Solution Structure of SpoIVB Reveals Mechanism of PDZ Domain-Regulated Protease Activity

Abstract

Intramembrane proteases hydrolyze peptide bonds within the cell membrane as the decision-making step of various signaling pathways. Sporulation factor IV B protease (SpoIVB) and C-terminal processing proteases B (CtpB) play central roles in cellular differentiation via regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) process which activates pro-σ^K processing at the σ^K checkpoint during spore formation. SpoIVB joins CtpB in belonging to the widespread family of PDZ-proteases, but much remains unclear about the molecular mechanisms and structure of SpoIVB. In this study, we expressed inactive SpoIVB (SpoIVB^S378A) fused with maltose binding protein (MBP)-tag and obtained the solution structure of SpoIVB^S378A from its small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data. The fusion protein is more soluble, stable, and yields higher expression compared to SpoIVB without the tag. MBP-tag not only facilitates modeling of the structure in the SAXS envelope but also evaluates reliability of the model. The solution structure of SpoIVB^S378A fits closely with the experimental scattering data (χ²= 1.76). Comparing the conformations of PDZ-proteases indicates that SpoIVB adopts a PDZ-protease pattern similar to the high temperature requirement A proteases (HtrAs) rather than CtpB. We not only propose that SpoIVB uses a more direct and simple way to cleave the substrates than that of CtpB, but also that they work together as signal amplifiers to activate downstream proteins in the RIP pathway.

Introduction

Regulated intramembrane proteolysis was recently identified as a novel cell signaling strategy employed by an increasing number of membrane proteins, and is involved in a number of biological responses such as cellular differentiation (Brown et al., 2000; Lal and Caplan, 2011). RIP not only occurs in animal cells but is also observed in the sporulation of Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis), which is a well-studied model for cellular differentiation.

During the process of sporulation in B. subtilis, a polar septum partitions the developing cell into two asymmetrically compartments. The larger compartment is known as the mother cell, and the smaller one is referred to as the forespore. The forespore is engulfed by the mother cell, to create a protoplast within a cell (Gomez and Cutting, 1996; Pan et al., 2003; Ganesan et al., 2010). These two cell types differentiate further by activating different σ subunits of RNA polymerase (Delano, 2002; Doerks et al., 2002). The final steps of spore formation are controlled by a sigma factor σ^K, which is synthesized in the mother cell as an inactive and membrane-associated precursor protein (pro-σ^K). The pro-σ^K is activated by a RIP process (Campo and Rudner, 2006; Mastny et al., 2013; Konovalova et al., 2014) controlled by the processing enzyme SpoIVFB, a membrane-embedded metalloprotease held inactive by two membrane proteins SpoIVFA and BofA. Inhibition of SpoIVFB is relieved by the degradation of negative regulator SpoIVFA (Hoa et al., 2001; Dong and Cutting, 2004), leading to σ^K activation and the completion the sporulation program (Resnekov and Losick, 1998; Resnekov, 1999; Kroos et al., 2002).

In B. subtilis, activation of this spore RIP pathway is induced by the concerted activity of signaling proteases SpoIVB and CtpB. Both SpoIVB and CtpB belong to the widespread family of PDZ-proteases that combine a catalytic serine protease with a regulatory PDZ domain (Patterson et al., 2005). Crystal structures of CtpB at distinct functional states were reported and showed that CtpB constitutes a ring-like protein scaffold penetrated by two narrow tunnels, and the PDZ domains controls access to the proteolytic sites sequestered within two tunnels (Mastny et al., 2013). The largest subfamily of PDZ-protease is HtrA proteases with DegS as a representative member of the family (Wilken et al., 2004; Israeli et al., 2019). The crystal structure of DegS showed that the protease domains pack together to form a trimer with the PDZ domains located on the periphery locking the protease in inactive form. SpoIVB has been shown to be a new family of trypsin-like serine proteases belonging to clan PA (S55) (Wakeley et al., 2000). However, there is no report regarding the structure of SpoIVB to the best of our knowledge. Structure of SpoIVB has broad significance not only to understand how the PDZ domain regulates the protease activity, but also to the sporulation mechanism.

Here, we report the expression of the recombinant SpoIVB in inactive state (SpoIVB^S378A) which was fused with an MBP-tag. Combining biochemical and SAXS structural analysis of SpoIVB^S378A, we found that SpoIVB^S378A is a monomer in solution, but not a multimer as in the cases of CtpB and DegS. Comparisons of the PDZ and protease domains to previously reported structures show that the PDZ domain of SpolVB^S378A is almost identical to the typical and stable PDZ conformation. However, the protease domain does not form stable active sites and an oxyanion hole. In addition, the combinational pattern of PDZ-protease in SpoIVB is similar to HtrA proteases rather than CtpB. We propose that SpoIVB may adopt a classical cleavage mechanism of trypsin-like serine proteases which is a more directly and simple way to cleave the substrates than CtpB. This model provides new structural information for RIP mechanism.

Materials and Methods

Benzamidine (CAS number: 206752-36-5) and p-aminobenzimidamide (CAS number: 2498-50-2) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States).

Construction of SpoIVB Expression Vector

The cDNA encoding truncated SpoIVB (residues Thr75-Ser426, the numbering is according to UniProt entry P17896) was amplified from the full length SpoIVB cDNA [B. subtilis (strain 168), GenBank accession No. AL009126, its cDNA sequence is shown in Supplementary Materials and methods by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1]. The amplified PCR product was isolated and inserted into the modified expression vector pET22b(+), which has 6 × His-tag and a mMBP fusion tag, a special variant of MBP optimized to improve the possibility of crystallization, between the Not I and Asc I restriction sites. The construct was transformed into a competent Escherichia coli strain DH5α and was then screened on the LB agar plate (0.5% yeast extract, 1% tryptone, 1% NaCl, 2% agar) containing 100 μg/ml Amp to select positive colonies. In order to obtain a stable SpoIVB, we carried out the Site Directed Mutagenesis to mutate Ser378 to Ala (SpoIVB^S378A). After colony PCR, the recombinant SpoIVB expression vector was verified by sequencing.

Expression and Purification of SpoIVB^S378A

In this study, the fusion protein was synthesized in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS. Expression of SpoIVB^S378A was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM IPTG for 16 h at 16°C. Cells were washed by the buffer A (20 mM Tris–HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol pH 8.0) and disrupted by high pressure crushing. After removing debris by centrifugation, cell lysates were purified by passing through IMAC Sepharose^TM 6 Fast Flow column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in buffer A. The column was washed with the buffer A plus 20 mM and 50 mM imidazole and eluted with 300 mM imidazole. Eluted protein was then loaded on Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) previously equilibrated in the buffer A (20 mM Tris–HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol pH 8.0). Flow-through fractions that include SpoIVB^S378A were collected and then dialyzed in buffer B (20 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.0). Then the purity and concentration of SpoIVB^S378A were detected by SDS-PAGE and DS-11 Spectrophotometer (DeNOVIX).

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

Dynamic light scattering measurements were carried out on a Nano ZS ZEN 3600 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, United Kingdom) equipped with a 2 ml micro-sampling cell at 25°C. SpoIVB^S378A was diluted in a buffer of 20 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol pH 8.0 to a protein concentration of 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/ml. All agents were filtered through a 0.22 μM Millipore filter membrane to remove any dust particles before DLS measurement. The cuvette was then inserted into the unit and left to equilibrate for 2 min at 25°C before the measurement. The data were analyzed using the Dynamics software package version 5.

Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) and Structural Modeling of SpoIVB^S378A

Small angle X-ray scattering measurements of SpoIVB^S378A were carried out on the BL19U2 beamline, National Facility for Protein Science Shanghai (NFPSS). All data sets were measured with the exposure time 1 s at 283 K and at a wavelength of λ = 1.0000 Å. Three different concentrations of the protein, 1, 2.5, and 5 mg/ml were used for the measurements. Data for buffers were collected between every two protein samples. The scattering data were then scaled and the average values for the buffers before and after the sample measurements were subtracted. Multiple curves with different concentrations and different exposure times were scaled and merged to generate an ideal average scattering curve. The qualities of the scattering curves were analyzed using the program PRIMUS to ensure that there was no obvious aggregation and radiation damage before further analysis (Konarev et al., 2003). The initial R_g values were calculated from the Guinier plot, only data from low q values were used for the calculation. The P(r) distribution function was calculated with the program GNOM (Svergun, 1992). The molecular weight was estimated directly from the SAXSMoW server¹ using the P(r) distribution function (Fischer et al., 2010). Data were also processed and analyzed using SCATTER (Rambo and Tainer, 2013).

The low-resolution global shape of the protein in solution was modeled by the program DAMMIF (Franke and Svergun, 2009) in the asymmetric unit and P1 symmetry using both the original scattering curve and the calculated P(r) distribution curve. Twenty individual calculations were performed. Subsequently, continuous and meaningful shapes were picked up and averaged by the program DAMAVER (Volkov and Svergun, 2003). The starting model of mMBP was extracted from the published crystal structure of MBP (PDB code: 1ANF) (Quiocho et al., 1997) and updated its amino acid sequence. The rest part of SpoIVB^S378A, including the PDZ and protease domains, were modeled by the SWISS-MODEL server² based on their sequence homologies (Bienert et al., 2017), which used previous published PDZ (PDB codes: 1QAV) and protease (PDB codes: 1DLE) domains as the templates (Hillier et al., 1999; Jing et al., 2000). And then mMBP, PDZ, and protease domains were superimposed into the SAXS envelope of SpoIVB^S378A and adjusted them manually by using the program Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004), respectively. Hexamer His-tag at the N-terminal of SpoIVB^S378A was built in the model by COOT (Emsley et al., 2010).

Molecular Dynamic Simulation

Molecular dynamic simulations were performed on modeling of SpoIVB^S378A. No atom on the protein was within 13 Å from any side of the box. Sodium ions were added to counterbalance the charge of the protein. All systems were underwent MD simulations with AMBER ff99SB-ILDN force field (Walker et al., 2002; Craft and Legge, 2005; Lindorfflarsen et al., 2010) using the Amber 16 code (Case et al., 2010). The TIP3P model (Degryse, 2008) was used for the water molecules. PME (Darden et al., 1993) method was used to treat electrostatic interactions, and all covalent bonds containing hydrogen atoms were constrained using SHAKE algorithm. The cutoff distance applied for the non-bond interactions was taken at 10 Å. Each system underwent 25,000 steps of steepest-descent energy minimization, followed by 25,000 steps of conjugate-gradient minimization without restraints. The system was then gradually heated from 0 up to 298 K in 25,000 steps. After that, 100-ns-long MD simulations were carried out in the NPT ensemble for each system. Temperature and pressure controls were achieved by Nosé-Hoover thermostat (Liu et al., 2017) and Berendsen barostat (Berendsen et al., 1984) with a frequency of 2.0 ps, respectively. FoXS was used for computing a SAXS profile of the free energy optimized SpoIVB^S378A and for matching of the computed and experimental profiles (Schneidman-Duhovny et al., 2010).

Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) Analysis of SpoIVB^S378A Binding to Benzamidine

SpoIVB^S378A was labeled using the Protein Labeling Kit RED-NHS (NanoTemper Technologies). The labeling reaction was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions in the supplied labeling buffer applying a concentration of 10 μM protein (molar dye: protein ratio ≈ 2:1) at 4°C temperature for 2 h in the dark. Unreacted dye was removed with the supplied dye removal column equilibrated with PBS contained 0.05% Tween-20. The degree of labeling was determined using UV/VIS spectrophotometry at 650 and 280 nm. A degree of labeling of 0.8 was typically achieved. The labeled protein SpoIVB^S378A was adjusted to 1 μM with PBS buffer supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20. The ligand benzamidine was dissolved in PBS buffer supplemented with 0.05% Tween 20. For the measurement, each ligand dilution was mixed with one volume of labeled protein SpoIVB^S378A, which led to a final concentration of SpoIVB^S378A of 500 nM and final ligand concentrations ranging from 15 μM to 500 mM. After 15 min incubation followed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min, the samples were loaded into Monolith NT.115 [Premium] Capillaries (NanoTemper Technologies). MST was measured using a Monolith NT.115 [NT.115Pico/NT.LabelFree] instrument (NanoTemper Technologies) at an ambient temperature of 25°C. Instrument parameters were adjusted to 80% LED power and medium MST power. Data were analyzed using NanoTemper Analysis software v. 2.4 and plotted using the GraphPad Prism v.6.01 software from GraphPad Software, Inc.

Detection of the Binding Between SpoIVB^S378A and p-Aminobenzamidine (PAB) by Fluorescence Spectra

p-Aminobenzamidine can be used as a typical fluorescence probe to assay the accessibility of active site of serine proteases by determining the equilibrium binding constants (K_D). Fluorescence emission spectra were recorded at 25°C on a fluorescence spectrometer (Cary Eclipse, Varian, United States) in a 2 mm × 10 mm semi-micro quartz cuvette and in PBS buffer. Excitation was at 335 nm, and the emission was scanned from 350 to 400 nm using excitation and emission band passes of 5 and 10 nm, respectively. Equilibrium binding reactions were performed over a range of PAB concentrations (100–1000 μM) with 1 μM SpoIVB^S378A in PBS buffer. For positive control, binding reactions of PAB with 1 μM serine protease domain of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA-SPD) were also performed, respectively. Emission spectra were collected using an integration of 1–2 s over a 1.0 nm step resolution. Data were analyzed and plotted using the GraphPad Prism v.6.01 software from GraphPad Software, Inc.

