Qiong Xu
Qiongfang Cha1
Jiantao Shi- 1Department of Respiratory Disease, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
Backgrounds: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Current treatment strategies primarily involve surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, determined by TNM stages, histologic types, and genetic profiles. Plenty of studies have been trying to identify robust prognostic gene expression signatures. Even for high performance signatures, they usually have few shared genes. This is not totally unexpected, since a prognostic signature is associated with patient survival and may contain no upstream regulators. Identification of master regulators driving disease progression is a vital step to understand underlying molecular mechanisms and develop new treatments.
Methods: In this study, we have utilized a robust workflow to identify potential master regulators that drive poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. This workflow takes gene expression signatures that are associated with poor survival of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR-TKI resistance, and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively, and identifies recurrent master regulators from seven public gene expression datasets by a regulatory network-based approach.
Results: We have found that majority of the master regulators driving poor prognosis in early stage LUAD are cell-cycle related according to Gene Ontology annotation. However, they were demonstrated experimentally to promote a spectrum of processes such as tumor cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. Master regulators predicted from EGFR-TKI resistance signature and the EMT pathway signature are largely shared, which suggests that EMT pathway functions as a hub and interact with other pathways such as hypoxia, angiogenesis, TNF-α signaling, inflammation, TNF-β signaling, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways. Master regulators that repress immunotherapy are enriched with MYC targets, E2F targets, oxidative phosphorylation, and mTOR signaling.
Conclusion: Our study uncovered possible mechanisms underlying recurrence, resistance to targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. The predicted master regulators may serve as potential therapeutic targets in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Introduction
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and over 2.21 million new cases was reported in 2020 (Ferlay et al., 2021). Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of all lung cancer cases (Duma et al., 2019). Histologically, NSCLC is further divided into adenocarcinoma (∼40%), squamous cell carcinoma (∼40%), and large cell carcinoma (∼20%). Current treatment strategies for NSCLC primarily involve surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, determined by TNM stages, histologic types, and genetic profiles. Surgical resection is the treatment of first choice for early-stage (stage I-II) NSCLC patients. Patients with stage I or II lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have 60–70% 5-year survival after surgical resection (Booth et al., 2010). However, more than half of these patients eventually die of recurrences. Even for stage I patients, 11%–48% will relapse in 5 years (Vansteenkiste et al., 2014). With the advent of genomic medicine, EGFR-positive lung cancer was found to represent about 13–47% of LUAD patients (Zhou and Christiani, 2011). For inoperable NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) was received as the first-line therapy, but most patients eventually become resistant within 8–14 months (Yu et al., 2013). For inoperable NSCLC without EGFR mutation, PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has become the first-line therapy. Immunohistochemistry of PD-L1 protein has emerged as a biomarker for ICI treatment. However, patients with low PD-L1 expressing even undetectable PD-L1 expressing could also benefit from ICI treatment; and patients with high PD-L1 expressing could fail to respond to ICI treatment (Ilie et al., 2016). In summary, although targeted therapy and particularly immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment landscape of NSCLC, it remains the leading cause of cancer death. Understanding the prognostic factors and underlying molecular mechanisms of NSCLC are vital steps towards new treatments.
Prognostic factors in NSCLC include the stage of diagnosis, histology, smoking status, and gene expression profiles. Plenty of studies have been trying to identify robust prognostic gene expression signatures. However, half of the reported NSCLC prognostic signatures behave just like random gene sets (Tang et al., 2017). The lack of consistent prognostic biomarkers hinders its clinical application. Even for high-performance signatures, they usually have few shared genes. For example, expression signature of six genes including UBE2C, TPX2, MCM2, MCM6, FEN1, and SFN were associated with prognosis in stage I NSCLC patients (Kadara et al., 2009), but in another research, a totally different 15-gene signature was reported as prognostic markers in early-stage NSCLC patients (Zhu et al., 2010). Since a prognostic signature is associated with patient survival and may contain no upstream regulators, which reveal the mechanism of disease progression and may serve as novel therapeutic targets to improve patient survival (Manjang et al., 2021). Regarding EGFR-TKI resistance, the mechanism is relatively well understood (Westover et al., 2018). Genetic alterations account for 90% of the EGFR-TKI resistant cases including EGFR T790M mutation, KRAS mutation, MET amplification, and HER2 amplification (Westover et al., 2018). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Weng et al., 2019), hypoxia (Lu et al., 2018), and small cell transforming (Leonetti et al., 2021) were known to be linked to acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. Mining key regulators that mediate EGFR-TKI resistance meet the need for new therapeutic strategies. Cancer immunotherapy brings hope to eventually cure cancer by artificial stimulation of the immune system. ICI represents one of the most prominent treatment strategies. Responses to ICI therapy are not just dependent on PD-L1 protein expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB) (Chan et al., 2019), but also affected by T cell infiltration (Soares et al., 2015), T cell dysfunction, and neoantigen load (Lauss et al., 2017). Further identification of key regulators of ICI responses is essential to develop new targets that enhance efficacy.
In this study, we have built a customized workflow to identify potential master regulators that drive poor prognosis of patients with LUAD, based on well-established network inference package ARACNe (Lachmann et al., 2016) and regulator discovery method VIPER (Alvarez et al., 2016). This workflow takes gene expression signatures that are associated with poor survival of early-stage LUAD, EGFR-TKI resistance, and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively, and identifies potential master regulators by a regulatory network-based approach. Our study uncovered possible mechanisms underlying recurrence, resistance to EGFR-TKI and ICI, and identified promising therapeutic targets in patients with LUAD.
Materials and Methods
Prognostic Signatures for Lung Adenocarcinoma
To evaluate the degree of overlap among published LUAD prognostic gene signatures, we have tested 29 signatures curated in a previous study (Tang et al., 2017) (Supplementary Table S1). EMT signature was defined as the overlaps of differentially expressed genes in two datasets. T cell abundance is estimated by the mean expression of CD8A, CD8B, GZMA, and GZMB (Rooney et al., 2015). The signature of T cell dysfunction is taken from a published study (Jiang et al., 2018). GSE123066 and GSE121634, which were available from NCBI GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), were used to define a TKI resistant signature. In dataset GSE123066, EGFR TKI resistant samples were compared to parental cell lines, and differentially expressed genes were identified using limma (version 3.48.1) with default parameters (Ritchie et al., 2015). For dataset GSE121634, differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 (version 1.32.0) (Love et al., 2014) with default parameters. The EGFR TKI signature was defined as the genes that were significantly upregulated in both datasets (FDR < 5%).
Gene Expression Datasets
All gene expression datasets used in this study were publicly available. Seven lung adenocarcinoma datasets, including GSE14814 (Zhu et al., 2010), GSE37745 (Botling et al., 2013), GSE50081 (Der et al., 2014), GSE68465 (Director’s Challenge Consortium for the Molecular Classification of Lung Adenocarcinomo et al., 2008), GSE19188 (Hou et al., 2010), GSE31210 (Yamauchi et al., 2012), and TCGA-LUAD (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2014) were used to construct transcriptional regulatory networks (Supplementary Table S2). Except for TCGA-LUAD, samples on all other datasets were profiled with Affymetrix gene expression arrays and pre-processed with Bioconductor Affy package using the default parameters.
