Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome Caused by a Novel Hemizygous CHAT Mutation

Congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) is a neuromuscular transmission disorder caused by mutations in genes encoding neuromuscular junction proteins. CMS due to choline acetyltransferase (CHAT) gene mutation is characterized by episodic apnoea. To date, 52 cases of CMS caused by CHAT gene mutations have been reported. Here, we report a neonate with the third hemizygous mutation [a 4.9 Mb deletion [10q11.22–10q11.23 (chr10: 46123781–51028772)] containing the whole CHAT gene and c.1976A>T (p.Gln659Leu in the CHAT gene)]. The c.1976A>T (p.Gln659Leu) variant had not been reported in the ExAC or gnomAD databases and was predicted to be pathogenic. The alignment of amino acid sequences revealed that glutamine at codon 659 is highly conserved in different species and causes structural changes in the substrate-binding site. Our female patient with neonate-onset CMS presented with apnoea, dyspnoea, feeding difficulties, weak crying, and seizure-like episodes, and her respiration was ventilator dependent. The prostigmine test was positive. This case may help to further elucidate clinical features and treatment methods in neonate-onset CMS caused by CHAT gene mutations.

Introduction

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMSs) are rare genetically heterogeneous diseases caused by abnormal signal transduction due to mutations in genes coding for proteins expressed at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). According to the site of mutation, CMS can be divided into presynaptic, synaptic or postsynaptic (1). Individuals with presynaptic types commonly present with apnoea and can also present with dyspnoea, ventilator dependence, ptosis, bulbar paralysis, and fatigue. The above symptoms may be triggered by fever, cold, stress, infection, excitement, and excessive exercise and may lead to apnoea crisis. Arthrogryposis can also be seen in presynaptic types of CMS. Individuals with synaptic types can present with delayed pupillary light reflex; renal and ocular malformations; Pierson syndrome; and severe ocular, respiratory, and proximal limb muscle weakness. Patients typically present with apnoea and generalized weakness in the neonatal period or infancy that persists throughout life. Individuals with postsynaptic types can present with ptosis and ophthalmoparesis; micrognathia; lesser face symptoms; and weakness of the masticatory, limb girdle and neck muscles in the first year of life, and arthrogryposis at birth occurs in close to one-third of patients. Patients presenting later in childhood often have a milder clinical course. A useful clinical clue is selectively severe involvement of cervical, wrist, and extensor muscles (1–3). CMSs, with the exception of slow channel syndrome, SNAP25-CMS and synaptotagmin 2–CMS, are due to autosomal recessive hereditary mutations (4–6). Several novel CMS mutations have been discovered since 2011 due to the development of whole exome sequencing. Protein glycosylation with enzymatic defects, that is, posttranslational addition of glucose or mannose residues that occurs in the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum, has been identified as a new subtype of CMS (7). To date, more than 30 CMS disease genes have been identified (8, 9).

CHAT gene mutations are presynaptic types. They account for approximately 5% of CMS probands (1). The CHAT gene is located on the long arm of human chromosome 10 (10q11.23) and encodes the biosynthetic enzyme of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, namely, choline acetyltransferase. CHAT gene mutations can result in deficient resynthesis of acetylcholine following its reuptake at the nerve terminal (10). The choline acetyltransferase protein belongs to the family of eukaryotic acetyltransferases (11). To date, 48 CHAT gene mutations have been identified as related to CMS (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/dipx.php). Mutations located near the active-site tunnel, impairing substrate binding, result in more severe phenotypic effects in patients with CHAT-related CMS (12–14). Fifty-two cases of CMS caused by CHAT gene mutations have been reported, and only two of them have been identified as hemizygous mutations (12, 13, 15–29). In 2011, Shen et al. revealed the first hemizygous CHAT mutation in a patient with CMS by quantitative RT-PCR (12). Schwartz et al. reported the second hemizygous CHAT mutation in a patient with CMS in 2018 (16).

Here, we report a third case of hemizygous mutation. A neonate with CMS carried a 4.9 Mb deletion and a c.1976A>T (p.Gln659Leu) mutation in the CHAT gene. The deleted region, q11.22–q11.23 (chr10: 46123781-51028772) × 1, included 91 genes. Only five were associated with abnormal phenotypes in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM^®) database: CHAT (choline acetyltransferase), ERCC6 (chromatin remodeling factor), SLC18A3 (solute carrier family 18, member 3), GDF2 (growth differentiation factor 2), and RBP3 (retinol binding protein 3). Whole exome sequencing showed a hemizygous mutation in CHAT (c.1976A>T, p.Gln659Leu), which likely accounts for the patient's phenotype. The clinical features and treatment of this neonate were discussed below.

