Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol., 13 September 2019
Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

Association Between Serum Cotinine Level and Serological Markers of Epstein–Barr Virus in Healthy Subjects in South China Where Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Is Endemic

\nQian-Yi Yang,Qian-Yi Yang1,2Yong-Qiao HeYong-Qiao He1Wen-Qiong XueWen-Qiong Xue1Ting ZhouTing Zhou1Ying LiaoYing Liao1Mei-Qi ZhengMei-Qi Zheng1Yi-Jing JiaYi-Jing Jia1Lei-Lei YuanLei-Lei Yuan1Wei-Hua Jia,,
Wei-Hua Jia1,3,4*
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
  • 3School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 4Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Introduction: Self-reported smoking has been associated with higher seropositivity for the IgA response to Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) viral capsid antigen (VCA-IgA) and transcription activator protein (Zta) in healthy men in southern China where nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic. Results on the association of biochemically verified smoking status with EBV reactivation are scarce. We aimed to investigate the relations of serum cotinine level with serological markers of EBV in healthy women, in addition to men.

Methods: We collected information on demographic, lifestyle, environmental factors, and EBV serological markers in a cross-sectional study on 2,275 healthy subjects who were recruited from physical examination centers in Guangdong Province, China. In the present analysis, 901 subjects' serum cotinine levels have been measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Odds ratios (seropositivity of four EBV serological markers vs. seronegativity) for categorical serum cotinine levels were calculated by unconditional logistic regression with a group-specific confidence interval (CI).

Results: In women, compared with lower serum cotinine level (0–0.71 ng/ml), higher cotinine level (>0.71–1.20 ng/ml; >1.20–228.40 ng/ml) was associated but non-significantly with higher seropositivity for EBV VCA-IgA (age- and education-adjusted OR = 1.18, 95% CIs = 0.84–1.64, 1.06, 0.75–1.50). These associations remained but still non-significant after adjusting for 5-year age group, education, family history of cancer, consumption of tea, Chinese herbal tea, salted fish at childhood, and exposure to occupational dust, chemical, fume, and radiation (multivariable adjusted OR = 1.21, 95% CIs = 0.85–1.71, 1.09, 0.76–1.55). In men, compared with lower serum cotinine level (0–2.15 ng/ml), higher cotinine level (>2.15–103.6 ng/ml; >103.6–419.4 ng/ml) was significantly associated with higher seropositivity for EBV VCA-IgA and Zta-IgA (age- and education-adjusted OR = 2.16, 95% CIs = 1.37–3.41, 1.79, 1.11–2.90; 1.98, 1.17–3.34, 1.95, 1.14–3.34). The association remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders for Zta-IgA (OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.37–3.93 for >2.15–103.6, and 2.50, 1.43–4.38 for >103.6–419.4 ng/ml), but not for VCA-IgA (2.06, 1.29–3.27, and 1.61, 0.96–2.71).

Conclusions: Higher serum cotinine level is associated with higher seropositivity for EBV serological markers in healthy men in southern China. Such positive association was also observed in women but became non-significant. If confirmed to be causal, this finding has important implications for tobacco control and prevention of EBV-related disease, particularly for NPC.

Introduction

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous human herpesvirus, infecting over 90% of the adult population worldwide (1). EBV has been rated as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, because of its association with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (2). Primary EBV infection in developing countries usually occurs early in life, and most cases sustain an asymptomatic and lifelong infection (3). EBV infects and then persists latently in nearly all humans. However, NPC remains very rare in the world, except southern China, suggesting reactivation of EBV is necessary in the pathogenesis of NPC (4). The inducers of EBV reactivation are largely unclear. Our previous study has first reported that self-reported smoking initiation at younger age and higher cumulative amount of smoking (vs. never smoking) were associated with higher seropositivity for the IgA response to viral capsid antigen (VCA-IgA) in healthy men in Guangdong province, southern China where NPC is endemic (5). Furthermore, our recent study has also shown that self-reported smoking was associated with higher levels of other EBV antibodies (EBNA1-IgA and BZLF1 transcription activator protein [Zta-IgA]) in the same population (6). Results on the association between smoking and EBV reactivation in women are scarce, probably because of low smoking prevalence (about 3.4%) and a large intergenerational decrease in smoking uptake rates in Chinese women (7, 8). The validity of self-reported smoking is often questioned because of the common belief that smokers are inclined to underestimate the amount smoked or to deny smoking at all (9), particularly in women in China where smoking is usually socially undesirable (10).

An increasing number of studies have used biomarkers in assessing smoking exposure, which improve the validity of self-report smoking. Biomarkers can be used to classify people as smoking exposed or unexposed, identify deceivers (i.e., subjects misreporting their smoking status), or estimate relative degree of exposure. Cotinine, a major metabolite of nicotine, has been regarded as a gold standard of biomarker of smoking, and can provide objective data of smoking exposure.

We thereby examined the associations of smoking status (classified by serum cotinine level) with four serological markers of EBV (VCA-IgA, Zta, EBNA1, and latent membrane protein 1 [LMP1]) in healthy men that can validate our results with the previous studies, and first investigated the association of serum cotinine level with EBV VCA-IgA serology in healthy women.

Methods

This study was part of the large-scale NPC case–control study in Guangdong province, southern China. In the present analysis, we examined the cross-sectional data on 2,275 healthy subjects who were recruited from physical examination centers in the 21-RCCP study (21 regions in Guangdong Province collected from the Cantonese population). Details about the design, methods, and subjects have been described elsewhere (11). Briefly, all the subjects were Chinese without history of cancer. Information on demographic characteristics, occupational exposure, family history of cancer, smoking and drinking status, consumption of salted fish, preserved vegetable, tea and Chinese herbal tea was collected using a face-to-face, structured questionnaire in the physical examination centers. Each subject provided written informed consent for an interview and a 5–10 ml blood sample. All the EBV serological tests were conducted by the same technicians (sample information was blinded) in the same laboratory at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center to limit potential biases. The antibody titers of VCA-IgA, Zta-IgA, EBNA1-IgA, and LMP1-IgA were measured as indicators of EBV status using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Zhongshan Bio-tech Co Ltd., China). Details of sample collection and processing were reported (5, 12, 13). Briefly, for VCA-IgA in all subjects, serial dilutions of quality control sera (1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:80) were applied to each assay for the evaluation of intra-variability, and those subjects with titers ≥1:10 were categorized as positive. In men only, LMP1 peptide was derived from Yeast-expressed EBV strain (GD1) 185–366aa, and EBNA1 and Zta were produced with purified recombinant peptides specified by ENB BKRF1 (72 kDa) and KZLF1 (36 + 38-kDa fine doublet), respectively. The serostatus of LMP1-IgA, EBNA1-IgA, and Zta-IgA was defined as seronegative or seropositive according to the ELISA OD values following the manufacturers' instruction. For EBNA1-IgA, a weak seropositive status defined by the manufacturer's instruction was classified as seropositive in the present analysis. Due to the limited resources, all female subjects (N = 665) were enrolled, 300 male subjects were stratified sampling based on 5-year age group. Fifty-eight female and six male subjects were excluded from the analysis because of insufficient blood samples for additional cotinine test. In total, 607 female and 294 male subjects were included in the present analysis. Serum cotinine level was measured using a commercial immune-analysis cotinine ELISA kit provided by R&D Systems, and the results were expressed as ng/ml (sensitivity: 0.001 ng/ml).

Statistical Analysis

Generalized linear model with binomial distribution was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of EBV VCA-IgA (seropositive vs. seronegative) for the about tertile of serum cotinine levels stratified by sex with/without adjusting for 5-year age group, education, family history of cancer, salted fish at adulthood, and exposure to any occupational hazards (dust, chemical, fume, or radiation). We estimated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each group (including the reference) that corresponded to the amount of information underlying each group, using Plummer's methods (14), in the variable with three or more groups. To assess dose–response effect, a P-value for linear trend was determined by treating the exposure variables as continuous. Interactions or effect modifications were explored by including the interaction terms in the models. No evidence of interaction (in the model adjusting for age and education) by family history of cancer, smoking (no ever smokers), alcohol, consumption of salted fish, and exposure to any occupational hazards was found for the association between serum cotinine level and serostatus of different EBV markers (P-values for interaction ranged from 0.11 to 0.99 in women, and 0.15–0.97). Statistical analyses were done with R 3.5.1, and all tests were two-sided with α = 0.05.

