Sebastian Britz1*
Sebastian Matthias Markert1†
Daniel Witvliet2,3†Anna Maria Steyer4Sarah Tröger1
Ben Mulcahy2,3
Philip Kollmannsberger5Yannick Schwab4Mei Zhen2,3
Christian Stigloher1*- 1Imaging Core Facility of the Biocenter, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany
- 2Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 3Department of Molecular Genetics, Physiology and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 4European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, Heidelberg, Germany
- 5Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany
At the end of the first larval stage, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans developing in harsh environmental conditions is able to choose an alternative developmental path called the dauer diapause. Dauer larvae exhibit different physiology and behaviors from non-dauer larvae. Using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), we volumetrically reconstructed the anterior sensory apparatus of C. elegans dauer larvae with unprecedented precision. We provide a detailed description of some neurons, focusing on structural details that were unknown or unresolved by previously published studies. They include the following: (1) dauer-specific branches of the IL2 sensory neurons project into the periphery of anterior sensilla and motor or putative sensory neurons at the sub-lateral cords; (2) ciliated endings of URX sensory neurons are supported by both ILso and AMso socket cells near the amphid openings; (3) variability in amphid sensory dendrites among dauers; and (4) somatic RIP interneurons maintain their projection into the pharyngeal nervous system. Our results support the notion that dauer larvae structurally expand their sensory system to facilitate searching for more favorable environments.
Introduction
The non-parasitic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has a rapid reproductive life cycle passing four larval stages (Brenner, 1974; Sulston and Horvitz, 1977). This underlies either self-fertilization by hermaphrodites or sexual reproduction involving males (Sulston and Horvitz, 1977). Harsh environmental conditions repress the reproductive life cycle and favor an alternative life cycle (Cassada and Russell, 1975), regulated by dauer pheromones (Golden and Riddle, 1982). Dauer larvae can survive for months without food (Klass and Hirsh, 1976). This is possible due to specific anatomical adaptations like a sealed mouth, a switch in metabolism to lipid storage, and protection from dehydration by specific changes in cuticles (Cassada and Russell, 1975; Popham and Webster, 1979; Albert and Riddle, 1983; Erkut et al., 2013). Consistently, dauer larvae are non-feeding, with inactive pharynx and reduced intestine (Cassada and Russell, 1975; Popham and Webster, 1979; Albert and Riddle, 1983).
The decision to enter dauer diapause is made in the first larva (L1) stage, triggered by poor environmental conditions including crowding, starvation, and high temperature (Cassada and Russell, 1975; Golden and Riddle, 1984). When conditions do not provide enough food for the L1 larvae to become dauers, they arrest development and can survive without food for a few days (Johnson et al., 1984; Baugh and Sternberg, 2006). Arrested L1s do not have anatomical adaptions as pronounced as in dauer. For example, their mouth remains open, maintaining the ability to feed (Baugh and Sternberg, 2006; Baugh et al., 2009). Improvement of environmental conditions induces dauer exit and re-entry of reproductive development (Cassada and Russell, 1975; Golden and Riddle, 1982). As L1 is the only shared larval stage that is common between the reproductive and dauer developmental path before the dauer entry decision, the morphology of the L1 sensory apparatus is important as a comparative complement.
Dauer larvae can perform, individually or as a group, a specific behavior called nictation. They raise and move their anterior body in a circular manner to increase the chance of getting attached to transport hosts and, thereby, are carried to a better environment in a phoretic form of dispersal behavior (Sudhaus and Kiontke, 1996; Barrière and Félix, 2005; Lee et al., 2011; Félix and Duveau, 2012; Petersen et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2020).
The C. elegans nervous system consists of only a small number of neurons (Sulston and Horvitz, 1977) with similar morphologies and positions between individuals (White et al., 1986). It comprises two largely separated sub-systems, namely, a somatic and a pharyngeal nervous system, connected by two somatic interneurons (RIPL/R) (Ward et al., 1975; Albertson and Thomson, 1976; White et al., 1986). In non-dauers, the anterior dendritic endings of RIPL/R enter the pharyngeal basal lamina and form gap junctions with pharyngeal neurons (Ward et al., 1975; Albertson and Thomson, 1976). RIP neurons have been proposed to coordinate the activity between the pharyngeal and somatic nervous systems (Chalfie et al., 1985; Avery and Thomas, 1997). Whether RIPs maintain their projections to the dauer pharyngeal nervous system, which has become inactive (Cassada and Russell, 1975; Albert and Riddle, 1983), is unknown.
The somatic nervous system features multiple sensilla and non-sensilla associated sensory neurons that mediate a broad spectrum of sensory modalities from chemo-, mechano-, to thermo-sensation that are important for development and dauer behaviors (Hedgecock and Russell, 1975; Albert and Riddle, 1983; Chalfie et al., 1985; Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991a,b; Bretscher et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2011). Main sensory organs are located in the anterior tip, including six inner labial (IL), six outer labial (OL), four cephalic (CEP), and two amphid sensilla (Ward et al., 1975; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014). IL, OL, CEP, and amphid neurons have ciliated sensory endings (Ward et al., 1975; Ware et al., 1975; Perkins et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014). Dendritic endings of other sensory neurons (BAG, FLP, URX, and URY) project into this sensilla region, are ciliated, except for URY, and are not exposed to the external environment (Ward et al., 1975; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014; Kazatskaya et al., 2020).
One of the most relevant neuron types for dauer behaviors is sensory IL2 neurons, which regulate nictation (Lee et al., 2011). They reside in the IL sensilla, each consisting of two sensory neurons (IL1 and IL2), enclosed by one socket (ILso), and one sheath (ILsh) cell (Ward et al., 1975; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014). Dendrites of IL2 show increased branching specifically in dauers revealing life-cycle depending phenotypic plasticity (Schroeder et al., 2013). In non-dauers, all six IL2 neurons have a single primary (1°) dendrite that projects anterior along the labial bundles (Schroeder et al., 2013; Androwski et al., 2020). In dauers, two dorsal and two ventral IL2 neurons (together called IL2Q) emanate in the subsequent order of dendritic branches along 1° dendrites, some projecting between body wall muscle (BWM) and hypodermis (Hyp) cell into the midline (radial dendrites) and then along the body wall (body wall dendrites), others (midline dendrites) projecting along the midline (Schroeder et al., 2013; Androwski et al., 2020), and additional branches (dauer-specific 1° dendrites) appear from IL2 soma (Schroeder et al., 2013). Two lateral IL2 neurons (called IL2L) exhibit a different dauer-specific dendritic pattern from IL2Q. The ends of their 1° dendrites emanate in the subsequent order of short dendrites circumferentially reaching each other in some cases to form crown-like morphology (Schroeder et al., 2013). Ultrastructure and position in relation to anterior sensilla and further neurons in the sub-lateral cords of IL2 dendrites remain unclear.
Amphid and non-sensilla sensory neurons are critical for dauer development. Amphids consist of neurons that are important for dauer induction (ADF, ASG, ASI, ASJ, ASK) and recovery (ASJ) (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991b; Schackwitz et al., 1996; Kim et al., 2009). Some sense dauer pheromones (ASI, ASK, ADL) (Macosko et al., 2009; Jang et al., 2012; Park et al., 2012) and temperature (AFD) (Liu et al., 2012). Other sensory neurons detect oxygen and carbon dioxide (BAG, URX) (Hallem and Sternberg, 2008; Bretscher et al., 2011; Hallem et al., 2011; Carrillo et al., 2013). The preferred foraging habitat of C. elegans is rotten fruits and plant stems, where carbon dioxide level and oxygen vary mostly due to the composting process (Gea et al., 2004; Blaxter and Denver, 2012; Félix and Duveau, 2012). Temperature regulates dauer induction and behaviors (Hedgecock and Russell, 1975; Golden and Riddle, 1984).
In non-dauers and dauers, anterior endings of lateral ILso (ILLso) cells have two branches that are enclosed by respective BAG and FLP neurons, while others (ILQso) do not feature such branches or interactions (Ward et al., 1975; Ware et al., 1975; Albert and Riddle, 1983; Perkins et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014; Cebul et al., 2020). FLP neurons are highly branched along their dendrites and close to their cilia endings in adults (Albeg et al., 2011; Doroquez et al., 2014) while they only branch minimally in dauer larvae (Androwski et al., 2020). There was conflicting reporting on the sensory ending of URX neurons. URX was previously thought to be not ciliated (Doroquez et al., 2014), but recently reported to be ciliated in adults (Kazatskaya et al., 2020), and whether or not to be associated with ILLso cells (Doroquez et al., 2014; Cebul et al., 2020). The structures of URX dendritic endings in dauers have not been described.
