Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 14 December 2022
Sec. Nanobiotechnology
This article is part of the Research Topic Terahertz Technologies for Biosensing and Biomedical Analysis View all 11 articles

Early detection of gastric cancer via high-resolution terahertz imaging system

Han Shi,,&#x;Han Shi1,2,3Tenghui Li,&#x;Tenghui Li2,3Zhaoyang Liu,&#x;Zhaoyang Liu1,4Junhua Zhao,
Junhua Zhao2,3*Feng Qi,
Feng Qi1,4*
  • 1Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China
  • 2Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors (China Medical University), Ministry of Education, Shenyang, China
  • 4Key Laboratory of Terahertz Imaging and Sensing, Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China

Terahertz (THz) wave has demonstrated a good prospect in recent years, but the resolution is still one of the problems that restrict the application of THz technology in medical imaging. Paraffin-embedded samples are mostly used in THz medical imaging studies, which are thicker and significantly different from the current gold standard slice pathological examination in sample preparation. In addition, THz absorption in different layers of normal and cancerous tissues also remains to be further explored. In this study, we constructed a high-resolution THz imaging system to scan non-tumorous adjacent tissue slices and gastric cancer (GC) tissue slices. In this system, a THz quantum cascade laser emitted a pulsed 3 THz signal and the transmitted THz wave was received by a THz detector implemented in a 65 nm CMOS process. The slice thickness was only 20 μm, which was close to that of the medical pathology examination. We successfully found THz transmittance differences between different layers of normal gastric tissues based on THz images, and the resolution could reach 60 μm for the first time. The results indicated that submucosa had a lower THz transmittance than that of mucosa and muscular layer in non-tumorous adjacent tissue. However, in GC tissue, THz transmittance of mucosa and submucosa was similar, caused by the decreased transmittance of mucosa, where the cancer occurs. Therefore, we suppose that the similar terahertz transmittance between gastric mucosa and submucosa may indicate the appearance of cancerization. The images obtained from our THz imaging system were clearer than those observed with naked eyes, and can be directly compared with microscopic images. This is the first application of THz imaging technology to identify non-tumorous adjacent tissue and GC tissue based on the difference in THz wave absorption between different layers in the tissue. Our present work not only demonstrated the potential of THz imaging to promote early diagnosis of GC, but also suggested a new direction for the identification of normal and cancerous tissues by analyzing differences in THz transmittance between different layers of tissue.

1 Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC), as one of the most common cancer worldwide, is the world’s major healthcare burden (Joshi and Badgwell, 2021). In recent years, many studies on improving prognosis of patients with GC have been conducted (Alberts et al., 2003; Charalampakis et al., 2018; Salati et al., 2019), and 5-year survival rate can reach 90% in those at early stage (Song et al., 2017). However, the outcome of advanced GC is still poor (Digklia and Wagner, 2016). GC usually infiltrates from the superficial mucosa to the deeper tissue and is frequently diagnosed at advanced stage (Bray et al., 2018). Thus, it is important to improve the diagnostic method of GC.

At present, the imaging diagnosis of cancer mainly depends on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CT as a common technique used to assess tumor invasion, has a short scan time and can image both thorax and abdomen at the same time (Borggreve et al., 2019). MRI is significantly more sensitive to minor lesions and avoids radiation exposure (Brenner et al., 2014; Ohana et al., 2018). However, health concerns may lead to over-testing of patients (Jankauskaite et al., 2022). This phenomenon also occurs in low-income and middle-income countries (Albarqouni et al., 2022). It could be harm to patients and cause unnecessary financial costs. For example, the ionizing radiation from CT scans could cause DNA damage and increase the risk of cancer (Pearce et al., 2012). And the MRI has a high cost and relatively long acquisition times (Bor et al., 2016; Heidkamp et al., 2021). In addition, the sensitivity of CT and MRI in the detection of micro lesions of cancer still needs to be improved (Gai et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021). As a new type of diagnostic technology, optical imaging has the characteristics of no ionizing radiation exposure and high spatial resolution in cancer diagnosis (Wang et al., 2018). Nevertheless, this technique often requires the use of additional specific probes or dyes, which limits its clinical application. The gold standard for cancer diagnosis is pathological examination. However, it has a long diagnosis period. In addition, compared with examinations based on H&E staining slices, the results of electromagnetic wave detection could be relatively objective. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a technique, which is non-invasive and high-accuracy for cancer diagnosis.

