Adellah Sariah
Zhening Liu
Weidan Pu
Haihong Liu4
Zhimin Xue
Xiaojun Huang- 1Mental Health Institute of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 2Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Hubert Kairuki Memorial University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- 3Medical Psychological Institute, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 4Mental Health Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
Background: A number of neuroimaging studies have investigated structural, metabolic, and functional connectivity changes in betel quid (BQ) chewers. We present a systematic review of neuroimaging studies with emphasis on key brain systems affected by BQ chewing to bring a better understanding on the neuro mechanisms involved in BQD.
Methods: All BQ neuroimaging studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Google scholar for English articles published until March 2018 using the key words: Betel-quid, resting state, functional MRI, structural MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and betel quid dependence basing on the PRISMA criteria. We also sought unpublished studies, and the rest were obtained from reference lists of the retrieved articles. All neuroimaging studies investigating brain structural, and functional alterations related to BQ chewing and BQ dependence were included. Our systematic review registration number is CRD42018092669.
Results: A review of 12 studies showed that several systems in the brain of BQ chewers exhibited structural, metabolic, and functional alterations. BQ chewing was associated with alterations in the reward [areas in the midbrain, and prefrontal cortex (PFC)], impulsivity (anterior cingulate cortex, PFC) and cognitive (PFC, the default mode, frontotemporal, frontoparietal, occipital/temporal, occipital/parietal, temporal/limbic networks, hippocampal/hypothalamus, and the cerebellum) systems in the brain. BQ duration and severity of betel quid dependence were associated with majority of alterations in BQ chewers.
Conclusion: Betel quid chewing is associated with brain alterations in structure, metabolism and function in the cognitive, reward, and impulsivity circuits which are greatly influenced by duration and severity of betel quid dependence.
Introduction
Betel quid (BQ) is a chewable substance made up of fresh unripe or dried Areca catechu nut (AN) usually wrapped in a betel leaf from the piper betel vine, smeared with aqueous lime, and always flavored (1). Worldwide, BQ ranks number four among the most popular self-administered psychoactive substances (caffeine, alcohol, and nicotine) (2). Studies have found that, more than 600 million people use BQ within the Indo-Asia-Pacific regions (3) and Asian immigrants in Africa, Europe, and North America (2). The proportion of betel quid dependence (BQD) among users was 20.9–33.3% in mainland China and Sri Lanka; 41.3–52.8% in Taiwan and Malaysia; and 84.4–99.6% in Indonesia and Nepal. Generally, men displayed a higher BQD prevalence (3.5–7.7%) than women (0.3–1.1%) in Taiwan and mainland China, while the opposite was observed in Malaysia and Indonesia, where the prevalence was higher in women (7.7–40.5%) than in men (2.0–10.0%) (4).
Habitual users of have reported experiencing psychological effects immediately after chewing BQ; including heightened alertness, euphoria, relaxation, arousal, anti-migraine, improved motor responses, and a sense of wellbeing (5). Onset of such effects was observed within 2 min after chewing, suggesting that the active compounds of BQ are immediately absorbed in the mucosal membrane of the oral cavity. Fresh and occasional BQ users tend to experience stronger effects than habitual chewers, proposing that tolerance occurs with continual use (6). For some, the initial BQ taste may be unpleasant, however the experienced cognitive effects such as arousal and increased alertness may be considered pleasant enough for a repetitive behavior that results into dependence (7). Similar to opiate withdrawal, BQ dependent users have acknowledged experiencing tolerance, craving, substance seeking behavior, and withdrawal symptoms (4, 8–12), that meet the criteria for substance abuse (13). Such symptoms originate from chronic exposure of G protein coupled receptors to compounds like arecoline, leading to reduced receptor sensitivity (14, 15) which parallels the development of tolerance and habitual drug use (7). Arecoline is one of the AN alkaloids found in betel preparations, others include guvacine, guvacoline, and arecaidine (16). Previous studies considered arecoline as the main ingredient of AN that is responsible for numerous symptoms of BQ chewing (17). However, recent studies have reported a higher concentration of arecoline and guvacine in young and mature betel nut respectively (16). Arecoline in BQ activates the M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) which in turn potentiate dopamine (DA) transmission in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) (18) and projects to the dorsal striatum for regulation of synaptic plasticity which influences striatal microcircuitry (19). Similar to nicotine's mechanism of action, BQ through the action of arecoline is thought to enhance excitatory input to DA neurons via presynaptic activation (20). Arecoline also affects smooth muscles and binds to GABA receptors in the brain, and thus contributing to the reported psychoactive effects (2). Meanwhile, cholinergic (nicotinic and muscarinic) and inhibitory GABA'ergic input also exert a high modulatory effect on mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons which are involved in reinforcement learning, reward processing (21), and addiction (22). Additionally, the ventral tegmental area (VTA), NAc and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) form the mesocorticolimbic system which is the primary reward pathway, known to increase DA concentration in the VTA and other projection areas directly and/or indirectly (20). Long term use of psychoactive substances is often associated with the disruption of the DA reward system (23), and adaptation to repeated drug use is often accompanied by brain changes (in structure, neurons, receptors, molecular mechanisms, and connectivity) (24) and by memories formed from the experienced drug intoxication (25). For example, people addicted to substances experience a reduced sensitivity to brain's reward system due to decreased D2 receptors compared to non-addicts (26). The loss in reward sensitivity may explain the reported compulsion to continue taking drugs in order to regain the pleasurable feelings once experienced from the reward system (27). Normally, the PFC controls the dorsal striatum and the NAc in habit responses and therefore inhibits incentive salience (28). However, drug addiction disrupts the PFC leading to compromised executive functions. Increased glutamate in the PFC stimulate the habit system in the dorsal striatum which contributes to impulsivity which is associated with substance seeking (29), supporting the observed dependence syndrome reported in an extensive number of BQ users (9, 30).
The Global statistics on addiction has not formally recognized BQ use as an addictive behavior (31). However, numerous studies have used the DSM-IV criteria to measure BQD (4, 7, 11, 30, 32). A very recent study evaluated betel use disorder (BUD) using DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders (33). In the DSM-5, substance use disorder is a combination of the DSM-IV categories of substance abuse and substance dependence into a single disorder ranging in a continuum from mild to severe (34). Changes incorporated in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria include the presence of 2–3 symptoms from a list of 11 (the DSM-IV required only one symptom for substance abuse); an addition of drug craving and a removal of problems with the law enforcement criteria (35). Majority of current BQ neuroimaging studies have utilized Betel quid dependence scale (BQDS) to screen for BQD (36–42). BQDS was developed from DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence. It has a cut-off point of 4 and is structured into three parts; “physical and psychological urgent need,” “increasing dose,” and “maladaptive use.” BQDS has a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.921), optimal sensitivity and specificity of 0.26 and 0.977 respectively with an overall predictive accuracy up to 99.3% (8). The betel nut dependence scale (BNDS) is another measurement that has been used in neuroimaging and other related BQ studies (43, 44). The BNDS is comprised of three elements: craving and desire, withdrawal and response, and tasting habits. The scores range from 11 to 44, the higher the score the higher the level of BQD. It has a good criterion-related validity and the α coefficients of reliability lied between 0.73 and 0.89. The three elements accounted for 63.10% of total variances (45).