In amphid sensilla, all sensory endings are enclosed by the amphid sheath cell (AMsh) (Ward et al., 1975; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014). Amphid channel neurons (AM CNs: ASE, ADF, ASG, ASH, ASI, ASJ, ASK, ADL) expose ciliated endings through the amphid cuticle opening whereby the channel itself is formed by a socket cell (AMso). Other amphid sensilla sensory endings are enclosed by AMsh cells but do not enter the open channel (AWA, AWB, AWC, AFD) (Ward et al., 1975; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014).
Regarding amphid sensilla, several structural differences were reported between dauers and non-dauers in previous studies (Ward et al., 1975; Ware et al., 1975; Albert and Riddle, 1983; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014). The sensory endings of the temperature sensing neurons (AFD) were shown to be expanded in its microvilli-like morphology in dauer larvae (Albert and Riddle, 1983) but it is important to note that the number of microvilli was only estimated in this study. In dauers, endings of AMsh cells were reported to be fused in approximately every second individual, and odor-sensing neurons (AWC) (Bargmann et al., 1993) expand their wing-like sensory endings more widely (Albert and Riddle, 1983; Procko et al., 2011).
Previous studies investigated the sensory structures of adult (Ward et al., 1975; Ware et al., 1975; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014) and dauer sensilla with electron microscopy (EM) methods (Albert and Riddle, 1983). Classical chemical fixation is particularly limited in dauer due to their thick cuticles. High pressure freezing followed by careful freeze substitution (Weimer, 2006; Stigloher et al., 2011; Doroquez et al., 2014) now allows near-to-native preservation of dauers (Schieber et al., 2017). Moreover, focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) now enables the acquisition of comparably large volumes (Heymann et al., 2006) at very high Z-resolution (Briggman and Bock, 2012; Schieber et al., 2017). Combining the advantages of these emerging techniques, we applied them in this study to the anterior sensilla of dauer larvae. This allows us to obtain EM volumes with near-to-native ultrastructure at sufficient Z-resolution to reliably trace sensory neuron dendrites. Although our data sets provide more information, we focused on 3D reconstructions of anterior sensory neuron endings and their support cells and thereby describe unique structural features that have not been resolved in previous studies.
Materials and Methods
Caenorhabditis elegans Maintenance and Dauer Induction
Caenorhabditis elegans N2 Bristol worms were maintained on 35 mm agar plates with nematode growth medium lite (Sun and Lambie, 1997) and Escherichia coli OP50 lawn at 20°C (Brenner, 1974). Crowded populations where OP50 bacteria were still present were chunked onto 94 mm agar plates seeded with OP50 and cultured for seven days at 20°C. Most worms developed into the dauer stage due to overcrowding and starvation. Worms were washed off from plates with M9 buffer and treated with 1% SDS solution for 10 min (Cassada and Russell, 1975). Five washing steps with M9 buffer were applied. To remove the liquid, worms were centrifuged at 2,000 g first. Then, worms were pipetted at the edge of a fresh unseeded agar plate for recovery and incubated for about 1–2 h. Dauer and some L1 larvae survived the SDS treatment and spread out over the plate. The agar areas with dead worms were removed with a spatula.
High Pressure Freezing, Freeze Substitution, and Minimal Resin Embedding
The dauer and L1 larvae that survived SDS were washed off with M9 buffer, which was then exchanged with 20% bovine serum albumin in M9 buffer. Worms were pipetted into high pressure freezing planchettes with 100 μm recesses and high pressure frozen with an EM HPM100 machine (Leica) (Schieber et al., 2017). Worms were freeze substituted according to our published protocol in an EM AFS2 machine (Leica), infiltrated with Durcupan resin, and then minimal resin embedded (Schieber et al., 2017).
FIB-SEM Acquisition and Image Adjustment
Minimal resin embedded worms were further prepared for FIB-SEM imaging (Schieber et al., 2017). The data sets were acquired with a FIB-SEM Auriga 60 or Crossbeam 540 (Carl Zeiss Company) using ATLAS 3D software (part of Atlas5 from Fibics) by milling about 8 nm layers with the ion beam and imaging the block face with 5 nm pixel size. The data sets were acquired at 1.5 kV with the energy-selective back-scattered electron (EsB) detector (grid voltage 1,100 V), at 700 pA. The anterior ends of three dauer larvae (DauerE1, DauerE2, DauerE3) were imaged in transversal sections starting from posterior in the worm body orienting at specific anatomical landmarks of the worm. For DauerE1, a larger body segment, starting at the amphid commissures was imaged. The anterior end of an L1 larva (L1E4) was imaged longitudinally.
Images were aligned using TrakEM2 in Fiji (Cardona et al., 2012; Schindelin et al., 2012). Image stack orientation regarding rotation (transversal), flipping, and stack recursion (longitudinal) as well as cropping, brightness, and contrast were adjusted either with TrakEM2 or Fiji. The image stack of L1E4 was transformed first from a longitudinal to a transverse stack using the reslicing function of Fiji and then scaled to the respective pixel size by enlargement using a bilinear interpolation. In DauerE2 and DauerE3, the VSNR denoising tool was used to reduce stationary artifacts (Fehrenbach et al., 2012). L1E4 was denoised applying a Gaussian blur (sigma 1) in Fiji. The full volumes of DauerE1 and DauerE3 were prepared and exported with TrakEM2 and then uploaded to CATMAID (Saalfeld et al., 2009; Cardona et al., 2012).
For stage identification, we imaged a transverse section in the middle of the body of each worm to reveal cuticle, alae, and intestine morphology using the FIB-SEM. For additional investigation of the L1 larva, the remaining body fragments were re-embedded in Epon resin and longitudinally sectioned with an ultramicrotome. The sections were contrasted and imaged with a JSM-7500F SEM (JEOL) with our standard settings (Markert et al., 2017).
Images in figures and videos were adjusted and the layout was carried out as described in the Supplementary Material.
Larval Stage and Cell Identification
We identified the larval stage and sex of the three analyzed dauer larvae and the starved L1 larva by anatomical features listed in Supplementary Table 1 and shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Left and right orientation were concluded from the known imaging direction and the other two body axes. This was validated for all data sets by analyzing the asymmetrical ventral nerve cord and asymmetry of certain neurons in the nerve ring in DauerE1. In general, cells and other structures were identified with an orientation provided by published maps (Ward et al., 1975; Albert and Riddle, 1983; White et al., 1986; Hall, 2008; Doroquez et al., 2014; Witvliet et al., 2021). All cells forming sensilla were identified in general by their position and morphology in the anterior end for all four data sets. Investigated neurons that are not part of sensilla (BAG, FLP, URX, URY, AVM, RIP) were identified by skeletal tracing up to the nerve ring region in DauerE1 first. Some of these neurons (BAG, URX, URY, RIP) with a characteristic morphology were identified in DauerE2, DauerE3, and L1E4 by comparison of their anterior endings with those in DauerE1. This was not reliably possible for others (FLP, AVM) as the morphology of their anterior endings was not characteristic in DauerE1. RIP neurons endings were not part of the image volume of DauerE2. As the dendrites of AM CNs (ASE, ADF, ASG, ASH, ASI, ASJ, ASK, ADL) could not be traced back to their nerve ring entry, they were identified for DauerE1 comparing their entry-order into AMsh cell as well as their location of the distal tips in the AMso cell with the literature (Ward et al., 1975; Albert and Riddle, 1983; Hall, 2008; Doroquez et al., 2014). These neurons could not be reliably identified in the other three data sets. Anterior projections of SAB and SAA in the ventral sub-lateral cords in DauerE1 could not be traced back to their nerve ring entry or somas, and thus, their identity was not differentiated.
Volumetric Reconstruction and Cell Tracing
Cells of interest in the most anterior 2,000 images of DauerE1 were volumetrically reconstructed (DauerE1v) with the 3dmod package of the IMOD software (Kremer et al., 1996). The same cells were reconstructed in DauerE2 and L1E4. In general, cell contours were drawn manually at regular section intervals and contours of skipped sections were interpolated with the 3dmod interpolator plugin. Some cells, like sheath cells, were encapsulating other cells or fusing with themselves, forming inward-facing surfaces which we did not reconstruct as the inner morphology was already defined by the ensheathed cells. Relevant cells in the data volume of DauerE1 were skeleton traced (DauerE1s) using CATMAID. The tracing nodes were set into the centroid of the cells. This was performed for DauerE3 as well (DauerE3s). In addition, cells of special interest were volumetrically reconstructed (DauerE3v). Measurements were performed in this model as well. We traced some of the IL2Q dendrites retrogradely from the midlines to their 1° dendrite due to resolution limits.
The color code for cells was adapted from literature (Doroquez et al., 2014). The colors of the left and right neurons were assigned different gradings for visual differentiation in some cases (AWA, AWB, AWC, FLP, IL2L, RIP). The cuticle of a larger volume of DauerE1s shown in Figure 1B was automatically reconstructed with 3dmod applying the imodauto function to an image stack rendering mask. This mask was created by the application of filters and manual editing in Fiji, 3dmod, and GIMP (GIMP.org Team, 2021) functions. Automatically created contours were manually corrected in 3dmod. The cuticle of DauerE1v shown in Figure 2 was manually reconstructed as described above.
Figure 1. Electron microscopy reconstruction of the investigated head sensilla of Caenorhabditis elegans maintained under starving conditions. (A) Differential interference contrast image of a random dauer larva with a dashed line marking the estimated corresponding body segment from B. Anterior left. (B) Volumetric reconstruction of the head sensilla of one dauer larva in the context of the full focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) image volume used for cell tracing in C. X, Y, and Z image slices are shown. Reconstruction of the cuticle in the complete volume is shown. Scale refers to image volume. (C) Cell trajectories of the data set from B were reconstructed by skeleton tracing. Color-coded spheres label the identified somas. Images of a small segment are misaligned leading to a shift of tracing trajectories (asterisk). The data set is squeezed in Z by factor 0.625 due to incorrect settings. (D) Volumetric reconstruction of the head sensilla of a second dauer larva data set from a different individual. (E) Skeleton tracing of the head sensilla of a third dauer larva. The data set is squeezed in Z by factor 0.625. Left is right in this data set. (F) Volumetric reconstruction of the head sensilla of a starving first stage (L1) larva.
Figure 2. Volumetric reconstruction of 93 anterior cell endings including all sensory neurons and their support cells of a C. elegans dauer larva. (A) Ventral view of the volumetric reconstruction in the context of the body wall and buccal cuticle. (B) View from the anterior-right side. (C) Transverse FIB-SEM section at 2.4 μm from anterior with cell labels according to color code (see E). (D) Scheme of cell labels from C. The four sensilla types called AM, IL, CEP, and OL are highlighted for one sensillum as an example each, indicating their location. Asterisks indicate associated parts respectively (*: AM; **: IL). (E) Cell names and color codes (adapted from Doroquez et al., 2014). Cells are grouped by sensilla. AWA, AWB, AWC, lateral IL2, FLP, and RIP neurons are shown in different color gradients for left and right neurons for visual distinction. All cells shown are sensory neurons, except RIP neurons, or supporting socket (so) or sheath (sh) cells.
Measurements
Distances and lengths were measured with 3dmod by tracing the respective cell segment with an open contour and getting its length with Edit > Contour > Info for all four data sets (Kremer et al., 1996). The exact number of the dendritic endings of AWA was determined by drawing points on each end in 3dmod and counting the total number of points. Only endings distal to the ciliary base were counted. The length of the AWC wings was measured by a contour from end to end. In addition, the contour length was measured as flat contour applying Edit > Object > Flatten. The span of the AWC wings was measured end-to-end as follows. A point was set at each end and one in the center of the worm body in 3dmod. Then, a snapshot facing the three points in parallel perspective (front view) in the 3dmod model view was taken. The snapshot was imported into Inkscape (Inkscape.org Team, 2021). The two endpoints were connected with the center-point each by two straight lines. The angle between the two lines was measured with the Inkscape measurement tool. This method was adapted from previous measurements of the wing span of AWC endings (Albert and Riddle, 1983). The number of AFD microvilli endings was determined in the same manner as the number of AWA endings.
Results
FIB-SEM Data Sets Allow Detailed 3D Reconstruction of Anterior Sensilla
To get a near-to-native isotropic high-resolution 3D-insight into the anterior sensory apparatus of C. elegans dauer larvae we used high-pressure freezing followed by freeze substitution, minimal resin embedding, and FIB-SEM acquisition as previously described (Schieber et al., 2017).
We analyzed the anterior regions of sensilla of three dauer hermaphrodites by FIB-SEM image stacks, DauerE1, DauerE2, and DauerE3 (with E = EM data set). The number that follows the letter denotes different individuals, and the letter that follows the number denotes different reconstruction techniques (v = volumetric; s = skeletal). We applied volumetric reconstruction (DauerE1v, DauerE2v, DauerE3v) (Figures 1A,B,D) or skeleton tracing (DauerE1s, DauerE3s) (Figures 1C,E). The DauerE1v data set was restricted to the anterior sensilla region (Figure 1B and Supplementary Video 1) while DauerE1s was traced to the amphid commissures (Figure 1C and Supplementary Video 2). Only relevant cells of DauerE3 were volumetrically reconstructed (DauerE3v) (Supplementary Figures 2B, 4D,E, 5C). For comparative reasons we also acquired a data set of the anterior region of the sensilla of a starved L1 hermaphrodite that we reconstructed volumetrically (L1E4v) (Figure 1F). DauerE1, DauerE2, DauerE3, and L1E4 larva were maintained under the same conditions. Features of these larvae and properties of these image stacks can be found in section Materials and Methods and Supplementary Tables 1, 2 and Supplementary Figure 1.
Volumetric Reconstruction Reveals the Morphology of the Anterior Sensilla
For DauerE1v, we present volumetric reconstructions of six IL, four CEP, six OL, two amphid sensilla, and sensory endings of URX, URY, FLP, and BAG (Figures 2A,B). 3D reconstructions of the endings of somatic sensory neuron AVM and interneurons (RIP) are included. The spatial organization of all sensilla and sensory neurons is shown in a transverse EM section (Figures 2C,D). Cells are labeled by the same color code used for the EM reconstruction of the anterior sensilla of the adult C. elegans (Doroquez et al., 2014) (Figure 2E) to facilitate comparisons. The full reconstruction of DauerE1v and additional details are shown in Supplementary Video 1.
Due to the improved Z-resolution and near-to-native sample preparation, we could identify several features that have been previously either not reported or misreported, which we now can present and clarify in detail.
Non-ciliated Dendrites of IL2L Project Peripherally of All Anterior Sensilla
The crown-like dendrites of the inner labial sensilla IL2L cells are a specific feature of dauer larvae and their gross anatomy has been reported by fluorescence microscopy (Schroeder et al., 2013). Yet, the ultrastructural context of the dauer crown-like dendrites of IL2L and their location in relation to anterior sensilla is still unknown. We investigated and observed an overall similar anatomy for IL2L in all three dauer larvae. The location, morphology, and cellular structure of the crown-like dendrites of IL2L are shown for DauerE1v (Figures 3C,I) and DauerE3v (Supplementary Figures 2A,E).
Figure 3. Morphology of dauer-specific crown-like dendrites of lateral IL2 endings. (A) Example of the morphology of IL2LL (panel left) and ILLso (panel right) cell endings. As an example, only left cells are shown. IL2LL has a crown-like dendrite projecting to the dorsal and ventral sides. ILLsoL shows two branches. (B) Example of the morphology of IL2Q (panel left) and ILQso (panel right) cell endings. Dorsal-left cells are shown as examples. IL2QDL shows no crown-like dendrite, but several other dendritic branches are located more posteriorly. ILQsoDL shows no branches. (D) Schematic 2D projection of IL2 sensory endings including crown-like dendrites of a volume containing 5 μm from the anterior of the model. IL2Q is graphically hatched. (C,E–G) Four transverse FIB-SEM sections following the small 2° dendrite (arrowhead) from the 1° dendrite to the crown-like dendrite (which is a 3° dendrite). Asterisk in C indicates the Hyp syncytium, which together with the cuticle forms the only barrier to the environment for the crown-like dendrite. Panels are oriented on the same level in Y-dimension. C is on the same level as Figure 2C. (H) 3D reconstruction of all six IL sensilla in context with BWM cell endings. (I) Names and color code of cells shown.
For each IL2L neuron (Figure 3A, left), a small 2° dendrite was branching off the end of the 1° dendrite (Figures 3C,E–G), oriented in parallel to the anterior-lateral midline. These dendrites branched again to form a 3° dendrite, which we referred to as the crown-like dendrites (Figures 3C,D,H). The origin of the 2° dendrite was located posterior to the ciliary base (Supplementary Material). Crown-like dendrites had varicosities (Figures 3A,D) and in some cases (e.g., DauerE3v), vesicular organelles (Supplementary Figure 2A). They projected to both dorsal and ventral sides, each around the circumference of the worm head, mostly peripherally of amphid, CEP, and OL sensilla (Figures 3C,D,H). Crown-like dendrites were peripherally only in contact with the Hyp syncytium which produces the cuticle (Figure 3C). We also observed crown-like dendrites to overlap in some cases (Figures 3D,H and Supplementary Figure 2B). There were minor differences in IL2L crown-like dendrites among dauer samples as they extended 4° dendrites in DauerE3v (Supplementary Figures 2B–D) but not in other dauers (Figure 3H and Supplementary Material).
Dauer-Specific Branches of IL2Q Reach SAB or SAA Neurons
As described previously (Schroeder et al., 2013), we observed several dendritic branches on IL2Q dendrites (Figures 4A,J and Supplementary Video 2) following the body wall (body wall dendrites) (Figures 4C,D) or along the midline (midline dendrites) into both directions (Figures 4B,G–I). Both types originated mostly from a 2° radial dendrite which projected into the respective midline between BWM and the Hyp cell (Figures 4C,F). Some body wall dendrites originated from midline dendrites (Figure 4B). Body wall dendrites projected further from the midline along the body wall of the respective side, still between BWM and Hyp cell (Figure 4D). Some of them reached SAB neurons in the case of dorsal IL2Q dendrites (Figures 4D,E). Ventral IL2Q dendrites reached neurons in the sub-lateral cords as well but in this study, the identity of ventral SAB vs. SAA projections could not be clarified (Figure 4G). We were able to identify several IL2Q branches that were very clearly visible (Figure 4F). Some IL2Q midline dendrites ended in the midline (Figure 4G) and some were bundled with AVM (Supplementary Material). Dendritic IL2Q branches showed varicosities in most cases (Figure 4D).
Figure 4. IL2Q neurons extend dauer-specific highly ordered branches all along their 1° dendrites, some of which come into close contact with SAA and SAB neurons. (A) Skeleton tracing of all six IL2 neurons, four SAA, and three SAB neurons in the anterior dauer larva. Spheres indicate the respective somas. Only IL2Q dendrites extend multiple branches along their length. IL2L neurons show anterior crown-like dendrites only. (B) Skeleton tracing of the right IL2Q neurons from (A), as an example for IL2Q. (C) Scheme of an exemplary body wall dendrite of IL2QDL from D originating from a radial dendrite which is schematically delineated (magenta). (D) Transverse FIB-SEM section through the body wall dendrite of IL2QDL (arrowheads) used for the scheme in C. (E) IL2QDL dendritic branch (arrowhead) from D reaching the SABD neuron (300 nm anterior to D). (F) Example of a radial dendrite of IL2QDR (arrowhead) one section before its branching point (arrow). (G) Scheme of IL2QVR dendrite branching indicated in (B) following the midline in both directions (arrowheads) and representing highly ordered branching up to 4° dendrite including body wall dendrites reaching neurons in the sub-lateral cord (arrows). Note that the identity of ventral SAB vs. SAA projections could not be clarified in our data set (*). (H) Transverse FIB-SEM section through IL2QVR (arrowheads) 4° dendrite (arrow). (I) Transverse FIB-SEM section through the IL2QVR (arrowhead) 2° dendrite (arrow) projecting posteriorly along the midline. (J) Names and color code of cells or structures shown.
URX Endings Are Supported by ILLso and AMso Socket Cells Near Amphid Openings
The two branches of the ILLso cells interacted with non-IL sensilla cells (URX and BAG). One branch was facing into posterior direction originating from the socket ending (Figure 3A, right) and was enclosed by a certain part of the URX neuron (Figures 5A,I). This part of the URX neuron was then again enclosed by the AMso cell at the level where the AMso cell formed the channel of the AM CNs (Figures 5B,D,H, 6B). The AMso cell ended at the amphid opening of the cuticle and was enclosed there by the OLLso cell (Figure 5C). URX endings were enclosed by AMso cells in all dauers. A similar but less extended ILLso-URX-AMso sandwich structure was observed across all dauers, and in some cases (DauerE2v) ILLso was in contact but not enclosed by URX. The described ILLso branch was missing in one case (DauerE3s). URX endings were not enclosed by AMso cells in L1E4v but were enclosing respective branches of ILLso endings (Supplementary Figures 3E,F).
Figure 5. Anterior dendritic endings of dauer URX neurons are putatively ciliated and extend distal structures to enclose ILLso and to be enclosed by AMso support cells. (A) Volumetric 3D reconstruction of URXL sensory ending enclosing a branch of ILLsoL (arrowhead). As an example, the left side is shown. (B) Example of the spatial arrangement of URXL, ILLsoL, AMsoL, OLLsoL, and IL2LL. Part of AMsoL is clipped to allow a view inside. AMsoL encloses the part of URXL which encloses the branch of ILLsoL shown in A (arrowhead). OLLsoL encloses AMsoL at the amphid opening. The crown-like dendrite of IL2LL is in direct contact with AMsoL. (C) Transverse FIB-SEM section at the amphid opening (arrow) in the cuticle, which marks the beginning of the amphid channel formed by AMsoL. AMsoL is enclosed by OLLsoL. (D) Transverse section at the position where AMsoL encloses URXL which encloses ILLsoL (arrowhead). (E) Transverse section at the position where AMsoL encloses URXL but without enclosing ILLsoL. The IL2LL branch passes AMsoL at the periphery. (F) Higher magnified part of E showing microtubules inside URXL. Inset shows the same image with enhanced contrast. (G) Scheme indicating microtubules in F. (H) Overview of reconstruction of all mentioned cell endings. (I) Names and color code of cells shown.
Figure 6. Volumetric reconstruction of the anterior sensory endings of amphid neurons in dauer. (A) Models of sensory endings of all 12 left amphid neurons, of which eight are amphid channel neurons shown as a group (AM CNs), and models of the endings of their two support cells AMsoL and AMshL, where the latter is fused with AMshR. Left cells are shown as an example. (B) Models of sensory endings of all eight left amphid channel neurons from A. ADFL and ADLL are double ciliated while all others are single ciliated. (C) Models of sensory endings of all amphid neurons and their support cells. (D) Names and color code of cells shown.
Compared to the branch of ILLso described above, its second branch was originating from the cell rod and enclosed by BAG (Supplementary Figures 3B,C), which was facing into the anterior direction (Figure 3A, right), just below the cuticle surface (Supplementary Figures 3B,C). We observed this in all three dauer larvae and to a lesser extent in L1E4v where BAG enclosed a swelling at the respective ILLso cell rod posterior to its socket (Supplementary Material).
We observed microtubules in the URX endings, suggesting that those are ciliated (Figures 5E–G). We also observed convoluted whorls of membranes and large vesicles, enclosed either by URX or the AMso cell (Supplementary Figures 3A,G). We found similar membranous structures enclosed by BAG or ILLso cells of which some originated from Hyp cells or URX (Supplementary Figure 3B). However, we could not determine their origin exactly.
Each FLP neuron had one 1° dendrite following the lateral labial bundle to the anterior of which each extended two 2° dendrites following dorsal or ventral labial bundles, respectively (Supplementary Figure 3D). These anterior projections were almost unbranched. Their endings did not appear to be branched in DauerE1v (Supplementary Figure 3C). We could not find any cilia microtubules in FLP. During the investigation of the ventral midline of DauerE1s, we followed the AVM neuron and found its end anterior in the dauer at approximately 5 μm from the tip of the worm (Supplementary Figures 3C,D) reaching as far as the respective BWM cell.
Volumetric Reconstruction of Dauer Amphids at Single Microvilli Resolution
We determined the exact number of dendritic endings at the sensory tip of AWA neurons in dauer (Table 1 and Figures 6A,D). Branches of AWA neurons in DauerE3v widely overlapped (Supplementary Figures 4D,G) which was not the case in DauerE1v and just partly in DauerE2v. We also counted AWA endings in L1E4v (Table 1). One AWA neuron showed a wing-like expansion in one branch in L1E4v (Supplementary Figure 4F).
Table 1. Measurements of amphid neuron endings.
Notably, we observed variability in the branching patterns of AWB as the two branches of the AWB neuron endings extended into the dorsal and ventral direction in dauer (Figure 6A) while in one case of AWBL of individual DauerE3v both branches extended into ventral direction only (Supplementary Figure 4E).
The prominent wing-like endings of AWC neurons were Y-shaped (Figure 6A) in dauers. The AWC wings overlapped on the dorsal and ventral sides (Figure 6C) and intertwined in some cases. We measured the span and length of AWC wings from end to end across all dauer larvae (Table 1). The wing of AWCR had a smaller span in DauerE2v (Table 1). This wing fused with itself enclosing AMsh cytoplasm at two positions (Supplementary Figures 4A–C) which was only seen in this data set. The AWC wings in L1E4v were less expanded and did not overlap (Table 1).
We determined the exact number of AFD microvilli endings (Figure 6A and Table 1). In DauerE2v, some posterior microvilli might be missing, because they were cut off in the data set. Therefore, we provide in this study the number of cut off microvilli in the reduced data set in addition, being aware that this is an underestimate of the total number (Table 1). We also counted AFD microvilli endings in L1E4v (Table 1).
RIP Neurons Maintain Their Projection Into the Pharynx in Dauers
We found that in dauers, RIP neurons (Figures 7A,G) maintain their projections to the pharyngeal nervous system (Figure 7F). They entered through the pharyngeal basal lamina (Figures 7B,D), similarly in L1E4v (Supplementary Figures 5E,F). Posterior to the position where the endings migrated into the pharynx, they featured a bouton containing electron dense vesicles in both DauerE1v and DauerE3v (Figure 7E and Supplementary Figures 5A,C) and to a lesser extent in L1E4v (Supplementary Figure 5D). Inside the pharyngeal nervous system, RIP endings of DauerE1v and DauerE3v formed such a bouton-like shape as well (Figure 7F and Supplementary Figure 5C) filled with electron dense vesicles (Figure 7C), which were also present in L1E4v but again, to a lesser extent (Supplementary Figure 5E). The bouton of RIPL, located posterior to the entry into the pharynx in DauerE3v, was enclosed by the respective BWM cell (Supplementary Figures 5A,C). We observed a readily identifiable active zone-like structure inside the bouton of RIPL of DauerE3v opposing the BWM, which suggests that it is a neuromuscular junction (Supplementary Figure 5B).
Figure 7. Anterior dendritic endings of RIP neurons of dauer enter the pharyngeal nervous system. (A) Tracing of RIP neurons. (B) Transverse FIB-SEM section at the position where the ending of RIPR is entering the pharyngeal nervous system through an opening of the pharyngeal basal lamina. (C) Bouton with electron dense vesicles of RIPR inside the pharyngeal nervous system. (D) RIPR split at the pharyngeal basal lamina just before its ending is entering the pharyngeal nervous system. (E) Transverse section posterior of B where RIPR forms a small bouton filled with electron dense vesicles. (F) 3D reconstruction of RIP endings projecting through the pharyngeal basal lamina. (G) Names and color code of cells and structures shown.
Discussion
Earlier studies of sensilla cell morphologies of the dauer stage were limited by the ultrastructural preservation of classical fixation and the Z-resolution of ultramicrotomy sections (Albert and Riddle, 1983). To overcome these limitations, we used high-pressure freezing and FIB-SEM to reach near-to-native preservation and high Z-resolution to identify precise dauer-specific features for the anterior sensory apparatus. Our findings confirm and reveal features that are consistent with an expansion of sensory function, plasticity, and remarkable variability of sensory structures.
Morphological and Functional Implications of IL2 Branching Patterns
We confirm a distinct difference in the morphology between IL2L and IL2Q neuron branching types in dauer previously revealed by a light-microscopy study (Schroeder et al., 2013). These differences in their arborization pattern are mirrored at the molecular level by distinct expressions of transcription factors (Schroeder et al., 2013). Furthermore, these two neuron types differ in their synaptic connectivity in non-dauers (White et al., 1986; Witvliet et al., 2021). These differences suggest a functional difference between IL2L (Figure 3A) and IL2Q (Figure 3B) neurons that is morphologically manifested in dauer.
IL2 neurons are hypothesized to play roles in chemosensation as their endings are exposed to the external environment in non-dauers (Ward et al., 1975; Ware et al., 1975; Lewis and Hodgkin, 1977; Albert and Riddle, 1983). In dauers, sensory endings of IL2 project less far anterior in relation to IL1 endings. This is opposite to non-dauers (Albert and Riddle, 1983). Potential retraction of IL2 sensory endings suggests that chemosensory functions in dauers may be partially replaced by increased mechanosensory or temperature perceptions mediated by dauer-extended branches important for nictation (Lee et al., 2011; Schroeder et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2020). Consistent with this idea, the crown-like dendrites at IL2L endings are located peripherally to other sensilla and are, therefore, in direct contact with the Hyp cell and are in prime position to sense mechanical forces impacting on the anterior surface of the worm. Their location suggests sensing of nose touch. Furthermore, the midline dendrites of IL2QVs (Figure 4A) shared the trajectory of AVM what contributes to gentle touch responses (Chalfie and Sulston, 1981), suggesting similar mechanosensitive functionalities for IL2Qs which are slightly different from IL2Ls. Previously, dauer IL2 neurons were proposed to play similar roles as mechano- and temperature-sensitive FLP neurons (Kaplan and Horvitz, 1993; Chatzigeorgiou and Schafer, 2011; Liu et al., 2012) in non-dauers as they build dendritic branches in a similar receptive field (Albeg et al., 2011; Schroeder et al., 2013; Androwski et al., 2020). The morphological appearance of IL2L crown-like dendrites is fairly stable across dauers, with only slight differences in the 4° dendrites in one individual (Supplementary Figures 2B–D). It would be interesting to identify specific functional roles of the crown-like dendrites. Their overlap may indicate signaling feedback.
Dauer-Specific Interactions of IL2Qs With Other Neurons
We found that dauer-specific dendritic endings of IL2Qs reach the anterior projections of SAA or SAB (Figure 4A). The anterior projections of SAAs originate from their axons (White et al., 1986) but are devoid of synapses (Witvliet et al., 2021). They are proposed to possess stretch receptors and were modeled to be required for periodic bending of the anterior body (White et al., 1986; Sakata and Shingai, 2004; Vidal et al., 2015). An alternative model suggests that IL1 dendrites serve this role instead (Hart et al., 1995; Sakata and Shingai, 2004; Kindt et al., 2007). In non-dauers, anterior projections of SABs make neuromuscular junctions (Witvliet et al., 2021). It would be interesting to examine whether BWM cells receive synaptic input from SABs in dauers and whether SAB is required for nictation. Our current findings let us speculate that IL2Q may acquire mechanosensory functions and may regulate nictation via dauer-specific synapses with SAA or SAB (White et al., 1986; Witvliet et al., 2021).
Increased Mechanosensation in Dauers
Being a diapause state, dauer larvae exhibit remarkably quick responses and the fast forward movement induced by mechanical stimuli (Cassada and Russell, 1975; Gaglia and Kenyon, 2009). Our hypotheses that dauer shows a higher degree of plasticity and is more mechanosensitive is further supported by finding a dauer-specific anterior extension of AVM dendrite in DauerE1. AVM ends more posterior in non-dauers, approximately at the level of the pharyngeal metacorpus (Chalfie and Sulston, 1981; White et al., 1986). In the future, these observations should be further quantified by analyzing more individuals with imaging techniques that allow much larger sampling such as fluorescence microscopy with specific reporter lines (Ch'ng et al., 2003; Androwski et al., 2020).
ILLso-URX-AMso Structures Unique for Dauers
Gas sensing neurons BAG interact with ILLso cells in C. elegans adults. Therefore, ILLso is hypothesized to provide structural stability (Doroquez et al., 2014; Cebul et al., 2020). Contrary to previous observations (Doroquez et al., 2014), gas sensing neurons URX interact with ILLso as well (Cebul et al., 2020). Similar observations were made for BAG and URX cell homologs in P. pacificus adults (Hong et al., 2019). We observed similar interaction in C. elegans dauers. ILQso does not form structures to physically interact with BAG or URX. Therefore, ILso cells also consist of two principally different categories similar to IL2 neurons.
It would be interesting to address if the morphological difference within ILso cells is also functionally relevant. ILso cells express receptors required for nose touch sensitivity mediated by IL1 (Hart et al., 1995; Kindt et al., 2007; Han et al., 2013). Such sensitivity may be further functionally enhanced in dauer. Moreover, we discovered that in dauers the AMso cell encloses the URX neuron. In some cases, URX additionally encloses ILLso at the same position, forming a sandwich structure that was not observed in C. elegans (Doroquez et al., 2014) and P. pacificus (Hong et al., 2019) adults. Our investigation also revealed that AMso cells did not enclose URX neuron endings in the starved L1E4v larva (Supplementary Figures 3E,F). This is likely a dauer-specific adaptation that can be further investigated by examining the morphology of AMso and URX endings with fluorescent reporter lines previously described (Kim and Li, 2004; Low et al., 2019; Cebul et al., 2020; Fung et al., 2020).
We confirm that URX endings are ciliated in dauer (Figures 5F,G), as is the case in adults (Kazatskaya et al., 2020) and P. pacificus (Hong et al., 2019). We are aware of the resolution limits of our FIB-SEM approach. To further clarify precise microtubule arrangement and fine structure, a higher lateral resolution (<4 nm/pixel) by transmission or scanning EM would be necessary. Surprisingly, we did not observe FLP endings to interact with ILLso or to be ciliated, as previously reported for non-dauers (Ward et al., 1975; Ware et al., 1975; Perkins et al., 1986; White et al., 1986; Doroquez et al., 2014) and dauers (Albert and Riddle, 1983).
Intracellular Manifestations of Dauer Physiology
We observed convoluted whorls of membrane enclosed by or originating from either URX, BAG, AMso, ILLso, or Hyp cells (Supplementary Figures 3A,B). They resemble what has been described as exophers (Melentijevic et al., 2017). Exophers are formed by sensory neurons to overcome neurotoxic stress (Melentijevic et al., 2017). As dauers are in a constant state of physiological stress due to the absence of food uptake (Cassada and Russell, 1975), it is not surprising to find exopher-like structures. Hyp cells are involved in the cellular recycling of exophers (Melentijevic et al., 2017). As AMso and ILLso have hypodermal-like properties (White et al., 1986; Low et al., 2019; Cebul et al., 2020) and interact with URX or BAG, they could take on this task. The formation of exophers reinforces the sensitivity of neurons (Melentijevic et al., 2017). These findings further support that sensory activity is increased in dauers.
Dauer Specific Adaptation and Variability of Amphid Sensory Arborizations
Carbon dioxide and temperature can be perceived by AFD neurons (Bretscher et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012). Both parameters are important for dauers (Golden and Riddle, 1984; Hallem et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2020). We found a range between 82 and 110 microvilli per AFD neuron in dauers (Table 1), two times more than the previous estimation (Albert and Riddle, 1983). AWA terminal branches are between 12 and 24 in dauers (Table 1). Adults possess ~80 branches (Doroquez et al., 2014), implicating a developmental increase as reported for FLP (Albeg et al., 2011). We observed a wing-like swelling in one AWA branch in L1E4v. This may be an effect of starvation as similar starvation-dependent morphological changes for AWB neurons in adults have been described by Mukhopadhyay et al. (2008). In non-dauers, AWC is rather T-shaped (Ward et al., 1975; Doroquez et al., 2014). In dauers, we found them more as a Y-shape, and the radial span of AWC wings in our data sets are larger (up to 343°, Table 1) than previously reported by Albert and Riddle (1983).
Morphological differences in sensory structures between individuals may be triggered by the external environment or intrinsic influences. In contrast to developmental plasticity where the relevance of environmental influences is clear, here we prefer to use the term variability, as the environmental impact has not been investigated in detail yet. There is variability in the morphology of amphid sensory endings among dauers. AWC in DauerE2 showed cupola-shaped structures in parts of the wing. In addition, the branch direction of AWBL in DauerE3 was different from others. We hypothesize that phenotypic variability among dauers might be a preadaptation for the dauer population to find and adapt to new habitats.
Interactions Between the Pharyngeal and Somatic Nervous System
Pharyngeal pumping is inactivated in dauers (Cassada and Russell, 1975; Albert and Riddle, 1983). We found that RIP, the only direct neuronal connection between the pharyngeal and somatic nervous system, projects in a similar manner as in non-dauers (Ward et al., 1975). RIP projection terminals contain synaptic varicosities filled with electron dense vesicles in our observations which often contain neuropeptides (Ann et al., 1997; Salio et al., 2006). Similar varicosities were not found in starved L1E4 and have not been described in other non-dauers (Ward et al., 1975; Albertson and Thomson, 1976). In dauers, RIP may also function as motor neuron (Supplementary Figure 5B).
In non-dauers, RIP regulates inhibition of pharynx pumping triggered by light touch perceived by other neurons (Chalfie et al., 1985; Avery and Thomas, 1997). RIP could be responsible for pharynx inhibition in dauers. As IL1 are mechanosensitive (Hart et al., 1995; Kindt et al., 2007) and IL2 are hypothesized to be so with high activity, both may dauer-specifically enhance inhibition of the pharynx via RIP similarly (White et al., 1986).
Conclusions and Outlook
In summary, we observed remarkable expansion, plasticity, and variability of the sensory neuron apparatus in dauers. We schematically illustrated these results in the context of our hypotheses (Figure 8). An enhancement of sensory perception facilitates the finding of more favorable environments to re-enter the reproductive life cycle and might explain the critical role of the dauer stage in the evolution of nematodes. Notably, anatomical, behavioral, and signaling adaptations exhibited by C. elegans dauers are reminiscent of infectious stages in parasitic nematodes (Reed and Wallace, 1965; Dieterich and Sommer, 2009; Ogawa et al., 2009). For example, nictation behavior was reported in insect-parasitic nematodes (Reed and Wallace, 1965; Gaugler and Campbell, 1993; Yang et al., 2020). Furthermore, certain sensory neurons regulate dauer formation by an endocrine signaling system (Schackwitz et al., 1996) similar to that of parasitic nematodes (Ogawa et al., 2009).
Figure 8. Scheme summarizing dauer remodeled anterior sensilla neuron endings in the context of perception of environmental cues. The perceptive field of IL2s is extended by dendritic branching putatively allowing to sense mechanical stimulations and/or temperature. Cilia endings of IL2s are retracted suggesting reduction of potential chemosensitivity. Note that IL channels might be constricted in dauer, reducing chemical passage. AWCs are expanded in their wingspan and AFDs in their number of microvilli speaking for increased sensitivity. Amphid channels are open, allowing amphid neurons to efficiently sense certain volatile cues present in the environment.
To obtain a deeper understanding of wiring plasticity, there needs to be an analysis of a higher number of individuals exposed to different environmental factors and challenges. Advances in high-throughput technology such as multi-beam EM and parallel EM imaging have started to pave the way. To analyze an increasingly large body of data, an artificial intelligence approach of annotation would be favorable. Recent advances in machine learning and computational processing speed have made it possible to automate segmentation. Specifically, automated neuron reconstruction from 3D EM data with convolutional networks has already been demonstrated in zebra finch (Januszewski et al., 2018), the mouse somato-sensory cortex (Motta et al., 2019), the adult Drosophila central brain (Scheffer et al., 2020), and the C. elegans brains (Witvliet et al., 2021). 3D annotations from this and other (Witvliet et al., 2021) studies might serve as valuable ground truth for further development of automated segmentation methods in future studies.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data of this article is available online with the following URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5525883.
Author Contributions
YS, PK, MZ, and CS: study concept and design. SB, DW, SM, ST, BM, and AS: data analysis and interpretation. SB, CS, and MZ: drafting of the manuscript. SM and AS: acquisition of data. MZ and CS: study supervision. All authors: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, had full access to all the data in the study, took responsibility for the integrity of the data, and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Funding
This study was supported by a Ph.D. grant from the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes (to SM), by a Messreise grant of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Elektronenmikroskopie (to SB), and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Scheme 154274 and International Human Frontier Science Program Organization RGP0051/2014 (to MZ). This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Wuerzburg.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank the support of co-annotators F. Schinke, A. Hutchings, A. Gerber, J. Olbrich, C. Sommer, P. Dinkel, J. Karl, and R. Jacobalis. We thank D. Mastronarde, J. Bush, and S. Spielhaupter, for their support and helpful hints about 3dmod software. We thank M. Wang, D. Fon, and A. D. T. Samuel for CATMAID server support. We thank D. Bunsen, C. Gehrig-Höhn, B. Trost, J. Kattan, and N. Schieber for excellent technical support and helpful hints regarding sample preparation. We thank the electron microscopy core unit at the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine for access to their Crossbeam 540.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnana.2021.732520/full#supplementary-material
References
Albeg, A., Smith, C., Chatzigeorgiou, M., Feitelson, D. G., Hall, D. H., Schafer, W. R., et al. (2011). C. elegans multi-dendritic sensory neurons: morphology and function. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 46, 308–317. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.10.001
Albert, P. S., and Riddle, D. L. (1983). Developmental alterations in sensory neuroanatomy of the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva. J. Comp. Neurol. 219, 461–481. doi: 10.1002/cne.902190407
Albertson, D. G., and Thomson, J. N. (1976). The Pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275, 299–325. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1976.0085
Androwski, R. J., Asad, N., Wood, J. G., Hofer, A., Locke, S., Smith, C. M., et al. (2020). Mutually exclusive dendritic arbors in C. elegans neurons share a common architecture and convergent molecular cues. PLOS Genet. 16:e1009029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009029
Ann, K., Kowalchyk, J. A., Loyet, K. M., and Martin, T. F. J. (1997). Novel Ca2+-binding protein (CAPS) related to UNC-31 required for Ca2+-activated Exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19637–19640. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.32.19637
Avery, L., and Thomas, J. H. (1997). “Feeding and Defecation,” in C. elegans II, eds. D. L. Riddle, T. Blumenthal, B. J. Meyer, and J. R. Priess (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press). Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20138/ (accessed April 29, 2020).
Bargmann, C. I., Hartwieg, E., and Horvitz, H. R. (1993). Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell 74, 515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80053-H
Bargmann, C. I., and Horvitz, H. R. (1991a). Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7, 729–742. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90276-6
Bargmann, C. I., and Horvitz, H. R. (1991b). Control of larval development by chemosensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 251, 1243–1246. doi: 10.1126/science.2006412
Barrière, A., and Félix, M.-A. (2005). High local genetic diversity and low outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations. Curr. Biol. 15, 1176–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.022
Baugh, L. R., DeModena, J., and Sternberg, P. W. (2009). RNA pol II accumulates at promoters of growth genes during developmental arrest. Science 324, 92–94. doi: 10.1126/science.1169628
Baugh, L. R., and Sternberg, P. W. (2006). DAF-16/FOXO regulates transcription of cki-1/Cip/Kip and repression of lin-4 during C. elegans L1 arrest. Curr. Biol. 16, 780–785. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.021
Blaxter, M., and Denver, D. R. (2012). The worm in the world and the world in the worm. BMC Biol. 10:57. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-57
Bretscher, A. J., Kodama-Namba, E., Busch, K. E., Murphy, R. J., Soltesz, Z., Laurent, P., et al. (2011). Temperature, oxygen, and salt-sensing neurons in C. elegans are carbon dioxide sensors that control avoidance behavior. Neuron 69, 1099–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.023
Briggman, K. L., and Bock, D. D. (2012). Volume electron microscopy for neuronal circuit reconstruction. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.022
Cardona, A., Saalfeld, S., Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Preibisch, S., Longair, M., et al. (2012). TrakEM2 software for neural circuit reconstruction. PLoS ONE 7:e38011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038011
Carrillo, M. A., Guillermin, M. L., Rengarajan, S., Okubo, R. P., and Hallem, E. A. (2013). O2-sensing neurons control CO2 response in C. elegans. J. Neurosci. 33, 9675–9683. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4541-12.2013
Cassada, R. C., and Russell, R. L. (1975). The dauerlarva, a post-embryonic developmental variant of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 46, 326–342.
Cebul, E. R., McLachlan, I. G., and Heiman, M. G. (2020). Dendrites with specialized glial attachments develop by retrograde extension using SAX-7 and GRDN-1. Development 147:dev180448. doi: 10.1242/dev.180448
Chalfie, M., and Sulston, J. (1981). Developmental genetics of the mechanosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 82, 358–370. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90459-0
Chalfie, M., Sulston, J. E., White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., and Brenner, S. (1985). The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 5, 956–964. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-04-00956.1985
Chatzigeorgiou, M., and Schafer, W. R. (2011). Lateral facilitation between primary mechanosensory neurons controls nose touch perception in C. elegans. Neuron 70, 299–309. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.046
Ch'ng, Q., Williams, L., Lie, Y. S., Sym, M., Whangbo, J., and Kenyon, C. (2003). Identification of genes that regulate a left-right asymmetric neuronal migration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 164, 1355–1367.
Dieterich, C., and Sommer, R. J. (2009). How to become a parasite - lessons from the genomes of nematodes. Trends Genet. TIG 25, 203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.006
Doroquez, D. B., Berciu, C., Anderson, J. R., Sengupta, P., and Nicastro, D. (2014). A high-resolution morphological and ultrastructural map of anterior sensory cilia and glia in Caenorhabditis elegans. eLife 3:e01948. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01948
Erkut, C., Vasilj, A., Boland, S., Habermann, B., Shevchenko, A., and Kurzchalia, T. V. (2013). Molecular strategies of the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva to survive extreme desiccation. PLoS ONE 8:e82473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082473
Fehrenbach, J., Weiss, P., and Lorenzo, C. (2012). Variational algorithms to remove stationary noise: applications to microscopy imaging. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 4420–4430. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2206037
Félix, M.-A., and Duveau, F. (2012). Population dynamics and habitat sharing of natural populations of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. BMC Biol. 10:59. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-59
Fung, W., Wexler, L., and Heiman, M. G. (2020). Cell-type-specific promoters for C. elegans glia. J. Neurogenet. 34, 335–346. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2020.1781851
Gaglia, M. M., and Kenyon, C. (2009). Stimulation of Movement in a Quiescent, Hibernation-Like Form of Caenorhabditis elegans by Dopamine Signaling. J. Neurosci. 29, 7302–7314. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3429-08.2009
Gaugler, R., and Campbell, J. F. (1993). Nictation behaviour and its ecological implications in the host search strategies of entomopathogenic nematodes (heterorhabditidae and steinernematidae). Behaviour 126, 155–169. doi: 10.1163/156853993X00092
Gea, T., Barrena, R., Artola, A., and Sánchez, A. (2004). Monitoring the biological activity of the composting process: oxygen uptake rate (OUR), respirometric index (RI), and respiratory quotient (RQ). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 88, 520–527. doi: 10.1002/bit.20281
GIMP.org Team (2021). GIMP Version 2.10.24. Available online at: https://www.gimp.org/ (accessed June 13, 2021).
Golden, J. W., and Riddle, D. L. (1982). A pheromone influences larval development in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 218, 578–580. doi: 10.1126/science.6896933
Golden, J. W., and Riddle, D. L. (1984). The Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva: developmental effects of pheromone, food, and temperature. Dev. Biol. 102, 368–378. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90201-X
Hallem, E. A., Dillman, A. R., Hong, A. V., Zhang, Y., Yano, J. M., DeMarco, S. F., et al. (2011). A sensory code for host seeking in parasitic nematodes. Curr. Biol. 21, 377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.048
Hallem, E. A., and Sternberg, P. W. (2008). Acute carbon dioxide avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 8038–8043. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707469105
Han, L., Wang, Y., Sangaletti, R., D'Urso, G., Lu, Y., Shaham, S., et al. (2013). Two novel DEG/ENaC channel subunits expressed in glia are needed for nose-touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 33, 936–949. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2749-12.2013
Hart, A. C., Sims, S., and Kaplan, J. M. (1995). Synaptic code for sensory modalities revealed by C. elegans GLR-1 glutamate receptor. Nature 378, 82–85. doi: 10.1038/378082a0
Hedgecock, E. M., and Russell, R. L. (1975). Normal and mutant thermotaxis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 4061–4065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.4061
Heymann, J. A. W., Hayles, M., Gestmann, I., Giannuzzi, L. A., Lich, B., and Subramaniam, S. (2006). Site-specific 3D imaging of cells and tissues with a dual beam microscope. J. Struct. Biol. 155, 63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.03.006
Hong, R. L., Riebesell, M., Bumbarger, D. J., Cook, S. J., Carstensen, H. R., Sarpolaki, T., et al. (2019). Evolution of neuronal anatomy and circuitry in two highly divergent nematode species. eLife 8:e47155. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47155
Inkscape.org Team (2021). Inkscape Version 1.1. Available online at: https://inkscape.org/ (accessed June 13, 2021).
Jang, H., Kim, K., Neal, S. J., Macosko, E., Kim, D., Butcher, R. A., et al. (2012). Neuromodulatory state and sex specify alternative behaviors through antagonistic synaptic pathways in C. elegans. Neuron 75, 585–592. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.034
Januszewski, M., Kornfeld, J., Li, P. H., Pope, A., Blakely, T., Lindsey, L., et al. (2018). High-precision automated reconstruction of neurons with flood-filling networks. Nat. Methods 15, 605–610. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0049-4
Johnson, T. E., Mitchell, D. H., Kline, S., Kemal, R., and Foy, J. (1984). Arresting development arrests aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech. Ageing Dev. 28, 23–40. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90150-7
Kaplan, J. M., and Horvitz, H. R. (1993). A dual mechanosensory and chemosensory neuron in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 2227–2231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2227
Kazatskaya, A., Yuan, L., Amin-Wetzel, N., Philbrook, A., de Bono, M., and Sengupta, P. (2020). The URX Oxygen-Sensing Neurons in C. elegans are Ciliated. MicroPublication Biol. Available online at: https://www.micropublication.org/journals/biology/micropub-biology-000303/ (accessed November 4, 2020).
Kim, K., and Li, C. (2004). Expression and regulation of an FMRFamide-related neuropeptide gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 475, 540–550. doi: 10.1002/cne.20189
Kim, K., Sato, K., Shibuya, M., Zeiger, D. M., Butcher, R. A., Ragains, J. R., et al. (2009). Two chemoreceptors mediate developmental effects of dauer pheromone in C. elegans. Science 326, 994–998. doi: 10.1126/science.1176331
Kindt, K. S., Viswanath, V., Macpherson, L., Quast, K., Hu, H., Patapoutian, A., et al. (2007). Caenorhabditis elegans TRPA-1 functions in mechanosensation. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 568–577. doi: 10.1038/nn1886
Klass, M., and Hirsh, D. (1976). Non-ageing developmental variant of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 260, 523–525. doi: 10.1038/260523a0
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N., and McIntosh, J. R. (1996). Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013
Lee, H., Choi, M., Lee, D., Kim, H., Hwang, H., Kim, H., et al. (2011). Nictation, a dispersal behavior of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, is regulated by IL2 neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 107–112. doi: 10.1038/nn.2975
Lewis, J. A., and Hodgkin, J. A. (1977). Specific neuroanatomical changes in chemosensory mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 172, 489–510. doi: 10.1002/cne.901720306
Liu, S., Schulze, E., and Baumeister, R. (2012). Temperature- and touch-sensitive neurons couple CNG and TRPV channel activities to control heat avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 7:e32360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032360
Low, I. I. C., Williams, C. R., Chong, M. K., McLachlan, I. G., Wierbowski, B. M., Kolotuev, I., et al. (2019). Morphogenesis of neurons and glia within an epithelium. Development 146:171124. doi: 10.1242/dev.171124
Macosko, E. Z., Pokala, N., Feinberg, E. H., Chalasani, S. H., Butcher, R. A., Clardy, J., et al. (2009). A hub-and-spoke circuit drives pheromone attraction and social behaviour in C. elegans. Nature 458, 1171–1175. doi: 10.1038/nature07886
Markert, S. M., Bauer, V., Muenz, T. S., Jones, N. G., Helmprobst, F., Britz, S., et al. (2017). “Chapter 2 - 3D subcellular localization with superresolution array tomography on ultrathin sections of various species,” in Methods in Cell Biology, eds. T. Müller-Reichert, and P. Verkade (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 21–47. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2017.03.004
Melentijevic, I., Toth, M. L., Arnold, M. L., Guasp, R. J., Harinath, G., Nguyen, K. C., et al. (2017). C. elegans neurons jettison protein aggregates and mitochondria under neurotoxic stress. Nature 542, 367–371. doi: 10.1038/nature21362
Motta, A., Berning, M., Boergens, K. M., Staffler, B., Beining, M., Loomba, S., et al. (2019). Dense connectomic reconstruction in layer 4 of the somatosensory cortex. Science 366:eaay3134. doi: 10.1126/science.aay3134
Mukhopadhyay, S., Lu, Y., Shaham, S., and Sengupta, P. (2008). Sensory signaling-dependent remodeling of olfactory cilia architecture in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 14, 762–774. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.002
Ogawa, A., Streit, A., Antebi, A., and Sommer, R. J. (2009). A conserved endocrine mechanism controls the formation of dauer and infective larvae in nematodes. Curr. Biol. 19, 67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.063
Park, D., O'Doherty, I., Somvanshi, R. K., Bethke, A., Schroeder, F. C., Kumar, U., et al. (2012). Interaction of structure-specific and promiscuous G-protein–coupled receptors mediates small-molecule signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 9917–9922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202216109
Perkins, L. A., Hedgecock, E. M., Thomson, J. N., and Culotti, J. G. (1986). Mutant sensory cilia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 117, 456–487. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90314-3
Petersen, C., Hermann, R. J., Barg, M.-C., Schalkowski, R., Dirksen, P., Barbosa, C., et al. (2015). Travelling at a slug's pace: possible invertebrate vectors of Caenorhabditis nematodes. BMC Ecol. 15:19. doi: 10.1186/s12898-015-0050-z
Popham, J. D., and Webster, J. M. (1979). Aspects of the fine structure of the dauer larva of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Can. J. Zool. 57, 794–800. doi: 10.1139/z79-098
Procko, C., Lu, Y., and Shaham, S. (2011). Glia delimit shape changes of sensory neuron receptive endings in C. elegans. Dev. Camb. Engl. 138, 1371–1381. doi: 10.1242/dev.058305
Reed, E. M., and Wallace, H. R. (1965). Leaping locomotion by an insect-parasitic nematode. Nature 206, 210–211. doi: 10.1038/206210a0
Saalfeld, S., Cardona, A., Hartenstein, V., and Tomančák, P. (2009). CATMAID: collaborative annotation toolkit for massive amounts of image data. Bioinformatics 25, 1984–1986. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp266
Sakata, K., and Shingai, R. (2004). Neural network model to generate head swing in locomotion of Caenorhabditis elegans. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 15, 199–216. doi: 10.1088/0954-898X_15_3_003
Salio, C., Lossi, L., Ferrini, F., and Merighi, A. (2006). Neuropeptides as synaptic transmitters. Cell Tissue Res. 326, 583–598. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0268-3
Schackwitz, W. S., Inoue, T., and Thomas, J. H. (1996). Chemosensory neurons function in parallel to mediate a pheromone response in C. elegans. Neuron 17, 719–728. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80203-2
Scheffer, L. K., Xu, C. S., Januszewski, M., Lu, Z., Takemura, S., Hayworth, K. J., et al. (2020). A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain. eLife 9:e57443. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57443
Schieber, N. L., Machado, P., Markert, S. M., Stigloher, C., Schwab, Y., and Steyer, A. M. (2017). Minimal resin embedding of multicellular specimens for targeted FIB-SEM imaging. Methods Cell Biol. 140, 69–83. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2017.03.005
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schroeder, N. E., Androwski, R. J., Rashid, A., Lee, H., Lee, J., and Barr, M. M. (2013). Dauer-specific dendrite arborization in C. elegans is regulated by KPC-1/Furin. Curr. Biol. 23, 1527–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.058
Stigloher, C., Zhan, H., Zhen, M., Richmond, J., and Bessereau, J.-L. (2011). The presynaptic dense projection of the Caenorhabiditis elegans cholinergic neuromuscular junction localizes synaptic vesicles at the active zone through SYD-2/Liprin and UNC-10/RIM-dependent interactions. J. Neurosci. 31, 4388–4396. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-10.2011
Sudhaus, W., and Kiontke, K. (1996). Phylogeny of rhabditis subgenus Caenorhabditis (Rhabditidae, Nematoda)*. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 34, 217–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1996.tb00827.x
Sulston, J. E., and Horvitz, H. R. (1977). Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 56, 110–156. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90158-0
Sun, A. Y., and Lambie, E. J. (1997). gon-2, a gene required for gonadogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 147, 1077–1089.
Vidal, B., Santella, A., Serrano-Saiz, E., Bao, Z., Chuang, C.-F., and Hobert, O. (2015). C. elegans SoxB genes are dispensable for embryonic neurogenesis but required for terminal differentiation of specific neuron types. Development 142, 2464–2477. doi: 10.1242/dev.125740
Ward, S., Thomson, N., White, J. G., and Brenner, S. (1975). Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 160, 313–337. doi: 10.1002/cne.901600305
Ware, R. W., Clark, D., Crossland, K., and Russell, R. L. (1975). The nerve ring of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: sensory input and motor output. J. Comp. Neurol. 162, 71–110. doi: 10.1002/cne.901620106
Weimer, R. M. (2006). Preservation of C. elegans tissue via high-pressure freezing and freeze-substitution for ultrastructural analysis and immunocytochemistry. Methods Mol. Biol. 351, 203–221. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-151-7:203
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., and Brenner, S. (1986). The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 314, 1–340. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0056
Witvliet, D., Mulcahy, B., Mitchell, J. K., Meirovitch, Y., Berger, D. R., Wu, Y., et al. (2021). Connectomes across development reveal principles of brain maturation. Nature 596, 257–261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
Keywords: FIB-SEM, 3D reconstruction, neuroanatomy, IL2 branching, amphids, Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), dauer
Citation: Britz S, Markert SM, Witvliet D, Steyer AM, Tröger S, Mulcahy B, Kollmannsberger P, Schwab Y, Zhen M and Stigloher C (2021) Structural Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans Dauer Larval Anterior Sensilla by Focused Ion Beam-Scanning Electron Microscopy. Front. Neuroanat. 15:732520. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.732520
Received: 29 June 2021; Accepted: 24 September 2021;
Published: 05 November 2021.
Edited by:
Michael Lazarus, University of Tsukuba, JapanReviewed by:
Joachim H. R. Lübke, Helmholtz-Verband Deutscher Forschungszentren (HZ), GermanyValentin Nägerl, UMR5297 Institut Interdisciplinaire de Neurosciences (IINS), France
Copyright © 2021 Britz, Markert, Witvliet, Steyer, Tröger, Mulcahy, Kollmannsberger, Schwab, Zhen and Stigloher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sebastian Britz, sebastian.britz@uni-wuerzburg.de; Christian Stigloher, christian.stigloher@uni-wuerzburg.de
†These authors share second authorship