accelerated cartilage degeneration at the onset of OA. Application of COX-2 inhibitors to animals at 12.5–25% of the clinical application dosage for 4 weeks resulted in normalization of the microstructure of subchondral bone and relief of cartilage degeneration in mice; a similar effect was also found in a rheumatoid arthritis mice model (TNF-α transgenic RA mice). This important piece of pre-clinical evidence suggested a treating window for bone remodeling during the development of arthritis, and the current clinical available COX-2 inhibitors could also manage the subchondral bone remodeling via regulating the osteocytes (Tu et al., 2019).
In addition, subchondral bone osteocyte-derived matrix metallopeptidase 13 (MMP13) was also identified as a regulator of articular cartilage health, by affecting PLR of osteocytes. Mazur et al. (2019) established a MMP13 knockout mouse model with a Cre recombinase driven dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1 (DMP1) promoter to specifically ablate osteocyte MMP13, without affecting chondrocyte derived MMP13. The depletion of osteocyte MMP13 increased both cortical and subchondral bone mass, and suppressed PLR during OA development in animals. Results from this study provided insights on the important contribution of osteocyte derived MMP13 to PLR during OA development, and on the dynamic crosstalk between subchondral bone osteocytes and cartilage (Mazur et al., 2019).
Other Therapeutic Targets: Vascularization and Nerve Innervation
The vasculature in bone is indispensable for skeletal development and homeostasis. Osteogenesis is coupled with angiogenesis during bone modeling and remodeling (Brandi and Collin-Osdoby, 2006; Kusumbe et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2014). The role of angiogenesis in subchondral bone has been studied recently with genetic mouse models. Su et al. (2020) used transgenic mice to prove that overexpression of platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) in preosteoclast spontaneously recapitulated the OA-like phenotype in subchondral bone by enhancing both angiogenesis and subchondral bone remodeling; meanwhile, conditional PDGF-BB knockout could effectively prevent surgically-induced OA progression (Su et al., 2020). These results suggested that subchondral bone angiogenesis is one of the key processes in subchondral bone remodeling and may be considered as a potential target. Besides intrinsically inhibiting subchondral bone vascularization, exogenous drugs targeting subchondral bone angiogenesis have also been studied. For example, bevacizumab (a VEGF antibody), halofuginone (inhibiting phosphorylation of Smad2/3 and TGFβ) and defactinib (inhibitor of focal adhesion kinase, FAK) all showed promising beneficial effects against OA in animal models via inhibition of subchondral vascularization (Cui et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2020).
Nerves often grow along new blood vessels into subchondral bone structures that are normally not innervated, which is also a feature of OA pathogenesis (Figure 2A), and may be related to pain (Mapp and Walsh, 2012). Recently, in a study of the role of osteoclast-initiated subchondral bone remodeling in sensory innervation and OA pain, Zhu et al. (2019) showed that osteoclast-initiated aberrant subchondral bone remodeling induced sensory innervation via subchondral osteoclast-derived Netrin-1, resulting in enhanced subchondral bone sensory nerve growth. This sensory innervation and OA pain could be attenuated by either inhibiting subchondral osteoclasts (by means of gene knockout in DMP1-Rankl Flox mice or treatment with alendronate), or deleting Netrin1 in osteoclast-lineage cells (by means of knockout in Trap-Netrin1 flox mice) (Zhu et al., 2019). Our group has recently reported the role of NGF/TrkA signaling pathway in calcification of human healthy articular chondrocyte, representing another mechanism operating on the other side of the cartilage tidemark that regulates OA subchondral remodeling (Jiang and Tuan, 2019). Another osteoblast-secreted inflammatory mediator, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), was also found to be increased in OA subchondral bone and sensory innervation. PGE2 activates an ion channel protein, Nav1.8, and inhibition of PEG2 production or Nav1.8 function with a selective Nav1.8 sodium channel blocker A-803467 could attenuate OA (Zhu et al., 2020). Taken together, these observations provide insights on the linkage between sensory innervation and OA subchondral bone remodeling (Zhu et al., 2020).
That angiogenesis/vascularization and nerve innervation appear to play functional roles in subchondral bone remodeling during OA progression suggests that they are potential therapeutic targets for the development of OA drugs (Figure 2F).
Regenerative Therapy
Regenerative therapies, including stem cell-based therapies are actively investigated for OA treatment. There are Phase I/II clinical trials of using bone marrow derived MSCs/BMSCs (Gupta et al., 2016; Shapiro et al., 2017), adipose tissue derived MSCs/ADSCs (Song et al., 2018; Lu et al., 2019), and other allogeneically derived MSCs (Matas et al., 2019) to treat OA knees (Table 2). For instance, two Phase II clinical trials showed that intra-articular injections of human ADSCs (5 × 107 cells) exhibited the improvement in both pain relief and cartilage volume (Song et al., 2018; Lu et al., 2019). However, the favorable results reported are primarily focused on pain relief and functional improvement but few tissue regeneration and subchondral bone reestablishment, and the application is with the strict condition of administrative DOSES (Donor, Origin tissue, Separation method, Exhibited cell characteristics associated with behavior, and Site of delivery), i.e., cell derivation, cell number, harvesting method, sites of delivery (Murray et al., 2019) and frequency (Kim et al., 2019).
Table 2. Stem cell-based therapy for cartilage/osteochondral defect and OA.
Regenerative therapy also represents an emerging strategy to enhance the subchondral bone health, particularly at the early stage of disease that could prevent OA progression. Subchondroplasty is a recently developed, clinically-used surgical treatment using bioactive materials, e.g., calcium phosphate, as bone substitute materials (BSMs), to fill the subchondral bone marrow lesions. The BSMs used for subchondroplasty are injectable, and are engineered products that have similar mechanical properties as the surrounding trabecular bone, thereby providing a bioactive scaffold for local subchondral bone remodeling, and preventing further damage to the osteochondral tissue (Farr and Cohen, 2013; Colon et al., 2015). Another approach is to use cell-based therapy to regenerate the osteochondral defects before it progresses to OA. Autologous chondrocytes (Brittberg et al., 1994; Peterson et al., 2010) and adult stem cells such as cartilage derived-progenitors (Jiang et al., 2016), bone marrow derived-MSCs (Wakitani et al., 2002, 2007; Kuroda et al., 2007) are the most frequently used cell types with satisfactory tissue repair results in clinical studies and applications (Jiang et al., 2017) (Table 2).
Tissue engineering constitutes a major strategy in regenerative therapy, i.e., to repair the tissue with exogenous cells, biomaterials, and/or bioactive factors. Another strategy is to enhance and push the limit of a tissue's self-healing capacity. Subchondral bone has a certain degree of self-repair ability in healthy joints. This healing capacity has been reported in different animal models, dependent on age and species (Pfeifer et al., 2017), size and site of the defect (Fisher et al., 2015; Orth et al., 2016), and is the foundation of the well-established surgical technique of microfracture. Microfracture has been used to treat small to medium sized cartilage/osteochondral defects by creating perpendicular channels into the subchondral bone plate and allowing the bone marrow to seep into the defect area (Pan et al., 2009). The cartilage repair/resurfacing resulting from this type of marrow stimulation techniques is thought to be partially due to the recruitment and local differentiation of bone marrow-derived MSCs, which act as a key player in subchondral bone remodeling and osteochondral homeostasis. We have previously established the application of a bioactive scaffold that achieved fast healing of subchondral bone in a rabbit osteochondral defect model. Interestingly, articular cartilage resurfacing was observed in the fast healing subchondral bone groups without any other additional treatments (Jiang et al., 2013). A subchondral remodeling step thus appears to take place in advance of cartilage repair in osteochondral healing, and the quality of cartilage generated from the marrow stimulation techniques is dependent on the healing speed and quality of subchondral bone remodeling (Chen et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2013).
