Li Wei1
Luca Tamagnone
Hua You- 1Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- 3Istituto di Istologia ed Embriologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- 4Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- 5YouJiang Medical University For Nationalities, Baise, China
- 6Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
While semaphorins were initially identified as axonal guidance cues for wiring the neural network, it was then recognized their wide relevance in tissue development and homeostasis. Notably, semaphorin activities were also extensively studied in many types of solid tumors; however, their relevance in hematological malignancies is far from understood. In this mini-review, we surveyed the current knowledge about semaphorins and their receptors in leukemias, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. Noteworthy, current data support a promoting role for Semaphorin 4D and Neuropilin-1 in these tumors, while Semaphorin 3A seems to consistently act as oncosuppressor in leukemias and multiple myeloma. The expression levels and functional activities of SEMA3B, SEMA3F, and Neuropilin-2 have furthermore been investigated in leukemias and lymphoma cells. Herein, we reviewed the state of the art and highlighted some of the open questions to be addressed in the field.
Introduction
The first Semaphorin was identified as repelling molecule for axonal guidance in the developing nervous system (1). Thereafter, the functional diversity of semaphorin family members beyond the wiring of neuronal network has been widely explored, ranging from the regulation of cardiovascular development and angiogenesis, to bone homeostasis and immune response (2, 3). Furthermore, while semaphorin activities have been extensively studied in many types of solid tumors (4, 5), their relevance in hematological malignancies is far from understood. The semaphorin family includes both secreted and transmembrane proteins, which can signal in autocrine/paracrine manner or upon cell-cell contact, respectively. Notably, semaphorin receptors (especially found in Neuropilin and Plexin families) can form a range of diverse complexes with distinctive signaling cascades, and interact with other growth factor receptors, making semaphorin activities highly cell-context dependent (6). Moreover, transmembrane semaphorins can mediate bidirectional signals, acting both as ligands and as receptors (7). In this mini-review, we summarized the current knowledge about semaphorins and their receptors in hematological malignancies, including leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, and highlighted the main research trends and open questions to be addressed in the field.
Semaphorins in Leukemias
Leukemias are a group of life threatening malignant disorders of the blood and bone marrow (BM), presenting with increased numbers of leucocytes and BM precursors. The dominantly presenting leukemia cells may be mature such as in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), or precursor cells of various lineage such as in the acute leukemias, or both precursor and mature cells as in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (8). The first report about semaphorins and their receptors in leukemias concerns transmembrane Semaphorin 4D (SEMA4D/CD100) and dates back in 2003 (9) (Table 1). SEMA4D/CD100 was found to be expressed in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells and in normal CD5+ B lymphocytes, and its high-affinity receptor Plexin-B1 was found in BM stromal cells, follicular dendritic cells, and activated T lymphocytes. This expression pattern led to explore a potential interaction in trans between CD100+ lymphocytes/CLL cells and neighboring Plexin-B1+ cells in the microenvironment. It was discovered that this interaction enhanced the proliferation and extended the life span of both leukemic and normal CD5+ B cells (9). Consistent with these findings, a subsequent independent study demonstrated that an upstream CD31-CD38 signaling axis in trans between stromal and leukemic cells of CLL patients actually led to SEMA4D/CD100 up-regulation, promoting leukemia cell viability through Plexin-B1 found in stromal cells, as well as a concomitant decrease in the expression of CD72 negative regulator of immunity (10). In both studies, however, it remained undetermined the identity of pro-survival factors produced by stromal cells in response to SEMA4D/Plexin-B1 signaling. Another study assessed the growth-suppressing activity of CD72, the low affinity receptor of SEMA4D, in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells (11). In fact, CD72 ligation by an agonistic antibody, or by its natural ligand SEMA4D/CD100, suppressed the proliferation of the AML Kasumi-1 cells and induced apoptotic cell death. The implicated molecular mechanism depends on CD72 phosphorylation and SHP-1 recruitment, leading to de-phosphorylation of Src family kinases and JNK (11). Thus, multiple data support a pro-tumorigenic role of SEMA4D in leukemias, consistent with the current knowledge about this semaphorin in solid tumors (12).
Table 1. Summary of the expression profile of semaphorins and receptors in hematological malignancies.
Notably, SEMA4D-targeting agents for prospective application in clinical trials have been developed (13). VX15/2503 is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to SEMA4D and blocks the binding of SEMA4D to its receptors, plexinB1, plexinB2, and CD72 (14, 15). A total of 42 patients with advanced refractory solid tumors were enrolled, weekly i.v. doses were administered on a 28-day cycle, and safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, cSEMA4D expression and saturation, soluble SEMA4D (sSEMA4D) serum levels, and serum biomarker levels were evaluated (15). Patients experienced well tolerances for VX15/2503, one patient (20 mg/kg) experienced a partial response, 45.2% (19/42) of patients exhibited stable disease for 8 weeks, and 19% (8/42) of patients exhibited stable disease for 16 weeks (15). Recent studies in mouse models also demonstrated that targeting SEMA4D improved response to immune checkpoint blockade via attenuation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) recruited in the tumor microenvironment (16, 17).
The expression of the secreted semaphorin SEMA3A was reported to be lower in acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemia (ALL/AML) and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells, compared to hematopoietic cells found in the normal BM (18). In a recent study, it was also reported that SEMA3A levels in the serum of ALL and AML patients are significantly reduced compared to healthy individuals (19). Consistent with a putative suppressor role of this semaphorin, it was interestingly shown that SEMA3A (via receptor complexes including Neuropilin-1/NRP1 and Plexin-A1) can promote Fas translocation into membrane rafts, thus sensitizing leukemic cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis (20). In an independent study, SEMA3A was also found to induce apoptosis in leukemia cells, via NRP1 co-receptor (14). It was furthermore shown that SEMA3A may partially reverse VEGF-induced proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells, and the combined administration of VEGF inhibitors and recombinant SEMA3A was suggested as potential treatment for AML patients (21). Notably, the potential application of recombinant SEMA3A (or derived molecules) in cancer therapy has been studied in multiple pre-clinical models of solid tumors, mainly focusing on its ability to inhibit endothelial cells sustaining aberrant angiogenesis (22–24).
Interestingly, the levels of the semaphorin receptor Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) in BM biopsies of patients with newly diagnosed, untreated, AML were significantly increased compared those found in normal controls; and in fact higher level of NRP-1 were associated with poor overall survival (25). NRP1 was found to be highly expressed also in CLL cells, and its expression was upregulated by VEGF (26). Interestingly, it has been shown that NRP1 transcripts are targeted by miR-9 that was found to be downregulated in ALL cells; indeed miR-9 forced re-expression could inhibit leukemia cell proliferation and cell cycle progression (27). In addition, clinical studies revealed high NRP1 levels to be an independent risk factor for poor overall survival of AML patients, as well as a predictor of shorter recurrence-free survival after complete therapeutic response in AML (28). Moreover, it was demonstrated that a cell-internalized oligopeptidic molecule targeting NRP1 displays potent anti-leukemia cell effect (29). In general, NRP1 expression has been associated with cancer progression in multiple types of solid tumors (30), and diverse NRP1-targeting agents have been demonstrated to have tumor suppressing activity in mouse preclinical models (31, 32).
Different from SEMA3A, the levels of SEMA3B in the circulating blood of AML patients were significantly increased compared with those of healthy controls (33). Actually, the role of SEMA3B in cancer is controversial, being considered as a suppressor or as a promoter in different studies (34). Moreover, SEMA3F and its receptor Neuropilin-2/NRP2 were found to be highly expressed in human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma primary cells, but SEMA3F was shown to inhibit the migration of malignant cells induced by CXCL12 and S1P (35).
Semaphorins in Lymphomas
Lymphoma is a heterogeneous group of hematological malignancies derived from lymphocytes, with various underlying etiological factors, clinical manifestations, histopathological features, and genetic/molecular profiles; they may thus be subject to different therapeutic strategies. Lymphomas can be divided into two major categories: Hodgkin's lymphomas and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). The latter constitute around 90% of the lymphoid neoplasms, and can be classified into B and T/natural killer (NK)-cell lymphomas (36). Dorfman and coworkers examined SEMA4D/CD100 expression pattern in 138 cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) by immunohistochemistry (37); most of T-cell NHL cases were positive for SEMA4D, whereas B-cell lymphomas were consistently negative for SEMA4D, including cases of small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), follicular lymphomas, marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These results were further confirmed by analyzing gene expression at mRNA level, however, the signaling mechanism and functional role of SEMA4D in T-cell lymphoma cells was not clarified in this study.
SEMA3F was shown to inhibit normal thymocytes as well as T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) primary cells migration induced by CXCL12 and S1P (35). Notably T-LBL samples were found to express high levels of both SEMA3F and its receptor Neuropilin-2 (NRP2), although the functional relevance of these molecules was not addressed by loss-of-function experiments, in this study. SEMA3F is generally considered as a tumor suppressor gene and its expression is often downregulated in solid tumors (34), but its function could be different in leukemia and lymphomas, and awaits clarification. NRP2 is considered a potential therapeutic target in certain solid tumors, and blocking antibodies and other targeting tools have been validated for this purpose in preclinical mouse models (38, 39). Notably, the homologous semaphorin co-receptor NRP1, was successfully targeted in lymphoma cells with an oligopeptidic drug candidate for cancer therapy (29).
Semaphorins in Multiple Myeloma
Despite improvements in the therapeutic protocols, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, due to the proliferation of malignant plasma-cells in the bone marrow (BM), and accumulation of monoclonal antibodies in the blood and urine, with associated organ dysfunction (19, 39, 40). MM is thought to evolve from a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) (19). SEMA3A was the first family member found to have a functional role in MM (40). In fact, BM endothelial cells isolated from patients with MM showed higher levels of VEGF and lower levels of SEMA3A compared to normal controls, consistent with the loss of endothelial inhibitory activity attributed to SEMA3A (40). These results underscored the potential usefulness of SEMA3A as anti-angiogenic molecule to restore the physiological regulation in the microenvironment. Consistently, a subsequent study demonstrated that the concentration of SEMA3A in serum of MM patients was strongly reduced, compared to healthy individuals, and the extent of this reduction was significantly associated with disease progression (19). In a preclinical experimental model in mice, it was demonstrated that forced SEMA3A overexpression in MM cells could inhibit disease progression, reduce the incidence and severity of bone lesions, and prolong overall survival.
Another study reported about increased levels of SEMA4D and its receptor Plexin-B1 in both BM and the serum of MM patients (41). Notably, elevated SEMA4D levels correlated with increased bone resorption, hypercalcemia, and higher stage, providing a potential target for novel therapeutic approaches in MM (41). It was then mechanistically investigated the relevance of SEMA4D in myeloma cells by knock down experiments (42); notably, SEMA4D expression was found to mediate paracrine signaling preventing the induction of the pivotal differentiation factor Runx2 in osteoprogenitor cells. Moreover, myeloma cell-conditioned medium induced SEMA4D expression in osteoclasts, featuring an additional paracrine mechanism to inhibit osteoblasts activity. Thus, SEMA4D signaling in myeloma cells seems to act both directly and indirectly to hinder bone formation (42). In sum, as discussed above with reference to leukemias, SEMA4D could be a promising therapeutic target also for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Accumulating evidences underscore the multifaceted activities of semaphorins and their receptors in hematological malignancies (Table 1). Different from solid tumors, the regulation of leukemia and lymphoma cells may occur in the circulation, as well as in BM and lymphoid organs, which are poorly understood tumor microenvironments. Thus, future studies are warranted to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of semaphorin activity in this context, and validate the potential clinical application of these molecules as prognostic/predicting factors, as well as novel targets for therapy. Notably, a SEMA4D-targeting monoclonal antibody, VX15/2503, is under validation in clinical trials for patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to therapy. Indeed, targeting SEMA4D with this antibody in murine models fostered a shift toward pro-inflammatory signals and anti-tumor immune response within the microenvironment; and the combination of anti-SEMA4D and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies achieved synergistic progress of tumor rejection and mice survival (16, 17). These data open perspectives for future application of anti-SEMA4D antibodies (or other semaphorin-targeting molecules) in the fight to cure hematological malignancies.
Author Contributions
LW and HL searched for current literature on the topic and drafted the manuscript outline. LT and HY reviewed the manuscript and finalized it for publication.
Funding
The work in the laboratory of HY is mainly supported by grants from Guangzhou Medical University (the start-up funds). HY is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670180, 81711540047, 81850410547, 81370077, and 81001220), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT) bilateral cooperation agreement (Joint China-Sweden Mobility), and the Beijing Nova Program of the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z171100001117091), and Guangzhou key medical discipline construction project. The research activity in LT lab is supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC-IG #19923 and AIRC-Multiunit-5perMille grant #21052).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Luo Y, Raible D, Raper JA. Collapsin: a protein in brain that induces the collapse and paralysis of neuronal growth cones. Cell. (1993) 75:217–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80064-L
2. Alto LT, Terman JR. Semaphorins and their signaling mechanisms. Methods Mol Biol. (2017) 1493:1–25. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6448-2_1
3. Jongbloets BC, Pasterkamp RJ. Semaphorin signalling during development. Development. (2014) 141:3292–7. doi: 10.1242/dev.105544
4. Neufeld G, Mumblat Y, Smolkin T, Toledano S, Nir-Zvi I, Ziv K, et al. The semaphorins and their receptors as modulators of tumor progression. Drug Resist Updat. (2016) 29:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2016.08.001
5. Rehman M, Tamagnone L. Semaphorins in cancer: biological mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Semin Cell Dev Biol. (2013) 24:179–89. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.10.005
6. Cagnoni G, Tamagnone L. Semaphorin receptors meet receptor tyrosine kinases on the way of tumor progression. Oncogene. (2014) 33:4795–802. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.474
7. Gurrapu S, Tamagnone L. Transmembrane semaphorins: multimodal signaling cues in development and cancer. Cell Adh Migr. (2016) 10:675–691. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2016.1197479
9. Granziero L, Circosta P, Scielzo C, Frisaldi E, Stella S, Geuna M, et al. CD100/Plexin-B1 interactions sustain proliferation and survival of normal and leukemic CD5+ B lymphocytes. Blood. (2003) 101:1962–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1339
10. Deaglio S, Vaisitti T, Bergui L, Bonello L, Horenstein AL, Tamagnone L, et al. CD38 and CD100 lead a network of surface receptors relaying positive signals for B-CLL growth and survival. Blood. (2005) 105:3042–50. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-10-3873
11. Kataoka TR, Kumanogoh A, Hirata M, Moriyoshi K, Ueshima C, Kawahara M, et al. CD72 regulates the growth of KIT-mutated leukemia cell line Kasumi-1. Sci Rep. (2013) 3:2861. doi: 10.1038/srep02861
12. Ch'ng ES, Kumanogoh A. Roles of Sema4D and Plexin-B1 in tumor progression. Mol Cancer. (2010) 9:251. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-251
13. Evans EE, Paris M, Smith ES, Zauderer M. Immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment by neutralization of Semaphorin 4D. Oncoimmunology. (2015) 4:e1054599. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1054599
14. Fisher TL, Seils J, Reilly C, Litwin V, Green L, Salkowitz-Bokal J, et al. Saturation monitoring of VX15/2503, a novel semaphorin 4D-specific antibody, in clinical trials. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. (2016) 90:199–208. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21338
15. Patnaik A, Weiss GJ, Leonard JE, Rasco DW, Sachdev JC, Fisher TL, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a humanized anti-semaphorin 4D antibody, in a first-in-human study of patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. (2016) 22:827–36. doi: 10.1158/1078–0432.CCR-15-0431
16. Evans EE, Jonason AS Jr, Bussler H, Torno S, Veeraraghavan J, Reilly C, et al. Antibody blockade of semaphorin 4D promotes immune infiltration into tumor and enhances response to other immunomodulatory therapies. Cancer Immunol Res. (2015) 3:689–701. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0171
17. Clavijo PE, Friedman J, Robbins Y, Moore EC, Smith E, Zauderer M, et al. Semaphorin4D inhibition improves response to immune-checkpoint blockade via attenuation of MDSC recruitment and function. Cancer Immunol Res. (2019) 7:282–91. doi: 10.1158/2326–6066.CIR-18-0156
18. Wang Z, Li Y, Wu X, Cheng S, Yang L, Wu Y. KDR and Sema3 genes expression in bone marrow stromal cells and hematopoietic cells from leukemia patients and normal individuals. Hematology. (2005) 10:307–12. doi: 10.1080/10245330500072389
19. Lavi N, Kessler O, Ziv K, Nir-Zvi I, Mumblat Y, Eiza N, et al. Semaphorin-3A inhibits multiple myeloma progression in a mouse model. Carcinogenesis. (2018) 39:1283–91. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgy106
20. Moretti S, Procopio A, Lazzarini R, Rippo MR, Testa R, Marra M, et al. Semaphorin3A signaling controls Fas (CD95)-mediated apoptosis by promoting Fas translocation into lipid rafts. Blood. (2008) 111:2290–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096529
21. Yang ZG, Wen RT, Qi K, Li J, Zheng GX, Wang YF, et al. The neuropilin-1 ligand, Sema3A, acts as a tumor suppressor in the pathogenesis of acute leukemia. Anat Rec. (2018). doi: 10.1002/ar.24016
22. Casazza A, Fu X, Johansson I, Capparuccia L, Andersson F, Giustacchini A, et al. Systemic and targeted delivery of semaphorin3A inhibits tumor angiogenesis and progression in mouse tumor models. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2011) 31:741–9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.211920
23. Maione F, Capano S, Regano D, Zentilin L, Giacca M, Casanovas O, et al. Semaphorin 3A overcomes cancer hypoxia and metastatic dissemination induced by antiangiogenic treatment in mice. J Clin Invest. (2012) 122:1832–48. doi: 10.1172/JCI58976
24. Gioelli N, Maione F, Camillo C, Ghitti M, Valdembri D, Morello N, et al. A rationally designed NRP1-independent superagonist SEMA3A mutant is an effective anticancer agent. Sci Transl Med. (2018) 10:eaah4807. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4807
25. Kreuter M, Woelke K, Bieker R, Schliemann C, Steins M, Buechner T, et al. Correlation of neuropilin-1 overexpression to survival in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. (2006) 20: 1950–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404384
26. Piechnik A, Dmoszynska A, Omiotek M, Mlak R, Kowal M, Stilgenbauer S, et al. The VEGF receptor, neuropilin1, represents a promising novel target for chronic lymphocyticleukemia patients. Int J Cancer. (2013) 133:1489–96. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28135
27. Zang Y, Yu R, Bai Y, Chen X. MicroRNA-9 suppresses cancer proliferation and cell cycle progression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia with inverse association of neuropilin-1. J Cell Biochem. (2018) 119:6604–13. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26799
28. Zhao J, Gu L, Li C, Ma W, Ni Z. Investigation of a novel biomarker, neuropilin-1, and its application for poor prognosis in acutemyeloid leukemia patients. Tumour Biol. (2014) 35:6919–24. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1942-9
29. Karjalainen K, Jaalouk DE, Bueso-Ramos CE, Zurita AJ, Kuniyasu A, Eckhardt BL, et al. Targeting neuropilin-1 in human leukemia and lymphoma. Blood. (2011) 117:920–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-282921
30. Rizzolio S1, Tamagnone L. Multifaceted role of neuropilins in cancer. Curr Med Chem. (2011) 18:3563–75. doi: 10.2174/092986711796642544
31. Meyer LA, Fritz J, Pierdant-Mancera M, Bagnard D. Current drug design to target the Semaphorin/Neuropilin/Plexin complexes. Cell Adh Migr. (2016) 10:700–8. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2016.1261785
32. Rizzolio S, Cagnoni G, Battistini C, Bonelli S, Isella C, Van Ginderachter JA, et al. Neuropilin-1 upregulation elicits adaptive resistance to oncogene-targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. (2018) 128:3976–90. doi: 10.1172/JCI99257
33. Klimov EA, Selivanova NL, Razumnova GI, Rudko OI, Golovatenko-Abramov PK. RHOA, SEMA3B, and CKAP2 expression in leukaemia of different types: the results of a pilot experiment. Folia Biol. (2013) 59:204–6.
34. Neufeld G, Mumblat Y, Smolkin T, Toledano S, Nir-Zvi I, Ziv K, et al. The role of the semaphorins in cancer. Cell Adh Migr. (2016) 10:652–74. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2016.1197478
35. Mendes-da-Cruz DA, Brignier AC, Asnafi V, Baleydier F, Messias CV, Lepelletier Y, et al. Semaphorin 3F and neuropilin-2 control the migration of human T-cell precursors. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e103405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103405
36. Rosenquist R, Beà S, Du MQ, Nadel B, Pan-Hammarström Q. Genetic landscape and deregulated pathways in B-cell lymphoid malignancies. J Intern Med. (2017) 282:371–94. doi: 10.1111/joim.12633
37. Dorfman DM, Shahsafaei A, Nadler LM, Freeman GJ. The leukocyte semaphorin CD100 is expressed in most T-cell, but few B-cell, non-hodgkin's lymphomas. Am J Pathol. (1998) 153:255–62. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65566–6
38. Goel HL, Pursell B, Chang C, Shaw LM, Mao J, Simin K, et al. GLI1 regulates a novel neuropilin-2/α6β1 integrin based autocrine pathway that contributes to breast cancer initiation. EMBO Mol Med. (2013) 5:488–508. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201202078
39. Elaimy AL, Guru S, Chang C, Ou J, Amante JJ, Zhu LJ, et al. VEGF-neuropilin-2 signaling promotes stem-like traits in breast cancer cells by TAZ-mediated repression of the Rac GAP β2-chimaerin. Sci Signal. (2018) 11:eaao6897. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aao6897
40. Vacca A, Scavelli C, Serini G, Di Pietro G, Cirulli T, Merchionne F, et al. Loss of inhibitory semaphorin 3A (SEMA3A) autocrine loops in bone marrow endothelial cells of patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. (2006) 108:1661–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-014563
41. Terpos E, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Christoulas D, Bagratuni T, Bakogeorgos M, Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Semaphorin 4D correlates with increased bone resorption, hypercalcemia, and disease stage in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. (2018) 8:42. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0075-6
Keywords: semaphorins, Neuropilin, Plexin, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma
Citation: Wei L, Li H, Tamagnone L and You H (2019) Semaphorins and Their Receptors in Hematological Malignancies. Front. Oncol. 9:382. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00382
Received: 28 February 2019; Accepted: 24 April 2019;
Published: 09 May 2019.
Edited by:
Giorgio Seano, Institut Curie, FranceReviewed by:
Abdelilah S. Gounni, University of Manitoba, CanadaThomas Mathivet, INSERM U970 Paris-Centre de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (PARCC), France
Copyright © 2019 Wei, Li, Tamagnone and You. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hua You, youhua307@163.com
Luca Tamagnone, luca.tamagnone@unicatt.it