- 1School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China
- 2Center of Mental Health Education and Research, School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China
- 3College of Life Science, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China
This study aimed to investigate the effect of disability in activities of daily living (ADLs) on successful aging, and the possible moderators between them. Based on data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Surveys (CLHLS), we used the Cox proportional hazards model of survival analysis and multivariate regression analysis (SPSS 16.0) to test our hypotheses. Mortality or cognition impairment were the dependents variables, and disability in ADLs was the independent variable. Well-being and residence location were the moderators. The results showed that in survey 2005, the Chinese elders with disability in ADLs, after controlling elder's gender, age, residence place, and marital status, often experienced more mortality and cognition impairment risk in the next 3 years. Our findings also showed that the increased mortality risk among elders with disability in ADLs was lower in those with higher well-being or younger age. The increased cognitive impairment risk among elders with disability in ADLs was lower in those living in the city than those living in a rural area or small towns. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between disability in ADLs and successful aging among Chinese elders. Our findings also expose other elements to consider such as psychological factors (e.g., well-being) and residence location in the relationships between the disability in ADLs and mortality (or cognition impairment), which have a psychological impact in successful aging of the Chinese elders.
Introduction
An aging population is a significant challenge for most countries in the world, including China (1). Attention should be paid on aging population due to their physical decline, high mortality, possible depression symptom, and cognition impairment, which are regarded as important obstacles in reaching the goals of successful aging (2–5). The activity center was proved as an effective model for health support and health-related quality of life improvements for older people (6, 7). However, the direct impact of disability in activities of daily living (ADLs) on longevity and cognitive impairment and how the relationship varies with other variables are still unclear.
Disability in ADLs is defined as individuals who are partly or entirely unable to perform basic ADLs (e.g., dressing) (1, 8). Elders with disability in ADLs often need help from their family members or caregivers (9). Due to the declining ability in making their own choice and shrinking social network (2, 5), elders often experience low self-control and a strong sense of loneliness or meaninglessness, which are risk factors that increase elder's cognition impairment, suicide, and mortality risk (10–14). So disability in ADLs might have a direct effect on the elder's mortality and cognitive function. Besides, the association between disability in ADLs and mortality (or cognitive impairment) can vary due to individual mental status (e.g., well-being) and living environment (e.g., residence place). Comparing with low well-being elders or those living in Chinese rural area, elders with high well-being or those living in Chinese urban area might have high internal (e.g., positive attitude to life) or external resources (e.g., social or medical support) against adversity (e.g., disability in ADLs) (1, 10, 12, 15), which could reduce the increased risk of disability in ADLs on elder's mortality or cognitive impairment. Thus, residence place and well-being could moderate the relationship between the disability in ADLs and cognitive impairment (or mortality). Therefore, two hypotheses were proposed as follows.
Hypothesis 1: The disability in ADLs was positively related to mortality and cognitive impairment.
Hypothesis 2: The relation between the disability in ADLs and mortality or cognitive impairment might be moderated by well-being or residence place.
Materials and Methods
Participants
This study used data from the 2005 and 2008 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Surveys (CLHLS). CLHLS is a national survey which adopted a targeted random-sample design to ensure the representativeness of the Chinese aging population considering the gender, age, and other factors. In survey 2005, 15,638 elders participated, of those participants, 2,938 were lost in the following 3 years (2008 survey) and were excluded. Therefore, we only used data from 12,700 participants in the analysis. The age of participants (42.7% men, n = 5,430) ranged from 60 to 112 years (M = 86.1, SD 11.7), 3,871 participants (30.5%) were married and living with their spouses, 2,461 participants (19.4%) received pension as retired workers or government officers (economic status), 2,168 participants (21%) experienced serious physical or mental illness (e.g., cancer, dementia) in the previous years before survey 2008, and 2,795 participants' (23%) had their residence in cities. The Research Ethics Committees of Peking University and Jiangxi Normal University reviewed the study protocol and granted approval for the Protection of Human Subjects for CLHLS, including the collection of data used in the study.
Measurements
Cognition impairment was measured with the mini-MMSE (16), which is proved as an excellent assessment tool for Chinese elders (17). The mini-MMSE includes 24 items regarding attention, calculation, recall, and language, with a total score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating less cognitive impairment. For mortality, a score of 0 indicates that the participants were still alive in survey 2008, while a score of 1 indicates that the participant was dead. Well-being was measured using a psychological well-being scale (12), which includes seven items covering positive effects (e.g., optimism) and adverse effects (e.g., loss of self-worth) with a five-point Likert scale. A psychological well-being index was conducted using the total scores of these seven items, with higher scores indicating better well-being. Disability in ADLs was measured using a brief scale of disability in ADLs, which includes six items (e.g., eating) and proved to be a proper measurement for Chinese elder's functional capacity (1). A score of 1 indicates that the participants need assistance with the daily activities, while a score of 0 indicates that participants are self-sufficient and do not need any assistance.
