This article is a commentary on:
Contextualising Maximal Fat Oxidation During Exercise: Determinants and Normative Values
Francisco J. Amaro-Gahete
Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado
Jonatan R. Ruiz- 1Departament of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- 2PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
A Commentary on
Contextualising Maximal Fat Oxidation During Exercise: Determinants and Normative Values
by Maunder, E., Plews, D. J., and Kilding, A. E. (2018). Front. Physiol. 9:599. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00599
We read with interest the study by Maunder et al. (2018) where they elegantly synthesized the available evidence regarding the biological factors that affect maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and the exercise intensity at which MFO occurs (Fatmax) (Maunder et al., 2018). Moreover, they compiled data from previous studies and provided normative values for MFO and Fatmax during exercise. Although we appreciate the usefulness of this approach, there are several important aspects that need to be considered.
Firstly, as Maunder et al. recognized, they provide percentiles for MFO and Fatmax derived from calculations based on mean and standard deviation rather than in true percentiles. This approach assumes a normal distribution of data, which may not be the case in studies with relatively small sample size.
Secondly, due to the lack of definitions of physical activity or fitness level in overweight and obese populations, Maunder et al. provided normative values for sedentary and physically active overweight/obese individuals without considering this important aspect. Several studies showed significant changes on MFO after an exercise intervention in overweight-obese individuals (Besnier et al., 2015; Rosenkilde et al., 2015). Therefore, the MFO and Fatmax normative values for the overweight and obese group should be considered with caution.
Thirdly, they compiled data from studies performed in cycloergometer. The mode of exercise (cycling, running, or walking) significantly influences MFO and Fatmax in young healthy and relatively fit individuals (Mendelson et al., 2012). However, its influence on sedentary people is unknown. Thus, it remains to be elucidated whether the provided normative values for MFO and Fatmax apply to the treadmill test.
Finally, Maunder et al. did not consider the potential effect of age on MFO and Fatmax, and, therefore, it was not taken into account in the normative values reported. Data from our laboratory (Table 1) suggest that age influences MFO, and, therefore, participants' age should be considered when providing normative values.
TABLE 1
Table 1. Normative percentile values for maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and the exercise intensity at which maximal fat oxidation occurs (Fatmax) in sedentary individuals.
Here, we provide normative values by sex, weight status, and age for MFO and Fatmax (Table 1) of 167 (n = 107 women) sedentary healthy individuals evaluated by a treadmill test. We determined the MFO and Fatmax in 125 young adults aged 22.1 ± 2.2 years old [84 women, body mass index (BMI): 25.0 ± 4.8 kg/m2] (Sanchez-Delgado et al., 2015) and in 42 middle-aged adults aged 52.1 ± 4.6 years old [23 women, BMI: 27.8±3.6 kg/m2] (Amaro-Gahete et al., 2018). We conducted a graded exercise protocol on a treadmill that started with a 3-min warm-up at 3.5 km/h (gradient 0%) and continued with speed increments of 1 km/h every 3 min until the maximal walking speed was reached. The treadmill speed was kept constant with the gradient increasing by 2% every 3 min until the respiratory exchange ratio was ≥1.0 (Jeukendrup and Wallis, 2005). Fat oxidation was calculated during the last 60 s of each step using a stoichiometric equation for respiratory gas exchange (Frayn, 1983) disregarding protein oxidation. A third polynomial curve with intersection at 0;0 (Croci et al., 2014) was determined for each individual in order to determine MFO and Fatmax.
Our results showed that absolute MFO was higher in men than in women (0.37 ± 0.11 vs. 0.32 ± 0.10 g/min, respectively, P = 0.004, see Table 1), while Fatmax was lower in men than in women (40.8 ± 10.99 vs. 46.1 ± 12.84% VO2max [maximum oxygen uptake], respectively, P = 0.009, see Table 1). Considering the known sex-related differences in body composition, MFO relative to fat free mass (FFM) might be more appropriate when conducting sex comparisons (Venables et al., 2005; Fletcher et al., 2017; Maunder et al., 2018). Our results showed that MFO relative to FFM (assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) was lower in men than in women (0.050 ± 0.026 vs. 0.084 ± 0.043 g/min/kg, respectively, P < 0.001). These findings concur with those presented by Maunder et al. (2018), who showed that absolute MFO was greater in physically active men than in women (0.56 vs. 0.33 g/min, respectively), whereas Fatmax was slightly higher in physically active women than in men (56.0 vs. 51.0% VO2max, respectively).
A recent study described the MFO and Fatmax values in an athletic population across different ages, and showed large inter-individual differences regardless of the sport modality (Randell et al., 2017). Our results showed significantly higher MFO in young compared with middle-aged sedentary adults (0.36 ± 0.11 vs. 0.29 ± 0.78 g/min, respectively, P < 0.001), whereas no differences were observed in Fatmax (44.0 ± 13.30 vs. 44.7 ± 9.47 % VO2max, respectively, P = 0.753).
Furthermore, we reported MFO and Fatmax normative values by weight status in sedentary adults. We observed similar MFO and Fatmax values in normal-weight, overweight, and obese individuals (MFO: 0.34 ± 0.11, 0.33 ± 0.09, and 0.36 ± 0.12 g/min, respectively, P = 0.494; Fatmax: 45.9 ± 12.9 vs. 42.6 ± 10.9 vs. 43.3 ± 13.5% VO2max, respectively, P = 0.146). In contrast, Maunder et al. (2018) showed lower MFO in obese individuals, which may be due to differences in training status, since Maunder et al. (2018) did not consider this dimension in the obese population.
It should be noted that the cohorts included in Maunder et al. review performed a graded exercise protocol test after an overnight fast, whereas the participants in our study fasted only for 5–6 h. Previous studies suggested that the nutritional status plays an important role in MFO and Fatmax determination (Achten and Jeukendrup, 2003; Fletcher et al., 2017; Amaro-Gahete and Ruiz, 2018; Maunder et al., 2018; Purdom et al., 2018), and, therefore, fasting should be carefully considered when determining MFO and Fatmax.
We believe that the normative values provided here and those by Maunder et al. will be very useful when evaluating MFO and Fatmax both in research and in clinical settings. However, whenever possible, future studies should provide normative data by sex, age, training status, and weight status.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.
Author Contributions
FA-G, GS-D, and JR-R fully reviewed and criticized the original article, drafted the commentary, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education (FPU 13/04365 and FPU14/04172), by the University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigación 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence; Scientific Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES), by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI13/01393), Fondos Estructurales de la Unión Europea (FEDER) and by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RYC-2010-05957, RYC-2011-09011).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Ms. Carmen Sainz-Quinn for assistance with the English language. This study is part of a Ph.D. Thesis conducted in the Biomedicine Doctoral Studies of the University of Granada, Spain.
References
Achten, J., and Jeukendrup, A. E. (2003). The effect of pre-exercise carbohydrate feedings on the intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation. J. Sports Sci. 21, 1017–1024. doi: 10.1080/02640410310001641403
Amaro-Gahete, F. J., De-la,-O., A., Jurado-Fasoli, L., Espuch-Oliver, A., Robles-Gonzalez, L., Navarro-Lomas, G., et al. (2018). Exercise training as S-Klotho protein stimulator in sedentary healthy adults: rationale, design, and methodology. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 11, 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.05.013
Amaro-Gahete, F. J., and Ruiz, J. R. (2018). Methodological issues related to maximal fat oxidation rate during exercise : comment on: change in maximal fat oxidation in response to different regimes of periodized high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 118, 2029–2031. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3921-0
Besnier, F., Lenclume, V., Gérardin, P., Fianu, A., Martinez, J., Naty, N., et al. (2015). Individualized exercise training at maximal fat oxidation combined with fruit and vegetable-rich diet in overweight or obese women: the LIPOXmax-réunion randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10:e0139246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139246
Croci, I., Borrani, F., Byrne, N. M., Byrne, N., Wood, R. E., Wood, R., et al. (2014). Reproducibility of Fatmax and fat oxidation rates during exercise in recreationally trained males. PLoS ONE 9:e97930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097930
Fletcher, G., Eves, F. F., Glover, E. I., Robinson, S. L., Vernooij, C. A., Thompson, J. L., et al. (2017). Dietary intake is independently associated with the maximal capacity for fat oxidation during exercise. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 105, 864–872. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.133520
Frayn, K. N. (1983). Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gaseous exchange. J. Appl. Physiol. 55, 628–634. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.2.628
Jeukendrup, A. E., and Wallis, G. A. (2005). Measurement of substrate oxidation during exercise by means of gas exchange measurements. Int. J. Sports Med. 26(Suppl. 1), S28–S37. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830512
Maunder, E., Plews, D. J., and Kilding, A. E. (2018). Contextualizing maximal fat oxidation during exercise: determinants and normative values. Front. Physiol. 9:599. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00599
Mendelson, M., Jinwala, K., Wuyam, B., Levy, P., and Flore, P. (2012). Can crossover and maximal fat oxidation rate points be used equally for ergocycling and walking/running on a track? Diabetes Metab. 38, 264–270. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2012.02.001
Purdom, T., Kravitz, L., Dokladny, K., and Mermier, C. (2018). Understanding the factors that effect maximal fat oxidation. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12970-018-0207-1
Randell, R. K., Rollo, I., Roberts, T. J., Dalrymple, K. J., Jeukendrup, A. E., and Carter, J. M. (2017). Maximal fat oxidation rates in an athletic population. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49, 133–140. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001084
Rosenkilde, M., Reichkendler, M. H., Auerbach, P., Bonne, T. C., Sjödin, A., Ploug, T., et al. (2015). Changes in peak fat oxidation in response to different doses of endurance training. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 25, 41–52. doi: 10.1111/sms.12151
Sanchez-Delgado, G., Martinez-Tellez, B., Olza, J., Aguilera, C. M., Labayen, I., Ortega, F. B., et al. (2015). Activating brown adipose tissue through exercise (ACTIBATE) in young adults: Rationale, design and methodology. Contemp. Clin. Trials 45, 416–425. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.004
Keywords: MFO, FATmax, substrate oxidation, exercise, peak fat oxidation
Citation: Amaro-Gahete FJ, Sanchez-Delgado G and Ruiz JR (2018) Commentary: Contextualising Maximal Fat Oxidation During Exercise: Determinants and Normative Values. Front. Physiol. 9:1460. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01460
Received: 02 August 2018; Accepted: 26 September 2018;
Published: 18 October 2018.
Edited by:
Davide Malatesta, Université de Lausanne, SwitzerlandReviewed by:
Jean-Frédéric Brun, INSERM U1046 Physiologie et Médecine Expérimentale du Coeur et des Muscles, FranceCopyright © 2018 Amaro-Gahete, Sanchez-Delgado and Ruiz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Francisco J. Amaro-Gahete, amarof@ugr.es