Picocyanobacteria Community and Cyanophage Infection Responses to Nutrient Enrichment in a Mesocosms Experiment in Oligotrophic Waters

Abstract

Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus are pico-sized cyanobacteria that play a fundamental role in oceanic primary production, being particularly important in warm, nutrient-poor waters. Their potential response to nutrient enrichment is expected to be contrasting and to differ from larger phytoplankton species. Here, we used a metagenomic approach to characterize the responses to nutrient enrichment in the community of picocyanobacteria and to analyze the cyanophage response during a mesocosms experiment in the oligotrophic Red Sea. Natural picoplankton community was dominated by Synechococcus clade II, with marginal presence of Prochlorococcus (0.3% bacterial reads). Increased nutrient input triggered a fast Synechococcus bloom, with clade II being the dominant, with no response of Prochlorococcus growth. The largest bloom developed in the mesocosms receiving a single initial input of nutrients, instead of daily additions. The relative abundances of cyanophage sequences in cellular metagenomes increased during the experiment from 12.6% of total virus reads up to 40% in the treatment with the largest Synechococcus bloom. The subsequent collapse of the bloom pointed to a cyanophage infection on Synechococcus that reduced its competitive capacity, and was then followed by a diatom bloom. The cyanophage attack appears to have preferentially affected the most abundant Synechococcus clade II, increasing the evenness within the host population. Our results highlight the relevance of host-phage interactions on determining population dynamics and diversity of Synechococcus populations.

Introduction

The cyanobacteria Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus are major components of marine pico-phytoplankton (<2 μm cell diameter). They play a key role in primary production in the oceans, particularly in warm and nutrient-poor waters (Partensky et al., 1999; Agawin et al., 2002), as their small size gives them a high specific affinity for the scarce nutrients (Raven, 1986; Chisholm, 1992; Raven, 1998). This high affinity and the fast growth of Synechococcus, also associated with its small size, allow these microorganisms to respond rapidly to nutrient inputs (Glover et al., 1988; Phlips et al., 1999; Agawin et al., 2000), thereby rendering it a major component of spring blooms in oligotrophic areas (Lindell and Post, 1995; DuRand et al., 2001). In contrast, increased nutrient concentrations have less conspicuous effects on the growth of its sister clade Prochlorococcus (Chung et al., 2011), that blooms in summer under very specific conditions of water stratification and nutrient depletion (Lindell and Post, 1995).

Genomic analyses have helped to identify at least 16 different Synechococcus clades (I–XVI) (Paerl et al., 2008; Ahlgren and Rocap, 2012; Huang et al., 2012; Mazard et al., 2012). There is a distinct distribution of Synechococcus clades globally, where clades I and IV usually dominate in cold, nutrient-rich waters; clades II, III, and X proliferate in warm and oligotrophic habitats; clades CRD1 and CRD2 are more successful in Fe-depleted waters, and the less abundant clades XV and XVI are mostly present at ecotone sites with intermediate conditions (Sohm et al., 2016). However, the genotypic composition of natural populations is dynamic and can change seasonally (Mackey et al., 2017; Ahlgren et al., 2019), as stratification and available nutrients vary along the year (Tai and Palenik, 2009; Post et al., 2011), or even at a shorter scale after temporary nutrient enrichments (Chung et al., 2011).

Due to the considerable biogeochemical and ecological significance of blooms, representing large biomass accumulations with impacts on carbon, nutrients and oxygen cycling, these phenomena have been an important subject of study since first described in the XIX Century (Francis, 1878). During the last years, innovative molecular tools, such as massively parallel DNA sequencing, have been used to allow a deeper understanding of the responses of marine microbial communities to different environmental conditions, unveiling the mechanisms responsible for population fluctuations (e.g., Chung et al., 2011; Post et al., 2011; Choi et al., 2013; Pearman et al., 2016).

Synechococcus blooms seasonally in the euphotic zone, when seawater temperature increases beyond a threshold value, and the nutrient availability is enhanced (Lindell and Post, 1995; Tai and Palenik, 2009; Chung et al., 2011; Post et al., 2011; Hunter-Cevera et al., 2016). Nutrient-induced Synechococcus blooming processes have been previously studied on natural samples during cruises, time series, and mesocosm experiments (Agawin et al., 2000; Tai and Palenik, 2009; Chung et al., 2011; Post et al., 2011), showing that Synechococcus can thrive shortly after nutrient addition, depending on nutrient loading (Agawin et al., 2000, 2004). Available results from mesocosm experiments showed the effect of nutrient addition on phytoplankton communities, mostly at a size-group or genus level. In the oligotrophic Mediterranean Sea, nutrient addition led to a fast response of picophytoplankton that was afterward replaced by microphytoplankton as the dominant group (Duarte et al., 2000). Agawin et al. (2004) also tested the effect of N:P ratios on Mediterranean picoplankton using nutrient enriched mesocosms. They observed that Synechococcus sp. and small flagellates dominated the water column 3 days after nutrient addition in all mesocosms, reaching different abundances depending on the N:P load. In fact, Synechococcus has a greater potential for nutrient acquisition in low-nutrient environments than bigger-celled photosynthetic plankton due to their small size and great ability to use different nitrogen sources (Raven, 1998; Moore et al., 2002). Amongst the different clades that constitute Synechococcus populations, those that consistently dominate the population throughout the year have also been shown to be dominant during the seasonal blooms (Tai and Palenik, 2009; Post et al., 2011), suggesting that these blooming processes do not preferentially affect particular clades.

Nutrient-induced increases in Synechococcus cell abundances trigger density-dependent mechanisms of population control (e.g., parasites and grazers) (Raven, 1998). These mechanisms decimate the blooming population, leading to a shift in the phytoplankton community composition toward the dominance of bigger cells as Synechococcus populations decline (Hein and Riemann, 1995; Duarte et al., 2000). Amongst these control mechanisms, viral infection has been defined as a key factor in determining host abundances and causing fast collapses of cyanobacteria blooms (Wilson and Mann, 1997; McDaniel et al., 2002; Mühling et al., 2005).

Viruses, mainly bacteriophages, are the most abundant entities in aquatic systems, reaching concentrations between 10⁴ and 10⁸ viruses mL^–1 (Wommack and Colwell, 2000). Phages infecting cyanobacteria belong to the order Caudovirales, dsDNA tailed phages that include the families Myoviridae, Podoviridae and Siphoviridae (Mann, 2003; Ma et al., 2014). Cyanophages can have different host ranges, some of them showing preferences for specific host strains (e.g., Waterbury and Valois, 1993), therefore revealing a close relationship between the genetic diversities of both phage and host populations (Sullivan et al., 2003; Mühling et al., 2005; Gregory et al., 2016). Cyanophages are an abundant and dynamic component of marine waters (Bergh et al., 1989; Suttle and Chan, 1993, 1994), and when the host abundance surpasses a threshold value, viral propagation becomes more efficient and their concentration increases dramatically (Suttle and Chan, 1994; Weinbauer and Suttle, 1996).