In this manner, a practical regenerative approach for OA is to enhance the performance of the subchondral bone by introducing additional bone marrow derived MSCs, to maintain osteochondral tissue homeostasis and prevent further cartilage loss. Some exciting results from a series of clinical trials have just been released by Hernigou et al. (2018, 2020a,b) (Table 3), with clinical data of up to 15 years of follow-ups. Patients with different OA conditions (moderate to advanced OA, 60 cases; advanced OA, 140 cases; OA secondary to knee osteonecrosis related to corticosteroids, 30 cases) were recruited. These patients have comparable clinical symptom in bilateral knees, and were randomized to accept subchondral bone MSC therapy or other surgical treatments. The subchondral bone MSC therapy was delivered to one knee, while the other knee was treated with either intraarticular MSC injection (n = 60) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n = 140) (Table 3, Study 1 and Study 2). These results showed that: (i) precise delivery of MSCs to subchondral bone could postpone TKA in OA patients for more than 10 years; (ii) subchondral bone MSC therapy achieved similar clinical scores as TKA knees in short and long-term follow ups; and (iii) subchondral bone MSC therapy could effectively reduce the size of BMLs in OA patients, and postpone or prevent the first TKA surgery in young patients with secondary osteonecrosis related to corticosteroids (Table 3, Study 3).
Table 3. Clinical results of subchondral bone MSC therapy for OA patients.
The exact injection site and optimal delivery technique for bone marrow concentrate/MSC are of high significance for these studies. Surgeons used fluoroscopy to direct the trocar to subchondral bone marrow lesions, reaching a distance of 5 mm distal from the tidemark to avoid perforating the cartilage and to keep the calcified cartilage intact; such an approach ensures precise delivery of MSCs to the injury sites of subchondral bone in clinical practice. Delivery sites (subchondral bone vs. intraarticular) of MSCs are also of importance: 20% of the knees (12 in 60) in the subchondral implantation group underwent TKA at a mean of 14 years (range, 9–16 years), while 70% of the knees (42 in 60) in the intra-articular implantation group underwent TKA at a mean of 7 years (range, 3–14 years) (Hernigou et al., 2020a).
OA Subtypes and Therapeutic Targets
OA is a heterogeneous and multifactorial disease, and the disease is described and categorized into subtypes on the basis of pathological mechanisms and clinical phenotypes. Defining the OA subtypes is clinically relevant to provide insights into the pathological process as well as to generate future therapeutic guidelines for specific patient groups. For example, Sun et al. (2018) subcategorized OA patients into two groups, pEGFRhigh and pEGFRlow, according to the level of expression of phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (pEGFR) in cartilage (Sun et al., 2018). Inhibition of EGFR signaling pathway in murine chondrocytes by gene knockout or using the EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib was found to attenuate cartilage degeneration in mouse OA model. These findings suggest a rationale for exploration of Gefitinib as a potential intervention therapeutic to treat OA patients in the pEGFRhigh subgroup.
Herrero-Beaumont et al. (2017) characterized four subtypes of OA, including biomechanical, osteoporotic, metabolic, and inflammatory OA. Karsdal et al. (2014) proposed six potential OA subtypes, including low-grade autoimmunity, inflammation, genetic, hormonal, metabolic and mechanotransduction subtypes, and categorized the drivers of OA into at least three different types based on the most active or affected joint tissues, including cartilage, bone and inflamed synovium. Recent work based on transcriptomic profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells identified two OA subtypes, a degenerative subtype, and an inflammation related subtype (Zhao et al., 2018). Presented below is a discussion of potential OA subtypes on the basis of current reported pathology and intervention studies and clinical findings on the response profile of subchondral bone remodeling.
Profile of the OA Subchondral Bone Remodeling Responders
Four potential OA subtype are proposed: (1) responders to bone-acting agents; (2) responders to NSAIDs (Bingham et al., 2006); (3) responders to MSC-subchondral bone/regenerative therapy; and (4) responders to mechanical stimuli.
Responders to Bone-Acting Agents
Bone acting agents that are reported to be beneficial for OA patients include estrogen (Carbone et al., 2004), BPs (Carbone et al., 2004; Hayes et al., 2020), and SrR (Reginster et al., 2013; Bruyere et al., 2014). Effective responders to estrogen and BPs are mostly postmenopausal women at early stage of OA, and non-overweight; administration of estrogen or BPs reduced radiographic knee OA progression, and is correlated to less subchondral bone lesions (Carbone et al., 2004; Hayes et al., 2020). Responders to SrR are generally early OA patients from both genders over 50 years old with joint space width 2.5–5 mm from the SEKOIA clinical trial (ISRCTN41323372) (Reginster et al., 2013; Bruyere et al., 2014). It is noteworthy that while estrogen could prevent subchondral bone lesions, reduction of knee pain was not observed (Carbone et al., 2004); thus, using bone-acting agents for subchondral bone remodeling is more likely to be a preventive step at the very early phase of OA.
Responders to NSAIDs
OA patients are reported to have different types of subchondral bone osteoblast behavior, characterized by difference in endogenous production levels of PGE2 (Massicotte et al., 2002; Kwan Tat et al., 2008), i.e., low PGE2 OA [L-OA] or high PGE2 OA [H-OA] (Massicotte et al., 2002). The L-OA osteoblasts produce higher level of RANKL and exhibit a lower ratio of OPG/RANKL compared with healthy subchondral bone osteoblasts, suggesting that L-OA osteoblasts may play a causal role in subchondral bone resorption in certain subtypes of OA (Kwan Tat et al., 2008). In addition, Tu et al. (2019) identified another subchondral bone responder subtype as COX-2+ OA and COX-2− OA in animal models, according to expression level of COX-2 in subchondral bone, and the elevated levels of COX-2 in subchondral bone accelerated cartilage degeneration at the onset of OA. These patients with PGE2high/COX-2+ subchondral bone osteoblast are highly likely to be the responders to NSAIDs.
Responders to MSC (Subchondral Bone Application) and Regenerative Therapy
From the patient inclusion criteria of subchondroplasty and the cell-based therapies (Table 2), it is clear that regenerative therapies are the frontline choices to bone marrow lesions (Hernigou et al., 2020a), osteochondral defects, and injuries (Brittberg et al., 1994; Wakitani et al., 2002, 2007; Kuroda et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2016).
Hernigou et al. provided a wide spectrum patient profile for MSC-based therapy for subchondral bone remodeling to prevent OA development and minimize TKA (Table 3). In the 140-case study, patients scheduled for TKA who were administrated subchondral injection of BMSCs reported good joint preservation results after 15 years of follow up (Hernigou et al., 2020b). In the young osteonecrosis patients, 96% of those who received subchondral bone MSC injection showed postponement of the first TKA for more than 10 years, while a 20% revision rate was found in the TKA treatment group (Hernigou et al., 2018). Subchondral bone MSCs treatment was found to be applicable for both early and late stage OA in terms of subchondral bone remodeling and joint preservation. These investigators also found that: (i) persistent BML larger than 3 cm3 after MSC therapy was an independent risk factor for TKA; and (ii) incidence rates of arthroplasty were higher for young patients and for patients with severe malalignment (hip-knee-ankle angle < 170°) (Hernigou et al., 2020b). In other words, responders to MSC subchondral bone injection were most likely individuals whose BML was no larger than 3 cm3 and without lower limb malalignment.
Responders to Mechanical Stimuli
Two obvious effective management strategies for OA related to mechanical stimuli are weight loss and exercise, both of which are recommended by the American College of Rheumatology (Kolasinski et al., 2020). A pre-clinical study showed that body weight-supported treadmill training (lower than 60% loading in the joint) is more efficient in maintaining cartilage integrity and attenuating subchondral bone loss and remodeling than treadmill training alone (Hao et al., 2020). Weight loss and exercise are therefore highly beneficial for early OA patients.
Lower limb malalignment alters the stress distribution across the knee, resulting in altered bone remodeling in tibiofemoral joint, and is a major contributor to severity of OA. Patients with malalignment are mechanical stimuli responders, and the conditions can be attenuated by correction of malalignment. The subchondral bone remodeling before and after osteotomy or other malalignment correction surgeries can be observed by bone scintigraphy, which measures reflects alterations in the metabolic activity of bone (Kraus et al., 2009), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (Dexa), and MRI.
Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a surgical procedure involving the gradual separation of the two joint surfaces by an external fixator frame (Intema et al., 2011). Interestingly, separation and mechanical unloading of OA affected joint surfaces could reduce tissue wear and tear. Intema et al. (2011) reported a decrease in subchondral bone density on the OA affected compartment after KJD for 12 months, delaying the progression of late OA. Goh et al. (2019) recently reviewed the role of KJD in OA management and summarized available supportive evidence for the beneficial outcomes. Therefore, KJD could be a promising, clinically available therapy for OA patients, based on the reduction of mechanical stimuli to prevent OA development. In addition, exoskeletons have also shown promise in modifying the biomechanical environment of the knee in OA patients (Mcgibbon et al., 2017).
Future Targets Under Investigation
Several new cellular and molecular targets of OA subchondral bone remodeling have been recently reported in pre-clinical animal studies, including TGFβ, PGE2/Cox2, vascularization, and mechanical sensor proteins (Figure 2). These mechanistic studies are investigated with small animals, and the targets and their possible pharmacological manipulation are summarized in Table 1. Among these, the known OA subchondral bone regulatory signaling pathways of estrogen, TGFβ, and COX2/PEG2 have been discussed in previous sections. Additional details on the regulators of the vascular and mechanical responses in OA subchondral bone are provided below.
Increased vascularization of subchondral bone and the invasion into osteochondral junction are important pathological characteristics of OA (Suri et al., 2007). The vascularization in subchondral bone is one of the potential targets. In the arthritic joint, VEGF signaling contributes to bone resorption and destruction via recruitment and activation osteoclasts (Matsumoto et al., 2002). Administration of bevacizumab, a neutralizing VEGF antibody, either intra-articularly (1 mL; 25 mg/mL; 3 weeks) or intravenously (5 mg/kg; 2 weeks), has been confirmed to attenuate OA in a rabbit model (Nagai et al., 2014). Su et al. (2020) discovered that preosteoclast-derived PDGF-BB enhanced the H type vessel numbers in OA subchondral bone (Kusumbe et al., 2014; Su et al., 2020). In addition, Hu et al. (2020) reported that H-type vessels and MSCs were coordinated in a positive feedback loop via focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling in MSCs, subsequently causing aberrant bone formation in ACLT-induced murine OA subchondral bone (Hu et al., 2020); furthermore, the FAK inhibitor defactinib effectively suppressed the positive loop between H type vessels and MSCs, and alleviated OA in mice (Hu et al., 2020) (Table 1).
As both cartilage and bone are mechanical sensitive joint tissues, the mechanosensitive pathway in subchondral bone represents another potential target. The expression of the mechanosensing molecule, Yes-associated protein (YAP), in human knee joint articular cartilage was positively correlated with cartilage ECM stiffness. In OA mouse cartilage, YAP expression was aberrantly increased, and conditional knockout of YAP protected against cartilage degeneration. Intra-articular administration of Verteporfin, a YAP-selective inhibitor, also lowered the expression of YAP and alleviated cartilage degeneration in DMM-induced murine OA model (Zhang et al., 2020). Wang et al. (2020) recently identified PIEZO1 as the major skeletal mechanosensor or mechanostat protein that tunes bone homeostasis. Mice deficient in Piezo1 gene expression in osteoblastic cells, while showing loss of bone mass and spontaneous fractures with increased bone resorption, are resistant to further bone loss and bone resorption due to mechanical unloading, suggesting that PIEZO1 in osteoblasts controls osteoblast-osteoclast crosstalk in response to mechanical forces. PIEZO1 regulates the YAP-dependent expression of collagen types II and IX, which in turn regulate osteoclast differentiation and bone remodeling. Additional support is provided by the findings of Zhou et al. (2020) who also reported that Piezo1/2 could regulate bone formation by mediating mechanotransduction via the NFAT/YAP1/ß-catenin axis in mice (Zhou et al., 2020). The manner and approach of regulating the mechano-modulatory factors and cellular activities in OA subchondral bone thus requires further exploration. Definitive classification of the nature of impairment of mechanoresponsive pathways in subchondral bone would be helpful to identify new subtypes of OA patients.
Conclusion
In summary, we have provided a review of the key cellular and molecular players in subchondral bone remodeling, and the changes that accompany the pathogenesis of OA in the articular joint. These factors and associated pathways are potential targets for development of OA therapies focused on subchondral bone remodeling. Brief profiles of the different types of OA responders to subchondral bone remodeling are presented, based on available clinical therapies. Finally, we have also summarized the novel mediators of OA subchondral bone remodeling that are currently under investigation.
Author Contributions
YJ: conceptual design. YC, XZ, and YJ: data mining and collection. XZ, YJ, and YC: manuscript preparation. YJ, RT, and PY: manuscript editing. PY, RT, and YJ: data interpretation. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0111900 to YJ).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the research support of The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Abbreviations
ACLT, anterior cruciate ligament transection; ADSCs, adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BMLs, bone marrow lesions; BMSCs, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells; BPs, bisphosphonates; BSMs, bone substitute materials; CaP, calcium phosphate; COL1, collagen type I; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; CTSK, cathepsin K; Dexa, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; DKK2, Dickkopf-2; DMOAD, disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug; DMP1, dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1; ECM, extracellular matrix; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; HTO, high tibial osteotomy; ICOAP, intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain; ICRS, International Cartilage Repair Society; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; KJD, knee joint distraction; KL, Kellgren-Lawrence; KOOS, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; MACI, matrix induced autologous chondrocyte implantation; MMX, medial meniscectomy; MMP, metalloproteinase; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; mTORC1, mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1; OA, osteoarthritis; OCN, osteocalcin; ODF, osteoclast differentiation factor; OPG, osteoprotegerin; OPGL, osteoprotegerin ligand; ON, osteonecrosis; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor-BB; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PLR, perilacunar/canalicular remodeling; RANK, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B; PTH, parathyroid hormone; PTHrP, parathyroid hormone related peptide; RAL, Raloxifene; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand; SERMs, selective estrogen receptor modulators; SMSCs, synovium-derived mesenchymal stromal cells; SrR, strontium ranelate; TGFβ1, transforming growth factor β1; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; UC-MSCs, umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells; VAS, visual analog scale; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index; YAP, Yes-associated protein.