Identification of Master Regulators
For each LUAD dataset with a reasonablely large sample size (n > 100), the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) was constructed using ARACNe-AP (Lachmann et al., 2016) with default parameters (MI p-value = 10–8, 100 bootstraps). The TRN for TCGA-LUAD was extracted from the Bioconductor data package aracne. networks (version 1.18.0). For a given prognostic signature, patient samples were stratified by the enrichment of this signature as quantified by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The top 50 samples with the highest enrichment scores were compared to those with the lowest by VIPER (version 1.26.0) (Alvarez et al., 2016) to identify potential master regulators with a p-value cutoff of 0.01. With this workflow, each signature was tested on seven independent LUAD datasets.
Evaluation of the Workflow
For a robust workflow, statistically equivalent signatures result in highly concordant master regulators. To evaluate the robustness of the workflow, we have compared two well-established LUAD prognostic signatures. One is the top-scoring signature (Xie signature) (Xie et al., 2011) described in a review study (Tang et al., 2017), the other one is embryonic stem cell (ESC) signature (Ben-Porath et al., 2008). Jacard index was used to measure similarities between master regulators identified from two signatures. To capture dynamic ranges, 80% of genes were sampled without replacement from two signatures, respectively, the resulting master regulators were then compared using Jacard index. This procedure was repeated 100 times, and the median Jacard index was reported. Similarly, random signatures sampled from the background were compared 100 times.
Pathway and Survival Analysis
Hypergeometric test was used to evaluate the enrichment of pathways in a list of genes. Hallmark and Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets curated by MSigDB (version 5.0) (Subramanian et al., 2005; Liberzon et al., 2011; Liberzon et al., 2015) were used in this study. Given two groups of samples, the survival difference was compared with the Kaplan-Meier method, implemented in R package survival (version 3.2).
Code and Data Availability
The code and data are publicly available at Github (https://github.com/JiantaoShi/LungMR).
Results
A Robust Workflow to Identify Master Regulators
Numerous studies have been trying to identify prognostic signatures for LUAD. Though a significant proportion of them perform better than random gene sets, few genes are shared. We have evaluated 29 lung adenocarcinoma signatures curated in a previous study (Supplementary Table S1) (Tang et al., 2017) and found only two pairs of signatures shared more than 10% of their genes, as measured by Jaccard index (Figure 1). This is not totally unexpected, since genes are correlated, and different studies may identify combinations of different genes. We have built a workflow to identify master regulators that potentially drive poor survival in patients with LUAD (Section 2, Supplementary Figure S1). To demonstrate the effectiveness of this method, we have tested the best-scoring signature (Xie signature) (Xie et al., 2011), benchmarked in a previous review study (Tang et al., 2017). Since it is associated with overall survival, we have compared it to the embryonic stem cell (ESC) signature which is known to be associated with poor survival in multiple cancer types including LUAD (Ben-Porath et al., 2008). The master regulators predicted with these two signatures are highly concordant, as demonstrated by the two-dimensional histogram (Figure 2A). For instance, seven master regulators, including BUB1B, ECT2, MCM6, RACGAP1, TOP2A, WDR12, and ZWINT, were identified by both signatures across all seven datasets tested. In contrast, master regulators predicted from two random signatures have little overlap. None of the genes that were identified in four or more datasets were shared (Figure 2B). To further evaluate the robustness of this workflow, we compared the overlap between results identified from subsampled Xie signature and ESC signature (Section 2). For LUAD signatures, the Jacard index reaches 0.7297 and 0.3988 for activated and repressed master regulators, respectively; in contrast, a value of 0 was observed for random signatures (Figure 3C).
FIGURE 1. Pairwise comparison of published prognostic gene signatures for LUAD. All signatures were taken from a review study (Tang et al., 2017) and the original references were listed in Supplementary Table S1. Jaccard index was used to quantify the level of overlap between two signatures and shown as a heatmap (A). The number of genes in each signature was shown as a bar plot (B).
FIGURE 2. A workflow to identify master regulators driving prognosis in patients with LUAD. (A) Comparison of master regulators predicted with two well-established LUAD signatures, one was the best-scoring signature benchmarked in a previous review study (Xie signature) (Xie et al., 2011), the other is embryonic stem cells signature (ESC) (Ben-Porath et al., 2008). Both signatures were tested across seven LUAD gene expression datasets and master regulators were identified with a p-value cutoff of 0.01 (Section 2). The results were summarized to show how many times a master regulator was identified and represented as a 2D histogram. (B) Comparison of master regulators predicted with random signatures. (C) Evaluation of robustness. The Jacard index shows the similarity of master regulators predicted from subsampling of LUAD signatures (100 times), as well as that from random background.
FIGURE 3. Master regulators driving prognosis in early-stage LUAD. (A) A Venn diagram of three prognostic signatures for early-stage LUAD. Signature names as well as the number of genes in each signature were shown. (B) The Venn diagram of activated and repressed master regulators, predicted from three prognostic signatures for early-stage LUAD. (C) The lists of shared master regulators that are predicted from all three signatures. (D) Expression of shared master regulators is associated with poor survival in patients with stage I LUAD in dataset GSE14814. Hazard ratio (HR) and log-rank test p-value are also shown.
Master Regulators Driving Poor Prognosis in Patients With Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma
Using the workflow described above, we first explored the master regulators driving relapses in lung cancer patients in early stages (stage I/II). We have chosen three gene expression signatures from the top five best-scoring ones according to a previous review study (Tang et al., 2017). They are denoted as Lu et al. (2006), Chen et al. (2011), and Tomida et al. (2004). Interestingly, though these three gene signatures have no shared genes (Figure 3A), the predicted master regulators were largely shared (Figure 3B). For instance, 46 activated master regulators were identified with signature Tomida et al. (2004), and all of them were included in results from signature Chen2. Similarly, 41 out of 43 activated master regulators identified from signature Lu were also identified by signature Chen2. When overlapping results from all three signatures, 32 activated and 16 repressed master regulators were identified (Figure 3C). Many of them have been reported to be associated with the survival of patients with LUAD. FOXM1 was demonstrated to be necessary and sufficient to cause the progression of lung adenomas into invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas in vivo by activating AGR2 (Milewski et al., 2017). It was also shown to promote LUAD invasion and metastasis by upregulating SNAIL (Wei et al., 2015). EIF4EBP1 (Seki et al., 2010) and HMGA1 (Qiao et al., 2021) were shown to be potential markers for predicting recurrence and poor prognosis in stage I LUAD. The activated master regulators are predominantly enriched with GO term Cell Cycle (p-value < 10–16, Supplementary Table S3), and they generally fall into three functional categories based on previous studies: cell proliferation, cell metastasis, and drug resistance. Cell cycle-related genes such as AURKA, AURKB, GTSE1, CCNA2, and MYBL2 were shown to promote tumor progression of LUAD (Musa et al., 2017; Ruan et al., 2017; Galetta and Cortes-Dericks, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). Some of the predicted master regulators, including PTTG1 (Li et al., 2013), RFC4 (Liu et al., 2021), TRIP13 (Zhang et al., 2019), BUB1B (Chen et al., 2015), TTK (Tsai et al., 2020), and ZWINT (Peng et al., 2019) are capable of promoting migration, invasion, and metastasis of lung cancer cells. CHEK1 (Bartucci et al., 2012), FEN1 (He et al., 2017), and UBE2C (Wu et al., 2019) were shown to confer chemotherapy resistance in NSCLC. Chemotherapeutic resistance is usually associated with overactive HR repair mechanisms, which could be driven by overexpression of RAD51 (Ward et al., 2015). Furthermore, some of the predicted master regulators have been tested as potential drug targets. For example, EZH2 is activated in many cancer types including LUAD and may serve as an opportunity for targeted therapy in lung cancer (Zhang et al., 2016). The expression of predicted master regulators is significantly associated with poor survival in early-stage LUAD in dataset GSE14814 (p = 0.0191, Hazard ratio = 2.38) (Figure 3D).
