Abstract
High salinity is one of the major environmental stresses that plants encounter. Roots are the initial and direct organs to perceive the signal. However, how plant roots perceive and respond to salinity at the molecular and physiological levels is still poorly understood. Here, we report that IAA-CONJUGATE-RESISTANT 4 (IAR4) plays a key role in primary root growth under salt stress conditions. Mutation of IAR4 led to increased sensitivity to salt stress conditions, with strongly inhibited primary root growth and reduced survival rate in two iar4 mutant alleles. iar4 mutants accumulated greater Na+ and exhibited a greater Na+/K+ ratio under NaCl treatment. In addition, more reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulated in the iar4 mutants due to reduced ROS scavenging. NaCl treatment greatly suppressed the expression levels of ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP, and ProDR5:GFP, and suppressed root meristem activity in iar4. GSH or auxin treatment greatly recovered the PIN expression, auxin distribution and primary root growth in the iar4 mutants, suggesting ROS is a vital mediator between salt stress and auxin response. Our data support a model in which IAR4 integrates ROS and auxin pathways to modulate primary root growth under salinity stress conditions, by regulation of PIN-mediated auxin transport.
Introduction
Salinity is one of the key environmental factors that seriously affects plant growth and development, and thus influences crop production worldwide (Zhu, 2002; Munns and Tester, 2008). Among all types of salts in soil, sodium chloride is the most soluble and widespread, exerting both osmotic stress and ionic stress on plants (Hasegawa et al., 2000; Hernandez et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 2007; Munns and Tester, 2008; Yu et al., 2010). The root is the first and direct organ to sense elevated salinity levels (Wang et al., 2009). Previous reports show that salt stress represses root meristem activity, root cell cycle, and cell elongation (Burssens et al., 2000; West et al., 2004; Bustos et al., 2008; Jiang et al., 2016), resulting in primary root growth retardation (Bustos et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2015; Jiang et al., 2016). In addition, salt stress also affects root gravitropism (Sun et al., 2008) and lateral root formation (Wang et al., 2009; Zolla et al., 2010).
Auxin plays an essential role in root meristem maintenance and root growth (Han et al., 2017), depending on auxin levels and distribution in root tips, where auxin maximum is formed and maintained by polar auxin transport (Sabatini et al., 1999; Blilou et al., 2005; Dello Ioio et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2013, 2014; Hong et al., 2014; Mroue et al., 2018). It was reported that salt stress markedly disturbed auxin homeostasis and distribution patterns in primary roots (Wang et al., 2009), which suppressed the expression of the auxin carrier PIN-FORMED 2 (PIN2), and repressed the stabilization abundance of the PIN2 protein and INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID INDUCIBLE 17 (IAA17), thereby repressing auxin signaling and root meristem development (Sun et al., 2008). A recent study showed that salt stress induced MIR393A expression and led to a reduction of TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1 (TIR1) and AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX 2 (AFB2) receptors, which subsequently triggered stabilization of the Aux/IAA repressors and led to the decline of auxin signaling (Iglesias et al., 2014). These results suggest that auxin distribution and signaling mediate plant response to salt stress conditions.
An elevated Na+ level breaks the balance between ROS (reactive oxygen species) production and scavenging, causing ROS accumulation (Miller et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2012), which subsequently results in oxidative stress and cell damage (Ling et al., 2009; Miller et al., 2010). Meanwhile, ROS also serves as a vital second messenger that regulates the balance between cellular proliferation and differentiation in roots, and modulates root growth and development (Shoresh et al., 2011; He et al., 2012).
Reactive oxygen species and auxin are two key switch elements that are used by plants to trigger dynamic responses to salt stress conditions (Chen and Miller, 2014). The crosstalk between auxin and ROS has gained attention in terms of plant growth and development. ABA-induced ROS production in mitochondria can control PLETHORA (PLT) expression and auxin accumulation to regulate root meristem activity (Yang et al., 2014). On the other hand, auxin can regulate ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE 1 (APX1) activity to induce redox change, causing alteration of root growth and development (Correaaragunde et al., 2013; Chen and Miller, 2014). An auxin receptor mutant tir1afb2 showed enhanced tolerance to salt stress with enhanced redox metabolism, also supporting the opinion that auxin regulates ROS status (Iglesias et al., 2010). However, how salt stress and root development are integrated by ROS-auxin crosstalk is still not clear.
To identify genes that function in salt stress and to understand the relationship between salt stress and auxin response, we focused on salt-inducible and auxin-responsive genes according to their expression patterns using Gene Investigator. We collected around 100 T-DNA insertion lines of these genes. Through screening the growth performance under salt stress conditions, we identified that IAR4 was involved in salt-inhibited primary root growth. iar4 mutants showed hypersensitive response to salt stress and primary root growth retardation. In addition, salt stress induced ROS overaccumulation in the iar4 mutants by impairing ROS scavenging. Salt stress greatly suppressed the expression levels of ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP, and ProDR5:GFP and suppressed root meristem activity in the iar4 mutants, which could be largely rescued by glutathione (GSH) antioxidant or auxin treatment. Taken together, our study provides a mechanistic understanding of how IAR4 mediates the root response to salt stress and illustrates the potential role between ROS and auxin in primary root growth.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
All Arabidopsis lines used in this study were in the Columbia background (Col-0). The IAR4 mutant line iar4-7 (SALK_091909) was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) and iar4-8 (SALK_137286) was obtained from Dr. Lin Xu (Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, SIBS, CAS). Plants were grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing different supplements in a Percival chamber with controlled conditions (22°C, 16 h light/8 h night regime, 80 μmol photons m-2 s-1 light intensity, and 70% relative humidity).
Salt Tolerance and Phenotype Identification
To determine the survival rate under salt stress conditions, at least 50 seeds of the wild-type (WT) and iar4-7 mutant per experiment were sown on MS medium supplemented with 150 mM NaCl for 3 weeks. For determination of primary root growth under salt or osmotic stress conditions, 3-day-old iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT seedlings were grown on vertical MS medium plates, and were transferred to MS medium supplemented with NaCl (0, 50, 75, 100, 120 mM) or mannitol (0, 100, 150, 200 mM) and incubated vertically for 5 days. For the effect of GSH or auxin on primary root growth suppressed by NaCl, 3-day-old seedlings on MS medium were transferred to MS medium supplemented with 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaCl plus 200 mM GSH, 100 mM NaCl plus 0.1 μM IAA, or 100 mM NaCl plus 0.1 μM NAA for 10 days. All experiments were repeated three times, and the error bars indicated the standard deviation (SD).
