Abstract
We study the elastic response of a class of optimal planar metamaterials designed as periodic patterns of tensegrity cells. Specifically, we consider an infinite slab constituted by prismatic cells whose sections on the middle plane are regular hexagons, squares or equilateral triangles subjected to a uniform normal stress. An attracting property of the proposed metamaterial is a very small tangential stiffness compared with the normal one. This property suggests the design of innovative isolation devices with extreme properties.
1. Introduction
Metamaterials represent an innovative approach to the problem of obtaining unusual or extreme physical responses for advanced applications. Since their extreme macroscopic responses depend primarily on the internal low scale pattern, the understanding of how the microstructure topology influences the macroscopic properties is the key-point in the design of new advanced metamaterials.
The growing scientific and technological interest on these new designed materials is due to the possibility of getting electromagnetic and optical properties (Chen et al., 2010) or mechanical responses unreached by standard materials. Metamaterials can exhibit extreme static or dynamical behaviors, such as negative effective dynamic modulus (Fang et al., 2006), vanishing macroscopic shear modulus (Schittny et al., 2013) or selective buckling under external stresses (Paulose et al., 2015). Recently, the possibility of harnessing the postbuckling response of cellular materials for auxetic and dissipative properties has been analyzed by Bertoldi (2017). Based on these specific mechanical properties also the design of tensegrity-based metamaterials has been oriented to produce extreme or controllable behaviors. In particular, extreme behaviors in the propagation of mechanical waves have been considered by Amendola et al. (2018) and Fraternali et al. (2012, 2014), whereas elastic responses controllable by adjusting the level of self-equilibrated forces have been studied by Sabouni-Zawadzka and Gilewski (2019). Further, it has been recognized that the transmission and the control of forces in biological systems is diffusely achieved by means of systems based on tensegrity schemes (see e.g., Volokh et al., 2000; Ingber et al., 2014; Fraldi et al., 2019).
Metamaterials are usually classified into three-dimensional and surface (planar) materials and are frequently based on elementary geometric patterns (see e.g., Koohestani, 2017; Salahshoor et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). Many studies approaching these periodic materials by means of lattice theory have been carried out. Within this research line, Hutchinson and Fleck (2006) studied the structural performance of periodic planar trusses. Buckling of a planar periodic frame was considered by Triantafyllidis and Schnaidt (1993). More recently, Thomsen et al. (2018) performed a topological optimization of 2D periodic materials undergoing buckling type instabilities. Moreover, the non-linear response of planar periodic materials has been analyzed by Vigliotti et al. (2014).
This paper is focused on the elastic response of a planar metamaterial made up of a pattern of equal tensegrity units, where each unit cell is a three dimensional T-bar (Skelton et al., 2017). In particular, we consider an infinite slab undergoing a uniform compressive macro stress. Based on a well-known result on planar tessellation, we consider systems with three different periodic patterns of identical prismatic cells filling the space, whose sections on the middle plane of the slab are equilateral triangles, squares, and regular hexagons (see Figures 1, 2). The mass optimization of this metamaterial was discussed in a previous paper (DeTommasi et al., 2017b). Here we determine the overall (macro) elastic properties of these optimal slabs as functions of both design and actual applied loads. Interestingly, the proposed metamaterial exhibits a low shear stiffness coupled with a high extensional stiffness. This property suggests the possibility of obtaining isolation devices with extreme properties.
Figure 1
Figure 2
2. Morphological Optimization
As already stated, in our optimization problem we consider only slabs made up of periodic sequences of tensegrity cells having equilateral triangular, square, or regular hexagonal shapes, which are the unique shapes allowing us to tessellate the plane into identical regular polygons. On the external plane surfaces of the slab a normal compression macro stress Σ is applied, so that
is the load applied to the single tensegrity cell (see Figure 1). Here, the cross section area Acell for a cross section having p sides (p = 3, 4, 6) is given by
where H is the height of a cell and α is the angle formed by the principal struts and the principal cables (see Figure 1). Once the cell shape is defined, α represents the optimization geometrical parameter of the described metamaterial. The following assumptions are introduced:
A prestress must be assigned such that both in the loaded and unloaded states only traction forces are exerted on cables;
Both in the loaded and unloaded states, cables respect material failure condition and struts both material failure and local Euler buckling conditions;
Equilibrium is globally stable.
For a fixed Σ, we aim to minimize the metamaterial volume density
where tensegrity volume is the global volume of all members of a tensegrity cell and Acell is given by (2). We remark that, since we assume that all tensegrity units are made of the same material, the minimum value of ρ corresponds to the slab of minimal mass. Furthermore we observe that neighboring tensegrity units (see Figure 2) share the same transversal cables. Thus the areas of these cables considered for a singular unit are the half of the total ones. The above statements lead to the constrained minimum problem already discussed in DeTommasi et al. (2017b).