Case Report

Medical history

The proband was a 13-day-old female, the second child of healthy non-consanguineous parents. She was born as the first of fraternal twins at 37 weeks via cesarean section due to reduced heart rate of the twins. Her birth weight was 2.4 kg (<10th p). Her older brother and the other neonate twin were both normal, and there was no relevant medical family history. After birth, she required a laryngeal mask to pressurize the oxygen. The treatment relieved her cyanosis. She was then immediately transferred to the local neonatal intensive care unit where she was intubated and ventilated. She was also treated with anti-infectious and excitatory respiration center drugs (nalmefene hydrochloride injection). However, the effect was poor. She failed to extubate after multiple attempts due to carbon dioxide retention. The patient was hospitalized in our neonatal intensive care unit for dyspnoea for 13 days with failure to extubate for 1 day.

Physical Examination

The patient had a full-term appearance, a weight of 2.35 kg, poor response to physical examinations, weak crying, labored breathing, shortness of breath, and a positive three-concave sign. Both lungs were clear on auditory percussion. Neither obvious wet nor dry rattling was heard. The heart rate was strong, and no obvious murmurs were heard in the precordial region. There was no abdominal guarding upon palpation, and abdominal rumbling was weak. There was reduced movement of the limbs, decreased muscle tone and absent primitive reflexes.

Main Laboratory Examinations

The results of routine blood examination were as follows: white blood cell count 27.90 × 10⁹/L, erythrocyte count 3.61 × 10¹²/L, hemoglobin 113.0 g/L, platelet count 390 × 10⁹/L, percentage of neutrophils 55.8%, and percentage of lymphocytes 32.8%. The levels of inflammatory markers were as follows: procalcitonin 0.390 ng/mL and C-reactive protein 7.60 mg/L. The N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide level was 1,334.00 pg/mL. The prostigmine test was positive. The fungal glucan level was 405.05 pg/mL. The myocardial enzyme levels were as follows: creatine kinase 70.00 U/L and creatine kinase isoenzyme 20.10 U/L. The chest plain film indicated a double-lung texture growing thick and heavy, and CT images showed an increasing density of patchy shadows with blurry margins, which was consistent with the manifestations of pneumonia (Figures 1A,B). No abnormalities were found on cranial MRI (Figure 1C). In regard to brain function, the upper and lower peaks were generally normal, but the differences in the sleep-wake cycle were not obvious. The acetylcholine receptor antibody level was 0.045 mmol/L (within the normal range).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Results of imaging tests and genetic tests, alignment of amino acid sequences, and a schematic of gene structure and protein structure. (A) Chest plain film indicated double-lung texture growing thick and heavy. (B) CT images showed an increasing density of patchy shadows with blurry margins (arrows). (C) The brain MRI showed no abnormalities. (D) The results of CNV-Seq from the patient's genomic DNA sample (q11.22–q11.23 deletion on chromosome 10 is shown in the box). (E) Sanger sequencing of the CHAT gene showed the hemizygous mutation c.1976A>T (p.Gln659Leu) in the proband, absence of the mutation in the mother and heterozygous mutation in the father.

Therapeutic Process

Upon transfer to our neonatal intensive care unit, the patient's oxygen saturation decreased frequently and at times was accompanied by convulsions. Subsequently, the patient was intubated for mechanical ventilation, was fed milk through a nasogastric tube and later showed difficulty in weaning from the ventilator. We administered a neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) intramuscular injection, which relieved the dyspnoea and improved her feeding. We then orally administered pyridostigmine (5 mg/kg) to replace the intramuscular injection, which controlled her dyspnoea. We did not observe any side effects from these drugs. Later, she was weaned successfully from mechanical ventilation and could gradually breathe independent of oxygen therapy. However, episodes of dyspnoea accompanied by cyanosis and decreased oxygen saturation occurred upon reducing the dosage of pyridostigmine. We failed to make a definitive diagnosis at the initial stage of treatment due to rejection of genetic testing by the family members. She was transferred to a hospital with better equipment and treatment capacity, according to the parent's wishes, where she died.