Creation of the Complementation Construct and Transgenic Plants
For the complementation assay, the genomic DNA fragment containing the complete IAR4 gene and native promoter was amplified by the primer pairs listed in Supplementary Table S1. The purified PCR product was digested with ApaI and SpeI, and then was cloned into the corresponding sites of the pGPTVII-hyg binary vector (Walter et al., 2004). The ProIAR4:IAR4 construct was transformed into iar4-7 via the floral dipping method (Clough and Bent, 1998). The transgenic plants were screened on MS medium containing 25 mg L-1 hygromycin. Three randomly selected independent transgenic T3 lines (COM-1, COM-3, COM-5) were used for further experiments.
RT-PCR and qRT-PCR Analyses
Semi-quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was used to detect IAR4 expression in the leaves of WT, iar4-7, iar4-8, and IAR4 complementation plants. qRT-PCR was used to detect the expression levels of salt-responsive genes and ROS-related genes in 7-day-old WT and iar4-7 seedlings that treated with 0 or 100 mM NaCl for 8 h. Total RNAs were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Ambion), and the first-strand cDNAs were synthesized using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Madison, WI, United States) according to the provided protocols. Actin7 was used as an internal control for RT-PCR and UBQ5 was used as an internal control for qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR was performed with the Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System using Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). The PCR amplification was performed with the procedure of 1 min at 95°C, 50 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 15 s at 55–60°C and 15 s at 72°C, 5 min at 72°C. The primer sequences used for RT-PCR and qRT-PCR were listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Determination of ROS Levels
H2O2 levels in roots were detected by 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluoresin diacetate (H2DCF-DA) (Sigma-Aldrich) and 3′,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining. For H2DCF-DA staining, 5-day-old iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT seedlings grown on MS medium were treated with 100 mM NaCl for 30 min, and then their roots were immersed in 20 μm H2DCF-DA buffer for 20 min. A laser scanning confocal (TCS SP8, Leica) microscope was used to detect the fluorescence with excitation at 488 nm and emission at 525 nm. The relative fluorescence was analyzed with ImageJ software, and the fluorescence in control plants without treatment was set as 100%. H2O2 detection by 3′,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, 1 mg mL-1) staining and superoxide detection by nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT, 1 mg mL-1) staining were performed according to the published methods (Jiang et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2014).
Antioxidant Enzyme Assays
Seven-day-old seedlings were treated with 100 mM NaCl for 2 days, and then root samples were harvested. Enzyme extractions were performed at 4°C as described (Wang et al., 2016). Enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were measured with SOD and CAT assay kits (Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) as described (Pan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016). Absorbances were measured using a spectrophotometer (DU730, Beckman Coulter) at 560 nm and 240 nm for SOD and CAT, respectively.
Measurement of Na+ and K+ Content
Wild-type and two iar4 mutant alleles were grown in a hydroponic system with half-strength Hoagland’s solution (Li et al., 2012) for 20 days, and then were treated with 100 mM NaCl for 4 days. Plant tissues (shoots and roots) were collected and dried for 3 days at 65°C. Dried samples were digested by HNO3 overnight at room temperature, and the digested solutions were further incubated in boiling water for 2 h. The samples were diluted with double-distilled water and measured for Na+ and K+ content by an absorption spectrometer (AA240Duo, Agilent, United States).
Measurement of Zone Length, Cell Number, and Cell Length in MZ, EZ, and TZ
Three-day-old seedlings were transferred to MS medium supplemented with 100 mM NaCl or 200 μM GSH or both for 5 days. The roots were then placed in a mounting solution (80 g chloral hydrate, 10 mL glycerol, and 30 mL water) and were photographed with a Zeiss Axio Imager M2. The zone length, cell length, and cell number of meristem zone (MZ), transition zone (TZ), and elongation zone (EZ) in the cortex were measured and analyzed by ImageJ software according to the published methods (Verbelen et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2016). At least 10 roots were used for each measurement, and the experiments were repeated at least three times.
Fluorescence Detection
Four-day-old WT, iar4-7, and iar4-8 seedlings expressing ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP, or ProDR5:GFP were transferred to MS medium or MS medium containing 100 mM NaCl or 200 μM GSH or both for 2 days. Root GFP fluorescence was detected with a confocal (Leica TCS SP8) microscope with excitation at 488 nm and emission at 525 nm. The relative fluorescence was analyzed with ImageJ software, and the fluorescence in WT on MS medium was set as 100%. At least 10 roots were used for each experiment, and at least three independent experiments were performed.
Statistical Analysis
Differences among treatments or genotypes were assessed by Student’s t-test. The values were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Results
iar4 Mutants Were Hypersensitive to Salt Stress Conditions
To identify the mutants that exhibit differential growth performance under salt stress conditions, we screened around 100 T-DNA insertion lines on MS medium plus 150 mM NaCl, in each of which one salt-inducible and auxin-responsive gene was disrupted. One mutant line SALK_091909 (referred to as iar4-7) (Steinwand et al., 2014) was screened out, as it was hypersensitive to NaCl treatment and had a significantly reduced survival rate than WT did (Figure 1A,B). However, there was no significant difference in growth performance between WT and iar4-7 under normal growth conditions. IAR4, encoding a putative mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase E1α-subunit (LeClere et al., 2004), was reported to regulate auxin homeostasis (Quint et al., 2009).
FIGURE 1
Salinity is also known to inhibit primary root growth. We next determined the primary root growth of the iar4 mutants under salinity conditions. We obtained another T-DNA insertion allele of iar4, SALK_137286, here named as iar4-8. These two mutant alleles, iar4-7 and iar4-8, were both determined as knock-down mutants by our genotyping analyses (Supplementary Figure S1). Three-day-old seedlings of WT, iar4-7, and iar4-8 were transferred to MS medium plus 0 or 100 mM NaCl for 7 days (Figure 1C). The root length in iar4-7 and iar4-8 was slightly shorter than that of WT without NaCl treatment, consistent with a previous study (LeClere et al., 2004). NaCl treatment greatly inhibited the primary root growth of these genotypes, however, the inhibitions in the iar4-7 and iar4-8 seedlings were greatly exaggerated (Figure 1C and Supplementary Figures S2A,B). These results suggest that IAR4 dysfunction leads to root growth retardation under salt stress conditions.
