Yonghua Liu
Jiajia Li
Yulei Zhu2,3
Ray J. Rose
Youhong Song- 1College of Horticulture, Hainan University, Haikou, China
- 2School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
- 3National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Stress Resistance Breeding, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
- 4Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- 5School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Grain legumes provide a rich resource of plant nutrition to human diets and are vital for food security and sustainable cropping. Heat stress during flowering has a detrimental effect on legume seed yield, mainly due to irreversible loss of seed number. To start with, we provide an overview of the developmental and physiological basis of controlling seed setting in response to heat stress. It is shown that every single process of seed setting including male and female gametophyte development, fertilization, and early seed/fruit development is sensitive to heat stress, in particular male reproductive development in legume crops is especially susceptible. A series of physiochemical processes including heat shock proteins, antioxidants, metabolites, and hormones centered with sugar starvation are proposed to play a key role in regulating legume seed setting in response to heat stress. The exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying reproductive heat tolerance is in its infancy. Medicago truncatula, with a small diploid genome, and well-established transformation system and molecular platforms, has become a valuable model for testing gene function that can be applied to advance the physiological and molecular understanding of legume reproductive heat tolerance.
Introduction
Legumes rank the third largest family of flowering plants (Gepts et al., 2005) and the second most important crop family, with nearly 20,000 species (Doyle and Luckow, 2003). Grain legumes provide a significant source of starch, protein, and oil, as well as flavonoids for human diets (Graham and Vance, 2003; Suso et al., 2015; Ozga et al., 2017; Song et al., 2017b). For example, soybean seed contains up to 40% protein and 20% oil, while chickpea seed contains up to 40% starch and 20% protein (Suso et al., 2015; Song et al., 2017a). Legumes have a unique capacity to fix atmosphere N due to the symbiosis between root nodules and rhizobia. Thus, legume crops are often used in rotation cultivation for sustainable agricultural systems (Zander et al., 2016; Stagnari et al., 2017). Grain legumes may be cultivated either in cool seasons such as chickpea (Siddique et al., 2013) or in the warm seasons such as soybean (Vadez et al., 2012). Notably, legume cropping is expanding to warmer regions, e.g., in India (Gaur et al., 2015). It is convenient for legume integration into annual cropping systems (Pelzer et al., 2017; Stagnari et al., 2017). Therefore, grain legumes in cropping systems play a vital role in ensuring food security for increased human population (Foyer et al., 2016; Considine et al., 2017). However, according to the IPCC report in 2018, global average temperature over the last 5 years (2014–2018) has increased by 1.04°C compared to the preindustrial base line and will reach 1.5°C as soon as by 2030 (IPCC, 2018). As a consequence, legume growth and development will be subjected to more frequent and severe heat stress as the global climate changes (Zinn et al., 2010; Vadez et al., 2012).
Heat stress during legume reproduction causes significant loss of seed yield, primarily by compromising seed setting and/or subsequent seed filling (Ruan et al., 2010; Zinn et al., 2010; Hatfield and Prueger, 2015; Siebers et al., 2015; Patriyawaty et al., 2018). It should be noted that failure of seed setting by heat stress imposed at the early reproductive stage cannot be rescued, usually leading to fatal and irreversible yield loss, while compromised seed filling by heat stress imposed at the late reproductive stage may be to some extent recovered by subsequent proper cultivation management. Heat stress during the critical period, i.e., bracketing flowering, disrupts sexual reproductive processes including microsporogenesis and megasporogenesis, pollen production and viability, stigma receptivity, pollen germination and tube elongation, fertilization and early embryogenesis (Warrag and Hall, 1984b; Monterroso and Wien, 1990; Devasirvatham et al., 2012a,b; Kumar et al., 2013; Siebers et al., 2015), inducing huge loss of seed number. For example, preanthesis heat stress impairs anther development and reduces pollen production and fertility in chickpea, while heat stress during anthesis and/or postanthesis diminishes stigma receptivity, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth, limiting the success of double fertilization (Devasirvatham et al., 2012a,b). In extreme cases, high temperature stress even causes the abscission of flower buds and flowers in common bean (Nakano et al., 1997, 1998). Heat stress just prior to or during flowering usually has the most detrimental effect on seed setting in legumes (Warrag and Hall, 1983; Prasad et al., 2008; Petkova et al., 2009; Patriyawaty et al., 2018), whereas the post-fertilization stage and early pod development may have a relatively higher tolerance to heat stress (Gross and Kigel, 1994).
Thus far, current research has predominantly focused upon morphophysiological and anatomic characteristics of floral development and fertilization under heat stress as described above. However, the physiological and molecular mechanisms of regulating legume seed setting under heat stress has received less attention, though the exploration on the molecular basis of reproductive resilience to heat stress has emerged in recent years (Paupière et al., 2014, 2017; Nahar et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Ozga et al., 2017). Therefore, this review starts to examine the heat responses of reproductive tissue development, and fertilization associated with determination of seed setting in diverse legume species, and then analyses likely physiological and molecular mechanisms by which legume seed setting withstanding heat stress have been achieved.
Seed Setting in Response to Heat Stress
Male Reproductive Development
Heat stress may influence every single process of anther and pollen development (Table 1). Structural abnormalities in anthers may occur under heat stress, such as changes in anther locule number and anther epidermis wall thickening in chickpea (Devasirvatham et al., 2012a, 2013). Heat stress induces a thicker exine wall and a disintegrated tapetum layer in soybean, ultimately causing abnormalities of pollen development (Djanaguiraman et al., 2012, 2013). Heat stress may lead to anther indehiscence, which prevents pollen grains shedding for pollination in cowpea and common bean (Ahmed et al., 1992; Gross and Kigel, 1994; Porch and Jahn, 2001).
Table 1. Effects of heat stress on the development of various male and female tissues in different legume species.
The effects of heat stress on pollen development vary depending on the developmental time point the stress occurs. In chickpea, heat stress in early flowering leads to pollen abnormalities such as small, shrunken, and empty pollen grains (Devasirvatham et al., 2012b). Heat stress during flowering decreases pollen viability and pollen production in chickpea (Devasirvatham et al., 2012b), common bean (Konsens et al., 1991), cowpea (Ahmed et al., 1992), groundnut (Prasad et al., 1999; Kakani et al., 2002), soybean (Koti et al., 2005), and lentil (Sita et al., 2017a). Heat stress shortly after flowering disrupts the germination and tube elongation of pollens in chickpea (Devasirvatham et al., 2012b), common bean (Gross and Kigel, 1994), and soybean (Salem et al., 2007).
Female Reproductive Development
Compared to male reproductive organs, much less is known about the effects of heat stress on female reproductive organs. The developmental failure of female organs caused by heat stress also inevitably leads to reduced legume seed set (Table 1). In common bean, heat stress during flowering causes more abnormal embryo sacs and endosperm development failure (Ormrod et al., 1967; Gross and Kigel, 1994). In lupin, heat stress causes ovule abortion and thus reduced seed set (Downes and Gladstones, 1984). In cowpea, heat stress after flowering leads to embryo abortion (Warrag and Hall, 1984a,b). In chickpea, heat stress causes ovule and ovary abnormality and thus decreased seed and pod set (Devasirvatham et al., 2013). In addition, heat stress also affects stigma receptivity and thus fertilization in chickpea (Kaushal et al., 2013; Kumar et al., 2013) and in lentil (Sita et al., 2017a).
Different Heat Sensitivities of Male and Female Development
Similar to findings in non-legume crops such as maize, tomato, and oil rapeseed (Dupuis and Dumas, 1990; Peet et al., 1998; Young et al., 2004), it has been well documented that male reproductive development in legume crops is more susceptible to heat stress as compared to female reproductive organs, and male development is one of the major limiting factors for pod and seed set under heat stress (Kakani et al., 2002, 2005; Parish et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2015). For example, heat stress impairs pollen development without disrupting ovule development, thus decreasing the ratio of seed/ovule in pea (Jiang et al., 2015). In chickpea, the effect of heat stress on pollen fertility starts at the third day after heat stress, whereas the effects on ovule and ovary become apparent after 7 days after heat stress (Devasirvatham et al., 2013). It has been shown that chickpea pollen grains are more sensitive to high temperature than the stigma in both field and controlled environments (Devasirvatham et al., 2013). Studies on cowpea and common bean are also in agreement with this conclusion (Warrag and Hall, 1983; Monterroso and Wien, 1990).