Gender, martial status, economic status (e.g., received pension as retired workers or government officers), and serious illness were proved to have an impact on elder's mortality and cognition impairment (1, 13, 18) and were used as control variables.
Procedure Process and Analytical Strategies
All the variables in the present study were collected in survey 2005, except the data of cognitive impairment and mortality, which was collected in survey 2008. To examine the relationship between disability in ADLs and mortality, we used two Cox proportional hazards model of survival analysis (19). Model 1 included the independent variable (e.g., disability in ADLs), moderators (e.g., residence place, well-being), and the control variables (e.g., economic status, serious illness, marital status, and gender). Model 2 added a two-way interaction between disability in ADLs and residence place, disability in ADLs and well-being. In the survival analysis, survival time for survivors (or decreased respondents) was the number of days between the date of survey 2005 and the date of survey 2008 (or death). Two multiple variables regression models were used to measure the relationship between disability in ADLs and cognitive impairment. Model 3 included the independent variable, moderator, and control variables, as showed in model 1. Model 4 added a two-way interaction between the independent variables and moderators, as showed in model 3. In model 2 and 4, we did not include the two-way or three-way interaction between disability in ADLs and other control variables (except age in model 2 of Table 1) because they were not significant. All models above were analyzed using the SPSS software (version 16.0).
Results
Mortality
Table 1 shows the relative risk factors of mortality. Model 1 shows that one-point increase in disability in the ADLs index was associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) of 35% (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.32–1.39), after controlling for elder's gender, age, residence place, and well-being. Model 2 shows that the HR of the interaction between disability in ADLs and well-being was more than 1 (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03), while the HR of the interaction between disability in ADLs and age was < 1 (HR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.07–0.08). This indicates that the increased mortality risk among elders with disability in ADLs was lower in those with higher well-being (or younger age) than in those with lower well-being (or older age).
Cognition Impairment
Table 2 shows the relative risk factors of cognitive impairment. Model 3 shows that elders with disability in ADLs had a worse cognitive function (β = −0.06, P < 0.001), after controlling for elder's gender, age, residence place, and well-being. There is a significant interaction effect between disability in ADLs and residence place in predicting elder's cognitive function (β = −0.24, P < 0.001). Simple slope analysis shows the increased cognitive impairment risk among elders with disability in ADLs was lower for those living in the city than in those living in rural areas or small towns (city: β = −0.04, P = 0.24; rural or small towns: β = −0.084, P < 0.001).
Discussion
The study findings show that in 2005, Chinese elders with disability in ADLs often experienced more mortality and cognition impairment in the following 3 years, after controlling for age, residence place, etc. (supported hypothesis 1). It indicates that disability in ADLs is a risk factor for elder's successful aging due to the shrinking social network and the declining ability in making their own choice. Our finding also found that the increased mortality risk among elders with disability in ADLs was lower in those with higher well-being (or younger age). A possible reason might be that high well-being (or younger age) act as protective factors and could provide enough mental (or physical) energy to reduce the risk of disability in ADLs. Moreover, we found that the increased cognitive impairment risk among elders with disability in ADLs was lower in those living in cities than in those living in rural areas or small towns. The possible explanation is that living in cities could provide better medical or educational resource, which could reduce the risk of disability in ADLs on cognitive impairment while living in rural areas or small towns could not. These findings suggest that government officers should pay more attention to Chinese elders with disability in ADLs, especially for those who lived in town or village in policy-making for successful aging. And these findings also suggest that psychological factor (e.g., well-being) can be used as a psychological intervention for successful aging among Chinese elders.
Although survival time could reflect the longevity, the valid age of death might be a better index for measuring longevity. Future research could use the valid age of death as the index of longevity to provide a robust evidence for the relation between disability in ADLs and successful aging. In addition, Brain derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., Interleukin-1 beta) are implicated in cognitive impairment and dementia (7, 20). And medical conditions or comorbidities, and education also play important role in the process of the successful aging (5, 19). Further research should focus on other factors which were not explored in this study, such as the direct effect of BDNF, medical conditions or comorbidities, and interaction effect of BDNF, medical conditions or comorbidities, education, and disability in ADLs.
Conclusion
Our findings showed that disability in ADLs is a risk factor of mortality and cognition impairment among Chinese elders, and the increased mortality or cognitive impairment risk of disability in ADLs could be moderated by the variables of well-being, age, or residence place.
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: http://opendata.pku.edu.cn/dataverse/CHADS.
Ethics Statement
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Research Ethics Committees of Peking University with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of Peking University.