Master Regulators Driving EGFR-TKI Resistance
We performed differential gene expression between EGFR-TKI resistant and parental EGFR mutant cell lines using two public datasets GSE123066 (Becker et al., 2019) and GSE121634 (Nilsson et al., 2020), and defined a new signature as the shared genes (Figure 4A). This 796-gene signature is significantly enriched with EMT signaling pathway (hypergeometric test p-value < 10–16) (Figure 4B), which is an extensively validated pathway involved in EGFR-TKI resistance. The master regulators identified with this signature and the EMT pathway signature were largely shared, as indicated by the 2D histogram (Figure 4C). AXL and CAVIN1 were identified by both signatures across all seven datasets tested. AXL is one of the best-known genes involved in TKI resistance (Zhang et al., 2012) and it was demonstrated to confers intrinsic resistance to Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI that was approved for the treatment of EGFR-T790M-positive NSCLC (Taniguchi et al., 2019). At the pathway level, besides EMT signaling pathway, several known pathways have been recovered (FDR < 5%) (Figure 4D). For instance, hypoxia was shown to promote resistance to EGFR inhibition in NSCLC cells via the histone demethylases (Lu et al., 2018). However, the master regulators that mediate the effect of hypoxia in lung cancer remain unelucidated. Our prediction was validated by studies of these master regulators in other biological systems. AKAP12 (Finger et al., 2015), CTGF (Higgins et al., 2004), ETS1 (Qiao et al., 2015), PDGFB (Schito et al., 2012), PIM1 (Casillas et al., 2018), TGFB3 (Schaffer et al., 2003), TGM2 (Jin et al., 2012), and WISP2 (Fuady et al., 2014) were shown to be essential to mediate hypoxia effect in various cell systems (Figure 4E). Angiogenesis pathway was also enriched in top predicted master regulators and it was known to be an important prognostic factor and therapeutic target in LUAD. Targeting VEGFR2, the VEGFA receptor that is essential for endothelial cell functions associated with angiogenesis, enhances the anti-tumor activity of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC with EGFR-TKI resistance (Li et al., 2017). Angiogenesis-related master regulators identified in this study such as CCND2, FSTL1, and MSX1 represent new options to module angiogenesis in LUAD. Consistent with previous studies, our results show that master regulators in TNF-α signaling pathway mediate resistance to EGFR inhibition in LUAD (Gong et al., 2018). TGF-β signal pathway is also identified as a mechanism of TKI resistance, which has been supported by several previous studies (Serizawa et al., 2013). Cancer cells can increase their production of active TGF-β during the development of EGFR-TKI resistance, which triggers EMT and allow the cells to become invasive (Jakobsen et al., 2016). Interestingly, a group of inflammation master regulators was predicted to drive EGFR-TKI resistance, including AXL which is one of the well-known genes involved in TKI resistance, as described above (Zhang et al., 2012). ITGA5 was known to promote cancer cell migration and invasion through the FAK/STAT3/AKT signaling pathway in TKI-resistant NSCLC (Yang et al., 2021). CCL2, a potent chemokine for macrophages and a variety of other immune cells, has been reported to play an indispensable role in the process of TKI resistance (Xiao et al., 2020). Besides, studies have shown that Notch signaling leads to acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI and Notch inhibition overcomes resistance in LUAD (Bousquet Mur et al., 2020). And there is crosstalk between Notch and Wnt signaling pathways in EGFR mutant NSCLC (Arasada et al., 2018).
FIGURE 4. Master regulators driving EGFR-TKI resistance. (A) A new EGR-TKI resistance signature. EGFR-TKI resistant samples were compared to parental cell lines and the signature was defined as the genes that were significantly upregulated in two independent datasets. (B) Enrichment of EMT pathway in EGFR-TKI resistance signature. (C) Comparison of master regulators predicted with EGFR-TKI signature and EMT pathway signature. Both signatures were tested across seven LUAD gene expression datasets and master regulators were identified with a p-value cutoff of 0.01 (Section 2). The results were summarized to show how many times a master regulator was identified and represented as a 2D histogram. (D) Pathways enriched in top-ranking master regulators predicted using TKI resistance signature or EMT pathway signature. (E) Selected master regulators grouped by enriched pathways. To avoid redundancy, a gene in multiple pathways was only assigned to the one with higher significance.
Master Regulators Driving Response in Immunotherapy
Two signatures were used to identify master regulators promoting immunotherapy that is based on immune checkpoint blockade, one quantifying the abundance of tumor-infiltrating T cells (Rooney et al., 2015), and the other characterizing T cell dysfunction (Jiang et al., 2018). Activated master regulators are correlated with higher T cell abundance and enhanced T cell activity. Six activated master regulators have been predicted to regulate both signatures across six or more datasets (Figure 5A), including ARHGAP25, IL16, BTK, IKZF1, ITGAL, and STK10, most of which were reported to function in immune-related pathways. IL16 is a chemoattractant for CD4+ cells and a modulator of T cell activation (Mathy et al., 2000). BTK is known to be essential for BCR-mediated proliferation and survival. A recent study showed that BTK can promote T cell activation by phosphorylation of PLCγ1 upon TCR engagement (Xia et al., 2020). IKZF1 is a lymphocyte-specific transcription factor that controls a wide spectrum of immune cell development, especially CD4+ T cell subsets (Wu et al., 2006). Intriguingly, IKZF1 was demonstrated to enhance immune infiltrate recruitment in several cancer types including LUAD, and thus susceptibility to immunotherapy (Chen et al., 2018). ITGAL is a pan-leukocyte marker and is involved in a variety of immune phenomena including T cell-mediated killing. Though its function in cancer has not been reported, it was shown to play an essential role in cytotoxic T Cell accumulation and activation in adipose tissue (Jiang et al., 2014). At the pathway level, immune system and T cell activation pathways are significantly enriched in the top-ranking master regulators (Figures 5B,C).
FIGURE 5. Master regulators that are associated with enhanced responses in immune checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy. (A) Comparison of master regulators predicted from T cell infiltration and T cell dysfunction signatures. The same set of master regulators that were identified in at least six datasets were shown. (B) Pathways enriched in top-ranking master regulators. The top three most enriched pathways were shown. (C) Selected master regulators grouped by enriched pathways.
Master regulators that result in lower T cell abundance and T cell dysfunction are more interesting, since they could be repressed by inhibitors to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Seven master regulators, including COPS5, DDX1, GGCT, MSH2, TAF2, TFB2M, and ZNHIT3, were identified in at least six datasets with the signature of T cell dysfunction (Figure 6A). COPS5 is required for TNF-α-mediated PD-L1 stabilization in breast cancer cells and inhibition of COPS5 sensitized cancer cells to anti-CTLA4 therapy (Lim et al., 2016). MSH2 is a known DNA mismatch repair gene and mismatch repair deficiency is a predictor of immune response for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy (Zhao et al., 2019). At the pathway level, we found top-ranking master regulators were enriched with MYC targets, E2F targets, oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, and mTORC1 signaling (FDR < 5%) (Figure 6B). It has been shown that MYC amplified tumors are associated with suppressed immune cell infiltrates in neuroblastoma and melanoma models (Wu et al., 2021). CBX3 is a putative target of MYC (Figure 6C) and may serve as a new diagnostic biomarker and a potential target for immunotherapy in gastric cancer (Lin et al., 2020). E2F targets are essential regulators of the cell cycle which is a classical therapeutic target in cancer. ASF1A is one of E2F targets predicted to repress cancer immunity and was identified as a critical regulator of sensitivity to anti–PD-1 therapy in LUAD (Li et al., 2020). Furthermore, researchers found that pharmacological inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK6 boost tumor immunogenicity (Goel et al., 2017). The mTOR pathway regulates cancer cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis. Clinically, mTOR inhibitor only shows modest anticancer efficacy due to resistance and immunosuppressive properties (El Hage and Dormond, 2021), which suggests that mTOR inhibitors represent a therapeutic opportunity to promote the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy (Esfahani et al., 2019). Given the support from previous studies in other cancer systems, it is worth further testing the pathways and master regulators predicted by our workflow with comprehensive experiments.
FIGURE 6. Master regulators that are associated with poor responses in ICB-based immunotherapy. (A) Comparison of master regulators predicted from T cell infiltration and T cell dysfunction signatures. The master regulators predicted in at least six datasets with T cell dysfunction signature were shown. (B) Pathways enriched in top-ranking master regulators. (C) Selected master regulators grouped by enriched pathways.
Discussion
In this study, we have systemically identified master regulators driving prognosis in patients with LUAD, treated with surgical resection, EGFR-TKI, and ICB-based cancer immunotherapy. This network-based workflow is highly robust, and it identified concordant master regulators from prognostic signatures with no shared genes. This is an important and unique feature of this workflow, as signatures tend to be divergent but upstream regulators can be convergent. Furthermore, running this workflow requires only gene expression data and predefined signatures, which make it useful for a variety of biological systems.
With this workflow, we have found that the majority of the master regulator driving poor prognosis in early-stage LUAD are cell-cycle related according to Gene Ontology annotation. However, they were demonstrated experimentally to promote a spectrum of processes such as tumor cell proliferation (Musa et al., 2017; Ruan et al., 2017; Galetta and Cortes-Dericks, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021), invasion (Li et al., 2013), metastasis (Liu et al., 2021), and drug resistance (Bartucci et al., 2012; He et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2019). This analysis not only uncovered the mechanism of regulation, but also identified novel molecular targets for treating LUAD. For instance, RAD51 and SPAG5 were identified to be associated with poor survival in patients with early stage LUAD but their function in lung cancer has not been extensively characterized (Qiao et al., 2005; Huang and Li, 2020). Studies in other cancer types suggest they are promising targets to follow up. SPAG5 is a mitotic spindle protein, which promotes cancer cell proliferation and invasion by activating AKT/mTOR pathway in bladder and hepatocellular cancer (Liu et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). Knocking down SPAG5 increased the S-phase cell population and decreased the expression of c-MYC target genes, including the DNA repair proteins RAD51 and BRCA1/2 in triple-negative breast cancer (Li et al., 2019). In NSCLC, miR-1179 suppresses cancer cell growth and invasion by direct targeting SPAG5 (Song et al., 2018). Furthermore, SPAG5 was shown to confer resistance to cisplatin-induced apoptosis in bladder urothelial carcinoma cells (Liu et al., 2018). Taken together, SPAG5 represents one of the novel therapeutic targets that promote poor prognosis in LUAD.
Given the significance of targeted therapy in lung cancer, the mechanism of EGFR-TKI resistance was extensively characterized and mainly focused on EMT pathway (Westover et al., 2018; Weng et al., 2019). It is noted that master regulators predicted from EGFR-TKI resistance signature and EMT pathway signature are largely shared, which suggests that EMT pathway functions as a hub and interact with other pathways such as hypoxia, angiogenesis, TNF-α signaling, inflammation, TNF-β signaling, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways. Our integrative analysis not only uncovers key pathways that mediate EGFR-TIK resistance but also suggests new options to modulate these pathways to overcome resistance. Some master regulators have been characterized in NSCLC (Zhang et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2021), and some have been reported in other cancer types, which pave the way for successful validation in lung cancer. For instance, FOXC2 is an EMT regulator (Thiery et al., 2009) and promotes cell migration and invasion through EMT in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer (Hollier et al., 2013). It also confers chemoresistance in multiple cancer types, including nasopharyngeal carcinomas (Zhou et al., 2015), breast cancer (Cai et al., 2015), and lung cancer. It is a promising therapeutic target to overcome EMT-mediated EGFR-TKI resistance in LUAD.
With cancer immune signatures, we have identified master regulators potentially enhance or suppress ICB-based immunotherapy response in LUAD. ICB was designed to help the immune system recognize and attack cancer cells (Jiang et al., 2018). In concordant with this concept, master regulators that activate the immune system especially T cells are capable of enhancing immune response. Master regulators that repress immunotherapy are enriched with MYC targets, E2F targets, oxidative phosphorylation, and mTOR signaling. The emerging concept of metabolic modulation of immunity is opening a new window for cancer immunotherapy (Guerra et al., 2020). Our prediction suggests that oxidative phosphorylation is a metabolic target for lung cancer immunotherapy, which has been demonstrated in melanoma (Najjar et al., 2019). Several genes in these pathways were demonstrated to be involved in immunotherapy response, such as COPS5 (Lim et al., 2016), MSH2 (Zhao et al., 2019), CBX3 (Lin et al., 2020), ASF1A (Li et al., 2020) and HSP90A (Song et al., 2020). Some of the predicted master regulators are known to function in cancer cells, but their role in immunotherapy response is worth further exploring. For example, SRPK1, an enzyme that phosphorylates splicing factors rich in serine/arginine domains (SR proteins), is associated with poor survival in various cancers (Patel et al., 2019). In lung cancer, SRPK1 inhibition suppresses angiogenesis, metastasis, and the acquisition of a cancer stem cell phenotype (Wu et al., 2017; Wagner et al., 2019). SRPK1 is associated with lung cancer progression by activating the transcriptional activity of the beta-catenin/T-cell factor (TCF) complex (Liu et al., 2016). Our prediction suggests that SRPK1 represses immunotherapy response through the MYC pathway.
The workflow described in this study not only identified well-characterized master regulators, but also discovered novel ones that can be potentially tested as therapeutic targets in LUAD. We believe it can be used on other types of lung cancers such as lung squamous cell cancers and small cell lung cancer.
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. The code and data are publicly available at Github (https://github.com/JiantaoShi/LungMR).
Author Contributions
JS and XW conceived the study. QX performed data analysis. QC, BL, and HQ delivered suggestion on analytical strategy and discussion. All authors have read and approved manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Shanghai Pujiang Program (No. 20PJ1414700).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbinf.2022.813960/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure S1 | The workflow diagram. Regulons which were pre-computed from 7 LUAD gene expression datasets are ready to use. For a given prognostic signature, master regulators were identified with two analytical steps. Tools and methods used in this workflow were highlighted in green.
References
Alvarez, M. J., Shen, Y., Giorgi, F. M., Lachmann, A., Ding, B. B., Ye, B. H., et al. (2016). Functional Characterization of Somatic Mutations in Cancer Using Network-Based Inference of Protein Activity. Nat. Genet. 48, 838–847. doi:10.1038/ng.3593
Arasada, R. R., Shilo, K., Yamada, T., Zhang, J., Yano, S., Ghanem, R., et al. (2018). Notch3-dependent β-catenin Signaling Mediates EGFR TKI Drug Persistence in EGFR Mutant NSCLC. Nat. Commun. 9, 3198. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05626-2
Bartucci, M., Svensson, S., Romania, P., Dattilo, R., Patrizii, M., Signore, M., et al. (2012). Therapeutic Targeting of Chk1 in NSCLC Stem Cells during Chemotherapy. Cel. Death Differ. 19, 768–778. doi:10.1038/cdd.2011.170
Becker, J. H., Gao, Y., Soucheray, M., Pulido, I., Kikuchi, E., Rodríguez, M. L., et al. (2019). CXCR7 Reactivates ERK Signaling to Promote Resistance to EGFR Kinase Inhibitors in NSCLC. Cancer Res. 79, 4439–4452. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0024
Ben-Porath, I., Thomson, M. W., Carey, V. J., Ge, R., Bell, G. W., Regev, A., et al. (2008). An Embryonic Stem Cell-like Gene Expression Signature in Poorly Differentiated Aggressive Human Tumors. Nat. Genet. 40, 499–507. doi:10.1038/ng.127
Booth, C. M., Shepherd, F. A., Peng, Y., Darling, G. E., Li, G., Kong, W., et al. (2010). Adoption of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: a Population-Based Outcomes Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 3472–3478. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.1709
Botling, J., Edlund, K., Lohr, M., Hellwig, B., Holmberg, L., Lambe, M., et al. (2013). Biomarker Discovery in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Integrating Gene Expression Profiling, Meta-Analysis, and Tissue Microarray Validation. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 194–204. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1139
Bousquet Mur, E., Bernardo, S., Papon, L., Mancini, M., Fabbrizio, E., Goussard, M., et al. (2020). Notch Inhibition Overcomes Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Driven Lung Adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 612–624. doi:10.1172/JCI126896
Cai, J., Tian, A. X., Wang, Q. S., Kong, P. Z., Du, X., Li, X. Q., et al. (2015). FOXF2 Suppresses the FOXC2-Mediated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Multidrug Resistance of Basal-like Breast Cancer. Cancer Lett. 367, 129–137. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.001
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2014). Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Lung Adenocarcinoma. Nature 511, 543–550. doi:10.1038/nature13385
Casillas, A. L., Toth, R. K., Sainz, A. G., Singh, N., Desai, A. A., Kraft, A. S., et al. (2018). Hypoxia-Inducible PIM Kinase Expression Promotes Resistance to Antiangiogenic Agents. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 169–180. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1318
Chan, T. A., Yarchoan, M., Jaffee, E., Swanton, C., Quezada, S. A., Stenzinger, A., et al. (2019). Development of Tumor Mutation burden as an Immunotherapy Biomarker: Utility for the Oncology Clinic. Ann. Oncol. 30, 44–56. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy495
Chen, D. T., Hsu, Y. L., Fulp, W. J., Coppola, D., Haura, E. B., Yeatman, T. J., et al. (2011). Prognostic and Predictive Value of a Malignancy-Risk Gene Signature in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 103, 1859–1870. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr420
Chen, H., Lee, J., Kljavin, N. M., Haley, B., Daemen, A., Johnson, L., et al. (2015). Requirement for BUB1B/BUBR1 in Tumor Progression of Lung Adenocarcinoma. Genes Cancer 6, 106–118. doi:10.18632/genesandcancer.53
Chen, J. C., Perez-Lorenzo, R., Saenger, Y. M., Drake, C. G., and Christiano, A. M. (2018). IKZF1 Enhances Immune Infiltrate Recruitment in Solid Tumors and Susceptibility to Immunotherapy. Cel. Syst. 7, 92–e4. doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.05.020
Der, S. D., Sykes, J., Pintilie, M., Zhu, C. Q., Strumpf, D., Liu, N., et al. (2014). Validation of a Histology-independent Prognostic Gene Signature for Early-Stage, Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Including Stage IA Patients. J. Thorac. Oncol. 9, 59–64. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000042
Director's Challenge Consortium for the Molecular Classification of Lung Adenocarcinomo Shedden, K., Taylor, J. M., Enkemann, S. A., Tsao, M. S., Yeatman, T. J., Gerald, W. L., et al. (2008). Gene Expression-Based Survival Prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma: a Multi-Site, Blinded Validation Study. Nat. Med. 14, 822–827. doi:10.1038/nm.1790
Duma, N., Santana-Davila, R., and Molina, J. R. (2019). Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 94, 1623–1640. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.013
El Hage, A., and Dormond, O. (2021). Combining mTOR Inhibitors and T Cell-Based Immunotherapies in Cancer Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 13, 1359. doi:10.3390/cancers13061359
Esfahani, K., Al-Aubodah, T. A., Thebault, P., Lapointe, R., Hudson, M., Johnson, N. A., et al. (2019). Targeting the mTOR Pathway Uncouples the Efficacy and Toxicity of PD-1 Blockade in Renal Transplantation. Nat. Commun. 10, 4712. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12628-1
Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Parkin, D. M., Pineros, M., Znaor, A., et al. (2021). Cancer Statistics for the Year 2020: An Overview. Int. J. Cancer 149 (4), 778–789. doi:10.1002/ijc.33588
Finger, E. C., Castellini, L., Rankin, E. B., Vilalta, M., Krieg, A. J., Jiang, D., et al. (2015). Hypoxic Induction of AKAP12 Variant 2 Shifts PKA-Mediated Protein Phosphorylation to Enhance Migration and Metastasis of Melanoma Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 112, 4441–4446. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418164112
Fuady, J. H., Bordoli, M. R., Abreu-Rodríguez, I., Kristiansen, G., Hoogewijs, D., Stiehl, D. P., et al. (2014). Hypoxia-inducible Factor-Mediated Induction of WISP-2 Contributes to Attenuated Progression of Breast Cancer. Hypoxia (Auckl) 2, 23–33. doi:10.2147/HP.S54404
Galetta, D., and Cortes-Dericks, L. (2020). Promising Therapy in Lung Cancer: Spotlight on Aurora Kinases. Cancers (Basel) 12, 3371. doi:10.3390/cancers12113371
Goel, S., Decristo, M. J., Watt, A. C., Brinjones, H., Sceneay, J., Li, B. B., et al. (2017). CDK4/6 Inhibition Triggers Anti-tumour Immunity. Nature 548, 471–475. doi:10.1038/nature23465
Gong, K., Guo, G., Gerber, D. E., Gao, B., Peyton, M., Huang, C., et al. (2018). TNF-driven Adaptive Response Mediates Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 2500–2518. doi:10.1172/JCI96148
Guerra, L., Bonetti, L., and Brenner, D. (2020). Metabolic Modulation of Immunity: A New Concept in Cancer Immunotherapy. Cel. Rep. 32, 107848. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107848
He, L., Luo, L., Zhu, H., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, H., et al. (2017). FEN1 Promotes Tumor Progression and Confers Cisplatin Resistance in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Mol. Oncol. 11, 640–654. doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12058
Higgins, D. F., Biju, M. P., Akai, Y., Wutz, A., Johnson, R. S., and Haase, V. H. (2004). Hypoxic Induction of Ctgf Is Directly Mediated by Hif-1. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 287, F1223–F1232. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00245.2004
Hollier, B. G., Tinnirello, A. A., Werden, S. J., Evans, K. W., Taube, J. H., Sarkar, T. R., et al. (2013). FOXC2 Expression Links Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Stem Cell Properties in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 1981–1992. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2962
Hou, J., Aerts, J., Den Hamer, B., Van Ijcken, W., Den Bakker, M., Riegman, P., et al. (2010). Gene Expression-Based Classification of Non-small Cell Lung Carcinomas and Survival Prediction. PLoS One 5, e10312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010312
Huang, R., and Li, A. (2020). SPAG5 Is Associated with Unfavorable Prognosis in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma and Promotes Proliferation, Motility and Autophagy in A549 Cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 20, 77. doi:10.3892/etm.2020.9205
Ilie, M., Hofman, V., Dietel, M., Soria, J. C., and Hofman, P. (2016). Assessment of the PD-L1 Status by Immunohistochemistry: Challenges and Perspectives for Therapeutic Strategies in Lung Cancer Patients. Virchows Arch. 468, 511–525. doi:10.1007/s00428-016-1910-4
Jakobsen, K. R., Demuth, C., Sorensen, B. S., and Nielsen, A. L. (2016). The Role of Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 5, 172–182. doi:10.21037/tlcr.2016.04.07
Jiang, E., Perrard, X. D., Yang, D., Khan, I. M., Perrard, J. L., Smith, C. W., et al. (2014). Essential Role of CD11a in CD8+ T-Cell Accumulation and Activation in Adipose Tissue. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 34, 34–43. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302077
Jiang, P., Gu, S., Pan, D., Fu, J., Sahu, A., Hu, X., et al. (2018). Signatures of T Cell Dysfunction and Exclusion Predict Cancer Immunotherapy Response. Nat. Med. 24, 1550–1558. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0136-1
Jin, T., Lin, H. X., Lin, H., Guo, L. B., Ge, N., Cai, X. Y., et al. (2012). Expression TGM2 and BNIP3 Have Prognostic Significance in Laryngeal Cancer Patients Receiving Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy: a Retrospective Study. J. Transl. Med. 10, 64. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-10-64
Kadara, H., Lacroix, L., Behrens, C., Solis, L., Gu, X., Lee, J. J., et al. (2009). Identification of Gene Signatures and Molecular Markers for Human Lung Cancer Prognosis Using an In Vitro Lung Carcinogenesis System. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 2, 702–711. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0084
Lachmann, A., Giorgi, F. M., Lopez, G., and Califano, A. (2016). ARACNe-AP: Gene Network Reverse Engineering through Adaptive Partitioning Inference of Mutual Information. Bioinformatics 32, 2233–2235. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw216
Lauss, M., Donia, M., Harbst, K., Andersen, R., Mitra, S., Rosengren, F., et al. (2017). Mutational and Putative Neoantigen Load Predict Clinical Benefit of Adoptive T Cell Therapy in Melanoma. Nat. Commun. 8, 1738. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01460-0
Leonetti, A., Minari, R., Mazzaschi, G., Gnetti, L., La Monica, S., Alfieri, R., et al. (2021). Small Cell Lung Cancer Transformation as a Resistance Mechanism to Osimertinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review. Front. Oncol. 11, 642190. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.642190
Li, H., Yin, C., Zhang, B., Sun, Y., Shi, L., Liu, N., et al. (2013). PTTG1 Promotes Migration and Invasion of Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells and Is Modulated by miR-186. Carcinogenesis 34, 2145–2155. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgt158
Li, F., Zhu, T., Cao, B., Wang, J., and Liang, L. (2017). Apatinib Enhances Antitumour Activity of EGFR-TKIs in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR-TKI Resistance. Eur. J. Cancer 84, 184–192. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.037
Li, M., Li, A., Zhou, S., Lv, H., and Yang, W. (2019). SPAG5 Upregulation Contributes to Enhanced C-MYC Transcriptional Activity via Interaction with C-MYC Binding Protein in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 14. doi:10.1186/s13045-019-0700-2
Li, F., Huang, Q., Luster, T. A., Hu, H., Zhang, H., Ng, W.-L., et al. (2020). In Vivo Epigenetic CRISPR Screen Identifies Asf1a as an Immunotherapeutic Target in Kras-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 10, 270–287. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0780
Liberzon, A., Subramanian, A., Pinchback, R., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Tamayo, P., and Mesirov, J. P. (2011). Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260
Liberzon, A., Birger, C., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Ghandi, M., Mesirov, J. P., and Tamayo, P. (2015). The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) Hallmark Gene Set Collection. Cel. Syst. 1, 417–425. doi:10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004
Lim, S. O., Li, C. W., Xia, W., Cha, J. H., Chan, L. C., Wu, Y., et al. (2016). Deubiquitination and Stabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5. Cancer Cel. 30, 925–939. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.10.010
Lin, H., Lian, J., Xia, L., Guan, G., and You, J. (2020). CBX3 Promotes Gastric Cancer Progression and Affects Factors Related to Immunotherapeutic Responses. Cancer Manag. Res. 12, 10113–10125. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S271807
Liu, H., Hu, X., Zhu, Y., Jiang, G., and Chen, S. (2016). Up-regulation of SRPK1 in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Promotes the Growth and Migration of Cancer Cells. Tumour Biol. 37, 7287–7293. doi:10.1007/s13277-015-4510-z
Liu, J. Y., Zeng, Q. H., Cao, P. G., Xie, D., Yang, F., He, L. Y., et al. (2018). SPAG5 Promotes Proliferation and Suppresses Apoptosis in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma by Upregulating Wnt3 via Activating the AKT/mTOR Pathway and Predicts Poorer Survival. Oncogene 37, 3937–3952. doi:10.1038/s41388-018-0223-2
Liu, L., Tao, T., Liu, S., Yang, X., Chen, X., Liang, J., et al. (2021). An RFC4/Notch1 Signaling Feedback Loop Promotes NSCLC Metastasis and Stemness. Nat. Commun. 12, 2693. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22971-x
Love, M. I., Huber, W., and Anders, S. (2014). Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Lu, Y., Lemon, W., Liu, P. Y., Yi, Y., Morrison, C., Yang, P., et al. (2006). A Gene Expression Signature Predicts Survival of Patients with Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Plos Med. 3, e467. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030467
Lu, Y., Liu, Y., Oeck, S., and Glazer, P. M. (2018). Hypoxia Promotes Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in NSCLC Cells via the Histone Demethylases, LSD1 and PLU-1. Mol. Cancer Res. 16, 1458–1469. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0637
Manjang, K., Tripathi, S., Yli-Harja, O., Dehmer, M., Glazko, G., and Emmert-Streib, F. (2021). Prognostic Gene Expression Signatures of Breast Cancer Are Lacking a Sensible Biological Meaning. Sci. Rep. 11, 156. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79375-y
Mathy, N. L., Scheuer, W., Lanzendörfer, M., Honold, K., Ambrosius, D., Norley, S., et al. (2000). Interleukin-16 Stimulates the Expression and Production of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines by Human Monocytes. Immunology 100, 63–69. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00997.x
Milewski, D., Balli, D., Ustiyan, V., Le, T., Dienemann, H., Warth, A., et al. (2017). FOXM1 Activates AGR2 and Causes Progression of Lung Adenomas into Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinomas. Plos Genet. 13, e1007097. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007097
Musa, J., Aynaud, M. M., Mirabeau, O., Delattre, O., and Grünewald, T. G. (2017). MYBL2 (B-Myb): a central Regulator of Cell Proliferation, Cell Survival and Differentiation Involved in Tumorigenesis. Cel. Death Dis. 8, e2895. doi:10.1038/cddis.2017.244
Najjar, Y. G., Menk, A. V., Sander, C., Rao, U., Karunamurthy, A., Bhatia, R., et al. (2019). Tumor Cell Oxidative Metabolism as a Barrier to PD-1 Blockade Immunotherapy in Melanoma. JCI Insight 4, e124989. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.124989
Nilsson, M. B., Sun, H., Robichaux, J., Pfeifer, M., Mcdermott, U., Travers, J., et al. (2020). A YAP/FOXM1 axis Mediates EMT-Associated EGFR Inhibitor Resistance and Increased Expression of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Components. Sci. Transl Med. 12, eaaz4589. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz4589
Patel, M., Sachidanandan, M., and Adnan, M. (2019). Serine Arginine Protein Kinase 1 (SRPK1): a Moonlighting Protein with Theranostic Ability in Cancer Prevention. Mol. Biol. Rep. 46, 1487–1497. doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4545-5
Peng, F., Li, Q., Niu, S. Q., Shen, G. P., Luo, Y., Chen, M., et al. (2019). ZWINT Is the Next Potential Target for Lung Cancer Therapy. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 145, 661–673. doi:10.1007/s00432-018-2823-1
Qiao, G. B., Wu, Y. L., Yang, X. N., Zhong, W. Z., Xie, D., Guan, X. Y., et al. (2005). High-level Expression of Rad51 Is an Independent Prognostic Marker of Survival in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients. Br. J. Cancer 93, 137–143. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602665
Qiao, N., Xu, C., Zhu, Y. X., Cao, Y., Liu, D. C., and Han, X. (2015). Ets-1 as an Early Response Gene against Hypoxia-Induced Apoptosis in Pancreatic β-cells. Cel. Death Dis. 6, e1650. doi:10.1038/cddis.2015.8
Qiao, G. B., Wang, R. T., Wang, S. N., Tao, S. L., Tan, Q. Y., and Jin, H. (2021). GRP75 ‐mediated Upregulation of HMGA1 Stimulates Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma Progression by Activating JNK/c‐JUN Signaling. Thorac. Cancer 12, 1558–1569. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13944
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., et al. (2015). Limma powers Differential Expression Analyses for RNA-Sequencing and Microarray Studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007
Rooney, M. S., Shukla, S. A., Wu, C. J., Getz, G., and Hacohen, N. (2015). Molecular and Genetic Properties of Tumors Associated with Local Immune Cytolytic Activity. Cell 160, 48–61. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.033
Ruan, J. S., Zhou, H., Yang, L., Wang, L., Jiang, Z. S., and Wang, S. M. (2017). CCNA2 Facilitates Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition via the Integrin αvβ3 Signaling in NSCLC. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 10, 8324–8333. http://www.ijcep.com/files/ijcep0052011.pdf
Schäffer, L., Scheid, A., Spielmann, P., Breymann, C., Zimmermann, R., Meuli, M., et al. (2003). Oxygen-regulated Expression of TGF-Beta 3, a Growth Factor Involved in Trophoblast Differentiation. Placenta 24, 941–950. doi:10.1016/s0143-4004(03)00166-8
Schito, L., Rey, S., Tafani, M., Zhang, H., Wong, C. C., Russo, A., et al. (2012). Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1-dependent Expression of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor B Promotes Lymphatic Metastasis of Hypoxic Breast Cancer Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 109, E2707–E2716. doi:10.1073/pnas.1214019109
Seki, N., Takasu, T., Sawada, S., Nakata, M., Nishimura, R., Segawa, Y., et al. (2010). Prognostic Significance of Expression of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E and 4E Binding Protein 1 in Patients with Pathological Stage I Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 70, 329–334. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.03.006
Serizawa, M., Takahashi, T., Yamamoto, N., and Koh, Y. (2013). Combined Treatment with Erlotinib and a Transforming Growth Factor-β Type I Receptor Inhibitor Effectively Suppresses the Enhanced Motility of Erlotinib-Resistant Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Cells. J. Thorac. Oncol. 8, 259–269. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e318279e942
Soares, K. C., Rucki, A. A., Wu, A. A., Olino, K., Xiao, Q., Chai, Y., et al. (2015). PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Together with Vaccine Therapy Facilitates Effector T-Cell Infiltration into Pancreatic Tumors. J. Immunother. 38, 1–11. doi:10.1097/CJI.0000000000000062
Song, L., Dai, Z., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., Liu, C., Ma, X., et al. (2018). MicroRNA-1179 Suppresses Cell Growth and Invasion by Targeting Sperm-Associated Antigen 5-mediated Akt Signaling in Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 504, 164–170. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.149
Song, K. H., Oh, S. J., Kim, S., Cho, H., Lee, H. J., Song, J. S., et al. (2020). HSP90A Inhibition Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Reversing Multi-Modal Resistance and Stem-like Property of Immune-Refractory Tumors. Nat. Commun. 11, 562. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14259-y
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., et al. (2005). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis: a Knowledge-Based Approach for Interpreting Genome-wide Expression Profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 102, 15545–15550. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Tang, H., Wang, S., Xiao, G., Schiller, J., Papadimitrakopoulou, V., Minna, J., et al. (2017). Comprehensive Evaluation of Published Gene Expression Prognostic Signatures for Biomarker-Based Lung Cancer Clinical Studies. Ann. Oncol. 28, 733–740. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw683
Taniguchi, H., Yamada, T., Wang, R., Tanimura, K., Adachi, Y., Nishiyama, A., et al. (2019). AXL Confers Intrinsic Resistance to Osimertinib and Advances the Emergence of Tolerant Cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 259. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08074-0
Thiery, J. P., Acloque, H., Huang, R. Y., and Nieto, M. A. (2009). Epithelial-mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease. Cell 139, 871–890. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007
Tomida, S., Koshikawa, K., Yatabe, Y., Harano, T., Ogura, N., Mitsudomi, T., et al. (2004). Gene Expression-Based, Individualized Outcome Prediction for Surgically Treated Lung Cancer Patients. Oncogene 23, 5360–5370. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207697
Tsai, Y. M., Wu, K. L., Chang, Y. Y., Hung, J. Y., Chang, W. A., Chang, C. Y., et al. (2020). Upregulation of Thr/Tyr Kinase Increases the Cancer Progression by Neurotensin and Dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 in Lung Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1640. doi:10.3390/ijms21051640
Vansteenkiste, J., Crinò, L., Dooms, C., Douillard, J. Y., Faivre-Finn, C., Lim, E., et al. (2014). 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer: Early-Stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Consensus on Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Ann. Oncol. 25, 1462–1474. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu089
Wagner, K. D., El Maï, M., Ladomery, M., Belali, T., Leccia, N., Michiels, J. F., et al. (2019). Altered VEGF Splicing Isoform Balance in Tumor Endothelium Involves Activation of Splicing Factors Srpk1 and Srsf1 by the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor Wt1. Cells 8, 41. doi:10.3390/cells8010041
Ward, A., Khanna, K. K., and Wiegmans, A. P. (2015). Targeting Homologous Recombination, New Pre-clinical and Clinical Therapeutic Combinations Inhibiting RAD51. Cancer Treat. Rev. 41, 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.10.006
Wei, P., Zhang, N., Wang, Y., Li, D., Wang, L., Sun, X., et al. (2015). FOXM1 Promotes Lung Adenocarcinoma Invasion and Metastasis by Upregulating SNAIL. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 11, 186–198. doi:10.7150/ijbs.10634
Weng, C. H., Chen, L. Y., Lin, Y. C., Shih, J. Y., Lin, Y. C., Tseng, R. Y., et al. (2019). Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) beyond EGFR Mutations per se Is a Common Mechanism for Acquired Resistance to EGFR TKI. Oncogene 38, 455–468. doi:10.1038/s41388-018-0454-2
Westover, D., Zugazagoitia, J., Cho, B. C., Lovly, C. M., and Paz-Ares, L. (2018). Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to First- and Second-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Ann. Oncol. 29, i10–i19. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx703
Wu, Y., Borde, M., Heissmeyer, V., Feuerer, M., Lapan, A. D., Stroud, J. C., et al. (2006). FOXP3 Controls Regulatory T Cell Function through Cooperation with NFAT. Cell 126, 375–387. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.042
Wu, F., Li, J., Du, X., Zhang, W., Lei, P., and Zhang, Q. (2017). Chimeric Antibody Targeting SRPK-1 in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer by Inhibiting Growth, Migration and Invasion. Mol. Med. Rep. 16, 2121–2127. doi:10.3892/mmr.2017.6833
Wu, Y., Jin, D., Wang, X., Du, J., Di, W., An, J., et al. (2019). UBE2C Induces Cisplatin Resistance via ZEB1/2-Dependent Upregulation of ABCG2 and ERCC1 in NSCLC Cells. J. Oncol. 2019, 8607859. doi:10.1155/2019/8607859
Wu, X., Nelson, M., Basu, M., Srinivasan, P., Lazarski, C., Zhang, P., et al. (2021). MYC Oncogene Is Associated with Suppression of Tumor Immunity and Targeting Myc Induces Tumor Cell Immunogenicity for Therapeutic Whole Cell Vaccination. J. Immunother. Cancer 9, e001388. doi:10.1136/jitc-2020-001388
Xia, S., Liu, X., Cao, X., and Xu, S. (2020). T-cell Expression of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Promotes Autoreactive T-Cell Activation and Exacerbates Aplastic Anemia. Cel. Mol. Immunol. 17, 1042–1052. doi:10.1038/s41423-019-0270-9
Xiao, F., Liu, N., Ma, X., Qin, J., Liu, Y., and Wang, X. (2020). M2 Macrophages Reduce the Effect of Gefitinib by Activating AKT/mTOR in Gefitinib-Resistant Cell Lines HCC827/GR. Thorac. Cancer 11, 3289–3298. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13670
Xie, Y., Xiao, G., Coombes, K. R., Behrens, C., Solis, L. M., Raso, G., et al. (2011). Robust Gene Expression Signature from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Samples Predicts Prognosis of Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 5705–5714. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0196
Yamauchi, M., Yamaguchi, R., Nakata, A., Kohno, T., Nagasaki, M., Shimamura, T., et al. (2012). Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Defines Critical Prognostic Genes of Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 7, e43923. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043923
Yang, Y. F., Zhang, M. F., Tian, Q. H., Fu, J., Yang, X., Zhang, C. Z., et al. (2018). SPAG5 Interacts with CEP55 and Exerts Oncogenic Activities via PI3K/AKT Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 17, 117. doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0872-3
Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Che, X., Hou, K., Wu, J., Zheng, C., et al. (2021). Integrin α5 Promotes Migration and Invasion through the FAK/STAT3/AKT Signaling Pathway in Icotinib-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Oncol. Lett. 22, 556. doi:10.3892/ol.2021.12817
Yu, H. A., Arcila, M. E., Rekhtman, N., Sima, C. S., Zakowski, M. F., Pao, W., et al. (2013). Analysis of Tumor Specimens at the Time of Acquired Resistance to EGFR-TKI Therapy in 155 Patients with EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 2240–2247. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2246
Zhang, Z., Lee, J. C., Lin, L., Olivas, V., Au, V., Laframboise, T., et al. (2012). Activation of the AXL Kinase Causes Resistance to EGFR-Targeted Therapy in Lung Cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 852–860. doi:10.1038/ng.2330
Zhang, H., Qi, J., Reyes, J. M., Li, L., Rao, P. K., Li, F., et al. (2016). Oncogenic Deregulation of EZH2 as an Opportunity for Targeted Therapy in Lung Cancer. Cancer Discov. 6, 1006–1021. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0164
Zhang, Q., Dong, Y., Hao, S., Tong, Y., Luo, Q., and Aerxiding, P. (2019). The Oncogenic Role of TRIP13 in Regulating Proliferation, Invasion, and Cell Cycle Checkpoint in NSCLC Cells. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 12, 3357–3366. http://www.ijcep.com/files/ijcep0092658.pdf
Zhang, F., Meng, J., Jiang, H., Feng, X., Wei, D., and Meng, W. (2021). GTSE1 Facilitates the Malignant Phenotype of Lung Cancer Cells via Activating AKT/mTOR Signaling. Anal. Cel Pathol (Amst) 2021, 5589532. doi:10.1155/2021/5589532
Zhao, P., Li, L., Jiang, X., and Li, Q. (2019). Mismatch Repair Deficiency/microsatellite Instability-High as a Predictor for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy Efficacy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 54. doi:10.1186/s13045-019-0738-1
Zhou, W., and Christiani, D. C. (2011). East Meets West: Ethnic Differences in Epidemiology and Clinical Behaviors of Lung Cancer between East Asians and Caucasians. Chin. J. Cancer 30, 287–292. doi:10.5732/cjc.011.10106
Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., Xie, B., Wang, X., Yang, X., Ding, N., et al. (2015). FOXC2 Promotes Chemoresistance in Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas via Induction of Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition. Cancer Lett. 363, 137–145. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2015.04.008
Keywords: lung adenocarcinoma, relapse, TKI resistance, immunotherapy, master regulator
Citation: Xu Q, Cha Q, Qin H, Liu B, Wu X and Shi J (2022) Identification of Master Regulators Driving Disease Progression, Relapse, and Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front. Bioinform. 2:813960. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.813960
Received: 15 November 2021; Accepted: 04 January 2022;
Published: 28 January 2022.
Edited by:
Richard Allen White III, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United StatesReviewed by:
Denis Jacob Machado, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United StatesMagdalena Julita Orzechowska, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Copyright © 2022 Xu, Cha, Qin, Liu, Wu and Shi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xueling Wu, d3V4dWVsaW5nQHJlbmppLmNvbQ==; Jiantao Shi, anRzaGlAc2liY2IuYWMuY24=