Catrin F. Williams
Christopher H. George- 1School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- 2Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, United Kingdom
The connectedness of signaling components in network structures is a universal feature of biologic information processing. Such organization enables the transduction of complex input stimuli into coherent outputs and is essential in modulating activities as diverse as the cooperation of bacteria within populations and the dynamic organization of mitochondria within cells. Here, we highlight some common principles that underpin collectivization in bacteria and mitochondrial populations and the advantages conferred by such behavior. We discuss the concept that bacteria and mitochondria act as signal transducers of their localized metabolic environments to bring about energy-dependent clustering to modulate higher-order function across multiple scales.
Introduction
The conventional view of mitochondria as enslaved “powerhouses” of the cell has shifted to a more nuanced understanding of mitochondria as excitable, communicative entities that are enmeshed in complex signaling pathways to modulate an array of cellular processes (Whelan and Zuckerbraun, 2013; Chandel, 2015). Dynamic mitochondrial clustering and fragmentation (fusion and fission, respectively) influences events across multiple scales, for example, in cells (Ding et al., 2010), tissues (Familtseva et al., 2014) and organs (Eisner et al., 2017; Coronado et al., 2018) through to influencing the viability of the physiologic state (Biala et al., 2015) and even speciation (Barreto et al., 2018). These advances have helped evolve the evocative concept of mitochondria as pseudo-autonomous entities adopting “hive-like” order and behavior (Braschi and McBride, 2010).
There are striking similarities between the self-organization of mitochondrial networks and the collectivization of their ancestors, bacteria, into multicellular populations (e.g., biofilms). Both involve the transduction of localized environmental cues into altered function via the establishment and maintenance of extensively coupled networks (mitochondria) or matrix-embedded bacterial communities (biofilms). In the case of bacteria, selective pressures leading to the formation of biofilms result in emergent properties including resistance to environmental stressors and enhanced nutrient acquisition. These advantageous properties, which ultimately might directly influence higher-order behavior [e.g., between bacteria and their hosts (Hughes and Sperandio, 2008; Carding et al., 2015)], outweigh the high energetic costs of biofilm formation (Lyons and Kolter, 2015) (see section “The Benefits of the Impermanent Interactions”). Collectivization in bacterial biofilms thus represents exemplary self-organization and circular causality, i.e., bacteria generate their own local microenvironments (e.g., nutrient and oxygen gradients) that elicits responses on different temporal scales (e.g., by differential gene expression) which subsequently modulates localized conditions thereby tuning their ensuing behavior within the population etc., (Klauck et al., 2018; Piras et al., 2018).
Here, we consider evidence that mitochondria retain these hallmark features of topology, self-organization and feedback loops characteristic of bacterial collectivization. We highlight evidence that mitochondria, like bacteria, sense localized metabolic environments to bring about dynamic energy-dependent clustering events that entrain long-range correlations that subsequently modulate higher-order function across multiple scales.
Self-Organization and Criticality
Biological networks are canonically “scale-free” and are defined by the presence of long-range, power-law correlations arising from multi-fractal connectedness operating over multiple spatial and temporal scales (Strogatz, 2000; Goldberger et al., 2002; Barabasi and Oltvai, 2004; Aon et al., 2008). Such network structures possess, at their core, autonomic self-organizing, self-repairing, and self-maintaining behavior. Thus the normal physiologic “steady state” is not one of constancy (as might be inferred by the term “homeostasis”), but rather is the manifestation of a dynamically configured system characterized by
(1) Multiple levels of control via delocalized “diffuse” coupled feedback loops,
(2) Spatio-temporal compartmentalization,
(3) Plasticity, reconfiguration/ adaptation,
(4) Intrinsic “memory” of previous configurations, and
(5) Energetic and entropic positioning far from equilibrium.
These properties are comprehensively reviewed elsewhere (Glass and Mackey, 1979; Ivanov et al., 1999; Goldberger et al., 2002; Weiss et al., 2006; Aon and Cortassa, 2012; Gintant and George, 2018).
The description of living cellular systems have been further refined to “dynamical entities that evolve and adapt with time and prior states having an influence on present states” (Bernabo et al., 2014). Here, we consider experimental evidence – which invokes the concept of “fractal dynamics” (Goldberger et al., 2002; Aon et al., 2008; Kurakin, 2011) – that such a description of higher-order network configuration would apply equally to bacteria and mitochondria.
