Iryna Leshchyns'ka
Vladimir Sytnyk- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Cell adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) including the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and members of the L1 family of neuronal cell adhesion molecules play important functions in the developing nervous system by regulating formation, growth and branching of neurites, and establishment of the synaptic contacts between neurons. In the mature brain, members of IgSF regulate synapse composition, function, and plasticity required for learning and memory. The intracellular domains of IgSF cell adhesion molecules interact with the components of the cytoskeleton including the submembrane actin-spectrin meshwork, actin microfilaments, and microtubules. In this review, we summarize current data indicating that interactions between IgSF cell adhesion molecules and the cytoskeleton are reciprocal, and that while IgSF cell adhesion molecules regulate the assembly of the cytoskeleton, the cytoskeleton plays an important role in regulation of the functions of IgSF cell adhesion molecules. Reciprocal interactions between NCAM and L1 family members and the cytoskeleton and their role in neuronal differentiation and synapse formation are discussed in detail.
Immunoglobulin Superfamily Cell Adhesion Molecules (IgSF CAMs)
IgSF CAMs are cell surface glycoproteins highly expressed in the developing and mature nervous system. They are characterized by a large extracellular domain containing one or several immunoglobulin-like (Ig) repeats (Shapiro et al., 2007). In a recent study, over 50 different members of this family were found to be expressed in the mammalian nervous system (Gu et al., 2015), however only some of them were extensively studied. While most of IgSF members are single-pass transmembrane proteins with intracellular domains of various lengths, some IgSF CAMs are anchored to the cell surface plasma membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing examples of the structure of IgSF CAMs and their links to the cytoskeleton components. Linker proteins connecting IgSF CAMs to the cytoskeleton components are shown in square boxes. Note, that NrCAM and neurofascin, nectin and SynCAM, and axonin/TAG1 and F3/contactin have similar structures which are shown only once. Homologs of mammalian NCAM and L1 and their interaction partners in Drosophila and Aplysia are indicated in dark and light gray, respectively. See Table 1 for references.
The extracellular domains of IgSF CAMs typically mediate homophilic cell adhesion, i.e., cell adhesion mediated by interactions between the same molecules on membranes of adjacent cells, with Ig domains playing a key role in homophilic interactions (Zhao et al., 1998; Soroka et al., 2003; Shapiro et al., 2007; Kulahin et al., 2011). In addition, IgSF CAMs heterophilically interact with a variety of other cell surface receptors, cell adhesion molecules, and proteins of the extracellular matrix.
IgSF CAMs play key roles in the developing nervous system by regulating migration of neurons, growth and branching of axons and dendrites, and establishment of contacts between neurons (Dityatev et al., 2004; Dalva et al., 2007; Maness and Schachner, 2007; Hansen et al., 2008; Schmid and Maness, 2008). In the mature nervous system, these molecules play an essential role in the maintenance and plasticity of functionally important cell-to-cell contacts, such as synaptic contacts, specialized contacts between neurons mediating neurotransmission (Schachner, 1997; Gerrow and El-Husseini, 2006; Dityatev et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2014).
A number of IgSF CAMs expressed in neurons have been shown to interact with the neuronal cytoskeleton, which is composed of actin filaments, microtubules, and the submembrane actin-spectrin meshwork (Figure 1). While our knowledge about the complex picture of the multiple interactions between IgSF CAMs is still very fragmented, current evidence indicates that the relationship between IgSF CAMs and the neuronal cytoskeleton is reciprocal and that while IgSF members regulate the assembly of the cytoskeleton, the functioning of IgSF CAMs also depends on and is regulated by the cytoskeleton. In this review, we mostly focus on the reciprocal interactions between the cytoskeleton and the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and members of the L1 family including L1, close homologue of L1 (CHL1), neurofascin and neuronal-glial cell adhesion molecule related cell adhesion molecule (NrCAM) since interactions of these molecules and their homologs in invertebrates with the cytoskeleton have been extensively studied. Members of these families are highly expressed in the developing and mature nervous system. Multiple roles that NCAM and L1 family members play in regulation of neuronal development and function are the subject of a number of recent reviews (Maness and Schachner, 2007; Schmid and Maness, 2008; Kriebel et al., 2012; Sakurai, 2012; Schafer and Frotscher, 2012) and discussed only briefly here in the context of the interactions with the cytoskeleton. We also consider the evidence showing that reciprocal interactions with the cytoskeleton play an important role in functions of other members of IgSF as well.
IgSF CAMs Interact with the Cytoskeleton Components
Interactions with the cytoskeleton components have been described for a number of IgSF members expressed in the mammalian nervous system and also for their homologs in invertebrates (Figure 1; Table 1). Typically, binding to the cytoskeleton is mediated by the intracellular domains of IgSF members and can be either direct or via linker proteins (Figure 1). In the mammalian nervous system, the intracellular domains of two transmembrane isoforms of the neural cell adhesion molecule 1, NCAM140, and NCAM180, directly bind to βI spectrin (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2003). The intracellular domains of L1 family members contain a binding site for ankyrin, which links them to the spectrin meshwork (Garver et al., 1997; Hortsch et al., 1998a). The intracellular domains of nectins and nectin-like protein 2 (NECL-2), also called synaptic cell adhesion molecule (SynCAM)/cell adhesion molecule 1 (Cadm 1)/tumor suppressor in lung cancer 1 (TSLC-1), are connected to the actin cytoskeleton via linker proteins afadin and FERM, Rho/ArhGEF, and Pleckstrin domain protein 1 (Farp1), respectively (Takahashi et al., 1999; Cheadle and Biederer, 2012), while the intracellular domain of activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) is connected to the actin cytoskeleton via syntenin-1 and ezrin (Tudor et al., 2014). The intracellular domain of the Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DsCAM) is linked to tubulin via tubulin folding cofactor D (Okumura et al., 2015).
Table 1. Examples of IgSF CAMs, which bind directly or indirectly via linker proteins to the cytoskeleton components.
Interestingly, at least for some IgSF CAMs including NCAM and L1 family members, binding to multiple cytoskeleton components has been described with distinct domains within their intracellular domains being responsible for interactions with different cytoskeletal components. For instance, in addition to binding to βI spectrin, the intracellular domain of NCAM180 binds to tubulin and actin (Buttner et al., 2003; Figure 2). In addition to the ankyrin-binding site, the intracellular domain of L1 contains a binding site for ezrin, which links it to the actin cytoskeleton (Dickson et al., 2002). The intracellular domain of L1 can also bind directly to microtubule associated protein 2c (MAP2c), which can link it to tubulin (Poplawski et al., 2012; Figure 2). The intracellular domain of CHL1 contains a binding site for ezrin (Schlatter et al., 2008), and also directly binds to βII spectrin (Tian et al., 2012). These observations suggest that interactions of IgSF CAMs with the cytoskeleton can be amplified by multiple linker proteins, and that the intracellular domains of IgSF CAMs can function as scaffolds for the assembly of multiple cytoskeleton components. However, it is also possible that these interactions do not occur simultaneously, but are rather initiated in response to the changes in the subcellular localization or function of IgSF CAMs. This possibility is supported by observations showing that the interactions of IgSF CAMs with the cytoskeleton are highly regulated. For example, the interaction of L1 with ankyrin is regulated by phosphorylation in response to the extracellular signals (Garver et al., 1997), while the CHL1/βII spectrin complex is disrupted in response to Ca2+ influx induced by the binding of CHL1 to its ligands (Tian et al., 2012).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the domains and motives within the intracellular domains of L1 and NCAM involved in interactions with the components of the cytoskeleton. The intracellular domain of L1 (L1-ID) comprises binding motives for ezrin and ankyrin linking L1-ID to the actin and spectrin, respectively. MAP2c links L1-ID to tubulin, however, the binding sequence for MAP2c within L1-ID is not known. The intracellular domain of NCAM (NCAM-ID) comprises a binding motive for kinesin-1, which can link it to tubulin. This motive is present in both transmembrane isoforms of NCAM, NCAM140, and NCAM180, which contain the same amino acid sequences except for the presence of the NCAM180 specific region encoded by exon 18 in NCAM180. Intracellular domains of both transmembrane isoforms of NCAM directly bind to spectrin. The exact binding motive for spectrin is not known and is probably present in amino acid sequences present in both NCAM isoforms. Actinin, MAP1a, tropomyosin and actin were isolated from the brain using NCAM-ID as bait, however, the direct binding of these proteins has not been analyzed and exact binding sequences are not known. Since actinin binds to intracellular domains of NCAM140 and NCAM180, while MAP1a and tropomyosin bind to the intracellular domain of NCAM180 only, the binding sequences for these proteins are located in regions either present in both NCAM isoforms or in NCAM180 specific region, respectively. See Table 1 for references.
Interactions of IgSF CAMs with the cytoskeleton have also been described for the homologs of the mammalian IgSF CAMs in invertebrates. For example, in a sea slug Aplysia, a cell adhesion molecule apCAM, a structural homologue of the mammalian NCAM, associates with actin microfilaments and microtubules via linker proteins, such as cortactin (Suter et al., 1998; Lee and Suter, 2008; Decourt et al., 2009). In a fruit fly Drosophila, a cell adhesion molecule fasciclin II, also a structural homologue of the mammalian NCAM, is linked to the microtubules via linker proteins including a long isoform of ankyrin 2 (Pielage et al., 2008). The intracellular domain of neuroglian, a Drosophila homologue of mammalian L1, binds to Drosophila homologue of ankyrin (Hortsch et al., 1998b). Interestingly, the intracellular domain of human L1 is also able to bind to the Drosophila homologue of ankyrin (Hortsch et al., 1998b). Thus interactions between IgSF CAMs and the cytoskeleton components appear as highly evolutionary conserved.
Interestingly, interactions with the cytoskeleton have been described not only for transmembrane IgSF CAMs but also for the members of this superfamily which do not contain the intracellular domain but are linked to the plasma membrane via a GPI-anchor. For example, βI spectrin co-immunoprecipitates with a GPI-anchored isoform of mouse NCAM, NCAM120 (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2003) in accordance with previous reports showing that a large fraction of NCAM120 is immobile or shows restricted mobility in the cell surface plasma membranes (Simson et al., 1998). The interaction between NCAM120 and βI spectrin is disrupted after depletion of the cellular cholesterol (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2003). Similarly, transient anchorage of a mouse GPI-anchored IgSF CAM Thy-1 to the cytoskeleton is abolished by cholesterol depletion (Chen et al., 2006). In addition, transient anchorage of mouse Thy-1 to the cytoskeleton depends on the transmembrane protein Csk-binding protein (CBP; Chen et al., 2009). Therefore, interactions with lipids and transmembrane proteins appear to play key roles in linking GPI-anchored IgSF members to the cytoskeleton.
IgSF CAMs Regulate the Assembly of the Submembrane Cytoskeleton
A number of observations indicate that IgSF CAMs are directly involved in regulation of the assembly of the submembrane cytoskeleton. In cultured mouse hippocampal neurons and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells used as model system, overexpression of NCAM results in an increase in the levels of polymerized βI spectrin indicating that NCAM not only binds to but also promotes polymerization of the βI spectrin meshwork beneath the cell surface plasma membrane (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2003; Figure 3). In an African green monkey kidney fibroblast-like COS7 cell line, overexpressed NCAM180 promotes capture and tethering of the microtubule plus-ends at the cell surface by binding to dynein, which binds to the intracellular domain of NCAM180 and links it to microtubules (Perlson et al., 2013). NCAM180-dependent cell adhesion is abolished after disruption of the association of NCAM180 with dynein, indicating that the association with the cytoskeleton is required (Perlson et al., 2013). In human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells, overexpression of CHL1 results in the recruitment of ankyrin to the cell surface plasma membrane (Buhusi et al., 2003). Clustering of two other members of the L1 family, neurofascin and NrCAM, at nodes of Ranvier in rats precedes redistribution of ankyrin G, also suggesting that these cell adhesion molecules define the initial site for subsequent assembly of the ankyrin-containing spectrin meshwork (Lambert et al., 1997). In primary rat fibroblasts, endogenous, or heterologous Thy-1 expression promotes focal adhesion and stress fiber formation by modulating the activity of p190 RhoGAP and Rho GTPase (Barker et al., 2004), indicating that GPI-anchored IgSF CAMs also play a role in the cytoskeleton regulation.
Figure 3. Proposed model for NCAM-dependent assembly and remodeling of the submembrane spectrin-actin cytoskeleton. Homophilic interactions between NCAM molecules on adjacent membranes promote clustering of NCAM at interneuronal contacts. The intracellular domains of NCAM bind to spectrin and promote its recruitment to the cell surface plasma membrane, thereby inducing formation of the spectrin-actin meshwork. Formation of the spectrin-actin meshwork results in further clustering of NCAM by limiting its diffusion in addition to the effect of homophilic interactions. Clustering of NCAM promotes partitioning of a subpopulation of NCAM molecules into lipid rafts due to interactions between the extracellular domain of NCAM and prion protein and palmitoylation of the intracellular domain of NCAM. In lipid rafts, NCAM promotes recruitment and activation of caspases, which induce partial local proteolysis of the spectrin-actin meshwork. The release of the short actin filaments from the spectrin-actin meshwork provides nucleation sites for formation and remodeling of the actin filaments.
The importance of the interactions between IgSF CAMs and the cytoskeleton for the assembly of the cytoskeleton in functionally important subcellular compartments is also demonstrated by the analysis of neuronal synapses. Spectrin βI is one of the major components of the post-synaptic cytoskeleton in synapses. Synaptic levels of βI spectrin are reduced in synapses formed by cultured hippocampal neurons from NCAM-deficient mice and in synaptosomes isolated from brains of NCAM deficient mice indicating that NCAM regulates synaptic targeting of spectrin (Sytnyk et al., 2006). Disruption of the interaction between NCAM180 and dynein also perturbs preferential microtubule plus-end dynamics at synapses of cultured cortical neurons (Perlson et al., 2013). The intracellular domain of SynCAM 1 binds to Farp1, which regulates synaptic actin cytoskeleton polymerization via Rac1. Levels of Farp1 and polymerized actin are reduced in synapses of SynCAM 1 knockout mice indicating that SynCAM 1 is required for Farp1 recruitment to synaptic membranes (Cheadle and Biederer, 2012).
Studies in mammalian cells are consistent with observations in Drosophila showing that the recruitment of ankyrin to cell-cell contacts in Drosophila S2 cells is dependent on neuroglian-mediated cell adhesion (Hortsch et al., 1998b) and is required for neuroglian-mediated cell adhesion (Hortsch et al., 1998a). Furthermore, the homophilic interaction between GPI-anchored human TAG-1 and human L1 overexpressed in Drosophila S2 cells results in TAG-1-dependent recruitment of Drosophila ankyrin to areas of cell contacts (Malhotra et al., 1998) again indicating that the function of IgSF CAMs in regulation of the cytoskeleton is highly conserved during evolution. In Drosophila synapses, neuroglian has been shown to play a role in anchoring of microtubules in synapses possibly via interaction with a microtubule stabilizing protein doublecortin (Godenschwege et al., 2006) and giant ankyrin, a long isoform of Drosophila ankyrin 2 (Pielage et al., 2008).
Interestingly, several studies indicate that IgSF members also play a role in transcriptional and post-translational regulation of the expression of the cytoskeleton components they bind to. For example, overexpression of NCAM results in overall increased levels of βI spectrin in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons and CHO cells while levels of βI spectrin are reduced in brains of NCAM deficient mice (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2003). The expression of MAP2c in the mouse brain is regulated by L1 both at the protein and mRNA levels (Poplawski et al., 2012). In Drosophila, protein but not mRNA levels of neuronal ankyrin are reduced in neuroglian null mutants (Bouley et al., 2000). Thus, it is possible that IgSF members not only promote the assembly of the cytoskeleton components at the functionally important domains at the plasma membrane but also regulate the expression of the key cytoskeletal components and regulators.
Ligand-Induced Remodeling of the Cytoskeleton by IgSF CAMs
Binding of IgSF members to their extracellular ligands induces a plethora of the intracellular signaling cascades converging on enzymes involved in the cytoskeleton regulation (Maness and Schachner, 2007; Hansen et al., 2008; Schmid and Maness, 2008). In agreement, a number of observations indicate that binding of IgSF CAMs to their ligands in the extracellular environment results in changes in the structure of the cytoskeleton. These changes include redistribution of the cytoskeleton components to the sites of interactions of IgSF CAMs and changes in the level of polymerization of the cytoskeleton components.
In mammalian cells, ligand-induced clustering of NCAM induces accumulation of polymerized detergent insoluble βI spectrin in NCAM clusters (Sytnyk et al., 2006; Figure 3). In addition, clustering of NCAM also increases levels of the proteolytic cleavage products of βI spectrin via activation of caspases-8 and -3 and local and partial proteolysis of the components of the spectrin meshwork (Westphal et al., 2010; Figure 3). While the molecular mechanisms of the coordinated assembly and remodeling of the cytoskeleton by NCAM remain incompletely understood, cholesterol-enriched lipid microdomains, called lipid rafts, may play a significant role. A small portion of the transmembrane isoforms of NCAM is associated with lipid rafts, and this association is enhanced in response to clustering of NCAM by its ligands inducing palmitoylation of the intracellular domain of NCAM and interactions with the GPI-anchored cellular prion protein (Niethammer et al., 2002; Bodrikov et al., 2005; Santuccione et al., 2005). Lipid rafts are enriched in initiator caspase-8, a caspase-3 activator (Westphal et al., 2010). The association of caspase-8 and -3 with lipid rafts is reduced in NCAM deficient neurons, indicating that NCAM is important for targeting of caspases to these signaling platforms to induce remodeling of the spectrin cytoskeleton (Westphal et al., 2010). The release of short actin filaments via partial proteolysis of the spectrin meshwork can provide nucleation sites for polymerization of the new microfilaments (Figure 3). It is interesting in this respect that NCAM also induces the lipid raft-dependent activation of p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) and its downstream effectors LIMK1 and cofilin, which are involved in the regulation of the assembly of the actin microfilaments (Li et al., 2013). Levels of the filamentous actin are reduced in the brains of NCAM-deficient mice and filopodium motility is reduced in developing NCAM-deficient neurons indicating that NCAM-dependent cytoskeleton remodeling is functionally important (Li et al., 2013).
Ligand binding by the mammalian L1 family members L1, CHL1, NrCAM, and neurofascin also induces their association with lipid rafts (Ren and Bennett, 1998; Falk et al., 2004; Tian et al., 2012). Levels of polymerized ankyrin-B/βII spectrin are increased in CHL1 deficient mouse brains. Ligand induced clustering of CHL1 in wild type cultured mouse neurons induces partial removal of βII spectrin from the plasma membrane and internalization of CHL1 in a lipid raft-dependent manner indicating that CHL1 also plays a role in the remodeling of the spectrin meshwork (Tian et al., 2012).
The role of the IgSF CAM-ligand interactions in cytoskeleton remodeling is also supported by the work in Aplysia showing dynamic rearrangements of the cytoskeleton in growth cones of the growing neurites in response to ligands of apCAM. Clustering of apCAM at the cell surface of growth cones using beads covered with antibodies against apCAM or with purified native apCAM results in the coupling of the beads to the retrograde actin flow (Suter et al., 1998). Immobilization of the beads induces the restructuring of the actin filaments followed by the extension of the microtubules toward the immobilized apCAM accumulations (Suter et al., 1998, 2004). Interestingly, coupling of apCAM to the cytoskeleton is regulated by the src family tyrosine kinases, which accumulate in lipid rafts, suggesting that lipid rafts also play a role in apCAM-dependent cytoskeleton remodeling (Suter and Forscher, 2001).
The Cytoskeleton Regulates the Functions of IgSF CAMs
A number of observations indicate that while IgSF CAMs regulate the cytoskeleton, the cytoskeleton plays a direct role in regulation of the functions of cell adhesion molecules of this superfamily primarily by regulating the levels of these proteins at functionally important domains of the cell surface plasma membrane of neurons.
In mammalian cells, interactions with the βI spectrin meshwork reduce the lateral diffusion in the cell surface plasma membrane of NCAM, and particularly its largest isoform NCAM180 with the longest intracellular domain (Pollerberg et al., 1986). This reduction in the mobility is required for the accumulation of NCAM180 at the post-synaptic sites of excitatory synapses in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2011). Similarly, depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton using latrunculin A induces dispersion of Nectin-1, an IgSF cell adhesion molecule which interacts with actin via afadin (Takahashi et al., 1999), from synapses of developing neurons accompanied by the shedding of Nectin-1 from the cell surface (Lim et al., 2008).
The lateral mobility of neurofascin in the cell surface plasma membrane of B104 rat neuroblastoma cells is reduced by interactions with ankyrin, which links it to the spectrin meshwork (Garver et al., 1997). Interestingly, binding to ankyrin is required for neurofascin-mediated cell adhesion (Tuvia et al., 1997) indicating that the cytoskeleton is directly involved in regulation of the functions of this cell adhesion molecule. The ankyrin-binding motive of neurofascin is also required for tethering of neurofascin in the axonal initial segment in cultured rat hippocampal neurons (Boiko et al., 2007). Interactions with the actin cytoskeleton also reduce the mobility of L1 and Thy-1 at the initial segment of the axon in cultured rat hippocampal neurons, which is required for the maintenance of the polarized distribution of these proteins in neurons (Winckler et al., 1999). Interactions of TAG-1 with protein 4.1B via transmembrane Caspr2 are important for the association of the GPI-anchored TAG-1 with the spectrin meshwork and accumulation of TAG-1 at juxtaparanodes in myelinated axons (Cifuentes-Diaz et al., 2011). Also in Drosophila, the lateral mobility of neuroglian is regulated by interactions with ankyrin 2 (Enneking et al., 2013).
The spectrin meshwork not only reduces the mobility, but also regulates the removal of L1 family members from the neuronal cell surface by endocytosis. Disruption of the interaction between L1 and ankyrin in rat B35 neuroblastoma cells by pathogenic mutations within the ankyrin binding site results in increased endocytosis of L1 (Needham et al., 2001). Furthermore, knock-down of αII spectrin expression using siRNA interference results in reduced levels of L1 at the cell surface and reduced clustering of L1 in growth cones in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells (Trinh-Trang-Tan et al., 2014). Similarly, disruption of the interaction between CHL1 and βII spectrin by knock-down of βII spectrin expression using targeted siRNA results in increased endocytosis of CHL1 in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons (Tian et al., 2012).
Other components of the cytoskeleton play an indirect role in regulation of the cell surface levels of cell adhesion molecules by being involved in their intracellular transport. The intracellular domain of NCAM binds to a microtubule-binding molecular motor kinesin-1, which promotes the delivery of NCAM to the cells surface (Wobst et al., 2015), while kinesin-4 plays a role in the transport of L1 (Peretti et al., 2000). It remains to be investigated whether microtubules and microfilaments are also directly involved in regulation of the cell surface distribution of IgSF CAMs.
In addition to regulation of the cell surface distribution of IgSF CAMs, the cytoskeleton components play a key role in linking IgSF CAMs to a number of other proteins, such as other receptors, enzymes and ion channels required for signal transduction across the plasma membrane in response to binding of IgSF members to their ligands in the extracellular environment. For example, βI spectrin links NCAM to the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase α (RPTPα), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, and intracellular enzymes including protein kinase C (PKC) and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2003; Bodrikov et al., 2005, 2008; Sytnyk et al., 2006). Interactions of L1 with ankyrin B are also required for L1-dependent intracellular signaling including elevation of cyclic AMP levels in neurons (Ooashi and Kamiguchi, 2009).
The Role of the Cytoskeleton in IgSF CAM – Dependent Neuronal Differentiation and Synapse Formation
Current data indicates that the cytoskeleton plays a direct role in IgSF CAM-mediated functions. Soluble and substrate-immobilized ligands of IgSF CAMs, including antibodies against the extracellular domains of IgSF CAMs or recombinant fragments of the extracellular domains of IgSF CAMs, trigger changes in the interactions between IgSF CAMs and the cytoskeleton and also function as potent regulators of neuronal differentiation and function. For example, application of recombinant extracellular domains of L1 triggers interactions between the intracellular domain of L1 and ankyrin B and induces neurite initiation in cultured mouse cerebellar granule cells (Nishimura et al., 2003). Application of antibodies against the extracellular domain of NCAM triggers interactions of NCAM with spectrin (Sytnyk et al., 2006) and induces neurite outgrowth in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons (Chernyshova et al., 2011). Clustering of NrCAM using microspheres coated with its ligands, recombinant NrCAM, or antibodies against NrCAM, induces linkage between NrCAM and the F-actin retrograde flow required for NrCAM-dependent regulation of neurite outgrowth in cultured mouse cerebellar granule cells (Faivre-Sarrailh et al., 1999).
The functional role of the interactions between the cytoskeleton and IgSF CAMs is supported by studies showing that IgSF CAM-mediated neuronal differentiation and synapse formation are inhibited when these interactions are disrupted. In developing cultured mouse hippocampal neurons, disruption of the association between NCAM and βI spectrin using dominant-negative spectrin fragments results in inhibition of NCAM-dependent neurite outgrowth (Leshchyns'ka et al., 2003). L1-mediated branching in developing cultured mouse cerebellar neurons is inhibited by deletion of the binding sites for ezrin, which links L1 to the actin cytoskeleton (Cheng et al., 2005). Disruption of the binding of CHL1 to ankyrin abolishes CHL1-dependent cell migration in HEK293 cells (Buhusi et al., 2003). In mature cultured hippocampal and cortical neurons, disruption of the interaction between NCAM and βI spectrin or NCAM and dynein results in reduced formation of synapses (Sytnyk et al., 2006; Perlson et al., 2013). Spectrin cytoskeleton-enriched postsynaptic densities are thinner in synapses of NCAM-deficient hippocampal neurons and contain increased numbers of perforations (Puchkov et al., 2011). These defects are accompanied by increased endocytosis of the postsynaptic glutamate receptors of the AMPA type via perforations, indicating that the NCAM-dependent assembly of the βI spectrin meshwork is functionally important for the maintenance of the protein composition of the postsynaptic density (Puchkov et al., 2011). Mutations disrupting the interactions between neuroglian and ankyrin in Drosophila result in impaired synapse stability and abnormal neuromuscular junction growth (Enneking et al., 2013).
Importantly, pathogenic mutations in the ankyrin-binding site of the intracellular domain of L1 in humans with the X-linked mental retardation syndrome CRASH (corpus callosum hypoplasia, retardation, aphasia, spastic paraplegia, hydrocephalus) have been shown to reduce the interaction between L1 and ankyrin indicating that disruptions in the association with the cytoskeleton can directly contribute to the mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction in human X-linked mental retardation (Needham et al., 2001; Vos and Hofstra, 2010). Changes in the protein levels of L1 and other IgSF CAMs associated either with single nucleotide polymorphisms, environmental factors or pathological processes are found in a number of other conditions including Alzheimer's disease and psychiatric disorders (Atz et al., 2007; Gibbons et al., 2009; Gray et al., 2010; Leshchyns'ka et al., 2015). Whether these changes affect the bidirectional relationship between IgSF CAMs and the cytoskeleton and whether they contribute to the etiology of brain disorders are important questions for future studies.
Author Contributions
All authors listed, have made substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Atz, M. E., Rollins, B., and Vawter, M. P. (2007). NCAM1 association study of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: polymorphisms and alternatively spliced isoforms lead to similarities and differences. Psychiatr. Genet. 17, 55–67. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e328012d850
Barker, T. H., Grenett, H. E., MacEwen, M. W., Tilden, S. G., Fuller, G. M., Settleman, J., et al. (2004). Thy-1 regulates fibroblast focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization and migration through modulation of p190 RhoGAP and Rho GTPase activity. Exp. Cell Res. 295, 488–496. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.01.026
Bodrikov, V., Leshchyns'ka, I., Sytnyk, V., Overvoorde, J., den Hertog, J., and Schachner, M. (2005). RPTPalpha is essential for NCAM-mediated p59fyn activation and neurite elongation. J. Cell Biol. 168, 127–139. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200405073
Bodrikov, V., Sytnyk, V., Leshchyns'ka, I., den Hertog, J., and Schachner, M. (2008). NCAM induces CaMKIIalpha-mediated RPTPalpha phosphorylation to enhance its catalytic activity and neurite outgrowth. J. Cell Biol. 182, 1185–1200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200803045
Boiko, T., Vakulenko, M., Ewers, H., Yap, C. C., Norden, C., and Winckler, B. (2007). Ankyrin-dependent and -independent mechanisms orchestrate axonal compartmentalization of L1 family members neurofascin and L1/neuron-glia cell adhesion molecule. J. Neurosci. 27, 590–603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4302-06.2007
Bouley, M., Tian, M. Z., Paisley, K., Shen, Y. C., Malhotra, J. D., and Hortsch, M. (2000). The L1-type cell adhesion molecule neuroglian influences the stability of neural ankyrin in the Drosophila embryo but not its axonal localization. J. Neurosci. 20, 4515–4523.
Buhusi, M., Midkiff, B. R., Gates, A. M., Richter, M., Schachner, M., and Maness, P. F. (2003). Close homolog of L1 is an enhancer of integrin-mediated cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 25024–25031. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303084200
Buhusi, M., Schlatter, M. C., Demyanenko, G. P., Thresher, R., and Maness, P. F. (2008). L1 interaction with ankyrin regulates mediolateral topography in the retinocollicular projection. J. Neurosci. 28, 177–188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3573-07.2008
Buttner, B., Kannicht, C., Reutter, W., and Horstkorte, R. (2003). The neural cell adhesion molecule is associated with major components of the cytoskeleton. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 310, 967–971. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.105
Buttner, B., Kannicht, C., Reutter, W., and Horstkorte, R. (2005). Novel cytosolic binding partners of the neural cell adhesion molecule: mapping the binding domains of PLC gamma, LANP, TOAD-64, syndapin, PP1, and PP2A. Biochemistry 44, 6938–6947. doi: 10.1021/bi050066c
Cheadle, L., and Biederer, T. (2012). The novel synaptogenic protein Farp1 links postsynaptic cytoskeletal dynamics and transsynaptic organization. J. Cell Biol. 199, 985–1001. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201205041
Chen, Y., Thelin, W. R., Yang, B., Milgram, S. L., and Jacobson, K. (2006). Transient anchorage of cross-linked glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins depends on cholesterol, Src family kinases, caveolin, and phosphoinositides. J. Cell Biol. 175, 169–178. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200512116
Chen, Y., Veracini, L., Benistant, C., and Jacobson, K. (2009). The transmembrane protein CBP plays a role in transiently anchoring small clusters of Thy-1, a GPI-anchored protein, to the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3966–3972. doi: 10.1242/jcs.049346
Cheng, L., Itoh, K., and Lemmon, V. (2005). L1-mediated branching is regulated by two ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM)-binding sites, the RSLE region and a novel juxtamembrane ERM-binding region. J. Neurosci. 25, 395–403. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4097-04.2005
Chernyshova, Y., Leshchyns'ka, I., Hsu, S. C., Schachner, M., and Sytnyk, V. (2011). The neural cell adhesion molecule promotes FGFR-dependent phosphorylation and membrane targeting of the exocyst complex to induce exocytosis in growth cones. J. Neurosci. 31, 3522–3535. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3109-10.2011
Cifuentes-Diaz, C., Chareyre, F., Garcia, M., Devaux, J., Carnaud, M., Levasseur, G., et al. (2011). Protein 4.1B contributes to the organization of peripheral myelinated axons. PLoS ONE 6:e25043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025043
Dalva, M. B., McClelland, A. C., and Kayser, M. S. (2007). Cell adhesion molecules: signalling functions at the synapse. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 206–220. doi: 10.1038/nrn2075
Davis, J. Q., and Bennett, V. (1994). Ankyrin binding activity shared by the neurofascin/L1/NrCAM family of nervous system cell adhesion molecules. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27163–27166.
Decourt, B., Munnamalai, V., Lee, A. C., Sanchez, L., and Suter, D. M. (2009). Cortactin colocalizes with filopodial actin and accumulates at IgCAM adhesion sites in Aplysia growth cones. J. Neurosci. Res. 87, 1057–1068. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21937
Dickson, T. C., Mintz, C. D., Benson, D. L., and Salton, S. R. (2002). Functional binding interaction identified between the axonal CAM L1 and members of the ERM family. J. Cell Biol. 157, 1105–1112. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200111076
Dityatev, A., Bukalo, O., and Schachner, M. (2008). Modulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity by cell adhesion and repulsion molecules. Neuron Glia Biol. 4, 197–209. doi: 10.1017/S1740925X09990111
Dityatev, A., Dityateva, G., Sytnyk, V., Delling, M., Toni, N., Nikonenko, I., et al. (2004). Polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule promotes remodeling and formation of hippocampal synapses. J. Neurosci. 24, 9372–9382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1702-04.2004
Enneking, E. M., Kudumala, S. R., Moreno, E., Stephan, R., Boerner, J., Godenschwege, T. A., et al. (2013). Transsynaptic coordination of synaptic growth, function, and stability by the L1-type CAM Neuroglian. PLoS Biol. 11:e1001537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001537
Faivre-Sarrailh, C., Falk, J., Pollerberg, E., Schachner, M., and Rougon, G. (1999). NrCAM, cerebellar granule cell receptor for the neuronal adhesion molecule F3, displays an actin-dependent mobility in growth cones. J. Cell Sci. 112 (Pt 18), 3015–3027.
Falk, J., Thoumine, O., Dequidt, C., Choquet, D., and Faivre-Sarrailh, C. (2004). NrCAM coupling to the cytoskeleton depends on multiple protein domains and partitioning into lipid rafts. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 4695–4709. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-03-0171
Garver, T. D., Ren, Q., Tuvia, S., and Bennett, V. (1997). Tyrosine phosphorylation at a site highly conserved in the L1 family of cell adhesion molecules abolishes ankyrin binding and increases lateral mobility of neurofascin. J. Cell Biol. 137, 703–714. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.3.703
Gerrow, K., and El-Husseini, A. (2006). Cell adhesion molecules at the synapse. Front. Biosci. 11, 2400–2419. doi: 10.2741/1978
Gibbons, A. S., Thomas, E. A., and Dean, B. (2009). Regional and duration of illness differences in the alteration of NCAM-180 mRNA expression within the cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 112, 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.04.002
Godenschwege, T. A., Kristiansen, L. V., Uthaman, S. B., Hortsch, M., and Murphey, R. K. (2006). A conserved role for Drosophila Neuroglian and human L1-CAM in central-synapse formation. Curr. Biol. 16, 12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.062
Gray, L. J., Dean, B., Kronsbein, H. C., Robinson, P. J., and Scarr, E. (2010). Region and diagnosis-specific changes in synaptic proteins in schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Psychiatry Res. 178, 374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.07.012
Gu, Z., Imai, F., Kim, I. J., Fujita, H., Katayama, K., Mori, K., et al. (2015). Expression of the immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules in the developing spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion. PLoS ONE 10:e0121550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121550
Gunn-Moore, F. J., Hill, M., Davey, F., Herron, L. R., Tait, S., Sherman, D., et al. (2006). A functional FERM domain binding motif in neurofascin. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 33, 441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.09.003
Hansen, S. M., Berezin, V., and Bock, E. (2008). Signaling mechanisms of neurite outgrowth induced by the cell adhesion molecules NCAM and N-cadherin. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 3809–3821. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8290-0
Hortsch, M., Homer, D., Malhotra, J. D., Chang, S., Frankel, J., Jefford, G., et al. (1998a). Structural requirements for outside-in and inside-out signaling by Drosophila neuroglian, a member of the L1 family of cell adhesion molecules. J. Cell Biol. 142, 251–261. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.1.251
Hortsch, M., O'Shea, K. S., Zhao, G., Kim, F., Vallejo, Y., and Dubreuil, R. R. (1998b). A conserved role for L1 as a transmembrane link between neuronal adhesion and membrane cytoskeleton assembly. Cell Adhes. Commun. 5, 61–73. doi: 10.3109/15419069809005599
Kriebel, M., Wuchter, J., Trinks, S., and Volkmer, H. (2012). Neurofascin: a switch between neuronal plasticity and stability. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 44, 694–697. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.01.012
Kulahin, N., Kristensen, O., Rasmussen, K. K., Olsen, L., Rydberg, P., Vestergaard, B., et al. (2011). Structural model and trans-interaction of the entire ectodomain of the olfactory cell adhesion molecule. Structure 19, 203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.12.014
Lambert, S., Davis, J. Q., and Bennett, V. (1997). Morphogenesis of the node of Ranvier: co-clusters of ankyrin and ankyrin-binding integral proteins define early developmental intermediates. J. Neurosci. 17, 7025–7036.
Lee, A. C., and Suter, D. M. (2008). Quantitative analysis of microtubule dynamics during adhesion-mediated growth cone guidance. Dev. Neurobiol. 68, 1363–1377. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20662
Leshchyns'ka, I., Liew, H. T., Shepherd, C., Halliday, G. M., Stevens, C. H., Ke, Y. D., et al. (2015). Abeta-dependent reduction of NCAM2-mediated synaptic adhesion contributes to synapse loss in Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Commun. 6:8836. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9836
Leshchyns'ka, I., Sytnyk, V., Morrow, J. S., and Schachner, M. (2003). Neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) association with PKCbeta2 via betaI spectrin is implicated in NCAM-mediated neurite outgrowth. J. Cell Biol. 161, 625–639. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200303020
Leshchyns'ka, I., Tanaka, M. M., Schachner, M., and Sytnyk, V. (2011). Immobilized pool of NCAM180 in the postsynaptic membrane is homeostatically replenished by the flux of NCAM180 from extrasynaptic regions. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23397–23406. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.252098
Li, S., Leshchyns'ka, I., Chernyshova, Y., Schachner, M., and Sytnyk, V. (2013). The Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (NCAM) Associates with and signals through p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1). J. Neurosci. 33, 790–803. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1238-12.2013
Lim, S. T., Lim, K. C., Giuliano, R. E., and Federoff, H. J. (2008). Temporal and spatial localization of nectin-1 and l-afadin during synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 507, 1228–1244. doi: 10.1002/cne.21608
Malhotra, J. D., Tsiotra, P., Karagogeos, D., and Hortsch, M. (1998). Cis-activation of L1-mediated ankyrin recruitment by TAG-1 homophilic cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33354–33359. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33354
Maness, P. F., and Schachner, M. (2007). Neural recognition molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily: signaling transducers of axon guidance and neuronal migration. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 19–26. doi: 10.1038/nn1827
Needham, L. K., Thelen, K., and Maness, P. F. (2001). Cytoplasmic domain mutations of the L1 cell adhesion molecule reduce L1-ankyrin interactions. J. Neurosci. 21, 1490–1500.
Niethammer, P., Delling, M., Sytnyk, V., Dityatev, A., Fukami, K., and Schachner, M. (2002). Cosignaling of NCAM via lipid rafts and the FGF receptor is required for neuritogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 157, 521–532. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200109059
Nishimura, K., Yoshihara, F., Tojima, T., Ooashi, N., Yoon, W., Mikoshiba, K., et al. (2003). L1-dependent neuritogenesis involves ankyrinB that mediates L1-CAM coupling with retrograde actin flow. J. Cell Biol. 163, 1077–1088. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200303060
Okumura, M., Sakuma, C., Miura, M., and Chihara, T. (2015). Linking cell surface receptors to microtubules: tubulin folding cofactor D mediates Dscam functions during neuronal morphogenesis. J. Neurosci. 35, 1979–1990. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0973-14.2015
Ooashi, N., and Kamiguchi, H. (2009). The cell adhesion molecule L1 controls growth cone navigation via ankyrin(B)-dependent modulation of cyclic AMP. Neurosci. Res. 63, 224–226. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.11.009
Peretti, D., Peris, L., Rosso, S., Quiroga, S., and Caceres, A. (2000). Evidence for the involvement of KIF4 in the anterograde transport of L1-containing vesicles. J. Cell Biol. 149, 141–152. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.1.141
Perlson, E., Hendricks, A. G., Lazarus, J. E., Ben-Yaakov, K., Gradus, T., Tokito, M., et al. (2013). Dynein interacts with the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM180) to tether dynamic microtubules and maintain synaptic density in cortical neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 27812–27824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.465088
Pielage, J., Cheng, L., Fetter, R. D., Carlton, P. M., Sedat, J. W., and Davis, G. W. (2008). A presynaptic giant ankyrin stabilizes the NMJ through regulation of presynaptic microtubules and transsynaptic cell adhesion. Neuron 58, 195–209. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.017
Pollerberg, G. E., Schachner, M., and Davoust, J. (1986). Differentiation state-dependent surface mobilities of two forms of the neural cell adhesion molecule. Nature 324, 462–465. doi: 10.1038/324462a0
Poplawski, G. H., Tranziska, A. K., Leshchyns'ka, I., Meier, I. D., Streichert, T., Sytnyk, V., et al. (2012). L1CAM increases MAP2 expression via the MAPK pathway to promote neurite outgrowth. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 50, 169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2012.03.010
Puchkov, D., Leshchyns'ka, I., Nikonenko, A. G., Schachner, M., and Sytnyk, V. (2011). NCAM/spectrin complex disassembly results in PSD perforation and postsynaptic endocytic zone formation. Cereb. Cortex 21, 2217–2232. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq283
Ren, Q., and Bennett, V. (1998). Palmitoylation of neurofascin at a site in the membrane-spanning domain highly conserved among the L1 family of cell adhesion molecules. J. Neurochem. 70, 1839–1849. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70051839.x
Sakurai, T. (2012). The role of NrCAM in neural development and disorders–beyond a simple glue in the brain. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 49, 351–363. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.12.002
Santuccione, A., Sytnyk, V., Leshchyns'ka, I., and Schachner, M. (2005). Prion protein recruits its neuronal receptor NCAM to lipid rafts to activate p59fyn and to enhance neurite outgrowth. J. Cell Biol. 169, 341–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200409127
Schachner, M. (1997). Neural recognition molecules and synaptic plasticity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 627–634. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80115-9
Schafer, M. K., and Frotscher, M. (2012). Role of L1CAM for axon sprouting and branching. Cell Tissue Res. 349, 39–48. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1345-4
Schlatter, M. C., Buhusi, M., Wright, A. G., and Maness, P. F. (2008). CHL1 promotes Sema3A-induced growth cone collapse and neurite elaboration through a motif required for recruitment of ERM proteins to the plasma membrane. J. Neurochem. 104, 731–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05013.x
Schmid, R. S., and Maness, P. F. (2008). L1 and NCAM adhesion molecules as signaling coreceptors in neuronal migration and process outgrowth. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 245–250. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.015
Shapiro, L., Love, J., and Colman, D. R. (2007). Adhesion molecules in the nervous system: structural insights into function and diversity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 451–474. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113034
Simson, R., Yang, B., Moore, S. E., Doherty, P., Walsh, F. S., and Jacobson, K. A. (1998). Structural mosaicism on the submicron scale in the plasma membrane. Biophys. J. 74, 297–308. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77787-2
Soroka, V., Kolkova, K., Kastrup, J. S., Diederichs, K., Breed, J., Kiselyov, V. V., et al. (2003). Structure and interactions of NCAM Ig1-2-3 suggest a novel zipper mechanism for homophilic adhesion. Structure 11, 1291–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2003.09.006
Suter, D. M., Errante, L. D., Belotserkovsky, V., and Forscher, P. (1998). The Ig superfamily cell adhesion molecule, apCAM, mediates growth cone steering by substrate-cytoskeletal coupling. J. Cell Biol. 141, 227–240. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.1.227
Suter, D. M., and Forscher, P. (2001). Transmission of growth cone traction force through apCAM-cytoskeletal linkages is regulated by Src family tyrosine kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 155, 427–438. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200107063
Suter, D. M., Schaefer, A. W., and Forscher, P. (2004). Microtubule dynamics are necessary for SRC family kinase-dependent growth cone steering. Curr. Biol. 14, 1194–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.049
Sytnyk, V., Leshchyns'ka, I., Nikonenko, A. G., and Schachner, M. (2006). NCAM promotes assembly and activity-dependent remodeling of the postsynaptic signaling complex. J. Cell Biol. 174, 1071–1085. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604145
Takahashi, K., Nakanishi, H., Miyahara, M., Mandai, K., Satoh, K., Satoh, A., et al. (1999). Nectin/PRR: an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule recruited to cadherin-based adherens junctions through interaction with Afadin, a PDZ domain-containing protein. J. Cell Biol. 145, 539–549. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.3.539
Tian, N., Leshchyns'ka, I., Welch, J. H., Diakowski, W., Yang, H., Schachner, M., et al. (2012). Lipid raft-dependent endocytosis of close homolog of adhesion molecule L1 (CHL1) promotes neuritogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 44447–44463. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.394973
Trinh-Trang-Tan, M. M., Bigot, S., Picot, J., Lecomte, M. C., and Kordeli, E. (2014). AlphaII-spectrin participates in the surface expression of cell adhesion molecule L1 and neurite outgrowth. Exp. Cell Res. 322, 365–380. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.01.012
Tudor, C., te Riet, J., Eich, C., Harkes, R., Smisdom, N., Bouhuijzen Wenger, J., et al. (2014). Syntenin-1 and ezrin proteins link activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule to the actin cytoskeleton. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 13445–13460. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.546754
Tuvia, S., Garver, T. D., and Bennett, V. (1997). The phosphorylation state of the FIGQY tyrosine of neurofascin determines ankyrin-binding activity and patterns of cell segregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 12957–12962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.12957
Vos, Y. J., and Hofstra, R. M. (2010). An updated and upgraded L1CAM mutation database. Hum. Mutat. 31, E1102–E1109. doi: 10.1002/humu.21172
Westphal, D., Sytnyk, V., Schachner, M., and Leshchyns'ka, I. (2010). Clustering of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) at the neuronal cell surface induces caspase-8- and -3-dependent changes of the spectrin meshwork required for NCAM-mediated neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 42046–42057. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.177147
Winckler, B., Forscher, P., and Mellman, I. (1999). A diffusion barrier maintains distribution of membrane proteins in polarized neurons. Nature 397, 698–701. doi: 10.1038/17806
Wobst, H., Schmitz, B., Schachner, M., Diestel, S., Leshchyns'ka, I., and Sytnyk, V. (2015). Kinesin-1 promotes post-Golgi trafficking of NCAM140 and NCAM180 to the cell surface. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2816–2829. doi: 10.1242/jcs.169391
Yageta, M., Kuramochi, M., Masuda, M., Fukami, T., Fukuhara, H., Maruyama, T., et al. (2002). Direct association of TSLC1 and DAL-1, two distinct tumor suppressor proteins in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 62, 5129–5133.
Yang, X., Hou, D., Jiang, W., and Zhang, C. (2014). Intercellular protein-protein interactions at synapses. Protein Cell 5, 420–444. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0054-z
Zhang, X., Davis, J. Q., Carpenter, S., and Bennett, V. (1998). Structural requirements for association of neurofascin with ankyrin. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30785–30794. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30785
Keywords: cell adhesion molecule, immunoglobulin superfamily, neural cell adhesion molecule, L1, cytoskeleton, neurons, neurite outgrowth, synapse
Citation: Leshchyns'ka I and Sytnyk V (2016) Reciprocal Interactions between Cell Adhesion Molecules of the Immunoglobulin Superfamily and the Cytoskeleton in Neurons. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 4:9. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00009
Received: 19 December 2015; Accepted: 01 February 2016;
Published: 16 February 2016.
Edited by:
Mitsugu Fujita, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, JapanReviewed by:
Sigrid A. Langhans, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, USARené-Marc Mège, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
Copyright © 2016 Leshchyns'ka and Sytnyk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Vladimir Sytnyk, v.sytnyk@unsw.edu.au