94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Chetan Singh Thakur1*
Jamal Lottier Molin2
Gert Cauwenberghs3
Giacomo Indiveri4
Kundan Kumar1
Ning Qiao4
Johannes Schemmel5
Runchun Wang6
Elisabetta Chicca7
Jennifer Olson Hasler8
Jae-sun Seo9Shimeng Yu9Yu Cao9
André van Schaik6
Ralph Etienne-Cummings2- 1Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
- 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- 3Department of Bioengineering and Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
- 4Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 5Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- 6The MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
- 7Cognitive Interaction Technology – Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- 8School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 9School of Electrical, Computer and Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
A Corrigendum on
Large-Scale Neuromorphic Spiking Array Processors: A Quest to Mimic the Brain
by Thakur, C. S., Molin, J. L., Cauwenberghs, G., Indiveri, G., Kumar, K., Qiao, N., et al. (2018). Front. Neurosci. 12:891. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00891
In the original article, there were mistakes in Table 5, Comparison of event-based neural processors, as published. The area per neuron for the transistor channel was incorrectly provided as “4 cm2” and should be “–” (empty). The synaptic plasticity for true North was incorrectly provided as “STDP” and should be “No Plasticity.” The area per neuron for Loihi was incorrectly provided as “0.4 mm2” and should be “0.4 mm2*.” The corrected Table 5, Comparison of event-based neural processors, appears below.
TABLE 5
Table 5. Comparison of event-based neural processors.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that the do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: neuromorphic engineering, large-scale systems, brain-inspired computing, analog sub-threshold, spiking neural emulator
Citation: Thakur CS, Molin JL, Cauwenberghs G, Indiveri G, Kumar K, Qiao N, Schemmel J, Wang R, Chicca E, Hasler JO, Seo J, Yu S, Cao Y, van Schaik A and Etienne-Cummings R (2019) Corrigendum: Large-Scale Neuromorphic Spiking Array Processors: A Quest to Mimic the Brain. Front. Neurosci. 12:991. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00991
Received: 07 December 2018; Accepted: 10 December 2018;
Published: 07 January 2019.
Approved by:
Frontiers in Neuroscience Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2019 Thakur, Molin, Cauwenberghs, Indiveri, Kumar, Qiao, Schemmel, Wang, Chicca, Hasler, Seo, Yu, Cao, van Schaik and Etienne-Cummings. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chetan Singh Thakur, Y3N0aGFrdXJAaWlzYy5hYy5pbg==