Abstract
The nervous system (NS) of invertebrates and vertebrates is composed of two main types of cells: neurons and glia. In both types of organisms, nerve cells have similarities in biochemistry and functionality. The neurons are in charge of the synapse, and the glial cells are in charge of important functions of neuronal and homeostatic modulation. Knowing the mechanisms by which NS cells work is important in the biomedical area for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders. For this reason, cellular and animal models to study the properties and characteristics of the NS are always sought. Marine invertebrates are strategic study models for the biological sciences. The sea slug Aplysia californica and the squid Loligo pealei are two examples of marine key organisms in the neurosciences field. The principal characteristic of marine invertebrates is that they have a simpler NS that consists of few and larger cells, which are well organized and have accessible structures. As well, the close phylogenetic relationship between Chordata and Echinodermata constitutes an additional advantage to use these organisms as a model for the functionality of neuronal cells and their cellular plasticity. Currently, there is great interest in analyzing the signaling processes between neurons and glial cells, both in vertebrates and in invertebrates. However, only few types of glial cells of invertebrates, mostly insects, have been studied, and it is important to consider marine organismsā research. For this reason, the objective of the review is to present an update of the most relevant information that exists around the physiology of marine invertebrate neuronal and glial cells.
Introduction
Marine organisms have been used as study models in different branches of the biological sciences like toxicology, evolutionary biology, developmental biology, biomedicine, and neurobiology. The use of these unique models has allowed identifying diverse mechanisms related to the functioning of the nervous system (NS). Multicellular living organisms have a NS composed of a variety of cellular types. The proteins and macromolecules of these different and specialized cells cooperate between them to get a functional NS which coordinates the major body functions in organisms (Arendt, 2015). Cells of nervous tissue are in control too of organismās response, and its reaction to environmental stimulus. Understanding brain activities would be relevant in the biomedical field for the identification and treatment of neuropathologies, including those present in humans.
Nerve cells existed and are found in both multi and single-celled marine organisms where, as in the rest of the organisms, arrangement of nerve cells and communication between them is the key to understand how all NSs process, select, and transport information, and even how these cells are regenerated. Among all the organisms, invertebrates have the simpler NS structured with few and large cells, organized in a simple and accessible way (Blankenship and Houck, 2014). In general, invertebrate NS are composed of spherical, ellipsoidal or cylindrical lobes of tissue (tissue shapes frequently are directly related to the observation method), while vertebrate NS tissue is larger, with specific structural and physiological characteristics, that requires specific methods to be observed (Leise, 1990). Invertebrate and vertebrate NS consist of two types of cells named neurons (mainly motor, sensory, and interneurons), and glia cells. Despite differences, the invertebrate nervous cells present the same biochemistry and functionality characteristics as those of vertebrates, demonstrating the high degree of phylogenetic conservation between phyla. Nevertheless, there are differences in cellular properties and cellular arrangements of neural areas among phyla.
Differences between phyla are relevant to understand the origin, development, and regeneration of marine NS. Origins of NS remain unresolved until now (Moroz et al., 2014), but the discovery and identification of key basic proteins in marine unicellular organisms is providing relevant information in this regard (AliƩ and Manuƫl, 2010; Hoffmeyer and Burkhardt, 2016; Cavalier-Smith, 2017). Developing mechanisms of NS are better understood where cellular division, differentiation, and cellular migration are relevant processes required in both vertebrates and invertebrates (Anderson et al., 1980; Bulloch, 1985). Respect to the regeneration processes in the NS of marine organisms, the process have been observed for years (Weis and Weis, 1978; Ladurner et al., 2000; Dahlberg et al., 2009), and now some key molecules are used as regeneration factors (Bailly et al., 2014; Joly, 2017; Kamenev and Dolmatov, 2017).
In the following sections, the prevailing information regarding neurons and glial cells of the NS in the main families of marine invertebrates will be described.
Nervous System in Marine Organisms
The study of NS in marine organisms has been done using organisms with an easily accessible and identifiable system. It has also been considered to those organisms that have a system with conserved characteristics to that of higher mammals, such as humans. In this group of organisms the main representatives are the sea slug Aplysia californica and the squid Loligo pealei, whose studies have been the basis of relevant research that led to the winning of two Nobel prizes in Physiology and Medicine (in 1963 and in 2000, respectively) (Nobel, 2019).
The NS of marine organisms is made up of specialized and organized cells (with particular shapes and functions) that act together to control the organism behavior, and to sense and respond to environmental stimuli (Northcutt et al., 2017). NSs are expressed as nerveplexus, dorsal nerve cord, and ventral nerve cord. Nerve cells interact between them at specific points and under certain conditions to perform all the organism functions. The NS gives organisms the capability to respond to environmental stimuli by receiving (internal or external), encoding, transmitting, and processing information (Hickman et al., 2008). Ultrastructural examination demonstrates that synapses are present in vertebrates and invertebrates, with common mechanisms like changes in ions concentrations and transmitter release (Watson, 1992).
The invertebrate neuronal cells are in simple numerical proportions, with a diverse composition and organization that includes large neurons (Meinertzhagen, 2017). They are on charge of the electric signaling transmission (or synapses) through between them, and among distinct body parts. On the other hand, glia cells participate in the early development of the NS, as support and protection of neurons, in the maintenance of axon function for normal neurotransmission, in proportionate the normal supply of metabolic fuel to the neurons, and in the homeostatic regulation of the NS (Denes et al., 2007; Coles, 2009; Brand and Livesey, 2011). Besides, glia cells participate too as a bloodābrain barrier, and in the guidance mechanisms of young neurons to ensure their appropriate migration to specific targets (Leise, 1990; Coles, 2009).
To elucidate the evolutionary origin of NS in marine organisms, the comparison of the types of constituent neuronal cells is required. Evolution of metazoan phylogeny (Figure 1), from nerve nets to centralized NS has been the subject of discussion. Nerve net concept is referred to the simplest organization of a NS, where signals are transmitted in any direction; recently this term includes irregular arrays of neurites that come from monopolar, bipolar or multipolar neurons (Hejnol and Rentzsch, 2015). NS of metazoan phylogeny has been examined to find the evolutionary relationship between nerve nets and centralized NSs, as well as the possible dorsoventral axis inversion in vertebrates, and the common brain structure of bilaterian and chordate ancestry (Meinertzhagen and Okamura, 2001; CaƱestro et al., 2005; Lowe et al., 2006). Important discoveries have been made thanks to the identification of key basic proteins in the unicellular marine organisms, the Choanoflagellates, organisms whose brains and nerve cells have been studied with evolutionary and functional proposes (AliƩ and Manuƫl, 2010). Studies in the annelid marine worm Platynereis dumerilii have concluded that the protostome and deuterostome ancestor had a centralized NS. This would explain why chordates and annelids share similarities in their NS pattering (Telford and Littlewood, 2009).
FIGURE 1
In Protostomia clade, the larval apical organ and adjacent lateral cells originate the brain (Lacalli, 1984), where neurons are identifiable individually. It is suggested that in these organisms, neurogenesis is a precise and controlled process (Harzsch and MĆ¼ller, 2007). Molecular, morphological, and embryological evidence suggest that chordates are inverted protostomes (Arendt and NĆ¼bler-Jung, 1994; NĆ¼bler-Jung and Arendt, 1996), and its ventral nerve cord is comparable with the dorsal NS of vertebrates (Nielsen, 1999). Thanks to Protostomia marine organisms like Sagitta setosa (Harzsch and MĆ¼ller, 2007), Spadella cephaloptera (Perez et al., 2013), and Symsagittifera roscoffensis (Semmler et al., 2010) it has been possible to get a better understanding about the evolutionary development of the NS centralization, or in other words, from an irregular and diffuse nerve array to a centralized nerve organization. It is important to mention that the evolutionary transition of nerve networks to the centralization of the NS involved both a localized concentration of neurons and their interrelation to function in a coordinated manner (Arendt et al., 2008).
Neural anatomy of deuterostomes including Echinodermata, present a plexus like NS meanwhile the chordates exhibit a truly dorsal NS with parts of the common ancestor (Byrne and Cisternas, 2002; CaƱestro et al., 2005). The marine arrow worm Chatognatha is an example of an organism with ancestral plexus and centralized nervous structures (Harzsch and Wanninger, 2010). It is speculated that these organisms are the earliest protostome, and its study contributes to the understanding of the NS evolution in Bilateria (Frƶbius and Funch, 2017; Nielsen, 2017).
In neurobiology, marine Nematoda, Annelida, and Mollusca phylum are among the most studied Protostomia organisms. In the clade Deuterostomia most studied are Chordata and Echinodermata, but Hemicordata is taking importance since the development of their NS can lead to understand the evolution of the system in all organisms. In the following sections, updated information regarding the NS of the mentioned invertebrate phylum will be described. Table 1 summarizes the known main characteristics for each Phylum in terms of development, neurogenesis, anatomy, and physiology.
TABLE 1
| Phylum | Development/Neurogenesis | Adult anatomy | Physiology | References |
| Nematoda | Neurons are mainly formed by the AB-lineage (95% approximately) Neurogenesis involves various types of intrinsic factors that are sent to neurons through the process of molecular asymmetric divisions | Throughout almost all species is made up of a nerve ring, constituted of four ganglia and nerve cords Set up by few hundreds of neurons (194ā302) Is constantly changing according to the organism functional necessities Two glial cells are present in some species with processes of 0.3ā0.9 Ī¼m thick | Constitute sensory cells, serve as tactile receptors, and monitor bending of the body during locomotion | Teuchert, 1977; Houthoofd et al., 2003; Blaxter, 2011; Hartenstein and Stollewerk, 2015; Brusca et al., 2016 |
| Arthropoda | Is formed from clusters of neuroectodermal cells Most neurons are generated from neuroblasts Neurogenesis in the species suggested that the process is regulated by a common and ancestral mechanism | Constituted by the dorsal brain, and by a ventral, longitudinal and ganglionated nerve cord Involves the distinct sensillia (sense) organs like leg tips, joints, mouthparts, and antennae | Set up of photoreceptors (simple ocelli, complex lensed ocelli, and compound eyes), and sensillia organs Establish communication between new sensillia organs and the old ones, in each molt | Laverack, 1987; Elofsson and Hessler, 2005; Sandeman et al., 2011; Hartenstein and Stollewerk, 2015; Brusca et al., 2016 |
| Lophophorata | Mature ganglia in several species are epithelial In neurogenesis invagination of the neuroectoderm occurs | Has great variations between species Possess one or two well organized giant nerve fibers Composed by a dorsal and an inner ganglion, an inner and a tentacular nerve ring, and six nerves per tentacle | Most nerves associated with the body wall (intraepidermal or immediately subepidermal) Supplies the tentacles with nerves and some motor nerves originate the longitudinal muscles | Temereva and Malakhov, 2009; Hartenstein and Stollewerk, 2015; Brusca et al., 2016 |
| Annelida | Ectoderm domains present cylindrical epithelial cells with increased proliferative activity that originate nervous cells | Distributed in two connectives and in four transverse commissures Formed by the ventral nerve cord, by a ganglion, and by nerves located within each segment Two glial cells are present in some species with processes of 0.3ā0.9 Ī¼m thick | Nerves innervate the tissue form the body wall to the digestive tract Inside each medium-ventral segment, nerves are responsible for the impulse transmission from the motor nerves to the sensory nerves | Purschke, 1990; Orrhage, 1993; Orrhage and MĆ¼ller, 2005; Denes et al., 2007; Rimskaya-Korsakova N.N. et al., 2018 |
| Mollusca | Result of an anterior circumenteric arrangement of ganglia and paired ventral nerve cords Neurogenesis is derived from ectodermal placode where proliferating neural progenitors are packed | Constituted of five (cerebral, buccal, pleural, pedal, and visceral) or six (the five above plus the parietal pair) sets of ganglia (Budelmann, 1995; Bulloch and Ridgway, 1995) Some have glia cells either small (4ā5 Ī¼m of diameter, 0.2ā0.5 Ī¼m thick), or large (100ā600 Ī¼m long, 2 Ī¼m thick, 20 Ī¼m wide) | Forms highly specialized sensory structures Responsible of the function of sensory tentacles, statocysts, photoreceptors, and osphradia (patches of sensory epithelium near the gill or the mantle wall) | Willmer, 1978; Goldstein et al., 1982; Jacob, 1984; Paemen et al., 1992; Budelmann, 1995; Bulloch and Ridgway, 1995; Coles, 2009; Brusca et al., 2016 |
| Hemichordata | An invagination of ectoderm form the neurochord Initial neurogenesis is not restricted along the dorsoventral axis, and allow the formation of dorso-ventral neurons | Primitive NS with nerve cells distributed throughout the epidermal layer Nerve fibers are disposed in two layers: one thin basal layer composed of fibers with an irregular arrangement, and one thicker superficial layer whose fiber organization are forming the conducting system | Regulate sensory cells (located over most of the body), the preoral ciliary organ, and the touch receptors | Knight-Jones, 1952; Lowe et al., 2006; Cunningham and Casey, 2014; Brusca et al., 2016 |
| Echinodermata | Noticeable nerves are derived from the ectoneural system Neurogenesis is regulated by its basiepithelial nerve plexus, where packed neurons form cords or ganglia | Present a relatively simple architecture with a radiate pattern Is made up of three networks (ectoneural or oral, hyponeural, and entoneural or aboral) combined into ganglionated nerve cords Organized in a circular or pentagonal circumoral nerve ring Glia cells are 45ā70% of the total NS cell mass | Plexus of the ectoneural system innervate the simple epithelial sensory receptors Epidermal sensory neurons are sensitive to water currents, light, touch, and dissolved chemicals | Hyman, 1955; Bellock, 1965; Pentreath and Cobb, 1972; Cobb, 1987; GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”s et al., 2001; Mashanov et al., 2010; Brusca et al., 2016 |
Comparative analysis of marine invertebrateās nervous system.
The table shows the known main characteristics for each Phylum in terms of development, neurogenesis, anatomy, and physiology.
Protostomia
Nematoda
The NS of Nematoda is simple and accessible, and is constituted by a group of a few hundreds of neurons whose number ranges between 194 in Pellioditis marina and 302 in Caenorhabditis elegans (Houthoofd et al., 2003; Blaxter, 2011). In nematodes the cell lineage and configuration of NS is not fixed, and is constantly adjusted according to the organism functional necessities. During development, nematode neuronās final position is close to the place where they originated as has been observed in the marine organisms Enoplus brevis and P. marina (Voronov and Panchin, 1998; Houthoofd et al., 2003). The study of the NS in this group of organisms has shown that the development of this system, together with the epidermis and the pharynx, between terrestrial and marine annelids is different and present low similarity. These were shown when comparing tissue configuration of C. elegans and P. marina embryos, a low similarity degree between their NS was observed (Houthoofd et al., 2003). Due the similarity between NS organization in organisms with big brains and the neural circuits in nematodes, these organisms have been used as model (Schafer, 2016) of nervous processes. Such is the case of Nematostella vectensis for neurogenesis (Layden et al., 2016), and Deontostoma californicum for the study of the NS organization (Siddiqui and Viglierchio, 1971, 1977).
Arthropoda
Nervous system of arthropods is constituted by the dorsal brain, and by a ventral, longitudinal, and ganglionated nerve cord. The nerve cord is primitively paired and is the origin of all lateral nerves that extends along each segment of the arthropod body (Laverack, 1987). The NS of this group of marine invertebrates is similar to the annelids. Due to their similarities, it was thought that arthropods evolved from annelids, but molecular evidence is suggesting that they are evolved independently (Harzsch, 2006; Wolfe et al., 2019). The NS of arthropods involves the body surface where are the distinct sensillia (sense) organs like leg tips, joints, mouthparts, and antennae (Laverack, 1987; Elofsson and Hessler, 2005). The arthropodās sensory system is highly organized, and presents a specific architecture in each genus. These organisms are growing continuously and have numerous molts during their adult life. Each molt must have new sensillia organs which combine with the old ones, resulting in an increasing and complex nervous net as long as they live. Study of cellular anatomy and architecture of arthropods NS, besides their physiology, requires specific investigations to get a better comprehension of how it is working (Benzid et al., 2005; Brenneis and Richter, 2010). In neurosciences, particular characteristics of arthropodās NS has been studied mainly to get a better understanding of neurogenesis, besides to know a distinct type of neuron-muscle communication.
Arthropodās small size muscles generate a peculiar neuromuscular organization. As result, muscular contractions are regulated by the specific neuron type on charge of each one of the muscular fibers (Harzsch, 2006). Arthropod muscular innervation is multiterminal and polyneuronal with mostly monopolar motor neurons. The interneurons of arthropods do not produce action potentials, do not drive the postsynaptic neurons by transmitter release, and some are non-spiking; this is probably related with the short distance between neurons in a ganglion. In arthropods like in other invertebrates, one motor neuron innervates multiple muscle fibers, and the primary excitatory neurotransmitter involved is glutamate, while vertebrates use acetylcholine. As well, muscle contraction is mediated by Ī³-amino-butyric acid (GABA), which binds to muscle fibers that receive inhibitory synaptic information (Smarandache-Wellmann, 2016). In neuron-muscle communication both vertebrates and arthropods express transcription factors as Foxf1, myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2 (Mef2), and Nkx3.2 (Arendt et al., 2016). This makes arthropods interesting models to understand the functioning of neurons involved in processes as simple as bending a limb, or more complex such as sensing the environment or emitting snaps. For example, in Limulus polyphemus leg contraction is the result of six axons of excitatory neurons that are innervating the muscle (Parnas et al., 1968; Wyse and Dwyer, 1973). On the other hand, a great axon number is necessary to perform the distinctive snaps of each shrimpās genus. In Alpheus heterochelis and Aplysia californiensis the snapping mechanisms are regulated by both motor and sensory neurons, but there each one involves distinct axon numbers (from 3,000 to 13,000) (Knowlton and Moulton, 1963; Ritzmann, 1974; Read et al., 1991). In terms of neurogenesis, animals like the crab Carcinus maenas (Hansen and Schmidt, 2001), and the sea spider Pseudopallene sp. (Brenneis et al., 2013) are being used mainly as models to understand the process during the embryonic development. Nevertheless, a novel approach is being given to the capacity of adult arthropods to generate new-born neurons. Evidence suggests that in adult organisms of distinct phylum, including arthropods, neurogenesis is regulated by a common and ancestral mechanism (Sandeman et al., 2011). It is not clear yet what is the functional and applied contribution of this knowledge to the human health, but the generation of new neurons in adults organism, is always an important issue that deserve a detailed research.
Lophophorata
Lophophores are organisms with unique structural patterns, and as adults they live in colonies. Their NS organization has great variations between species. Lophophorata possess one or two well organized giant nerve fibers, and do not have a clear organization in neither the nerve trunks nor the nerve ganglia (Temereva and Malakhov, 2009). Lophopore NS is composed by a dorsal and an inner ganglion, an inner and a tentacular nerve ring, and six nerves per tentacle; these structures are controlled by three distinct nerve centers named dorsal-ganglion, outer lophophoral nerve ring, and inner lophophoral nerve ring (Temereva, 2017). Variations in NS of lophophores are related with the organization of their distinctive structures (tentacles innervation and their connection with the main nerve cores, and cerebral ganglion) (Temereva and Kosevich, 2016). The study of lophophore adult innervation is useful to clarify its monophyly origin, which still is confusing. Until now, exist few research about the physiology of the NS in this class; almost all the investigations are focused in understanding the origin of its NS, and its relationship with other phylum. Phoronopsis harmeri (Temereva and Malakhov, 2009), Symbion pandora (Wanninger, 2005), Phoronis australis (Pardos et al., 1991), and P. harmeri (Temereva and Tsitrin, 2014) are some of the lophophore models used to elucidate the anatomy, architecture, and functioning of the NS of these peculiar organisms.
Annelida
In annelids, the NS present ancient and distinctive characteristics distributed in two connectives and in four transverse commissures. Polychaeta is the first and largest class of Annelida (Dales, 1967). Their nerve structures have been found and reported in almost all studied families of Polychaeta for decades (Wells et al., 1972; GĆ¼nther, 1975; Orrhage and Eibye-Jacobsen, 1998; Rimskaya-Korsakova N.N. et al., 2018). The NS of annelids is formed by the ventral nerve cord or medium-ventral segment (composed of two strands that extends to the length of the organism), by a ganglion, and by nerves located within each segment (Orrhage and MĆ¼ller, 2005). In each segment, nerves innervate the tissue form the body wall to the digestive tract (Orrhage, 1993; Rimskaya-Korsakova N. et al., 2018). Inside each medium-ventral segment, nerves are responsible for the impulse transmission from the motor nerves or ganglion, to the sensory nerves or receptor. Surface epithelium tissue of these organisms has the cell bodies of sensory nerves, meanwhile inside either the ganglion or separate parapodial ganglia, are located the motor nerves. In the majority of the annelids, their nerve cord has giant fibers called neurochords. Rapid impulses transmission from one end of the worm to the other are carried out by these neurochords, which in some genus like Myxicola, measure 1.5 mm in diameter and are not covered with myelin (Wells et al., 1972; Eng et al., 1980; Orrhage and MĆ¼ller, 2005). Nevertheless, individual nerve cells of their discrete ganglia are not always easily observable under the microscope (Blackshaw, 1986).