A number of neuroimaging modalities have been used in BQ studies including resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and structural MRI. Correlates of structural and functional connectivity (FC) alterations associated with BQ chewing and dependence have also been documented (36–38, 43, 46). To date, majority of published reviews have focused on neuroimaging studies of alcohol and other substance use disorders 47–51. Reviews of BQ have specifically investigated the pharmacology of intoxication and addiction (7), the association with oral cancers (52), and systemic health effects (53). There has been no systematic review of BQ neuroimaging studies to date. The purpose of this systematic review is to present the current state of knowledge in brain FC, and structural alterations associated with BQ chewing, studies' limitations and future research directions in BQ neuroimaging research.
Objectives
We sought to identify from BQ neuroimaging findings the systems in the brain with structural, biochemical, and FC alterations related to BQ chewing.
Research Question
What are the BQ neuroimaging findings regarding systems in the brain with structural, biochemical, and FC alterations related to BQ chewing?
Methods
Search Strategy
Various combination of key words was used including: betel quid, resting state, fMRI, structural MRI, betel quid dependence, and DTI which were included basing on preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria (54). Our systematic review protocol has been registered (CRD42018092669) in international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care. Initial search in PubMed with the key word “betel quid” yielded” 919 articles, “betel quid dependence” yielded 27 articles, “betel quid” and “resting state” yielded 8 articles, “betel quid” AND “resting state” AND “fMRI” yielded 6 articles, “betel quid” and “structural MRI” yielded 4 articles, while “betel quid” and “DTI” yielded 1 article. Other articles were obtained from reference lists and bibliographies of the retrieved published articles.
Data Sources, Studies Selection, and Data Extraction
Relevant articles for review of neuroimaging studies on BQ were retrieved from PubMed and EMBASE, and Google scholar databases. All unpublished (conference abstracts) and published English articles in peer reviewed journals till March, 2018 comprising one or both gender specified, regardless of study designs, were sought. Moreover, all BQ studies with fMRI and structural MRI modalities were included in our review. Exposure of interest was BQ as a mixture of areca nut, slaked lime, piper betel leaf, Acacia catechu, flavorings with or without tobacco. Any BQ study without neuroimaging modality was excluded.
The review consisted of three main stages. We first screened articles basing on the title followed by abstract and lastly we studied in detail full text articles that addressed the study aims. The latter stage was accompanied by collection of relevant information for our review. Two reviewers independently selected the articles that met the inclusion criteria. Any observed discrepancies were discussed and resolved between reviewers prior to the final selection of the articles to be included in the systematic review.
Results
Of the 919 identified studies from the search results, 892 completely deviated from the established inclusion criteria, and 17 were BQ studies without neuroimaging approaches. The remaining 12 studies met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1) and were categorized according to brain functional regions including, the reward, impulsive, and cognitive systems.
Figure 1. Flow diagram on included neuroimaging studies in betel quid chewers.
The Reward System in BQ Chewing
Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated the effects of BQ chewing and dependence in the brain reward system. Increased FC was displayed in the orbitofrontal of BQD compared to HCs (36), as well as in HCs immediately after BQ chewing (55). The BQDS scores positively correlated with the increased FC in the orbitofrontal and negatively correlated with decreased FC in the medial frontal/ACC networks (36). Similarly, some parts of the reward areas in the midbrain including, the ventral tegmental area and pons, caudate, and thalamus displayed increased FC in the BQD group compared to the controls (39). Compared with controls, gray matter (GM) volume of BQD patients was significantly reduced in the midbrain, which negatively correlated with the BQDS scores (40). A summary of BQ neuroimaging studies is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics of betel quid (BQ) neuroimaging studies.
The Impulsive System in BQ Chewing
A resting state fMRI study revealed a decrease in FC in the ACC of healthy males immediately after BQ chewing (55). Moreover, compared to HC, BQD individuals displayed a decreased FC in the ACC (36, 39, 46). The BQDS scores positively correlated with increased FC of right ACC to the left thalamus and left ACC to pons while the duration of BQ chewing negatively correlated with FC in the right ACC to left precuneus (39). The BQDS scores also negatively correlated with the decreased FC in medial frontal/ACC networks (36), and the right ACC (41). While investigating alterations in long and short-range FC density (FCD), a study found reduced long-range and short-range FCD in the right ACC in the BQD group compared with HCs. The short range FCD alterations in the right ACC negatively correlated with the BQDS scores (42). Studies have also documented metabolic changes that emanate from BQ chewing. For example, a magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) study investigating biochemical changes in BQD chewers found reduced N-acetylaspartate/creatinine (NAA/Cr); increased choline/creatinine (Cho/Cr) and glutamate/creatinine (Glx/Cr) ratios in the bilateral ACC as well as higher Myoinositol/creatinine (MI/Cr) ratios in the left ACC of the BQD individuals compared to the control group (38). The NAA/Cr ratios in the right ACC negatively correlated with BQDS scores and BQ duration, while the NAA/Cr ratios in the left ACC negatively correlated with BQ duration. Furthermore, the NAA/Cr ratios in the right ACC positively correlated with BQDS scores (38).
Likewise, the GM in the ACC of the BQD group in a voxel-based morphometry study demonstrated significant decreased volume compared to the control group. The GM volumes of the right ACC negatively correlated with BQD duration (40). During the investigation of white matter integrity alterations, findings revealed that a smaller fractional anisotropy (FA) but larger mean diffusivity (MD) were displayed in bilateral anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) of BQD individuals compared to HCs. Both the increased MD and reduced FA correlated with severity of BQ dependence as measured by the BQDS (56).
