Abstract
FOXG1-related syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental encephalopathy characterized by early onset hyperkinetic movement disorders, absent language, autistic features, epilepsy, and severe cognitive impairment. However, detailed evaluation of cognition and evolution of movement disorders over time have not been clearly described before. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing in a cohort with unknown severe encephalopathy and movement disorders, with/without autistic behaviors. We identified FOXG1 mutations in three patients. One of them had a novel mutation that has not been described before. The neuropsychological test by Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) showed severe psychomotor impairments in all patients. There were uneven cognitive abilities in terms of verbal and non-verbal cognitive domains in all of them, with approximately 2 months differences. Gross motor skills and expressive language were more severely affected than the other domains in all the patients. All individuals had early onset hyperkinetic movement disorders. The movement disorders in one of our patients changed from predominantly hyperkinetic in early childhood to more hypokinetic in adolescence with the development of dystonia. To the best of our knowledge, this evolution had never been described before. In conclusion, individuals with FOXG1-related syndrome may show clinical progression from hyperkinetic to hypokinetic features over time. There were also uneven cognitive abilities in verbal and non-verbal cognitive domains. The FOXG1 mutation should be considered in individuals with a history of hyperkinetic movements, microcephaly, and uneven cognitive abilities with characteristic brain images.
Introduction
FOXG1-related syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental encephalopathy, associated with heterozygous variants in the forkhead box G1 (FOXG1) gene. Although this syndrome was initially described as a congenital Rett syndrome (RTT) variant (1–4), children with this syndrome have clinical presentations and cerebral malformations distinguishable from those in RTT. This syndrome is characterized by developmental delays, autism-like traits, microcephaly, absence of language, severe cognitive disabilities, early-onset dyskinesia, stereotypic hand movements, epilepsy, and corpus callosum dysgenesis (5, 6). Fewer than 90 cases have been reported worldwide to date (7–9), and the disease is also very rare in Taiwan (10).
Early-onset hyperkinetic movement disorders, such as choreoathetosis and orolingual/facial dyskinesias, which are usually non-responsive to medication, are the hallmarks of this disease (7, 11). However, progression of the movement disorders overtime has not been reported. In addition, although developmental delays are a common feature, few studies have conducted psychological evaluations on these patients (7). The evaluation of cognitive abilities in children with FOXG1-related syndrome is challenging because of their limited language ability that resembles that of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (12). The comprehensive norm-referenced developmental test called Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) (13) is widely used for the assessment of young children with ASD or developmental disabilities (14, 15). Since many behavioral features can further interfere with the accurate assessment of children's cognitive abilities, the MSEL can be used to quickly and easily test young children with autism-like traits, and it identifies the strengths and weaknesses in verbal and non-verbal skills of these children with limited social interaction and communication skills (16).
Herein, three cases with FOXG1-related syndrome were found by whole-exome sequencing, and we describe their clinical characteristics and progression. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on FOXG1-related syndrome from Han Chinese children in Taiwan.
Methods and Materials
Patient Enrollment
Children or infants with unknown developmental delay, movement disorders, autistic behavior, and severe encephalopathy without definite diagnosis were enrolled for analysis in the present study. Molecular diagnosis was done by whole exome sequence in those suspected to have genetic etiologies. The clinical presentations, variation of movement disorders, and evolution of clinical symptoms were then analyzed. The study had been approved by the Ethical Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital, and written informed consents were obtained from the parents of all subjects.
Whole Exome Sequence
Whole-exome sequencing was performed in all samples. Illumina VariantStudio 3.0 software was used for annotation of detected variants. Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the results of whole exome sequence.
Neuropsychological Evaluation
MSEL, a comprehensive norm-referenced developmental test for children aged from 0 to 68 months, was used (17). The instrument contains 5 subscales: Visual Reception, Expressive Language, Receptive Language, Gross Motor, and Fine Motor scales. A non-verbal mental age was constructed for each child via averaging the age equivalents from the visual reception and fine motor scales. A verbal mental age was constructed for each child by averaging the age equivalents from the Receptive Language and Expressive Language scales.
A development quotient (DQ) is an alternative and numerical indicator to help illustrate the maturity of child's cognitive ability. The overall DQ, summed by the DQ of 4 MSEL subscales (i.e., Visual Reception, Fine Motor, Receptive Language, Expressive Language scales), was derived from the MSEL as representative of overall cognitive function. The DQ is comparable with intellectual quotient (IQ) with DQ ≧ 85 considered normal development (18–20). The MSEL has been reported to have good reliability and moderate to high correlations with the Bayley Mental Development Index and the Peabody Fine Motor Scale (17). In addition, previous studies have found that the MSEL has acceptable discriminative validity in that children with ASD obtain lower MSEL scores than typically-developing children (15, 21, 22) or children with global developmental delay (22).
Results
We performed whole-exome sequencing in samples from a total of 30 cases with unknown severe encephalopathy and movement disorders, with/without autistic behaviors. We found three children with FOXG1-related syndrome (Table 1). Case 1 had a missense mutation c.763T>C (p.Trp255Arg), located in the forkhead domain; cases 2 and 3 had altered base pairs of 256 in the N-terminal domain, and both harbored c.256delC (p.Gln86Argfs*106) and c.256dupC (p.Gln86Aspfs*34) that generated truncated proteins completely or partially lacking the forkhead domain, respectively (Figure 1). All mutations were classified as pathogenic variants according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) genomics standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants (23). The mutation of case 1 c.763T>C (p.Trp255Arg) had never been reported before.
Table 1
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene mutation | c.763 T>C | c. 250delC | c.256dupC |
| Amino acid change | (p.Trp255Arg) | (p.Gln86Argfs*106), | (p.Gln86Aspfs*34) |
| Age of diagnosis (years) | 1.92 | 15.91 | 1.67 |
| Age (years) | 2.58 | 17.33 | 1.83 |
| Head circumference (cm), (percentile) | 42 (<3rd) | 49 (<3rd) | 45 (<3rd) |
| Gross motor development | |||
| Held upright, holds head steady | + | + | + |
| Rotates head | + | + | + |
| Move arms and legs vigorously | + | + | + |
| Forearm supported (prone position) | + | + | + |
| Rolls over | + | – | + |
| Sits supported, head steady | + | + | + |
| Stands with hands help | + | – | – |
| Epilepsy | + | + | + |
| Seizure type | Focal | Generalized, focal | Focal (FLE) |
| Onset (years) | 2.6 | 1 | 1.5 |
| EEG | |||
| Epileptiform discharge | – | Right fronto-central, left centro-pareito-temporal | Cz |
| Slowing of background | + | + | – |
| Hypotonia | + | – | + |
| Respiratory arrhythmia | – | – | – |
| Impaired social contact | + | + | + |
| Movement disorders | |||
| Stereotypies | + | + | + |
| Dystonia | + | + | + |
| Rigidity | – | + | – |
| Chorea-athetosis | + | – | + |
| Orofacial-dyskinesia | + | + | + |
| Jerky limb movement | + | + | + |
| Brain MRI | |||
| Dysgenesis of corpus callosum | + | + | + |
| Underdevelopment of frontal areas | + | + | + |
| Hypomyelination | + (Temporal) | – | + (Frontal, Internal capsule) |
Clinical Features of Subjects with FOXG1-related syndrome.
Figure 1
All patients had microcephaly with developmental delay found at around 2 to 4 months of age (Figure 2). Early-onset (<1 years of age) hyperkinetic movement disorders with predominantly orofacial dyskinesia and jerky limb movements appeared first, and then stereotypies, mostly hand wringing, developed later. The movement disorders evolved with age in case 2, who was 17 years of age at time of writing. The hand stereotypies and chorea-athetosis with jerky movements, which appeared at early childhood, have decreased markedly. In contrast, prominent dystonia and rigidity developed over his trunk and extremities.
Figure 2
The MSEL evaluation results (Table 2) showed that our three patients had severe psychomotor impairments, with DQ < 55 in all MSEL scales, in particular, case 2 who was 17 years of age had all DQs < 5. The gross motor and expressive language scales were more severely affected than the other scales in all the patients, with lower DQs and an overall mental age of≤6 months. We found uneven cognitive abilities in verbal and non-verbal cognitive domains in all of them, with ~2 month differences. Cases 1 and 3 had better non-verbal than verbal abilities, while the non-verbal abilities were worse than verbal abilities in Case 2, who was in his adolescence.
Table 2
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biological Age at evaluation (months) | 27 | 203 | 23 |
| Age equivalent (months) | |||
| Overall mental age | 9 | 5.25 | 6.5 |
| Non-verbal mental age | 10 | 4.5 | 7.5 |
| Verbal mental age | 8 | 6 | 5.5 |
| Subscales | |||
| Visual reception | 11 | 6 | 8 |
| Fine motor | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| Receptive language | 11 | 7 | 5 |
| Expressive language | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Gross motor | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Developmental quotient (DQ) | |||
| Overall cognition | 33.3 | 2.6 | 28.3 |
| Nonverbal | 37.0 | 2.2 | 32.6 |
| Verbal | 29.6 | 3.0 | 23.9 |
| Subscales | |||
| Visual reception | 40.7 | 3.0 | 34.8 |
| Fine motor | 33.3 | 1.5 | 30.4 |
| Receptive language | 40.7 | 3.5 | 21.7 |
| Expressive language | 18.5 | 2.5 | 26.1 |
| Gross motor | 22.2 | 1.5 | 21.7 |
The evaluation of Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) of Subjects with FOXG1-related syndrome.
The developmental performance evaluated by MSEL demonstrated non-verbal (Table 3) and verbal (Table 4) performances among our three cases. Regarding non-verbal performance, Case 1 had the highest developmental performance, whereas Case 2 had the lowest performance. All three cases showed visual abilities to horizontal and far/near localized tracking, look and track for dropping items, and cord pull to obtain items. In addition, all of them performed basic hand functions, such as holding reflex and grasping six-inch pegs without using their thumbs. Cases 1 and 3 had comparable non-verbal performances, except that Case 1 was able to match objects without naming them and could pincer-grasp and bang blocks in the midline, while Case 3 could not. Both Cases 1 and 3 were able to play with a ball, attend to pictures, and grasp blocks with their thumbs and drop them, while Case 2 lacked those skills.
Table 3
| MSEL nonverbal skills items | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual tracking (Horizontal) | 180 degrees | 180 degrees | 180 degrees |
| Localization | 1. Horizontal shift 2. Far and near | 1. Horizontal shift 2. Far and near | 1. Horizontal shift 2. Far and near |
| Star at own hand | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Look for dropping spoon | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pull cord to obtain | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Turn cup upside down | No | No | No |
| Make object association | Ball | No | Ball |
| Attend to pictures | Yes | No | Yes |
| Match objects without naming | Shoes, Cars, Keys, Sticks | No | No |
| Arm and hand reflex | 1. Hold ring reflexively 2. Midline 3. Grasp reflex integrated | 1. Hold ring reflexively 2. Midline | 1. Hold ring reflexively 2. Midline 3. Grasp reflex integrated |
| Grasp | 1.6 inches peg (ulnar palmar) 2. Block (with thumb) 3. Drop the block | 6 inches peg (ulnar palmar) | 1.6 inches peg (ulnar palmar) 2. Block (with thumb) 3. Transfer or drop the block |
| Pincer Grasp and Bang | 1. Refined pincer grasp 2. Bang the blocks in midline | No | No |
Developmental performance of MSEL nonverbal skills in the subjects with FOXG1-related syndrome.
Table 4
| MSEL verbal skills items | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound response | 1. Alert to sound 2. Social smiling and vocalizing | 1. Alert to sound 2. Social smiling and vocalizing | 1. Alert to sound 2. Social smiling and vocalizing |
| Listening coordination | With turning and looking | With turning and looking | With turning and looking |
| Enjoy self mirror interaction | Yes | No | Yes |
| Attend to words and movement | Yes | Yes | No |
| Language recognition | Familiar names and words, and own name | Familiar names and words, and own name | No |
| Language understanding | Inhibitory words, simple verbal input, and command with gesture | No | No |
| Smiling and laughing | Make more than one kind of laughter | Make more than one kind of laughter | Make more than one kind of laughter |
| Vocalization | 1. Make “ah, eh, m” 2. Play with own sounds | 1. Make “ah, eh, m” 2. Play with own sounds | 1. Make “ah, eh, m” 2. Play with own sounds 3. Voluntary babbling |
Developmental performance of MSEL verbal skills in the subjects with FOXG1-related syndrome.
Case 1 had the highest developmental verbal performance, whereas Case 3 had the lowest. All cases were able to respond to sounds by smiling and laughing and could listen attentively by turning their heads and looking when the examiner made a sound. In addition, all of them could make more than one laughter and play with their own sounds. Cases 1 and 3 enjoyed self-mirror interactions, whereas Case 2 did not. Although Case 3 had the lowest verbal performance, he was the only one who could babble voluntarily. Compared with Case 3, both Cases 1 and 2 were capable of attending to words and movement, and recognized familiar names, words, and their own names. Moreover, Case 1 could even understand inhibitory words, simple verbal inputs (i.e., bye-bye or clap), and gesture commands.
Discussion
We report the first case series of FOXG1-related syndrome in Han Chinese children in Taiwan. We found two novel mutations that were never described before. This is the first study showing the clinical progression of movement disorders overtime in patients with FOXG1-related syndrome. The movement disorders changed from hyperkinetic in early childhood to more hypokinetic in adolescence, along with the development of dystonia.
FOXG1, formerly BF-1, is a transcription repressor expressed in both fetal and adult brains and is composed of one coding exon and belongs to the forkhead (FOX) family of genes that were identified in animals ranging from worms to humans. It is essential for the development of the forebrain (telencephalon) and for structures derived from the telencephalon, including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and basal ganglia, as shown in animal models (24, 25).
The FOXG1-related syndrome was initially described as a congenital variant of the RTT (2–4), but phenotypic studies found different features from it, like the presence of hyperkinetic movements in early infancy and characteristic brain imaging abnormalities, as well as the lack of regression and lack of respiratory arrhythmias (5–8, 11).
In line with other studies (5–8, 11), all our three cases demonstrated cardinal symptoms of FOXG1-related syndrome. They all developed acquired microcephaly at around 2 to 4 months of age. The early-onset hyperkinetic movement disorders with developmental delays were the first symptoms noted. The stereotypies developed later with characteristic brain MRI findings including dysgenesis of the corpus callosum over the genu and body (5, 6). All our cases also presented underdevelopment of the frontal areas of the cerebrum.
To the best of our knowledge, no long-term evaluations of movement disorders in FOXG1-related syndrome have been reported. In our series, Case 2 presented with hyperkinetic movement disorders, including prominent orofacial dyskinesia, jerky limb movements, and choreoathetosis in early stage. However, he developed limb rigidity and dystonia with less hand stereotypies when getting older. Therefore, FOXG1-related syndrome should still be considered in older children or adults with characteristic brain image findings, acquired microcephaly, and hypokinetic movement disorders, even if lacking hyperkinetic movements. However, because this is only a single case demonstration, more data from adolescent and adult patients with FOXG1-related disorder are needed to clarify the evolution of movement disorder.
After assessing the clinical severity of various phenotypes including somatic growth, motor and speech development, behavior, neurological features, and MRI anomalies, Mitter et al. suggested that subjects with frameshift or non-sense variants in the N-terminal domain and forkhead domain (except for conserved site 1) had more severe phenotypes than those with missense variants in the forkhead conserved site 1 (8). However, no neuropsychological evaluation was done in that study.
In our study, alterations of base pair 256 in the N-terminal domains in Cases 2 and 3 both harbored mutations of c.256delC (p.Gln86Argfs*106) and c.256dupC (p.Gln86Aspfs*34), respectively (Figure 1), generating truncated proteins that completely or partially lack the forkhead domain. In line with the study of Mitter et al. (8), both showed severe phenotypes with severe psychomotor impairment, and their verbal and non-verbal mental age were between 4.5 and 8 months (Table 1). In contrast, Case 1, who had a novel missense mutation c.763T>C (p.Trp255Arg) located in the forkhead domain, had better cognitive abilities. Interestingly, Case 2, the oldest subject (17 years old), had the worst cognitive abilities among them, particularly in fine and gross motor domain. These findings may be explained by the progressive extremity rigidity with age limiting voluntary movements of the hands of this case.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our cases highlighted the uneven verbal and non-verbal cognitive abilities of subjects with FOXG1-related syndrome. Of note, individuals with FOXG1-related syndrome may show clinical progression from hyperkinetic to hypokinetic features with age. Therefore, the FOXG1 mutation should be considered in individuals with a history of hyperkinetic movements in childhood, stereotypies, microcephaly, and characteristic brain images. However, our findings are limited by small case number. Therefore, future studies which enroll more cases are needed to validate this finding.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets for this manuscript are not publicly available because all data had been shown in the paper. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to leeped@hotmail.com.
Ethics statement
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Ethical Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital.
Author contributions
L-CW contributed to the study design, data collection, and writing. Y-TW, C-JH, W-CW, and W-CT contributed to data collection. W-TL contributed to the study design and conduct, writing, and revision.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from Intramural grant of Cathay General Hospital (CGH-MR-A106022), Taiwan.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
MencarelliMAKleefstraTKatzakiEPapaFTCohenMPfundtRet al. 14q12 Microdeletion syndrome and congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. (2009) 52:148–52. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.03.004
2.
Le GuenTBahi-BuissonNNectouxJBoddaertNFichouYDieboldBet al. A FOXG1 mutation in a boy with congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Neurogenetics. (2011) 12:1–8. 10.1007/s10048-010-0255-4
3.
ArianiFHayekGRondinellaDArtusoRMencarelliMASpanhol-RossetoAet al. FOXG1 is responsible for the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. (2008) 83:89–93. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.05.015
4.
JeffreyLNKaufmannWEGlazeDGChristodoulouJClarkeAJBahi-BuissonNet al. Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann Neurol. (2010) 68:944–50. 10.1002/ana.22124
5.
De BruynCVanderhasseltTTanyalcinIKeymolenKVan RompaeyKLDe MeirleirLet al. Thin genu of the corpus callosum points to mutation in FOXG1 in a child with acquired microcephaly, trigonocephaly, and intellectual developmental disorder: a case report and review of literature. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2014) 18:420–6. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.11.010
6.
KortümFDasSFlindtMMorris-RosendahlDJStefanovaIGoldsteinAet al. The core FOXG1 syndrome phenotype consists of postnatal microcephaly, severe mental retardation, absent language, dyskinesia, and corpus callosum hypogenesis. J Med Genet. (2011) 48:396–406. 10.1136/jmg.2010.087528
7.
CaporaliCSignoriniSDe GiorgisVPichiecchioAZuffardiOOrcesiS. Early-onset movement disorder as diagnostic marker in genetic syndromes: three cases of FOXG1-related syndrome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2018) 22:336–9. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.01.007
8.
MitterDPringsheimMKaulischMPlumacherKSSchroderSWarthemannRet al. FOXG1 syndrome: genotype-phenotype association in 83 patients with FOXG1 variants. Genet Med. (2017) 20:98–108. 10.1055/s-0037-1602913
9.
ZhangQWangJLiJBaoXZhaoYZhangXet al. Novel FOXG1 mutations in Chinese patients with Rett syndrome or Rett-like mental retardation. BMC Med Genet. (2017) 18:96. 10.1186/s12881-017-0455-y
10.
Chin WongLHungPLJanTYLeeWT. Variations of stereotypies in individuals with Rett syndrome: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Taiwan. Autism Res. (2017) 10:1204–14. 10.1002/aur.1774
11.
PapandreouASchneiderRBAugustineEFNgJMankadKMeyerEet al. Delineation of the movement disorders associated with FOXG1 mutations. Neurology. (2016) 86:1794–800. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002585
12.
De GiacomoAFombonneE. Parental recognition of developmental abnormalities in autism. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (1998) 7:131–6. 10.1007/s007870050058
13.
MullenEM. Mullen Scales of Early Learning.Circle Pines, MN: AGS (1995).
14.
FilipekPAAccardoPJBaranekGTCookEHJr.DawsonGGordonBet al. The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. (1999) 29:439–84.
15.
AkshoomoffN. Use of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning for the assessment of young children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Child Neuropsychol. (2006) 12:269–77. 10.1080/09297040500473714
16.
RogersSJHepburnSLStackhouseTWehnerE. Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2003) 44:763–81. 10.1111/1469-7610.00162
17.
MullenEM. Mullen Scales of Early Learning.AGS Edition, American Guidance Services (1995).
18.
ElliotC. Differential Ability Scales-II (DAS-II).San Antonio. TX: Pearson (2007).
19.
BayleyN. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. Inc. (2006). p. 266.
20.
LuizDBarnardAKnoesenNKotrasNHorrocksSMcAlindenPet al. Griffiths Mental Development Scales-Extended Revised (Two to Eight Years): Administration Manual. Oxford: Hogrefe (2006).
21.
BurnsTGKingTZSpencerKS. Mullen scales of early learning: the utility in assessing children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy. Appl Neuropsychol Child. (2013) 2:33–42. 10.1080/21622965.2012.682852
22.
HellendoornAWijnroksLvan DaalenEDietzCBuitelaarJKLesemanP. Motor functioning, exploration, visuospatial cognition and language development in preschool children with autism. Res Dev Disabil. (2015) 39:32–42. 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.033
23.
RichardsSAzizNBaleSBickDDasSGastier-FosterJet al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. (2015) 17:405–24. 10.1038/gim.2015.30
24.
DouCLLiSLaiE. Dual role of brain factor-1 in regulating growth and patterning of the cerebral hemispheres. Cereb Cortex. (1999) 9:543–50. 10.1093/cercor/9.6.543
25.
WieseSMurphyDBSchlungABurfeindPSchmundtDSchnulleVet al. The genes for human brain factor 1 and 2, members of the fork head gene family, are clustered on chromosome 14q. Biochim Biophys Acta. (1995) 1262:105–12. 10.1016/0167-4781(95)00059-P
Summary
Keywords
FOXG1, movement disorder, hyperkinetic, hypokinetic, evolution, cognition
Citation
Wong L-C, Wu Y-T, Hsu C-J, Weng W-C, Tsai W-C and Lee W-T (2019) Cognition and Evolution of Movement Disorders of FOXG1-Related Syndrome. Front. Neurol. 10:641. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00641
Received
07 April 2019
Accepted
30 May 2019
Published
28 June 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Alberto Spalice, Policlinico Umberto I, Italy
Reviewed by
Satoru Takahashi, Asahikawa Medical University, Japan; Chunjie Zhao, Southeast University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Wong, Wu, Hsu, Weng, Tsai and Lee.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wang-Tso Lee leeped@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Pediatric Neurology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.