Characteristics of annelids make them important models for the study of different features of the NS. Among these excels the study of nerve regeneration processes in distinct Polychaeta genus. Regeneration has been studied mainly in Nereis virens (Holmes, 1931), Nereis diversicolor (Clark and Bonney, 1960), Owenia fusiformis (Coulon et al., 1989), Eurythoe complanata (Zapata-VĆvenes, 2005), Dorvillea bermudensis (Paulus and MĆ¼ller, 2006), Cirratulus cf. cirratus (Weidhase et al., 2014), Typosyllis antoni (Weidhase et al., 2017), Alitta virens (Kozin et al., 2017), and in P. dumerilii (Kostyuchenko et al., 2019). Collectively, these studies demonstrated that each specie present differences in its ability to regenerate. Moffett (1996) and MĆ¼ller et al. (2003) considered that these results are probably due to (1) the intrinsic growth program of each annelid species and (2) the relationship between the wound done experimentally in the worms, the distance to the ventral cord, and the intensity of the signals that must be transmitted by the ventral cord.
Mollusca
Molluscs are a large and discrepant collection of organisms. Marine species are classified into five groups that present great metabolic and phenotypic diversity. This variability includes the NS, which in squid and octopus is as complex as that of lower invertebrates; meanwhile in monoplacophors and chitons it can be as simple as that of annelids (Budelmann, 1995). Despite the discrepancies between molluscs, the NS of all Phyla shares few similarities. Their NS is constituted of pairs of ganglia, which are divided in five (cerebral, buccal, pleural, pedal, and visceral) or six (the five above plus the parietal pair) sets (Budelmann, 1995; Bulloch and Ridgway, 1995). Molluscs also have highly specialized sensory structures, like the aesthetes in chitons or the sensory tentacles in cephalopods (Sigwart and Sumner-Rooney, 2016). The molluscs study has not only contributed to a better understanding of neuronal functioning and its evolutionary process, but has also served for the phylogenetic classification of some species, which previously were not known to be molluscs (Sigwart and Sumner-Rooney, 2016).
In neurosciences, A. californica, a marine mollusk, has been an important model organism to the study of neuron functions (Frazier et al., 1967; Kriegstein, 1977) due the facility to identify its nervous cells by their position, their size, and their electrophysiological properties. Neurons of A. californica have allowed the characterization of neuron nuclear DNA and chromatin arraignment from individual neurons (Coggeshall et al., 1971; Lasek and Dower, 1971; Treistman and Schwartz, 1976), besides the study of the RNA metabolism in neurons (Berry and Cohen, 1972), its transcriptome (Moroz et al., 2006), and the synthesis of specific proteins in single phenotypically different neurons (Loh and Peterson, 1974). The characterization of neurons containing choline (Giller and Schwartz, 1971), serotonin (Ono and McCaman, 1984; Marois and Carew, 1997), and its function in synaptic transmissions (Pellmar and Carpenter, 1980; Mauelshagen et al., 1998), as well as the role of other peptides in motor neurons (Church and Lloyd, 1991, 1994; Whim et al., 1993), has been possible too in the sea slug. The neuron research in A. californica has led to the development of the L7 neural cell line from its abdominal ganglion, that have served for the study of the metabolite content and the osmolyte of single neural cells (Grant et al., 2000). Characteristics of this kind of molluscās brains have allowed even molecular studies related to the consolidation of memory and learning in A. californica (Kandel and Schwartz, 1982; Kandel, 2006), and using another sea slug named Hermissenda crassicornis (Tamvacakis et al., 2015).
Cephalopods are an unusual kind of Mollusca of great interest too in the field of neurosciences due the higher functions of their NS, which are similar to vertebrate and present a bloodābrain barrier of glia cells (Bundgaard and Abbott, 1992; Budelmann, 1995; Maselli et al., 2018). In the cephalopod brain of organisms like sepia and octopus, recognized neurotransmitter molecules has been found, in addition of high efferent innervation of receptor cells and afferent first-order peripheral neurons (Bullock, 1984; Bullock and BaÅar, 1988; Bullock and Budelmann, 1991; Budelmann, 1995).
Deuterostomia
Hemichordata
Hemichordates are organisms with a bilateral symmetry during all their lifespan. They live either solitary or in filter-feeding colonies, and are key animals in the evolution field to investigate the origins of the clade Deuterostome. Their closer relationship with echinoderms and chordates generated that Hemichordata receive attention since the last century (Dakin, 1916; Knight-Jones, 1952). Evidence suggests that chordates and hemichordates share the ontogenetic module that originated the NS at not the same parts of the body (Nomaksteinsky et al., 2009). Hemicordata has a primitive NS with nerve cells distributed throughout the epidermal layer. Nerve fibers are disposed in two layers: the first one is a thin basal layer composed of fibers with an irregular arrangement, and the second one is a thicker superficial layer whose fiber organization are forming the conducting system (the main nerve cord and the small bundles) (Knight-Jones, 1952). Hemichordates are fragile organisms that present a remarkable and primarily epimorphic regeneration capacity which includes their nerve net (Rychel and Swalla, 2009; Luttrell et al., 2016). Evidence of its regeneration ability has been proved in solitary hemichordates, since there is little information for colonial hemichordate regeneration. Due their bilateral symmetry as adults, hemichordates show analogous regeneration patterns with the chordates. This has been proved at molecular level, where gene expression analysis revealed that Hemicordata regeneration requires an independent stem-cell endogenous transdifferentiation, and particular genetic mechanisms (Lowe et al., 2003; Arimoto and Tagawa, 2015, 2018; Miyamoto and Wada, 2015). In Deuterostome, Hemichordate are the only known to regenerate the complete NS of the anterior head-like structure, as Ptychodera flava that has the ability to regenerate their entire NS in 1ā4 days (Humphreys et al., 2010; Luttrell et al., 2016). Besides P. flava, Glossobalanus berkeleyi is being used too to study the molecular bases of the hemichordate regeneration process (Rychel and Swalla, 2009). As long as Ptychodera bahamensis and Saccoglossus kowalevskii are neurulation models in which it has been possible to conclude that in the collar cord some neuronal integration occurs (Kaul and Stach, 2010). Despite what we know so far, there are only few hemichordates that are used as neuronal models. It is necessary to carry out more studies in distinct hemichordates to get a better understanding of the NS regeneration mechanisms, and elucidate how to apply this in the neurosciences field.
Echinodermata
In metazoans, Echinodermata is considered one key phylum in evolution and ecology studies, but it its NS is one of the least studied due to the technical difficulties. Despite this, NS of echinoderms has been studied during the past 75 years (Hyman, 1955; Bellock, 1965; Pentreath and Cobb, 1972; Cobb, 1987; GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”s et al., 2001; Mashanov et al., 2013; DĆaz-Balzac and GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”s, 2018), and important information has been added to the understanding of these organisms. The close phylogenetic relationship between echinoderms and chordates, and the evidence that they shared a common ancestor (Winchell et al., 2002; Blair and Hedges, 2005), make them a unique study model in neurosciences. Echinodermsā NS present a relatively simple architecture with a radiate pattern be made up of three networks (ectoneural or oral, hyponeural, and entoneural or aboral) combined into ganglionated nerve cords (Hyman, 1955; Pentreath and Cobb, 1972; Cobb, 1987; GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”s et al., 2001). In five of the six phylum of echinoderms (Crinoidea, Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea, Echinoidea, and Holothurioidea), the ectoneural system constitutes the main component of their NS; in adults of class Crinoidea, aboral system controls them (Hyman, 1955; GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”s et al., 2001). Motor, sensory, and interneurons, besides radial glia cells, have been identified in the central NS of echinoderms. Transmission in both motor and sensory neurons is mediated by acetylcholine; whereas that in the interneurons, the neurotransmitters are noradrenaline and/or dopamine. Axons of the Echinodermata neurons are small and unmyelinated, and are disposed in packages with a parallel arrangement. In the plexus and on the surface of the primary podia, epithelial (sensory) cells are responsible of axon supply. The distinct types of axons sometimes are not easily distinguishably, such is the case of the peripheral axons which can be confused with the processes of muscle and interstitial cells (Pentreath and Cobb, 1972; Byrne et al., 2018; Hinman and Burke, 2018).
In neurosciences, echinoderms are an extraordinary model for the study of neuronal regeneration processes. They have the remarkable capacity for regrown both external and internal parts, including the NS. Molecular studies revealed interesting aspects related with the neuroregeneration in Echinodermata like the presence of pluripotency factors orthologs, known in mammalian cells as Yamanaka factors (Mashanov et al., 2015a); the expression of Hox gene homologs (Thorndyke et al., 2001); and the involvement of growth factors (TGF-Ī², NGF, and FGF-2), neuropeptides (substance P), and neurotransmitters (monoamines) in the regeneration process (Thorndyke and Candia Carnevali, 2001). It is remarkable the possibility to carry out this kind of studies in all class of the Phylum Echinodermata. There are evidence of NS regeneration in Asteroidea species as Marthasterias glacialis (Franco et al., 2012), Asterias rubens (Moss et al., 1998), and Ophiocoma echinata (Pomory and Lawrence, 1999); in Ophiuroidea like Ophioderma longicaudum and Amphiura filiformis (Dupont and Thorndyke, 2006; Biressi et al., 2010); in Eupentacta fraudatrix (Mashanov et al., 2008), and Cladolabes schmeltzii (Kamenev and Dolmatov, 2015) class Holothuroidea; in the Echinoidea Psammechinus miliaris (Chia, 1970); and in the Crinoidea Antedon mediterranea (Candia Carnevali et al., 1997). In all cases, evidence indicates that during the lifespan of these organisms an unusual NS regeneration program can be activated by distinct neurotrophic factors that include morphogens, mitogens, and growth and/or regulatory molecules.
Role of Glia Cells in Marine Invertebrates
Glia cells are defined as non-neuronal cells of the NS, with particular biochemical and structural characteristics, that allow them to get involved in all those functions that are carried out in the NS (Zhang, 2001). The evidence suggests that in the processes of evolution, development and regeneration, glia cells have an important role. Invertebrate glia cells share both morphological and physiological characteristics with vertebrates (Tables 2, 3). As in chordates, glial cells of marine invertebrates participate in osmoregulation, neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and neuroregeneration processes. Nevertheless, in some particular cases the role of glia cells is not clear and new research is required. In a similar manner as in mammals, in invertebrates glutamate is considered a necessary substance to cellular signaling between glia cells and the axon (Lieberman and Sanzenbacher, 1992). Glutamate effect has been demonstrated in the hyperpolarization of Schwann cells of squids, mainly in Alloteuthis sp. and Loligo sp. (Lieberman et al., 1989; Inoue et al., 2002). In Aplysiaās sensorimotor synapses glutamate act as a neurotransmitter, and glutamate transporters has been located within similar to mammalian disposition (Levenson et al., 2000).
TABLE 2
| Characteristic | Marine invertebrates | Vertebrate organisms | References |
| Shape | Ovoid, symmetrical and asymmetrical forms | Ovoid, star-shaped, symmetrical and asymmetrical forms | Siddiqui and Viglierchio, 1977; Auld and Robitaille, 2003; Orrhage and MĆ¼ller, 2005 |
| Soma range | 4ā20 Ī¼m, 0.2ā2 Ī¼m thick | 1.1ā50 Ī¼m | Willmer, 1978; Goldstein et al., 1982; Paemen et al., 1992; Rajkowska et al., 1998; Coles, 2009 |
| Nuclear shape | Rounded or ovoid | Rounded, ovoid, elongated, comma shaped, and polylobular | Mashanov et al., 2013; GarcĆa-Cabezas et al., 2016 |
| Cytoplasm | Usually not visible | Usually not visible | GarcĆa-Cabezas et al., 2016; Mashanov and Zueva, 2018 |
| Process length | Up to 600 Ī¼m | Up to 300 Ī¼m | Willmer, 1978; Goldstein et al., 1982; Paemen et al., 1992; Coles, 2009; Kettenmann and Verkhratsky, 2011 |
Characteristics of glial cells in marine invertebrates and vertebrate organisms.
The table summarizes the known glia characteristics of marine invertebrates in which these cells have been found.
TABLE 3
| Phylum | Reported species | Glia functions | References |
| Arthropoda | Limulus polyphemus | Osmoregulation | Harrison and Lane, 1981 |
| Homarus vulgaris | Nutrition of synaptic region | HƔmori and Horridge, 1966 | |
| Glyptonotus antarcticus, Panulirus argus, Panulirus interruptus, Carcinus | Formation of axon sheath | Horridge and Chapman, 1964; Laverack and Ardill, 1965; Spencer and Linberg, 1986; Chaigneau et al., 1991 | |
| Pseudopallene sp. | Embryonic neurogenesis | Brenneis et al., 2013 | |
| Annelida | Armandia brevis and Protodrilus sp. | Encapsulation of light-receptive sensory organs | Hermans, 1969; Purschke, 1990 |
| Myxicola infundibulum | Formation of axon sheath | Wells et al., 1972 | |
| Nereis diversicolor | Chemotaxis and possible protection against cellular compression | Baskin, 1971; Paemen et al., 1992 | |
| Mollusca | Mactra stultorum | Possible uptake and inactivation of neurotransmitters | Elekes, 1978 |
| Mytilus edulis | Osmoregulation | Paemen et al., 1992 | |
| Aplysia sp. | Intracellular transport of macromolecules and calcium homeostasis | Goldstein et al., 1982; Maggio et al., 1991 | |
| Echinodermata | Holothuria glaberrima | Precursors of new-born glial cells and neurons | Mashanov et al., 2008, 2013; San Miguel-Ruiz et al., 2009 |
| Sphaerechinus granularis | Possible participation with sensory system of epidermal cells | Flammang and Jangoux, 1993 |
Glia functions in marine invertebrates.
In marine invertebrates, glia cells are reported as āgenerally absentā but several investigations have proved that these cells are present in numerous marine phylum. The number, kind, and distribution of glial cells in the NS of invertebrates are variable. For example, some marine nematodes and annelids species have two glial cells with processes of 0.3ā0.9 Ī¼m thick (Teuchert, 1977; Purschke, 1990). In certain molluscs glia cells are small (4ā5 Ī¼m of diameter), and their filaments are 0.2ā0.5 Ī¼m thick; while in other molluscs like the giant squid, glia cells are 100ā600 Ī¼m long and approximately 2 Ī¼m thick, 20 Ī¼m wide (Willmer, 1978; Goldstein et al., 1982; Paemen et al., 1992; Coles, 2009). In echinoderms, glia cells can compose 45ā70% of the total NS cell mass (Mashanov et al., 2010). Although the presence of glial cells has already been reported in almost all Phyla of marine invertebrates (exceptions are Lophophorata and Hemichordata), the function that these cells have in some of the phylum (like Nematoda) is still unknown, or its literature is not obtainable. It is possible that in some cases glia cells are very little and only few commercial cell markers are specific for marine invertebrates, like has been reported in Aplysia (Lockhart et al., 1996). In the following paragraphs and in Table 3, the known functions of glial cells for marine invertebrates are mentioned.
Arthropods as L. polyphemus uses its glial cells for osmoregulation; if it is true that glial cells are not forming a blood-barrier like in insects, exist junctional complexes between them to restrict the entry of ions and molecules (Harrison and Lane, 1981). Glia cells also participate in the nutrition of the synaptic region in the lobster Homarus vulgaris (HƔmori and Horridge, 1966). In Glyptonotus antarcticus these cells are wrapping its sensory neurons (Chaigneau et al., 1991), which is similar in Panulirus argus and Panulirus interruptus sensory cell bodies, and in the leg nerves of the crab Carcinus, where glia cells form a sheath (Horridge and Chapman, 1964; Laverack and Ardill, 1965; Spencer and Linberg, 1986). As well, in early embryonic stages of Pseudopallene sp. immature glia cells are participating in neurogenesis (Brenneis et al., 2013).
In annelids as far as glial cells are concerned, they have different functions in each one of the annelid species where they have been found. In Armandia brevis processes of sensory nerves are projected into the ocellar cavity, where they almost filled it; the cavity is lined by squamous glial cells which enclosed the photoreceptors in the prostomium (Hermans, 1969). In Protodrilus sp. processes of glial cells are encapsulating its light-receptive sensory organ (but its exact function is still unknown) (Purschke, 1990). In Myxicola infundibulum glial cells are forming a sheath that surrounds the giant axon (Wells et al., 1972). Meanwhile in N. diversicolor is thought that glia cells can induce chemotaxis (Paemen et al., 1992) or may be protecting the neurons from cellular compression (Baskin, 1971).
In Mollusca, different glia cells have been discovered in the same organism. In Mactra stultorum it is suggested that glial elements are participating in transmitter uptake and inactivation (Elekes, 1978). Mytilus edulis has at least two types of small glia cells (Paemen et al., 1992), whose are participating in osmoregulation processes to keep the organismās osmotic and ionic equilibrium (Willmer, 1978). In Aplysia glia cells are contributing to the intracellular transport of macromolecules, and to the intracellular glial calcium homeostasis (Goldstein et al., 1982; Maggio et al., 1991).
Despite the recognized ability of echinoderms to regenerate their NS, even during their life as adults, there are very few species in which the function of glia cells has been reported. Of relevance are the studies reported Mashanov and co-workers in the NS of the sea cucumber (Mashanov et al., 2007, 2009, 2010). They described that in echinoderms, radial glia cells are the major and unique type of glial cells. Radial glial cells of Holothuria glaberrima adults, act as precursors of new-born glial cells and neurons (San Miguel-Ruiz et al., 2009; Mashanov et al., 2013), and constitute the supporting scaffold during neuronal migration (Mashanov and Zueva, 2018). Molecular aspects of this process regulated by glia cells showed that Myc and Bmi-1, besides mammalās gene homologs like Sox2, Oct4, and Klf4 take part in sea cucumber neuroregeneration (Mashanov et al., 2015b, 2014). Besides their role in neuroregeneration, echinodermās glial cells processes are associated with epidermal sensory cells of Sphaerechinus granularis, a sea urchin (Flammang and Jangoux, 1993).
Conclusion
Marine invertebrate organisms live in a great variety of ecosystems, where are exposed to drastic ambient changes. For example, animals living in shores requires very particular homeostatic systems to regulate their metabolism and avoid physiologic damages as consequence of temperature, atmospheric pressure, nutrients availability, and sea water salinity variations that occur during tidal changes. As many organisms, marine invertebrates are susceptible to predation, so they need run away mechanisms to ensure their survival. Each one of these survival requirements should be controlled by the NS, which is relatively less complex in invertebrates and therefore theoretically easier to study. In almost all marine invertebrate phylum, the presence of neurons and glia has been demonstrated. In addition, the anatomy and architecture of the NS of many marine invertebrates has been described for more than a century, so there is a significant amount of information about it. For some organisms the function of both cell types has also been described. In other cases and as mentioned above, further studies are required. These reasons all together make marine invertebrates excellent model organisms for the neurosciences field.
Diverse marine models are being already used to understand important process in the NS as neurogenesis, neuroregeneration, neuroprotection, and neuro-osmoregulation. Among them, are distinguished the sea cucumber H. glaberrima, used to understand NS regeneration after an injury or deletion; the squid giant Architeuthis and the sea slug Aplysia, which have been used to study in situ the interactions between neurones and glia cells in the context of complex brain functions; the mussel Mytilus for the study of NS homeostatic control; Nereis to the study of nerve regeneration processes; Alpheus to understand the snapping mechanisms regulated by both motor and sensory neurons; Limulus to delineate neuron control on leg contraction, besides NS osmoregulation; Panulirus to be familiar with glial neuroprotection; Deontostoma and Nematostella for or the study of the NS organization; Pseudopallene sp. for embryonic NS development.
Although higher vertebrates have unique cerebral abilities, the physicochemical principles of all brains follow basic and in some cases common strategies. These include organization, neuron-glia communication, gene expression, release and transport of neurotransmitters and other molecules, osmoregulation, formation of glial sheaths, among others. To the extent that the common characteristics between the NS of the chordates and the non-chordates are known and better understood, it will be possible to generate knowledge about the correlation that exists in processes as particular as neuronal regeneration. Once this is achieved, it will be possible to apply such knowledge for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases in humans and with this, improve their quality of life.
Statements
Author contributions
AO contributed to the writing, editing, and discussion of this contribution. TO-B structured and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from UABC program ā18va Convocatoria Internaā to TO-B, and by Conacyt grant 255087 to AO. Both authors declare no competing financial interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Francisco Correa Sandoval for advising us on the phylogenetic classification of species. We also thank the Instituto de Investigaciones OceanolĆ³gicas ā Universidad AutĆ³noma de Baja California.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AliƩA.ManuƫlM. (2010). The backbone of the post-synaptic density originated in a unicellular ancestor of choanoflagellates and metazoans.BMC Evol. Biol.10:34. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-34
2
AndersonH.EdwardsJ. S.PalkaJ. (1980). Developmental neurobiology of invertebrates.Ann. Rev. Neurosci.397ā139. 10.1146/annurev.ne.03.030180.000525
3
ArendtD. (2015). āPerspective - evolution of neural cell types,ā in Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous Systems, edsSchmidt-RhaesaA.HarzschS.PurschkeG., (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 25ā36.
4
ArendtD.DenesA. S.JĆ©kelyG.Tessmar-RaibleK. (2008). The evolution of nervous system centralization.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.3631523ā1528. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2242
5
ArendtD.MusserJ. M.BakerC. V. H.BergmanA.CepkoC.ErwinD. H.et al (2016). The origin and evolution of cell types.Nat. Rev. Genet.17744ā757. 10.1038/nrg.2016.127
6
ArendtD.NĆ¼bler-JungK. (1994). Inversion of dorsoventral axis?Nature371:26. 10.1038/371026a0
7
ArimotoA.TagawaK. (2015). Hedgehog expression during development and regeneration in the hemichordate, Ptychodera flava.Zool. Sci.3233ā37. 10.2108/zs140157
8
ArimotoA.TagawaK. (2018). Regeneration in the enteropneust hemichordate, Ptychodera flava, and its evolutionary implications.Dev. Growth Differ.60400ā408. 10.1111/dgd.12557
9
AuldD. S.RobitailleR. (2003). Glial cells and neurotransmission: an inclusive view of synaptic function.Neuron40389ā400. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00607-X
10
BaillyX.LaguerreL.CorrecG.DupontS.KurthT.PfannkuchenA.et al (2014). The chimerical and multifaceted marine acoel Symsagittifera roscoffensis: from photosymbiosis to brain regeneration.Front. Microbiol.5:498. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00498
11
BaskinD. G. (1971). Fine structure, functional organization and supportive role of neuroglia in nereis.Tissue Cell3579ā587. 10.1016/S0040-8166(71)80005-8
12
BellockT. H. (1965). āEchinodermata,ā in Structure and Function in the Nervous Systems of Invertebrates, edsBullockT. H.HorridgeG. A., (London: W. H. Freeman & Co), 1519ā1558.
13
BenzidD.MorrisC.BarthĆ©lĆ©myR. M. (2005). First detection of serotonin in the nervous system of the marine calanoid copepod Centropages typicus.J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K.8571ā72. 10.1017/S0025315405010842h
14
BerryR. W.CohenM. J. (1972). Synaptic stimulation of RNA metabolism in the giant neuron of Aplysia californica.J. Neurobiol.3209ā222. 10.1002/neu.480030304
15
BiressiA. C. M.ZouT.DupontS.DahlbergC.Di BenedettoC.BonasoroF.et al (2010). Wound healing and arm regeneration in Ophioderma longicaudum and Amphiura filiformis (Ophiuroidea, Echinodermata): comparative morphogenesis and histogenesis.Zoomorphology1291ā19. 10.1007/s00435-009-0095-7
16
BlackshawS. E. (1986). āOrganization and development of the peripheral nervous systems in annelids,ā in Nervous Systems in Invertebrates, ed.AliM. A., (Montreal, QU: Plenum Press), 265ā302. 10.1007/978-1-4613-1955-9_10
17
BlairJ. E.HedgesS. B. (2005). Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of deuterostome animals.Mol. Biol. Evol.222275ā2284. 10.1093/molbev/msi225
18
BlankenshipJ. E.HouckB. (2014). āNervous system (invertebrate),ā in AccessScience (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education), 210. 10.1036/1097-8542.449210
19
BlaxterM. (2011). Nematodes: the worm and its relatives.PLoS Biol.9:e1001050. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001050
20
BrandA. H. H.LiveseyF. J. J. (2011). Neural stem cell biology in vertebrates and invertebrates: more alike than different?Neuron70719ā729. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.016
21
BrenneisG.RichterS. (2010). Architecture of the nervous system in Mystacocarida (Arthropoda, Crustacea)-An immunohistochemical study and 3D reconstruction.J. Morphol.271169ā189. 10.1002/jmor.10789
22
BrenneisG.StollewerkA.ScholtzG. (2013). Embryonic neurogenesis in Pseudopallene sp. (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) includes two subsequent phases with similarities to different arthropod groups.Evodevo4:32. 10.1186/2041-9139-4-32
23
BruscaR. C.MooreW.ShusterS. M. (2016). Invertebrates, 3 Edn, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Incorporated.
24
BudelmannB. U. (1995). āThe cephalopod nervous system: what evolution has made of the molluscan design,ā in The Nervous Systems of Invertebrates: An Evolutionary and Comparative Approach, edsBreidbachO.KutschW., (Basel: BirkhƤuser Basel), 115ā138. 10.1007/978-3-0348-9219-3_7
25
BullochA. G. M. (1985). Development and plasticity of the molluscan nervous system.Mollusca8335ā410. 10.1016/B978-0-12-751408-6.50011-4
26
BullochA. G. M.RidgwayR. L. (1995). āComparative aspects of gastropod neurobiology,ā in The Nervous Systems of Invertebrates: An Evolutionary and Comparative Approach, edsBreidbachO.KutschW., (Basel: BirkhƤuser Basel), 89ā113. 10.1007/978-3-0348-9219-3_6
27
BullockT. H. (1984). Ongoing compound field potentials from octopus brain are labile and vertebrate-like.Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.57473ā483. 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90077-4
28
BullockT. H.BaÅarE. (1988). Comparison of Ongoing Compound Field Potentials in the Brains of Invertebrates and Vertebrates in How Do Brains Work.Boston, MA: BirkhƤuser Boston, 356ā374. 10.1007/978-1-4684-9427-3-32
29
BullockT. H.BudelmannB. U. (1991). Sensory evoked potentials in unanesthetized unrestrained cuttlefish: a new preparation for brain physiology in cephalopods.J. Comp. Physiol. A168141ā150. 10.1007/BF00217112
30
BundgaardM.AbbottN. J. (1992). Fine structure of the blood-brain interface in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Mollusca, Cephalopoda).J. Neurocytol.21260ā275. 10.1007/BF01224760
31
ByrneM.CisternasP. (2002). Development and distribution of the peptidergic system in larval and adult patiriella: comparison of sea star bilateral and radial nervous systems.J. Comp. Neurol.451101ā114. 10.1002/cne.10315
32
ByrneM.KoopD.MorrisV. B.ChuiJ.WrayG. A.CisternasP. (2018). Expression of genes and proteins of the pax-six-eya-dach network in the metamorphic sea urchin: insights into development of the enigmatic echinoderm body plan and sensory structures.Dev. Dyn.247239ā249. 10.1002/dvdy.24584
33
Candia CarnevaliM. D.BonasoroF.BialeA. (1997). Pattern of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in the advanced stages of arm regeneration in the feather star Antedon mediterranea.Cell Tissue Res.289363ā374. 10.1007/s004410050883
34
CaƱestroC.BasshamS.PostlethwaitJ. (2005). Development of the central nervous system in the larvacean Oikopleura dioica and the evolution of the chordate brain.Dev. Biol.285298ā315. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.06.039
35
Cavalier-SmithT. (2017). Origin of animal multicellularity: precursors, causes, consequencesāthe choanoflagellate/sponge transition, neurogenesis and the Cambrian explosion.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.372:20150476. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0476
36
ChaigneauJ.BesseC.JarosP. P.MartinG.WƤgeleJ. W.WilligA. (1991). Organ of Bellonci of an Antarctic crustacean, the marine isopod Glyptonotus antarcticus.J. Morphol.207119ā128. 10.1002/jmor.1052070202
37
ChiaF. S. (1970). Histology of the globiferous pedicellariae of Psammechinus miliaris (Echinodermata: Echinoidea).J. Zool.1609ā16. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1970.tb02894.x
38
ChurchP. J.LloydP. E. (1991). Expression of diverse neuropeptide cotransmitters by identified motor neurons in Aplysia.J. Neurosci.11618ā625. 10.1523/jneurosci.11-03-00618.1991
39
ChurchP. J.LloydP. E. (1994). Activity of multiple identified motor neurons recorded intracellularly during evoked feedinglike motor programs in Aplysia.J. Neurophysiol.721794ā1809. 10.1152/jn.1994.72.4.1794
40
ClarkR. B.BonneyD. G. (1960). Influence of the supra-oesophageal ganglion on posterior regeneration in Nereis diversicolor.J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.8112ā118.
41
CobbJ. L. S. (1987). āNeurobiology of the echinodermata,ā in Nervous Systems in Invertebrates, ed.AliM. A., (Boston, MA: Springer), 483ā525. 10.1007/978-1-4613-1955-9_17
42
CoggeshallR.YakstaB.SwartzF. (1971). A cytophotometric analysis of the DNA in the nucleus of the giant cell, R-2, in Aplysia.Chromosoma32205ā212. 10.1007/BF00286009
43
ColesJ. A. (2009). Glial Cells: Invertebrate in Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 749ā759. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.04613-4
44
CoulonJ.DianoM.ArsantoJ.-P.ThouvenyY. (1989). Remodeling processes during anterior regeneration of Owenia fusiformis (Polychaeta, Annelidae): a morphological and immunocytochemical survey.Can. J. Zool.67994ā1005. 10.1139/z89-143
45
CunninghamD.CaseyE. S. (2014). Spatiotemporal development of the embryonic nervous system of Saccoglossus kowalevskii.Dev. Biol.386252ā263. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.12.001
46
DahlbergC.AugerH.DupontS.SasakuraY.ThorndykeM.JolyJ. S. (2009). Refining the Ciona intestinalis model of central nervous system regeneration.PLoS One4:e4458. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004458
47
DakinW. J. (1916). A new species of Enteropneusta, Ptychodera pelsarti, from the Abrolhos Islands.J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool.3385ā100. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1916.tb00254.x
48
DalesR. P. (1967). Annelids, 2 Edn, London: Hutchinson And Co. Ltd.
49
DenesA. S.JĆ©kelyG.SteinmetzP. R. H.RaibleF.SnymanH.PrudāhommeB.et al (2007). Molecular architecture of annelid nerve cord supports common origin of nervous system centralization in bilateria.Cell129277ā288. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.040
50
DĆaz-BalzacC. A.GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”sJ. E. (2018). Echinoderm Nervous System - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51
DupontS.ThorndykeM. C. (2006). Growth or differentiation? Adaptive regeneration in the brittlestar Amphiura filiformis.J. Exp. Biol.2093873ā3881. 10.1242/jeb.02445
52
ElekesK. (1978). Autoradiographic localization of monoamine uptake in the central nervous system of a marine mollusc (Mactra stultorum L., pelecypoda).Neuroscience349ā58. 10.1016/0306-4522(78)90153-7
53
ElofssonR.HesslerR. R. (2005). The tegumental sensory organ and nervous system of Derocheilocaris typica (Crustacea: Mystacocarida).Arthropod Struct. Dev.34139ā152. 10.1016/j.asd.2005.01.004
54
EngL. F.LasekR. J.BigbeeJ. W.EngD. L. (1980). Immunocytologic analyses of 10 nm intermediate filaments in the nervous system of Myxicola.J. Histochem. Cytochem.281312ā1318. 10.1177/28.12.7014711
55
FlammangP.JangouxM. (1993). Functional morphology of coronal and peristomeal podia in Sphaerechinus granularis (Echinodermata.Echinoida). Zoomorphology11347ā60. 10.1007/BF00430976
56
FrancoC. F.SoaresR.PiresE.SantosR.CoelhoA. V. (2012). Radial nerve cord protein phosphorylation dynamics during starfish arm tip wound healing events.Electrophoresis333764ā3778. 10.1002/elps.201200274
57
FrazierW. T.KandelE. R.KupfermannI.WaziriR.CoggeshallR. E. (1967). Morphological and functional properties of identified neurons in the abdominal ganglion of Aplysia californica.J. Neurophysiol.30:1288. 10.1152/jn.1967.30.6.1288
58
FrƶbiusA. C.FunchP. (2017). Rotiferan hox genes give new insights into the evolution of metazoan bodyplans.Nat. Commun.8:9. 10.1038/s41467-017-00020-w
59
GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”sJ. E.Rojas-SotoM.JimĆ©nezL. B.DĆaz-MirandaL. (2001). The enteric nervous system of echinoderms: unexpected complexity revealed by neurochemical analysis.J. Exp. Biol.204865ā873.
60
GarcĆa-CabezasM.JohnY. J.BarbasH.ZikopoulosB. (2016). Distinction of neurons, glia and endothelial cells in the cerebral cortex: an algorithm based on cytological features.Front. Neuroanat.10:107. 10.3389/fnana.2016.00107
61
GhoraiA.GhoshU. (2014). miRNA gene counts in chromosomes vary widely in a species and biogenesis of miRNA largely depends on transcription or post-transcriptional processing of coding genes.Front. Genet.5:100. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00100
62
GillerE. J.SchwartzJ. H. (1971). Choline acetyltransferase in identified neurons of abdominal ganglion of Aplysia californica.J. Neurophysiol.3493ā107. 10.1152/jn.1971.34.1.93
63
GoldsteinR. S.WeissK. R.SchwartzJ. H. (1982). Intraneuronal injection of horseradish peroxidase labels glial cells associated with the axons of the giant metacerebral neuron of Aplysia.J. Neurosci.21567ā1577. 10.1523/jneurosci.02-11-01567.1982
64
GrantS. C.AikenN. R.PlantH. D.GibbsS.MareciT. H.WebbA. G.et al (2000). NMR spectroscopy of single neurons.Magn. Reson. Med.4419ā22. 10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<19::AID-MRM4<3.0.CO;2-F
65
GĆ¼ntherJ. (1975). Neuronal syncytia in the giant fibres of earthworms.J. Neurocytol.455ā62. 10.1007/BF01099095
66
HĆ”moriJ.HorridgeG. A. (1966). The lobster optic lamina. IV. Glial cells.J. Cell Sci.1275ā280.
67
HansenA.SchmidtM. (2001). Neurogenesis in the central olfactory pathway of the adult shore crab Carcinus maenas is controlled by sensory afferents.J. Comp. Neurol.441223ā233. 10.1002/cne.1408
68
HarrisonJ. B.LaneN. J. (1981). Lack of restriction at the blood-brain interface in limulus despite atypical junctional arrangements.J. Neurocytol.10233ā250. 10.1007/BF01257969
69
HartensteinV.StollewerkA. (2015). The evolution of early neurogenesis.Dev. Cell32390ā407. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.004
70
HarzschS. (2006). Neurophylogeny: architecture of the nervous system and a fresh view on arthropod phyologeny.Integr. Comp. Biol.46162ā194. 10.1093/icb/icj011
71
HarzschS.MĆ¼llerC. H. (2007). A new look at the ventral nerve centre of sagitta: implications for the phylogenetic position of Chaetognatha (arrow worms) and the evolution of the bilaterian nervous system.Front. Zool.4:14. 10.1186/1742-9994-4-14
72
HarzschS.WanningerA. (2010). Evolution of invertebrate nervous systems: the chaetognatha as a case study.Acta Zool.9135ā43. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2009.00423.x
73
HejnolA.RentzschF. (2015). Neural nets.Curr. Biol.25R782āR786. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.001
74
HermansC. O. (1969). Fine structure of the segmental ocelli of Armandia brevis (Polychaeta: Opheliidae).Zeitschr. Zellforsch. Mikroskop. Anat.96361ā371. 10.1007/BF00335214
75
HickmanC. P. J.RobertsL. S.KeenS. L.EisenhourD. J.LarsonA.LāArsonH. (2008). Integrated Principles of Zoology.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
76
HinmanV. F.BurkeR. D. (2018). Embryonic neurogenesis in echinoderms.Dev. Biol.7:e316. 10.1002/wdev.316
77
HoffmeyerT. T.BurkhardtP. (2016). Choanoflagellate models - Monosiga brevicollis and Salpingoeca rosetta.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.3942ā47. 10.1016/j.gde.2016.05.016
78
HolmesG. E. (1931). The influence of the nervous system on regeneration in Nereis virens.Sars. J. Exp. Zool.60485ā509. 10.1002/jez.1400600404
79
HorridgeG. A.ChapmanR. A. (1964). Sheaths of the motor axons of the Crab Carcinus.J. Cell Sci.3175ā181.
80
HouthoofdW.JacobsenK.MertensC.VangestelS.CoomansA.BorgonieG. (2003). Embryonic cell lineage of the marine nematode Pellioditis marina.Dev. Biol.25857ā69. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00101-5
81
HumphreysT.SasakiA.UenishiG.TaparraK.ArimotoA.TagawaK. (2010). Regeneration in the hemichordate Ptychodera flava.Zoolog. Sci.2791ā95. 10.2108/zsj.27.91
82
HymanL. H. (1955). The Invertebrates: Echinodermata The Coelomate Bilateria.New York: McGraw-Hill.
83
InoueI.TsutsuiI.Joan AbbottN.BrownE. R. (2002). Ionic currents in isolated and in situ squid schwann cells.J. Physiol.541769ā778. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.019638
84
IsaevaV. V.KasyanovN. V.PresnovE. V. (2014). Topology in biology: singularities and surgery transformations in metazoan development and evolution.Appl. Math.52664ā2674. 10.4236/am.2014.517255
85
JacobM. H. (1984). Neurogenesis in Aplysia californica resembles nervous system formation in vertebrates.J. Neurosci.41225ā1239. 10.1523/jneurosci.04-05-01225.1984
86
JolyJ.-S. (2017). Aquatic Model Organisms in Neurosciences: The Genome-Editing Revolution.Cham: Springer, 10.1007/978-3-319-60192-2-2
87
KamenevY. O.DolmatovI. Y. (2015). Posterior regeneration following fission in the holothurian Cladolabes schmeltzii (Dendrochirotida: Holothuroidea).Microsc. Res. Tech.78540ā552. 10.1002/jemt.22507
88
KamenevY. O.DolmatovI. Y. (2017). Anterior regeneration after fission in the holothurian Cladolabes schmeltzii (Dendrochirotida: Holothuroidea).Microsc. Res. Tech.80183ā194. 10.1002/jemt.22786
89
KandelE. R. (2006). In Search of Memory: The Emergence of A New Science of Mind.New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
90
KandelE. R.SchwartzJ. H. (1982). Molecular biology of learning: modulation of transmitter release.Science218433ā443. 10.1126/science.6289442
91
KaulS.StachT. (2010). Ontogeny of the collar cord: neurulation in the hemichordate Saccoglossus Kowalevskii.J. Morphol.2711240ā1259. 10.1002/jmor.10868
92
KettenmannH.VerkhratskyA. (2011). Neuroglia, der lebende nervenkitt.Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiatr.79588ā597. 10.1055/s-0031-1281704
93
Knight-JonesE. W. (1952). On the nervous system of Saccoglossus cambrensis (Enteropneusta).Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.236315ā354. 10.1098/rstb.1952.0004
94
KnowltonR.MoultonJ. (1963). Sound production in the snapping shrimps Alpheus (Crangon) and Synalpheus.Biol. Bull.125311ā331. 10.2307/1539406
95
KostyuchenkoR. P.KozinV. V.FilippovaN. A.SorokinaE. V. (2019). FoxA expression pattern in two polychaete species, Alitta virens and Platynereis dumerilii: examination of the conserved key regulator of the gut development from cleavage through larval life, postlarval growth, and regeneration.Dev. Dyn.248728ā743. 10.1002/dvdy.7
96
KozinV. V.FilippovaN. A.KostyuchenkoR. P. (2017). Regeneration of the nervous and muscular system after caudal amputation in the polychaete Alitta virens (Annelida: Nereididae).Russ. J. Dev. Biol.48198ā210. 10.1134/S1062360417030079
97
KriegsteinA. R. (1977). Development of the nervous system of Aplysia californica.Physiol. Sci.74375ā378. 10.1016/B978-0-12-374947-5.00028-6
98
LacalliT. C. (1984). Structure and organization of the nervous system in the trochophore larva of Spirobranchus.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.30679ā135. 10.1098/rstb.1984.0082
99
LadurnerP.RiegerR.BaguĆ±Ć J. (2000). Spatial distribution and differentiation potential of stem cells in hatchlings and adults in the marine platyhelminth Macrostomum sp.: A bromodeoxyuridine analysis.Dev. Biol.226231ā241. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9867
100
LasekR. J.DowerW. J. (1971). Aplysia californica: analysis of nuclear DNA in individual nuclei of giant neurons.Science172278ā280. 10.1126/science.172.3980.278
101
LaverackM. S. (1987). āThe nervous system of the crustacea, with special reference to the organisation of the sensory system,ā in Nervous Systems in Invertebrates, ed.AliM. A., (Boston, MA: Springer), 323ā352. 10.1007/978-1-4613-1955-9-12
102
LaverackM. S.ArdillD. J. (1965). The innervation of the aesthetasc hairs of Panulirus argus.J. Cell Sci.10645ā60.
103
LaydenM. J.JohnstonH.AmielA. R.HavrilakJ.SteinworthB.ChockT.et al (2016). MAPK signaling is necessary for neurogenesis in Nematostella vectensis.BMC Biol.14:61. 10.1186/s12915-016-0282-1
104
LeiseE. M. (1990). Modular construction of nervous systems: a basic principle of design for invertebrates and vertebrates.Brain Res. Rev.151ā23. 10.1016/0165-0173(90)90009-D
105
LevensonJ.SherryD. M.DryerL.ChinJ.ByrneJ. H.EskinA. (2000). Localization of glutamate and glutamate transporters in the sensory neurons of Aplysia.J. Comp. Neurol.423121ā131. 10.1002/1096-9861
106
LiebermanE. M.AbbottN. J.HassanS. (1989). Evidence that glutamate mediates axon-to-schwann cell signaling in the squid.Glia294ā102. 10.1002/glia.440020205
107
LiebermanE. M.SanzenbacherE. (1992). Mechanisms of glutamate activation of axon-to-Schwann cell signaling in the squid.Neuroscience47931ā939. 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90041-Y
108
LockhartS. T.LevitanI. B.PikielnyC. W. (1996). Ag, a novel protein secreted from Aplysia glia.J. Neurobiol.2935ā48. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695199601
109
LohY. P.PetersonR. P. (1974). Protein synthesis in phenotypically different, single neurons of Aplysia.Brain Res.7883ā98. 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90355-2
110
LoweC. J.TerasakiM.WuM.FreemanR. M.RunftL.KwanK.et al (2006). Dorsoventral patterning in hemichordates: Insights into early chordate evolution.PLoS Biol.13:e1002354. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040291
111
LoweC. J.WuM.SalicA.EvansL.LanderE.Stange-ThomannN.et al (2003). Anteroposterior patterning in hemichordates and the origins of the chordate nervous system.Cell113853ā865. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00469-0
112
LuttrellS. M.GottingK.RossE.AlvaradoA. S.SwallaB. J. (2016). Head regeneration in hemichordates is not a strict recapitulation of development.Dev. Dyn.2451159ā1175. 10.1002/dvdy.24457
113
MaggioK.WatrinA.KeicherE.NicaiseG.Hernandez-NicaiseM. L. (1991). Ca(2+)-ATPase and Mg(2+)-ATPase in Aplysia glial and interstitial cells: an EM cytochemical study.J. Histochem. Cytochem.391645ā1658. 10.1177/39.12.1719071
114
MaroisR.CarewT. J. (1997). Ontogeny of serotonergic neurons in Aplysia californica.J. Comp. Neurol.386477ā490. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861
115
MaselliV.XuF.SyedN. I.PoleseG.Di CosmoA. (2018). A novel approach to primary cell culture for Octopus vulgaris neurons.Front. Physiol.9:220. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00220
116
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. (2018). Radial glia in echinoderms.Dev. Neurobiol.79396ā405. 10.1002/dneu.22659
117
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.Garcia-ArrarasJ. E. (2010). Organization of glial cells in the adult sea cucumber central nervous system.Glia581581ā1593. 10.1002/glia.21031
118
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”sJ. E. (2013). Radial glial cells play a key role in echinoderm neural regeneration.BMC Biol.11:49. 10.1186/1741-7007-11-49
119
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”sJ. E. (2014). Transcriptomic changes during regeneration of the central nervous system in an echinoderm.BMC Genomics15:357. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-357
120
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”sJ. E. (2015a). Expression of pluripotency factors in echinoderm regeneration.Cell Tissue Res.359521ā536. 10.1007/s00441-014-2040-4
121
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”sJ. E. (2015b). Myc regulates programmed cell death and radial glia dedifferentiation after neural injury in an echinoderm.BMC Dev. Biol.15:24. 10.1186/s12861-015-0071-z
122
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.HeinzellerT. (2008). Regeneration of the radial nerve cord in a holothurian: a promising new model system for studying post-traumatic recovery in the adult nervous system.Tissue Cell40351ā372. 10.1016/j.tice.2008.03.004
123
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.HeinzellerT.AschauerB.DolmatovI. Y. (2007). Developmental origin of the adult nervous system in a holothurian: an attempt to unravel the enigma of neurogenesis in echinoderms.Evol. Dev.9244ā256. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00157.x
124
MashanovV. S.ZuevaO. R.HeinzellerT.AschauerB.NaumannW. W.GrondonaJ. M.et al (2009). The central nervous system of sea cucumbers (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) shows positive immunostaining for a chordate glial secretion.Front. Zool.6:11. 10.1186/1742-9994-6-11
125
MauelshagenJ.SherffC. M.CarewT. J. (1998). Differential induction of long-term synaptic facilitation by spaced and massed applications of serotonin at sensory neuron synapses of Aplysia californica.Learn. Mem.5246ā256. 10.1101/lm.5.3.246
126
MeinertzhagenI. A. (2017). āMorphology of invertebrate neurons and synapses,ā in The Oxford Handbook of Invertebrate Neurobiology, ed.ByrneJ. H., (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 71. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190456757.013.9
127
MeinertzhagenI. A.OkamuraY. (2001). The larval ascidian nervous system: the chordate brain from its small beginnings.Trends Neurosci.24401ā410. 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01851-8
128
MiyamotoN.WadaH. (2015). Hemichordates: Development in ELS.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 10.1002/9780470015902.a0004110.pub2
129
MoffettS. B. (1996). Annelida: Introduction to the Phylum: Nervous System Regeneration in the Invertebrates.Pullman: Springer.
130
MorozL. L.EdwardsJ. R.PuthanveettilS. V.KohnA. B.HaT.HeylandA.et al (2006). Neuronal transcriptome of aplysia: neuronal compartments and circuitry.Cell1271453ā1467. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.052
131
MorozL. L.KocotK. M.CitarellaM. R.DosungS.NorekianT. P.PovolotskayaI. S.et al (2014). The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems.Nature510109ā114. 10.1038/nature13400
132
MossC.HunterA. J.ThorndykeM. C. (1998). Patterns of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and neuropeptide immunoreactivity during arm regeneration in the starfish Asterias rubens.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.353421ā436. 10.1098/rstb.1998.0220
133
MĆ¼llerM. C. M.BerenzenA.WestheideW. (2003). Experiments on anterior regeneration in Eurythoe complanata (āPolychaetaā, Amphinomidae): reconfiguration of the nervous system and its function for regeneration.Zoomorphology12295ā103. 10.1007/s00435-003-0073-4
134
NielsenC. (1999). Origin of the chordate central nervous system and the origin of chordates.Dev. Genes Evol.209198ā205. 10.1007/s004270050244
135
NielsenC. (2017). Evolution of deuterostomy ā and origin of the chordates.Biol. Rev.92316ā325. 10.1111/brv.12229
136
NobelM. (2019). All Nobel Prizes in Physiology or Medicine [WWW Document]. Nobel Media AB. Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/(accessed January 31, 2018).
137
NomaksteinskyM.RƶttingerE.DufourH. D.ChettouhZ.LoweC. J.MartindaleM. Q.et al (2009). Centralization of the deuterostome nervous system predates chordates.Curr. Biol.191264ā1269. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.063
138
NorthcuttR. G.NobackC. R.KallenB. (2017). āNervous system (vertebrate),ā in AccessScience (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education), 300. 10.1036/1097-8542.449300
139
NĆ¼bler-JungK.ArendtD. (1996). Enteropneusts and chordate evolution.Curr. Biol.6352ā353. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00491-8
140
OnoJ. K.McCamanR. E. (1984). Imunocytochemical localization and direct assays of serotonin-containing neurons in Aplysia.Neuroscience11549ā560. 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90044-7
141
OrrhageL. (1993). On the microanatomy of the cephalic nervous system of nereidae (Polychaeta), with a preliminary discussion of some earlier theories on the segmentation of the polychaete brain.Acta Zool.74145ā172. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1993.tb01231.x
142
OrrhageL.Eibye-JacobsenD. (1998). On the anatomy of the central nervous system of Phyllodocidae (Polychaeta) and the phylogeny of phyllodocid genera: a new alternative.Acta Zool.79215ā234. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1998.tb01160.x
143
OrrhageL.MĆ¼llerM. C. M. M. (2005). Morphology of the nervous system of polychaeta (Annelida).Hydrobiologia53579ā111. 10.1007/s10750-004-4375-4
144
PaemenL. R.Porchet-HennereE.MassonM.LeungM. K.HughesT. K.StefanoG. B. (1992). Glial localization of interleukin-1 Ī± in invertebrate ganglia.Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.12463ā472. 10.1007/BF00711547
145
PardosF.RoldĆ”nC.BenitoJ.EmigC. C. (1991). Fine structure of the tentacles of Phoronis australis haswell (Phoronida, Lophophorata).Acta Zool.7281ā90. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1991.tb00320.x
146
ParnasI.AbbottB. C.ShapiroB.LangF. (1968). Neuromuscular system of limulus leg closer muscle.Comp. Biochem. Physiol.26467ā478. 10.1016/0010-406x(68)90639-7
147
PaulusT.MĆ¼llerM. C. M. (2006). Cell proliferation dynamics and morphological differentiation during regeneration in Dorvillea bermudensis (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae).J. Morphol.267393ā403. 10.1002/jmor.10280
148
PellmarT. C.CarpenterD. O. (1980). Serotonin induces a voltage-sensitive calcium current in neurons of Aplysia californica.J. Neurophysiol.44423ā439. 10.1152/jn.1980.44.3.423
149
PentreathV. W.CobbJ. L. (1972). Neurobiology of echinodermata.Biol. Rev.47363ā392. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1972.tb00977.x
150
PerezY.RiegerV.MartinE.MĆ¼llerC. H. G.HarzschS. (2013). Neurogenesis in an early protostome relative: progenitor cells in the ventral nerve center of chaetognath hatchlings are arranged in a highly organized geometrical pattern.J. Exp. Zool. Part B Mol. Dev. Evol.320179ā193. 10.1002/jez.b.22493
151
PomoryC. M.LawrenceJ. M. (1999). Effect of arm regeneration on energy storage and gonad production in Ophiocoma echinata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea).Mar. Biol.13557ā63. 10.1007/s002270050601
152
PurschkeG. (1990). Ultrastructure of the āstatocystsā in Protodrilus species (Polychaeta): reconstruction of the cellular organization with morphometric data from receptor cells.Zoomorphology11091ā104. 10.1007/BF01632815
153
RajkowskaG.SelemonL. D.Goldman-RakicP. S. (1998). Neuronal and glial somal size in the prefrontal cortex: a postmortem morphometric study of schizophrenia and huntington disease.Arch. Gen. Psychiatry55215ā224. 10.1001/archpsyc.55.3.215
154
ReadA. T.McTeagueJ. A.GovindC. K. (1991). Morphology and behavior of an unusually flexible thoracic limb in the snapping shrimp, Alpheus heterochelis.Biol. Bull.181158ā168. 10.2307/1542498
155
Rimskaya-KorsakovaN.GalkinS.MalakhovV. (2018). Annelid brain and nerve cord in siboglinid Riftia pachyptila.bioRxiv [Preprint], 10.1101/325431
156
Rimskaya-KorsakovaN. N.GalkinS. V.MalakhovV. V. (2018). The neuroanatomy of the siboglinid Riftia pachyptila highlights sedentarian annelid nervous system evolution.PLoS One13:e0198271. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198271
157
RitzmannR. E. (1974). Mechanisms for the snapping behavior of two alpheid shrimp, Alpheus californiensis and Alpheus heterochelis.J. Comp. Physiol. A95217ā236. 10.1007/BF00625445
158
RychelA. L.SwallaB. J. (2009). āRegeneration in hemichordates and echinoderms,ā in Stem Cells in Marine Organisms, edsRinkevichB.MatrangaV., (Dordrecht: Springer), 245ā265. 10.1007/978-90-481-2767-2-10
159
San Miguel-RuizJ. E.Maldonado-SotoA. R.GarcĆa-ArrarĆ”sJ. E. (2009). Regeneration of the radial nerve cord in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima.BMC Dev. Biol.9:3. 10.1186/1471-213X-9-3
160
SandemanD. C.BazinF.BeltzB. S. (2011). Adult neurogenesis: examples from the decapod crustaceans and comparisons with mammals.Arthropod Struct. Dev.40258ā275. 10.1016/j.asd.2011.03.001
161
SchaferW. (2016). Nematode nervous systems.Curr. Biol.26R955āR959. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.044
162
SemmlerH.ChiodinM.BaillyX.MartinezP.WanningerA. (2010). Steps towards a centralized nervous system in basal bilaterians: insights from neurogenesis of the acoel Symsagittifera roscoffensis.Dev. Growth Differ.52701ā713. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01207.x
163
SiddiquiI. A.ViglierchioD. R. (1971). Ultrastructure of the lamellated cytoplasmic inclusions in schwann cells of the marine nematode, Deontostoma californicum.J. Nematol.3264ā275.
164
SiddiquiI. A.ViglierchioD. R. (1977). Ultrastructure of the anterior body region of marine nematode Deontostoma californicum.J. Nematol.956ā82.
165
SigwartJ. D.Sumner-RooneyL. H. (2016). āMollusca: caudofoveata, monoplacophora, polyplacophora, scaphopoda, and solenogastres,ā in Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous Systems, edsRhaesaA. S.HarzschS., (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 172ā189. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682201.003.0018
166
Smarandache-WellmannC. R. (2016). Arthropod neurons and nervous system.Curr. Biol.26R960āR965. 10.1016/J.CUB.2016.07.063
167
SpencerM.LinbergK. A. (1986). Ultrastructure of aesthetasc innervation and external morphology of the lateral antennule setae of the spiny lobster Panulirus interruptus (Randall).Cell Tissue Res.24569ā80. 10.1007/BF00218088
168
TamvacakisA. N.SenatoreA.KatzP. S. (2015). Identification of genes related to learning and memory in the brain transcriptome of the mollusc, Hermissenda crassicornis.Learn. Mem.22617ā621. 10.1101/lm.038158.115
169
TelfordM. J.LittlewoodD. T. J. (2009). Animal Evolution: Genomes, Fossils, And Trees.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
170
TemerevaE. N. (2017). Innervation of the lophophore suggests that the phoronid Phoronis ovalis is a link between phoronids and bryozoans.Sci. Rep.7:14440. 10.1038/s41598-017-14590-8
171
TemerevaE. N.KosevichI. A. (2016). The nervous system of the lophophore in the ctenostome Amathia gracilis provides insight into the morphology of ancestral ectoprocts and the monophyly of the lophophorates.BMC Evol. Biol.16:181. 10.1186/s12862-016-0744-7
172
TemerevaE. N.MalakhovV. V. (2009). Microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the nervous system of phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912 (Lophophorata: Phoronida).Russ. J. Mar. Biol.35388ā404. 10.1134/S1063074009050046
173
TemerevaE. N.TsitrinE. B. (2014). Organization and metamorphic remodeling of the nervous system in juveniles of Phoronopsis harmeri (Phoronida): insights into evolution of the bilaterian nervous system.Front. Zool.11:35. 10.1186/1742-9994-11-35
174
TeuchertG. (1977). The ultrastructure of the marine gastrotrich turbanella cornuta remane (Macrodasyoidea) and its functional and phylogenetical importance.Zoomorphologie88189ā246. 10.1007/BF00995474
175
ThorndykeM. C.Candia CarnevaliM. D. (2001). Regeneration neurohormones and growth factors in echinoderms.Can. J. Zool.791171ā1208. 10.1139/z00-214
176
ThorndykeM. C.ChenW. C.BeesleyP. W.PatrunoM. (2001). Molecular approach to echinoderm regeneration.Microsc. Res. Tech.55474ā485. 10.1002/jemt.1192
177
TreistmanS. N.SchwartzJ. H. (1976). Functional constancy in Aplysia nervous systems with anomalously duplicated identified neurons.Brain Res.109607ā614. 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90040-8
178
VoronovD. A.PanchinY. V. (1998). Cell lineage in marine nematode Enoplus brevis.Development125143ā150.
179
WanningerA. (2005). Immunocytochemistry of the nervous system and the musculature of the chordoid larva of Symbion pandora (Cycliophora).J. Morphol.265237ā243. 10.1002/jmor.10354
180
WatsonA. H. D. (1992). Presynaptic modulation of sensory afferents in the invertebrate and vertebrate nervous system.Comp. Biochem. Physiol.103227ā239. 10.1016/0300-9629(92)90573-9
181
WeidhaseM.BeckersP.BleidornC.AguadoM. T. (2017). Nervous system regeneration in Typosyllis antoni (Annelida: Syllidae).Zool. Anz.26957ā67. 10.1016/j.jcz.2017.07.004
182
WeidhaseM.BleidornC.HelmC. (2014). Structure and anterior regeneration of musculature and nervous system in Cirratulus cf. cirratus (Cirratulidae. Annelida).J. Morphol.2751418ā1430. 10.1002/jmor.20316
183
WeisP.WeisJ. S. (1978). Methylmercury inhibition of fin regeneration in fishes and its interaction with salinity and cadmium.Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci.6327ā334. 10.1016/0302-3524(78)90020-8
184
WellsJ.BessoJ. A.BoldosserW. G.ParsonsR. L. (1972). The fine structure of the nerve cord of Myxicola infundibulum (annelida, polychaeta).Zeitschr. Zellforsch. Mikroskop. Anat.131141ā148. 10.1007/BF00306923
185
WhelanN. V.KocotK. M.MorozL. L.HalanychK. M. (2015). Error, signal, and the placement of Ctenophora sister to all other animals.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1125773ā5778. 10.1073/pnas.1503453112
186
WhimM. D.ChurchP. J.LloydP. E. (1993). Functional roles of peptide cotransmitters at neuromuscular synapses in Aplysia.Mol. Neurobiol.7335ā347. 10.1007/BF02769181
187
WillmerP. (1978). Volume regulation and solute balance in the nervous tissue of an osmoconforming bivalve (Mytilus Edulis).J. Exp. Biol.77157ā179.
188
WinchellC. J.SullivanJ.CameronC. B.SwallaB. J.MallattJ. (2002). Evaluating hypoteheses of deuterostome phylogeny and chordate evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DAN Data.Mol. Biol. Evol.19762ā776. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004134
189
WolfeJ. M.BreinholtJ. W.CrandallK. A.LemmonA. R.LemmonE. M.TimmL. E.et al (2019). A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.286:20190079. 10.1098/rspb.2019.0079
190
WyseG. A.DwyerN. K. (1973). The neuromuscular basis of coxal feeding and locomotory movements in Limulus.Biol. Bull.144567ā579. 10.2307/1540309
191
Zapata-VĆvenesE. (2005). Immunological responses and wound healing in the polychaete Eurythoe complanata (Annelida: Amphinomidae) exposed to copper.Ciencias Mar.311ā10. 10.7773/cm.v31i11.83
192
ZhangS. C. (2001). Defining glial cells during CNS development.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.2840ā843. 10.1038/35097593
Summary
Keywords
neuronal cells, marine models, neurogenesis, invertebrate neuroregeneration, marine neurophysiology
Citation
Ortega A and Olivares-BaƱuelos TN (2020) Neurons and Glia Cells in Marine Invertebrates: An Update. Front. Neurosci. 14:121. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00121
Received
25 October 2019
Accepted
30 January 2020
Published
18 February 2020
Volume
14 - 2020
Edited by
Liliane Schoofs, KU Leuven, Belgium
Reviewed by
Mithilesh Kumar Jha, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Maria Claudia Gonzalez Deniselle, Instituto de BiologĆa y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), Argentina
Updates
Copyright
Ā© 2020 Ortega and Olivares-BaƱuelos.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tatiana N. Olivares-BaƱuelos, tatiana.olivares@uabc.edu.mx
This article was submitted to Neuroendocrine Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.