Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Hum. Neurosci., 21 August 2020
Sec. Brain Imaging and Stimulation
This article is part of the Research Topic Examinations of Variability in Neuroimaging Data and Cognitive Performance View all 11 articles

Corrigendum: Correlation Between the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale- 3rd Edition Metrics and Brain Structure in Healthy Individuals: A Whole-Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

\nShinsuke HideseShinsuke HideseMiho OtaMiho OtaJunko MatsuoJunko MatsuoIkki IshidaIkki IshidaMoeko HiraishiMoeko HiraishiYuuki YokotaYuuki YokotaKotaro HattoriKotaro HattoriYukihito YomogidaYukihito YomogidaHiroshi Kunugi
Hiroshi Kunugi*
  • Department of Mental Disorder Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan

A Corrigendum on
Correlation Between the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale- 3rd Edition Metrics and Brain Structure in Healthy Individuals: A Whole-Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

by Hidese, S., Ota, M., Matsuo, J., Ishida, I., Hiraishi, M., Yokota, Y., et al. (2020). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14:211. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00211

In the original article, there were errors. The MRI system and parameters were described incorrectly. Furthermore, the reference for (Ota et al., 2017) was incorrectly written as (Ota et al., 2017, Ota et al., 2008). It should be (Ota et al., 2017) and refers to “Ota, M., Sato, N., Hidese, S., Teraishi, T., Maikusa, N., Matsuda, H., et al. (2017). Structural differences in hippocampal subfields among schizophrenia patients, major depressive disorder patients, and healthy subjects. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 259, 54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.11.002.”

A correction has been made to the Materials and Methods section, MRI Data Acquisition and Processing, paragraph 1:

“High spatial resolution, three-dimensional T1-weighted and DTI images were obtained using a 3.0 Tesla MR system (Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Detailed information on the MRI parameters was as follows: the same as our previous report (Ota et al., 2017) for T1-weighted images; echo time/repetition time = 85/6,200 ms, field of view = 240 × 240, matrix = 96 × 96, voxel dimensions = 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm3 for DTI images.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

Ota, M., Sato, N., Hidese, S., Teraishi, T., Maikusa, N., Matsuda, H., et al. (2017). Structural differences in hippocampal subfields among schizophrenia patients, major depressive disorder patients, and healthy subjects. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 259, 54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: gray matter, healthy individuals, Japanese Adult Reading Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, white matter, whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging

Citation: Hidese S, Ota M, Matsuo J, Ishida I, Hiraishi M, Yokota Y, Hattori K, Yomogida Y and Kunugi H (2020) Corrigendum: Correlation Between the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale- 3rd Edition Metrics and Brain Structure in Healthy Individuals: A Whole-Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14:291. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00291

Received: 23 June 2020; Accepted: 29 June 2020;
Published: 21 August 2020.

Edited and reviewed by: Jodie Reanna Gawryluk, University of Victoria, Canada

Copyright © 2020 Hidese, Ota, Matsuo, Ishida, Hiraishi, Yokota, Hattori, Yomogida and Kunugi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hiroshi Kunugi, hkunugi@ncnp.go.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.