- 1School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
- 2Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
- 3Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Editorial on the Research Topic
Minimally Invasive Monitoring of Stress in Farm Animals, Volume I
Stress is the biological reaction when the animal is facing a potential threat to its welfare, which in farm animals can reduce productivity. Productivity may be defined as a level of improved performance or fitness or a quantified production trait of an animal, which can be measured by terms of meat, milk, wool, and egg quality and quantity in most production farm animals.
In Edition 1 of this Research Topic, we show a collection of 6 peer reviewed articles and 2 reviews, which highlight the different minimally invasive methods and techniques that are already in use or currently in development in order to monitor different types of stress in livestock animals and methods of reducing it.
For example, research conducted on broiler chickens by Livingston et al. showed that point-of-care devices, which are rapid blood detection devices, can be used to monitor heat stress by checking specific biomarkers that were found to be of importance for the survival and better performance of male chicks. The researchers also showed that nutritional manipulation of some factors, such as vitamins C and E, could greatly reduce the mortality rate and altered the body score of young chicks under heat stress conditions.
Similarly, to the chicks in the article mentioned above, Dado-Senn et al. found that in utero heat stress during late gestation reduced the growth size, organ development and immunity of dairy calves post birth, with the authors pointing out that this may lead to reduced milk productivity in the future. The heat stress of the pregnant dam was measured by calculating the temperature-humidity index (THI) of the different pens, by recording the dam’s flank movement per minute to calculate the respiration rate, and skin temperature using an infrared thermometer. Another similar method that can be to measure stress is the heart rate interval, which was used by Kitajima et al. to measure stress due to Vitamin A restriction in fattening steers. In the literature review conducted by Islam et al. those methods are only some of the currently available techniques for monitoring heat stress and some other types of stress in cattle using minimally invasive technologies, and the authors came to the conclusion that more automated smart technologies will have to be put in the future in order to monitor and mitigate the effects of heat stress in cattle.
Three of the papers focus on stress in young calves and lambs, with Freitas-de-Melo et al. discussing how less invasive weaning methods may improve the welfare and reduce the stress of the lambs’ post weaning. Two of the publications focus on using a non-invasive technique, hair cortisol concentration, to determine stress in calves (Tamminen et al.) and lambs (Hantzopoulou et al.), which is a non-invasive technique, and currently the only technique that can monitor chronic stress.
Finally, the paper by Henniger et al. investigates how growth promoting implants, which are used to enhance growth, may affect the microbial community in the rumen of steers. Orogastric tubing was used to collect samples from the rumen of the animals under the different implant treatments.
Overall, this Research Topic highlights the array of already existing minimally invasive techniques for monitoring stress in livestock animals, and the need for further research in this sector. The use of a combination of physiology, behaviour, and emerging technologies could be a powerful tool in reducing the stress in production animals and increasing productivity as a result.
Author Contributions
EN conceptualized this Research Topic and collaborated with SC for the co-editorship. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The editors thank the Frontiers admin team for their wonderful support with the Research topic as well as the numerous peer reviewers. The Stress Lab (The University of Queensland) graduate scholar Georgia Hantzopoulou provided valuable assistance with compiling this editorial.
Keywords: physiology, welfare, stress management, livestock, biomarkers
Citation: Narayan E and Chauhan SS (2022) Editorial: Minimally Invasive Monitoring of Stress in Farm Animals (Volume 1). Front. Anim. Sci. 3:955817. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2022.955817
Received: 29 May 2022; Accepted: 09 June 2022;
Published: 22 June 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Geoffrey E. Dahl, University of Florida, United StatesCopyright © 2022 Narayan and Chauhan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Edward Narayan, ZS5uYXJheWFuQHVxLmVkdS5hdQ==