Abstract
Dopaminergic neurons are located in several brain areas including the olfactory bulb (OB) and involved in many physiological and pathophysiological processes. In the OB, dopamine (DA) is released exclusively by a population of interneurons termed short axon cells (SACs) in the glomerular layer, the initial synaptic integration site of the whole olfactory system. SACs corelease GABA and extend their processes to many glomeruli forming the interglomerular circuit. Two major groups of DA receptors D1-like (D1LRs) and D2-like (D2LRs) types are differentially distributed in the OB, i.e., D1LRs are broadly present except the most superficial olfactory nerve (ON) layer while D2LRs are predominantly confined to the ON and glomerular layers, suggesting that they mediate different physiological functions. In contrast to the well-known D2LR-mediated presynaptic inhibition of ON terminals in the OB, the cellular and circuit targets of the D1LR-mediated DA actions remain unclear even though D1LR activation improves odor detection and discrimination. We recently demonstrated that endogenous DA released from SACs or exogenous DA excites a population of excitatory glomerular neurons termed external tufted cells (ETCs) via D1LRs. But the physiological significance of this D1LR activation is largely unknown. In the present study, we addressed these questions by a systematic examination of exogenous DA actions on synaptic activities and excitabilities in most glomerular neurons and OB output neurons with the following major findings: (1) DA via D1LRs enhances OB output by potentiating the ETC-mediated feedforward excitation to the OB output neurons but suppresses spontaneous excitatory synaptic activities in both types of inhibitory glomerular interneurons periglomerular (PGCs) and SACs; (2) this suppression of excitatory synaptic activities in PGCs and SACs depends on activation of GABAB receptors; (3) DA via D1LRs augments spontaneous inhibitory synaptic activities in all glomerular neurons and OB output neurons; (4) DA selectively activates SACs via D1LRs. These findings suggest that activation of D1LRs elevates the system’s sensitivity to odor stimuli and provide a mechanistic basis for the functional roles of DA in modulating odor detection and discrimination.
Introduction
Dopamine (DA) as a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator plays important roles in many brain functions including motor control, motivation, reward, cognition, maternal and reproductive behaviors (Bjorklund and Dunnett, 2007a; Klein et al., 2019). DA actions are mediated by G protein-coupled receptors, which are classified into two major types based on their gene sequence homology and functions: the excitatory D1-like (D1LRs) and inhibitory D2-like (D2LRs) receptors (Beaulieu and Gainetdinov, 2011). In the mammalian brain DA-containing neurons are located in several distinctive cell groups distributed from the mesencephalon to the olfactory bulb (OB) (Dahlstroem and Fuxe, 1964; Bjorklund and Dunnett, 2007b).
In the OB, DA is exclusively released by a population of interneurons termed short axon cells (SACs), which express glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 67, a key enzyme for biosynthesis of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA (Kosaka and Kosaka, 2008; Kiyokage et al., 2010). Both D1LRs and D2LRs are present in the OB with distinct distribution patterns, i.e., D1LRs are broadly present from glomerular to granule cell layers while D2LRs are confined only to the superficial olfactory nerve (ON) and the glomerular layers (Guthrie et al., 1991; Levey et al., 1993; Coronas et al., 1997; Gutierrez-Mecinas et al., 2005; Yu et al., 2019). Pharmacological activation of D2LRs (Nickell et al., 1991; Hsia et al., 1999; Ennis et al., 2001; Maher and Westbrook, 2008; McGann, 2013) or optogenetic activation of SACs inhibits glutamate release from ON terminals to postsynaptic cellular targets in the glomerular layer (Vaaga et al., 2017). Moreover, in vivo studies showed that blocking either D1LRs or D2LRs (Escanilla et al., 2009) or lack of DA transporters or D2LRs impairs odor discrimination in animals (Tillerson et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2009) whereas olfactory deprivation upregulates D2LR density in the OB (Guthrie et al., 1991). Interestingly, a mating-triggered DA surge in the main OB of female mice impairs their perception of social odors contained in male urine (Serguera et al., 2008). Additionally, dopaminergic SACs exhibit high level of activity-dependent plasticity. For example, naris closure leads to a drastic reduction in the number of TH-immunoreactive cells and processes (Cave and Baker, 2009; Parrish-Aungst et al., 2011; Lazarini et al., 2014; Bonzano et al., 2016). Furthermore, majority of DAergic SACs originate from postnatal neurogenesis and are continuously subject to replenishment during adult life (Lazarini et al., 2014; Bonzano et al., 2016). All these previous findings suggest that DA actively participates in modulating signal processing in the OB. However, the mechanistic actions of DA at the cellular and circuit levels in the OB are not well understood.
The DAergic/GABAergic SACs have somata and processes confined to the glomerular layer (Kosaka and Kosaka, 2008; Kiyokage et al., 2010), where excitatory and inhibitory circuits are formed among the axonal terminals of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), apical dendrites of ETCs and the OB output neurons mitral and tufted cells (MTCs), and two major populations of inhibitory interneurons types – SACs and periglomerular cells (PGCs) (Lledo et al., 2005; Wilson and Mainen, 2006; Nagayama et al., 2014; Burton, 2017; Pignatelli and Belluzzi, 2017). Thus, the DAergic/GABAergic SACs are well-situated to modulate olfactory signal processing at the initial site of synaptic integration in the whole olfactory system. Physiological evidence suggests that functional operation of the SAC-derived circuit depends on postsynaptic cellular targets. For instance, DA is coreleased with GABA from SACs to mediate a biphasic excitatory-inhibitory sequential response in ETCs (Liu et al., 2013) while the transmission from SACs to MTCs or PGCs is mediated by GABAergic and electrical synapses (Banerjee et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016) or GABA alone but not by DA (Shao et al., 2019). Alternatively, DA potentially functions as a neuromodulator in the OB through volume transmission (Cragg et al., 2001). A recent study revealed that DA release from SACs in the OB was quantal and calcium-dependent but was asynchronous and lasted for tens of seconds (Borisovska et al., 2013), supporting volume transmission. Thus, in the present study we designed experiments to examine actions of exogenous DA on both excitatory and inhibitory transmission in the glomerular circuit and analyzed the underlying cellular mechanisms.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Both male and female C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Charles River. The GAD2gfp mice provided of courtesy by Dr. Gabor Szabo were initially from the GAD65_3e/gfp5.5 #30 line on a genetic background of C57BL6 backcrossed to B6CBAF1/J wild-type mice to generate the transgene heterozygotes (Lopez-Bendito et al., 2004). TH-GFP mice were initially courtesy of Dr. Kobayashi (Matsushita et al., 2002) and generated using a 9.0 kb 5′-flanking region of the TH gene on a genetic background of C57BL/6J to crossbreed with DBA/2J mice. These TH-GFP transgenic mice were then backcrossed to C57BL/6J mice to generate heterozygotes for experimental usage. All animals were maintained with a standard 12-h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with protocols submitted to and approved by the Howard University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Slice Preparation
Acute OB slices were prepared from 6- to 8-week-old male or female mice as described previously (Liu et al., 2013). Briefly, horizontal slices (350 μm) were cut with a VT1200s vibratome (Nussloch, Germany) in an ice-cold and oxygenated (95% O2–5% CO2) sucrose-based artificial CSF (sucrose-ACSF) containing (in mM) 210 sucrose, 3 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 2.6 MgSO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 10 glucose. After 30 min incubation in normal ACSF at 30°C, slices were then transferred to ACSF at room temperature until they were used for recordings. Normal ACSF was continuously bubbled with 95% O2–5% CO2 and had the following composition (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.0 MgSO4, 2.0 CaCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 10 glucose. During experiments, slices were perfused at 3 ml/min with ACSF equilibrated with 95% O2–5% CO2 and warmed to 30°C.
Electrophysiology
Whole cell patch clamp recordings were made from OB neurons visualized using Axio Examiner (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) fixed-stage upright microscope with near-infrared differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. Short axon (SACs) and periglomerular cells (PGCs) were identified by their expression of TH- or GAD65-EGFP in corresponding transgenic mice, respectively.
External tufted cells (ETCs) were initially reported in previous studies with Golgi staining (Romon and Cajal, 1909; Pinching and Powell, 1971a, b; Macrides and Schneider, 1982). Recent work more rigorously characterized the morphological and electrophysiological properties of ETCs (Hayar et al., 2004b; Antal et al., 2006). Based on findings from these studies, we redefined and identified ETCs with the following criteria: (1) spontaneous and intrinsic burst spiking that is resistant to blockers of fast synaptic transmitter receptors; (2) soma residing in the deep half of the glomerular layer with “pear” appearance viewed in near-IR DIC optics; (3) an apical dendrite tuft extensively ramifying in a single glomerulus but lack of lateral dendrites in the external plexiform layer (EPL).
To localize apical dendrite tufts of the recorded mitral/tufted cells (MTCs) in the glomerular layer, Alexa-594 (10 μM) was added to the recording electrode solution. Whole cell current or voltage signals were recorded with a MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA, United States) and low-pass filtered at 4 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz with a DIGIDATA 1550B 16-bit analog-to-digital converter (Molecular Devices) using Clampex 11.0.3 (Molecular Devices). Patch recording electrodes were pulled from standard-wall glass capillary tubes without filament (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, United States). Patch pipettes (4–7 MΩ) for whole cell current clamp recording contained (in mM) 115 K-gluconate, 5.0 EGTA, 0.63 CaCl2, 5.5 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 3 Na2-ATP, 0.3 Na3-GTP, and 14 Tris-phosphocreatine (pH 7.3, 285–295 mOsm). Voltage clamp recordings of spontaneous excitatory (sEPSCs) or inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) were made with internal solution containing (in mM) 133 CsCH3O3S, 3 EGTA, 0.4 CaCl2, 5 QX-314, 4 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 3 Na2-ATP, 0.3 Na3-GTP (pH 7.3, 285–295 mOsm). Cells were voltage clamped at −70 mV, the reversal potential of Cl–, to minimize the Cl-mediated sIPSCs thus to optimize the recording of sEPSCs. Cells were voltage clamped at 0 mV, the reversal potential of AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated sEPSCs, to optimize recording of sIPSCs. Before bath application of the GABAA receptor blocker gabazine (GBZ), NBQX (10 μM) and APV (50 μM) were pre-applied to block fast glutamate receptors thus preventing epileptic activity.
Electrical Stimulation
Electrical stimulation was delivered by bipolar glass electrodes made from theta borosilicate tubes (Sutter Instrument). The isolated and constant current stimulation pulses (100 μs) were triggered by a Master-9 stimulator (AMPI, Jerusalem, Israel).
Data Analysis
Amplitudes and frequencies of sEPSCs or sIPSCs were measured with Wdetecta.1 Drug effects on sEPSCs and sIPSCs were determined by measuring these parameters from 1 min duration traces taken immediately before or 1 min (micropuffing) or 2 min (bath application) after drug application in each condition for each cell. Other data were measured and analyzed with Clampfit 11.0.3 (Molecular Devices) and Origin Pro 2019 (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, United States). Statistical significance of population responses was calculated by using paired Student’s t-test or ANOVA One-way repeated measure with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons in Origin Pro 2019.
Drugs Delivery and Chemicals
Drugs were applied by either bath perfusion to treat the whole slices or micropuffing to target the relevant glomeruli by 2 ms and 30 psi pneumatic pressure generated by a picospritzer (Parker Instruments, Cleveland, OH, United States). Micropuffing pipettes were made from thick wall borosilicate glass capillaries without filament (Sutter Instrument) with a 6-μm tip diameter. These parameters were calibrated to deliver an injection volume of ∼20 nl and were previously shown to deliver drug coverage restricted to a single glomerulus (Shao et al., 2012).
D-2-Amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid sodium salt (APV, 50 μM), 2,3-Dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide disodium salt (NBQX disodium salt, 10 μM), Gabazine (SR95531, 10 μM), 8-Bromo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol hydrobromide (SKF83566 bromide, 10 μM), (S)-(-)-5-Aminosulfonyl-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2-methoxybenzamide [(S)-(-)-Sulpiride, 100 μM], (2S)-3-[[(1S)-1-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)ethyl]amino-2-hydroxypropyl](phenylmethyl)phosphinic acid hydrochloride (CGP55845 hydrochloride, 10 μM) were purchased from Tocris Cookson (Ellisville, MO, United States). Dopamine chloride (DA, 20 μM or 100 μM) and all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). All drugs were dissolved in distilled water as stock solution and diluted 1000 times with ACSF to final concentrations.
Results
Dopamine Inhibits Spontaneous EPSCs in Glomerular Interneurons via D1LRs
Previous studies have shown that optogenetic activation of SACs leads to GABA and DA corelease (Liu et al., 2013). The coreleased GABA and DA orchestrate to modulate ETC physiological behaviors in such a way that DA enhances Ih to boost the rebound excitation following the GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition (Liu et al., 2013). Consistently, exogenous DA increases the Ih-dependent bursts of action potentials in ETCs. As a major excitatory element in the glomerular circuit, ETCs monosynaptically drive vast majority of the inhibitory periglomerular cells (PGCs) and SACs (Shao et al., 2009; Kiyokage et al., 2010). All these findings lead us to predict that DA increases spontaneous excitatory synaptic activities in the ETC-driven PGCs and SACs. To test this, we recorded sEPSCs in PGCs and SACs in OB slices under voltage clamp and examined effects of exogenous DA. As PGCs and SACs exclusively express the key enzyme of GABA biosynthesis GAD65 and the rate-limiting enzyme of dopamine biosynthesis tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), respectively (Kiyokage et al., 2010), PGCs and SACs were accordingly identified in GAD65-GFP (Figure 1A) and TH-GFP (not shown) mice. To differentiate the ON-driven and ETC-driven PGCs and SACs, we started with recording their responses to ON stimulation. Consistent with previous findings (Shao et al., 2009; Kiyokage et al., 2010), vast majority of PGCs (8/13) or SACs (8/12) respond to ON-stimulation with long and inconsistent latencies (4.3 ± 0.31 ms, n = 8 PGCs; 4.6 ± 0.42, n = 8 SACs) EPSCs and exhibit bursts of sEPSCs (Figures 1B,C), indicating that they are ETC-driven glomerular interneurons. The rest PGCs (5/13) and SACs (4/12) responded to ON stimulation with short latencies (2.3 ± 0.15 ms, n = 5 PGCs; 2.1 ± 0.17, n = 4 SACs), suggesting that they are ON-driven glomerular interneurons. Surprisingly, bath application of DA reversibly suppressed sEPSCs in all tested PGCs (n = 13, Figures 1C–F,H) and SACs (n = 12). sEPSC frequency and amplitude in PGCs (n = 13) were 63.0 ± 6.7 Hz and 57.4 ± 5.0 pA in ACSF, 29.2 ± 3.0 Hz (P < 0.0001 vs. in ACSF) and 32.3 ± 3.4 pA (P < 0.0001 vs. in ACSF) in DA (20 μM), and 61.3 ± 6.3 Hz (P = 1 vs. in ACSF) and 55.7 ± 5.0 pA (P = 1 vs. in ACSF) after DA washout. Similarly, sEPSC frequency and amplitude in 12 SACs were 64.3 ± 8.4 Hz and 71.0 ± 9.0 pA in ACSF, 28.8 ± 3.6 (P < 0.0001 vs. ACSF) and 37.4 ± 4.3 pA Hz (P < 0.0001 vs. ACSF) in DA, 63.6 ± 8.5 Hz (P = 1 vs. ACSF) and 70.3 ± 8.8 pA (P = 1 vs. ACSF) after DA washout (Figures 1I,K). While the DA suppression of sEPSCs in the ON-driven PGCs and SACs is consistent with previous findings that DA inhibits glutamate release from the ON terminals (Hsia et al., 1999; Berkowicz and Trombley, 2000; Ennis et al., 2001; Maher and Westbrook, 2008; Vaaga et al., 2017), the similar DA action on the ETC-driven PGCs and SACs may indicate dopaminergic modulation of glutamate release from ETC apical dendritic terminals in the glomerular layer. Given that burst sEPSCs reflect spontaneous burst firing activities in presynaptic ETCs, we also measured the sEPSC burst frequencies and found that the frequency of sEPSC bursts was also reduced by DA (Figures 1G,J). sEPSC burst frequencies in PGCs (n = 8) and SACs (n = 8) were 6.1 ± 1.0 Hz and 7.8 ± 1.1 Hz in ACSF, 4.1 ± 0.7 Hz (P < 0.0001 vs. ACSF) and 5.3 ± 0.8 Hz (P < 0.0001 vs. ACSF) in DA, 6.1 ± 0.9 Hz (P = 1 vs. ACSF) and 7.7 ± 1.0 Hz (P = 1 vs. ACSF) after DA washout, respectively. Collectively, these results indicate that DA inhibits glutamate release from presynaptic ETC apical dendrites to PGCs and SACs thus reduces burst sEPSCs.
FIGURE 1
Dopamine actions are mediated by two major categories of G protein-coupled receptors – D1LRs and D2LRs (Beaulieu and Gainetdinov, 2011). Evidence shows that D2LRs in ON terminals mediate presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release to their postsynaptic targets in the glomerular layer (Nickell et al., 1991; Aroniadou-Anderjaska et al., 2000; McGann, 2013). This explains why DA suppresses sEPSCs in the ON-driven PGCs and SACs. All ETCs receive direct ON input (Hayar et al., 2004a; De Saint et al., 2009; Gire and Schoppa, 2009), does DA inhibit ON terminals via D2LRs to reduce ETC burst firing thus indirectly suppresses burst sEPSCs in the ETC-driven PGCs and SACs? To test this, we treated OB slices with bath application of (S)-(-)-Sulpiride (100 μM), a selective D2LR antagonist, for 10 min before addition of DA (Figure 2A). In these conditions, DA reduced sEPSC frequency by 46.8 ± 1.9% (n = 7) in PGCs and 49.7 ± 1.9% (n = 6) in SACs, amplitude by 47.9 ± 3.7% (n = 7) in PGCs and 48.3 ± 3.0% (n = 6) in SACs (Figures 2A–C) in the presence of (S)-(-)-Sulpiride. Specifically, sEPSC frequency and amplitude in PGCs (n = 7) were 76.8 ± 11.9 Hz and 75.1 ± 11.6 pA in (S)-(-)-Sulpiride, 40.3 ± 5.9 Hz [P < 0.0001 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] and 39.0 ± 6.8 pA [P < 0.0001 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] in (S)-(-)-Sulpiride+DA, and 77.4 ± 12.4 Hz [P = 1 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] and 74.0 ± 11.7 pA [P = 1 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] after washout DA, respectively (Figures 2D,E). Similar results were observed in SACs (n = 6) with average frequency and amplitude of 68.2 ± 11.4 Hz and 65.7 ± 12.1 pA in (S)-(-)-Sulpiride, 34.2 ± 6.0 Hz [P < 0.0001 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] and 34.3 ± 6.7 pA [P < 0.0001 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] in the addition of DA, and 67.1 ± 12.0 Hz [P = 1 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] and 64.3 ± 11.8 pA [P = 1 vs. (S)-(-)-Sulpiride] after DA washout (Figures 2D,E). These findings suggest that D2LRs do not mediate presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release from ON terminals to ETCs to PGCs and SACs.
FIGURE 2
Then we examined DA effects on sEPSCs in PGCs and SACs in the presence of the selective D1LR antagonist SKF83566 (10 μM). However, in these conditions, DA altered neither frequency nor amplitude of sEPSCs in either population of glomerular interneurons (Figures 2F–J), implying that the DA suppression of sEPSCs in both PGCs and SACs is mediated by D1LRs.
Altogether, our results support that DA reduces sEPSCs in the ETC-driven PGCs and SACs by activation of D1LRs but this action is not due to reduced ETC activities, which result from activation of D2LRs on ON terminals to reduce glutamate release.
DA Enhances Spontaneous IPSCs in Glomerular Neurons
Since activation of D1LRs on ETCs produces an excitatory effect (Liu et al., 2013) whereas ON terminals are devoid of D1LRs (Levey et al., 1993; Coronas et al., 1997; Beaulieu and Gainetdinov, 2011), we hypothesized that the DA via D1LRs directly excites PGCs and/or SACs to release GABA, which activates GABAB receptors on ETC apical dendrites (Karpuk and Hayar, 2008) to reduce glutamate release onto PGCs and SACs. In this scenario, DA should elevate the glomerular inhibition. To test this, we recorded spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) in voltage clamp in all three populations of glomerular neurons including PGCs, SACs and ETCs, which all have apical dendrites or processes confined to the glomerular layers thus could manifest potential DA-enhanced glomerular inhibition. To maximize detection sIPSCs, which have reversal potential around −70 mV based on chloride concentrations of our internal and external solutions, and minimize sEPSCs, which have a reversal potential at 0 mV, we voltage clamped cells at 0 mV in the presence of NBQX (10 μM) and D-APV (50 μM) to block AMPA and NMDA receptors thus minimize circuit influence. In these conditions, bath application of DA (20 μM) reversibly enhanced sIPSCs in PGCs (Figure 3A). When sIPSCs were completely abolished by the selective GABAA receptor blocker gabazine (GBZ, 10 μM, Figure 3A), DA showed no effect on the holding current, suggesting that DA does not affect PGCs per se. Further analysis revealed that both frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs in PGCs were elevated by DA (Figures 3B,C). To determine what receptors mediate these actions, either (S)-(-)-Sulpiride (100 μM) or SKF83566 (10 μM) was bath-applied before DA addition in another set of experiments. It turned out that SKF83566 rather than (S)-(-)-Sulpiride completely blocked DA effects on sIPSCs in all tested PGCs (Figures 3D,E), indicating mediation by D1LRs. Specifically, the average frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs in seven PGCs were 18.4 ± 5.0 Hz and 47.1 ± 8.7 pA in ACSF, 30.0 ± 6.8 Hz (p < 0.0001 vs. in ACSF) and 72.5 ± 13.4 pA in DA (p < 0.0001 vs. in ACSF), and 18.8 ± 4.8 Hz (p = 1 vs. in ACSF) and 47.9 ± 8.5 pA (p = 1 vs. in ACSF) after DA washout, respectively. In the presence of (S)-(-)-Sulpiride, average frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs in another set of six PGCs were 23.0 ± 7.5 Hz and 50.2 ± 11.0 pA, 33.6 ± 8.7 Hz (P < 0.0001 vs. Sul) and 70.7 ± 14.1 pA (P < 0.0001 vs. Sul) with addition of DA, 23.2 ± 7.3 Hz (p = 1 vs. Sul) and 51.8 ± 11.1 pA (p = 1 vs. Sul), respectively. However, with SKF83566 in the bath, average frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs in six PGCs were 19.5 ± 5.7 Hz and 44.6 ± 9.0 pA, 19.4 ± 5.6 Hz (p = 1 vs. SKF) and 44.4 ± 8.3 pA (p = 1 vs. SKF) with addition of DA, respectively. Similar pharmacological results of DA actions on sIPSCs were observed in both SACs and ETCs (Figures 3F–I) except DA did not show significant effect on sIPSC amplitude in SACs (Figure 3G), supporting our prediction that DA increases overall glomerular inhibition.
FIGURE 3
In sum, our results demonstrate that DA enhances both frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs similarly in both PGCs and ETCs while in SACs DA increased only frequency but not amplitude of sIPSCs. Pharmacological analyses suggest that all these elevating effects in all three populations of glomerular neurons are mediated by D1LRs.
Glomerular Application of DA Augments sIPSCs in Mitral Cells (MCs)
MCs, the principal OB output neurons, have apical dendrites ramifying in single glomeruli where they receive glomerular inhibition. Thus, it was plausible to predict that DA potentiated glomerular inhibition of MCs. To examine this possibility, we voltage clamped MCs at −0 mV in OB slices to maximize sIPSC detection in the presence of NBQX and APV. MC responses to DA (100 μM) micropuffed (30 psi for 2 ms) to the glomeruli receiving apical dendrites of the recorded cells were recorded as described previously (Shao et al., 2012). Alexa 594 (10 μM) was included in internal solution to visualize the recorded cells and their apical dendrites thus facilitate DA micropuffing (Figure 4A). In these conditions, micropuffing DA reversibly increased both frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs in all tested seven MCs (Figures 4B–F). The average frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs in seven cells were 42.6 ± 7.7 Hz and 32.0 ± 8.7 pA in ACSF (control), 62.0 ± 11.6 Hz (p < 0.001 vs. control) and 49.6 ± 11.2 pA (p < 0.001 vs. control) in DA, and 42.3 ± 7.8 Hz (p = 1 vs. control) and 31.1 ± 8.0 pA (p = 1 vs. control) after DA washout, respectively. Collectively, our results demonstrate that DA enhances glomerular inhibition of MCs.
FIGURE 4
Dopamine Selectively Excites Short Axon Cells
Periglomerular cells and SACs are two major populations of inhibitory glomerular interneurons. To test whether DA activates them to release GABA and increase glomerular inhibition, we did both voltage and current clamp recordings from both SACs and PGCs in the presence of synaptic transmission blockers NBQX (10 μM), APV (50 μM) and GBZ (10 μM) to eliminate circuit influence. SACs responded to bath application of DA with an inward current (Figure 5A) in voltage clamp (Vhold = −65 mV) or depolarization with spikes in current clamp (Figure 5C) while PGCs did not respond to the same dose of DA (Figures 5B,D). The average amplitude of the DA-induced inward current in five SACs was 13.0 ± 2.6 pA in ACSF and 0.2 ± 0.1 pA in the presence of SKF83566 (p < 0.01 vs. in ACSF) while in five PGCs the average amplitude was 0.4 ± 0.1 pA (Figure 5E). In current clamp, the average amplitude of DA-induced depolarization in five SACs was 5.1 ± 0.6 mV in ACSF and 0.3 ± 0.1 mV (p < 0.01 vs. in ACSF) in the presence of SKF83566 while there was no depolarization in five PGCs (0.2 ± 0.1 mV) (Figure 5F). Taken together, our results demonstrate that DA selectively excites SACs via D1LRs.
FIGURE 5
GABAB Receptors Mediate the DA Suppressive Effects on sEPSCs in Glomerular Interneurons
Dopamine and GABA are coreleased from SACs (Maher and Westbrook, 2008; Borisovska et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2013; McGann, 2013) whereas activation of D2LRs or GABAB receptors produces presynaptic inhibition in many brain areas including the OB (Nickell et al., 1994; Aroniadou-Anderjaska et al., 2000; Ennis et al., 2001; Isaacson and Vitten, 2003; Wachowiak et al., 2005; Beaulieu and Gainetdinov, 2011; McGann, 2013). To test whether activation of GABAB receptors is required for the DA actions we observed, sEPSCs were recorded in both PGCs and SACs and their responses to DA were compared between with and without the selective GABAB receptor antagonist CGP55845 (10 μM) in the bath. As shown in Figures 6A–C, neither CGP55845 nor CGP55845 plus DA showed effect on sEPSCs in a PGC compared to control. Further analysis revealed DA effect on neither frequency nor amplitude of sEPSCs in six PGCs or five SACs (Figures 6D,E), suggesting that activation of GABAB receptors is required for the DA suppressive effects on sEPSCs in PGCs and SACs.
FIGURE 6
DA Produces an Excitatory Net Effect on MCs
External tufted cells provide direct excitatory input to MCs and contribute to long-lasting depolarization (LLD) (De Saint et al., 2009; Gire and Schoppa, 2009). Our previous study showed that DA increases ETC spontaneous spike burst frequency (Liu et al., 2013), indicating that DA increase LLD frequency. However, our present results showed that DA enhanced glomerular inhibition at least partially due to its selective activation of SACs, indicating that DA inhibits MC output. What will be the DA net effects on MC output with integration of these two directionally opposite actions? To answer this question, we first recorded MCs in voltage clamp with a holding potential at −60 mV and observed their responses to glomerular application of DA as shown by Figures 7A,B. Alexa 594 (10 μM) was included in the patch pipette to visualize the recorded MC somata and their apical dendrites. In these conditions, micropuffing DA (100 μM, 2 ms) to glomeruli (off-target) next to the ones receiving the apical dendrites of the recorded cells did not evoke alteration in the spontaneous LLD (sLLD, Figure 7C top traces). However, when the puffing electrode was moved to target the glomerulus innervated by the apical dendrite of the recorded cell (on-target), DA reversibly induced an inward current in MCs (Figure 7C middle traces). The frequency of the spontaneous LLD superimposed on the inward current was increased compared to that before DA application (Figure 7C middle blown-up traces). After bath application of the glutamatergic receptor blockers NBQX and APV, sLLDs disappeared and glomerular application of DA showed no effect on the holding current (Figure 7C bottom trace), indicating that DA does not affect MC intrinsic properties and the DA-induced inward current is mediated by glutamate from ETCs. Consistently, further experiments showed that DA effects on MCs were completely blocked by SKF83566 (Figures 7D,E), indicating that they are due to activation of D1LRs in ETCs (Liu et al., 2013). In seven MCs, the average amplitude of the first and second dose of DA-induced inward current was 96.8 ± 8.7 pA and 91.9 ± 8.9 pA, respectively (Figure 7D). The sLLD frequency in seven MCs was increased from 0.48 ± 0.08 Hz in control to 0.83 ± 0.08 Hz by the first dose of DA but resumed to 0.49 ± 0.08 Hz after DA washout. The second dose of DA elevated this frequency to 0.78 ± 0.07 Hz (p < 0.05 compared to washout of first dose of DA) followed by a recovery (0.49 ± 0.08 Hz). In sum, these voltage clamp data showed that glomerular application of DA produced an excitatory net effect on MCs via D1LRs.
FIGURE 7
This conclusion led us to predict that DA enhance MC output to downstream centers. To test this, we repeated the prior experiments in current clamp (Figures 8A,B). Again, off-target glomerular application of DA did not evoke significant effect on MC membrane potential or sLLD frequency (Figure 8C top traces and Figure 8E) while on-target DA reversibly and reliably evoked spike responses in MCs (Figure 8C middle traces and Figure 8C). Consistent with voltage clamp results, after treatment of OB slices with SKF83566 for 10 min, on-target DA neither elicited spike response nor affected sLLDs (Figures 8C,E) whereas DA no longer showed any effect in the presence of NBQX and APV to completely block sLLDs (Figure 8C bottom trace). The first dose of DA increased the average instant frequency of spikes in 10 MCs from 4.8 ± 2.4 Hz to 32.2 ± 3.8 Hz (p < 0.0001) followed by a complete recovery (4.9 ± 2.4 Hz, p = 1 compared to pre-DA) while the second dose of DA reversibly elevated it up to 30.6 ± 4.2 Hz (p < 0.0001 compared to first DA washout). These actions were completely blocked by SKF83566 (Figure 8D).
FIGURE 8
Taken together, our results demonstrate that DA produces an excitatory net effect on MCs and consequently increases OB output to downstream olfactory centers.
Discussion
We characterized DA actions on both excitatory and inhibitory transmission in the glomerular circuit followed by analysis of the underlying cellular mechanisms and DA impact on OB output with five major findings (Figure 9). First, DA via D1LRs suppresses sEPSCs in the ETC-driven inhibitory glomerular interneurons, contradicting with DA excitatory actions on ETCs. Second, activation of D1LRs potentiates sIPSCs in all glomerular neurons, indicating enhancement of glomerular inhibition. Consistently, glomerular application of DA elevates sIPSCs in MCs. Third, the depression of sEPSCs in inhibitory glomerular interneurons is blocked by inhibition of GABAB receptors, implying that DA increases GABA release from inhibitory glomerular interneurons to inhibit glutamate release from ETC apical dendrites. Fourth, DA selectively excites the GABAergic SACs but not PGCs via D1LRs. Finally, DA produces a net excitatory effect on MC output via D1LRs. This effect is mediated by glutamate, suggesting the DA excitation of ETCs surpasses the enhanced glomerular inhibition thus potentiates the OB output to downstream targets.
FIGURE 9
DA Regulates the Excitation–Inhibition Balance in the Glomerular Circuit
Our previous study demonstrates that endogenous DA released from SACs or exogenous DA enhances ETC output by elevating the hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) (Liu et al., 2013). ETCs do not have lateral dendrites and their sole apical dendrites ramify in individual glomeruli (Pinching and Powell, 1971a; Macrides and Schneider, 1982; Hayar et al., 2004b; Antal et al., 2006). Thus, they are generally considered as local excitatory interneurons participating in the operation of glomerular circuit. ETC apical dendrites form glutamatergic dendrodendritic synapses with vast majority of PGCs and SACs (Shao et al., 2009; Kiyokage et al., 2010), and apical dendrites of MTCs (De Saint et al., 2009; Gire and Schoppa, 2009) so that the overall excitation level at the glomerular level has been thought to be controlled or coordinated by ETC activities (De Saint et al., 2009). Subsequent studies with optogenetic approaches did not reveal endogenous DA actions on other postsynaptic targets of SACs including MTCs and PGCs (Banerjee et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016; Shao et al., 2019), suggesting that DA functions as a neurotransmitter to mediate wiring transmission only from SACs to ETCs. In this context, by activating ETCs DA should increase synaptic excitation across all neuron populations in the glomerular layer. However, DA may alternatively function as a neuromodulator to mediate volume transmission given its long-lasting small quantal release from SACs (Cragg et al., 2001; Borisovska et al., 2013). In this scenario, actions of endogenous DA released from SACs may alter synaptic activities at dendritic terminals without detectable changes in membrane current or potential at cell somata where recordings are normally made from with conventional electrophysiological approaches. In other words, DA could act on neurons other than ETCs to subtly alter the synaptic excitation–inhibition balance among distinct neuron populations. Consistently, findings of the present study support this prediction, i.e., exogenous DA excites only MTCs but not the ETC-driven inhibitory glomerular interneurons PGCs and SACs, in which DA via D1LRs decreases spontaneous excitatory synaptic activities instead. Our further analysis supports that the excitatory actions of DA on MTCs are not due to direct activation of MTCs but instead are through ETC intermediation because they are eliminated by blocking the glutamatergic receptors AMPA and NMDA receptors, which mediate the transmission from ETCs to MTCs (De Saint et al., 2009; Gire and Schoppa, 2009). Thus, DA differentiates the ETC-driven MTCs from ETC-driven PGCs and SACs by resetting the ETC-derived excitatory synaptic input to postsynaptic targets. These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that:(1) DA activates ETCs (Liu et al., 2013) which provide excitatory feedforward to MTCs (De Saint et al., 2009; Gire and Schoppa, 2009); (2) D1LRs are broadly expressed in the OB including the glomerular layer (Coronas et al., 1997; Beaulieu and Gainetdinov, 2011). Therefore, the overall impact of DA actions is to enhance the OB output by enhancing the ETC-intermediated excitatory feedforward to MTCs and weakening ETC-driven excitatory synaptic input to the local GABAergic interneurons PGCs and SACs, which provide inhibitory feedforward to MTCs.
Cellular Mechanisms Underlying DA Actions
Our mechanistic analysis revealed that the DA-induced suppression of excitatory synaptic activities in ETC-driven PGCs and SACs requires activation of GABAB receptors. Activation of GABAB receptors on OSN axon terminals inhibits glutamate releases (Nickell et al., 1994; Aroniadou-Anderjaska et al., 2000; Wachowiak et al., 2005; McGann, 2013) whereas GABAB receptors are also present in OB glomerular neurons (Fritschy et al., 1999; Panzanelli et al., 2004). Consistent with previous work showing that GABAB receptors inhibit dendrodendritic transmission from MTCs to granule cells in the OB (Isaacson and Vitten, 2003), our finding suggests that GABA released from local interneurons in response to DA activates GABAB receptors on ETC apical dendrites to reduce glutamate release causing suppression of excitatory synaptic activities in postsynaptic PGCs and SACs. This interpretation is supported by our findings that DA via D1LRs augments spontaneous inhibitory synaptic activities in all glomerular neurons and MTCs, suggesting DA increases GABA release from inhibitory interneurons in the glomerular layer. Interestingly, DA selectively excites or depolarizes SACs and increases their spontaneous firing frequency without detectable effect on PGCs. Taken together, these findings lead us to conclude that DA excites SACs, which release GABA to activate GABAB receptors on ETC apical dendrites and reduce glutamate release causing suppression of spontaneous excitatory synaptic activities in PGCs and SACs (Figure 9). Recent studies showed that another type of inhibitory neurons termed deep short axon cells (dSACs) have processes extending into the glomerular layer (Eyre et al., 2008; Burton et al., 2017). Future work needs to examine DA effect on dSACs to see if this population of interneuron are also subject to DAergic modulation.
Functional Implications
Similar to other brain regions like the striatum, activation of D1LR or D2LRs produces opposite effects on olfactory processing (Yue et al., 2004). In contrast to activation of D2LRs that generally produces inhibitory effects on odor discrimination and transmission of the first synapse from OSNs to postsynaptic targets in the OB (Nickell et al., 1991; Aroniadou-Anderjaska et al., 2000; Ennis et al., 2001; Yue et al., 2004; Tillerson et al., 2006; Escanilla et al., 2009; McGann, 2013), activation of D1LRs improves odor detection and discrimination (Doty et al., 1998; Yue et al., 2004). Consistently, our findings in the present study show that overall net effect of DA on OB output is the D1LR-mediated excitation, which depolarizes the output neurons MTCs to bring their resting membrane potential closer to the threshold of action potential generation, meanwhile, activation of D1LRs selectively excites SACs. Since SACs have long processes connecting multiple glomeruli (Kosaka and Kosaka, 2008; Kiyokage et al., 2010), DA activation of SACs is speculated to extend inhibition to ETCs (Liu et al., 2013; Whitesell et al., 2013) and output neurons (Banerjee et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016) in neighboring or distal glomeruli. Thus, we propose that activation of D1LRs is to produce a center-surrounding effect thus enhances OB output from the activated glomeruli to facilitate odor detection and discrimination. Further work by knocking out D1LRs or chemogenetic inhibition of D1LRs in the OB would provide insight into this speculation.
Statements
Data availability statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the manuscript.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Howard University Animal Care and Use Committees.
Author contributions
SL planned and performed the experiments, analyzed the data, performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the results, wrote the manuscript, and approved the content.
Funding
This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health, NIDCDR01DC014447 to SL.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
References
1
AntalM.EyreM.FinkleaB.NusserZ. (2006). External tufted cells in the main olfactory bulb form two distinct subpopulations.Eur. J. Neurosci.241124–1136. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04988.x
2
Aroniadou-AnderjaskaV.ZhouF. M.PriestC. A.EnnisM.ShipleyM. T. (2000). Tonic and synaptically evoked presynaptic inhibition of sensory input to the rat olfactory bulb via GABA(B) heteroreceptors.J. Neurophysiol.841194–1203. 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1194
3
BanerjeeA.MarbachF.AnselmiF.KohM. S.DavisM. B.Garcia da SilvaP.et al (2015). An Interglomerular circuit gates glomerular output and implements gain control in the mouse olfactory bulb.Neuron87193–207. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.019
4
BeaulieuJ. M.GainetdinovR. R. (2011). The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors.Pharmacol. Rev.63182–217. 10.1124/pr.110.002642
5
BerkowiczD. A.TrombleyP. Q. (2000). Dopaminergic modulation at the olfactory nerve synapse.Brain Res.85590–99. 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02342-2
6
BjorklundA.DunnettS. B. (2007a). Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: an update.Trends Neurosci.30194–202. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.006
7
BjorklundA.DunnettS. B. (2007b). Fifty years of dopamine research.Trends Neurosci.30185–187. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.004
8
BonzanoS.BovettiS.GendusaC.PerettoP.De MarchisS. (2016). Adult born olfactory bulb dopaminergic interneurons: molecular determinants and experience-dependent plasticity.Front. Neurosci.10:189.
9
BorisovskaM.BensenA. L.ChongG.WestbrookG. L. (2013). Distinct modes of dopamine and GABA release in a dual transmitter neuron.J. Neurosci.331790–1796. 10.1523/jneurosci.4342-12.2013
10
BurtonS. D. (2017). Inhibitory circuits of the mammalian main olfactory bulb.J. Neurophysiol.1182034–2051. 10.1152/jn.00109.2017
11
BurtonS. D.LaRoccaG.LiuA.CheethamC. E.UrbanN. N. (2017). Olfactory bulb deep short-axon cells mediate widespread inhibition of tufted cell apical dendrites.J. Neurosci.371117–1138. 10.1523/jneurosci.2880-16.2016
12
CaveJ. W.BakerH. (2009). Dopamine systems in the forebrain.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.65115–35. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0322-8_2
13
CoronasV.SrivastavaL. K.LiangJ. J.JourdanF.MoyseE. (1997). Identification and localization of dopamine receptor subtypes in rat olfactory mucosa and bulb: a combined in situ hybridization and ligand binding radioautographic approach.J. Chem. Neuroanat.12243–257. 10.1016/s0891-0618(97)00215-9
14
CraggS. J.NicholsonC.Kume-KickJ.TaoL.RiceM. E. (2001). Dopamine-mediated volume transmission in midbrain is regulated by distinct extracellular geometry and uptake.J. Neurophysiol.851761–1771. 10.1152/jn.2001.85.4.1761
15
DahlstroemA.FuxeK. (1964). Evidence for the existence of monoamine-containing neurons in the central nervous system. I. Demonstration of monoamines in the cell bodies of brain stem neurons.Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl,232231–255.
16
De SaintJ. D.HirnetD.WestbrookG. L.CharpakS. (2009). External tufted cells drive the output of olfactory bulb glomeruli.J. Neurosci.292043–2052. 10.1523/jneurosci.5317-08.2009
17
DotyR. L.LiC.BaglaR.HuangW.PfeifferC.BrosvicG. M.et al (1998). SKF 38393 enhances odor detection performance.Psychopharmacology13675–82. 10.1007/s002130050541
18
EnnisM.ZhouF. M.CiomborK. J.Aroniadou-AnderjaskaV.HayarA.BorrelliE.et al (2001). Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition of olfactory nerve terminals.J. Neurophysiol.862986–2997. 10.1152/jn.2001.86.6.2986
19
EscanillaO.YuhasC.MarzanD.LinsterC. (2009). Dopaminergic modulation of olfactory bulb processing affects odor discrimination learning in rats.Behav. Neurosci.123828–833. 10.1037/a0015855
20
EyreM. D.AntalM.NusserZ. (2008). Distinct deep short-axon cell subtypes of the main olfactory bulb provide novel intrabulbar and extrabulbar GABAergic connections.J. Neurosci.288217–8229. 10.1523/jneurosci.2490-08.2008
21
FritschyJ. M.MeskenaiteV.WeinmannO.HonerM.BenkeD.MohlerH. (1999). GABAB-receptor splice variants GB1a and GB1b in rat brain: developmental regulation, cellular distribution and extrasynaptic localization.Eur. J. Neurosci.11761–768. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00481.x
22
GireD. H.SchoppaN. E. (2009). Control of on/off glomerular signaling by a local GABAergic microcircuit in the olfactory bulb.J. Neurosci.2913454–13464. 10.1523/jneurosci.2368-09.2009
23
GuthrieK. M.PullaraJ. M.MarshallJ. F.LeonM. (1991). Olfactory deprivation increases dopamine D2 receptor density in the rat olfactory bulb.Synapse861–70. 10.1002/syn.890080109
24
Gutierrez-MecinasM.CrespoC.Blasco-IbanezJ. M.Gracia-LlanesF. J.Marques-MariA. I.NacherJ.et al (2005). Distribution of D2 dopamine receptor in the olfactory glomeruli of the rat olfactory bulb.Eur. J. Neurosci.221357–1367. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04328.x
25
HayarA.KarnupS.EnnisM.ShipleyM. T. (2004a). External tufted cells: a major excitatory element that coordinates glomerular activity.J. Neurosci.246676–6685. 10.1523/jneurosci.1367-04.2004
26
HayarA.KarnupS.ShipleyM. T.EnnisM. (2004b). Olfactory bulb glomeruli: external tufted cells intrinsically burst at theta frequency and are entrained by patterned olfactory input.J. Neurosci.241190–1199. 10.1523/jneurosci.4714-03.2004
27
HsiaA. Y.VincentJ. D.LledoP. M. (1999). Dopamine depresses synaptic inputs into the olfactory bulb.J. Neurophysiol.821082–1085. 10.1152/jn.1999.82.2.1082
28
IsaacsonJ. S.VittenH. (2003). GABA(B) receptors inhibit dendrodendritic transmission in the rat olfactory bulb.J. Neurosci.232032–2039. 10.1523/jneurosci.23-06-02032.2003
29
KarpukN.HayarA. (2008). Activation of postsynaptic GABAB receptors modulates the bursting pattern and synaptic activity of olfactory bulb juxtaglomerular neurons.J. Neurophysiol.99308–319. 10.1152/jn.01086.2007
30
KiyokageE.PanY. Z.ShaoZ.KobayashiK.SzaboG.YanagawaY.et al (2010). Molecular identity of periglomerular and short axon cells.J. Neurosci.301185–1196. 10.1523/jneurosci.3497-09.2010
31
KleinM. O.BattagelloD. S.CardosoA. R.HauserD. N.BittencourtJ. C.CorreaR. G. (2019). Dopamine: functions, signaling, and association with neurological diseases.Cell Mol. Neurobiol.3931–59. 10.1007/s10571-018-0632-3
32
KosakaT.KosakaK. (2008). Tyrosine hydroxylase-positive GABAergic juxtaglomerular neurons are the main source of the interglomerular connections in the mouse main olfactory bulb.Neurosci. Res.60349–354. 10.1016/j.neures.2007.11.012
33
LazariniF.GabellecM. M.MoigneuC.de ChaumontF.Olivo-MarinJ. C.LledoP. M. (2014). Adult neurogenesis restores dopaminergic neuronal loss in the olfactory bulb.J. Neurosci.3414430–14442. 10.1523/jneurosci.5366-13.2014
34
LeveyA. I.HerschS. M.RyeD. B.SunaharaR. K.NiznikH. B.KittC. A.et al (1993). Localization of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in brain with subtype-specific antibodies.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.908861–8865. 10.1073/pnas.90.19.8861
35
LiuS.PlachezC.ShaoZ.PucheA.ShipleyM. T. (2013). Olfactory bulb short axon cell release of GABA and dopamine produces a temporally biphasic inhibition-excitation response in external tufted cells.J. Neurosci.332916–2926. 10.1523/jneurosci.3607-12.2013
36
LiuS.PucheA. C.ShipleyM. T. (2016). The interglomerular circuit potently inhibits olfactory bulb output neurons by both direct and indirect pathways.J. Neurosci.369604–9617. 10.1523/jneurosci.1763-16.2016
37
LledoP. M.GheusiG.VincentJ. D. (2005). Information processing in the mammalian olfactory system.Physiol. Rev.85281–317. 10.1152/physrev.00008.2004
38
Lopez-BenditoG.SturgessK.ErdelyiF.SzaboG.MolnarZ.PaulsenO. (2004). Preferential origin and layer destination of GAD65-GFP cortical interneurons.Cereb. Cortex141122–1133. 10.1093/cercor/bhh072
39
MacridesF.SchneiderS. P. (1982). Laminar organization of mitral and tufted cells in the main olfactory bulb of the adult hamster.J. Comp. Neurol.208419–430. 10.1002/cne.902080410
40
MaherB. J.WestbrookG. L. (2008). Co-transmission of dopamine and GABA in periglomerular cells.J. Neurophysiol.991559–1564. 10.1152/jn.00636.2007
41
MatsushitaN.OkadaH.YasoshimaY.TakahashiK.KiuchiK.KobayashiK. (2002). Dynamics of tyrosine hydroxylase promoter activity during midbrain dopaminergic neuron development.J. Neurochem.82295–304. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00972.x
42
McGannJ. P. (2013). Presynaptic inhibition of olfactory sensory neurons: new mechanisms and potential functions.Chem. Sens.38459–474.
43
NagayamaS.HommaR.ImamuraF. (2014). Neuronal organization of olfactory bulb circuits.Front. Neural. Circ.8:98.
44
NickellW. T.BehbehaniM. M.ShipleyM. T. (1994). Evidence for GABAB-mediated inhibition of transmission from the olfactory nerve to mitral cells in the rat olfactory bulb.Brain Res. Bull.35119–123. 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90091-4
45
NickellW. T.NormanA. B.WyattL. M.ShipleyM. T. (1991). Olfactory bulb DA receptors may be located on terminals of the olfactory nerve.Neuroreport29–12. 10.1097/00001756-199101000-00002
46
PanzanelliP.Lopez-BenditoG.LujanR.Sassoe-PognettoM. (2004). Localization and developmental expression of GABA(B) receptors in the rat olfactory bulb.J. Neurocytol.3387–99. 10.1023/b:neur.0000029650.28943.b2
47
Parrish-AungstS.KiyokageE.SzaboG.YanagawaY.ShipleyM. T.PucheA. C. (2011). Sensory experience selectively regulates transmitter synthesis enzymes in interglomerular circuits.Brain Res.138270–76. 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.068
48
PignatelliA.BelluzziO. (2017). Dopaminergic neurones in the main olfactory bulb: an overview from an electrophysiological perspective.Front. Neuroanat.11:7.
49
PinchingA. J.PowellT. P. (1971a). The neuron types of the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb.J. Cell Sci.9305–345.
50
PinchingA. J.PowellT. P. (1971b). The neuropil of the periglomerular region of the olfactory bulb.J. Cell Sci.9379–409.
51
RomonY.CajalS. (1909). Histologie du SysteÌme Nerveux de l’homme & des Verteìbreìs.Paris: Maloine.
52
SergueraC.TriacaV.Kelly-BarrettJ.BanchaabouchiM. A.MinichielloL. (2008). Increased dopamine after mating impairs olfaction and prevents odor interference with pregnancy.Nat. Neurosci.11949–956. 10.1038/nn.2154
53
ShaoZ.PucheA. C.KiyokageE.SzaboG.ShipleyM. T. (2009). Two GABAergic intraglomerular circuits differentially regulate tonic and phasic presynaptic inhibition of olfactory nerve terminals.J. Neurophysiol.1011988–2001. 10.1152/jn.91116.2008
54
ShaoZ.PucheA. C.LiuS.ShipleyM. T. (2012). Intraglomerular inhibition shapes the strength and temporal structure of glomerular output.J. Neurophysiol.108782–793. 10.1152/jn.00119.2012
55
ShaoZ.LiuS.ZhouF.PucheA. C.ShipleyM. T. (2019). Reciprocal inhibitory glomerular circuits contribute to excitation-inhibition balance in the mouse olfactory bulb.eNeuro6:ENEURO.0048-19. 10.1523/ENEURO.0048-19.2019
56
TaylorT. N.CaudleW. M.ShepherdK. R.NoorianA.JacksonC. R.IuvoneP. M.et al (2009). Nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease revealed in an animal model with reduced monoamine storage capacity.J. Neurosci.298103–8113. 10.1523/jneurosci.1495-09.2009
57
TillersonJ. L.CaudleW. M.ParentJ. M.GongC.SchallertT.MillerG. W. (2006). Olfactory discrimination deficits in mice lacking the dopamine transporter or the D2 dopamine receptor.Behav. Brain Res.17297–105. 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.04.025
58
VaagaC. E.YorgasonJ. T.WilliamsJ. T.WestbrookG. L. (2017). Presynaptic gain control by endogenous cotransmission of dopamine and GABA in the olfactory bulb.J. Neurophysiol.1171163–1170. 10.1152/jn.00694.2016
59
WachowiakM.McGannJ. P.HeywardP. M.ShaoZ.PucheA. C.ShipleyM. T. (2005). Inhibition [corrected] of olfactory receptor neuron input to olfactory bulb glomeruli mediated by suppression of presynaptic calcium influx.J. Neurophysiol.942700–2712. 10.1152/jn.00286.2005
60
WhitesellJ. D.SorensenK. A.JarvieB. C.HentgesS. T.SchoppaN. E. (2013). Interglomerular lateral inhibition targeted on external tufted cells in the olfactory bulb.J. Neurosci.331552–1563. 10.1523/jneurosci.3410-12.2013
61
WilsonR. I.MainenZ. F. (2006). Early events in olfactory processing.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.29163–201. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112950
62
YuQ.LiuY. Z.ZhuY. B.WangY. Y.LiQ.YinD. M. (2019). Genetic labeling reveals temporal and spatial expression pattern of D2 dopamine receptor in rat forebrain.Brain Struct. Funct.2241035–1049. 10.1007/s00429-018-01824-2
63
YueE. L.ClelandT. A.PavlisM.LinsterC. (2004). Opposing effects of D1 and D2 receptor activation on odor discrimination learning.Behav. Neurosci.118184–190. 10.1037/0735-7044.118.1.184
Summary
Keywords
dopamine, synaptic transmission, interneuron, olfactory bulb, excitation, inhibition
Citation
Liu S (2020) Dopaminergic Modulation of Glomerular Circuits in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 14:172. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00172
Received
15 April 2020
Accepted
20 May 2020
Published
12 June 2020
Volume
14 - 2020
Edited by
Julian P. Meeks, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
Reviewed by
Shin Nagayama, Texas Medical Center, United States; David Henry Gire, University of Washington, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shaolin Liu, Shaolin.liu@howard.edu
This article was submitted to Cellular Neurophysiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.