Aline Silva Miranda
Leonardo Cruz de Souza
Antônio Lúcio Teixeira- 1Laboratório de Neurobiologia, Departamento de Morfologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- 2Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- 3Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
- 4Santa Casa BH Ensino e Pesquisa, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Editorial on the Research Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury: From Bench to Bedside
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a critical public health and socio-economic problem worldwide. It is one of the leading causes of death and disability among children and young adults, and its incidence in the elderly population has been rising (1). Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that each year in the USA 1.7 million people have a TBI, with 1.4 million of these injured individuals treated in emergency departments, leading to around 275,000 hospitalizations and 52,000 fatalities. The cost of TBI in the USA was estimated to be US$ 76.5 billion in 2010, comprising US$ 11.5 billion in direct medical expenses and US$ 64.8 billion with indirect expenses (2). High-quality data from low- and middle-income countries are scarce. In Brazil, it was recorded approximately 125,000 hospital admissions due to TBI per year between the years of 2008 and 2012, an incidence of 65.7 admissions per 100,000 inhabitants per year with a hospital mortality of 5.1/100,000/year (Information Technology Department of the Unified Health System, DATASUS). The average annual cost of these hospital expenses was US$ 70,960,000, with an average cost per admission of US$ 568. More importantly, a reliable quantification of the societal and personal burden caused by TBI in developing countries like Brazil is very difficult to establish due to inadequate standardization and incomplete capture of data on the incidence and outcome of brain injury (3).
Motor and cognitive deficits are well-known sequelae of TBI, contributing to long-term functional impairment and decrease in quality of life (4). Over the past years, studies have shown that behavioral or psychiatric disorders, specially depression and anxiety, also represent a significant source of distress in TBI patients (5). The prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses in these patients is much higher than in the general population, and up to 45% of them presents more than one psychiatric disorder. The detection and management of neuropsychiatric phenomena affects important decisions that will set the pace for treatment and increase the likelihood of successful rehabilitation (6). Accordingly, a careful assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders is essential in TBI.
Although molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in TBI pathophysiology are not fully understood, a growing body of evidence supports the involvement of a wide range of pathways including inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and excitotoxicity, that are associated with cognitive, motor, and behavioral outcomes (7–13). For instance, TBI induces a complex inflammatory response characterized by fast proliferation and migration of, respectively, brain resident immune cells (microglia) and circulating monocytes to the lesion site, with consequent production of inflammatory mediators that influence neuronal activity (7, 12). Microglial cells remain activated for weeks, months, or even years following a TBI event, which has been associated with increased expression of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNF, and long-term cognitive dysfunction (8–11). Therefore, TBI treatment should not focus only in the acute phase of the traumatic event but also on chronic processes that may influence the development of TBI long-term cognitive and behavioral changes (9, 14).
Currently, there is no treatment that prevents or minimizes TBI neurological and psychiatric sequelae. The understanding of the mechanisms underlying TBI pathophysiology may pave the way for the identification of biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets that ultimately will lead to efficacious therapeutic strategies (15).
This Research Topic gathers a set of seven studies in an interdisciplinary platform that addresses potential cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying TBI neuropsychiatry outcomes and potential therapeutic strategies. This Research Topic also highlights TBI-associated cognitive and behavioral changes in different populations as well as the continuing effort to identify predictors of TBI related mortality.
Areas et al. conducted a prospective multicentric study in Brazil to investigate predictors of hospital mortality in patients with severe TBI. During a period of 22 months, from April 2014 to January 2016, 266 patients with Glasgow coma scale (GCS) ≤ 8 were enrolled in the study. Patients were mostly men (n = 230, 86.5%) with a mean age of 38 years. The hospital mortality was 31.1% (n = 83). The study concluded that older age, worse neuroimaging results, as assessed by the Marshall Computed Tomography Classification, lower GCS scores, presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the CT, and pupillary abnormalities were independent predictors of hospital mortality.
Cardoso et al. investigated cognitive impairment in patients with mild TBI (GCS score ranging from 13 to 15), admitted at a different trauma reference in Brazil during the acute phase (<24 h) of the trauma. Compared to controls and normative data, TBI patients performed worse in a battery of cognitive tests, revealing significant cognitive deficits as memory and learning impairment. Interestingly, the cognitive alterations were not associated with loss of consciousness or previous TBI history, but seem to be negatively influenced by lower educational levels. This is one of the first studies to highlight the role of “cognitive reserve” in TBI outcomes.
Sports are important cause of TBI, and related concussions have been associated with short- and long-term cognitive impairment (16). Rodrigues et al. investigated whether subconcussive impacts occurring during soccer headings may lead to cognitive deficits in active professional soccer players. This type of impact may represent an additional mechanism of cumulative brain injury. Compared with non-athletes, matched by age, and educational level, no evidence of cognitive dysfunction was found in active professional soccer players. Future studies, with a longitudinal design and neuroimaging assessment will help to elucidate whether soccer heading might be a cause of brain injury and cognitive impairment.
Tau pathology seems to be one of the hallmarks of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Katsumoto et al. revised the emerging evidence regarding clinical outcomes and molecular mechanisms underlying tau pathology following single and repetitive TBI. The authors also discussed the similarities and differences regarding the tau pathology observed in chronic traumatic encephalopathy and Alzheimer's disease. The mechanism of rapid tau accumulation remains to be unveiled in both conditions, but structural diversity of tau might explain, at least in part, the difference in outcomes.
Tapp et al. provided an overview regarding the role of neuroinflammation, mainly focused in microglia, in TBI acute and chronic neuropsychiatric sequelae. The authors highlight the involvement of physical and psychological stressors in triggering TBI cognitive and behavioral outcomes. They also hypothesize that the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction following TBI might be a key factor underlying the emergence of neuropsychiatric symptoms through the activation of stress-immune pathways.
Besides cognitive impairment, mild TBI seems to be associated with dizziness and balance impairment. Lee et al. provided the first evidence that genetic variants of Acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3), an ion channel that responds to changes in pH and mechanical stimulation and is expressed in the vestibular and proprioceptive systems, may underlie mild TBI-associated balancing disorders. This finding may prompt further investigation of ASIC3 as a target for balance disorders therapeutics.
A single experimental study was conducted. Szczygielski et al. by employing a closed head injury model of severe TBI in mice demonstrated that administration of acetazolamide (ACZ), a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, as an adjuvant strategy to decompressive craniectomy, attenuated brain edema, and neurological dysfunction. Further studies are necessary to explore the mechanisms underlying ACZ beneficial effects when combined with decompression following TBI, and to translate this finding into clinical practice.
We hope that this Research Topic might contribute to advance the understanding of such a complex and multifaceted field. We are very grateful to the different groups who submitted their scientific findings to this issue, and to the reviewers who kindly provided their time, effort, and experience to improve the quality of each study.
Author Contributions
AM: conception, drafting the work, revising it, and final approval of the version to be published. LS and AT: conception, revising the work critically for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be published.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
AM is a 2016 NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (grant number 25414) and a For Women in Science from L'Oréal Brasil-Unesco-Academia Brasileira de Ciências award recipient.
References
1. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. (2008) 7:728–41. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70164-9
2. Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations and Deaths 2002–2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2010). Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/tbi_ed.html
3. Almeida CER, Sousa JL, Dourado JC, Gontijo PAM, Dellaretti MA, Costa BS. Traumatic brain injury epidemiology in Brazil. World Neurosurg. (2016) 87:540–7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.020
4. Hawthorne G, Gruen RL, Kaye AH. Traumatic brain injury and long-term quality of life: findings from an Australian study. J Neurotrauma. (2009) 26:1623–33. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0735
5. Schwarzbold M, Diaz A, Martins ET, Rufino A, Amante LN, Thais ME, et al. Psychiatric disorders and traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2008) 4:797–816. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s2653
6. Rao V, Lyketsos CG. Psychiatric aspects of traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am. (2002) 25:43–69. doi: 10.1016/S0193-953X(03)00052-2
7. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci. (2005) 8:752–8. doi: 10.1038/nn1472
8. Johnson VE, Stewart JE, Begbie FD, Trojanowski JQ, Smith DH, Stewart W. Inflammation and white matter degeneration persist for years after a single traumatic brain injury. Brain. (2013) 136 (Pt 1):28–42. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws322
9. Loane DJ, Kumar A, Stoica BA, Cabatbat R, Faden AI. Progressive neurodegeneration after experimental brain trauma: association with chronic microglial activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2014) 73:14–29. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0000000000000021
10. Ramlackhansingh AF, Brooks DJ, Greenwood RJ, Bose SK, Turkheimer FE, Kinnunen KM, et al. Inflammation after trauma: microglial activation and traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol. (2011) 70:374–83. doi: 10.1002/ana.22455
11. Smith C, Gentleman SM, Leclercq PD, Murray LS, Griffin WS, Graham DI, et al. The neuroinflammatory response in humans after traumatic brain injury. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. (2013) 39:654–66. doi: 10.1111/nan.12008
12. Turtzo LC, Lescher J, Janes L, Dean DD, Budde MD, Frank JA. Macrophagic and microglial responses after focal traumatic brain injury in the female rat. J Neuroinflamm. (2014) 11:82. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-82
13. Woodcock T, Morganti-Kossmann MC. The role of markers of inflammation in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol. (2013) 4:18. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00018
14. Loane DJ, Faden AI. Neuroprotection for traumatic brain injury: translational challenges and emerging therapeutic strategies. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2010) 31:596–604. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.09.005
15. Machado CA, Simões e Silva AC, de Miranda AS, Cordeiro TME, Ferreira RN, de Souza LC, et al. Immune-based therapies for traumatic brain injury: insights from pre-clinical studies. Curr Med Chem. (2019). doi: 10.2174/0929867326666190710173234. [Epub ahead of print].
Keywords: traumatic brain injury, cognition, anxiety, depression, inflammation
Citation: Miranda AS, de Souza LC and Teixeira AL (2019) Editorial: Traumatic Brain Injury: From Bench to Bedside. Front. Neurol. 10:1214. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01214
Received: 03 October 2019; Accepted: 31 October 2019;
Published: 15 November 2019.
Edited and reviewed by: Mårten Risling, Karolinska Institute (KI), Sweden
Copyright © 2019 Miranda, de Souza and Teixeira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Aline Silva Miranda, bWlyYW5kYXMuYWxpbmUmI3gwMDA0MDtnbWFpbC5jb20=