References
Abed, E., Delalandre, A., and Lajeunesse, D. (2017). Beneficial effect of resveratrol on phenotypic features and activity of osteoarthritic osteoblasts. Arthritis Res. Ther. 19:151. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1365-2
Arden, N. K., Griffiths, G. O., Hart, D. J., Doyle, D. V., and Spector, T. D. (1996). The association between osteoarthritis and osteoporotic fracture: the Chingford study. Br. J. Rheumatol. 35, 1299–1304. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.12.1299
Atkins, G. J., Welldon, K. J., Halbout, P., and Findlay, D. M. (2009). Strontium ranelate treatment of human primary osteoblasts promotes an osteocyte-like phenotype while eliciting an osteoprotegerin response. Osteoporos. Int. 20, 653–664. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0728-6
Bailey, A. J., Sims, T. J., and Knott, L. (2002). Phenotypic expression of osteoblast collagen in osteoarthritic bone: production of type I homotrimer. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 34, 176–182. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00107-8
Behets, C., Williams, J. M., Chappard, D., Devogelaer, J. P., and Manicourt, D. H. (2004). Effects of calcitonin on subchondral trabecular bone changes and on osteoarthritic cartilage lesions after acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19, 1821–1826. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040609
Bei, M. J., Tian, F. M., Xiao, Y. P., Cao, X. H., Liu, N., Zheng, Z. Y., et al. (2020). Raloxifene retards cartilage degradation and improves subchondral bone micro-architecture in ovariectomized rats with patella baja-induced - patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 28, 344–355. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.014
Bellido, M., Lugo, L., Roman-Blas, J. A., Castaneda, S., Caeiro, J. R., Dapia, S., et al. (2010). Subchondral bone microstructural damage by increased remodelling aggravates experimental osteoarthritis preceded by osteoporosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 12:R152. doi: 10.1186/ar3103
Bettica, P., Cline, G., Hart, D. J., Meyer, J., and Spector, T. D. (2002). Evidence for increased bone resorption in patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis: longitudinal results from the Chingford study. Arthritis Rheum. 46, 3178–3184. doi: 10.1002/art.10630
Bian, W., Lian, Q., Li, D., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Jin, Z., and Qiu, Y. (2016). Morphological characteristics of cartilage-bone transitional structures in the human knee joint and CAD design of an osteochondral scaffold. Biomed. Eng. Online 15:82. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0200-3
Bianco, D., Todorov, A., Cengic, T., Pagenstert, G., Scharen, S., Netzer, C., et al. (2018). Alterations of subchondral bone progenitor cells in human knee and hip osteoarthritis lead to a bone sclerosis phenotype. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:475. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020475
Bingham, C. O. III., Buckland-Wright, J. C., Garnero, P., Cohen, S. B., Dougados, M., Adami, S., et al. (2006). Risedronate decreases biochemical markers of cartilage degradation but does not decrease symptoms or slow radiographic progression in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: results of the two-year multinational knee osteoarthritis structural arthritis study. Arthritis Rheum. 54, 3494–3507. doi: 10.1002/art.22160
Bolbos, R. I., Zuo, J., Banerjee, S., Link, T. M., Ma, C. B., Li, X., et al. (2008). Relationship between trabecular bone structure and articular cartilage morphology and relaxation times in early OA of the knee joint using parallel MRI at 3 T. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 16, 1150–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.02.018
Borciani, G., Montalbano, G., Baldini, N., Cerqueni, G., Vitale-Brovarone, C., and Ciapetti, G. (2020). Co-culture systems of osteoblasts and osteoclasts: simulating in vitro bone remodeling in regenerative approaches. Acta Biomater. 108, 22–45. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.043
Boskey, A. L., and Robey, P. G. (2013). “The composition of bone,” in Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, ed. C. J. Rosen. 8th ed. (Hoboken, NJ: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research), 49–58.
Brandi, M. L., and Collin-Osdoby, P. (2006). Vascular biology and the skeleton. J. Bone Miner. Res. 21, 183–192. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050917
Brittberg, M., Lindahl, A., Nilsson, A., Ohlsson, C., Isaksson, O., and Peterson, L. (1994). Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 331, 889–895. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410063311401
Brown, T. D., and Vrahas, M. S. (1984). The apparent elastic modulus of the juxtarticular subchondral bone of the femoral head. J. Orthop. Res. 2, 32–38. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100020106
Bruyere, O., Reginster, J. Y., Bellamy, N., Chapurlat, R., Richette, P., Cooper, C., et al. (2014). Clinically meaningful effect of strontium ranelate on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis: a responder analysis. Rheumatology 53, 1457–1464. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu018
Burr, D. B., and Gallant, M. A. (2012). Bone remodelling in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 665–673. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.130
Cai, G., Aitken, D., Laslett, L. L., Pelletier, J. P., Martel-Pelletier, J., Hill, C., et al. (2020). Effect of intravenous zoledronic acid on tibiofemoral cartilage volume among patients with knee osteoarthritis with bone marrow lesions: a randomized clinical Trial. JAMA 323, 1456–1466. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2938
Cai, Z., Feng, Y., Li, C., Yang, K., Sun, T., Xu, L., et al. (2018). Magnoflorine with hyaluronic acid gel promotes subchondral bone regeneration and attenuates cartilage degeneration in early osteoarthritis. Bone 116, 266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.08.015
Carballo, C. B., Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, I., and Rodeo, S. A. (2017). Basic science of articular cartilage. Clin. Sports Med. 36, 413–425. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2017.02.001
Carbone, L. D., Nevitt, M. C., Wildy, K., Barrow, K. D., Harris, F., Felson, D., et al. (2004). The relationship of antiresorptive drug use to structural findings and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 50, 3516–3525. doi: 10.1002/art.20627
Chan, T. F., Couchourel, D., Abed, E., Delalandre, A., Duval, N., and Lajeunesse, D. (2011). Elevated Dickkopf-2 levels contribute to the abnormal phenotype of human osteoarthritic osteoblasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 1399–1410. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.358
Chang, J. K., Chang, L. H., Hung, S. H., Wu, S. C., Lee, H. Y., Lin, Y. S., et al. (2009). Parathyroid hormone 1-34 inhibits terminal differentiation of human articular chondrocytes and osteoarthritis progression in rats. Arthritis Rheum. 60, 3049–3060. doi: 10.1002/art.24843
Chen, H., Chevrier, A., Hoemann, C. D., Sun, J., Ouyang, W., and Buschmann, M. D. (2011). Characterization of subchondral bone repair for marrow-stimulated chondral defects and its relationship to articular cartilage resurfacing. Am. J. Sports Med. 39, 1731–1740. doi: 10.1177/0363546511403282
Chen, L., Yao, F., Wang, T., Li, G., Chen, P., Bulsara, M., et al. (2020). Horizontal fissuring at the osteochondral interface: a novel and unique pathological feature in patients with obesity-related osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 79, 811–818. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216942
Chen, S., Fu, P., Wu, H., and Pei, M. (2017). Meniscus, articular cartilage and nucleus pulposus: a comparative review of cartilage-like tissues in anatomy, development and function. Cell Tissue Res. 370, 53–70. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2613-0
Chen, Y., Hu, Y., Yu, Y. E., Zhang, X., Watts, T., Zhou, B., et al. (2018). Subchondral trabecular rod loss and plate thickening in the development of osteoarthritis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 33, 316–327. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3313
Chen, Y., Wang, T., Guan, M., Zhao, W., Leung, F. K., Pan, H., et al. (2015). Bone turnover and articular cartilage differences localized to subchondral cysts in knees with advanced osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 23, 2174–2183. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.07.012
Clark, J. M. (1990). The structure of vascular channels in the subchondral plate. J. Anat. 171, 105–115.
Clarke, B. (2008). Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3, S131–S139. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04151206.
Colon, D. A., Yoon, B. V., Russell, T. A., Cammisa, F. P., and Abjornson, C. (2015). Assessment of the injection behavior of commercially available bone BSMs for Subchondroplasty(R) procedures. Knee 22, 597–603. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.06.017
Conaghan, P. G., Bowes, M. A., Kingsbury, S. R., Brett, A., Guillard, G., Rizoska, B., et al. (2020). Disease-modifying effects of a novel cathepsin K inhibitor in osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 172, 86–95. doi: 10.7326/M19-0675
Connor, J. R., Lepage, C., Swift, B. A., Yamashita, D., Bendele, A. M., Maul, D., et al. (2009). Protective effects of a cathepsin K inhibitor, SB-553484, in the canine partial medial meniscectomy model of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 17, 1236–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.03.015
Corrado, A., Neve, A., and Cantatore, F. P. (2013). Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in normal, osteoarthritic and osteoporotic osteoblasts. Clin. Exp. Med. 13, 81–84. doi: 10.1007/s10238-011-0170-5
Couchourel, D., Aubry, I., Delalandre, A., Lavigne, M., Martel-Pelletier, J., Pelletier, J. P., et al. (2009). Altered mineralization of human osteoarthritic osteoblasts is attributable to abnormal type I collagen production. Arthritis Rheum. 60, 1438–1450. doi: 10.1002/art.24489
Coxon, F. P., Thompson, K., Roelofs, A. J., Ebetino, F. H., and Rogers, M. J. (2008). Visualizing mineral binding and uptake of bisphosphonate by osteoclasts and non-resorbing cells. Bone 42, 848–860. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.12.225
Crane, J. L., and Cao, X. (2014). Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and TGF-beta signaling in bone remodeling. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 466–472. doi: 10.1172/JCI70050
Cui, Z., Crane, J., Xie, H., Jin, X., Zhen, G., Li, C., et al. (2016). Halofuginone attenuates osteoarthritis by inhibition of TGF-beta activity and H-type vessel formation in subchondral bone. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 75, 1714–1721. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207923
Delaisse, J.-M. (2014). The reversal phase of the bone-remodeling cycle: cellular prerequisites for coupling resorption and formation. Bonekey Rep. 3, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2014.56
Dole, N. S., Mazur, C. M., Acevedo, C., Lopez, J. P., Monteiro, D. A., Fowler, T. W., et al. (2017). Osteocyte-intrinsic TGF-beta signaling regulates bone quality through perilacunar/canalicular remodeling. Cell. Rep. 21, 2585–2596. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.115
Duncan, H., Jundt, J., Riddle, J. M., Pitchford, W., and Christopherson, T. (1987). The tibial subchondral plate. A scanning electron microscopic study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Amb. 69, 1212–1220. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198769080-00015
Durand, M., Komarova, S. V., Bhargava, A., Trebec-Reynolds, D. P., Li, K., Fiorino, C., et al. (2013). Monocytes from patients with osteoarthritis display increased osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption: the in vitro osteoclast differentiation in arthritis study. Arthritis Rheum. 65, 148–158. doi: 10.1002/art.37722
European Medicines Agency (2020). Science Medicines Health. Available online at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/referrals/calcitonin (accessed November 15 2020).
Farr, J. II., and Cohen, S. B. (2013). Expanding applications of the subchondroplasty procedure for the treatment of bone marrow lesions observed on magnetic resonance imaging. Operat Tech Sports Med. 21, 138–143. doi: 10.1053/j.otsm.2013.03.006
Fisher, M. B., Belkin, N. S., Milby, A. H., Henning, E. A., Bostrom, M., Kim, M., et al. (2015). Cartilage repair and subchondral bone remodeling in response to focal lesions in a mini-pig model: implications for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 21, 850–860. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0384
Freitag, J., Bates, D., Wickham, J., Shah, K., Huguenin, L., Tenen, A., et al. (2019). Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Regen. Med. 14, 213–230. doi: 10.2217/rme-2018-0161
Frost, H. M. (1994). Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 64, 175–188.
Funck-Brentano, T., Bouaziz, W., Marty, C., Geoffroy, V., Hay, E., and Cohen-Solal, M. (2014). Dkk-1-mediated inhibition of Wnt signaling in bone ameliorates osteoarthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 66, 3028–3039. doi: 10.1002/art.38799
Goh, E. L., Lou, W. C. N., Chidambaram, S., and Ma, S. (2019). The role of joint distraction in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and quantitative analysis. Orthop. Res. Rev. 11, 79–92. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S211060
Goldring, S. R. (2009). Role of bone in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Med. Clin. N. Am. 93, 25–35, xv. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.09.006
Goldring, S. R., and Goldring, M. B. (2016). Changes in the osteochondral unit during osteoarthritis: structure, function and cartilage-bone crosstalk. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 12, 632–644. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.148
Gupta, P. K., Chullikana, A., Rengasamy, M., Shetty, N., Pandey, V., Agarwal, V., et al. (2016). Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Arthritis Res. Ther. 18:301. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1195-7
Hannan, M. T., Anderson, J. J., Zhang, Y., Levy, D., and Felson, D. T. (1993). Bone mineral density and knee osteoarthritis in elderly men and women. The Framingham Study. Arthritis Rheum. 36, 1671–1680. doi: 10.1002/art.1780361205
Hao, X., Wang, S., Zhang, J., and Xu, T. (2020). Effects of body weight-supported treadmill training on cartilage-subchondral bone unit in the rat model of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Res. 2020, 1–9. doi: 10.1002/jor.24791
Hayes, K. N., Giannakeas, V., and Wong, A. K. O. (2020). Bisphosphonate use is protective of radiographic knee osteoarthritis progression among those with low disease severity and being non-overweight: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. J. Bone Miner. Res. 35, 2318–2326. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4133
Henrotin, Y., Labasse, A., Zheng, S. X., Galais, P., Tsouderos, Y., Crielaard, J. M., et al. (2001). Strontium ranelate increases cartilage matrix formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16, 299–308. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.299
Hering, S., Isken, E., Knabbe, C., Janott, J., Jost, C., Pommer, A., et al. (2001). TGFbeta1 and TGFbeta2 mRNA and protein expression in human bone samples. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 109, 217–226. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15109
Hernigou, P., Auregan, J. C., Dubory, A., Flouzat-Lachaniette, C. H., Chevallier, N., and Rouard, H. (2018). Subchondral stem cell therapy versus contralateral total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis following secondary osteonecrosis of the knee. Int. Orthop. 42, 2563–2571. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3916-9
Hernigou, P., Bouthors, C., Bastard, C., Flouzat Lachaniette, C. H., Rouard, H., and Dubory, A. (2020a). Subchondral bone or intra-articular injection of bone marrow concentrate mesenchymal stem cells in bilateral knee osteoarthritis: what better postpone knee arthroplasty at fifteen years? A randomized study. Int. Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04687-7. [Epub ahead of print].
Hernigou, P., Delambre, J., Quiennec, S., and Poignard, A. (2020b). Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell injection in subchondral lesions of knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study versus contralateral arthroplasty at a mean fifteen year follow-up. Int. Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04571-4. [Epub ahead of print].
Herrero-Beaumont, G., Roman-Blas, J. A., Bruyere, O., Cooper, C., Kanis, J., Maggi, S., et al. (2017). Clinical settings in knee osteoarthritis: pathophysiology guides treatment. Maturitas 96, 54–57. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.11.013
Hilal, G., Martel-Pelletier, J., Pelletier, J. P., Ranger, P., and Lajeunesse, D. (1998). Osteoblast-like cells from human subchondral osteoarthritic bone demonstrate an altered phenotype in vitro: possible role in subchondral bone sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 41, 891–899. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<891::AID-ART17>3.0.CO;2-X
Hu, Y., Wu, H., Xu, T., Wang, Y., Qin, H., Yao, Z., et al. (2020). Defactinib attenuates osteoarthritis by inhibiting positive feedback loop between H-type vessels and MSCs in subchondral bone. J. Orthop. Translat. 24, 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.04.008
Huang, J., Zhao, L., and Chen, D. (2018). Growth factor signalling in osteoarthritis. Growth Fact. 36, 187–195. doi: 10.1080/08977194.2018.1548444
Intema, F., Sniekers, Y. H., Weinans, H., Vianen, M. E., Yocum, S. A., Zuurmond, A. M., et al. (2010). Similarities and discrepancies in subchondral bone structure in two differently induced canine models of osteoarthritis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 1650–1657. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.39
Intema, F., Van Roermund, P. M., Marijnissen, A. C., Cotofana, S., Eckstein, F., Castelein, R. M., et al. (2011). Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: an open 1-year pilot study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 70, 1441–1446. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.142364
Jaiprakash, A., Prasadam, I., Feng, J. Q., Liu, Y., Crawford, R., and Xiao, Y. (2012). Phenotypic characterization of osteoarthritic osteocytes from the sclerotic zones: a possible pathological role in subchondral bone sclerosis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 8, 406–417. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.4221
Jensen, P. R., Andersen, T. L., Pennypacker, B. L., Duong, L. T., and Delaiss,é, J. M. (2014). The bone resorption inhibitors Odanacatib and Alendronate affect post-osteoclastic events differently in Ovariectomized rabbits. Calcif. Tissue Int. 94, 212–222. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9800-0
Jiang, Y., Cai, Y., Zhang, W., Yin, Z., Hu, C., Tong, T., et al. (2016). Human cartilage-derived progenitor cells from committed chondrocytes for efficient cartilage repair and regeneration. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 5, 733–744. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0192
Jiang, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, S., Tong, T., Zhang, W., Liu, W., et al. (2013). Incorporation of bioactive polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine within bilayered collagen scaffolds enhances the differentiation and subchondral osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 9, 8089–8098. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.014
Jiang, Y., Lin, H., and Tuan, R. S. (2017). “Overview: state of the art and future prospectives for cartilage repair,” in Cartilage Volume 3: Repair Strategies and Regeneration, eds. S. Grässel, and A. Aszódi (Chem: Springer), 1–34.