The finely balanced physiologic network state enables rapid changes in functionality (e.g., increase in heart rate via the fight-or-flight mechanism) and longer-term adaptive responses (e.g., physiologic cardiac hypertrophy). Given the fractal nature of biological control, these same features of network topology also define lower-order behavior in bacteria and mitochondria (e.g., collectivization and altered behavior in response to changing nutrient availability and energy demands) (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Collectivization and coherence in mitochondrial networks and bacterial biofilms. Under periods of low energy demand and nutrient sufficiency, mitochondria and bacteria tend to exist as individual units producing weak, incoherent signals. However, during periods of higher energy demand and lower nutrient availability, formation of coupled networks produces strong and coherent signaling. AI, autoinducers include modified peptides, hydroxylated pentanediones (“AI2”), derivatised lactones, heterocyclic compounds (e.g., quinolones, indoles) and esterified palmitic acid. Other AIs have been phenomenologically described as diffusible signal factor (DSF) and cholerae autoinducer-1 (CAI-1). The upper panel (mitochondria) is adapted from Picard and Burelle (2012) with permission.
In bacteria, nutrient availability promotes growth and biofilm establishment that is sustained by cooperativity and self-organization through propagation of electrical and metabolic signals (Liu et al., 2015; Lyons and Kolter, 2015; Prindle et al., 2015; Humphries et al., 2017). Feedback loops linking K+ channel opening and glutamate diffusion lead to periodic oscillatory growth that initiates suddenly when biofilms reach a critical size (i.e., existence close to points of bifurcation) (Liu et al., 2015; Prindle et al., 2015; Larkin et al., 2018). Similarly, criticality and percolation are also hallmark characteristics of mitochondria which have been shown to operate at the edge of dynamic instability (i.e., close to chaotic behavior) and undergo sharp phase transitions (Aon et al., 2004; Kurz et al., 2015; Zamponi et al., 2018).
The Benefits of the Impermanent Interactions
Given the advantages conferred by physical interconnectivity as described above, it is pertinent to question why individualism has been retained in mitochondria and bacteria. While pseudo-reticular inter-mitochondrial connections do exist in skeletal muscle in order to facilitate energy distribution (Glancy et al., 2015), we consider some reasons why mitochondrial and bacterial interactions are dynamic and why this confers advantage over permanent fusion.
(i) Unlike permanent reticular structures in eukaryotes [e.g., endoplasmic reticulum (ER)], the spatiotemporal patterning of inter-mitochondrial interactions give rise to emergent properties in response to localized environments (e.g., redox and energetic status). Thus long-range ordering may be shaped by periodic oscillatory events that occur over numerous fission/fusion cycles and which influence behavior across multiple scales (see section “Introduction”). Similarly, it has been reported that oscillatory behavior associated with bacterial incorporation into biofilms encodes an adaptive “memory” that persists across multiple generations (Lee et al., 2018).
(ii) Collectivization is an energy-dependent process. Separateness enables the discrimination of individual units based on their functional competency (energetic “fitness”). Those mitochondria that are energetically damaged (i.e., “unfit” mitochondria with aberrant membrane potential), and thus do not have the requisite competency for fusion, are targeted for degradation via mitophagy (Twig et al., 2008; Vasquez-Trincado et al., 2016). Surveillance may thus serve as an early self-preservation mechanism to negate aberrant oscillatory behavior arising from the incorporation of damaged mitochondria into a mitochondrial network (Yang et al., 2015; Dey et al., 2018). This phenomenon has been suggested to modulate the longer-term viability of the host cell (Gomes et al., 2011). Likewise, surveillance of energetic fitness also exists to monitor the competency of individual bacteria to aggregate into multicellular structures (Burmann et al., 2011). Such quality control mechanisms ensure the fidelity of population behavior and enables the identification and elimination of “rogues” (Diggle et al., 2007; Allocati et al., 2015).
(iii) Although the modulation of mitochondrial networks is typically considered the product of fusion and fission events, mitochondrial nanotunnels have been discovered in heart cells where the densely packed cellular ultrastructure does not allow dynamic mitochondrial movement (Huang et al., 2013; Vincent et al., 2017). These nanotunnels support highly interconnected, non-fused networks of spatially segregated mitochondria. The evidence that inter-organellar tubular connections are conserved through evolution (Vincent et al., 2017), and also that heterogeneous mitochondrial distribution and function is a feature of non-excitable cells (Collins et al., 2002), suggests that nanotunnels may represent a common means to enhance mitochondrial network ordering in addition to fusion/fission events. In an intriguing corollary to the concept described in (ii) that the formation of mitochondrial networks represents the “selection of the fittest,” nanotunnels may form between those mitochondria exhibiting reduced competency for fusion or those showing early signs of damage (Vincent et al., 2017). Indeed, the observation of tubular protrusions may point to abortive fusion events by those energetically compromised mitochondria that are “reaching out for help” (Vincent et al., 2017). In a similar way, bacterial nanotubes enable sharing of nutrients and useful genes between distant neighbors, promoting cell survival (Dubey and Ben-Yehuda, 2011).
