Abstract
Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) is a severe arboviral neuroinvasive disease with high mortality and neurological sequelae. Treatment for EEE is primarily supportive. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and high-dose steroids have been used as empirical therapy for EEE with some case reports of benefit. We report a case of a patient who presented with encephalopathy with initial cerebrospinal spinal fluid (CSF) serology analysis showing California serogroup encephalitis virus IgG positivity. However, the rapid clinical deterioration of the patient into a comatose state prompted a second CSF serology analysis that showed seroconversion of high titer Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus IgM and positive titer of California serogroup encephalitis virus IgG. The patient completed a 5-day course of empiric IVIg without concurrent corticosteroid therapy but did not show significant clinical improvement.
Introduction
Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) is the most severe arboviral disease with >35% mortality in humans, especially in the <15 and >50 year-old populations (1–4). Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) is a member of Togaviridae family with positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome (5). The EEEV life cycle is maintained in an enzootic cycle between Culiseta melanura mosquitoes that breed in freshwater hardwood swamp areas and birds (4). From 2007–2016, a total of 68 cases of neuroinvasive EEE were reported in the United States with an average of 7 cases per year (6). A recent study implicated Florida in a source-sink model as the major source of EEEV in eastern United States (5). Enzootic EEEV infection has also recently been reported in Panama (7). Mammalian infection of EEEV requires bridging mosquitoes that feed on both birds and mammals, such as the Aedes or Coquillettidia species (4). EEEV-infected humans typically do not develop a high enough viremia level to allow virus transmission to feeding mosquitoes, thus humans are considered dead-end hosts (4).
Most EEEV infections have no clinical symptoms and < 5% of people infected with EEEV develop viral meningitis or encephalitis (1–4). Acute onset of fever, chills, malaise, myalgia, and arthralgia characterizes systemic EEEV infection (4). Neuroinvasive EEE is characterized by fever, headache, encephalopathy, and seizures (1). In addition to its high mortality rate, EEE results in neurologic sequelae in >50% of survivors (1). Neuroimaging of EEE cases typically show abnormal MRI T2 weighted hyperintensities in the bilateral basal ganglia and thalami with associated restricted diffusion (1, 8). Meningeal enhancement is also frequently present. The diagnosis of EEE is made in the presence of positive EEEV IgM in the CSF (1). Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and high-dose IV methylprednisolone have been given in several isolated cases reported to have good outcomes, but the relationship between these patient outcomes and these interventions is unknown (1, 9–11).
The California serogroup virus is in the family Bunyaviridae, which includes the La Crosse virus (LACV), and is the most common cause of severe symptomatic disease in the pediatric population (2, 6, 12, 13). Clinical symptoms of La Crosse virus infection include fever, headache, vomiting, meningitis, encephalitis, and meningoencephalitis (12, 14). Mortality rate of La Crosse encephalitis is very low (<1%) and most patients recover completely (14). Diagnosis of La Crosse virus is made in the presence of La Crosse virus IgM (14).
Case Presentation
A 57-year-old woman with a past medical history of hypertension, scoliosis and depression presented with 1 week of flu-like symptoms (diffuse body aches, fatigue, and chills) and generalized weakness that rapidly progressed over several days in June 2018. Her social history is significant for living in a trailer in a wooded area in Florida, living in areas close to a mix of salt and river water, and exposure to mold, rats, and bat droppings near her home. On initial neurological examination, the patient was lethargic but oriented to person, place and time. She had impaired concentration and required occasional tactile or auditory stimulus to maintain attention. There were no cranial nerve deficits. Strength was 4/5 in the bilateral upper extremities and 3/5 in the bilateral lower extremities. There were no pathologic reflexes and sensation to light touch was intact in all extremities. The patient then had a rapid deterioration requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. Serum laboratory results and serology testing throughout the hospital course are presented in Tables 1–6. Ceftriaxone, acyclovir, vancomycin, and ampicillin were started due to suspicion of meningitis based on the initial clinical presentation and serum testing. Computed Tomography (CT) angiogram of the head was unremarkable. Initial MRI Brain without contrast (hospital day 1) showed abnormally increased T2 FLAIR signal in the deep gray nuclei bilaterally, most prominent in the striatum (Figure 1). Blood cultures were negative throughout her hospitalization. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was suggestive of meningitis and is presented in Table 5. Her CSF arboviral antibody panel is shown in Table 6 and was initially unremarkable except for California encephalitis IgG 1:256.
Table 1
| Ref. range | Hospital day 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Amphetamine | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Barbiturate | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Benzodiazepine | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Cannabinoid | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Cocaine metabolites | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Methadone screen | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Opiate screen | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Oxycodone | Range: None detected | None detected |
| Ethyl alcohol | Range: Not detected | Below detectable limits |
Urine drug screen.
Table 2
| Ref. range | Hospital day 1 | Hospital day 4 | Hospital day 8 | Hospital day 22 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium | Range: 136–145 mmol/L | 137 | 136 | 146 (H) | 139 |
| Potassium | Range: 3.3–5.1 mmol/L | 3.6 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
| Chloride | Range: 98–107 mmol/L | 103 | 109 (H) | 111 (H) | 102 |
| Carbon dioxide | Range: 22–30 mmol/L | 23 | 19 (L) | 26 | 30 |
| Urea nitrogen | Range: 6–21 mg/dL | 12 | 18 | 14 | 17 |
| Creatinine | Range: 0.38–1.02 mg/dL | 0.87 | 0.54 | 0.34 (L) | 0.43 |
| Glucose | Range: 65–99 mg/dL | 137 (H) | 100 (H) | 124 (H) | 116 (H) |
| Calcium | Range: 8.4–10.2 mg/dL | 8.8 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Phosphorus | Range: 2.7–4.5 mg/dL | 3.3 | 3.6 | 2.6 (L) | 2.8 |
| Magnesium | Range: 1.5–2.8 mg/dL | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Total protein | Range: 6.4–8.3 g/dL | 7.0 | |||
| Albumin | Range: 3.5–5.2 g/dL | 4.1 | |||
| Albumin/globulin ratio | Latest units: (calc) | 1.4 | |||
| AST | Range: 0–37 IU/L | 24 | |||
| ALT (SGPT) | Range: 0–35 IU/L | 12 | |||
| Bilirubin, direct | Range: 0.0–0.2 mg/dL | < 0.1 | |||
| Total bilirubin | Range: 0.0–1.0 mg/dL | 0.4 | |||
| Alkaline phosphatase | Range: 33–133 IU/L | 60 |
Serum metabolic panel.
Table 3
| Ref. range | Hospital day 1 | Hospital day 4 | Hospital day 8 | Hospital day 22 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC | Range: 4.0–10.0 thou/cu mm | 14.9 (H) | 11.9 (H) | 4.9 | 8.1 |
| RBC | Range: 4.00–5.20 x10E6/uL | 4.97 | 4.22 | 3.51 (L) | 3.81 (L) |
| Hemoglobin | Range: 12.0–16.0 g/dL | 14.9 | 12.8 | 10.8 (L) | 11.6 (L) |
| Hematocrit | Range: 35.0–45.0% | 43.9 | 37.5 | 31.2 (L) | 34.2 (L) |
| MCV | Range: 78.0–100.0 fl | 88.3 | 88.9 | 89.0 | 89.7 |
| MCH | Range: 26.0–34.0 pg | 29.9 | 30.2 | 30.7 | 30.4 |
| MCHC | Range: 31.0–37.0 g/dL | 33.9 | 34.0 | 34.4 | 33.9 |
| RDW | Range: 11.0–14.0% | 13.3 | 13.7 | 13.5 | 13.6 |
| Platelet count | Range: 150–450 thou/cu mm | 181 | 193 | 243 | 491 (H) |
| MPV | Range: 6.0–10.0 fl | 8.2 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Neutrophils | Range: 40.0–80.0% | 90.1 (H) | 86.4 (H) | 64.0 | 66.8 |
| Lymphocytes | Range: 20.0–45.0% | 4.9 (L) | 6.2 (L) | 20.2 | 15.1 (L) |
| Monocytes | Range: 2.0–10.0% | 4.6 | 7.2 | 14.1 (H) | 15.9 (H) |
| Eosinophils | Range: 0.0–8.0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Basophils | Range: 0.0–2.0% | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| CRP, high sensitivity | Range: 0.00–5.00 mg/L | 10.96 (H) |
Complete blood counts, C-reactive protein.
Table 4
| Ref. range | Hospital day 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptococcal Ag CSF | Range: Negative | Not detected |
| Histoplasma antigen urine | Latest Units: ng/mL | Not detected |
| Histoplasma galactomannan Ag urine | Range: Not detected | Not detected |
| EBV quant interpretation CSF | Range: Not detected | Not detected |
| Enterovirus PCR CSF | Range: Negative | Negative |
| HSV DNA PCR CSF | Range: Not detected | Not detected |
| Varicella zoster DNA PCR CSF | Range: Not detected | Not detected |
CSF and urine infectious serology panel.
Table 5
| Ref. range | Hospital day 2 | Hospital day 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC | Range: 0– < 5 cu mm | 810 (H) | 8 (H) |
| RBC | Range: 0– < 5 cu mm | 2 | 90 (H) |
| Protein | Range: 15–45 mg/dL | 117 (H) | 163 (H) |
| Glucose | Range: 40–70 mg/dL | 81 (H) | 66 |
| Appearance | Hazy | Clear | |
| Lymphs | 19% (H) | 83% (H) | |
| Mono/macrocyte | 8% (H) | 17% (H) | |
| Polys | 73% (H) | ||
| Xanthochromia | Clear | Xanthochromia absent | |
| Tube number | 3 |
Cerebrospinal fluid results.
Table 6
| Ref. range | Hospital day 2 | Hospital day 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| California Encephalitis IgG | Range: < 1:16 | 1:256 (H) | 1:64 (H) |
| California Encephalitis IgM | Range: < 1:16 | < 1:16 | < 1:16 |
| East Equine IgG | Range: < 1:16 | < 1:16 | < 1:16 |
| East Equine IgM | Range: < 1:16 | < 1:16 | 1:512 (H) |
| St Louis IgG | Range: < 1:16 | < 1:16 | < 1:16 |
| St Louis IgM | Range: < 1:16 | < 1:16 | < 1:16 |
| West Equine IgG | Range: < 1:16 | < 1:16 | < 1:16 |
| West Equine IgM | Range: < 1:16 | < 1:16 | < 1:16 |
| West Nile IgG | Range: ≤ 1.29 IV | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| West Nile IgM | Range: ≤ 0.89 IV | 0.02 | 0.00 |
Arbovirus serology panel.
Figure 1
Electroencephalogram (EEG) showed diffuse background slowing and rare left temporal sharp waves. On hospital day 4, neurological exam in the setting of pharmacologic sedation and mechanical ventilation was significant for a comatose state with absent brainstem reflexes except for bilateral positive corneal reflexes. She withdrew to painful stimuli in the upper extremities but not lower extremities. Continuous EEG (cEEG) eventually found evidence of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and the patient was stabilized with levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lacosamide. Acute viral encephalitis was suspected and a 5-day course of 0.4 g/kg/day IVIg was started on hospital day 7. Results from repeat CSF arbovirus panel drawn 5 days after the first panel (hospital day 7) showed strongly positive EEE IgM titer at 1:512, and positive California encephalitis IgG at 1:64. Follow up MRI Brain with and without contrast (hospital day 8) demonstrated progressive abnormal increased T2 signal in the deep gray nuclei with restricted diffusion. There was new diffuse involvement of the cortex, most prominent in the bilateral mesial temporal lobes and the high convexities. There was also leptomeningeal and perivascular enhancement throughout the cerebral hemispheres. After completion of empirical IVIg trial, the patient continued to be in a comatose state in the absence of pharmacologic sedation. MRI Brain with and without contrast 10 days after completing IVIg (hospital day 22) showed decreased leptomeningeal and pial enhancement suggestive of decreased inflammation. There was again progressive T2 hyperintensity in the deep gray nuclei, with near complete involvement of the caudate and putamen. There were no new areas of restricted diffusion. The patient was successfully weaned off mechanical ventilation 5 weeks after empiric IVIg treatment completion. During clinic follow-up 6 weeks post-IVIg trial completion, neurological exam showed an awake state with spontaneous eye opening, presence of bilateral blink to threat, intact corneal reflexes, and withdrawal to noxious stimuli in all extremities. She was non-verbal, unable to follow simple instructions, unable to walk, and completely dependent in her activities of daily living.
Discussion
Recent case reports of possible positive outcome from empiric IVIg and high-dose IV methylprednisolone (1 g/day) in EEE suggest that a part of the neuropathology associated with EEEV infection may be due to the inflammatory reaction in the brain. EEE patients treated with IVIg were able to follow commands within 1–6 days after IVIg initiation (9–11). Many factors including timing of IVIg administration during EEE disease course may contribute to the decreased effectiveness of IVIg. Various mechanisms underlying the immunomodulatory effect of IVIg have been suggested (15). The dimeric antigen-binding fragment, F(ab')2, and the constant fragment (Fc), have both been shown to be crucial for immunosuppression in IVIg therapy (15). F(ab')2-dependent mechanisms involves inflammatory cell depletion, cellular receptors blockade, cytokines and autoantibody neutralization, and anaphylatoxin scavenging (15). Saturating the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), promoting expansion of regulatory T (Treg) cells, blocking activating receptor, modulating dendritic cells, blocking immune complex binding to low-affinity Fcγ receptors (FcγRs), and modulation of activating and inhibitory FcγR expression on innate immune effector cells and B cells are Fc-dependent mechanisms attributed to IVIg (15).
The clinical manifestations of multiple arbovirus infections in a single patient have not been well-characterized. This case report showed an acute seroconversion of EEEV IgM in the background of the patient's California serogroup encephalitis virus IgG seropositivity, the patient remained in a comatose state upon completion of IVIg therapy. She may have experienced a more severe encephalitis due to neuroinvasive EEEV coinfection on California serogroup encephalitis virus infection. Recent studies have shown that the La Crosse virus induces neuronal death through activation of innate immune signaling (16). EEEV was recently shown to avoid innate immune activation by using a host microRNA to restrict viral replication in innate immune cells, and the degree of peripheral innate immune escape is directly correlated to mortality in mice (17). Concomitant innate immune signaling activation by a California serogroup encephalitis virus and peripheral innate immune escape of EEEV in the current patient may explain the rapid progression to comatose state and decreased effectiveness of IVIg treatment.
In this patient, initial CSF serology testing showed only California serogroup encephalitis virus IgG positivity. The rapidly deteriorating clinical course of a patient presenting with encephalopathy and then progressing to comatose state within 1 day is atypical for California serogroup encephalitis, especially in adults (13, 14). However, a case of encephalitis and rapid cognitive decline associated with Jamestown Canyon virus, a member of the California serogroup viruses, was reported in a 73-year-old male (18). This raises the possibility of attributing the patient's severe clinical presentation to coinfection of EEEV and Jamestown Canyon virus as arbovirus coinfection can augment in vivo replication [reviewed in Vogels et al. (19)]. Repeat CSF serology 5 days later revealed high EEEV IgM titer along with California serogroup encephalitis virus IgG. Indirect immunofluorescence assay for Rabies virus is known to have cross-reactivity with West Nile and Powassan flaviviruses (20), which raises the possibility that our detection of California serogroup encephalitis virus and EEEV could be due to cross-reactivity. However, cross-reactivity is unlikely because we detected California serogroup encephalitis virus IgG initially without EEEV IgM or IgG and EEEV IgM was only detected in the repeat CSF serology 5 days later, showing acute seroconversion of EEEV. If cross-reactivity did occur, then both EEEV IgM or IgG would be detected concomitantly with California serogroup encephalitis virus IgM or IgG in both CSF samples. Another limitation of this case report is the lack of PCR study confirming the presence of EEEV and California serogroup encephalitis virus in the patient's CSF. Only 3 cases of EEE with good outcomes have been reported in the setting of empiric IVIg therapy (9–11). No randomized clinical trials have examined the efficacy of IVIg in EEE, likely due to the rarity of EEE (6).
This report presents a unique case of acute EEEV seroconversion with coinfection on California serogroup encephalitis virus infection. Repeat CSF serology testing should be performed to confirm a clinical suspicion of EEE. IVIg therapy can be considered if the clinical suspicion of EEE is high though blinded randomized controlled trials are needed to establish whether IVIg has any efficacy in EEEV encephalitis. Additional research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the effect of IVIg in EEE and the disruption of such therapeutic mechanisms in the presence of multiple arbovirus disease processes.
Statements
Ethics statement
This case study was exempted due to no change in standard of care. Informed consent for publication was obtained from patient's next-of-kin.
Author contributions
JC: medical student; JW: resident physician; BN-L: neurology attending physician on the management team of the patient; JH and RD: interpreted radiological findings and prepared figures and legends; JC, JW, JH, RD, and BN-L: wrote the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The United States Navy, United States Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program, funds medical education of JC. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the US Government. UF Neurology Department Neuromuscular and Pain Division funded the publication of this case report.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
DeresiewiczRLThalerSJHsuLZamaniAA. Clinical and neuroradiographic manifestations of eastern equine encephalitis. N Engl J Med. (1997) 336:1867–74. 10.1056/NEJM199706263362604
2.
GaensbauerJTLindseyNPMessacarKStaplesJEFischerM. Neuroinvasive arboviral disease in the United States: 2003 to 2012. Pediatrics. (2014) 134:e642–50. 10.1542/peds.2014-0498
3.
AdamsDAThomasKRJajoskyRAFosterLBaroiGSharpPet al. Summary of notifiable infectious diseases and conditions—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2017) 64:1–143. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6453a1
4.
LindseyNPStaplesJEFischerM. Eastern equine encephalitis virus in the United States, 2003–2016. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2018) 98:1472–7. 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0927
5.
TanYTsan-YukLam THeberlein-LarsonLASmoleSCAugusteAJHenniganSet al. Large scale complete genome sequencing and phylodynamic analysis of eastern equine encephalitis virus reveal source-sink transmission dynamics in the United States. J Virol. (2018) 92:00074–18. 10.1128/JVI.00074-18
6.
BurakoffALehmanJFischerMStaplesJELindseyNP. West Nile virus and other nationally notifiable arboviral diseases—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2018) 67:13–7. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6701a3
7.
CarreraJPForresterNWangEVittorAYHaddowADLopez-VergesSet al. Eastern equine encephalitis in Latin America. N Engl J Med. (2013) 369:732–44. 10.1056/NEJMoa1212628
8.
NickersonJPKannabiranSBurbankHN. MRI findings in eastern equine encephalitis: the “parenthesis” sign. Clin Imaging. (2016) 40:222–3. 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.10.012
9.
GolombMRDurandMLSchaeferPWMcdonaldCTMaiaMSchwammLH. A case of immunotherapy-responsive eastern equine encephalitis with diffusion-weighted imaging. Neurology. (2001) 56:420–1. 10.1212/WNL.56.3.420
10.
WendellLCPotterNSRothJLSallowaySPThompsonBB. Successful management of severe neuroinvasive eastern equine encephalitis. Neurocrit Care. (2013) 19:111–5. 10.1007/s12028-013-9822-5
11.
MukerjiSSLamADWilsonMR. Eastern equine encephalitis treated with intravenous immunoglobulins. Neurohospitalist. (2016) 6:29–31. 10.1177/1941874415578533
12.
HaddowADOdoiA. The incidence risk, clustering, and clinical presentation of La Crosse virus infections in the eastern United States, 2003-2007. PLoS ONE. (2009) 4:e6145. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006145
13.
TeleronALRoseBKWilliamsDMKemperSEMcJunkinJE. La Crosse encephalitis: an adult case series. Am J Med. (2016) 129:881–4. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.03.021
14.
McJunkinJEDeLos Reyes ECIrazuztaJECaceresMJKhanRRMinnichLLet al. La Crosse encephalitis in children. N Engl J Med. (2001) 344:801–7. 10.1056/NEJM200103153441103
15.
SchwabINimmerjahnF. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: how does IgG modulate the immune system?Nat Rev Immunol. (2013) 13:176–89. 10.1038/nri3401
16.
MukherjeePWoodsTAMooreRAPetersonKE. Activation of the innate signaling molecule MAVS by bunyavirus infection upregulates the adaptor protein SARM1, leading to neuronal death. Immunity. (2013) 38:705–16. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.013
17.
TrobaughDWGardnerCLSunCHaddowADWangEChapnikEet al. RNA viruses can hijack vertebrate microRNAs to suppress innate immunity. Nature. (2014) 506:245–8. 10.1038/nature12869
18.
WebsterDDimitrovaKHollowayKMakowskiKSafronetzDDrebotMA. California serogroup virus infection associated with encephalitis and cognitive decline, Canada, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. (2017) 23:1423–4. 10.3201/eid2308.170239
19.
VogelsCBFRuckertCCavanySMPerkinsTAEbelGDGrubaughND. Arbovirus coinfection and co-transmission: a neglected public health concern?PLoS Biol. (2019) 17:e3000130. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000130
20.
RuddRJApplerKAWongSJ. Presence of cross-reactions with other viral encephalitides in the indirect fluorescent-antibody test for diagnosis of rabies. J Clin Microbiol. (2013) 51:4079–82. 10.1128/JCM.01818-13
Summary
Keywords
Eastern equine encephalitis, IVIg, California encephalitis virus serogroup, seroconversion, coinfection
Citation
Cho JJ, Wong JK, Henkel J, DeJesus RO and Nazario-Lopez B (2019) Acute Seroconversion of Eastern Equine Encephalitis Coinfection With California Serogroup Encephalitis Virus. Front. Neurol. 10:242. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00242
Received
13 September 2018
Accepted
25 February 2019
Published
19 March 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Avindra Nath, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), United States
Reviewed by
Shibani Mukerji, Harvard Medical School, United States; April Davis, New York State Department of Health, United States; Michael Wilson, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Cho, Wong, Henkel, DeJesus and Nazario-Lopez.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bernadette Nazario-Lopez bernadette.nazario@neurology.ufl.edu
This article was submitted to Neuroinfectious Diseases, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.