Jiang, Y., and Tuan, R. S. (2019). Role of NGF-TrkA signaling in calcification of articular chondrocytes. FASEB J. 33, 10231–10239. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900970
Karsdal, M. A., Byrjalsen, I., Alexandersen, P., Bihlet, A., Andersen, J. R., Riis, B. J., et al. (2015). Treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with oral salmon calcitonin: results from two phase 3 trials. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 23, 532–543. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.019
Karsdal, M. A., Christiansen, C., Ladel, C., Henriksen, K., Kraus, V. B., and Bay-Jensen, A. C. (2014). Osteoarthritis–a case for personalized health care? Osteoarthr. Cartil. 22, 7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.018
Katsimbri, P. (2017). The biology of normal bone remodelling. Eur. J. Cancer Care 26:e12740. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12740
Kegelman, C. D., Coulombe, J. C., Jordan, K. M., Horan, D. J., Qin, L., Robling, A. G., et al. (2020). YAP and TAZ mediate osteocyte perilacunar/canalicular remodeling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 35, 196–210. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3876
Kim, S. H., Ha, C. W., Park, Y. B., Nam, E., Lee, J. E., and Lee, H. J. (2019). Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for clinical outcomes and cartilage repair in osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 139, 971–980. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03140-8
Kolasinski, S. L., Neogi, T., Hochberg, M. C., Oatis, C., Guyatt, G., Block, J., et al. (2020). 2019 American college of rheumatology/arthritis foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 72, 220–233. doi: 10.1002/art.41142
Kraus, V. B., Mcdaniel, G., Worrell, T. W., Feng, S., Vail, T. P., Varju, G., et al. (2009). Association of bone scintigraphic abnormalities with knee malalignment and pain. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68, 1673–1679. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.094722
Kuroda, R., Ishida, K., Matsumoto, T., Akisue, T., Fujioka, H., Mizuno, K., et al. (2007). Treatment of a full-thickness articular cartilage defect in the femoral condyle of an athlete with autologous bone-marrow stromal cells. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 15, 226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.08.008
Kusumbe, A. P., Ramasamy, S. K., and Adams, R. H. (2014). Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature 507, 323–328. doi: 10.1038/nature13145
Kwan Tat, S., Pelletier, J. P., Lajeunesse, D., Fahmi, H., Lavigne, M., and Martel-Pelletier, J. (2008). The differential expression of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) in human osteoarthritic subchondral bone osteoblasts is an indicator of the metabolic state of these disease cells. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 26, 295–304.
Lampropoulou-Adamidou, K., Dontas, I., Stathopoulos, I. P., Khaldi, L., Lelovas, P., Vlamis, J., et al. (2014). Chondroprotective effect of high-dose zoledronic acid: an experimental study in a rabbit model of osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Res. 32, 1646–1651. doi: 10.1002/jor.22712
Laslett, L. L., Dore, D. A., Quinn, S. J., Boon, P., Ryan, E., Winzenberg, T. M., et al. (2012). Zoledronic acid reduces knee pain and bone marrow lesions over 1 year: a randomised controlled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 71, 1322–1328. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200970
Lee, W. S., Kim, H. J., Kim, K. I., Kim, G. B., and Jin, W. (2019). Intra-articular injection of autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a phase IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 8, 504–511. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0122
Leydet-Quilici, H., Le Corroller, T., Bouvier, C., Giorgi, R., Argenson, J. N., Champsaur, P., et al. (2010). Advanced hip osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging aspects and histopathology correlations. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 18, 1429–1435. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.08.008
Li, B., and Aspden, R. M. (1997). Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12, 641–651. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.4.641
Li, G., Ma, Y., Cheng, T. S., Landao-Bassonga, E., Qin, A., Pavlos, N. J., et al. (2014). Identical subchondral bone microarchitecture pattern with increased bone resorption in rheumatoid arthritis as compared to osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 22, 2083–2092. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.08.015
Li, G., Yin, J., Gao, J., Cheng, T. S., Pavlos, N. J., Zhang, C., et al. (2013). Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: insight into risk factors and microstructural changes. Arthritis Res. Ther. 15:223. doi: 10.1186/ar4405
Li, Y., Mu, W., Xu, B., Ren, J., Wahafu, T., Wuermanbieke, S., et al. (2019). Artesunate, an anti-malaria agent, attenuates experimental osteoarthritis by inhibiting bone resorption and CD31(hi)Emcn(hi) vessel formation in subchondral bone. Front. Pharmacol. 10:685. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00685
Lin, C., Liu, L., Zeng, C., Cui, Z. K., Chen, Y., Lai, P., et al. (2019). Activation of mTORC1 in subchondral bone preosteoblasts promotes osteoarthritis by stimulating bone sclerosis and secretion of CXCL12. Bone Res. 7:5. doi: 10.1038/s41413-018-0041-8
Lindstrom, E., Rizoska, B., Tunblad, K., Edenius, C., Bendele, A. M., Maul, D., et al. (2018). The selective cathepsin K inhibitor MIV-711 attenuates joint pathology in experimental animal models of osteoarthritis. J. Transl. Med. 16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1425-7
Liu, X. S., Sajda, P., Saha, P. K., Wehrli, F. W., Bevill, G., Keaveny, T. M., et al. (2008). Complete volumetric decomposition of individual trabecular plates and rods and its morphological correlations with anisotropic elastic moduli in human trabecular bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 23, 223–235. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.071009
Lories, R. J., and Luyten, F. P. (2011). The bone-cartilage unit in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 7, 43–49. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.197
Lu, J., Zhang, H., Cai, D., Zeng, C., Lai, P., Shao, Y., et al. (2018). Positive-feedback regulation of subchondral H-type vessel formation by chondrocyte promotes osteoarthritis development in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 33, 909–920. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3388
Lu, L., Dai, C., Zhang, Z., Du, H., Li, S., Ye, P., et al. (2019). Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with intra-articular injection of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase IIb clinical trial. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10:143. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1248-3
Mapp, P. I., and Walsh, D. A. (2012). Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 390–398. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.80
Massicotte, F., Lajeunesse, D., Benderdour, M., Pelletier, J. P., Hilal, G., Duval, N., et al. (2002). Can altered production of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, transforming growth factor-beta and prostaglandin E(2) by isolated human subchondral osteoblasts identify two subgroups of osteoarthritic patients. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 10, 491–500. doi: 10.1053/joca.2002.0528
Matas, J., Orrego, M., Amenabar, D., Infante, C., Tapia-Limonchi, R., Cadiz, M. I., et al. (2019). Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for knee osteoarthritis: repeated MSC dosing is superior to a single MSC dose and to hyaluronic acid in a controlled randomized phase I/II trial. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 8, 215–224. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0053
Matsumoto, Y., Tanaka, K., Hirata, G., Hanada, M., Matsuda, S., Shuto, T., et al. (2002). Possible involvement of the vascular endothelial growth factor-Flt-1-focal adhesion kinase pathway in chemotaxis and the cell proliferation of osteoclast precursor cells in arthritic joints. J. Immunol. 168, 5824–5831. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5824
Mazur, C. M., Woo, J. J., Yee, C. S., Fields, A. J., Acevedo, C., Bailey, K. N., et al. (2019). Osteocyte dysfunction promotes osteoarthritis through MMP13-dependent suppression of subchondral bone homeostasis. Bone Res. 7:34. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0070-y
Mcclung, M. R., O'donoghue, M. L., Papapoulos, S. E., Bone, H., Langdahl, B., Saag, K. G., et al. (2019). Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of the LOFT multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and LOFT Extension study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 7, 899–911. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30346-8
McErlain, D. D., Ulici, V., Darling, M., Gati, J. S., Pitelka, V., Beier, F., et al. (2012). An in vivo investigation of the initiation and progression of subchondral cysts in a rodent model of secondary osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 14:R26. doi: 10.1186/ar3727
Mcgibbon, C. A., Brandon, S. C. E., Brookshaw, M., and Sexton, A. (2017). Effects of an over-ground exoskeleton on external knee moments during stance phase of gait in healthy adults. Knee 24, 977–993. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.04.004
Mullard, A. (2016). Merck &Co. drops osteoporosis drug odanacatib. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15:669. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.207
Muratovic, D., Cicuttini, F., Wluka, A., Findlay, D., Wang, Y., Otto, S., et al. (2016). Bone marrow lesions detected by specific combination of MRI sequences are associated with severity of osteochondral degeneration. Arthritis Res. Ther. 18, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0953-x
Murray, I. R., Chahla, J., Safran, M. R., Krych, A. J., Saris, D. B. F., Caplan, A. I., et al. (2019). International expert consensus on a cell therapy communication tool: DOSES. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 101, 904–911. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00915
Nagai, T., Sato, M., Kobayashi, M., Yokoyama, M., Tani, Y., and Mochida, J. (2014). Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, inhibits osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 16:427. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0427-y
Nakashima, T., Hayashi, M., Fukunaga, T., Kurata, K., Oh-Hora, M., Feng, J. Q., et al. (2011). Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat. Med. 17, 1231–1234. doi: 10.1038/nm.2452
Nevitt, M. C., Cummings, S. R., Lane, N. E., Hochberg, M. C., Scott, J. C., Pressman, A. R., et al. (1996). Association of estrogen replacement therapy with the risk of osteoarthritis of the hip in elderly white women. Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Arch. Intern. Med. 156, 2073–2080. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1996.00440170081009
Orth, P., Duffner, J., Zurakowski, D., Cucchiarini, M., and Madry, H. (2016). Small-diameter awls improve articular cartilage repair after microfracture treatment in a translational animal model. Am. J. Sports Med. 44, 209–219. doi: 10.1177/0363546515610507
Pan, J., Zhou, X., Li, W., Novotny, J. E., Doty, S. B., and Wang, L. (2009). In situ measurement of transport between subchondral bone and articular cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 27, 1347–1352. doi: 10.1002/jor.20883
Park, Y. B., Ha, C. W., Lee, C. H., Yoon, Y. C., and Park, Y. G. (2017). Cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritic patients by a composite of allogeneic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronate hydrogel: results from a clinical trial for safety and proof-of-concept with 7 years of extended follow-up. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6, 613–621. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2016-0157
Peterson, L., Vasiliadis, H. S., Brittberg, M., and Lindahl, A. (2010). Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a long-term follow-up. Am. J. Sports Med. 38, 1117–1124. doi: 10.1177/0363546509357915
Pfeifer, C. G., Fisher, M. B., Saxena, V., Kim, M., Henning, E. A., Steinberg, D. A., et al. (2017). Age-dependent subchondral bone remodeling and cartilage repair in a minipig defect model. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 23, 745–753. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0109
Radin, E. L., Martin, R. B., Burr, D. B., Caterson, B., Boyd, R. D., and Goodwin, C. (1984). Effects of mechanical loading on the tissues of the rabbit knee. J. Orthop. Res. 2, 221–234. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100020303
Reginster, J. Y., Badurski, J., Bellamy, N., Bensen, W., Chapurlat, R., Chevalier, X., et al. (2013). Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 179–186. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202231
Robling, A. G., and Bonewald, L. F. (2020). The osteocyte: new insights. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 82, 485–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034332
Rogers, M. J., Crockett, J. C., Coxon, F. P., and Monkkonen, J. (2011). Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates. Bone 49, 34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.008
Rosa, R. G., Collavino, K., Lakhani, A., Delve, E., Weber, J. F., Rosenthal, A. K., et al. (2014). Clodronate exerts an anabolic effect on articular chondrocytes mediated through the purinergic receptor pathway. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 22, 1327–1336. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.009
Sampson, E. R., Hilton, M. J., Tian, Y., Chen, D., Schwarz, E. M., Mooney, R. A., et al. (2011). Teriparatide as a chondroregenerative therapy for injury-induced osteoarthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 3:101ra193. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002214
Sanchez, C., Deberg, M. A., Bellahcene, A., Castronovo, V., Msika, P., Delcour, J. P., et al. (2008). Phenotypic characterization of osteoblasts from the sclerotic zones of osteoarthritic subchondral bone. Arthritis Rheum. 58, 442–455. doi: 10.1002/art.23159
Sanchez, C., Mazzucchelli, G., Lambert, C., Comblain, F., Depauw, E., and Henrotin, Y. (2018). Comparison of secretome from osteoblasts derived from sclerotic versus non-sclerotic subchondral bone in OA: a pilot study. PLoS ONE 13:e0194591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194591
Schett, G., Hayer, S., Zwerina, J., Redlich, K., and Smolen, J. S. (2005). Mechanisms of disease: the link between RANKL and arthritic bone disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 1, 47–54. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0036
Sekiya, I., Muneta, T., Horie, M., and Koga, H. (2015). Arthroscopic Transplantation of synovial stem cells improves clinical outcomes in knees with cartilage defects. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 473, 2316–2326. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4324-8
Shapiro, S. A., Kazmerchak, S. E., Heckman, M. G., Zubair, A. C., and O'Connor, M. I. (2017). A prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial of bone marrow aspirate concentrate for knee osteoarthritis. Am. J. Sports Med. 45, 82–90. doi: 10.1177/0363546516662455
Shimomura, K., Yasui, Y., Koizumi, K., Chijimatsu, R., Hart, DA., Yonetani, Y., et al. (2018). First-in-human pilot study of implantation of a scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct generated from autologous synovial mesenchymal stem cells for repair of knee chondral lesions. Am. J. Sports Med. 46, 2384–2393. doi: 10.1177/0363546518781825
Sims, N. A., and Martin, T. J. (2020). Osteoclasts provide coupling signals to osteoblast lineage cells through multiple mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 82, 507–529. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034425
Sims, N. A., Martin, T. J., and Quinn, J. M. W. (2015). “Coupling: the influences of immune and bone cells,” in Osteoimmunology: Interactions of the Immune and Skeletal Systems, eds. J. Lorenzo, M. C. Horowitz, Y. Choi, H. Takayanagi, and G. Schett. 2 ed. (London: Academic Press), 169–185.
