Dingyu Rao
Defa Huang
Chengpeng Sang1,2
Zhixian Tang- 1The First Clinical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
- 2Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ganna Medical University, Ganzhou, China
- 3Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
Exosomes are tiny vesicles with a double membrane structure that cells produce. They range in diameter from 40 to 150 nm and may contain a variety of biomolecules including proteins and nucleic acids. Exosomes have low toxicity, low immunogenicity, and the ability to encapsulate a wide variety of substances, making them attractive drug delivery vehicles. MSCs secrete large amounts of exosomes and hence serve as an excellent source of exosomes. MSCs-derived exosomes have regenerative and tissue repair functions comparable to MSCs and can circumvent the risks of immune rejection and infection associated with MSC transplantation, indicating that they may be a viable alternative to MSCs’ biological functions. In this review, we summarized the drug delivery methods and advantages of exosomes, as well as the advancement of MSC exosomes as drug carriers. The challenges and prospects of using exosomes as drug delivery vectors are presented.
Introduction
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a class of pluripotent stem cells capable of self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation. They are one of the most commonly employed stem cells. MSCs are derived from several tissues, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, muscle, and placenta (Jackson et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; Frese et al., 2016). MSCs perform a number of biological functions, including tissue repair, immunosuppression, and neuroprotection (Yu et al., 2014). With low immunogenicity, multi-directional differentiation ability, in particular homing ability, it has significant research potential in cardiovascular diseases, nervous diseases, and hematopoietic diseases (Wang et al., 2018a). However, cells as drug carriers still face many problems such as uncertain differentiation accidents, cell embolism, infection, production, and storage (Su et al., 2021). Therefore, the drug delivery system based on MSCs has become one of the most attractive therapeutic methods. Many studies have suggested that the therapeutic effects of MSCs may be mediated by their paracrine secretion (Praveen Kumar et al., 2019; Kong et al., 2020). As the secretion of MSCs, the exosomes inherit the relative advantages of MSCs and overcome the problems of MSCs as drug carriers (Tang et al., 2021).
Exosomes are nanoscale extracellular vesicles that organisms produce under normal physiological and pathological conditions. Exosomes were first discovered by Pan and Johnstone while investigating the maturation mechanisms of sheep reticulocytes into erythrocytes (Harding and Stahl, 1983; Pan and Johnstone, 1983; Pan et al., 1985). These vesicles originate from multivesicular bodies and are eventually released outside the cell (Latifkar et al., 2019) (Figure 1). Exosomes have been detected in a variety of body fluids, including blood, urine, breast milk, ascites, amniotic fluid, saliva, and cerebrospinal fluid (Wang et al., 2019). They can carry biologically active molecules such as nucleic acids and proteins and serve as messengers between cells, delivering their contents to the target cell (Hendrix et al., 2010; Gu et al., 2012; Weber et al., 2019).
FIGURE 1. Biogenesis of exosomes. Exosomes begin as multivesicular vesicles (MVB), which invaginate the cytoplasmic membrane and then develop into early endosomes. The endosomes then bud inwards to form multivesicular bodies, which have two fates: one is to migrate to the cell surface and fuse with the plasma membrane, releasing the exosomes outside the cell in a cytosolic vomit; the other is to bind to lysosomes and degrade the contents.
MSCderived exosomes (MSC-Exos) were originally discovered by Lai et al. (2010) during the isolation of MSCs culture media. MSC-Exos have many unique characteristics, such as small size, low immunogenicity, long-circulating half-life, remarkable penetration, and biocompatibility. Furthermore, because of its particle size advantage, it can transport cargo molecules across biological barriers (such as the blood-brain barrier) (Chen et al., 2016a). It is one of the best choices for researchers to find drug carriers in vivo (Lai et al., 2013). Studies have shown that MSC-Exos possesses anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and pro-angiogenic effects with regenerative potential in myocardial tissue from ischemic injury in chronic myocardial infarction, acute and chronic renal injury, and fibrotic tissue (Gatti et al., 2011; Li et al., 2013; Yamaguchi et al., 2015). These features contribute to the potential of MSC-Exos as a natural drug delivery vehicle that can either accomplish the biological function of the package or achieve superior biological function than that of unmodified MSC-Exos.
Isolation and Characterization of Exosomes
Currently, exosome isolation techniques include differential centrifugation, density gradient centrifugation, immunosorbent assay, precipitation, ultrafiltration, and size-exclusion chromatography (Cheruvanky et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2015; Lobb et al., 2015; Zeringer et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017a). Among them, differential centrifugation is the most frequently used method for exosome isolation and purification and is widely regarded as the gold standard for exosome isolation. Differential centrifugation and density gradient centrifugation make use of the density and size difference between exosomes and other components to separate exosomes using different centrifugal forces. Immunosorption occurs as a result of specific interaction between corresponding antibodies with exosomal membrane proteins. Precipitation chemicals, such as polyethylene glycol, are used to reduce the solubility of exosomes, causing them to precipitate. Ultrafiltration is a technique for separating exosomes based on their size differences using ultrafiltration membranes. Size exclusion chromatography employs polymer gel packings with varying particle sizes as the separation medium to separate exosomes based on their size properties. However, existing separation methods remain challenging. Microfluidic separation has recently been recognized as a method for rapidly and precisely isolating exosomes from small quantities of liquid samples (Liga et al., 2015).
At present, the most frequently used techniques for characterizing exosomes include electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analyzer, Western bolt (WB), and flow cytometry. Electron microscopy offers a high resolution and can determine the thickness, concentration, and particle size distribution of exosomes’ phospholipid bilayer (Nojima et al., 1993). Nanoparticle tracking analysis estimates exosome concentration, particle size distribution, and other information by tracking the trajectory of individual particles (Xu et al., 2011). WB is a traditional exosome characterization method that uses high-quality monoclonal antibodies to identify antigen-presenting proteins (e.g. CD63, CD81, CD9, TSG101, ALIX, etc.) on the surface of exosomes to improve the reliability of identification results (Tian et al., 2018a). Flow cytometry offers the advantages of high speed, high statistical accuracy, and high practicability, making it an advanced analytical tool for exosome heterogeneity analysis, exosome-based diagnostic markers research, and therapeutic agent development.
Exosome Drug Delivery Mode
To date, exosome loading drug approaches are divided into two categories: extracellular and intracellular loading strategies.
Extracellular Loading Strategy
Extracellular drug loading entails the purification and isolation of exosomes from donor cells followed by the loading of the desired drug into the exosomes using several methods such as incubation, electroporation, sonication, extrusion, freeze-thaw, and saponin-assisted loading (Figure 2). The table below summarizes the advantages, disadvantages, and applications of various extracellular drug delivery methods (Table 1).
