Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Cell. Neurosci., 03 July 2018
Sec. Cellular Neurophysiology
Volume 12 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00197

Corrigendum: Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila

This article is a correction to:

  1. Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila

    1. Read original article
\r\nAlja Lüdke*Alja Lüdke1*Georg Raiser,Georg Raiser1,2Johannes Nehrkorn,Johannes Nehrkorn3,4Andreas V. M. Herz,Andreas V. M. Herz3,4C. Giovanni GaliziaC. Giovanni Galizia1Paul SzyszkaPaul Szyszka1
  • 1Department of Biology, Neurobiology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
  • 2International Max Planck Research School for Organismal Biology, Konstanz, Germany
  • 3Fakultät für Biologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
  • 4Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Munich, Germany

A corrigendum on
Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila

by Lüdke, A., Raiser, G., Nehrkorn, J., Herz, A. V. M., Galizia, C. G., and Szyszka, P. (2018). Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:128. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00128

In the original article, we did not indicate the number of analyzed animals and glomeruli/somata/ROIs. We provide this information below:

Figures 2, 3, and 7:

ORN axons: N = 9 flies, n = 85 glomeruli (glomeruli per fly: 11, 11, 10, 5, 10, 10, 7, 10, 11)

PN dendrites: N = 10 flies, n = 88 glomeruli (glomeruli per fly: 9, 5, 8, 9, 11, 10, 10, 12, 7, 7)

[In Figures 3C–F the N and n for the odors EACE (N = 3, n = 22) and MCH (N = 7, n = 66) in PN dendrites is lower, since these odors were used alternately].

Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S2:

(same flies as above, with one additional fly and thirteen additional glomeruli in ORN axons):

ORN axons: N = 10 flies, n = 98 glomeruli (glom. per fly: 11, 11, 10, 6, 10, 10, 10, 9, 10, 11)

PN dendrites: N = 10 flies, n = 88 glomeruli (glom. per fly: 9, 5, 8, 9, 11, 10, 10, 12, 7, 7)

Figures 5, 6:

PN somata: N = 10 flies, n = 108 somata (somata per fly: 18, 15, 13, 5, 13, 10, 9, 9, 12, 4)

KC dendrites: N = 6 flies, n = 343 ROIs (ROIs per fly: 57, 35, 31, 60, 84, 76)

KC somata: N = 9 flies, n = 339 somata (somata per fly: 47, 28, 26, 52, 44, 23, 3, 55, 61)

(In Figures 6C–F and Supplementary Figure S3 the N and n in the PN somata and KC somata matrices vary for each odor pair, because not every odor was analyzable in every fly. PN somata: N = 4–10 flies, n = 47–108 somata; KC somata: N = 5–8 flies, n = 217–313 somata).

Figure 7:

PN somata: N = 2 flies, n = 25 somata (somata per fly: 13, 12)

KC dendrites: N = 6 flies, n = 343 ROIs (ROIs per fly: 57, 35, 31, 60, 84, 76)

KC somata: N = 5 flies, n = 217 somata (somata per fly: 47, 28, 26, 55, 61)

(Note that for the SVM we could only use flies with complete data for the same set of odorants (ButL, AceA, ProL, ProA, MO),

hence the lower N in PN somata and KC somata).

In the original article the following reference was incorrectly cited as “unpublished”. The corrected reference appears below:

Betkiewicz, R. L., Lindner, B., and Nawrot, M. P. (2017). Circuit and cellular mechanisms facilitate the transformation from dense to sparse coding in the insect olfactory system. BioRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/240671

We apologize for this missing information and emphasize that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

The original article has been updated.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Keywords: Drosophila melanogaster, olfaction, sensory memory, mushroom body, Kenyon cells, trace conditioning, calcium imaging

Citation: Lüdke A, Raiser G, Nehrkorn J, Herz AVM, Galizia CG and Szyszka P (2018) Corrigendum: Calcium in Kenyon Cell Somata as a Substrate for an Olfactory Sensory Memory in Drosophila. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:197. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00197

Received: 08 June 2018; Accepted: 18 June 2018;
Published: 03 July 2018.

Edited and reviewed by: Dieter Wicher, Max-Planck-Institut für chemische Ökologie, Germany

Reviewed by:

Ricardo C. Araneda, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
Philippe Lucas, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), France

Copyright © 2018 Lüdke, Raiser, Nehrkorn, Herz, Galizia and Szyszka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Alja Lüdke, YWxqYS5sdWVka2VAdW5pLWtvbnN0YW56LmRl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.