Abstract
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a serious threat to the sustainability of healthcare systems and is currently having a significant effect on living conditions worldwide. No therapeutic agent has yet proven to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19. The management of this disease currently relies on supportive care and the off-label and compassionate use of antivirals and immunomodulators. Nevertheless, there has been a great worldwide effort to progress research and test the efficacy and safety/tolerability profiles of numerous candidate agents that may positively affect the various clinical syndromes associated with COVID-19. In parallel, vaccination and chemoprophylaxis strategies are being investigated. This article provides a summary of interventional studies targeting COVID-19 during the emergency phase of the outbreak to broadly inform clinicians and researchers on what happened and what they can expect in upcoming months. The clinicaltrials.gov database and the European Union (EU) Clinical Trials Register were investigated on March 31, 2020, to identify all ongoing phase 1–4 research protocols testing pharmacological interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or clinical syndromes associated with COVID-19. Overall, six phase 1, four phase 1-2, 14 phase 2, ten phase 2-3, 19 phase 3, and nine phase 4 studies were identified, and the features of these studies are described in the present review. We also provide an updated overview of the change overtime in the pipeline following this emergency phase and based on the current epidemiology of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Introduction
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has been caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It poses a serious threat to the sustainability of healthcare systems, with substantial effects on living conditions worldwide. As of April 3, 2020, more than one million COVID-19 cases and around 53,000 deaths have been calculated in 181 countries worldwide (1). In parallel, nearly half of the global population is currently in lockdown.
To date, no therapeutic compound has been proven to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19. In the initial emergency phase of the outbreak, therapeutic management of affected individuals relied on supportive care (2, 3) and on the off-label and compassionate use of a variety of antiviral (e.g., lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir, favipiravir) and/or immunomodulator (e.g., chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, anti-IL-6 inhibitors, steroids) drugs, the efficacy of which had not then been demonstrated (4, 5). Moreover, their safety and tolerability profiles in patients with COVID-19 remains to be clarified (4, 6).
In this pandemic scenario, a great deal of effort is currently being devoted to the identification of novel therapies and prophylactic strategies, with new research protocols registered internationally every week (if not daily) (7). Moreover, the urgent need to move this field forward in response to this ongoing outbreak needs to be counterbalanced by ensuring that the products under investigation are evaluated through scientifically and ethically appropriate studies (8). There are challenging time-frames connected to the process of developing new therapeutic strategies against COVID-19 or repositioning existing compounds with plausible modifying effects on the disease. The clinical course of patients is not yet fully elucidated (9), and there is incomplete data on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms (10) and potential therapeutic targets.
In this article, we provide a summary of the interventional studies that have been conducted worldwide to test the efficacy and/or safety/tolerability of pharmacological compounds against COVID-19 in the emergency phase of the pandemic.
Methods
Data Source
Two databases, the clinicaltrials.gov database and the European Union (EU) Clinical Trials Register, constituted the reference sources for the present study. Clinicaltrials.gov is a web-based resource maintained by the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health that provides information on publicly and privately supported clinical studies. Registration on this database is mandatory for all clinical investigations of any US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-regulated drug or medical device. However, it also represents a repository for the vast majority of clinical trial protocols conducted worldwide. EU Clinical Trial Register gathers information on ongoing authorized interventional studies in the EU and the European Economic Area (EEA) that are registered in the EU Drug Regulation Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT).
Search Strategy
The databases were investigated on March 31, 2020, using the following search terms: “COVID-19” OR “SARS-CoV-2” OR “2019 novel coronavirus” OR “2019-nCoV” OR “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” OR “coronavirus.” In clinicaltrials.gov, the advanced search function was used to restrict the search to: (i) interventional studies (STUDY TYPE); (ii) “recruiting,” “enrolling by invitation,” and “active not recruiting” protocols (STATUS: RECRUITMENT); and (iii) phase 1, phase 2, phase 3, phase 4 studies (PHASE).
Two reviewers (L.T. and G.R.) screened the identified protocols to remove duplicates and verify the fulfillment of the following predefined inclusion criteria: (1) targeting SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or clinical syndromes associated with COVID-19; and (2) testing the efficacy and/or safety/tolerability of pharmacological interventions. Studies investigating novel medical devices or diagnostic tools were not considered in the present analysis. Disagreements in the selection were solved by consensus, involving two additional reviewers (M.C. and V.R.). The flow chart in Figure 1 illustrates the process of protocols' selection.
Figure 1
Data Extraction
The following data were abstracted by three authors (F.T., Ga.R., and Gi.R.) from the selected protocols: NCT (the unique identification code assigned by clinicaltrials.gov) and/or EudraCT codes; study phase; allocation and masking procedures; tested compound(s); way of administration; mechanism of action; primary outcome measure(s); expected primary completion date; expected number of participants; age range of participants; targeted COVID-19 related condition; sponsor; and location.
Clinical syndromes associated with COVID-19 were coded according to the classifications provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) (i.e., mild illness, pneumonia, severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], sepsis, and septic shock) (2). When the WHO classification could not be applied or was not specified, the targeted conditions were classified according to the definitions provided in the protocol.
Results
Search Results
A total of 74 protocols were identified through a structured search of the two adopted databases (n = 57 on clinicaltrials.gov and n = 17 on EU Clinical Trials Register). After the removal of six duplicates, six additional protocols were excluded because not targeting COVID-19. Specifically, five of them were focused on the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome and one on other bacterial or viral infections. Thus, 62 protocols were ultimately retained. The reviewers reported a >90% agreement in the selection process.
Characteristics of the Selected Protocols
Clinical trials involving new drugs are commonly classified into four phases, with some individual trials encompassing more than one phase (e.g., combined phase 1–2). Overall, six phase 1, four phase 1–2, 14 phase 2, ten phase 2–3, 19 phase 3, and nine phase 4 studies were identified. Their detailed characteristics are presented in Tables 1–3.
Table 1
| Identification Trial Number | Treatment(s) Comparator(s)(if any) | Primary completion | Allocation Assignment | Masking | Primary outcome(s) | Subjects | Age | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | ||||||||
| NCT04252118 | 1. Mesenchymal stem cells IV 2. Conventional treatment | December 20 | Non-randomized Parallel | None | - Size of lesion area by chest radiograph or CT (day 0,3,6,10,14,21,28) - Side effects (day 0,3,6,10,14,21,28,90,180) | 20 | 18-70y | Pneumonia* |
| NCT04313322 | 1. Wharton's Jelly mesenchymal stem cells IV | June 20 | Single group | None | - Improvement of clinical symptoms (week 3) - Side effects measured by chest radiograph (week 3) - RT-PCR results (week 3) | 5 | ≥18y | Infection* |
| NCT04299724 | 1. Artificial antigen presenting cells (aAPC) vaccine SC | July 23 | Single group | None | - Vaccine events and severe events (days 0-28) - Proportion of subjects with positive T cell response (days 0-28) | 100 | 6m-80y | Healthy subjects Infection* |
| NCT04313127 | 1. Ad5-nCoV vaccine (low) IM 2. Ad5-nCoV vaccine (middle) IM 3. Ad5-nCoV vaccine (high) IM | December 20 | Non-randomized Sequential | None | - Safety indexes of adverse reactions (days 0-7) | 108 | 18-60y | Healthy subjects |
| NCT04283461 | 1. mRNA-1273 vaccine (low) IM 2. mRNA-1273 vaccine (middle) IM 3. mRNA-1273 vaccine (high) IM | June 21 | Non-randomized Sequential | None | - Frequency of adverse events and new-onset chronic medical conditions (days 0-394) | 45 | 18-55y | Healthy subjects |
| NCT04280224 | 1. Natural killer cells 2. Conventional treatment | September 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Improvement of clinical symptoms (days 0-28) - Adverse events (days 0-28) | 30 | 18-65y | Pneumonia* |
| Phase 1-2 | ||||||||
| NCT04288102 | 1. Mesenchymal stem cells IV 2. Placebo | December 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIOa) | -Size of lesion area and severity of pulmonary fibrosis by chest CT (day 0,6,10,14,28,90) | 90 | 18-75y | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04324996 | 1. Natural killer (NK) cells IV 2. IL15-NK cells IV 3. NKG2D CAR-NK cells IV4. ACE2 CAR-NK cells IV5. NKG2D-ACE2 CAR-NK cells IV | May 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIOa) | - Clinical response (day 28) - Side effects (day 28) | 90 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia ARDS Sepsis/septic shock |
| NCT04276896 | 1. Synthetic minigene vaccine (LV-SMENP-DC) IV SC | July 23 | Single group | None | - Clinical improvement (day 28) - Lower Murray lung injury score (day 7) | 100 | 6m-80y | Healthy subjects Infection* |
| NCT04275245 | 1. Meplazumab IV | December 20 | Single group | None | - Virological clearance rate using RT-PCR (day 3,7,14) | 20 | 18-75y | Pneumonia* |
| Phase 2 | ||||||||
| NCT04307693 | 1. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O 2. Hydroxychloroquine O 3. No intervention | May 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Viral load (day 3,5,7,10,14,18) | 150 | 16-99y | Pneumonia |
| NCT04280588 | 1. Fingolimod O 2. No intervention | July 20 | Non-randomized Parallel | None | - Change of pneumonia severity on X-ray images (day 5) | 30 | 18-85y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia |
| NCT04317092EudraCT-2020-001110-38 | 1. Tocilizumab IV | December 20 | Single group | None | - Mortality rate (month 1) | 330 | All | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04279197 | 1. Fuzheng Huayu O 2. Placebo | December 22 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PI) | - Evaluation of pulmonary fibrosis (CT)(week 24) - Evaluation of lung function improvement (week 24) | 136 | 18-65y | Pulmonary fibrosis* |
| NCT04305457 | 1. Nitric oxide IN 2. No intervention | April 21 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Reduction in the incidence of patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation (day 28) | 240 | ≥18y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia |
| NCT04306393 | 1. Nitric oxide IN 2. No intervention | March 21 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (P) | - Change of arterial oxygenation (48 hours) | 200 | 18-99y | ARDS |
| NCT04269525 | 1. Umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells IV | April 20 | Single group | None | - Oxygenation index (day 14) | 10 | 18-75y | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04264533 | 1. Vitamin C IV 2. Placebo | September 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCOa) | - Ventilation-free days (day 28) | 140 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04323527 | 1. Chloroquine (low) O 2. Chloroquine (high) O | August 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIOa) | - Absolute mortality (day 28) | 440 | 18-100y | SARS with or without infection* |
| NCT04276688 | 1. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O + Ribavirin O + Interferon ß-1b SC 2. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O | January 22 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Time to negative nasopharyngeal swab (month 1) | 70 | ≥18y | Infection* |
| EudraCT-2020-001200-42 | 1. Camostat mesylate O 2. Placebo | na | Randomized Parallel | Yes (DB) | - Time to clinical improvement (from day 0 to discharge/death) | 180 | ≥18y | Infection* |
| EudraCT- 2020-001023-14 | 1. Interferon β-1a IN 2. Placebo | na | Randomized | Yes (DB) | - Clinical improvement (day 14) | 400 | ≥18y | Infection* |
| EudraCT-2020-001224-33 | 1. Hydroxychloroquine O 2. Placebo | na | Randomized Parallel | Yes (DB) | - Viral clearance (RT-PCR) | 220 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia |
| EudraCT-2020-001243-15 | 1. Itraconazole O 2. Best clinical practice | na | Randomized | None | - Clinical improvement (day 15) | 200 | ≥18y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| Phase 2-3 | ||||||||
| NCT04315298 | 1. Sarilumab (low) IV 2. Sarilumab (high) IV 3. Placebo | March 21 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIOa) | - Time to resolution of fever (day 29) - Clinical improvement (day 15) | 400 | ≥18y | Severe pneumoniaARDS Sepsis |
| NCT04278963 | 1. Yinhu Qingwen Decoction (low) O 2. Yinhu Qingwen Decoction (high) O | January 21 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PO) | - Mean clinical recovery time (day 28) | 300 | ≥18y | Pneumonia |
| NCT04275414 | 1. Bevacizumab IV | April 20 | Single group | None | - PaO2 to FiO2 ratio (day 1,3,7) | 20 | 18-80y | ARDS |
| NCT04322344 | 1. Escin O 2. Escin IV 3. Standard therapy | June 20 | Non-randomized Parallel | Yes (PC) | - Mortality rate (day 30) - Clinical status (day 30) | 120 | 18-75y | Infection* |
| NCT04323592 | 1. Methylprednisolone IV | May 20 | Single group | None | - Death or ICU admission or Invasive ventilation (composite)(day 28) - Death (day 28) - Admission to ICU (day 28) - Endotracheal intubation (day 28) | 104 | 18-80y | ARDS |
| NCT04244591 | 1. Methylprednisolone IV 2. Standard of care | April 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Lower Murray lung injury score (day 7,14) | 80 | ≥18y | ARDS |
| NCT04319900 | 1. Favipiravir O + Chloroquine O 2. Favipiravir O 3. Placebo | April 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PC) | - Time of improvement or recovery of respiratory symptoms (day 10) - Number of days virus nucleic acid shedding (day 10) - Frequency of improvement or recovery of respiratory symptoms (day 10) | 150 | 18-75y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia |
| EudraCT-2020-001246-18 | 1. Sarilumab IV 2. Tocilizumab IV 3. Anakinra IV4. Standard of care | na | Randomized Parallel | None | - Survival without needs of ventilator utilization (day 14) - Cumulative incidence of successful tracheal extubation (day 14) - Clinical improvement (day 4) | 1,000 | ≥18y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| EudraCT-2020-001113-21 | 1. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O 2. Interferon β-1a IN 3. Dexamethasone IV4. Hydroxychloroquine O | na | Randomized Parallel | None | - In-hospital mortality (day 28) | 2,000 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| EudraCT-2020-001162-12 | 1. Sarilumab IV 2. Placebo | na | Randomized Parallel | Yes (DB) | - Time to resolution of fever (day 29) - Clinical improvement (day 15) | 460 | ≥18y | Severe pneumoniaARDS |
Characteristics of the selected phase 1, phase 1-2, phase 2, and phase 2-3 protocols targeting COVID-19-related conditions.
IM, intramuscular; IN, inhaled; IV, intravenous; O, oral; SC, subcutaneous; DB, double blind; P, participant; I, investigator; C, care provider; Oa, outcomes assessor.
Not based on the WHO classification of COVID-19 associated conditions.
Most trials were conducted in China (n = 30), followed by the US (n = 10), Italy (n = 8), Germany (n = 6), France (n = 6), Spain (n = 5), and Korea (n = 5) (Figure 2). Seven trials involved international networks of clinical sites, whereas 55 were run in single countries; 35% of studies (n = 22) are multicentric. The majority of studies were funded by non-commercial research institutions (e.g., universities, hospitals, foundations, institutes) while only 11 were sponsored by the biopharma industry. Protocols had a varying duration and are expected to be completed (in terms of primary completion) between April 2020 and July 2023.
Figure 2
Forty-five trials had a randomized design, mostly relying on a parallel assignment of participants. Masking procedures were instead adopted by less than half of the trials (n = 26), with nine studies reporting quadruple masking involving both the participants, investigators, care providers, and outcomes assessors. Placebo or standard care were used as comparators in 27 studies, and 14 use one or more active comparators, whereas nine compared different regimens (i.e., dosages and/or duration) of the same treatment.
Tested Interventions
Most protocols (n = 32) investigated the efficacy and/or safety profiles of compounds that are expected to act as immune system modulators in COVID-19 associated conditions (Figure 3). These compounds included vaccines (n = 5), cell-based therapies (n = 6; e.g., mesenchymal stem cells, natural killer cells), antimalarial drugs (n = 9; e.g., chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine), corticosteroids (n = 4), interleukin inhibitors, and interferons. Twenty-two studies have been testing antiviral agents such as antiretroviral protease inhibitors (e.g., darunavir, lopinavir, ritonavir), neuraminidase inhibitors (e.g., oseltamivir), nucleotide analogs (e.g., remdesivir), and broad-spectrum antivirals. The remaining trials were designed to investigate other potential adjuvant therapies such as nitric oxide, antioxidants, phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Finally, seven studies have been evaluating the combinations of substances with both immunomodulant and antiviral properties.
Figure 3
Most of the selected primary outcome measures referred to clinical endpoints (e.g., mortality rates, clinical improvement/remission, hospital discharge, intensive care unit admission, ventilation-free days). A sizeable proportion of studies (n = 24) incorporated laboratory (e.g., viral clearance/load) or radiological (e.g., change of pneumonia severity on X-ray or CT) changes as primary endpoints. A residual number of trials (n = 7) were instead primarily aimed at exploring the safety and tolerability profiles of the tested interventions.
Targeted Conditions
A total of 41,110 participants will tentatively be recruited in the selected protocols, with sample sizes widely ranging between five and 6,800 subjects.
The entire clinical spectrum of COVID-19, ranging from infection with mild symptoms to sepsis complicated by shock, was targeted by the studies in the emergency phase of the COVID-19 outbreak. It also planned to recruit healthy subjects or individuals exposed to higher risk (e.g., healthcare providers or household contact).
Early phase studies (Table 1) preliminarily tested the tolerated dose, the safety, and efficacy of candidate agents in small representative groups. The target population was composed by healthy subjects (n = 4), individuals with laboratory confirmed infection without a clear WHO definition of the clinical syndrome (n = 6), patients with pneumonia ranging from mild to severe (n = 19), and more severe/critical clinical syndromes including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and sepsis (n = 14). In the late phases studies (Tables 2, 3) that are testing on a large scale those agents with documented safety and evidence of preliminary efficacy in the earlier phases, the target participants were largely represented by healthy or at-risk subjects with infection (n = 7), patients with mild/severe pneumonia (n = 20), and patients with more severe/critical clinical syndrome (n = 10).
Table 2
| Identification trial number | Treatment(s) Comparator(s)(if any) | Primary completion | Allocation Assignment | Masking | Primary outcome(s) | Subjects | Age | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT04292899 EudraCT-2020-000841-15 | 1. Remdesivir IV (5 days) 2. Remdesivir IV (10 days) | May 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Proportion with normalization of fever and oxygen saturation (day 14) | 2,400 | ≥18y≥12y | Pneumonia |
| NCT04292730 EudraCT-2020-000842-32 | 1. Remdesivir IV (5 d) 2. Remdesivir IV (10 d) 3. Standard of care | May 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Proportion of participants discharged by (day 14) | 600 | ≥18y | Pneumonia |
| NCT04304313 | 1. Sildenafil O | Mar 20 | Single group | None | - Rate of disease remission (day 14) - Rate of entering the critical stage (day 14) - Time of entering the critical stage (day 14) | 10 | ≥18y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia |
| NCT04304053 | 1. Darunavir/Cobicistat O 2. Hydroxychloroquine O 3. Isolation | June 20 | Cluster-RCT Randomized Parallel | None | - Incidence of secondary COVID-19 cases among contacts (day 14) (chemoprophylaxis) | 3,040 | ≥18y | Healthy subjects Infection* |
| NCT04252664 | 1. Remdesivir O 2. Placebo | April 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIOa) | - Time to clinical recovery (day 28) | 308 | ≥18y | Pneumonia |
| NCT04320238 | 1. Recombinant human Interferon α-1b IN 2. Recombinant human Interferon α-1b IN + Thymosin α1 SC | May 20 | Non-randomized Parallel | None | - New-onset COVID-2019 (week 6) | 2,944 | 18–65y | Healthy health care providers |
| NCT04261270 | 1. ASC09F + Oseltamivir O 2. Ritonavir + Oseltamivir O 3. Oseltamivir O | May 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (P) | - Rate of comprehensive adverse outcome (day 14) | 60 | 18–55y | Pneumonia |
| NCT04322682 | 1. Colchicine O 2. Placebo | September 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (P) | - Composite of death or the need for hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection (day 30) | 6,000 | ≥40y | Infection* |
| NCT04315948 EudraCT-2020-000936-23 | 1. Remdesivir IV 2. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O 3. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O + Interferon β-1a SC 4. Hydroxychloroquine O 5. Standard of care | March 23 | Randomized Parallel | None | -Clinical improvement (day 15) | 3,100 | ≥18y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04280705 EudraCT-2020-001052-18 | 1. Remdesivir IV 2. Placebo | April 23 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PI) | -Clinical improvement (day 15) | 440 | 18–99y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04257656 | 1. Remdesivir IV 2. Placebo | April 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIO) | - Time until clinical improvement (day 28) | 453 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04252274 | 1. Darunavir/Cobicistat O 2. Conventional treatment | August 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Virological clearance (day 7) | 30 | All | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia |
| NCT04320277 | 1. Baricitinib + Ritonavir O 2. Ritonavir O and/or Hydroxychloroquine O | April 20 | Non-randomized Crossover | None | - Percentage of ICU admission in patients vs. controls (week 2) | 60 | 18-85y | Pneumonia |
| NCT04308668 | 1. Hydroxychloroquine O 2. Placebo | April 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIOa) | - Incidence of COVID-19 in asymptomatic subjects (day 14) - Change in COVID-19 Severity (day 14) among symptomatic: | 3,000 | ≥18y | Healthy subjects Infection* |
| NCT04282902 | 1. Pirfenidone O 2. Standard of care | April 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Laboratory, imaging and clinical improvement (week 4) | 294 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia |
| NCT03680274 | 1. Vitamin C IV 2. Placebo | December 21 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIOa) | - Deceased participants or with persistent organ dysfunction (day 28) | 800 | ≥18y | Sepsis |
| NCT03808922 | 1. DAS181 IN 2. Placebo | April 21 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (PCIO) | - Clinical status improvement (day 14) (sub-study) | 250 (main study) | All | Severe pneumonia |
| EudraCT-2020-000982-18 | 1. Hydroxychloroquine O 2. Standard of care | na | Randomized | None | - In-hospital mortality | 443 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia ARDS Sepsis/septic shock |
| EudraCT-2020-000890-25 | 1. Hydroxychloroquine O | na | Single group | None | - Results of SARS-CoV2 virus detection (day 1,4,7,14) | 25 | ≥12y | Infection* |
Characteristics of the selected phase 3 protocols targeting COVID-19-related conditions.
IN, inhaled; IV, intravenous; O, oral; SC, subcutaneous; P, participant; I, investigator; C, care provider; Oa, outcomes assessor.
Not based on the WHO classification of COVID-19 associated conditions.
Table 3
| Identification trial number | Treatment(s) Comparator(s)(if any) | Primary completion | Allocation Assignment | Masking | Primary outcome(s) | Subjects | Age Years | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT04308317 | 1. Tetrandrine O 2. Standard of care | March 21 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Death event (week 12) | 60 | 18–75y | PneumoniaSevere pneumonia |
| NCT04326920 EudraCT-2020-001254-22 | 1. Sargramostim IN or IV 2. Placebo | October 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | - Improvement in oxygenation (day 5) | 80 | 18–80y | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04255017 | 1. Abidol hydrochloride O 2. Oseltamivir O 3. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O 4. Symptomatic treatment | June 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (P) | - Rate of clinical remission (week 2) - Time of lung imaging recovery (week 2) | 400 | ≥18y | PneumoniaSevere pneumoniaARDS |
| NCT04254874 | 1. Abidol hydrochloride O 2. Abidol hydrochloride O + Interferon (PegIFNα-2b) IV | June 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (P) | - Rate of clinical remission (week 2) - Time of lung imaging recovery (week 2) | 100 | ≥18y | Pneumonia Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT04263402 | 1. Methylprednisolone (<40mg) IV 2. Methylprednisolone(40-80mg) IV | June 20 | Randomized Parallel | Yes (P) | - Rate of disease remission (day 7) - Rate and time of entering the critical stage (respiratory failure or multiorgan failure)(day 7) | 100 | ≥18y | Severe pneumonia ARDS |
| NCT02735707 | 1. No antiviral 2. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O 3. Hydroxychloroquine O 4. Hydroxychloroquine O + Lopinavir/Ritonavir O 5. No immune modulators 6. Interferon β-1a IV 7. Anakinra IV | December 21 | Randomized Factorial | None | - All cause death (day 90) - Days alive and outside of ICU (day 21) | 6,800 (main study) | ≥18y | Sever pneumoniaARDSSepsis/septic shock |
| NCT04252885 | 1. Lopinavir/Ritonavir O 2. Arbidol O 3. Standard of care | May 20 | Randomized Parallel | None | -The rate of virus inhibition (in nose/throat swab) (day 0,2,4,7,10,14,21) | 125 | 18–80y | Infection* |
| 2020-001010-38 | 1. Hydroxychloroquine O 2. Standard of care | Randomized | None | -Rate of decline in SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal samples (96 h) | 200 | ≥18y | Pneumonia | |
| EudraCT-2020-000919-69 | 1. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination ID | Randomized | Yes (DB) | - Number of days of unplanned absenteeism for any reason (hospital personnel) (days 0–180) | 1,000 | ≥18y | Healthcare providers |
Characteristics of the selected phase 4 protocols targeting COVID-19-related conditions.
ID, intradermal; IN, inhaled; IV, intravenous; O, oral; DB, double blind; P, participant.
Not based on the WHO classification of COVID-19 associated conditions.
Discussion
Although the first COVID-19 cases were reported just 4 months ago (11), there has been an unprecedented response from the international community. The findings of several interventional studies have already been disseminated (5, 12). Encouragingly, a relevant number of clinical trials have explored safe and effective therapeutics to face the pandemic, enrolling individuals with COVID-19 worldwide, and some of these trials will publish the results as early as in the next few weeks/months. This emerging evidence will largely be concerned with hard outcomes such as mortality (adopted as the primary endpoint in ten studies), access to intensive care units, clinical remission, and will therefore have profound clinical implications.
This review provides an overview of studies in the emergency phase of the outbreak, utilizing the two most common open access protocol registries in the US and Europe, with the aim of informing clinicians and researchers on what they can expect in the upcoming months. Of note, is the fact that we restricted our focus to only two clinical trial registries and we are aware that this might potentially underestimate the current situation. When a broader search is conducted by including most of the existing national and international databases, the number of ongoing studies is much higher and needs to be constantly updated (13). Accordingly, coalitions/networks have recently been launched to provide frequently updated resources (e.g., living systematic reviews) summarizing the characteristics of research protocols targeting COVID-19 (7, 13). These initiatives are particularly welcomed, as they potentially allow for the coordination of a multinational research effort and better allocation of the available research resources.
As expected, interventional studies were largely performed and promoted in those countries where the outbreak has already significantly affected the community and the healthcare system. The inclusion criteria of the studies was designed to target the entire spectrum of clinical syndromes associated with COVID-19 at the time the study was conducted, namely asymptomatic status, mild illness, pneumonia, ARDS, and septic complications. The opportunity to include the clinical struggles for different categories of patients was also implemented. Several trials were instead focused on the vaccination and chemoprophylaxis of healthy individuals. Two studies were specifically dedicated to health care providers, consistently with their established vulnerability in the COVID-19 pandemic (14). These studies are very much needed, as in some countries the number of healthcare providers with infection is rapidly increasing due to a shortage of personal protective equipment, in parallel with the high demand for care that usually occurs during a pandemic (15). Currently, slowing the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 relies on measures of social distancing and recommended changes to lifestyle and behavior that have unmeasurable consequences on the life of individuals and communities, not to mention the economic crisis that countries face. In light of this, it is pivotal to cooperate and optimize the effort for a common solution starting from the systematic recruitment of patients to complete the ongoing trials.
Based on the registered information, some protocols will probably provide proof-of-concept evidence supporting the design of large-scale clinical trials. Conversely, some of the ongoing phase 3 randomized controlled trials and phase 4 post marketing studies seem already adequately informed to be able to draw either positive or negative conclusions on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of pharmacological compounds with different mechanisms of action. Of note, is the fact that some trials are adopting adaptive designs, allowing them to rapidly accept or reject multiple experimental therapies, which is especially promising in the current outbreak scenario (4).
The major limitation of our study is related to the extremely dynamic evolution of knowledge on the topic. As mentioned, an incredible number of trials have been proposed on COVID during the past weeks and it is likely that this number will rapidly and exponentially increase in the next months, especially given the more consistent dissemination of the coronavirus in different regions of the world. In this regard, since April 1, 2020, 585 new protocols have been registered on the clinicaltrials.gov database (search updated to August 18, 2020) with an expected overall number of around 375,000 participants. As compared with the emergency phase, a greater proportion of phase 1 and 2 studies are currently active (70.2 vs. 54.8%). An increase in the percentage of industry-funded trials (34.2 vs. 17.7%) and of studies adopting a randomized design (85.3 vs. 72.6%) has been observed. As expected by the changes that have occurred in the epidemiology of COVID-19, the US and Europe persist as the main recruiting sites while centers in South America, India, and Africa have recently started to contribute. It is noteworthy that, due to a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease (10), there are a relevant number of novel compounds, mostly acting as immunomodulators, that are being tested (e.g., ruxolitinib, colchicine, heparins, mavirilumab, ivermectin). These were not present nor in the pipeline at the end of March 2020. Moreover, 47 protocols are currently investigating the efficacy and safety profiles of vaccines whereas 67 focused on convalescent plasma therapies. As of August 18, 2020, the (negative) findings of four of the studies that started in the emergency phase have already been published (i.e., three testing remdesivir [NCT04292899, NCT04292730, NCT04257656] and one testing hydroxychloroquine [NCT04308668]) (16–19).
In conclusion, the present analysis provides an account for researchers and clinicians for them to understand present research and envision the future of therapeutics testing for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Statements
Data availability statement
All datasets presented in this study are included in the article.
Author contributions
MCa and VR: study design, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. GRe: study design, data collection, and drafting of the manuscript. FT, GRic, LT, GRis, and AA: data collection. GB, MCe, and NV: data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
MCa is supported by a research grant of the Italian Ministry of Health for the project Dementia in immigrants and ethnic minorities living in Italy: clinical-epidemiological aspects and public health perspectives (ImmiDem) (GR-2016-02364975). VR was supported by the Scientific Independence of Young Researchers Program (RBSI14HNVT), Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR), Rome, Italy.
Acknowledgments
We thank Marco Moroni for the realization of Figure 3. We thank Dr. Giuseppe Traversa (National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health) for revising the manuscript for intellectual content.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. COVID-19 Map. Available online at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed April 3, 2020)
2.
World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when COVID-19 is suspected. Pediatria Medycyna Rodzinna. (2020) 16:9–26. 10.15557/PiMR.2020.0003
3.
PostonJTPatelBKDavisAM. Management of critically Ill adults with COVID-19. JAMA. (2020). 10.1001/jama.2020.4914. [Epub ahead of print].
4.
KalilAC. Treating COVID-19—Off-label drug use, compassionate use, and randomized clinical trials during pandemics. JAMA. (2020). 10.1001/jama.2020.4742. [Epub ahead of print].
5.
CaoBWangYWenDLiuWWangJFanGet al. A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:1787–1799. 10.1056/NEJMc2008043
6.
RussellCDMillarJEBaillieJK. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet. (2020) 395:473–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30317-2
7.
MaguireBJGuérinPJ. A living systematic review protocol for COVID-19 clinical trial registrations. Wellcome Open Res. (2020) 5:60. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15821.1
8.
European Medicines Agency. Points to Consider on Implications of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) on Methodological Aspects of Ongoing Clinical Trials.Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency (2020).
9.
ZhouFYuTDuRFanGLiuYLiuZet al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. (2020) 395:1054–62. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
10.
KabirMTUddinMSHossainMFAbdulhakimJAAlamMAAshrafGMet al. nCOVID-19 pandemic: from molecular pathogenesis to potential investigational therapeutics. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 8:616. 10.3389/fcell.2020.00616
11.
HuangCWangYLiXRenLZhaoJHuYet al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. (2020) 395:497–506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
12.
ChenZHuJZhangZJiangSHanSYanDet al. Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial. medRxiv. 10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758. [Epub ahead of print].
13.
COVID-19Clinical Research Coalition. Global coalition to accelerate COVID-19 clinical research in resource-limited settings. Lancet. (2020) 395:1322–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30798-4
14.
The Lancet. COVID-19: protecting health-care workers. Lancet. (2020) 395:922. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30644-9
15.
RanneyMLGriffethVJhaAK. Critical supply shortages — the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:e41. 10.1056/NEJMp2006141
16.
GoldmanJDLyeDCBHuiDSMarksKMBrunoRMontejanoRet al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 days in patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. (2020). 10.1056/NEJMoa2015301. [Epub ahead of print].
17.
SpinnerCDGottliebRLCrinerGArribas LópezJRCattelanAMViladomiuASet al. Effect of remdesivir vs standard care on clinical status at 11 days in patients with moderate COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2020). 10.1001/jama.2020.16349. [Epub ahead of print].
18.
WangYZhangDDuGDuRZhaoJJinYet al. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. (2020) 395:1569–78. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9
19.
SkypperCPPastickKAEngenNWBangiwalaASAbassiMLofgrenSMet al. Hydroxychloroquine in nonhospitalized adults with early COVID-19: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. (2020) 16:M20–4207. 10.7326/M20-4207
Summary
Keywords
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, clinical trials, antivirals, immunomodulators, research protocols, drug development
Citation
Canevelli M, Remoli G, Trentin F, Riccardi G, Tariciotti L, Risoleo G, Ancidoni A, Bruno G, Cesari M, Vanacore N and Raparelli V (2020) The Pipeline of Therapeutics Testing During the Emergency Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak. Front. Med. 7:552991. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.552991
Received
17 April 2020
Accepted
01 September 2020
Published
24 September 2020
Volume
7 - 2020
Edited by
Mohan Jyoti Dutta, Massey University, New Zealand
Reviewed by
Xiaojiong Jia, Harvard Medical School, United States; Mohamed M. Abdel-Daim, Suez Canal University, Egypt
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Canevelli, Remoli, Trentin, Riccardi, Tariciotti, Risoleo, Ancidoni, Bruno, Cesari, Vanacore and Raparelli.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marco Canevelli marco.canevelli@iss.it
This article was submitted to Infectious Diseases - Surveillance, Prevention and Treatment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.