The Cognitive System in BQ Chewing
Neuroimaging studies have reported extensive alterations in brain functioning and structure that have been linked with cognitive impairment in BQ chewers. For instance, increased FC was observed in the cerebellum (49, 50), occipital/parietal (36, 55), occipital/temporal (55), frontoparietal, and frontotemporal networks, while decreased activity was found in the medial frontal cortex (49) and para hippocampal/hypothalamus (39). Similarly, BQD group demonstrated increased short-range FCD in the left cerebellum posterior lobe (CPL) while increased long-range FCD was observed in the left CPL and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) than the HCs. The long-range FCD alterations in the left IPL positively correlated with BQD duration. Furthermore, the BQD group displayed reduced short-range FCD in the left dlPFC compared to HCs (42). The effect of BQ was also reported by Liu et al. (41), who showed that, individuals with BQD had greater ALFF and ReHo values in the primary motor cortex area, the temporal lobe and some parts in the occipital lobe than the HCs. The BQD individuals also displayed reduced ALFF and ReHo values in the prefrontal gyrus compared to HCs (41). Apart from functional alterations, studies have also detected structural alterations in brain areas responsible for cognitive functions. Several areas in the PFC of BQ chewers including the bilateral dlPFC (37, 40), ventral medial PFC (vmPFC), and left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) displayed reduced GM volume compared to HCs (37). The GM volumes in the dlPFC negatively correlated with BQD duration (40), and predicted the BQDS scores, history of BQ chewing and the level of daily BQ chewing (37). Reduction in GM volume was also demonstrated in the right superior temporal gyrus (STG) while increased GM volume was observed in the right hippocampal of BQD patients compared to the control group (40). Conversely, another study reported increased FC in the right hippocampus in BQ chewers compared to tobacco and alcohol users, and HCs (44). The effects of BQ chewing in the default mode network (DMN) have also been documented. For example, healthy individuals displayed reduced FC in the DMN immediately after BQ chewing (55). Additionally, compared to HCs, BQD chewers demonstrated a decrease in FC in the anterior part of the DMN comprising, the orbital mPFC/ACC, and vmPFC. The FC in the orbital mPFC/ACC in BQD individuals negatively correlated with BQDS scores (46). The BQD individuals also displayed decreased connectivity from regions in the ACC to the DMN when compared to HCs (39). The precuneus, which forms part of the DMN exhibited increased GM volume in BQD patients compared to the control group (40), which is in contrast to another study that displayed greater FC in the precuneus compared to tobacco and alcohol controls and HCs (44). Table 2 presents a summary of brain areas with altered structure, metabolism, and function in BQ chewers.
Table 2. Brain areas with alterations in BQ chewers.
The studies included in the review were similar in that they were all BQ studies that used neuroimaging techniques to explore different alterations in the brain. However, we noted several inconsistencies among them: first, the sample sizes ranged from 27 to 65 individuals and the number of individuals in the BQD and control groups varied among studies (e.g., 16 and 33 were the minimum and maximum numbers of BQD individuals respectively). Second, majority of studies in the review reported an enhanced reward system (36, 39, 43, 44, 55) and impaired inhibitory control (36, 38–40, 42, 46, 55) in BQD chewers; (43, 44), however, are exceptions. These studies reported that BQ chewing was associated with a facilitated inhibitory control. The observed disparity may have been influenced by the variation in scales used to identify individuals with BQD (that is, BNDS in the latter two studies vs. BQDS in the former studies) leading to the inclusion of subjects with different BQ dependence levels. Moreover, examining only 16 individuals in the BQ chewers group may have made it difficult to identify clearly brain areas with alterations. Likewise, the inclusion of controls who used tobacco and alcohol concomitantly may have influenced the results, possibly due to the different neurobiological effects these substances tend to impose on the brain.
Risk of Bias
We assessed for risk of bias in the included primary studies by considering the sample size, gender, inclusion criteria for individuals with BQD and controls, BQD screening tools, and other potential sources of bias to determine how these may have affected the study results. To prevent publication bias, we considered both published and unpublished studies in our search strategy. Any observed discrepancies were discussed and resolved between reviewers prior to the final selection of the articles to be included in the systematic review.
Discussion
In this systematic review, we were able to identify 12 neuroimaging studies which have highlighted the current state of knowledge about important brain systems with structural, metabolic, and functional alterations associated with BQ chewing.
The Reward System in BQ Chewing
Humans tend to consume alcohol or self-administer drugs of abuse because they experience rewarding effects from these substances (22). The reward areas in the brain include the basal ganglia, the limbic system, and parts of the PFC (57). The review found increased FC in the orbitofrontal cortex which forms part of the PFC. The orbitofrontal network is known for its function in regulating emotions, monitoring reward and evaluation of punishers (58) whose disruption by addictive drugs is related to maladaptive and impulsive decision making (59). It has also been suggested that the OFC together with the dlPFC are involved in reward processing (60), explaining the observed decision making and goal driven behavior abnormalities in BQ chewers (41). Additionally, decreased FC in vmPFC and orbital mPFC in BQD supports the addiction model (26, 61), where they have been reported to play a role in salience attribution and goal directed behaviors (62). Increased connectivity (39) and diffusion anisotropy (43) was observed in midbrain regions of BQ users. DA neurons in the midbrain play an important role in attention, motivation, motor control, regulation of emotion, maintenance of working memory, and reinforcement (63). The DA cells in the VTA projecting into the NAc (the mesolimbic DA pathway), those in the substantia niagra (SN) projecting into dorsal striatum (mesostriatal) as well as those in the VTA projecting in to the frontal cortex (mesocortical) play a very important role in drug reward and addiction (22). During addiction, there is a higher expectation value of the drug in the reward, memory, and motivation circuits which overcomes the control circuit leading to consumption of drugs (64). Task-based fMRI studies have reported midbrain activation during anticipation of pleasant tastes (65), monetary gains (66), and exposure to visual stimuli that elicited feelings of intense romantic love (67). The dorsal striatum in the midbrain plays a fundamental role in acquisition and expression of action–outcome associations conditioning (68) including the development of habitual compulsive drug dependence. Brain neuroimaging studies showed that increased levels of DA in the dorsal striatum (caudate and putamen) were triggered by alcohol-associated cues, an effect that correlated with self-reports of craving for alcohol (69). Significant increased FC was displayed in the cerebellum of BQD individuals. The cerebellum also plays part in reward monitoring and as an intermediate between motor and reward, as well as motivation and cognitive control systems, which are all relevant etiologic factors in drug addiction (70). Studies have also reported extremely increased glucose metabolism in the cerebellum of addicts when they performed reward expectation tasks (71). Activation of the cerebellum has been directly related to the intensity of cue-elicited craving (72).
The Impulsive System in BQ Chewing
The PFC, OFC and ACC are known for their contribution in executive functions and impulse inhibition (73). Alterations in the PFC as a result of addiction leads to compulsive drug taking and detrimental behaviors which are associated with addiction and loss of free will (28). Studies have reported about the reduction of striatal dopamine 2 receptors (D2R) in addicted individuals after extended period of detoxification (74). The reduced striatal D2R reductions have been linked with decreased metabolism in the OFC, dlPFC, and ACC (75), whose role in salience attribution, decision making, and emotional regulation/inhibitory control form a basis to the enhanced motivational value of drugs in their behavior and loss of inhibition to drug use (76). Evidence also shows that, disrupted OFC and ACC are associated with impulsivity behaviors (77). For instance, individuals who abused methamphetamine displayed reduced striatal D2R which was linked to impulsivity (78). The limbic network is implicated in reward processing, addiction, and goal-directed behavior (79), supporting the increased FC reported from the BQ neuroimaging studies. Activation of the limbic networks and the loss of inhibition in the frontal cortical areas may lead to impulsivity, which is a major characteristic of addiction (73). The ACC forms part of the DMN, and it was observed to have a reduction in connectivity (36, 39, 42, 46, 55), GM volume (40), and NAA/Cr (38). In addiction theories, ACC is thought to be involved in inhibitory control of reward-related behavior (61). As a result, addicted individuals are unable to control short term and immediate gratification of habitual drug use regardless of existing or anticipated consequences (59). Reduced activation in the ACC of opiate-dependent individuals has been linked with deficits in response inhibition and impulse control (80). Reduction in NAA concentration was reported in the dorsal ACC (81) and frontal gray matter (82) of opiate dependent individuals. This reduction has often been interpreted as a representation of neuronal damage and/or loss (83, 84). Decreased NAA levels in the ACC of BQD individuals supports preclinical work, signifying that Arecoline leads to neurotoxicity with greater oxidative stress and suppressed antioxidant protective system (85). Increased levels of Cho/Cr, Glx/Cr, and ml/Cr in the ACC of BQD individuals was reported by Liu et al. (38). The increased Cho/Cr levels portrays a high intracellular Cho in ACC neurons which may be the pathological phenomenon or compensatory response to BDQ. Studies have shown that ml is an osmoregulator (86), and elevated levels of mI were reported in the ACC of alcoholic patients, which indicates a temporarily increased glial activation or, a state of drug-induced osmotic stress, and an attempt to regulate cell volume (87). Meanwhile, Glx increase is considered a potential illustration of abnormalities in decision making and reward-based learning, or a modulator of dopaminergic neurotransmission (81). Reduced FA in the ATR of BQD individuals was reported by Yuan et al. (56). The ATR (links the anterior and medial thalamic nuclei with the PFC) is known for its role in modulating the basic impulses and flexibility in attaining planned goals, whose disruption has been linked with lack of inhibition from the PFC (88). It is also involved in controlling basic impulses and working toward defined goals (88–91). Extensive decreased white matter integrity has been reported in the ATR of pathological gamblers (92) and internet gaming disorder subjects (93). The observed alterations suggest a significant role of the ATR in the neurobiology of BQD (56). Furthermore, increased MD within the ATR of BQ dependent individuals (56) is suggested to be linked with reduced myelination or neuronal loss (94), explaining a lack of inhibition from prefrontal cortex to the subcortical areas (89). This mechanism has been mentioned in substance and behavioral addiction (88–91, 95).
The Cognitive System in BQ Chewing
Several areas of the brain are involved in cognitive processing including the PFC [orbital frontal cortex (OFC), dorsal lateral PFC (dlPFC), ventral medial PFC (vmPFC)], limbic regions, cerebellum, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes. The PFC participates in various cognitive processes, such as working memory, attention, decision making and delay discounting, all of which are impaired in addicts (28). BQ neuroimaging studies have reported increased connectivity in the frontoparietal, frontotemporal, occipital/parietal, occipital/temporal/cerebellum (36, 49). Habitual users of BQ reported experiencing heightened alertness, euphoria, relaxation, arousal, improved motor responses, and a sense of wellbeing (5), suggesting that the increased connectivity may enhance cognitive abilities (55) and thus perpetuate addiction behavior. BQ chewing also displayed reductions in FC (39, 41, 42, 46) and GM volume (39, 52) in the PFC including the dlPFC, mPFC, vmPFC, and orbital mPFC. In addiction studies, the PFC plays a crucial role in self-control activities, salience attribution, preservation of motivational arousal and self-awareness (28). Addiction studies have extensively cited the dlPFC which interacts with numerous structures in the cortex. For instance, together with the dACC, the dlPFC exerts top-down control and meta-cognitive functions (28). The dlPFC is also involved in working memory processing (96, 97), decision making and cognitive control (98, 99), executive functions (100), as well as conflict resolution (101). Therefore, the reported alterations in the dlPFC may have contributed to impaired decision making, cognitive control and memory processing leading to habitual and compulsive BQ chewing. Additionally, BQ studies reported decreased GM volume (37) and increased FC (44) in the insula in BQ chewers. The insula plays a critical role in generating conscious, interoceptive signals into what one may subjectively experience as a feeling of desire, anticipation, or urge (88, 102). Decreased connectivity of the interoceptive insula in BQ chewers may make them misadjust the reward value of the substance to optimize their choices to satisfy their internal and external need (103, 104). Neuroimaging studies have shown that addicted individuals had lower GM volume and reduced activity of insula (105).
The PFC is also linked with other cortical and subcortical brain regions and networks, including the DMN and the dorsal attention networks which are involved in executive control processes, such as attention and inhibition (106). Functional MRI studies have established that reduction in neural connectivity of the PFC is associated with maladaptive decision making (107) and cognitive control (108). The DMN which is known to be active when the brain is “at rest,” has been implicated in mind-wandering (109) and social understanding of others including, emotional perception, empathy, and morality (110). The DMN deactivates when individuals focus on the external environment or perform goal-directed tasks (111). The effects of BQ chewing in suppressing DMN connectivity have been associated with a reduction in mind-wandering, enhanced focused attention, lessened depression, improved social cognition (55), self-awareness and insight into illness (112). Neuro dysfunction in the DMN of addicts tends to compromise insight, disease awareness, and need for treatment (112), supporting what is demonstrated in BQD individuals.
The frontoparietal network is known for its involvement in cognitive control, and development of reasoning ability (113). Along with the frontotemporal, visual, and occipitoparietal regions are involved in visual spatial judgment (114) while the frontoparietal is involved in spoken language comprehension (115). Similarly, increased long range FCD in IPL was thought to impair distant information processing in BQD individuals (42). The IPL is linked with verbal fluency, working memory, complex sequential motor behavior, and skill learning (116). Verbal fluency deficits have been observed in cocaine-dependent individuals (117).
Additionally, increased connectivity between the cerebellum and other brain areas (36, 39, 42, 55) supports its role in decision making (118), and acts as a link between motivation and cognitive control systems, thus playing an important role in drug addiction (70). Reduced GM volume was found in the superior temporal gyrus (STG) (40) which is an important structure in social cognition (119) and emotion (120). There is evidence that neuronal networks connecting the mPFC with temporal areas are greatly destroyed in BQD patients, which is consistent with a previous fMRI study on cocaine users (121).
Studies have reported increased GM volume (40) and FC (44) in the precuneus and hippocampus in BQ chewers. Precuneus has been associated with identification of visual and appetite cues (122, 123), which conforms with BQ chewing, while the hippocampus is involved in processing memory and emotions (124). Studies have found that compared to non-dependent and non-chewers, BQ dependent chewers displayed impaired spatial short term memory (125). BQ chewing has also been associated with antidepressant properties due to its influence in increasing the levels of serotonin and noradrenaline (126), proposing the role of hippocampus in emotional regulation, predominantly depression. The thalamus has been increasingly implicated in addiction due to its integrative function in regulating arousal and modulating attention. An effect related to craving was observed when dopamine neurotransmission in the thalamus was increased due to intravenous administration of Methyphenidate in cocaine users as compared to controls (127). Similarly, Results from both PET and fMRI results have demonstrated that compared to non-rewards, both primary and secondary rewards can increase thalamic activation (128).
Findings from neuroimaging studies have also demonstrated alterations in white matter integrity (43) and FC in the visual cortex of BQD individuals (36, 41, 55). The visual cortex is known for its role in cognitive processing including visual perception, working memory (129) as well as influencing motivation and alertness (130). Despite its documented roles in the brain, the visual cortex has received less attention in addiction neuroimaging studies. The reported alterations in the visual cortex support the heightened alertness experienced by BQ habitual users (8). These changes are believed to originate from both acute (55) and chronic (36) effects of BQ exposure. Similar studies have found increased FC in the visual cortex (131) and specifically in the primary visual cortex during acute alcohol administration (132). Likewise, compared to neutral cues, exposure to visual drug cues elicited greater activation in the visual cortex of substance abusers (133).
Limitations
There are however several limitations to note from these studies. First, the differences in subjects among studies (age, gender, variations in BQ preparation, dependence level, and the duration of BQ exposure) could have potentially influence the results. Second, inclusion criteria of individuals with BQD, where different screening tools (BQDS vs. BNDS) were utilized to identify individuals with BQD could have biased our results. Third, all reviewed BQ neuroimaging studies were observational, which limits inferences on causality. Future longitudinal neuroimaging studies may lead to a better understanding of mechanisms underlying BQ use and thus describe a cause and effect relationship among brain alterations and BQ use. Fourth, four (4) studies only included men as study participants which may have limited the generalizability of study findings to females. Fifth, very small sample sizes were used with a range from 27 to 65 which could have potentially led to biased results. Studies with larger sample sizes with inclusion of both males and females may improve generalizability and prevent unbiased results. Lastly the observed brain alterations cannot be deeply attributed to BQ chewing only but considerations should be taken on the possibility of the potential influence of alcohol and tobacco consumption in the results.
Conclusion
The review has highlighted the current state of knowledge regarding important systems in the brain that are commonly affected by BQ chewing and BQD. Generally, the aforementioned brain alterations have been involved in one way or another to enhance the reward system, decline inhibitory control and executive functions (including emotions, cognition, and affective decision making) in BQ chewers and BQ dependent individuals. The exhibited brain alterations are associated with BQD severity and duration of BQ use. These alterations have all been implicated to potentially play a role in drug addiction. Therefore, further neuroimaging research involving BQ dependent and abstinent individuals might help explain the neuro-mechanisms of BQ use and hence extend what these studies found.
Author Contributions
AS and XH searched, selected, and reviewed all articles, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AS, XH, ZL, WP, HL, and ZX revised and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 81561168021, 81471362, and 81671335) and the China Precision Medicine Initiative (2016YFC0906300).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Zhong He from the Department of Radiology of Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University for his assistance in imaging data acquisition.
References
1. Lee C-H, Ko AM-S, Warnakulasuriya S, Yin B-L, Sunarjo Zain RB, et al. Intercountry prevalences and practices of betel-quid use in south, southeast and eastern asia regions and associated oral preneoplastic disorders: an international collaborative study by asian betel-quid consortium of south and east Asia. Int J Cancer (2011) 129:1741–51. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25809
2. Boucher BJ, Mannan N. Metabolic effects of the consumption of Areca catechu. Addict Biol. (2002) 7:103–10. doi: 10.1080/13556210120091464
3. Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of areca nut usage. Addict Biol. (2002) 7:77–83. doi: 10.1080/13556210020091437
4. Lee C-H, Ko AM-S, Yen C-F, Chu K-S, Gao Y-J, Warnakulasuriya S, et al. Betel-quid dependence and oral potentially malignant disorders in six Asian countries. Br J Psychiatry (2012) 201:383–91. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.107961
5. Osborne PG, Chou T-S, Shen T-W. Characterization of the Psychological, Physiological, psychological and EEG profiles of Acute Betel Quid Intoxication naive subjects. PLoS ONE (2011) 6:e23874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023874
6. Chu N-S. Neurological aspects of areca and betel chewing. Addict Biol. (2002) 7:111–4. doi: 10.1080/13556210120091473
7. Osborne PG, Ko Y-C, Wu M-T, Lee C-H. Intoxication and substance use disorder to Areca catechu nut containing betel quid: a review of epidemiological evidence, pharmacological basis and social factors influencing quitting strategies. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2017) 179:187–97. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.039
8. Lee C-Y, Chang C-S, Shieh T-Y, Chang Y-Y. Development and validation of a self-rating scale for betel quid chewers based on a male-prisoner population in Taiwan: the Betel Quid Dependence Scale. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2012) 121:18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.07.027
9. Bhat SJS, Blank MD, Balster RL, Nichter M, Nichter M. Areca nut dependence among chewers in a South Indian community who do not also use tobacco: areca nut topography and dependence. Addiction (2010) 105:1303–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02952.x
10. Herzog TA, Murphy KL, Little MA, Suguitan GS, Pokhrel P, Kawamoto CT. The Betel Quid Dependence Scale: replication and extension in a Guamanian sample. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2014) 138:154–60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.022
11. Lee C-H, Chiang S-L, Ko AM-S, Hua C-H, Tsai M-H, Warnakulasuriya S, et al. Betel-quid dependence domains and syndrome associated with betel-quid ingredients among chewers: an Asian multi-country evidence: betel-quid dependence and betel-quid ingredients. Addiction (2014) 109:1194–204. doi: 10.1111/add.12530
12. Mubeen K, Kumar CN, Puja R, Jigna VR, Chandrashekar H. Psychiatric morbidity among patients with oral sub-mucous fibrosis: a preliminary study: psychiatric morbidity in patients with OSF. J Oral Pathol Med. (2010) 39:761–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.00948.x
13. Garg A, Chaturvedi P, Mishra A, Datta S. A review on harmful effects of pan masala. Indian J Cancer (2015) 52:663. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.178449
14. van Koppen CJ, Kaiser B. Regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor signaling. Pharmacol Ther. (2003) 98:197–220. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(03)00032-9
15. Wess J, Eglen RM, Gautam D. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: mutant mice provide new insights for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2007) 6:721. doi: 10.1038/nrd2379
16. Franke AA, Mendez AJ, Lai JF, Arat-Cabading C, Li X, Custer LJ. Composition of betel specific chemicals in saliva during betel chewing for the identification of biomarkers. Food Chem Toxicol. (2015) 80:241–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.03.012
17. Chu N-S. Effects of betel chewing on the central and autonomic nervous systems. J Biomed Sci. (2001) 8:229–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02256596
18. Shina JH, Adrovera MF, Wessb J, Alvareza VA. Muscarinic regulation of dopamine and glutamate transmission in the nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2015) 112:8124–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508846112
19. Lerner TN, Kreitzer AC. Neuromodulatory control of striatal plasticity and behavior. Curr Opin Neurobiol. (2011) 21:322–7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.01.005
20. Sulzer D. How addictive drugs disrupt presynaptic dopamine neurotransmission. Neuron (2011) 69:628–49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.010
21. Saddoris MP. Rapid dopamine dynamics in the accumbens core and shell Learning and action. Front Biosci. (2013) 5:273–88. doi: 10.2741/E615
22. Wise RA. Roles for nigrostriatal—not just mesocorticolimbic—dopamine in reward and addiction. Trends Neurosci. (2009) 32:517–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.06.004
23. Volkow ND, Morales M. The brain on drugs: from reward to addiction. Cell (2015) 162:712–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.046
24. Luscher C. Cocaine-evoked synaptic plasticity of excitatory transmission in the ventral tegmental area. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2013) 3:a012013. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012013
25. Wise RA, Koob GF. The development and maintenance of drug addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology (2013) 39:254. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.261
26. Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology (2010) 35:217. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.110
27. Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang G-J, Logan J, Alexoff DL, Jayne M, et al. Stimulant-induced dopamine increases are markedly blunted in active cocaine abusers. Mol Psychiatry (2014) 19:1037–43. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.58
28. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2011) 12:652–69. doi: 10.1038/nrn3119
29. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Surgeon General. Facing addiction in America: The Surgeon General's Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. Washington, DC: HHS (2016).
30. Benegal V, Rajkumar R, Muralidharan K. Does areca nut use lead to dependence? Drug Alcohol Depend. (2008) 97:114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.016
31. Gowing LR, Ali RL, Allsop S, Marsden J, Turf EE, West R, et al. Global statistics on addictive behaviours: 2014 status report: addiction global statistics. Addiction (2015) 110:904–19. doi: 10.1111/add.12899
32. Mirza SS, Shafique K, Vart P, Arain MI. Areca nut chewing and dependency syndrome: is the dependence comparable to smoking? a cross sectional study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy (2011) 6:23. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-23
33. Lee C-H, Ko AM-S, Yang FM, Hung C-C, Warnakulasuriya S, Ibrahim SO, et al. Association of DSM-5 betel-quid use disorder with oral potentially malignant disorder in 6 betel-quid endemic asian populations. JAMA Psychiatry (2018) 75:261. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4307
34. American Psychiatric Association editor. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing (2013). p 947.
35. Hasin DS, O'Brien CP, Auriacombe M, Borges G, Bucholz K, Budney A, et al. DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am J Psychiatry (2013) 170:834–51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782
36. Huang X, Pu W, Liu H, Li X, Greenshaw AJ, Dursun SM, et al. Altered brain functional connectivity in betel quid-dependent chewers. Front Psychiatry (2017) 8:239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00239
37. Yuan F, Kong L, Zhu X, Jiang C, Fang C, Liao W. Altered gray-matter volumes associated with betel quid dependence. Front Psychiatry (2017) 8:139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00139
38. Liu T, Li J, Huang S, Zhao Z, Yang G, Pan M, et al. Neurochemical abnormalities in anterior cingulate cortex on betel quid dependence: a 2D 1H MRS investigation. Am J Transl Res. (2015) 7:2795–804.
39. Liu T, Li J, Zhao Z, Zhong Y, Zhang Z, Xu Q, et al. Betel quid dependence is associated with functional connectivity changes of the anterior cingulate cortex: a resting-state fMRI study. J Transl Med. (2016) 14:33. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0784-1
40. Chen F, Zhong Y, Zhang Z, Xu Q, Liu T, Pan M, et al. Gray matter abnormalities associated with betel quid dependence: a voxel-based morphometry study. Am J Transl Res. (2015) 7:364–74.
41. Liu T, Li J, Zhao Z, Yang G, Pan M, Li C, et al. Altered spontaneous brain activity in betel quid dependence: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Medicine (2016) 95:e2638. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002638
42. Liu T, Li J, Zhang Z, Xu Q, Lu G, Huang S, et al. Altered long- and short-range functional connectivity in patients with betel quid dependence: a resting-state functional MRI study. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2016) 40:1626–36. doi: 10.1159/000453212
43. Weng J-C, Kao T-W, Huang G-J, Tyan Y-S, Tseng H-C, Ho M-C. Evaluation of structural connectivity changes in betel-quid chewers using generalized q-sampling MRI. Psychopharmacology (2017) 234:1945–55. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4602-0
44. Weng J-C, Chou Y-S, Huang G-J, Tyan Y-S, Ho M-C. Mapping brain functional alterations in betel-quid chewers using resting-state fMRI and network analysis. Psychopharmacology (2018) 235:1257–71. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4841-8
45. Li R, Ho MC, Tang TC, Chang CF. Development of the betel nut dependency scale (BNDS). Chin J Psychol. (2012) 54:331–48.
46. Zhu X, Zhu Q, Jiang C, Shen H, Wang F, Liao W, et al. Disrupted resting-state default mode network in betel quid-dependent individuals. Front Psychol. (2017) 8:84. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00084
47. Niciu MJ, Mason GF. Neuroimaging in alcohol and drug dependence. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. (2014) 1:45–54. doi: 10.1007/s40473-013-0005-7
48. Schacht JP, Anton RF, Myrick H. Functional neuroimaging studies of alcohol cue reactivity: a quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review: alcohol cue imaging. Addict Biol. (2013) 18:121–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00464.x
49. Bühler M, Mann K. Alcohol and the human brain: a systematic review of different neuroimaging methods. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. (2011) 35:1771–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01540.x
50. McClernon FJ. Neuroimaging of nicotine dependence: key findings and application to the study of smoking–mental illness co-morbidity. J Dual Diagn. (2009) 5:168–78. doi: 10.1080/15504260902869204
51. Jasinska AJ, Zorick T, Brody AL, Stein EA. Dual role of nicotine in addiction and cognition: a review of neuroimaging studies in humans. Neuropharmacology (2014) 84:111–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.02.015
52. Gupta B, Johnson NW. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Association of Smokeless Tobacco and of Betel Quid without Tobacco with Incidence of Oral Cancer in South Asia and the Pacific. PLoS ONE (2014) 9:e113385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113385
53. Javed F, Bello Correra FO, Chotai M, Tappuni AR, Almas K. Review Article: systemic conditions associated with areca nut usage: a literature review. Scand J Public Health (2010) 38:838–44. doi: 10.1177/1403494810379291
54. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
55. Huang X, Liu Z, Mwansisya TE, Pu W, Zhou L, Liu C, et al. Betel quid chewing alters functional connectivity in frontal and default networks: a resting-state fMRI study: Betel Quid Alters Network Connectivity. J Magn Reson Imaging (2016) 45:157–66. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25322
56. Yuan F, Zhu X, Kong L, Shen H, Liao W, Jiang C. White matter integrity deficit associated with betel quid dependence. Front Psychiatry (2017) 8:201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00201
58. Kringelbach M. The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Prog Neurobiol. (2004) 72:341–72. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.006
59. Schoenbaum G, Shaham Y. The role of orbitofrontal cortex in drug addiction: a review of preclinical studies. Biol Psychiatry (2008) 63:256–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.003
60. Kobayashi S, Lauwereyns J, Koizumi M, Sakagami M, Hikosaka O. Influence of reward expectation on visuospatial processing in macaque lateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol. (2002) 87:1488–98. doi: 10.1152/jn.00472.2001
61. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Tomasi D. Addiction circuitry in the human brain. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (2012) 52:321–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134625
62. Volkow ND, Chang L, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Ding Y-S, Sedler M, et al. Low level of brain dopamine D2 receptors in methamphetamine abusers: association with metabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry (2001) 158:2015–21. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.12.2015
63. Bissonette GB, Roesch MR. Development and function of the midbrain dopamine system: what we know and what we need to: development and function of the dopamine system. Genes Brain Behav. (2016) 15:62–73. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12257
64. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Tomasi D, Telang F. Addiction: beyond dopamine reward circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2011) 108:15037–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010654108
65. Tudge L, Williams C, Cowen PJ, McCabe C. Neural effects of cannabinoid CB1 neutral antagonist tetrahydrocannabivarin on food reward and aversion in healthy volunteers. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2015) 18:pyu094. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu094
66. Späti J, Chumbley J, Brakowski J, Dörig N, Grosse Holtforth M, Seifritz E, et al. Functional lateralization of the anterior insula during feedback processing: role of the Insula in Self-Attributed Feedback. Hum Brain Mapp. (2014) 35:4428–39. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22484
67. Aron A, Fisher H, Mashek DJ, Strong G, Li H, Brown LL. Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. J Neurophysiol. (2005) 94:327–37. doi: 10.1152/jn.00838.2004
68. Yin HH, Ostlund SB, Knowlton BJ, Balleine BW. The role of the dorsomedial striatum in instrumental conditioning: striatum and instrumental conditioning. Eur J Neurosci. (2005) 22:513–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04218.x
69. Heinz A. Correlation between dopamine D2 receptors in the ventral striatum and central processing of alcohol cues and craving. Am J Psychiatry (2004) 161:1783–9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.161.10.1783
70. Moulton EA, Elman I, Becerra LR, Goldstein RZ, Borsook D. The cerebellum and addiction: insights gained from neuroimaging research. Addict Biol. (2014) 19:317–31. doi: 10.1111/adb.12101
71. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Ma Y, Fowler JS, Zhu W, Maynard L, et al. Expectation enhances the regional brain metabolic and the reinforcing effects of stimulants in cocaine abusers. J Neurosci. (2003) 23:11461–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-36-11461.2003
72. Grant S, London ED, Newlin DB, Villemagne VL, Liu X, Contoreggi C, et al. Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1996) 93:12040–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.12040
73. Crews FT, Boettiger CA. Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (2009) 93:237–47. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.04.018
74. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Baler R, Telang F. Imaging dopamine's role in drug abuse and addiction. Neuropharmacology (2009) 56:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.05.022
75. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, Jayne M, et al. Profound decreases in dopamine release in striatum in detoxified alcoholics: possible orbitofrontal involvement. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:12700–6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3371-07.2007
76. Volkow ND, Fowler JS. Addiction, a diseaseof compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbital frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex (2000) 10:318–25. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.3.318
77. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry (2002) 159:1642–52. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642
78. Lee B, London ED, Poldrack RA, Farahi J, Nacca A, Monterosso JR, et al. Striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptor availability is reduced in methamphetamine dependence and is linked to impulsivity. J Neurosci. (2009) 29:14734–40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3765-09.2009
79. Bari A, Niu T, Langevin J-P, Fried I. Limbic neuromodulation. Neurosurg Clin N Am. (2014) 25:137–45. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.08.004
80. Forman SD, Dougherty GG, Casey B, Siegle GJ, Braver TS, Barch DM, et al. Opiate addicts lack error-dependent activation of rostral anterior cingulate. Biol Psychiatry (2004) 55:531–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.09.011
81. Yu¨cel M, Lubman D, Harrison B, Fornito A, Allen N, Wellard R, et al. A combined spectroscopic and functional MRI investigation of the dorsal anterior cingulate region in opiate addiction. Mol Psychiatry (2007) 12:691–702. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001955
82. Haselhorst R, Dürsteler–MacFarland KM, Scheffler K, Ladewig D, Müller–Spahn F, Stohler R, et al. Frontocortical N-acetylaspartate reduction associated with long-term IV heroin use. Neurology (2002) 58:305–7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.2.305
83. Chen J, Charles H, Barboriak D, Doraiswamy P. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Alzheimer's disease: focus on N-acetylaspartate. Acta Neurol Scand. (2000) 176:20–6.
84. Payen J-F, Francony G, Fauvage B, Le Bas J-F. Apport de la spectroscopie RMN à l'évaluation du traumatisme crânien. Ann Fr Anesth Réanimation (2005) 24:522–7. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2005.03.005
85. Shih Y-T, Chen PS, Wu C-H, Tseng Y-T, Wu Y-C, Lo Y-C. Arecoline, a major alkaloid of the areca nut, causes neurotoxicity through enhancement of oxidative stress and suppression of the antioxidant protective system. Free Radic Biol Med. (2010) 49:1471–9. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.07.017
86. Nakanishi T, Turner JR, Burg MB. Osmoregulatory changes in myo-inositol transport by renal cells. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. (1989) 86:6002–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.15.6002
87. Schweinsburg BC, Taylor MJ, Videen JS, Alhassoon OM, Patterson TL, Grant I, et al. Elevated myo-inositol in gray matter of recently detoxified but not long-term abstinent alcoholics: a preliminary MR spectroscopy study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. (2000) 24:699–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02042.x
88. Noël X, Brevers D, Bechara A. A neurocognitive approach to understanding the neurobiology of addiction. Curr Opin Neurobiol. (2013) 23:632–8. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.018
89. He Q, Xiao L, Xue G, Wong S, Ames SL, Xie B, et al. Altered dynamics between neural systems sub-serving decisions for unhealthy food. Front Neurosci. (2014) 8:350. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00350
90. He Q, Chen C, Dong Q, Xue G, Chen C, Lu Z-L, et al. Gray and white matter structures in the midcingulate cortex region contribute to body mass index in Chinese young adults. Brain Struct Funct. (2015) 220:319–29. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0657-9
91. He Q, Xiao L, Xue G, Wong S, Ames SL, Schembre SM, et al. Poor ability to resist tempting calorie rich food is linked to altered balance between neural systems involved in urge and self-control. Nutr J. (2014) 13:92. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-92
92. Joutsa J, Saunavaara J, Parkkola R, Niemelä S, Kaasinen V. Extensive abnormality of brain white matter integrity in pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging (2011) 194:340–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.08.001
93. Jeong BS, Han DH, Kim SM, Lee SW, Renshaw PF. White matter connectivity and Internet gaming disorder. Addict Biol. (2016) 21:732–42. doi: 10.1111/adb.12246
94. Sexton CE, Mackay CE, Ebmeier KP. A systematic review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in affective disorders. Biol Psychiatry (2009) 66:814–23. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.024
95. He Q, Turel O, Bechara A. Brain anatomy alterations associated with Social Networking Site (SNS) addiction. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:45064. doi: 10.1038/srep45064
96. Barbey AK, Koenigs M, Grafman J. Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex (2013) 49:1195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022
97. Blumenfeld RS, Parks CM, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. Putting the Pieces Together: the role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in relational memory encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. (2011) 23:257–65. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21459
98. Bogdanov M, Ruff CC, Schwabe L. Transcranial stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex increases the impact of past expenses on decision-making. Cereb Cortex (2015) 27:1094–102. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv298
99. Coutlee CG, Huettel SA. The functional neuroanatomy of decision making: prefrontal control of thought and action. Brain Res. (2012) 1428:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.053
100. Koenigs M, Grafman J. The functional neuroanatomy of depression: distinct roles for ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res. (2009) 201:239–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.004
101. Azizian A, Nestor LJ, Payer D, Monterosso JR, Brody AL, London ED. Smoking reduces conflict-related anterior cingulate activity in abstinent cigarette smokers performing a stroop task. Neuropsychopharmacology (2010) 35:775–82. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.186
102. Naqvi NH, Bechara A. The hidden island of addiction: the insula. Trends Neurosci. (2009) 32:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.009
103. Naqvi NH, Bechara A. The insula and drug addiction: an interoceptive view of pleasure, urges, and decision-making. Brain Struct Funct. (2010) 214:435–50. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0268-7
104. Paulus MP, Stewart JL. Interoception and drug addiction. Neuropharmacology (2014) 76:342–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.002
105. Droutman V, Read SJ, Bechara A. Revisiting the role of the insula in addiction. Trends Cogn Sci. (2015) 19:414–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.005
106. Raichle ME, Snyder AZ. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage (2007) 37:1083–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041
107. Kohno M, Morales AM, Ghahremani DG, Hellemann G, London ED. Risky decision making, prefrontal cortex, and mesocorticolimbic functional connectivity in methamphetamine dependence. JAMA Psychiatry (2014) 71:812. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.399
108. Cisler JM, Elton A, Kennedy AP, Young J, Smitherman S, Andrew James G, et al. Altered functional connectivity of the insular cortex across prefrontal networks in cocaine addiction. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging (2013) 213:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.02.007
109. Mason MF, Norton MI, Van Horn JD, Wegner DM, Grafton ST, Macrae CN. Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science (2007) 315:393–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1131295
110. Li W, Mai X, Liu C. The default mode network and social understanding of others: what do brain connectivity studies tell us. Front Hum Neurosci. 8:74. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00074
111. Anticevic A, Cole MW, Murray JD, Corlett PR, Wang X-J, Krystal JH. The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease. Trends Cogn Sci. (2012) 16:584–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.008
112. Goldstein RZ, Craig AD (Bud), Bechara A, Garavan H, Childress AR, Paulus MP, et al. The neurocircuitry of impaired insight in drug addiction. Trends Cogn Sci. (2009) 13:372–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.004
113. Dosenbach NUF, Fair DA, Cohen AL, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends Cogn Sci. (2008) 12:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.001
114. de Graaf TA, Roebroeck A, Goebel R, Sack A. Brain network dynamics underlying visuospatial judgment: an fMRI connectivity study. J Cogn Neurosci. (2010) 22:2012–26. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21345
115. Rodd JM, Longe OA, Randall B, Tyler LK. The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia (2010) 48:1324–35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.035
116. Witt ST, Laird AR, Meyerand ME. Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: an ALE meta-analysis. Neuroimage (2008) 42:343–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.025
117. Cunha PJ, Nicastri S, Gomes LP, Moino RM, Peluso MA. Neuropsychological impairments in crack cocainedependent inpatients: preliminary findings. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. (2004) 26:103–6. doi: 10.1590/S1516-44462004000200007
118. Bolla K, Eldreth D, Matochik J, Cadet J. Neural substrates of faulty decision-making in abstinent marijuana users. Neuroimage (2005) 26:480–92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.012
119. Jou RJ, Minshew NJ, Keshavan MS, Vitale MP, Hardan AY. Enlarged right superior temporal gyrus in children and adolescents with autism. Brain Res. (2010) 1360:205–12. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.005
120. Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Öhman A, Dolan RJ. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci. (2004) 7:189–95. doi: 10.1038/nn1176
121. Gu H, Salmeron BJ, Ross TJ, Geng X, Zhan W, Stein EA, et al. Mesocorticolimbic circuits are impaired in chronic cocaine users as demonstrated by resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage (2010) 53:593–601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.066
122. Gearhardt AN, Yokum S, Stice E, Harris JL, Brownell KD. Relation of obesity to neural activation in response to food commercials. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2014) 9:932–8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst059
123. Tang DW, Fellows LK, Small DM, Dagher A. Food and drug cues activate similar brain regions: a meta-analysis of functional MRI studies. Physiol Behav. (2012) 106:317–24. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.009
124. Phelps E. Human emotion and memory: interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. (2004) 14:198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.015
125. Chiu M-C, Shen B, Li S-H, Ho M-C. Spatial short-term memory is impaired in dependent betel quid chewers. Psychopharmacology (2016) 233:2925–32. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4331-9
126. Abbas G, Naqvi S, Erum S, Ahmed S, Atta-ur-Rahman Dar A. Potential antidepressant activity of Areca catechu nut via elevation of serotonin and noradrenaline in the hippocampus of rats. Phytother Res. (2013) 27:39–45. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4674
127. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Hitzemann R, et al. Decreased striatal dopaminergic responsiveness in detoxified cocaine-dependent subjects. Nature (1997) 386:830–3. doi: 10.1038/386830a0
128. Sescousse G, Caldú X, Segura B, Dreher J-C. Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2013) 37:681–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.002
129. Supèr H. Working memory in the primary visual cortex. Arch Neurol. (2003) 60:809–12. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.6.809
130. Maksimenko VA, Runnova AE, Zhuravlev MO, Makarov VV, Nedayvozov V, Grubov VV, et al. Visual perception affected by motivation and alertness controlled by a noninvasive brain-computer interface. PLoS ONE (2017) 12:e0188700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188700
131. Shokri-Kojori E, Tomasi D, Wiers CE, Wang G-J, Volkow ND. Alcohol affects brain functional connectivity and its coupling with behavior: greater effects in male heavy drinkers. Mol Psychiatry (2017) 22:1185–95. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.25
132. Esposito F, Pignataro G, Di Renzo G, Spinali A, Paccone A, Tedeschi G, et al. Alcohol increases spontaneous BOLD signal fluctuations in the visual network. Neuroimage (2010) 53:534–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.061
Keywords: betel quid, resting state, functional MRI, structural MRI, betel quid dependence, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), systematic review, brain alterations
Citation: Sariah A, Liu Z, Pu W, Liu H, Xue Z and Huang X (2019) Structural and Functional Alterations in Betel-Quid Chewers: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Findings. Front. Psychiatry 10:16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00016
Received: 10 September 2018; Accepted: 11 January 2019;
Published: 29 January 2019.
Edited by:
Stefan Borgwardt, Universität Basel, SwitzerlandReviewed by:
Feng Chen, Hainan General Hospital, ChinaMing-Chou Ho, Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan
Copyright © 2019 Sariah, Liu, Pu, Liu, Xue and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaojun Huang, eGlhb2p1bmg5QGNzdS5lZHUuY24=