Rui Wang
Shilei Ni2
Meihua Li- 1Department of Stomatology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- 2Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- 3Department of Fever Clinic, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Titanium and titanium alloy implants are essential for bone tissue regeneration engineering. The current trend is toward the manufacture of implants from materials that mimic the structure, composition and elasticity of bones. Titanium and titanium alloy implants, the most common materials for implants, can be used as a bone conduction material but cannot promote osteogenesis. In clinical practice, there is a high demand for implant surfaces that stimulate bone formation and accelerate bone binding, thus shortening the implantation-to-loading time and enhancing implantation success. To avoid stress shielding, the elastic modulus of porous titanium and titanium alloy implants must match that of bone. Micro-arc oxidation technology has been utilized to increase the surface activity and build a somewhat hard coating on porous titanium and titanium alloy implants. More recently, a growing number of researchers have combined micro-arc oxidation with hydrothermal, ultrasonic, and laser treatments, coatings that inhibit bacterial growth, and acid etching with sand blasting methods to improve bonding to bone. This paper summarizes the reaction at the interface between bone and implant material, the porous design principle of scaffold material, MAO technology and the combination of MAO with other technologies in the field of porous titanium and titanium alloys to encourage their application in the development of medical implants.
Introduction
With the growth of the aging population, titanium and titanium alloy materials have become increasingly widely used in implants. Titanium and titanium alloys are frequently utilized in biomedical implants due to their biocompatibility, strong mechanical qualities, and corrosion resistance (Geetha et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2017; Takizawa et al., 2018; Zhang and Chen, 2019; Chen L. Y. et al., 2020). However, because the elastic modulus of metal is substantially larger than that of bone, this results in a “stress shielding” effect that prevents the necessary stress from reaching the neighboring bone matrix, which eventually causes local osteoclast production and implant loss (Engh et al., 2003; Niinomi and Nakai, 2011; Manoj et al., 2018; Raffa et al., 2021). Bone is made of cancellous and cortical components. Bone density gradually increases from the inner cancellous bone to the outer cortical bone, revealing uneven and porous structure (Hadjidakis and Androulakis, 2006; Currey, 2011; Chen H. et al., 2020). By altering the size and structure of pores in implants, bone-like mechanical characteristics can be achieved (Engh et al., 2003; Niinomi and Nakai, 2011; Manoj et al., 2018; Raffa et al., 2021). In addition to assisting cell attachment, growth, division and differentiation, biocompatible metal implants should also facilitate the movement of nutrients and metabolic wastes (Ryan et al., 2008; Koolen et al., 2020; Lv et al., 2021; Rana et al., 2021). The traditional methods for manufacturing porous implant materials include powder metallurgy (Ryan et al., 2008; Nicoara et al., 2016; Rodriguez-Contreras et al., 2021), freeze drying (Sachlos and Czernuszka, 2003; Murphy et al., 2010), gas foaming (Sachlos and Czernuszka, 2003), spark plasma sintering (Annur et al., 2021), and open-pore titanium foam (Imwinkelried, 2007). However, the abovementioned porous materials have characteristics such as small pores, uneven pore distributions, poor permeability or numerous micropores within the pore wall structure that hinder their applications as biomaterials (Ryan et al., 2008; Koolen et al., 2020; Lv et al., 2021). The current design of materials for implants focuses on their elastic modulus, compressive strength, and biocompatibility (Chen H. et al., 2020; Dziaduszewska and Zielinski, 2021).
Because of the potential of 3D printing technology to create individualized and tailored products, its use in orthopedics and dentistry has expanded in recent years (Jing et al., 2020). Additive manufacturing (AM) technology allows the manufacture of implants that have regulated structures, shapes and properties. It is possible to directly design models with complex 3D hierarchical structures, which offers a new option for the preparation of porous implants (Huang and Schmid, 2018; Yu et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2020; Dziaduszewska and Zielinski, 2021; Khorsandi et al., 2021; Salmi, 2021). Ti6Al4V is the titanium alloy that is most frequently employed for 3D printing. Since Brånemark’s (1983) discovery of osseointegration between titanium and bone tissue, titanium and titanium alloy-based screw-type implants and orthopedic implant materials have been widely utilized in dentistry and orthopedic medicine.
Titanium and its alloys cannot bond well with bone due to biological surface inertia, and this affects implant success. Aseptic loosening and bacterial infection of implants are significant concerns in orthopedics and dentistry (Wang et al., 2020; Yin et al., 2022). Biofunctionalization to alter the morphology, structure, elements, and crystal phase composition endows the surfaces of titanium implants with biological activity, promotes their integration with bone tissue, and enhances their mechanical and antibacterial properties; it is the key to expanding the application of titanium implants (Zhang B. et al., 2018, 2020; Wang H. et al., 2021; Fazel et al., 2021). It is more challenging to modify the surfaces of porous implants than nonporous implants due to their unique shape.
Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) technology has gradually gained popularity as an implant surface modification method because it is a convenient and efficient way to dope materials with active ingredients, change the morphology of the implant surface, and greatly enhance the biological activity of titanium-based implants. Under the influence of the immediate high temperature and high pressure produced by arc discharge, MAO, also known as plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) and anode spark deposition (ASD), is utilized to generate oxide coatings with complicated geometries on the surface of valve metals (Wang C. et al., 2018). This approach can incorporate bioactive electrolyte components such as calcium and phosphate into the coating. Calcium phosphate (CaP) coatings, particularly hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings, can facilitate early and rapid osseointegration. The bioactivity of the coating is determined by its physicochemical characteristics, including roughness, porosity, phase, elemental composition, and adhesive strength (Terleeva et al., 2010) (Figure 1). In recent years, scientists have tried to combine MAO with other surface treatment technologies and achieve better bone bonding effect. Biocompatible implant materials must have appropriate size, shape, porosity, morphology, surface composition and protective coating. This paper reviews the reaction at the interface between bone and implant material, the porous design principle of scaffold material, MAO technology and the combination of MAO with other technologies in the field of porous titanium and titanium alloys to support their application in orthopedics and oral implants.
FIGURE 1. Different coating morphologies were formed by micro-arc oxidation, (A) Micropores of unequal size, (B) Cortex-like structure, (C) Bioactive ions coatings developed.
Interface response between bone and implant material following implant placement
Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration are connected to the process of bone regeneration following injury. Osteoinduction refers to inducing the development of new bone around the implant. Osteoinduction refers to the stimulation of primitive, undifferentiated and pluripotent stem cells to differentiate into osteoblast lines (Albrektsson, 2001). Osteoconduction is a term commonly used in the context of implants. Allowing bone to grow on the surface or inward into pores, channels, or tubes in implant is referred to as osteoconduction (Albrektsson, 2001). Osteointegration is the term used to describe the direct structural and functional link between the surface holding the implant and the organized living bone (Mavrogenis et al., 2009). In complex dynamic environment, the implant-tissue interface is characterized by the mechanical and biological interaction of the implant with the surrounding tissues. To establish long-term stability of the implant-tissue contact, the ultimate goal is to fully integrate the implant with tissues (Grzeskowiak et al., 2020).
The majority of the bone that is newly produced after implant insertion is formed by osteoinduction, which is a typical component of bone healing. Implantation of materials damage tissues during surgery, and bleeding is the first and most critical phase in the healing process (Grzeskowiak et al., 2020). After migrating from the capillary to the surface of the implant material, several blood components, including red blood cells, platelets and immune system cells, such as polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes, are activated, releasing cytokines and other growth factors at the site of the injury (Mavrogenis et al., 2009). Hemostasis and coagulation occur 1 h after implantation, followed by granulation tissue formation within 2 h (Overmann et al., 2020). Bone formation requires several different kinds of bone growth factors, including bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), insulin-like growth factors (IGF I and II), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). BMP is naturally released during trauma or bone reconstruction and is a known inducer. However, it is believed that nonintrinsic factors, such as stress or other forms of applied electrical impulses, can directly or indirectly influence osteoinduction (Albrektsson, 2001).
Bone growth at the implant’s surface is dependent on the functions of differentiated bone cells. These cells may originate from preexisting osteoblasts triggered by trauma or mesenchymal cells recruited through osteoinduction. Therefore, in practice, osteoconduction is heavily reliant on preceding osteoinduction. The proliferation of differentiated bone cells at the interface between implanted materials and natural bone is necessary for normal bone formation. Osteoconduction in implants is affected by bone regeneration conditions, biomaterials used and their reactions (Yao et al., 2013, 2021; Li et al., 2017). The surface properties of implant materials are crucial to their design and medical use since they are the initial point of interaction with the environment (Wu et al., 2014). For the implant to achieve long-term stability, its ultimate goal is to integrate with the surrounding tissue (Grzeskowiak et al., 2020). Several biological processes, such as the formation of hematomas, the growth of mesenchymal tissue, the production of intramembranous (woven) bone, and the construction of lamellar bone, have been found to occur after the implantation of implant material (Grzeskowiak et al., 2020). The most critical part of osteoconduction is the chain reaction on the surface of the implant, which induces osteoblast migration by activating platelets (Davies, 2003). When activated, platelets and inflammatory cells release chemical attractants, attracting fibroblasts to the site and forming fibrin matrix that promotes bone growth. Then, the fibrin matrix on the surface of the implant gradually changes into osteoid matrix, and its structure is similar to that of the bone cement line and bone plate with weakly mineralized osteoid tissue. As osteoblasts produce and secrete collagen to form calcified layers, osteoid tissues on the surface of implants slowly calcify. In the loading stage, mineralized osteoid tissue is transformed into braided bone, which fills the gap between the host bone and the implant but also helps to maintain its structural integrity (Grzeskowiak et al., 2020).
The third stage is osseointegration, which Brånemark et al. (2001) originally described. Albrektsson (2001) first defined direct touch as typical in any bone healing process. Three months after implantation, the woven bone gradually develops into dense lamellar bone. Osteoblasts form bone-like tissue and new bone trabeculae, which remodel into lamellar bone when in contact with the implant surface (osseointegration). When a thin layer of bone (comprising osteoblasts, osteoclasts, mesenchymal stem cells, lymphocytes, and blood vessels) surrounds the implant, the bone around the implant reaches its highest degree of tissue and mechanical qualities, and osseointegration of the implant is complete (Junker et al., 2009).