The discovery of new electromagnetic waves often leads to the development of new medical diagnostic and imaging tools (Xiang et al., 2020, Lou et al., 2022). Terahertz (THz) light is a class of electromagnetic waves that the frequency is in the range of 0.1–10 THz (Shumyatsky and Alfano, 2011). Unlike x-rays used in traditional examinations, THz light’s frequency is about one-million-time lower. Due to this feature, THz radiation’s low-energy photons, which range between 0.4 and 41 millielectronvolts (meV), have no hazard of ionizing radiation (Yang et al., 2016). THz imaging technology has made great achievements in biomedical imaging. It is quite important to extract information from THz images and a sound understanding of interactions between THz waves and tissues will contribute, including absorption, scattering, corresponding path loss etc. (Liu et al., 2019). Influence of the effects above can be investigated by MonteCarlo simulations, similar to the work in (Lin et al., 2022). THz imaging system can be divided into different systems according to their structures. Based on terahertz pulsed imaging (TPI) system, researchers have been able to observe the boundary between cancerous and normal tissue in laryngeal cancer, breast cancer, and mouse brain glioma (Oh et al., 2014; Chavez et al., 2018; Vohra et al., 2020; Ke et al., 2022). By using continuous-wave terahertz (CW THz) transmission or reflection scanning imaging system, the difference of THz images between cancerous and normal tissues in colon cancer and mouse brain glioma was detected respectively (Wahaia et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2019). With CW THz near-field microscopy imaging system, researchers successively distinguished cancerous tissues from normal tissues in stomach and colon (Chen et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2022). Based on attenuated total reflection (ATR) imaging system, THz absorption difference between mouse brain glioma and normal mouse brain tissue was observed (Wu et al., 2022). However, previous studies usually focused on the difference in terahertz absorption between cancerous and normal tissues. Further exploration of THz absorption by different fine structures of tissue will promote the application of THz technology in clinical diagnosis. The resolution of THz imaging needs to be improved as well. The use of thinner slices instead of paraffin-embedded samples could also facilitate the observation of fine structure of the tissue. In addition, analysis of normal tissue with THz imaging technology could help explore the difference between normal and cancerous tissue, which may provide a more reliable basis for clinical diagnosis, and study the transformation process of normal tissue into cancerous tissue from the perspective of physics.

In this study, a high-resolution THz imaging system was designed. At 3 THz, the resolution of the scanned image is 60 μm, which is clearer than observation with naked eyes and can be directly compared with microscopic images. With this high-resolution imaging system, we then investigated the THz transmittance of different layers of normal and cancerous tissue by detecting slices of non-tumorous adjacent specimens and GC specimens. The variation of THz transmittance difference between different layers of normal and cancerous tissue reveals the potential of THz in assisting early diagnosis of GC.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental system setup introduction

The THz imaging system is shown in Figure 1A. A THz quantum cascade laser (QCL) emits a pulsed 3 THz signal with a repetition rate of 5 kHz and a duty cycle of 1%. Two parabolic mirrors are used to focus the THz radiation on an object, which is fixed on a two-dimensional stepper to realize scanning image. The transmitted THz radiation is collimated and focused on a THz detector by two other parabolic mirrors. The output signal of the detector is captured by a lock-in amplifier and then collected by a computer. The detector is shown in Figure 1B, which is a 3 THz detector implemented in a 65 nm CMOS process. The resolution of the imaging system is about 60 μm.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. (A) Block diagram of the THz imaging system and (B) die photo of the THz detector.