Results

Table 1 shows that differences in education level (P < 0.001), smoking (P < 0.001), drinking (P < 0.001), consumption of salted fish at adulthood (P = 0.003), and exposure to any occupational hazards (all P-values: <0.01) were observed between men and women. Very few women were ever smokers (1.5%), but 72.8% of men ever smoked (58 ex-smokers and 156 current smokers). 78.1% of women were never drinkers comparing with 33.7% of never drinkers in men. Men were more likely to be exposed to any occupational hazards (dust: 58.5%, chemical: 52.4%, fume: 40.1%, or radiation: 10.5%). In women, the corresponding figure for exposure to any occupational hazards was 39.0, 27.0, 9.1, and 5.8%. No difference in age, family history of cancer, and consumption of salted fish at age 10 was observed (all P-values >0.05).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study populations in 607 women and 294 men.

Table 2 shows that in women, the multivariable ORs (95% CIs) of being seropositive (vs. seronegative) in EBV VCA-IgA for the about tertile of serum cotinine levels (>0.71–1.20 and >1.20–228.40 vs. 0–0.71 ng/ml) were 1.21 (0.85–1.71) and 1.09 (0.76–1.55) (P-value for trend = 0.75).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of EBV VCA-IgA antibody titers for serum cotinine level in women.

Table 3 shows that in men, the age- and education-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) of being seropositive (vs. seronegative) in EBV VCA-IgA for the about tertile of serum cotinine levels (>2.15–103.6 and >103.6–419.4 vs. 0–2.15 ng/ml) were 2.16 (1.37–3.41) and 1.79 (1.11–2.90) (P-value for trend = 0.20). The corresponding values in the other three serological markers of EBV (Zta-IgA, EBNA1-IgA, and LMP1-IgA), respectively, were 1.98 (1.17–3.34) and 1.95 (1.14–3.34) (P-value for trend = 0.15), 1.53 (0.99–2.38) and 1.33 (0.86–2.05) (0.39), and 1.29 (0.79–2.13) and 1.53 (0.90–2.61) (0.30). These positive associations remained but became non-significant in the multivariable model except for Zta-IgA.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. ORs and 95% CIs of Epstein–Barr virus serological markers (VCA-IgA, Zta-IgA, EBNA1-IgA, and LMP1-IgA) for serum cotinine level in men.

Discussion

A landmark report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2014 stated that NPC is considered to be causally related to tobacco smoking. Such association was mainly observed in low-risk regions for squamous cell NPC, but was rarely reported for non-keratinizing NPC, which is the predominant histology subtype in high-risk regions of NPC, probably due to the different stages of tobacco epidemic between developed (advanced) and developing (early) countries/regions (15). Most high-risk regions of NPC are developing countries/regions where tobacco consumption increases substantially in recent years (16). Indeed, since the 2000s, smoking has also been found to be associated with non-keratinizing NPC (1725).

The present analysis is the first study to investigate the relation between serum cotinine level and EBV serology status of the general population in southern China where NPC is endemic. We found that higher serum cotinine level was associated with higher seropositivity for VCA-IgA and Zta-IgA in men. This finding is consistent with our previous studies (5, 6), suggesting that our data should be robust.

Of the non-smokers in Mainland China, more than 53.5% were passively exposed to tobacco smoke for more than 15 min per day for at least 1 day per week (26). When the numbers of active and passive smokers are combined, more than 72% of them are exposed to tobacco smoke (26). Given this high proportion of passive smoking exposure in Mainland China, inadequate assessment of exposure to passive smoking can contaminate the reference groups of never smoking, thus resulting in underestimating the effect of smoking. Therefore, we first used serum cotinine level to estimate the “real” exposure of smoking. Indeed, we did find that higher serum cotinine level was significantly associated with higher seropositivity for EBV VCA-IgA and Zta-IgA in men.

In addition to the findings in men, the present study is the first to report that in women, higher serum cotinine level was associated but non-significantly with higher EBV VCA-IgA seropositivity in China where female smoking prevalence is very low (2.4% in 2010). Although the present analysis included largest female subjects, our sample size of 607 (statistical power = 54%, assuming 1.45% cotinine-verified ever smokers with EBV VCA-IgA seronegativity and 3.23% with seropositivity, at a significance level of 0.05) would have a 46% probability of failing to detect a significant difference when one does exist (type II error). Further research on a larger sample size (at least 1,129 subjects, with 80% power) is warranted. Indeed, a recent prospective cohort study on 10,181 residents in Sihui city (27), southern China, showed that in non-NPC subjects, ever smokers were associated with higher odds of EBV seropositivity at baseline (VCA-IgA: adjusted OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.22–1.60; EBNA1-IgA: 1.58, 1.38–1.82), and in the 3–5 years of follow up (VCA-IgA: 1.68, 1.29–2.18; EBNA1-IgA: 1.92, 1.42–2.59).

EBV reactivation plays an important role of NPC (28), suggesting that understanding the factors related to EBV reactivation is important. Our previous studies have shown smoking, also a Group 1 carcinogen, was associated with EBV reactivation. The present findings in men and in women using biochemically verified smoking status provided additional evidence that smoking (active or passive) is associated with EBV reactivation.

This study has several limitations beyond those previously mentioned. First, our results did not examine the role of passive smoking on EBV serostatus, as information on second hand smoke exposure was not collected. Collecting a comprehensive list of the sources of exposure to passive smoking is warranted. Selection bias among men might have occurred. However, no difference between included and excluded men was found (data not shown), suggesting that the influence would not be large. Furthermore, despite adjusting for several potential confounders, residual confounding cannot be ruled out.

Conclusions

Our study provided additional evidence to support the idea that higher serum cotinine level is associated with higher seropositivity for EBV serological markers in healthy men in southern China where NPC is endemic. Furthermore, we have also found positive but non-significant associations between higher serum cotinine level and EBV VCA-IgA seropositivity in women. Strong tobacco control measures are needed to prevent subjects with high risk of NPC from the harmful effects of smoking. Smoking cessation also should be advocated in the endemic regions of NPC.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Human Ethics Approval Committee at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

W-HJ conceived, designed the study, and wrote the final draft. Q-YY participated in the study design, performed the data collection and analysis, drafted the manuscript, and has checked the accuracy and completeness of the references. Y-QH, W-QX, TZ, and YL assisted the experiments. M-QZ, Y-JJ, and L-LY assisted the participant recruitment and data collection. All authors revised the text critically for important intellectual content and contributed to final approval of the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the: National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC1302704), the Sino-Sweden Joint Research Program (Grant No. 81861138006), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China (Grant No. 201804020094), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou City, China (Grant No. 201804020094), the Special Support Program for High level Professionals on Scientific and Technological Innovation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2014TX01R201), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (Grant No. 81325018), the Key Project for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81220108022), the Science and Technology project of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2014B050504004).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The chief acknowledgment is to the relatives who provided information for this study. We thank Jim Z. M. Mai for advice on data analysis and revising the manuscript, and F. H. Xu for technical assistance.

References

1. Gourzones C, Busson P, Raab-Traub N. Epstein–Barr virus and the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinomas. In: Busson P, editor. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Keys for Translational Medicine and Biology. New York, NY: Springer (2013). p. 42–60.

Google Scholar

2. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. (2002) 420:860–7. doi: 10.1038/nature01322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Feng BJ. Descriptive, environmental and genetic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In: Busson P, editor. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Keys for Translational Medicine and Biology. Springer (2013). p. 23–41.

Google Scholar

4. Jia WH, Qin HD. Non-viral environmental risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review. Semin Cancer Biol. (2012) 22:117–26. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Xu FH, Xiong D, Xu YF, Cao SM, Xue WQ, Qin HD, et al. An epidemiological and molecular study of the relationship between smoking, risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and Epstein–Barr virus activation. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2012) 104:1396–410. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. He YQ, Xue WQ, Xu FH, Xu YF, Zhang JB, Yu HL, et al. The relationship between environmental factors and the profile of Epstein–Barr virus antibodies in the lytic and latent infection periods in healthy populations from endemic and non-endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma areas in China. EBioMedicine. (2018) 30:184–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.02.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Liu S, Zhang M, Yang L, Li Y, Wang L, Huang Z1, et al. Prevalence and patterns of tobacco smoking among Chinese adult men and women: findings of the 2010 national smoking survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2017) 71:154–61. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207805