Nutrient addition to experimental mesocosms can trigger phytoplankton blooms, followed by increased viral numbers and eventually a collapse of the bloom, as observed in Emiliania huxleyi (Bratbak et al., 1993; Jacquet et al., 2002) and Synechococcus (Wilson et al., 1998). However, McDaniel and Paul (2005) also tested the effect of nutrient addition in natural Synechococcus communities, finding a decrease in the lytic production. In mesocosms experiments with nutrient limitation, the growth of the host community was reduced, and viral production was delayed or reduced (Bratbak et al., 1993; Jacquet et al., 2002). The adsorption of cyanophages to host cells was observed to be independent of nutrient concentration in the medium (Wilson et al., 1996), suggesting that changes in host growth and abundance in response to nutrients increase will enhance cyanophage production (Middelboe, 2000; Mei and Danovaro, 2004).

The goal of this study was to characterize the response of a natural oligotrophic community of picocyanobacteria and its viruses to different nutrient loadings, reaching a deep taxonomic level through the use of metagenomic tools. We used mesocosms enclosures that allow reproducing the natural oligotrophic Red Sea environmental conditions and the responses and interactions of the whole plankton community. We expected that nutrient additions would stimulate cyanobacterial growth, generating changes in the proportions of Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus and in their population diversities, that would be unveiled through a metagenomic approach to a clade or subclade level. We also expected that the induction of host growth would stimulate lytic viral infection, leading to the collapse of the bloom. The analysis of metagenome would also characterize and reveal the changes experienced in viral taxonomic composition. This study, conducted through experimental manipulation of nutrients in mesocosms in the Red Sea, will help to understand picophytoplankton responses in a salty, warming, oligotrophic, and highly transparent ecosystem.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Set Up

The experimental setup and the evolution of the temperature, nutrients and overall conditions are described in detail in Pearman et al. (2016). Briefly, a set of mesocosm bags of 8000 L (2.5 m deep) was placed in the research harbor of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) in Thuwal, Saudi Arabia (22.3°N, 39.1°E), between the 27th January and the 15th February 2013. The experiment aimed to analyze the phytoplankton response to different nutrient loadings, as a single nutrient pulse (i.e., simulating a single event as a dust storm) and a continuous nutrient input (i.e., simulating a eutrophication source as coastal urbanization or aquaculture development) (Pearman et al., 2016). The experiment consisted of 4 nutrient treatments plus a control (no nutrient addition), with 2 replicates each (Table 1). In two treatments, a high nutrient pulse was added only once at the beginning of the experiment (initial addition treatments, NP-I and NPSi-I), while in the other two treatments, a lower concentration of nutrients was added every day over the first 2 weeks (continuous addition treatments, NP-C and NPSi-C) (Table 1).

Temperature, salinity, and fluorescence profiles were measured daily using a CTD (Valeport Monitor CTD Profiler) with an attached chlorophyll sensor. Nitrate, nitrite, and orthophosphate concentrations were measured from each mesocosm bag, filtering through a 0.45 lm filter into acid washed sample bottles, and keeping samples stored at −20°C until analysis on an Autoanalyser AAIII pentacanal BRAN-LUEBBE (see Pearman et al., 2016 for details).

Sampling

Surface water (1 m) was sampled daily from each mesocosm at solar noon, using a Niskin bottle. For Synechococcus cell counts, 15 mL of water pre-filtered through a 40 μm mesh were fixed in glutaraldehyde (2.5% final conc.) and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen until analysis. Synechococcus cell abundances were quantified using a FACSVerse flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Belgium), equipped with a blue laser (488 nm), using 1.002 μm beads (Polysciences, Europe) for verification of the equipment.

The net growth rates (μ) of Synechococcus along the experiment were calculated from the slope of changes of the natural logarithm of the cell abundance (N) over time (t, in days). To do so, we fitted the linear regression equation, where a equals the intercept of the line with cell abundance (y-axis):

Water samples for metagenomic analysis were collected at the first day of incubation and at 2–3 day intervals, and immediately transferred to carboys for immediate filtration. Approximately 4 L of seawater was filtered through a 0.2 μm Cell-Trap^TM (Mem-Teq, United Kingdom). Concentrated cells were then eluted using 2 mL of filtered seawater (from the same sample), and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for later analysis. Results on total phytoplankton and plankton community responses are described in Pearman et al. (2016).

DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Cells were pelleted via centrifugation and resuspended in buffer (Qiagen) and lysozyme. Cells were lysed using a Tissue Lyser II machine (Qiagen) and Zirconia/Silica Beads. DNA was extracted following a phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (IAA) method (see Pearman et al., 2016, for details).

Paired-end sequencing libraries (100 × 2 bp) were prepared following the manufacturer’s protocols using the NEBNext Ultra DNA kit (#E7370L). Six samples were multiplexed per lane and were subsequently sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer at the KAUST Biosciences Corelab (BCL).

Sequence Analysis

The analysis of the metagenomic data obtained here was performed in the following manner. High quality reads and corresponding assemblies were obtained from every sample using standard error-correction methods, followed by assembly procedure using metaSpades Software v3.9.0 (Nurk et al., 2017), and resulting contigs were filtered for minimum length of 500. Gene prediction was performed using Prodigal with options “-p meta” and the “-c” switch for closed ends. Clustering of gene coding sequences (CDSes) by pooling all genes from all samples was performed using CD-HIT producing a non-redundant gene catalog. Paired-end reads from individual samples were mapped on to the gene catalog to seek gene presence and abundance estimates. Read mapping was performed using standard bow-tie software parameters by providing error-corrected paired end reads and resulting alignments in sam format were processed through eXpress software to obtain normalized mapped reads as reads (transcripts) per million and Fragment Per Kilobase per Million (FPKM) reads.

For annotation and visualization, we used Annotation and Compare modules provided by the Dragon Metagenomic Analysis Platform (DMAP)¹. The Annotation module allowed a comprehensive annotation of genes based on reference datasets employing Automatic Annotation of Microbial or Meta Genomes (AAMG). AAMG provided taxonomic assignments based on traversing BLAST results for Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA) approach (considering a minimum E-value of 1E-2 and 50% of BLAST coverage).

The Compare module provided an interface to compare and visualize samples based on available taxonomic and functional annotation.

We filtered data for Synechococcus (taxon id 1129) in DMAP using filter blast_tree:1129. The normalized read counts for genes related to different Synechococcus strains were manually assigned to their correspondent clade in agreement with the databases compiled in previous works (Mazard et al., 2012; Farrant et al., 2016). Also using DMAP, we looked for the single-copy, ribosomal protein gene rpsC amongst Synechococcus data (blast_tree:1129, HMM accession id: PF000189 and 80% blast coverage), to relate the normalized read counts of this target gene with the Synechococcus cell abundances determined with flow cytometry.

To look for related phage presence, absence or abundance in our metagenomic samples, we followed the same process as for Synechococcus, using the corresponding taxon id for all viruses (10239), and for the families Myoviridae (10662), Siphoviridae (10699), and Podoviridae (10744), and selecting those phages classified as Cyanobacteria, Prochlorococcus or Synechococcus phages.

To determine population evenness (Shannon’s equitability, E_H), we estimated the Shannon diversity index (H) within the Synechococcus populations from the different treatments using the alpha_diversity.py script in QIIME, and then applied the formula:

where H_max is the logarithm of the number of Synechococcus clades (clade richness, S) found in each sample.

Results

Nutrient concentrations were low at the onset of the experiment, with nitrite plus nitrate concentrations of 0.1 μM and phosphate below detection levels (detection limit for phosphate: 0.01 μM, Table 1). The initial addition in the NP-I and NPSi-I treatments led to a strong increase in nutrient concentrations on day 1, decreasing over time (Table 1). Nutrient concentrations in the NP-C and NPSi-C treatments were low on day 1, but accumulated in the mesocosms during the 2 weeks of continuous addition (Table 1). Throughout the incubation time, average (± SE) values for temperature and salinity in all mesocosms were 25 (± 0.3) °C and 40.4 (± 0.1) psu, respectively.

Chlorophyll a concentrations remained low in the control treatment (Table 1), and showed the highest values in the continuous addition treatments on days 13 (NP-C) and 8 (NPSi-C). In the NP-I and NPSi-I treatments the maximum chlorophyll a concentrations were reached on days 5 and 8, respectively (Table 1).

Synechococcus dominated the initial pico-phytoplankton community, with an abundance of 0.24 × 10⁶ cells mL^–1 (Figure 1). Prochlorococcus was not detected in the flow cytometric counts for the initial community or along the experiment. During the first day of incubation, the growth rate (± SE) estimated for the control treatment was -0.02 d^–1 (± 0.05, p = 0.76), as Synechococcus cell abundance decreased in the absence of nutrient addition (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

The growth during the first day of incubation was similar between the four nutrient addition treatments, averaging 0.28 d^–1 (± 0.03, p < 0.0001). In the treatments receiving continuous nutrient input, Synechococcus abundances peaked between days 1 and 2, reaching maximum values of 0.43 × 10⁶ cells mL^–1, and 0.62 × 10⁶ cells mL^–1 in the NP-C and NPSi-C treatments, respectively (Figure 1). However, in the treatments receiving a single initial nutrient pulse, Synechococcus reached the maximum cell concentrations at day 4, of 1.73 × 10⁶ cells mL^–1 for NP-I, and 1.33 × 10⁶ cells mL^–1 for NPSi-I treatments (Figure 1). After reaching the highest abundances, Synechococcus populations decreased in all the mesocosms and remained at low concentrations after day 6, with only a small increase during the second week in the control and NP-I treatment (Figure 1).

Synechococcus Genes and Clade Composition

Total hit numbers assigned to different taxonomic levels are shown in Table 2. At the beginning of the experiment, the proportion of bacterial reads assigned to Synechococcus averaged 15.7%. Its sister genus Prochlorococcus was also detected, but only averaged 0.3% of bacterial reads (Table 2). Within the total virus community, a high proportion of the reads was assigned to the Myoviridae family (average 34.6%). For the Podoviridae and Siphoviridae families, these proportions were lower (3.9 and 5.2%, respectively).

For Synechococcus, we observed a strong positive relationship between the number of rpsC reads taxonomically assigned to Synechococcus and the cell abundances determined with flow cytometry (R² = 0.68, p < 0.0001, Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

Amongst the Synechococcus strains obtained by DMAP analysis, 43 were assigned to 14 different clades, based on Mazard et al. (2012) and Farrant et al. (2016) (Table 3). Other strains found could not be assigned to any specific clade, and were grouped together as “Unclassified” (Table 3). The highest proportion of reads corresponded to clades II and III. Gene reads related to clades I, IV, V, VI, VIII, IX, UC-A, and WPC1 were also present, with clades CRD1, VII and XV, and members of the 5.2 sub-cluster being the least abundant. At the beginning of the incubations, gene reads assigned to clade II were dominant in all treatments, comprising more than a 76% of the total Synechococcus reads (Figure 3). More specifically, strains WH 8109 (subclade IIb) and CC9605 (subclade IIc) stood out among the most abundant in all experiments. The second most represented clade (clade III), comprised between 6 and 8% of total Synechococcus reads at the first day of incubation in all treatments (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3

The changes in the proportion of reads assigned to the different Synechococcus clades was analyzed for the first 2 weeks of incubation (Table 4), as the decrease in total reads assigned to Synechococcus obtained for subsequent days was too low to reliably assign the sequences. The lower number of reads and their more even dispersion among multiple clades made difficult their identification, and was reflected here in an increase in the proportion of reads related to unidentified Synechococcus toward the end of incubation, significantly in treatments NP-C and NPSi-C treatments receiving continuous nutrient additions (Figure 3 and Table 4). The proportion of the most abundant clade (clade II) decreased with time along the first 2 weeks, significantly in all treatments except for NPSi-I (t-test, Figure 3 and Table 4). In the initial addition treatment but without Si (NP-I), we observed a significant increase in the proportion of clades III, WPC1, UC-A and sub-cluster 5.2. In both continuous addition treatments, both clade UC-A and the unidentified Synechococcus proportions increased significantly with time (t-test, Figure 3 and Table 4). Also, clades I and VIII increased significantly in NP-C mesocosms (t-test, Figure 3 and Table 4). In the control mesocosm clade IX also decreased, with a significant increase in the proportion of clades III, WPC1 and UC-A (t-test, Figure 3 and Table 4).

After 1 day of incubation, the number of different clades identified in each treatment (clade richness) varied slightly between 12 clades in the control and NPSi-I treatments to 14 in the continuous nutrient addition treatments (Figure 4A). Clade richness was higher in the NP-I treatment during most of the experimental time, decreasing at the end of the experiment, as observed for all nutrient addition treatments (Figure 4A). The number of clades in the control treatment remained at 12 during all the experiment (Figure 4A).

FIGURE 4

The clade evenness within the Synechococcus populations represented using Shannon’s equitability showed in general the opposite tendency (Figure 4B). The clade evenness of the Synechococcus population increased over time, although for the control and NP-I treatments decreased toward the end of the experiment (Figure 4B), following the changes in the proportion of clade II along the experiment. For the rest of the treatments, E_H showed a tendency to increase with time, showing high values close to 0.8 at the end of the experiment (Figure 4B). When compared to the number of reads assigned to Synechococcus, Shannon’s equitability value increased in all treatments as the number of Synechococcus reads decreased (Figure 4C), suggesting that the increase in evenness is related to the decrease in Synechococcus populations.

Responses of Cyanophages and Virus

The cyanophage community represented a small proportion (12.6%) of the total number of viral reads at the beginning of the experiment (Figure 5). This proportion increased along the experiment, showing the maximum values on day 5 in the NP-C treatment (20.5%), and on day 6 in NPSi-C (30.3%), NP-I (43.6%), and NPSi-I (37.1%). In the control treatment, the proportion of cyanophages amongst the total viral reads also increased, but the maximum values were reached later in the experiment (day 10, 34%). We identified 53 different cyanophages after the taxonomic assignment of our metagenomic data, able to infect Synechococcus, Prochlorococcus, or both (Table 5). Amongst the Synechococcus phages, 14 were T4-like viruses from the Myoviridae family, 17 belong to the Podoviridae family, and 5 to Siphoviridae. The T4-like phages were the most abundant (e.g., Synechococcus phages S-RSM4 and ACG-2014h), in terms of number of reads, followed by members of the Siphoviridae family (e.g., Synechococcus phage S-SKS1). Podoviruses were also present, including several T7-like viruses (Table 5), but were much less represented.

FIGURE 5

The proportion of reads for Synechococcus phages increased a few days after the peak in Synechococcus cell abundances (Figures 6A,B). We observed a slight increase in the proportion number of reads for Synechococcus phages on the control and continuous treatments (Figure 6A), and a stronger increase in NP-I and NPSi-I, reaching the highest values at days 6 and 8, respectively (Figure 6B).

FIGURE 6

The Synechococcus phages that contributed most to this increase in read counts belonged to the Myoviridae family, with the proportion of reads assigned to this family increasing significantly from an average 5.8% (± SE = 0.3) on day 1 to 24.5% (± SE = 5.8) on day 6, for the nutrient addition treatments (Pearson’s Chi-squared test, p < 0.001, Figures 5, 7).

FIGURE 7

Discussion

Our results, by using a metagenomic approach, showed the effects of nutrient enrichment on a Synechococcus community at a low taxonomic level and cyanophages, during a mesocosm experiment with warm and oligotrophic waters of the Red Sea.

Our data showed that Synechococcus populations dominated the phytoplankton response during the first days after nutrient addition. At the beginning of the experiment, Synechococcus cell abundances fell within the range of values previously reported for the Red Sea (Veldhuis and Kraay, 1993; Kürten et al., 2015). During the first days of incubation, Synechococcus responded rapidly to the nutrient input, consistent with the occurrence of Synechococcus blooms in areas subject to episodic nutrient pulses (Phlips et al., 1999). In fact, pico-sized autotrophic plankton can experience nutrient limitation in oligotrophic waters (Vaulot et al., 1996; Thingstad, 1998), where they can typically support relatively fast, even if suboptimal, growth rates due to their high specific affinity for nutrients (Chisholm, 1992; Vaulot et al., 1996; Raven, 1998). The nutrient-stimulated growth of Synechococcus was more intense in the treatments with a large initial nutrient pulse, indicating that the higher nutrient loading allowed a more sustained growth than in the continuous addition treatments, reaching higher cell abundances (Agawin et al., 2000). In addition, the rapid growth and nutrient uptake rates that characterize Synechococcus, provided an advantage in responding to a nutrient pulse, whereas larger phytoplankton, including diatoms, would be better able to compete when nutrients are supplied continuously (Pearman et al., 2016). This was supported by chlorophyll a concentrations, that peaked after the first week of incubation reflecting an increase in total autotrophic biomass, mainly diatoms (in the NPSi-C treatment) and dinoflagellates (in the NP-C treatment) (Pearman et al., 2016). Prochlorococcus was a less abundant or minor component of the initial community, as reported for surface waters in other oligotrophic coastal areas (Veldhuis and Kraay, 1993; Babiæ et al., 2017; Pearman et al., 2017), and did not respond to nutrient additions as expected by its higher preference for ammonium instead of nitrate (Berube et al., 2015; Biller et al., 2015). On the other hand, the lack of nutrient addition in the control treatment precluded the development of phytoplankton and of Synechococcus.

The data derived from metagenomic analyses allowed a deep, unbiased characterization of the natural Synechococcus population to a clade level. Synechococcus clades I-IX had been previously observed in the Gulf of Aqaba, in northern Red Sea (Fuller et al., 2003, 2005; Lindell et al., 2005; Mühling et al., 2005; Penno et al., 2006; Post et al., 2011). In the present work, using more recent and complete Synechococcus clade databases, we could also identify the presence of clades XV, UC-A, WPC1, CRD1, and cluster 5.2.

Our results showed a prevalence of reads associated with clade II at the beginning of the experiment and during the blooms. Clade II is found in most (sub)tropical marine waters encompassing a broad range of nutrient concentrations (Post et al., 2011). This result also agreed with previous studies in the Red Sea (Fuller et al., 2003, 2005; Farrant et al., 2016), where this clade clearly prevailed in the Synechococcus community. Clades II and III (the second most abundant) have been reported to be prevalent and dominant in warm, oligotrophic, open-ocean habitats in tropical and subtropical oceans (Sohm et al., 2016), consistent with their dominant role in the Red Sea. Clade II also dominated the community forming a bloom in response to nutrient additions, whether delivered as a pulse of continuous additions. This can be observed here in the Synechococcus communities present in the four nutrient addition treatments on day 5, when the blooms were collapsing, and clade II remained as the dominant group (Tai and Palenik, 2009; Post et al., 2011). Other clades present at the beginning of the experiment also proliferated during the blooms, preserving similar proportions in the community. However, our results reflect a general decrease in the abundance of reads assigned to the different Synechococcus clades, following Synechococcus cell abundances decrease after the initial blooms in the nutrient addition treatments. Overall, the most conspicuous change is the decrease in the most abundant clade II and in its dominance in the population, while the proportion of other less abundant clades increased (e.g., UC-A), likely taking advantage as the resources not exploited by clade II became available. Clade II is the dominant Synechococcus clade in the Red Sea and the decline observed at the end of the experimental time reflect the general decrease of Synechococcus and competition with diatoms and other phytoplankton groups that proliferated in the mesocosms after the first week (Pearman et al., 2016). Besides this, low Synechococcus abundances toward the end of the experiment hampered a proper clade identification and were reflected in a higher proportion of unidentified clades, significantly in the continuous addition treatments.

In the control treatment, the predominating Synechococcus clades shifted from II to III, with clade III dominating the small bloom observed on the second week. Post et al. (2011) observed during a temporal study on the Gulf of Aqaba that while Synechococcus was dominated by clade II during the spring bloom, clade III contributed significantly to diversity during summer stratification (Mühling et al., 2005; Post et al., 2011). In fact, clade III became more prevalent in the Red Sea and in other oligotrophic areas during periods of severe nutrient depletion, occupying preferably stable, low-nutrient environments (Penno et al., 2006; Zwirglmaier et al., 2008; Post et al., 2011; Farrant et al., 2016). At the end of the experiment, nutrients were below detection limits in the control treatment, and the growth of clade III supports its preference for strong oligotrophic conditions. The proportion of clade III also showed a significant increase in NP-I, as nutrients became exhausted along the incubation, although in this case clade II remained dominant. In the Synechococcus populations present in nutrient addition treatments, increased cell abundances during the blooms allowed the quantification of the low abundant clade CRD1 in the initial addition treatments on day 5, but not in the continuous addition treatments. This difference contributed to the two slightly different outcomes for evenness between initial and continuous addition treatments observed on day 5, with decreased E_H values in NP-I and NPSi-I treatments.

At the end of the experiment, when blooms were finished for all the nutrient treatments, there was a slight reduction in clade richness. This was related in general to the decrease of clades XV, CRD1 and VII, the least abundant groups (<1% reads) that were not always detected along the experiment. Clade CRD1 appeared in the initial addition treatments, but not in the continuous addition treatments. In the non-blooming control treatment, the number of clades did not change. However, as clade III abundance increased, clade evenness also increased, and once clade III became predominant instead of clade II, evenness decreased again. In the continuous addition and NPSi-I treatments, evenness increased toward the end of the experiment as clade II dominance decreased. The result for NP-I differed as evenness decreased after the bloom but increased toward the onset of the experiment as the population of clade II recovered as observed at the beginning of the incubations. The reason for these changes could be associated to the cyanophage dynamics that were larger in this specific treatment.

Metagenomic data is superior to amplicon data (e.g., 16S or similar) in that it is PCR-free and, therefore, is free of the biases derived from differential amplification of sequences from different clades and viruses. Concurrently, metagenomic analyses provide information on the abundance for cyanobacteria and their associated phage community, as number of reads assigned to the organisms of interest. A high presence of viral DNA can be found in cell fraction metagenome samples (>0.2 μm), containing key viral information, which may be missing in viriome studies (e.g., Ghai et al., 2010; López-Pérez et al., 2017). The viral genes detected in the cellular fraction correspond to viruses on an intracellular stage (including replication intermediates generated during the lytic cycle, prophages or viruses on a lysogenic stage), big-sized viruses, viruses attached or adsorbed to particles, and free viruses that are retained as the filter saturates (De Long et al., 2006; Rodriguez-Valera et al., 2014; López-Pérez et al., 2017). This technique allowed us to get detailed information to differentiate and identify the Synechococcus cyanophages from other phages present in our samples, as bacteria are the most abundant organisms in the oceans (Cochlan et al., 1993; Fuhrman, 1999; Weinbauer, 2004), from which the ubiquitous Synechococcus is only a fraction (Li, 1998; Li and Harrison, 2001).

Our metagenomic approach revealed a massive cyanophage infection developing a few days after the onset of the Synechococcus bloom. Phage infection is a significant source of mortality of marine microorganisms (Proctor and Fuhrman, 1990; Fuhrman and Suttle, 1993; Suttle and Chan, 1994), exerting a major influence in their community structure, diversity and dynamics (Suttle et al., 1990; Bratbak et al., 1993; Brussaard et al., 1996). It has been estimated that about 15% of marine cyanobacteria are infected by phages at any given time (Proctor and Fuhrman, 1990), and that approximately a 2–3% of Synechococcus primary production is daily lost to viral lysis (Suttle, 1994). Viral reproduction requires host cell infection; infectivity increases with host abundance because infection is a direct function of the encounter rate between a pathogen and its host (Danovaro et al., 2011). Viral abundances increase in response to the increasing host abundances during algal blooms (Bratbak et al., 1990; Suttle and Chan, 1994; Weinbauer and Suttle, 1996), and has been reported to be a major factor responsible for bloom terminations. For example, Nagasaki et al. (1994) described the role of viruses in the rapid termination of a red-tide algal bloom in the Inland Sea of Japan. Also, several studies have related the cell mortality caused by viruses with the termination of blooms of the haptophyte Emiliana huxleyi in the North Sea (Bratbak et al., 1993; Brussaard et al., 1996; Jacquet et al., 2002). Grazing by protists could be also responsible for the decline of Synechococcus blooms, as both viral infection and grazing exert control over picoplankton populations (Baudoux et al., 2008; Boras et al., 2009). However, the evolution of protist abundances during our experiments did not show any negative relationship to Synechococcus abundances (Pearman et al., 2016), increasing their abundance toward the end of the first week of incubation, once the Synechococcus blooms had already collapsed. Therefore, our results are consistent with published reports indicating that nutrient amendments stimulate lytic phage production as a result from the enhanced growth of host cells (Williamson and Paul, 2004). The majority of cyanophages that have been isolated are lytic (Suttle, 2005). However, in natural populations of Synechococcus, the lysogenic phase prevails at times of low host availability, resource limitation or adverse environmental conditions in order to ensure viral survival (McDaniel et al., 2002; Ortmann et al., 2002), as has been observed for different bacterial communities (Weinbauer et al., 2003; Payet and Suttle, 2013). During lysogeny, the genetic material if the phage is integrated into the host genome as a prophage and subsequently transmitted vertically during cell division in a non-infectious form. Later, the lytic pathway can be induced either spontaneously or by physical, chemical or biological factors, such as increased growth of the host (Paul, 2008; Payet and Suttle, 2013). As observed here, when resource supplies allow the host concentration to proliferate, concentrations of cyanophages increase dramatically (Suttle and Chan, 1994; Weinbauer and Suttle, 1996), thereby acting as key drivers in terminating algal blooms (Wilson and Mann, 1997; McDaniel et al., 2002; Mühling et al., 2005).

Viruses can exert a significant selection pressure on the host community (e.g., Suttle and Chan, 1993, 1994; Ahlgren et al., 2019). Synechococcus phages show varied host specificities, being able to attack one or several host strains (Suttle and Chan, 1993), with a strong effect on the community microdiversity of the host (Ahlgren et al., 2019). The viral community also changes, as observed in Alarcón-Schumacher et al. (2019), who described a shift in the predominant viral family from Myoviridae, that infects bacteria and archaea, to Picodnaviridae, infecting eukaryotes, during a diatom-dominated bloom. In our study, the most abundant Synechococcus phages were T4-like phages, belonging to the widely distributed Myoviridae family (Mann, 2003; Ma et al., 2014). T4-like myoviruses can encode their own tRNAs, a strategy that may allow them to expand their potential host range (Limor-Waisberg et al., 2011), supporting the hypothesis that in oligotrophic oceanic waters, phages with broad host ranges would have a greater chance of successful host encounter (Wommack and Colwell, 2000). This way, as the host-phage interactions in the experimental blooms reported here are unlikely to be strain-specific but mainly density-dependent, the most successful host lineage will be preferentially attacked by phages (Thingstad et al., 2008). Consistently, during our study the viral attack seems to have affected the most abundant clade (clade II), whose proportion in the Synechococcus population showed a decreasing trend after the bloom had started to collapse.

Phage-host interactions influence host population diversity, in terms of the number of taxa present (richness) or the homogeneity of their frequencies (evenness) (Mühling et al., 2005; Rodriguez-Valera et al., 2009). The Shannon’s equitability index decreased in all treatments as the number of Synechococcus reads increased, relating homogeneity to the development of blooms and the changes in the dominance of clade II. The sharper increase in evenness between days 5 and 8 for the initial addition treatments could be related to the phage-induced mortality of clade II, which grew again at the end of the experiment once virus numbers decreased, resulting in a decrease in evenness. This contrasts with the control treatment, where the absence of nutrient amendments prevented the development of a Synechococcus bloom, and the less pronounced viral control allowed clade III (better adapted to low nutrient conditions) to thrive, replacing clade II.

As active members of marine planktonic communities, viruses influence community composition introducing organic nutrients into the system that can be recycled by bacteria (Lara et al., 2017), and also by removing the fast-growing, blooming hosts (Bratbak et al., 1990; Fuhrman, 1999). During our experiment, different picoeukaryotes and nanoeukaryotes increased their abundance to dominate the community following Synechococcus bloom collapse (Pearman et al., 2016), as observed in previous mesocosm experiments (Duarte et al., 2000; Castberg et al., 2001). Hence, our results suggest viral control of Synechococcus abundances probably had indirect consequences on community structure and dynamics, providing opportunities and recycled resources for other species to grow (Castberg et al., 2001).

In summary, our metagenomic analysis showed that intense nutrient inputs triggered Synechococcus blooms, without conspicuous changes in clade composition. These blooms appear to have been terminated by subsequent cyanophage outbursts. The observed decrease in Synechococcus clade II after the blooms had collapsed increased the evenness within the Synechococcus population, more strongly in the initial addition treatment where the preferential viral attack on the most abundant clade may have accentuated the change in the host evenness. In contrast, during the control treatment, the low nutrient availability prevented the development of a Synechococcus bloom and of the consequent phage outburst, with a substantial change in Synechococcus clade composition where clade III outcompeted clade II.

These results reflect the dynamic composition of Synechococcus communities and highlight the importance of nutrient-induced blooms and viral infection in maintaining Synechococcus abundance and diversity, with broad implications for the dynamics of plankton communities in warm, oligotrophic waters.

References

• 1

  AgawinN. S.AgustíS.DuarteC. M. (2002). Abundance of Antarctic picophytoplankton and their response to light and nutrient manipulation.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.29161–172. 10.3354/ame029161

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AgawinN. S.DuarteC. M.AgustíS. (2000). Response of Mediterranean Synechococcus growth and loss rates to experimental nutrient inputs.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.20697–106. 10.3354/meps206097

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AgawinN. S.DuarteC. M.AgustíS.VaquéD. (2004). Effect of N: P ratios on response of Mediterranean picophytoplankton to experimental nutrient inputs.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.3457–67. 10.3354/ame034057

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AhlgrenN. A.PerelmanJ. N.YehY. C.FuhrmanJ. A. (2019). Multi−year dynamics of fine−scale marine cyanobacterial populations are more strongly explained by phage interactions than abiotic, bottom−up factors.Environ. Microbiol.212948–2963. 10.1111/1462-2920.14687

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AhlgrenN. A.RocapG. (2012). Diversity and distribution of marine Synechococcus: multiple gene phylogenies for consensus classification and development of qPCR assays for sensitive measurement of clades in the ocean.Front. Microbiol.3:213. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00213

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Alarcón-SchumacherT.Guajardo-LeivaS.AntónJ.DíezB. (2019). Elucidating viral communities during a phytoplankton bloom on the West Antarctic Peninsula.Front. Microbiol.10:1014. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BabiæI.PetriæI.BosakS.MihanoviæH.RadiæI. D.LjubešiæZ. (2017). Distribution and diversity of marine picocyanobacteria community: targeting of Prochlorococcus ecotypes in winter conditions (southern Adriatic Sea).Mar. Genomics363–11. 10.1016/j.margen.2017.05.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BaudouxA. C.VeldhuisM. J. W.NoordeloosA. A. M.Van NoortG.BrussaardC. P. D. (2008). Estimates of virus-vs. grazing induced mortality of picophytoplankton in the North Sea during summer.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.5269–82. 10.3354/ame01207

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  BerghØBørsheimK. Y.BratbakG.HeldalM. (1989). High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments.Nature340467–468. 10.1038/340467a0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BerubeP. M.BillerS. J.KentA. G.Berta-ThompsonJ. W.RoggensackS. E.Roache-JohnsonK. H.et al (2015). Physiology and evolution of nitrate acquisition in Prochlorococcus.ISME J.91195–1207. 10.1038/ismej.2014.211

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BillerS. J.BerubeP. M.LindellD.ChisholmS. W. (2015). Prochlorococcus: the structure and function of collective diversity.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.1313–27. 10.1038/nrmicro3378

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BorasJ. A.SalaM. M.Vázquez−DomínguezE.WeinbauerM. G.VaquéD. (2009). Annual changes of bacterial mortality due to viruses and protists in an oligotrophic coastal environment (NW Mediterranean).Environ. Microbiol.111181–1193. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01849.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BratbakG.EggeJ. K.HeldalM. (1993). Viral mortality of the marine alga Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyceae) and termination of algal blooms.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.9339–39. 10.3354/meps093039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BratbakG.HeldalM.NorlandS.ThingstadT. F. (1990). Viruses as partners in spring bloom microbial trophodynamics.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.561400–1405. 10.1128/AEM.56.5.1400-1405.1990

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BrussaardC. P. D.KempersR. S.KopA. J.RiegmanR.HeldalM. (1996). Virus-like particles in a summer bloom of Emiliania huxleyi in the North Sea.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.10105–113. 10.3354/ame010105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  CastbergT.LarsenA.SandaaR. A.BrussaardC. P. D.EggeJ. K.HeldalM.et al (2001). Microbial population dynamics and diversity during a bloom of the marine coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyta).Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.22139–46. 10.3354/meps221039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  ChisholmS. W. (1992). “Phytoplankton size,” in Primary Production and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea, edsFalkowskiP. G.WoodheadA. D. (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 213–237. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0762-2_12

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  ChoiD. H.NohJ. H.ShimJ. (2013). Seasonal changes in picocyanobacterial diversity as revealed by pyrosequencing in temperate waters of the East China Sea and the East Sea.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.7175–90. 10.3354/ame01669

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  ChungC. C.ChangJ.GongG. C.HsuS. C.ChiangK. P.LiaoC. W. (2011). Effects of Asian dust storms on Synechococcus populations in the subtropical Kuroshio Current.Mar. Biotechnol.13751–763. 10.1007/s10126-010-9336-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  CochlanW. P.WiknerJ.StewardG. F.SmithD. C.AzamF. (1993). Spatial distribution of viruses, bacteria and chlorophyll a in neritic, oceanic and estuarine environments.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.9277–77. 10.3354/meps092077

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  DanovaroR.CorinaldesiC.Dell’AnnoA.FuhrmanJ. A.MiddelburgJ. J.NobleR. T.et al (2011). Marine viruses and global climate change.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.35993–1034. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00258.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  De LongE. F.PrestonC. M.MincerT.RichV.HallamS. J.FrigaardN. U.et al (2006). Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior.Science311496–503. 10.1126/science.1120250

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  DuarteC. M.AgustiS.AgawinN. S. (2000). Response of a Mediterranean phytoplankton community to increased nutrient inputs: a mesocosm experiment.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.19561–70. 10.3354/meps195061

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  DuRandM. D.OlsonR. J.ChisholmS. W. (2001). Phytoplankton population dynamics at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series station in the Sargasso Sea.Deep Sea Res. Pt. II481983–2003. 10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00166-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  FarrantG. K.DoréH.Cornejo-CastilloF. M.PartenskyF.RatinM.OstrowskiM.et al (2016). Delineating ecologically significant taxonomic units from global patterns of marine picocyanobacteria.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.113E3365–E3374. 10.1073/pnas.1524865113

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  FrancisG. (1878). Poisonous Australia lake.Nature1811–12. 10.1038/018011d0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  FuhrmanJ. A. (1999). Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects.Nature399541–548. 10.1038/21119

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  FuhrmanJ. A.SuttleC. A. (1993). Viruses in marine planktonic systems.Oceanography651–63. 10.5670/oceanog.1993.14

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  FullerN. J.MarieD.PartenskyF.VaulotD.PostA. F.ScanlanD. J. (2003). Clade-specific 16S ribosomal DNA oligonucleotides reveal the predominance of a single marine Synechococcus clade throughout a stratified water column in the Red Sea.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.692430–2443. 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2430-2443.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  FullerN. J.WestN. J.MarieD.YallopM.RivlinT.PostA. F.et al (2005). Dynamics of community structure and phosphate status of picocyanobacterial populations in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea.Limnol. Oceanogr.50363–375. 10.4319/lo.2005.50.1.0363

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  GhaiR.Martin-CuadradoA. B.MoltoA. G.HerediaI. G.CabreraR.MartinJ.et al (2010). Metagenome of the Mediterranean deep chlorophyll maximum studied by direct and fosmid library 454 pyrosequencing.ISME J.41154–1166. 10.1038/ismej.2010.44

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  GloverH. E.PrézelinB. B.CampbellL.WymanM.GarsideC. (1988). A nitrate-dependent Synechococcus bloom in surface Sargasso Sea water.Nature331161–163. 10.1038/331161a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  GregoryA. C.SolonenkoS. A.Ignacio-EspinozaJ. C.LaButtiK.CopelandA.SudekS.et al (2016). Genomic differentiation among wild cyanophages despite widespread horizontal gene transfer.BMC Genomics17:930. 10.1186/s12864-016-3286-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  HeinM.RiemannB. (1995). Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton biomass or growth rate: an experimental approach using marine enclosures.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.188167–180. 10.1016/0022-0981(95)00002-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  HuangS.WilhelmS. W.HarveyH. R.TaylorK.JiaoN.ChenF. (2012). Novel lineages of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus in the global oceans.ISME J.6285–297. 10.1038/ismej.2011.106

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  Hunter-CeveraK. R.NeubertM. G.OlsonR. J.SolowA. R.ShalapyonokA.SosikH. M. (2016). Physiological and ecological drivers of early spring blooms of a coastal phytoplankter.Science354326–329. 10.1126/science.aaf8536

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  JacquetS.HeldalM.Iglesias-RodriguezD.LarsenA.WilsonW.BratbakG. (2002). Flow cytometric analysis of an Emiliana huxleyi bloom terminated by viral infection.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.27111–124. 10.3354/ame027111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  KürtenB.KhomayisH. S.DevassyR.AudritzS.SommerU.StruckU.et al (2015). Ecohydrographic constraints on biodiversity and distribution of phytoplankton and zooplankton in coral reefs of the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia.Mar. Ecol.361195–1214. 10.1111/maec.12224

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  LaraE.VaquéD.SàE. L.BorasJ. A.GomesA.BorrullE.et al (2017). Unveiling the role and life strategies of viruses from the surface to the dark ocean.Sci. Adv.3:e1602565. 10.1126/sciadv.1602565

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  LiW. K. W. (1998). Annual average abundance of heterotrophic bacteria and Synechococcus in surface ocean waters.Limnol. Oceanogr.431746–1753. 10.4319/lo.1998.43.7.1746

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  LiW. K. W.HarrisonW. G. (2001). Chlorophyll, bacteria and picophytoplankton in ecological provinces of the North Atlantic.Deep Sea Res. Pt. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr.482271–2293. 10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00180-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Limor-WaisbergK.CarmiA.ScherzA.PilpelY.FurmanI. (2011). Specialization versus adaptation: two strategies employed by cyanophages to enhance their translation efficiencies.Nucleic Acids Res.396016–6028. 10.1093/nar/gkr169

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  LindellD.PennoS.Al−QutobM.DavidE.RivlinT.LazarB.et al (2005). Expression of the nitrogen stress response gene ntcA reveals nitrogen−sufficient Synechococcus populations in the oligotrophic northern Red Sea.Limnol. Oceanogr.501932–1944. 10.4319/lo.2005.50.6.1932

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  LindellD.PostA. F. (1995). Ultraphytoplankton succession is triggered by deep winter mixing in the Gulf of Aqaba (Eilat), Red Sea.Limnol. Oceanogr.401130–1141. 10.4319/lo.1995.40.6.1130

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  López-PérezM.Haro-MorenoJ. M.Gonzalez-SerranoR.Parras-MoltóM.Rodriguez-ValeraF. (2017). Genome diversity of marine phages recovered from Mediterranean metagenomes: size matters.PLoS Genet.13:e1007018. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  MaY.AllenL. Z.PalenikB. (2014). Diversity and genome dynamics of marine cyanophages using metagenomic analyses.Environ. Microbiol. Rep.6583–594. 10.1111/1758-2229.12160

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  MackeyK. R.Hunter-CeveraK.BrittenG. L.MurphyL. G.SoginM. L.HuberJ. A. (2017). Seasonal succession and spatial patterns of Synechococcus microdiversity in a salt marsh estuary revealed through 16S rRNA gene oligotyping.Front. Microbiol.8:1496. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01496

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  MannN. H. (2003). Phages of the marine cyanobacterial picophytoplankton.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.2717–34. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00016-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  MazardS.OstrowskiM.PartenskyF.ScanlanD. J. (2012). Multi-locus sequence analysis, taxonomic resolution and biogeography of marine Synechococcus.Environ. Microbiol.14372–386. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02514.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  McDanielL.HouchinL. A.WilliamsonS. J.PaulJ. H. (2002). Plankton blooms: lysogeny in marine Synechococcus.Nature415:496. 10.1038/415496a

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  McDanielL.PaulJ. H. (2005). Effect of nutrient addition and environmental factors on prophage induction in natural populations of marine Synechococcus species.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.71842–850. 10.1128/AEM.71.2.842-850.2005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  MeiM. L.DanovaroR. (2004). Virus production and life strategies in aquatic sediments.Limnol. Oceanogr.49459–470. 10.4319/lo.2004.49.2.0459

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  MiddelboeM. (2000). Bacterial growth rate and marine virus–host dynamics.Microb. Ecol.40114–124. 10.1007/s002480000050

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  MooreL. R.PostA. F.RocapG.ChisholmS. W. (2002). Utilization of different nitrogen sources by the marine cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus.Limnol. Oceangr.47989–996. 10.4319/lo.2002.47.4.0989

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  MühlingM.FullerN. J.MillardA.SomerfieldP. J.MarieD.WilsonW. H.et al (2005). Genetic diversity of marine Synechococcus and co−occurring cyanophage communities: evidence for viral control of phytoplankton.Environ. Microbiol.7499–508. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00713.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  NagasakiK.AndoM.ImaiI.ItakuraS.IshidaY. (1994). Virus-like particles in Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae): a possible red tide disintegration mechanism.Mar. Biol.119307–312. 10.1007/BF00349570

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  NurkS.MeleshkoD.KorobeynikovA.PevznerP. A. (2017). MetaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler.Genome Res.27824–834. 10.1101/gr.213959.116

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  OrtmannA. C.LawrenceJ. E.SuttleC. A. (2002). Lysogeny and lytic viral production during a bloom of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus spp.Microb. Ecol.43225–231. 10.1007/s00248-001-1058-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  PaerlR. W.FosterR. A.JenkinsB. D.MontoyaJ. P.ZehrJ. P. (2008). Phylogenetic diversity of cyanobacterial narB genes from various marine habitats.Environ. Microbiol.103377–3387. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01741.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  PartenskyF.BlanchotJ.VaulotD. (1999). Differential distribution and ecology of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus in oceanic waters: a review.Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco19457–476.

  • Google Scholar

• 61

  PaulJ. H. (2008). Prophages in marine bacteria: dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas?ISME J.2579–589. 10.1038/ismej.2008.35

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  PayetJ. P.SuttleC. A. (2013). To kill or not to kill: the balance between lytic and lysogenic viral infection is driven by trophic status.Limnol. Oceanogr.58465–474. 10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0465

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  PearmanJ. K.CasasL.MerleT.MichellC.IrigoienX. (2016). Bacterial and protist community changes during a phytoplankton bloom.Limnol. Oceanogr.61198–213. 10.1002/lno.10212

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  PearmanJ. K.EllisJ.IrigoienX.SarmaY. V. B.JonesB. H.CarvalhoS. (2017). Microbial planktonic communities in the Red Sea: high levels of spatial and temporal variability shaped by nutrient availability and turbulence.Sci. Rep.7:6611. 10.1038/s41598-017-06928-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  PennoS.LindellD.PostA. F. (2006). Diversity of Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus populations determined from DNA sequences of the N−regulatory gene ntcA.Environ. Microbiol.81200–1211. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01010.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  PhlipsE. J.BadylakS.LynchT. C. (1999). Blooms of the picoplanktonic cyanobacterium Synechococcus in Florida Bay, a subtropical inner-shelf lagoon.Limnol. Oceanogr.441166–1175. 10.4319/lo.1999.44.4.1166

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  PostA. F.PennoS.ZandbankK.PaytanA.HuseS.WelchD. M. (2011). Long term seasonal dynamics of Synechococcus population structure in the Gulf of Aqaba, Northern Red Sea.Front. Microbiol.2:131. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00131

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  ProctorL. M.FuhrmanJ. A. (1990). Viral mortality of marine bacteria and cyanobacteria.Nature34360–62. 10.1038/343060a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  RavenJ. A. (1986). “Physiological consequences of extremely small size for autotrophic organisms in the sea,” in Photosynthetic Picoplankton, edsPlattT.LiW. K. W. (Ottawa, ON: Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Oceans), 1–70.

  • Google Scholar

• 70

  RavenJ. A. (1998). The twelfth Tansley Lecture. Small is beautiful: the picophytoplankton.Funct. Ecol.12503–513. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00233.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  Rodriguez-ValeraF.Martin-CuadradoA. B.Rodriguez-BritoB.PašiæL.ThingstadT. F.RohwerF.et al (2009). Explaining microbial population genomics through phage predation.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.7828–836. 10.1038/nrmicro2235

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  Rodriguez-ValeraF.MizunoC. M.GhaiR. (2014). Tales from a thousand and one phages.Bacteriophage4:e1003987. 10.4161/bact.28265

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  SohmJ. A.AhlgrenN. A.ThomsonZ. J.WilliamsC.MoffettJ. W.SaitoM. A.et al (2016). Co-occurring Synechococcus ecotypes occupy four major oceanic regimes defined by temperature, macronutrients and iron.ISME J.10333–345. 10.1038/ismej.2015.115

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  SullivanM. B.WaterburyJ. B.ChisholmS. W. (2003). Cyanophages infecting the oceanic cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus.Nature4241047–1051. 10.1038/nature01929

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  SuttleC. A. (1994). The significance of viruses to mortality in aquatic microbial communities.Microb. Ecol.28237–243. 10.1007/BF00166813

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  SuttleC. A. (2005). Viruses in the sea.Nature437356–361. 10.1038/nature04160

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  SuttleC. A.ChanA. M. (1993). Marine cyanophages infecting oceanic and coastal strains of Synechococcus: abundance, morphology, cross-infectivity and growth characteristics.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.9299–109. 10.3354/meps092099

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  SuttleC. A.ChanA. M. (1994). Dynamics and distribution of cyanophages and their effect on marine Synechococcus spp.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.603167–3174. 10.1128/AEM.60.9.3167-3174.1994

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  SuttleC. A.ChanA. M.CottrellM. T. (1990). Infection of phytoplankton by viruses and reduction of primary productivity.Nature347467–469. 10.1038/347467a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  TaiV.PalenikB. (2009). Temporal variation of Synechococcus clades at a coastal Pacific Ocean monitoring site.ISME J.3903–915. 10.1038/ismej.2009.35

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  ThingstadT. F. (1998). A theoretical approach to structuring mechanisms in the pelagic food web.Hydrobiology36359–72. 10.1023/A:1003146310365

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  ThingstadT. F.BratbakG.HeldalM. (2008). “Aquatic phage ecology,” in Bacteriophage Ecology, ed.AbedonS. T. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 251–280.

  • Google Scholar

• 83

  VaulotD.LebotN.MarieD.FukaiE. (1996). Effect of phosphorus on the Synechococcus cell cycle in surface Mediterranean waters during summer.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.622527–2533. 10.1128/AEM.62.7.2527-2533.1996

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  VeldhuisM. J.KraayG. W. (1993). Cell abundance and fluorescence of picoplankton in relation to growth irradiance and nitrogen availability in the Red Sea.Neth. J. Sea. Res.31135–145. 10.1016/0077-7579(93)90003-B

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  WaterburyJ. B.ValoisF. W. (1993). Resistance to co-occurring phages enables marine Synechococcus communities to coexist with cyanophages abundant in seawater.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.593393–3399. 10.1128/AEM.59.10.3393-3399.1993

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  WeinbauerM. G. (2004). Ecology of prokaryotic viruses.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.28127–181. 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  WeinbauerM. G.BrettarI.HöfleM. G. (2003). Lysogeny and virus−induced mortality of bacterioplankton in surface, deep, and anoxic marine waters.Limnol. Oceanogr.481457–1465. 10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1457

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  WeinbauerM. G.SuttleC. A. (1996). Potential significance of lysogeny to bacteriophage production and bacterial mortality in coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.624374–4380. 10.1128/AEM.62.12.4374-4380.1996

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  WilliamsonS. J.PaulJ. H. (2004). Nutrient stimulation of lytic phage production in bacterial populations of the Gulf of Mexico.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.369–17. 10.3354/ame036009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  WilsonW. H.CarrN. G.MannN. H. (1996). The effect of phosphate status on the kinetics of cyanophage infection in the oceanic cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. wh7803.J. Phycol.32506–516. 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1996.00506.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  WilsonW. H.MannN. H. (1997). Lysogenic and lytic viral production in marine microbial communities.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.1395–100. 10.3354/ame013095

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  WilsonW. H.TurnerS.MannN. H. (1998). Population dynamics of phytoplankton and viruses in a phosphate-limited mesocosm and their effect on DMSP and DMS production.Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.4649–59. 10.1006/ecss.1998.0333

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  WommackK. E.ColwellR. R. (2000). Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.6469–114. 10.1128/MMBR.64.1.69-114.2000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  ZwirglmaierK.JardillierL.OstrowskiM.MazardS.GarczarekL.VaulotD.et al (2008). Global phylogeography of marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus reveals a distinct partitioning of lineages among oceanic biomes.Environ. Microbiol.10147–161.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar