Vanessa Aguiar Veloso
James S. Drouillard- Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States
Liver abscessation is an important metabolic disorder that commonly afflicts cattle consuming cereal-based, high-concentrate diets. Economic ramifications of liver abscessation are substantial, and include liver condemnation, decreased body weight gain, poorer efficiency of feed utilization, reduced carcass yield, and impairments in operational efficiency of commercial abattoirs. The etiological agent most commonly associated with liver abscesses is Fusobacterium necrophorum, which is an anaerobic, Gram-negative, nonmotile, nonsporulating, and rod-shaped (pleomorphic) bacterium. Fusobacterium necrophorum is one of the major proteolytic species of bacteria in the rumen, and it is believed to have a major role in degradation of dietary lysine. Herein we describe interactions between lysine and F. necrophorum, and the potential role of dietary lysine as an enabling factor in the development of liver abscesses in cattle.
Introduction
Aggressive feeding programs, such as those used by North American feedlot operations, often are associated with increased incidence of liver abscesses in cattle at slaughter (1). Data from Brown et al. (2) revealed that liver abscesses decreased daily weight gain and efficiency of feed utilization in feedlot cattle. When comparing slaughtered cattle with severe liver abscesses vs. healthy cattle or animals with minor abscesses, Brown et al. (3) reported that severe abscesses decrease gain and resulted in poorer dressing percentages compared to animals with healthy livers. The rate of liver condemnations in U.S. cattle has been estimated to be 44.6%, with most condemnations being due to liver abscessation (4). A variety of dietary characteristics have been studied and associated with incidence of liver abscesses in feedlot cattle. Generally, the incidence is affected by amount and type of forage included in the finishing diets. Animals fed diets with greater proportions of roughage were observed to have lower incidence of liver abscesses (5). Utley et al. (6) observed that physical characteristics of the forage tended to impact incidence of liver abscesses. Additionally, grain type also was described to affect incidence of liver abscess (7), presumably as a result of differences in rate of ruminal digestion. Incidence of liver abscesses typically is greater in feedlot steers than in heifers, which likely is due to differences in feed intake between heifers and steers (8). Holstein feedlot steers, which normally are fed for longer periods compared to beef breeds, also have greater incidence of abscessed livers compared to slaughtered beef breeds (8).
Liver abscesses are a major cause of liver condemnations in packing plants, and the economic impact of liver condemnations is heavily influenced by suboptimal animal performance and decreased carcass yield compared to healthy cattle (1, 9), as well as decreases in line speed at commercial abattoirs. Brown and Lawrence (10) estimated an annual economic loss of $7,007,797 to the beef industry due to liver abscessation in cattle. Severely abscessed livers are frequently found adhered to the diaphragm and/or abdominal organs, which results in substantial losses due to trimming of compromised areas of the carcass. Carcass trimmings reduce total hot carcass weight and are estimated to cause an opportunity loss of more than 25 million kg of carcass weight in US beef production (10). The estimated decrease in carcass value of an animal with a severely abscessed liver (i.e., livers with multiple large abscesses, livers adhered to abdominal organs and/or diaphragm, and livers with ruptured abscesses) range from $25.54 (10) to more than $52 (11).
Formation of liver abscesses in ruminants is regarded as a secondary sequelae to ruminal acidosis, which can result in ruminal lesions that allow pathogens to enter into the portal blood supply (12). Hence, the same factors that lead to development of ruminal acidosis and ruminitis, such as irregular bunk management and abrupt changes in amount or fermentability of the diet, can induce liver abscessation in cattle. Severe abscesses also can affect surrounding tissues, leading to increased carcass trim losses during processing and reduced carcass weight. Rupture of abscesses during processing can lead to contamination of the carcass, often requiring extensive trimming of the carcass and interruption of the slaughter chain flow (1).
Liver Abscess in Feedlot Cattle
Liver abscesses are the primary liver abnormalities of feedlot cattle recorded at the time of slaughter (10). According to the National Beef Quality Audit-2016, 44.6% of livers were condemned at slaughter, and liver abscesses accounted for 46.4% of the total liver condemnations (4), thus affecting over 20% of the U.S. fed cattle population.
Liver abscesses have a significant economic impact on the feedlot cattle industry, which varies according to the severity of liver abscesses (i.e., severely abscessed livers may be found adhered to abdominal organs and diaphragm resulting in carcass trimming). Based on the number and size of abscesses, liver abscesses are scored on a scale of 1 to 3, as mild, moderate, and severe, respectively [or as A-, A, and A+; (3)]. Brown and Lawrence (10) estimated a decrease in carcass returns of US$20 to US$80 as the opportunity value lost due to liver abscessation in the beef industry per animal.
Although it is well stablished that F. necrophorum is the primary etiological agent of liver abscessation in feedlot cattle, bacteriologic studies performed in abscessed livers have shown that other microbes can be involved (7). In most cases, the second most frequent pathogen isolated from liver abscesses is Trueperella pyogenes (previously identified as Arcanobacterium pyogenes; 4).
Trueperella pyogenes is a Gram-positive, pleomorphic, rod-shaped bacterium, and a facultative anaerobe. Generally, the occurrence of T. pyogenes in hepatic abscesses range from 2 to 40% (8). Furthermore, occurrence of T. pyogenes in hepatic abscesses is almost always associated with F. necrophorum [i.e., isolated from 100% of the hepatic abscesses; (8)]. Such observations lead other authors to speculate the existence of a pathogenic synergism between the two species (13), which could potentially occur either during initial establishment of F. necrophorum in the ruminal wall or in the liver parenchyma. It has been hypothesized that T. pyogenes utilizes oxygen, creating an anaerobic environment that is optimal for multiplication of F. necrophorum. Furthermore, a number of other anaerobic and facultative bacteria have been isolated from hepatic abscesses, including Bacteriodes spp., Clostridium spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Mobilincus spp., Pasteurella spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Porphyromonas spp., Prevotella spp., Propionibacterium spp., Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Salmonella enterica, and others (8).
Fusobacterium Necrophorum
Fusobacterium necrophorum has been identified as the primary etiologic agent of liver abscesses in feedlot cattle (7). It is an anaerobic Gram-negative, nonmotile, nonsporulating, and rod-shaped (pleomorphic) bacterium. Members of the genera Fusobacterium are the most common anaerobes identified in animals with infectious pyonecrotic processes, where F. necrophorum is the most commonly isolated specie (14).
In the rumen, F. necrophorum utilizes lactate as its primary energy substrate (13). Because F. necrophorum is a lactate-fermenting bacterium, its concentrations in the rumen tended to be 10-fold greater in grain-fed cattle than cattle fed forage-based diets (13). Russell (15) also observed that Fusobacterium spp. isolated from the rumen could utilize lysine as an energy source for growth. In fact, the strains isolated from dairy cattle fed timothy hay or a commercial dairy ration degraded lysine rapidly (15). Amino acids are degraded in the rumen by a group of bacteria generally classified as hyper-ammonia producers (16). Attwood et al. (17) identified a strain of F. necrophorum isolated from the rumen that was hyper-ammonia producing. Thereafter, Russel (15) described F. necrophorum's great capacity for degrading lysine. Those observations led subsequent authors to hypothesize that F. necrophorum may be the major bacteria involved in lysine degradation within the rumen. Elwakeel et al. (18) conducted in vitro studies to characterize lysine degradation by ruminal F. necrophorum using seven ruminal isolates that were grown on lactate or lysine as the primary energy sources. Both sub-species of ruminal F. necrophorum (necrophorum and fundiliforme) were described to use lysine as their primary source of carbon and energy.
Aguiar Veloso (19) conducted a study in which a ruminally-protected form of lysine was fed at 4 different levels (0, 20, 40, or 60 g/animal daily) to finishing beef steers during the final 42 days of the feedlot finishing period, and observed a dose-dependent increase in liver abscesses (P < 0.04) as the amount of supplemental lysine was increased in the diet. Additionally, supplementing lysine tended (P = 0.07) to increase severity of liver abscesses. The mechanism by which lysine supplementation stimulated formation of liver abscesses in finishing cattle was not readily evident, but the observation raises questions concerning the possible role of lysine in stimulating proliferation and (or) virulence of F. necrophorum within the rumen, post-ruminal gastrointestinal tract, or in the liver.
Prophylaxis
The control of liver abscesses in feedlot cattle has been heavily dependent on the use of antimicrobial compounds. Antibacterial drugs are largely incorporated in feedlot diets to improve overall animal health and feed conversion (20); however, the use of antibiotics in livestock production has become a matter of concern. Although there is some concern with regard to the presence of antibiotic residues in meat, generally this would be considered minor when compared with the issue of selection and amplification of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria. Extensive use of sub-therapeutic doses of antimicrobial agents as growth promotants constitutes selective pressure that can induce local bacteria populations to develop resistance to antibiotic agents. The emergence of microbial resistance may compromise therapeutic use of antibiotics in various ways, such as: (1) selection of microbes that are direct human pathogens; (2) selection of resistant zoonotic microorganisms (i.e., pathogenic to animals and humans); (3) resistance determinants may be selected in a bacterium that is a member of the commensal flora that subsequently can become pathogenic to humans, animals, or both (21). Furthermore, to reduce the risk of selecting resistant bacteria, the use of antibiotics must be restricted, and the most reasonable area for reducing the use of antibiotics is their use as growth promoters in food animals. In June of 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced their final rule aimed at restricting access to “medically important” drugs and prohibiting their use as growth promotants. In January 2017, the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) and animal drug manufacturers completed the voluntary transition of all medically important antimicrobial drugs used in or on animal feed, from over-the-counter to Veterinary Feed Directive marketing status, thus requiring a veterinary prescription for their use.
A 10-year net change for retail beef supply after removing preventative liver abscess controls was estimated by Olvera (22), who predicted a reduction in total quantities of 6.31% over that timeframe, corresponding to a loss of 510 million kilograms of beef. If causational factors of liver abscess were identified, alternative preventive or curative methods could perhaps be more quickly identified and compared. Mir et al. (23) observed that sunflower seed supplementation to finishing steers reduced incidence and severity of liver abscesses. Others described a quadratic decrease in incidence of liver abscesses when any amount of dried full-fat corn germ was included in finishing cattle diets (24). The authors attributed decreases in liver abscesses to the decrease in starch intake and to changes in feed intake patterns caused by full-fat corn germ supplementation. The full-fat corn germ used in their research was, however, dried and thus was subject to formation of Maillard reactions end-products, including the brown melanoidin pigments (25). It is worthy to note that melanoidins interfere with normal proteolytic activity (26), and also are known to have activity against specific microbial populations (27), thus it is conceivable that decreases in liver abscessation were a consequence of indirect effects on Fusobacteria sp. through suppression of its proteolytic activity.
Although there is an established relationship between highly fermentable diets and hepatic abscessation in ruminants, the impact of other dietary characteristics and ingredient profiles have not been fully explored. Aguiar Veloso (19) initially described a relationship between lysine supplementation and liver abscessation in feedlot steers; however, the author failed to replicate the observation in a second study. To the best of our knowledge there are no studies that investigate impact of dietary protein concentration on incidence and severity of liver abscessation in cattle. When Prior et al. (28) fed diets with low, medium, and high levels of energy and protein, incidence of liver abscessation was reported with respect to dietary energy levels but impact of dietary protein concentration was not elucidated. Thus, further studies are needed to determine the impact of dietary protein level, as well as other nutrients, on the incidence and severity of hepatic abscessation in cattle.
Conclusions and Discussion
In summary, from the current knowledge, we infer that dietary lysine may play an important role in the formation of liver abscesses in cattle fed high-concentrate diets. Furthermore, we speculate that this may be the result of its effects on proliferation or virulence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, the predominant etiological agent associated with abscessed livers. It is unknown if this effect occurs within the rumen, post-ruminal gastrointestinal tract, or liver. A more complete understanding of the role of lysine in formation of liver abscesses could be important in identifying alternative, non-antibiotic mitigation methods.
Author Contributions
VAV and JD were responsible for conceptualization and writing, review, and editing. Both authors have approved this manuscript for publication.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project KS-1018307-HA.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The content of this manuscript has been published in part as component of the thesis of Vanessa Aguiar Veloso 2020. Effects of ruminally-protected lysine supplementation on growing and finishing performance of beef cattle. MS Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan. https://hdl.handle.net/2097/40539.
References
1. Nagaraja TG, Chengappa MM. Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle: A Review. J Anim Sci. (1998) 76:287–98. doi: 10.2527/1998.761287x
2. Brown H, Elliston NG, McAskill JW, Muenster OA, Tonkinson LV. Tylosin phosphate (TP) and tylosin urea adduct (TUA) for the prevention of liver abscesses, improved weight gains and feed efficiency in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. (1973) 37:1085–91. doi: 10.2527/jas1973.3751085x
3. Brown H, Bing RF, Grueter HP, McAskill JW, Cooley CO, Rathmacher RP. Tylosin and chloretetracycline for the prevention of liver abscesses, improved weight gains and feed efficiency in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. (1975) 40:207–13. doi: 10.2527/jas1975.402207x
4. Harris MK, Eastwood LC, Boykin CA, Arnold AN, Gehring KB, Hale DS, et al. National Beef Quality Audit-2016, assessment of cattle hide characteristics, offal condemnations, and carcass traits to determine the quality status of the market cow and bull beef industry. Trans Anim Sci. (2018) 2:37–49. doi: 10.1093/tas/txx002
5. Zinn RA, Plascencia A. Effects of forage level on the comparative feeding value of supplemental fat in growing-finishing diets for feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. (1996) 74:1194–201. doi: 10.2527/1996.7461194x
6. Utley PR, Hellwig RE, Butler JL, McCormick WC. Comparison of unground, ground and pelleted peanut hulls as roughage sources in steer finishing diets. J Anim Sci. (1973) 37:608–11. doi: 10.2527/jas1973.372608x
7. Nagaraja TG, Lechtenberg KF. Liver Abscesses in Feedlot Cattle. Vet Clin North Am - Food Anim Pract. (2007) 23:351–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.05.002
8. Amachawadi RG, Nagaraja TG. Liver abscesses in cattle: a review of incidence in Holsteins and of bacteriology and vaccine approaches to control in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. (2016) 94:1620–32. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0261
9. Brink DR, Lowry SR, Stock RA, Parrott JC. Severity of liver abscesses and efficiency of feed utilization of feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. (1990) 68:1201–7. doi: 10.2527/1990.6851201x
10. Brown TR, Lawrence TE. Association of liver abnormalities with carcass grading performance and value. J Anim Sci. (2010) 88:4037–43. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3219
11. Reinhardt CD, Hubbert ME. Control of liver abscesses in feedlot cattle: a review. Prof Am Sci. (2015) 31:101–8. doi: 10.15232/pas.2014-01364
12. Jensen R, Connel WE, Deem AW. Rumenitis and its relation to rate of change of ration and the proportion of concentrate in the ration of cattle. Am J Vet Res. (1954) 51:425–8.
13. Tadepalli S, Narayanan SK, Stewart GC, Chengappa MM, Nagaraja TG. Fusobacterium necrophorum: A ruminal bacterium that invades liver to cause abscesses in cattle. Anaerobe. (2009) 15:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2008.05.005
14. Jang SS, Hirsh DC. Characterization, distribution, and microbiological associations of Fusobacterium spp. in clinical specimens of animal origin. J Clin Microbiol. (1994) 32:384–7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.32.2.384-387.1994
15. Russell JB. Enrichment of fusobacteria from the rumen that can utilize lysine as an energy source for growth. Anaerobe. (2005) 11:177–84. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.01.001
16. Russell JB, Onodera R, Hino T. Ruminal protein fermentation: new perspectives on previous contradictions. In: Kawashima R, Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, editors. Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants. New York, NY: Academic Press. (1991). p. 681–97. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-702290-1.50034-5
17. Attwood GT, Klieve AV, Ouwerkerk D, Patel BKC. Ammonia-hyperproducing bacteria from New Zealand ruminants. Appl Environ Microbiol. (1998) 64:1796–804. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.5.1796-1804.1998
18. Elwakeel EA, Amachawadi RG, Nour AM, Nasser MEA, Nagaraja TG, Titgemeyer EC. In vitro degradation of lysine by ruminal fluid-based fermentations and by Fusobacterium necrophorum. J Dairy Sci. (2013) 96:495–505. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5810
19. Aguiar Veloso V. Effects of ruminally-protected lysine supplementation on growing and finishing performance of beef cattle. M.S. Thesis. Kansas State University, Kanas, MA, United States. (2020). Available online at: https://hdl.handle.net/2097/40539. (accessed September 21, 2020).
20. National Academy of Science Engineering. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 8th Revised Edition. 8th Rev. Washington, DC: E National Academy Press (2016).
21. Hughes P, Heritage J. Antibiotic growth-promoters in food animals. In Assessing quality and safety of animal feeds. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization od the United Nations (2004). p. 129–152.
22. Olvera ID. Economic Implications Associated With Pharmaceutical Technology Bans in US Beef Production. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States. (2016). Available online at: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/157852. (accessed September 21, 2020).
23. Mir PS, Dugan MER, He ML, Entz T, Yip B. Effects of dietary sunflower seeds and tylosin phosphate on production variables, carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and liver abscess incidence in crossbred steers. J Anim Sci. (2008) 86:3125–36. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-0875
24. Montgomery SP, Drouillard JS, Sindt JJ, Greenquist MA, Depenbusch BE, Good EJ, et al. Effects of dried full-fat corn germ and vitamin E on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing cattle. J Anim Sci. (2005) 83:2440–7. doi: 10.2527/2005.83102440x
25. Van Boekel MAJS. Formation of flavour compounds in the Maillard reaction. Biotechnol Adv. (2006) 24:230–3. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.11.004
26. Langner E, Rzeski W. Biological properties of melanoidins: A review. Int J Food Prop. (2014) 17:344–53. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2011.631253
27. Mu K, Wang S, Kitts DD. Evidence to indicate that maillard reaction products can provide selective antimicrobial activity. Integr Food Nutr Metab. (2016) 3:330–5. doi: 10.15761/IFNM.1000154
Keywords: liver abscess, Fusobacterium necrophorum, cattle, lysine, feedlot
Citation: Aguiar Veloso V and Drouillard JS (2020) On the Potential Role of Dietary Lysine as a Contributing Factor in Development of Liver Abscesses in Cattle. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:576647. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.576647
Received: 26 June 2020; Accepted: 01 September 2020;
Published: 02 October 2020.
Edited by:
Pietro Lombardi, University of Naples Federico II, ItalyReviewed by:
Jennifer Martin, Colorado State University, United StatesGabriel O. Ribeiro, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Copyright © 2020 Aguiar Veloso and Drouillard. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: James S. Drouillard, jdrouill@ksu.edu
Contribution no. 20-350-J from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan