Addis Hailu Demo
Girma Asefa Bogale- School of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
Dryland agriculture requires the efficient utilization of water resources and the implementation of water-conserving technologies. Mulching is a water conservation practice used in arid land areas to preserve soil moisture, control temperature, and minimize soil evaporation rates. Organic mulching minimizes soil deterioration, enhances organic matter, and boosts the soil’s ability to retain water. Mulching can help keep moisture in the root zone, allowing plants to receive water for extended periods. Mulching with composted yard waste led to higher soil nutrient levels, including phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and organic matter when compared to uncovered soil. Under plastic mulch, soluble nutrients such as nitrate (NO3−), ammonium (NH4+), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), potassium (K+), and fulvic acid are released as organic matter decomposes, enhancing the soil’s nutrient availability. Mulching has several advantages for dryland agriculture, such as reducing soil water loss, soil erosion, weed growth, water droplet kinetic energy, and competition for nutrients and water with nearby fields. This review article aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of ground mulching in water conservation. This is particularly important in arid regions where agricultural sustainability is at risk due to drought, heat stress, and the inefficient use of limited water resources during the cropping season. Ground mulching is essential for minimizing surface evaporation and hence decreasing water loss. This review research thoroughly examines the advantages of organic and synthetic mulches in crop production, as well as their use in the preservation of soil and water resources.
1 Introduction
Feeding the future population cannot be addressed solely by enhancing water productivity within current land usage, as there is a severe limitation of agricultural land (Ranjan et al., 2017). Rainfed agriculture, such as non-irrigated crops constitutes 60–70% of the world’s agricultural production and occupies 80% of cropland (Li et al., 2018). Moreover, as water scarcity continues to rise, rainfed farming becomes increasingly vital in ensuring global food supply (Li et al., 2017). The scarcity of water caused by rising temperatures and unpredictable rainfall patterns is responsible for the limited crop yields in arid and semi-arid regions (Qin et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017). Hence, it is crucial to manage the water usage on farmland to preserve water resources in agricultural areas. Dryland farming prioritizes rainfed agriculture and requires the efficient utilization of water resources and the implementation of water conserving technologies (Qin et al., 2013). Consequently, in semi-arid and arid regions, globally, prudent and effective water consumption has been practiced successfully over an extended period.
Kader et al. (2017) revealed that mulching is done by covering the soil surface around plants with organic or synthetic material to increase plant development and improve agricultural output. In dryland agriculture, the focus is on rainfed production, which demands the deployment of water-conserving technology to optimize the effective use of available water. Qin et al. (2013) and Yu et al. (2018) indicated that mulching boosts crop growth and production and improves water efficiency.
Furthermore, mulches can be classified as either inorganic, composed mostly of plastic-based components, or organic biodegradable materials (Kader et al., 2017). According to Adhikari et al. (2016) both categories have grown in popularity in recent years. Another research by Adeboye et al. (2017) reported in different areas, crop production and soil hydrothermal conditions were found to be impacted by the addition of different biodegradable and inorganic mulches following rainfall. It is crucial for dry land farmers to comprehend how much mulching boot crop yields while preserving soil moisture. Mulching in dryland agriculture gives advantages such as moisture retention, temperature regulation, weed suppression, soil health advancement, and erosion control, boosting water resource efficiency and crop yields (Kishore et al., 2022). Mulch works as a protective layer, decreasing nutrient leaching and runoff produced by heavy rainfall or irrigation. It slows down water flow, conserving nutrients in the root zone, and making them more available to plants (Qiu et al., 2020). Mulch also offers a home for beneficial soil microorganisms, which play a critical role in nutrient cycling and plant uptake (De Biman et al., 2021).
Mulch is a helpful technique for minimizing soil erosion by covering the soil surface, absorbing rainwater, and slowing flow velocity. This is particularly effective in sloping landscapes or places with vulnerable soil conditions (Fernández, 2023). Mulch also preserves topsoil, guaranteeing its preservation and availability for plant absorption. It also offers a good habitat for beneficial organisms like earthworms, insects, and bacteria, which play a critical role in soil health and nitrogen cycling, hence boosting nutrient availability and ecosystem health (Barajas-Guzmán et al., 2006).
Mulch, especially organic mulch derived from plant residues, contributes to carbon sequestration in soil by supplying organic matter and boosting soil organic carbon concentration (Chen et al., 2018). This not only enhances soil fertility and structure but also helps avoid climate change by absorbing carbon dioxide (Chen et al., 2018). Organic mulches may impact soil pH, with strong acid components like pine needles lowering it over time, while high alkalinity components like wood ash increase it (Larkin, 2020). Understanding these pH-modifying capacities may assist manage soil pH levels and generate optimum growing conditions for diverse crops (Larkin, 2020). Different mulches also alter nutrient availability and absorption for certain crops, boosting nutrient management approaches and overall use efficiency (Jain et al., 2017).
Therefore, the overall objective of this review paper was to assess the effects of mulch on crop yield and soil moisture conservation in arid areas.
2 The potential of mulching for sustainable soil and water conservation in agricultural practices
Spreading different materials over a field before or after planting is a common agricultural practice known as mulching, which helps to increase crop yields and soil quality. As mulching materials, you can use plastic, agricultural waste, animal dung, sand, and pebble (Gan et al., 2013). Mulching’s main objectives are to limit weed growth, improve moisture retention, increase soil warming, and decrease water evaporation (Gan et al., 2013). According to studies, mulching can boost crop growth, yields, and water use (Chaudhary et al., 2003; Abdrabbo et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2018; Ali Mozaffari, 2022).
2.1 Types of mulching materials
The three categories of mulching materials are defined as organic, inorganic, and special by Kader et al. (2017). Animal manure, wood debris, leftover processed foods, and agricultural waste may all be utilized to generate organic mulching materials. Inorganic mulching materials include synthetic plastics and plastics made from polyethylene sheets, according to Kader et al. (2017). Similarly, Adhikari et al. (2016) have also created environmentally friendly products that are adaptable and simple to use, such as surface coatings, biodegradable polymer films, and compostable and photodegradable plastic films that are essential for use in agriculture.
2.1.1 Organic mulches
The best time to apply organic mulch, which is made from plant or animal matter, is right after crop germination. According to Goodman (2020), organic mulches have numerous benefits, including reducing nitrate leaching, improving soil physical properties, promoting microbial activity, balancing the nutrient cycle, enriching the soil with nutrients, regulating temperature, improving water absorption by the soil, and preventing erosion. Organic materials, on the other hand, are difficult to employ for crop production and need a substantial amount of effort. As a result, due to economic and logistical restrictions, the use of organic mulch in horticulture production has been limited (Zhao et al., 2014).
2.1.1.1 Wood chips
For gardening, landscaping, and horticulture, wood chips composed of shredded or chipped wood are used. We won’t have to weed by hand or apply herbicides as often since they block the sun and stop weed seeds from growing (Bantle et al., 2014). In addition to providing insulation, its barrier effect decreases soil moisture retention and evaporation. improved soil structure, increased microbial activity, and reduced soil erosion are all long-term benefits of using wood chips (Zheng et al., 2022).
2.1.1.2 Straw mulch
For protection in the garden and on the farm consideration of straw mulch made from the stalks of cereal crops is important. It protects soil from excessive temperature changes, prevents weeds from growing, and retains soil moisture. Because it preserves soil particles and lessens the effect of rain and wind, it stops soil erosion (Ma et al., 2024). Straw mulch, when let to decompose, adds organic matter to the soil, which in turn improves soil structure, nutrient availability, and the populations of beneficial soil organisms (Goodman, 2020).
2.1.1.3 Sawdust mulch
In landscaping and gardening, sawdust mulch made from finely ground or chipped wood waste is used to inhibit weed growth by obstructing sunlight. However, it may still enable weeds to sprout if sprayed lightly (Davis and Strik, 2022). Sawdust absorbs moisture and holds moisture, but its high carbon content may contribute to nitrogen depletion in the soil. Some woods, like pine or cedar, may make sawdust acidic, influencing soil pH. In addition to potentially stunting plant development, sawdust takes longer to decompose than other organic mulch materials (Tan et al., 2016).
2.1.1.4 Bark mulch
Bark mulches are organic mulches created from tree bark, and used in landscaping and gardening for their aesthetic appeal and practical advantages (Łukasiewicz, 2013). They generate a thick covering that discourages weed growth, lowers evaporation, and helps keep moisture in the soil. They also operate as a barrier, providing insulation, and reducing soil erosion. Bark mulches break down slowly and may endure for many years, making them a durable alternative for mulching. Different varieties of bark have unique features (Kosterna, 2014).
2.1.1.5 Newspaper mulch
Newspaper mulch is an eco-friendly, affordable, and ecologically acceptable solution for weed control and soil moisture retention in gardens and landscapes (Puka-Beals and Gramig, 2021). It inhibits sunlight, stops weed seeds from developing, and serves as a physical barrier to suffocate existing weeds. Newspaper mulch conserves soil moisture by minimizing evaporation, making it advantageous in dry climates. The degraded wood pulp of newspaper supplies organic matter to the soil, enhancing soil structure and fertility (Puka-Beals and Gramig, 2021). It offers insulation, moderating soil temperature, and offering protection during cold times. Newspaper is widely accessible and commonly thrown as garbage, making it a sustainable alternative to other mulch materials (Haapala et al., 2014).
2.1.1.6 Compost mulch
Compost mulch is a nutrient-rich mulch formed from decomposed organic debris, which increases soil health and plant development (Mallory and Smagula, 2014). It distributes vital nutrients like nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium into the soil, increasing soil structure and boosting microbial activity. Compost mulch also increases soil moisture-holding capacity, aeration, and drainage, and helps reduce weed development by burying weeds and preventing seed germination (Paradelo et al., 2012). It also offers insulation, controlling soil temperature, and guarding against frost during colder months. Overall, compost mulch is a good and nutrient-rich solution for plant health (Mallory and Smagula, 2014).
2.1.2 Inorganic mulches
Plastic mulch is widely utilized in industrial crop cultivation, the most popular forms being polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene films. Because these plastic coatings are more permeable to long-wave radiation, they can raise the temperature around the crop during winter nights. As a result, Gosar and Baričevič (2011) propose that polyethylene mulch is the best material for horticultural crop development. In another study by Gao et al. (2019), many plastic films produced from various polymers, including polyvinyl chloride (PVC), high-density polyester (HDPE), and low-density polyethylene (LDPE), were studied for mulching applications in the 1960s. Because of its convenience, LLDPE is the most often used plastic mulching material. Because of their great results, black plastic mulch films have become increasingly popular, particularly in dry and semi-arid locations. According to Qin et al. (2014), using black polyethylene mulch boosted crop output and quality, increased soil water content, and transformed the soil microbial community, resulting in greater financial returns for farmers. According to Serrano-Ruiz et al. (2021), the “plastic culture” farming approach, which involves utilizing plastic as mulch, is increasingly being used to produce fresh vegetables. In addition, Yu et al. (2018) indicated that around one million tons of synthetic mulch material are consumed worldwide every year.
In Spain, for example, the utilization of plastic film as mulch in greenhouses grew by 5.7% in 2012, reaching 60,000 hectares (Market, 2016). According to Daryanto et al. (2017), China uses forty percent of the globe’s mulch made from plastic each year, or 0.7 million tons, and presently utilizes eighty percent of the world’s film made from plastic mulch, coupled with Japan and South Korea (Zhao et al., 2022). Plastic mulching enhanced wheat and maize yield in China by roughly 33.2% and 33.7%, respectively (Li et al., 2016).
2.2 Benefits of mulching
Mulching gradually improves air circulation around plants, soil particle aggregation, soil fertility, and permeability (Kader et al., 2017). Mulch functions as an insulator, shielding the soil from hot and cold temperatures. Mulch treatments help agricultural fields in different ways, including decreased soil water loss, soil erosion, raindrop influence on the surface of soil, weed growth, and competition for nutrients and moisture from nearby fields (Yang et al., 2015; Kader et al., 2017). As observed by Qin et al. (2015) mulches are especially useful in the summer because they prevent soil moisture loss owing to evaporation. Mulch may also increase the structure of the soil and nutrient circulation by boosting earthworm mobility in soil pores (Qin et al., 2015). Moreover, mulching also decreases soil pH, which improves nutrient accessibility (Larentzaki et al., 2008). According to Larentzaki et al. (2008), who noted that organic mulch decomposes over time, replenishing the soil with nutrients and improving the soil’s capacity to maintain long-term access to nutrients.
Because of its impermeability to gas movement, plastic mulch acts as a dependable barrier for fumigants and protects against sun exposure. However, it can have surprising implications on soil health and pest control (Chalker-Scott, 2007). Mulch increases efficient fertilizer usage and lowers nutrient leaching by retaining nutrients in the crop’s roots area, resulting in better soil health. Mulch also increases the attractiveness of the surroundings by providing a consistent appearance. Soil is a complex ecosystem in which crop type, water retention, topsoil and crop water loss, and rainfall penetration all affect the amount of water present (Li et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2018). Plants need a range of temperatures and moisture from the soil at various stages of growth. According to Kader et al. (2017), organic mulching lowers soil degradation, promotes organic matter, and raises the soil’s capacity to retain water. Figure 1 demonstrates the advantages of mulched and un-mulched soil interactions with plants and environmental systems.
Figure 1 Advantages of mulched and unmulched soil interactions with plants and environments. Reproduced from Kader et al. (2017). Used with permission of Elsevier Science & Technology Journals, from "Recent advances in mulching materials and methods for modifying soil environment", M. A. Kader, M. Senge, M. A. Mojid, and K. Ito, Soil and Tillage Research vol. 168, May 2017; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
2.3 Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches
Research has shown that the use of mulching may effectively mitigate soil water loss in arid regions by decreasing evaporation (Yang et al., 2015; Kader et al., 2017). Plastic mulch that blocks moisture seeps into the soil by re-forming evaporated water and allowing it to return as droplets. This increases the length of time that moisture can be stored, allowing for longer intervals between irrigations and a reduction in the water required to produce crops (Kader et al., 2017). Plastic mulching works better than straw mulching in terms of preserving soil water (Li et al., 2017). Two further significant benefits of mulching are that it lessens soil erosion and surface evaporation (Qin et al., 2016). It also helps to keep moisture around plants root zone, making water available to them for longer periods of time (Tuure et al., 2021).
According to Qin et al. (2016), the primary advantage of mulching is its ability to maintain soil moisture by minimizing soil loss and lowering surface water loss. As Figure 2 demonstrates, in agricultural operations, mulching helps to conserve soil water by decreasing evaporation and managing the soil’s temperature (Kader et al., 2017). Understanding the soil temperature and water transport mechanisms under the mulch layer is crucial for enhancing system accessibility for efficient mulching (Kader et al., 2017; Li et al., 2018). Figure 3 depicts a Schematic illustration of how sustainable agriculture interferes with changing temperatures and crops.
Figure 2 The diagram demonstrates sustainable agriculture that interacts with the climate and crops. (Adapted from Figure 1 of Kader et al., 2019 under CC-BY 4.0 license.)
Figure 3 A schematic diagram of how conservation agriculture interacts with climate change and crops. (Adapted from Figure 1 of El-Beltagi et al., 2022 under CC-BY 4.0 license.)
2.3.1 Effects of mulch on soil and water conservation
Mulching it is extremely effective for maintaining moisture availability in arid regions by slowing the rate of evaporated water (Yang et al., 2015; Zribi et al., 2015; Kader et al., 2017). Mulching with moisture barrier plastic film is particularly effective because it keeps soil moisture from evaporating under the covering of mulch films and then condenses to return to the soil as minute droplets of water (Kader et al., 2017). This helps to keep soil moisture in place for many days, extending the time between irrigation and minimizing the demand for irrigation throughout the growth season. According to Li et al. (2013), plastic mulching is far more successful than straw mulching at conserving soil water. The fundamental benefit of mulching is its capacity to prevent surface evaporation, retaining soil moisture while simultaneously minimizing soil erosion (Dass et al., 2013; Qin et al., 2016).
According to Li et al. (2018) and Kader et al. (2019), both water and heat transfer pathways are critical for the optimal utilization of mulching materials. El-Beltagi et al. (2022) emphasize the need of selecting proper mulching materials in order to reduce the frequency of watering required during crop production. Mulching can help keep moisture in the root zone, allowing plants to receive water for extended periods of time (Kazemi and Safari, 2018). According to Safari et al. (2021), mulched soil evaporates at a slower pace than bare soil. Figure 4 demonstrates a comparison technique for covered and uncovered soil/crops.
Figure 4 Comparison technique for covered and uncovered soil/crops. (Reproduced from Figure 3 of El-Beltagi et al., 2022 under CC-BY 4.0 license.)
2.3.2 Soil temperature
According to Steinmetz et al. (2016), plastic mulch can transmit a significant percentage of the heat it absorbs to the soil. The temperature of the soil changes throughout the year, particularly during extreme heat and cold periods and from day to night. Mulches operate as an insulator, keeping the soil temperature stable. Mulch with a higher water content reduces evaporation, which helps to regulate soil temperature. However, various variables impact soil temperature. White mulches chill the soil, whereas clear plastic mulches heat it up. Black plastic mulch is more efficient than bare soil in boosting soil temperatures due to increased radiation absorption (Rajablariani et al., 2012). According to Tan et al. (2017), compost mulch may manage soil temperature by minimizing the daily variance and providing a more stable environment ideal for root activity.
Mulching layers control temperature by sheltering the soil against direct sunshine and minimizing soil water evaporation (Bakshi et al., 2015). Mulching with organic matter may lower soil temperatures by more than 10°C compared to bare soil, as observed in research done in hotter areas or throughout the summer, according to (Chalker-Scott, 2007). Particularly, soil temperature increased by 0.9 to 4.3°C during the seedling stage, 1.6 to 2.3°C during the bud initiation stage, and 0.8 to 1.9°C during the flowering stage (Xie et al., 2005). Another study by Subrahmaniyan and Zhou (2008) found that a transparent, photodegradable polythene films raised the soil temperature by 2.9 to 3.30°C. In early May, the temperature difference between mulched and bare soil for transparent film and black film reached 7°C and 5°C, respectively. Rajablariani et al. (2012) observed that in comparison to bare soil, the average temperature of soil rose by 3 to 6°C below different colored plastic mulches. Table 1 outlines the influence of different types of mulch on the soil’s temperatures in various crops and Table 2 outlines the impact of mulching on soil moisture and temperature when compared with no mulch.
Table 1 Impact of various mulch types on the soil temperature in different crops.
Table 2 Impact of mulching on soil moisture and temperature when compared with no mulch.
2.3.3 Soil compaction
Mulching preserves the soil’s structure against compaction induced by excessive rainfall or foot activity by serving as a shield (Bashir et al., 2017). Simple mulches like straw have been demonstrated to promote soil stability in aggregates, enhancing the soil’s capacity for water infiltration and deeper layer aeration. Bark mulch, for example, can distribute the direct contact of water droplets, feet, and tires, recovering soil aggregation and porosity. Iqbal et al. (2020) suggested that mulch should be applied before compaction occurs rather than after. Mulching has been shown to alter the relationships between soil management elements, such as organic material content, the activity of microbes, availability of nutrients, decrease of soil eroding and compacting, and temperature control (Tellen and Yerima, 2018).
2.3.4 Soil nutrient
Mulching helps keep nutrients near the plant roots, ensuring their efficient utilization and reducing fertilizer leaching. For a more visually appealing landscape, uniform mulching is preferred (Li et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2018). After organic mulch decomposes, the soil’s organic content increases rapidly, enhancing its water storage capacity (Kader et al., 2017).
Mulch acts as a barrier between the soil and external factors, preserving soil nutrients and promoting a healthy soil composition. In a similar study, Kasirajan and Ngouajio (2012) discovered that the use of black polythene mulch reduced nitrogen transport and leaching while enhancing bean crop utilization. Fang et al. (2011) observed that mulching with composted yard waste led to higher soil nutrient levels, including phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and organic matter when compared to uncovered soil. Additionally, mulching increased soil cation exchange capacity (CEC), total microbial biomass, and organic matter, while also enhancing water availability and soil porosity, resulting in better mineral absorption. Based on the research by Marwein (2016), the use of mulch increased the total phosphorus concentration in the soil, with levels rising from 601–658 mg kg−1 after four years and 491–694 mg kg−1 after eleven years.
The introduction of organic acids into the soil through the decomposition of organic matter beneath plastic mulch can lower soil pH and increase the bioavailability of micronutrients such as manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe). Grewal (2020) found that Fe and Zn levels were elevated in the soil beneath plastic mulch, supporting this claim. Over time, the mineralization of organic nitrogen also increases the availability of nitrogen in the soil. Under plastic mulch, soluble nutrients such as nitrate (NO3−), ammonium (NH4+), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), potassium (K+), and fulvic acid are released as organic matter decomposes, enhancing the soil’s nutrient availability (Thapa et al., 2022). Table 3 outlines the impact of mulching on soil fertility.
Table 3 Impact of mulching on soil fertility.
2.3.5 Moisture retaliation in the root zone
The application of mulch may prevent evaporation from the soil, which helps to maintain moisture levels around plant roots and increases the time available for plants to utilize water. As a consequence, the use of mulch may minimize the demand for irrigation in covered regions (Ranjan et al., 2017). For plants to retain moisture in their roots, mulch is an essential component. Plants can retain more water for longer because this protective layer decreases evaporation by shielding them from wind and sunshine (Tang et al., 2022). As an insulating layer, it controls soil temperature, reduces heat stress, and maintains consistent soil moisture levels. By reducing the rate at which water moves over the soil’s surface, mulch also reduces runoff, which means that more water makes it to the root zone (Suburika et al., 2018). It prevents weeds from growing, which means less water is available for the roots and less watering is required. Mulches made of organic materials enhance soil structure as they decompose; this, in turn, increases the soil’s ability to hold water and provides more moisture for plant roots (Fonteyne et al., 2020).
2.3.6 Increase the infiltration rate
Mulching can decrease surface runoff and improve the retention of rainwater on the soil surface, allowing water to penetrate the soil for a longer duration (Eid and Negm, 2019). Conservation agriculture resulted in a reduction of irrigation water required by increasing the infiltration rate for crop production (Belay et al., 2019). In high-potential areas of Zimbabwe, mulching was found to significantly decrease surface runoff and increase infiltration, based on experiments conducted (Erenstein, 2002). Mulch, especially compost or wood chips, may improve soil structure by increasing organic matter, which in turn increases water retention and decreases runoff (Rasyid et al., 2018). It prevents soil crusting and rainwater runoff by acting as a protective layer. Mulch promotes soil porosity by producing air pockets, enabling water to travel easily through the soil profile (Čížková et al., 2021). The total penetration rate is increased when water penetrates the soil via the mulch layer. Furthermore, mulch lessens surface compaction, which in turn limits the circulation of water. By providing a cushioning effect, mulch lowers foot traffic and prevents heavy equipment from compacting the soil surface, enabling water to infiltrate the soil more quickly, thereby boosting the infiltration rate (Baker et al., 2021).
2.3.7 Effect of mulching in weed management
Mulch may cover the soil surface or operate as a material barrier and limit weed growth or physically regulate seedling emergence (Khan et al., 2022; Kaur et al., 2024). The lowest weed intensity was found in plots with polyethylene and straw mulch in comparison with plots with chemical mulch and without mulch. Weed management with and without mulch has documented considerable disparities between plots of various crops (Yadav et al., 2018). Mulch is a simple technique for managing weed populations in nurseries as well as in the field. However, to date, the weed reduction phenomena have not been thoroughly understood (Iqbal et al., 2020). When mulch is applied on the soil surface, it functions as a barrier to light transmission, decreasing the germination of small-seeded weeds. Different kinds of coatings (15 different types of coatings) were utilized compared to no coating, and the research findings revealed that there was little variation among all types of coatings, however, there were substantial changes in weed reduction when treating bare soil (Kader et al., 2019).
Mulch serves as a barrier to weed development (Ahmad et al., 2015, 2020); nevertheless, when organic mulches break down, they rapidly rise to the land’s surfaces. Some natural mulches also have an allergenic impact and produce toxic compounds that are good for weed control. Additionally, the habitat generated by mulch is excellent for beneficial bacteria that feed on weed species or seeds from weeds (Chalker-Scott, 2007). Likewise, living mulch is effective in suppressing weeds by competing for fundamental resources like light, moisture, nutrients, and oxygen. They also have therapeutic benefits on weeds. Various crops for cover and mulches also assist in minimizing weed seed germination and establishment (Iqbal et al., 2020).
2.3.8 Water saved by mulching
The application of mulch is an effective water conservation method done in arid locations to maintain soil moisture, moderate temperature, and limit soil evaporation (Yang et al., 2015; Kader et al., 2017). The findings of Zribi et al. (2015) show that surface mulching is a popular strategy of water conservation in agricultural systems that rely on rainfall. Li et al. (2013) discovered that wheat straw mulch is less successful in keeping soil moisture in check than plastic sheet mulch. Qin et al. (2015) noted that mulching’s primary advantage is its ability to preserve soil moisture by minimizing water loss from the soil surface and erosion of soil. Kader et al. (2017) stated that mulching manages soil temperature and reduces soil evaporation to conserve soil water, lowering the need for irrigation during crop cultivation seasons. According to Li et al. (2019), in order to increase system availability, mulching is essential for efficient heat and water transfer mechanisms. It is challenging to estimate how much water is conserved by mulching because of the interplay between the environment of the soil, plant development, and microclimate (Steinmetz et al., 2016). The impact of different mulches on soil water content is presented in Table 4.
Table 4 Impact of different mulches on the moisture content of the soil.
2.4 Benefits of mulching in dryland agriculture
The kind of material, ecological location, color, thickness, perforation, and availability of resources, as well as the practicality of growing crops, all influence the choice of an acceptable mulching material (Li et al., 2017). When choosing a mulch, it’s crucial to take certain traits into account. Avoid using agricultural debris as mulch since it raises the possibility of spreading pests or viruses to farmed crops. Additionally, avoid using mulch that has weed seeds in it.
By slowing the rate of evaporation, mulching is a useful method for preserving soil moisture, especially in dryland environments (Zribi et al., 2015; Kader et al., 2017). By enabling soil moisture to evaporate under the mulch layer and then condense again in the soil as droplets of water, plastic mulch with moisture-blocking qualities keeps soil moisture from leaving and may even improve soil moisture availability. Since the soil moisture is kept for many days, this helps to lengthen the application interval and decrease the need for irrigation throughout the crop growth season (Yang et al., 2015; Kader et al., 2017). Li et al. (2013) found that mulching with plastic is far more successful in retaining soil water than mulching with straw. By encouraging soil aeration around the plant, aggregating soil particles, and enhancing water drainage, mulching may increase soil productivity (Kader et al., 2017). Mulching provides several benefits for dryland agriculture, including the mitigation of soil erosion, water droplet kinetic energy, weed development, soil water loss, and competition for nutrients and water with neighboring fields (Yang et al., 2015; Kader et al., 2017). According to Qin et al. (2015), mulch may also help improve soil structure and guide nutrient flow as a result of earthworm migration into the soil. It may also decrease the pH of the soil, which increases the availability of nutrients. Plastic mulch is marketed as a stronger process wall and as being impervious to gas migration.
2.5 Role of mulching on crop production
The majority of research on mulching has been on how it affects agricultural productivity or output. López-Tolentino et al. (2016) in cucumber and Wang et al. (2021) in maize have shown that black plastic mulch may boost crop yields in the early stages of growth. Strawberry establishment may be accelerated and increase in yield by using biodegradable plastic mulches (Berglund et al., 2006). More study has been done on layer mulches in crops than on other kinds of mulch. Pine bark performed better than live sedum mulch in research on the impact of mulch types on vegetable output in a green roof system (Whittinghill et al., 2016).
To ensure effective growth of potato tubers, the soil temperature must be maintained between 16 and 20°C (Adamchuk et al., 2016). Dry conditions and temperatures higher than the ideal range can negatively impact tuber production, resulting in tuber malformation or chain sprouting of new, small tubers due to poor vegetative conditions. High temperatures can also lead to a reduction in the amount of storage components like starch, resulting in a change in tuber quality (Ávila-Valdés et al., 2020). Worldwide, mulch is produced from natural sources like organic matter, straws, and other agricultural waste; one easy and useful mulch source is cereal straw (Sabatino et al., 2018). Straw mulch treatment provides various advantages, including simplicity of application, lower soil temperature, less temperature changes during the day, and enhanced soil moisture. The effects of different mulches on various plants, such as tomatoes and eggplant, have been investigated (Rodan et al., 2020). According to Abdrabbo et al. (2017), the reaction of plants to plastic mulch is impacted by the kind of plant materials utilized and the surrounding environment. A study by Yin et al. (2012) found that mulching improved sweet cherry crops’ water status. Additionally, mulches encourage the establishment of roots, which benefits plant expansion and growth (Kader et al., 2019). The effects of mulching on crop production are shown in Table 5.
Table 5 Impact of mulching on crop yield.
2.6 Negative impact of mulching
The cost of labor, transportation, removal, and disposal of mulch can be high. The close contact of the plastic film with the soil can lead to soil fragmentation and contamination, as noted by Steinmetz et al. (2016). Grass and straw, which are commonly used types of organic mulch, contain seeds that can promote weed growth and release acid into the soil (Chalker-Scott, 2007; Patil et al., 2013). Organic mulch materials, particularly newspaper, can also be impacted by wind. Gonzalez-Dugo et al. (2014) found that the films burned and dumped on-site by farmers significantly contaminated the soil. The plastic film fragments that are discarded and buried in the arable land layer can slow crop growth.
Mulching is helpful for plants, but excessive or inappropriate application may lead to negative repercussions. Overly wet mulch may provide a permissive environment for root rot and fungal infections, thus it’s vital to monitor soil moisture levels and regulate the mulch thickness (Souza et al., 2022). Mulch may also attract pests, such as termites, and can temporarily tie up nitrogen in the soil, producing stunted growth or fading leaves (Caboň et al., 2021). To offset this, incorporating aged or decomposed mulch or supplement nitrogen fertilizer is necessary. Certain mulches, such as pine needles or oak leaves, might gently acidify the soil, helping acid-loving plants but adversely hurting neutral or alkaline plants. It’s crucial to examine the pH needs of plants and pick mulch appropriately. Thick amounts of organic mulch may block gas exchange, reducing oxygen supply to roots and fostering anaerobic conditions (Juhos et al., 2023).
2.7 The economic advantage of mulching crop
mulching offers several economic advantages by improving water efficiency, reducing weed competition, enhancing soil fertility, controlling erosion, minimizing pest and disease issues, and decreasing labor and maintenance requirements (Dong et al., 2018). By implementing mulching practices, individuals and businesses can realize cost savings, higher yields, and improved overall productivity (Kader et al., 2019). While not directly economic, mulching can have positive environmental implications that can indirectly impact the economy. For example, mulching helps conserve water resources, reduce soil erosion, and minimize nutrient runoff, which can improve water quality. These environmental benefits can have long-term economic gains by reducing costs associated with water treatment or soil remediation (Blaise et al., 2021).
It is important to note that the economic implications of mulching can vary depending on factors such as the specific crop or plant, regional conditions, scale of operations, and the overall management practices employed (Dabi et al., 2017). Nevertheless, the potential cost savings, increased productivity, soil health benefits, reduced input requirements, and environmental advantages make mulching a valuable practice with positive economic implications in various contexts (Choudhary and Bhambri, 2014).
3 Conclusion and future direction
Dryland farming focuses on rainfed agriculture, requiring efficient water resource utilization and water-conserving technologies. Mulching, a water conservation practice, is used in arid land areas to preserve soil moisture, control temperature, and minimize evaporation rates. Plastic film mulch usage increased by 5.7% in 2012, while organic mulching minimizes soil deterioration and enhances soil nutrient levels. Mulching reduces soil water loss, erosion, weed growth, and competition for nutrients and water with nearby fields. Mulching is a crucial practice in dryland agriculture, as rising temperatures and erratic rainfall can impact crop yield and soil moisture preservation. It is necessary to maintain soil moisture and make the most use of water.
Mulching materials may decrease nitrate leaching, increase microbial activity, and enhance soil characteristics. They can be inorganic, organic, or unique materials. However, the ecology of the soil and the environment are adversely affected by plastic mulching. Research is also ongoing on new mulching materials, including textile, petroleum-based, and biodegradable options. There is a need for further research since mulches made from recycled paper may leak ink into soil surfaces. Comprehending the mechanics of water flow and the interplay between soil mulch and the plant-canopy interface is crucial for optimizing mulching methods in agricultural soil.
Author contributions
AD: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GA: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abdrabbo M. A. A., Saleh S. M., Hashem F. A. (2017). Eggplant production under deficit irrigation and polyethylene mulch. Egypt J. Appl. Sci. 32, 148–161.
Adamchuk V., Prysyazhnyi V., Ivanovs S., Bulgakov V. (2016). “May. Investigations in technological method of growing potatoes under mulch of straw and its effect on the yield,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava. Vol. 25, 2016.
Adeboye O. B., Schultz B., Adekalu K. O., Prasad K. (2017). Soil water storage, yield, water productivity and transpiration efficiency of soybeans (Glyxine max L. Merr) as affected by soil surface management in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 5, 141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.04.006
Adhikari R., Bristow K. L., Casey P. S., Freischmidt G., Hornbuckle J. W., Adhikari B. (2016). Preformed and sprayable polymeric mulch film to improve agricultural water use efficiency. Agric. Water Manage. 169, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.02.006
Agassi M., Hadas A., Benyamini Y., Levy G. J., Kautsky L., Avrahamov L., et al. (1998). Mulching effects of composted MSW on water percolation and compost degradation rate. Compost Sci. Utilization. 6, 34–41. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.1998.10701929
Ahmad S., Raza M. A. S., Saleem M. F., Zahra S. S., Khan I. H., Ali M., et al. (2015). Mulching strategies for weeds control and water conservation in cotton. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 8, 299–306.
Alami-Milani M., Amini R., Mohammadinasab A. D., Shafaghkalvanegh J., Asgharzade A., Emaratpardaz J. (2013). Yield and yield components of lentil (Lens culinaris Medick.) affected by drought stress and mulch. Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 5, 1228.
Ali Mozaffari G. (2022). Climate change and its consequences in agriculture. Harris S. A. (ed.) The nature, causes, effects and mitigation of climate change on the environment. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.101444
Arora V. K., Singh C. B., Sidhu A. S., Thind S. S. (2011). Irrigation, tillage and mulching effects on soybean yield and water productivity in relation to soil texture. Agric. Water Manage. 98, 563–568. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.004
Ashrafuzzaman M., Halim M. A., Ismail M. R., Shahidullah S. M., Hossain M. A. (2011). Effect of plastic mulch on growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 54, 321–330. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132011000200014
Ávila-Valdés A., Quinet M., Lutts S., Martínez J. P., Lizana X. C. (2020). Tuber yield and quality responses of potato to moderate temperature increase during Tuber bulking under two water availability scenarios. Field Crops Res. 251, 107786. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107786
Baker J., Albrecht K., Feyereisen G., Gamble J. (2021). A perennial living mulch substantially increases infiltration in row crop systems. J. Soil Water Conserv. 77, 212–220. doi: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00080
Bakshi P., Wali V. K., Iqbal M., Jasrotia A., Kour K., Ahmed R., et al. (2015). Sustainable fruit production by soil moisture conservation with different mulches: A review. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 10, 4718–4729. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2014.9149
Bantle A., Borken W., Ellerbrock R. H., Schulze E. D., Weisser W. W., Matzner E. (2014). Quantity and quality of dissolved organic carbon released from coarse woody debris of different tree species in the early phase of decomposition. For. Ecol. Manage. 329, 287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.035
Barajas-Guzmán M. G., Campo J., Barradas V. L. (2006). Soil water, nutrient availability and sapling survival under organic and polyethylene mulch in a seasonally dry tropical forest. Plant Soil 287, 347–357. doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9082-7
Bashir S., Javed A., Bibi I., Ahmad N. (2017). Soil and water conservation (Pakistan: University of Agriculture, Faisalabad), 263–286.
Belay S. A., Schmitter P., Worqlul A. W., Steenhuis T. S., Reyes M. R., Tilahun S. A. (2019). Conservation agriculture saves irrigation water in the dry monsoon phase in the Ethiopian highlands. Water 11, 2103. doi: 10.3390/w11102103
Berglund R., Svensson B., Gertsson U. (2006). Impact of plastic mulch and poultry manure on plant establishment in organic strawberry production. J. Plant Nutr. 29, 103–112. doi: 10.1080/01904160500416497
Bhardwaj R. L. (2013). Effect of mulching on crop production under rainfed condition-a review. Agric. Rev. 34, 188–197. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0741.34.3.003
Blaise D., Manikandan A., Desouza N., Bhargavi B., Somasundaram J. (2021). Intercropping and mulching in rain-dependent cotton can improve soil structure and reduce erosion. Environ. Adv. 4, 100068. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100068
Caboň M., Galvánek D., Detheridge A. P., Griffith G. W., Maráková S., Adamčík S. (2021). Mulching has negative impact on fungal and plant diversity in Slovak oligotrophic grasslands. Basic Appl. Ecol. 52, 24–37. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.007
Chalker-Scott L. (2007). Impact of mulches on landscape plants and the environment—A review. J. Environ. Hortic. 25, 239–249. doi: 10.24266/0738-2898-25.4.239
Chaudhary R. S., Patnaik U. S., Dass A. (2003). Efficacy of mulches in conserving monsoonal moisture for the Rabi crops. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 51, 495–498.
Chen J., Heiling M., Resch C., Mbaye M., Gruber R., Dercon G. (2018). Does maize and legume crop residue mulch matter in soil organic carbon sequestration? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 265, 123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.005
Chen N., Li X., Šimůnek J., Shi H., Hu Q., Zhang Y. (2021). Evaluating the effects of biodegradable and plastic film mulching on soil temperature in a drip-irrigated field. Soil Tillage Res. 213, 105116. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105116
Chen Q., Liu Z., Zhou J., Xu X., Zhu Y. (2021). Long-term straw mulching with nitrogen fertilization increases nutrient and microbial determinants of soil quality in a maize–wheat rotation on China's Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 775, 145930. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145930
Choudhary V., Bhambri M. (2014). Agro-economic potential of capsicum with drip irrigation and mulching. SAARC J. Agric. 10, 51–60. doi: 10.3329/sja.v10i2.18323
Čížková A., Burg P., Zatloukal P., Vaidová M. (2021). Organic mulch materials improve soil moisture in vineyard. Soil Sci. Annu. 72, 1–6. doi: 10.37501/soilsa/140644
Dabi N., Fikirie K., Mulualem T. (2017). Soil and water conservation practices on crop productivity and its economic implications in Ethiopia: A review. Asian J. Agric. Res. 11, 128–136. doi: 10.3923/ajar.2017.128.136
Danish M., Kumar R., Sahu R. K. (2020). Effect of rate of organic mulch on soil moisture conservation. IJCS 8, 631–635. doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3g.9277
Daryanto S., Wang L., Jacinthe P. A. (2017). Global synthesis of drought effects on cereal, legume, tuber and root crops production: A review. Agric. Water Manage. 179, 18–33. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.022
Dass A., Singh A., Rana K. S. (2013). In-situ moisture conservation and nutrient management practices in fodder-sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Ann. Agric. Res. 34, 254–259.
Davis A. J., Strik B. C. (2022). Long-term effects of pre-plant incorporation with sawdust, sawdust mulch, and nitrogen fertilizer rate on ‘Elliott’ Highbush blueberry. HortScience 57, 414–421. doi: 10.21273/hortsci16359-21
De Biman, Bandyopadhyay S., Mukhopadhyay D. (2021). Tillage-mulch-nutrient interaction effect on N, P and K balance in soil and plant uptake in maize-black gram cropping system in an acid soil of North Bengal. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 69, 50–59. doi: 10.5958/0974-0228.2021.00020.7
Devasinghe D. A. U. D., Premaratne K. P., Sangakkara U. R. (2015). Impact of rice straw mulch on growth. Yield Components and Yield of Direct Seeded Lowland Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Trop. Agric. Res. 24, 4. doi: 10.4038/tar.v24i4.8018
Dong Q., Yang Y., Yu K., Feng H. (2018). Effects of straw mulching and plastic film mulching on improving soil organic carbon and nitrogen fractions, crop yield and water use efficiency in the Loess Plateau, China. Agric. Water Manage. 201, 133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.021
Duan C., Chen G., Hu Y., Wu S., Feng H. (2021). Alternating wide ridges and narrow furrows with film mulching improves soil hydrothermal conditions and maize water use efficiency in dry sub-humid regions. Agric. Water Manage. 245, 106559. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106559
Eid A. R., Negm A. (2019). Improving agricultural crop yield and water productivity via sustainable and engineering techniques. Conventional Water Resour. Agric. Egypt, 561–591. doi: 10.1007/698_2018_259
El-Beltagi H. S., Basit A., Mohamed H. I., Ali I., Ullah S., Kamel E. A., et al. (2022). Mulching as a sustainable water and soil saving practice in agriculture: A review. Agronomy 12, 1881. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081881
Erenstein O. (2002). Crop residue mulching in tropical and semi-tropical countries: An evaluation of residue availability and other technological implications. Soil tillage Res. 67, 115–133. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00062-4
Fang S., Xie B., Liu D., Liu J. (2011). Effects of mulching materials on nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen availability and poplar growth on degraded agricultural soil. New Forests 41, 147–162. doi: 10.1007/s11056-010-9217-9
Fernández C. (2023). Effects of post-fire application of straw mulch strips on soil erosion, soil moisture and vegetation regeneration in European dry heathlands in NW Spain. Ecol. Eng. 196, 107095. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2023.107095
Fetri M., Ghobadi M. E., Ghobadi M., Mohammadi G. (2015). Effects of mulch and sowing depth on yield and yield components of rain-fed chickpea (Cicer arietinum. L). Jordan J. Agric. Sci. 11.
Fonteyne S., Singh R. G., Govaerts B., Verhulst N. (2020). Rotation, mulch and zero tillage reduce weeds in a long-term conservation agriculture trial. Agronomy 10, 962. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10070962
Gan Y., Siddique K. H., Turner N. C., Li X. G., Niu J. Y., Yang C., et al. (2013). Ridge-furrow mulching systems—an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. Adv. Agron. 118, 429–476. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405942-9.00007-4
Gao S., Tang G., Hua D., Xiong R., Han J., Jiang S., et al. (2019). Stimuli-responsive bio-based polymeric systems and their applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 7, 709–729. doi: 10.1039/C8TB02491J
García-Orenes F., Cerdà A., Mataix-Solera J., Guerrero C., Bodí M. B., Arcenegui V., et al. (2009). Effects of agricultural management on surface soil properties and soil–water losses in eastern Spain. Soil Tillage Res. 106, 117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2009.06.002
Gheshm R., Brown R. N. (2020). The effects of black and white plastic mulch on soil temperature and yield of crisphead lettuce in Southern New England. HortTechnology 30, 781–788. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH04674-20
Gonzalez-Dugo V., Zarco-Tejada P. J., Fereres E. (2014). Applicability and limitations of using the crop water stress index as an indicator of water deficits in citrus orchards. Agric. For. Meteorol. 198, 94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.08.003
Goodman B. A. (2020). Utilization of waste straw and husks from rice production: A review. J. Biores. Bioprod. 5, 143–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jobab.2020.07.001
Gordon G. G., Foshee W. G., Reed S. T., Brown J. E., Vinson E. L. (2010). The effects of colored plastic mulches and row covers on the growth and yield of okra. HortTechnology 20, 224–233. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.20.1.224
Gosar B., Baričevič D. (2011). Ridge–furrow–ridge rainwater harvesting system with mulches and supplemental Irrigation. HortScience 46, 108–112. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.1.108
Grewal A. (2020). Haskap (Lonicera caerulea L.) Response to plastic Mulch colours and fertility amendments. Doctoral dissertation.
Gu X. B., Li Y. N., Du Y. D. (2017). Biodegradable film mulching improves soil temperature, moisture and seed yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Soil Tillage Res. 171, 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.04.008
Guo C. H. E. N., Liu S., Xiang Y., Tang X., Liu H., Yao B., et al. (2020). Impact of living mulch on soil C: N: P stoichiometry in orchards across China: A meta-analysis examining climatic, edaphic, and biotic dependency. Pedosphere 30, 181–189. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60003-0
Haapala T., Palonen P., Korpela A., Ahokas J. (2014). Feasibility of paper mulches in crop production, a review. Agric. Food Sci. 23, 60–79. doi: 10.23986/afsci.8542
Hashim S., Marwat K. B., Saeed M., Haroon M., Waqas M., Shah F. (2013). Developing a sustainable and eco-friendly weed management system using organic and inorganic mulching techniques. Pakistan J. Bot. 45, 483–486.
Iqbal R., Raza M. A. S., Valipour M., Saleem M. F., Zaheer M. S., Ahmad S., et al. (2020). Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches—a review. Bull. Natl. Res. Centre 44, 1–16. doi: 10.1186/s42269-020-00290-3
Jabran K., Ullah E., Hussain M., Farooq M., Zaman U., Yaseen M., et al. (2015). Mulching improves water productivity, yield and quality of fine rice under water-saving rice production systems. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 201, 389–400. doi: 10.1111/jac.12099
Jain N. K., Meena H. N., Bhaduri D. (2017). Improvement in productivity, water-use efficiency, and soil nutrient dynamics of summer peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) through use of polythene mulch, hydrogel, and nutrient management. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 48, 549–564. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1269792
Jat H. S., Singh G., Singh R., Choudhary M., Jat M. L., Gathala M. K., et al. (2015). Management influence on maize–wheat system performance, water productivity and soil biology. Soil Use Manage. 31, 534–543. doi: 10.1111/sum.12208
Javaid M. M., AlGwaiz H. I., Waheed H., Ashraf M., Mahmood A., Li F. M., et al. (2022). Ridge-furrow mulching enhances capture and utilization of rainfall for improved maize production under rain-fed conditions. Agronomy 12, 1187. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12051187
Jia H., Wang Z., Zhang J., Li W., Ren Z., Jia Z., et al. (2020). Effects of biodegradable mulch on soil water and heat conditions, yield and quality of processing tomatoes by drip irrigation. J. Arid Land 12, 819–836. doi: 10.1007/s40333-020-0108-4
Jiang S., Gao X., Liang J., Wang P., Gao J., Qu Y., et al. (2012). Effect of different furrow and mulched ridge on water moisture conversation and water saving of spring mung bean planted farmland. J. Agric. Sci. 4, 132. doi: 10.5539/jas.v4n7p132
Juhos K., Papdi E., Kovács F., Vasileiadis V. P., Veres A. (2023). The effect of wool mulch on plant development in the context of the physical and biological conditions in soil. Plants 12, 684. doi: 10.3390/plants12030684
Jun F., Yu G., Quanjiu W., Malhi S. S., Yangyang L. (2014). Mulching effects on water storage in soil and its depletion by alfalfa in the Loess Plateau of northwestern China. Agric. Water Manage. 138, 10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.02.018
Kader M. A., Senge M., Mojid M. A., Ito K. (2017). Recent advances in mulching materials and methods for modifying soil environment. Soil Tillage Res. 168, 155–166. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.01.001
Kader M. A., Singha A., Begum M. A., Jewel A., Khan F. H., Khan N. I. (2019). Mulching as water-saving technique in dryland agriculture. Bull. Natl. Res. Centre 43, 1–6. doi: 10.1186/s42269-019-0186-7
Kalita N. (2022). Effect of mulch types on soil moisture, soil fertility, growth and yield of pineapple (Ananas comosus) in hill zone of Assam. Ann. Plant Soil Res 24 (3), 391–395. doi: 10.47815/apsr.2021.10181
Kamal I., Gelicus A., Allaf K. (2012). Impact of instant controlled pressure drop (DIC) treatment on drying kinetics and caffeine extraction from green coffee beans. J. Food Res. 1, 24. doi: 10.5539/jfr.v1n1p24
Kasirajan S., Ngouajio M. (2012). Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 501–529. doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0068-3
Kaur R., Bana R. S., Singh T., SL M., Raj R., Govindasamy P., et al. (2024). Sequential herbicide application coupled with mulch enhances the productivity and quality of winter onion (Allium cepa L.) while effectively controlling the mixed weed flora. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7, 1271340. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1271340
Kazemi F., Safari N. (2018). Effect of mulches on some characteristics of a drought tolerant flowering plant for urban landscaping. Desert 23, 75–84.
Khan B. A., Nijabat A., Khan M. I., Khan I., Hashim S., Nadeem M. A., et al. (2022). “Implications of Mulching on weed management in crops and vegetable,” in Mulching in Agroecosystems: Plants, Soil & Environment (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore), 199–213.
Kishore G., Babu B. M., Mattaparti L. D. (2022). Influence of plastic mulching and irrigation levels on soil temperature, moisture and water use efficiency of tomato crop (Solanum lycopersicum). Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 34(20), 277–282. doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2031152
Kosterna E. (2014). Organic mulches in the vegetable cultivation (a review). Ecol. Chem. Eng. 21, 481–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jobab.2020.07.001
Kumari P., Ojha R. K., Job M. (2016). Effect of plastic mulches on soil temperature and tomato yield inside and outside the polyhouse. Agric. Sci. Digest-A Res. J. 36, 333–336. doi: 10.18805/asd.v36i4.6479
Kuniga T., Hoshi N., Kita M. (2018). “Effect of reflective mulching sheets on citrus tree growth,” in XXI International Congress on Plastics in Agriculture: Agriculture, Plastics and Environment. 1252, 265–270.
Larentzaki E., Plate J., Nault B. A., Shelton A. M. (2008). Impact of straw mulch on populations of onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in onion. J. Econ. Entomol. 101, 1317–1324. doi: 10.1093/jee/101.4.1317
Larkin R. P. (2020). Effects of selected soil amendments and mulch type on soil properties and productivity in organic vegetable production. Agronomy 10, 795. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10060795
Lee J. G., Hwang H. Y., Park M. H., Lee C. H., Kim P. J. (2019). Depletion of soil organic carbon stocks are larger under plastic film mulching for maize. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 70, 807–818. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12757
Li R., Hou X., Jia Z., Han Q., Yang B. (2012). Effects of rainfall harvesting and mulching technologies on soil water, temperature, and maize yield in Loess Plateau region of China. Soil Res. 50, 105–113. doi: 10.1071/SR11331
Li Q., Li H., Zhang L., Zhang S., Chen Y. (2018). Mulching improves yield and water-use efficiency of potato cropping in China: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 221, 50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.017
Li S. X., Wang Z. H., Li S. Q., Gao Y. J., Tian X. H. (2013). Effect of plastic sheet mulch, wheat straw mulch, and maize growth on water loss by evaporation in dryland areas of China. Agric. Water Manage. 116, 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.004
Li C., Wang Q., Wang N., Luo X., Li Y., Zhang T., et al. (2021). Effects of different plastic film mulching on soil hydrothermal conditions and grain-filling process in an arid irrigation district. Sci. Total Environ. 795, 148886. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148886
Li C., Wang C., Wen X., Qin X., Liu Y., Han J., et al. (2017). Ridge–furrow with plastic film mulching practice improves maize productivity and resource use efficiency under the wheat–maize double–cropping system in dry semi–humid areas. Field Crops Res. 203, 201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.029
Li C., Wen X., Wan X., Liu Y., Han J., Liao Y., et al. (2016). Towards the highly effective use of precipitation by ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching instead of relying on irrigation resources in a dry semi-humid area. Field Crops Res. 188, 62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.013
Li W., Xiong L., Wang C., Liao Y., Wu W. (2019). Optimized ridge–furrow with plastic film mulching system to use precipitation efficiently for winter wheat production in dry semi–humid areas. Agric. Water Manage. 218, 211–221. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.048
Li Z., Zhang Q., Qiao Y., Du K., Li Z., Tian C., et al. (2022). Influence of straw mulch and no-tillage on soil respiration, its components and economic benefit in a Chinese wheat–maize cropping system. Global Ecol. Conserv. 34, e02013. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02013
Liao Y., Cao H. X., Liu X., Li H. T., Hu Q. Y., Xue W. K. (2021). By increasing infiltration and reducing evaporation, mulching can improve the soil water environment and apple yield of orchards in semiarid areas. Agric. Water Manage. 253, 106936. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106936
Liu Z., Li Z., Huang F., Wang B., Zhao C., Zhang P., et al. (2022). Plastic film mulching and biochar amendment enhance maize yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency by reducing gaseous nitrogen losses. Field Crops Res. 289, 108714. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108714
López-Tolentino G., Ibarra-Jiménez L., Méndez-Prieto A., Lozano-del Río A. J., Lira-Saldivar R. H., Valenzuela-Soto J. H., et al. (2016). Photosynthesis, growth, and fruit yield of cucumber in response to oxo-degradable plastic mulches. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B Soil & Plant Science. 67, 1, 77–84. doi: 10.1080/09064710.2016.1224376
Lu H., Xia Z., Fu Y., Wang Q., Xue J., Chu J. (2020). Response of soil temperature, moisture, and spring maize (Zea mays L.) root/shoot growth to different mulching materials in semi-arid areas of Northwest China. Agronomy 10, 453. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10040453
Łukasiewicz S. (2013). Hazards of excessive use of bark mulch in green areas. Ecol. Questions 18. doi: 10.2478/ecoq-2013-0006
Luo L., Hui X., He G., Wang S., Wang Z., Siddique K. H. (2022). Benefits and limitations to plastic mulching and nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and sulfur nutrition: Multi-site field trials in the semiarid area of China. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 799093. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.799093
Ma J., Chang L., Li Y., Lan X., Ji W., Zhang J., et al. (2024). Straw strip mulch improves soil moisture similar to plastic film mulch but with a higher net income. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 362, 108855. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108855
Ma D., Chen L., Qu H., Wang Y., Misselbrook T., Jiang R. (2018). Impacts of plastic film mulching on crop yields, soil water, nitrate, and organic carbon in Northwestern China: A meta-analysis. Agric. Water Manage. 202, 166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.001
Malik A., Shakir A. S., Khan M. J., Naveedullah M., Ajmal M., Ahmad S. (2018). Effects of different mulching techniques on sugar beet performance under semi-arid subtropical climatic conditions. Pak J. Bot. 50, 1219–1224.
Mallory E., Smagula J. (2014). EFFECTS OF SEAFOOD-WASTE COMPOST AND MULCH ON SOIL HEALTH AND SOIL NUTRIENT DYNAMICS IN WILD BLUEBERRY (VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM AIT.). Acta Hortic. 1017, 461–468. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1017.57
Marwein Y.E.A.R.B.O.K. (2016). Influence of organic mulching on soil moisture and yield of rajma (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties under mid altitude of Meghalaya. Central Agricultural University-Imphal, 76p. Unpublished M. Sc. dissertation, submitted to the College of Postgraduate Studies.
McMillen M. (2013). The effect of mulch type and thickness on the soil surface evaporation rate (San Luis Obispo, CA, USA: California Polytechnic State University).
Mehmood S., Zamir S., Rasool T., Akbar W. (2014). Effect of tillage and mulching on soil fertility and grain yield of sorghum. Sci. Agric. 8, 31–36. doi: 10.15192/pscp.sa.2014.4.1.3136
Moursy F. S., Mostafa F. A., Solieman N. Y. (2015). Polyethylene and rice straw as soil mulching: reflection of soil mulch type on soil temperature, soil borne diseases, plant growth and yield of tomato. Global J. Advanced Res. 2, 1497–1519.
Paradelo R., Devesa-Rey R., Cancelo-González J., Basanta R., Pena M., Díaz-Fierros F., et al. (2012). Effect of a compost mulch on seed germination and plant growth in a burnt forest soil from NW Spain. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 12, 73–86. doi: 10.4067/s0718-95162012000100007
Patil S. S., Kelkar T. S., Bhalerao S. M., Soil A., Practice W. C. (2013). A soil and water conservation practice. Res. J. Agric. For 1, 26–29. doi: 10.14303/irjas.2013.114
Puka-Beals J., Gramig G. (2021). Weed suppression potential of living mulches, newspaper hydromulches, and compost blankets in organically managed carrot production. HortTechnology 31, 89–96. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH04745-20
Qin W., Chi B., Oenema O. (2013). Long-term monitoring of rainfed wheat yield and soil water at the loess plateau reveals low water use efficiency. PloS One 8, e78828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078828
Qin W., Hu C., Oenema O. (2015). Soil mulching significantly enhances yields and water and nitrogen use efficiencies of maize and wheat: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 5, 16210. doi: 10.1038/srep16210
Qin S., Li S., Kang S., Du T., Tong L., Ding R. (2016). Can the drip irrigation under film mulch reduce crop evapotranspiration and save water under the sufficient irrigation condition? Agric. Water Manage. 177, 128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.06.022
Qin S., Zhang J., Dai H., Wang D., Li D. (2014). Effect of ridge–furrow and plastic-mulching planting patterns on yield formation and water movement of potato in a semi-arid area. Agric. Water Manage. 131, 87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.09.015
Qin S., Zhang Y., Wang J., Wang C., Mo Y., Gong S. (2022). Transparent and black film mulching improve photosynthesis and yield of summer maize in North China plain. Agriculture 12, 719. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12050719
Qiu Y., Wang X., Xie Z., Wang Y. (2020). Effects of gravel-sand mulch on the runoff, erosion, and nutrient losses in the Loess Plateau of north-western China under simulated rainfall. Soil Water Res. 16, 22–28. doi: 10.17221/141/2019-swr
Rajablariani H. R., Hassankhan F., Rafezi R. (2012). Effect of colored plastic mulches on yield of tomato and weed biomass. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 3, 590. doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2012.V3.291
Ranjan P., Patle G. T., Prem M., Solanke K. R. (2017). Organic mulching-A water saving technique to increase the production of fruits and vegetables. Curr. Agric. Res. J. 5(3), 371–380. doi: 10.12944/CARJ.5.3.17
Rasyid B., Oda M., Omae H. (2018). “Soil water retention and plant growth response on the soil affected by continuous organic matter and plastic mulch application,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing Vol. 157. 012008. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/157/1/012008
Rodan M. A., Hassandokht M. R., Sadeghzadeh-Ahari D., Mousavi A. (2020). Mitigation of drought stress in eggplant by date straw and plastic mulches. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 19, 492–498. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2020.09.006
Sabatino L., Iapichino G., Vetrano F., Moncada A., Miceli A., De Pasquale C., et al. (2018). EFFECTS OF POLYETHYLENE AND BIODEGRADABLE STARCH-BASED MULCHING FILMS ON EGGPLANT PRODUCTION IN A MEDITERRANEAN AREA. Carpathian J. Food Sci. Technol. 10. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1015.25
Safari N., Kazemi F., Tehranifar A. (2021). Examining temperature and soil moisture contents of mulches in the urban landscaping of an arid region. Desert 26, 139–156.
Saikia U. S., Kumar A., Das S., Pradhan R., Goswami B., Wungleng V. C., et al. (2014). Effect of mulching on microclimate, growth and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea) under mid-hill condition of Meghalaya. J. Agrometeorol 16, 144–145. doi: 10.54386/jam.v16i1.1502
Serrano-Ruiz H., Martin-Closas L., Pelacho A. M. (2021). Biodegradable plastic mulches: Impact on the agricultural biotic environment. Sci. Total Environ. 750, 141228. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141228
Shashidhar K. R., Bhaskar R. N., Priyadharshini P., Chandrakumar H. L. (2008). Effect of different organic mulches on pH, organic carbon content and microbial status of soil and its influence on leaf yield of M5 mulberry (Morus indica L.) under rainfed condition. Curr. Biotica 2, 405–413.
Snyder K., Grant A., Murray C., Wolff B. (2015). The effects of plastic mulch systems on soil temperature and moisture in central Ontario. HortTechnology 25, 162–170. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.25.2.162
Song X., Sun R., Chen W., Wang M. (2019). Effects of surface straw mulching and buried straw layer on soil water content and salinity dynamics in saline soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 100, 58–68. doi: 10.1139/cjss-2019-0038
Souza R., Jha A., Calabrese S. (2022). Quantifying the hydrological impact of soil mulching across rainfall regimes and mulching layer thickness. J. Hydrol. 607, 127523. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127523
Steinmetz Z., Wollmann C., Schaefer M., Buchmann C., David J., Tröger J., et al. (2016). Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Sci. Total Environ. 550, 690–705. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.153
Subrahmaniyan K., Zhou W. (2008). Soil temperature associated with degradable, non-degradable plastic and organic mulches and their effect on biomass production, enzyme activities and seed yield of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). J. Sustain. Agric. 32, 611–627. doi: 10.1080/10440040802394927
Suburika F., Mangera Y., Wahida W. (2018). Conservation of soil moisture using mulch of green bean plants (Vigna radiata). Musamus AE Featuring J. 1, 10–18. doi: 10.35724/maef-j.v1i1.1609
Tan S., Wang Q., Xu D., Zhang J., Shan Y. (2017). Evaluating effects of four controlling methods in bare strips on soil temperature, water, and salt accumulation under film-mulched drip irrigation. Field Crops Res. 214, 350–358. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.004
Tan Z., Yi Y., Wang H., Zhou W., Yang Y., Wang C. (2016). Physical and degradable properties of mulching films prepared from natural fibers and biodegradable polymers. Appl. Sci. 6, 147. doi: 10.3390/app6050147
Tang M., Gao X., Wu P., Li H., Zhang C. (2022). Effects of living mulch and branches mulching on soil moisture, temperature and growth of rain-fed jujube trees. Plants 11, 2654. doi: 10.3390/plants11192654
Teame G., Tsegay A., Abrha B. (2017). Effect of organic mulching on soil moisture, yield, and yield contributing components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Int. J. Agron. 2017, 1–6. doi: 10.1155/2017/4767509
Tellen V. A., Yerima B. P. (2018). Effects of land use change on soil physicochemical properties in selected areas in the North West region of Cameroon. Environ. Syst. Res. 7, 1–29. doi: 10.1186/s40068-018-0106-0
Thapa R., Tully K. L., Reberg-Horton C., Cabrera M., Davis B. W., Fleisher D., et al. (2022). Cover crop residue decomposition in no-till cropping systems: Insights from multi-state on-farm litter bag studies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 326, 107823. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107823
Torres-Olivar V., Ibarra-Jiménez L., Cárdenas-Flores A., Lira-Saldivar R. H., Valenzuela-Soto J. H., Castillo-Campohermoso M. A. (2018). Changes induced by plastic film mulches on soil temperature and their relevance in growth and fruit yield of pickling cucumber. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B—Soil Plant Sci. 68, 97–103. doi: 10.1080/09064710.2017.1367836
Tuure J., Räsänen M., Hautala M., Pellikka P., Mäkelä P. S. A., Alakukku L. (2021). Plant residue mulch increases measured and modelled soil moisture content in the effective root zone of maize in semi-arid Kenya. Soil Tillage Res. 209, 104945. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.104945
Wang Z., Li M., Flury M., Schaeffer S. M., Chang Y., Tao Z., et al. (2021). Agronomic performance of polyethylene and biodegradable plastic film mulches in a maize cropping system in a humid continental climate. Sci. Total Environ. 786, 147460. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147460
Whittinghill L. J., Rowe D. B., Ngouajio M., Cregg B. M. (2016). Evaluation of nutrient management and mulching strategies for vegetable production on an extensive green roof. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 40, 297–318. doi: 10.1080/21683565.2015.1129011
Xie Z. K., Wang Y. J., Li F. M. (2005). Effect of plastic mulching on soil water use and spring wheat yield in arid region of northwest China. Agric. Water Manage. 75, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.12.014
Xiukang W., Zhanbin L., Yingying X. (2015). Effects of mulching and nitrogen on soil temperature, water content, nitrate-N content and maize yield in the Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manage. 161, 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.019
Yadav G. S., Das A., Lal R., Babu S., Meena R. S., Patil S. B., et al. (2018). Conservation tillage and mulching effects on the adaptive capacity of direct-seeded upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) to alleviate weed and moisture stresses in the North Eastern Himalayan Region of India. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 64, 1254–1267. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1423555
Yang L., Muhammad I., Chi Y. X., Wang D., Zhou X. B. (2022). Straw return and nitrogen fertilization to maize regulate soil properties, microbial community, and enzyme activities under a dual cropping system. Front. Microbiol. 13, 823963. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.823963
Yang J., Qin R., Shi X., Wei H., Sun G., Li F. M., et al. (2022). The effects of plastic film mulching and straw mulching on licorice root yield and soil organic carbon content in a dryland farming. Sci. Total Environ. 826, 154113. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154113
Yang N., Sun Z. X., Feng L. S., Zheng M. Z., Chi D. C., Meng W. Z., et al. (2015). Plastic film mulching for water-efficient agricultural applications and degradable films materials development research. Mater. Manufacturing Processes 30, 143–154. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2014.930958
Yin X., Long L. E., Huang X. L., Jaja N., Bai J., Seavert C. F., et al. (2012). Transitional effects of double-lateral drip irrigation and straw mulch on irrigation water consumption, mineral nutrition, yield, and storability of sweet cherry. HortTechnology 22, 484–492. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.22.4.484
Yin W., Feng F., Zhao C., Yu A., Hu F., Chai Q., et al. (2016). Integrated double mulching practices optimizes soil temperature and improves soil water utilization in arid environments. Int. J. Biometeorol. 60 (9), 1423–1437. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1134-y
Yordanova M., Gerasimova N. (2015). Effect of mulching on weed infestation and yield of beetroot (Beta vulgaris ssp. rapaceae atrorubra Krass). Org. Agric. (2), 133–138. doi: 10.1007/s13165-015-0122-6
Yu Y. Y., Turner N. C., Gong Y. H., Li F. M., Fang C., Ge L. J., et al. (2018). Benefits and limitations to straw-and plastic-film mulch on maize yield and water use efficiency: A meta-analysis across hydrothermal gradients. Eur. J. Agron. 99, 138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.07.005
Zhao H., Wang R. Y., Ma B. L., Xiong Y. C., Qiang S. C., Wang C. L., et al. (2014). Ridge-furrow with full plastic film mulching improves water use efficiency and tuber yields of potato in a semiarid rainfed ecosystem. Field Crops Res. 161, 137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.013
Zhao Z. Y., Wang P. Y., Xiong X. B., Wang Y. B., Zhou R., Tao H. Y., et al. (2022). Environmental risk of multi-year polythene film mulching and its green solution in arid irrigation region. J. Hazard. Mater. 435, 128981. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128981
Zhao H., Xiong Y. C., Li F. M., Wang R. Y., Qiang S. C., Yao T. F., et al. (2012). Plastic film mulch for half growing-season maximized WUE and yield of potato via moisture-temperature improvement in a semi-arid agroecosystem. Agric. Water Manage. 104, 68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.11.016
Zheng Y., Sun X., Li S., Zhou W., Fan Z., Du T., et al. (2022). Soil erodibility after the removal of wood chip mulch: A wind tunnel experiment. J. Soil Water Conserv. 77, 493–500. doi: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00125
Zhou Z., Zeng X., Chen K., Li Z., Guo S., Shangguan Y., et al. (2019). Long-term straw mulch effects on crop yields and soil organic carbon fractions at different depths under a no-till system on the Chengdu Plain, China. J. Soils Sediments 19, 2143–2152. doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-02234-x
Keywords: soil-water conservation, organic matter, mulch, soil moisture, dry land
Citation: Demo AH and Asefa Bogale G (2024) Enhancing crop yield and conserving soil moisture through mulching practices in dryland agriculture. Front. Agron. 6:1361697. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2024.1361697
Received: 26 December 2023; Accepted: 11 March 2024;
Published: 27 March 2024.
Edited by:
Francesco Morari, University of Padua, ItalyReviewed by:
Ioannis Roussis, Agricultural University of Athens, GreeceAnchal Dass, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), India
Copyright © 2024 Demo and Asefa Bogale. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Addis Hailu Demo, YWRkaXNoYWlsdTk5M0BnbWFpbC5jb20=