Abstract
Increased temperatures caused by global warming threaten agricultural production, as warmer conditions can inhibit plant growth and development or even destroy crops in extreme circumstances. Extensive research over the past several decades has revealed that chloroplasts, the photosynthetic organelles of plants, are highly sensitive to heat stress, which affects a variety of photosynthetic processes including chlorophyll biosynthesis, photochemical reactions, electron transport, and CO2 assimilation. Important mechanisms by which plant cells respond to heat stress to protect these photosynthetic organelles have been identified and analyzed. More recent studies have made it clear that chloroplasts play an important role in inducing the expression of nuclear heat-response genes during the heat stress response. In this review, we summarize these important advances in plant-based research and discuss how the sensitivity, responses, and signaling roles of chloroplasts contribute to plant heat sensitivity and tolerance.
Introduction
Increased temperatures due to climate change pose a severe threat to crop yields worldwide (Wang et al., 2018). Generally, heat stress is often defined as the rise in temperature beyond a threshold level for a period of time sufficient to cause irreversible damage to plant growth and development (Wahid et al., 2007). High temperatures damage the activity of proteins and the fluidity membrane lipids, thus affecting the activity of chloroplast- and mitochondria-based enzymes and membrane integrity. Both severe heat stress and long-term exposure to moderate high temperatures can result in cellular damage and cell death. In tropical and subtropical climates, heat stress may become a major limiting factor in field crop production. Thus, it is imperative that we develop crops with improved heat tolerance by means of heat acclimation of plants, molecular breeding and genetic engineering (Schöffl et al., 1998; Howarth, 2005; Wahid et al., 2007).
During photosynthesis in higher plants, sunlight is trapped and converted into biological energy by chloroplasts. These organelles serve as metabolic centers and play key roles in sensing heat stress and instigating appropriate physiological adaptive responses. Photosynthesis-associated processes including electron transport, CO2 assimilation, photophosphorylation, chlorophyll (Chl) biosynthesis, thylakoid membrane fluidity and photochemical reactions are sensitive to heat stress. Normally, these major metabolic processes optimize carbon fixation and growth (Berry and Bjorkman, 1980; Sharkey, 2005; Wahid et al., 2007; Allakhverdiev et al., 2008; Kmiecik et al., 2016; Sun and Guo, 2016). Heat stress-induced damage to chloroplasts leads to the inactivation of heat-sensitive proteins such as Rubisco activase (RCA) and the down-regulation of important chloroplast components, thereby leading to decreased photosynthetic efficiency, redox imbalance and possible cell death (Eamus et al., 1995; Klimov et al., 1997; Salvucci, 2004; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004; Wahid et al., 2007; Allakhverdiev et al., 2008; Li et al., 2018). As the photosynthetic apparatus within chloroplasts is prone to damage due to thermal stress, these organelles are key to the activation of cellular heat stress signaling processes (Yu et al., 2012; Sun and Guo, 2016; Chen et al., 2017).
As an essential biological process, protein biosynthesis motivates the growth and development of all living organisms (Shalgi et al., 2013; Li et al., 2018). To respond to heat stress, heat shock proteins (HSPs) have evolved in plants. These proteins act as molecular chaperones to promote the folding and refolding of non-native proteins during protein quality control processes (Vierling, 1991; Baniwal et al., 2007; Kotak et al., 2007; von Koskull-Döring et al., 2007; Schramm et al., 2008). The heat shock transcription factor (HSF), which regulates the expression of HSP genes, recognizes the heat shock cis element (HSE) that is conserved in the HSP gene promoter (Kotak et al., 2007; von Koskull-Döring et al., 2007). A large number of studies have been carried out to investigate the functions of HSFs and HSPs. Although these have greatly increased our knowledge of the heat stress response in plants, our understanding of the regulatory network that controls the heat shock response system is far from complete (Yu et al., 2012).
In this review, we summarize the impact of heat stress on chloroplast components and the mechanisms that underlie the heat-sensitive nature of this photosynthetic organelle. Heat-induced effects include the inactivation of Photosystem II (PSII), Chl breakdown, inactivation of Rubisco and impairment of protein translation. We also discuss the protective mechanisms that are implemented by chloroplasts in response to heat stress, including the generation of a large number of protein chaperones, and the roles of chloroplasts in retrograde signal pathways that protect cellular integrity and the normal growth of plants under heat stress (Figure 1). The importance and significance of chloroplasts in plant development and productivity under heat stress are also discussed.
FIGURE 1
Chloroplast Sensitivity to Heat Stress
Heat Sensitivity of Photosynthesis
It is well-known that photosynthesis is highly sensitive to high temperatures and heat damage leads to cellular energy imbalance. This is mainly reflected in the distinct alteration to the redox state related to the injury of thylakoid membranes (Berry and Bjorkman, 1980; Biswal et al., 2011). At high temperatures, the photochemical reactions in the thylakoid lamellae and carbon metabolism in the stroma of chloroplasts are most affected (Wise et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2018). Heat stress could directly damage the photosynthetic apparatus, such as PSI and PSII, the cytochrome b6f (Cytb6f) complex and Rubisco (Havaux, 1993a, b; Wise et al., 2004); moreover, heat-induced inactivation of these photosynthetic components can lead to the inhibition of various redox and metabolic reactions (Mathur et al., 2014).
Photosystem II
Of the chloroplast thylakoid membrane protein complexes, PSII is the most sensitive target of heat stress. Photosynthetic electron transport and ATP synthesis are greatly affected if PSII suffers from severe thermal damage (Wang et al., 2018). Under high temperatures, due to the increased fluidity of thylakoid membranes, PSII light-harvesting complexes fall off the thylakoid membranes, which results in impaired PSII integrity and affects photosynthetic electron transfer (Baker and Rosenqvist, 2004; Janka et al., 2013; Mathur et al., 2014). The oxygen evolving complex (OEC) in PSII is dissociated by heat stress, which further results in the inhibition of electron transport from the OEC to the acceptor side of PSII (Havaux and Tardy, 1996; Allakhverdiev et al., 1997; Wahid et al., 2007; Allakhverdiev et al., 2008).
High temperature stress is accompanied by oxidative stress in plants. A recent study revealed that reactive singlet oxygen, 1O2, is produced as a byproduct of photosynthesis and can damage PSII reaction center proteins, which in turn induces the PSII repair cycle (Dogra and Kim, 2019). It is also well known that PSII is extremely susceptible to light damage (Aro et al., 1993; Tikkanen et al., 2012). Recent reports suggest that AhVDE [a peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) violaxanthin de-epoxidase gene] can mitigate PSII photoinhibition induced by heat and high irradiance stress (Yang et al., 2015). Xanthophyll cycle-dependent non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) can protect PSII under excess irradiance by converting surplus light energy into heat energy to alleviate the excitation energy pressure on PSII reaction centers (Morosinotto et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2015). Previous studies suggest that Zeaxanthin plays an important role in the NPQ mechanism (Niyogi et al., 1998; Nilkens et al., 2010). As is known to all, PSII splits water by absorbed light energy and then transmits electron for the next reaction. However, PSII is susceptible to environmental stress, especially heat stress and oxidative stress. These stresses might inhibit the repair of the photodamaged PSII by inhibition of PSII protein synthesis (Takahashi and Murata, 2008), thus leading to the decrease of photosynthetic efficiency in plants.
Chlorophyll
Chl, the main photosynthetic pigment in the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts, could harvest light energy and drive electron transfer during the initial and indispensable processes of photosynthesis (Wang et al., 2018). Studies have shown that degradation of Chl could protect plant cells from the hazardous effects of phototoxic pigments (Ginsburg et al., 1994; Hörtensteiner, 2006, 2009). Under normal growth conditions, the synthesis and degradation of Chl reach equilibrium and the levels of this molecule remain stable (Ginsburg et al., 1994; Hörtensteiner, 2006; Wang et al., 2018). Conversely, when plants are subject to environmental stress, including heat, the content of Chl decreases, leading to leaf senescence or chlorosis (Kim and Nam, 2007; Lim et al., 2007; Allakhverdiev et al., 2008; Rossi et al., 2017). Under heat treatment, the activity of chlorophyllase and Chl-degrading peroxidase dramatically increases, resulting in a serious reduction in Chl levels (Figure 2; Wang et al., 2018). One study demonstrated that the exogenous application of zeatin riboside (ZR) increases Chl levels by reducing the activity of protease in creeping bentgrass during heat stress (Figure 2; Veerasamy et al., 2007). Moreover, degradation of Chl might also be a protective response of plants. Excessive light energy captured by chlorophyll could also threaten the photosynthesis in plants. The study has shown that an ABA biosynthesis-defective mutant nced3nced5 had less Chl content compared with the wild type under high light (Huang et al., 2019). It may be shows that ABA could regulates Chl biosynthesis under high light. The balance of Chl biosynthesis and breakdown is crucial to maintain the photosynthetic apparatus to promote photosynthetic efficiency, ultimately influencing crop development and yield.
FIGURE 2
Ribulose-1, 5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase (Rubisco)
Rubisco is not only an important carboxylase in C3 carbon reaction of photosynthesis, but also an indispensable oxygenase in photorespiration. During the photosynthetic process, the enzyme Rubisco is responsible for fixing an estimated 1,011 tons of atmospheric CO2 (Field et al., 1998; Galmés et al., 2013). Within the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle, Rubisco catalyzes the carboxylation of the 5-carbon sugar ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate (RuBP) (Wang et al., 2018). Under moderately elevated temperatures, the activity of RCA is inhibited, resulting in the thermal inactivation of Rubisco activity (Spreitzer and Salvucci, 2002; Portis, 2003; Sharkey, 2005; Sage et al., 2008; Perdomo et al., 2017). Under high temperatures, the stability of Rubisco’s chaperone activating enzyme decreases, which results in the inhibition of photosynthesis in plants. These results support the theory that RCA is a limiting factor in photosynthesis when the atmospheric temperature exceeds the optimum range for plants (Wang et al., 2018). Studies have shown that photosynthesis is not completely limited by carbon and probably caused by stomata closure. Stomata closure could prevent excessive water loss and increases the temperature of the leaves, thereby increasing the absorption of heat and the photorespiration of Rubisco (Losciale et al., 2014). Moreover, as temperature rises, the affinity of Rubisco for CO2 decreases, which tends to catalyze its oxygenase reaction. It would result in the increase of photorespiration and reduce the efficiency of photosynthesis, ultimately leading to reduced crop yields. Recent studies found that a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) chloroplast-targeted DnaJ protein (SlCDJ2) could maintain of CO2 assimilation capacity mainly by protecting Rubisco activity under heat stress (Wang et al., 2015). SDJ20 might enhance the carboxylase activity of Rubisco under high temperature stress. Large-scale replacement of the amino acid sequence in the active center of Rubisco enzyme and reprogramming of the coding genes may effectively reduce or remove the damage caused by photorespiration to plants, but it is still difficult to achieve by current biotechnology methods.
Heat Sensitivity of Chloroplast Protein Translation
As a semi-autonomous organelle, the chloroplast has an independent genome that is used mainly to encode ribosomal proteins and protein molecules that are closely related to photosynthesis. However, heat stress usually leads to the aggregation and denaturation of proteins. The downregulation of nuclear photosynthetic genes in higher plants is caused generally by the inhibition of plastid translation (Beck, 2005; Nott et al., 2006; Bräutigam et al., 2007). Translation elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is a conserved GTP-binding protein that is essential to the translation of proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotic mitochondria and plastids (Li et al., 2018). Li et al. (2018) found that the Arabidopsis plastid EF-Tu, Rabe1b, is associated with plastid translation under heat stress. Knockdown mutants of Arabidopsis rabe1b, virus-induced silencing of tomato Rabe1b or overexpression of constitutive GTP- or GDP-bound mutant forms of Rabe1b in Arabidopsis all reduce heat tolerance. These results indicate that heat-sensitive plastid EF-Tu is associated with the plant response to heat stress (Li et al., 2018). In addition, Yu et al. (2012) confirmed that a retrograde pathway is involved in the regulation of heat stress. They found that chloroplast ribosomal protein S1 (RPS1) is a heat-responsive protein. Importantly, in both rps1 and Rabe1b mutants, the induction of nuclear heat-responsive genes regulated by the HSF HsfA2 is also compromised. These results indicated that chloroplast protein translation is required to induce retrograde signaling in the nuclear heat stress response (Yu et al., 2012; Yang and Guo, 2014). Therefore, chloroplast protein translation functions are important not only in the synthesis of chloroplast proteins that are required for normal function, but also in the communication between plastids and nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of plant cells.
Protective Responses of Chloroplasts to Heat Stress
Protective Role of Chloroplast Protein Chaperones
If chloroplasts are damaged during their development, photosynthetic efficiency is decreased, which leads to a severe reduction in plant productivity (Dutta et al., 2009). However, high temperatures induce the expression of protective chaperones and modulate growth responses (Dickinson et al., 2018). It is well-known that HSPs including Hsp101, Hsp100, and small HSPs (sHsp) play essential roles in responding to heat stress. HSPs, as molecular chaperones, can prevent protein denaturation and aggregation (Barua et al., 2003). Genetic analysis has shown that HSP101 is essential to plant thermotolerance and survival under high-temperature stress (Hong and Vierling, 2001; Myouga et al., 2006; Mathur et al., 2014). Arabidopsis hsp101 mutants were found to be sensitive to high temperature (Hong and Vierling, 2000), while Hsp101 overexpressing plants displayed increased tolerance to thermal stress (Queitsch et al., 2000). Myouga et al. (2006) used albino or pale-green (apg) mutants containing a Ds insertion in the gene encoding APG6 (ClpB3) to reveal it as a homologue of Hsp101. The study demonstrated the roles of nuclear genes in chloroplast development and pigment synthesis. In apg6 mutants, chloroplast proteins related to photosynthesis were markedly decreased. Further analysis suggest that, as a molecular chaperone, APG6 mediates internal thylakoid membrane formation during plastid differentiation and confers thermotolerance to chloroplasts under heat stress (Myouga et al., 2006).
Hsp100 proteins are molecular chaperones involved in many important metabolic processes of prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Schirmer et al., 1996). Accumulating data indicate that HSP100 is also vital to heat tolerance. Yang et al. (2006) isolated the Lehsp100/ClpB gene for HSP100 from tomato chloroplasts. The expression of Lehsp100/ClpB was inhibited in antisense transgenic tomatoes, leading to marked impairment of their photosynthetic function. LeHSP100/ClpB proteins are thought to protect PSII against heat stress (Yang et al., 2006). In addition, small HSPs in chloroplasts are associated with the thylakoids and protect PSII under heat and other stresses, possibly by stabilizing the OEC (Heckathorn et al., 2002). Most small HSPs are highly expressed under heat stress and improve heat resistance by protecting proteins from irreversible denaturation (Sun et al., 2002; Sun and MacRae, 2005; Zhong et al., 2013). For example, HSP21 is a nuclear-encoded chloroplast-localized small HSP. It plays an essential role in protecting PSII against heat stress (Heckathorn et al., 1998; Härndahl et al., 1999; Wang and Luthe, 2003; Shakeel et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012; Zhong et al., 2013). Studies have found that the loss of HSP21 function severely affects seedling development and this small HSP interacts with plastid nucleoid protein pTAC5 to maintain the function of plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP) and plays an essential role in chloroplast development (Zhong et al., 2013). Moreover, Hu et al. (2015) revealed that sHSP26 improved maize chloroplast performance under heat stress by interacting with specific proteins (Hu et al., 2015).
The Orange (Or) protein functions as a holdase chaperone and regulates carotenoid biosynthesis and environmental stress in plants (Zhou et al., 2015; Park et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2017). After heat shock, the efficiency of PSII and chlorophyll contents are improved by the overexpression of the Or gene (IbOr) from Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam in transgenic Arabidopsis (Park et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2017). In higher plants, oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2-1 (PsbP) protein is necessary for normal thylakoid structure. PsbP can also regulate and stabilize the PSII (Yi et al., 2007, 2009). Sweet potato plants can acquire heat tolerance by stabilizing IbPsbP using the holdase chaperone function of IbOr and stabilizing PSII (Kang et al., 2017). Collectively, chloroplast HSPs and other protein chaperones play important roles in acquiring thermtolerance and protecting chloroplast development and photosynthesis under heat stress.
Chloroplast Protein Quality Control
Majority of proteins in chloroplasts are encoded by nuclear genes and synthesized in the cytoplasm, and only a small part of the proteins are synthesized by themselves. TOC (transocon at the outer membrane of chloroplasts) and TIC (transocon at the inner membrane of chloroplasts) complexes at the double membrane envelope of chloroplasts mediate the import of the majority of nucleus-encoded proteins into plastids. Extensive studies have shown that the plastid protein import machinery is an important organellar protein targeting system (Abdallah et al., 2000; Leister, 2003; Li and Chiu, 2010; Shi and Theg, 2013; Paila et al., 2015; Richardson et al., 2017; Sjuts et al., 2017). The normal function of chloroplasts depends on the assembly and homeostasis of a large number of nucleus-encoded proteins (Ling et al., 2019). Therefore, Chloroplast protein quality control is important for plans to response to the environmental stress, including heat stress. Upon environmental stimulation, damaged proteins in chloroplasts would be rapidly degraded to ensure normal photosynthesis. Under extreme stress, even the entire chloroplast must be removed to ensure normal plant growth.
The thermal stability of protein import apparatus is quite low. After intact chloroplasts were exposed to 40°C, the protein import inhibition rate reached 100%, but in intact plants, exposed to high temperatures of 40°C for up to 24–48 h, protein introduction is only partially reduced 49–67% (Dutta et al., 2009). The TOC complexes control the initial recognition and translocation of precursor proteins at the outer membrane. Toc159 and Toc34 share a highly conserved GTP-binding domain that initially recognize the chloroplast targeting peptide (Kouranov and Schnell, 1997; Keegstra and Froehlich, 1999; Chen et al., 2000; Sveshnikova et al., 2000; Kessler and Schnell, 2002, 2006; Becker et al., 2004; Dutta et al., 2009). The polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA) domains of Toc75 orient toward the intermembrane space and prevent preproteins from misfolding there (Chen et al., 2016; Paila et al., 2016; Richardson et al., 2017). Moreover, Tic22 is a chaperone in the intermembrane space and facilitates the continuity of precursor translocation between the TOC and TIC channels (Richardson et al., 2017). Tic20 is an essential component of protein import apparatus (Chen et al., 2002; Teng et al., 2006). The outer-membrane channel Toc75 can bind directly to Tic236, which is anchored to the inner membrane (Chen et al., 2018). Dutta et al. (2009) found that the impairment of protein import in heat-stressed plants was mainly due to a decrease in preprotein binding resulting from a decrease in Toc159 expression. The inhibition of import efficiency may reach 67%, which may be due to the down-regulation of gene/protein expression of certain components of the TOC complex (Toc75), the TIC complex (Tic20, Tic32, Tic55, and Tic62), stromal Hsp93 and stromal processing peptidase (Dutta et al., 2009). In addition, Shakeel et al. (2013) performed a qualitative and quantitative proteomic analysis of the chloroplast stromal proteome. They found that ∼25% of the proteins were membrane proteins in both heat-treated and control samples, only 1–7% of the proteins were found to be involved in functions related to the cytoskeleton, mitochondria, ribosome, and cytoplasm. Therefore, these proteins could be grouped as transport-related or defense-related proteins (Shakeel et al., 2013).
When plants are exposed to high temperatures, the chloroplasts are unfolded and vulnerable to proteolytic enzymes, resulting in rapid degradation of chloroplast proteins (Dutta et al., 2009). It is generally known that the D1 protein, one of the major core subunits in PSII, is the main site susceptible to damage by heat stress or high light (Murata et al., 2007; Yamamoto et al., 2008; Su et al., 2014). The hetero-hexameric FtsH protease which is located in the thylakoid membrane, is essential in degrading damaged PSII reaction center proteins. Previous study found that an FtsH protease(s) was involved in the primary cleavage of the D1 protein under moderate heat stress (Yoshioka et al., 2006). Moreover, the study found that the loss of the central subunit of the FtsH protease, FtsH2, weakened the PSII repair (impaired by heat stress), thereby impairing PSII proteostasis (Dogra and Kim, 2019). After the damaged protein is degraded, a newly synthesized protein is required to replace it to perform normal functions. Echevarría-Zomeño et al. (2016) found two chloroplast ribosomal proteins proteins, PSRP3 and PRPL28 by proteomic analysis (Romani et al., 2012; Tiller et al., 2011). The levels of PSRP3 and PRPL28P increased during committed to survival treatment (38°C for 1 h, set back to 22°C for 1 h and then followed by a challenge of 45°C during 3 h and set back to 22°C for 5 h) (Echevarría-Zomeño et al., 2016). It is reasonable to speculate that PSRP3 and PRPL28P might be related to chloroplast protein synthesis. Therefore, it is essential for plants to maintain proteostasis in chloroplasts under environmental stress. Furthermore, enhanced PSII proteostasis and the accumulation of damaged proteins may facilitate salicylic acid synthesis through the isochorismate pathway established by chloroplasts. Salicylic acid may act as a retrograde signaling molecule for the regulation of nuclear gene expression (Dogra and Kim, 2019). Therefore, there is also a correlation between chloroplast protein homeostasis and retrograde signaling pathways.
Chloroplast-Associated Retrograde Signaling in Plant Heat Stress Responses
The chloroplast is an environmental sensor that affects the expression of nuclear genes through retrograde signaling. Therefore, it is not surprising that these organelles play an important role in activating cellular heat stress signals (Chan et al., 2016; Dickinson et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018). Nuclear gene expression is regulated by nuclear-encoded proteins targeted to chloroplasts and retrograde signals from plastids to the nucleus (Rintamäki et al., 2009). Under high temperatures, the heat shock response triggers increased transcription of HSF and HSP genes (Yu et al., 2012). Chloroplasts transmit environmental stimuli to the nucleus through retrograde signaling pathways by utilizing reactive oxygen species (ROS), tocopherols and chlorophyll biosynthetic intermediates to regulate gene expression in the nucleus.
HsfA2-Dependent Retrograde Signaling
Protection against high temperature stress in eukaryotes is coordinated by HSFs, transcription factors that activate the expression of protective chaperones. HSFs regulate the expression of HSP genes at the transcriptional level by recognizing HSEs that are conserved in HSP gene promoters (Kotak et al., 2007; von Koskull-Döring et al., 2007). HsfA2 is a major HSF in the heat-induced expression of nuclear heat-responsive genes in plants and a key regulator of heat tolerance in plants including tomato (Scharf et al., 1998; Döring et al., 2000; Chan-Schaminet et al., 2009) and Arabidopsis (Nishizawa et al., 2006; Schramm et al., 2006; Charng et al., 2007). In Arabidopsis, Hsf1, Hsf3, HsfA2, and HsfA3 are all associated with heat tolerance but AtHsfA2 is most strongly induced by a rise in temperature (Ogawa et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2018). In tomato, HsfA2 is highly stable and under heat shock conditions translocates into the nucleus upon binding to HsfA1 to form a hetero-oligomer (Scharf et al., 1998; Heerklotz et al., 2001). Interestingly, AtHsfA2 from Arabidopsis can also enter the nucleus from the cytoplasm and activates the expression of a series of Hsp or chaperone genes in the absence of AtHsfA1 (Schramm et al., 2006).
ROF1 (AtFKBP62) interacts with HSP90.1 and regulates the HSF, HsfA2, to induce heat tolerance. Meiri and Breiman (2009) reported that the HSP90.1-ROF1 complex appeared in the nucleus and cytoplasm under heat treatment. It is possible that heat stress activates HsfA2 and other unknown factors, leading to the nuclear translocation of the ROF1-HSP90.1 complex (Meiri and Breiman, 2009). RPS1 is responsive to heat stress and also participates in retrograde activation of heat stress responses in higher plants. Arabidopsis rps1 mutant plants are impaired in the activation of HsfA2-dependent heat-responsive gene expression in the nucleus (Figure 3), which is necessary for thermotolerance in higher plants (Yu et al., 2012). In addition, down-regulation of RPS1 can inhibit thylakoid membrane-associated physiological processes. It affects the generation of ROS such as H2O2 under heat stress and influences the activation of ROS-mediated retrograde signal transduction (Yu et al., 2012).
FIGURE 3
ROS as Retrograde Signals
The aerobic metabolism of plants unavoidably generates ROS such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide, hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH), and singlet oxygen (1O2) (Sun and Guo, 2016). ROS serve as a plastid signals and instruct the nucleus to activate the expression of genes that encode antioxidant enzymes and adjust the stress-response mechanisms. It is believed that, under conditions of stress, ROS trigger various operational retrograde signaling pathways and play vital roles in the acclimation of plants (Pogson et al., 2008; Galvez-Valdivieso and Mullineaux, 2010; Suzuki et al., 2012; Sun and Guo, 2016; Wang et al., 2018). Yao et al. (2017) demonstrated that ROS are important in the early heat shock response and may function as major signaling molecules (Yao et al., 2017). H2O2, for example, is a signaling molecule that activates core transcription regulators under heat stress. Volkov et al. (2006) determined that H2O2 activates HSFs (Figure 3; Volkov et al., 2006) and subsequently induces HSP70 expression. Thus, H2O2 triggers the transduction of a signal to the nucleus that induces the activation of heat-associated gene expression (Dickinson et al., 2018). In fact, the singlet oxygen pathway, which is independent of Mg-protoporphyrin IX (Mg-ProtoIX), is the most intensely studied ROS-dependent retrograde signaling pathway in higher plants (Suzuki et al., 2012). One study revealed that 1O2 can oxidize β-carotene to produce β-cyclocitral (Ramel et al., 2012; García-Plazaola et al., 2017) but the molecules that transmit the plastid 1O2 signal out of the chloroplast remain to be identified (Ramel et al., 2013).
Tocopherols as a Retrograde Signal
The regulation of transcription by retrograde signals is at the center of nuclear gene expression control. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are dynamically and delicately regulated by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. These mechanisms influence the processing and stability of primary and/or mature miRNAs (Rogers and Chen, 2013; Ha and Kim, 2014; Fang et al., 2018). Fang et al. (2018) found that miRNA biogenesis could be regulated by tocopherols (vitamin E). Phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) is mainly metabolized to produce aromatic amino acids (Tyr, Phe, and Trp) via the shikimate pathway (Fischer et al., 1997; Streatfield et al., 1999; Fang et al., 2018). However, genetic analysis has revealed that Tyr, not Phe or Trp, is essential to the accumulation of miRNAs. Tyr regulates the production of miRNAs by producing downstream metabolite tocopherols. Tocopherols could protect primary miRNAs from degradation and nuclear RNA exonuclease (XRN) negatively controls primary miRNA levels (Fang et al., 2018). Estavillo et al. (2011) found that 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphate (PAP) is the chloroplast retrograde inhibitor of XRNs (Estavillo et al., 2011). Therefore, tocopherols could inhibit the activity of XRN through chloroplast retrograde signaling molecule PAP, preventing the degradation of primary miRNAs and promoting the formation of miRNAs (Figure 3). Interestingly, the induction of PAP under heat seems to depend on the induction of tocopherols. The study has been shown that primary miR398 and mature miR398 accumulate downstream of PAP induction. Under heat stress, miR398 is induced, and its target gene COPPER/ZINC SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE2 (CSD2) is downregulated to protect plants against high temperatures. Heat induces the production of tocopherols and PAP, which is required to increase miR398 accumulation and improve thermotolerance (Fang et al., 2018).
Plant Hormones as Signals
In addition to the above-mentioned chloroplast-associated retrograde signals, the biosynthesis and signal transduction of some plant hormones introduced by some transcriptomic studies may also affect the photosynthesis of chloroplast. Interestingly, after excluding the effects of heat stress on plants, Huang et al. (2019) found that an abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis-defective mutant nced3nced5 was hypersensitive to high light and had less chlorophyll contents compared with the wild type under high light. Plants could dynamically regulate hormones (particularly ABA), photosynthesis, Blue/UV-A photoreceptors, etc. to response to high light (Huang et al., 2019). It can be seen that high light would also affect the photosynthesis of plants, even more damage to plants than high temperature. The biosynthesis of jasmonic acid (JA) involves the translocation of lipid intermediates from the chloroplast membranes to the cytoplasm and then into peroxisomes (León, 2013). Balfagón et al. (2019) revealed that JA is required for regulating several transcriptional responses unique to the stress combination (heat stress and high light). They also found that chloroplast structures and expression of transcripts that encode proteins involved in the photosynthesis changed under high light, heat stress, and combination of high light and heat stress, especially the levels of D1 protein in PSII. Moreover, compared to CT, the quantum yield of PSII and maximal efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) values of JA-deficient mutant aos markedly decreased under combination of high light and heat stress (Balfagón et al., 2019). Therefore, JA may act as a signal molecule to regulate plant photosynthesis under combination of high light and heat stress, but the signal pathway needs further experiments to explore and verify.
Conclusion and Future Prospects
In many parts of the world, high temperature has become one of the most important restrictions to plant growth and development, particularly influencing the photosynthetic capacity of plants. Extensive studies on the responses and adaptation of crops to high temperatures have expanded our understanding of thermal stress responses in these organisms. In this review, we have discussed the roles of chloroplasts in heat stress responses from an organellar perspective. High temperatures negatively affect many photosynthetic processes in chloroplasts including chlorophyll biosynthesis, photochemical reactions, electron transport and CO2 assimilation. Heat stress leads to the impairment of plastid-based protein translation and under high temperatures, newly synthesized proteins could misfold and existing proteins may be denatured (Ellis, 1990; Bita and Gerats, 2013). Chloroplast heat stress responses are therefore essential to reducing damage and increasing survival rates for plants under high temperatures.
As sessile organisms, plants, especially agricultural crops, are sensitive to elevated temperatures. Under heat stress, various genes and proteins are induced and regulated to protect the normal function of chloroplast and improve the heat tolerance of plants. Plants have evolved complex signaling pathways to sense and respond to heat stress. The interrelation between chloroplasts and the nucleus, termed retrograde signaling, under heat stress has received much attention in recent years. However, the mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in the development of thermotolerance in plants are far from completely understood. We can analyze transcriptomics and proteomics data to screen genes and proteins related to chloroplast heat resistance in order to better understand plant heat resistance mechanisms and signaling pathways. Furthermore, a better understanding of the chloroplast response to heat stress is valuable to the development of new strategies directed at improving crop yield under thermal stress. We could also conduct thermotolerance breeding through genetic engineering and molecular biological techniques to pave the way for providing high-yield economic crops.
Statements
Author contributions
SH and YD conceived and designed content framework of the review. CZ proposed valuable opinions and ideas. CZ and YD revised the review. SH wrote the manuscript. All authors red and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by funding from Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY19C020001 and LR17C130001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771698), and the National Key Research and Development Project of China, the International Cooperation Project (2018YFE0111900).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Zhixiang Chen of Purdue University for his critical reading and editing of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbdallahF.SalaminiF.LeisterD. (2000). A prediction of the size and evolutionary origin of the proteome of chloroplasts of Arabidopsis.Trends Plant Sci.5141–142. 10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01574-0
2
AllakhverdievS. I.KreslavskiV. D.KlimovV. V.LosD. A.CarpentierR.MohantyP. (2008). Heat stress: an overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis.Photosynth. Res.98541–550. 10.1007/s11120-008-9331-0
3
AllakhverdievS. I.YruelaI.PicorelR.KlimovV. V. (1997). Bicarbonate is an essential constituent of the water-oxidizing complex of photosystem II.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.94, 5050–5054. 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5050
4
AroE.-M.VirginI.AnderssonB. (1993). Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1143113–134. 10.1016/0005-2728(93)90134-2
5
BakerN. R.RosenqvistE. (2004). Applications of chlorophyii fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities.J. Exp. Bot.551607–1621. 10.1093/jxb/erh196
6
BalfagónD.SenguptaS.Gómez-CadenasA.FritschiF. B.AzadR.MittlerR.et al (2019). Jasmonic acid is required for plant acclimation to a combination of high light and heat stress.Plant Physiol.1811668–1682. 10.1104/pp.19.00956
7
BaniwalS. K.ChanK. Y.ScharfK.-D.NoverL. (2007). Role of heat stress transcription factor HsfA5 as specific repressor of HsfA4.J. Biol. Chem.2823605–3613. 10.1074/jbc.m609545200
8
BaruaD.DownsC. A.HeckathornS. A. (2003). Variation in chloroplast small heat-shock protein function is a major determinant of variation in thermotolerance of photosynthetic electron transport among ecotypes of Chenopodium album.Funct. Plant Biol.301071–1079. 10.1071/fp03106
9
BeckC. F. (2005). Signaling pathways from the chloroplast to the nucleus.Planta222743–756. 10.1007/s00425-005-0021-2
10
BeckerT.JelicM.VojtaA.RadunzA.SollJ.SchleiffE. (2004). Preprotein recognition by the Toc complex.EMBO J.23520–530. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600089
11
BerryJ.BjorkmanO. (1980). Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.31491–543. 10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.002423
12
BiswalB.JoshiP. N.RavalM. K.BiswalU. C. (2011). Photosynthesis, a global sensor of environmental stress in green plants: stress signalling and adaptation.Curr. Sci.10147–56.
13
BitaC. E.GeratsT. (2013). Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops.Front. Plant Sci.4:273. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00273
14
BräutigamK.DietzelL.PfannschmidtT. (2007). “Plastid-nucleus communication: anterograde and retrograde signalling in the development and function of plastids,” in Cell and Molecular Biology of Plastids: Topics in Current Genetics, Vol. 19ed.BockR. (Berlin: Springer), 409–455. 10.1007/4735_2007_0243
15
ChanK. X.PhuaS. Y.CrispP.McQuinnR.PogsonB. J. (2016). Learning the languages of the chloroplast: retrograde signaling and beyond.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.6725–53. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111854
16
Chan-SchaminetK. Y.BaniwalS. K.BublakD.NoverL.ScharfK.-D. (2009). Specific interaction between tomato HsfA1 and HsfA2 creates hetero-oligomeric superactivator complexes for synergistic activation of heat stress gene expression.J. Biol. Chem.28420848–20857. 10.1074/jbc.m109.007336
17
CharngY. Y.LiuH. C.LiuN. Y.ChiW. T.WangC. N.ChangS. H.et al (2007). A heatinducible transcription factor, HsfA2, is required for extension of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.143251–262. 10.1104/pp.106.091322
18
ChenK.ChenX.SchnellD. J. (2000). Initial binding of preproteins involving the Toc159 receptor can be bypassed during protein import o chloroplasts.Plant Physiol.122813–822. 10.1104/pp.122.3.813
19
ChenS. T.HeN. Y.ChenJ. H.GuoF. Q. (2017). Identification of core subunits of photosystem II as action sites of HSP21, which is activated by the GUN5-mediated retrograde pathway in Arabidopsis.Plant J.891106–1118. 10.1111/tpj.13447
20
ChenX.SmithM. D.FitzpatrickL.SchnellD. J. (2002). In vivo analysis of the role of atTic20 in protein import into chloroplasts.Plant Cell14641–654. 10.1105/tpc.010336
21
ChenY. L.ChenL. J.ChuC. C.HuangP. K.WenJ. R.LiH. M. (2018). TIC236 links the outer and inner membrane translocons of the chloroplast.Nature564125–129. 10.1038/s41586-018-0713-y
22
ChenY.-L.ChenL.-J.LiH. (2016). Polypeptide transport-associated domains of the Toc75 channel protein are located in the intermembrane space of chloroplasts.Plant Physiol.172235–243. 10.1104/pp.16.00919
23
DickinsonP. J.KumarM.MartinhoC.YooS. J.LanH.ArtavanisG.et al (2018). Chloroplast signaling gates thermotolerance in Arabidopsis.Cell Rep.221657–1665. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.054
24
DograV.KimC. (2019). Chloroplast protein homeostasis is coupled with retrograde signaling.Plant Signal. Behav.14. 10.1080/15592324.2019.1656037[Epub ahead of print].
25
DöringP.TreuterE.KistnerC.LyckR.ChenA.NoverL. (2000). The role of AHA motifs in the activator function of tomato heat stress transcription factors HsfA1 and HsfA2.Plant Cell Online12265–278. 10.1105/tpc.12.2.265
26
DuttaS.MohantyS.TripathyB. C. (2009). Role of temperature stress on chloroplast biogenesis and protein import in pea.Plant Physiol.1501050–1061. 10.1104/pp.109.137265
27
EamusD.DuffG. A.BerrymanC. A. (1995). Photosynthetic responses to temperature, light flux-density, CO2 concentration and vapour pressure deficit in Eucalyptus tetrodonta grown under CO2 enrichment.Environ. Pollut.9041–49. 10.1016/0269-7491(94)00088-u
28
Echevarría-ZomeñoS.Fernández-CalvinoL.Castro-SanzA. B.LópezJ. A.VázquezJ.CastellanoM. M. (2016). Dissecting the proteome dynamics of the early heat stress response leading to plant survival or death in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell Environ.391264–1278. 10.1111/pce.12664
29
EllisR. J. (1990). Molecular chaperones: the plant connection.Science250954–959. 10.1126/science.250.4983.954
30
EstavilloG. M.CrispP. A.PornsiriwongW.WirtzM.CollingeD.CarrieC.et al (2011). Evidence for a SAL1-PAP chloroplast retrograde pathway that functions in drought and high light signaling in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell233992–4012. 10.1105/tpc.111.091033
31
FangX.ZhaoG.ZhangS.LiY.GuH.LiY.et al (2018). Chloroplast-to-nucleus signaling regulates microRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis.Dev. Cell48371–382.e4. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.046
32
FieldC. B.BehrenfeldM. J.RandersonJ. T.FalkowskiP. (1998). Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components.Science281237–240. 10.1126/science.281.5374.237
33
FischerK.KammererB.GutensohnM.ArbingerB.WeberA.HauslerR. E.et al (1997). A new class of plastidic phosphate translocators: a putative link between primary and secondary metabolism by the phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate antiporter.Plant Cell9453–462. 10.2307/3870494
34
GalmésJ.AranjueloI.MedranoH.FlexasJ. (2013). Variation in rubisco content and activity under variable climatic factors.Photosynth. Res.11773–90. 10.1007/s11120-013-9861-y
35
Galvez-ValdiviesoG.MullineauxP. M. (2010). The role of reactive oxygen species in signalling from chloroplasts to the nucleus.Physiol. Plant.138430–439. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01331.x
36
García-PlazaolaJ. I.Portillo-EstradaM.Fernández-MarínB.KännasteA.NiinemetsÜ. (2017). Emissions of carotenoid cleavage products upon heat shock and mechanical wounding from a foliose lichen.Environ. Exp. Bot.13387–97. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.10.004
37
GinsburgS.SchellenbergM.MatileP. (1994). Cleavage of chlorophyll-porphyrin (requirement for reduced ferredoxin and oxygen).Plant Physiol.105545–554. 10.1104/pp.105.2.545
38
HaM.KimV. N. (2014). Regulation of microRNA biogenesis.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.15509–524. 10.1038/nrm3838
39
HärndahlU.HallR. B.OsteryoungK. W.VierlingE.BornmanJ. F.SundbyC. (1999). The chloroplast small heat shock protein undergoes oxidation-dependent conformational changes and may protect plants from oxidative stress.Cell Stress Chaperones4129–138. 10.2307/1601779
40
HavauxM. (1993a). Characterization of thermal damage to the photosynthetic electron transport system in potato leaves.Plant Sci.9419–33. 10.1016/0168-9452(93)90003-i
41
HavauxM. (1993b). Rapid photosynthetic adaptation to heat stress triggered in potato leaves by moderately elevated temperatures.Plant Cell Environ.16461–467. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00893.x
42
HavauxM.TardyF. (1996). Temperature-dependent adjustment of the thermal stability of photosystem II in vivo: possible involvement of xanthophyll-cycle pigments.Planta198324–333. 10.1007/bf00620047
43
HeckathornS. A.DownsC. A.SharkeyT. D.ColemanJ. S. (1998). The small, methionine-rich chloroplast heat-shock protein protects photosystem ii electron transport during heat stress.Plant Physiol.116439–444. 10.1104/pp.116.1.439
44
HeckathornS. A.RyanS. L.BaylisJ. A.WangD. I.IIHamiltonE. W.CundiffL.et al (2002). In vivo evidence from an agrostis stolonifera selection genotype that chloroplast small heat-shock proteins can protect photosystem ii during heat stress.Funct. Plant Biol.29933–944. 10.1071/pp01191
45
HeerklotzD.DöringP.BonzeliusF.WinkelhausS.NoverL. (2001). The balance of nuclear import and export determines the intracellular distribution and function of tomato heat stress transcription factor HsfA2.Mol. Cell. Biol.211759–1768. 10.1128/mcb.21.5.1759-1768.2001
46
HongS.-W.VierlingE. (2000). Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana defective in the acquisition of tolerance to high temperature stress.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.974392–4397. 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4392
47
HongS.-W.VierlingE. (2001). Hsp101 is necessary for heat tolerance but dispensable for development and germination in the absence of stress.Plant J.2725–35. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01066.x
48
HörtensteinerS. (2006). Chlorophyll degradation during senescence.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.5755–77. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105212
49
HörtensteinerS. (2009). Stay-green regulates chlorophyll and chlorophyll-binding protein degradation during senescence.Trends Plant Sci.14155–162. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.002
50
HowarthC. J. (2005). “Genetic improvements of tolerance to high temperature,” in Abiotic Stresses: Plant Resistance through Breeding and Molecular Approaches, edsAshrafM.HarrisP. J. C. (New York, NY: Haworth Press Inc), 277–300.
51
HuX.YangY.GongF.ZhangD.ZhangL.WuL.et al (2015). Protein sHSP26 improves chloroplast performance under heat stress by interacting with specific chloroplast proteins in maize (Zea mays).J. Proteom.201581–92. 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.12.009
52
HuangJ.ZhaoX.ChoryJ. (2019). The Arabidopsis transcriptome responds specifically and dynamically to high light stress.Cell Rep.294186–4199.e3. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.051
53
JankaE.KörnerO.RosenqvistE.OttosenC.-O. (2013). High temperature stress monitoring and detection using chlorophyll a fluorescence and infrared thermography in chrysanthemum (dendranthema grandiflora).Plant Physiol. Biochem.6787–94. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.02.025
54
KangL.KimH. S.KwonY. S.KeQ.JiC. Y.ParkS.-C.et al (2017). IbOr regulates photosynthesis under heat stress by stabilizing IbPsbP in sweet potato.Front. Plant Sci.8:989. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00989
55
KeegstraK.FroehlichJ. E. (1999). Protein import into chloroplasts.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.2471–476. 10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00021-7
56
KesslerF.SchnellD. J. (2002). A GTPase gate for protein import into chloroplasts.Nat. Struct. Biol.981–83. 10.1038/nsb0202-81
57
KesslerF.SchnellD. J. (2006). The function and diversity of plastid protein import pathways: a multilane GTPase highway into plastids.Traffic7, 248–257. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00382.x
58
KimH. J.NamH. G. (2007). Leaf senescence.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.58115–136. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316
59
KimK.-H.AlamI.KimY.-G.SharminS. A.LeeK.-W.LeeS.-H.et al (2012). Overexpression of a chloroplast-localized small heat shock protein OsHSP26 confers enhanced tolerance against oxidative and heat stresses in tall fescue.Biotechnol. Lett.34371–377. 10.1007/s10529-011-0769-3
60
KlimovV.BaranovS.AllakhverdievS. (1997). Bicarbonate protects the donor side of photosystem II against photoinhibition and thermoinactivation.FEBS Lett.418243–246. 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01392-6
61
KmiecikP.LeonardelliM.TeigeM. (2016). Novel connections in plant organellar signalling link different stress responses and signalling pathways.J. Exp. Bot.673793–3807. 10.1093/jxb/erw136
62
KotakS.LarkindaleJ.LeeU.von Koskull-DöringP.VierlingE.ScharfK.-D. (2007). Complexity of the heat stress response in plants.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.10310–316. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011
63
KouranovA.SchnellD. J. (1997). Analysis of the interactions of preproteins with the import machinery over the course of protein import into chloroplasts.J. Cell Biol.1391677–1685. 10.1083/jcb.139.7.1677
64
LeisterD. (2003). Chloroplast research in the genomic age.Trends Genet.1947–56. 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)00003-3
65
LeónJ. (2013). Role of plant peroxisomes in the production of jasmonic acid-based signals.Sub Cell. Biochem.69299–313. 10.1007/978-94-007-6889-5_16
66
LiH.ChiuC.-C. (2010). Protein transport into chloroplasts.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.61157–180. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112222
67
LiX.CaiC.WangZ.FanB.ZhuC.ChenZ. (2018). Plastid translation elongation factor Tu is prone to heat-induced aggregation despite its critical role in plant heat tolerance.Plant Physiol.1763027–3045. 10.1104/pp.17.01672
68
LimP. O.KimH. J.Gil NamH. (2007). Leaf senescence.Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.58, 115–136. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316
69
LingQ.BroadW.TröschR.TöpelM.Demiral SertT.LymperopoulosP.et al (2019). Ubiquitin-dependent chloroplast-associated protein degradation in plants.Science363:eaav4467. 10.1126/science.aav4467
70
LoscialeP.ManfriniL.MorandiB.NovakB.PierpaoliE.ZibordiM.et al (2014). Water restriction effect on pear rootstocks: photoprotective processes and the possible role of photorespiration in limiting carbon assimilation.Acta Hortic.1058237–244. 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1058.27
71
MathurS.AgrawalD.JajooA. (2014). Photosynthesis: response to high temperature stress.J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.137116–126. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.01.010
72
MathurS.AllakhverdievS. I.JajooA. (2011). Analysis of high temperature stress on the dynamics of antenna size and reducing side heterogeneity of Photosystem II in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum).Biochim. Biophys. Acta180722–29. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.09.001
73
MeiriD.BreimanA. (2009). Arabidopsis ROF1 (FKBP62) modulates thermotolerance by interacting with HSP90.1 and affecting the accumulation of HsfA2-regulated sHSPs.Plant J.59387–399. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03878.x
74
MorosinottoT.BaronioR.BassiR. (2002). Dynamics of chromophore binding to Lhc proteins in vivo and in vitro during operation of the Xanthophyll Cycle.J. Biol. Chem.27736913–36920. 10.1074/jbc.m205339200
75
MurataN.TakahashiS.NishiyamaY.AllakhverdievS. I. (2007). Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1767414–421. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.11.019
76
MyougaF.MotohashiR.KuromoriT.NagataN.ShinozakiK. (2006). An Arabidopsis chloroplast-targeted Hsp101 homologue, APG6, has an essential role in chloroplast development as well as heat-stress response.Plant J.48249–260. 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02873.x
77
NilkensM.KressE.LambrevP.MiloslavinaY.MüllerM.HolzwarthA. R.et al (2010). Identification of a slowly inducible zeaxanthin-dependent component of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence generated under steady-state conditions in Arabidopsis.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1797466–475. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.01.001
78
NishizawaA.YabutaY.YoshidaE.MarutaT.YoshimuraK.ShigeokaS. (2006). Arabidopsis heat shock transcription factor A2 as a key regulator in response to several types of environmental stress.Plant J.48535–547. 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02889.x
79
NiyogiK. K.GrossmanA. R.BjorkmanO. (1998). Arabidopsis mutants define a central role for the Xanthophyll Cycle in the regulation of photosynthetic energy conversion.Plant Cell101121–1134. 10.2307/3870716
80
NottA.JungH.-S.KoussevitzkyS.ChoryJ. (2006). Plastid-to-nucleus retrograde signaling.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.57739–759. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.10
81
OgawaD.YamaguchiK.NishiuchiT. (2007). High-level overexpression of the Arabidopsis HsfA2 gene confers not only increased themotolerance but also salt/osmotic stress tolerance and enhanced callus growth.J. Exp. Bot.583373–3383. 10.1093/jxb/erm184
82
PailaY. D.RichardsonL. G.InoueH.ParksE. S.McMahonJ.InoueK.et al (2016). Multi-functional roles for the polypeptide transport associated domains of Toc75 in chloroplast protein import.eLife5:e12631. 10.7554/elife.12631
83
PailaY. D.RichardsonL. G. L.SchnellD. J. (2015). New insights into the mechanism of chloroplast protein import and its integration with protein quality control, organelle biogenesis and development.J. Mol. Biol.4271038–1060. 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.08.016
84
ParkS.KimH. S.JungY. J.KimS. H.JiC. Y.WangZ.et al (2016). Orange protein has a role in phytoene synthase stabilization in sweet potato.Sci. Rep.6:33563. 10.1038/srep33563
85
PerdomoJ. A.Capó-BauçàS.Carmo-SilvaE.GalmésJ. (2017). Rubisco and rubisco activase play an important role in the biochemical limitations of photosynthesis in rice, wheat, and maize under high temperature and water deficit.Front. Plant Sci.8:490. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00490
86
PogsonB. J.WooN. S.FörsterB.SmallI. D. (2008). Plastid signalling to the nucleus and beyond.Trends Plant Sci.13602–609. 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.08.008
87
PortisA. R.Jr. (2003). Rubisco activase – Rubisco’s catalytic chaperone.Photosynth. Res.7511–27. 10.1023/a:1022458108678
88
QueitschC.HongS.-W.VierlingE.LindquistS. (2000). Heat shock protein 101 plays a crucial role in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell Online12479–492. 10.1105/tpc.12.4.479
89
RamelF.BirticS.GiniesC.Soubigou-TaconnatL.TriantaphylidesC.HavauxM. (2012). Carotenoid oxidation products are stress signals that mediate gene responses to singlet oxygen in plants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1095535–5540. 10.1073/pnas.1115982109
90
RamelF.KsasB.AkkariE.MialoundamaA. S.MonnetF.Krieger-LiszkayA.et al (2013). Light-induced acclimation of the Arabidopsis chlorina1 mutant to singlet oxygen.Plant Cell251445–1462. 10.1105/tpc.113.109827
91
RichardsonL. G. L.SinghalR.SchnellD. J. (2017). The integration of chloroplast protein targeting with plant developmental and stress responses.BMC Biol.15:118. 10.1186/s12915-017-0458-3
92
RintamäkiE.LepistöA.KangasjärviS. (2009). Implication of chlorophyll biosynthesis on chloroplast-to-nucleus retrograde signaling.Plant Signal. Behav.4545–547. 10.4161/psb.4.6.8711
93
RogersK.ChenX. (2013). Biogenesis, turnover, and mode of action of plant microRNAs.Plant Cell252383–2399. 10.1105/tpc.113.113159
94
RomaniI.TadiniL.RossiF.MasieroS.PribilM.JahnsP.et al (2012). Versatile roles of Arabidopsis plastid ribosomal proteins in plant growth and development.Plant J.72, 922–934. 10.1111/tpj.12000
95
RossiS.BurgessP.JespersenD.HuangB. (2017). Heat-induced leaf senescence associated with chlorophyll metabolism in bentgrass lines differing in heat tolerance.Crop Sci.57S–169. 10.2135/cropsci2016.06.0542
96
SageR. F.WayD. A.KubienD. S. (2008). Rubisco, rubisco activase, and global climate change.J. Exp. Bot.591581–1595. 10.1093/jxb/ern053
97
SalvucciM. E. (2004). Relationship between the heat tolerance of photosynthesis and the thermal stability of rubisco activase in plants from contrasting thermal environments.Plant Physiol.1341460–1470. 10.1104/pp.103.038323
98
SalvucciM. E.Crafts-BrandnerS. J. (2004). Inhibition of photosynthesis by heat stress: the activation state of Rubisco as a limiting factor in photosynthesis.Physiol. Plant.120179–186. 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0173.x
99
ScharfK.-D.HeiderH.HöhfeldI.LyckR.SchmidtE.NoverL. (1998). The tomato Hsf system: HsfA2 needs interaction with HsfA1 for efficient nuclear import and may be localized in cytoplasmic heat stress granules.Mol. Cell. Biol.182240–2251. 10.1128/mcb.18.4.2240
100
SchirmerE. C.GloverJ. R.SingerM. A.LindquistS. (1996). HSP100/Clp proteins: a common mechanism explains diverse functions.Trends Biochem. Sci.21289–296. 10.1016/s0968-0004(96)10038-4
101
SchöfflF.PrändlR.ReindlA. (1998). Regulation of the Heat-Shock Response: Fig. 1.Plant Physiol.1171135–1141. 10.1104/pp.117.4.1135
102
SchrammF.GanguliA.KiehlmannE.EnglichG.WalchD.von Koskull-DöringP. (2006). The heat stress transcription factor HsfA2 serves as a regulatory amplifier of a subset of genes in the heat stress response in Arabidopsis.Plant Mol. Biol.60759–772. 10.1007/s11103-005-5750-x
103
SchrammF.LarkindaleJ.KiehlmannE.GanguliA.EnglichG.VierlingE.et al (2008). A cascade of transcription factor DREB2A and heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 regulates the heat stress response of Arabidopsis.Plant J.53264–274. 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03334.x
104
ShakeelS.HaqN. U.HeckathornS. A.HamiltonE. W.LutheD. S. (2011). Ecotypic variation in chloroplast small heat-shock proteins and related thermotolerance in Chenopodium album.Plant Physiol. Biochem.49898–908. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.05.002
105
ShakeelS. N.AmanS.HaqN. U.HeckathornS. A.LutheD. (2013). Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of Agave americana in response to heat stress.Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.31840–851. 10.1007/s11105-013-0555-6
106
ShalgiR.HurtJ. A.KrykbaevaI.TaipaleM.LindquistS.BurgeC. B. (2013). Widespread regulation of translation by elongation pausing in heat shock.Mol. Cell49439–452. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.028
107
SharkeyT. D. (2005). Effects of moderate heat stress on photosynthesis: importance of thylakoid reactions, rubisco deactivation, reactive oxygen species, and thermotolerance provided by isoprene.Plant Cell Environ.28269–277. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01324.x
108
ShiL.-X.ThegS. M. (2013). The chloroplast protein import system: from algae to trees.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1833314–331. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.002
109
SjutsI.SollJ.BölterB. (2017). Import of soluble proteins into chloroplasts and potential regulatory mechanisms.Front. Plant Sci.8:168. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00168
110
SpreitzerR. J.SalvucciM. E. (2002). RUBISCO: structure, regulatory interactions, and possibilities for a better enzyme.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.53449–475. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.13
111
StreatfieldS. J.WeberA.KinsmanE. A.HauslerR. E.LiJ.Post-BeittenmillerD.et al (1999). The phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate translocator is required for phenolic metabolism, palisade cell development, and plastid-dependent nuclear gene expression.Plant Cell111609–1622. 10.2307/3871041
112
SuX.WuS.YangL.XueR.LiH.WangY.et al (2014). Exogenous progesterone alleviates heat and high light stress-induced inactivation of photosystem II in wheat by enhancing antioxidant defense and D1 protein stability.Plant Growth Regul.74311–318. 10.1007/s10725-014-9920-1
113
SunA.-Z.GuoF.-Q. (2016). Chloroplast retrograde regulation of heat stress responses in plants.Front. Plant Sci.7:398. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00398
114
SunW.Van MontaguM.VerbruggenN. (2002). Small heat shock proteins and stress tolerance in plants.Biochim. Biophys. Acta15771–9. 10.1016/s0167-4781(02)00417-7
115
SunY.MacRaeT. H. (2005). Small heat shock proteins: molecular structure and chaperone function.Cell. Mol. Life Sci.622460–2476. 10.1007/s00018-005-5190-4
116
SuzukiN.KoussevitzkyS.MittlerR.MillerG. (2012). ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress.Plant Cell Environ.35259–270. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02336.x
117
SveshnikovaN.SollJ.SchleiffE. (2000). Toc34 is a preprotein receptor regulated by GTP and phosphorylation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.974973–4978. 10.1073/pnas.080491597
118
TakahashiS.MurataN. (2008). How do environmental stresses accelerate photoinhibition?Trends Plant Sci.13178–182. 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.01.005
119
TengY.-S.SuY.-S.ChenL.-J.LeeJ. Y.HwangI.LiH.-M. (2006). Tic21 is an essential translocon component for protein translocation across the chloroplast inner envelope membrane.Plant Cell Online182247–2257. 10.1105/tpc.106.044305
120
TikkanenM.GriecoM.NurmiM.RantalaM.SuorsaM.AroE.-M. (2012). Regulation of the photosynthetic apparatus under fluctuating growth light.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.3673486–3493. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0067
121
TillerN.WeingartnerM.ThieleW.MaximovaE.SchöttlerM. A.BockR. (2011). The plastid-specific ribosomal proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana can be divided into non-essential proteins and genuine ribosomal proteins.Plant J.69, 302–316. 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04791.x
122
VeerasamyM.HeY.HuangB. (2007). Leaf senescence and protein metabolism in creeping bentgrass exposed to heat stress and treated with cytokinins.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.132467–472. 10.21273/JASHS.132.4.467
123
VierlingE. (1991). The roles of heat shock proteins in plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.42579–620. 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.003051
124
VolkovR. A.PanchukI. I.MullineauxP. M.SchöfflF. (2006). Heat stress-induced H2O2 is required for effective expression of heat shock genes in Arabidopsis.Plant Mol. Biol.61733–746. 10.1007/s11103-006-0045-4
125
von Koskull-DöringP.ScharfK.-D.NoverL. (2007). The diversity of plant heat stress transcription factors.Trends Plant Sci.12452–457. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.014
126
WahidA.GelaniS.AshrafM.FooladM. R. (2007). Heat tolerance in plants: an overview.Environ. Exp. Bot.61199–223. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
127
WangD.LutheD. S. (2003). Heat sensitivity in a bentgrass variant. Failure to accumulate a chloroplast heat shock protein isoform implicated in heat tolerance.Plant Physiol.133319–327. 10.1104/pp.102.018309
128
WangG.KongF.ZhangS.MengX.WangY.MengQ. (2015). A tomato chloroplast-targeted DnaJ protein protects Rubisco activity under heat stress.J. Exp. Bot.663027–3040. 10.1093/jxb/erv102
129
WangQ.-L.ChenJ.-H.HeN.-Y.GuoF.-Q. (2018). Metabolic reprogramming in chloroplasts under heat stress in plants.Int. J. Mol. Sci.19:849. 10.3390/ijms19030849
130
WiseR. R.OlsonA. J.SchraderS. M.SharkeyT. D. (2004). Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature.Plant Cell Environ.27717–724. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01171.x
131
YamamotoY.AminakaR.YoshiokaM.KhatoonM.KomayamaK.TakenakaD.et al (2008). Quality control of photosystem II: impact of light and heat stresses.Photosynth. Res.98589–608. 10.1007/s11120-008-9372-4
132
YangJ. Y.SunY.SunA.YiS.QinJ.LiM.et al (2006). The involvement of chloroplast HSP100/ClpB in the acquired thermotolerance in tomato.Plant Mol. Biol.62385–395. 10.1007/s11103-006-9027-9
133
YangS.MengD.-Y.HouL.-L.LiY.GuoF.MengJ.-J.et al (2015). Peanut violaxanthin de-epoxidase alleviates the sensitivity of PSII photoinhibition to heat and high irradiance stress in transgenic tobacco.Plant Cell Rep.341417–1428. 10.1007/s00299-015-1797-6
134
YangX. F.GuoF. Q. (2014). Research advances in mechanisms of plant leaf senescence under heat stress.Plant Physiol. J.501285–1292. 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2014.1012
135
YaoY.HeR. J.XieQ. L.ZhaoX.DengX.HeJ.et al (2017). ETHYLENE RESPONSE Factor 74 (ERF74) plays an essential role in controlling a respiratory burst oxidase homolog D (RbohD)-dependent mechanism in response to different stresses in Arabidopsis.New Phytol.2131667–1681. 10.1111/nph.14278
136
YiX.HargettS. R.FrankelL. K.BrickerT. M. (2009). The PsbP protein, but not the PsbQ protein, is required for normal thylakoid architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana.FEBS Lett.5832142–2147. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.05.048
137
YiX.HargettS. R.LiuH.FrankelL. K.BrickerT. M. (2007). The PsbP protein is required for photosystem II complex assembly/stability and photoautotrophy in Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Biol. Chem.28224833–24841. 10.1074/jbc.m705011200
138
YoshiokaM.UchidaS.MoriH.KomayamaK.OhiraS.MoritaN.et al (2006). Quality control of photosystem II.J. Biol. Chem.28121660–21669. 10.1074/jbc.m602896200
139
YuH.-D.YangX.-F.ChenS.-T.WangY.-T.LiJ.-K.ShenQ.et al (2012). Downregulation of chloroplast RPS1 negatively modulates nuclear heat-responsive expression of HsfA2 and its target genes in Arabidopsis.PLoS Genet.8:e1002669. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002669
140
ZhangY. J.ZhangY. Y.ZhangH. N.QinN.LiG. L.XiG. L. (2018). Characterization and regulatory roles in thermotolerance of wheat heat shock transcription factor gene TaHsfA2e.Acta Agron. Sin.441818–1828. 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01818
141
ZhongL.ZhouW.WangH.DingS.LuQ.WenX.et al (2013). Chloroplast small heat shock protein HSP21 interacts with plastid nucleoid protein pTAC5 and is essential for chloroplast development in Arabidopsis under heat stress.Plant Cell252925–2943. 10.1105/tpc.113.111229
142
ZhouX.WelschR.YangY.ÁlvarezD.RiedigerM.YuanH.et al (2015). Arabidopsis OR proteins are the major posttranscriptional regulators of phytoene synthase in controlling carotenoid biosynthesis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1123558–3563. 10.1073/pnas.1420831112
Summary
Keywords
heat stress, chloroplasts, response, photosynthetic, retrograde signals
Citation
Hu S, Ding Y and Zhu C (2020) Sensitivity and Responses of Chloroplasts to Heat Stress in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 11:375. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00375
Received
15 December 2019
Accepted
16 March 2020
Published
02 April 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Cornelia Spetea, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Reviewed by
Takumi Nishiuchi, Kanazawa University, Japan; Saijaliisa Kangasjärvi, University of Turku, Finland
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Hu, Ding and Zhu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yanfei Ding, dingyanfei1984@126.comCheng Zhu, pzhch@cjlu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.