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Chen Z, Peto R, Zhou M, Iona A, Smith M, Yang L, et al. Contrasting male and female trends in tobacco-attributed mortality in China: evidence from successive nationwide prospective cohort studies. Lancet. (2015) 386:1447–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00340-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. (1994) 84:1086–93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.7.1086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ma J, Zhu J, Li N, He Y, Cai Y, Qiao J, et al. Severe and differential underestimation of self-reported smoking prevalence in Chinese adolescents. Int J Behav Med. (2014) 21:662–6. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9326-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Jia WH, Luo XY, Feng BJ, Ruan HL, Bei JX, Liu WS, et al. Traditional Cantonese diet and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: a large-scale case–control study in Guangdong, China. BMC Cancer. (2010) 10:446. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Liu Y, Huang Q, Liu W, Liu Q, Jia W, Chang E, et al. Establishment of VCA and EBNA1 IgA-based combination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as preferred screening method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a two-stage design with a preliminary performance study and a mass screening in southern China. Int J Cancer. (2012) 131:406–16. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Cao SM, Liu Z, Jia WH, Huang QH, Liu Q, Guo X, et al. Fluctuations of Epstein–Barr virus serological antibodies and risk for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective screening study with a 20-year follow-up. PLoS ONE. (2011) 6:e19100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Plummer M. Improved estimates of floating absolute risk. Stat Med. (2004) 23:93. doi: 10.1002/sim.1485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Thun M, Peto R, Boreham J, Lopez AD. Stages of the cigarette epidemic on entering its second century. Tob Control. (2012) 21:96–101. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chan R, Chan D, Woo J, Ohlsson C, Mellström D, Kwok T, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels in relation to blood pressure in a cross-sectional study in older Chinese men. J Hum Hypertens. (2012) 26:20. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality from cancer in relation to smoking: 50 years observations on British doctors. Br J Cancer. (2005) 92:426–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Friborg JT, Yuan JM, Wang R, Koh WP, Lee HP, Yu MC. A prospective study of tobacco and alcohol use as risk factors for pharyngeal carcinomas in Singapore Chinese. Cancer. (2007) 109:1183–91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hsu WL, Chen JY, Chien YC, Liu MY, You SL, Hsu MM, et al. Independent effect of EBV and cigarette smoking on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a 20-year follow-up study on 9,622 males without family history in Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers. (2009) 18:1218–26. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lin JH, Jiang CQ, Ho SY, Zhang WS, Mai ZM, Xu L, et al. Smoking and nasopharyngeal carcinoma mortality: a cohort study of 101,823 adults in Guangzhou, China. BMC Cancer. (2015) 15:906. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1902-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Guo X, Johnson RC, Deng H, Liao J, Guan L, Nelson GW, et al. Evaluation of nonviral risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a high-risk population of Southern China. Int J Cancer. (2009) 124:2942–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Feng BJ, Khyatti M, Ben-Ayoub W, Dahmoul S, Ayad M, Maachi F, et al. Cannabis, tobacco and domestic fumes intake are associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in North Africa. Br J Cancer. (2009) 101:1207–12. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Autier P, Gandini S, Mullie P. A systematic review: influence of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 97:2606–13. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Xue WQ, Qin HD, Ruan HL, Shugart YY, Jia WH. Quantitative association of tobacco smoking with the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies conducted between 1979 and 2011. Am J Epidemiol. (2013) 178:325–38. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Long M, Fu Z, Li P, Nie Z. Cigarette smoking and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e016582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yang G, Fan L, Tan J, Qi G, Zhang Y, Samet JM, et al. Smoking in China: findings of the 1996 national prevalence survey. JAMA. (1999) 282:1247–53. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.13.1247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Hu T, Lin CY, Xie SH, Chen GH, Lu YQ, Ling W, et al. Smoking can increase nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk by repeatedly reactivating Epstein-Barr Virus: an analysis of a prospective study in southern China. Cancer Med. (2019) 8:2561–71. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zeng Y, Zhang LG, Wu YC, Huang YS, Huang NQ, Li JY, et al. Prospective studies on nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Epstein–Barr virus IgA/VCA antibody-positive persons in Wuzhou City, China. Int J Cancer. (1985) 36:545–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910360505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), smoking, VCA-IgA, cotinine, Chinese

Citation: Yang Q-Y, He Y-Q, Xue W-Q, Zhou T, Liao Y, Zheng M-Q, Jia Y-J, Yuan L-L and Jia W-H (2019) Association Between Serum Cotinine Level and Serological Markers of Epstein–Barr Virus in Healthy Subjects in South China Where Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Is Endemic. Front. Oncol. 9:865. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00865

Received: 10 June 2019; Accepted: 21 August 2019;
Published: 13 September 2019.

Edited by:

Jerry Polesel, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (IRCCS), Italy

Reviewed by:

Matteo Di Maso, University of Milan, Italy
Jianhua Yin, Second Military Medical University, China

Copyright © 2019 Yang, He, Xue, Zhou, Liao, Zheng, Jia, Yuan and Jia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wei-Hua Jia, jiawh@sysucc.org.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.