On Quorum Sensing
The multi-step, energy-demanding process of biofilm formation is controlled by quorum sensing (QS). In this process, under conditions of nutrient availability, microbes sense their neighbors via autoinducers (AI) which results in the synchronization of gene expression across a microbial community (Nealson et al., 1970; Li and Tian, 2012; Figure 1). QS ensures bacterial collectivization when the propensity for emergent behavior is maximal, e.g., induction of bioluminescence (Nealson et al., 1970), enhanced virulence (Hentzer et al., 2003) and antibiotic production (Folcher et al., 2001). Opining on whether mitochondria exhibit QS, as has been posited by others (Picard and Burelle, 2012), is not the primary purpose of this Perspective. However, given the evidence above on the commonality of collectivization in bacteria and mitochondria, it is difficult to refute the existence of QS-like behavior in mitochondria. Notably, QS-like behavior is also observed in higher-order systems [e.g., the enhanced sensitivity to morphogenetic gradients in coupled populations of mammalian epithelial cells (Ellison et al., 2016)] and, remarkably, in artificial systems designed to produce autonomous devices (Hennig et al., 2015).
Conclusion
It is an over-simplification to describe mitochondrial function as merely a response to environmental conditions and that mitochondrial “fission versus fusion” events are the final downstream acts of cellular commitment (“flourish” versus “die”). Rather, compelling evidence exists that the intrinsic behavior of mitochondria, via long-range correlation and chaotic behavior, contributes to setting the initial conditions to which they subsequently respond. By drawing parallels with the collectivized behavior of mitochondrial ancestors - bacteria - we conclude that dynamic remodeling of inter-mitochondrial interaction is a fundamental determinant of cellular fate andtissue function and that it critically influences higher-level ordering that underpins the physiologic state.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed for this study.
Author Contributions
CW and CG jointly conceived, designed, and wrote the perspective, contributed to the manuscript revision, and read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
Funding
CW holds a Sêr Cymru II Fellowship part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh Government (TG/KJB/VSM: 1063339). CG was supported by the British Heart Foundation (RG/15/6/31436), Wellcome Trust (094219/Z/10/Z), and European Union (T37/18).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Allocati, N., Masulli, M., Di Ilio, C., and De Laurenzi, V. (2015). Die for the community: an overview of programmed cell death in bacteria. Cell Death Dis. 6:e1069. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.570
Aon, M. A., and Cortassa, S. (2012). Mitochondrial network energetics in the heart. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 4, 599–613. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1188
Aon, M. A., Cortassa, S., and O’rourke, B. (2004). Percolation and criticality in a mitochondrial network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 4447–4452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307156101
Aon, M. A., Roussel, M. R., Cortassa, S., O’rourke, B., Murray, D. B., Beckmann, M., et al. (2008). The scale-free dynamics of eukaryotic cells. PLoS One 3:e3624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003624
Barabasi, A. L., and Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 101–113. doi: 10.1038/nrg1272
Barreto, F. S., Watson, E. T., Lima, T. G., Willett, C. S., Edmands, S., Li, W., et al. (2018). Genomic signatures of mitonuclear coevolution across populations of tigriopus californicus. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1250–1257. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0588-1
Bernabo, N., Barboni, B., and Maccarrone, M. (2014). The biological networks in studying cell signal transduction complexity: the examples of sperm capacitation and of endocannabinoid system. Comp. Struct. Biotech. J. 11, 11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2014.09.002
Biala, A. K., Dhingra, R., and Kirshenbaum, L. A. (2015). Mitochondrial dynamics: orchestrating the journey to advanced age. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 83, 37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.04.015
Braschi, E., and McBride, H. M. (2010). Mitochondria and the culture of the Borg. Bioessays 32, 958–966. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000073
Burmann, F., Ebert, N., Van Baarle, S., and Bramkamp, M. (2011). A bacterial dynamin-like protein mediating nucleotide-independent membrane fusion. Mol. Microbiol. 79, 1294–1304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07523.x
Carding, S., Verbeke, K., Vipond, D. T., Corfe, B. M., and Owen, L. J. (2015). Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb. Ecol. Heath Dis. 26:26191.
Chandel, N. S. (2015). Evolution of mitochondria as signaling organelles. Cell Metab. 22, 204–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.013
Collins, T. J., Berridge, M. J., Lipp, P., and Bootman, M. D. (2002). Mitochondria are morphologically and functionally heteregeneous within cells. EMBO J. 21, 1616–1627. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1616
Coronado, M., Fajardo, G., Nguyen, K., Zhao, M., Kooiker, K., Jung, G., et al. (2018). Physiological mitochondrial fragmentation is a normal cardiac adaptation to increased energy demand. Circ. Res. 122, 282–295. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310725
Dey, S., Demazumder, D., Sidor, A., Foster, D. B., and O’Rourke, B. (2018). Mitochondrial ROS drive sudden cardiac death and chronic proteome remodeling in heart failure. Circ. Res. 123, 356–371. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312708
Diggle, S. P., Griffin, A. S., Campbell, G. S., and West, S. A. (2007). Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450, 411–414. doi: 10.1038/nature06279
Ding, H., Jiang, N., Liu, H., Liu, X., Liu, D., Zhao, F., et al. (2010). Response to mitochondrial fusion and fission protein gene expression to exercise in rat skeletal muscle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1800, 250–256. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.08.007
Dubey, G. P., and Ben-Yehuda, S. (2011). Intercellular nanotubes mediate bacterial communication. Cell 144, 590–600. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.015
Eisner, V., Cupo, R. R., Gao, E., Csordas, G., Slovinsky, W. S., Paillard, M., et al. (2017). Mitochondrial fusion dynamics is robust in the heart and depends on calcium oscillations and contractile activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E859–E868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617288114
Ellison, D., Mugler, A., Brennan, M. D., Lee, S. H., Huebner, R. J., Shamir, E. R., et al. (2016). Cell-cell communication enhances the capacity of cell ensembles to sense shallow gradients during morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E679–E688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516503113
Familtseva, A., Kalani, A., Chaturvedi, P., Tyagi, N., Metreveli, N., and Tyagi, S. C. (2014). Mitochondrial mitophagy in mesenteric artery remodelling in hyperhomocysteinemia. Physiol. Rep. 2:e00283. doi: 10.14814/phy2.283
Folcher, M., Gaillard, H., Nguyen, L. T., Lacroix, P., Barnas-Jacques, N., Rinkel, M., et al. (2001). Pleiotropic functions of a Streptomyces pristinaespiralis autoregulator receptor in development, antibiotic biosynthesis, and expression of a superoxide dismutase. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 44297–44306. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101109200
Gintant, G. A., and George, C. H. (2018). Introduction to biological complexity as a missing link in drug discovery. Exp. Opin. Drug. Discov. 13, 753–763. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2018.1480608
Glancy, B., Hartnell, L. M., Malide, D., Yu, Z. X., Combs, C. A., Connelly, P. S., et al. (2015). Mitochondrial reticulum for cellular energy distribution in muscle. Nature 523, 617–620. doi: 10.1038/nature14614
Glass, L., and Mackey, M. C. (1979). Pathological conditions resulting from instabilities in physiological control systems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 316, 214–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1979.tb29471.x
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Peng, C. K., and Stanley, H. E. (2002). Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterations with disease and aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 2466–2472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012579499
Gomes, L. C., Di Benedetto, G., and Scorrano, L. (2011). During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 589–598. doi: 10.1038/ncb2220
Hennig, S., Rodel, G., and Ostermann, K. (2015). Artificial cell-cell communication as an emerging tool in synthetic biology applications. J. Biol. Eng. 9:13. doi: 10.1186/s13036-015-0011-2
Hentzer, M., Wu, H., Andersen, J. B., Riedel, K., Rasmussen, T. B., Bagge, N., et al. (2003). Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors. EMBO J. 22, 3803–3815. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg366
Huang, X., Sun, L., Ji, S., Zhao, T., Zhang, W., Xu, J., et al. (2013). Kissing and nanotunneling mediate intermitochondrial communication in the heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 2846–2851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300741110
Hughes, D. T., and Sperandio, V. (2008). Inter-kingdom signalling: communication between bacteria and their hosts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 111–120. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1836
Humphries, J., Xiong, L., Liu, J., Prindle, A., Yuan, F., Arjes, H. A., et al. (2017). Species-dependent attraction to biofilms through electrical signalling. Cell 168, 200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.014
Ivanov, P. C., Amaral, L. A. N., Goldberger, A. L., Havlin, S., Rosenblum, M. G., Struziki, Z. R., et al. (1999). Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics. Nature 399, 461–465. doi: 10.1038/20924
Klauck, G., Serra, D. O., Possling, A., and Hengge, R. (2018). Spatial organization of different sigma factor activities and c-di-GMP signalling within the three-dimensional landscape of a bacterial biofilm. Open Biol. 8:180066. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180066
Kurakin, A. (2011). The self-organizing fractal theory as a universal discovery method: the phenomenon of life. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 8:4. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-8-4
Kurz, F. T., Derungs, T., Aon, M. A., O’rourke, B., and Armoundas, A. A. (2015). Mitochondrial networks in cardiac myocytes reveal dynamic coupling behavior. Biophys. J. 108, 1922–1933. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.040
Larkin, J. W., Zhai, X., Kikuchi, K., Redford, S. E., Prindle, A., et al. (2018). A Signal percolation within a bacterial community. Cell Syst. 7, 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.06.005
Lee, C. K., De Anda, J., Baker, A. E., Bennett, R. R., Luo, Y., Lee, E. Y., et al. (2018). Multigenerational memory and adaptive adhesion in early bacterial biofilm communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 4471–4476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720071115
Li, Y. H., and Tian, X. (2012). Quorum sensing and bacterial soclal interactions in biofilms. Sensors 12, 2519–2538. doi: 10.3390/s120302519
Liu, J., Prindle, A., Humphries, J., Gabalda-Sagarra, M., Asally, M., Lee, D. Y. L., et al. (2015). Metabolic co-dependence gives rise to collective oscillations within biofilms. Nature 523, 550–554. doi: 10.1038/nature14660
Lyons, N. A., and Kolter, R. (2015). On the evolution of bacterial multicellularity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 24, 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.12.007
Nealson, H. N., Platt, T., and Hastings, J. W. (1970). The cellular control of synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. J. Bacteriol. 104, 313–322.
Picard, M., and Burelle, Y. (2012). Mitochondria: starving to reach quorum? Bioessays 34, 272–274. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100179
Piras, V., Chiow, A., and Selvarajoo, K. (2018). Long Range Order and Short Range Disorder in Saccharomyces cerevisiae biofilm. bioRxiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/451062
Prindle, A., Liu, J., Asally, M., Ly, S., Garcia-Ojalvo, J., and Suel, G. (2015). Ion channels enable electrical communication in bacterial communities. Nature 527, 59–63. doi: 10.1038/nature15709
Strogatz, S. H. (2000). From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators. Physica D 143, 1–20. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00094-4
Twig, G., Elorza, A., Molina, A. J. A., Mohamed, H., Wikstrom, J. D., Walzer, G., et al. (2008). Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J. 27, 433–446. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601963
Vasquez-Trincado, C., Garcia-Carvajal, I., Pennanen, C., Parra, V., Hill, J. A., Rothermel, B. A., et al. (2016). Mitochondrial dynamics, mitophagy and cardiovascular disease. J. Physiol. 594, 509–525. doi: 10.1113/JP271301
Vincent, A. E., Turnbull, D. M., Eisner, V., Hajnoczky, G., and Picard, M. (2017). Mitochondrial nanotunnels. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 787–799. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.08.009
Weiss, J. N., Yang, L., and Qu, Z. (2006). Network perspectives of cardiovascular metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 47, 2355–2366. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R600023-JLR200
Whelan, S. P., and Zuckerbraun, B. S. (2013). Mitochondrial signaling: forwards, backwards, and in between. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013:351613. doi: 10.1155/2013/351613
Yang, J., Huang, T., Petralia, F., Long, Q., Zhang, B., Argmann, C., et al. (2015). Synchronized age-related gene expression changes across mutliple tissues in human and the link to complex diseases. Sci. Rep. 5:15145. doi: 10.1038/srep15145
Keywords: self-organization, mitochondria, collectivization, bacteria, dynamic system
Citation: Williams CF and George CH (2019) Connect and Conquer: Collectivized Behavior of Mitochondria and Bacteria. Front. Physiol. 10:340. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00340
Received: 31 October 2018; Accepted: 13 March 2019;
Published: 29 March 2019.
Edited by:
Miguel A. Aon, National Institute on Aging (NIA), United StatesReviewed by:
Jeffrey J. Saucerman, University of Virginia, United StatesMartin Picard, Columbia University, United States
Copyright © 2019 Williams and George. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Catrin F. Williams, d2lsbGlhbXNjZkBjYXJkaWZmLmFjLnVr; Y2F0cmlud2lsbGlhbXNAaG90bWFpbC5jb20=