What is the basis of the particular sensitivity of pollen development to heat stress? Studies have shown low levels of heat shock proteins (HSPs) transcript accumulation in mature pollen of maize and its absence in pollen of Brassica napus (Zinn et al., 2010). Little or no increase in HSP101 protein or mRNA was observed in response to heat stress in mature maize pollen (Young et al., 2001). If there is over-expression of AtHSP101 in tobacco or cotton pollen germination and pollen tube growth under high temperature is improved (Burke and Chen, 2015). Pollen has relatively high levels of reactive oxygen species and low activity of antioxidant enzymes under heat stress in sorghum (Djanaguiraman et al., 2018). In lentil, heat tolerant genotypes were particularly associated with higher sucrose levels in pollen (Sita et al., 2017a). The interaction of HSPs reactive oxygen species (ROS), and sugar levels are discussed further below when considering physiological and molecular mechanisms of heat tolerance.
Considering the extreme sensitivity of pollen development and its importance in plant reproductive development, pollen-based screening methods have been developed to evaluate the tolerance of various genotypes to heat stress (Salem et al., 2007; Kumar et al., 2016). Based on this, many heat-tolerant lines have been developed for chickpea, common bean, faba bean, lentil, and soybean (Salem et al., 2007; Gaur et al., 2015).
The Process of Fertilization and Early Embryogenesis
Double fertilization is a vital process by which the embryo is formed. After pollen grains have landed on the stigma, preparations for fertilization begins, with pollen germination, followed by pollen tube elongation and fusion of one sperm to the egg cell and the other sperm to the two polar nuclei of the central cell within the embryo sac, i.e., double fertilization (Dumas and Rogowsky, 2008). Heat stress could exert adverse effects on all steps of the fertilization process. Pollen germination is one of the most sensitive processes during fertilization (Saini et al., 1983). The germination rate of pollen grains was reduced by heat stress by 52% (32/27°C), 44% (43/43°C) and 50% (38/30°C) in common bean, groundnut and soybean, respectively (Porch and Jahn, 2001; Kakani et al., 2002; Koti et al., 2005). In chickpea, heat-stressed pollen grains cannot even germinate on the stigma (Devasirvatham et al., 2013). In addition to germination, the elongation of the pollen tube is also very sensitive to heat stress. In chickpea and common bean, for example, heat stress decreases pollen tube elongation, impairing the fertilization process (Ormrod et al., 1967; Gross and Kigel, 1994; Suzuki et al., 2001; Devasirvatham et al., 2012a,b; Kumar et al., 2013). In groundnut, heat stress results in not only inhibited pollen elongation, but also abnormal pollen tube growth with thinner and zigzag tubes (Prasad et al., 2001). In another study on chickpea, heat stress not only causes zigzag growth of pollen tube, but also induces pseudo-germination of pollen grains, consequently reducing fertilization (Devasirvatham et al., 2013). In vitro pollen germination and pollen tube elongation in soybean are significantly impaired by temperature elevated from 30/22 to 38/30°C, and heat-tolerant genotypes have greater pollen germination and tube elongation compared to heat-sensitive genotypes (Salem et al., 2007). Also, heat stress is reported to decrease pollen germination and pollen tube elongation in pea (Petkova et al., 2009; Jiang et al., 2015). Furthermore, heat-tolerant pea cultivars show a more stable composition of lipids in the pollen coat and/or exine compared to heat-sensitive cultivars (Jiang et al., 2015), which benefits the pollen-stigma interaction during the pollen germination and elongation.
However, to the best of our knowledge, most studies in legumes have focused on pollen germination and elongation, and little is known about how heat stress affects the double fertilization process and subsequent early embryogenesis. Thus, it will be necessary to draw attention to such activities, by which seed setting is significantly determined under heat stress due to its sensitivity.
Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Controlling Seed Setting Under Heat Stress
Up to now, the efforts in exploring physiological and molecular basis have been mainly focused on the vegetative stage rather than reproductive stage in legumes (Lin et al., 1984; Valliyodon and Nguyen, 2006; Kumar et al., 2012; Sita et al., 2017b). However, in recent years, physiological and molecular studies of legume reproductive heat tolerance have received increased attention (Devasirvatham et al., 2012b; Kaushal et al., 2013; Sita et al., 2017b; Patriyawaty et al., 2018). For instance, in chickpea, the reproductive heat tolerance traits, i.e., eight QTLs (Table 2) for pod setting and filling have been identified, located between two markers in both CaLG05 and CaLG06. In soybean, three loci (Table 2) of flowering time under heat stress have been found in three different chromosomes (Bai et al., 2015). However, the physiological and molecular (in particular) mechanisms underlying reproductive tolerance to heat stress in legume crops are lacking. A possible reason for this is due to the lack of transgenic evidence since many legume cultivars are recalcitrant to plant transformation (Young and Udvardi, 2009; Song et al., 2013). Nevertheless, based on existing studies, the possible mechanisms can be proposed to explain the legume reproductive tolerance to heat stress at both physiological and molecular levels (Figure 1).
Table 2. QTLs for traits associated with heat tolerance response in legumes.
Figure 1. A schematic network illustrating the mechanisms by which heat stress regulates reproductive development of legumes through sugar metabolism and signaling. Under heat stress, reproductive organs of legumes experience sugar starvation. On one hand, heat stress response (HSR) (HSF and HSP) and the biosynthesis of antioxidants (GSH and AsA) and compatible osmolytes (e.g., proline and glycine betaine) are inhibited due to reduced supply of energy and carbon skeletons. On the other hand, sugar starvation also affects hormone signaling via sugar signaling pathways and subsequently regulates reproductive development. Solid arrows represent processes demonstrated experimentally in legumes, whereas dashed arrows indicate processes based on studies on non-legume crops. See text for more details. HSR, heat stress response; HSP, heat shock protein; HSF, heat stress transcription factor; GSH, glutathione; AsA, ascorbic acid.
Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) and Heat Tolerance
It is well-known that HSPs play a vital role in plant heat tolerance by maintaining the function of proteins and integrity of various biomembranes under heat stress (Queitsch et al., 2000; Giorno et al., 2010; Fragkostefanakis et al., 2016; Ohama et al., 2016). HSPs act as molecular chaperones, preventing protein denaturation and aggregation. Existing studies have revealed that HSPs can enhance heat tolerance of legumes. For example, the accumulation of HSPs closely positively correlates with heat tolerance of soybean seedlings (Lin et al., 1984). Recently, genome-wide analysis and expression profiles indicate that the HSP gene family is involved in drought and heat stress responses in soybean seedlings (Zhang et al., 2015). Proteomic analysis also shows that heat shock-related proteins seem to be regulating heat tolerance in soybean seedlings (Das et al., 2016). It is noted that the above reports are mainly from studies in legume vegetative organs. The accumulation of HSPs in vegetative organs is not related to the heat tolerance of legume reproductive organs (Hall, 2004). Thus, more evidence is necessary in elucidating the roles of HSPs for heat tolerance of legume reproductive organs.
It is reported that five QTLs identified are related to pod set number per peduncle under heat stress (Lucas et al., 2013; Pottorff et al., 2014). Further syntenic analysis with the soybean genome revealed that these QTL regions included HSPs and heat shock factor (HSF) genes. HSFs play an important role in improved tolerance against heat stress by regulating the expression of heat-responsive genes including HSPs (Ohama et al., 2016). Ma et al. (2016) have shown that the CarHSFB2, a class B HSF, functions in the developing seed, and the embryo of germinating seed with heat stress responses in chickpea.
Antioxidants and Heat Tolerance
Heat stress often leads to excess accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide radical (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), causing oxidative damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids and thus reproductive failure (Dat et al., 1998; Laloi et al., 2004; Foyer and Noctor, 2005; Oktyabrsky and Smirnova, 2007). For example, heat stress (38/28°C) decreases the activity of superoxide dismutase by 13.3%, catalase by 44.6%, and peroxidase by 42.9% and increases O2− by 63.0% and H2O2 by 70.4% and membrane damage by 54.7% in soybean leaves, compared to optimum temperature (28/18°C) (Djanaguiraman and Prasad, 2010). Increased H2O2 content and lipid peroxidation under heat stress are also observed in chickpea and mung bean leaves (Kumar et al., 2013; Nahar et al., 2015).
Antioxidants, such as glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid (AsA) and proline, play important roles in protecting plants from oxidative damage by scavenging ROS and thus enhance heat tolerance of legumes. For example, the application of exogenous GSH enhanced mung bean seedling tolerance of short-term high temperature stress (42°C) by modulating the antioxidant and glyoxalase systems (Nahar et al., 2015). Application of exogenous proline improved chickpea heat tolerance, which is partially attributed to the enhanced biosynthesis of GSH and AsA in shoots and roots (Kaushal et al., 2011). In addition, heat-tolerant chickpea genotypes have shown higher levels of AsA and reduced GSH in leaves than sensitive genotypes under heat stress (Kumar et al., 2013). However, little is known about effects of heat stress on ROS content and oxidative damage in legume reproductive organs. Chebrolu et al. (2016) have found that a diverse set of antioxidant metabolites, including tocopherols, flavonoids, phenylpropanoids, and ascorbate precursors are enriched in the seed of heat tolerant soybean genotypes, based on global metabolite profiles. There is evidence that HSFs may be activated by ROS signaling. In addition to stimulating the expression of HSPs, HSF can also affect ROS scavenger gene expression (Driedonks et al., 2015).
Compatible Osmolyte and Heat Tolerance
Under abiotic stresses such as heat stress, drought, and salinity, plants often overproduce different types of compatible organic solutes, among which proline and glycine betaine are important in stress tolerance of plants by acting as osmoprotectants and ROS scavengers (Ashraf and Foolad, 2007). In chickpea, exogenous application of proline and glycine betaine improves the growth of seedlings under heat stress (Kaushal et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2012). Proline may enhance heat tolerance of chickpea through alleviating the inhibition of heat stress on key enzymes in carbon and oxidative metabolism in seedlings (Kaushal et al., 2011). Proline translocation also appears to play an important role in controlling heat tolerance of reproductive development in cowpea (Mutters et al., 1989). Proline transporter genes have been identified among five heat-tolerant QTLs relevant to cowpea reproduction (Lucas et al., 2013). Therefore, it is speculated that proline and its transportation might regulate the response of legume reproduction to heat stress, which will be further testified by more direct evidence.
Hormones and Heat Tolerance
Hormones play vital roles in plant reproduction under both normal and heat stress conditions. In general, auxin, gibberellin (GA), and cytokinin (CK) positively regulate plant reproductive tolerance to heat stress (Ozga et al., 2017 and references therein). For example, in common bean, the heat tolerant cultivars which have a smaller loss in pod and seed number under heat stress, have a smaller reduction of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content in flowers and young pods (Ofir et al., 1993). Furthermore, foliar application of the auxins 4-chloroindole-3-acetic acid (4-Cl-IAA) at early reproductive stage of pea increased its seed yield under heat stress (Abeysingha, 2015).
Different from auxin, ethylene (ET) may play a negative role in legume reproduction under heat stress. Heat treatment of soybean plants increases ET production rate along with induction of oxidative damage, which triggers flower abscission and decreased pod set percentage (Djanaguiraman and Prasad, 2010; Djanaguiraman et al., 2011). The application of the ethylene perception inhibitor 1-MCP (1-Methylcyclopropene) reduces or postpones reproduction failure by inhibiting ethylene production (Djanaguiraman and Prasad, 2010; Djanaguiraman et al., 2011). The positive role of auxin in legume reproduction under heat stress may be attributed to its inhibition of ET-induced floral abscission since the hastened pedicel abscission with exogenous application of ethephon in soybean is inhibited by treatment of exogenous indole-3-acetic acid under normal conditions (Oberholster et al., 1991). Recent research has further revealed that the effects of heat stress on ET biosynthesis and legume reproduction seems dependent on the development stage of reproductive organs. In this research on pea, heat stress promotes ET biosynthesis in the pre-pollinated ovary and thus increases fruit abscission, whereas heat stress inhibits ET biosynthesis in pollinated ovary and consequently it has no significant effects on ovary development (Savada et al., 2017). It is noteworthy, however, that in non-legume crops, ET plays negative roles only at anthesis and post-anthesis stages under heat stress, but positive roles at the pre-anthesis stage (Firon et al., 2012; Ozga et al., 2017 and references therein). Thus, further research is needed to clarify the differences of findings.
The role of ABA in legume reproduction under heat stress remains to be elucidated. The heat tolerance of chickpea seedlings can be enhanced by exogenous ABA application, which leads to elevated accumulation of osmoprotectants including proline and glycine betaine (Kumar et al., 2012). More recently, it has been found that overexpression of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE transcription factors SPL1 or SPL12 enhances the thermotolerance in both Arabidopsis and tobacco inflorescences (Chao et al., 2017). The inflorescence thermotolerance conferred by SPL1 and SPL2 is associated with PYL (ABA receptor)-mediated ABA signaling. Thus, based on these findings at the legume vegetative stage and non-legume reproductive stage, it could be speculated that ABA plays a positive role in heat tolerance of legume reproduction (Ji et al., 2011). To date, few studies have been conducted on the role of hormones in the heat tolerance of legume reproduction.
Sugar Starvation Responsible for Heat Sensitivity of Legume Reproduction
A large number of studies in non-legume crops have suggested that the high sensitivity of reproductive development to heat stress is attributed to sugar depletion (Frank et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Ruan, 2014 and references therein), probably due to reduced photosynthesis and/or increased respiration (Prasad et al., 2008; Mittler and Blumwald, 2010). In tomato, for example, heat stress decreased the number of pollen grains per flower, pollen viability and germination in tomato, which was attributed to the reduction of starch and soluble sugar content in the pollen grain (Sato et al., 2002). Compared to the sensitive genotype, pollen grains from the heat-tolerant tomato genotype had an unchanged starch and soluble sugar content under heat stress (Firon et al., 2006). Similarly, heat stress compromised the growth rate of pollen tubes through the style of cotton due to an inadequate supply of sucrose and hexose in the pistil (Snider et al., 2009).
Studies on effects of heat stress on sugar content in legume reproductive organs remain scarce. In chickpea, heat-sensitive cultivars have lower sucrose and hexose content in anther and pollen than heat-tolerant cultivars under heat stress, which is related to lower pollen germination rate and fertilization in the heat-sensitive cultivar (Kaushal et al., 2013). Their further study reveals that the activities of sucrose synthase (SUS) and vacuolar invertase (VIN) in these organs is inhibited to a larger extent in heat-sensitive cultivars, suggesting vital roles of sucrose catabolism in controlling heat tolerance of reproductive development possibly through providing hexoses for various structural and functional requirements.
On one hand, to deal with heat stress, plants have to divert considerable resource to heat shock response to maintain normal structure and function of cells, since the biosynthesis of heat shock proteins (Finka et al., 2012; Mittler et al., 2012), antioxidants (Bolouri-Moghaddam et al., 2010; Xiang et al., 2011), and compatible osmolytes has a high energetic and metabolic cost. This could further deteriorate sugar starvation by competing sugars with reproductive organs (Wahid et al., 2007). On the other hand, sugar limitation by heat stress often induces the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequently oxidative damage of plant cells (Couée et al., 2006; Bolouri-Moghaddam et al., 2010). A continuous and sufficient supply of glucose may maintain the activity of mitochondria-associated hexokinase, which provides sufficient ADP for the mitochondrial electron transport chain to produce ATP, and consequently avoid ROS overproduction (Xiang et al., 2011).
Improvement of sugar metabolism may help to reduce sucrose starvation in crop reproductive development and thus enhances seed/fruit set. In transgenic tomato, the elevated activity of cell wall invertase (CWIN), one enzyme hydrolyzing sucrose into glucose and fructose, enhances fruit set percentage under heat stress by facilitating sucrose import into the young ovary (Liu et al., 2016). Therefore, similar studies need to be implemented in legumes, in order to sustain their seed setting under global warming. A schematic diagram for the control of reproductive tolerance to heat stress based on sugar starvation is shown in Figure 1.
Exploring Mechanisms of High Night Temperature Affecting Legume Reproduction
It is noted that high temperature studies have been mainly focused on day temperature rather than night temperature. The latter also dramatically affects male reproductive development of legumes. For example, a high night temperature of 27°C impaired anthers dehiscence in common bean (Konsens et al., 1991). In addition, high night temperature (30°C) leads to small and shrunken pollen and thus 100% pod abortion in cowpea (Ahmed et al., 1992). In soybean, high night temperature (29°C) reduces pollen viability, pollen germination, and pod setting rate, ultimately resulting in lower yield (Djanaguiraman et al., 2013).
Under heat stress, night temperature is usually lower than day temperature and thus represents a moderate heat stress. It has been suggested that responsive mechanisms of plant to moderate and severe heat stress are very different (Yeh et al., 2012; Hancock et al., 2014). For example, mitochondrial co-chaperone MGE2 is a component of the DnaK/HSP70 complex. MGE2 is required for tolerance of Arabidopsis to moderate heat stress (35°C), but not for the tolerance to severe heat stress (44°C, Hu et al., 2012). In addition, plants are in a different physiological status at night time as compared to day time (Djanaguiraman et al., 2013; Rieu et al., 2017). Therefore, it is imperative to explore physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying legume seed setting in responses to high night temperature.
Medicago Truncatula as a Model to Study the Molecular Basis of Legume Reproductive Heat Tolerance
M. truncatula has long been used as a model for studying legume biology (Cook, 1999; Rose, 2008). It is further employed to study legume reproductive processes (Figures 2A–C) from development to production (Benlloch et al., 2003; Wang and Grusak, 2005; Chatelain et al., 2012). The anatomy, biochemistry, and molecular profile of M. truncatula flower and ovary development have been made clear (Wang et al., 2012; Kurdyukov et al., 2014; Song et al., 2017b). M. truncatula has been used to study abiotic stress including heat shock (Soares-Cavalcanti et al., 2012). The late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins have been shown to be related to desiccation tolerance (Boudet et al., 2006). Stress-related genes have been profiled (Shu et al., 2013; Song et al., 2015, 2017; Albornos et al., 2017), and myo-inositol and proline have been shown to be involved in Medicago drought tolerance (Zhang et al., 2014). The salinity tolerance is related to the induction and expression of highly regulated antioxidant mechanisms (Mhadhbi et al., 2011). MtCBF4 has been shown to play a vital role in abiotic stress responses (Li et al., 2011), and there are 48 candidate MtERF genes involved in abiotic stress responses, requiring further functional studies.
Figure 2. M. truncatula flower (A), pod (B), seed (C) and highly embryogenic calli used for transformation (D). Bars (A,B, and C) = 5 mm, bar (D) = 2 cm. Images from RJR laboratory.
M. truncatula has a small diploid genome, thoroughly sequenced and annotated (Young et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2014), plus rich available bioinformatic platforms (Benedito et al., 2008; Li et al., 2012a,b; Rose, 2013). It is widely used in functional genomics (Cañas and Beltrán, 2018; De Bruijn, 2019). An efficient transformation system (Figure 2D) has been developed in M. truncatula to facilitate gene discovery and functional tests (Song et al., 2013; Nolan et al., 2014). With M. truncatula as a model, the mechanisms of heat stress adaptation and tolerance during reproduction may be effectively studied and elucidated in legumes, building on advances in the understanding of epigenetics (Chen et al., 2016), transcriptional regulation (Ohama et al., 2017), and small RNAs (Liu et al., 2017) in relation to heat stress. The findings in M. truncatula can be conveniently translated to crop legumes (Young and Udvardi, 2009).
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Legume reproductive tolerance to heat stress has been receiving increased attention recently due to legume expansion in adaption to climate change and the demand for sustainable development. This review assessed the reproductive development associated with seed setting in response to heat stress across various legume species. Male development is more sensitive to heat stress compared to female development though both are affected by heat stress. Carbon starvation resulting from reduced photosynthetic supply and carbohydrate diversion for antioxidants, heat shock proteins and osmolytes, is proposed to be a major contributor to reproductive heat response and adaptation. It has been revealed in non-legume crops such as wheat that priming can affect the vegetative stage which helps to improve the thermo-tolerance during the reproductive stage. Priming may have a similar application in legumes, which is deserving of future studies. The clarification of the molecular basis including QTLs of the tolerance of seed setting under heat stress will help accelerate the breeding for reproductive heat tolerance. This can be advanced by the emergence of M. truncatula as a model for studying legume reproductive biology, with its well-developed transformation systems and platforms for functional genomics.
Author Contributions
YL and YS conceived this review, and drafted and finalized the paper. JL, YZ, and AJ helped to improve the draft by providing useful suggestions and information. RR helped in finalizing the paper. All authors approved the work for publication.
Funding
The work is supported by National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2017YFD0301307 and 2017YFD0300204-3) and Anhui Agricultural University startup funds for YS, and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31760579) and Hainan University startup funds (No. kyqd1663) for YL.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Abeysingha, GLDN. (2015). The effects of auxins on seed yield parameters in wheat, pea and canola grown under controlled environmental and Western Canadian field conditions. MSc thesis. Edmonton (AB): University of Alberta.
Ahmed, F. E., Hall, A. E., and DeMason, D. A. (1992). Heat injury during floral development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79, 784–791. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13655.x
Albornos, L., Martín, I., Labrador, E., and Dopico, B. (2017). Three members of Medicago truncatula ST family are ubiquitous during development and modulated by nutritional status (MtST1) and dehydration (MtST2 and MtST3). BMC Plant Biol. 17:117. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1061-z
Ashraf, M., and Foolad, M. R. (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59, 206–216. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
Bai, X., Liang, S., and Xing, X. (2015). Association analysis for soybean yield traits under drought and heat stress with soybean SSR markers. J. Northeast. Agric. Univ. 46, 15–22. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2015.10.003
Benedito, V. A., Torres-Jerez, I., Murray, J. D., Andriankaja, A., Allen, S., Kakar, K., et al. (2008). A gene expression atlas of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 55, 504–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03519.x
Benlloch, R., Navarro, C., Beltrán, J., and Cañas, L. A. (2003). Floral development of the model legume Medicago truncatula: ontogeny studies as a tool to better characterize homeotic mutations. Sex. Plant Reprod. 15, 231–241. doi: 10.1007/s00497-002-0157-1
Bhandari, K., Siddique, K. H. M., Turner, N. C., Kaur, J., Singh, S., Agrawal, S. K., et al. (2016). Heat stress at reproductive stage disrupts leaf carbohydrate metabolism, impairs reproductive function, and severely reduces seed yield in lentil. J. Crop Improv. 30, 118–151. doi: 10.1080/15427528.2015.1134744
Bolouri-Moghaddam, M., Le Roy, K., Xiang, L., Rolland, F., and Van den Ende, W. (2010). Sugar signalling and antioxidant network connections in plant cells. FEBS J. 277, 2022–2037. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07633.x
Boudet, J., Buitink, J., Hoekstra, F. A., Rogniaux, H., Larré, C., Satour, P., et al. (2006). Comparative analysis of the heat stable proteome of radicles of Medicago truncatula seeds during germination identifies late embryogenesis abundant proteins associated with desiccation tolerance. Plant Physiol. 140, 1418–1436. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.074039
Burke, J. J., and Chen, J. (2015). Enhancement of reproductive heat tolerance in plants. PLoS One 10:e0122933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122933
L. A. Cañas and J. P. Beltrán (eds.) (2018). Functional genomics in Medicago truncatula, methods and protocols. Methods in molecular biology. Vol. 1822 (NY: Humana Press, Springer Nature).
Chao, L. M., Liu, Y. Q., Chen, D. Y., Xue, X. Y., Mao, Y. B., and Chen, X. Y. (2017). Arabidopsis transcription factors SPL1 and SPL12 confer plant thermotolerance at reproductive stage. Mol. Plant 10, 735–748. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.010
Chatelain, E., Hundertmark, M., Leprince, O., Gall, S. L., Satour, P., Deligny-Penninck, S., et al. (2012). Temporal profiling of the heat-stable proteome during late maturation of Medicago truncatula seeds identifies a restricted subset of late embryogenesis abundant proteins associated with longevity. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 1440–1455. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02501.x
Chebrolu, K. K., Fritschi, F. B., Ye, S. Q., Krishnan, H. B., Smith, J. R., and Gillman, J. D. (2016). Impact of heat stress during seed development on soybean seed metabolome. Metabolomics 12, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11306-015-0941-1
Chen, Y., Müller, F., Rieu, I., and Winter, P. (2016). Epigenetic events in plant male germ cell heat stress responses. Plant Reprod. 29, 21–29. doi: 10.1007/s00497-015-0271-5
Considine, M. J., Siddique, K. H. M., and Foyer, C. H. (2017). Nature’s pulse power: legumes, food security and climate change. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1815–1818. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx099
Cook, D. R. (1999). Medicago truncatula – a model in the making! Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2, 301–304. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)80053-3
Couée, I., Sulmon, C., Gouesbet, G., and El Amrani, A. (2006). An involvement of soluble sugars in reactive oxygen species balance and responses to oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 449–459. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj027
Das, D., Eldakak, M., Paudel, B., Kim, D. W., Hemmati, H., Basu, C., et al. (2016). Leaf proteome analysis reveals prospective drought and heat stress response mechanisms in soybean. Biomed. Res. Int. 8, 1–23. doi: 10.1155/2016/6021047
Dat, J. F., Lopez-Delgado, H., Foyer, C. H., and Scott, I. M. (1998). Parallel changes in H2O2 and catalase during thermotolerance induced by salicylic acid or heat acclimation in mustard seedlings. Plant Physiol. 116, 1351–1357. doi: 10.1104/pp.116.4.1351
Devasirvatham, V., Gaur, P. M., Mallikarjuna, N., Raju, T. N., Trethowan, R. M., and Tan, D. K. (2013). Reproductive biology of chickpea response to heat stress in the field is associated with the performance in controlled environments. Field Crop Res. 142, 9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.011
Devasirvatham, V., Tan, D. K. Y., Gaur, P. M., Raju, T. N., and Trethowan, R. M. (2012a). High temperature tolerance in chickpea and its implications for plant improvement. Crop Pasture Sci. 63, 419–428. doi: 10.1071/CP11218
Devasirvatham, V., Tokachichu, R. N., Trethowan, R. M., Tan, D. K. Y., Gaur, P. M., and Mallikarjuna, N. (2012b). Effect of high temperature on the reproductive development of chickpea genotypes under controlled environments. Funct. Plant Biol. 39, 1009–1018. doi: 10.1071/FP12033
Djanaguiraman, M., Perumal, R., Jagadish, S. V., Ciampitti, I. A., Welti, R., and Prasad, P. V. (2018). Sensitivity of sorghum pollen and pistil to high-temperature stress. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 1065–1082. doi: 10.1111/pce.13089
Djanaguiraman, M., and Prasad, P. V. V. (2010). Ethylene production under high temperature stress causes premature leaf senescence in soybean. Funct. Plant Biol. 37, 1071–1084. doi: 10.1071/FP10089
Djanaguiraman, M., Prasad, P. V. V., and Al-khatib, K. (2011). Ethylene perception inhibitor 1-MCP decreases oxidative damage of leaves through enhanced antioxidant defense mechanisms in soybean plants grown under high temperature stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 71, 215–223. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.12.006
Djanaguiraman, M., Prasad, P. V. V., Boyle, D. L., and Schapaugh, W. T. (2012). Soybean pollen anatomy, viability and pod set under high temperature stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 199, 171–177. doi: 10.1111/jac.12005
Djanaguiraman, M., Prasad, P. V. V., and Schapaugh, W. T. (2013). High day- or night time temperature alters leaf assimilation, reproductive success, and phosphatidic acid of pollen grain in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Crop Sci. 53, 1594–1604. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.07.0441
Downes, R. W., and Gladstones, J. S. (1984). Physiology of growth and seed production in Lupinus angustifolius L. I. Effects on pod and seed set of controlled short duration high temperatures at flowering. Crop Pasture Sci. 35, 493–499.
Doyle, J. J., and Luckow, M. A. (2003). The rest of the iceberg. Legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiol. 131, 900–910. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.018150
Driedonks, N., Xu, J., Peters, J. L., Park, S., and Rieu, I. (2015). Multi-level interactions between heat shock factors, heat shock proteins, and the redox system regulate acclimation to heat. Front. Plant Sci. 6:999. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00999
Dumas, C., and Rogowsky, P. (2008). Fertilization and early seed formation. C. R. Biol. 331, 715–725. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.07.013
Dupuis, I., and Dumas, C. (1990). Influence of temperature stress on in vitro fertilization and heat shock protein synthesis in maize (Zea mays L.) reproductive tissues. Plant Physiol. 94, 665–670. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.2.665
Finka, A., Quendet, A. F. H., Maathuis, F. J. M., Saidi, Y., and Goloubinoff, P. (2012). Plasma membrane cyclic nucleotide gated calcium channels control land plant thermal sensing and acquired thermo tolerance. Plant Cell 24, 3333–3348. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.095844
Firon, N., Pressman, E., Meir, S., Khoury, R., and Altahan, L. (2012). Ethylene is involved in maintaining tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) pollen quality under heat-stress conditions. AoB Plants 2012:pls024. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/pls024
Firon, N., Shaked, R., Peet, M., Pharr, D., Zamski, E., Rosen-feld, K., et al. (2006). Pollen grains of heat tolerant tomato cultivars retain higher carbohydrate concentration under heat stress conditions. Sci. Hortic. 109, 212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.03.007
Foyer, C. H., Lam, H. M., Nguyen, H. T., Siddique, K. H., Varshney, R. K., Colmer, T. D., et al. (2016). Neglecting legumes has compromised human health and sustainable food production. Nat. Plants 2:16112. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.112
Foyer, C. H., and Noctor, G. (2005). Oxidant and antioxidant signaling in plants: a re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant Cell Environ. 28, 1056–1071. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01327.x
Fragkostefanakis, S., Mesihovic, A., Simm, S., Paupière, M. J., Hu, Y., Paul, P., et al. (2016). HsfA2 controls the activity of developmentally and stress-regulated heat stress protection mechanisms in tomato male reproductive tissues. Plant Physiol. 170, 2461–2477. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01913
Frank, G., Pressman, E., Ophir, R., Althan, L., Shaked, R., Freedman, M., et al. (2009). Transcriptional profiling of maturing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) microspores reveals the involvement of heat shock proteins, ROS scavengers, hormones, and sugars in the heat stress response. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 3891–3908. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp234
Gaur, P. M., Samineni, S., Krishnamurthy, L., Kumar, S., Ghanem, M. E., Beebe, S. E., et al. (2015). High temperature tolerance in grain legumes. Legume Perspectives 7, 23–24. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00179
Gepts, P., Beavis, W. D., Brummer, E. C., Shoemaker, R. C., Stalker, H. T., Weeden, N. F., et al. (2005). Legumes as a model plant family. Genomics for food and feed report of the cross-legume advances through genomics conference. Plant Physiol. 137, 1228–1235. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.060871
Giorno, F., Wolters-Arts, M., Grillo, S., Scharf, K. D., Vriezen, W. H., and Mariani, C. (2010). Developmental and heat stress-regulated expression of HsfA2 and small heat shock proteins in tomato anthers. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 453–462. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp316
Graham, P. H., and Vance, C. P. (2003). Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol. 131, 872–877. doi: 10.1104/pp.017004
Gross, Y., and Kigel, J. (1994). Differential sensitivity to high temperature of stages in the reproductive development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Field Crop Res. 36, 201–212. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(94)90112-0
Hall, A. E. (2004). “Comparative ecophysiology of cowpea, common bean and peanut” in Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding. eds. H. T. Nguyen and A. Blum (New York: Marcel Dekker), 271–325.
Hancock, R. D., Morris, W. L., Ducreux, L. J., Morris, J. A., Usman, M., Verrall, S. R., et al. (2014). Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant to moderately elevated temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 439–450. doi: 10.1111/pce.12168
Hatfield, J. L., and Prueger, J. H. (2015). Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim. Extrem. 10, 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
Hu, C., Lin, S. Y., Chi, W. T., and Charng, Y. Y. (2012). Recent gene duplication and subfunctionalization produced a mitochondrial GrpE, the nucleotide exchange factor of the Hsp70 complex, specialized in thermotolerance to chronic heat stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 158, 747–758. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.187674
IPCC (2018). IPCC-SR15, Global Warming of 1.5°C. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/ (Accessed June 17, 2019).
Ji, X., Dong, B., Shiran, B., Talbot, M. J., Edlington, J. E., Hughes, T., et al. (2011). Control of abscisic acid catabolism and abscisic acid homeostasis is important for reproductive stage stress tolerance in cereals. Plant Physiol. 156, 647–662. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176164
Jiang, Y., Lahlali, R., Karunakaran, C., Kumar, S., Davis, A. R., and Bueckert, R. A. (2015). Seed set, pollen morphology and pollen surface composition response to heat stress in field pea. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 2387–2397. doi: 10.1111/pce.12589
Kakani, V. G., Prasad, P. V. V., Craufurd, P. Q., and Wheeler, T. R. (2002). Response of in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes to temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 1651–1661. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00943.x
Kakani, V. G., Reddy, K. R., Koti, S., Wallace, T. P., Prasad, P. V., Reddy, V. R., et al. (2005). Differences in in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of cotton cultivars in response to high temperature. Ann. Bot. 96, 59–67. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci149
Kaushal, N., Awasthi, R., Gupta, K., Gaur, P., Siddique, K. H. M., and Nayyar, H. (2013). Heat-stress-induced reproductive failures in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) are associated with impaired sucrose metabolism in leaves and anthers. Funct. Plant Biol. 40, 1334–1349. doi: 10.1071/FP13082
Kaushal, N., Gupta, K., Bhandhari, K., Kumar, S., Thakur, P., and Nayyar, H. (2011). Proline induces heat tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants by protecting vital enzymes of carbon and antioxidative metabolism. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 17, 203–213. doi: 10.1007/s12298-011-0078-2
Konsens, I., Ofir, M., and Kigel, J. (1991). The effect of temperature on the production and abscission of flowers and pods in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Ann. Bot. 67, 391–399. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088173
Koti, S., Reddy, K. R., Reddy, V. R., Kakani, V. G., and Zhao, D. (2005). Interactive effects of carbon dioxide, temperature, and ultraviolet-B radiation on soybean (Glycine max L.) flower and pollen morphology, pollen production, germination, and tube lengths. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 725–736. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri044
Kumar, J., Kant, R., Kumar, S., Basu, P. S., Sarker, A., and Singh, N. P. (2016). Heat tolerance in lentil under field conditions. Legume Genomics Genet. 7, 1–11. doi: 10.5376/lgg.2016.07.0001
Kumar, S., Kaushal, N., Nayyar, H., and Gaur, P. (2012). Abscisic acid induces heat tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seedlings by facilitated accumulation of osmoprotectants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 34, 1651–1658. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-0959-1
Kumar, S., Thakur, P., Kaushal, N., Malik, J. A., Gaur, P., and Nayyar, H. (2013). Effect of varying high temperatures during reproductive growth on reproductive function, oxidative stress and seed yield in chickpea genotypes differing in heat sensitivity. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 59, 823–843. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2012.683424
Kurdyukov, S., Song, Y., Sheahan, M. B., and Rose, R. J. (2014). Transcriptional regulation of early embryo development in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Rep. 33, 349–362. doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1535-x
Laloi, C., Apel, K., and Danon, A. (2004). Reactive oxygen signaling: the latest news. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 323–328. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.005
Li, J., Dai, X., Liu, T., and Zhao, P. X. (2012a). LegumeIP: an integrative database for comparative genomics and transcriptomics of model legumes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1221–D1229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr939
Li, Z. M., Palmer, W. M., Martin, A. P., Wang, R., Rainsford, F., Jin, Y., et al. (2012b). High invertase activity in tomato reproductive organs correlates with enhanced sucrose import into, and heat tolerance of, young fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 1155–1166. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err329
Li, D., Zhang, Y., Hu, X., Shen, X., Ma, L., Su, Z., et al. (2011). Transcriptional profiling of Medicago truncatula under salt stress identified a novel CBF transcription factor MtCBF4 that plays an important role in abiotic stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 11:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-109
Lin, C. Y., Roberts, J. K., and Key, J. L. (1984). Acquisition of thermotolerance in soybean seedlings synthesis and accumulation of heat shock proteins and their cellular localization. Plant Physiol. 74, 152–160. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.152
Liu, Y. H., Offler, C. E., and Ruan, Y. L. (2013). Regulation of fruits and seed response to heat and drought by sugars as nutrients and signals. Front. Plant Sci. 4:282. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00282
Liu, Y. H., Offler, C. E., and Ruan, Y. L. (2016). Cell wall invertase promotes fruit set under heat stress by suppressing ROS-independent plant cell death. Plant Physiol. 172, 163–180. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00959
Liu, Q., Yan, S., Yang, T., Zhang, S., Chen, Y. Q., and Liu, B. (2017). Small RNAs in regulating temperature stress response in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 59, 774–791. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12571
Lucas, M. R., Ehlers, J. D., Huynh, B. L., Diop, N. N., Roberts, P. A., and Close, T. J. (2013). Markers for breeding heat-tolerant cowpea. Mol. Breed. 31, 529–536. doi: 10.1007/s11032-012-9810-z
Ma, H., Wang, C. T., Yang, B., Cheng, H. Y., Wang, Z., Mijiti, A., et al. (2016). CarHSFB2, a class B heat shock transcription factor, is involved in different developmental processes and various stress responses in chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.). Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 34, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11105-015-0892-8
Mhadhbi, H., Fotopoulos, V., Mylona, P. V., Jebara, M., Elarbi Aouani, M., and Polidoros, A. N. (2011). Antioxidant gene–enzyme responses in Medicago truncatula genotypes with different degree of sensitivity to salinity. Physiol. Plantarum 141, 201–214.
Mittler, R., and Blumwald, E. (2010). Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 443–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112116
Mittler, R., Finka, A., and Goloubinoff, P. (2012). How do plants feel the heat? Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.11.007
Monterroso, V. A., and Wien, H. C. (1990). Flower and pod abscission due to heat stress in beans. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 115, 631–634.
Mutters, R. G., Hall, A. E., and Patel, P. N. (1989). Photoperiod and light quality effects on cowpea floral development at high temperatures. Crop Sci. 29, 1501–1505. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900060037x
Nahar, K., Hasanuzzaman, M., Alam, M. M., and Fujita, M. (2015). Exogenous glutathione confers high temperature stress tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) by modulating antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification system. Environ. Exp. Bot. 112, 44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.12.001
Nakano, H., Kobayashi, M., and Terauchi, T. (1998). Sensitive stages to heat stress in pod setting of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Jpn. J. Trop. Agr. 42, 78–84.
Nakano, H., Momonoki, T., Miyashige, T., Otsuka, H., Hanada, T., Sugimoto, A., et al. (1997). ‘Haibushi’, a new variety of snap bean tolerant to heat stress. JIRCAS J. 5, 1–12.
Nolan, K. E., Song, Y., Liao, S., Saeed, N. A., Zhang, X., and Rose, R. J. (2014). An unusual abscisic acid and gibberellic acid synergism increases somatic embryogenesis, facilitates its genetic analysis and improves transformation in Medicago truncatula. PLoS One 9:e99908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099908
Oberholster, S. D., Peterson, C. M., and Dute, R. R. (1991). Pedicel abscission of soybean: cytological and ultrastructural changes induced by auxin and ethephon. Can. J. Bot. 69, 2177–2186. doi: 10.1139/b91-273
Ofir, M., Gross, Y., Bangerth, F., and Kigel, J. (1993). High temperature effects on pod and seed production as related to hormone levels and abscission of reproductive structures in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Sci. Hortic. 55, 201–211. doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(93)90032-L
Ohama, N., Kusakabe, K., Mizoi, J., Zhao, H., Kidokoro, S., Koizum, S., et al. (2016). The transcriptional cascade in the heat stress response of Arabidopsis is strictly regulated at the expression levels of transcription factors. Plant Cell 28, 181–201. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00435
Ohama, N., Sato, H., Shinozaki, K., and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2017). Transcriptional regulatory network of plant heat stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.015
Oktyabrsky, O. N., and Smirnova, G. V. (2007). Redox regulation of cellular functions. Biochemistry 72, 132–145. doi: 10.1134/S0006297907020022
Ormrod, D. P., Woolley, C. J., Eaton, G. W., and Stobbe, E. H. (1967). Effect of temperature on embryo sac development in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Can. J. Bot. 45, 948–950. doi: 10.1139/b67-097
Ozga, J. A., Kaur, H., Savada, R. P., and Reinecke, D. M. (2017). Hormonal regulation of reproductive growth under normal and heat-stress conditions in legume and other model crop species. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 1885–1894. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw464
Parish, R. W., Phan, H. A., Iacuone, S., and Li, S. F. (2012). Tapetal development and abiotic stress: a centre of vulnerability. Funct. Plant Biol. 39, 553–559. doi: 10.1071/FP12090
Patriyawaty, N. R., Rachaputi, R. C. N., and George, D. (2018). Physiological mechanisms underpinning tolerance to high temperature stress during reproductive phase in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Environ. Exp. Bot. 150, 188–197. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.03.022
Paupière, M. J., Müller, F., Li, H. J., Tikunov, Y. M., Visser, R. G. F., and Bovy, A. G. (2017). Untargeted metabolomic analysis of tomato pollen development and heat stress response. Plant Reprod. 30, 81–94. doi: 10.1007/s00497-017-0301-6
Paupière, M. J., van Heusden, A. W., and Bovy, A. G. (2014). The metabolic basis of pollen thermo-tolerance: perspectives for breeding. Meta 4, 889–920. doi: 10.3390/metabo4040889
Peet, M. M., Sato, S., and Gardner, R. G. (1998). Comparing heat stress effects on male-fertile and male-sterile tomatoes. Plant Cell Environ. 21, 225–231. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00281.x
Pelzer, E., Bourlet, C., Carlsson, G., Lopez-Bellido, R. J., Jensen, E. S., and Jeuffroy, M. H. (2017). Design, assessment and feasibility of legume-based cropping systems in three European regions. Crop Pasture Sci. 68, 902–914. doi: 10.1071/CP17064
Petkova, V., Nikolova, V., Kalapchieva, S. H., Stoeva, V., Topalova, E., and Angelova, S. (2009). Physiological response and pollen viability of Pisum sativum genotypes under high temperature influence. Acta Hortic. 830, 665–671. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.830.96
Porch, T. G., and Jahn, M. (2001). Effects of high-temperature stress on microsporogenesis in heat-sensitive and heat-tolerant genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 723–731. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00716.x
Pottorff, M., Roberts, P. A., Close, T. J., Lonardi, S., Wanamaker, S., and Ehlers, J. D. (2014). Identification of candidate genes and molecular markers for heat-induced brown discoloration of seed coats in [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. BMC Genomics 15, 328–339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-328
Prasad, P. V. V., Craufurd, P. Q., Kakani, V. G., Wheeler, T. R., and Boote, K. J. (2001). Influence of high temperature during pre- and post-anthesis stages of floral development on fruit set and pollen germination in peanut. Funct. Plant Biol. 28, 233–240. doi: 10.1071/PP00127
Prasad, P. V. V., Craufurd, P. Q., and Summerfield, R. J. (1999). Sensitivity of peanut to timing of heat stress during reproductive development. Crop Sci. 39, 1352–1357. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.3951352x
Prasad, P. V. V., Staggenborg, S. A., and Ristic, Z. (2008). “Impacts of drought and/or heat stress on physiological, developmental, growth, and yield processes of crop plants” in Response of crops to limited water: Understanding and modeling water stress effects on plant growth processes. eds. L. H. Ahuja and S. A. Saseendran (Madison, WI, USA: Advances in Agricultural Systems Modeling Series 1; ASA-CSSA), 301–355.
Pronob, J., Paul, P. J., Samineni, S., Thudi, M., Sajja, S. B., Rathore, A., et al. (2018). Molecular mapping of QTLs for heat tolerance in chickpea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2166–2186. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082166
Queitsch, C., Hong, S. W., Vierling, E., and Lindquist, S. (2000). Heat shock protein 101 plays a crucial role in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12, 479–492. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.4.479
Rieu, I., Twell, D., and Firon, N. (2017). Pollen development at high temperature: from acclimation to collapse. Plant Physiol. 173, 1967–1976. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01644
Rose, R. J. (2008). Medicago truncatula as a model for understanding plant interactions with other organisms, plant development and stress biology: past, present and future. Funct. Plant Biol. 35, 253–264. doi: 10.1071/FP07297
R. J. Rose (ed.) (2013). Legume genomics, methods and protocols. Methods in molecular biology. Vol. 1069 (Springer NY: Humana Press).
Ruan, Y. L. (2014). Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 33–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040251
Ruan, Y. L., Jin, Y., Li, G. J., Yang, Y. J., and Boyer, J. S. (2010). Sugar input, metabolism and signaling mediated by invertase: roles in development, yield potential and response to drought and heat. Mol. Plant 3, 942–955. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq044
Saini, H. S., Sedgley, M., and Aspinall, D. (1983). Effect of heat stress during floral development on pollen tube growth and ovary anatomy in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10, 137–144.
Salem, M. A., Kakani, V. G., Koti, S., and Reddy, K. R. (2007). Pollen-based screening of soybean genotypes for high temperatures. Crop Sci. 47, 219–231. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0443
Sato, S., Peet, M. M., and Thomas, J. F. (2002). Determining critical pre- and post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1187–1195. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.371.1187
Savada, R. P., Ozga, J. A., Jayasinghege, C. P. A., Waduthanthri, K. D., and Reinecke, D. M. (2017). Heat stress differentially modifies ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in pea floral and fruit tissues. Plant Mol. Biol. 95, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11103-017-0653-1
Shu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Song, L., and Guo, C. (2013). Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF superfamily genes and their responses to abiotic stress in Medicago truncatula. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1247. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01247
Siddique, K. H. M., Erskine, W., Hobson, K., Knights, E. J., Leonforte, A., Khan, T. N., et al. (2013). Cool-season grain legume improvement in Australia—use of genetic resources. Crop Pasture Sci. 64, 347–360. doi: 10.1071/CP13071
Siebers, M. H., Yendrek, C. R., Drag, D., et al. (2015). Heat waves imposed during early pod development in soybean (Glycine max) cause significant yield loss despite a rapid recovery from oxidative stress. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 3114–3125. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12935
Sita, K., Sehgal, A., HanumanthaRao, B., Nair, R. M., Vara Prasad, P. V., Kumar, S., et al. (2017b). Food legumes and rising temperatures: effects, adaptive functional mechanisms specific to reproductive growth stage and strategies to improve heat tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1658. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01658
Sita, K., Sehgal, A., Kumar, J., Kumar, S., Singh, S., Siddique, K. H., et al. (2017a). Identification of high-temperature tolerant lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) genotypes through leaf and pollen traits. Front. Plant Sci. 8:744. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00744
Snider, J. L., Oosterhuis, D. M., Skulman, B. W., and Kawakami, E. M. (2009). Heat stress-induced limitations to reproductive success in Gossypium hirsutum. Physiol. Plant. 137, 125–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01266.x
Soares-Cavalcanti, N. M., Belarmino, L. C., Kido, E. A., Pandolfi, V., Marcelino-Guimarães, F. C., Rodrigues, F. A., et al. (2012). Overall picture of expressed heat shock factors in Glycine max, Lotus japonicus and Medicago truncatula. Genet. Mol. Biol. 35, 247–259. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012000200006
Song, Y., He, L., Wang, X. D., Smith, N., Wheeler, S., Garg, M. L., et al. (2017a). Regulation of carbon partitioning in the seed of the model legume Medicago truncatula and Medicago orbicularis: a comparative approach. Front. Plant Sci. 8:2070. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02070
Song, J., Mo, X., Yang, H., Yue, L., Song, J., and Mo, B. (2017). The U-box family genes in Medicago truncatula: key elements in response to salt, cold, and drought stresses. PLoS One 12:e0182402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190064
Song, Y., Nolan, K. E., and Rose, R. J. (2013). “Stable transformation of Medicago truncatula cv. Jemalong for gene analysis” in Legume genomics methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology. Vol. 1069, ed. R. J. Rose (Springer, New York: Humana Press), 203–214.
Song, J. B., Wang, Y. X., Li, H. B., Li, B. W., Zhou, Z. S., Gao, S., et al. (2015). The F-box family genes as key elements in response to salt, heavy metal, and drought stresses in Medicago truncatula. Funct. Integr. Genomics 15, 495–507. doi: 10.1007/s10142-015-0438-z
Song, Y., Wang, X. D., and Rose, R. J. (2017b). Oil body biogenesis and biotechnology in legume seeds. Plant Cell Rep. 36, 1519–1532. doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2201-5
Stagnari, F., Maggio, A., Galieni, A., and Pisante, M. (2017). Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 4:2. doi: 10.1186/s40538-016-0085-1
Suso, M., Bebeli, P., and Palmer, R. (2015). “Reproductive biology of grain legumes” in Grain legumes. Handbook of plant breeding. Vol. 10, ed. A. De Ron (New York, NY: Springer).
Suzuki, K., Takeda, H., Tsukaguchi, T., and Egawa, Y. (2001). Ultrastructural study of degeneration of tapetum in anther of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under heat-stress. Sex. Plant Reprod. 13, 293–299. doi: 10.1007/s004970100071
Tang, H., Krishnakumar, V., Bidwell, S., Rosen, B., Chan, A., Zhou, S., et al. (2014). An improved genome release (version Mt4.0) for the model legume Medicago truncatula. BMC Genomics 15:312. doi: 10.1186/1471-216415-312
Vadez, V., Berger, J. D., Warkentin, T., Asseng, S., Ratnakumar, P., Rao, K. P. C., et al. (2012). Adaptation of grain legumes to climate change: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 31–44. doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0020-6
Valliyodon, B., and Nguyen, H. T. (2006). Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.019
Wahid, A., Gelani, S., Ashraf, M., and Foolad, M. R. (2007). Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 61, 199–223. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
Wang, H. L., and Grusak, M. A. (2005). Structure and development of Medicago truncatula pod wall and seed coat. Ann. Bot. 95, 737–747. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci080
Wang, X.-D., Song, Y., Sheahan, M. B., Garg, M. L., and Rose, R. J. (2012). From embryo sac to oil and protein bodies: embryo development in the model legume Medicago truncatula. New Phytol. 193, 327–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03925.x
Warrag, M. O. A., and Hall, A. E. (1983). Reproductive responses of cowpea to heat stress: genotypic differences in tolerance to heat at flowering. Crop Sci. 23, 1088–1092. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300060016x
Warrag, M. O. A., and Hall, A. E. (1984a). Reproductive responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to heat stress. I. Responses to soil and day air temperatures. Field Crop Res. 8, 3–16.
Warrag, M. O. A., and Hall, A. E. (1984b). Reproductive responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to heat stress. II. Responses to night air temperature. Field Crop Res. 8, 17–33.
Xiang, L., Li, Y., Rolland, F., and Van den Ende, W. (2011). Neutral invertase, hexokinase and mitochondrial ROS homeostasis: emerging links between sugar metabolism, sugar signaling and ascorbate synthesis. Plant Signal. Behav. 6, 1567–1573. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.10.17036
Yeh, C. H., Kaplinsky, N. J., Hu, C., and Charng, Y. Y. (2012). Some like it hot, some like it warm: phenotyping to explore thermotolerance diversity. Plant Sci. 195, 10–23. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.004
Young, N. D., Debelle, F., Oldroyd, G. E., Geurts, R., Cannon, S. B., Udvardi, M. K., et al. (2011). The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature 480, 520–524. doi: 10.1038/nature10625
Young, T. E., Ling, J., Geisler-Lee, C. J., Tanguay, R. L., Caldwell, C., and Gallie, D. R. (2001). Developmental and thermal regulation of the maize heat shock protein HSP101. Plant Physiol. 127, 777–791. doi: 10.1104/pp.010160
Young, N. D., and Udvardi, M. (2009). Translating Medicago truncatula genomics to crop legumes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.11.005
Young, L. W., Wilen, R. W., and Bonham-Smith, P. C. (2004). High temperature stress of Brassica napus during flowering reduces micro- and megagametophyte fertility, induces fruit abortion, and disrupts seed production. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 485–495. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh038
Zander, P., Amjath-Babu, T. S., Preissel, S., Reckling, M., Bues, A., Schläfke, N., et al. (2016). Grain legume decline and potential recovery in European agriculture: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36:26. doi: 10.1007/s13593-016-0365-y
Zhang, J. Y., Cruz De Carvalho, M. H., Torres-Jerez, I. V. O. N. E., Kang, Y., Allen, S. N., Huhman, D. V., et al. (2014). Global reprogramming of transcription and metabolism in Medicago truncatula during progressive drought and after rewatering. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 2553–2576. doi: 10.1111/pce.12328
Zhang, L., Zhao, H. K., Dong, Q. L., Zhang, Y. Y., Wang, Y. M., Li, H. Y., et al. (2015). Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling under heat and drought treatments of HSP70 gene family in soybean (Glycine max L.). Front. Plant Sci. 6:773. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00773
Keywords: legumes, Medicago truncatula, heat stress, reproductive development, sugar metabolism, seed set
Citation: Liu Y, Li J, Zhu Y, Jones A, Rose RJ and Song Y (2019) Heat Stress in Legume Seed Setting: Effects, Causes, and Future Prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 10:938. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00938
Edited by:
Jose C. Jimenez-Lopez, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Granada, SpainReviewed by:
Rohini Garg, Shiv Nadar University, IndiaLiang Tang, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
Arun S. K. Shunmugam, Agriculture Victoria, Australia
Copyright © 2019 Liu, Li, Zhu, Jones, Rose and Song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Youhong Song, uqysong@163.com; y.song@ahau.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work