Agata Gulisano
Sofia Alves
João Neves Martins2
Luisa M. Trindade- 1Wageningen University & Research Plant Breeding, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
- 2DRAT, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisbon, Portugal
Protein crops have gained increasing interest in recent years, as a transition towards plant-protein based diets appears pivotal to ensure global food security and preserve the environment. The Andean species Lupinus mutabilis emerges as an ideal protein crop with great potential for Europe and other regions with temperate climates. This species is characterized by oil and protein content similar to soybean and is highly valued for its adaptability to colder climates and low input agriculture on marginal land. However, its introduction outside the Andes has yet to take off. To date, L. mutabilis remains an under-studied crop, lacking high yield, early maturity and a consistent breeding history. This review paper identifies L. mutabilis limitations and potential uses, and suggests the main breeding targets for further improvement of this crop. It also highlights the potential of new molecular tools and available germplasm resources that can now be used to establish L. mutabilis as a viable protein crop.
Introduction
Over the past decades, challenges such as food security and environmental sustainability have earned the status of main priorities worldwide and are the basis of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) defined by the United Nations in 2015. As world population continues to rise, our food production has already exceeded the planet’s environmental boundaries driving climate changes, biodiversity loss and unsustainable use of land and water. The growing demand for animal proteins has played an important role in this process, by turning livestock sector in the main user of agricultural land and in one of the biggest contributors to climate change. In light of the current situation, a transition from meat-intensive diets towards plant proteins-based diets is vital to ensure global food security and preserve the environment.
To create alternatives to animal protein, the cultivation of protein crops has gained interest in recent years. The European Union has launched initiatives to reduce its dependency on the import of soybean by growing an increasing quantity and variety of protein crops within the European member states. Research has focused on identifying sources of proteins that can reduce the current protein deficit while contributing to the transition to more sustainable agricultural systems. One such source is protein-rich leguminous plants. Legumes also stand out for their great potential in the reclamation of poor and marginal lands for agriculture, due to their ability to fix nitrogen and their beneficial effects on the soil (De Ron et al., 2017). Among legumes, lupins have been identified as particularly promising, characterized by high-quality protein content, suitability for sustainable production and potential health benefits (Lucas et al., 2015). The genus Lupinus includes almost 300 species, but only four play an important role in agriculture: L. albus, L. angustifolius, L. luteus and L. mutabilis (Gresta et al., 2017). The first three listed species are native to Europe and represent the majority of lupins cultivated worldwide. At the same time, despite years of extensive research, the success of these species has been hampered by unstable yields, low oil content and adaptation to a narrow-range of agro-climatic conditions. The fourth species listed, L. mutabilis, is a species native to the Andes, and is cultivated only in some parts of South America and not yet commercially available in Europe (Lucas et al., 2015). However, L. mutabilis is characterized by the highest grain quality of all cultivated lupins, with an oil content similar to soybean, and is adapted to low input farming in temperate climates. The combination of these characteristics makes L. mutabilis a potentially superior alternative to the current plant-based sources of protein and oil in Europe and other regions with temperate climates.
Lupinus mutabilis Sweet is considered to be one of the lost crops of the Incas. Its seeds are characterized by a high protein and oil content (44% dw and 18% dw, respectively), which exceeds that of any other lupin species (Blanco-Galdos, 1982; Pate et al., 1985). In addition, lupin seeds are practically devoid of starch, and the major carbohydrates found are oligosaccharides (mainly stachyose and raffinose) and cell wall storage polysaccharides (Trugo et al., 2003). Most essential amino acids, lysine in particular, are also present in the seeds (Table 1) together with a substantial amount of dietary fiber and fatty acids (Table 2) (Carvajal-Larenas et al., 2016). The history of this species as a subsistence crop in the Andes demonstrates its potential as a crop for low input agriculture on marginal lands. L. mutabilis shows a high adaptability to temperate and cold climates, low-fertile soils, high altitudes and harsh conditions while actively enriching the soil with nitrogen (Cowling et al., 1998). Currently, its cultivation is mostly confined to the Andean region of South America, where its bitter seeds represent a regionally important food known as tarwi. It is an economically accessible source of good quality protein, on par with animal proteins, to a large percentage of the population (Carvajal-Larenas, 2013).
Table 1 A comparison of the essential amino acids profiles (+ cystine) of four species of lupins and soybean (Glycine Max).
Table 2 Nutritional composition of four species of Lupinus as compared to Soybean (Glycine max).
The presence of toxic alkaloids in the seeds and low yields (800–1300 kg/ha) have strongly limited the expansion of this crop (Tapia, 2015). Selection activities by Andean farmers in the past 1,500 years of cultivation have represented the only means of domestication for L. mutabilis, leading to semi-domesticated forms characterized by non-shattering pods, large seeds, multi-colored flowers, highly branched architecture and a more or less annual life cycle (Clements et al., 2008). It played an important role as a rotation crop in Andean agriculture, but the introduction of western pulses during the Spanish conquest in the sixteenth century, led to its decline and marginalization (Cowling et al., 1998; Caligari et al., 2000). In contrast, the wide genetic diversity that characterizes this crop has enabled its adaptation to poor soils and microhabitats, preserving its cultivation in many areas where other crops cannot grow (Carvajal-Larenas, 2013). This genetic diversity is also reflected in a broad phenotypic diversity, e.g. of seeds and flowers color (as shown in Figure 1).
Figure 1 Phenotypic variation in flowers and seeds of L. mutabilis.
In recent years, efforts have been made to re-establish L. mutabilis as a crop in South America, and to also adapt it to conditions in Europe (Caligari et al., 2000). Numerous studies investigating the nutritional profile and potential applications of these grains have found a wide range of possible products ranging from proteins, oil, and food additives to cosmetics, medicines, and bio-pesticides. In contrast, few studies have addressed the agronomic aspect of L. mutabilis cultivation. From these studies it emerges that the main obstacle to L. mutabilis cultivation is the lack of high yielding, early maturing genotypes. These results are mainly determined by an indeterminate growth habit and a lack of locally adapted genotypes, and can be overcome via breeding (Caligari et al., 2000). To date L. mutabilis remains an under-studied crop, characterized by a very young and fragmented breeding history. The important role that this crop could play in the transition toward a more sustainable food production system has prompted us to review the current state of this crop. This paper summarizes past breeding achievements and sheds light on the new breeding challenges we must resolve to establish L. mutabilis as a protein crop in Europe.
Origin and Distribution of the “Andean Lupin”
The earliest archeological evidence of domesticated L. mutabilis seeds has been found in Mantaro Valley, central Peru and dates back to ca. 1800 BP. The use of RADseq in the analysis of this archeological material confirms that L. mutabilis was first domesticated not far from the Montaro Valley in the Cajamarca region (north Peru), from the wild progenitor L. piurensis. Demographic analysis suggests that L. mutabilis split from its progenitor around 2600 BP (650 BC) and suffered a domestication bottleneck and a subsequent rapid population expansion as it became cultivated across the Andes (Atchison et al., 2016). L. mutabilis presence has been reported across the eastern side of South America, from Colombia to the North of Argentina (from 10°N to 20°S), and over a wide range of altitudes, from 1,500 to 3,800 m a.s.l. (Jacobsen and Mujica, 2008). The crop is adapted to a temperate climate and is strongly influenced by day length. It is susceptible to low temperatures (−2°C) in the initial stages, and requires about 350–800 mm of rainfall and can grow for 240–300 days (Jacobsen and Mujica, 2006; Jacobsen and Mujica, 2008; Adomas et al., 2015). Based on these requirements, L. mutabilis could be cultivated in Southern Europe as a winter crop, and in Northern Europe as a summer crop. Nowadays L. mutabilis is of agricultural importance only in Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. Approximately 1,895 ha are cultivated in Bolivia with an average yield of 648 kg/ha, 5,974 ha in Ecuador (400 kg/ha) and 10,628 ha in Peru (1,335 kg/ha) (Mercado et al., 2018).
Biological and Genetic Features
L. mutabilis is an annual herbaceous plant of the Fabaceae family. It is an autogamous species, with hermaphroditic flowers arranged in apical racemes, but characterized by a predominant level of allogamy. Different ranges of cross-fertilization by insects have been reported, fluctuating from 4–11% in Peru to 9.5–18.9% in Poland (Blanco-Galdos, 1982; Gnatowska et al., 2000). It has been observed that multiple groups of insects visit L. mutabilis, suggesting that this species could be a generalist; bees of the Apidae family and bumblebees from the genus Xylocopa are the main visitors in native environments, while bumblebees from the genus Bombus are more common in Europe (Ochoa-Zavala et al., 2016; Arnold et al., 2014). The isolation of different genotypes is thus indispensable in breeding programs, as much as the careful wrapping of emasculated flowers in intraspecific hybridization (Von Baer, 2011; Adomas et al., 2015). Phylogenetic analysis places L. mutabilis (2n = 48) within the Andean clade of Western New World species of the genus Lupinus. This genus includes almost 300 species, grouped by their different centers of origin into Old World (Mediterranean) and New World (American) subgenera. To date, L. mutabilis is the only cultivated species from the New World group (Gresta et al., 2017). Notably, the Andean clade to which it belongs is characterized by the highest speciation rate within the genus (Hughes and Eastwood, 2006). The species in this clade belong to a paleoploid group of plants with basic chromosome number x = 6 (Naganowska et al., 2003). Events of allo- and autopolyploidization, together with other chromosomal rearrangements, during the evolution of this species might have led to duplication/or triplication of genome regions, as observed in the Old World species Lupinus angustifolius (Kroc et al., 2014).
The Unexploited Potential of L. Mutabilis, an Under-Studied Crop
L. mutabilis appears to be a valid alternative to soybeans for satisfying plant protein requirements in Europe. Like soybean, L. mutabilis seeds are rich in proteins as well as in oil. They can find applications as food and feed, but also as raw materials for the production of bio-based products. On the other hand, L. mutabilis cultivation tolerates better cold climates and can therefore contribute to the production and diversification of sustainable European sources of proteins and oil.
However, despite the clear potential, research on L. mutabilis has been limited. As is often the case for under-utilized crops, L. mutabilis has been long neglected by research and industry due to its limited economic importance on the global market. A recent domestication and a breeding history fragmented in time and space have also contributed to this neglect, resulting in a lack of genetic improvement and inferior yield. In the Andes, L. mutabilis germplasm collection and breeding programs started only in the 1970s and have so far relied on participatory approaches with farmers for the selection of local ecotypes (Table 3). The selection of genotypes with better yields mainly relies on the geographical distribution and vegetative cycle of the ecotypes and it has rarely resulted in the registration of cultivars (Fries and Tapia, 2007; Peralta et al., 2012; Vicente Rojas, 2016). In Europe, researchers began working on the selection of sweet lines in the 1920s, but it was only in the 1970s, when the nutritional value of L. mutabilis seeds became well known, that the interest for this crop arose. The difficult accessibility of germplasm from the Andean area was overcome in Europe with a large use of induced mutations and intraspecific crossing of mutants. Preliminary field trials of L. mutabilis in Europe reported large differences in seed yields, from 0.5 to 6.5 t/ha depending on years and location (Masefield, 1976; Romer and Jahn-Deesbach, 1992; Weissmann and Weissmann, 1992; Rubenschuh, 1997). In 1993, the first European project aimed at evaluating the “Adaptation of Lupinus mutabilis to European soil and climate conditions” was funded. Field trials reported very low seed yields (1.1 t/ha) and pointed out the need of breeding for a better plant architecture and early maturity (Caligari et al., 2000). Many years of mutation experiments in Poland have resulted in improvement in yield and sweetness and in the selection of determinate lines for research purposes, but not yet in the establishment or registration of new varieties (Galek, 2010; Galek et al., 2017) (Table 3). Australia has also shown interest in L. mutabilis and multiple projects to evaluate its potential for southern Australia were funded. Of particular relevance in their work was the selection of male sterile lines, used to introduce early vigor, anthracnose resistance, tolerance to brown spot and resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in L. mutabilis (Sweetingham et al., 2006) (Table 3). The ongoing development of recombinant inbred lines (RIL) population at the University of Western Australia is mentioned in the literature and could be exploited for mapping QTLs, however little information is available about its existence and state (J. C. Clements and M. N. Nelson, unpubl. data in Berger et al., 2013).
Table 3 A list of L. mutabilis lines involved in breeding research.
In Europe, the urgent need to provide alternative protein sources and recover marginal land has contributed to revive the interest in L. mutabilis. Recently, a new program investigating L. mutabilis cropping in marginal lands for enhanced bio economy has been funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 program (www.libbio.net). The possibility of cultivating L. mutabilis as a summer crop in North-central Europe and winter crop in the Mediterranean area is being investigated, along with the development of pre-industrial processing and the assessment of its socio-economic and environmental impact.
Establishing L. mutabilis as a Protein Crop in EUROPE: The Breeding Challenges
Adaptation to European Environment
The environmental differences between the native environment of L. mutabilis and other cultivation areas around the world, such as europe, represent one of the barriers to the expansion of this crop. In temperate climatic conditions L. mutabilis cultivation is characterized by a long period of maturation and uneven maturation of the pod, blossom drop, and shattering of early stage pods (Hardy et al., 1998; Swiecicki and Nawrot, 2004; Galek et al., 2007). Due to low resistance to frost during the first growth stage, sowing is limited to autumn in mediterranean environments and to spring in northern countries. In both cases, the crop will reach flowering towards the beginning of the dry season. Dry conditions can accelerate maturation, but considerably affect the biomass yield, pod set and consequently, the seed yield (Hardy et al., 1997). Hence, it is crucial to generate early maturing genotypes with increased drought tolerance and consistent yield performance (yield stability). Previous work has pointed out that vernalization has no effect on early and mid-season genotypes of L. mutabilis, but can reduce the flowering time of late season genotypes such as Inti. It was observed that a vernalization period of 2–4 weeks at 6°C can shorten flowering time of four weeks in Inti, reducing the gap between early- and late-flowering lines to only 3 weeks (Adhikari et al., 2012).
Research on drought stress in L. mutabilis has uncovered the existence of different drought tolerance strategies across genotypes, either via stomatal adjustments or through the accumulation of osmoprotectants. Some traits, like stomatal conductance and water potential, appear to decrease uniformly among all accessions while other traits such as membrane ion leakage or accumulation of proline and soluble sugars show particular trends depending on the genotype. This might indicate the ability of some L. mutabilis genotypes to adapt their cell membrane during periods of water stress, as an alternative strategy to stomatal adjustment (Lizarazo et al., 2010). Therefore, both stomatal conductance and membrane ion leakage can prove useful in the selection of drought resistant cultivars.
Response to photoperiod is another important factor for determining adaptation to different locations. Reports on photoperiodic sensitivity in L. mutabilis are contrasting. Hackbarth reported L. mutabilis as neutral to day length, while Jacobsen and Mujica affirm that in the Andean region L. mutabilis accelerates grain filling when the day length is short (Hackbarth, 1961; Jacobsen and Mujica, 2008).Given the latter, adaptation at higher latitudes should be based on the selection of lines less sensitive to day length effects on grain filling. A more exhaustive understanding of sensitivity to day length through characterization of germplasm collections and knowledge about its genetic basis would enable the generation of genotypes for high latitudes with little or no sensitivity (Jacobsen and Mujica, 2008).
Growth Habit: Toward a Semi-Determinate Type
Indeterminate growth habit and sympodial branching pattern have been identified as the main factors limiting yield of L. mutabilis in European field trials (Caligari et al., 2000). In L. mutabilis the vegetative development begins with the production of a main stem bearing a terminal inflorescence and continues with the production of successive orders of branches throughout the entire growing season (that can be from 0 to 52 branches), as long as growing conditions are favorable (Blanco-Galdos, 1982; Hardy et al., 1997) (Figure 2A). This growth habit leads to an overlap of vegetative and reproductive phases, characterized in this species by a preferential partitioning of nutrients to vegetative growth. As a result, the possibility of uniform maturation is hindered and reproductive growth is constantly delayed, often so far as to coincide with late-season drought, thus further reducing productivity. Furthermore, only the racemes of the main stem and first order branches are highly productive, while the production becomes progressively weaker on the other order of branches (Adhikari et al., 2001).
Figure 2 Different growth forms of L. mutabilis.
It has long been proposed that the development of determinate lines could guarantee a more stable seed yield by providing an earlier and more uniform maturation (Huyghe, 1998). Determinate lupin cultivars have been obtained in L. albus, L. luteus, and L. angustifolius mainly through selection of spontaneous or induced mutants. Vavilov’s homologous order of restricted branching (rb) was selected independently in these species with a different mode of inheritance, a different number of alleles in the rb locus and somewhat differentiated expression in the respective species (Gorynowicz et al., 2014). Similarly, a completely determinate line of L. mutabilis was found upon induced mutation with EMS. This mono-stem determinate mutant—L. mutabilis KW 1—did not produce lateral branches, matured early and was characterized by tall stems (Sawicka, 1993) (Figure 2C). The inheritance of the determinate character was found to be monogenic recessive (Römer, 1994). Unfortunately, determinate plants were found to lodge and were not able to compensate for stress during main stem flowering because of increased pod set on the branches (Romer, 1995). Semi-determinate types with only one or two orders of lateral branches up to the top of the plant thus seem preferable from an agronomic point of view (Caligari et al., 2000) (Figure 2B). Ongoing research in Poland has focused on crossing the KW-1 mutant with early maturing mutants characterized by a reduced number of side branches for the selection of determinate form for research purposes (Sawicka-Sienkiewicz and Kadlubiec, 2001; Sawicka-Sienkiewicz et al., 2005; Galek et al., 2007). Determinate forms distinguished by medium-tall stems without lateral branches, resistant to lodgings and with early generative growth have been obtained (Galek et al., 2007). Indeterminate forms appear to have a higher mass of stems and plant aerial parts and a lower share of seeds in the yield structure, and may therefore be more suitable for biomass production (Gas, 2014; Adomas et al., 2015).
Understanding the Mechanisms Regulating Alkaloid Content
Food and feed industries have set the strict threshold of 0.02% (DM weight) alkaloid content in lupin seeds (Cowling et al., 1998; Frick et al., 2017). Quinolizidine Alkaloids (QAs) are typically synthesized by lupin species and are mainly known for causing bitter taste and anticholinergic toxicity when present in the grains. However, QAs also play an important role in the mechanism of defense against pathogens and predators, have allelopathic functions (Wink, 1993) and constitute nitrogen reserves for the plant (Wink and Witte, 1985). They are biosynthesized from L-lysine in green tissues of the plant, transported via phloem and stored in all the organs of the plant, especially seeds. The content and composition of QAs depend on many factors, including genotype, biotic/abiotic stresses and pedoclimatic conditions. Each lupin species is characterized by a different alkaloid profile, known as an alkaloid-fingerprint, which fluctuates among the different organs of the plant, expressing a lower diversity and concentration in leaves than in seeds (Wink et al., 1995; Boschin and Resta, 2013). Although the chemistry of Quinolizidine alkaloids has been extensively studied leading to the identification of more than 170 structures (Wink, 1993), their biosynthetic pathway is only partially elucidated and information on the genes and enzymes involved remains limited (Frick et al., 2017).
The breeding of sweet lines of L. mutabilis has been mainly based on the selection of natural and induced mutants, mostly in Chile, Poland and Australia. The first stable “sweet” variety, Inti, was bred in Chile in 1980. It was characterized by an alkaloid content of 0.0075% with no reported detrimental effect on the protein (51%) or oil (16%) content, but low yield and long vegetation period hindered its adoption in different places (Gross et al., 1988; Von Baer, 2011). Yet, the inheritance of the trait was recessive and of polygenic nature, such that only 12% of the F2 plants had low alkaloid content (Von Baer and Von Baer). These characteristics require major efforts to maintain the purity of mother’s lines and to prevent the risk of progressive re-bittering due to cross-pollination in regions where lupin grows in the wild (Santana and Empis, 2001; Von Baer, 2011). In 1984, seed treatments with ethyl methanesulfonate led to the identification of the recessive allele mutal of the gene Mutal. When homozygous, the allele mutal was found to reduce the alkaloid level to 0.2–0.3% of seeds DM, giving rise to plants organoleptically sweet both in their seeds and vegetative parts (Williams et al., 1984). It has been suggested that along the reselection process additional minor alleles were recombined at several loci to lower alkaloid levels (Clements et al., 2008). At present, none of the mutations found has led to complete suppression of alkaloids. The reduction in total alkaloids is mainly due to a reduced percentage of sparteine and lupanine, the two most toxic QAs to humans (Williams et al., 1984). The result of the work done in Chile in the last 40 years is the acquisition of a new variety, PINTA (Inti x SCG9) which combines low content of alkaloids, high content of protein and oil, and large seeds (Von Baer, 2011). In Poland, post-mutagen treated material has been widely screened using iodine test to select 13 lines that don’t exceed 0.1% of alkaloid content in the seeds. These genotypes can be very useful in breeding programs, particularly to derive homozygous lines. In addition to facilitating the development of stables sweet varieties these homozygous lines can also be used to study the inheritance of alkaloid content in seeds (Galek et al., 2017).
A major drawback of reducing alkaloids is the increased sensitivity of plants to pests and diseases. Future work should therefore target the development of bitter/sweet lines, with sufficient level of alkaloids in the vegetative tissues to deter pathogens, but low levels in the seeds (Wink, 1990). To use this strategy fundamental knowledge on how to target the transporters involved in the translocation of QAs from source tissues to seeds is required. Candidate transporters may include plasma membrane importers in cells of reproductive tissue, and vacuolar membrane importers in cells of both aerial and reproductive tissues, as alkaloids are often sequestered within vacuoles to avoid toxic effects within tissues (Yazaki et al., 2008). To our knowledge, there are no studies yet investigating these mechanisms.
Seed Color, a Matter of Acceptance
To further develop the market for L. mutabilis, it is essential to take into account consumer preferences. When whole lupin beans are marketed as food, seed coat color becomes a decisive trait for the acceptance of a cultivar. As for L. mutabilis, white color is the most attractive for consumers. The phenotypical diversity in seed shape and seed coat color observed in this species appears to be larger than that in all the other lupins (Blanco-Galdos, 1982). Seed characteristics with large diversity include shape (from lenticulate to spherical), primary seed color, secondary seed color and its pattern distribution (Figure 1). The color can vary from pearly white to solid black, and include beige/yellow, brown, dark brown and intermediate colors, like brownish green and greyish colors. Most seeds have a secondary color distribution in darker tones of the primary color. The secondary color distribution also varies between a large range of patterns, such as moustache, eyebrow, crescent, marbled, or spotted which can be expressed singularly or in combination (Falconí, 2012; Tapia, 2015). The variability in seed coat color may reflect the genetic pressure L. mutabilis was subjected to during its domestication, but very little is known about the genetic mechanism behind this trait. Some authors try to explain this variation hypothesizing the concerted effect of different alleles in the control of different colors and at different regions of the seed coat. That is, having different genes controlling the primary color, the secondary color, the color of the hilum and/or its adjacent region and the different patterns of distribution of secondary colors (Blanco-Galdos, 1982). Another possible explanation for the existence of such diversity in seed color and patterns may be the presence of transposable elements, as observed in other crops (Li et al., 2012). There appears to be a connection between seed color and flower color. Darker seeds lead to darker flowers, suggesting that the white color behaves as a recessive character (Blanco-Galdos, 1982).
The complexity in seed color represents a great challenge for breeders to select pure lines with uniform and heritable colors and patterns, and in particular to combine locus for high yield and white color. Still, pearly white is in 95% of the cases the most common color found in the cultivars sampled for germplasm collections of the Andean regions.
Identification of Health-Promoting Proteins
Lupinus mutabilis seeds contain a high content of protein, ranging from 38 to 45% of DM; yet, the identification of unique properties in L. mutabilis proteins opens the door to new markets and raises the nutritional and economic value of the crop. The major protein classes encountered in legume seeds are globulins and albumins, followed by minor fractions of prolamin and glutelin (Doxastakis, 2000). Globulins (α-,β-,γ- and δ- conglutins) represent about 91–94% of the proteins in L. mutabilis, while albumins only ∼6.4%(Santos et al., 1997). Interest in conglutins has exponentially increased since their beneficial nutritional and pharmaceutical properties have been shown, such as cardiovascular health benefits and the use of γ- and β-conglutin in the control of insulin resistance and diabetes as well as anti-inflammatory molecules (Magni et al., 2004; Belski et al., 2011; Lima-Cabello et al., 2017). (Foley et al., 2015) used 16 individual conglutin genes previously identified in L. angustifolius to characterize homologous genes in five other lupin species, including L. mutabilis. Oddly, transcriptomic studies revealed the lowest level of conglutin transcripts for L. mutabilis, but the highest percentage of proteins. The expression levels for β-conglutin were particularly high (∼40%) and for γ-conglutin exceptionally low (4%), while the expression levels of α- and δ- conglutin (∼26% and 30%) were comparable to the values encountered in L. albus and L. angustifolius. Previous studies have highlighted considerable differences in structure and composition of α-conglutin and β-conglutin in L. mutabilis as compared to L. albus. In the case of α-conglutin differences were observed also within different genotypes of L. mutabilis (Inti and Potosi) (Santos et al., 1997), suggesting that these proteins may have different functions between and within lupin species (Carvajal-Larenas et al., 2016). In contrast, γ-conglutin was reported to possess identical composition in all lupin species studied and to represent approximately 6% of the total proteins in L. mutabilis seeds (Carvajal-Larenas et al., 2016). Regarding albumins in L. mutabilis, they were found to be less abundant and different in structure when compared to L. albus (Santos et al., 1997). Finally, the presence of ferritin (Fe-rich protein) in the protein profile of lupin (Strozycki et al., 2007) increases the nutritional value of this crop by offering a safe way to increase dietary iron intake. The success of its use in the development of food products for special nutritional purposes would depend on the achievement of ferritin overexpression, which may result in easier, cheaper, and more accepted methods for increasing dietary iron intake than supplementing and/or fortifying other crops (Zielińska-Dawidziak, 2015).
Exploiting the High Nutritional Value of L. mutabilis Oil
L. mutabilis seeds are also an important source of oil. The oil content of this species (∼18%) is the highest within lupins and the only one comparable to soybean (20%). Moreover, its fatty acid composition is nutritionally superior to that of soybean: both have a similar ratio of saturated/unsaturated fatty acids (17–18%), but L. mutabilis has a lower amount of linolenic acid, thus avoiding the need for industrial removal of this acid as soybean and L. albus do, and its oil stability is naturally higher (Schoeneberger et al., 1982). In addition L. mutabilis oil does not have any toxic erucic acid found in other lupin species, and when compared to other edible oils presents a higher or similar quality, being inferior only to olive oil (Martins et al., 2016) (Table 2). Improvement of oil production via breeding could further enhance the economic suitability of this crop by making it dual-purpose for protein and oil, in a manner similar to the soybean (Lucas et al., 2015).
Oil content and composition are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, and previous studies have identified a large environmental component. One study by (Williams, 1979) has reported higher oil content in late-flowering and late-maturing varieties and identified a highly significant correlation between oil content and the length of interval between flowering and pod maturity. Negative correlations between protein and oil content are also reported in the literature (r = −0.71; r = −0.77) (Perez et al., 1984; Jacobsen and Mujica, 2006; Clements et al., 2008). The identification of accessions in which oil and protein content are not (or less) inversely related could make it possible to combine high levels of both components in the seeds through selective breeding (Romer and John-Deesbach, 1986). An opportunity could come from the fiber component of lupin seeds, mainly β-galactan chains in the form of thickened cell walls of the endosperm (Al-Kaisey and Wilkie, 1992). Since catabolism of both carbohydrates and lipids generally represents the main source of germination energy, it is possible to assume that oil content might be increased via breeding at the expense of β-galactan content.
Relevant Resources for Future Breeding of L. mutabilis
Germplasm Collections to Exploit Natural Diversity
The Andean region, center of origin and domestication of L. mutabilis, represents the main hotspot of diversity for this species. Germplasm collections were started in 1974 by Dr. Oscar Blanco at the University of Cusco (Peru) and soon extended to Bolivia and Ecuador. At present, South American institutions hold more than 3,000 genotypes of Andean Lupin. The largest and most relevant germplasm collections of L. mutabilis are held in the gene banks of Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia, but smaller collections are also present in Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Australia, Russia, Poland, Germany, Spain, Hungary, United Kingdom, and Portugal. Yet, reports suggest much of the diversity remains uncollected (Jacobsen and Mujica, 2008). The presence of a considerable variation across germplasm is shown by different phenotypic traits, such as a wide range of growing periods, branching patterns, color and shape of grains and flowers, and flowering times. Both Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) and Simple Sequenced Repeat (SSR) markers have revealed a wide genetic diversity among L. mutabilis lines (Chirinos-Arias et al., 2015; Galek et al., 2017). In some cases, the variation illustrated by the analysis of genetic distance did not match the differences defined by morphological markers, suggesting that molecular markers other than ISSR and SSR may be more useful (Galek et al., 2017).
Molecular and Genetic Tools Available
At present, the availability of molecular resources for breeding of L. mutabilis remains scarce. The majority of molecular studies have so far focused on understanding L. mutabilis phylogeny. Initially, isozyme numbers revealed an affinity of L. mutabilis to the Old World species closer than that of any other North American species studied (Wolko and Weeden, 1990). Later, the use of conserved chloroplast genes and internal transcribed spaces (ITS) highlighted the presence of an Andean group within the New World species (Käss and Wink, 1997; Ainouche and Bayer, 1999; Wink et al., 1999). Only recently, the advent of nextRADseq technology has elucidated the area and timing of L. mutabilis domestication (Atchison et al., 2016). Protein-based approaches have been carried out to determine seed storage protein composition in L. mutabilis and its differences between species and lines (Santos et al., 1997). Lately DNA based markers such as RFLP, AFLP, ISSR, and RAPD have been used to assess genetic diversity between Lupinus species and have revealed a high intraspecific variation within L. mutabilis populations (Olczak et al., 2001; Talhinhas et al., 2003; Zoga et al., 2008). A total of 113 SSR primers and 118 polymorphic InDel from L. luteus have been successfully used to characterize L. mutabilis genetically (Parra-González et al., 2012; Osorio et al., 2018).
Relative to other legumes, little genomic information is available for L. mutabilis. To date, even the number of ESTs sequenced and submitted to the genomic databases remains very low (∼65), and it mainly refers to molecular targets in ribosomal RNA (IGS and ITS) and other sequences used for taxonomic purposes [i.e. rps16 gene, submitted by (Keller et al., 2017)]. However, new developments in genomic technologies now provide a realistic opportunity to overcome the scarcity of genomic information and to hasten the identification of traits of interest. Over the last 15 years the limitations of approaches based on the identification of QTLs derived from biparental crosses have shifted the focus towards association mapping in large panels of diverse genotypes. Genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) techniques can now provide thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers at a much lower cost than earlier techniques, and they can be used to perform genotyping studies such as Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS). In these studies natural populations hold the potential to replace recombinant populations in gene mapping and marker-trait associations (Iqbal et al., 2012). With regard to L. mutabilis, GWAS could represent a possible approach to exploit the genetic resources of entire germplasm collections at once, while saving time and resources, exploiting multiple recombination events, and considering the whole allele diversity. This kind of approach may serve as a foundation study and help to identify and establish valuable genetic markers for genomic selections, which will ultimately allow informed choices for further selection of breeding material and QTL analysis.
A wider selection of tools is available for L. angustifolius and L. albus, which have been more extensively studied in the past years. Genetic maps, BAC libraries, transcriptome and proteome assemblies, QTLs and molecular markers for traits such as low alkaloids, flowering time, and anthracnose disease resistance have been developed for these species and can potentially be exploited for L. mutabilis improvement (reviewed in Wolko et al., 2011; Abraham et al., 2019). Furthermore, the recent release of a high-quality genome draft for L. angustifolius (951 Mb; 2n = 40), and a high-quality chromosome-scale genome assembly for L. albus (451 Mb; 2n = 50) represent a big support for the future whole-genome analysis of other lupin species, such as L. mutabilis (Hane et al., 2017; Hufnagel et al., 2018). Similar 2C nuclear DNA contents were estimated in L. mutabilis (1.90 pg) and L. angustifolius (1.89 pg), suggesting that there might be a higher affinity between these two species (Naganowska et al., 2003).
Applications and Potential Uses of L. mutabilis: Much More Than Proteins
L. mutabilis emerges as a human health food and food additive, but its potential applications go far beyond food and target the utilization of the whole plant. L. mutabilis seeds represent an important and versatile source of proteins. Once debittered, the seeds can be directly consumed as a snack, or as an ingredient of many products and meals. In the Andean region they are traditionally used in soups, stew and salads or as raw material for preparing flour, milk, and margarine (Falconí, 2012). Like soybean, lupins also have important applications as food ingredients in many products: lupin flour, protein concentrate, and protein isolate display physical and functional properties which are very valuable to the food and chemical sector (Carvajal-Larenas et al., 2016). These derivatives can be used as base for meat alternative or replacers, as an egg replacement, as a bread improver, as an emulsifier and to increase the nutrient content of many products. After protein extraction, the large amount of dietary fiber still available (up to 40% of seed mass in L. angustifolius) can find application as prebiotic and human food ingredient in the production of fiber-enriched baked goods (Clark and Johnson, 2002; Smith et al., 2006). The oil, characterized by a high nutritional value, also represents an attractive product for both nutraceutical and cosmetic purposes. Furthermore, pharmaceutics uses have also been described. L. mutabilis intake has been proven to reduce blood glucose and insulin levels, representing a valid alternative for treating hyperglycemic diseases (Fornasini et al., 2012). In the medical field, QAs also have an important role due to multiple properties such as anti-arrhythmic, anti-inflammatory, diuretic and hypotensive effects among others (Bunsupa et al., 2012). In addition QAs can also find application in agriculture as a bio-stimulant increasing growth and yield of other crops (Przybylak et al., 2005), as antibacterial agents (Romeo et al., 2018) or as biocidal agents replacing synthetic toxins (Bermúdez-Torres et al., 2009). Similarly a Blad-containing oligomer (BCO), a bioactive subunit of a polypeptide oligomer termed Blad (Banda de Lupinus albus doce) isolated in young cotyledons of Lupin spp. as a breakdown product of β-conglutin catabolism, has been recently introduced in the market as a novel fungicide against both human and phytopathogenic fungi, confirming the multiplicity of resources offered by this plant. BCO also acts as plant bio stimulant and exhibits bactericide activity especially towards Gram+ bacteria (Carreira et al., 2018). Beyond this, L. mutabilis can also be used as a fodder species. In the Andean area debittered seeds are used to feed pigs, sheep, and poultry (Cremer, 1983). However, the optimal use of the plants for feed purposes would be as a green-fodder or silage, as debittered seeds are more profitable for food applications. Uses as silage or hay for livestock feed are mentioned in the literature, but its composition and nutritional value remain unstudied (Sherasia et al., 2017). Similar to other legumes, L. mutabilis is also able to assimilate atmospheric nitrogen and leave appreciable amounts in the soil as post-harvest residues of up to 400 kg ha−1 N (Brücher, 1989; Adomas et al., 2015). Yet, it could prove more profitable to turn L. mutabilis biomass residues into bio-based products and energy sources, due to the boost in biomass demands in Europe.
Future Prospects
Compared to many other pulses which dominate our agriculture (i.e. pea, lentil, faba bean), the domestication history of L. mutabilis appears very short and fragmented between Europe, South America and Australia. Even though global holdings of L. mutabilis represent a plethora of genetic resources, this source remains under-utilized and very often inaccessible. In addition, the lack of refined biotechnological methods in genetics, molecular cytogenetics or tissue culture, has limited the possibility of exploiting natural variability and performing distant crosses and haploidization of breeding material. The repeated use of a limited set of genetic resources in hybridization programs and the limited pre-breeding efforts account for a narrow genetic basis. Base broadening through mutation and hybridization—the main methods used so far—is a very slow process, taking many years before pure lines can be achieved. The coupled use of germplasm resources and modern approaches to broaden the genetic basis could now aid the introgression of desirable adaptive traits for specific environments, which are essential to develop L. mutabilis into a valuable crop outside the Andes. The selection of genotypes adapted to specific latitudes and day lengths appear fundamental for farmers both in the Andes and in other parts of the world. Indeterminate growth habit and alkaloid content still represent a main limitation, but sweet lines and determinate forms with early maturation have been generated (Galek et al., 2007) (Table 3). A major effort is now required to fix these traits and breed them into stable variety for agricultural purposes. Breeding targets and strategies proposed in this review are summarized in (Table 4). Currently, promising L. mutabilis lines are being screened throughout Europe aiming at the development of varieties adapted to European farming conditions within the next 10 years. Future work should focus on the development of bitter/sweet lines and on the promotion of different end-uses for proteins, oil and alkaloids which can contribute to increase the value of the crop in the near future. In this regard, studies combing genetic and multi-environment dataset will be important to unravel the genetic control of valuable traits. Further implementation of genomic selection and marker-assisted selection, will play a key role in speeding up breeding processes.
Table 4 Suggested breeding traits for the improvement of L. mutabilis, goals and proposed strategies.
In spite of limitations, there remains enormous potential for the introduction of L. mutabilis as a protein crop. Its cultivation constitutes an important opportunity to provide a substantial source of protein through low input farming, both in the Andes and elsewhere in the world. In this regard, the potential of enhancing marginal lands production while contributing to the diversification of the protein market, righteously places L. mutabilis in the European agricultural system. Hence, L. mutabilis plays a major role on the protein transition scene, where plant based proteins will gradually replace animal proteins. Pivotal to achieving this aim are breeding programs focused on ensuring economic viability and consumer acceptance of the crop. Germplasm resources should be used together with conventional and molecular tools to unlock the genetic potential of L. mutabilis and secure it as a promising (new) protein crop. Finally, L. mutabilis represents a source of important traits for introduction into major lupin species or other legumes to aid their adaptation in a rapidly changing climate. Further research on this species can also provide valuable insights into important processes like protein and oil production in seeds or regulation of alkaloid content.
Author Contributions
AG wrote the manuscript. LT coordinated the writing and revised the manuscript. SA and JM contributed to the writing. All authors approved the manuscript.
Funding
This project has received funding from the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 720726 (LIBBIO).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Abraham, E. M., Ganopoulos, I., Madesis, P., Mavromatis, A., Mylona, P., Nianiou-Obeidat, I., et al. (2019). The Use of Lupin as a Source of Protein in Animal Feeding: Genomic Tools and Breeding Approaches. Intern. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 851. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040851
Adhikari, K. N., Buirchell, B. J., Sweetingham, M. W. (2012). Length of vernalization period affects flowering time in three lupin species. Plant Breed. 131, 631–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2012.01996.x
Adhikari, K. N., Galwey, N. W., Dracup, M. (2001). The genetic control of highly restricted branching in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Euphytica 117, 261–274. doi: 10.1023/A:1026571416075
Adomas, B., Galek, R., M, G.-S., W, H., M, H., A, K., Kozak, M., et al. (2015). Adaptation of the Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) to natural conditions of south-western Poland. Wrocławiu, Polonia: Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu.
Ainouche, A.-K., Bayer, R. J. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships in Lupinus (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Am. J. Bot. 86, 590–607. doi: 10.2307/2656820
Al-Kaisey, M. T., Wilkie, K. C. B. (1992). The polysaccharides of agricultural lupin seeds. Carbohydr. Res. 227, 147–161. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(92)85067-A
Arnold, S. E., Idrovo, M. E. P., Arias, L. J. L., Belmain, S. R., Stevenson, P. C. (2014). Herbivore defence compounds occur in pollen and reduce bumblebee colony fitness. J. Chem. Ecol. 40, 878–881. doi: 10.1007/s10886-014-0467-4
Atchison, G. W., Nevado, B., Eastwood, R. J., Contreras-Ortiz, N., Reynel, C., Madriñán, S., et al. (2016). Lost crops of the Incas: Origins of domestication of the Andean pulse crop tarwi, Lupinus mutabilis. Am. J. Bot. 103, 1592–1606. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600171
Belski, R., Mori, T. A., Puddey, I. B., Sipsas, S., Woodman, R. J., Ackland, T R., et al. (2011). Effects of lupin-enriched foods on body composition and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a 12-month randomized controlled weight loss trial. Int. J. Obes. 35, 810. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.213
Berger, J. D., Clements, J. C., Nelson, M. N., Kamphuis, L. G., Singh, K. B., Buirchell, B. (2013). The essential role of genetic resources in narrow-leafed lupin improvement. Crop Pasture Sci. 64, 361–373, 313. doi: 10.1071/CP13092
Bermúdez-Torres, K., Herrera, J. M., Brito, R. F., Wink, M., Legal, L. (2009). Activity of quinolizidine alkaloids from three Mexican Lupinus against the lepidopteran crop pest Spodoptera frugiperda. BioControl 54, 459–466. doi: 10.1007/s10526-008-9180-y
Blanco-Galdos, O. (1982). Genetic variability of tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Schriftenreihe der Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit, 33–49.
Boschin, G., Resta, D. (2013). “Alkaloids Derived from Lysine: Quinolizidine (a Focus on Lupin Alkaloids),” in Natural Products: Phytochemistry, Botany and Metabolism of Alkaloids, Phenolics and Terpenes. Eds. Ramawat, K. G., Mérillon, J.-M. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 381–403. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22144-6_11
Brücher, H. (1989). “Lupinus mutabilis Sweet,” in Useful Plants of Neotropical Origin and Their Wild Relatives (Springer-Verlag), 80. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-73313-0
Bunsupa, S., Katayama, K., Ikeura, E., Oikawa, A., Toyooka, K., Saito, K., et al. (2012). Lysine decarboxylase catalyzes the first step of quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis and coevolved with alkaloid production in Leguminosae. Plant Cell 24, 1202. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.095885
Caligari, P. D. S., Römer, P., Rahim, M. A., Huyghe, C., Neves-Martins, J., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E. J. (2000). “The Potential of Lupinus mutabilis as a crop,” in Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the Third International Food Legumes Research Conference. Ed. Knight, R. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 569–573. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4385-1_54
Carreira, A., Ferreira, J. B., Pereira, I., Ferreira, J., Filipe, P., Ferreira, R. B., et al. (2018). Blad-containing oligomer: a novel fungicide used in crop protection as an alternative treatment for tinea pedis and tinea versicolor. J Med. Microbiol. 67, 198–207. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000675
Carvajal-Larenas, F. (2013). Managing technological aspects of Lupinus mutabilis from a food sovereignty perspective in Ecuador. [Ph.D. dissertation]. [Wageningen (NL)]: Wageningen University.
Carvajal-Larenas, F. E., Linnemann, A. R., Nout, M. J. R., Koziol, M., Van Boekel, M. A. J. S. (2016). Lupinus mutabilis: composition, uses, toxicology, and debittering. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56, 1454–1487. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.772089
Chirinos-Arias, M., Jiménez, E. J., Vilca-Machaca, S. L. (2015). Analysis of Genetic Variability among thirty accessions of Andean Lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) using ISSR molecular markers. Scientia Agropecuaria 6, 17–30. doi: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2015.01.02
Clark, R., Johnson, S. (2002). Sensory Acceptability of Foods with Added Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) Kernel Fiber Using Pre-set Criteria. J. Food Sci 67, 356–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb11410.x
Clements, J., Sweetingham, M., Smith, L., Francis, G., Thomas, G., Sipsas, S. (2008). “Crop improvement in Lupinus mutabilis for Australian agriculture-progress and prospects,” in Lupins for health and wealth. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia, 14-18 September 2008 (International Lupin Association), 244–250.
Collins, F. I., Howell, R. W. (1957). Variability of linolenic and linoleic acids in soybean oil. J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc. 34, 491–493. doi: 10.1007/BF02638073
Cowling, W., Buirchell, B., Tapia, M. (1998). “Lupin. Lupinus spp. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 23,” in Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Resources (Rome, Italy: Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute).
Cremer, H. (1983). Current aspects on legumes as a food constituent in Latin America with special emphasis on lupines: Introduction. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. (Formerly Qualitas Plantarum) 32, 95–100. doi: 10.1007/BF01091329
De Ron, A., Sparvoli, F., Pueyo, J., Bazile, D. (2017). Editorial: Protein Crops: Food and Feed for the Future. Front Plant Sci. 8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00105
Doxastakis, G. (2000). “Lupin seed proteins,” in Developments in Food Science. Eds. Doxastakis, G., Kiosseoglou, V. (Elsevier), 7–38.
Falconí, C. (2012). Lupinus mutabilis in Ecuador with special emphasis on anthracnose resistance. [Ph.D. dissertation] .[Wageningen (NL)]: Wageningen University.
Foley, R. C., Jimenez-Lopez, J. C., Kamphuis, L. G., Hane, J. K., Melser, S., Singh, K. B. (2015). Analysis of conglutin seed storage proteins across lupin species using transcriptomic, protein and comparative genomic approaches. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 106. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0485-6
Fornasini, M., Castro, J., Villacrés, E., Narváez, L., Villamar, M. P., Baldeón, M. E. (2012). Hypoglycemic effect of Lupinus mutabilis in healthy volunteers and subjects with dysglycemia. Nutr. Hosp. 27, 425–433.
Frick, K. M., Kamphuis, L. G., Siddique, K. H. M., Singh, K. B., Foley, R. C. (2017). Quinolizidine Alkaloid Biosynthesis in Lupins and Prospects for Grain Quality Improvement. Front Plant Sci. 8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00087
Galek, R. (2010). Studies on the variability of some morphological and functional characters of Lupinus with particular consideration intra and interspecific hybrids. Monografie (Poland).
Galek, R., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., Zalewski, D. (2007). Evaluation of interspecific hybrids of andean lupin and their parental forms with regard to some morphological and quantitative characters. Fragmenta Agronomica (Poland).
Galek, R., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., Zalewski, D., Stawiński, S., Spychała, K. (2017). Searching for low alkaloid forms in the Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis) collection. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 53, 55–62. doi: 10.17221/71/2016-CJGPB
Gas, M. (2014). Wpływ wybranych czynników agrotechnicznych na rozwój i plonowanie łubinu andyjskiego (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet).) [The influence of selected agronomic factors on the development and yielding of Andean lupine (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet)]. [Ph.D. dissertation] [Wroclaw, Polonia]: Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 148 pp.
Gnatowska, M., Święcicki, W., Wolko, B. (2000). “Preliminary data on the outcrossing rate in sweet Lupinus mutabilis”, in: Lupin, an ancient crop for the new millennium: Proceedings of the 9th International Lupin Conference, Klink/Muritz, Germany, 20-24 June, 1999: International Lupin Association), 167–168.
Gorynowicz, B., Swiecicki, W., Osiecka, A., Kaczmarek, Z. (2014). Terminal inflorescence and restricted branching genes in lupins (L. albus L., L. angustifolius L., L. luteus L.) and field bean (Vicia faba L.) breeding in Poland. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. B 4, 712–721. doi: 10.17265/2161-6264/2014.09.004
Gresta, F., Wink, M., Prins, U., Abberton, M., Capraro, J., Scarafoni, A., et al.,(2017). “Lupins in European cropping systems,” in Legumes in Cropping Systems. CABI 88–108. doi: 10.1079/9781780644981.0088
Gross, R., Baer, E. V. (1981). Lupine, eine neue Kulturpflanze in den Anden. II. Umwelt-und genotypisch bedingte Einflusse auf Olgehalt und-qualitat im Samen von Tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Zeitschrift fur Acker-und Pflanzenbau [Journal of agronomy and crop science].
Gross, R., Von Baer, E., Koch, F., Marquard, R., Trugo, L., Wink, M. (1988). Chemical composition of a new variety of the Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis cv. Inti) with low-alkaloid content. J Food Compost. Anal. 1, 353–361. doi: 10.1016/0889-1575(88)90035-X
Guaytarilla, P., Falconi, C. A. (2014). “Selección pro arquitectura de la planta y rsistencia a la Antracnosis de 7 Genotipos de Chocho (Lupinus mutabilis),” in IX Congreso De Ciencia Y Tecnologia Espe. ESPE 63–70.
Hackbarth, J. (1961). Lupinosis in the light of old and new evidence. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 27, 1–7.
Hane, J. K., Ming, Y., Kamphuis, L. G., Nelson, M. N., Garg, G., Atkins, C. A., et al. (2017). A comprehensive draft genome sequence for lupin (Lupinus angustifolius), an emerging health food: insights into plant–microbe interactions and legume evolution. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 318–330. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12615
Hardy, A., Huyghe, C., Papineau, J. (1997). Dry matter accumulation and partitioning, and seed yield in indeterminate Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 48, 91–102. doi: 10.1071/A96015
Hardy, A., Huyghe, C., Rahim, M. A., Roemer, P., Neves-Martins, J. M., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., et al. (1998). Effects of genotype and environment on architecture and flowering time of indeterminate Andean lupins (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 49, 1241–1252. doi: 10.1071/A98060
Hudson, B. J. F., Fleetwood, J. G., Lewis, J. I. (1983). Oil content, fatty acids and unsaponifiable lipids of lupin seed. J. Plant Foods 5, 15–21. doi: 10.1080/0142968X.1983.11904271
Hufnagel, B., Marques, A., Marande, W., Sallet, E., Sorriano, A., Arribat, S., et al. (2018). “Genome sequence of white lupin, a model to study root developmental adaptations”, in: 12th Congress of the International Plant Molecular Biology.
Hughes, C., Eastwood, R. (2006). Island radiation on a continental scale: Exceptional rates of plant diversification after uplift of the Andes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103, 10334–10339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601928103
Huyghe, C. (1998). Genetics and genetic modifications of plant architecture in grain legumes: a review. Agronomie 18, 383–411. doi: 10.1051/agro:19980505
Iqbal, M. J., Mamidi, S., Ahsan, R., Kianian, S. F., Coyne, C. J., Hamama, A. A., et al. (2012). Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in Lupinus albus L. germplasm and its implication for association mapping. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 517–530. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1850-6
Jacobsen, S.-E., Mujica, A. (2006). El Tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet.) y sus parientes silvestres. Botánica Económica de los Andes Centrales 28.
Jacobsen, S.-E., Mujica, A. (2008). Geographical distribution of the Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Plant Genet. Res. Newslett. 155, 1–8.
Käss, E., Wink, M. (1997). Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography ofLupinus (Leguminosae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene and ITS 1 + 2 regions of rDNA. Plant Syst. Evol. 208, 139–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00985439
Keller, J., Rousseau-Gueutin, M., Martin, G. E., Morice, J., Boutte, J., Coissac, E., et al. (2017). The evolutionary fate of the chloroplast and nuclear rps16 genes as revealed through the sequencing and comparative analyses of four novel legume chloroplast genomes from Lupinus. DNA Res. 24, 343–358. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsx006
Kroc, M., Koczyk, G., Świecicki, W., Kilian, A., Nelson, M. (2014). New evidence of ancestral polyploidy in the Genistoid legume Lupinus angustifolius L. (narrow-leafed lupin). Theor. Appl. Genet., 127. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2294-y
Li, X., Chen, L., Hong, M., Zhang, Y., Zu, F., Wen, J., et al. (2012). A large insertion in bHLH transcription factor BrTT8 resulting in yellow seed coat in Brassica rapa. PLoS One 7, e44145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044145
Lima-Cabello, E., Alche, V., Foley, R. C., Andrikopoulos, S., Morahan, G., Singh, K. B., et al. (2017). Narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) β-conglutin proteins modulate the insulin signaling pathway as potential type 2 diabetes treatment and inflammatory-related disease amelioration. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61, 1600819. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600819
Lizarazo, C., Stoddard, F., Mäkelä, P., Santanen, A. (2010). Genetic variability in the physiological responses of Andean lupin to drought stress. Suomen Maataloustieteellisen Seuran Tiedote, 1–5. doi: 10.33354/smst.76862
Lucas, M. M., Stoddard, F., Annicchiarico, P., Frias, J., Martinez-Villaluenga, C., Sussmann, D., et al. (2015). The future of lupin as a protein crop in Europe. Front Plant Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00705
Magni, C., Sessa, F., Accardo, E., Vanoni, M., Morazzoni, P., Scarafoni, A., et al. (2004). Conglutin γ, a lupin seed protein, binds insulin in vitro and reduces plasma glucose levels of hyperglycemic rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 15, 646–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2004.06.009
Martins, J. M. N., Talhinhas, P., Sousa, R. B. D. (2016). Yield and seed chemical composition of Lupinus mutabilis in Portugal. Revista de Ciências Agrárias 39, 518–525. doi: 10.19084/RCA16079
Masefield, G. (1976). Further trials of pearl lupins in England. Exp. Agric. 12, 97–102. doi: 10.1017/S0014479700007158
Mercado, G., Davalos, J., Ipdrs, Hivos, and Cipca (2018). Memoria foro virtual: Los caminos del tarwi y la integración andina: Bolivia, Perú y Ecuador. Bolivia: IPDRS.
Naganowska, B., Wolko, B., Sliwinska, E., Kaczmarek, Z. (2003). Nuclear DNA Content Variation and Species Relationships in the Genus Lupinus (Fabaceae). Ann. Bot. 92, 349–355. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg145
Ochoa-Zavala, M., Suárez-Montes, P., Chávez-Pesqueira, M., López-Cobos, D. E., Figueredo, C. J., David, A., et al. (2016). “Diferencias en morfología y visitantes florales entre Lupinus mutabilis y Lupinus aff. ballianus en la microcuenca de Warmiragra, Perú,” in Domesticación en el continente americano. Manejo de biodiversidad y evolución dirigida por las culturas del Nuevo Mundo. Eds. Casas, A., Torres-Guevara, J., Parra, F. (Chiapas, Mexico: UNAM UNALM), 353–356.
Olczak, T., Rurek, M., Janska, H., Augustyniak, H., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E. (2001). Screening of cytoplasmic DNA diversity between and within Lupinus mutabilis Sweet and Lupinus albus sensu lato by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). J. Appl. Genet. 42, 127–137.
Osorio, C. E., Udall, J. A., Salvo-Garrido, H., Maureira-Butler, I. J. (2018). Development and characterization of InDel markers for Lupinus luteus L. (Fabaceae) and cross-species amplification in other Lupin species. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 31, 44–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.11.002
Parra-González, L. B., Aravena-Abarzúa, G. A., Navarro-Navarro, C. S., Udall, J., Maughan, J., Peterson, L. M., et al. (2012). Yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) transcriptome sequencing: molecular marker development and comparative studies. BMC Genomics 13, 425. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-425
Pate, J., Williams, W., Farrington, P., (1985). “Lupin (Lupinus spp.),” in Grain Legume crops. Eds. Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H. (London, UK: Collins), 699–746 157 refs, illus.
Peralta, E., Murillo, Á, Rivera, M., Rodríguez, D., Lomas, L., Monar, C. (2012). Chocho, quinua, amaranto y ataco. Manual agrícola de granos andinos, 4–5.
Perez, J. F., Quidiello, R. D., Sainz, M. V. T., (1984). “Determinacion de la produccion y contenidos proteico y graso de 217 ecotipos de L. mutabilis Sweet“, in: Proc. 3rd Int. Lupin Conf.: International Lupin Association, 548.
Prakash, D., Misra, P. S. (1988). Protein content and amino acid profile of some wild leguminous seeds. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 38, 61–65. doi: 10.1007/BF01092311
Przybylak, J., Ciesiołka, D., Wysocka, W., Garcı´a-López, M., Ruiz, M., Wysocki, W., et al. (2005). Alkaloid profiles of Mexican wild lupin and an effect of alkaloid preparation from Lupinus exaltatus seeds on growth and yield of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 21, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.001
Romeo, F., Fabroni, S., Ballistreri, G., Muccilli, S., Alfio, S., Rapisarda, P. (2018). Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Alkaloid Extracts from Seeds of Different Genotypes of Lupinus spp. Sustainability 10, 788. doi: 10.3390/su10030788
Romer, P. (1995).“New attempts to select early maturing Lupinus mutabilis for middle Europe”, in: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Grain Legumes, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Römer, P. (1994). “A determinated mutant of L. mutabilis as a possible source of early maturity”, in: Advances in Lupin research. 7th International Lupin conference, Evora, 18–23.
Romer, P., Jahn-Deesbach, W. (1992). Eight years of experiences in breeding Lupinus mutabilis under Middle European conditions. Agrimed Research Programme-Lupinus mutabilis: its adaptation and production under European pedoclimatic conditions (Commission of the European Communities). EUR 14102, 79–85.
Romer, P., John-Deesbach, W. (1986). “Developments in breeding of Lupinus mutabilis.[Conference paper]”, in: 4. International Lupin Conference, Geraldton, WA (Australia), 17 Aug 1986: Department of Agriculture.
Rubenschuh, U. (1997). On the variability of yield components and seed components of Lupinus mutabilis. [Ph.D. dissertation, in German]. [Giessen, Germany]: University of Giessen, 193.
Santana, F. C., Empis, J. (2001). Bacterial removal of quinolizidine alkaloids from Lupinus albus flours. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 212, 217–224. doi: 10.1007/s002170000221
Santos, C. N., Ferreira, R. B., Teixeira, A. R. (1997). Seed Proteins of Lupinus mutabilis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45, 3821–3825. doi: 10.1021/jf970075v
Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., Galek, R., Zalewski, D., Augiewicz, J., Rurek, M., Augustyniak, H., et al. (2005). Morphological and molecular characteristics of interspecific hybrids in the genus Lupinus. Proceedings of the 11th International Lupin Conference.
Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E. J., Kadlubiec, W. (2001). Aktualny stan badan nad lubinem andyjskim [Lupinus mutabilis Sweet]. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu. Rolnictwo 82, 115–129.
Sawicka, E. (1993). The induced mutations in Andean lupine (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Prace Ogrodu Bot., PAN, s. Monografie i Rozprawy 3, 1–112.
Schoeneberger, H., Gross, R., Cremer, H. D., Elmadfa, I. (1982). Composition and protein quality of lupinus mutabilis. J. Nutr. 112, 70–76. doi: 10.1093/jn/112.1.70
Sharma, D., Gupta, R., Joshi, I. (2014). Nutrient analysis of raw and processed soybean and development of value added soybean noodle. Invent. J. 1, 1–5.
Sherasia, P. L., Garg, M. R., Bhanderi, B. M. (2017). Pulses and their by-products as animal feed. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), doi: 10.18356/9aa0e148-en
Smith, S. C., Choy, R., Johnson, S. K., Hall, R. S., Wildeboer-Veloo, A. C. M., Welling, G. W. (2006). Lupin kernel fiber consumption modifies fecal microbiota in healthy men as determined by rRNA gene fluorescent in situ hybridization. Eur. J. Nutr. 45, 335–341. doi: 10.1007/s00394-006-0603-1
Strozycki, P. M., Szczurek, A., Lotocka, B., Figlerowicz, M., Legocki, A. B. (2007). Ferritins and nodulation in Lupinus luteus: iron management in indeterminate type nodules. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 3145–3153. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm152
Sweetingham, M., Clements, J., Buirchell, B., Sipsas, S., Thomas, G., Quealy, J., et al. (2006). “Preliminary breeding and development of Andean lupin for Australian agriculture,” in México, where old and new world lupins meet. Proceedings of the 11th International Lupin Conference, 4-9 May 2005. Eds. van Santen, E., Hill, G. D. (Canterbury, New Zealand: International Lupin Association), 32–34.
Swiecicki, W., Nawrot, C. (2004). Zasoby genowe rodzaju Lupinus. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 497.
Talhinhas, P., Neves-Martins, J., Leitao, J. (2003). AFLP, ISSR and RAPD markers reveal high levels of genetic diversity among Lupinus spp. Plant Breed. 122, 507–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2003.00892.x
Trugo, L. C., Von Baer, D., Von Baer, E. (2003). “LUPIN,” in Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Ed. Caballero, B. (Oxford: Academic Press), 3623–3629. doi: 10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00717-3
Vicente Rojas, J. J. (2016). El cultivo de Tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) en el Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. Revista Científica de Investigación INFO-INIAF 88.
Von Baer, E. (2011). “Domestication of Andean lupin (L. mutabilis)”, in Naganowska, B., Kachlicki, P., Wolko, B. (eds) 2011. ‘Lupin crops - an opportunity for today, a promise for the future’ Proceedings of the 13th International Lupin Conference, 6-10 June 2011, Poznan, Poland. International Lupin Association, Canterbury, New Zealand. 129–132.
Von Baer, E., Von Baer, D. (1988). “Lupinus mutabilis: Cultivation and breeding,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Internation Lupin Conference. Ed. Twardowski, T. (Poznań, Poland: PWRiL), 237–247.
Weissmann, E., Weissmann, S. (1992). Variation of various constituents in seeds of Lupinus mutabilis under German climatic conditions. Agrimed Research Programme-Lupinus mutabilis: its adaptation and production under European pedoclimatic conditions (Commission of the European Communities). EUR 14102, 155–163.
Williams, W. (1979). Studies on the development of lupins for oil and protein. Euphytica 28, 481–488. doi: 10.1007/BF00056608
Williams, W., Harrison, J. E. M., Jayasekera, S. (1984). Genetical control of alkaloid production in Lupinus mutabilis and the effect of a mutant allele Mutal isolated following chemical mutagenesis. Euphytica 33, 811–817. doi: 10.1007/BF00021907
Wink, M. (1990). “Plant breeding: low or high alkaloid content”, in Proceedings of the 6th International Lupin Conference. [Temuco, Pucón, Chile], 326–334.
Wink, M. (1993). “Allelochemical properties or the raison d’etre of alkaloids,” in The alkaloids: chemistry and pharmacology (Elsevier), 1–118. doi: 10.1016/S0099-9598(08)60134-0
Wink, M., Meißner, C., Witte, L. (1995). Patterns of quinolizidine alkaloids in 56 species of the genus Lupinus. Phytochemistry 38, 139–153. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(95)91890-D
Wink, M., Merino, F., Käss, E., (1999). “Molecular evolution of lupins (Leguminosae: Lupinus)”, in: Lupin, an ancient crop for the New Millenium. Proceedings of the 9th International Lupin Conference. (Klink/Müritz), 20–24.
Wink, M., Witte, L. (1985). Quinolizidine alkaloids as nitrogen source for lupin seedlings and cell cultures. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 40, 767–775. doi: 10.1515/znc-1985-11-1204
Wolko, B., Clements, J. C., Naganowska, B., Nelson, M. N., Yang, H. A.,(2011). “Lupinus,” in Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Legume Crops and Forages. Ed. Kole, C. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 153–206. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14387-8_9
Wolko, B., Weeden, N. (1990). Isozyme number as an indicator of phylogeny in Lupinus. Genetica Polonica 31, 179–187.
Yazaki, K., Sugiyama, A., Morita, M., Shitan, N. (2008). Secondary transport as an efficient membrane transport mechanism for plant secondary metabolites. Phytochemistry Rev 7, 513–524. doi: 10.1007/s11101-007-9079-8
Zielińska-Dawidziak, M. (2015). Plant ferritin–a source of iron to prevent its deficiency. Nutrients 7, 1184–1201. doi: 10.3390/nu7021184
Zoga, M., Pawelec, A., Galek, R., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E. (2008). “Morphological, cytological and molecular characteristics of parents and interspecific hybrid (Lupinus mutabilis LM-13 × Lupinus albus sensu lato)” In Lupins for health and wealth. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia, 14-18 September 2008. (Canterbury, New Zealand: International Lupin Association), 173–176.
Keywords: Lupinus mutabilis, lupin, breeding, genetics, protein crop, plant protein
Citation: Gulisano A, Alves S, Martins JN and Trindade LM (2019) Genetics and Breeding of Lupinus mutabilis: An Emerging Protein Crop. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1385. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01385
Received: 17 July 2019; Accepted: 07 October 2019;
Published: 30 October 2019.
Edited by:
Sean Mayes, University of Nottingham, United KingdomReviewed by:
Fred Stoddard, University of Helsinki, FinlandKarl Kunert, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Copyright © 2019 Gulisano, Alves, Martins and Trindade. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Luisa M. Trindade, luisa.trindade@wur.nl