2.2 Human tissue samples

The samples were obtained from patients undergoing surgical resection of GC at the First Hospital of China Medical University during 2016. After surgery, the fresh specimens were fixed in formalin, routinely processed, and embedded in paraffin, then stored as tissue blocks. The samples were sectioned for H&E staining (5 μm) and THz imaging (20 μm), the surrounding paraffin was melted away for THz imaging, and only the relative flat tissues were selected for experiments.

2.3 Ethical approval

This study followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Required specimens were collected through informed patient consent and in accordance with institutional ethical guidelines. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of China Medical University (Shenyang, China).

2.4 H&E staining

The tissue slices (5 μm) were immersed in xylene for deparaffinization and rehydrated in graded ethanol solutions for staining in hematoxylin solution (5 min). They were then dipped in 1% hydrochloric acid ethanol, washed in distilled water, and stained in eosin solution (3 min). Finally, graded alcohol solutions were applied for dehydration and subsequent immersion in xylene. The stained slices were examined by a Leica DM4000B microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.5 Relative transmittance determination

Combined with histopathological examination, the boundaries of mucosa, submucosa and muscular layer were outlined with dashed blue lines. For each layer of tissue sample in the images, we randomly select nine points in the region with uniform color to calculate the average transmittance as the transmittance of this layer. To quantify transmissivity, we calculated the relative transmittance (RT) to compare the transmittance of different layers in each of the collected samples. RT between mucosa and submucosa was defined as RT = (Tm-Ts)/Tm, where Tm was averaged transmittance of labeled mucosa area in the sample and Ts was averaged transmittance of labeled submucosa area in the same specimen. This was to avoid the influence of tissue variation between different samples on the overall transmittance.

2.6 Statistical analysis

All data comparisons were based on Student’s t-test and were computed via standard software (SPSS v25.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States), by setting significance at p < 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Collected samples

Overall, eight collected tissue samples were tested during the study, which included three non-tumorous adjacent tissues (NATs) (N1, N2, N3) and five primary GC lesions (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5). N1 and T1 were from a 42-year-old woman (P1); N2 and T2 were from a 52-year-old man (P2); T3 was from a 76-year-old man (P3); T4 was from a 64-year-old woman (P4); N3 and T5 were from a 55-year-old woman (P5). Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The general shapes of all 8 samples can be distinguished in THz image.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Basic information of patients included.

3.2 Difference of THz transmittance between different layers of normal gastric tissue

To explore the transmittance characteristics of normal gastric tissue, we measured and acquired THz images of non-tumorous adjacent tissue N1, N2 and N3 from three GC patients (P1, P2 and P5) (Figure 2). It is shown that THz images had a relative high resolution, corresponding to the position and shape of different tissue layers (mucosa, submucosa, and muscular layer) in H&E examination of these three samples. Figures 2A,D,H were THz images of collected NAT. The boundaries of mucosa, submucosa and muscular layer are outlined with dashed blue lines in H&E-stained slice (Figures 2B,E,I). The magnified H&E-stained images of boundaries between different layers of tissue were also presented in Figures 2C,F,G,J,K. N1 was collected from the NAT from a 42-year-old woman P1 (Figures 2A–C). The Tm and Ts in this sample were 0.745 (±0.057) and 0.485 (±0.077) respectively. The RT of N1 was 0.349. N2 was the slide of the NAT from a 52-year-old man P2 (Figures 2D–G). The Tm, Ts and TM in this sample were 0.722 (±0.014), 0.574 (±0.048) and 0.690 (±0.031), respectively. The RT of N2 was calculated to be 0.205. N3 was the slide of the NAT from a 55-year-old woman P5 (Figures 2H,K). The Tm, Ts and TM in this sample were 0.623 (±0.030), 0.519 (±0.047) and 0.599 (±0.042), respectively. The RT of N3 was calculated to be 0.166. RT was defined as the difference in the transmittance of mucosa and submucosa divided by mucosa transmittance. The results showed that the THz transmittance was different between mucosa and submucosa.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Images of non-tumorous adjacent tissue: (A) THz image, (B) H&E-stained slice, and (C) H&E-stained image corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (B) of N1; (D) THz image, (E) H&E-stained slice, and (F,G) H&E-stained images corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (E) of N2; (H) THz image, (I) H&E-stained slice, and (J,K) H&E-stained images corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (I) of N3. In H&E-stained images, “m” indicates “mucosa”, “s” indicates “submucosa” and “M” indicates “muscular layer”. In (B,E,I), the boundaries of mucosa, submucosa and muscular layer are outlined with dashed blue lines. (C,F,J) are boundaries between mucosa and submucosa. (G,K) are the boundaries between submucosa and muscular layer.

Although THz images could not identify tissue morphology of samples alone, it was able to distinguish the region of mucosa, submucosa, and muscular layer in normal gastric tissue through intense color contrast. As shown in Figure 3, the transmittance of submucosa is significantly lower than mucosa in all three samples. Besides, submucosa of sample N2 and N3 also presented a lower transmittance than muscular layer. The THz images of Figure 2 also clearly showed that THz transmittance of submucosa is lower than that of mucosa and muscular layer. That is, the submucosa absorbs more THz waves than mucosa and muscular layer in normal gastric tissue.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. The transmittance of different layers in sample N1, N2, and N3. The transmittance of submucosa was lower than that of mucosa and muscular layer. ****: p < 0.0001, ***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01.

3.3 Variation of difference of THz transmittance between different layers of GC tissue

After that, we obtained THz images of primary cancer lesions T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 from five GC patients (P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5) to explore whether there were changes in transmittance difference among different layers of GC tissue. Figures 4A,E,I and Figures 5A,E were THz images of collected GC tissues. The boundaries of mucosa, submucosa and muscular layer are outlined with dashed blue lines in H&E-stained slices (Figures 4B,F,J and Figures 5B,F). The magnified H&E-stained images of boundaries between different layers of tissue were also presented in Figures 4C,D,G,H,K,L, and Figures 5C,D,G,H. T1 was collected from the GC tissue from a 42-year-old woman P1 (Figures 4A–D). The Tm, Ts in this sample were 0.520 (±0.045) and 0.483 (±0.050) respectively. The RT was calculated to be 0.071. T2 was from the GC tissue from a 52-year-old man P2 (Figures 4E–H). The Tm, Ts in this sample were 0.509 (±0.019) and 0.530 (±0.021) respectively. The calculated RT was -0.041. T3 was collected from the GC tissue from a 76-year-old man P3 (Figures 4I–L). The Tm, Ts in this sample were 0.382 (±0.027) and 0.411 (±0.032) respectively. The RT was calculated to be −0.076. T4 was from the GC tissue from a 64-year-old woman P4 (Figures 5A–D). The Tm, Ts in this sample were 0.439 (±0.023) and 0.408 (±0.045) respectively. The calculated RT was 0.069. T5 was collected from the GC tissue from a 55-year-old woman P3 (Figures 5E–H). The Tm, Ts in this sample were 0.533 (±0.051) and 0.524 (±0.048) respectively. The RT was calculated to be 0.017. RT was defined as the difference in the transmittance of mucosa and submucosa divided by mucosa transmittance. The results revealed that the THz transmittance between mucosa and submucosa was similar.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Images of GC sample: (A) THz image, (B) H&E-stained slice, and (C,D) H&E-stained images corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (B) of T1; (E) THz image, (F) H&E-stained slice, and (G,H) H&E-stained images corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (F) of T2; (I) THz image, (J) H&E-stained slice, and (K,L) H&E-stained images corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (J) of T3. In H&E-stained images, “m” indicates “mucosa”, “s” indicates “submucosa” and “M” indicates “muscular layer”. In images (B,F,J), the boundaries of mucosa, submucosa, and muscular layer are outlined with dashed blue lines. (C,G,K) are boundaries between mucosa and submucosa. (D,H,L) are boundaries between submucosa and muscular layer.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Images of GC sample: (A) THz image, (B) H&E-stained slice, and (C,D) H&E-stained images corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (B) of T4; (E) THz image, (F) H&E-stained slice, and (G,H) H&E-stained images corresponding to the region indicated by the red square in (F) of T5. In H&E-stained images, “m” indicates “mucosa”, “s” indicates “submucosa” and “M” indicates “muscular layer”. In images (B,F), the boundaries of mucosa, submucosa, and muscular layer are outlined with dashed blue lines. (C,G) are boundaries between mucosa and submucosa. (D,H) are boundaries between submucosa and muscular layer.

Samples’ THz images in Figures 4, 5 also showed that the THz transmittance of mucosa is similar to that of submucosa in sample T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5. Similarly, as Figure 6 presented, there was no significant difference in transmittance between mucosa and submucosa in all five samples. Although the boundaries of mucosa and submucosa in H&E-stained images were still relatively visible, it was difficult to accurately identify the areas of different tissue by color contrast in THz images. This is due to the fact that GC mainly rises from mucosa, which leads to a decrease in THz transmission, so the THz absorption capacity of mucosa is similar to that of submucosa. Based on the findings above, we analyzed RT of three NAT samples and five GC tissue samples to investigate the variation of RT between NAT and GC tissue. The results in Figure 7 revealed a statistical difference of RT between normal and cancerous gastric tissue (p = 0.006). The results suggested that our THz imaging technology had the potential to detect cancers by measuring the transmittance difference between different layers of tissue.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. The transmittance of mucosa and submucosa in T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5. The transmittance of these two layers was similar in each of the three samples. ns: not significant.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 7. The difference of RT between NAT and GC tissue. The transmittance difference between mucosa and submucosa in NAT was significantly higher than that in GC tissue. RT between submucosa and mucosa was defined as RT = (Tm-Ts)/Tm, where Tm was averaged transmittance of mucosa and Ts was averaged transmittance of submucosa. **: p < 0.01.

4 Discussion

In our study, we designed a high-resolution THz imaging system to scan gastric tissue slides. There was a novel finding that the THz transmittance of mucosa, submucosa and muscular layer were different in normal gastric tissue. The transmittance of submucosa was relatively low, while the transmittance of mucosa and muscular layer were relatively high. It was also found that the transmittance between mucosa and submucosa in GC tissue was similar. We believe this is due to the fact that cancerous tissue mainly arises from the mucosa, resulting in a decrease in THz transmittance.

Considerable progress has been made in the research on the biological application of electromagnetic wave (Zhang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021). A growing number of studies have shown that THz is a useful approach for identifying cancers because malignant tumors usually contain more water and can absorb large amounts of THz radiation (Reid et al., 2011; Wahaia et al., 2011; Yamaguchi et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2022). The difference in THz transmittance among layers of normal gastric tissue may be due to water content differences as well. CW THz transmission scanning imaging system has shown great potential in the diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer, breast cancer and colon cancer (Joseph et al., 2011; Bowman et al., 2016; Wahaia et al., 2016). In addition, the CW THz near-field microscopy imaging system has made some achievements in the identification of cancerous and normal gastric tissues. Nevertheless, these studies have not yet enabled high resolution imaging of the fine structure of tissues. Moreover, current studies on the use of THz imaging to diagnose cancer are usually based on the difference of THz parameters between normal and cancerous tissue (Chen et al., 2022; Ke et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2022). Our study provided a new idea for THz diagnosis of GC. By calculating the difference in transmittance between mucosa and submucosa, the existence of cancerization in tissue sample could be inferred. In addition, we obtained THz images with a resolution of up to 60 μm for the first time, while the thickness of the scanned slice was only 20 μm. Thinner slices are also conducive to further observe of the fine structure of the tissue. Meanwhile, the slices’ thickness was close to that of the slices used in clinical pathology examination, facilitating direct comparison of THz images with microscopic images. Our THz transmission imaging system is expected to save time and workload on GC pathology examinations and provide convenience for pathologists.

In the GC tissue we collected, the THz transmittance of the muscular layer was similar to that of the submucosa in some samples (T2, T3, T4, and T5), while different in the other sample (T1). This may be related to different degrees of invasion of cancerous tissue. Our study could assist in the diagnosis of GC by comparing the transmittance difference between mucosa and submucosa. Future studies could further focus on inferring the invasion depth of cancerous tissue by THz imaging to distinguish between early and advanced GC.

In conclusion, we proposed a high-resolution THz imaging system to scan normal and cancerous gastric tissue slides. The resolution is up to 60 μm. With this imaging system, we explored the THz transmittance characteristics of different layers of gastric wall tissue and identify them in THz images for the first time. Moreover, it is impressive that the THz transmittance of submucosa is lower than that of mucosa in NAT slides, but the THz transmittance of submucosa is similar to that of mucosa in GC tissue slides. We hypothesize that similar terahertz transmittance between gastric mucosa and submucosa may be an indication of carcinogenesis. We reported this phenomenon hoping to provide readers with more information. In future studies, we will explore this phenomenon in depth to provide more evidence.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of China Medical University (Shenyang, China). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

HS: Investigation, visualization, writing-original draft. TL: Investigation, visualization, writing-original draft. ZL: Investigation, visualization, software. JZ: Conceptualization, resources, writing-review and editing. FQ: Conceptualization, resources, writing-review and editing.

Funding

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61804160, 61801467); The Central Guidance on Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Liaoning Province (No. 2022JH6/100100010); “Xing Liao Ying Cai” Talents of Liaoning Province (XLYC2007074); Applied Basic Research Program of Liaoning Province (2022020284-JH2/1013); Joint Fund for the Cross-Disciplinary in Medicine and Engineering of Science and Technology Program Projects of Liaoning Province (No. 2021-YGJC-04); Shenyang Young and Middle-aged Science and Technology Innovation Talent Support Program (RC200512); Top Young Talents of China Medical University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Albarqouni, L., Arab-Zozani, M., Abukmail, E., Greenwood, H., Pathirana, T., Clark, J., et al. (2022). Overdiagnosis and overuse of diagnostic and screening tests in low-income and middle-income countries: A scoping review. BMJ Glob. Health 7, e008696. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008696

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alberts, S. R., Cervantes, A., and van de Velde, C. J. (2003). Gastric cancer: Epidemiology, pathology and treatment. Ann. Oncol. 14, ii31–6. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bor, R., Fábián, A., and Szepes, Z. (2016). Role of ultrasound in colorectal diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 22, 9477–9487. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borggreve, A. S., Goense, L., Brenkman, H. J. F., Mook, S., Meijer, G. J., Wessels, F. J., et al. (2019). Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: Current role and future potential of MRI. Br. J. Radiol. 92, 20181044. doi:10.1259/bjr.20181044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bowman, T., El-Shenawee, M., and Campbell, L. K. (2016). Terahertz transmission vs reflection imaging and model-based characterization for excised breast carcinomas. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 3756–3783. doi:10.1364/boe.7.003756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., and Jemal, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brenner, H., Kloor, M., and Pox, C. P. (2014). Colorectal cancer. Lancet 383, 1490–1502. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61649-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Charalampakis, N., Economopoulou, P., Kotsantis, I., Tolia, M., Schizas, D., Liakakos, T., et al. (2018). Medical management of gastric cancer: A 2017 update. Cancer Med. 7, 123–133. doi:10.1002/cam4.1274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chavez, T., Bowman, T., Wu, J., Bailey, K., and El-Shenawee, M. (2018). Assessment of terahertz imaging for excised breast cancer tumors with image morphing. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 39, 1283–1302. doi:10.1007/s10762-018-0529-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, H., Han, J., Ma, S., Li, X., Qiu, T., and Chen, X. (2022). Clinical diagnosis of gastric cancer by high-sensitivity THz fiber-based fast-scanning near-field imaging. Cancers (Basel) 14, 3932. doi:10.3390/cancers14163932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, H., Ma, S., Wu, X., Yang, W., and Zhao, T. (2015). Diagnose human colonic tissues by terahertz near-field imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 20, 036017. doi:10.1117/1.jbo.20.3.036017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Digklia, A., and Wagner, A. D. (2016). Advanced gastric cancer: Current treatment landscape and future perspectives. World J. Gastroenterol. 22, 2403–2414. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i8.2403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gai, Q., Li, X., Li, N., Li, L., Meng, Z., and Chen, A. (2021). Clinical significance of multi-slice spiral CT, MRI combined with gastric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 23, 2036–2045. doi:10.1007/s12094-021-02606-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heidkamp, J., Scholte, M., Rosman, C., Manohar, S., Fütterer, J. J., and Rovers, M. M. (2021). Novel imaging techniques for intraoperative margin assessment in surgical oncology: A systematic review. Int. J. Cancer 149, 635–645. doi:10.1002/ijc.33570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jankauskaite, L., Grechukha, Y., Kjær, K. A., Mamenko, M., Nakstad, B., Romankevych, I., et al. (2022). Overuse of medical care in paediatrics: A survey from five countries in the European Academy of pediatrics. Front. Pediatr. 10, 945540. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.945540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joseph, C. S., Yaroslavsky, A. N., Neel, V. A., Goyette, T. M., and Giles, R. H. (2011). Continuous wave terahertz transmission imaging of nonmelanoma skin cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 43, 457–462. doi:10.1002/lsm.21078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joshi, S. S., and Badgwell, B. D. (2021). Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. Ca. A Cancer J. Clin. 71, 264–279. doi:10.3322/caac.21657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ke, J., Jia, L., Hu, Y., Jiang, X., Mo, H., An, X., et al. (2022). Clinical and experimental study of a terahertz time-domain system for the determination of the pathological margins of laryngeal carcinoma. World J. Surg. Oncol. 20, 339. doi:10.1186/s12957-022-02788-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Chang, C., Zhu, Z., Sun, L., and Fan, C. (2021). Terahertz Wave Enhances Permeability of the Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 4311–4318. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c09401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, Z., Xu, G., Zhang, Q., and Song, Z. (2022). Average symbol error probability and channel capacity of the underwater wireless optical communication systems over oceanic turbulence with pointing error impairments. Opt. Express 30, 15327–15343. doi:10.1364/oe.457043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, G. Z., Chang, C., Qiao, Z., Wu, K. J., Zhu, Z., Cui, G. Q., et al. (2019). Myelin Sheath as a Dielectric Waveguide for Signal Propagation in the Mid-Infrared to Terahertz Spectral Range. Advanced Functional Materials 29. doi:10.1002/adfm.201807862

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Li, J., Sun, J., Lv, H., et al. (2021). Preoperative T and N restaging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: An accuracy comparison between MSCT and MRI. Front. Oncol. 11, 806749. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.806749

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lou, J., Jiao, Y., Yang, R., Huang, Y., Xu, X., Zhang, L., et al. (2022). Calibration-free, high-precision, and robust terahertz ultrafast metasurfaces for monitoring gastric cancers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, e2209218119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2209218119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh, S. J., Kim, S. H., Ji, Y. B., Jeong, K., Park, Y., Yang, J., et al. (2014). Study of freshly excised brain tissues using terahertz imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 5, 2837–2842. doi:10.1364/boe.5.002837

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohana, O., Soffer, S., Zimlichman, E., and Klang, E. (2018). Overuse of CT and MRI in paediatric emergency departments. Br. J. Radiol. 91, 20170434. doi:10.1259/bjr.20170434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pearce, M. S., Salotti, J. A., Little, M. P., McHugh, K., Lee, C., Kim, K. P., et al. (2012). Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380, 499–505. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60815-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reid, C. B., Fitzgerald, A., Reese, G., Goldin, R., Tekkis, P., O'Kelly, P. S., et al. (2011). Terahertz pulsed imaging of freshly excised human colonic tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 4333–4353. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salati, M., Orsi, G., Smyth, E., Aprile, G., Beretta, G., De Vita, F., et al. (2019). Gastric cancer: Translating novels concepts into clinical practice. Cancer Treat. Rev. 79, 101889. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101889

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shumyatsky, P., and Alfano, R. R. (2011). Terahertz sources. J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 033001. doi:10.1117/1.3554742

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, Z., Wu, Y., Yang, J., Yang, D., and Fang, X. (2017). Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Tumour. Biol. 39, 101042831771462. doi:10.1177/1010428317714626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vohra, N., Bowman, T., Bailey, K., and El-Shenawee, M. (2020). Terahertz imaging and characterization protocol for freshly excised breast cancer tumors. J. Vis. Exp. doi:10.3791/61007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahaia, F., Kasalynas, I., Venckevicius, R., Seliuta, D., Valusis, G., Urbanowicz, A., et al. (2016). Terahertz absorption and reflection imaging of carcinoma-affected colon tissues embedded in paraffin. J. Mol. Struct. 1107, 214–219. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.11.048

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahaia, F., Valusis, G., Bernardo, L. M., Almeida, A., Moreira, J. A., Lopes, P. C., et al. (2011). Detection of colon cancer by terahertz techniques. J. Mol. Struct. 1006, 77–82. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.05.049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C., Wang, Z., Zhao, T., Li, Y., Huang, G., Sumer, B. D., et al. (2018). Optical molecular imaging for tumor detection and image-guided surgery. Biomaterials 157, 62–75. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, L., Wang, Y., Liao, B., Zhao, L., Chen, K., Ge, M., et al. (2022). Temperature dependent terahertz spectroscopy and imaging of orthotopic brain gliomas in mouse models. Biomed. Opt. Express 13, 93–104. doi:10.1364/boe.445597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, L., Xu, D., Wang, Y., Liao, B., Jiang, Z., Zhao, L., et al. (2019). Study of in vivo brain glioma in a mouse model using continuous-wave terahertz reflection imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 10, 3953–3962. doi:10.1364/boe.10.003953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiang, Z. X., Tang, C. X., Chang, C., Liu, G. Z., et al. (2020). A primary model of THz and far-infrared signal generation and conduction in neuron systems based on the hypothesis of the ordered phase of water molecules on the neuron surface I: signal characteristics. Science Bulletin 65, 308–317. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2019.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, S., Fukushi, Y., Kubota, O., Itsuji, T., Ouchi, T., and Yamamoto, S. (2016). Origin and quantification of differences between normal and tumor tissues observed by terahertz spectroscopy. Phys. Med. Biol. 61, 6808–6820. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/18/6808

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X., Zhao, X., Yang, K., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Fu, W., et al. (2016). Biomedical applications of terahertz spectroscopy and imaging. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 810–824. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., He, Y., Liang, S., Liao, X., Li, T., Qiao, Z., et al. (2021). Non-invasive, opsin-free mid-infrared modulation activates cortical neurons and accelerates associative learning. Nat. Commun. 12, 2730. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23025-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: terahertz, imaging, gastric cancer, H&E staining, high-resolution

Citation: Shi H, Li T, Liu Z, Zhao J and Qi F (2022) Early detection of gastric cancer via high-resolution terahertz imaging system. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:1052069. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1052069

Received: 23 September 2022; Accepted: 28 November 2022;
Published: 14 December 2022.

Edited by:

Junhong Lü, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute (CAS), China

Reviewed by:

Qian Xiaoqin, Jiangsu University Affiliated People’s Hospital, China
Guanjun Xu, East China Normal University, China

Copyright © 2022 Shi, Li, Liu, Zhao and Qi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Feng Qi, qifeng@sia.cn; Junhua Zhao, jhzhao@cmu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.