Genetic Tests

In consideration of the clinical course of the neonate, we suspected that she had CMS. To explore the potential genetic etiology, we communicated with the patient's parents repeatedly and ultimately obtained informed consent for genetic tests 15 days after admission. The genetic testing was performed when she was 28 days old (2018-05-14). Two milliliters of peripheral blood was extracted from the proband and her parents. The blood was sent to Cipher Gene LLC, and the following tests were conducted. Whole exome sequencing was performed on the proband and her parents using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Agilent SSELXT Human All Exon V6 was used to capture and construct the library, and a paired-end sequencing strategy was used. CNV-Seq was performed on the proband using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000. A TruSeq Library Construction Kit was used to capture and construct the library, and a paired-end sequencing strategy was used. CNV-Seq indicated a 4.9 Mb deletion [10q11.22-10q11.23 (chr10: 46123781-51028772)], which contained the whole CHAT gene (Figure 1D). The whole-exome sequencing validated by Sanger sequencing indicated that the patient carries a hemizygous mutation in exon14 of CHAT (c.1976A>T, p.Gln659Leu), which is inherited from her father (Figure 1E).

Discussion

Our patient presented with dyspnoea, ventilator dependence, and apnoea. The prostigmine test was positive. Pyridostigmine relieved dyspnoea in our patient, and she weaned successfully from mechanical ventilation and could gradually breathe independent of oxygen therapy. The clinical course of the neonate and whole exome sequencing indicated CHAT-related CMS.

fifty-two cases of CHAT-related CMS have been reported to date (Table S1), and our literature search revealed a total of 48 genetic variations that have been identified to date. Our patient carried a 4.9 Mb deletion [10q11.22-10q11.23 (chr10: 46123781-51028772)] and a hemizygous mutation in CHAT (p.Gln659Leu). The copy number variation of the 4.9 Mb deletion in this study and its highly overlapping deletion fragment could not be found in the Genetic Variation Database. Highly overlapping pathogenic or suspected pathogenic CNVs were found in the Decipher patient database (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/syndromes#syndromes/overview (Table S2). The mutation of p.Gln659Leu was located on the 14 exon of CHAT (Figure 2A). The variant had not been reported in the ExAC (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/) or gnomAD databases (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/about) and was predicted to be pathogenic by multiple prediction software programs (SIFT, Polyphen2, LRT, Mutation Taster, FATHMM, etc.). The alignment of amino acid sequences revealed that glutamine at codon 659 is highly conserved in different species (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/), which suggests p.Gln659Leu is likely pathogenic (Figure 2B). Three-dimensional structures of the wild-type and mutant CHAT protein of human were constructed by the homologous modeling database SWISS-MODEL (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/). Residual changes between the wild-type and mutant CHAT proteins were mapped to the model by PyMol v1.3 software. This mutation causes a structural change in the substrate-binding site (Figures 2C,D). Mutations located near the active-site tunnel impair substrate binding and result in more severe phenotypic effects in patients with CHAT-related CMS (12–14). Glutamine possesses features of polarity compared with non-polar leucine due to the amide group in the residue side chain. As shown in Figure 2D, higher numbers of polar contacts between Q (amide group) and acetyl coenzyme A (amino group in the alanine residue and hydroxyl group in diphosphate) might indicate stronger substrate binding in the wild type. However, the hydrophobic alkyl group in the leucine residue side chain might impair substrate binding. Therefore, we speculate the mutation reduces catalytic activity of the enzyme resulting in the defect of neuromuscular transmission.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. (A) The c.1976A>T (p.Gln659Leu) mutation is shown in a schematic of the gene structure. (B) (Q) Glutamine at position 659 is highly conserved in CHAT in various species (the box marks the amino acid of interest). (C) Homology models for CHAT protein generated using the crystal structures of CHAT protein (PDB accession code: 2FY4) as the template. (D) Cartoon structure representation of the subtle changes (Gln-to-Leu) at position 659. The green cartoon represents the wild-type protein, and the purple cartoon represents the mutant protein. Yellow dots represent polar contacts.

The current treatment for CMS is dependent on the CMS gene involved. The treatments of CHAT-associated CMS are mainly cholinesterase inhibitors and respiratory support, which can help improve clinical symptoms and prognosis. The most commonly used cholinesterase inhibitor is pyridostigmine, which can be used for the treatment of CHAT-related CMS pediatric patients. Apnoeic episodes can be relieved with oral or parenteral neostigmine administration (30). In our patient, apnoea and dyspnoea were significantly improved with intramuscular injection of neostigmine, and she was weaned from the ventilator successfully after pyridostigmine (4 mg/kg/day) administration. After 14 days of treatment, we reduced the dosage of pyridostigmine (2 mg/kg/day); however, the oxygen saturation was reduced. We considered that the crisis may have been caused by uncontrolled infection, insufficient drug administration or rapid drug reduction. Patients with CHAT-related CMS may have symptoms accompanied by convulsions, which may be easily mistaken for epileptic seizures (27). Our patient's symptoms were initially accompanied by convulsions. Sedative drugs with bolus injection had poor anticonvulsive effects in our case, a finding that warrants attention. It is important to carefully select drug therapy because the same drug can be effective, invalid, or even harmful for different CMSs. For instance, the use of cholinesterase inhibitor in CMS caused by collagen-like tail subunit of acetylcholinesterase mutation is invalid and worsens the condition by enhancing the effect of cholinesterase (30). Patients diagnosed with CMS are rare, and clinical trials to determine optimal pharmacotherapeutic combinations for patients remain difficult to perform. Therefore, a standard treatment for patients with CHAT mutations has not been established.

We suggest that all patients suspected of having CMS receive precise genetic diagnosis as soon as possible. We report here a case of CMS caused by a novel hemizygous mutation of the CHAT gene and hope this report helps improve physicians' knowledge of CHAT-related CMS.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/about.

Ethics Statement

We obtained written informed consent to publish this case. This study was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University ethics committee (ID No: 2019-LW-010).

Author Contributions

QZ conceived and designed the work. YZ drafted the manuscript and collected the data. XC contributed to the conception of the work and played an important role in interpreting the clinical data. CL contributed to the manuscript revision. ML contributed to figure preparation. FM contributed to the adjustment of the structure of the manuscript. ZS contributed to figure preparation. WC contributed to table preparation. JZ contributed to data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Hall of Henan Province, China (Grant No. 172102410017 to QZ), the Province-ministry Co-construction of Henan China (Grant No. SBGJ2018040 to QZ), the Province Office of Education of Henan China (Grant No. 15A320039 to QZ), and the guiding plan of Henan Province, China (Grant No. 20130410 to QZ).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nomathamsanqa Resegofetse Maimela for providing feedback on the manuscript. We also thank Cipher Gene LLC for technical help with the genetic tests. We also thank Zhihong Li of the Mass Spectrometry System at the National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai (NFPS), China for providing assistance in Protein structure analysis. We sincerely thank the neonatal intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and all the reviewers. In addition, YZ would like to thank Xinwei Zhang and Miaomiao Zhang, in particular, for their patience, care and support.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2020.00185/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Engel AG. Chapter 37—genetic basis and phenotypic features of congenital myasthenic syndromes. In: Daniel H, Geschwind H, Paulson L, Christine K. editors. The Holland: Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Neurogenetics, Part II, Vol 148 Amsterdam: Elsevier (2018). p. 565–89. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00037-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Finsterer J. Congenital myasthenic syndromes. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2019) 14:57. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1025-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Angelini C, Lispi L, Salvoro C, Mostacciuolo ML, Vazza G. Clinical and genetic characterization of an Italian family with slow-channel syndrome. Neurol Sci. (2019) 40:503–7. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3645-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Finlayson S, Spillane J, Kullmann DM, Howard R, Webster R, Palace J, et al. Slow channel congenital myasthenic syndrome responsive to a combination of fluoxetine and salbutamol. Muscle Nerve. (2013) 47:279–82. doi: 10.1002/mus.23534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Shen XM, Selcen D, Brengman J, Engel AG. Mutant SNAP25B causes myasthenia, cortical hyperexcitability, ataxia, and intellectual disability. Neurology. (2014) 83:2247–55. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Herrmann D, Horvath R, Sowden J, Gonzalez M, Sanchez-Mejias A, Guan Z, et al. Synaptotagmin 2 mutations cause an autosomal-dominant form of lambert-eaton myasthenic syndrome and nonprogressive motor neuropathy. Am J Hum Genet. (2014) 95:332–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.08.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Senderek J, Müller JS, Dusl M, Strom TM, Guergueltcheva V, Diepolder I, et al. Hexosamine biosynthetic pathway mutations cause neuromuscular transmission defect. Am J Hum Genet. (2011) 88:162–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Engel AG, Shen X-M, Selcen D, Sine SM. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. (2015) 14:420–34. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70201-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. McMacken G, Abicht A, Evangelista T, Spendiff S, Lochmüller H. The increasing genetic and phenotypical diversity of congenital myasthenic syndromes. Neuropediatrics. (2017) 48:294–308. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602832

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Mora M, Lambert EH, Engel AG. Synaptic vesicle abnormality in familial infantile myasthenia. Neurology. (1987) 37:206–14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.37.2.206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kraner S, Laufenberg I, Strassburg HM, Sieb JP, Steinlein OK. Congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnea in patients homozygous for a CHAT missense mutation. Arch Neurol. (2003) 60:761–3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.5.761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Shen XM, Crawford TO, Brengman J, Acsadi G, Iannaconne S, Karaca E, et al. Functional consequences and structural interpretation of mutations of human choline acetyltransferase. Hum Mutat. (2011) 32:1259–67. doi: 10.1002/humu.21560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Arredondo J, Lara M, Gospe SdM, Mazia CG, Vaccarezza M, Garcia Erro M, et al. Choline acetyltransferase mutations causing congenital myasthenic syndrome: molecular findings and genotype-phenotype correlations. Hum Mutat. (2015) 36:881–93. doi: 10.1002/humu.22823