FIGURE 2. Exosomes extracellular drug delivery strategy. (A) Drug co-incubation; (B) Acoustic processing; (C) Squeeze method; (D) Electroporation; (E) Freeze-thaw; (F) Saponin-assisted loading
TABLE 1. Advantages, disadvantages, and applications of various extracellular drug delivery methods.
The simplest method of exosome loading is drug co-incubation, which involves simply combining the isolated exosome with the drug. Loading is driven by drug concentration, and the efficiency of loading by this method is dependent on the drug’s lipophilicity as well as the concentration gradient (Sun et al., 2010). The primary disadvantage of this method is its low loading efficiency.
The electroporation technique of drug loading disrupts the electric field of the phospholipid bilayer of the exosome, forming small pores in its membrane, and allowing the drug to pass into the vesicle. The integrity of the vesicle membrane is then restored, allowing the formation of drug-loaded vesicles. Studies have shown that electroporation has been effective in loading siRNAs into exosomes (Alvarez-Erviti et al., 2011). Wahlgren et al. (2012) showed that electroporation results in a higher siRNA loading than chemical transfection. However, electroporation has been challenged as a method of loading siRNA into exosomes, with Kooijmans et al. (2013) stating that electroporation destroys exosome integrity and is significantly less effective than co-incubation.
Acoustic treatment, in which exosomes from donor cells are combined with the drug and sonicated by a probe sonicator, results in the drug flowing into the exosome due to ultrasound-induced membrane deformation. The following are some examples of ultrasound treatments for drug loading: Kim et al. (2016) loaded paclitaxel into exosomes released from macrophages using ultrasound treatment. This method offers a high loading efficiency and sustained drug release while having no effect on exosome protein and lipid content. Lamichhane et al. (2016) also used ultrasound to deliver functional small RNAs into exosomes isolated from HEK293T and MCF-7 cells.
The extrusion method involves combining the exosomes with the drug, then loading the mixture into a syringe-based lipid extruder and extruding through a membrane with a pore size of 100–400 nm at a controlled temperature. During extrusion, the exosome membrane is disrupted and forcefully mixed with the drug, allowing the drug to be loaded into the exosome. Fuhrmann et al. loaded porphyrins into the exosomes by extrusion. However, it was demonstrated that the exosome extrusion method of drug delivery caused cytotoxicity, while other methods of preparing exosome carriers did not (Antimisiaris et al., 2018).
The freeze-thaw method entails incubating the drug with exosomes at room temperature, then freezing the mixture at −80°C or in liquid nitrogen, and then thawing it at room temperature. To load the drug into the exosomes, the procedure is consecutively repeated three times (Sato et al., 2016). This method allows peroxisomes, therapeutic RNA, and other components to be loaded into exosomes. However, this method may cause exosomes to aggregate, resulting in a significantly poorer loading efficiency than that ultrasound or extrusion methods.
Saponin is a surfactant molecule that co-incubates with exosomes to generate pores in the exosome membrane, enhancing exosome-membrane permeability. To generate peroxidase-loaded exosomes, Haney et al. (2015) mixed peroxidase with exosomes, added saponin and placed them on an oscillator for 20 min at room temperature. This method may also be used to load hydrophilic molecules into exosomes, such as porphyrins (Fuhrmann et al., 2015). This method offers a high loading efficiency and prevents protease degradation.
Intracellular Drug Delivery Strategy
Intracellular drug loading is the co-culture of drug with donor cells or chemically transfected donor cells loaded into the donor cells, and when the drug enters the exosome and is released from the donor cells, the drug-loaded exosome is isolated and purified.
Although the loading efficiency of drug co-culture with donor cells is uncontrollable, it has been used in more research due to the ease with which the drug may be loaded. Pascucci et al. (2014) encapsulated paclitaxel (PTX) into mouse mesenchymal stromal cells, washed, and incubated them with fresh media. After 48 h, exosomes were recovered from PTX-loaded cells. Exosomes loaded with PTX had a strong inhibitory impact on CFPAC-1 human pancreatic cells as compared to exosomes obtained from cells in the untreated group.
Transfection is the most commonly used and effective method for loading therapeutic proteins or oligonucleotides into exosomes. Akao et al. (2010) successfully loaded therapeutic miRNAs into TH-1 macrophage secretory exosomes. Similarly, Ohno et al. (2013) demonstrated that exosomes loaded with miRNA could effectively target recipient cells when their surfaces were modified with specific peptides, as well as that intravenous injection of exosomes could reduce tumor growth at tumor accumulative sites.
Advantages of Exosomes as Drug Carriers
A liposome is an ultramicroscopic spherical carrier formulation formed by a lipid bilayer. It possesses the ability to load lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs and to exhibit targeting effects by the attachment of targeting ligands to its surface (Zhou et al., 2013a). While the liposome is a relatively mature drug carrier, it has some limitations, including the toxicity of the synthetic liposome membrane and the low biocompatibility of targeted ligand (Sercombe et al., 2015).
Exosomes outperform synthetic liposomes as drug carriers. 1) Exosomes are actively secreted by living cells and can be considered as natural liposomes, overcoming the limitations of synthetic liposomes; 2) Exosomes are derived from the organism, making them less immunogenic and possessing good tolerability and safety (Chen et al., 2016b); 3) Exosomes can cross the blood-brain barrier and enter the brain circulation, allowing for non-invasive treatment of intracerebral diseases (Long et al., 2017); 4) Exosomes have intrinsic homing properties and can also be artificially modified to express specific molecules or to improve their targeting ability (Li et al., 2017b).
MSCExos has unique advantages as a drug carrier. Although primary cells derived from MSCs are commonly used in clinical practice can produce a large number of exosomes, they have limited proliferation capacity for large-scale production, and the exosomes produced may have batch-to-batch variation, necessitating repeated testing and validation in multiple batches and increasing production costs (Fang et al., 2019). Chen et al. (2011) found that using c-myc transfected human embryonic stem cell-derived MSC (hESC-MSC) may enhance the proliferation rate and reduce the time required to produce MSCs without compromising the exosome quality. Transfected hESC-MSC may produce exosomes in the milligram range, indicating the possibility of producing biologically beneficial exosomes. Subsequently, a previous study compared the ability of c-myc-transfected hESC-MSC, skeletal muscle cell lines, HEK cells, small airway epithelial cell lines, and THP1 cell lines to produce exosomes. By analyzing CD81 levels, this study found that hESC-MSC produced at least 10-fold the amount of CD81 + exosomes produced by other cell lines (Yeo et al., 2013).
In addition, exosomes can be functionally modified to improve their use as carriers. Exosome functionalization can increase exosome circulation duration, improve exosome intercellular transport efficiency, and promote better targeting of exosomes (Lu et al., 2018). At present, the commonly used targeted modification approach is to use genetic engineering to transfect the gene encoding the targeted peptide into exosome source cells, resulting in exosomes carrying the targeted peptide (Shamili et al., 2018). Furthermore, some studies have used a covalent approach to exosome modification, such as bioorthogonal copper-free azide-alkyne cycloaddition to attach functional ligands to exosomes, which has been shown to have no significant effect on exosome structural integrity and interaction with receptor cells and can be used for rapid and large-scale production of functionalized exosomes (Tian et al., 2018b). In addition to covalent approaches, non-covalent modifications such as electrostatic interactions, receptor-ligand binding, and hydrophobic reactions can be utilized to modify the surface of exosomes (Armstrong et al., 2017).
Application of MSC-Exos as a Drug Delivery Vehicle
MSCExos has similar physiological functions to MSCs, indicating its potential for application as a therapeutic agent. Additionally, MSC-Exos can act as a drug delivery carrier, which is increasingly used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, neurological diseases, and malignant tumors.
Diseases of the Cardiovascular System
At present, an increasing number of researchers are interested in the effect of MSC-Exos on cardiovascular disease. MSC-EXOS has been shown to reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MI/R) through multiple signaling pathways, such as activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Cui et al., 2017). The AMPK/mTOR and Akt/mTOR pathways also induce autophagy in cardiomyocytes (Liu et al., 2017). Furthermore, MSC-Exos therapy increased the ATP and NADH levels in MI/R hearts, reduced the degree of oxidative stress, and significantly reduced local and systemic inflammatory responses (Arslan et al., 2013). Cardiac stem cells (CSCs) pretreated with MSC-Exos have a better survival rate and promote long-term recovery of cardiac function in rat models of myocardial infarction (Zhang et al., 2016a).
MiR-132 can modulate endothelial cells during angiogenesis, however, its safe delivery in vivo remains an unresolved issue. Ma et al. (2018) investigated whether MSC-Exos could be used to treat myocardial ischemia through miR-132 delivery. Exosomes loaded with miR-132 were able to significantly increase the lumen-like structure of endothelial cells in vitro, while exosome-pretreated human umbilical vein endothelial cells exhibited increased angiogenic potential in vivo. In addition, implantation of Mir-132-coated exosomes into the ischemic heart of mice, significantly increased new angiogenesis in the periinfarct region and protected cardiac function. Following a myocardial infarction, the therapeutic impact of transplanted MSCs may be enhanced by exosomes loaded with Mir-125b-5p61, which improves autophagy (Xiao et al., 2018). Furthermore, the recombinant adenovirus-mediated Mir-486 gene was used to modify MSCs, and it was discovered that the mir-486 level in MSC-Exos was increased, and MSC-Exos with high expression of Mir-486 was found to promote cardiomyocytes proliferation and migration while inhibiting cardiomyocytes apoptosis. It is anticipated that it will be a novel strategy for cardiac regeneration and repair (Fang et al., 2018).
Interference with the environment in which exosomes are produced (e.g., hypoxia) has been discovered to affect the components secreted by exosomes. Zhu et al. (2018a) investigated whether hypoxia-treated MSCs-derived exosomes (ExoH) were superior to those produced under normoxic conditions (ExoN) in terms of myocardial repair. ExoH-treated mice showed greater survival rates, smaller scars, and improved cardiac function in myocardial infarction experiments in mice. Further research found that ExoH exhibited greater levels of miR-210 expression than ExoN, as well as expression of neutral sphingomyelinase 2, which is essential for exosome secretion. Similarly, Zhu et al. (2018b) discovered that miR125b-5p delivered by MSC-Exos under hypoxic conditions promote ischemic heart repair by improving cardiomyocyte apoptosis. In addition, they developed a novel drug delivery vector by collocating ExoH with an ischemia myocardial targeting peptide, increasing the specificity of drug delivery in ischemic diseases. It was also shown that ExoH significantly reduced apoptosis and reactive oxygen species generation in CSCs following oxidative stress injury compared to ExoN, most likely due to its higher miR-214 expression, although the overall mechanism of action remains unknown (Wang et al., 2018b).
Neurological Diseases
The blood-brain barrier prevents the flow of endogenous molecules, exogenous biological agents, and immune-monitoring cells such as macrophages, therefore preserving central system homeostasis (Zhou et al., 2018). When neurological lesions occur, therapeutic drugs cannot reach the corresponding target cells due to the protective effect of the blood-brain barrier, limiting the treatment of neurological diseases. MSC-Exos increases functional recovery, neurosynaptic remodelling, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis in a rat stroke model, and represents a novel treatment option for stroke (Xin et al., 2013). Small porcine adipose-derived MSCs and their associated exosomes reduce the size of the cerebral infarct zone and enhance neurological function in rats, in an acute ischemic stroke model, with a significant safety profile (Chen et al., 2016b). In addition, MSC-Exos loaded with peroxidase was found to successfully cross the blood-brain barrier and ameliorate the disease state of Parkinson’s disease (Haney et al., 2021). MSC-Exos was also found to protect retinal pigment epithelial cells from blue light stimulation and improve laser-induced retinal damage by down-regulating vascular endothelial growth factor-A (He et al., 2018).
Loss of Retinal Ganglion Cells (RGC) and their axons is a major cause of blindness. Mead and Tomarev (2017) demonstrated for the first time that MSC-Exos was effective in protecting RGC. MSC-Exos promoted RGC survival and axon regeneration in the rat optic nerve crush model while preventing RGC axon loss and dysfunction to some extent. To further examine the mechanism of RGC protection by MSC-Exos, this study transfected MSCs with siRNA to silence the Argonaute-2 gene (a key miRNA effector) and isolated the exosomes generated. It was discovered that the exosome successfully delivered its “cargo” to the inner retina and that the effect was miRNA-dependent, with the therapeutic effect of MSC-Exos being reduced when Argonaute-2 was knocked out.
Malignant Tumors
MSCExos has also garnered considerable attention for its potential use in the treatment of malignant tumors. Breast cancer is currently treated mostly by surgical excision, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy (Yu et al., 2015). MSC-Exos can address the drawbacks and hence has significant potential as a targeted delivery vehicle for breast cancer treatment. Lee et al. (2013) demonstrated that MSC-Exos significantly down-regulated the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer cells, thereby inhibiting angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Lin et al. (2013), on the other hand, suggested that MSC-Exos could promote breast cancer cell migration via the Wnt signaling pathway. Therefore, the mechanism by which MSC-Exos acts on breast cancer must be further explored to maximize MSC-Exos’s therapeutic effects.
Dormant breast cancer cells induce MSCs to release exosomes carrying various miRNAs (e.g., miR-222/223), therefore promoting quiescence and conferring drug resistance in a proportion of cancer cells (Bliss et al., 2016). MSC-Exos was found to suppress breast cancer tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo through the delivery of miRNA-142-3p inhibitors. MSC-Exos successfully delivered miRNA-142-3p inhibitors in vitro, reduced miRNA-142-3p and miR-150 levels, and increased transcription of regulatory target genes APC and P2X7R. In vivo, MSC-Exos can deliver inhibitory oligonucleotides to tumor tissue, thus down-regulating miRNA-142-3p and miR-150 expression levels (Naseri et al., 2018). In addition, miR-100 delivered by MSC-Exos was able to inhibit angiogenesis in vitro by regulating the mTOR/HIF-1α/VEGF signaling axis in breast cancer cells, thereby influencing the behavior of breast cancer cells (Pakravan et al., 2017).
TNF-Related Apoptosis Induced Ligand (TRAIL) is one of the potential antitumor drugs for preclinical research due to its ability to induce selective apoptosis in a variety of tumor cells without causing toxic effects on normal cells. Shamili et al. (2018) utilized non-viral vectors to introduce plasmids encoding TRAIL -GFP into MSCs. The findings indicate that MSCs-derived TRAIL-loaded exosomes (Exo-TRAIL) inhibit melanoma progression by promoting massive necrosis of cancer cells and that their anti-tumor effect is dose-dependent. Pascucci et al. (2014) loaded MSC-Exos with paclitaxel by co-incubating high doses of paclitaxel with MSCs, which inhibited the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Kalimuthu et al. (2018) found that paclitaxel-loaded MSC-Exos mimics were effective in inhibiting the growth of breast cancer in vivo than unencapsulated MSC-Exos mimics, and because the mimics were easily isolated, they provided a novel drug delivery vehicle for the treatment of breast cancer.
In addition, MSC-Exos can be utilized to treat different types of tumors by delivering endogenous or exogenous miRNAs, proteins, etc., Table 2 summarizes the various cargoes delivered by MSC-Exos for different tumor treatments (Table 2).
TABLE 2. A summary of the various cargoes delivered by MSC-Exos for different oncology treatments.
However, exosomes may also negatively affect chemotherapy treatment by shuttling chemotherapeutic drugs away from the target cancer cells (Kalluri, 2016). Study confirmed the presence of cisplatin and doxorubicin in post-treatment cancer cell-derived exosomes (Yin et al., 2012). In addition, HER-2+ exosomes produced by HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer cells inhibited trastuzumab-induced anti-proliferative activity (Ciravolo et al., 2012). Thus, removing HER-2+ exosomes from the circulation of HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer patients has a positive effect on trastuzumab therapy (Marleau et al., 2012). Depletion of exosomes from the blood of cancer patients may also improve exosome-mediated immune tolerance (Ichim et al., 2008). MSC-Exos may provide therapeutic benefits for cancer patients, but more research is needed to understand the combined effects of MSC-Exos on the body. As a result, there are no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved exosome products available, and this is also the case in China.
Others
Studies have shown that MSC-Exos can repair osteochondral damage and can better restore steroid-induced early ischemia necrosis of the femoral head by delivering mutant HIF-1α (Zhang et al., 2016b; Jiang et al., 2018). In a model of acute liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride, the antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of MSC-Exos were superior to those of the commonly used hepatoprotective agent bifenthix (Chen et al., 2018). In a mouse model of autoimmune hepatitis, MSC-Exos encapsulated with miR-223 significantly reduced serum levels of ALT, AST, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as mRNA levels of these cytokines in the liver compared to MSC-Exos (Jia et al., 2018). Furthermore, in a model of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury, MSC-Exos was able to prevent nephrotoxic injury caused by cisplatin by delivering 14-3-3ζ, and it had the effect of repairing kidney injury both in vivo and in vitro (Zhou et al., 2013b; Jeppesen et al., 2019).
Discussion
Exosomes as an emerging drug delivery vehicle have become a research hotspot in recent years. It exhibits unique benefits due to its biological properties such as non-toxicity and non-immunogenicity. This study focused on the isolation and characterization of exosomes, outlined the drug delivery modalities and advantages of exosomes, and summarized the application of MSC-Exos as a drug carrier in cardiovascular system diseases, neurological diseases, and malignancies.
Extracellular vesicles of the same size or larger than exosomes have been reported to develop in many cell types via the outgrowth of plasma membranes or membrane extensions (e.g., microvilli, filamentous pseudopods, cilia, and flagella) from the main body of the cell. Extracellular vesicles of equivalent size to exosomes have the same biophysical properties as exosomes in terms of size, density, and membrane localization, and hence existing methods cannot effectively distinguish them.
A significant advancement in exosome research in recent years has been the growing recognition that extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes, include many distinct granule subtypes, each of which may have intriguing functions in intercellular communication. Despite growing interest in this field, understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that control extracellular vesicle biogenesis, release, uptake, and function is limited. The technical difficulties in isolating and characterizing specific granule subtypes is a significant limitation in accurately describing extracellular vesicles since the methods currently used result in systematic co-isolation of extracellular vesicles of different subcellular origins. Therefore, while numerous articles use the term “exosomes” to refer to preparations of extracellular vesicles isolated from larger extracellular vesicles by physical processes, they are more likely to refer to a mixture of tiny extracellular vesicles that are exosomal and non-exosomal in nature. as a result, unless their multivesicular origin is identified, the generic term “small extracellular vesicles” may be preferred.
Jeppesen et al. (2019) recently reported on the use of high-resolution density gradient separation and direct immunoaffinity capture techniques to precisely characterize RNA, DNA, and protein fractions in exosomes, and other non-vesicular material. Extracellular RNA, RNA-binding proteins, and other cellular proteins were found to be differentially expressed in exosomes and non-vesicular compartments, but no Argonaute 1, Argonaute 2, Argonaute 3, Argonaute 4, glycolytic enzymes, or cytoskeletal proteins were detected in exosomes. Membrane-linked protein A1 (annexin A1) was discovered to be a unique marker for microvesicles shed directly from the plasma membrane. They also discovered that tiny extracellular vesicles do not function as carriers of DNA release. Instead, they proposed a novel model for active extracellular DNA secretion that relies on autophagy and the multivesicular endosome rather than exosomes. As a result, these findings imply that the composition of exosomes should be re-evaluated, providing a framework for a better understanding of the heterogeneity of extracellular vesicles.
Current understanding of the physiology, diversity, internalization, and transport of molecular cargoes in extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, is still very limited, therefore it impossible to draw precise conclusions about the mechanisms by which extracellular vesicles interact with and modify recipient cells. To achieve advances in the field of extracellular vesicles, investigations must be conducted in an integrated way, encompassing molecular, cellular, and functional characterization, so that various extracellular vesicle subtypes in a particular experimental system may be compared to the greatest extent possible. These approaches are critical for determining which molecules or mechanisms are exclusive to various extracellular vesicle subtypes and which are relevant to all extracellular vesicle subtypes.
Therefore, despite the great potential of exosomes as drug carriers, there are still significant challenges: 1) Exosome composition and mode of action of exosomes must be well understood to ensure their safety and efficacy, and formulation composition and mode of action must be validated. 2) The need to improve and refine isolation and purification procedures, as well as increase the efficiency of exosome production. 3) The choice of which cell-derived exosomes to use as drug carriers must be targeted to reduce off-targeting, side effects, and clearance. If these challenges are adequately addressed, exosomes will be the next generation of drug delivery systems. Exosomal drug carriers are expected to be widely employed in the clinic in the near future.
Author Contributions
DR and DH searched for literature and wrote the first draft of this article. CS edited tables and figures. TZ, ZZ, and ZT strictly reviewed the manuscript and polished the grammar. All authors approved the final version submitted and agree on its submission to this journal.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Funds of China (Grant No. 81860337, 81960326, 82060384), Natural Science Funds of Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 20202ACBL206014, 20192BAB205009, 2020BABL206116), Science & Tecnology Programn of Jiangxi Health Commission (Grant No. 20201080, 202130660), National Health Commission Science & Technology Development Research Center (Grant No.2019ZH-07E-003), General projects of Jiangxi Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology (Grant No.2020B0214).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Akao, Y., Nakagawa, Y., Hirata, I., Iio, A., Itoh, T., Kojima, K., et al. (2010). Role of Anti-oncomirs miR-143 and -145 in Human Colorectal Tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 17, 398–408. doi:10.1038/cgt.2009.88
Alvarez-Erviti, L., Seow, Y., Yin, H., Betts, C., Lakhal, S., and Wood, M. J. A. (2011). Delivery of siRNA to the Mouse Brain by Systemic Injection of Targeted Exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 341–345. doi:10.1038/nbt.1807
Antimisiaris, S., Mourtas, S., and Marazioti, A. (2018). Exosomes and Exosome-Inspired Vesicles for Targeted Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 10, 218. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10040218
Armstrong, J. P. K., Holme, M. N., and Stevens, M. M. (2017). Re-Engineering Extracellular Vesicles as Smart Nanoscale Therapeutics. ACS Nano 11, 69–83. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b07607
Arslan, F., Lai, R. C., Smeets, M. B., Akeroyd, L., Choo, A., Aguor, E. N. E., et al. (2013). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Increase ATP Levels, Decrease Oxidative Stress and Activate PI3K/Akt Pathway to Enhance Myocardial Viability and Prevent Adverse Remodeling after Myocardial Ischemia/reperfusion Injury. Stem Cel Res. 10, 301–312. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2013.01.002
Bliss, S. A., Sinha, G., Sandiford, O. A., Williams, L. M., Engelberth, D. J., Guiro, K., et al. (2016). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Stimulate Cycling Quiescence and Early Breast Cancer Dormancy in Bone Marrow. Cancer Res. 76, 5832–5844. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1092
Chen, C. C., Liu, L., Ma, F., Wong, C. W., Guo, X. E., Chacko, J. V., et al. (2016). Elucidation of Exosome Migration across the Blood-Brain Barrier Model In Vitro. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 9, 509–529. doi:10.1007/s12195-016-0458-3
Chen, K.-H., Chen, C.-H., Wallace, C. G., Yuen, C.-M., Kao, G.-S., Chen, Y.-L., et al. (2016). Intravenous Administration of Xenogenic Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSC) and ADMSC-Derived Exosomes Markedly Reduced Brain Infarct Volume and Preserved Neurological Function in Rat after Acute Ischemic Stroke. Oncotarget 7, 74537–74556. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.12902
Chen, L., Lu, F.-b., Chen, D.-z., Wu, J.-l., Hu, E.-d., Xu, L.-m., et al. (2018). BMSCs-derived miR-223-Containing Exosomes Contribute to Liver protection in Experimental Autoimmune Hepatitis. Mol. Immunol. 93, 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2017.11.008
Chen, T. S., Arslan, F., Yin, Y., Tan, S. S., Lai, R. C., Choo, A. B. H., et al. (2011). Enabling a Robust Scalable Manufacturing Process for Therapeutic Exosomes through Oncogenic Immortalization of Human ESC-Derived MSCs. J. Transl Med. 9, 47. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-9-47
Cheruvanky, A., Zhou, H., Pisitkun, T., Kopp, J. B., Knepper, M. A., Yuen, P. S. T., et al. (2007). Rapid Isolation of Urinary Exosomal Biomarkers Using a Nanomembrane Ultrafiltration Concentrator. Am. J. Physiology-Renal Physiol. 292, F1657–F1661. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00434.2006
Ciravolo, V., Huber, V., Ghedini, G. C., Venturelli, E., Bianchi, F., Campiglio, M., et al. (2012). Potential Role of HER2-Overexpressing Exosomes in Countering Trastuzumab-Based Therapy. J. Cel. Physiol. 227, 658–667. doi:10.1002/jcp.22773
Cui, X., He, Z., Liang, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, H., and Zhang, J. (2017). Exosomes from Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Protect the Myocardium against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury through Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 70, 225–231. doi:10.1097/FJC.0000000000000507
Fang, L., Shi, X. F., Sun, H. Y., Li, Y. X., Xiao, F. J., Wang, H., et al. (2018). Effects of Exosomes Derived from miR-486 Gene Modified Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Biological Characteristics of Rat Cardiomyocytes. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 26, 1531–1537. doi:10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2018.05.045
Fang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., and Cao, K. (2019). Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes: a Novel Pathway for Tissues Repair. Cell Tissue Bank 20, 153–161. doi:10.1007/s10561-019-09761-y
Frese, L., Dijkman, P. E., and Hoerstrup, S. P. (2016). Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine. Transfus. Med. Hemother 43, 268–274. doi:10.1159/000448180
Fuhrmann, G., Serio, A., Mazo, M., Nair, R., and Stevens, M. M. (2015). Active Loading into Extracellular Vesicles Significantly Improves the Cellular Uptake and Photodynamic Effect of Porphyrins. J. Controlled Release 205, 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.029
Gatti, S., Bruno, S., Deregibus, M. C., Sordi, A., Cantaluppi, V., Tetta, C., et al. (2011). Microvesicles Derived from Human Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells Protect against Ischaemia-Reperfusion-Induced Acute and Chronic Kidney Injury. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 1474–1483. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr015
Gu, J., Qian, H., Shen, L., Zhang, X., Zhu, W., Huang, L., et al. (2012). Gastric Cancer Exosomes Trigger Differentiation of Umbilical Cord Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts through TGF-β/Smad Pathway. PLoS One 7, e52465. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052465
Haney, M. J., Klyachko, N. L., Zhao, Y., Gupta, R., Plotnikova, E. G., He, Z., et al. (2021). Corrigendum to "Exosomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles for Parkinson's Disease Therapy" [Journal of Controlled Release 207, (2015) 18-30]. J. Control. Release 339, 232–234. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.09.027
Haney, M. J., Klyachko, N. L., Zhao, Y., Gupta, R., Plotnikova, E. G., He, Z., et al. (2015). Exosomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles for Parkinson's Disease Therapy. J. Controlled Release 207, 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.033
Harding, C., and Stahl, P. (1983). Transferrin Recycling in Reticulocytes: pH and Iron Are Important Determinants of Ligand Binding and Processing. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 113, 650–658. doi:10.1016/0006-291x(83)91776-x
He, G. H., Zhang, W., Ma, Y. X., Yang, J., Chen, L., Song, J., et al. (2018). Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Blue Light Stimulation in Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cells and Retinal Laser Injury by VEGF-dependent Mechanism. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 11, 559–566. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.04.04
Hendrix, A., Westbroek, W., Bracke, M., and De Wever, O. (2010). An Ex(o)citing Machinery for Invasive Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 70, 9533–9537. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3248
Ichim, T. E., Zhong, Z., Kaushal, S., Zheng, X., Ren, X., Hao, X., et al. (2008). Exosomes as a Tumor Immune Escape Mechanism: Possible Therapeutic Implications. J. Transl Med. 6, 37. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-6-37
Jackson, W. M., Alexander, P. G., Bulken-Hoover, J. D., Vogler, J. A., Ji, Y., McKay, P., et al. (2013). Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells Derived from Traumatized Muscle Enhance Neurite Growth. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 7, 443–451. doi:10.1002/term.539
Jeppesen, D. K., Fenix, A. M., Franklin, J. L., Higginbotham, J. N., Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, L. J., et al. (2019). Reassessment of Exosome Composition. Cell 177, 428–445. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029
Jia, H., Liu, W., Zhang, B., Wang, J., Wu, P., Tandra, N., et al. (2018). HucMSC Exosomes-Delivered 14-3-3ζ Enhanced Autophagy via Modulation of ATG16L in Preventing Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Am. J. Transl Res. 10, 101–113.
Jiang, W., Tan, Y., Cai, M., Zhao, T., Mao, F., Zhang, X., et al. (2018). Human Umbilical Cord MSC-Derived Exosomes Suppress the Development of CCl4-Induced Liver Injury through Antioxidant Effect. Stem Cell Int. 2018, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2018/6079642
Kalimuthu, S., Gangadaran, P., Rajendran, R. L., Zhu, L., Oh, J. M., Lee, H. W., et al. (2018). A New Approach for Loading Anticancer Drugs into Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosome Mimetics for Cancer Therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 1116. doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01116
Kalluri, R. (2016). The Biology and Function of Exosomes in Cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 1208–1215. doi:10.1172/JCI81135
Kim, M. S., Haney, M. J., Zhao, Y., Mahajan, V., Deygen, I., Klyachko, N. L., et al. (2016). Development of Exosome-Encapsulated Paclitaxel to Overcome MDR in Cancer Cells. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biol. Med. 12, 655–664. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2015.10.012
Kong, L.-y., Liang, M.-y., Liu, J.-p., Lai, P., Ye, J.-s., Zhang, Z.-x., et al. (2020). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Rescue Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation-Induced Injury in Endothelial Cells. Curr. Neurovascular Res. 17, 155–163. doi:10.2174/1567202617666200214103950
Kooijmans, S. A. A., Stremersch, S., Braeckmans, K., de Smedt, S. C., Hendrix, A., Wood, M. J. A., et al. (2013). Electroporation-induced siRNA Precipitation Obscures the Efficiency of siRNA Loading into Extracellular Vesicles. J. Controlled Release 172, 229–238. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.014
Lai, R. C., Arslan, F., Lee, M. M., Sze, N. S. K., Choo, A., Chen, T. S., et al. (2010). Exosome Secreted by MSC Reduces Myocardial Ischemia/reperfusion Injury. Stem Cel Res. 4, 214–222. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2009.12.003
Lai, R. C., Yeo, R. W. Y., Tan, K. H., and Lim, S. K. (2013). Exosomes for Drug Delivery - a Novel Application for the Mesenchymal Stem Cell. Biotechnol. Adv. 31, 543–551. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.08.008
Lamichhane, T. N., Jeyaram, A., Patel, D. B., Parajuli, B., Livingston, N. K., Arumugasaamy, N., et al. (2016). Oncogene Knockdown via Active Loading of Small RNAs into Extracellular Vesicles by Sonication. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 9, 315–324. doi:10.1007/s12195-016-0457-4
Latifkar, A., Hur, Y. H., Sanchez, J. C., Cerione, R. A., and Antonyak, M. A. (2019). New Insights into Extracellular Vesicle Biogenesis and Function. J. Cel Sci 132, 132. doi:10.1242/jcs.222406
Lee, J.-K., Park, S.-R., Jung, B.-K., Jeon, Y.-K., Lee, Y.-S., Kim, M.-K., et al. (2013). Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Suppress Angiogenesis by Down-Regulating VEGF Expression in Breast Cancer Cells. PLoS One 8, e84256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084256
Lee, K., Shao, H., Weissleder, R., and Lee, H. (2015). Acoustic Purification of Extracellular Microvesicles. ACS Nano 9, 2321–2327. doi:10.1021/nn506538f
Li, C.-y., Wu, X.-y., Tong, J.-b., Yang, X.-x., Zhao, J.-l., Zheng, Q.-f., et al. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue under Xeno-free Conditions for Cell Therapy. Stem Cel Res Ther 6, 55. doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0066-5
Li, H., Liu, D., Li, C., Zhou, S., Tian, D., Xiao, D., et al. (2017). Exosomes Secreted from Mutant-HIF-1α-Modified Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuate Early Steroid-Induced Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head in Rabbit. Cell Biol Int 41, 1379–1390. doi:10.1002/cbin.10869
Li, P., Kaslan, M., Lee, S. H., Yao, J., and Gao, Z. (2017). Progress in Exosome Isolation Techniques. Theranostics 7, 789–804. doi:10.7150/thno.18133
Li, T., Yan, Y., Wang, B., Qian, H., Zhang, X., Shen, L., et al. (2013). Exosomes Derived from Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviate Liver Fibrosis. Stem Cell Dev. 22, 845–854. doi:10.1089/scd.2012.0395
Liga, A., Vliegenthart, A. D. B., Oosthuyzen, W., Dear, J. W., and Kersaudy-Kerhoas, M. (2015). Exosome Isolation: a Microfluidic Road-Map. Lab. Chip 15, 2388–2394. doi:10.1039/c5lc00240k
Lin, R., Wang, S., and Zhao, R. C. (2013). Exosomes from Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Migration through Wnt Signaling Pathway in a Breast Cancer Cell Model. Mol. Cel Biochem 383, 13–20. doi:10.1007/s11010-013-1746-z
Liu, L., Jin, X., Hu, C.-F., Li, R., Zhou, Z. e., and Shen, C.-X. (2017). Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Rescue Myocardial Ischaemia/Reperfusion Injury by Inducing Cardiomyocyte Autophagy via AMPK and Akt Pathways. Cell Physiol Biochem 43, 52–68. doi:10.1159/000480317
Lobb, R. J., Becker, M., Wen Wen, S., Wong, C. S. F., Wiegmans, A. P., Leimgruber, A., et al. (2015). Optimized Exosome Isolation Protocol for Cell Culture Supernatant and Human Plasma. J. Extracellular Vesicles 4, 27031. doi:10.3402/jev.v4.27031
Long, Q., Upadhya, D., Hattiangady, B., Kim, D.-K., An, S. Y., Shuai, B., et al. (2017). Intranasal MSC-Derived A1-Exosomes Ease Inflammation, and Prevent Abnormal Neurogenesis and Memory Dysfunction after Status Epilepticus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3536–E3545. doi:10.1073/pnas.1703920114
Lu, M., Xing, H., Xun, Z., Yang, T., Zhao, X., Cai, C., et al. (2018). Functionalized Extracellular Vesicles as Advanced Therapeutic Nanodelivery Systems. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 121, 34–46. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2018.05.001
Ma, T., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Meng, Q., Sun, J., Shao, L., et al. (2018). MicroRNA-132, Delivered by Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes, Promote Angiogenesis in Myocardial Infarction. Stem Cell Int. 2018, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2018/3290372
Marleau, A. M., Chen, C.-S., Joyce, J. A., and Tullis, R. H. (2012). Exosome Removal as a Therapeutic Adjuvant in Cancer. J. Transl Med. 10, 134. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-10-134
Mead, B., and Tomarev, S. (2017). Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes Promote Survival of Retinal Ganglion Cells through miRNA-dependent Mechanisms. STEM CELLS Translational Med. 6, 1273–1285. doi:10.1002/sctm.16-0428
Naseri, Z., Kazemi Oskuee, R., Jaafari, M. R., and Forouzandeh, M. (2018). Exosome-mediated Delivery of Functionally Active miRNA-142-3p Inhibitor Reduces Tumorigenicity of Breast Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo. Int. J. Nanomedicine 13, 7727–7747. doi:10.2147/IJN.S182384
Nojima, Y., Hirose, T., Tachibana, K., Tanaka, T., Shi, L., Doshen, J., et al. (1993). The 4F9 Antigen Is a Member of the Tetra Spans Transmembrane Protein Family and Functions as an Accessory Molecule in T Cell Activation and Adhesion. Cell Immunol. 152, 249–260. doi:10.1006/cimm.1993.1285
Ohno, S.-i., Takanashi, M., Sudo, K., Ueda, S., Ishikawa, A., Matsuyama, N., et al. (2013). Systemically Injected Exosomes Targeted to EGFR Deliver Antitumor microRNA to Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Ther. 21, 185–191. doi:10.1038/mt.2012.180
Pakravan, K., Babashah, S., Sadeghizadeh, M., Mowla, S. J., Mossahebi-Mohammadi, M., Ataei, F., et al. (2017). MicroRNA-100 Shuttled by Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Suppresses In Vitro Angiogenesis through Modulating the mTOR/HIF-1α/VEGF Signaling axis in Breast Cancer Cells. Cell Oncol. 40, 457–470. doi:10.1007/s13402-017-0335-7
Pan, B.-T., and Johnstone, R. M. (1983). Fate of the Transferrin Receptor during Maturation of Sheep Reticulocytes In Vitro: Selective Externalization of the Receptor. Cell 33, 967–978. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90040-5
Pan, B. T., Teng, K., Wu, C., Adam, M., and Johnstone, R. M. (1985). Electron Microscopic Evidence for Externalization of the Transferrin Receptor in Vesicular Form in Sheep Reticulocytes. J. Cel Biol 101, 942–948. doi:10.1083/jcb.101.3.942
Pascucci, L., Coccè, V., Bonomi, A., Ami, D., Ceccarelli, P., Ciusani, E., et al. (2014). Paclitaxel Is Incorporated by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Released in Exosomes that Inhibit In Vitro Tumor Growth: a New Approach for Drug Delivery. J. Controlled Release 192, 262–270. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.042
Praveen Kumar, L., Kandoi, S., Misra, R., Vijayalakshimi, S., Rajagopal, K., and Verma, R. S. (2019). The Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome: A New Paradigm towards Cell-free Therapeutic Mode in Regenerative Medicine. Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev. 46, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.04.002
Sato, Y. T., Umezaki, K., Sawada, S., Mukai, S.-a., Sasaki, Y., Harada, N., et al. (2016). Engineering Hybrid Exosomes by Membrane Fusion with Liposomes. Sci. Rep. 6, 21933. doi:10.1038/srep21933
Sercombe, L., Veerati, T., Moheimani, F., Wu, S. Y., Sood, A. K., and Hua, S. (2015). Advances and Challenges of Liposome Assisted Drug Delivery. Front. Pharmacol. 6, 286. doi:10.3389/fphar.2015.00286
Shamili, F. H., Bayegi, H. R., Salmasi, Z., Sadri, K., Mahmoudi, M., Kalantari, M., et al. (2018). Exosomes Derived from TRAIL-Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Effective Anti-tumor Activity in a Mouse Melanoma Model. Int. J. Pharmaceutics 549, 218–229. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.067
Su, Y., Zhang, T., Huang, T., and Gao, J. (2021). Current Advances and Challenges of Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Based Drug Delivery System and Their Improvements. Int. J. Pharmaceutics 600, 120477. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120477
Sun, D., Zhuang, X., Xiang, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, C., et al. (2010). A Novel Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System: the Anti-inflammatory Activity of Curcumin Is Enhanced when Encapsulated in Exosomes. Mol. Ther. 18, 1606–1614. doi:10.1038/mt.2010.105
Tang, Y., Zhou, Y., and Li, H.-J. (2021). Advances in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes: a Review. Stem Cel Res Ther 12, 71. doi:10.1186/s13287-021-02138-7
Tian, T., Zhang, H.-X., He, C.-P., Fan, S., Zhu, Y.-L., Qi, C., et al. (2018). Surface Functionalized Exosomes as Targeted Drug Delivery Vehicles for Cerebral Ischemia Therapy. Biomaterials 150, 137–149. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.012
Tian, Y., Ma, L., Gong, M., Su, G., Zhu, S., Zhang, W., et al. (2018). Protein Profiling and Sizing of Extracellular Vesicles from Colorectal Cancer Patients via Flow Cytometry. ACS Nano 12, 671–680. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b07782
Wahlgren, J., Karlson, T. D. L., Brisslert, M., Vaziri Sani, F., Telemo, E., Sunnerhagen, P., et al. (2012). Plasma Exosomes Can Deliver Exogenous Short Interfering RNA to Monocytes and Lymphocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e130. doi:10.1093/nar/gks463
Wang, M., Yuan, Q., and Xie, L. (2018). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Immunomodulation: Properties and Clinical Application. Stem Cell Int. 2018, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2018/3057624
Wang, X., Zhong, W., Bu, J., Li, Y., Li, R., Nie, R., et al. (2019). Exosomal Protein CD82 as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Precision Medicine for Breast Cancer. Mol. Carcinog 58, 674–685. doi:10.1002/mc.22960
Wang, Y., Zhao, R., Liu, D., Deng, W., Xu, G., Liu, W., et al. (2018). Exosomes Derived from miR-214-Enriched Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Regulate Oxidative Damage in Cardiac Stem Cells by Targeting CaMKII. Oxidative Med. Cell Longevity 2018, 1–21. doi:10.1155/2018/4971261
Weber, A., Wehmeyer, J. C., Schmidt, V., Lichtenberg, A., and Akhyari, P. (2019). Rapid Fluorescence-Based Characterization of Single Extracellular Vesicles in Human Blood with Nanoparticle-Tracking Analysis. J. Vis. Exp. (143), e58731. doi:10.3791/58731
Xiao, C., Wang, K., Xu, Y., Hu, H., Zhang, N., Wang, Y., et al. (2018). Transplanted Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduce Autophagic Flux in Infarcted Hearts via the Exosomal Transfer of miR-125b. Circ. Res. 123, 564–578. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312758
Xin, H., Li, Y., Cui, Y., Yang, J. J., Zhang, Z. G., and Chopp, M. (2013). Systemic Administration of Exosomes Released from Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Promote Functional Recovery and Neurovascular Plasticity after Stroke in Rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 33, 1711–1715. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.152
Xu, Y., Nakane, N., and Maurer-Spurej, E. (2011). Novel Test for Microparticles in Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet Concentrates Using Dynamic Light Scattering. Transfusion 51, 363–370. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02819.x
Yamaguchi, T., Izumi, Y., Nakamura, Y., Yamazaki, T., Shiota, M., Sano, S., et al. (2015). Repeated Remote Ischemic Conditioning Attenuates Left Ventricular Remodeling via Exosome-Mediated Intercellular Communication on Chronic Heart Failure after Myocardial Infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 178, 239–246. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.144
Yeo, R. W. Y., Lai, R. C., Zhang, B., Tan, S. S., Yin, Y., Teh, B. J., et al. (2013). Mesenchymal Stem Cell: an Efficient Mass Producer of Exosomes for Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 336–341. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.001
Yin, J., Yan, X., Yao, X., Zhang, Y., Shan, Y., Mao, N., et al. (2012). Secretion of Annexin A3 from Ovarian Cancer Cells and its Association with Platinum Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients. J. Cel Mol Med 16, 337–348. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01316.x
Yu, B., Zhang, X., and Li, X. (2014). Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 4142–4157. doi:10.3390/ijms15034142
Yu, D. d., Wu, Y., Shen, H. y., Lv, M. m., Chen, W. x., Zhang, X. h., et al. (2015). Exosomes in Development, Metastasis and Drug Resistance of Breast Cancer. Cancer Sci. 106, 959–964. doi:10.1111/cas.12715
Zeringer, E., Barta, T., Li, M., and Vlassov, A. V. (2015). Strategies for Isolation of Exosomes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2015, pdb.top074476–23. doi:10.1101/pdb.top074476
Zhang, S., Chu, W. C., Lai, R. C., Lim, S. K., Hui, J. H. P., and Toh, W. S. (2016). Exosomes Derived from Human Embryonic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Osteochondral Regeneration. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 24, 2135–2140. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.022
Zhang, Z., Yang, J., Yan, W., Li, Y., Shen, Z., and Asahara, T. (2016). Pretreatment of Cardiac Stem Cells with Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Myocardial Repair. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 5, e002856. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002856
Zhou, J., Zhao, W.-Y., Ma, X., Ju, R.-J., Li, X.-Y., Li, N., et al. (2013). The Anticancer Efficacy of Paclitaxel Liposomes Modified with Mitochondrial Targeting Conjugate in Resistant Lung Cancer. Biomaterials 34, 3626–3638. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.078
Zhou, Y., Peng, Z., Seven, E. S., and Leblanc, R. M. (2018). Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier with Nanoparticles. J. Controlled Release 270, 290–303. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.12.015
Zhou, Y., Xu, H., Xu, W., Wang, B., Wu, H., Tao, Y., et al. (2013). Exosomes Released by Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Protect against Cisplatin-Induced Renal Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis In Vivo and In Vitro. Stem Cel Res Ther 4, 34. doi:10.1186/scrt194
Zhu, J., Lu, K., Zhang, N., Zhao, Y., Ma, Q., Shen, J., et al. (2018). Myocardial Reparative Functions of Exosomes from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Are Enhanced by Hypoxia Treatment of the Cells via Transferring microRNA-210 in an nSMase2-dependent Way. Artif. Cell Nanomedicine, Biotechnol. 46, 1–12. doi:10.1080/21691401.2017.1388249
Keywords: exosomes, mesenchymal stem cells, drug delivery vehicle, tumor, nanocarrier (nanoparticle)
Citation: Rao D, Huang D, Sang C, Zhong T, Zhang Z and Tang Z (2022) Advances in Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:797359. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.797359
Received: 25 October 2021; Accepted: 14 December 2021;
Published: 04 February 2022.
Edited by:
Wolfgang Holnthoner, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AustriaReviewed by:
Roberta Tasso, University of Genoa, ItalyAleksandra Leszczynska, University of California, San Diego, United States
Copyright © 2022 Rao, Huang, Sang, Zhong, Zhang and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tianyu Zhong, emhvbmd0aWFueXVAZ21haWwuY29t; Zuxiong Zhang, emhhbmd6eDA2MTVAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Zhixian Tang, dHpoaXhpYW4yMDIwQGdtdS5lZHUuY24=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship