Abstract
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex network of proteins and proteoglycans secreted by keratinocytes, fibroblasts and immune cells. The function of the skin ECM has expanded from being a scaffold that provides structural integrity, to a more dynamic entity that is constantly remodeled to maintain tissue homeostasis. The ECM functions as ligands for cell surface receptors such as integrins, dystroglycans, and toll-like receptors (TLRs) and regulate cellular signaling and immune cell dynamics. The ECM also acts as a sink for growth factors and cytokines, providing critical cues during epithelial morphogenesis. Dysregulation in the organization and deposition of ECMs lead to a plethora of pathophysiological conditions that are exacerbated by aberrant ECM-immune cell interactions. In this review, we focus on the interplay between ECM and immune cells in the context of skin diseases and also discuss state of the art therapies that target the key molecular players involved.
Introduction
Homeostasis in the skin, the largest organ of the body, is critical for maintaining its structural, protective and regulatory functions. Alterations in this homeostasis, as seen in major skin disorders such as Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Psoriasis, Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB), and skin cancer, lead to impaired skin hydration, thermoregulation, and increased susceptibility to infections (Mellerio, 2010; Romanovsky, 2014; Nyström and Bruckner-Tuderman, 2018). An important role in exacerbating the disease condition is played by dysregulated interactions between two important goal keepers of skin function, the immune cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM). Immune cells play a critical role in the breakdown, synthesis, and remodeling of ECM components that are important for physiological processes such as mammary gland remodeling, lung branching morphogenesis and wound healing (Allori et al., 2008; Rozario and DeSimone, 2010). ECM components such as laminin and collagens, on the other hand, act as ligands for immune cells and facilitate their adhesion and trafficking (Simon and Bromberg, 2017). Proteolytic enzymes secreted by the immune cells generate fragmented laminin and collagen peptides that can serve as chemotactic signals for the recruitment of immune cells (Bonnans et al., 2014). Moreover, ECM components and their physical properties can drive specific activation states of immune cells such as macrophages (McWhorter et al., 2015). In certain chronic disease conditions, excess ECM deposition results in fibrosis that can later develop into cancer (Bonnans et al., 2014). Therefore, maintaining a balance between remodeling by the immune system and ECM dynamics becomes critical to maintain homeostasis.
Skin diseases are largely incurable and therefore remain a major burden; globally posing an adverse socio-economic and psychological impact on the affected populations. The prevalence estimates of psoriasis can go as high as 1% in the U.S. to 8.5% in Norway (Parisi et al., 2013). AD affects up to one-fifth of the population in developed countries (Weidinger and Novak, 2016). Skin cancers, especially non-melanoma skin cancer affects over 3 million Americans yearly with high mortality rates (Apalla et al., 2017). The prevalence of EB has risen to 11.07 per million live births globally and the numbers continue to rise (Fine, 2016). Commonly used treatment regimes for skin diseases include, the use of topical steroids and anti-inflammatory medications to control disease progression (Thomas et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2018). However, there is a paucity of curative therapies, which necessitates further understanding of the mechanisms that exacerbate the disease condition. Thus, focusing on the crosstalk between ECM and immune cells in skin diseases may help identify better targets for therapeutic interventions. In this review, we highlight the bidirectional interactions between ECM and immune cells in the major skin diseases and discuss the therapeutic strategies for dampening this “War of the Titans.”
The Skin and its ECM
Mammalian skin comprises of a stratified epithelium known as the epidermis and a connective tissue layer termed the dermis. The epidermis is made up of specialized cells containing keratin intermediate filaments known as keratinocytes and is stratified into different layers, namely, basal (stratum basale), suprabasal (stratum spinosum), granular (stratum granulosum), and cornified (stratum corneum) layers (Figure 1) (Fuchs and Raghavan, 2002; Breitkreutz et al., 2013). The basal keratinocytes comprise a pool of proliferating stem cells, which undergo terminal differentiation and eventually lose their nuclei to form the outermost cornified layer (Blanpain and Fuchs, 2006). Each of these epidermal layers is characterized by the expression of different structural proteins. The basal keratinocytes express keratin 5 and 14, which are replaced by keratin 1 and 10 as they differentiate into the spinous layer. The granular layer, as the name suggests, contains keratohyalin granules made up of lipids and precursors of proteins such as loricrin, filaggrin, and involucrin. These proteins and lipids are covalently crosslinked by transglutaminase to form the outermost layer, the stratum corneum that is 10–30 cell layers thick. The stratum corneum is composed of flattened, and enucleated cells embedded in matrix that is rich in proteins and insoluble lipids (Candi et al., 2005). Mutations in any of the above mentioned genes can lead to skin diseases, some of which are discussed later in the review (Chandran, 2013). The dermis is a highly vascularized tissue comprising of fibroblasts, adipocytes and various pools of innate and adaptive immune cells (Mueller et al., 2014). It is divided into a thin upper papillary dermis with loosely arranged collagen fibrils and a thick lower reticular dermis with dense collagen packing. Furthermore, the dermal and hypodermal compartments of the skin also comprise of triglyceride rich adipocyte depot called the dermal white adipose tissue (DWAT) and subcutaneous white adipose tissue (SWAT), respectively (Driskell et al., 2014).
Figure 1
ECM components in the skin are present in the basement membrane and interstitial matrix (Frantz et al., 2010). The BM is a non-cellular array of structural ECM components that separates epidermis from dermis. It is composed of different subtypes of laminins and collagens, primarily laminin 5 (laminin-332) and collagen IV, which are non-covalently connected through perlecan and nidogen (Breitkreutz et al., 2013). This forms a highly dynamic fibrous structure that also functions as a diffusion barrier and serves as a repository of growth factors (Jayadev and Sherwood, 2017). The interstitial matrix is localized to the interstitial spaces in the dermal compartments. These primarily comprise of other collagen subtypes that also impart structural stability to the tissue (Bonnans et al., 2014). Additionally, there are non-structural ECM components called matricellular proteins that are synthesized by the epidermal and dermal cells during development and under non-homeostatic conditions. Matricellular proteins are involved in modulating cell function by interacting with structural ECM proteins as well as with various receptors, hormones and proteases. These interactions are a function of local availability of growth factors and overall composition of the ECM. Tenascin-C (TNC), thrombospondin (TSP), a secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), osteopontin (OPN), decorin, periostin (POSTN), and cysteine-rich protein 61 (CCN-1) are some of the major matricellular proteins (Bornstein, 2009). While basement membrane components are relatively stable, matricellular proteins undergo rapid turnover (Bonnans et al., 2014).
Organization of the BM components is mediated through transmembrane heterodimeric cell surface receptors called integrins that are expressed by the basal keratinocytes (Hynes, 2002; Andriani et al., 2003). Integrins are composed of α and β subunits. There are 18 α and 8 β subunits that form 24 different combinations. In the skin epidermis, α2β1, α3β1, and α6β4 are the main integrin pairs that are expressed (Watt and Fujiwara, 2011). Integrin β4 and β1 are components of multi-protein cell-substratum junctional complexes known as hemidesmosomes and focal adhesions, respectively. These structures facilitate the adherence of basal keratinocytes to its underlying BM either via intermediate filaments (in hemidesmosomes) or via actin cytoskeleton network (in focal adhesions) (Tsuruta et al., 2011). ECM-integrin signaling at the BM is indispensable for several cellular processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, migration, and apoptosis (Hegde and Raghavan, 2013). Any disruptions in the ECM-integrin interactions lead to adhesion defects (Nelson and Larsen, 2015). Recent work from our laboratory uncovered the importance of ECM-integrin interaction in embryonic skin homeostasis. We showed that loss of integrin β1 in embryonic skin results in ECM degradation that is exacerbated through a sterile inflammatory response (Kurbet et al., 2016).
Immunomodulatory functions of ECM
ECM molecules are potent regulators of immune cell function (Table 1). Alterations in the structure and composition of ECM in disease conditions provide immune cells with physical and biochemical cues that, in turn, affect their activation states. Several studies have shown that both enzymatically digested ECM components as well as intact ECM proteins can modulate activation, fate determination, and chemotaxis of immune cells (Lu et al., 2011; Hallmann et al., 2015; Simon and Bromberg, 2017).
Table 1
| ECM component | Immune functions | ECM related skin diseases | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS | |||
| Laminin | • Laminin affects adhesion, migration, and proliferation of immune cells via integrin signaling. • Fragments or processed peptides of laminin chains act as DAMPs (damage associated molecular patterns), and can affect gene expression of cytokines and MMPs (Matrix metalloproteinases). | JEB and anti-laminin γ1 pemphigoid. | Adair-Kirk and Senior, 2008; Kamata et al., 2013; Senyürek et al., 2014; Simon and Bromberg, 2017 |
| Collagen | • Collagen can bind to immune receptors thereby activating them that, in turn, can inhibit cytotoxic functions of natural killer and T cells. Collagen can affect proliferation of other immune cells. • Collagen can interact with other immune activating matricellular proteins such as cochlin to mount anti-pathogenic responses. • Collagen fragments can increase secretion of IL-1β by blood monocytes. | RDEB (Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa), EBA (Epidermolysis bullosa aquisita), Systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma. | Jimenez et al., 1996; Meyaard et al., 1997; Stultz et al., 2007; Rygiel et al., 2011; An and Brodsky, 2016; Nyström et al., 2018 |
| Elastin | • Elastin peptides act as chemotactic agents for immune cells. | Cutis laxa, pseudoxanthonum elasticum | Uitto and Shamban, 1987; Fulop et al., 2012 |
| ECM-1 | • ECM-1 suppresses Th17 responses and can be secreted by Th2 immune cells in autoimmune diseases. • ECM-1 can interact with αv integrins and block TGF-β activation. | Lipoid proteinosis, lichen sclerosus | Oyama et al., 2003; Su et al., 2016 |
| Fibronectin | • Fibronectin variants obtained by splicing and partial folding can activate TLR signaling and induce secretion of cytokines and chemokines by fibroblasts. • Fibronectin can be produced by Th1 cells and may be important in opsonizing intracellular pathogens. | Atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, perforating skin disorders. | Sandig et al., 2009; McFadden et al., 2011; Kelsh et al., 2014 |
| MATRICELLULAR COMPONENTS | |||
| Tenascin C | • Tenascin affects adhesion properties of monocytes, B and T cells. • Tenascin C binds to TLR-2 & TLR-4 and initiates a pro-inflammatory cascade. | Basal cell carcinoma, psoriasis, solar keratosis, Bowen's diseases | Rüegg et al., 1989; Schalkwijk et al., 1991; Zuliani-Alvarez et al., 2017 |
| Osteopontin | • OPN promotes Th17 and Th1 while suppressing Th2 responses. | Systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, contact dermatitis | Mori et al., 2008; Buback et al., 2009; Reduta et al., 2015 |
| CCN | • CCN helps in macrophage adhesion via binding to cognate integrin receptors. • CCN activates NFκB mediated transcription followed by a pro-inflammatory cascade. • Promotes IL1β secretion by psoriatic keratinocytes. | Psoriasis, scleroderma | Bai et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2015; Henrot et al., 2018 |
| Decorin | • Mounts pro-inflammatory responses by binding to TLR-2 and -4 or by suppressing TGF-β responses. | Delayed type hypersensitivity | Yamaguchi et al., 1990; Seidler et al., 2011; Bocian et al., 2013; Frey et al., 2013 |
| TSP-1 | • Promotes anti-tumor M1 macrophage recruitment via release of reactive oxygen species. • Facilitates adhesion of neutrophils and serves as chemotactic agent for monocytes and neutrophils. • Activates TGF-β | N/A | Bornstein, 2001; Martin-Manso et al., 2008 |
| Periostin (POSTN) | • Activates keratinocytes by binding to αv integrins and stimulates them to secrete TSLP that can trigger a Th2 response. | Atopic dermatitis, dermal fibrosis | Liu et al., 2014; Yamaguchi, 2014 |
Immune functions of ECM.
Skin Immune Cell Repertoire and its Role in Maintaining ECM Dynamics
The skin contains a diverse population of immune cells that continuously surveil the organ to protect from assaults and maintain homeostasis. The epidermal and dermal compartments of the skin have distinct populations of immune cells that perform multiple functions including antigen cross-presentation to effector cells, tolerance induction, mediation of inflammation, promotion of growth and repair, regulation of stem cell quiescence, and maintenance of epidermal differentiation (Di Meglio et al., 2011). Langerhan cells and dendritic epidermal T cells are primarily located in the epidermis while, distinct populations of other dendritic cells and macrophages are present in the dermis (Heath and Carbone, 2013). Mast cells and T cell populations including αβ, γδT, Tregs, Th17, and memory T cells get recruited to both the epidermis and dermis depending on the homeostatic status of the skin (Matejuk, 2018). Details of the expression markers, location, and regulatory roles of immune cells in maintaining skin homeostasis are listed in Table 2.
Table 2
| Immune cell | Subsets | Marker expression | Localization | Functions in skin | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Mouse | |||||
| Dendritic cells (CD11c+, MHC-ll+) | Epidermal dendritic cells | |||||
| Langerhans cells | CD1a+CD80,CD86,HLA-DR+CD83DC-LAMP | CD207+ (Langerin), CD11b+, CD103−, CD86+, EpCAM+, SIRPa+ | Epidermis, ORS of hair follicle | • Antigen cross-presentation. • Th17 cell differentiation. • CD4+ follicular helper T cell and Th2 cell proliferation. • IgE production during allergic conditions. • Tolerance induction. • Activation of skin resident regulatory cells. • Mediation of inflammation. | Hoeffel et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2016; Kaplan, 2017 | |
| Dermal dendritic cells | ||||||
| 1. Langerin+ DC | CD141hi, CD14+ | CD45+, CD11blo, CD11c, MHC-II+, CD103+, XCR1+, EpCam−, Sirpa− | Dermis | • Phagocytosis of cell debris and infectious microorganism. • Activation of naïve T cells through antigen presentation. • Regulation of Th1 responses. • Promotion of cytotoxic and memory responses of CD8+ T cells. | Nagao et al., 2009; Henri et al., 2010; Chu et al., 2011; Flacher et al., 2014; Mildner and Jung, 2014 | |
| 2. CD11B+ DC | CD1a+, CD1c+ | CD45+, CD11b++, CD11c, MHC class II, CD205+, CD103 -EpCam−, Sirpa+ | Dermis | • Clearance of infection. | ||
| 3. Langerin-XCR1− DC | ND | CD207−, CD11b−, EpCAM−, Sirpa+, XCR1−, CX3CD1++ | Dermis | ND | ||
| Macrophage | CD11b, F4/80, CD163, factor XIIIa, CD16, CD32 and CD64 | CD45+, MHC II+, MERTK+, CCRlo, F4/80, CD64+ | Dermis | • Phagocytosis. • Modulation of tissue environment. • Promotion and suppression of inflammation. • Extravasation of neutrophils during inflammation. • Regulation of hair bulge stem cell populations. | Malissen et al., 2014; Yanez et al., 2017 | |
| T cells CD3+ | Dendritic epidermal T cells CD8+, Vγ3Vδ1 TCR | Epidermis and ORS of hair follicle | • Regulation of antimicrobial function. • Prevention of tumor formation. • Promotion of wound closure. • Maintenance of keratinocyte homeostasis through production of growth factors. | Macleod et al., 2013 | ||
| Memory T cells (Trm) (CD8+, CD103+) | ||||||
| 1. Epidermal Trm | CD45RO+,CLA+,CCR4+ | CD49+, CD49 | Epidermis | • Antimicrobial defense. | Clark et al., 2006; Zaid et al., 2014; Cheuk et al., 2017 | |
| 2. Dermal Trm | CD49−, CD4+ | Dermis | • Antimicrobial defense. | |||
| γδT cells (DETC) | CD8+, γδ TCR+ | CD8+, γδ TCR+ | Epidermis and dermis | • Promotion of Hair follicle regeneration. • Extravasation of neutrophils during inflammation. • Synthesis of keratinocytes and fibroblast growth factors. | Bos et al., 1990; Sumaria et al., 2011; Gay et al., 2013; Cruz et al., 2018 | |
| αβT cells | CD8+/CD4+,αβ TCR + | CD8+/CD4+, αβTCR + | Epidermis and dermis | • Cytokine synthesis during tissue damage and infection. • Regulation of hair cycle. • Recruitment of other immune cells. • Promoting cell cytotoxicity. | ||
| Regulatory T cells (Tregs) | FOXP3+, CD45RO+,CD4+,CD25+,CD127− | FOXP3+, CD25+ | Around hair follicles | • Epithelial stem cell differentiation. • IL-17 secretion in inflammatory condition. • Maintenance of self-tolerance. • Suppression of inflammation. | Clark, 2010; Sakaguchi et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2017 | |
| Th17 cells | CD4+,RORC+,CD161+ | CD4+, CD161+, CCR6+, IL17A+, RORyt+ | Epidermis and dermis | • Protection against pathogens by inducing synthesis of antimicrobial peptides. • Promotes synthesis of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. | Koga et al., 2008; Maggi et al., 2010; Peck and Mellins, 2010 | |
| Mast cells | FcyRI−, FcyRIIa,CD30 | CD117+, CD25+ | Epidermis and dermis | • Pathogens, production of antimicrobial peptides. • Regulation of allergic responses. • Maintenance of epidermal differentiation. | Sehra et al., 2016 | |
Immune cell repertoire in skin.
Immune cells are one of the most important regulators of ECM degradation, synthesis, assembly and remodeling. Mechanisms by which immune cells accomplish this include–(i) synthesis of enzymes that remodel ECM components, (ii) synthesis of cytokines and growth factors that induce ECM synthesis or degradation, and (iii) synthesis of ECM components.
Synthesis of enzymes that remodel ECM components: Metalloproteinases are enzymes secreted by the immune cells that cleave ECM proteins leading to alterations in the physical and biochemical properties of the tissue. Degradation of ECM by metalloproteinases aids in the trafficking of immune cells, generates bioactive peptides, and releases the sequestered growth factors (Mott and Werb, 2004). Metalloproteinases include MMPs, (matrix metalloproteinases) adamlysins including ADAMS (a disintegrin and metalloproteinases), ADAMTs (ADAMs containing a thrombospondin motif), Meprins as well as serine proteases such as plasmins, granzymes, and cathepsins. These enzymes cleave collagens (MMP-1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -9, -10, -11, -12, -13, -14, -16, -19, -25, -26; ADAM-10, -12 and -15; Meprin a and b), elastins (MMP-2, -3, -7, -9, -10, -11, - 12), gelatins (MMP-2, -3, -7, -9, -12, -14, -15, -16, -17, -23A, - 23B, -24, -25; ADAM-9, -10, -12, -15), aggrecans (MMP-3, -13; ADAMTs), and laminins (MMP-3, -7, -11, -12, -14, -15, -19, Meprin α and β) (Bonnans et al., 2014). Several studies have highlighted the important roles played by metalloproteinases, derived from immune cells, in remodeling the ECM thereby driving the pathophysiology and severity of various diseases. The T cell repertoire, particularly Th1 cells secrete gelatinases, MMP-2 and -9 that further stimulate the release of gelatinases from macrophages (Oviedo-Orta et al., 2008). In squamous cell carcinoma, mast cells, macrophages and neutrophils secrete MMP-9 that exacerbates the disease condition by increasing keratinocyte hyperproliferation and metastasis (Coussens et al., 2000). Dendritic and Langerhans cells in skin secrete MMP-2 and -9 to facilitate their trans-epithelial migration for antigen presentation (Ratzinger et al., 2002). Monocytes and lung resident macrophages are the primary source of MMP-8 that eventually contributes to fibrosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (Craig et al., 2014). Likewise, MMP-8 and -12 is synthesized by neutrophils and macrophages in cystic fibrosis accelerating disease progression (Wagner et al., 2016). Increased expression of MMP-9 by splenic and infiltrating T cells correlates with the growth in mammary tumors (Owen et al., 2003). Furthermore, in UVB irradiated skin, neutrophil elastase causes the degradation of ECM components by activating MMP-1, and MMP-2 (Takeuchi et al., 2010).
Synthesis of cytokines and growth factors that induce ECM synthesis or degradation: Cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, and IL-33) and growth factors (TGF-β) secreted by immune cells stimulate the synthesis of ECM components (Verrecchia et al., 2001; Fujitsu et al., 2003; Rankin et al., 2010). In mouse dermal fibroblasts, TGF-β signaling results in the activation of SMAD2/3, which, in turn, increases the expression of ECM, related genes such as Col1a1 and Col3a1 (Verrecchia et al., 2001; Li et al., 2003). IL-13 produced by innate lymphoid cells stimulates the differentiation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts increasing collagen synthesis and its accumulation in fibrosis (Fichtner-Feigl et al., 2006). In bronchial asthma, Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 stimulate the synthesis of periostin from bronchial fibrocytes, leading to sub-epithelial fibrosis (Takayama et al., 2006; Aoudjehane et al., 2008). On the other hand, IL-6 and TNF-α produced by inflammatory immune cells can reduce the synthesis of MMP-2, which, in turn, protects liver hepatocytes from fibrosis (Bansal et al., 2005).
Synthesis of ECM components: Immune cells can themselves be a source for various ECM proteins. Macrophages and T cells present in tuberculosis associated granulomas produce OPN that aid in their chemotaxis, adhesion, and proliferation (O'regan et al., 1999). In a subset of patients with systemic stenosis, circulating CD14+ monocytes overexpress versican, which is associated with the aggressive fibrosis (Masuda et al., 2013). TAMs (tumor associated åmacrophages) modify the architecture of the tumor matrix by synthesizing proteoglycans, fibronectin, OPN, SPARC and various collagen subtypes (Liguori et al., 2011).
Taken together, these studies point to a critical role played by immune cells in modulating ECM dynamics during normal development and in disease states.
Skin Diseases
Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing and TH2 cell/IgE driven inflammatory skin disorder characterized by intense pruritus and eczematous lesions (Bieber, 2008). The onset of AD is caused by barrier dysfunction, due to heritable mutations in the filaggrin (FLG) gene, and environmental triggers culminating in loss of skin hydration, enhanced sensitization to allergens and susceptibility to pathogenic agents (Weidinger and Novak, 2016). Clinical manifestations of AD occur both in children (Childhood AD) and adults (Adult AD) with similar clinical symptoms but with discrete pathophysiologies. While childhood AD is characterized by additional Th17/Th22 driven cascades along with tight junction and lipid metabolism disorders, AD in adults is associated with a Th1 specific response with aberrations in the epidermal differentiation complex (Brunner et al., 2018). AD usually precedes other allergic disorders like food allergies, allergic rhinitis, and asthma, commonly referred to as the “Atopic March,” the mechanism for which remains undefined (Dharmage et al., 2014).
Abnormalities in BM composition, suggesting ECM dysfunction, have been reported in AD. Affected skin in AD patients has decreased BM thickness, along with reduced expression of collagen-IV and integrin α6 in the BM zone (Kim et al., 2018). A report by Shin et al. (2015) also suggested that the loss of the regenerative capability of the skin correlated with lower expression of p63 protein, a putative stem cell marker, in AD affected skin (Shin et al., 2015). Several SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in LAMA3 gene correlated with increased susceptibility to AD (Stemmler et al., 2014). In acute AD, an increase in the expression of hyaluronan (HA), an extracellular polysaccharide, and hyaluronan synthase 3 (HAS3), an epidermal specific enzyme responsible for the synthesis and extracellular transport of hyaluronan, is observed (Ohtani et al., 2009). Increased expression of HA has been associated with abnormal keratinocyte differentiation, a hallmark of AD (Malaisse et al., 2014).
IL-4 and IL-13 are important cytokines known to play a critical role in AD pathogenesis. In situ hybridization studies on skin biopsy samples show a greater number of IL-13 positive cells in asymptomatic, acute and chronically affected AD patients compared to unaffected individuals (Hamid et al., 1996). Optimum expression of IL-13 is critical to maintain epidermal barrier homeostasis since both excess and insufficient levels of IL-13 provoke epidermal barrier dysfunction (Strid et al., 2016). IL-4 and IL-13 downregulate the expression of filaggrin, involucrin, loricrin, and the production of antimicrobial peptides. This exacerbates the skin barrier dysfunction and predisposes AD-affected skin to infection by microbes (Howell et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2008; Kisich et al., 2008). IL-4 is also shown to repress the expression of fibronectin in immortalized human keratinocytes (Serezani et al., 2017). In a human skin equivalent model system, IL-13 expression leads to the loss of BM structure and regenerative capability of the skin, recapitulating the AD phenotype (Shin et al., 2015). Furthermore, IL-13 treated human keratinocytes attract CD4+ CCR4+ T cells in vitro, providing a mechanism for a feed-forward loop that recruits more Th2 cells to acute AD lesions (Purwar et al., 2006). A critical correlation exists between IL-13 and MMP-9 mediated BM protein remodeling in AD. IL-13 is co-expressed with MMP-9 in skin samples from atopic eczema patients and it also increases MMP-9 synthesis in cultured keratinocytes (Purwar et al., 2008). IL-4 and IL-13 treated keratinocytes show an overexpression of TNC aggravating the inflammatory response (Ogawa et al., 2005). While mast cells and CD4+/CD8+ T cells are well known sources of IL-13 in AD affected skin, other immune cells including macrophages and dendritic cells can also be potential sources, which warrants further investigation (Obara et al., 2002). Taken together, these studies highlight the critical role played by IL-4 and IL-13 in driving AD pathogenesis.
Immune cell mediated remodeling of ECM in AD has been widely reported. BM remodeling matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) including MMP-1, -3, -7, -8, and -9 is involved in AD pathophysiology (Harper et al., 2010). AD patients have enhanced serum levels of MMP-8 and -9 (Devillers et al., 2007). An immediate early effect in increase of MMP-9 by langerhans cells is observed upon treatment of skin with hapten, a well-known model for contact hypersensitivity (Kobayashi, 1997). The hyperplasic epidermis in AD secretes thymic stromal lymphopoeitin (TSLP), an IL-2 family cytokine, that activate DCs. DCs, in turn, produce MMP-3 and -9 that aid in their migration to lymph nodes where they activate naïve T cells (Ratzinger et al., 2002). Additionally, degranulation product of epidermal mast cells in AD-affected skin is associated with increased expression of MMP-7 (Landriscina et al., 2015). These reports indicate an indirect immune cell mediated BM remodeling in the context of AD. However, focused studies addressing this crosstalk are limited.
Monocytes and macrophages also play an important role in AD pathogenesis. An insightful review on the role of macrophages in AD has been previously published (Kasraie and Werfel, 2013). In AD skin, the epidermis overexpresses monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and, this results in the recruitment of monocytes in a CCR-2 dependent manner (Vestergaard et al., 2004). Acute and chronically inflamed AD skin show enhanced infiltration of heterogeneous pools of macrophages (Kiekens et al., 2001). Immunohistochemistry and ELISA analysis of AD skin and peripheral blood show increased CD163 expressing macrophages. Their role in aggravating disease condition is suggested by in vitro studies where the macrophages show an impaired TLR-2 signaling and increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-8, and IL-6 (Niebuhr et al., 2009). Given the preponderance of evidence on ECM-macrophage crosstalk in diseases, it is tempting to speculate that these heterogeneous pools of macrophages may play an important role in ECM remodeling.
Interestingly, recent studies point to the importance of ECM driven cascades in AD pathogenesis. Mitamura et al., showed that IL-13 upregulates the synthesis of POSTN which, in turn, increases IL-24 expression in the epidermal keratinocytes. IL-24, in turn, downregulates the expression of filaggrin, that contributes to the barrier dysfunction seen in atopic dermatitis (Mitamura et al., 2018). Another study showed that, the binding of TNF superfamily member 14 (TNFSF-14) to its receptor HVEM (herpes virus entry mediator) on keratinocytes resulted in the synthesis of POSTN and development of AD. Blocking this pathway by HVEM deletion and HVEM specific antibody resulted in suppression in AD symptoms (Herro et al., 2018). The importance of OPN in AD is highlighted in several studies. Its expression is elevated in the serum of patients with allergic contact dermatitis (Reduta et al., 2015). In disease conditions, immune cells such as T cells, NKT cells, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells synthesize OPN that acts as a bridging molecule between the innate and adaptive immune system (Clemente et al., 2016). OPN promotes a pro-inflammatory environment by enhancing production of IL-12 by macrophages and suppressing IL-27 production from conventional dendritic cells, thereby activating Th1 and Th17 cells (Clemente et al., 2016). OPN binds to CD44 receptors on mast cells leading to its recruitment and degranulation (Bulfone-Paus and Paus, 2008). Thus, studies on matricellular proteins POSTN and OPN have highlighted therapeutically targetable pathways that are the key drivers of AD symptoms.
Collectively, AD is characterized by a multitude of dysregulated immune responses, as well as close bidirectional interactions with matricellular and basement membrane components that exacerbate disease pathophysiology.
Psoriasis
Psoriasis is a skin disorder associated with pathological changes such as appearance of erythematous lesions, scaling of the epidermis, inflammation, and vascular abnormalities (Nestle et al., 2009). Lesions appear as red and scaly plaques in areas like the elbow, joints, lower back, and the scalp (Boehncke and Schön, 2015). It is classified into plaque, guttate, erythrodermic, and pustular types with plaque psoriasis (or psoriasis vulgaris) being the most common type associated with about 90% of the cases (Dubois Declercq and Pouliot, 2013). Based on the age of onset of the disease, psoriasis is classified as Type I (occurs in individuals below 40 years of age) and Type II (sets in after 40 years of age) (Langley et al., 2005). Type I is more common, runs in families and is associated with more severe phenotypes compared to Type II (Schmitt-Egenolf et al., 1991). The exact cause of this disease is still unknown. However, a combination of genetic and environmental factors such as infection, injury, and various administered drugs may be responsible for disease onset (Langley et al., 2005).
Cell death due to injury or trauma is thought to trigger the keratinocytes to produce antimicrobial peptides like LL-37 that activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) (Morizane and Gallo, 2012). The pDCs secrete IL-12 and IL-23 and mount a T cell mediated inflammatory response. The T cells, primarily Th1, Th17, and Th22, secrete the cytokines IFN-γ and TNF that promote inflammation in psoriatic skin. An increase in the infiltration of neutrophils, dendritic cells and T cells in the lesional skin of psoriatic patients evokes a crosstalk between the activated keratinocytes and immune cells (Baliwag et al., 2015; Albanesi et al., 2018). Although, T cells and dendritic cells primarily drive psoriasis, interesting roles for macrophages and neutrophils have recently emerged. Depletion of macrophages by clodronate treatment leads to alleviation of the psoriatic phenotypes in mice (Stratis et al., 2006). Neutrophil derived cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23 are associated with specific gene expression changes in keratinocytes that result in epidermal hyperproliferation and abnormal differentiation (Terui et al., 2000; Tecchio et al., 2014). In contrast, antibody mediated neutralization of neutrophils does not reduce inflammation. Interestingly, neutrophils in psoriatic skin form web-like extracellular traps, referred to as NET (Neutrophil extracellular trap) that is composed of chromatin and antimicrobial components such as LL-37, neutrophil elastase, and myeloperoxidase (Fuchs, 2007). The formation of NET is associated with NETosis, which involves killing of pathogens through the release of IL-17 and antimicrobial peptides (Hu et al., 2016).
Several studies have underscored the contribution of ECM proteins in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. A disorganized BM (laminin) in the psoriatic skin is associated with keratinocyte-derived plasminogen activating factor (McFadden et al., 2012). Laminin-332 and -511 are overexpressed in the BM of psoriatic skin lesions. Furthermore increased expression of laminin-511 in HaCat cells stimulated proliferation and inhibited apoptosis providing a mechanism for the observed epidermal hyperplasia (Natsumi et al., 2018). Additionally, alteration in laminin α1 chain along with overexpression of fibronectin in the papillary dermis and T cell lymphokines are correlated with abnormal cellular morphology (Vaccaro et al., 2002). While laminins are shown to facilitate neutrophil recruitment and enhance the phagocytic ability of dendritic cells, its role in immunomodulation in the context of psoriasis remains elusive (Wondimu et al., 2004; García-Nieto et al., 2010; Simon and Bromberg, 2017).
CCN-1, a matricellular protein is overexpressed in the lesional and non-lesional psoriatic epidermis in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-17 and TNF-α. It binds to integrin α6β1 on keratinocytes and activates PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway and result in the upregulation of ICAM, HLA-DR, and HLA-ABC genes. These genes, in turn, increase the immune cell-keratinocyte interaction and mount an inflammatory response. Its role in promoting epidermal hyperplasia and inflammation was further demonstrated in IL-23 induced psoriatic skin lesions, where the knockdown of CCN-1 ameliorated the phenotypes (Sun et al., 2015). Other studies have shown that CCN-1 stimulates secretion of the cytokines IL-1β and IL-8 by psoriatic keratinocytes via the p38 MAPK and JNK/NF-κB signaling pathways, respectively underscoring its role in regulation of inflammation (Sun et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2017). Furthermore, CCN-1 promotes CCL-20 chemokine synthesis from hyperplasic epidermis of psoriatic skin that causes increased recruitment of immune cells (Li H. et al., 2017). Taken together, these studies highlight an important role played by CCN-1 in regulation inflammation in psoriatic skin.
OPN, expressed by epithelial cells, is shown to act as a potent pro-inflammatory stimulant and activates immune cells such as T-cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages/monocytes (Clemente et al., 2016). Interaction of OPN with integrin and CD44 leads to the promotion of Th1 response and suppression of Th2 response. In psoriasis, OPN is highly expressed in the PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cell), skin and plasma. Buommino et al showed that OPN secreted by PBMCs enhances the expression pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ. TNF-α upregulates OPN expression while anti-TNF-α antibody treatment abrogates its synthesis (Buommino et al., 2012).
Overall, these studies suggest that ECM components play a critical role in psoriatic skin by acting as co-stimulatory factors for keratinocytes and immune cell activation leading to chronic progression of the disease.
Epidermolysis Bullosa
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare heritable diseases characterized by blistering and fragile skin. It is associated with anomalies such as palmar-plantar thickening, syndactyly, dysphagia, gingival hyperkeratosis, cardiomyopathy, and osteoporosis (Maldonado-Colin et al., 2017). The blistering results from mechanical stress that eventually gives rise to chronic wound conditions (Medeiros and Riet-Correa, 2015). EB is caused by mutations in hemidesmosomal and extracellular matrix genes and the mode of inheritance can be either dominant or recessive. EB has been broadly categorized into simplex (EBS), junctional (JEB), dystrophic (DEB) types, and kindler syndrome (Shinkuma, 2015; Barna et al., 2017). The severity of disease is a function of the location of the split and the genes affected. So far mutations in at least 19 genes are reported to cause different types of EBs (Vahidnezhad et al., 2018). The site of splitting associated with various mutations is illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2
EBS is caused by mutations in the genes coding for either keratin 5 (KRT5) or keratin 14 (KRT14) accounting for the four major subtypes. KRT5/14 form a stable cytoskeletal network and are involved in maintaining tissue integrity (Coulombe and Lee, 2012). Mutations in KRT5/14 result in rupture of basal keratinocytes leading to increased susceptibility to infection and dehydration. The least severe form of EBS is Weber-Cockayne type characterized by mild blistering restricted to feet and hands whereas the most severe form known as Dowling-Maera type is marked by extensive blistering, which however seems to get better with age. The other two subtypes are Koebner type and EBS with mottled pigmentation (Chung and Uitto, 2010a). Additionally, mutation in the plectin (PLEC) gene, a hemidesmosomal protein, is associated with a rare type of EBS known as Ogna type (Pfendner et al., 2005). The features common to all the subtypes are thickened palm and soles (palmoplantar keratoderma), non-scarring blisters, alopecia and dystrophic nails (Chung and Uitto, 2010a). EBS is the most prevalent and mildest type of EB, and exhibits an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern (Coulombe et al., 2009). Mouse knockouts for Krt5 and Krt14 serve as good models for studying EBS disease pathogenesis (Coulombe et al., 1991; Peters et al., 2001).
JEB is an autosomal recessive form of EB caused by mutations in the laminin-332 chains encoded by LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2 genes, and COL17A1 genes that code for collagen XVII/BP180 protein (Sawamura et al., 2010). Collagen-XVII is an important structural element of the hemidesmosomal complex that together with laminins in the BM, maintain the dermal-epidermal adhesion. JEB can be further classified into two subtypes; Herlitz and non-Herlitz based on its severity. Patients with the Non-Herlitz subtype display blisters primarily in the feet, elbows and knees, which are non-life threatening (Yancey and Hintner, 2010). The Herlitz subtype, on the other hand, causes severe disease, and is associated with widespread blistering of the lining of oral and digestive tracts, syndactyly and alopecia, and restricts life expectancy to 1 year after birth (Yuen et al., 2011).
Col17a1 knockout mice display the blistering pattern associated with the non-Herlitz subtype and show prolonged survival; whereas Lama3 and Lamc2 knockouts recapitulate the Herlitz type of EB, exhibiting severe skin blistering resulting in perinatal lethality (Bubier et al., 2010; Natsuga et al., 2010). Two other rare autosomal recessive forms of EB include EB with pyloric atresia (EB-PA) and EB with muscular dystrophy (EB-MD). EB-PA is caused by mutations in ITGA6 and ITGB4 genes whereas EB-MD is associated with mutations in the PLEC gene (Shimizu et al., 1999; Yancey and Hintner, 2010). Itga6 and Itgb4 knockout mouse models recapitulate the dermal-epidermal detachment leading to development of EB-PA (Georges-Labouesse et al., 1996; Mencía et al., 2016).
DEB is associated with mutations in Col7a1 gene resulting in the loss of collagen-VII protein. Collagen-VII is an anchoring fibril protein crucial for dermal-epidermal integrity and is present in the BM on the side of papillary dermis (Chung and Uitto, 2010b). The two major subtypes of DEB based on mode of inheritance and severity include autosomal dominant (DDEB) and recessive (RDEB) types. Unlike EBS and JEB, DEB is associated with extensive scarring (Shinkuma, 2015). RDEB, the more severe subtype is characterized by pseudosyndactyly, alopecia with scarring, and esophageal stenosis that leads to dysphagia. This disease is further complicated by the development of aggressive squamous cell carcinoma in juvenile patients (Shinkuma, 2015). The conditional Col7a1 KO mice recapitulate all of the phenotypes of RDEB and has proven to be an invaluable tool to understand disease progression as well as to test therapeutic interventions (Natsuga et al., 2010).
Kindler syndrome is the only skin disease known to be associated with actin cytoskeleton related abnormalities and is characterized by variable planes of cleavage in the skin (Medeiros and Riet-Correa, 2015). Keratinocytes express kindlin-1, a protein that regulates cellular processes such as proliferation, migration and cell-substratum adhesion (Rognoni et al., 2016). Mutations in the FERMT1 gene, coding for the kindlin-1 protein, lead to this rare fragile skin blistering disorder with symptoms similar to other EB subtypes (Lai-Cheong et al., 2009). Kindlin-1 deficient mice display skin atrophy without blister formation (Ussar et al., 2008). The loss of kindlin-1 from keratinocytes results in dysregulated integrin signaling and focal adhesion turnover (Margadant et al., 2013).
Another form of EB called aquisita (EBA) is caused by the production of autoantibodies against collagen-VII protein. The two subtypes of EBA are classical and the inflammatory types. The classical form is characterized by trauma induced blistering in adults whereas the inflammatory form starts in childhood and show more widespread blistering that is not restricted to the injured sites (Kasperkiewicz et al., 2016).
The null and conditional KO mouse models that have been discussed above recapitulate various aspects of disease progression of the EB class of skin disorders and are being used as platforms to develop therapeutic interventions for these devastating diseases (Georges-Labouesse et al., 1996; Cao et al., 2001; Peters et al., 2001; Bruckner-Tuderman et al., 2010).
Insights into the role of inflammation and immune cells in EB pathophysiology have come from the studies on Krt5, Itgb4, and Col7a1 knockouts that cause EBS, EB-PA, and DEB, respectively. Increased expression of chemokines and cytokines such as CCL-2, CCL-19, CCL-20, IL-6, and IL-1β is reported in Krt5 knockout skin. The cytokine expression is associated with a 2-fold increase in the recruitment of Langerhans cells to the EB affected skin (Lu et al., 2007; Roth et al., 2009). Loss of Itgb4 in mice leads to severe blistering associated with Th2 inflammatory response, which suggests involvement of immune cells in EB pathophysiology (Han et al., 2018). Knockout of Col7a1 recapitulates RDEB and creates a chronic wound condition underscoring its role in maintenance of epidermal-dermal integrity. Collagen-VII deficient wounds display suprabasal expression of α6β4 that lead to a dysregulated α6β4-laminin-332-JNK-STAT3. This, in turn, delays wound re-epithelialization and prolongs the presence of inflammatory CD11b cells in skin (Nyström et al., 2013). Interestingly, depletion of collagen-VII from immunodeficient mice (NSG mice) results in a less severe disease phenotype. Taken together, these studies emphasize the critical role played by the immune cells in exacerbating the disease condition (Esposito et al., 2016).
Blisters in the bullous diseases are usually associated with increased infiltration of cytotoxic T cells, B cells, neutrophils and other immune cells as well as their secreted cytokines (Hussein et al., 2007). Previous work has suggested that there is a substantial increase in the levels of cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-15, and TNF-α, and chemokines such as CXCL-1, CXCL-2, CXCL-3, CCL-5, CCL-27 in the blister fluids of EB patients compared to healthy controls. Moreover, the cytokine and chemokine expression profile varies between EB subtypes such that early DEB and JEB blisters expressed lower levels of cytokines and chemokines compared to that of early EBS (Alexeev et al., 2017). In EBA, several groups have shown that autoantibody production against COL7A1 is mediated through a milieu of neutrophils, macrophages, B cells and T cells and these phenotypes are ameliorated by the depletion of neutrophils and T cells (Sitaru et al., 2010; Iwata et al., 2013; Bieber et al., 2016).
MMPs secreted by immune cells can also influence the recruitment pattern of other immune cells to the injured tissue. Studies have shown that the severity of RDEB is a function of the type of MMP synthesized, its expression level and the balance between MMPs and TIMPs (Bodemer et al., 2003). Interestingly, a SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) in the MMP1 gene has also been implicated in increasing disease severity by influencing the expression of collagen-VII (Titeux et al., 2008). Likewise the correlation between MMP-9 and blister formation was shown in a study where treatment with doxycycline derivative, an inhibitor of MMP-9, alleviated the phenotype (Lettner et al., 2013). Collectively MMPs can serve as effective therapeutic targets.
Since DEB is a disorder of the basement membrane zone (BMZ), it is not surprising that, in RDEB patients that lack collagen-VII, two major BM components collage-IV and laminin-332 display a disrupted distribution pattern and do not co-localize at the BMZ (Onetti Muda et al., 1996). The disruption precedes blister formation suggesting that it could be a direct consequence of the lack of collagen-VII. Dermal-epidermal splitting also leads to an increase in the expression of TNC at the site of the split, which could be in response to the cytokines secreted either by epidermis or the recruited immune cells (Schenk et al., 1995). These studies suggest that TNC can serve as a potential link between the immune and ECM components in DEB.
Interaction between collagen-VII and cochlin is required to mount an immune cell mediated antibacterial response. In RDEB patients, absence of this interaction leads to increased bacterial colonization that further exacerbates the disease condition (Nyström et al., 2018). Lack of collagen-VII in RDEB destabilize the BMZ and cause the release of TGF-β associated with ECM increasing its bioavailability. TGF-β mediated activation of dermal fibroblasts, in turn, cause excessive deposition of ECM components (Nyström and Bruckner-Tuderman, 2018). In a recent case study, monozygotic twins suffering from RDEB exhibited distinct phenotypes due to changes in the expression of TGF-β target genes, despite having similar loss of collagen-VII. The more affected individual displayed increased fibrosis, which was ameliorated by treatment with the anti-fibrotic the matricellular protein decorin (Odorisio et al., 2014). These data point to the complexity of managing and treating RDEB, a genetic disease that is associated with loss in ECM organization which is further exacerbated by TGF-β mediated alteration in ECM dynamics. The involvement of matricellular proteins in mounting an immune response in EB provides an additional avenue for therapeutic intervention. Taken together, while EBs remain one of the most challenging diseases to manage and treat, and future treatment paradigms will need to take into account the immune-ECM interactions.
Skin Cancers
Skin cancers are broadly classified as melanoma and non-melanoma types. Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer that originates from melanocytes; the pigment producing cells in the skin (Villanueva and Herlyn, 2008). Non-melanoma skin cancers include Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). SCCs originate from interfollicular stem or progenitor cell population in the epidermis and BCCs from the progenitor cells present in interfollicular epidermis and upper infundibulum (Donovan, 2009; Wang et al., 2011). MCCs, on the other hand, are the cancer of neuroendocrine (merkel) cells present in the basal layer of the epidermis (Munde et al., 2013). Other aggressive forms of skin cancer include cutaneous T and B lymphomas, a varied group of extranodal lymphoproliferative disorders associated with abnormal accumulation and proliferation of T and B lymphocytes in skin (Pandolfino et al., 2000; Siegel et al., 2012). Cutaneous T cell lymphomas are the most common with 65% incidence rate as compared to B cell lymphomas with a 25% incidence rate (Sokołowska-Wojdyło et al., 2015). All skin cancer types show a positive correlation with exposure to UV radiation as well as mutations in genes associated with tumor suppression, DNA repair, apoptosis and cell cycle regulation (D'Orazio et al., 2013; Kandoth et al., 2013).
Tumor resident and recruited immune cells play a dynamic role in regulating cancer progression. The tumor and its stroma recruit different populations of immune cells by releasing chemotactic factors and cytokines resulting in a chronic inflammatory condition (Binnewies et al., 2018). The immune cell repertoire, associated with the tumor microenvironment includes monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, T and B cells (Cavallo et al., 2011). Factors such as CCL-2, CCL-5, CCL-17, CCL-22, CXCL-12, M-CSF, VEGF, and TGF-β synthesized by the tumor stroma aid in the recruitment of monocytes and subsets of T cells (Owen et al., 2003; Hiratsuka et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2008). In melanomas, the chemokines CCL-2, CCL-3, CCL-5, CXCL-9, and CXCL-10 recruit CD8+ T cells (Harlin et al., 2009). In a recent study it was shown that, tumor derived factors such as colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1), CCL-2, IL-34, and VEGF recruit circulating macrophages to the melanomas (Pieniazek et al., 2018). In human melanomas, CCL-2, also known as MCP-1, is associated with an increased inflammatory response and recruitment of macrophages and T cells (Ilkovitch and Lopez, 2008). Similarly in BCCs, CXCL-9, CXCL-10, and CXCL-11 recruit CXCR-3 expressing effector and memory T cells (Lo et al., 2011). In BCCs, the chemokines, CCL-17, CCL-18, and CCL-22 that recruit Tregs are overexpressed in the tumor islands and peritumoral skin. The stromal cells in turn synthesize CCL-17, which suggests a mechanism for the Treg infiltration seen in the stroma surrounding the BCC nests (Omland et al., 2016). In MCC, a recent study has shown that over expression of CCL-17 and its receptor CCR-4, aid in recruitment of CD4+ Tregs, Th2, and Th17 cells (Rasheed et al., 2018). Macrophage derived CCL-18 in cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL) recruit T lymphocytes to the skin and is associated with enhanced invasion (Wu et al., 2014). Overall, the tumor and its stroma recruit a plethora of immune cells that contributes to tumor progression.
Dynamic crosstalk between the stroma and immune cells, change the tumor milieu from a tumor suppressive (or immunogenic) to tumorigenic (or immunosuppressive) state. Specifically, tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) switch from pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, that are antigen presenting cells, to anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, that are tissue remodeling and tumor growth promoting cells (Tariq et al., 2017). M1 macrophages phagocytose tumor cells, produce reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-23, IL-12, and TNF-α that activate Th1 response (Komohara et al., 2014; Noy and Pollard, 2014). In contrast, M2 macrophages express anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-10 and TGF-β that play a role in promoting tumor growth (Aras and Raza Zaidi, 2017). Depletion of M2 macrophages by treating with clodronate in CTCL xenograft mouse models, reduces angiogenesis and tumor growth (Wu et al., 2014). Human keratinocytes can inactivate T cell response by downregulating signaling pathways critical for T cell recruitment and cytotoxicity (Bronte and Zanovello, 2005; Bluth et al., 2009). In SCCs and BCCs, immunosuppression is mediated by preventing the recruitment of T cells to the cancer site through the activation of EGFR-Ras-MAPK signaling pathway (Pivarcsi et al., 2007). Interestingly, Tregs are known to suppress immune response by producing IL-10 and TGF-β and compete for T-cells-activating pro-inflammatory cytokines (Jarnicki et al., 2006). They are critical for inducing tolerance to self-antigens and also inhibit the antigen presenting ability of DCs (Sakaguchi et al., 2009). The transcription factor FOXP3 is important in regulating Treg function. Increased FOXP3 expressing Tregs correlates with poor disease outcome in SCCs, BCCs and melanomas (Moreira et al., 2010). In BCCs, recruited Tregs build an immunosuppressive niche by locally synthesizing TGF-β (Omland et al., 2016). In MCC, M2 macrophages and Tregs present in the tumor maintain an immunosuppressive state contributing to a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment (Gaiser et al., 2018). Interestingly, increased recruitment of CD8+ T cells to the skin is associated with better prognosis in MCCs (Touzé et al., 2011).
Taken together, there is growing evidence that tumor microenvironment in cancers develop immune suppressive mechanisms to evade the T cell mediated cytotoxicity that can promote metastasis.
The ECM in cancer is highly remodeled and disorganized due to aberrant deposition by activated fibroblasts and enzymatic remodeling by the tumor and immune cells (Karagiannis et al., 2012). Changes in ECM dynamics promote tumor growth by regulating proliferation, survival, adhesion and migration (Pickup et al., 2014). The BM in melanomas has reduced thickness compared to healthy controls due to the absence of collagen-VII (Schmoeckel et al., 1989). A study of the BM in BCC affected skin showed aberrations in bullous pemphigoid antigens possibly due to its abnormal synthesis by the tumor associated cells (Stanley et al., 1982). Similarly, the BM structure in aggressive SCCs is irregular and discontinuous (Sakr et al., 1987). Matrix metalloproteinases such as MMP-1, -2, -3, -8, -9, -10, -13, -15, -16, and -26 can facilitate tumor growth, invasion, and angiogenesis in BCC, SCC and melanomas (Pittayapruek et al., 2016). In a recent study, expression profiling of BCCs showed an increase in ECM remodeling proteins including MMP-1, -3, -8, -9, and Cathepsin-K indicating the important role played by these enzymes in cancer progression (Ciazynska et al., 2018). In organ culture models of BCC the increased expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 correlates with degradation of collagen-I and -IV at the tumor front (Goździalska et al., 2016). Likewise, the expression of ADAM-10, -12, and -17 was specifically observed in deep invasion area of BCC biopsies and correlated with the loss of collagen-XVII (Oh et al., 2009). The TAMs in BCCs induce COX-2 expression, which, in turn, results in a COX-2 dependent release of MMP-9, VEGF, and FGF that promotes tumor invasion (Tjiu et al., 2009). Interestingly, MMP-9 producing inflammatory macrophages and neutrophils are associated with BM degradation in BCC patients (Boyd et al., 2008).
Similarly, in SCCs the γ2 chain of laminin-332 is overexpressed in the invasive front (Hamasaki et al., 2011). In a DMBA (7,12-dimethylbenz-anthracene)-TPA (12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate) induced mouse model of SCCs, overexpression of collagen-XVII, integrin α6β4 and the γ2 chain of laminin, promoted tumorigenesis (Moilanen et al., 2017). Increased laminin-332 expression with high MMP-2 and MMP-14 activity is seen in invasive SCCs with poor prognosis (Marinkovich, 2007). Reduced expression of collagen-VII in SCCs enhances invasion, dysregulates epithelial differentiation and drives epithelial to mesenchymal transition (Martins et al., 2009). Loss of collagen-VII expression (in RDEB) results in an upregulation of TGF-β signaling and increased angiogenesis in SCCs underscoring the critical role played by collagen-VII in suppressing TGF-β signaling (Martins et al., 2016). Transgenic mice lacking MMP-9 reduced the tumor invasiveness in a mouse model of SCC whereas, transplanting MMP-9 producing bone marrow cells increased tumor invasiveness (Coussens et al., 2000). The cleaved oligosaccharides generated by heparinize digestion of heparin sulfate chains is shown to play an important role in tumor progression in BCCs and SCCs (Pinhal et al., 2016). The abundance and stiffness of collagen also play an important role in melanoma progression where it stimulates proliferation and differentiation in a YAP/PAX3/MITF dependent manner (Miskolczi et al., 2018). In melanoma and BCCs, cathepsin K expression is associated with a fibromucinous stroma around the tumor nests, indicative of ECM degradation (Ishida et al., 2013). Interestingly, the matricellular protein POSTN is associated with metastatic progression in melanoma by attenuating adhesion and promoting migration (Fukuda et al., 2015). Tumor fronts of aggressive BCCs and SCCs overexpress TNC (Schalkwijk et al., 1991; Dang et al., 2006). Likewise, CCN-1 and CCN-2 are overexpressed in keratinocytes of BCCs in a YAP dependent manner promoting cell proliferation and survival (Quan et al., 2014).
The crosstalk between immune cells and ECM is thought to be critical in driving skin cancer pathogenesis. In patient samples of SSCs, an increase in CD163+ TAMs is associated with enhanced expression of MMP-9 and MMP-11, which promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth. The same study also reports the activation of IL-4 dependent STAT-6 signaling in TAMs that induces differentiation of Th2 cells, further maintaining an immune-suppressive environment (Pettersen et al., 2011). In a DMBA-TPA induced mouse model of SCC, Gr1+ neutrophils produce remodeling enzymes including myeloperoxidase (MPO) and elastase, which are associated with poor disease outcome (Gasparoto et al., 2012). TNF-α and TGF-β secreted by macrophages synergistically increase melanoma migration in a NF-κB dependent manner through the release of MMP-1 and MT1-MMPs (Li R. et al., 2017). Hyaluronic and proteoglycan link protein (HAPLN-1) is an ECM protein highly expressed in young fibroblasts compared to aged fibroblasts and is important for maintaining stability of hyaluronan and collagen (Ecker et al., 2019). Since T cells use collagen fibrils to infiltrate tumors, downregulating HAPLN-1 expression in melanoma models results in decreased CD3+ T cell infiltration associated with increased tumor cell extravasation. On the other hand treatment with recombinant HAPLN-1 increases the T cell recruitment and reduces the tumor growth. The association between collagen fiber stability and T cell migration has been suggested as one of the reasons for aggressive melanomas in aged individuals (Kaur et al., 2018). In CTCL, T lymphocytes localize toward the epidermis by expressing integrin α3β1 allowing them to bind with laminin-332 and migrate through the BM, which interestingly does not result in ECM disorganization (Wayner et al., 1993). Tumor derived OPN binds to macrophages through integrin α9β1 resulting in the overexpression of COX-2 and MMP-9 and promotes angiogenesis in melanomas (Kale et al., 2014). In melanoma models, IFN-γ induced by TSP-1 overexpression is critical for macrophage recruitment and polarization to the M1 state (Martin-Manso et al., 2008). This points to an important role played by TSP-1 in suppressing tumor growth.
The ECM-immune cell interactions have been well studied in the context of cancer since the ECM is highly remodeled by both the tumor and immune cells to facilitate the tumor growth. The tumor microenvironment can switch from being anti-tumorigenic to pro tumorigenic depending on dynamic interactions between the tumors; ECM and immune compartments and can result in aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Understanding the signaling events regulating this process has led to the development of therapies targeting the immune system as evidenced by advent of immunotherapy in treating cancer. Figure 3 summarizes the ECM-immune interactions in all of the skin diseases discussed in this review.
Figure 3
Current State of the Art Therapeutic Interventions
Currently available treatment approaches for skin diseases involve treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, topical steroids, and anti-histamines (Grassberger et al., 2004; Abraham and Roga, 2014). Conventional therapies for the treatment of the diseases discussed in this review are listed in the Table 3. With the advent of techniques such as nanomedicine, gene therapy (genetic engineering), stem cell transplantation, and cell and protein replacement therapy, curative treatment of skin diseases seem achievable and have been discussed below.
Table 3
| Skin Disease | Drugs | Mode of action | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atopic Dermatitis | Calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus and pimecrolimus | Prevent the activation of NFAT by inhibition of calcineurin phosphatase resulting in prevention of activation of T cells, mast cells, and cytokines like IL-4, -5, - 31, TNF-α. | Mayba and Gooderham, 2017; Papier and Strowd, 2018 |
| Phosphodiesterase inhibitors: crisaborole and Apremilast. | Prevent the conversion of cAMP to AMP that leads to accumulation of cAMP. This in turn causes suppression of NFAT, and NFKB pathways involved in inflammation. | ||
| Janus Associated Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK - STAT) inhibitors: Tofacitinib | Inhibit phosphorylation of JAK-1 and JAK-3 and prevent the activation of STATs.Reduce immune cell polarization and cytokine production. | ||
| Cytokine and cytokine signaling inhibitors: Dipulimab, Lebrikizumab, and Nemolizumab. | Dipulimab is an antibody that binds to the alpha subunit of the IL-4 receptor. This inhibits the pathways driven by IL-4 and IL-13 and reduces the expression level of genes involved in epidermal hyperplasia and immune cell activation. Lebrikizumab is an antibody that blocks IL-13 and the signaling pathways associated with it. Nemolizumab is an antibody against receptor A of IL-31. It blocks homing of CLA+ T cells and decrease pruritus. | ||
| Systemic immunosuppressants: Ciclosporin A, Methotrexate, and Benvitimod | Inhibition of immune cell recruitment and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. | ||
| Antihistamines: Hydroxyzine, Diphenhydramine, Chlorpheniramine | Inhibition of allergic responses and associated pruritis. | ||
| Psoriasis | Vitamin D3 analogues: Calcitriol, Tacalcitol, and Calcipotriol. | Antiproliferative, pro-differentiation, suppression of T cell activation, increased production of Tregs, MHC-II suppression. | Duvic et al., 1997; Trémezaygues and Reichrath, 2011; Uva et al., 2012; Almutawa et al., 2013; Jacobi et al., 2015; Torsekar and Gautam, 2017 |
| Calcineurin inhibitors Pimecrolimus, and Tacrolimus. | Same as above. | ||
| Keratolytics - Salicyclic acid, and urea. | Increases shedding of corneocytes and reduction of pH. | ||
| Topical corticosteroids | Vasoconstrictive, antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory, and immunosuppressive. | ||
| Retinoids Tazarotene, and Acitercin | Binds to family of retinoic acid receptors - down-regulates keratinocyte differentiation, proliferation, and inflammation. | ||
| UV based therapy | Inhibition of inflammatory pathways, induction of apoptosis, downregulation of TH1/TH17 inflammatory axis, cell cycle arrest. | ||
| Phosphodiesterase inhibitor: Apremilast | Same as above | ||
| Systemic immunosuppressants: Ciclosporin, and Methotrexate. | Same as above | ||
| Cytokine and cytokine signaling inhibitors: Adalimumab, Etanercept, Infliximab, Secukinumab, and Ustekinumab. | Adalimumab, Etanercept, and infliximab are antibodies against TNF that result in inhibition of inflammation and immune cell recruitment. Secukinumab binds and neutralizes IL-17 that cause reduction in inflammation, immune cell recruitment and epidermal hyperproliferation. Ustekinumab binds to common receptor for cytokines IL-12 and IL-23 thereby reducing the activation and differentiation of Natural killer (NK) cells and CD4+ T cells. | ||
| Anti-hyperproliferative Dithranol | Impedes DNA replication and reduces elevated cGMP levels. | ||
| EB | Treatment involves draining blisters using sterile needles, surgeries for separating fused digits. | Nystrom et al., 2015 | |
| A small-molecule angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist Losartan | Reduction in TGFβ expression slowing down fibrosis in RDEB. | ||
| NSAIDs, analgesics | Suppress inflammation. | Goldschneider et al., 2014 | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Single or in combinations—Surgery, thermal ablation, radiation | Ribero et al., 2017; Yanagi et al., 2018 | |
| Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor: Cetuximab, Panitumumab, gefitinib, and erlotinib | Cetuximab and Panitumumab monoclonal antibody binds EGFR and inhibits EGF mediated signaling. Gefitinib and Erlotinib bind to tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR. | ||
| Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: imatinib | Imatinib binds close to ATP binding site of tyrosine kinases thereby preventing its activity. | ||
| 26S proteasome inhibitor: Bortezomib | Bortezomib contains a boron atom which binds to active site of 26S proteasome and prevents degradation of ubiquitin tagged proteins thereby enhancing cell death. | ||
| Apoptosis inducer: Isotrenoin | Induces apoptosis in sebaceous gland cells and enhances neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) production which induces sebocyte apoptosis. | ||
| Cytotoxic drugs: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin | 5-FU is an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase, which inhibits DNA replication. Doxorubicin inhibits topoisomerase II action. Cisplatin cross links DNA and prevents mitosis. | ||
| Immune checkpoint inhibitors: Anti-PD-1: Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Anti-CTLA-4: Ipilimumab | Cytotoxic T cell mediated killing of tumor cells. | ||
| Basal cell carcinoma | Surgical excision, cryotherapy, Laser therapy, Mohs micrographic surgery, photodynamic therapy and radiotherapy. | Lewin and Carucci, 2015; Migden et al., 2018 | |
| Inhibitors of DNA replication: 5-FU. | Same as above. | ||
| Hedgehog pathway inhibitors: vismodegib and sonidegib | It is an antagonist of smoothened which in turn causes inactivation of GLI-1 and GLI-2 transcription factors. | ||
| Immune response modifier: imiquimod | Activates innate immune cells and incites an inflammatory response. This, in turn, activates adaptive immune cells. | ||
| Melanoma | BRAF inhibitor: vemurafenib and dabrafenib | Inhibit the mutated kinase domain of BRAF involved in MAPK signaling. | Johnson and Sosman, 2015 |
| MEK inhibitor: Trametinib | Allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/2 that is constitutively activated. | ||
| Immunotherapy: Interleukin-2 | Activates immune system to attack cancer cells. Also stimulate melanoma cells to secrete chemoattractants for immune cells. | ||
| Anti-PD-1: Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab | Same as above. | ||
| Anti-CTLA-4: Ipilimumab | Same as above | ||
| Merkel cell carcinoma | Mohs micrographic surgery, lymph node dissection and radiation therapy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy | Tello et al., 2018 | |
| Chemotherapy: Somatostatin analogs | Inhibition of endocrine tumor growth. | ||
| mTOR inhibitors | Blocking PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and inhibit cell proliferation and tumor growth. | ||
| Immune checkpoint inhibitors: | |||
| Anti-PD-1: Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab avelumab | Same as above. | ||
| Anti-CTLA-4: Ipilimumab | Same as above. | ||
| Cutaneous lymphoma | Topical Corticosteroids | Wollina, 2012 | |
| Phototherapy | Use of UVA on skin, which results in self destruction of T cells. | ||
| Topical chemotherapy: Mechlorethamine and carmustine. | Chemically modify DNA and prevent tumor growth. | ||
| Topical imiquimod | Aid in the release of IFN-γ and cytokines for suppressing tumor growth. | ||
| Cytokine therapy: TNF-α | Stimulate immune system to target tumor cells. |
Conventional treatment strategies.
Nanomedicine
Nanomedicine involves the use of particles within the nanometer range, for the detection and treatment of diseases. They are effective drug delivery agents for targeted therapy that enhance drug bioavailability and facilitate controlled drug release for long-term effect. Various nanoparticles as delivery agents for treatment of skin diseases include liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, polymeric micelles and nanospheres, dendrimers, nanotubes, quantum dots, gold particles etc. that has been reviewed previously (Dianzani et al., 2014). In mouse and rat models of AD and psoriasis, nanoparticle based delivery of drugs such as tacrolimus, corticosteroids, retinoids, methotrexate, and cyclosporine result in better outcomes (Palmer and DeLouise, 2016). Similarly, doxorubicin-loaded cationic solid lipid nanoparticles (DOX-SLN) have shown better drug penetration and inhibition of skin cancer tumor growth (Huber et al., 2015). In RDEB, localized delivery of gold nanoparticle coated with epigallocatechin-3-gallate (E3G) in SCC tumor site has been shown to abrogate the adverse effect of the drug in the liver (Manoukian et al., 2014). Additionally in EB, a novel nanocapsule based wound dressing technique has been developed. Upon infection, it releases antibiotics and undergoes a color change that indicates response to an active infection (Zhou et al., 2018). The promise of nanomedicine provides new therapeutic opportunities for treating skin disorders that have been refractory to treatment so far.
Gene and Stem Cell Therapy
Gene therapy involves the introduction of corrected copy of genes into cells for treating genetic disorders (Anguela and High, 2019). Likewise, stem cell therapy refers to stem cell transplantation, either from the same (autologous) or from a different (allogeneic) individual replacing affected cells. Alternatively, gene-corrected autologous stem cells can be engineered to generate skin substitutes followed by transplantation (Karantalis et al., 2015). Gene and stem cell therapy have proven highly beneficial for genetic skin disorders such as EB which continues to be a major health burden due to lack of effective treatment. The retroviral mediated transfer of COL7A1 into fibroblasts and keratinocytes have shown successful incorporation of collagen-VII at the dermal-epidermal junction of the engineered skin grafts (Ferrari et al., 2006; Piaceski et al., 2018). In a recent path-breaking paper, physicians were able to repair the skin of a 7-year old JEB patient who had lost 80% of his epidermis. The JEB was caused by a mutation in the LAMB3 gene. Autologous non-lesional keratinocytes were used to introduce the corrected gene copy, and these cells were used to generate epidermal skin grafts. The patient showed complete recovery 2 years after the skin was grafted (Hirsch et al., 2017).
Under homeostatic conditions, bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to regulate proliferation and maturation of T cells, NK cells, B cells, and dendritic cells. However, this regulation is perturbed in AD and psoriatic patients and bone marrow transplantation has been shown to result in remission of diseases (Li et al., 2015; Shin et al., 2017). Similarly, transplantation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells into RDEB patients showed symptomatic improvement (Uitto, 2008).
Genetically engineered bone marrow cells have been designed to carry tumor antigens for targeting skin cancers. Autologous transplantation of lymphocytes that are genetically modified to express tumor antigen MAGE-A3 has been shown to mount effective tumor killing response in melanoma (Fontana et al., 2009). Furthermore, engineering T cells with NY-ESO-1, melanoma antigen resulted in tumor regression in clinical trials (Dummer et al., 2008). Adenovirus mediated transduction of T cells with IL-2 has also shown improved prognosis in clinical trials (Puzanov and Flaherty, 2010).
While at its infancy, stem cell therapies provide the promise of a “cure” particularly for devastating skin blistering disorders. The challenge will be to reduce the costs of such treatments to make it more accessible to patients.
Cell and Protein Replacement Therapy
Protein replacement therapy involves introduction of intact proteins for supplementing its loss from the patients and is primarily used in treatment of EB. Fibroblasts that can produce intact collagen-VII protein have been intradermally injected to RDEB patients and mouse models. The recipients, in turn, showed increased production of collagen-VII at the dermal-epidermal junction and enhanced wound healing (Nyström et al., 2013). Likewise, in mice that were grafted with skin from RDEB patients, topical application of recombinant collagen-VII protein to wounds resulted in collagen-VII incorporation in the wounded regions, and efficient repair (Uitto, 2008). More work will be required in the future to test the efficacy of this treatment in restoring normal skin function.
Conclusion, Perspectives and Future Directions
In this review we have highlighted the signaling and regulatory cascades central to the interactions between ECM and immune cells in several skin diseases. Based on the extensive literature reviewed, it is conceivable that the pathways governing this crosstalk can serve in developing novel effective targets for therapeutic interventions. Therefore, an important area of future research would be to identify these cascades. While, in diseases like AD, Psoriasis, and cancer, the interaction is well understood, further investigation is required to discern the crosstalk in EB. Additionally, skin disease conditions are often accompanied by a systemic response thereby, necessitating the use of combinatorial therapies that target both the local and systemic responses. While available therapies primarily rely on mitigating inflammatory response, directly targeting of the ECM–immune cell pathways might contribute to better disease outcome. Additionally, with the emerging functions of matricellular proteins such as decorin, POSTN, OPN, and CCN-1 in driving the skin diseases, a thorough investigation of their roles could further aid in better understanding of disease pathophysiology. Ongoing state of art therapeutic interventions such as stem cell transplantation, immunotherapy, gene therapy, and nanomedicine hold the promise for treating the most intractable of these conditions.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
This paper has been funded by the DST Grant to SR and AK (EMR/2016/003199).
Acknowledgments
We thank, Avinanda Banerjee, Sonakshi Mishra, and other members of the Raghavan lab for critical feedback on the manuscript. OB and UA are supported by DBT predoctoral fellowships.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbrahamA.RogaG. (2014). Topical steroid-damaged skin. Indian J. Dermatol. 59, 456–459. 10.4103/0019-5154.139872
2
Adair-KirkT. L.SeniorR. M. (2008). Fragments of extracellular matrix as mediators of inflammation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 40, 1101–1110. 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.005
3
AlbanesiC.MadonnaS.GisondiP.GirolomoniG. (2018). The interplay between keratinocytes and immune cells in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.Front. Immunol.9:1549. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01549
4
AlexeevV.Salas-AlanisJ. C.PalissonF.MukhtarzadaL.FortunaG.UittoJ.et al. (2017). Pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines dominate the blister fluid molecular signature in patients with epidermolysis bullosa and affect leukocyte and stem cell migration. J. Invest. Dermatol. 137, 2298–2308. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.07.002
5
AliN.ZirakB.RodriguezR. S.PauliM. L.TruongH. A.LaiK.et al. (2017). Regulatory T cells in skin facilitate epithelial stem cell differentiation. Cell169, 1119–1129. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.002
6
AlloriA. C.SailonA. M.WarrenS. M. (2008). Biological basis of bone formation, remodeling, and repair-part II: extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 14, 275–283. 10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0083
7
AlmutawaF.AlnomairN.WangY.HamzaviI.LimH. W. (2013). Systematic review of UV-based therapy for psoriasis. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 14, 87–109. 10.1007/s40257-013-0015-y
8
AnB.BrodskyB. (2016). Collagen binding to OSCAR: the odd couple. Blood127, 521–522. 10.1182/blood-2015-12-682476
9
AndrianiF.MargulisA.LinN.GriffeyS.GarlickJ. A. (2003). Analysis of microenvironmental factors contributing to basement membrane assembly and normalized epidermal phenotype. J. Invest. Dermatol. 120, 923–931. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12235.x
10
AnguelaX. M.HighK. A. (2019). Entering the modern era of gene therapy. Annu. Rev. Med. 70, 273–288. 10.1146/annurev-med-012017-043332
11
AoudjehaneL.PissaiaA.ScattonO.PodevinP.MassaultP. P.ChouzenouxS.et al. (2008). Interleukin-4 induces the activation and collagen production of cultured human intrahepatic fibroblasts via the STAT-6 pathway. Lab. Investig. 88, 973–985. 10.1038/labinvest.2008.61
12
ApallaZ.LallasA.SotiriouE.LazaridouE.IoannidesD. (2017). Epidemiological trends in skin cancer. Dermatol. Pract. Concept. 7, 1–6. 10.5826/dpc.0702a01
13
ArasS.Raza ZaidiM. (2017). TAMeless traitors: macrophages in cancer progression and metastasis. Br. J. Cancer117, 1583–1591. 10.1038/bjc.2017.356
14
BaiT.ChenC.-C.LauL. F. (2010). Matricellular protein CCN1 activates a proinflammatory genetic program in murine macrophages. J. Immunol. 184, 3223–3232. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902792
15
BaliwagJ.BarnesD. H.JohnstonA. (2015). Cytokines in psoriasis. Cytokine.73, 342–350. 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.12.014
16
BansalM. B.KovalovichK.GuptaR.LiW.AgarwalA.RadbillB.et al. (2005). Interleukin-6 protects hepatocytes from CCl4-mediated necrosis and apoptosis in mice by reducing MMP-2 expression. J. Hepatol. 42, 548–556. 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.11.043
17
BarnaB. K.EördeghG.IvánG.PiffkóJ.SillóP.AntalM. (2017). Az epidermolysis bullosa szájüregi tünetei és annak ellátása. Orv. Hetil. 158, 1577–1583. 10.1556/650.2017.30844
18
BieberK.WitteM.SunS.HundtJ. E.KaliesK.DrägerS.et al. (2016). T cells mediate autoantibody-induced cutaneous inflammation and blistering in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Sci. Rep. 6:38357. 10.1038/srep38357
19
BieberT. (2008). Mechanism of disease atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 47, 193–218. 10.1056/NEJMra074081
20
BinnewiesM.RobertsE. W.KerstenK.ChanV.FearonD. F.MeradM.et al. (2018). Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat. Med.24, 541–550. 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x
21
BlanpainC.FuchsE. (2006). Epidermal stem cells of the skin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 339–373. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104357
22
BluthM. J.ZabaL. C.MoussaiD.Suárez-FariasM.KaporisH.FanL.et al. (2009). Myeloid dendritic cells from human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma are poor stimulators of T-cell proliferation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 2451–2462. 10.1038/jid.2009.96
23
BocianC.UrbanowitzA. K.OwensR. T.IozzoR. V.GotteM.SeidlerD. G. (2013). Decorin potentiates interferon-γ activity in a model of allergic inflammation. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 12699–12711. 10.1074/jbc.M112.419366
24
BodemerC.TchenS. I.GhomrasseniS.SéguierS.GaultierF.FraitagS.et al. (2003). Skin expression of metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases in sibling patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis and intrafamilial phenotypic variation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 121, 273–279. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12325.x
25
BoehnckeW. H.SchönM. P. (2015). Psoriasis. Lancet386, 983–994. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61909-7
26
BonnansC.ChouJ.WerbZ. (2014). Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 786–801. 10.1038/nrm3904
27
BornsteinP. (2001). Thrombospondins as matricellular modulators of cell function. J. Clin. Invest. 107, 929–934. 10.1172/JCI12749
28
BornsteinP. (2009). Matricellular proteins: an overview. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 3, 163–165. 10.1007/s12079-009-0069-z
29
BosJ. D.TeunissenM. B. M.CairoI.KriegS. R.KapsenbergM. L.DasP. K.et al. (1990). T-cell receptor γδ bearing cells in normal human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 94, 37–42. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12873333
30
BoydS.TolvanenK.VirolainenS.KuivanenT.KyllönenL.Saarialho-KereU. (2008). Differential expression of stromal MMP-1, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in basal cell carcinomas of immunosuppressed patients and controls. Virchows Arch. 452, 83–90. 10.1007/s00428-007-0526-0
31
BreitkreutzD.KoxholtI.ThiemannK.NischtR. (2013). Skin basement membrane: The foundation of epidermal integrity - BM functions and diverse roles of bridging molecules nidogen and perlecan. Biomed Res. Int. 2013:179784. 10.1155/2013/179784
32
BronteV.ZanovelloP. (2005). Regulation of immune responses by L-arginine metabolism. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 641–654. 10.1038/nri1668
33
Bruckner-TudermanL.McGrathJ. A.RobinsonE. C.UittoJ. (2010). Animal models of epidermolysis bullosa: update 2010. J. Invest. Dermatol.130, 1485–1488. 10.1038/jid.2010.75
34
BrunnerP. M.IsraelA.ZhangN.LeonardA.WenH. C.HuynhT.et al. (2018). Early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis is characterized by TH2/TH17/TH22-centered inflammation and lipid alterations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 141, 2094–2106. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.040
35
BubackF.RenklA. C.SchulzG.WeissJ. M. (2009). Osteopontin and the skin: multiple emerging roles in cutaneous biology and pathology. Exp. Dermatol. 18, 750–759. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00926.x
36
BubierJ. A.SprouleT. J.AlleyL. M.WebbC. M.FineJ. D.RoopenianD. C.et al. (2010). A mouse model of generalized non-herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J. Invest. Dermatol.130, 1819–1828. 10.1038/jid.2010.46
37
Bulfone-PausS.PausR. (2008). Osteopontin as a new player in mast cell biology. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 338–341. 10.1002/eji.200738131
38
BuomminoE.De FilippisA.GaudielloF.BalatoA.BalatoN.TufanoM. A.et al. (2012). Modification of osteopontin and MMP-9 levels in patients with psoriasis on anti-TNF-α therapy. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 304, 481–485. 10.1007/s00403-012-1251-3
39
CandiE.SchmidtR.MelinoG. (2005). The cornified envelope: a model of cell death in the skin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 328–340. 10.1038/nrm1619
40
CaoT.LongleyM. A.WangX. J.RoopD. R. (2001). An inducible mouse model for epidermolysis bullosa simplex: implications for gene therapy. J. Cell Biol. 152, 651–656. 10.1083/jcb.152.3.651
41
CavalloF.De GiovanniC.NanniP.ForniG.LolliniP. L. (2011). 2011: The immune hallmarks of cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 60, 319–326. 10.1007/s00262-010-0968-0
42
ChandranV. (2013). The genetics of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.44, 149–156. 10.1007/s12016-012-8303-5
43
CheukS.SchlumsH.Gallais SérézalI.MartiniE.ChiangS. C.MarquardtN.et al. (2017). CD49a expression defines tissue-resident CD8+T cells poised for cytotoxic function in human skin. Immunity46, 287–300. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.01.009
44
ChuC.-C.Di MeglioP.NestleF. O. (2011). Harnessing dendritic cells in inflammatory skin diseases. Semin. Immunol. 23, 28–41. 10.1016/j.smim.2011.01.006
45
ChungH. J.UittoJ. (2010a). Epidermolysis bullosa with Pyloric atresia. Dermatol. Clin. 28, 43–54. 10.1016/j.det.2009.10.005
46
ChungH. J.UittoJ. (2010b). Type VII collagen: the anchoring fibril protein at fault in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatol. Clin. 28, 93–105. 10.1016/j.det.2009.10.011
47
CiazynskaM.BednarskiI. A.WódzK.KolanoP.NarbuttJ.SobjanekM.et al. (2018). Proteins involved in cutaneous basal cell carcinoma development. Oncol. Lett. 16, 4064–4072. 10.3892/ol.2018.9126
48
ClarkR. A. (2010). Skin-resident T cells: the ups and downs of on site immunity. J. Invest. Dermatol. 130, 362–370. 10.1038/jid.2009.247
49
ClarkR. A.ChongB.MirchandaniN.BrinsterN. K.YamanakaK.-I.DowgiertR. K.et al. (2006). The vast majority of CLA+ T cells are resident in normal skin. J. Immunol. 176, 4431–4439. 10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.4431
50
ClementeN.RaineriD.CappellanoG.BoggioE.FaveroF.SoluriM. F.et al. (2016). Osteopontin bridging innate and adaptive immunity in autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 2016:7675437. 10.1155/2016/7675437
51
CoulombeP. A.HuttonM. E.VassarR.FuchsE. (1991). A function for keratins and a common thread among different types of epidermolysis bullosa simplex diseases. J. Cell Biol. 115, 1661–1674. 10.1083/jcb.115.6.1661
52
CoulombeP. A.KernsM. L.FuchsE. (2009). Epidermolysis bullosa simplex: a paradigm for disorders of tissue fragility. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 1784–1793. 10.1172/JCI38177
53
CoulombeP. A.LeeC. H. (2012). Defining keratin protein function in skin epithelia: epidermolysis bullosa simplex and its aftermath.J. Invest. Dermatol.132(3 Pt 2), 763–775. 10.1038/jid.2011.450
54
CoussensL. M.TinkleC. L.HanahanD.WerbZ. (2000). MMP-9 supplied by bone marrow-derived cells contributes to skin carcinogenesis. Cell103, 481–490. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00139-2
55
CraigV. J.PolverinoF.Laucho-ContrerasM. E.ShiY.LiuY.OsorioJ. C.et al. (2014). Mononuclear phagocytes and airway epithelial cells: novel sources of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS ONE9:e97485. 10.1371/journal.pone.0097485
56
CruzM. S.DiamondA.RussellA.JamesonJ. M. (2018). Human αβ and γδ T cells in skin immunity and disease. Front. Immunol.9:1304. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01304
57
DangC.GottschlingM.RoewertJ.ForschnerT.StockflethE.NindlI. (2006). Tenascin-C patterns and splice variants in actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 155, 763–770. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07401.x
58
DevillersA. C.van ToorenenbergenaW.Klein HeerenbrinkG. J.MuldertP. G. H.OranjeaP. (2007). Elevated levels of plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with atopic dermatitis: a pilot study. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.32, 311–313. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2007.02378.x
59
DharmageS. C.LoweA. J.MathesonM. C.BurgessJ. A.AllenK. J.AbramsonM. J. (2014). Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march revisited. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 69, 17–27. 10.1111/all.12268
60
Di MeglioP.PereraG. K.NestleF. O. (2011). The multitasking organ: recent insights into skin immune function. Immunity35, 857–869. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.003
61
DianzaniC.ZaraG. P.MainaG.PettazzoniP.PizzimentiS.RossiF.et al. (2014). Drug delivery nanoparticles in skin cancers. Biomed Res. Int. 2014:895986. 10.1155/2014/895986
62
DonovanJ. (2009). Review of the hair follicle origin hypothesis for basal cell Carcinoma. Dermatologic Surg. 35, 1311–1323. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01236.x
63
D'OrazioJ.JarrettS.Amaro-OrtizA.ScottT. (2013). UV radiation and the skin. Int. J. Mol. Sci.14, 12222–12248. 10.3390/ijms140612222
64
DriskellR. R.JahodaC. A. B.ChuongC. M.WattF. M.HorsleyV. (2014). Defining dermal adipose tissue. Exp. Dermatol. 23, 629–631. 10.1111/exd.12450
65
Dubois DeclercqS.PouliotR. (2013). Promising new treatments for psoriasis. Sci. World J. 2013:980419. 10.1155/2013/980419
66
DummerR.RochlitzC.VeluT.AcresB.LimacherJ. M.BleuzenP.et al. (2008). Intralesional adenovirus-mediated interleukin-2 gene transfer for advanced solid cancers and melanoma. Mol. Ther. 16, 985–994. 10.1038/mt.2008.32
67
DuvicM.NagpalS.AsanoA. T.ChandraratnaR. A. S. (1997). Molecular mechanisms of tazarotene action in psoriasis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.37, S18–S24. 10.1016/S0190-9622(97)70412-2
68
EckerB. L.KaurA.DouglassS. M.WebsterM. R.AlmeidaF. V.MarinoG. E.et al. (2019). Age-related changes in HAPLN1 increase lymphatic permeability and affect routes of melanoma metastasis. Cancer Discov.9, 82–95. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0168
69
EspositoS.GuezS.OrentiA.TadiniG.ScuveraG.CortiL.et al. (2016). Autoimmunity and cytokine imbalance in inherited epidermolysis bullosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17:1625. 10.3390/ijms17101625
70
FerrariS.PellegriniG.MatsuiT.MavilioF.DeL. M. (2006). Towards a gene therapy clinical trial for epidermolysis bullosa. Rev.Recent Clin.Trials1, 155–162. 10.2174/157488706776876472
71
Fichtner-FeiglS.StroberW.KawakamiK.PuriR. K.KitaniA. (2006). IL-13 signaling through the IL-13α2receptor is involved in induction of TGF-β1production and fibrosis. Nat. Med. 12, 99–106. 10.1038/nm1332
72
FineJ. D. (2016). Epidemiology of inherited epidermolysis bullosa based on incidence and prevalence estimates from the national epidermolysis Bullosa registry. JAMA Dermatol. 152, 1231–1238. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2473
73
FlacherV.TrippC. H.MairhoferD. G.SteinmanR. M.StoitznerP.IdoyagaJ.et al. (2014). Murine Langerin+ dermal dendritic cells prime CD8+ T cells while Langerhans cells induce cross-tolerance. EMBO Mol. Med. 6, 1191–1204. 10.15252/emmm.201404707
74
FontanaR.BregniM.CipponiA.RaccostaL.RainelliC.MaggioniD.et al. (2009). Peripheral blood lymphocytes genetically modified to express the self/tumor antigen MAGE-A3 induce antitumor immune responses in cancer patients. Blood113, 1651–1660. 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168666
75
FrantzC.StewartK. M.WeaverV. M. (2010). The extracellular matrix at a glance.J. Cell Sci.123(Pt 24), 4195–4200. 10.1242/jcs.023820
76
FreyH.SchroederN.Manon-JensenT.IozzoR. V.SchaeferL. (2013). Biological interplay between proteoglycans and their innate immune receptors in inflammation. FEBS J. 280, 2165–2179. 10.1111/febs.12145
77
FuchsE. (2007). Scratching the surface of skin development. Nature445, 834–842. 10.1038/nature05659
78
FuchsE.RaghavanS. (2002). Getting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Genet.3, 199–209. 10.1038/nrg758
79
FujitsuY.FukudaK.KumagaiN.NishidaT. (2003). IL-4-induced cell proliferation and production of extracellular matrix proteins in human conjunctival fibroblasts. Exp. Eye Res.76, 107–114. 10.1016/S0014-4835(02)00248-8
80
FukudaK.SugiharaE.OhtaS.IzuharaK.FunakoshiT.AmagaiM.et al. (2015). Periostin is a key niche component for wound metastasis of melanoma. PLoS ONE10:e0129704. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129704
81
FulopT.KhalilA.LarbiA. (2012). The role of elastin peptides in modulating the immune response in aging and age-related diseases. Pathol. Biol. 60, 28–33. 10.1016/j.patbio.2011.10.006
82
GaiserM. R.WeisC. A.GaiserT.JiangH.Buder-BakhayaK.HerpelE.et al. (2018). Merkel cell carcinoma expresses the immunoregulatory ligand CD200 and induces immunosuppressive macrophages and regulatory T cells. Oncoimmunology7:e1426517. 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1426517
83
García-NietoS.JohalR. K.ShakesheffK. M.EmaraM.Pierre-JosephR.ChauD. Y. S.et al. (2010). Laminin and fibronectin treatment leads to generation of dendritic cells with superior endocytic capacity. PLoS ONE5:e10123. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010123
84
GasparotoT. H.De OliveiraC. E.De FreitasL. T.PinheiroC. R.RamosR. N.Da SilvaA. L.et al. (2012). Inflammatory events during murine squamous cell carcinoma development. J. Inflamm.9:46. 10.1186/1476-9255-9-46
85
GayD.KwonO.ZhangZ.SpataM.PlikusM. V.HollerP. D.et al. (2013). Fgf9 from dermal γδ T cells induces hair follicle neogenesis after wounding. Nat. Med.19, 916–923. 10.1038/nm.3181
86
Georges-LabouesseE.MessaddeqN.YehiaG.CadalbertL.DierichA.Le MeurM. (1996). Absence of integrin α6 leads to epidermolysis bullosa and neonatal death in mice. Nat. Genet.13, 370–373. 10.1038/ng0796-370
87
GoldschneiderK. R.GoodJ.HarropE.LiossiC.Lynch-JordanA.MartinezA. E.et al. (2014). Pain care for patients with epidermolysis bullosa: best care practice guidelines. BMC Med. 12:178. 10.1186/s12916-014-0178-2
88
GoździalskaA.Wojas-PelcA.DragJ.BrzewskiP.JaśkiewiczJ.PastuszczakM. (2016). Expression of metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) in basal-cell carcinoma. Mol. Biol. Rep.43, 1027–1033. 10.1007/s11033-016-4040-9
89
GrassbergerM.SteinhoffM.SchneiderD.LugerT. A. (2004). Pimecrolimus - an anti-inflammatory drug targeting the skin. Exp. Dermatol.13, 721–730. 10.1111/j.0906-6705.2004.00269.x
90
HallmannR.ZhangX.Di RussoJ.LiL.SongJ.HannocksM. J.et al. (2015). The regulation of immune cell trafficking by the extracellular matrix. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 36, 54–61. 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.06.006
91
HamasakiH.KogaK.AokiM.HamasakiM.KoshikawaN.SeikiM.et al. (2011). Expression of laminin 5-γ2 chain in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and its role in tumour invasion. Br. J. Cancer.105, 824–832. 10.1038/bjc.2011.283
92
HamidQ.NaseerT.MinshallE. M.SongY. L.BoguniewiczM.LeungD. Y. M. (1996). In vivo expression of IL-12 and IL-13 in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 98, 225–231. 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70246-4
93
HanL.WangL.TangS.YuanL.WuS.DuX.et al. (2018). ITGB4 deficiency in bronchial epithelial cells directs airway inflammation and bipolar disorder-related behavior. J. Neuroinflammation15:246. 10.1186/s12974-018-1283-5
94
HarlinH.MengY.PetersonA. C.ZhaY.TretiakovaM.SlingluffC.et al. (2009). Chemokine expression in melanoma metastases associated with CD8+ T-cell recruitment. Cancer Res. 69, 3077–3085. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2281
95
HarperJ. I.GodwinH.GreenA.WilkesL. E.HoldenN. J.MoffattM.et al. (2010). A study of matrix metalloproteinase expression and activity in atopic dermatitis using a novel skin wash sampling assay for functional biomarker analysis. Br. J. Dermatol. 162, 397–403. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09467.x
96
HeathW. R.CarboneF. R. (2013). The skin-resident and migratory immune system in steady state and memory: innate lymphocytes, dendritic cells and T cells. Nat. Immunol.14, 978–985. 10.1038/ni.2680
97
HegdeS.RaghavanS. (2013). A skin-depth analysis of integrins: role of the integrin network in health and disease. Cell Commun. Adhes. 20, 155–169. 10.3109/15419061.2013.854334
98
HenriS.PoulinL. F.TamoutounourS.ArdouinL.GuilliamsM.de BovisB.et al. (2010). CD207 + CD103 + dermal dendritic cells cross-present keratinocyte-derived antigens irrespective of the presence of Langerhans cells. J. Exp. Med. 207, 189–206. 10.1084/jem.20091964
99
HenrotP.TruchetetM.-E.FisherG.TaïebA.CarioM. (2018). CCN proteins as potential actionable targets in scleroderma. Exp. Dermatol. 28, 11–18. 10.1111/exd.13806
100
HerroR.ShuiJ. W.ZahnerS.SidlerD.KawakamiY.KawakamiT.et al. (2018). LIGHT - HVEM signaling in keratinocytes controls development of dermatitis. J. Exp. Med. 215, 415–422. 10.1084/jem.20170536
101
HiratsukaS.WatanabeA.AburataniH.MaruY. (2006). Tumour-mediated upregulation of chemoattractants and recruitment of myeloid cells predetermines lung metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1369–1375. 10.1038/ncb1507
102
HirschT.RothoeftT.TeigN.BauerJ. W.PellegriniG.De RosaL.et al. (2017). Regeneration of the entire human epidermis using transgenic stem cells. Nature551, 327–332. 10.1038/nature24487
103
HoeffelG.WangY.GreterM.SeeP.TeoP.MalleretB.et al. (2012). Adult Langerhans cells derive predominantly from embryonic fetal liver monocytes with a minor contribution of yolk sac-derived macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1167–1181. 10.1084/jem.20120340
104
HowellM. D.KimB. E.GaoP.GrantA. V.BoguniewiczM.DeBenedettoA.et al. (2007). Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.120, 150–155. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.04.031
105
HuS. C. S.YuH. S.YenF. L.LinC. L.ChenG. S.LanC. C. E. (2016). Neutrophil extracellular trap formation is increased in psoriasis and induces human β-defensin-2 production in epidermal keratinocytes. Sci. Rep.6:31119. 10.1038/srep31119
106
HuberL. A.PereiraT. A.RamosD. N.RezendeL. C. D.EmeryF. S.SobralL. M.et al. (2015). Topical skin cancer therapy using doxorubicin-loaded cationic lipid nanoparticles and iontophoresis. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol.11, 1975–1988. 10.1166/jbn.2015.2139
107
HusseinM. R.AliF. M. N.OmarA. E. M. M. (2007). Immunohistological analysis of immune cells in blistering skin lesions. J. Clin. Pathol. 60, 62–71. 10.1136/jcp.2006.037010
108
HynesR. O. (2002). Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell110, 673–687. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00971-6
109
IlkovitchD.LopezD. M. (2008). Immune modulation by melanoma-derived factors. Exp. Dermatol. 17, 977–985. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00779.x
110
IshidaM.KojimaF.OkabeH. (2013). Cathepsin K expression in basal cell carcinoma. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 27, 128–130. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04436.x
111
IwataH.BieberK.TiburzyB.ChrobokN.KaliesK.ShimizuA.et al. (2013). B cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages are required to induce an autoreactive CD4 helper T cell response in experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J. Immunol. 191, 2978–2988. 10.4049/jimmunol.1300310
112
JacobiA.MayerA.AugustinM. (2015). Keratolytics and emollients and their role in the therapy of psoriasis: a systematic review. Dermatol. Ther.5, 1–18. 10.1007/s13555-015-0068-3
113
JarnickiA. G.LysaghtJ.TodrykS.MillsK. H. G. (2006). Suppression of antitumor immunity by IL-10 and TGF- -producing T cells infiltrating the growing tumor: influence of tumor environment on the induction of CD4+ and CD8+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol.177, 896–904. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.2.896
114
JayadevR.SherwoodD. R. (2017). Basement membranes. Curr. Biol.27, R207–R211. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.006
115
JimenezS. A.HitrayaE.VargaJ. (1996). Pathogenesis of scleroderma. collagen. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 22, 647–674. 10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70294-5
116
JohnsonD. B.SosmanJ. A. (2015). Therapeutic advances and treatment options in metastatic melanoma. JAMA Oncol. 1, 380–386. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0565
117
KaleS.RajaR.ThoratD.SoundararajanG.PatilT. V.KunduG. C. (2014). Osteopontin signaling upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression in tumor-associated macrophages leading to enhanced angiogenesis and melanoma growth via α9β1 integrin. Oncogene33, 2295–2306. 10.1038/onc.2013.184
118
KamataM.FujitaH.HamanakaT.TakahashiK.KogaH.HashimotoT.et al. (2013). Anti-laminin γ1 pemphigoid accompanied by autoantibodies to laminin α3 and γ2 subunits of laminin-332. JAMA Dermatol. 33, 2295–2306. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5358
119
KandothC.McLellanM. D.VandinF.YeK.NiuB.LuC.et al. (2013). Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature502, 333–339. 10.1038/nature12634
120
KaplanD. H. (2017). Ontogeny and function of murine epidermal Langerhans cells. Nat. Immunol. 18, 1068–1075. 10.1038/ni.3815
121
KaragiannisG. S.PoutahidisT.ErdmanS. E.KirschR.RiddellR. H.DiamandisE. P. (2012). Cancer-associated fibroblasts drive the progression of metastasis through both paracrine and mechanical pressure on cancer tissue. Mol. Cancer Res. 10, 1403–1418. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0307
122
KarantalisV.SchulmanI. H.BalkanW.HareJ. M. (2015). Allogeneic cell therapy: a new paradigm in therapeutics. Circ. Res.116, 12–15. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.305495
123
KasperkiewiczM.SadikC. D.BieberK.IbrahimS. M.ManzR. A.SchmidtE.et al. (2016). Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita: from pathophysiology to novel therapeutic options. J. Invest. Dermatol. 136, 24–33. 10.1038/JID.2015.356
124
KasraieS.WerfelT. (2013). Role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Mediators Inflamm. 2013:942375. 10.1155/2013/942375
125
KaurA.EckerB. L.DouglassS. M.KugelC. H.WebsterM. R.AlmeidaF. V.et al. (2018). Remodeling of the collagen matrix in aging skin promotes melanoma metastasis and affects immune cell motility. Cancer Discov. 9, 64–81. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0193
126
KelshR.YouR.HorzempaC.ZhengM.McKeown-LongoP. J. (2014). Regulation of the innate immune response by fibronectin: synergism between the III-1 and EDA domains. PLoS ONE9:e102974. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102974
127
KiekensR. C. M.ThepenT.OostingA. J.BihariI. C.Van De WinkelJ. G. J.Bruijnzeel-KoomenC. A. F. M.et al. (2001). Heterogeneity within tissue-specific macrophage and dendritic cell populations during cutaneous inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 145, 957–965. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04508.x
128
KimB. E.LeungD. Y. M.BoguniewiczM.HowellM. D. (2008). Loricrin and involucrin expression is down-regulated by Th2 cytokines through STAT-6. Clin. Immunol.126, 332–337. 10.1016/j.clim.2007.11.006
129
KimT. I.ParkH. J.WonY. Y.ChoiH.JeongK. H.SungJ. Y.et al. (2018). Basement membrane status is intact in urticarial dermatitis vs. adult-onset atopic dermatitis.Ann. Dermatol.30, 258–261. 10.5021/ad.2018.30.2.258
130
KisichK. O.CarspeckenC. W.FiéveS.BoguniewiczM.LeungD. Y. M. (2008). Defective killing of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis is associated with reduced mobilization of human β-defensin-3. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.122, 62–68. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.022
131
KobayashiY. (1997). Langerhan's cell produce type IV collagenase (MMP-9) following epicutaneous stimulation with haptens. Immunology90, 496–501. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00212.x
132
KogaC.KabashimaK.ShiraishiN.KobayashiM.TokuraY. (2008). Possible pathogenic role of Th17 cells for atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 2625–2630. 10.1038/jid.2008.111
133
KomoharaY.JinushiM.TakeyaM. (2014). Clinical significance of macrophage heterogeneity in human malignant tumors. Cancer Sci. 105, 1–8. 10.1111/cas.12314
134
KurbetA. S.HegdeS.BhattacharjeeO.MarepallyS.VemulaP. K.RaghavanS. (2016). Sterile inflammation enhances ECM degradation in integrin β1 KO embryonic skin. Cell Rep. 16, 3334–3347. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.062
135
Lai-CheongJ. E.TanakaA.HawcheG.EmanuelP.MaariC.TaskesenM.et al. (2009). Kindler syndrome: a focal adhesion genodermatosis. Br. J. Dermatol.160, 233–242. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08976.x
136
LandriscinaA.RosenJ.AlbaneseJ.AminB.FriedmanA. J. (2015). Identifying new biologic targets in atopic dermatitis (AD): A retrospective histologic analysis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 73, 521–523. 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.036
137
LangleyR. G. B.KruegerG. G.GriffithsC. E. M. (2005). Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann. Rheum. Dis.64(Suppl. 2): ii18–ii23. 10.1136/ard.2004.033217
138
LettnerT.LangR.KlauseggerA.HainzlS.BauerJ. W.WallyV. (2013). MMP-9 and CXCL8/IL-8 are potential therapeutic targets in Epidermolysis bullosa simplex. PLoS ONE8:e70123. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070123
139
LewinJ.CarucciJ. (2015). Advances in the management of basal cell carcinoma. F1000Prime Rep. 7:53. 10.12703/P7-53
140
LiH.LiH.HuoR.WuP.ShenZ.XuH.et al. (2017). Cyr61/CCN1 induces CCL20 production by keratinocyte via activating p38 and JNK/AP-1 pathway in psoriasis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 88, 46–56. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.05.018
141
LiJ. H.HuangX. R.ZhuH. J.JohnsonR.LanH. Y. (2003). Role of TGF-β signaling in extracellular matrix production under high glucose conditions. Kidney Int.63, 2010–2019. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00016.x
142
LiR.HebertJ. D.LeeT. A.XingH.Boussommier-CallejaA.HynesR. O.et al. (2017). Macrophage-secreted TNFα and TGFβ1 influence migration speed and persistence of cancer cells in 3D tissue culture via independent pathways.Cancer Res.77, 279–290. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0442
143
LiX.LiJ.WangL.NiuX.HouR.LiuR.et al. (2015). Transmission of psoriasis by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and blood transfusion. Blood Cancer J. 5:e288. 10.1038/bcj.2015.15
144
LiguoriM.SolinasG.GermanoG.MantovaniA.AllavenaP. (2011). Tumor-associated macrophages as incessant builders and destroyers of the cancer stroma. Cancers3, 3740–3761. 10.3390/cancers3043740
145
LiuA. Y.ZhengH.OuyangG. (2014). Periostin, a multifunctional matricellular protein in inflammatory and tumor microenvironments. Matrix Biol. 37, 150–156. 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.04.007
146
LoB. K. K.JaliliR. B.ZlotyD.GhaharyA.CowanB.DutzJ. P.et al. (2011). CXCR3 ligands promote expression of functional indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in basal cell carcinoma keratinocytes. Br. J. Dermatol. 165, 1030–1036. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10489.x
147
LuH.ChenJ.PlankoL.ZigrinoP.Klein-HitpassL.MaginT. M. (2007). Induction of inflammatory cytokines by a keratin mutation and their repression by a small molecule in a mouse model for EBS. J. Invest. Dermatol. 127, 2781–2789. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700918
148
LuP.TakaiK.WeaverV. M.WerbZ. (2011). Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.3. 10.1101/cshperspect.a005058
149
MacleodA. S.HemmersS.GarijoO.ChabodM.MowenK.WitherdenD. A.et al. (2013). Dendritic epidermal T cells regulate skin antimicrobial barrier function. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 4364–4374. 10.1172/JCI70064
150
MaggiL.SantarlasciV.CaponeM.PeiredA.FrosaliF.CromeS. Q.et al. (2010). CD161 is a marker of all human IL-17-producing T-cell subsets and is induced by RORC. Eur. J. Immunol. 40, 2174–2181. 10.1002/eji.200940257
151
MalaisseJ.BourguignonV.De VuystE.Lambert De RouvroitC.NikkelsA. F.FlamionB.et al. (2014). Hyaluronan metabolism in human keratinocytes and atopic dermatitis skin is driven by a balance of hyaluronan synthases 1 and 3. J. Invest. Dermatol. 134, 2174–2182. 10.1038/jid.2014.147
152
Maldonado-ColinG.Hernández-ZepedaC.Durán-McKinsterC.García-RomeroM. (2017). Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: a multisystem disease of skin and mucosae fragility. Indian J. Paediatr. Dermatol.88, 185–198. 10.4103/ijpd.ijpd_16_17
153
MalissenB.TamoutounourS.HenriS. (2014). The origins and functions of dendritic cells and macrophages in the skin. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 417–428. 10.1038/nri3683
154
ManoukianM.OttS.RajadasJ.InayathullahM. (2014). Polymeric nanoparticles to combat squamous cell carcinomas in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Recent Patents Nanomed. 4, 15–24. 10.2174/1877912304666140708184013
155
MargadantC.KreftM.ZambrunoG.SonnenbergA. (2013). Kindlin-1 regulates integrin dynamics and adhesion turnover. PLoS ONE8:e65341. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065341
156
MarinkovichM. P. (2007). Tumour microenvironment: Laminin 332 in squamous-cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 7, 370–380. 10.1038/nrc2089
157
Martin-MansoG.GalliS.RidnourL. A.TsokosM.WinkD. A.RobertsD. D. (2008). Thrombospondin 1 promotes tumor macrophage recruitment and enhances tumor cell cytotoxicity of differentiated U937 cells. Cancer Res. 68, 7090–7099. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0643
158
MartinsL.CaleyM. P.MooreK.SzentpeteryZ.MarshS. T.MurrellD. F.et al. (2016). Suppression of TGFβ and angiogenesis by Type VII collagen in cutaneous SCC.J. Natl. Cancer Inst.108:djv293. 10.1093/jnci/djv293
159
MartinsV. L.VyasJ. J.ChenM.PurdieK.MeinC. A.SouthA. P.et al. (2009). Increased invasive behaviour in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with loss of basement-membrane type VII collagen. J. Cell Sci. 122, 1788–1799. 10.1242/jcs.042895
160
MasudaA.YasuokaH.SatohT.OkazakiY.YamaguchiY.KuwanaM. (2013). Versican is upregulated in circulating monocytes in patients with systemic sclerosis and amplifies a CCL2-mediated pathogenic loop. Arthritis Res. Ther. 15:R74. 10.1186/ar4251
161
MatejukA. (2018). Skin immunity. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp.66, 45–54. 10.1007/s00005-017-0477-3
162
MaybaJ. N.GooderhamM. J. (2017). Review of atopic dermatitis and topical therapies. J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 21, 227–236. 10.1177/1203475416685077
163
McFaddenJ.FryL.PowlesA. V.KimberI. (2012). Concepts in psoriasis: psoriasis and the extracellular matrix. Br. J. Dermatol. 167, 980–986. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11149.x
164
McFaddenJ. P.BasketterD. A.DearmanR. J.KimberI. R. (2011). Extra domain A-positive fibronectin-positive feedback loops and their association with cutaneous inflammatory disease. Clin. Dermatol. 29, 257–265. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.11.003
165
McWhorterF. Y.DavisC. T.LiuW. F. (2015). Physical and mechanical regulation of macrophage phenotype and function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 1303–1316. 10.1007/s00018-014-1796-8
166
MedeirosG. X.Riet-CorreaF. (2015). Epidermolysis bullosa in animals: a review. Vet. Dermatol. 26, 3–13. 10.1111/vde.12176
167
MellerioJ. E. (2010). Epidermolysis bullosa care in the United Kingdom. Dermatol. Clin. 28, 395–396. 10.1016/j.det.2010.02.015
168
MencíaÁ.GarcíaM.GarcíaE.LlamesS.CharlesworthA.de LucasR.et al. (2016). Identification of two rare and novel large deletions in ITGB4 gene causing epidermolysis bullosa with pyloric atresia. Exp. Dermatol. 25, 269–274. 10.1111/exd.1293
169
MeyaardL.AdemaG. J.ChangC.WoollattE.SutherlandG. R.LanierL. L.et al. (1997). LAIR-1, a novel inhibitory receptor expressed on human mononuclear leukocytes. Immunity7, 283–290. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80530-0
170
MigdenM. R.ChangA. L. S.DirixL.StratigosA. J.LearJ. T. (2018). Emerging trends in the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat. Rev. 64, 1–10. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.12.009
171
MildnerA.JungS. (2014). Development and function of dendritic cell subsets. Immunity40, 642–656. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.04.016
172
MiskolcziZ.SmithM. P.RowlingE. J.FergusonJ.BarriusoJ.WellbrockC. (2018). Collagen abundance controls melanoma phenotypes through lineage-specific microenvironment sensing. Oncogene37, 3166–3182. 10.1038/s41388-018-0209-0
173
MitamuraY.NunomuraS.NanriY.OgawaM.YoshiharaT.MasuokaM.et al. (2018). The IL-13/periostin/IL-24 pathway causes epidermal barrier dysfunction in allergic skin inflammation. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 73, 1881–1891. 10.1111/all.13437
174
MoilanenJ. M.LöffekS.KokkonenN.SaloS.VäyrynenJ. P.HurskainenT.et al. (2017). Significant role of collagen XVII and integrin β4 in migration and invasion of the less aggressive squamous cell carcinoma cells. Sci. Rep.7:45057. 10.1038/srep45057
175
MoreiraG.FulgêncioL. B.de MendonçaE. F.LelesC. R.BatistaA. C.da SilvaT. A. (2010). T regulatory cell markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma: relationship with survival and tumor aggressiveness. Oncol. Lett. 1, 127–132. 10.3892/ol_00000023
176
MoriR.ShawT. J.MartinP. (2008). Molecular mechanisms linking wound inflammation and fibrosis: knockdown of osteopontin leads to rapid repair and reduced scarring. J. Exp. Med. 205, 43–51. 10.1084/jem.20071412
177
MorizaneS.GalloR. L. (2012). Antimicrobial peptides in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. J. Dermatol.39, 225–230. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01483.x
178
MottJ. D.WerbZ. (2004). Regulation of matrix biology by matrix metalloproteinases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 558–564. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.07.010
179
MuellerS. N.ZaidA.CarboneF. R. (2014). Tissue-resident T cells: dynamic players in skin immunity.Front. Immunol.5:332. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00332
180
MundeP.KhandekarS.DiveA.SharmaA. (2013). Pathophysiology of merkel cell. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 17, 408–412. 10.4103/0973-029X.125208
181
NagaoK.GinhouxF.LeitnerW. W.MotegiS.-I.BennettC. L.ClausenB. E.et al. (2009). Murine epidermal Langerhans cells and langerin-expressing dermal dendritic cells are unrelated and exhibit distinct functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3312–3317. 10.1073/pnas.0807126106
182
NatsugaK.ShinkumaS.NishieW.ShimizuH. (2010). Animal models of epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatol. Clin. 28, 137–142. 10.1016/j.det.2009.10.016
183
NatsumiA.SugawaraK.YasumizuM.MizukamiY.SanoS.MoritaA.et al. (2018). Re-investigating the basement membrane zone of psoriatic epidermal lesions: is Laminin-511 a new player in psoriasis pathogenesis?J. Histochem. Cytochem.66, 847–862. 10.1369/0022155418782693
184
NelsonD. A.LarsenM. (2015). Heterotypic control of basement membrane dynamics during branching morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 401, 103–109. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.011
185
NestleF. O.KaplanD. H.BarkerJ. (2009). Mechanisms of disease psoriasis. N. Engl. J. Med.361, 496–509. 10.1056/NEJMra0804595
186
NiebuhrM.LutatC.SigelS.WerfelT. (2009). Impaired TLR-2 expression and TLR-2-mediated cytokine secretion in macrophages from patients with atopic dermatitis. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 64, 1580–1587. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02050.x
187
NoyR.PollardJ. W. (2014). Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy. Immunity41, 49–61. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.021
188
NyströmA.BornertO.KühlT.GretzmeierC.ThrieneK.DengjelJ.et al. (2018). Impaired lymphoid extracellular matrix impedes antibacterial immunity in epidermolysis bullosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, E705–E714. 10.1073/pnas.1709111115
189
NyströmA.Bruckner-TudermanL. (2018). Injury- and inflammation-driven skin fibrosis: the paradigm of epidermolysis bullosa. Matrix Biol. 68–69, 547–560. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.01.016
190
NystromA.ThrieneK.MittapalliV.KernJ. S.KiritsiD.DengjelJ.et al. (2015). Losartan ameliorates dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and uncovers new disease mechanisms. EMBO Mol. Med. 7, 1211–1228. 10.15252/emmm.201505061
191
NyströmA.VelatiD.MittapalliV. R.FritschA.KernJ. S.Bruckner-TudermanL. (2013). Collagen VII plays a dual role in wound healing. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 3498–3509. 10.1172/JCI68127
192
ObaraW.KawaY.RaC.NishiokaK.SomaY.MizoguchiM. (2002). T cells and mast cells as a major source of interleukin-13 in atopic dermatitis. Dermatology205, 11–17. 10.1159/000063145
193
OdorisioT.di SalvioM.OrecchiaA.di ZenzoG.PiccinniE.CianfaraniF.et al. (2014). Monozygotic twins discordant for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa phenotype highlight the role of TGF-β signalling in modifying disease severity. Hum. Mol. Genet.23, 3907–3922. 10.1093/hmg/ddu102
194
OgawaK.ItoM.TakeuchiK.NakadaA.HeishiM.SutoH.et al. (2005). Tenascin-C is upregulated in the skin lesions of patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 40, 35–41. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.06.001
195
OhS. T.SchrammeA.StarkA.TilgenW.GutweinP.ReichrathJ. (2009). The disintegrin-metalloproteinases ADAM 10, 12 and 17 are upregulated in invading peripheral tumor cells of basal cell carcinomas. J. Cutan. Pathol. 36, 395–401. 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2008.01082.x
196
OhtaniT.MemezawaA.OkuyamaR.SayoT.SugiyamaY.InoueS.et al. (2009). Increased hyaluronan production and decreased E-cadherin expression by cytokine-stimulated keratinocytes lead to spongiosis formation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 1412–1420. 10.1038/jid.2008.394
197
OmlandS. H.NielsenP. S.GjerdrumL. M. R.GniadeckiR. (2016). Immunosuppressive environment in basal cell carcinoma: the role of regulatory T cells. Acta Derm. Venereol. 96, 917–921. 10.2340/00015555-2440
198
Onetti MudaA.ParadisiM.AngeloC.PudduP.FaraggianaT. (1996). Three-dimensional distribution of basement membrane components in dystrophic recessive epidermolysis bullosa. J. Pathol.179, 427–431. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199608)179:4<427::AID-PATH608>3.0.CO;2-T
199
O'reganA. W.ChuppG. L.LowryJ. A.GoetschkesM.MulliganN.BermanJ. S. (1999). Osteopontin is associated with T cells in sarcoid granulomas and has T cell adhesive and cytokine-like properties in vitro. J. Immunol.162, 1024–1031.
200
Oviedo-OrtaE.Bermudez-FajardoA.KaranamS.BenbowU.NewbyA. C. (2008). Comparison of MMP-2 and MMP-9 secretion from T helper 0, 1 and 2 lymphocytes alone and in coculture with macrophages. Immunology124, 42–50. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02728.x
201
OwenJ. L.Iragavarapu-CharyuluV.Gunja-SmithZ.HerbertL. M.GrossoJ. F.LopezD. M. (2003). Up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in T lymphocytes of mammary tumor bearers: role of vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Immunol. 171, 4340–4351. 10.4049/jimmunol.171.8.4340
202
OyamaN.ChanI.NeillS. M.HamadaT.SouthA. P.WessagowitV.et al. (2003). Autoantibodies to extracellular matrix protein 1 in lichen sclerosus. Lancet362, 118–123. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13863-9
203
PalmerB. C.DeLouiseL. A. (2016). Nanoparticle-enabled transdermal drug delivery systems for enhanced dose control and tissue targeting. Molecules21:1719. 10.3390/molecules21121719
204
PandolfinoT. L.SiegelR. S.KuzelT. M.RosenS. T.GuitartJ. (2000). Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma: review and current concepts. J. Clin. Oncol. 18, 2152–2168. 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.10.2152
205
PapierA.StrowdL. C. (2018). Atopic dermatitis: a review of topical nonsteroid therapy. Drugs Context7:212521. 10.7573/dic.212521
206
ParisiR.SymmonsD. P. M.GriffithsC. E. M.AshcroftD. M. (2013). Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133, 377–385. 10.1038/jid.2012.339
207
PeckA.MellinsE. D. (2010). Precarious balance: Th17 cells in host defense. Infect. Immun. 78, 32–38. 10.1128/IAI.00929-09
208
PetersB.KirfelJ.BüH.VidalM.MaginT. M. (2001). Complete cytolysis and neonatal lethality in keratin 5 knockout mice reveal its fundamental role in skin integrity and in epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12, 1775–1789. 10.1091/mbc.12.6.1775
209
PettersenJ. S.Fuentes-DuculanJ.Suárez-FariasM.PiersonK. C.Pitts-KieferA.FanL.et al. (2011). Tumor-associated macrophages in the cutaneous SCC microenvironment are heterogeneously activated. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 1322–1330. 10.1038/jid.2011.9
210
PfendnerE. G.SadowskiS. G.UittoJ. (2005). Epidermolysis bullosa simplex: recurrent and de novo mutations in the KRT5 and KRT14 genes, phenotype/genotype correlations, and implications for genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 125, 239–243. 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23818.x
211
PiaceskiA. D.LaroucheD.GhaniK.BissonF.GhioS. C.LarochelleS.et al. (2018). Translating the combination of gene therapy and tissue engineering for treating recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Eur. Cells Mater.35, 73–86. 10.22203/eCM.v035a06
212
PickupM. W.MouwJ. K.WeaverV. M. (2014). The extracellular matrix modulates the hallmarks of cancer. EMBO Rep. 15, 1243–1253. 10.15252/embr.201439246
213
PieniazekM.MatkowskiR.DonizyP. (2018). Macrophages in skin melanoma-the key element in melanomagenesis (Review). Oncol. Lett.15, 5399–5404. 10.3892/ol.2018.8021
214
PinhalM. A. S.CostaA. S.SerranoR. L.AlmeidaM. C. L.TheodoroT. R.Machado FilhoC. D. S. (2016). Expression of heparanase in basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. An. Bras. Dermatol. 91, 595–600. 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164957
215
PittayapruekP.MeephansanJ.PrapapanO.KomineM.OhtsukiM. (2016). Role of matrix metalloproteinases in photoaging and photocarcinogenesis.Int. J. Mol. Sci.17:868. 10.3390/ijms17060868
216
PivarcsiA.MüllerA.HippeA.RiekerJ.van LieropA.SteinhoffM.et al. (2007). Tumor immune escape by the loss of homeostatic chemokine expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 19055–19060. 10.1073/pnas.0705673104
217
PurwarR.KrausM.WerfelT.WittmannM. (2008). Modulation of keratinocyte-derived MMP-9 by IL-13: a possible role for the pathogenesis of epidermal inflammation. J. Invest. Dermatol.128, 59–66. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700940
218
PurwarR.WerfelT.WittmannM. (2006). IL-13-stimulated human keratinocytes preferentially attract CD4+CCR4+ T cells: possible role in atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol.126, 1043–1051. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700085
219
PuzanovI.FlahertyK. T. (2010). Targeted molecular therapy in melanoma. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg.29, 196–201. 10.1016/j.sder.2010.06.005
220
QuanT.XuY.QinZ.RobichaudP.BetcherS.CalderoneK.et al. (2014). Elevated YAP and its downstream targets CCN1 and CCN2 in basal cell carcinoma: impact on keratinocyte proliferation and stromal cell activation. Am. J. Pathol.184, 937–943. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.12.017
221
RankinA. L.MummJ. B.MurphyE.TurnerS.YuN.McClanahanT. K.et al. (2010). IL-33 induces IL-13-dependent cutaneous fibrosis. J. Immunol.184, 1526–1535. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903306
222
RasheedK.AbdulsalamI.FismenS.GrimstadØ.SveinbjørnssonB.MoensU.et al. (2018). CCL17/TARC and CCR4 expression in Merkel cell carcinoma. Oncotarget9, 31432–31447. 10.18632/oncotarget.25836
223
RatzingerG.StoitznerP.EbnerS.LutzM. B.LaytonG. T.RainerC.et al. (2002). Matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 2 are necessary for the migration of langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells from human and murine skin. J. Immunol.168, 4361–4371. 10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4361
224
RedutaT.NiecinskaM.PawłosA.SulkiewiczA.SokołowskaM. (2015). Serum osteopontin levels in disseminated allergic contact dermatitis. Adv. Med. Sci.60, 273–276. 10.1016/j.advms.2015.05.001
225
RiberoS.StucciL. S.DanielsG. A.BorradoriL. (2017). Drug therapy of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is there any evidence?Curr. Opin. Oncol.29, 129–135. 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000359
226
RognoniE.RuppertR.FässlerR. (2016). The kindlin family: functions, signaling properties and implications for human disease. J. Cell Sci.129, 17–27. 10.1242/jcs.161190
227
RomanovskyA. A. (2014). Skin temperature: its role in thermoregulation. Acta Physiol.210, 498–507. 10.1111/apha.12231
228
RothW.ReuterU.WohlenbergC.Bruckner-TudermanL.MaginT. M. (2009). Cytokines as genetic modifiers in K5-/- mice and in human epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Hum. Mutat.30, 832–841. 10.1002/humu.20981
229
RozarioT.DeSimoneD. W. (2010). The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: a dynamic view. Dev. Biol.341, 126–140. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.026
230
RüeggC. R.Chiquet-EhrismannR.AlkanS. S. (1989). Tenascin, an extracellular matrix protein, exerts immunomodulatory activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.86, 7437–7441.
231
RygielT. P.StolteE. H.de RuiterT.van de WeijerM. L.MeyaardL. (2011). Tumor-expressed collagens can modulate immune cell function through the inhibitory collagen receptor LAIR-1. Mol. Immunol.49, 402–406. 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.09.006
232
SakaguchiS.MiyaraM.CostantinoC. M.HaflerD. A. (2010). FOXP3 + regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol.10, 490–500. 10.1038/nri2785
233
SakaguchiS.WingK.OnishiY.Prieto-MartinP.YamaguchiT. (2009). Regulatory T cells: How do they suppress immune responses?Int. Immunol.21, 1105–1111. 10.1093/intimm/dxp095
234
SakrW. A.ZarboR. J.JacobsJ. R.CrissmanJ. D. (1987). Distribution of basement membrane in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Hum. Pathol.18, 1043–1050. 10.1016/S0046-8177(87)80221-6
235
SandigH.McDonaldJ.GilmourJ.ArnoM.LeeT. H.CousinsD. J. (2009). Fibronectin is a TH1-specific molecule in human subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.124, 528–535. 10.1109/CSPA.2012.6194761
236
SawamuraD.NakanoH.MatsuzakiY. (2010). Overview of epidermolysis bullosa. J. Dermatol.37, 214–219. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00800.x
237
SchalkwijkJ.Van VlijmenI.OosterlingB.PerretC.KoopmanR.Van den BornJ.et al. (1991). Tenascin expression in hyperproliferative skin diseases. Br. J. Dermatol.124, 13–20. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb03276.x
238
SchenkS.Bruckner-TudermanL.Chiquet-EhrismannR. (1995). Dermo-epidermal separation is associated with induced tenascin expression in human skin. Br. J. Dermatol.133, 13–22.
239
Schmitt-EgenolfM.BoehnckeW. H.ChristophersE.StänderM.SterryW. (1991). Type I and type II psoriasis show a similar usage of T-cell receptor variable regions. J. Invest. Dermatol.97, 1053–1056. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12492569.
240
SchmoeckelC.StolzW.SakaiL. Y.BurgesonR. E.TimplR.KriegT. (1989). Structure of basement membranes in malignant melanoma and nevocytic nevi. J. Invest. Dermatol.92, 663–668. 10.1016/0022-202X(89)90179-6.
241
SehraS.SerezaniA. P. M.OcañaJ. A.TraversJ. B.KaplanM. H. (2016). Mast cells regulate epidermal barrier function and the development of allergic skin inflammation. J. Invest. Dermatol.136, 1429–1437. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.03.019.
242
SeidlerD. G.MohamedN. A.BocianC.StadtmannA.HermannS.SchafersK.et al. (2011). The role for decorin in delayed-type hypersensitivity. J. Immunol.187, 6108–6119. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100373
243
SenyürekI.KempfW. E.KleinG.MaurerA.KalbacherH.SchäferL.et al. (2014). Processing of laminin α chains generates peptides involved in wound healing and host defense. J. Innate Immun.6, 467–484. 10.1159/000357032
244
SerezaniA. P. M.BozdoganG.SehraS.WalshD.KrishnamurthyP.Sierra PotchanantE. A.et al. (2017). IL-4 impairs wound healing potential in the skin by repressing fibronectin expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.139, 142–151. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.012
245
ShimizuH.TakizawaY.PulkkinenL.MurataS.KawaiM.HachisukaH.et al. (1999). Epidermolysis bullosa simplex associated with muscular dystrophy: phenotype-genotype correlations and review of the literature. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.41, 950–956. 10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70252-5
246
ShinJ. W.ChoiY. J.ChoiH. R.NaJ. I.KimK. H.ParkI. A.et al. (2015). Defective basement membrane in atopic dermatitis and possible role of IL-13. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.29, 2060–2062. 10.1111/jdv.12596
247
ShinT. H.KimH. S.ChoiS. W.KangK. S. (2017). Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for inflammatory skin diseases: clinical potential and mode of action.Int. J. Mol. Sci.18:244. 10.3390/ijms18020244
248
ShinkumaS. (2015). Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a review. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol.8, 275–284. 10.2147/CCID.S54681
249
SiegelB. R. S.PandolfinoT.GuitartJ.RosenS.KuzelT. M. (2012). Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma : review and current concepts. J. Clin. Oncol.18, 2908–2925. 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2908
250
SimonT.BrombergJ. S. (2017). Regulation of the immune system by laminins. Trends Immunol.38, 858–871. 10.1016/j.it.2017.06.002
251
SinghT. P.ZhangH. H.BorekI.WolfP.HedrickM. N.SinghS. P.et al. (2016). Monocyte-derived inflammatory Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells mediate psoriasis-like inflammation. Nat. Commun.7:13581. 10.1038/ncomms13581
252
SitaruA. G.SesarmanA.MihaiS.ChiriacM. T.ZillikensD.HultmanP.et al. (2010). T cells are required for the production of blister-inducing autoantibodies in experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J. Immunol.184, 1596–1603. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901412
253
Sokołowska-WojdyłoM.Olek-HrabK.Ruckemann-DziurdzinskaK. (2015). Primary cutaneous lymphomas: diagnosis and treatment. Postep. Dermatologii i Alergol.32, 368–383. 10.5114/pdia.2015.54749
254
StanleyJ. R.BeckwithJ. B.FullerR. P.KatzS. I. (1982). A specific antigenic defect of the basement membrane is found in basal cell carcinoma but not in other epidermal tumors. Cancer50, 1486–1490. 10.1002/1097-0142(19821015)50:8<1486::AID-CNCR2820500807>3.0.CO;2-F
255
StemmlerS.ParwezQ.Petrasch-ParwezE.EpplenJ. T.HoffjanS. (2014). Association of variation in the LAMA3 gene, encoding the alpha-chain of laminin 5, with atopic dermatitis in a German case-control cohort. BMC Dermatol.14:17. 10.1186/1471-5945-14-17
256
StratisA.PasparakisM.RupecR. A.MarkurD.HartmannK.Scharffetter-KochanekK.et al. (2006). Pathogenic role for skin macrophages in a mouse model of keratinocyte-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation. J. Clin. Invest.116, 2094–2104. 10.1172/JCI27179
257
StridJ.McLeanW. H. I.IrvineA. D. (2016). Too much, too little or just enough: a goldilocks effect for IL-13 and skin barrier regulation?J. Invest. Dermatol.136, 561–564. 10.1016/j.jid.2015.12.025
258
StultzC. M.ThomasA. H.EdelmanE. R. (2007). Collagen fragments modulate innate immunity. Exp. Biol. Med.232, 406–411. 10.3181/00379727-232-2320406
259
SuP.ChenS.ZhengY. H.ZhouH. Y.YanC. H.YuF.et al. (2016). Novel function of extracellular matrix protein 1 in suppressing Th17 cell development in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol.197, 1054–1064. 10.4049/jimmunol.1502457.
260
SumariaN.RoedigerB.NgL. G.QinJ.PintoR.CavanaghL. L.et al. (2011). Cutaneous immunosurveillance by self-renewing dermal γδ T cells. J. Exp. Med.208, 505–518. 10.1084/jem.20101824
261
SunY.ZhangJ.ZhaiT.LiH.LiH.HuoR.et al. (2017). CCN1 promotes IL-1β production in keratinocytes by activating p38 MAPK signaling in psoriasis. Sci. Rep.7:43310. 10.1038/srep43310
262
SunY.ZhangJ.ZhouZ.WuP.HuoR.WangB.et al. (2015). CCN1, a pro-inflammatory factor, aggravates psoriasis skin lesions by promoting keratinocyte activation. J. Invest. Dermatol.135, 2666–2675. 10.1038/jid.2015.231
263
TakayamaG.ArimaK.KanajiT.TodaS.TanakaH.ShojiS.et al. (2006). Periostin: a novel component of subepithelial fibrosis of bronchial asthma downstream of IL-4 and IL-13 signals. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.118, 98–104. 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.046
264
TakeuchiH.GomiT.ShishidoM.WatanabeH.SuenobuN. (2010). Neutrophil elastase contributes to extracellular matrix damage induced by chronic low-dose UV irradiation in a hairless mouse photoaging model. J. Dermatol. Sci.60, 151–158. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.09.001
265
TariqM.ZhangJ.LiangG.DingL.HeQ.YangB. (2017). Macrophage polarization: anti-cancer strategies to target tumor-associated macrophage in breast cancer. J. Cell. Biochem.118, 2484–2501. 10.1002/jcb.25895
266
TecchioC.MichelettiA.CassatellaM. A. (2014). Neutrophil-derived cytokines: facts beyond expression. Front. Immunol.5:508. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00508
267
TelloT. L.CoggshallK.YomS. S.YuS. S. (2018). Merkel cell carcinoma: an update and review: current and future therapy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.78, 445–454. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.004
268
TeruiT.OzawaM.TagamiH. (2000). Role of neutrophils in induction of acute inflammation in T-cell-mediated immune dermatosis, psoriasis: a neutrophil-associated inflammation-boosting loop. Exp. Dermatol.9, 1–10. 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009001001.x
269
ThomasL. W.ElsensohnA.BergheimT.ShiuJ.GanesanA. (2018). Intramuscular steroids in the treatment of dermatologic disease: a systematic review. J. Drugs Dermatol.17, 323–329.
270
TiteuxM.PendariesV.TonassoL.DéchaA.BodemerC.HovnanianA. (2008). A frequent functional SNP in the MMP1 promoter is associated with higher disease severity in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Hum. Mutat.29, 267–276. 10.1002/humu.20647
271
TjiuJ. W.ChenJ. S.ShunC. T.LinS. J.LiaoY. H.ChuC. Y.et al. (2009). Tumor-associated macrophage-induced invasion and angiogenesis of human basal cell carcinoma cells by cyclooxygenase-2 induction. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 1016–1025. 10.1038/jid.2008.310
272
TorsekarR.GautamM. (2017). Topical therapies in psoriasis. Indian Dermatol. Online J. 8, 235–245. 10.4103/2229-5178.209622
273
TouzéA.Le BidreE.LaudeH.FleuryM. J. J.CazalR.ArnoldF.et al. (2011). High levels of antibodies against merkel cell polyomavirus identify a subset of patients with merkel cell carcinoma with better clinical outcome. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1612–1619. 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1704
274
TrémezayguesL.ReichrathJ. (2011). Vitamin D analogs in the treatment of psoriasis: where are we standing and where will we be going?Dermatoendocrinology3, 180–186. 10.4161/derm.17534
275
TsurutaD.HashimotoT.HamillK. J.JonesJ. C. R. (2011). Hemidesmosomes and focal contact proteins: functions and cross-talk in keratinocytes, bullous diseases and wound healing. J. Dermatol. Sci. 62, 1–7. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.01.005
276
UittoJ. (2008). Epidermolysis bullosa: prospects for cell-based therapies. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 2140–2142. 10.1038/jid.2008.216
277
UittoJ.ShambanA. (1987). Heritable skin diseases with molecular defects in collagen or elastin. Dermatol. Clin.5, 63–84. 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30767-8
278
UssarS.MoserM.WidmaierM.RognoniE.HarrerC.Genzel-BoroviczenyO.et al. (2008). Loss of kindlin-1 causes skin atrophy and lethal neonatal intestinal epithelial dysfunction. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000289. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000289
279
UvaL.MiguelD.PinheiroC.AntunesJ.CruzD.FerreiraJ.et al. (2012). Mechanisms of action of topical corticosteroids in psoriasis. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2012:561018. 10.1155/2012/561018
280
VaccaroM.MagauddaL.CutroneoG.TrimarchiF.BarbuzzaO.GuarneriF.et al. (2002). Changes in the distribution of laminin α1 chain in psoriatic skin: immunohistochemical study using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Br. J. Dermatol.146, 392–398. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04637.x
281
VahidnezhadH.YoussefianL.SaeidianA. H.TouatiA.SotoudehS.JazayeriA.et al. (2018). Next generation sequencing identifies double homozygous mutations in two distinct genes (EXPH5 and COL17A1) in a patient with concomitant simplex and junctional epidermolysis bullosa. Hum. Mutat.39, 1349–1354. 10.1002/humu.23592
282
VerrecchiaF.ChuM. L.MauvielA. (2001). Identification of novel TGF-β/Smad gene targets in dermal fibroblasts using a combined cDNA microarray/promoter transactivation approach. J. Biol. Chem.276, 17058–17062. 10.1074/jbc.M100754200
283
VestergaardC.JustH.Baumgartner NielsenJ.Thestrup-PedersenK.DeleuranM. (2004). Expression of CCR2 on monocytes and macrophages in chronically inflamed skin in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 84, 353–358. 10.1080/00015550410034444
284
VillanuevaJ.HerlynM. (2008). Melanoma and the tumor microenvironment. Curr. Oncol. Rep.10, 439–446. 10.1007/s11912-008-0067-y
285
WagnerC. J.SchultzC.MallM. A. (2016). Neutrophil elastase and matrix metalloproteinase 12 in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Mol. Cell. Pediatr. 3:25. 10.1186/s40348-016-0053-7
286
WangG. Y.WangJ.ManciantiM.-L.EpsteinE. H.Jr. (2011). Basal cell carcinomas arise from hair follicle stem cells in Ptch1(+/-) mice. Cancer Cell. 19, 114–124. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.007
287
WattF. M.FujiwaraH. (2011). Cell-extracellular matrix interactions in normal and diseased skin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.3:a005124. 10.1101/cshperspect.a005124
288
WaynerE. A.GilS. G.MurphyG. F.WilkeM. S.CarterW. G. (1993). Epiligrin, a component of epithelial basement membranes, is an adhesive ligand for α3β1 positive T lymphocytes. J. Cell Biol. 121, 1141–1152. 10.1083/jcb.121.5.1141
289
WeidingerS.NovakN. (2016). Atopic dermatitis. Lancet387, 1109–1122. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00149-X
290
WollinaU. (2012). Cutaneous Tcell lymphoma: update on treatment. Int. J. Dermatol. 51, 1019–1036. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05337.x
291
WondimuZ.GeberhiwotT.IngerpuuS.JuronenE.XieX.LindbomL.et al. (2004). An endothelial laminin isoform, laminin 8 (α4β1γ1), is secreted by blood neutrophils, promotes neutrophil migration and extravasation, and protects neutrophils from apoptosis. Blood104, 1859–1866. 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0396
292
WuP.MaG.ZhuX.GuT.ZhangJ.SunY.et al. (2017). Cyr61/CCN1 is involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis vulgaris via promoting IL-8 production by keratinocytes in a JNK/NF-κB pathway. Clin. Immunol.174, 53–62. 10.1016/j.clim.2016.11.003
293
WuX.SchulteB. C.ZhouY.HaribhaiD.MackinnonA. C.PlazaJ. A.et al. (2014). Depletion of M2-like tumor-associated macrophages delays cutaneous T-cell lymphoma development in vivo. J. Invest. Dermatol. 134, 2814–2822. 10.1038/jid.2014.206
294
YamaguchiY. (2014). Periostin in skin tissue skin-related diseases. Allergol. Int.63, 161–170. 10.2332/allergolint.13-RAI-0685
295
YamaguchiY.MannD. M.RuoslahtiE. (1990). Negative regulation of transforming growth factor-β by the proteoglycan decorin. Nature346, 281–284. 10.1038/346281a0
296
YanagiT.KitamuraS.HataH. (2018). Novel therapeutic targets in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 8:79. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00079
297
YanceyK. B.HintnerH. (2010). Non-herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatol. Clin. 28, 67–77. 10.1016/j.det.2009.10.008
298
YanezD. A.LacherR. K.VidyarthiA.ColegioO. R. (2017). The role of macrophages in skin homeostasis. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 469, 455–463. 10.1007/s00424-017-1953-7
299
YangL.HuangJ.RenX.GorskaA. E.ChytilA.AakreM.et al. (2008). Abrogation of TGFβ signaling in mammary carcinomas recruits Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells that promote metastasis. Cancer Cell.13, 23–35. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.12.004
300
YuS. H.DruckerA. M.LebwohlM.SilverbergJ. I. (2018). A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis.J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.78, 733–740.e11. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.074
301
YuenW. Y.LemminkH. H.Van Dijk-BosK. K.SinkeR. J.JonkmanM. F. (2011). Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa: diagnostic features, mutational profile, incidence and population carrier frequency in the Netherlands. Br. J. Dermatol. 165, 1314–1322. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10553.x
302
ZaidA.MackayL. K.RahimpourA.BraunA.VeldhoenM.CarboneF. R.et al. (2014). Persistence of skin-resident memory T cells within an epidermal niche. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, 5307–5312. 10.1073/pnas.1322292111
303
ZhouJ.YaoD.QianZ.HouS.LiL.JenkinsA. T. A.et al. (2018). Bacteria-responsive intelligent wound dressing: simultaneous in situ detection and inhibition of bacterial infection for accelerated wound healing. Biomaterials161, 11–23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.024
304
Zuliani-AlvarezL.MarzedaA. M.DeligneC.SchwenzerA.McCannF. E.MarsdenB. D.et al. (2017). Mapping tenascin-C interaction with toll-like receptor 4 reveals a new subset of endogenous inflammatory triggers. Nat. Commun. 8:1595. 10.1038/s41467-017-01718-7
Summary
Keywords
extracellular matrix, skin diseases, immune cells, crosstalk, therapeutics
Citation
Bhattacharjee O, Ayyangar U, Kurbet AS, Ashok D and Raghavan S (2019) Unraveling the ECM-Immune Cell Crosstalk in Skin Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7:68. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00068
Received
12 January 2019
Accepted
09 April 2019
Published
07 May 2019
Volume
7 - 2019
Edited by
Charles D. Little, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States
Reviewed by
Lidija Radenovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia; Nagaraj Balasubramanian, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Bhattacharjee, Ayyangar, Kurbet, Ashok and Raghavan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Srikala Raghavan srikala@instem.res.in
This article was submitted to Cell Adhesion and Migration, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.