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Morey TM, Winick-Ng W, Seah C, Rylett RJ. Chaperone-mediated regulation of choline acetyltransferase protein stability and activity by HSC/HSP70, HSP90, and p97/VCP. Front Mol Neurosci. (2017) 10:415. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ohno K, Tsujino A, Brengman JM, Harper CM, Bajzer Z, Udd B, et al. Choline acetyltransferase mutations cause myasthenic syndrome associated with episodic apnea in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2001) 98:2017–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.2017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Schwartz M, Sternberg D, Whalen S, Afenjar A, Isapof A, Chabrol B, et al. How chromosomal deletions can unmask recessive mutations? Deletions in 10q11.2 associated with CHAT or SLC18A3 mutations lead to congenital myasthenic syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A. (2018) 176:151–5. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38515

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Byring RF, Pihko H, Tsujino A, Shen XM, Gustafsson B, Hackman P, et al. Congenital myasthenic syndrome associated with episodic apnea and sudden infant death. Neuromuscular Disord. (2002) 12:548–53. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8966(01)00336-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Maselli RA, Chen D, Mo D, Bowe C, Fenton G, Wollmann RL. Choline acetyltransferase mutations in myasthenic syndrome due to deficient acetylcholine resynthesis. Muscle Nerve. (2003) 27:180–7. doi: 10.1002/mus.10300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Barisic N, Müller JS, Paucic-Kirincic E, Gazdik M, Lah-Tomulic K, Pertl A, et al. Clinical variability of CMS-EA (congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnea) due to identical CHAT mutations in two infants. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2005) 9:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2004.10.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Yeung WL, Lam CW, Fung LW, Hon KL, Ng PC. Severe congenital myasthenia gravis of the presynaptic type with choline acetyltransferase mutation in a Chinese infant with respiratory failure. Neonatology. (2009) 95:183–6. doi: 10.1159/000155612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mallory LA, Shaw JG, Burgess SL, Estrella E, Nurko S, Burpee TM, et al. A case of congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnea. Pediatr Neurol. (2009) 41:42–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.02.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Schara U, Christen HJ, Durmus H, Hietala M, Krabetz K, Rodolico C, et al. Long-term follow-up in patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome due to CHAT mutations. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2010) 14:326–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Yis U, Becker K, Kurul SH, Uyanik G, Bayram E, Haliloglu G, et al. Genetic landscape of congenital myasthenic syndromes from turkey: novel mutations and clinical insights. J Child Neurol. (2017) 32:759–65. doi: 10.1177/0883073817705252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Natera-De BDVilchez JJ, et al. Molecular characterization of congenital myasthenic syndromes in Spain. Neuromuscular Disord Nmd. (2017) 27:1087–98. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.08.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Tan J-S, Ambang T, Ahmad-Annuar A, Rajahram GS, Wong KT, Goh KJ. Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to novel CHAT mutations in an ethnic kadazandusun family. Muscle Nerve. (2016) 53:822–6. doi: 10.1002/mus.25037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Liu ZM, Fang F, Ding CH, Zhang WH, Deng J, Chen CH, et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of congenital myasthenia syndrome with episodic apnea caused by CHAT gene mutation: a report of 2 cases. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2018) 56:216–220. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2018.03.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. McMacken G, Whittaker RG, Evangelista T, Abicht A, Dusl M, Lochmüller H. Congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnoea: clinical, neurophysiological and genetic features in the long-term follow-up of 19 patients. J Neurol. (2018) 265:194–203. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8689-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Arican P, Gencpinar P, Cavusoglu D, Olgac Dundar N. Clinical and genetic features of congenital myasthenic syndromes due to CHAT mutations: case report and literature review. Neuropediatrics. (2018) 49:283–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1654706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Liu ZM, Zhang L, Shen DM, Ding CH, Yang XY, Zhang WH, et al. CHAT compound heterozygous gene mutations of a large deletion and a missense variant in a Chinese patient with severe congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnea. Front Pharmacol. (2019) 10:259. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Farmakidis C, Pasnoor M, Barohn RJ, Dimachkie MM. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: a clinical and treatment approach. Curr Treat Options Neurol. (2018) 20:36. doi: 10.1007/s11940-018-0520-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar