Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 05 January 2024
Sec. Nanobiotechnology
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing Biomechanotransduction to Influence Cell Fate View all 6 articles

Editorial: Harnessing biomechanotransduction to influence cell fate

  • 1Oujiang Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Alzheimer’s Disease of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Aging, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
  • 2Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 4School of Molecular Biosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Cells, the fundamental units of life, are not passive entities solely following genetic instructions; they actively respond to the physical forces in their microenvironment. Recent breakthroughs in cell biology emphasize the role of biophysical cues in directing cell fate, revealing a fascinating interplay between the physical surroundings and cellular destiny. This editorial explores the emerging field of biophysical cues and its implications for cell fate regulation.

Traditionally, cellular biology has centered on molecular signals–the intricate web of genetic instructions and chemical messengers guiding cells along developmental paths. However, researchers now recognize that a cell’s physical surroundings, encompassing mechanical forces, substrate stiffness, and topographical features, play equally influential roles in sculpting cellular destiny.

Biophysical cues possess the remarkable ability to mimic a cell’s natural environment. Cells, residing in tissues with diverse mechanical properties, finely tune their behaviors to respond to these variations. Mechanotransduction, the interplay between cells and their surroundings, is exemplified by substrate stiffness mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM). For example, stem cells on brain-tissue-mimicking substrates tend to differentiate into neural lineages. On the other hand, mechanical memory is also crucial; cells may remember microenvironmental conditions, participating in fate regulation afterward by altering epigenetic states.

Understanding how the physical microenvironment influences stem cell differentiation can revolutionize regenerative medicine. Scientists aim to orchestrate stem cell transformation into specific cell types by providing the right biophysical cues, offering unprecedented control over regeneration. The intriguing role of mechanotransduction in stem cell biology highlights stem cells’ sophisticated mechanosensing machinery. This machinery interprets mechanical cues in the microenvironment, allowing stem cells to make crucial fate decisions. For example, molecular clutch regulation of cytoskeletal tension in response to substrate elasticity, can drive osteogenic factors into the nucleus and lock in bone-related differentiation programs. During embryonic development, mechanical forces influence cell differentiation into specialized cell types. Also, tissues undergo dynamic mechanical changes, and cells respond by adapting their fate accordingly. Disruptions in these mechanical cues can lead to developmental abnormalities, emphasizing mechanotransduction’s integral role in life’s earliest stages.

Mechanotransduction’s implications extend beyond stem cells. Researchers leverage this knowledge to design biomaterials guiding cell fate actively, envisioning scenarios where biomaterial scaffolds, through their mechanical properties, coax cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue or repair injured spinal cords. Microscale and nanoscale topographical features add another fascinating dimension to biophysical regulation. Cells sense and respond to the physical architecture of their surroundings, influencing morphology, gene expression, and differentiation. Stretching, compression, and shear stress, which cells experience in vivo, play pivotal roles in tissue development and homeostasis. The mechanotransduction machinery within cells converts these physical signals into biochemical responses, steering cellular behavior. Unraveling mechanotransduction intricacies holds promise for interventions in conditions where mechanical cues are altered, such as cardiovascular diseases and musculoskeletal disorders.

Moreover, mechanotransduction plays a crucial role in the cell reprogramming of differentiated cells into a pluripotent state, a process vital for regenerative medicine and disease modeling. Cell reprogramming, demonstrated by induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), involves coaxing mature cells to revert to a pluripotent state. The mechanical cues within the cellular microenvironment during cell reprogramming significantly influence the process’s efficiency and fidelity. At the same time, transdifferentiation, where cells transform from one specialized identity to another without reverting to a stem cell state, challenges conventional boundaries of cellular fate. While the focus historically has been on genetic and molecular cues guiding transdifferentiation, recent revelations highlight the integral role played by mechanical forces in this transformative process.

Understanding mechanotransduction holds significant implications for disease, especially in conditions like cancer where aberrant mechanosensing contributes to progression and metastasis. Cancer cells often exhibit altered responses to mechanical cues, allowing them to evade normal regulatory mechanisms maintaining tissue integrity. Unraveling mechanotransduction pathways in cancer cells opens avenues for therapeutic interventions disrupting aberrant signaling.

In this Research Topic, 2 original research and 3 review articles were collected. Hu et al. review the JAK/STAT pathway’s multifaceted roles, emphasizing its importance in mechanotransduction and therapeutic strategies. Chen et al. summarize the objective of bioimplant engineering to develop biologically compatible materials for orthopedic applications, addressing nanotechnology’s potential and challenges in orthopedics. Wang et al. comprehensively discuss intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) pathology, active drugs, and nanotechnological applications for efficient ICH therapy. Ahmadian et al. introduce a novel 3D scaffold using decellularized tomato hairy leaves to mimic human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) microenvironments for drug testing. Hamrangsekachaee et al. investigate GCX-regulated mechanotransduction using a collagen-derived gelatin matrix, providing insights into endothelial functions under different conditions.

In conclusion, integrating biophysical cues into our understanding of cell fate regulation represents a paradigm shift in cellular biology. Cells are dynamic entities profoundly influenced by the physical world around them, not just biochemical entities responding to molecular signals. This evolving field opens avenues for groundbreaking therapies, providing hope for regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and a deeper understanding of developmental processes.

Author contributions

P-YW: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. HS: Writing–review and editing. H-YC: Writing–review and editing. MD: Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. P-YW thanks the support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2022YFA1105101) and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ23C070004).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: stem cells, mechanotransduction, epigenetic state, materiobiology, mechanobiology, biophysical cues, cell reprogramming, surface topography

Citation: Wang P-Y, Shahsaverani H, Chen H-Y and Dalby MJ (2024) Editorial: Harnessing biomechanotransduction to influence cell fate. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11:1357961. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1357961

Received: 19 December 2023; Accepted: 26 December 2023;
Published: 05 January 2024.

Edited and reviewed by:

Gianni Ciofani, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Italy

Copyright © 2024 Wang, Shahsaverani, Chen and Dalby. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Peng-Yuan Wang, cHl3YW5nMDYyNEBnbWFpbC5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.