Results and Discussion

Expression and Purification of SpoIVB^S378A

Since SpoIVB zymogen can be auto-activated, its expression in E. coli is toxic to the host, resulting in low yield of the recombinant protein as previously described (Dong and Cutting, 2004; Campo and Rudner, 2006). In our hands, we found that the expression level of the SpoIVB (Thr75-Ser426) fused to the modified MBP (mMBP) as an N-terminal tag was quite low. To address this problem, we mutated the catalytic residue Ser378 to Ala (SpoIVB^S378A), which led to an increased expression level (30 mg/l). The recombinant SpoIVB^S378A was captured from the cell lysates in one step by a Ni-NTA agarose column and further purified by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). This gave a peak with a retention volume of about 13.54 ml, which is between one standard protein (158 kDa, 12.77 ml) and the other standard protein (44 kDa, 15.30 ml). The pooled protein was detected as a predominant band of ∼83 kDa by SDS-PAGE, which is consistent with the predicted molecular weight of the truncated SpoIVB infused the mMBP (80.5 kDa, Figure 1A).

FIGURE 1

SpoIVB^S378A Is Monodispersed and Exists as Monomer in the Solution

The chromatography profile of SpoIVB^S378A showed that protein existed predominantly as a monomer. Next, we used DLS to analyze the size of SpoIVB^S378A at three concentrations (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/ml). The size of distribution of SpoIVB^S378A showed a single species with the hydrodynamic radii (R_H) at about 9 nm (Figure 1B), corresponding to a molecular weight of around 80 kDa based on a spherical model. These results demonstrated that SpoIVB^S378A was monodispersed and did not form multimer.

Ligand Binding Conformation of SpoIVB^S378A

To address if the SpoIVB^S378A active site was accessible, we determined its binding affinities to two classical serine proteases inhibitors by different methods to probe the accessibility of the active site. The first inhibitor is benzamidine, which is a reversible competitive inhibitor of serine proteases and has a binding affinity range in 5–20 μM for the active serine proteases (Tanizawa et al., 1971; Hedstrom et al., 1996). We used the MST method to measure the binding affinity of benzamidine for SpoIVB^S378A and found that benzamidine bound to SpoIVB^S378A with a rather weak affinity (K_D = 660 ± 28 μM) (Figure 2). The second inhibitor we used is PAB which is also a fluorescent probe for the active site of serine proteases, with excitation and emission maxima at 293 and 376 nm, respectively. Binding to serine proteases typically results in a blue shift of the emission peak to 362–368 nm, and 50–230 fold fluorescence enhancement (Evans et al., 1982). Mostly, the K_D of PAB to serine proteases is about 10–100 μM (Evans et al., 1982). For SpoIVB^S378A titrated with increasing concentrations of PAB, we found no fluorescence enhancement. However, in the positive control when the active uPA-SPD titrated with increasing concentrations of PAB, the fluorescence enhancement was found, indicating that the active site of SpoIVB^S378A was not properly formed (Supplementary Figure S2).

FIGURE 2

Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) Analyses of SpoIVB^S378A

We used the biological SAXS (BioSAXS) experiment to study the structure of SpoIVB^S378A in solution at series of concentrations (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/ml). We did not find unspecific aggregation of SpoIVB^S378A in the highest concentration (5 mg/ml), and thus used this concentration for BioSAXS shape reconstruction and modeling (Figure 3A). Kratky analysis was used to evaluate the degree of protein folding, which showed a peak at low q values and return to increase at high q values, indicating SpoIVB^S378A is folded but somewhat flexible in solution (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3

The gyration radii of SpoIVB^S378A (R_g) was measured to be 37.6 Å. The molecular weight of 77.6 kDa for SpoIVB^S378A was obtained from SAXSMoW using an integration range restricted to qR_g < 1.3 and q_max limited to I(0)/I(q_m) = 10^2.25 (Table 1). This value is close to the obtained molecular weight (80.5 kDa) based on the amino acid sequence and reflects that SpoIVB^S378A is a monomer, consistent with the results of SEC and DLS measurements.

The recombinant SpoIVB^S378A construct contains a hexamer His and mMBP tags at the N-terminal. mMBP tag is not only beneficial to purify the recombinant protein, but also conducive to determine the BioSAXS structure and evaluate the reliability of the model. The BioSAXS molecular envelope of SpoIVB^S378A showed appropriate space to fit the mMBP. Once mMBP was positioned inside the molecular envelope, the position of the PDZ and protease domains can be placed easily. Because the structure of SpoIVB is still unknown, we use the SWISS-MODEL server to reconstruct three-dimensional structures for the PDZ and protease domain, respectively. This model was then fitted into the molecular envelope of SAXS using the program Chimera and was energy-minimized by MDs (Supplementary Figure S1) to obtain the final solution structure of SpoIVB^S378A. The theoretical scattering pattern computed from the modeled structure of SpoIVB^S378A fits very well to the experimental data (χ² = 1.76) (Figure 3C).

In the overall structure, SpoIVB^S378A molecular envelope has a cylinder shape with a dimension of approximately 153.9 Å × 53.6 Å × 41.3 Å (Figure 4). The mMBP tag did not interact with PDZ domain and should not affect the conformation of other parts of recombinant protein, which was also the case as reported in previous studies (Waugh, 2016). The active site mutation has localized effect and is limited to the active site and will most likely not affect such domain orientation. There is only one interaction surface between two loops that is in PDZ and protease domain, respectively. The first loop locates on between the αB helix and βD strand of the PDZ domain, the other one locates on Gly252-Thr258 segment of protease domain (Supplementary Figure S3). Comparing with other reported PDZ domain structures, we found the PDZ domain in SpoIVB also adopts a conserved fold, which usually has five β strands as well as a short and long α helix (Morais Cabral et al., 1996). In contrast to the PDZ domain, the protease domain of SpoIVB^S378A adopts a non-canonical inactive protease conformation, which is a zymogen-like conformation with no oxyanion hole and a proper catalytic triad in SpoIVB^S378A (Supplementary Figure S4A). Hence, we propose that SpoIVB activation is a disorder–order transition that exits in other previously reported classical trypsin-like proteases activation. Such as in the inactive trypsinogen, the activation motif is highly flexible, whereas in the active trypsin protease it occupies a well-defined position poised for catalysis (Wilken et al., 2004). The other example can be found in the active uPA, the activation motif and the S1 pocket is well-defined position poised for catalysis. But when uPA is inactive, the activation motif is highly flexible and the S1 pocket is disordered (Jiang et al., 2013).

FIGURE 4

Dong and Cutting (2004) proposed that there are five steps to process the activation of SpoIVFB, including trans and cis cleavages. First, the PDZ domain of SpoIVB binds to its N-terminus to maintain in its zymogen form. Following secretion across the spore membrane, binding of one SpolVB molecule in trans to another SpolVB C-terminus occurs. This facilitates the first cleavage event of SpoIVB near the N-terminus, releasing it from the inner forespore membrane. Then at least two further cis cleavage events occur at specific sites near the N-terminus after which the PDZ domain targets SpoIVB to the BofA-SpoIVFA-SpoIVFB complex in the outer forespore membrane, in turn, activating the SpoIVFB by disruption of the complex.

During the second step of activating SpolVFB, it has been proposed that SpolVB must first bind to a C-terminal recognition Thr393-His-Val395 motif (TXV motif). This is identical to the classical PDZ recognition motif (Songyang et al., 1997; Beebe et al., 2000) and ensures trans cleave normally proceeds. However, we found that the TXV motif of SpoIVB^S378A locates at the opposite direction to the PDZ domain. This indicates that the PDZ domain does not make any intramolecular interactions with protease via the TXV motif (Supplementary Figure S4B). This may cause it to fail to complete the second step trans cleavage and the following steps.

Comparisons of SpoIVB With Other PDZ-Protease Family Members

Regulated intramembrane proteolysis is a method for transducing signals between cellular compartments. In the process of sporulation, two signaling serine proteases, SpoIVB and CtpB, trigger pro-σ^K processing by cleaving the extracellular domain of SpoIVFA at multiple sites. Following this, inhibition of SpolVFB is relieved. SpoIVB cooperates with CtpB ensuring the precise temporal control of transferring an activating signal from forespore to mother cell. However, it is still unclear why the two distinct proteases must be involved and how they cooperate with each other in same process of cleaving the regulator protein SpoIVFA.

First, we compared the structures of PDZ and protease domain in SpoIVB^S378A and CtpB at the resting state (PDB code: 4C2E; Mastny et al., 2013). We found that the PDZ-protease patterns are obvious different to each other (RMSD = 23.1 Å). As described above, the PDZ and protease domains do not have any interface in SpoIVB^S378A except for the two loops region. However, in the resting state of CtpB, PDZ domain gated the protease tunnel leading to CtpB unable to hydrolyze SpoIVFA. Comparing SpoIVFA cleavage sites targeted by SpoIVB (four cleavage sites) and CtpB (one cleavage site), we proposed that SpoIVB might adopt a different and higher efficient regulation way to trim the SpoIVFA substrate than CtpB.

Except SpoIVB and CtpB, there are the widespread family of PDZ-proteases. The HtrA proteases constitute the largest subfamily of PDZ-proteases including HtrA1, HtrA2, DegP, and DegS (Clausen et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2017). Although their protease domains belong to different classes, they share a homologous PDZ domain. There are five high conservative residues in the PDZ domains including Gly144, Asp149, Ile151, Asn155, and Are185 (based on SpoIVB sequence numbering). More strikingly, these residues locate on one face of the PDZ domain, which points to the protease domain and may play a role in regulate the substrate access to the active site of SpoIVB (Figure 5A).

FIGURE 5

It is a surprise that SpoIVB^S378A was monodispersed and did not form a multimer. This is different from the other PDZ-proteases, such as CtpB and DegS. The truncated DegS was trimeric in solution while CtpB was a dimer. Why SpoIVB^S378A is monomer? This may be because the mutation of the active site Ser378 to Ala made protease domain unstable and the S1 pocket more flexible. Structurally, the PDZ domain cannot make any intramolecular interactions with protease domain via the TXV motif in the solution structure of SpoIVB^S378A. This may lead to SpoIVB no being to form trans-dimer and exists as a monomer.

Zeth (2004) and Clausen et al. (2011) reported that the crystal structures of DegS and HtrA2 protease domains in an inhibited state, respectively (Wilken et al., 2004; Zeth, 2004; de Regt et al., 2015). These structures indicate that the proteases is present in a non-functional state without an oxyanion hole and a proper catalytic triad and unlike CtpB, in inactive DegS, the PDZ domain did not block the access to the active site. This is similar to the combinational pattern of PDZ-protease in SpoIVB (Figure 5B). Hence, we propose that the activation regulation of SpoIVB and HtrA proteases are in a similar way.

References

• 1

  BeebeK. D.ShinJ.PengJ.ChaudhuryC.KheraJ.PeiD. (2000). Substrate recognition through a PDZ domain in tail-specific protease.Biochemistry393149–3155. 10.1021/bi992709s

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  BerendsenH. J. C.PostmaJ. P. M.GunsterenW. F. V.DinolaA.HaakJ. R. (1984). Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath.J. Chem. Phys.813684–3690. 10.1063/1.448118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  BienertS.WaterhouseA.TjaartA. P.TaurielloG.StuderG.BordoliL.et al (2017). The SWISS-MODEL repository—new features and functionality.Nucleic Acids Res.45D313–D319. 10.1093/nar/gkw1132

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  BrownM. S.YeJ.RawsonR. B.GoldsteinJ. L. (2000). Regulated intramembrane proteolysis: a control mechanism conserved from bacteria to humans.Cell100391–398.

  • Google Scholar

• 5

  CampoN.RudnerD. Z. (2006). A branched pathway governing the activation of a developmental transcription factor by regulated intramembrane proteolysis.Mol. Cell2325–35. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  CaseD. A.CheathamT. E.DardenT.GohlkeH.LuoR.MerzK. M.et al (2010). The amber biomolecular simulation programs.J. Comput. Chem.261668–1688. 10.1002/jcc.20290

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  ClausenT.KaiserM.HuberR.EhrmannM. (2011). HTRA proteases: regulated proteolysis in protein quality control.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.12152–162. 10.1038/nrm3065

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  CraftJ. W.LeggeG. B. (2005). An AMBER/DYANA/MOLMOL phosphorylated amino acid library set and incorporation into NMR structure calculations.J. Biomol. NMR3315–24. 10.1007/s10858-005-1199-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  DardenT.YorkD.PedersenL. (1993). Particle mesh ewald: an N⋅log(N) method for ewald sums in large systems.J. Chem. Phys.9810089–10092. 10.1063/1.464397

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  de RegtA. K.KimS.SohnJ.GrantR. A.BakerT. A.SauerR. T. (2015). A conserved activation cluster is required for allosteric communication in HtrA-family proteases.Structure23517–526. 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  DegryseB. (2008). The Urokinase Receptor and Integrins Constitute A Cell Migration Signalosome.New York, NY: Springer.

  • Google Scholar

• 12

  DelanoW. L. (2002). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System.San Carlos, CA: DeLano Scientific.

  • Google Scholar

• 13

  DoerksT.CopleyR. R.SchultzJ.PontingC. P.BorkP. (2002). Systematic identification of novel protein domain families associated with nuclear functions.Genome Res.1247–56. 10.1101/gr.203201

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  DongT. C.CuttingS. M. (2004). The PDZ domain of the SpoIVB transmembrane signaling protein enables cis-trans interactions involving multiple partners leading to the activation of the pro-sigmaK processing complex in Bacillus subtilis.J. Biol. Chem.27943468–43478. 10.1074/jbc.m407048200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  EmsleyP.LohkampB.ScottW. G.CowtanK. (2010). Features and development of Coot.Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.66486–501. 10.1107/S0907444910007493

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  EvansS. A.OlsonS. T.ShoreJ. D. (1982). p-Aminobenzamidine as a fluorescent probe for the active site of serine proteases.J. Biol. Chem.2573014–3017.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  FischerH.De Oliveira NetoM.NapolitanoH. B.PolikarpovI.CraievichA. F. (2010). Determination of the molecular weight of proteins in solution from a single small-angle X-ray scattering measurement on a relative scale.J. Appl. Crystallogr.43101–109. 10.1107/s0021889809043076

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  FrankeD.SvergunD. I. (2009). DAMMIF, a program for rapid ab-initio shape determination in small-angle scattering.J. Appl. Crystallogr.42342–346. 10.1107/s0021889809000338

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  GanesanR.EigenbrotC.KirchhoferD. (2010). Structural and mechanistic insight into how antibodies inhibit serine proteases.Biochem. J.430179–189. 10.1042/BJ20100634

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  GomezM.CuttingS. M. (1996). Expression of the Bacillus subtilis spoIVB gene is under dual sigma(F)/sigma(G) control.Microbiology1423453–3457.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  HedstromL.LinT. Y.FastW. (1996). Hydrophobic interactions control zymogen activation in the trypsin family of serine proteases.Biochemistry354515–4523. 10.1021/bi951928k

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  HillierB. J.ChristophersonK. S.PrehodaK. E.BredtD. S.LimW. A. (1999). Unexpected modes of PDZ domain scaffolding revealed by structure of nNOS-syntrophin complex.Science284812–815. 10.1126/science.284.5415.812

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  HoaN. T.BranniganJ. A.CuttingS. M. (2001). The PDZ domain of the SpoIVB serine peptidase facilitates multiple functions.J. Bacteriol.1834364–4373. 10.1128/jb.183.14.4364-4373.2001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  IsraeliM. A.EliaU.RotemS.CohenH.TidharA.Bercovich-KinoriA.et al (2019). Distinct contribution of the HtrA protease and PDZ domains to its function in stress resilience and virulence of Bacillus anthracis.Front. Microbiol.10:255. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00255

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  JiangL.BotkjaerK. A.AndersenL. M.YuanC.AndreasenP. A.HuangM. (2013). Rezymogenation of active urokinase induced by an inhibitory antibody.Biochem. J.449161–166. 10.1042/BJ20121132

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  JingH.XuY.CarsonM.MooreD.MaconK. J.VolanakisJ. E.et al (2000). New structural motifs on the chymotrypsin fold and their potential roles in complement factor B.EMBO J.19164–173. 10.1093/emboj/19.2.164

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  KonarevP. V.VolkovV. V.SokolovaA. V.KochM. H. J.SvergunD. I. (2003). PRIMUS: a windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis.J. Appl. Crystallogr.361277–1282. 10.1107/s0021889803012779

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  KonovalovaA.Sogaard-AndersenL.KroosL. (2014). Regulated proteolysis in bacterial development.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.38493–522. 10.1111/1574-6976.12050

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  KroosL.YuY. T. N.MillsD.Ferguson-MillerS. (2002). Forespore signaling is necessary for pro- K processing during Bacillus subtilis sporulation despite the loss of SpoIVFA upon translational arrest.J. Bacteriol.1845393–5401. 10.1128/jb.184.19.5393-5401.2002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  LalM.CaplanM. (2011). Regulated intramembrane proteolysis: signaling pathways and biological functions.Physiology2634–44. 10.1152/physiol.00028.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  LindorfflarsenK.PianaS.PalmoK.MaragakisP.KlepeisJ. L.DrorR. O.et al (2010). Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformatics781950–1958. 10.1002/prot.22711

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  LiuD.XuD.LiuM.KnabeW. E.YuanC.ZhouD.et al (2017). Small molecules engage hot spots through cooperative binding to inhibit a tight protein-protein interaction.Biochemistry561768–1784. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01039