To better understand how the NaCl concentration range affects the primary root sensitivity, 3-day-old iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT seedlings were transferred to MS medium containing different NaCl concentrations. NaCl treatment inhibited primary root growth more in the iar4 mutants than in the WT on MS medium supplemented with 75 mM or 100 mM NaCl, and led to the decreased relative root growth rate in the iar4 mutants (Figure 1D). When the NaCl concentration was increased up to 120 mM or even greater, there were no significant differences in the relative root growth rate among iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT (Figure 1D and Supplementary Figure S2B). These findings suggest that 75 mM and 100 mM are suitable concentrations to distinguish the inhibition of primary root growth between the iar4 mutants and WT. The 100 mM concentration was chosen for further experiments in the study.
To further confirm that the salt hypersensitive responses of the iar4 mutants are due to the IAR4 mutation, a genomic DNA fragment containing IAR4 with its native promoter was introduced into one iar4 allele, iar4-7, since two iar4 mutant alleles used in this study showed similar phenotypes under salt stress conditions. The responses of three randomly selected IAR4-expressing iar4-7 lines to salt stress conditions were tested (Figure 1E). As expected, IAR4 expression not only restored the slightly short primary root phenotype of iar4-7 on NaCl-free MS medium, but also complemented the NaCl-hypersensitive primary root growth phenotype (Figure 1F,G). These results demonstrate that IAR4 is involved in the primary root growth under salt stress conditions.
iar4 Mutants Conferred Elevated Na+ Levels in Roots and Shoots
Salt stress is harmful to plants due to its osmotic stress or toxicity. To investigate which mechanism is responsible for the salt-hypersensitive primary root growth in the iar4-7 and iar4-8 mutants, 3-day-old seedlings were transferred to MS medium supplemented with mannitol for 5 days, which was considered as osmotic stress. There were no obvious differences in the relative root growth rate in the iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT under mannitol treatment (Figure 2A,B and Supplementary Figure S3). This suggests that the root hypersensitive response to salt stress in the iar4 mutants may not be caused by osmotic stress.
FIGURE 2
Elevated salinity can cause overaccumulation of Na+ levels and reduction of K+ levels in cells (Shabala et al., 2007). We treated 20-day-old liquid-cultured iar4 mutants and WT with 100 mM NaCl for 4 days, and measured Na+ and K+ content in shoots and roots. NaCl treatment increased the Na+ levels and decreased the K+ levels in both tissues in iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT (Figure 2C,D). However, iar4 mutants accumulated greater levels of Na+ in both roots and shoots, and had similar K+ levels in both tissues as WT did (Figure 2D), which led to a greater Na+/K+ ratio in the iar4-7 and iar4-8 plants (Figure 2E). Without NaCl treatment, no significant differences were detected in Na+ and K+ content, and similar Na+/K+ ratios were observed in both tissues of iar4 mutants and WT (Figure 2C). These results suggest that the phenotypes of primary root retardation and low survival rate in the iar4 mutants under salt stress conditions may be likely due to Na+ overaccumulation and high Na+/K+ ratio (Figure 1).
In Arabidopsis, Na+ homeostasis is coordinated by Na+ transporters. HKT1 is known to uptake Na+ into root cells, Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 exports Na+ out of the cell, and NHX1 transports Na+ into the vacuole for sequestration (Shi et al., 2000; Apse et al., 2003; Platten et al., 2006). To elucidate whether these transporters are involved in Na+ over-accumulation in the iar4 mutant plants, the expression levels of HKT1, SOS1, and NHX1 in roots were detected. NaCl treatment inhibited the expression of HKT1 in both genotypes, but HKT1 expression was slightly higher in iar4-7 than in WT. The expression levels of NHX1 were comparable in WT and iar4-7 with and without NaCl treatment. Surprisingly, SOS1 was greatly induced by NaCl treatment in WT, however, its induction in iar4-7 was totally blocked (Figure 2F). These results suggest that the overaccumulation of Na+ in the iar4 mutants may be mainly caused by the failure to exclude Na+ out of the root cells. Activation of the SOS signaling pathway has long been recognized as a key mechanism for Na+ exclusion and ion homeostasis control at the cellular level (Zhu, 2000). We then checked the expression level of SOS3, which is an upstream regulator of SOS1 and perceives the increase of cytosolic Ca2+ triggered by excess Na+. Interestingly, we found the induction of SOS3 by NaCl treatment was also strongly impaired in the iar4 mutant (Figure 2F). These results indicate that increased Na+ content in iar4 is mainly caused by less Na+ exclusion out of root cells by the SOS1 transporter, probably through the SOS signaling pathway.
iar4 Mutants Accumulated More ROS in Root Tips Under Salt Stress Conditions
Salt stress induces ROS accumulation. To determine whether the salt-induced root inhibition in the iar4 mutants is via ROS homeostasis pathway, we compared the levels of H2O2 (by H2DCF-DA and DAB staining) and superoxide (by NBT staining) in roots. Without NaCl treatment, iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT roots showed similar levels of H2O2 and superoxide. NaCl treatment induced H2O2 and superoxide levels in the iar4 mutants and WT, but the inductions were much greater in the iar4 mutants (Figure 3A–F). These results reveal that IAR4 dysfunction increases ROS levels in roots under salt stress conditions.
FIGURE 3
Reactive oxygen species homeostasis is balanced by ROS production and scavenging. To understand whether the greater ROS level in the iar4 mutants is due to the defect of ROS production or scavenging, the expression patterns of major ROS production genes (RBOHD and RBOHF) and ROS scavenging genes (CAT1, SOD1, and GST1) were determined in the roots of 7-day-old iar4-7 and WT seedlings treated with 100 mM NaCl for 8 h. NaCl treatment induced the expression of RBOHD and RBOHF in iar4-7 and WT, and their inductions were comparable. The expression levels of CAT1, SOD1, and GST1 were similar between iar4-7 and WT on MS medium, however, their inductions by NaCl treatment were less in the iar4-7 mutant compared with those in WT (Figure 3G). These results illustrate that the increased ROS accumulation in the iar4 mutants is mainly caused by the reduced ROS scavenging, rather than ROS production. To further prove this, the activities of two key ROS-scavenging enzymes, CAT, which scavenges H2O2, and SOD, which scavenges superoxide, were measured in the roots of iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT with or without NaCl treatment. NaCl treatment increased the activities of CAT and SOD in these genotypes, however, CAT and SOD activities were much less in iar4-7 and iar4-8 than in WT (Figure 3H,I), consistent with the expression levels of ROS scavenging genes (Figure 3G). Taken together, our results suggest that the primary root growth retardation in the iar4 mutants under salt stress conditions is likely due to the oxidative status caused by ROS accumulation.
Root Meristem Activity Was Impaired in the iar4 Mutants Under Salt Stress Conditions
To detect how NaCl or NaCl-induced ROS affects root length, we measured root zone length, cell number, and cell length of MZ, TZ, and EZ in iar4-7, iar4-8, and WT roots with or without NaCl treatment. Without NaCl treatment iar4-7 and iar4-8 exhibited less MZ length and fewer MZ cell numbers than WT did. NaCl treatment reduced the MZ length and cell number more in the iar4 mutants than in WT, but the MZ cell length was comparable in WT and iar4 roots with or without NaCl treatment (Figure 4A,D,F). The TZ was shorter and had fewer cell numbers in the iar4 mutants than in WT under both conditions. Although the TZ cell length was similar in the iar4 mutants and WT without NaCl treatment, NaCl treatment reduced the TZ cell length more in the iar4 mutants than in WT (Figure 4B,E,H). Without NaCl treatment the EZ length was also shorter in the iar4 mutants, with fewer cell numbers and shorter cell lengths. NaCl treatment reduced the EZ cell length and cell number more in the iar4 mutants than in WT, leading to further inhibited EZ length in the iar4 mutants (Figure 4C,F,I). These results indicate that the iar4 mutation reduces root meristem activity and increases the sensitivity of all three root zones to NaCl treatment, by reducing the cell number in all three zones, as well as the cell elongation in the TZ and EZ. To further reveal that the reduced cell number in the iar4 mutants is caused by the reduced cell division activity, the expression levels of cell cycle marker genes CYCB1;1 (AT4G37490) and CYCB1;2 (AT5G06150) (Weimer et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018) were detected. The expression levels of CYCB1;1 and CYCB1;2 were significantly less in the iar4 mutants than in WT without salt stress, and their repressions by salt stress were enhanced in the iar4 mutants (Supplementary Figure S4). These results were consistent with the cell number and root length phenotypes with or without NaCl treatment (Figure 4). These results suggest that the cell division activity in the iar4 mutant is reduced under normal and salt stress conditions.
FIGURE 4
GSH Treatment Partially Alleviated the Salt-Hypersensitive Root Growth Phenotype in the iar4 Mutants
H2O2 is a major ROS species in plants under abiotic stresses (Krishnamurthy and Rathinasabapathi, 2013), and can be scavenged by GSH antioxidant (Yang et al., 2014). To determine if the salt-inhibition of root growth in the iar4 mutants is caused by ROS overaccumulation, we investigated whether supplement of GSH could restore the root phenotype of the iar4 mutants under salt stress conditions. Supplement of 200 μM GSH greatly reduced ROS levels in WT and iar4 mutants that were promoted by NaCl treatment (Figure 5A,B and Supplementary Figures S5A,B), suggesting GSH (200 μM) is functional to scavenge ROS in the roots. We next detected the effect of GSH treatment on the primary root growth performance in the iar4 mutants under salt stress. NaCl treatment significantly inhibited the root length in the iar4 mutants, while GSH treatment partially restored the salt-hypersensitive root growth in the iar4 mutants (Figure 5C,D). These findings suggest that reducing ROS level can partially alleviate the root growth retardation in the iar4 mutants under salt stress.
FIGURE 5
We were also interested to know whether GSH treatment could restore cell division and cell elongation in the iar4 mutants, which were inhibited by accumulated ROS. For better interpretation of this, we firstly tested the effect of exogenous H2O2 treatment with or without GSH supplement on cell division and cell elongation in WT roots. Exogenous H2O2 (0.5 mM) suppressed the cell number and cell length in WT, and 200 μM GSH treatment could restore the phenotypes (Supplementary Figures S5C–H). We then treated 3-day-old WT, iar4-7, and iar4-8 seedlings with 200 mM GSH plus NaCl for 5 days, and determined the zone length and cell number in the MZ, TZ, and EZ. GSH treatment not only greatly rescued the MZ, TZ, and EZ lengths in iar4-7 and iar4-8, which were suppressed by NaCl (Figure 5E–G and Supplementary Figures S5I,J), but also greatly rescued the cell numbers in each zone (Figure 5H–J). These results suggest that GSH treatment reduces the oxidation status (ROS) in iar4 root tips, which then decreases the salt inhibition of root growth.
Salt Stress Suppressed the Expression Levels of ProDR5:GFP and Auxin Carriers More in iar4 Root Tips, Which Could Be Largely Reversed by GSH
Auxin is a major hormone that regulates root growth. Previous studies have shown that iar4 mutation exhibits increased IAA-Glu and similar endogenous auxin levels as Col-0. Supplement of IAA can complement the iar4 mutant phenotypes (LeClere et al., 2004; Quint et al., 2009), suggesting that IAR4 is involved in auxin homeostasis rather than in auxin biosynthesis. To see whether the reduced root growth under salt stress treatment in the iar4 mutants is due to an impairment of auxin level in root tips and responses, we crossed iar4-7 and iar4-8 with an auxin-responsive marker line ProDR5:GFP, which reports auxin accumulation and distribution in root tips (Friml et al., 2003). NaCl treatment decreased ProDR5:GFP expression in the iar4 mutants and WT, consistent with previous reports that salt stress inhibited auxin biosynthesis or auxin distribution (Jiang et al., 2016). However, the ProDR5:GFP expression in the iar4 root tips was much inhibited (Figure 6A,B). Note that without NaCl treatment, ProDR5:GFP expression in the iar4 root tips was also less than that in WT (Figure 6A,B), in agreement with the previous study (Quint et al., 2009).
FIGURE 6
iar4 mutants overaccumulated ROS and exhibited reduced auxin distribution in root tips. We next tested the effect of GSH on ProDR5:GFP expression in the iar4 mutants and WT under salt stress conditions. GSH treatment slightly increased ProDR5:GFP expression in both WT and iar4 root tips compared with controls on MS medium. Under NaCl conditions, GSH treatment increased ProDR5:GFP expression more in the iar4 mutants than in WT, which then diminished the differences in primary root length between the iar4 mutants and WT (Figure 6A,B). These results demonstrate that the less expression of ProDR5:GFP in the iar4 mutants under salt stress conditions is likely due to the high oxidation status in root tips.
Since auxin transporters play crucial roles in modulating root growth, we then detected ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP expression levels in the iar4 mutants and WT. Their expression levels were less in the iar4 mutants than in WT without NaCl treatment (Figure 6C–H), which contributed to the reduced expression of ProDR5:GFP in the iar4 mutants (Figure 6A,B), consistent with the previous study (Quint et al., 2009). NaCl treatment suppressed the expression levels of ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP in the iar4 mutants and WT, but their suppressions were dramatically exaggerated in the iar4 mutants compared with those in WT (Figure 6C–H). GSH treatment greatly diminished NaCl-inhibition of ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP expression levels in the iar4 mutants. Auxin homeostasis depends on auxin uptake and efflux. We next detected AUX1 expression under salt stress conditions with or without GSH treatment. The expression of AUX1 in the iar4 mutant was much inhibited by salt stress, and could also be restored by GSH treatment (Supplementary Figure S6), suggesting the reduced auxin uptake also contributes to the disturbed auxin homeostasis in the iar4 mutants. Together with the previous study which shows that iar4 mutation does not change the content of free IAAs in roots, shoots, or whole plants (Quint et al., 2009), our results indicate that the reduced expression of ProDR5:GFP and the reduced auxin carriers in iar4 roots under salt stress conditions are likely due to the elevated ROS level. These results also suggest ROS accumulated by salt stress reduces the auxin distribution in iar4 roots, and that ROS acts as a vital mediator between salt and auxin distribution in roots.
Exogenous Auxin Largely Recovered the Salt-Hypersensitive Root Growth Phenotype of iar4
The reduced DR5-GFP expression and root meristem activity in the iar4 mutants may be the main reason for the short primary root growth under salt stress. Reducing the ROS level in the iar4 mutants could reverse this phenotype. We performed experiments to see whether supplement of auxin could also recover the salt inhibition of root growth in the iar4 mutants. WT and iar4 mutant plants were grown on MS medium containing 0.1 μM NAA in the presence or absence of 100 mM NaCl. Without NaCl treatment, supplement of NAA inhibited the primary root growth of both WT and iar4 mutants, but the inhibition in the iar4 mutants was reduced, which resulted in the similar root lengths in the WT and iar4 mutants (Figure 7A,B and Supplementary Figure S7). With NaCl treatment, supplement of NAA further inhibited the primary root growth of WT compared with that grown on MS medium plus NaCl or NAA. In contrast, NAA largely abolished the inhibition of primary root length by NaCl treatment in the iar4 mutants (Figure 7A,B). Similar effects were observed in IAA treatment (Supplementary Figure S8).
FIGURE 7
We also detected the expression levels of ProDR5:GFP, ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP in WT and iar4 root tips under these conditions. NAA treatment together with NaCl resulted in the greater expression of ProDR5:GFP, ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP in the iar4 mutants and WT (Figure 7C–H). However, the increase was greater in the iar4 mutants than that in WT, which led to only the slight differences in primary root length between them (Figure 7A,B). These data demonstrate that auxin treatment can largely restore the salt inhibition of root growth in iar4, suggesting exogenous auxin compensates the NaCl-inhibited auxin accumulation in iar4 root tips.
Discussion
Salinity is a major abiotic stress that seriously affects crop production (Munns and Tester, 2008). In addition, the increasing soil salinity is threatening the sustainability of food production. The root is the direct and first organ to sense and respond to the increasing salinity, however, the underlying mechanisms still remain largely unknown. The present study demonstrates that IAR4 is essential for primary root growth under salt stress, by integrating the ROS and auxin pathways. We found that iar4 mutants showed a strong hypersensitive phenotype to salt stress. We further found that iar4 mutants accumulated elevated Na+ and ROS levels. The auxin distribution in root tips was much less in the iar4 mutants under salt stress, because of the reduced expression of auxin response reporter and auxin carriers, which led to the reduced root meristem activity and root growth. GSH treatment could partially recover the reduced root meristem activity and root growth retardation in the iar4 mutants induced by salt stress conditions.
Diverse mechanisms are adopted by plants in salt tolerance regulation, including ionic toxicity, osmotic stress, and oxidative stress on plant cells (Zhu, 2002; Zhu et al., 2007). Our results showed that the hypersensitive primary root growth in the iar4 mutants was mainly due to the Na+ toxicity and oxidative stress, rather than the osmotic effect. There were several reasons. First, osmotic stress by mannitol treatment had a similar effect on primary root growth in both WT and iar4 mutant alleles (Figure 2A,B and Supplementary Figure S3). Second, iar4 mutants accumulated much greater Na+ levels and exhibited a greater Na+/K+ ratio in both roots and shoots under salt stress conditions (Figure 2), which were contributed by significantly reduced SOS1 and SOS3 expression. This is in agreement with a previous study that sos1 mutation caused a salt hypersensitive phenotype (Shi et al., 2000). Third, ROS overaccumulated in the iar4 mutants, due to the reduced ROS scavenging. Supplement of GSH greatly recovered the root growth retardation in the iar4 mutants by NaCl treatment (Figure 3, 5 and Supplementary Figure S5). It was reported that ROS detoxification genes ENH1 and FeSOD were directly regulated by SOS1 (Katiyar-Agarwal et al., 2006). Finally, the accumulated Na+ and ROS in the iar4 mutants caused the reduction of root meristem activity, cell division, cell length, and root length (Figure 4). GSH treatment partially restored these phenotypes (Figure 5 and Supplementary Figure S5). These results demonstrate that the primary root growth retardation in the iar4 mutants under salt stress is directly linked to oxidative stress (ROS).
Auxin is reported to be a vital regulator in root meristem maintenance (Swarup et al., 2002; Overvoorde et al., 2010), and its distributions and levels in root tips directly regulate root growth. IAR4 encodes a putative mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase E1α-subunit. However, its function in linking glycolysis to the Krebs cycle is questionable, because Krebs cycle intermediates fail to rescue the iar4 root phenotypes. IAA treatment could rescue the root phenotypes under normal growth conditions, suggesting IAR4 might specifically function in the auxin pathway (LeClere et al., 2004; Quint et al., 2009). Further experiments showed that free IAA levels in roots or shoots in the iar4 mutants were comparable with those in Col-0, and IAA-Glu level was increased in the iar4 mutants, suggesting that IAR4 might be involved in auxin homeostasis. In our study, ProDR5:GFP expression in iar4 root tips was slightly reduced under normal growth conditions, consistent with the slightly shorter roots reported here (Figure 1, 2, 5, 7) and in previous studies (LeClere et al., 2004; Quint et al., 2009). Under salt stress, ProDR5:GFP expression was significantly decreased in the iar4 mutants (Figure 6A,B), leading to strongly inhibited primary root growth. The heavily suppressed expression of auxin carriers (ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP) in the iar4 mutants under NaCl treatment suggested that the reduced auxin level in root tips was due to the reduced auxin transport. The greater auxin levels in the EZ and TZ further inhibited cell elongation in these zones and root length. When auxin (IAA or NAA) was supplemented, the expression levels of ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP, and ProDR5:GFP were recovered. These findings suggest that IAR4 may mainly affect auxin distribution in roots under salt stress. IAR4 maintains the balance of free IAA and IAA-conjugates, and IAR4 is induced by salt treatment (Figure 2F). Under salt treatment, IAA-conjugates may be accumulated, and then free IAA is reduced in the iar4 mutant. In this sense, the strongly inhibited primary root growth may also be caused by disturbed auxin homeostasis.
Salt stress induces ROS accumulation and suppresses auxin biosynthesis, homeostasis, and responses, which might be a strategy that plants use to tolerate salinity. However, how salt signals and root development are integrated by ROS-auxin crosstalk is still uncertain. Some reports show that ROS inhibits auxin biosynthesis and homeostasis (Nakagami et al., 2006; De Tullio et al., 2010; Blomster et al., 2011). Other reports show that auxin regulates ROS homeostasis (Joo et al., 2001; Schopfer et al., 2002; Joo et al., 2005; Peer et al., 2013). Under salinity stress conditions, iar4 mutants accumulated more ROS (Figure 3) and exhibited reduced auxin levels in root tips than WT did (Figure 6, 7). Supplement of GSH or auxin partially restored the decreased expression of ProDR5:GFP, ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP under salt stress conditions (Figure 6, 7), and greatly rescued the primary root growth retardation phenotype in the iar4 mutants (Figure 5 and Supplementary Figure S5). These results suggest that reducing ROS levels in the iar4 mutants can release the salt-inhibition of auxin distribution and homeostasis (Figure 6). These results demonstrate that the dramatically reduced auxin transport and the changed homeostasis in the iar4 mutants are caused by higher ROS levels. It is also reported that SOS3 is required for auxin biosynthesis and polar auxin transport to root tips under salt stress conditions (Zhao et al., 2011). In the iar4 mutants, salt-induction of SOS3 was strongly inhibited (Figure 2F), indicating IAR4 mediates primary root growth under salt stress via ROS-mediated regulation of auxin distribution, probably through a SOS-controlled pathway. SOS3 may be inhibited by metabolites, since IAR4 encodes a PDH E1α subunit, or be inhibited by auxin or auxin-conjugates, or other mechanisms. However, further experiments are needed to investigate.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the present study identifies IAR4 that acts as a key player in primary root growth modulation under salt stress conditions. Furthermore, characterization of the roles of ROS and auxin in salt stress-regulated primary root growth leads to a model that IAR4 modulates primary root growth under salt stress conditions, mainly through ROS-mediated modulation of auxin distribution (Figure 7I). Under salt stress, IAR4 is induced to prevent Na+ overaccumulation, probably through a SOS signaling pathway. Na+ accumulation promotes ROS production, which negatively modulates root growth by regulating PIN-mediated auxin polar transport in roots.
Statements
Author contributions
HH and YF planned and designed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. YF, YY, SC, and NN performed the experiments.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31771552) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFD0100604).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Zhaojun Ding (Shandong University) for providing ProDR5:GFP, ProPIN2:PIN2-GFP, and ProPIN3:PIN3-GFP seeds, Dr. Chunli Chen (Huazhong Agricultural University) for providing ProPIN1:PIN1-GFP seeds and Dr. Lin Xu (Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, SIBS, CAS) for providing iar4-8 seeds.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00522/full#supplementary-material
References
1
ApseM. P.SottosantoJ. B.BlumwaldE. (2003). Vacuolar cation/H+ exchange, ion homeostasis, and leaf development are altered in a T-DNA insertional mutant of AtNHX1, the Arabidopsis vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter.Plant J.36229–239. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01871.x
2
BlilouI.XuJ.WildwaterM.WillemsenV.PaponovI.FrimlJ.et al (2005). The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots.Nature43339–44. 10.1038/nature03184
3
BlomsterT.SalojarviJ.SipariN.BroscheM.AhlforsR.KeinanenM.et al (2011). Apoplastic reactive oxygen species transiently decrease auxin signaling and cause stress-induced morphogenic response in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.1571866–1883. 10.1104/pp.111.181883
4
BurssensS.HimanenK.van de CotteB.BeeckmanT.Van MontaguM.InzeD.et al (2000). Expression of cell cycle regulatory genes and morphological alterations in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana.Planta211632–640. 10.1007/s004250000334
5
BustosD.LascanoR.VillasusoA. L.MachadoE.SennM. E.CordobaA.et al (2008). Reductions in maize root-tip elongation by salt and osmotic stress do not correlate with apoplastic levels.Ann. Bot.102551–559. 10.1093/aob/mcn141
6
ChenC.MillerG. (2014). ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE 6 protects Arabidopsis desiccating and germinating seeds stress from species mediates cross talk between reactive oxygen, acid abscisic, and auxin.Plant Physiol.166370–383. 10.1104/pp.114.245324
7
CloughS. J.BentA. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.16735–743. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x
8
CorreaaragundeN.ForesiN.DelledonneM.LamattinaL. (2013). Auxin induces redox regulation of ascorbate peroxidase 1 activity by S-nitrosylation/denitrosylation balance resulting in changes of root growth pattern in Arabidopsis.J. Exp. Bot.643339–3349. 10.1093/jxb/ert172
9
De TullioM. C.JiangK.FeldmanL. J. (2010). Redox regulation of root apical meristem organization: connecting root development to its environment.Plant Physiol. Biochem.48328–336. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.11.005
10
Dello IoioR.NakamuraK.MoubayidinL.PerilliS.TaniguchiM.MoritaM. T.et al (2008). A genetic framework for the control of cell division and differentiation in the root meristem.Science3221380–1384. 10.1126/science.1164147
11
FrimlJ.VietenA.SauerM.WeijersD.SchwarzH.HamannT.et al (2003). Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis.Nature426147–153. 10.1038/nature02085
12
HanE. H.PetrellaD. P.BlakesleeJ. J. (2017). ‘Bending’ models of halotropism: incorporating protein phosphatase 2A, ABCB transporters, and auxin metabolism.J. Exp. Bot.68:3071. 10.1093/jxb/erx127
13
HasegawaP. M.BressanR. A.ZhuJ. K.BohnertH. J. (2000). Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.51463–499. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463
14
HeJ.DuanY.HuaD.FanG.WangL.LiuY.et al (2012). DEXH box RNA helicase-mediated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production in Arabidopsis mediates crosstalk between abscisic acid and auxin signaling.Plant Cell241815–1833. 10.1105/tpc.112.098707
15
HernandezJ. A.FerrerM. A.JimenezA.BarceloA. R.SevillaF. (2001). Antioxidant systems and O2-/H2O2 production in the apoplast of pea leaves. Its relation with salt-induced necrotic lesions in minor veins.Plant Physiol.127817–831. 10.1104/pp.127.3.817
16
HongL. W.YanD. W.LiuW. C.ChenH. G.LuY. T. (2014). TIME FOR COFFEE controls root meristem size by changes in auxin accumulation in Arabidopsis.J. Exp. Bot.65275–286. 10.1093/jxb/ert374
17
IglesiasM. J.TerrileM. C.BartoliC. G.D’IppólitoS.CasalonguéC. A. (2010). Auxin signaling participates in the adaptative response against oxidative stress and salinity by interacting with redox metabolism in Arabidopsis.Plant Mol. Biol.74215–222. 10.1007/s11103-010-9667-7b
18
IglesiasM. J.TerrileM. C.WindelsD.LombardoM. C.BartoliC. G.VazquezF.et al (2014). MiR393 regulation of auxin signaling and redox-related components during acclimation to salinity in Arabidopsis.PLoS One9:e107678. 10.1371/journal.pone.0107678
19
JiangC.BelfieldE. J.MithaniA.VisscherA.RagoussisJ.MottR.et al (2012). ROS-mediated vascular homeostatic control of root-to-shoot soil Na delivery in Arabidopsis.EMBO J.314359–4370. 10.1038/emboj.2012.273
20
JiangK.Moe-LangeJ.HennetL.FeldmanL. J. (2016). Salt stress affects the redox status of Arabidopsis root meristems.Front. Plant Sci.7:81. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00081
21
JooJ. H.BaeY. S.LeeJ. S. (2001). Role of auxin-induced reactive oxygen species in root gravitropism.Plant Physiol.1261055–1060. 10.1104/pp.126.3.1055
22
JooJ. H.WangS. Y.ChenJ. G.JonesA. M.FedoroffN. V. (2005). Different signaling and cell death roles of heterotrimeric G protein alpha and beta subunits in the Arabidopsis oxidative stress response to ozone.Plant Cell17957–970. 10.1105/tpc.104.029603
23
Katiyar-AgarwalS.ZhuJ.KimK.AgarwalM.FuX.HuangA.et al (2006). The plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 interacts with RCD1 and functions in oxidative stress tolerance in Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10318816–18821. 10.1073/pnas.0604711103
24
KrishnamurthyA.RathinasabapathiB. (2013). Auxin and its transport play a role in plant tolerance to arsenite-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Cell Environ.361838–1849. 10.1111/pce.12093
25
LeClereS.RampeyR. A.BartelB. (2004). IAR4, a gene required for auxin conjugate sensitivity in Arabidopsis, encodes a pyruvate dehydrogenase E1α homolog.Plant Physiol.135989–999. 10.1104/pp.104.040519
26
LiR. F.ZhangJ. W.WuG. Y.WangH. Z.ChenY. J.WeiJ. H. (2012). HbCIPK2, a novel CBL-interacting protein kinase from halophyte Hordeum brevisubulatum, confers salt and osmotic stress tolerance.Plant Cell Environ.351582–1600. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02511.x
27
LingT.ZhangB.CuiW.WuM.LinJ.ZhouW.et al (2009). Carbon monoxide mitigates salt-induced inhibition of root growth and suppresses programmed cell death in wheat primary roots by inhibiting superoxide anion overproduction.Plant Sci.177331–340. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.06.004
28
LiuW.LiR. J.HanT. T.CaiW.FuZ. W.LuY. T. (2015). Salt stress reduces root meristem size by nitric oxide-mediated modulation of auxin accumulation and signaling in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.168343–356. 10.1104/pp.15.00030
29
MaL.ZhangH.SunL.JiaoY.ZhangG.MiaoC.et al (2012). NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF function in ROS-dependent regulation of Na+/K+ homeostasis in Arabidopsis under salt stress.J. Exp. Bot.63305–317. 10.1093/jxb/err280
30
MillerG.SuzukiN.Ciftci-YilmazS.MittlerR. (2010). Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses.Plant Cell Environ.33453–467. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
31
MroueS.SimeunovicA.RobertH. S. (2018). Auxin production as an integrator of environmental cues for developmental growth regulation.J. Exp. Bot.69:201. 10.1093/jxb/erx259
32
MunnsR.TesterM. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.59:651. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
33
NakagamiH.SoukupovaH.SchikoraA.ZarskyV.HirtH. (2006). A mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase mediates reactive oxygen species homeostasis in Arabidopsis.J. Biol. Chem.28138697–38704. 10.1074/jbc.M605293200
34
OvervoordeP.FukakiH.BeeckmanT. (2010). Auxin control of root development.CSH Perspect. Biol.2:a001537. 10.1101/cshperspect.a001537
35
PanL.ZhangX. Q.WangJ. P.MaX.ZhouM. L.HuangL. K.et al (2016). Transcriptional profiles of drought-related genes in modulating metabolic processes and antioxidant defenses in Lolium multiflorum.Front. Plant Sci.7:519. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00519