Soki, F. N., Yoshida, R., Paglia, D. N., Duong, L. T., Hansen, M. F., and Drissi, H. (2018). Articular cartilage protection in Ctsk(-/-) mice is associated with cellular and molecular changes in subchondral bone and cartilage matrix. J. Cell. Physiol. 233, 8666–8676. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26745
Song, Y., Du, H., Dai, C., Zhang, L., Li, S., Hunter, D. J., et al. (2018). Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for osteoarthritis: a pilot study with long-term follow-up and repeated injections. Regen. Med. 13, 295–307. doi: 10.2217/rme-2017-0152
Su, W., Liu, G., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Sun, Q., Zhen, G., et al. (2020). Angiogenesis stimulated by elevated PDGF-BB in subchondral bone contributes to osteoarthritis development. JCI Insight 5:135446. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.135446
Sun, H., Wu, Y., Pan, Z., Yu, D., Chen, P., Zhang, X., et al. (2018). Gefitinib for epidermal growth factor receptor activated osteoarthritis subpopulation treatment. EBioMedicine 32, 223–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.06.002
Suri, S., Gill, S. E., Massena De Camin, S., Wilson, D., Mcwilliams, D. F., and Walsh, D. A. (2007). Neurovascular invasion at the osteochondral junction and in osteophytes in osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 66, 1423–1428. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.063354
Taljanovic, M. S., Graham, A. R., Benjamin, J. B., Gmitro, A. F., Krupinski, E. A., Schwartz, S. A., et al. (2008). Bone marrow edema pattern in advanced hip osteoarthritis: quantitative assessment with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with clinical examination, radiographic findings, and histopathology. Skeletal Radiol. 37, 423–431. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0446-3
Tanamas, S. K., Wluka, A. E., Pelletier, J. P., Pelletier, J. M., Abram, F., Berry, P. A., et al. (2010). Bone marrow lesions in people with knee osteoarthritis predict progression of disease and joint replacement: a longitudinal study. Rheumatology 49, 2413–2419. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq286
Tat, S. K., Pelletier, J. P., Mineau, F., Caron, J., and Martel-Pelletier, J. (2011). Strontium ranelate inhibits key factors affecting bone remodeling in human osteoarthritic subchondral bone osteoblasts. Bone 49, 559–567. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.06.005
Tatsumi, S., Ishii, K., Amizuka, N., Li, M., Kobayashi, T., Kohno, K., et al. (2007). Targeted ablation of osteocytes induces osteoporosis with defective mechanotransduction. Cell. Metab. 5, 464–475. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.001
Teichtahl, A. J., Wluka, A. E., Wijethilake, P., Wang, Y., Ghasem-Zadeh, A., and Cicuttini, F. M. (2015). Wolff's law in action: a mechanism for early knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 17:207. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0738-7
Teitelbaum, S. L. (2000). Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 289, 1504–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504
Tran Van, P., Vignery, A., and Baron, R. (1982). An electron-microscopic study of the bone-remodeling sequence in the rat. Cell Tissue Res. 225, 283–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00214682
Tu, M., Yang, M., Yu, N., Zhen, G., Wan, M., Liu, W., et al. (2019). Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 activity in subchondral bone modifies a subtype of osteoarthritis. Bone Res. 7:29. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0071-x
Vaysbrot, E. E., Osani, M. C., Musetti, M. C., Mcalindon, T. E., and Bannuru, R. R. (2018). Are bisphosphonates efficacious in knee osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 26, 154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.11.013
Wakitani, S., Imoto, K., Yamamoto, T., Saito, M., Murata, N., and Yoneda, M. (2002). Human autologous culture expanded bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation for repair of cartilage defects in osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 10, 199–206. doi: 10.1053/joca.2001.0504
Wakitani, S., Nawata, M., Tensho, K., Okabe, T., Machida, H., and Ohgushi, H. (2007). Repair of articular cartilage defects in the patello-femoral joint with autologous bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation: three case reports involving nine defects in five knees. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 1, 74–79. doi: 10.1002/term.8
Wang, L., You, X., Lotinun, S., Zhang, L., Wu, N., and Zou, W. (2020). Mechanical sensing protein PIEZO1 regulates bone homeostasis via osteoblast-osteoclast crosstalk. Nat. Commun. 11:282. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14146-6
Wang, T., Wen, C. Y., Yan, C. H., Lu, W. W., and Chiu, K. Y. (2013). Spatial and temporal changes of subchondral bone proceed to microscopic articular cartilage degeneration in guinea pigs with spontaneous osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 21, 574–581. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.01.002
Wen, Z. H., Tang, C. C., Chang, Y. C., Huang, S. Y., Lin, Y. Y., Hsieh, S. P., et al. (2016). Calcitonin attenuates cartilage degeneration and nociception in an experimental rat model of osteoarthritis: role of TGF-beta in chondrocytes. Sci. Rep. 6:28862. doi: 10.1038/srep28862
Wilson, A. J., Murphy, W. A., Hardy, D. C., and Totty, W. G. (1988). Transient osteoporosis: transient bone marrow edema? Radiology 167, 757–760. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.3.3363136
Wu, H., Xu, T., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Li, K., Chen, P. S., et al. (2020). Specific inhibition of FAK signaling attenuates subchondral bone deterioration and articular cartilage degeneration during osteoarthritis pathogenesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 235, 8653–8666. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29709
Xian, L., Wu, X., Pang, L., Lou, M., Rosen, C. J., Qiu, T., et al. (2012). Matrix IGF-1 maintains bone mass by activation of mTOR in mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Med. 18, 1095–1101. doi: 10.1038/nm.2793
Xie, H., Cui, Z., Wang, L., Xia, Z., Hu, Y., Xian, L., et al. (2014). PDGF-BB secreted by preosteoclasts induces angiogenesis during coupling with osteogenesis. Nat. Med. 20, 1270–1278. doi: 10.1038/nm.3668
Xiong, J., Onal, M., Jilka, R. L., Weinstein, R. S., Manolagas, S. C., and O'brien, C. A. (2011). Matrix-embedded cells control osteoclast formation. Nat. Med. 17, 1235–1241. doi: 10.1038/nm.2448
Yang, P. Y., Tang, C. C., Chang, Y. C., Huang, S. Y., Hsieh, S. P., Fan, S. S., et al. (2014). Effects of tibolone on osteoarthritis in ovariectomized rats: association with nociceptive pain behaviour. Eur. J. Pain 18, 680–690. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00406.x
Zhang, X., Cai, D., Zhou, F., Yu, J., Wu, X., Yu, D., et al. (2020). Targeting downstream subcellular YAP activity as a function of matrix stiffness with Verteporfin-encapsulated chitosan microsphere attenuates osteoarthritis. Biomaterials 232:119724. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119724
Zhao, K., Lin, J., Wu, B., Sun, G., An, C., Paul, M. E., et al. (2018). Diagnosis of osteoarthritis subtypes with blood biomarkers. bioRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/366047
Zhen, G., Wen, C., Jia, X., Li, Y., Crane, J. L., Mears, S. C., et al. (2013). Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling in mesenchymal stem cells of subchondral bone attenuates osteoarthritis. Nat. Med. 19, 704–712. doi: 10.1038/nm.3143
Zhou, T., Gao, B., Fan, Y., Liu, Y., Feng, S., Cong, Q., et al. (2020). Piezo1/2 mediate mechanotransduction essential for bone formation through concerted activation of NFAT-YAP1-ss-catenin. Elife 9:e52779. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52779.sa2
Zhu, J., Zhen, G., An, S., Wang, X., Wan, M., Li, Y., et al. (2020). Aberrant subchondral osteoblastic metabolism modifies NaV1.8 for osteoarthritis. Elife 9:e57656. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57656
Zhu, S., Chen, K., Lan, Y., Zhang, N., Jiang, R., and Hu, J. (2013). Alendronate protects against articular cartilage erosion by inhibiting subchondral bone loss in ovariectomized rats. Bone 53, 340–349. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.12.044
Keywords: osteoarthritis, subchondral bone, cellular and molecular targets, subchondral bone remodeling, regenerative therapy, stem cells
Citation: Zhu X, Chan YT, Yung PSH, Tuan RS and Jiang Y (2021) Subchondral Bone Remodeling: A Therapeutic Target for Osteoarthritis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8:607764. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.607764
Received: 18 September 2020; Accepted: 28 December 2020;
Published: 21 January 2021.
Edited by:
Jiake Xu, University of Western Australia, AustraliaReviewed by:
David M. Findlay, University of Adelaide, AustraliaAkhilesh Kumar, Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR), India
Copyright © 2021 Zhu, Chan, Yung, Tuan and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yangzi Jiang, eWFuZ3pqaWFuZzIxJiN4MDAwNDA7Y3Voay5lZHUuaGs=; Rocky S. Tuan, dHVhbnImI3gwMDA0MDtjdWhrLmVkdS5oaw==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work