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  MastnyM.HeuckA.KurzbauerR.HeidukA.BoisguerinP.VolkmerR.et al (2013). CtpB assembles a gated protease tunnel regulating cell-cell signaling during spore formation in Bacillus subtilis.Cell155647–658. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.050

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  Morais CabralJ. H.PetosaC.SutcliffeM. J.RazaS.ByronO.PoyF.et al (1996). Crystal structure of a PDZ domain.Nature382649–652.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  PanQ.LosickR.RudnerD. Z. (2003). A second PDZ-containing serine protease contributes to activation of the sporulation transcription factor sigmaK in Bacillus subtilis.J. Bacteriol.1856051–6056. 10.1128/jb.185.20.6051-6056.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  PattersonH. M.BranniganJ. A.CuttingS. M.WilsonK. S.WilkinsonA. J.AbE.et al (2005). The structure of bypass of forespore C, an intercompartmental signaling factor during sporulation in Bacillus.J. Biol. Chem.28036214–36220. 10.1074/jbc.m506910200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  PettersenE. F.GoddardT. D.HuangC. C.CouchG. S.GreenblattD. M.MengE. C.et al (2004). UCSF chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.J. Comput. Chem.251605–1612. 10.1002/jcc.20084

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  QuiochoF. A.SpurlinoJ. C.RodsethL. E. (1997). Extensive features of tight oligosaccharide binding revealed in high-resolution structures of the maltodextrin transport/chemosensory receptor.Structure5997–1015. 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00253-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  RamboR. P.TainerJ. A. (2013). Accurate assessment of mass, models and resolution by small-angle scattering.Nature496477–481. 10.1038/nature12070

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  ResnekovO. (1999). Role of the sporulation protein BofA in regulating activation of the Bacillus subtilis developmental transcription factor sigmaK.J. Bacteriol.1815384–5388.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  ResnekovO.LosickR. (1998). Negative regulation of the proteolytic activation of a developmental transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.953162–3167. 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3162

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Schneidman-DuhovnyD.HammelM.SaliA. (2010). FoXS: a web server for rapid computation and fitting of SAXS profiles.Nucleic Acids Res.38W540–W544. 10.1093/nar/gkq461

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  SongyangZ.FanningA. S.FuC.XuJ.MarfatiaS. M.ChishtiA. H.et al (1997). Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains.Science27573–77. 10.1126/science.275.5296.73

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  SvergunD. (1992). Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria.J. Appl. Crystallogr.25495–503. 10.1107/s0021889892001663

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  TanizawaK.IshiiS.HamaguchiK.KanaokaY. (1971). Proteolytic enzymes. VI. Aromatic amidines as competitive inhibitors of trypsin.J. Biochem.69893–899.

  • Google Scholar

• 46

  ValentiniE.KikhneyA. G.PrevitaliG.JeffriesC. M.SvergunD. I. (2015). SASBDB, a repository for biological small-angle scattering data.Nucleic Acids Res.43D357–D363. 10.1093/nar/gku1047

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  VolkovV. V.SvergunD. I. (2003). Uniqueness of ab initio shape determination in small-angle scattering.J. Appl. Crystallogr.36860–864.

  • Google Scholar

• 48

  WakeleyP. R.DoraziR.HoaN. T.BowyerJ. R.CuttingS. M. (2000). Proteolysis of SpolVB is a critical determinant in signalling of Pro-sigmaK processing in Bacillus subtilis.Mol. Microbiol.361336–1348. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01946.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  WalkerR. C.De SouzaM. M.MercerI. P.GouldI. R.KlugD. R. (2002). Large and fast relaxations inside a protein: calculation and measurement of reorganization energies in alcohol dehydrogenase.J. Phys. Chem. B10611658–11665. 10.1021/jp0261814

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  WaughD. S. (2016). Crystal structures of MBP fusion proteins.Protein Sci.25559–571. 10.1002/pro.2863

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  WilkenC.KitzingK.KurzbauerR.EhrmannM.ClausenT. (2004). Crystal structure of the DegS stress sensor: how a PDZ domain recognizes misfolded protein and activates a protease.Cell117483–494.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  ZethK. (2004). Structural analysis of DegS, a stress sensor of the bacterial periplasm.FEBS Lett.569351–358. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.06.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  ZhuF.YangX.WuY.WangY.TangX. F.TangB. (2017). Release of an HtrA-like protease from the cell surface of thermophilic brevibacillus sp. WF146 via substrate-induced autoprocessing of the n-terminal membrane anchor.Front. Microbiol.8:481. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00481

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar