
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Cell. Neurosci. , 03 July 2018
Sec. Cellular Neurophysiology
Volume 12 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00197
This article is a correction to:
Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila
A corrigendum on
Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila
by Lüdke, A., Raiser, G., Nehrkorn, J., Herz, A. V. M., Galizia, C. G., and Szyszka, P. (2018). Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:128. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00128
In the original article, we did not indicate the number of analyzed animals and glomeruli/somata/ROIs. We provide this information below:
Figures 2, 3, and 7:
ORN axons: N = 9 flies, n = 85 glomeruli (glomeruli per fly: 11, 11, 10, 5, 10, 10, 7, 10, 11)
PN dendrites: N = 10 flies, n = 88 glomeruli (glomeruli per fly: 9, 5, 8, 9, 11, 10, 10, 12, 7, 7)
[In Figures 3C–F the N and n for the odors EACE (N = 3, n = 22) and MCH (N = 7, n = 66) in PN dendrites is lower, since these odors were used alternately].
Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S2:
(same flies as above, with one additional fly and thirteen additional glomeruli in ORN axons):
ORN axons: N = 10 flies, n = 98 glomeruli (glom. per fly: 11, 11, 10, 6, 10, 10, 10, 9, 10, 11)
PN dendrites: N = 10 flies, n = 88 glomeruli (glom. per fly: 9, 5, 8, 9, 11, 10, 10, 12, 7, 7)
Figures 5, 6:
PN somata: N = 10 flies, n = 108 somata (somata per fly: 18, 15, 13, 5, 13, 10, 9, 9, 12, 4)
KC dendrites: N = 6 flies, n = 343 ROIs (ROIs per fly: 57, 35, 31, 60, 84, 76)
KC somata: N = 9 flies, n = 339 somata (somata per fly: 47, 28, 26, 52, 44, 23, 3, 55, 61)
(In Figures 6C–F and Supplementary Figure S3 the N and n in the PN somata and KC somata matrices vary for each odor pair, because not every odor was analyzable in every fly. PN somata: N = 4–10 flies, n = 47–108 somata; KC somata: N = 5–8 flies, n = 217–313 somata).
Figure 7:
PN somata: N = 2 flies, n = 25 somata (somata per fly: 13, 12)
KC dendrites: N = 6 flies, n = 343 ROIs (ROIs per fly: 57, 35, 31, 60, 84, 76)
KC somata: N = 5 flies, n = 217 somata (somata per fly: 47, 28, 26, 55, 61)
(Note that for the SVM we could only use flies with complete data for the same set of odorants (ButL, AceA, ProL, ProA, MO),
hence the lower N in PN somata and KC somata).
In the original article the following reference was incorrectly cited as “unpublished”. The corrected reference appears below:
Betkiewicz, R. L., Lindner, B., and Nawrot, M. P. (2017). Circuit and cellular mechanisms facilitate the transformation from dense to sparse coding in the insect olfactory system. BioRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/240671
We apologize for this missing information and emphasize that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
The original article has been updated.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: Drosophila melanogaster, olfaction, sensory memory, mushroom body, Kenyon cells, trace conditioning, calcium imaging
Citation: Lüdke A, Raiser G, Nehrkorn J, Herz AVM, Galizia CG and Szyszka P (2018) Corrigendum: Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:197. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00197
Received: 08 June 2018; Accepted: 18 June 2018;
Published: 03 July 2018.
Edited and reviewed by: Dieter Wicher, Max-Planck-Institut für chemische Ökologie, Germany
Reviewed by:
Ricardo C. Araneda, University of Maryland, College Park, United StatesCopyright © 2018 Lüdke, Raiser, Nehrkorn, Herz, Galizia and Szyszka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alja Lüdke, YWxqYS5sdWVka2VAdW5pLWtvbnN0YW56LmRl
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.