Osteogenic Implant Material Design Requirements
Traditional implant design is usually based on statistical averages of the population, which results in a series of implant products with precise sizes. However, for patients whose bones have large defects or irregular shapes, traditional implants cannot be modified and customized according to individual needs. With the emergence of 3D printing technology, precision medicine can now be practiced (Lee et al., 2005). 3D printing can directly generate complex 3D layered structures from computational models (Bayata and Yildiz, 2020), which provides a new way to prepare porous implants (Van Bael et al., 2012; Taniguchi et al., 2016; Prasad et al., 2017; Zhang B. et al., 2018). The effective contact area controls how the implant material interacts with neighboring tissues when the implant surface directly contacts bone tissue. Implant structure can increase the contact area, which affects bone development at the junction between bone and implant. The change in the macrostructure of porous titanium alters its biocompatibility. Therefore, many studies have been devoted to fabricating porous Ti structures on implant materials, and their results have proven that bone development in porous structures occurred (Yang et al., 2017).
However, the implant materials industry has been focusing on establishing sufficient bone-implant contact, enhancing the biological activity of implant materials, and realizing the early function and long-term performance stability of implant materials (Jing et al., 2020). At present, there is no consensus on the structural requirements of ideal porous Ti6Al4V materials and no straightforward method to achieve high pore size uniformity. Therefore, the application of 3D printing technology to research and fabricate uniform pore structures with ideal characteristics and enhance their surface biological activity will provide a theoretical and experimental foundation for the future fabrication of innovative implants.
A successful porous metal implant material improves bone function and stimulates bone tissue regeneration in damaged regions. Ideal bone implant features include the following (Hutmacher, 2000; Wang et al., 2016; Shaunak et al., 2017): 1) biocompatibility; 2) the capacity of cells to cling together, grow, and mature; 3) density and porosity in three-dimensional space that allows cell development and the movement of nutrients and waste products; and 4) mechanical properties that match those of tissues to eliminate stress shielding. Therefore, the key features of the design of porous metal implant materials include the correct analysis of porosity, pore size and pore connectivity. These structural features significantly affect the physical and biological characteristics of metal implant materials that are necessary to obtain satisfactory clinical results.
Pore size
According to the previously published literature (Ai et al., 2021; Zou et al., 2021, 2022), it is still not clear how the pore size affects bone growth. Micropores are beneficial to the hypoxic environment, which leads to the development of osteoinduction before osteogenesis, while macropores with good vascularization lead to immediate osteogenesis (no previous cartilage formation) (Karageorgiou and Kaplan, 2005). According to research, the minimal pore size necessary to stimulate bone ingrowth is in the range of 100–150 μm (Deb et al., 2018; Abbasi et al., 2020), and the minimum value is determined by the size of osteoclasts responsible for bone resorption. Due to the narrow range of pore size, single cells can stretch and connect stomata, inhibit the inward invasion of cells, and limit the diffusion of wastes and nutrients into the cell network. Pores in the range of 200–400 μm in size are thought to promote osteoblast adhesion, migration, and proliferation. Implants with pores larger than 300 μm have been generally considered to dramatically enhance new bone and capillary formation (Ran et al., 2018), and better vascularization may promote osteogenesis.
Additionally, there was no significant increase in vascularization at pore diameters greater than 400 μm, which showed that 400 μm was the upper limit of vascularized pore size (Bai et al., 2010). Some studies have found that pores larger than 900 μm have limited cell bridging ability (Dziaduszewska and Zielinski, 2021). Smaller pores may have a more significant surface area that allows more bone tissue to form (Tan et al., 2017). Capillarity, vascularization, and cell-matrix interactions are supported by micropores with pore diameters less than 10 μm. The 150-900-μm pores allow waste and nutrients to diffuse into the cellular network (Deb et al., 2018). The ideal pore size has been shown to be in the range of 300–600 μm in studies of several elements of bone development, vascularization, mechanical strength, and permeability (Karageorgiou and Kaplan, 2005; Taniguchi et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2017).
Research has shown that when the pore diameters of titanium alloy implants manufactured using 3D printing technology are 400–1,000 μm, the implants have good osteogenesis ability. Fukuda et al. (2011) has used selective laser melting (SLM) to manufacture porous titanium implants with pores sizes in the range of 500–1200 μm. When the pore diameter was 500 μm, the area and length of bone formation demonstrated outstanding bone induction. Taniguchi et al. (2016) has shown that at 65% porosity, the osteogenesis performance of implants was better for pore diameters of 600 μm 300 and 900 μm. In contrast, the bone development was inferior for implants with 300 μm pore diameter. Wieding et al. (2015) reported that metatarsal restoration was successful when the pore diameter was 700 μm.
Similarly, Zhang et al. (2022) created porous implants with pore sizes of 400 μm, 700 μm, 900 μm, and 70% porosity using the SLM method, and the results revealed that pore sizes in the 600–700 μm range and porosities in the 70%–90% range offered promising outcomes for bone defect repair. Wang C. et al. (2021) used electron beam melting (EBM) printing technology to prepare implant materials with various pore sizes. They discovered that porous implants with designed pore diameters of 1,000 μm boosted stem cell adherence, growth, and osteogenesis, and this resulted in improved bone regeneration and vasculature. To summarize, pore size affects bone development dynamics and vascularization capacity in vascularized tissues such as bone. Small pores are required for bone formation to maximize available surface area and speed tissue regeneration. However, large pores enhance cell mobility, nutrition transfer and tissue oxidation (Cavo and Scaglione, 2016) as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Porosity and pore size of 3D printed titanium scaffold for bone regeneration (pore size is expressed as range or average pore size).
Porosity and pore structure
The main factors that affect bone formation are the distributions of the size and shape of the pores and the porosity and internal structure of the bone (Chen H. et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022). Numerous studies have been conducted on cellular response and osseointegration related to titanium implants with various pore diameters and porosities, and their optimal values remain a contentious topic (Zhang et al., 2022), possibly because results were inconsistent when researchers used implants with various porous structures and implanting them in different locations in the human body.
Porosity is defined as the ratio of the pore volume to the overall volume of material (Lei et al., 2020). Its value depends on the size and structure of the pores and their branched structure. The functions of porosity include regulating cell motility, oxygen, and nutrient delivery and offering a surface area for creating new tissue (Dziaduszewska and Zielinski, 2021). However, porous structure has contradictory effects. More porosity causes better bone ingrowth, but over time, it weakens the mechanical strength of the material. By controlling porosity and preferred pore size, the proper balance between mechanical characteristics and microstructure can be achieved to boost the effectiveness of implants in vivo (Kapat et al., 2017). In the laboratory, osteogenesis is accelerated by limiting cell growth and forcing cells to stick together. In contrast, increased porosity and pore size promote bone growth in vivo but at the expense of their mechanical properties, which sets a practical upper limit for pore size and porosity (Karageorgiou and Kaplan, 2005; Babaie and Bhaduri, 2018). Most porous metals used for bone implants have good mechanical strength and low porosity (up to 40%). However, low porosity does not guarantee proper implant permeability, which is needed for proper blood flow and mineralization of human bone tissue (Dabrowski et al., 2010). Recent experimental studies have demonstrated that implants with porosity close to that of natural trabeculae bone (70–90%) can promote cell survival and stimulate bone formation, whereas greater porosity (>60%) is advantageous to osteogenesis. As a result, for the design of porous implants, pore diameter >300 μm and porosity >60% are recommended (Zhang et al., 2022).
The overall design of the implant can be separated into homogeneous design, gradient design, and design based on topology optimization, all of which simulate the heterogeneous hierarchical structure of bone. As AM technology advances, the development of triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMSs) and Voronoi implants is accelerating (Chen H. et al., 2020). The Voronoi implant has greater unpredictability, and it is comparable to cancellous bone efficiency. Owing to their uniform and slick surface, TPMS implants have good permeability. Both designs have the characteristics that are required for medical implants (Chen H. et al., 2020). Fousova et al. (2017) used selective laser melting to prepare specimens of three types of Ti6Al4V alloys with porosity gradients and comprehensively characterized their microstructure, porosity, biocompatibility, and tensile and compressive mechanical properties. The dense part of the gradient structure had high strength and good mechanical properties, which simulated the behavior of human bones. Li et al. (2015) produced porous titanium with porosity of 30%–70% and average pore diameter of 100–650 μm by the diffusion-linking method, and the prepared porous titanium with anisotropic structure and porosity of 60%–70% can be used for trabecular bone repair. Liu et al. (2020) printed Ti6Al4V scaffold with curved structure and strut structure by SLM, with porosity of 65% and pore diameter of 650 mm. Two groups of scaffolds were inserted into the femoral condyle of rabbits and assessed for their potential to integrate with bone. The outcomes showed that while the mechanical qualities of the curved construction were inferior to those of the strut structure, their osteogenesis was superior. Deng designed four kinds of porous titanium alloy scaffolds with different structures, 65% porosity and pore diameter of approximately 650 μm and implanted them into the distal femur of rabbits. The findings demonstrated that pore structure had a significant impact on bone development; diamond lattice unit (DIA) structure had the most favorable effects (Deng et al., 2021).
The morphology (pore size, porosity, and porous structure) and mechanical characteristics of bone, as well as the gradient characteristics of adsorbed cytokines, make it challenging to fabricate biomaterial implants that fulfill the needs of specific application sites (Karageorgiou and Kaplan, 2005).
Micro-arc oxidation of titanium and alloy implant materials
Titanium alloy is a biologically inert substance, unlike calcium phosphate-coated implants, which cannot bond sufficiently with adjacent bones or stimulate bone growth and antibacterial ability. In clinical practice, there is a strong demand for implant surfaces that promote bone formation and faster bone binding, thus reducing the implantation-to-loading time and boosting implant success (Pellegrini et al., 2018; Llopis-Grimalt et al., 2020; Smirnov et al., 2020). Because the naturally occurring titanium oxide film is too thin to enhance the biocompatibility of titanium metal implants, the titanium oxide layer formed on the surface of titanium is critical for its biocompatibility. For Ti-based metal implants, several surface treatment techniques have been developed to increase their biological activity (Li and Zhao, 2009).
Different results, such as strong mechanical adhesion between bone and implant, enhanced osteoinduction and osteoconduction, better wear and corrosion resistance, improved bioactivity and biocompatibility, and accelerated healing time, can be accomplished through various changes in the surface (Sasikumar et al., 2019). Surface modification technologies can be divided into subtractive and additive techniques according to their method of surface modification. Subtraction technology includes sandblasting (Boyan et al., 1998), acid etching (Zhang et al., 2020), polishing (Wennerberg and Albrektsson, 2009), and microlaser deformation (Zheng et al., 2020), and addition technology includes physical deposition techniques such as plasma spray coating (Cao and Liu, 2013), anodic oxidation by chemical treatment (Macak et al., 2005), micro-arc oxidation (Cimenoglu et al., 2011; Zhang Y. et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019; Cui et al., 2021; Guan et al., 2021), hydroxyapatite and calcium phosphate coatings (Surmenev et al., 2014), and sol-gel technologies (Zhang et al., 2011). In chemical surface modification, electrochemical, chemical or biochemical reactions may occur at the interface between the titanium implant surface and solution (Pesode and Barve, 2021).
MAO is a new electrochemical surface modification technology that can form porous, relatively rough and firmly attached oxide films on the surface of valve metals, such as titanium substrates (Zhao Z. et al., 2009). The porous outer layer of oxide (sometimes called the “technical layer”) is mainly composed of a low-temperature X-ray amorphous phase. Below the technical layer is an important “functional layer,” which is a denser oxide prepared by Walsh et al. (2013) higher temperature modification. There is a very thin, dense and complex oxide layer (“barrier layer”) between the functional layer and the metal surface. The microstructure of MAO coatings is often relatively complex, while Ti MAO usually contains both anatase and rutile. Amorphous material is often also present. Machining the most common titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) produces a large amount of mixed oxide aluminum titanate. Notably, in general, it is difficult to heat treat MAO coatings to change these structures because the required temperature range is usually higher than or at least close to the melting point of the metal substrate (Clyne and Troughton, 2018).
External factors (electrical parameters and electrolyte temperature) and internal factors (electrolyte composition and pH value) affect the creation and microstructure of the MAO film. In particular, it is very important to use appropriate design, concentration and electrochemical parameters of the electrolyte to obtain the specific phase composition and microstructure required by the coating (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2. Surface treatment methods of titanium substrate and factors affecting micro-arc oxidation.
Electrolyte
The electrolyte is the most important of these MAO components because the plasma arc may be controlled by electrochemical processes connected to ionized chemical elements, which in turn affects the characteristics of the titanium oxide surface (Jung et al., 2014). The composition of the electrolyte is the most important factor that determines the microstructure and qualities of the MAO protective layer. Based on the probable reaction in the MAO process, there are two potential mechanisms for MAO coating development. Ions from one electrode migrate from the substrate/coating contact to the electrolyte while ions from the other electrode migrate inward, causing one electrode to grow outward and the other to grow inward (Wang et al., 2020). In recent years, domestic and foreign scholars have conducted extensive research on this topic (Table 2). Ti-based MAO electrolytes are mainly composed of acidic and alkaline solutions. However, due to the disadvantages of an unfavorable environment and difficult waste liquid treatment, alkaline solutions are gradually replacing acidic solutions. The standard solution includes a silicate electrolyte system, a phosphate electrolyte system, an aluminate electrolyte system and a sodium tetraborate electrolyte system. In recent years, organic phytate has been selected as the electrolyte for MAO of Ti-based alloys.
TABLE 2. MAO treatment of titanium and its alloys with different electrolyte compositions.
Silicate electrolyte system
In the process of MAO, the adsorption capacity of various anions is different. In the standard electrolyte system, silicate ions can quickly form a passivation film on the substrate surface, which makes the MAO reaction easier and the prepared coating thicker while allowing greater surface roughness and lower adhesion. MAO films made of titanium alloy in silicate electrolyte systems mainly contain anatase, rutile and amorphous silica. In an electrolyte containing Ca2+, H2PO4 and SiO2+, silicon-doped bioactive ceramic coating was formed on the surface of pure titanium using the MAO method (Zhang et al., 2008). Compared with the standard MAO film, the MAO film containing silicon had almost the same porous structure and phase composition. Wang et al. (2006) used a bipolar pulse power supply to form a bioceramic coating on the surface of Ti6Al4V alloy by MAO in a system solution that included Na2SiO3. The layer was mainly composed of rutile and a small amount of anatase, and it was doped with amorphous compounds of electrolyte components. A bioceramic film was formed on the surface of Ti6Al4V alloy in silicate electrolyte and calcium phosphate electrolyte by MAO technology (Wang et al., 2020). Research was performed to determine how the content of the solution and the positive voltage affected the microstructure of the coating as well as its resistance to corrosion. According to the findings, the MAO film that was prepared using silicate electrolyte expanded quickly and corroded in SBF solution. However, the MAO film that was prepared using calcium phosphate electrolyte had good surface characteristics and resisted corrosion. It is an ideal candidate material for applications in bone implants and dental replacement materials.
Phosphate electrolyte system
Phosphate-based electrolytes provide smoother surfaces and thinner coatings than those of silicate electrolyte systems, and they have excellent adhesion. The MAO film formed in phosphate electrolyte system based on titanium and its alloy is primarily made up of rutile and anatase. It is dense, wear-resistant and corrosion-resistant.
Wang et al. (2004) produced a ceramic coating on the surface of Ti6Al4V alloy in (NaPO3)6–NaF–NaAlO2 solution by using constant current MAO technology. As the treatment time increased, the coating grew quickly at first and then slowly, its appearance became rougher over time, the phase transition from anatase to rutile occurred. The interface between the substrate and the coating had a bonding strength of approximately 40 MPa. This was based on both the bonding force of the coating to the substrate and the cohesive strength inside the coating. Under various applied voltages (200–500 V), Song et al. (2004) used MAO to form titanium oxide coatings containing Ca and P on commercial titanium substrates in electrolyte containing β-glycerophosphate pentahydrate and calcium acetate monohydrate (CA). A macroporous titanium dioxide base film containing Ca and P formed on the titanium substrate. Micro-arc titanium oxide implants containing Ca and P have the ability to induce bone-like apatite (biological activity) in SBF. The 1.5 SBF decreased the apatite induction time, and apatite was generated on the surface of 350 V oxide films, which demonstrated that Ca and P play a similar role in titanium films and SBF. A more concentrated SBF was utilized to reduce the apatite induction time and examine the impact of the apatite formation ability on the oxide layer properties.
Kim et al. (2007) was the first to prepare nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (HAp) films on titanium surfaces by one-step MAO using an electrolyte containing Ca2+ and P5+ ions. At high density, hydroxyl groups can combine with Ca2+ and PO3 to form crystalline HAP. Because of the strong crystallinity of hydroxyapatite film, the material has strong biocompatibility and good potential in orthopedic and dental restoration applications. Hong et al. (2011) conducted MAO experiments using Ti6Al4V alloy as the substrate, different concentrations of citric acid, ethylenediamine, and ammonium phosphate as electrolytes, and various voltages. The results revealed that the films containing hydroxyapatite were biologically active, the adhesive force with the Ti substrate was comparable to that of commercial products and adhesion was unaffected by TiO2 film thickness and morphology. The adhesion and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells were regulated by Ca and P ion concentrations and the electrolyte fraction.
MAO was used by Fazel et al. (2015) to process pure Ti and Ti6Al4V samples at 180 V in an electrolyte of H2SO4-H3PO4. A cortical morphology with irregular worm-like slits was observed on seen, in contrast to the volcanic morphology of the oxide layer on pure Ti. The corrosion resistance of untreated samples was dramatically increased by the MAO procedure.
To demonstrate that the rough and porous surface of the titanium oxide film generated by MAO coating is critical for cell attachment, Jung et al. (2014) formed titanium oxide layers on titanium samples using two different electrolytes comprising Na3PO4 and K3PO4. Because of the high fraction of micropores, the surface of the oxide layer generated in the K3PO4 electrolyte was rougher than that formed by the Na3PO4 electrolyte. Osteoblast adhesion and proliferation to the oxide layer generated in the K3PO4 electrolyte were superior to that in the Na3PO4 electrolyte.
Aluminate electrolyte system
MAO can introduce alumina into the membrane as aluminate electrolyte solution. The MAO film generated in aluminate electrolyte solution offers excellent wear resistance because aluminum oxide typically has incredible hardness and stability. A thick ceramic oxide film was prepared on the surface of Ti6Al4V by MAO in aluminate solution. The residual matrix structure of the Ti6Al4V alloy remained unchanged, and no hardening zone was found in the matrix. In addition, oxygen atoms did not migrate into the alloy matrix, and the oxide film was mainly composed of TiO2 rutile and TiAl2O5 compounds (Wenbin et al., 2002). The MAO method was used to deposit a layer of titanium dioxide on pure titanium substrate in NaAlO2 electrolyte (Ping et al., 2016). The concentration of sodium aluminate had a direct impact on the performance of the MAO process and the quality of the film. By increasing the content of NaAlO2, the growth rate of the MAO film on the pure titanium surface was significantly increased and promoted by the working voltage. Rutile and anatase TiO2 constitute the majority of the MAO coating. With increasing NaAlO2 concentration, the TiO2 phase content decreases. The number of micropores on the coating surface decreases, and the surface of the layer is rough. The corrosion rate first decreases and then increases. However, the application of aluminate-based electrolytes is restricted due to their poor stability and ease of hydrolysis.
Sodium tetraborate electrolyte system
Studies have shown that cells tend to grow inward on porous and rough surfaces, and porous structures help to maintain the connection between implants and cells. Few investigations have studied alternative forms of MAO modification; previous studies have mostly focused on volcanic coatings on titanium substrates. By using sodium tetraborate as electrolyte in the MAO process, a titanium dioxide coating with cortical grooves was formed on a titanium substrate (Liu et al., 2013). Cortical coatings with internally communicating pores and gaps have better wettability than conventional volcanic coatings. Cell culture experiments showed that both cortical-like and volcanic coatings exhibited good cell adhesion, which indicated that they had good biocompatibility. The spreading of cells on the cortical coating was superior to that in the control group. The cell growth of the cortical coating followed cell ingrowth into the deep groove, which was beneficial to cell retention and implant stability.
Micro/nanostructures can promote the adhesion of proteins and cells, regulate angiogenesis growth factors, and affect the proliferation, differentiation and gene expression of osteoblasts and osteoblast-like cells (Raines et al., 2010). In addition, the three-dimensional porous structure helps to provide nutrition and support waste excretion. Li et al. (2018) adopted the tetraborate MAO method to prepare a novel “cortex-like” micro/nano double-scale TiO2 coating on the surface of titanium. This structure combined microslots with nanopores, and it showed super hydrophilicity. In vitro investigations revealed that the “cortex-like” form promoted bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell attachment, migration, and maturation and increased matrix mineralization. In vivo animal tests revealed that this “cortical” layer improved bone integration. Excellent cellular compatibility and bone attachment were achieved thanks to the hydrophilic synergy of the dual-scale structure and the “cortical” titanium dioxide covering, which may contribute to the success of implants.
Phytic acid
Experts have recently discovered that environmentally beneficial organic phytate can be utilized as electrolyte for titanium alloy MAO. Phytic acid is a nontoxic organic macromolecule found in beans, grains, oil seeds, nuts, spores, tubers, pollen, and organic soil (Zhang et al., 2015). Phytic acid and sodium phytate have many health benefits and can be employed as anticancer agents, dietary additives, and chelating agents (Dost and Tokul, 2006). An orthogonal test can quickly and accurately determine the influence of process factors on target parameters. We can determine the order of the influence of many technical aspects, from the most important to the least important. Orthogonal experiments are needed to determine how cations and anions enter the MAO layer (Wang et al., 2017). In solutions with phytic acid concentration of 15 g/L and KOH concentration of 10 g/L, the effects of EDTA-Na2 concentration, Ca(CH3COO)2 concentration, current density and treatment time on the content of calcium and phosphorus in the Ti6Al4V alloy micro-arc oxidation anode film were studied by orthogonal experiments with four factors and three levels (Qiao et al., 2016). The results showed that diffusion and electromigration processes allowed calcium to enter, and the amount of phosphorus in the anode coating was strongly dependent on the amount of Ca(CH3COO)2. In the electrolyte containing EDTA-ZnNa2, KOH and phytic acid, the orthogonal experiment with four components and three levels was adopted to explore the influence of various technological factors on the amounts of Zn and P (Wang Y. et al., 2018). The results showed that Zn entered the MAO membrane with P from phytic acid, and P mainly participated in membrane formation through diffusion. The concentration of phytic acid was the key factor that determined the contents of zinc and phosphorus in the film, which contributed to the formation of the film.
Zhang et al. (2015) used sodium phytate as an electrolyte to apply MAO and successfully formed anatase TiO2-based anodic oxidation coating on the surface of Ti6Al4V alloy. Sodium phytate contributed to the formation of the coating, and phytate was formed in the anode coating. The MTT test showed that both Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al4V treated with MAO were biocompatible. Wang et al. (2017) used phytic acid as a unique titanium electrolyte. The results showed that the MAO film was composed of rutile, anatase and Ti2O7 and has good hydrophilicity and micropore structure. Compared with the untreated group, osteoblasts treated with MAO showed good cell compatibility in activity, adhesion, proliferation and differentiation, which may have been related to surface morphology and phase structure. All these results further verified that Ti6Al4V alloy treated by MAO in phytic acid solution can be used in medical implants.
Electrical characteristics and power mode
When MAO is performed, the morphology and structural characteristics of the anode film are affected by the electrolyte composition and process electrical parameters, such as the treatment time, current density, frequency, temperature of the electrolyte and applied voltage (Pesode and Barve, 2021). However, there is a correlation between MAO process parameters that makes it more difficult to change them.
Huang et al. (2007) produced Ca-P titanium dioxide with rough porous structure by applying MAO technology at various voltages. The results demonstrated that the pore size increased with increasing applied voltage; samples prepared at 240 and 350 V exhibited greater bonding strength than those prepared at higher voltages. The modulus of elasticity and residual stress increased as the applied voltage increased. Typical compositions of the layer were anatase and rutile, but at higher voltages of 400 and 450 V, a new CaTiO3 phase formed. The total elastic modulus of the porous layer was significantly less than that of pure titanium, which reduced the stress shielding effect. In summary, MAO can dramatically enhance the mechanical qualities of titanium implants, which is advantageous for its widespread application.
Under various application voltages (250–500 V), Song et al. (2004) found that MAO produced a macroporous titanium oxide-based coating containing Ca and P on commercial titanium substrates. The in vitro bioactivity of oxidized materials was evaluated by immersing them in SBF with varying quantities of simulated body fluids and measuring their capacity to induce apatite formation. The experiment showed that the phase, Ca, and P content, shape, and thickness of the films were strongly related to the applied voltage. At low voltage, the oxide layer consisted primarily of anatase (250 V). With increasing applied voltage, the rutile phase appeared gradually, and the oxide layer became a mixture of anatase and rutile. X-ray diffraction (XRD) did not detect the phase containing Ca and P below 350 V. Experiments in vitro indicated that micro-arc titanium oxide implant materials containing Ca and P could create bone-like apatite (bioactive) in SBF.
By changing the voltage and time settings, Montazeri et al. (2011) adapted the MAO technique to an electrolyte containing Ca and P to create HA coatings directly on Ti6Al4V. The duration of voltage treatment played an important role in the formation of the HA phase, and minimum voltage was needed to form HA with titanium dioxide. Prolonging the operation time produced more HAs.
Electrical parameters such as AC or DC can be used in the MAO process for standard power modes. The coating process was more effective when AC power was used rather than DC power. Typically, pulsed bipolar or pulsed monopolar power sources are utilized for MAO treatment of titanium and its alloys. Currently, pulsed bipolar MAO power supplies are used extensively due to the increased thickness of the coatings and their excellent adherence to titanium substrates (Pesode and Barve, 2021). Current density is one of the parameters that has the greatest influence on coating performance and microstructure. With the increase in density, the thickness of the film increased, the microstructure became more accurate, and the surface roughness decreased (Yangi and Wu, 2012; Clyne and Troughton, 2018). Previous research demonstrated that frequency affected the performance of MAO coatings. At lower frequencies, the coatings were rougher with larger pores, and AC conditions were more effective than DC conditions for coating formation. As the duty cycle grew, the discharge period within a single pulse increased, the thickness of the film layer increased, more holes were produced, and the roughness increased when the voltage and frequency were constant (Torres-Ceron et al., 2019).
Combined application of MAO and other treatment methods
By modifying the process parameters (voltage, current, electrolyte concentration, and treatment time) in the MAO process, the thickness, microstructure, roughness, and concentration of bioactive atom in the MAO layer may be easily manipulated. The chemical properties of the MAO surface can also be employed to further enhance the bioactivity of MAO-treated materials by combining MAO with other modification approaches (Deng et al., 2010) (Figure 3). The theory of MAO surface interactions with other modification techniques is not yet understood (Table 3).
FIGURE 3. Combined application of MAO and other treatment methods.
TABLE 3. Combined application of MAO and other treatment methods.
Combined application of MAO and hydrothermal methods
The hydrothermal method is an effective method for inorganic synthesis and material treatment. It uses an aqueous solution as the reaction system in a specifically designed closed reactor (autoclave) and applies heat and pressure to dissolve and recrystallize normally insoluble materials. MAO can produce porous and firmly adhered titanium oxide coatings on titanium implant materials, thus enhancing the adhesion of titanium implant materials to bone. After hydrothermal treatment, the precipitation of HA on the titanium oxide film containing Ca and P ions produced a bioactive surface, so titanium oxide showed good bone adhesion and pushing force. After hydrothermal treatment, enough hydroxyl groups can be formed on the surface of the sample to serve as nucleation points of hydroxyapatite crystals. Additionally, Ca and P ions combine with hydroxyl groups, which can be converted into hydroxyapatite crystals under the applied temperature and pressure.
Huang et al. (2021) prepared multifunctional micro/nano hybrid coating on the surface of 3D printed porous Ti64 by MAO and a hydrothermal method (HT) and studied the surface morphology, chemical composition and surface/cell interaction of the obtained coating. The surface roughness of the modified sample was moderate, the biocompatibility was improved, and the osteogenic ability was enhanced. Compared with hydrothermal surface treatment, MAO surface treatment had better biocompatibility and osteogenic ability. In vitro experiments showed that all Ti64 implants modified by mixed coating could enhance the adsorption of protein and the activity, adhesion and differentiation of MC3T3 osteoblasts. In vivo experiments showed that the mixed coating could promote early osseointegration. In contrast, Ti64 treated by MAO had the best biological activity and the strongest osseointegration ability. This had important theoretical significance and provided an opportunity potential applications for improving the bioactivity of titanium implants.
MAO-HT treatment was initially applied to a porous metal scaffold that was formed using 3D printing by Xiu et al. (2017). In addition, they developed a cylindrical Ti6Al4V implant with 640 micropores and 73% porosity using the electron beam melting technique. Following MAO-HT treatment, porous Ti6Al4V implants showed multiscale micro/nano morphology and a large amount of CaP. Compared to the untreated implant, the treated implant produced more apatite. The two types of implants had different patterns of bone growth: the treated implant had a pattern of contact osteogenesis, and the bone grew on its surface; the untreated implant formed bone at its distal end. Following MAO-HT treatment, the three-dimensional porous Ti6Al4V implant exhibited biological activity, which considerably enhanced its ability for apatite induction in vitro and bone integration in vivo.
Combined application of MAO and ultrasonic assistance
MAO is widely used to build wear-resistant and corrosive environment films on titanium and titanium alloys; however, heterogeneity is inevitable. Xu et al. (2021) treated Ti6Al4V by ultrasonic-assisted micro-arc oxidation and compared it with Ti6Al4V by micro-arc oxidation without ultrasonication. They thoroughly studied the effects of different ultrasonic treatment times on the microstructure and characteristics of the coating. The results showed that ultrasonic-assisted MAO of Ti6Al4V could homogenize the coating structure and improve the corrosion resistance and wear resistance of the coating in the human body.
There are limited investigations on the biomedical application of ultrasonic-assisted MAO of Ti6Al4V alloy, and the influence of ultrasonic assistance on the morphological features of the oxide layer on Ti6Al4V alloy is still unknown. In addition, in light of the excellent properties of MAO films prepared on Al and Mg alloys by ultrasonic-assisted methods and the extensive use of Ti alloys in the biomedical field, further research into the characteristics of MAO films prepared on Ti6Al4V by ultrasonic-assisted methods is essential (Xu et al., 2021).
Combined application of MAO and lasers
Traditional surface treatment technology has some disadvantages, including low efficiency, high cost and difficult processing methods. Laser machining is an economical, efficient and rapid method to create and adjust complex topography to enhance wettability. For many years, scientists have paid more attention to the surface roughness and chemical surface treatment of material, and given less attention to the biological consequences and surface wettability. To promote long-term physical benefits, the optimal contact angle range for cell attachment is in the range of 40–60° (Lee et al., 1998; Faucheux et al., 2004; Zheng et al., 2020). Zheng et al. (2020) studied the wettability and surface morphology of the Ti6Al4V surface by laser processing microgrooves to observe the adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and cell morphology of mouse osteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells and determine whether the laser-treated surface could improve the biocompatibility of cells. The results demonstrated that the surface with laser microgrooves decreased the liquid‒solid contact angle and increased the surface roughness. The osteoblasts proliferated and differentiated sufficiently, most cells grew along the microgrooves, and the improved wettability provided a favorable environment for cell growth. Microgrooves play a vital function in cell contact guidance, and their characteristics regulate cell activity; therefore, they should be thoroughly researched.
Laser surface melting (LSM) is a new surface treatment method that may induce a nonequilibrium phase on the titanium alloy surface due to its rapid cooling rate. With LSM, the host material remains unchanged, and only the surface microstructure changes. Wu et al. (2020) prepared porous TiO2 ceramic coatings with high silicon and phosphorus contents on the surface of Ti6Al4V alloy by LSM and MAO. They studied the effect of LSM pretreatment on the morphology, composition and mechanical properties of MAO films. The results showed that the LSM-MAO coatings had more uniform pore distributions and smaller pores and were thicker than MAO coatings. The LSM-MAO coatings were harder and had better wear resistance than the MAO coatings. LSM is considered an appropriate and effective pretreatment method to obtain high-quality MAO coatings on titanium alloys.
MAO and bacteriostatic treatment
Although the application of biocompatible coatings such as HA to accelerate bone healing and improve bone integration with metal implants is challenging, infection related to implants is still a significant risk. Thus, inhibiting bacterial colonization on the surface of implants has become one of the primary concerns of their successful use Li and Zhao (2009). The biocompatibility, wear durability, and corrosion resistance of MAO films manufactured using a certain electrolyte are all outstanding. Silver (Ag), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) are the most often utilized inorganic antibacterial additions in MAO process electrolytes (Zhao L. et al., 2009; Ning et al., 2015). Since silver ions (Ag+) react with protein thiol groups and adhere to bacterial DNA, they have excellent antibacterial powers against many bacteria (Simchi et al., 2011). Therefore, the application of Ag coatings on the surface of implant materials has become an interesting biomedical business strategy. The Ag+ concentration in the antimicrobial coating of an implant must be strictly managed because of the potential for cytotoxicity at high Ag+ concentrations and poor antibacterial activity at low values (Antoci et al., 2008; Teker et al., 2015). MAO was performed at 380 V in electrolyte containing Ca, P, and Ag ions, and adding Ag to multilayer coatings (biocompatible compound layer and underlying TiO2 layer) improved antibacterial efficacy while maintaining biological activity (Teker et al., 2015). Multilayer biomedical coatings were prepared on the surface of Ti6Al4V alloy by MAO under positive and negative voltages of 400 and 80 V (Muhaffel et al., 2016). Silver nitrate was added to the basic electrolyte containing calcium acetate hydrate and anhydrous disodium hydrogen phosphate, which improved the biological and antibacterial activity of the synthesized coating and caused silver nanoparticles to precipitate on the hydroxyapatite layer. The antibacterial efficiency of the silver-containing coating was more than four times that of coating without silver. Adding 0.1 g/L AgNO3 to the basic electrolyte is promising for the MAO process of titanium-based implants. Zhang et al. (2016) created an antibacterial TiO2 MAO coating doped with both zinc and silver by combining silver nanoparticles with zinc acetate. Compared with the control group composed of polished titanium, the coating significantly reduced the number of planktonic bacteria in the culture solution and inhibited the adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus. Nano Cu2O and nano ZnO have excellent antibacterial ability. Zhao et al. (2016) developed MAO coatings containing nanoparticles by introducing nano-Cu2O and nano-ZnO into the electrolyte. The antibacterial properties of the membrane were determined by exposing the sample to Escherichia coli and comparing Ti after treatment with MAO with untreated Ti. The results showed that the antibacterial activity of the Ti-MAO-Cu2O group was the highest of those in the study. These results imply that the antibacterial properties of titanium can be enhanced by incorporating nanoscale metal oxides into the MAO-coated film via an electrolyte. The antibacterial mechanism of inorganic antimicrobial agents is widely assumed to involve the release of antimicrobial ions to destroy bacteria; however, the continuous release of bactericidal ions often results in severe cytotoxicity and environmental concerns. To address these disadvantages of current materials, new effective, safe, environmentally benign and economical antibacterial materials must be developed soon (Wang R. et al., 2021).
Sodium tungstate has been utilized to resolve bacteria-related issues. Adding sodium tungstate to MAO coatings can be an effective method for achieving antibacterial effects. MAO coatings containing tungsten was used in the antibacterial field to confirm that a sodium tungstate-based MAO coating had various antimicrobial qualities. Zhou et al. (2019) used an alkaline electrolyte to synthesize an antibacterial MAO coating and examined the effect of sodium tungstate in the MAO coating on Ti6Al4V. For the first time, the possibility of producing an antibacterial MAO coating that contained tungsten by doping the electrolyte with Na2WO4 was established, and the antibacterial feature of the layer were discovered to be primarily dependent on sodium tungstate. The tungsten-containing MAO coating effectively hindered bacterial attachment, reduced the number of planktonic bacteria in the culture media, and hinted at the antibacterial action of the coating. To explore the antibacterial mechanism of tungsten-doped TiO2 coatings, Wang R. et al. (2021) used MAO technology to coat the surface of Ti6Al4V with tungsten-doped TiO2 with antibacterial properties. The microstructure of tungsten-doped and undoped TiO2 coatings was studied and compared. The antibacterial behavior of the tungsten-doped TiO2 coating was closely related to its amorphous surface. The MAO coating had a double-layer microstructure with an amorphous outer layer and a polycrystalline inner layer. The new electrolyte system containing tungsten was beneficial to the formation of amorphous layer with high electron storage capacity. The high electron storage capacity of the tungsten-doped TiO2 coating is related to its excellent antibacterial activity, which provides a new method for designing coatings with controllable antibacterial performance.
Combined application of MAO with sandblasting and acid etching
Sandblasting plus acid etching has become the standard technique for the surface treatment of titanium implants, and it is a traditional modification technique used to enhance biological activity. Sandblasting, etching, or the combination of both can lead to the formation of various morphological features on the surface of titanium implants, including micron-scale changes such as dimples and ultra micron-scale changes such as waves or valleys. The surface roughness of implants is one of the factors that can successfully improve cell reactions in vitro and bone integration in vivo. The combination of micron-level and submicron-level roughness helps to increase osteoblast reactions, which may be partly due to the influence of surface protein-material interactions on the reaction of downstream cells (Cheng et al., 2014). However, sandblasting acid and etching change only the structure of the surface and have little effect on the chemical properties of the surface (Li et al., 2018). Deng et al. (2010) found that compared with MAO, MAO-HT and smooth surfaces, adherent osteoblasts showed stronger alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteocalcin (OC) production on MAO-SA surfaces. Experiments show that sandblasting and MAO can improve the surface morphology of titanium, increase the surface roughness, and make it a good place for cell growth and bone adhesion.
MAO combined with other bioactive factors
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) can induce new bone formation, and the effectiveness of BMPs in osteogenesis depends on the control of carrier type and release rate. Teng et al. (2019) developed a method using 3D printing, MAO treatment and coprecipitation of Ca and P layers with BMP-2 technology to produce porous titanium alloy-based implants with interconnected channel structures. Growth factor BMP-2 continuously diffused from the central area to the peripheral area of the implant, which promoted the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization of bone cells. In vivo experiments showed that bone tissue and blood vessels grew into the central area of the implant. MAO-CaP-BMP-2 was superior to MAO and MAO-CaP groups in new bone formation, which indicates that MAO-CAP-BMP2 has the potential to promote bone healing. MAO-CaP-BMP2 is a good candidate for applications as a growth factor vector.
Conclusions
There are broad opportunities in the fields of orthopedics and dentistry for the design of porous titanium-based alloy scaffolds and the combination of MAO with other surface modification technologies. However, several challenges must be resolved to accelerate their clinical implementation in medical implants. First, considering the complexity of bone structure, it is essential to optimize the characteristics of pore size, porosity and scaffold structure, and this will require numerous in vitro and in vivo tests. Second, appropriate processing methods for making porous materials should be explored. The disadvantages of using 3D printers to make porous materials are that it is not possible to completely melt powders and fully remove fine powders from pores in the materials. Moreover, the technological parameters of MAO are complicated, and optimal electrolyte composition and electrical parameters have not been determined; this will require many more experiments. At present, the osseointegration principle of MAO combined with other treatment methods is not clear and needs further exploration. Most of the controls implemented in commercial practice are based on experience and have significant potential for future development.
Author contributions
RW: Conceptualization; writing-original draft. SN, LM, and ML: Writing-review and editing; project administration; supervision. All of the authors read the final draft and agreed with it.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abbasi, N., Hamlet, S., Love, R. M., and Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 5, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007
Ai, C., Liu, L., and Goh, J. C. (2021). Pore size modulates in vitro osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in fibronectin/gelatin coated silk fibroin scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 124, 112088. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2021.112088
Albrektsson, C. J. T., and C., J. (2001). Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur. Spine J. 10, S96–S101. doi:10.1007/s005860100282
Annur, D., Kartika, I., Supriadi, S., and Suharno, B. (2021). Titanium and titanium based alloy prepared by spark plasma sintering method for biomedical implant applications—A review. Mat. Res. Express 8, 012001. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/abd969
Antoci, V., Adams, C. S., Parvizi, J., Davidson, H. M., Composto, R. J., Freeman, T. A., et al. (2008). The inhibition of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation by vancomycin-modified titanium alloy and implications for the treatment of periprosthetic infection. Biomaterials 29, 4684–4690. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.016
Babaie, E., and Bhaduri, S. B. (2018). Fabrication aspects of porous biomaterials in orthopedic applications: A review. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4, 1–39. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00615
Bai, F., Wang, Z., Lu, J., Liu, J., Chen, G., Lv, R., et al. (2010). The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: A quantitative study. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 3791–3803. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0148
Bayata, F., and Yildiz, C. (2020). The effects of design parameters on mechanical failure of Ti-6Al-4V implants using finite element analysis. Eng. Fail. Anal. 110, 104445. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104445
Boyan, B. D., Batzer, R., Kieswetter, K., Liu, Y., Cochran, D. L., Szmuckler-Moncler, S., et al. (1998). Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1a, 25-(OH)2D 3. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 33, 77–85. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199801)39:1<77::aid-jbm10>3.0.co;2-l
Brånemark, M. D. P. I. (1983). Osseointegration and its experimental background. J. Prosthet. Dent. 50, 399–410. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(83)80101-2
Brånemark, R., Brånemark, P. I., Rydevik, B., and Myers, R. R. (2001). Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 38, 175–181. doi:10.1023/A:1016608309389
Cao, H., and Liu, X. (2013). Plasma-sprayed ceramic coatings for osseointegration. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 10, 1–10. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02770.x
Cavo, M., and Scaglione, S. (2016). Scaffold microstructure effects on functional and mechanical performance: Integration of theoretical and experimental approaches for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 68, 872–879. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.041
Chen, H., Han, Q., Wang, C., Liu, Y., Chen, B., and Wang, J. (2020a). Porous scaffold design for additive manufacturing in orthopedics: A review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 609. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00609
Chen, L. Y., Cui, Y. W., and Zhang, L. C. (2020b). Recent development in beta titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Metals 10, 1139. doi:10.3390/met10091139
Chen, Z., Yan, X., Chang, Y., Xie, S., Ma, W., Zhao, G., et al. (2019). Effect of polarization voltage on the surface componentization and biocompatibility of micro-arc oxidation modified selective laser melted Ti6Al4V. Mat. Res. Express 6, 086425. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab1abc
Cheng, A., Humayun, A., Cohen, D. J., Boyan, B. D., and Schwartz, Z. (2014). Additively manufactured 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V constructs mimic trabecular bone structure and regulate osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and local factor production in a porosity and surface roughness dependent manner. Biofabrication 6, 045007. doi:10.1088/1758-5082/6/4/045007
Cimenoglu, H., Gunyuz, M., Kose, G. T., Baydogan, M., Uğurlu, F., and Sener, C. (2011). Micro-arc oxidation of Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al7Nb alloys for biomedical applications. Mat. Charact. 62, 304–311. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2011.01.002
Clyne, T. W., and Troughton, S. C. (2018). A review of recent work on discharge characteristics during plasma electrolytic oxidation of various metals. Int. Mat. Rev. 64, 127–162. doi:10.1080/09506608.2018.1466492
Cui, L., Li, H., Huang, J., and Xiong, D. (2021). Improved biotribological performance of Ti6Al4V alloy through the synergetic effects of porous TiO2 layer and zwitterionic hydrogel coating. Ceram. Int. 47, 34970–34978. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.038
Currey, J. D. (2011). The structure and mechanics of bone. J. Mat. Sci. 47, 41–54. doi:10.1007/s10853-011-5914-9
Dabrowski, B., Swieszkowski, W., Godlinski, D., and Kurzydlowski, K. J. (2010). Highly porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic applications. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 95, 53–61. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31682
Davies, J. E. (2003). Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J. Dent. Educ. 67, 932–949. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x
Deb, P., Deoghare, A. B., Borah, A., Barua, E., and Das Lala, S. (2018). Scaffold development using biomaterials: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 5, 12909–12919. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.276
Deng, F., Liu, L., Li, Z., and Liu, J. (2021). 3D printed Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds with different pore structure effects on bone ingrowth. J. Biol. Eng. 15, 4. doi:10.1186/s13036-021-00255-8
Deng, F., Zhang, W., Zhang, P., Liu, C., and Ling, J. (2010). Improvement in the morphology of Micro-arc oxidised titanium surfaces: A new process to increase osteoblast response. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 30, 141–147. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2009.09.010
Dost, K., and Tokul, O. (2006). Determination of phytic acid in wheat and wheat products by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta X. 558, 22–27. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.035
Dziaduszewska, M., and Zielinski, A. (2021). Structural and material determinants influencing the behavior of porous Ti and its alloys made by additive manufacturing techniques for biomedical applications. Mater. (Basel) 14, 712. doi:10.3390/ma14040712
Engh, C. A., Young, A. M., Engh, C. A., and Hopper, R. H. (2003). Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 157–163. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000096825.67494.e3
Faucheux, N., Schweiss, R., Lutzow, K., Werner, C., and Groth, T. (2004). Self-assembled monolayers with different terminating groups as model substrates for cell adhesion studies. Biomaterials 25, 2721–2730. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.069
Fazel, M., Salimijazi, H. R., Golozar, M. A., and Jazi, M. R. G. (2015). A comparison of corrosion, tribocorrosion and electrochemical impedance properties of pure Ti and Ti6Al4V alloy treated by micro-arc oxidation process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 324, 751–756. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.030
Fazel, M., Salimijazi, H. R., Shamanian, M., Minneboo, M., Modaresifar, K., van Hengel, I. A. J., et al. (2021). Osteogenic and antibacterial surfaces on additively manufactured porous Ti-6Al-4V implants: Combining silver nanoparticles with hydrothermally synthesized HA nanocrystals. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 120, 111745. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.111745
Fousova, M., Vojtech, D., Kubasek, J., Jablonska, E., and Fojt, J. (2017). Promising characteristics of gradient porosity Ti-6Al-4V alloy prepared by SLM process. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. 69, 368–376. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.043
Fukuda, A., Takemoto, M., Saito, T., Fujibayashi, S., Neo, M., Pattanayak, D. K., et al. (2011). Osteoinduction of porous Ti implants with a channel structure fabricated by selective laser melting. Acta Biomater. 7, 2327–2336. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.037
Geetha, M., Singh, A. K., Asokamani, R., and Gogia, A. K. (2009). Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review. Prog. Mat. Sci. 54, 397–425. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004
Grzeskowiak, R. M., Schumacher, J., Dhar, M. S., Harper, D. P., Mulon, P. Y., and Anderson, D. E. (2020). Bone and cartilage interfaces with orthopedic implants: A literature review. Front. Surg. 7, 601244. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2020.601244
Guan, S., Qi, M., Wang, C., Wang, S., and Wang, W. (2021). Enhanced cytocompatibility of Ti6Al4V alloy through selective removal of Al and V from the hierarchical micro-arc oxidation coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 541, 148547. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148547
Hadjidakis, D. J., and Androulakis, (2006). Bone remodeling. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1092, 385–396. doi:10.1196/annals.1365.035
Hong, M. H., Lee, D. H., Kim, K. M., and Lee, Y. K. (2011). Study on bioactivity and bonding strength between Ti alloy substrate and TiO2 film by micro-arc oxidation. Thin Solid Films 519, 7065–7070. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.223
Huang, L., Cai, B., Huang, Y., Wang, J., Zhu, C., Shi, K., et al. (2021). Comparative study on 3D printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds with surface modifications using hydrothermal treatment and microarc oxidation to enhance osteogenic activity. ACS Omega 6, 1465–1476. doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c05191
Huang, P., Wang, F., Xu, K., and Han, Y. (2007). Mechanical properties of titania prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation at different voltages. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 5168–5171. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.137
Huang, Y., and Schmid, S. R. (2018). Additive manufacturing for health: State of the art, gaps and needs, and recommendations. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 140, 094001. doi:10.1115/1.4040430
Hutmacher, D. W. (2000). Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21, 2529–2543. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6
Imwinkelried, T. (2007). Mechanical properties of open-pore titanium foam. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. A 81, 964–970. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31118
Jing, Z., Zhang, T., Xiu, P., Cai, H., Wei, Q., Fan, D., et al. (2020). Functionalization of 3D-printed titanium alloy orthopedic implants: A literature review. Biomed. Mat. 15, 052003. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/ab9078
Jung, Y. C., Shin, K. R., Ko, Y. G., and Shin, D. H. (2014). Surface characteristics and biological response of titanium oxide layer formed via micro-arc oxidation in K3PO4 and Na3PO4 electrolytes. J. Alloys Compd. 586, S548–S552. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.01.060
Junker, R., Dimakis, A., Thoneick, M., and Jansen, J. A. (2009). Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20 (4), 185–206. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x
Kapat, K., Srivas, P. K., Rameshbabu, A. P., Maity, P. P., Jana, S., Dutta, J., et al. (2017). Influence of porosity and pore-size distribution in Ti6Al4 V foam on physicomechanical properties, osteogenesis, and quantitative validation of bone ingrowth by micro-computed tomography. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 9, 39235–39248. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b13960
Karageorgiou, V., and Kaplan, D. (2005). Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26, 5474–5491. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
Khorsandi, D., Fahimipour, A., Abasian, P., Saber, S. S., Seyedi, M., Ghanavati, S., et al. (2021). 3D and 4D printing in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery: Printing techniques, materials, and applications. Acta Biomater. 122, 26–49. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.044
Kim, J. H., Kim, M. Y., Knowles, J. C., Choi, S., Kang, H., Park, S. H., et al. (2020). Mechanophysical and biological properties of a 3D-printed titanium alloy for dental applications. Dent. Mat. 36, 945–958. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.027
Kim, M. S., Ryu, J. J., and Sung, Y. M. (2007). One-step approach for nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite coating on titanium via micro-arc oxidation. Electrochem. Commun. 9, 1886–1891. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2007.04.023
Koolen, M., Yavari, S. A., Lietaert, K., Wauthle, R., Zadpoor, A. A., and Weinans, H. (2020). Bone regeneration in critical-sized bone defects treated with additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials: The effects of inelastic mechanical properties. Mater. (Basel) 13, 1992. doi:10.3390/ma13081992
Lee, J. H., Frias, V., Lee, K. W., and Wright, R. F. (2005). Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: A literature review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 94, 377–381. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.018
Lee, J. H., Khang, G., Lee, J. W., and Lee, H. B. (1998). Interaction of different types of cells on polymer surfaces with wettability gradient. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 205, 323–330. doi:10.1006/jcis.1998.5688
Lei, H. Y., Li, J. R., Xu, Z. J., and Wang, Q. H. (2020). Parametric design of Voronoi-based lattice porous structures. Mat. Des. 191, 108607. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108607
Li, F., Li, J., Xu, G., Liu, G., Kou, H., and Zhou, L. (2015). Fabrication, pore structure and compressive behavior of anisotropic porous titanium for human trabecular bone implant applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. 46, 104–114. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.023
Li, J., and Zhao, Y. (2009). Biocompatibility and antibacterial performance of titanium by surface treatment. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 9, 223–228. doi:10.1007/s11998-009-9221-1
Li, Y., Wang, W., Liu, H., Lei, J., Zhang, J., Zhou, H., et al. (2018). Formation and in vitro/in vivo performance of "cortex-like" micro/nano-structured TiO2 coatings on titanium by micro-arc oxidation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 87, 90–103. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.02.023
Li, Y., Xiao, Y., and Liu, C. (2017). The horizon of materiobiology: A perspective on material-guided cell behaviors and tissue engineering. Chem. Rev. 117, 4376–4421. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00654
Liu, L., Wang, S., Liu, J., Deng, F., Li, Z., and Hao, Y. (2020). Architectural design of Ti6Al4V scaffold controls the osteogenic volume and application area of the scaffold. J. Mat. Res. Technol. 9, 15849–15861. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.061
Liu, X., Chen, S., Tsoi, J. K. H., and Matinlinna, J. P. (2017). Binary titanium alloys as dental implant materials-a review. Regen. Biomater. 4, 315–323. doi:10.1093/rb/rbx027
Liu, Z., Wang, W., Liu, H., Wang, T., and Qi, M. (2013). Formation and characterization of titania coatings with cortex-like slots formed on Ti by micro-arc oxidation treatment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 266, 250–255. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.004
Llopis-Grimalt, M. A., Arbos, A., Gil-Mir, M., Mosur, A., Kulkarni, P., Salito, A., et al. (2020). Multifunctional properties of quercitrin-coated porous Ti-6Al-4V implants for orthopaedic applications assessed in vitro. J. Clin. Med. 9, 855. doi:10.3390/jcm9030855
Lv, Y., Wang, B., Liu, G., Tang, Y., Lu, E., Xie, K., et al. (2021). Metal material, properties and design methods of porous biomedical scaffolds for additive manufacturing: A review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 641130. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.641130
Macak, J. M., Tsuchiya, H., Taveira, L., Ghicov, A., and Schmuki, P. (2005). Self-organized nanotubular oxide layers on Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-6Al-4V formed by anodization in NH4F solutions. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. A 75, 928–933. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30501
Manoj, A., Kasar, A. K., and Menezes, P. L. (2018). Tribocorrosion of porous titanium used in biomedical applications. J. Bio. Tribocorros. 5, 3. doi:10.1007/s40735-018-0194-4
Mavrogenis, A. F., Dimitriou, R., Parvizi, J., and Babis, G. C. (2009). Biology of implant osseointegration. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 9, 61–71.
Montazeri, M., Dehghanian, C., Shokouhfar, M., and Baradaran, A. (2011). Investigation of the voltage and time effects on the formation of hydroxyapatite-containing titania prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation on Ti–6Al–4V alloy and its corrosion behavior. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 7268–7275. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.103
Muhaffel, F., Cempura, G., Menekse, M., Czyrska-Filemonowicz, A., Karaguler, N., and Cimenoglu, H. (2016). Characteristics of multi-layer coatings synthesized on Ti6Al4V alloy by micro-arc oxidation in silver nitrate added electrolytes. Surf. Coat. Technol. 307, 308–315. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.002
Murphy, C. M., Haugh, M. G., and O'Brien, F. J. (2010). The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31, 461–466. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063
Nicoara, M., Raduta, A., Parthiban, R., Locovei, C., Eckert, J., and Stoica, M. (2016). Low Young's modulus Ti-based porous bulk glassy alloy without cytotoxic elements. Acta Biomater. 36, 323–331. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.020
Niinomi, M., and Nakai, M. (2011). Titanium-based biomaterials for preventing stress shielding between implant devices and bone. Int. J. Biomater. 2011, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2011/836587
Ning, C., Wang, X., Li, L., Zhu, Y., Li, M., Yu, P., et al. (2015). Concentration ranges of antibacterial cations for showing the highest antibacterial efficacy but the least cytotoxicity against mammalian cells: Implications for a new antibacterial mechanism. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 28, 1815–1822. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00258
Overmann, A. L., Aparicio, C., Richards, J. T., Mutreja, I., Fischer, N. G., Wade, S. M., et al. (2020). Orthopaedic osseointegration: Implantology and future directions. J. Orthop. Res. 38, 1445–1454. doi:10.1002/jor.24576
Pellegrini, G., Francetti, L., Barbaro, B., and Del Fabbro, M. (2018). Novel surfaces and osseointegration in implant dentistry. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 9, e12349. doi:10.1111/jicd.12349
Pesode, P., and Barve, S. (2021). Surface modification of titanium and titanium alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation process for biomedical applications: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 46, 594–602. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.294
Ping, W., Ting, W., Hao, P., and Yang, G. X. (2016). Effect of NaAlO2 concentrations on the properties of micro-arc oxidation coatings on pure titanium. Mat. Lett. 170, 171–174. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.02.024
Prasad, K., Bazaka, O., Chua, M., Rochford, M., Fedrick, L., Spoor, J., et al. (2017). Metallic biomaterials: Current challenges and opportunities. Mater. (Basel) 10, 884. doi:10.3390/ma10080884
Qiao, L. P., Lou, J., Zhang, S. F., Qu, B., Chang, W. H., and Zhang, R. F. (2016). The entrance mechanism of calcium and phosphorus elements into micro arc oxidation coatings developed on Ti6Al4V alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 285, 187–196. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.11.041
Raffa, M. L., Nguyen, V. H., Hernigou, P., Flouzat-Lachaniette, C. H., and Haiat, G. (2021). Stress shielding at the bone-implant interface: Influence of surface roughness and of the bone-implant contact ratio. J. Orthop. Res. 39, 1174–1183. doi:10.1002/jor.24840
Raines, A. L., Olivares-Navarrete, R., Wieland, M., Cochran, D. L., Schwartz, Z., and Boyan, B. D. (2010). Regulation of angiogenesis during osseointegration by titanium surface microstructure and energy. Biomaterials 31, 4909–4917. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.071
Ran, Q., Yang, W., Hu, Y., Shen, X., Yu, Y., Xiang, Y., et al. (2018). Osteogenesis of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants with different pore sizes. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. 84, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.010
Rana, M., Karmakar, S. K., Pal, B., Datta, P., Roychowdhury, A., and Bandyopadhyay, A. (2021). Design and manufacturing of biomimetic porous metal implants. J. Mat. Res. 36, 3952–3962. doi:10.1557/s43578-021-00307-1
Rodriguez-Contreras, A., Punset, M., Calero, J. A., Gil, F. J., Ruperez, E., and Manero, J. M. (2021). Powder metallurgy with space holder for porous titanium implants: A review. J. Mat. Sci. Technol. 76, 129–149. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.11.005
Ryan, G. E., Pandit, A. S., and Apatsidis, D. P. (2008). Porous titanium scaffolds fabricated using a rapid prototyping and powder metallurgy technique. Biomaterials 29, 3625–3635. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.032
Sachlos, E., and Czernuszka, J. T. (2003). Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: The application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur. Cell. Mat. 5, 29–40. doi:10.22203/ecm.v005a03
Salmi, M. (2021). Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications. Mater. (Basel) 14, 191. doi:10.3390/ma14010191
Sasikumar, Y., Indira, K., and Rajendran, N. (2019). Surface modification methods for titanium and its alloys and their corrosion behavior in biological environment: A review. J. Bio. Tribocorros. 5, 36. doi:10.1007/s40735-019-0229-5
Shaunak, S., Dhinsa, B. S., and Khan, W. S. (2017). The role of 3D modelling and printing in orthopaedic tissue engineering: A review of the current literature. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12, 225–232. doi:10.2174/1574888X11666160429122238
Simchi, A., Tamjid, E., Pishbin, F., and Boccaccini, A. R. (2011). Recent progress in inorganic and composite coatings with bactericidal capability for orthopaedic applications. Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 7, 22–39. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2010.10.005
Singh, R., Lee, P. D., Dashwood, R. J., and Lindley, T. C. (2013). Titanium foams for biomedical applications: A review. Mat. Technol. (N. Y. N. Y). 25, 127–136. doi:10.1179/175355510x12744412709403
Smirnov, I. V., Deev, R. V., Bozo, I. I., Fedotov, A. Y., Gurin, A. N., Mamonov, V. E., et al. (2020). Octacalcium phosphate coating for 3D printed cranioplastic porous titanium implants. Surf. Coat. Technol. 383, 125192. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125192
Song, W. H., Jun, Y. K., Han, Y., and Hong, S. H. (2004). Biomimetic apatite coatings on micro-arc oxidized titania. Biomaterials 25, 3341–3349. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.103
Surmenev, R. A., Surmeneva, M. A., and Ivanova, A. A. (2014). Significance of calcium phosphate coatings for the enhancement of new bone osteogenesis--a review. Acta Biomater. 10, 557–579. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.036
Takizawa, T., Nakayama, N., Haniu, H., Aoki, K., Okamoto, M., Nomura, H., et al. (2018). Titanium fiber plates for bone tissue repair. Adv. Mat. 30, 1703608. doi:10.1002/adma.201703608
Tan, X. P., Tan, Y. J., Chow, C. S. L., Tor, S. B., and Yeong, W. Y. (2017). Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 76, 1328–1343. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094
Taniguchi, N., Fujibayashi, S., Takemoto, M., Sasaki, K., Otsuki, B., Nakamura, T., et al. (2016). Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 59, 690–701. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069
Teker, D., Muhaffel, F., Menekse, M., Karaguler, N. G., Baydogan, M., and Cimenoglu, H. (2015). Characteristics of multi-layer coating formed on commercially pure titanium for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 48, 579–585. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.058
Teng, F. Y., Tai, I. C., Ho, M. L., Wang, J. W., Weng, L. W., Wang, Y. J., et al. (2019). Controlled release of BMP-2 from titanium with electrodeposition modification enhancing critical size bone formation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 105, 109879. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109879
Terleeva, O. P., Sharkeev, Y. P., Slonova, A. I., Mironov, I. V., Legostaeva, E. V., Khlusov, I. A., et al. (2010). Effect of microplasma modes and electrolyte composition on micro-arc oxidation coatings on titanium for medical applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 205, 1723–1729. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.10.019
Torres-Ceron, D. A., Restrepo-Parra, E., Acosta-Medina, C. D., Escobar-Rincon, D., and Ospina-Ospina, R. (2019). Study of duty cycle influence on the band gap energy of TiO2/P coatings obtained by PEO process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 375, 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.021
Van Bael, S., Chai, Y. C., Truscello, S., Moesen, M., Kerckhofs, G., Van Oosterwyck, H., et al. (2012). The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 8, 2824–2834. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001
Walsh, F. C., Low, C. T. J., Wood, R. J. K., Stevens, K. T., Archer, J., Poeton, A. R., et al. (2013). Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) for production of anodised coatings on lightweight metal (Al, Mg, Ti) alloys. Trans. IMF 87, 122–135. doi:10.1179/174591908x372482
Wang, C., Ma, F., Liu, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., Zhang, K., et al. (2018a). The influence of alloy elements in Ti 6Al 4V and Ti 35Nb 2Ta 3Zr on the structure, morphology and properties of MAO coatings. Vacuum 157, 229–236. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.08.054
Wang, C., Xu, D., Lin, L., Li, S., Hou, W., He, Y., et al. (2021a). Large-pore-size Ti6Al4V scaffolds with different pore structures for vascularized bone regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 131, 112499. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2021.112499
Wang, H., Liu, J., Wang, C., Shen, S. G., Wang, X., and Lin, K. (2021b). The synergistic effect of 3D-printed microscale roughness surface and nanoscale feature on enhancing osteogenic differentiation and rapid osseointegration. J. Mat. Sci. Technol. 63, 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2019.12.030
Wang, J., Pan, Y., Feng, R., Cui, H., Gong, B., Zhang, L., et al. (2020). Effect of electrolyte composition on the microstructure and bio-corrosion behavior of micro-arc oxidized coatings on biomedical Ti6Al4V alloy. J. Mat. Res. Technol. 9, 1477–1490. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.073
Wang, R., Zhou, T., Liu, J., Zhang, X., Long, F., and Liu, L. (2021c). Bilayer microstructure of antibacterial TiO2 coating on Ti6Al4V fabricated via micro-arc oxidation in W-containing electrolytes. Surf. Coat. Technol. 413, 127094. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127094
Wang, X., Xu, S., Zhou, S., Xu, W., Leary, M., Choong, P., et al. (2016). Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. Biomaterials 83, 127–141. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012
Wang, Y., Lei, T., Jiang, B., and Guo, L. (2004). Growth, microstructure and mechanical properties of microarc oxidation coatings on titanium alloy in phosphate-containing solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 233, 258–267. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.231
Wang, Y., Lou, J., Zeng, L., Xiang, J., Zhang, S., Wang, J., et al. (2017). Osteogenic potential of a novel microarc oxidized coating formed on Ti6Al4V alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 412, 29–36. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.191
Wang, Y. M., Jiang, B. L., Lei, T. Q., and Guo, L. X. (2006). Microarc oxidation coatings formed on Ti6Al4V in Na2SiO3 system solution: Microstructure, mechanical and tribological properties. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 82–89. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.10.044
Wang, Y., Zeng, L., Zhang, H., Xiang, J., Zhang, S., Chang, W., et al. (2018b). Investigation of zinc and phosphorus elements incorporated into micro-arc oxidation coatings developed on Ti-6Al-4V alloys. Mater. (Basel) 11, 344. doi:10.3390/ma11030344
Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Dong, W., Zhao, S., et al. (2022). Biomimetic design strategy of complex porous structure based on 3D printing Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds for enhanced osseointegration. Mat. Des. 218, 110721. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110721
Wenbin, X., Chao, W., Ruyi, C., and Zhiwei, D. (2002). Structure and properties characterization of ceramic coatings produced on Ti–6Al–4V alloy by microarc oxidation in aluminate solution. Mat. Lett. 52, 435–441. doi:10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00440-2
Wennerberg, A., and Albrektsson, T. (2009). Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20 (4), 172–184. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x
Wieding, J., Lindner, T., Bergschmidt, P., and Bader, R. (2015). Biomechanical stability of novel mechanically adapted open-porous titanium scaffolds in metatarsal bone defects of sheep. Biomaterials 46, 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.010
Wu, G., Wang, Y., Sun, M., Zhang, Q., Yao, J., and Kovalenko, V. (2020). Effect of laser surface melting pretreatment on the growth behavior and mechanical properties of microarc oxidation coating on Ti6Al4V alloy. J. Laser Appl. 32, 012013. doi:10.2351/1.5098000
Wu, S., Liu, X., Yeung, K. W. K., Liu, C., and Yang, X. (2014). Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 80, 1–36. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001
Xiu, P., Jia, Z., Lv, J., Yin, C., Cai, H., Song, C., et al. (2017). Hierarchical micropore/nanorod apatite hybrids in-situ grown from 3-D printed macroporous Ti6Al4V implants with improved bioactivity and osseointegration. J. Mat. Sci. Technol. 33, 179–186. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2016.05.013
Xu, C., Chen, L. Y., Zheng, C. B., Zhang, H. Y., Zhao, C. H., Wang, Z. X., et al. (2021). Improved wear and corrosion resistance of microarc oxidation coatings on Ti–6Al–4V alloy with ultrasonic assistance for potential biomedical applications. Adv. Eng. Mat. 23, 2001433. doi:10.1002/adem.202001433
Yang, F., Chen, C., Zhou, Q., Gong, Y., Li, R., Li, C., et al. (2017). Laser beam melting 3D printing of Ti6Al4V based porous structured dental implants: Fabrication, biocompatibility analysis and photoelastic study. Sci. Rep. 7, 45360. doi:10.1038/srep45360
Yangi, Y., and Wu, H. (2012). Effects of current density on microstructure of titania coatings by micro-arc oxidation. J. Mat. Sci. Technol. 28, 321–324. doi:10.1016/s1005-0302(12)60062-0
Yao, X., Peng, R., and Ding, J. (2013). Cell-material interactions revealed via material techniques of surface patterning. Adv. Mat. 25, 5257–5286. doi:10.1002/adma.201301762
Yao, X., Wang, X., and Ding, J. (2021). Exploration of possible cell chirality using material techniques of surface patterning. Acta Biomater. 126, 92–108. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.032
Yin, C., Zhang, T., Wei, Q., Cai, H., Cheng, Y., Tian, Y., et al. (2022). Surface treatment of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants by ultraviolet photofunctionalization for improved osseointegration. Bioact. Mat. 7, 26–38. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.043
Yu, L., Wu, Y., Liu, J., Li, B., Ma, B., Li, Y., et al. (2018). 3D culture of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) could improve bone regeneration in 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 2074021. doi:10.1155/2018/2074021
Zhang, B., Pei, X., Zhou, C., Fan, Y., Jiang, Q., Ronca, A., et al. (2018a). The biomimetic design and 3D printing of customized mechanical properties porous Ti6Al4V scaffold for load-bearing bone reconstruction. Mat. Des. 152, 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.065
Zhang, J., Liu, J., Wang, C., Chen, F., Wang, X., and Lin, K. (2020). A comparative study of the osteogenic performance between the hierarchical micro/submicro-textured 3D-printed Ti6Al4V surface and the SLA surface. Bioact. Mat. 5, 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.008
Zhang, J. X., Guan, R. F., and Zhang, X. P. (2011). Synthesis and characterization of sol–gel hydroxyapatite coatings deposited on porous NiTi alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 509, 4643–4648. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.196
Zhang, L. C., and Chen, L. Y. (2019). A review on biomedical titanium alloys: Recent progress and prospect. Adv. Eng. Mat. 21, 1801215. doi:10.1002/adem.201801215
Zhang, L., Gao, Q., and Han, Y. (2016). Zn and Ag Co-doped anti-microbial TiO2 coatings on Ti by micro-arc oxidation. J. Mat. Sci. Technol. 32, 919–924. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2016.01.008
Zhang, R. F., Qiao, L. P., Qu, B., Zhang, S. F., Chang, W. H., and Xiang, J. H. (2015). Biocompatibility of micro-arc oxidation coatings developed on Ti6Al4V alloy in a solution containing organic phosphate. Mat. Lett. 153, 77–80. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.031
Zhang, W., Du, K., Yan, C., and Wang, F. (2008). Preparation and characterization of a novel Si-incorporated ceramic film on pure titanium by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 5216–5223. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.047
Zhang, Y., Sun, N., Zhu, M., Qiu, Q., Zhao, P., Zheng, C., et al. (2022). The contribution of pore size and porosity of 3D printed porous titanium scaffolds to osteogenesis. Biomater. Adv. 133, 112651. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2022.112651
Zhang, Y., Xiu, P., Jia, Z., Zhang, T., Yin, C., Cheng, Y., et al. (2018b). Effect of vanadium released from micro-arc oxidized porous Ti6Al4V on biocompatibility in orthopedic applications. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 169, 366–374. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.044
Zhao, D., Lu, Y., Wang, Z., Zeng, X., Liu, S., and Wang, T. (2016). Antifouling properties of micro arc oxidation coatings containing Cu2O/ZnO nanoparticles on Ti6Al4V. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mat. 54, 417–421. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2015.10.003
Zhao, L., Chu, P. K., Zhang, Y., and Wu, Z. (2009a). Antibacterial coatings on titanium implants. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 91, 470–480. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31463
Zhao, Z., Chen, X., Chen, A., Shen, M., and Wen, S. (2009b). Synthesis of bioactive ceramic on the titanium substrate by micro-arc oxidation. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. A 90, 438–445. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31902
Zheng, Q., Mao, L., Shi, Y., Fu, W., and Hu, Y. (2020). Biocompatibility of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy implants with laser microgrooved surfaces. Mat. Technol. (N. Y. N. Y). 1–10. doi:10.1080/10667857.2020.1816011
Zhou, T., Liu, J., Zhang, X., Shen, B., Yang, J., Hu, W., et al. (2019). The antibacterial W-containing microarc oxidation coating on Ti6Al4V. Surf. Coat. Technol. 374, 242–252. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.089
Zou, S., Fan, S., Oliveira, A. L., Yao, X., Zhang, Y., and Shao, H. (2022). 3D printed gelatin scaffold with improved shape fidelity and cytocompatibility by using antheraea pernyi silk fibroin nanofibers. Adv. Fiber Mat. 4, 758–773. doi:10.1007/s42765-022-00135-w
Keywords: surface modification, Micro-arc oxidation (MAO), porous, implants, osteogenesis, Ti-based materials
Citation: Wang R, Ni S, Ma L and Li M (2022) Porous construction and surface modification of titanium-based materials for osteogenesis: A review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:973297. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.973297
Received: 20 June 2022; Accepted: 29 July 2022;
Published: 25 August 2022.
Edited by:
Jianxun Ding, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry (CAS), ChinaReviewed by:
Liang-Yu Chen, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, ChinaYuting Lv, Shandong University of Science and Technology, China
Silvia Spriano, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Ni, Ma and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Meihua Li, meihua@jlu.edu.cn