2.1. Elastic Equilibrium of Tensegrity Cells
Due to periodicity and symmetry properties of the metamaterial introduced above, any cell is two-degrees statically indeterminate. In the loaded state (P = ΣAcell) two parameters β and τ are introduced to describe the internal forces
Here N is the compression force in the struts orthogonal to the middle plane and Tt is the traction force in the cables laying in the middle plane. Then the internal axial forces in the loaded state can be written as
where T denotes the traction force in the cables out of the middle plane and Nt the compression force in the transversal struts laying on the middle plane.
Similarly, in the unloaded state (P = 0) we can describe the distribution of the internal forces by the parameters and , defined as β and τ and given by
Here N[1] is the compression force induced in the principal struts by a unitary compression force (P = 1) and Tt[1] is the traction force induced in the tranversal cables by the same external force. In the unloaded state we have
Though, as already discussed in DeTommasi et al. (2017b), a complete stability analysis should be carried out in the context of lattice theory (Triantafyllidis and Schnaidt, 1993), here, for sake of simplicity we assume that all cells undergo identical critical displacements. We deem that this assumption is satisfactory within the present analysis. Moreover, precritical displacements are assumed to be small with the deformed lengths of the members identified with the natural ones. Under these hypotheses the total potential energy (set equal to zero in the unloaded state) of the system can be written as
where
Here u is the vector of generalized incremental displacements (see Figure 3); 2u1 is the contraction orthogonal to the middle plane; l(j), Δl(j), and A(j) are the length, the elongation and the area of the (j)-th member, respectively; Δx(j) is the length vector and T(j)u is the relative incremental displacement vector between the end joints of the (j)-th member. Furthermore, the Young modulus E has a unique value for all the bars and cables, made up of the same material. In particular, we have
where A and At are the areas of the cross sections of the principal and transversal struts, respectively, and Ac and Act the cross section areas of the principal and traversal cables, respectively.
Figure 3
The lengths l(j) of the members are given by
The axial forces N(j) (numbered with the same index of the lengths and the areas of the corresponding members) are given by (5). The tangent stiffness matrix K is the 10 × 10 Hessian matrix of the total potential energy in the loaded configuration:
that, for stable or critical equilibrium states, must be semidefinite positive
Based on the symmetry properties of the tensegrity cell, in our numerical analysis we choose the generalized displacements shown in Figure 3. Thanks to this approach, the Hessian matrix K is a block diagonal matrix, with maximum dimension of the submatrices equal to 2 × 2. This choice significantly simplifies the numerical analysis of positiveness in the following described optimization procedure. In particular, the above positivity condition is imposed by requiring that its leading principal minors are all non-negative.
3. Macro Elastic Constants
In this section the elastic constants of the slabs are evaluated. The tangent Young modulus Em in the direction orthogonal to the middle plane is determined as
where is the normal strain of the slab and is the incremental contraction of the thickness H of the slab (see Figure 3). In order to determine Em, we determine the incremental contraction induced by a unitary incremental value of the compressive macrostress , where the column vector 1E has all components equal to zero, except the first one, set equal to 1. Then (13) becomes
Analogously, the effective shear modulus of the slab is determined as
where is the incremental shear strain, is the incremental tangential relative displacement between the two end faces of the slab (see Figure 3) and Ṫ is the incremental effective shear stress applied to the two end faces. As in the previous case, Gm is evaluated by determining the incremental displacement vector induced by a unitary incremental shear stress , where the column vector 1G has all components are equal to zero, except the ninth one, set equal to 1. Then (15) becomes
It must be noted that for the three cells here considered the two last diagonal blocks of K are equal scalars. In other words, the only non-zero elements of the two last rows and columns are always the diagonal elements K9,9 and K10,10, which are identical. Then (16) can be also written as
The two last expressions (17) show that the elastic modulus G is independent from the direction of incremental shear macro stress Ṫ, so that the slabs exhibits a transversely isotropic type behavior.
4. Numerical Results
To discuss previous results, consider a slab with thickness H = 100 mm and struts with thin annular sections, whose ratio between the average radius and the thickness is equal to 10. The Young modulus is fixed to E = 200 GPa and the yield stress to σy = 200 MPa. The minimum volume density (3) has been determined for values of the design monoaxial macrostress Σd in the range [10−5, 10−1] MPa.
In Figure 4, the optimal density is shown vs. Σd for the three tensegrity shapes considered here. As the figure shows, the hexagonal shape is the most convenient. Interestingly we find an almost linear log-log dependence. This “scale invariant” behavior has been previously observed for similar tensegrities in DeTommasi et al. (2015) and had been used in DeTommasi et al. (2017a) to obtain optimal fractal like tensegrity structures.
Figure 4
This is coherently reflected in the observation that the optimal value of the geometrical parameter α, which describes the cell geometry, varies only very slightly in the considered range of the design macro stress Σd. In particular, for all the three different shapes we have tanα∈[0.10, 0.11]. Interestingly also the optimal prestress parameters β and τ change only very slightly in the considered range of the design macro stress: β∈[1.18, 1.20], τ∈[0.04, 0.05]. We then deduce that our solution identifies an optimal shape which is almost independent from the design macro stress in the considered range. Of course, on the contrary the optimal cross section areas strongly depend on the design macro stress.
Figure 5 shows the dependence of the macro elastic moduli Em and Gm of the optimal slabs from the design macro stress Σd. Also here we notice that the log-log graph is almost linear. Due to the small values of the shear modulus, we argue that the small deviations from the power law regime of graph can be ascribed to numerical reasons. A very important property of the considered metamaterial is that it is characterized by a difference of several orders of magnitude (from 2 to 5) between the Young's modulus Em and the tangential elastic modulus Gm, especially for low values of the design macro stress. This feature can be explained by observing that, in the considered range of the design data, the cross sections of the struts are always determined by the local buckling constraints and are much greater than those of the cables, especially for low values of the design macrostress. Furthermore, as we already stated, the optimal value of the angle between the principal cables and the struts is always small (tanα ≃ 0.10).
Figure 5
In Figure 6, we represent the variation of the tangent Young modulus Em with respect to both the actual applied macrostress Σ and the design macrostresses Σd. In particular, for each value of Σd it is shown that the tangent macro elastic modulus Em is almost independent from Σ, which is varying from the unloaded state (Σ = 0) to the loaded state (Σ = Σd). Therefore we argue that the proposed metamaterial has a linear behavior with respect to the axial load Σ.
Figure 6
Similarly, in Figure 7A, we represent the tangent shear modulus Gm (MPa) of the optimal slabs. As in the previous figure, for different fixed design macrostresses Σd we analyze its dependence on the actual applied macrostress Σ, with Σ ranging from the unloaded state (Σ = 0MPa) to the loaded state (Σ = Σd). We point out that, differently from the previous case, for each value of Σd the tangent shear modulus Gm varies with the applied macro stress, even if its decrease (softening) with respect increasing values of the actual macro stress is quite limited. This is shown in detail in Figure 7B for a single fixed value of the design macro stress (Σd = 0.1MPa). Observe that the tangent shear modulus Gm decreases linearly as the applied macrostress grows, showing the same slope for the three geometries. A similar softening behavior has been also observed in the non-linear elastic analysis for laminated rubber bearings (see D'Ambrosio et al., 1995). Several augmentations of the obtained interesting behavior of these tensegrity slabs should be obtained by extending the optimization to multiscale tensegrity structures (see e.g., DeTommasi et al., 2015, 2017a) and by considering multilayer slabs.
Figure 7
Conclusions
In this paper he have optimized a planar metamaterial made up of periodically patterned tensegrity-type unit cells. With reference to different values of the design macro stress we have compared the mechanical responses of three different geometries of unit cells. Further, for each value of the design macro stress the optimal densities are compared, showing that the minimal density metamaterial is made up by hexagonal cells (see Figure 2). As already found previously, the optimal density of these slabs exhibits a log-log dependence on the applied macrostress. Here this result has been extended to the elastic macroscopic response, showing again a power law dependence of the macroscopic elastic moduli on the design macro stress. Interestingly, for each adopted geometry we have found shapes of the optimal tensegrity cells almost independent by the design macro stress. These results suggest a scale-invariant behavior of the proposed metamaterial. Finally, we remark that the optimal proposed metamaterial is characterized by a shear elastic modulus which is up to five orders of magnitude smaller than the Young modulus. This indicates that the proposed scheme of metamaterial is suitable for the design of new isolation devices.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication. In particular, all authors equally contributed to the theoretical modelling, while FT also developed numerical analysis.
Funding
DD and GP have been supported by the Italian Ministry MIUR-PRIN project COAN 5.50.16.01 code 2015JW9NJT.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AmendolaA.KrushynskaA.DaraioC.PugnoN. M.FraternaliF. (2018). Tuning frequency band gaps of tensegrity mass-spring chains with local and global prestress. Int. J. Solids Struct.155, 47–56. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.002
2
BertoldiK. (2017). Harnessing instabilities to design tunable architected cellular materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.47, 51–61. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-123908
3
ChenH.ChanC. T.ShengP. (2010). Transformation optics and metamaterials. Nat. Mater.9, 387–396. 10.1038/nmat2743
4
D'AmbrosioP.DeTommasiD.MarzanoS. (1995). Nonlinear elastic deformations and stability of laminated rubber bearings. J. Eng. Mech.121, 1041–1048. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:10(1041)
5
DeTommasiD.MaddalenaF.PuglisiG.TrentadueF. (2017a). Fractality in selfsimilar minimal mass structures. J. Mech. Phys. Solids107, 433–450. 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.07.002
6
DeTommasiD.MaranoG.PuglisiG.TrentadueF. (2015). Optimal complexity and fractal limits of self-similar tensegrities. Proc. R. Soc. A471:20150250. 10.1098/rspa.2015.0250
7
DeTommasiD.MaranoG.PuglisiG.TrentadueF. (2017b). Morphological optimization of tensegrity-type metamaterials. Composites B Eng.115, 182–187. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.017
8
FangN.XiD.XuJ.AmbatiM.SrituravanichW.SunC.et al. (2006). Ultrasonic metamaterials with negative modulus. Nat. Mater.5, 452–456. 10.1038/nmat1644
9
FraldiM.PalumboS.CarotenutoA.CutoloA.DeseriL.PugnoN. (2019). Buckling soft tensegrities: fickle elasticity and configurational switching in living cells. J. Mech. Phys. Solids124, 299–324. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.017
10
FraternaliF.CarpentieriG.AmendolaA.SkeltonR.NesterenkoV. (2014). Multiscale tunability of solitary wave dynamics in tensegrity metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett.105:201903. 10.1063/1.4902071
11
FraternaliF.SenatoreL.DaraioC. (2012). Solitary waves on tensegrity lattices. J. Mech. Phys. Solids60, 1137–1144. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.02.007
12
HutchinsonR.FleckN. (2006). The structural performance of the periodic truss. J. Mech. Phys. Solids54, 756–782. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.10.008
13
IngberD. E.WangN.StamenovicD. (2014). Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. Rep. Progr. Phys.77:046603. 10.1088/0034-4885/77/4/046603
14
KoohestaniK. (2017). On the analytical form-finding of tensegrities. Composite Struct.166, 114–119. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.059
15
PauloseJ.MeeussenA. S.VitelliV. (2015). Selective buckling via states of self-stress in topological metamaterials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, 7639–7644. 10.1073/pnas.1502939112
16
Sabouni-ZawadzkaA.GilewskiW. (2019). Soft and stiff simplex tensegrity lattices as extreme smart metamaterials. Materials12:187. 10.3390/ma12010187
17
SalahshoorH.PalR.RimoliJ. (2018). Material symmetry phase transitions in three-dimensional tensegrity metamaterials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids119, 382–399. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.011
18
SchittnyR.BuckmannT.KadicM.WegenerM. (2013). Elastic measurements on macroscopic three-dimensional pentamode metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett.30:11905. 10.1063/1.4838663
19
SkeltonR.HeltonJ.AdhikariR.PinaudJ.ChanW. (2017). An introduction to the mechanics of tensegrity structures, in The Mechanical Systems Design Handbook: Modeling, Measurement, and Control, ed HurmuzluY. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 872.
20
ThomsenC.WangF.SigmundO. (2018). Buckling strength topology optimization of 2d periodic materials based on linearized bifurcation analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.339, 115–136. 10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.031
21
TriantafyllidisN.SchnaidtW. (1993). Comparison of microscopic and macroscopic instabilities in a class of two-dimensional periodic composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids41, 1533–1565. 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90039-I
22
VigliottiA.DeshpandeV.PasiniD. (2014). Non linear constitutive models for lattice materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids64, 44–60. 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.015
23
VolokhK.VilnayO.BelskyM. (2000). Tensegrity architecture explains linear stiffening and predicts softening of living cells. J. Rep. Prog. Phys33, 1543–1549. 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00157-3
24
ZhangL.LiS.ZhuS.ZhangB.XuG. (2018). Automatically assembled large-scale tensegrities by truncated regular polyhedral and prismatic elementary cells. Composite Struct.184, 30–40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.074
Summary
Keywords
metamaterials, global stability, tensegrities, optimization, isolation devices
Citation
De Tommasi D, Puglisi G and Trentadue F (2019) Elastic Response of an Optimal Tensegrity-Type Metamaterial. Front. Mater. 6:24. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2019.00024
Received
13 November 2018
Accepted
07 February 2019
Published
27 February 2019
Volume
6 - 2019
Edited by
Fernando Fraternali, University of Salerno, Italy
Reviewed by
Vagelis Plevris, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway; Zbigniew Wojciech Bieniek, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 De Tommasi, Puglisi and Trentadue.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Francesco Trentadue francesco.trentadue@poliba.it
This article was submitted to Mechanics of Materials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Materials
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.