Learn-Han Lee
Bey-Hing Goh
Kok-Gan Chan- 1Novel Bacteria and Drug Discovery Research Group, Microbiome and Bioresource Research Strength, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
- 2College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- 3Biofunctional Molecule Exploratory Research Group (BMEX), School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
- 4Division of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 5International Genome Centre, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Editorial on the Research Topic
Actinobacteria: Prolific Producers of Bioactive Metabolites
Introduction
For decades, scientists have conducted bioprospecting on Actinobacteria for the discovery of novel genera producing bioactive metabolites (Atalan et al., 2000; Bull et al., 2000; Goodfellow et al., 2018). Actinobacteria are the most prolific source of bioactive secondary metabolites, with diverse structural complexity (Takahashi, 2004). Actinobacteria-derived metabolites exhibit a wide spectrum of bioactivities, including antimicrobial (Umezawa et al., 1966), antifungal (Fukuda et al., 2005), anticancer (Omura et al., 1977), antiparasitic (Ǒmura, 2003), and immunosuppressive activities (Barka et al., 2016). Thus, Actinobacteria continue to fuel biotechnology and medicine sectors with new biomolecules. In this Research Topic, a total of nine articles were published, illustrating wide arrays of bioactive metabolites produced by Actinobacteria derived from diverse ecosystems and the biosynthetic regulatory mechanisms of these metabolites.
Streptomyces—a Powerhouse of Secondary Metabolites
After decades of bioprospecting, Streptomyces remains a priority due to its unsurpassed competency in producing a stunning multitude of diversified bioactive metabolites (Fiedler and Goodfellow, 2004; Goodfellow and Fiedler, 2010). The ability of Streptomyces to provide sources for new antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was highlighted (Kemung et al.). For instance, griseusin A, marinopyrrole A, and polyketomycin are several potent anti-MRSA compounds produced by Streptomyces, showing great promise for future clinical use. Balasubramanian et al. reported a compound (SKC3) from a marine sponge-derived Streptomyces sp. SBT348 extract with antagonistic effects against growth and biofilm formation of several staphylococcal strains. Yu et al. reported two new fatty acids with nitrile group Borrelidins J and K, produced by Streptomyces rochei MB037, exhibiting strong activities against S. aureus. Besides Streptomyces, other genera such as Microbacterium within the phylum Actinobacteria derived from marine sponges also showed promising antibacterial activity against MRSA (Santos et al.).
Microbial secondary metabolites exhibited many useful applications for humankind. Many antibiotics derived from Streptomyces act as a defense mechanism to mediate competitive interspecies interactions (Chevrette et al., 2019). Tenconi et al. demonstrated the production of broad-spectrum molecules, the prodiginines associated with programmed cell death of the host, S. coelicolor. Hence, researchers suggested that the third use for antibiotics would be as molecules for self-toxicity to regulate cell proliferation other than serving as traditionally perceived tools for inter- or intra-species communication (Mccormick and Flärdh, 2012).
Untapped Reservoir of Biodiversity for Bioprospecting
The widespread occurrences of drug resistance in cancer and pathogens have rendered many medicines ineffective, and new strategies are therefore needed to uncover new agents (Antoraz et al., 2015). Exploring new taxa from untapped sources is an efficient strategy in searching for new drug leads/chemical scaffolds, as taxonomic diversity correlates to chemical diversity (Harvey, 2000; Sayed et al., 2020). Untapped environments like deep oceans (Abdel-Mageed et al., 2010) and mangroves (Hong et al., 2009) are proven a prolific source of bioactive Actinobacteria (Bull et al., 2005; Bull and Goodfellow, 2019). Moreover, Rangseekaew and Pathom-aree summarized that cave ecosystems harbor novel and diverse Actinobacteria, with promising bioactive metabolites, with a total of 47 species within 30 genera, including seven types of novel genera of Actinobacteria reported between 1999 and 2018. The coastal salt marsh plants represent another reservoir for diverse and novel endophytic Actinobacteria with promising biosynthetic capabilities as biocontrol agents and fibrinolytic enzymes (Chen et al.).
Co-Cultivation-, Genome-, and Modern Metabolomics-Based Bioprospecting Approaches in Actinobacteria
Actinobacteria have widely differing genome sizes, ranging from 1 to 12 Mb (Větrovský and Baldrian, 2013), where biologically active compounds are genetically encoded as biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). The advancement in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies enhanced the understanding of secondary metabolite biosynthesis potentials of Actinobacteria (Nouioui et al., 2018). The genomic analysis revealed Actinobacteria capable of producing many more compounds than were observed in in vitro culture, indicating many of these BGCs are silent or weakly expressed under standard laboratory conditions.
Given that microbes commonly coexist in diverse communities in nature, microbes interact with each other via production of potentially useful bioactive secondary metabolites. Co-cultivation is an effective approach to simulate authentic circumstances in the environment. This approach has been shown to activate the silent genes and increase the yield of useful compounds by culturing two or more microorganisms in the same environment (Rateb et al., 2013). Herein, Yu et al. demonstrated co-culture of Streptomyces rochei MB037 with the gorgonian-derived fungus Rhinocladiella similis 35, which led to the isolation of three novel antibacterial compounds.
The ability to unravel the whole genomic sequences of Streptomyces strains has enabled the pleiotropic regulation or effective manipulation of regulatory genes in pathway-specific Streptomyces (Van Der Heul et al., 2018). Hou et al. revealed a potential role of a novel regulatory family, LmbU, to be used for yield enhancement of lincomycin from Streptomyces. Clearly, the enhancement of our understanding on the regulation of specialized metabolic gene clusters is the key to yielding improvement of a target compound for large-scale manufacturing in Actinobacteria. Despite the advances of bioinformatic prediction tools, new genomes are increasingly becoming available for identification in newly isolated microbial strains. Analytical chemistry techniques are indispensable in uncovering the full biosynthetic potential of microbes with use of hyphenated techniques, particularly high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) for systematic assessment of novel molecules (Goodfellow and Fiedler, 2010). Schneider et al. identified a new analog of geninthiocin, a thiopeptide antibiotic, named as geninthiocin B, and its BGCs from a Streptomyces sp. derived from a lichen Lepidostroma yunnana sp. nov. sample via genome mining coupled with MS- and NMR-based metabolomic approaches.
Conclusion
In summary, this Research Topic enhances our knowledge on the immense biological potential of Actinobacteria. The fact that this bacteria can easily be found in diverse ecosystems, including caves, coastal marshes, and marine sponges, further signifies the irreplaceable role of Actinobacteria in the field of biotechnology and medicine. Furthermore, the need for the development of new and effective bioprospecting tools is important in expediting the discovery process of potentially novel compounds from these biologically active Actinobacteria. Only the combination of technologies between microbiology, molecular biology, and analytical chemistry will continue to uncover the vast hidden scaffolds for novel bioactive secondary metabolites produced by Actinobacteria.
Author Contributions
L-HL, B-HG, and K-GC contributed to the literature review and writing of the project. The project was founded by L-HL. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the University of Malaya Research Grant (FRGS grant to K-GC grant no: FP022-2018A), the External Industry Grant from Biomerge Sdn Bhd to L-HL (Vote no. BMRG2018-01), and the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme to L-HL and B-HG (FRGS/1/2019/SKK08/MUSM/02/7 & FRGS/1/2019/WAB09/MUSM/02/1). The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Abdel-Mageed, W. M., Milne, B. F., Wagner, M., Schumacher, M., Sandor, P., Pathom-Aree, W., et al. (2010). Dermacozines, a new phenazine family from deep-sea dermacocci isolated from a Mariana Trench sediment. Org. Biomol. Chem. 8, 2352–2362. doi: 10.1039/c001445a
Antoraz, S., Santamaria, R. I., Diaz, M., Sanz, D., and Rodriguez, H. (2015). Toward a new focus in antibiotic and drug discovery from the Streptomyces arsenal. Front. Microbiol. 6:461. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00461
Atalan, E., Manfio, G. P., Ward, A. C., Kroppenstedt, R. M., and Goodfellow, M. (2000). Biosystematic studies on novel streptomycetes from soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 77, 337–353. doi: 10.1023/A:1002682728517
Barka, E. A., Vatsa, P., Sanchez, L., Gaveau-Vaillant, N., Jacquard, C., Klenk, H.-P., et al. (2016). Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 1–43. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00019-15
Bull, A. T., and Goodfellow, M. (2019). Dark, rare and inspirational microbial matter in the extremobiosphere: 16 000 m of bioprospecting campaigns. Microbiology 165, 1252–1264. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000822
Bull, A. T., Stach, J. E., Ward, A. C., and Goodfellow, M. (2005). Marine actinobacteria: perspectives, challenges, future directions. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 87, 65–79. doi: 10.1007/s10482-004-6562-8
Bull, A. T., Ward, A. C., and Goodfellow, M. (2000). Search and discovery strategies for biotechnology: the paradigm shift. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64, 573–606. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.3.573-606.2000
Chevrette, M. G., Carlos-Shanley, C., Louie, K. B., Bowen, B. P., Northen, T. R., and Currie, C. R. (2019). Taxonomic and metabolic incongruence in the ancient Genus Streptomyces. Front. Microbiol. 10:2170. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02170
Fiedler, H.-P., and Goodfellow, M. (2004). Alkaliphilic streptomycetes as a source of novel secondary metabolites. Microbiol. Aust. 25, 27–29. doi: 10.1071/MA04227
Fukuda, T., Matsumoto, A., Takahashi, Y., Tomoda, H., and Omura, S. (2005). Phenatic acids A and B, new potentiators of antifungal miconazole activity produced by Streptomyces sp. K03-0132. J. Antibiotics 58, 252–259. doi: 10.1038/ja.2005.29
Goodfellow, M., and Fiedler, H.-P. (2010). A guide to successful bioprospecting: informed by actinobacterial systematics. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 98, 119–142. doi: 10.1007/s10482-010-9460-2
Goodfellow, M., Nouioui, I., Sanderson, R., Xie, F., and Bull, A. T. (2018). Rare taxa and dark microbial matter: novel bioactive actinobacteria abound in Atacama Desert soils. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 111, 1315–1332. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1088-7
Harvey, A. (2000). Strategies for discovering drugs from previously unexplored natural products. Drug Discov Today 5, 294–300. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(00)01511-7
Hong, K., Gao, A.-H., Xie, Q.-Y., Gao, H. G., Zhuang, L., Lin, H.-P., et al. (2009). Actinomycetes for marine drug discovery isolated from mangrove soils and plants in China. Mar. Drugs 7, 24–44. doi: 10.3390/md7010024
Mccormick, J. R., and Flärdh, K. (2012). Signals and regulators that govern Streptomyces development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 206–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00317.x
Nouioui, I., Carro, L., García-López, M., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Woyke, T., Kyrpides, N. C., et al. (2018). Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 9:2007. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007
Ǒmura, S., (ed.). (2003). “Mode of action of avermectin,” in Macrolide Antibiotics: Chemistry, Biology and Practice (New York, NY: Academic Press), 571–776.
Omura, S., Tanaka, H., Oiwa, R., Awaya, J., Masuma, R., and Tanaka, K. (1977). New antitumor antibiotics, OS-4742 A1, A2, B1, and B2 produced by a strain of streptomyces. J. Antibiotics 30, 908–916. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.30.908
Rateb, M. E., Hallyburton, I., Houssen, W. E., Bull, A. T., Goodfellow, M., Santhanam, R., et al. (2013). Induction of diverse secondary metabolites in Aspergillus fumigatus by microbial co-culture. RSC Adv. 3, 14444–14450. doi: 10.1039/c3ra42378f
Sayed, A. M., Hassan, M. H., Alhadrami, H. A., Hassan, H. M., Goodfellow, M., and Rateb, M. E. (2020). Extreme environments: microbiology leading to specialized metabolites. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128, 630–657. doi: 10.1111/jam.14386
Takahashi, Y. (2004). Exploitation of new microbial resources for bioactive compounds and discovery of new actinomycetes. Actinomycetologica 18, 54–61. doi: 10.3209/saj.18_54
Umezawa, H., Maeda, K., Takeuchi, T., and Okami, Y. (1966). New antibiotics, bleomycin A and B. J. Antibiotics 19, 200–209.
Van Der Heul, H. U., Bilyk, B. L., Mcdowall, K. J., Seipke, R. F., and Van Wezel, G. P. (2018). Regulation of antibiotic production in Actinobacteria: new perspectives from the post-genomic era. Nat. Prod. Rep. 35, 575–604. doi: 10.1039/C8NP00012C
Keywords: Actinobacteria, prolific producers, Streptomyces, bioactive metabolites, bioprospecting
Citation: Lee L-H, Goh B-H and Chan K-G (2020) Editorial: Actinobacteria: Prolific Producers of Bioactive Metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 11:1612. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01612
Received: 01 May 2020; Accepted: 19 June 2020;
Published: 21 August 2020.
Edited by:
Natalia V. Kirienko, Rice University, United StatesReviewed by:
Christopher Milton Mathew Franco, Flinders University, AustraliaCopyright © 2020 Lee, Goh and Chan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Learn-Han Lee, lee.learn.han@monash.edu; leelearnhan@yahoo.com; Bey-Hing Goh, goh.bey.hing@monash.edu; Kok-Gan Chan, kokgan@um.edu.my