- 1College of Animation, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, Henan, China
- 2Department of Smart Experience Design, Kookmin University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Introduction: This study investigated the influence of indoor lighting environments on paper reading efficiency and brain fatigue to explore lighting parameters that benefit users during various reading durations.
Methods: The study was conducted in the Smart Lighting Lab, where 12 participants were tested under different illuminance levels and correlated color temperatures (CCT) for three distinct reading durations. Reading efficiency during the task tests and objective measures of brain activity by monitoring participants’ electroencephalograms (EEGs) were used as key factors to assess participants’ fatigue levels.
Results: By analyzing the subjective and objective results, we found that paper reading efficiency was significantly affected by changes in the lighting environment. Also, based on the results of this study, we propose lighting recommendations for paper reading tasks of different durations. For a 15 min reading task, the lighting condition of 500 lux-6,500 K were the most efficient for reading; for a 30 min reading task, 500 lux-4,000 K lighting environments were found to be the most effective; and 750 lux-6,500 K was the best lighting environment for a 60 min reading duration.
Discussion: These suggestions can serve as a reference for designing indoor lighting environment. In addition, they provide guidance to researchers and reviewers conducting similar studies.
1 Introduction
In recent years, increased indoor lifestyle have emphasized the significant impact of indoor lighting on health and work efficiency (Peeters et al., 2021; Collier et al., 2023). This trend highlights the urgent need for modern technology and human-centered approaches (Menendez-Velazquez et al., 2023), especially in terms of improving aspects like light color, intensity, and color temperature (Kaymaz and Manav, 2023). In this context, the indoor reading environment becomes particularly important. A well-designed lighting environment not only provides convenience and comfort but also helps protect visual health, enhance task efficiency and reduce discomfort (Liu et al., 2020).
The lighting environment is influenced by various parameters, including color rendering, glare, illuminance levels, illuminance uniformity, and color temperature (Chuanbo.magtechjournal, 2023). Within the field of indoor lighting, we typically focus on two primary characteristic parameters: Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) and illuminance. These parameters play an important role in indoor lighting environments (Hu et al., 2022; Choi et al., 2022). However, different countries and regions have varying standards for classroom illuminance. China’s “Architectural Lighting Design Standards” GB 50034-2013, specify a minimum of 300 lux for classroom illumination (Hu et al., 2021). The American Institute of Lighting Engineering recommends at least 500 lux for classrooms and labs where studying is frequent. The Japanese Industrial Standard suggests a range of 500–750 lux for classroom illumination. CIE’s “Lighting of Classroom” guidelines state that reading and writing tasks require an average illumination of at least than 500 lux (Davis, 2017; Mills and Borg, 1999). Additionally, changes in color temperature can impact emotions, attention, and comfort (Llinares et al., 2021). Low color temperature(2700 K)promotes positive emotions, creating a warm and relaxed lighting atmosphere (Yu and Akita, 2019). During this time, people also respond more rapidly to emotional images (Li et al., 2021). Neutral color temperature(4000 K) is considered more suitable for task-oriented activities such as reading and dining, as well as for classroom lighting environments (Dugar and Agarwal, 2019; Yang and Jeon, 2020). Higher color temperatures help to enhance performance in attention and memory tasks, making them suitable for activities that require a high degree of concentration (Maier et al., 2017).
Different indoor environments, especially workplaces, directly impact work efficiency and indirectly affect people’s attention and motivation (Morrice et al., 2021). For various scenarios and tasks, such as office lighting, a color temperature combination of 750 lux and 4000 K has been found to help reduce visual fatigue. Conversely, combinations of low illuminance and low color temperature, or high illuminance and high color temperature, may lead to more severe visual fatigue (Chen et al., 2023). Therefore, choosing appropriate lighting conditions is crucial for improving learning and work efficiency. Different lighting conditions also have a linear relationship with attention level (Fu et al., 2023a). Under conditions of 300 lux and 6000K, it is more suitable for highly concentrated attention for thinking and analyzing (Lan et al., 2021). In lighting conditions of 500 lux and 5000K, attention and work efficiency are at their highest with fatigue at its lowest (Yu and Akita, 2023). Under 1,000 lux and 5000 K conditions, individuals display optimal working memory performance but perform less effectively under conditions of 400 lux and 7000 K (Lee and Kim, 2020).
Objective experimental methods and physiological indicator measurements can quantify fatigue (Fang et al., 2022). Experiments involving work performance and differential attention tests have shown that both illuminance and color temperature are related to comfort and relaxation (Chen et al., 2022a). In experiments using pointer meter reading materials, neutral color temperature is generally used to enhance reading efficiency (Lu et al., 2020). By monitoring physiological parameters in electroencephalograms (EEG), physiological indicators can provide real-time indications of fatigue and evaluate cognitive workload during human cognitive tasks (Guan et al., 2022; Mehmood et al., 2023). Asymmetrical activity in the brain’s frontal lobe has been shown to be highly correlated with subjective questionnaires and objective task performance, making it a more objective indicator to validate traditional subjective questionnaire-based methods (Niu et al., 2022; Mir et al., 2022). Frequent waves in EEG, such as the low-frequency θ and α waves and high-frequency β waves, can be utilized to assess fatigue (Wang et al., 2023). α and β parameters have been found to be effective for measuring fatigue (Chai et al., 2022), with α wave oscillations reflecting fundamental cognitive processes and playing a critical role in integrating brain activities across different frequency ranges (Ippolito et al., 2022). Different wavelengths have also been shown to impact neurophysiological and neuropsychological parameters (Mankowska et al., 2022). Several studies have also explored the relationship between physiological changes and lighting environment. Under higher illumination, reduced pre-stimulus α activity is associated with delayed reaction times in sustained attention tasks (Chen et al., 2022b; Sun et al., 2022). Based on EEG signals of sustained attention tasks, it has been found that subjects experience better visual comfort at CCTs of 3300 and 4300 K and illuminance levels of 300 lux (Fu et al., 2023b). Monitoring EEG under different ambient light tests has revealed that improving illumination and color temperature in the workplace contributes to reduce fatigue (ZHU et al., 2015).
However, based on the literature review, few studies have comprehensively considered the impact of lighting environments on physiology and reading efficiency from the perspective of different reading durations. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the effects of reading duration, color temperature, and illuminance on human physiology and work efficiency, and to provide personalized recommendations for indoor lighting solutions for different reading durations. The experiment was conducted in a lighting laboratory without daylight. Users’ results were collected for assessing physiological changes and work efficiency under different lighting conditions. Finally, we propose suggestions for indoor lighting schemes applicable to different reading durations based on the experimental results. The originality of this study is reflected in two aspects:
1. In contrast to previous studies that focused on single factors or specific task conditions, our research considers the impact of multiple factors of color temperature and illuminance on human physiology and work efficiency under different reading durations.
2. Personalized indoor lighting scheme recommendations are provided based on three different reading durations to enhance learning and work efficiency and reduce fatigue.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental setup
2.1.1 Space
The experiment was conducted in a full-scale mock-up classroom, with dimensions of 300 cm in length, 200 cm in width, and 400 cm in height. Two desks with dimensions of 1.2 m (L) × 0.6 m (W) × 0.75 m (H) were placed in the space. Figure 1 shows the detailed layout of the space.
To prevent the influence of external light on the experiment, professional blackout curtains were installed on the inner side of the windows to minimize reflections. Additionally, to avoid the potential for glare from the light source, this experiment required that the vertical distance between the light fixture and the tabletop, as well as the horizontal distance between the participants and the paper-based reading materials, be no less than 60 cm.
The lighting equipment included Philips T5 LED lamps. Nine LED lamp tubes were placed on a shelf at an appropriate distance. Adjustable lighting devices were mounted on the wall, allowing illumination to be adjusted within a range from 0 to 1,000 lux. The configuration detailed list of lamps and lanterns are provided in Table 1.
2.1.2 Lighting conditions
Illuminance, measured in lux (lx), refers to the amount of visible light energy received per unit area. While higher illuminance levels can improve our ability to perceive light, excessive levels can have the opposite effect. Color temperature is the usual way to indicate the spectral quality of a light source. Light sources with a low color temperature have a higher proportion of red radiation in their energy distribution, known as “warm light”. As the color temperature increases, the proportion of blue radiation also increases, known as “cool light” (Masullo et al., 2022). Changes in color temperature can affect how people feel, such as comfort, pleasure, seriousness, or coldness. The architectural lighting design standard GB 50034-2013, it stipulates the standard color temperature values of 2,700 K, 4,000 K, and 6,500 K for different indoor lighting applications. Additionally, the standard also indicates that the illumination in the indoor environment should typically fall within the range of 300–750 lux. The various types of classroom lighting environment specifications are given in Table 2.
To eliminate the impact of variations in human thermal comfort during the experiment, the laboratory environment was controlled at a temperature range of 23°C–25°C (Celsius) and a relative humidity between 30% and 70%, ensuring that the participants were within a comfortable range (Masullo et al., 2022).
Based on the requirements of the above specifications for the lighting environment and comfort, in this experiment, the illuminance parameters were set at 300 lux, 500 lux, and 750 lux, while the color temperature parameters were 2,700 K, 4,000 K, and 6500 K. The temperature was maintained between 23 and 25°C, and the humidity was in the range of 30%-70%.
2.1.3 Equipment
In this experiment, a 16-channel EEG device and 16-channel electrode caps manufactured by Beijing Mind Ark were used for EEG data acquisition. A Dell desktop computer was also installed to connect to the EEG equipment for real-time EEG monitoring. Figure 2 shows the experimental EEG equipment. Illuminance and color temperature were measured with the Konica Minolta CL-200A Color Illuminance Meter. Timing was performed with a timer.
2.2 Subjects
A rigorous selection process was implemented to ensure that participants met specific criteria, including good overall health, sufficient cognitive abilities, and normal vision. Given the prevalence of college student in today society and the feasibility of this experimental manipulation, the subjects consisted of 12 selected graduate students, with an equal representation of both genders and ages ranging from 18 to 23. All participants were physically and mentally fit, with excellent visual acuity of at least 5.0 on the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart, even after receiving any necessary optical correction. The experiment required the subjects to maintain their normal working and resting routines in the 8 h preceding the experiment to ensure they had received adequate sleep. Additionally, no physical or mental exercise was performed within 2 h before the experiment to prevent any potential effects on their energy or excitement levels. Subject information is provided in Table 3.
2.3 Experimental materials
The experimental materials consisted of a number correction test, printed on A4-sized paper with a 12-point Times New Roman font. Subjects were to find different sets of numbers from two sets of contrasting numbers within a specified time, using “√” (for correct) and “×” (for incorrect) to mark them. This is shown in Figure 2. To counterbalance any potential sequence effects, an AB-BA design was employed for the presentation order of the number correction materials. This test simulated reading tasks in daily life that require rapid and accurate processing of information. The test material for “Number Correction” shown in Figure 3.
2.4 Experimental process
In complex multi-factor and multi-level studies, orthogonal experimental design methods are typically used to select representative experimental combinations for testing (Sun et al., 2020). In this experiment, three factors were involved: illuminance, color temperature, and reading duration, with each factor having three parameter levels. Therefore, we employed an L9 (3^3) orthogonal experimental design to develop the experimental plan. Table 4 demonstrated the experiment schedule.
1. The experimenters and participants first carried out relevant preparatory work before the experiment. The preparation process included an explanation of the experi-ment process and the wearing of EEG equipment.
2. Participants performed the task test for a prescribed reading duration.
3. After a 10-min intermission, the subjects entered different working conditions for the next round of the experiment.
The experimental sessions were carefully scheduled in the morning from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and in the afternoon from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. To ensure that the subjects were not disturbed, strict measures were taken to maintain absolute silence and control noise throughout the entire process. The illuminance and color temperature were precisely adjusted to follow the experimental schedule, creating a peaceful lighting environment. The participants wore EEG caps while conducting the reading tests as shown in Figure 5.
2.5 Data acquisition method
2.5.1 Reading efficiency measurement methods
The evaluation of one’s reading efficiency is intertwined with two fundamental factors: reading speed and accuracy (Grbovic et al.), (Wallace et al., 2022). These elements play a vital role in gauging an individual’s reading efficiency. Reading speed primarily entails how quickly one can comprehend written material, usually quantified by the number of words read per minute. Accuracy, on the other hand, measures the number of correct answers or task completion percentage. Eq. 1 defines the formula for calculating reading speed and Eq. 2 defines the formula for reading accuracy. Reading efficiency depends on both reading speed and accuracy rate. The equivalent reading efficiency was determined using Eq. 3.
Note 1. : v = reading speed, r = the number of words read, and t = the reading time.
Note 2. : P = reading accuracy, n = accuracy in answering questions, and N= Number of questions answered correctly.
Note3. : η = reading efficiency, v = reading speed, and p = accuracy.
For this experiment, we adopted the original reading material design. By analyzing the correct rate and reading speed of the subjects, their reading efficiency can be judged, reflecting the degree of fatigue in paper reading under various lighting environments.
2.5.2 Physiological methodology
In cognitive research, individuals require coordinated activity in multiple brain regions, including the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, cerebellum, and occipital lobe when dealing with tasks ranging from simple to complex (Fogassi and Luppino, 2005). In our everyday thinking and cognitive activities, the frontal and parietal lobes are typically the most active brain regions (Sammer et al., 2007). Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important tool used to assess brain function by visualizing fluctuating brain activity on a two-dimensional plane (Foged et al., 2022; Lassagne et al., 2022). It records the spontaneous electrical activity of pyramidal dendrites in the brain cortex, effectively reflecting the degree of brain fatigue and cortical excitability (Lin et al., 2015). Different colors represent different levels of brain activity and can be analyzed by color changes (Mostafavi et al., 2023). Therefore, in this study, we chose to use EEG signals to evaluate the impact of different lighting environment parameters on fatigue by comparing the activity levels in the frontal lobe (F3, F4, FZ) and central area (C3, C4, CZ). Table 5 presents the relevant brain regions and their corresponding physiological states.
3 Results
3.1 Reading efficiency
The reading efficiency tests were conducted in a controlled paper-based reading environment to ensure experimental consistency. Several studies have demonstrated a strong relationship between paper-based reading tasks and lighting conditions (Shamsul et al., 2013). This study comprehensively considered different reading durations to explore the impact of lighting conditions on reading efficiency. Data collection and analysis were carried out using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 27.0 software to ensure data accuracy and reliability. The experimental data were normally distributed with a significance level of 0.05. ANOVA was used to examine the effects of different factors on reading efficiency. The results showed that illuminance and color temperature had a significant effect on reading efficiency, with F = 3.062, p = 0.012 < 0.05 and F = 4.298, p = 0.02 < 0.05, respectively.
The results show that for 15-min and 30-min reading durations, 500 lux illumination yielded the best reading efficiency. However, as the reading duration to 60 min, an illuminance of 750 lux became the preferred choice. Figure 6 illustrates the average reading efficiency under the intensity of illuminance levels for different reading durations.
The results showed that the color temperature of 6,500 K had a positive effect on obtaining the highest reading efficiency at 15 min of reading duration. But at the 30 min paper reading duration, a color temperature of 4,000 K showed higher efficiency. It is worth noting that as the reading duration increased to 60 min, the optimal CCT again returned to 6,500 K to achieve the highest reading efficiency. Figure 7 displays the average reading efficiency under the intensity of correlated color temperature (CCT) for different reading durations.
Overall, the research results clearly show that both illuminance and CCT are two critical factors influencing reading efficiency, and their specific effects vary by reading duration. The findings of this study indicate that for a 15 min reading duration, the optimal lighting conditions were 500 lux and a CCT of 6,500 K. At a 30 min of reading duration, 500 lux and 4,000 K color temperature achieved the highest reading efficiency. Lastly, for a 60-min reading duration, a combination of 750 lux illuminance and a CCT of 6,500 K provided the highest efficiency for paper-based reading.
3.2 EEG
The electroencephalogram (EEG) offers high time resolution and excellent characteristics in the frequency domain (Van Der Cruijsen et al., 2021). Electroencephalography topographical representation can reflect changes in brain function and express color intensity changes, using this, a percentage topographic map of the ratio between different brain wave frequency band combinations can be obtained. In this experiment, the EEG topographical of the subjects at the beginning was compared with that near the end of the task. The change in the state at the end of the task had a significant effect on the energy distribution of different rhythm waves in the EEG. We further analyzed the EEG topographical to measure the degree of fatigue.
In experiments conducted with 15 min reading durations, we tested various lighting environments, including 300 lux–3000 K, 500 lux–6,500 K, and 750 lux–4,000 K. The results showed significant activation in the central and frontal regions of the brain, along with the presence of positive components in these areas. As shown in Figure 8, the change in state after the task test had a significant effect on the energy distribution of the different waves in the EEG. This finding helped determine that the lighting environment with an illuminance of 500 lux and a color temperature of 6500 K was the most suitable for tasks with this duration of reading.
After 30 min of reading in three different lighting environments, the highest level of brain activity was observed in the parietal and central regions, with some activity in the frontal regions as well. The red areas on the brain scans represented high activity levels, while darker red shadows reflected higher degree of fatigue. The results showed that the central region exhibited relatively low brain activity levels and lighter red areas near the end of the 30 min reading task. Specifically, the 500 lux-4,000 K lighting environments exhibited the lowest degree of brain fatigue, making it the optimal choice for the 30 min reading duration. Figure 9 displays the EEG topographical representation for 30 min.
During a 60 min duration of paper-based reading, specific lighting parameters were used: 300 lux–4000 K, 500 lux–3000 K, and 750 lux–6500 K. When the lighting was set to 750 lux and 6500 K, near the end of the experiment, participants’ central and frontal brain regions exhibited shallower red shadows, indicating lower activity levels. The results suggest that this lighting environment helped reduce fatigue and supported extended periods of reading tasks (Figure 10).
4 Discussion
4.1 Comprehensive analysis of light environment, efficiency and physiological
Based on the results of the previous section, it can be concluded that the lighting conditions in this study have an impact on both reading efficiency and physiological states. During this experiment, we measured the physiological state of the subjects’ EEG topographical and observed that the physiological effects of lighting conditions varied significantly with different reading durations. This suggests that the optimal lighting environment in the experiment varies with different reading durations. The results also indicated that with the increase of reading duration, the illuminance gradually increases, but the color temperature did not increase correspondingly. In conclusion, the experimental results clearly indicated that illuminance and color temperature had a significant impact on reading efficiency, and changes in lighting conditions also affected fatigue levels.
4.2 Suggestions for lighting environments for different reading durations
Several recommendations were proposed for different reading durations. For reading durations of 15 or 30 min, a consistent illuminance of 500 lux is recommended. This aligns with earlier research that illuminance variations do not significantly impact productivity over short durations (Fu et al., 2023a; Yu and Akita, 2023). However, for 60-min reading duration, a moderate increase in illuminance is suggested to achieve optimal lighting conditions (Bao et al., 2021). This finding is consistent with previous studies, including that of Bania, which found that 750 lux to be more suitable than 500 lux (Baniya et al., 2015).
Additionally, the color temperature of the lighting environment showed significant changes with varying reading durations, consistent with the results of the (Janosik and Marczak, 2016) study, highlighting the importance of CCT of the light source in object recognition (Janosik and Marczak, 2016). Specifically, for a 15-min reading duration, the highest reading efficiency was observed at a color temperature of 6,500 K, while for 30 min of reading, 4,000 K was more suitable. This indicates that different reading durations have distinct effects on individuals’ perceptual experiences and highlights the suitability of a 4,000 K color temperature for classroom lighting environments (Yu and Akita, 2023; Shahidi et al., 2021). For 60-min reading durations, the color temperature returned to 6,500 K. Other factors may have contributed to this result, such as those resulting from the long duration of this experiment or the small sample size of subjects.
Given that practical applications often involve considering various factors, combined with the results of the previous experiments, we provide lighting suggestions for interior spaces with different reading durations. By carefully selecting the appropriate combination of illuminance and color temperature, the overall reading experience can be enhanced, fatigue can be reduced, and efficiency can be improved. These suggestions can be used in reading areas such as libraries, classrooms, study rooms, and even aerospace industry cockpits to improve the design and optimization of lighting environments.
5 Conclusion
In this study, we investigated the combined effects of illuminance and Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) parameters in daily LED lighting. Subjects engaged in paper reading task under three different durations. We collected real-time electroencephalography (EEG) physiological data from participants and, in conjunction with reading test results, conducted an objective analysis to quantify the level of fatigue during paper reading. The study found that improving the illuminance and color temperature of the reading environment enhanced reading efficiency and reduced fatigue at different reading durations. The results showed that an indoor illuminance of 500 lux and a color temperature of 6,500 K were optimal for 15-min reading durations. For 30-min reading durations, illuminance of 500 lux and a color temperature of 4,000 K were more appropriate. For 60-min reading durations, illuminance of 750 lux and a color temperature of 6,500 K provided the best conditions. It is important to note that the results were obtained using specific measurements and tools, and future studies may benefit from the use of multiple methods and tools to comprehensively examine the relationship between CCT, illuminance, reading efficiency, and fatigue. The focus of this experiment was to explore the correlation between lighting parameters and reading efficiency, fatigue from an ergonomic perspective, with the aim of providing guidance for the design of lighting environments that optimize reading efficiency for various reading durations.
In this research, we mainly used artificial light devices to provide lighting, but daylight fluctuation may also influence fatigue. Therefore, future studies could explore lighting environments with a combination of natural and artificial light to fully explore this issue. There are some limitations to this study. Firstly, the division of reading durations in this experiment was relatively broad and may not encompass a wider range of reading scenarios, such as a 50-min classroom lesson or a 90-min examination. A more detailed categorization would provide a closer approximation to the real situation. Secondly, the impact of the subject’s physical factors, such as age and degree of myopia, on the experimental results should be considered. In this study, all the participants were limited to graduate students, and the results cannot establish a potential relationship between age variability and fatigue. In future research, participants from different age groups should be included, and various reading durations scenarios could create a more realistic experimental environment.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Huanghuai University Academic Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
AZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. YP: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all of the participants of this study for their time and willingness to share their experiences and feelings.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Author disclaimer
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
Bao, J., Song, X., Li, Y., Bai, Y., and Zhou, Q. (2021). Effect of Lighting Illuminance and Colour Temperature on Mental Workload in an Office Setting. Sci Rep. 11 (1), 15284. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94795-0
Baniya, R., Tetri, E., and Halonen, L. (2015). A study of preferred illuminance and correlated colour temperature for LED office lighting. Light Eng. 23, 39–47.
Chai, M., Hou, X., Zhang, Z., and Duan, Q. (2022). Identification and prediction of fatigue crack growth under different stress ratios using acoustic emission data. Int. J. Fatigue 160, 106860. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106860
Chen, R., Tsai, M.-C., and Tsay, Y.-S. (2022a). Effect of color temperature and illuminance on psychology, physiology, and productivity: an experimental study. Energies 15 (12), 4477. doi:10.3390/en15124477
Chen, X., Cao, L., and Haendel, B. F. (2022b). Human visual processing during walking: dissociable pre- and post-stimulus influences. NeuroImage 264, 119757. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119757
Chen, Y., Ma, T., Ye, Z., and Li, Z. (2023). Effect of illuminance and colour temperature of LED lighting on asthenopia during reading. Ophthalmic Physiological Opt. 43 (1), 73–82. doi:10.1111/opo.13051
Choi, S., Choi, A., and Sung, M. (2022). Cloud-based lighting control systems: fatigue analysis and recommended luminous environments. Build. Environ. 214, 108947. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108947
Chuanbo.magtechjournal (2023). Design of ship lighting system based on human factors. http://chuanbo.magtechjournal.com/CN/abstract/abstract2953.shtml (Accessed November 1, 2023).
Collier, J. M., Wilkerson, A., Durmus, D., and Rodriguez-Feo Bermudez, E. (2023). Studying response to light in offices: a literature review and pilot study. Buildings 13 (2), 471. doi:10.3390/buildings13020471
Davis, J. L. (2017). Luminaires for advanced lighting in education; DOE-RTI-07081-1. Research Triangle Park, NC (United States): RTI International. doi:10.2172/1367149
Dugar, A. M., and Agarwal, D. (2019). A pilot study assessing short-term chromatic adaptation preferences for correlated colour temperature in India. Light Eng. 27 (1), 38–45. doi:10.33383/2017-062
Fang, Y., Liu, C., Zhao, C., Zhang, H., Wang, W., and Zou, N. (2022). A study of the effects of different indoor lighting environments on computer work fatigue. IJERPH 19 (11), 6866. doi:10.3390/ijerph19116866
Fogassi, L., and Luppino, G. (2005). Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15 (6), 626–631. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.015
Foged, M. T., Scherg, M., Fabricius, M., and Beniczky, S. (2022). Learn to interpret voltage maps: an atlas of topographies. Epileptic Disord. 24 (2), 229–248. doi:10.1684/epd.2021.1396
Fu, X., Feng, D., Jiang, X., and Wu, T. (2023b). The effect of correlated color temperature and illumination level of LED lighting on visual comfort during sustained attention activities. Sustainability 15 (4), 3826. doi:10.3390/su15043826
Fu, X., Feng, D., and Xu, J. (2023a). Effect of correlated color temperature and illuminance on sustained attention collected via electroencephalography signals. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Manuf. Serv. Industries 33 (4), 327–337. doi:10.1002/hfm.20987
Grbovic, A., Stanimirov, K., Ayyıldız, E., Bankovic, S., and Jablan, B., Determinants of reading efficiency of the students with visual impairment. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM 2022 (209), 47. doi:10.15390/EB.2022.10271
Guan, K., Zhang, Z., Chai, X., Tian, Z., Liu, T., and Niu, H. (2022). EEG based dynamic functional connectivity analysis in mental workload tasks with different types of information. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabilitation Eng. 30, 632–642. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3156546
Hu, J., Guan, Y., Wang, R., Cao, Q., Guo, Y., and Hu, Q. (2022). Investigating the daytime visibility requirements of pavement marking considering the influence of CCT and illuminance of natural light. IJERPH 19 (5), 3051. doi:10.3390/ijerph19053051
Hu, S., Lu, M., He, M., Wang, G., Liang, P., Tong, L., et al. (2021). Research on the light comfort characterization method based on visual evoked potential energy. Build. Environ. 197, 107831. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107831
Ippolito, G., Bertaccini, R., Tarasi, L., Di Gregorio, F., Trajkovic, J., Battaglia, S., et al. (2022). The role of alpha oscillations among the main neuropsychiatric disorders in the adult and developing human brain: evidence from the last 10 Years of research. Biomedicines 10 (12), 3189. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10123189
Janosik, E., and Marczak, W. (2016). The effect of warm and cool lighting on visual performance of elderly workers. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie. doi:10.21008/J.0239-9415.2016.070.04
Kaymaz, E., and Manav, B. (2023). A proposal on residential lighting design considering visual requirements, circadian factors and energy performance of lighting. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 22 (5), 2851–2866. doi:10.1080/13467581.2022.2161308
Lan, L., Hadji, S., Xia, L., and Lian, Z. (2021). The effects of light illuminance and correlated color temperature on mood and creativity. Build. Simul. 14 (3), 463–475. doi:10.1007/s12273-020-0652-z
Lassagne, H., Goueytes, D., Shulz, D. E., Estebanez, L., and Ego-Stengel, V. (2022). Continuity within the somatosensory cortical map facilitates learning. Cell Rep. 39 (1), 110617. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110617
Lee, C. W., and Kim, J. H. (2020). Effect of LED lighting illuminance and correlated color temperature on working memory. Int. J. Opt. 2020, 1–7. doi:10.1155/2020/3250364
Li, Y., Ru, T., Chen, Q., Qian, L., Luo, X., and Zhou, G. (2021). Effects of illuminance and correlated color temperature of indoor light on emotion perception. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 14351. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93523-y
Lin, C. J., Ding, C. H., and Liu, C. C. (2015). Development of a real-time drowsiness warning system based on an embedded system. Procceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ARIS). Taipei, Taiwan. May 2015, (IEEE) 1–4.
Liu, T., Yuizono, T., Wang, Z., and Gao, H. (2020). The influence of classroom illumination environment on the efficiency of foreign language learning. Appl. Sci.-Basel 10 (6), 1901. doi:10.3390/app10061901
Llinares, C., Castilla, N., and Higuera-Trujillo, J. L. (2021). Do attention and memory tasks require the same lighting? A study in university classrooms. Sustainability 13 (15), 8374. doi:10.3390/su13158374
Lu, M., Hu, S., Mao, Z., Liang, P., Xin, S., and Guan, H. (2020). Research on work efficiency and light comfort based on EEG evaluation method. Build. Environ. 183, 107122. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107122
Maier, J., Zierke, O., Hoermann, H.-J., and Windemut, I. (2017). Subjectivity of lighting perception and comfort: the role of preferences and expectations. Environ. Behav. 49 (10), 1105–1127. doi:10.1177/0013916516678905
Mankowska, N. D., Grzywinska, M., Winklewski, P. J., and Marcinkowska, A. B. (2022). Neuropsychological and neurophysiological mechanisms behind flickering light stimulus processing. Biology 11 (12), 1720. doi:10.3390/biology11121720
Masullo, M., Cioffi, F., Li, J., Maffei, L., Scorpio, M., Iachini, T., et al. (2022). An investigation of the influence of the night lighting in a Urban Park on individuals’ emotions. Sustainability 14 (14), 8556. doi:10.3390/su14148556
Mehmood, I., Li, H., Umer, W., Arsalan, A., Anwer, S., Mirza, M. A., et al. (2023). Multimodal integration for data-driven classification of mental fatigue during construction equipment operations: incorporating electroencephalography, electrodermal activity, and video signals. Dev. Built Environ. 15, 100198. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100198
Menendez-Velazquez, A., Garcia-Delgado, A. B., and Morales, D. (2023). Human-centric lighting: rare-earth-free photoluminescent materials for correlated color temperature tunable white LEDs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (4), 3602. doi:10.3390/ijms24043602
Mills, E., and Borg, N. (1999). Trends in recommended illuminance levels: an international comparison. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 28 (1), 155–163. doi:10.1080/00994480.1999.10748262
Mir, M., Nasirzadeh, F., Bereznicki, H., Enticott, P., and Lee, S. (2022). Investigating the effects of different levels and types of construction noise on emotions using EEG data. Build. Environ. 225, 109619. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109619
Morrice, E., Murphy, C., Soldano, V., Addona, C., Wittich, W., and Johnson, A. P. (2021). Assessing optimal colour and illumination to facilitate reading: an analysis of print size. Ophthalmic Physiological Opt. 41 (6), 1209–1221. doi:10.1111/opo.12885
Mostafavi, A., Cruz-Garza, J. G., and Kalantari, S. (2023). Enhancing lighting design through the investigation of illuminance and correlated color temperature’s effects on brain activity: an EEG-VR approach. J. Build. Eng. 75, 106776. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106776
Niu, H., Zhai, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, X., and Wang, X. (2022). Investigating the short-term cognitive abilities under local strong thermal radiation through EEG measurement. Build. Environ. 224, 109567. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109567
Peeters, S. T., Smolders, K. C. H. J., Vogels, I. M. L. C., and de Kort, Y. A. W. (2021). Less is more? Effects of more vs. Less electric light on alertness, mood, sleep and appraisals of light in an operational office. J. Environ. Psychol. 74, 101583. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101583
Sammer, G., Blecker, C., Gebhardt, H., Bischoff, M., Stark, R., Morgen, K., et al. (2007). Relationship between regional hemodynamic activity and simultaneously recorded EEG-theta associated with mental arithmetic-induced workload. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28 (8), 793–803. doi:10.1002/hbm.20309
Shamsul, B. M. T., Sia, C. C., Ng, Y. G., and Karmegan, K. (2013). Effects of light’s colour temperatures on visual comfort level, task performances, and alertness among students. Am. J. Public Health Res. 1 (7), 159–165. doi:10.12691/ajphr-1-7-3
Shaw, J. L. (2023). Promoting meaningful learning through incorporation of creative exercises in inorganic chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 100 (1), 69–79. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00598
Shahidi, R., Golmohammadi, R., Babamiri, M., Faradmal, J., Aliabadi, M., et al. (2021). Effect of warm/cool white lights on visual perception and mood in warm/cool color environments. EXCLI J. 20, 1611–2156. doi:10.17179/EXCLI2021-3974
Sun, H., Wang, S., Huang, S., Peng, L., Wang, Q., Zhao, W., et al. (2020). 3D focusing acoustic lens optimization method using multi-factor and multi-level orthogonal test designing theory. Appl. Acoust. 170, 107538. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107538
Sun, L., Guo, Z., Yuan, X., Wang, X., Su, C., Jiang, J., et al. (2022). An investigation of the effects of brain fatigue on the sustained attention of intelligent coal mine VDT operators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (17), 11034. doi:10.3390/ijerph191711034
Van Der Cruijsen, J., Manoochehri, M., Jonker, Z. D., Andrinopoulou, E.-R., Frens, M. A., Ribbers, G. M., et al. (2021). Theta but not beta power is positively associated with better explicit motor task learning. NeuroImage 240, 118373. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118373
Wallace, S., Bylinskii, Z., Dobres, J., Kerr, B., Berlow, S., Treitman, R., et al. (2022). Towards individuated reading experiences: different fonts increase reading speed for different individuals. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29 (4), 1–56. doi:10.1145/3502222
Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Gu, B., Cao, S., and Fang, D. (2023). Identifying mental fatigue of construction workers using EEG and deep learning. Automation Constr. 151, 104887. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104887
Yang, W., and Jeon, J. Y. (2020). Effects of correlated colour temperature of LED light on visual sensation, perception, and cognitive performance in a classroom lighting environment. Sustainability 12 (10), 4051. doi:10.3390/su12104051
Yu, H., and Akita, T. (2019). The effect of illuminance and correlated colour temperature on perceived comfort according to reading behaviour in a capsule hotel. Build. Environ. 148, 384–393. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.027
Yu, H., and Akita, T. (2023). Effects of illuminance and color temperature of a general lighting system on psychophysiology while performing paper and computer tasks. Build. Environ. 228, 109796. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109796
Keywords: indoor lighting environment, reading efficiency, brain fatigue, EEG, reading durations
Citation: Zhou A and Pan Y (2023) Effects of indoor lighting environments on paper reading efficiency and brain fatigue: an experimental study. Front. Built Environ. 9:1303028. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1303028
Received: 11 October 2023; Accepted: 17 November 2023;
Published: 15 December 2023.
Edited by:
Yingdong He, Hunan University, ChinaReviewed by:
Lu Li, Syracuse University, United StatesJun Guan, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China
Jinhua Hu, Hunan University of Science and Technology, China
Copyright © 2023 Zhou and Pan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Younghwan Pan, cGV0ZXJwYW5Aa29va21pbi5hYy5rcg==