Author Contributions
XL, JF, and JL participated in the design of this study, carried out the data acquisition, analysis, manuscript editing, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be published. JW and SD carried out the literature search, contributed to data acquisition, and manuscript editing. XL provided the largest contribution to the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This study was funded by the Educational Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, CN (Grant No. 20ZD018); the Social Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, CN (Grant No. 16BJ21); the University Humanities Program of Jiangxi Province, CN (Grant No. XL17205).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the interviewees and their families for their voluntary participation in the CLHLS study.
References
1. Zeng Y, Feng Q, Hesketh T, Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Survival, disability in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study. Lancet. (2017) 389:1619–29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2
2. Dunlop DD, Hughes SL, Manheim LM. Disability in activities of daily living: patterns of change and a hierarchy of disability. Am J Public Health. (1997) 87:378–83. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.87.3.378
3. Niti M, Ng TP, Kua EH, Ho RCM, Tan CH. Depression and chronic medical illnesses in Asian older adults: the role of subjective health and functional status. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2007) 22:1087–94. doi: 10.1002/gps.1789
4. Ng KST, Sia A, Ng MKW, Tan CTY, Chan HY, Tan CH, et al. Effects of horticultural therapy on Asian older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:1705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081705
5. Burholt V. A social model of loneliness: the roles of disability, social resources, and cognitive impairment. Gerontologist. (2017) 57:1020–30. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw125
6. Nguyen TTH, Nguyen TX, Pham T, Nguyen CT, Thu Vu G, Nguyen LH, et al. Establishing activity centers for elderly people in metropolitan areas of Vietnam: preference and willingness-to-pay. J Multidiscip Healthc. (2019) 12:795–802. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S193821
7. Ng A, Tam WW, Zhang MW, Ho CS, Husain SF, Mcintyre RS, et al. IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and CRP in elderly patients with depression or Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:12050. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30487-6
8. Zhang L, Zhang Y. The disability of duration of the elderly in China. Chin J Popul Sci. (2017) 94–104.
9. Zhang MWB, Chan S, Wynne O, Jeong S, Hunter S, Wilson A, et al. Conceptualization of an evidence-based smartphone innovation for caregivers and persons living with dementia. Technol Health Care. (2016) 24:769–73. doi: 10.3233/THC-161165
10. Fratiglioni L, Wang HX, Ericsson K, Maytan M, Winblad B. Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet. (2000) 355:1315–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02113-9
11. Chida Y, Steptoe A. Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosom Med. (2008) 70:741–56. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818105ba
12. Gong E, Hua Y, Yan LL. Psychological wellbeing and all-cause mortality in the oldest old in China: a longitudinal survey-based study. Lancet. (2016) 388:S22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31949-3
13. Diniz BS, Iii CFR, Butters MA, Dew MA, Firmo JOA, Limacosta MF, et al. The effect of gender, age, and symptom severity in a late-life depression on the risk of all-cause mortality: the Bambuí cohort study of aging. Depress Anxiety. (2013) 31:787–95. doi: 10.1002/da.22226
14. Ho RCM, Ho ECL, Tai BC, Ng WY, Chia BH. Elderly suicide with and without a history of suicidal behavior: implications for suicide prevention and management. Arch Suicide Res. (2014) 18:363–75. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2013.826153
15. Waelde LC, Silvern L, Hodges WF. Stressful life events: moderators of the relationships of gender and gender roles to self-reported depression and suicidality among college students. Sex Roles. (1994) 30:1–22. doi: 10.1007/BF01420737
16. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. (1978) 12:189–98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
17. Ho RCM, Niti M, Yap KB, Kua EH, Ng TP. Metabolic syndrome and cognitive decline in Chinese older adults: results from the Singapore longitudinal ageing studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2008) 16:519–22. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31816b7841
18. Gu D, Yang F, Sautter J. Socioeconomic status as a moderator between frailty and mortality at old ages. BMC Geriatr. (2016) 16:151–61. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0322-2
19. Litwin H, Shiovitz-Ezra S. Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. Gerontologist. (2011) 51:379–88. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq094
Keywords: mortality, cognition impairment, disability in activities of daily living (ADLs), well-being, residence place
Citation: Li X, Wang J, Dong S, Fu J and Liu J (2020) The Influence of Disabilities in Activities of Daily Living on Successful Aging: The Role of Well-Being and Residence Location. Front. Public Health 7:417. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00417
Received: 02 November 2018; Accepted: 27 December 2019;
Published: 28 January 2020.
Edited by:
Roger C. Ho, National University of Singapore, SingaporeReviewed by:
Cyrus S. H. Ho, National University Health System, SingaporeZhisong Zhang, Huaibei Normal University, China
Copyright © 2020 Li, Wang, Dong, Fu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoshan Li, boat010519@126.com