36
PeerW. A.ChengY.MurphyA. S. (2013). Evidence of oxidative attenuation of auxin signalling.J. Exp. Bot.642629–2639. 10.1093/jxb/ert152
37
PlattenJ. D.CotsaftisO.BerthomieuP.BohnertH.DavenportR. J.FairbairnD. J.et al (2006). Nomenclature for HKT transporters, key determinants of plant salinity tolerance.Trends Plant Sci.11372–374. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.001
38
QuintM.BarkawiL. S.FanK. T.CohenJ. D.GrayW. M. (2009). Arabidopsis IAR4 modulates auxin response by regulating auxin homeostasis.Plant Physiol.150748–758. 10.1104/pp.109.136671
39
SabatiniS.BeisD.WolkenfeltH.MurfettJ.GuilfoyleT.MalamyJ.et al (1999). An auxin-dependent distal organizer of pattern and polarity in the Arabidopsis root.Cell.99463–472. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81535-4
40
SchopferP.LiszkayA.BechtoldM.FrahryG.WagnerA. (2002). Evidence that hydroxyl radicals mediate auxin-induced extension growth.Planta214821–828. 10.1007/s00425-001-0699-8
41
ShabalaT. A.PottosinI. (2007). Polyamines prevent NaCl-induced K+ efflux from pea mesophyll by blocking non-selective cation channels.FEBS Lett.5811993–1999. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.032
42
ShiH. Z.IshitaniM.KimC. S.ZhuJ. K. (2000). The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.976896–6901. 10.1073/pnas.120170197
43
ShoreshM.SpivakM.BernsteinN. (2011). Involvement of calcium-mediated effects on ROS metabolism in the regulation of growth improvement under salinity.Free Radical Bio Med.511221–1234. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.03.036
44
SteinwandB. J.XuS. L.PolkoJ. K.DoctorS. M.WestaferM.KieberJ. J. (2014). Alterations in auxin homeostasis suppress defects in cell wall function.PLoS One9:e0098193. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098193
45
SunF.ZhangW.HuH.LiB.WangY.ZhaoY.et al (2008). Salt modulates gravity signaling pathway to regulate growth direction of primary roots in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.146178–188. 10.1104/pp.107.109413
46
SwarupR.ParryG.GrahamN.AllenT.BennettM. (2002). Auxin cross-talk: integration of signalling pathways to control plant development.Plant Mol. Biol.49411–426. 10.1023/A:1015250929138
47
VerbelenJ. P.De CnodderT.LeJ.VissenbergK.BaluskaF. (2006). The root apex of Arabidopsis thaliana consists of four distinct zones of growth activities: meristematic zone, transition zone, fast elongation zone and growth terminating zone.Plant Signal Behav.1296–304. 10.4161/psb.1.6.3511
48
WalterM.ChabanC.SchutzeK.BatisticO.WeckermannK.NakeC.et al (2004). Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation.Plant J.40428–438. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02219
49
WangL. R.ZhaoP. S.ZhaoX.WangX. P.MaX. F.LiY. (2016). Physiological adaptations to osmotic stress and characterization of a polyethylene glycol-responsive gene in Braya humilis.Acta Soc. Bot. Pol.85:3487. 10.5586/asbp.3487
50
WangY.LiK.LiX. (2009). Auxin redistribution modulates plastic development of root system architecture under salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Plant Physiol.1661637–1645. 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.04.009
51
WeimerA. K.BiedermannS.HarashimaH.RoodbarkelariF.TakahashiN.ForemanJ.et al (2016). The plant-specific CDKB1-CYCB1 complex mediates homologous recombination repair in Arabidopsis.EMBO J.352068–2086. 10.15252/embj.201593083
52
WestG.InzeD.BeemsterG. T. (2004). Cell cycle modulation in the response of the primary root of Arabidopsis to salt stress.Plant Physiol.1351050–1058. 10.1104/pp.104.040022
53
YangL.ZhangJ.HeJ.QinY.HuaD.DuanY.et al (2014). ABA-mediated ROS in mitochondria regulate root meristem activity by controlling plethora expression in Arabidopsis.PLoS Genet.10:e1004791. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004791
54
YuL. J.NieJ. N.CaoC. Y.JinY. K.YanM.WangF. Z.et al (2010). Phosphatidic acid mediates salt stress response by regulation of MPK6 in Arabidopsis thaliana.New Phytol.188762–773. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03422.x
55
YuanH. M.XuH. H.LiuW. C.LuY. T. (2013). Copper regulates primary root elongation through PIN1-mediated auxin redistribution.Plant Cell Physiol.54766–778. 10.1093/pcp/pct030
56
YuanT. T.XuH. H.ZhangK. X.GuoT. T.LuY. T. (2014). Glucose inhibits root meristem growth via ABA INSENSITIVE 5, which represses PIN1 accumulation and auxin activity in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell Environ.371338–1350. 10.1111/pce.12233
57
ZhangQ. Q.LiY.FuZ. Y.LiuX. B.YuanK.FangY.et al (2018). Intact Arabidopsis RPB1 functions in stem cell niches maintenance and cell cycling control.Plant J.95150–167. 10.1111/tpj.13939
58
ZhaoY. K.WangT.ZhangW. S.LiX. (2011). SOS3 mediates lateral root development under low salt stress through regulation of auxin redistribution and maxima in Arabidopsis.New Phytol.1891122–1134. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03545.x
59
ZhuJ.FuX.KooY. D.ZhuJ. K.JenneyF. E.AdamsM. W. W.et al (2007). An enhancer mutant of Arabidopsis salt overly sensitive 3 mediates both ion homeostasis and the oxidative stress response.Mol Cell Biol.27:5214. 10.1128/Mcb.01989-06
60
ZhuJ. K. (2000). Genetic analysis of plant salt tolerance using Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.124941–948. 10.1104/pp.124.3.941
61
ZhuJ. K. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.53247–273. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329
62
ZollaG.HeimerY. M.BarakS. (2010). Mild salinity stimulates a stress-induced morphogenic response in Arabidopsis thaliana roots.J. Exp. Bot.61211–224. 10.1093/jxb/erp290
Summary
Keywords
IAR4, salt stress, primary root growth, ROS, auxin transport, root meristem activity
Citation
Fu Y, Yang Y, Chen S, Ning N and Hu H (2019) Arabidopsis IAR4 Modulates Primary Root Growth Under Salt Stress Through ROS-Mediated Modulation of Auxin Distribution. Front. Plant Sci. 10:522. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00522
Received
20 November 2018
Accepted
04 April 2019
Published
25 April 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
László Szabados, Biological Research Centre (MTA), Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
Reviewed by
Jianwei Pan, Lanzhou University, China; Abidur Rahman, Iwate University, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Fu, Yang, Chen, Ning and Hu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Honghong Hu, huhh@mail.hzau.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.