ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci., 08 November 2019

Sec. Global Change and the Future Ocean

Volume 6 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00685

Environmental and Benthic Community Patterns of the Shallow Hydrothermal Area of Secca Delle Fumose (Baia, Naples, Italy)

  • 1. Laboratory of Marine Ecology, Department of Science and Technology, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Naples, Italy

  • 2. National Interuniversity Consortium for Marine Sciences, Rome, Italy

  • 3. EEP/SPICI Group/UMR 8198, Department of Sciences et Technologies, University of Lille, Villeneuve-d’Ascq, France

  • 4. IFREMER, Centre Brest, REM/EEP/LEP, Plouzané, France

  • 5. Integrative Marine Ecology Department, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy

Abstract

The occurrence of hydrothermal vent ecosystems at Secca delle Fumose, Pozzuoli Bay (Gulf of Naples), represented an opportunity to study the benthic assemblages under the thermal stress of hydrothermal emissions in a very shallow environment (9–14 m water depth). In autumn 2016, the macrobenthic community was sampled by scuba divers at four sites located in the Baia Underwater Archeological Park. Two sites were characterized by vent emissions (one with white bacterial mat scattered on the bottom and one with a yellow substrate around a geyser opening) and two at about 100 m away, used as control. Sediment and interstitial water environmental variables were measured to determine their influence on the structure of macrobenthic assemblages. A total of 1,954 macrofaunal individuals was found, characterized by great differences in abundance and species richness among sites. This pattern was correlated to the dominance of a particular set of variables that drastically change in a very small spatial scale, from one site to another. The control sites, characterized by the highest percentage of gravel in the sediments (19.67 ± 2.6%) and normal level of major ions such as Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+ in the interstitial waters, showed the highest values of sinecological indices. The “white” hydrothermal site exhibited the lowest species richness, abundance and species diversity, influenced by low pH values (∼7.6), high temperatures (∼37.53°C) and by the highest total organic carbon content (TOC 34.78%) in the sediment. The “yellow” hydrothermal site, with sediment TOC equal to 30.03% and interstitial sulfide ions measuring 130.58 ppm, showed higher values of sinecological indices than those recorded at the “white” site. Therefore, taxonomic analysis revealed a high turnover between control and vents sites. This highlights the preference for hydrothermal vents by a few resistant species, such as the gastropod Tritia cuvierii and the polychaete Capitella capitata, confirming the role of the latter species as opportunistic in extreme environments like Secca delle Fumose.

Introduction

The relationship between environmental factors and benthic communities is of primary importance in determining the structure of biocenoses and their functioning (e.g., Feder et al., 1994; Ellingsen, 2002; Lloret and Marín, 2009; Arribas et al., 2014). A huge variety of marine species and bioconstructions is widely distributed along the bathymetrical gradient, from very shallow to deep-water. Among extreme marine systems, hydrothermal vents have wide global distribution, occurring in all oceanic bottoms, at different latitudes and depths and harboring rich and peculiar biological communities (Parson et al., 1995; Dando et al., 2000). Several studies revealed that the occurrence of benthic organisms in the hydrothermal systems is strongly related to the volcanic fluids that outflow from the bottom, characterized by high concentrations of iron, zinc sulfides and gases, such as CH4, H2S, H2, and CO2 (e.g., Van Dover and Fry, 1989; Micheli et al., 2002; Hall-Spencer et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2008; Yao et al., 2010). A great biological difference occurs between deep and shallow vents. The former are mainly characterized by chemolithotrophic bacteria using H2S as energy source, representing the basis for a complex heterotrophic ecosystem, while the latter are composed both by chemolithotrophic bacteria and by communities energetically driven by photosynthetic organisms, such as diatoms and algal-bacterial mats absent in deep-sea vents communities (Vismann, 1991; Lutz and Kennish, 1993; Tarasov et al., 2005; Raghukumar et al., 2008).

In the Mediterranean Sea, very shallow hydrothermal vents were reported for the Tyrrhenian and Aegean Sea, ranging from few meters to about 30 m depth (Dando et al., 1999). They are related to tectonically active coastal zones, where the volcanic fluids are characterized by high temperatures and mainly composed by sulfide and/or CO2 (Dando et al., 2000). Even though shallow benthic communities include tolerant species to natural or anthropogenic stressors, many studies have suggested that the increasing temperature and sulfides negatively affect a wide variety of benthic assemblages, reducing the water oxygen concentration and producing toxicity to the majority of aerobic species (Caldwell, 1975; Wang and Chapman, 1999; Vaquer-Sunyer and Duarte, 2010, 2011). Similarly, natural CO2 emissions in seawater produce a change in carbonate chemistry, resulting in a local seawater acidification, which, in turn, impacts on calcification and growth processes of many planktic and benthic species (Fabry et al., 2008; Doney et al., 2009; Wicks and Roberts, 2012).

Volcanic emissions, rich in CO2, were previously reported by Hall-Spencer et al. (2008) for the cold vents of Ischia Island, in the Gulf of Naples (Italy). Here, sulfides are absent while the high percentage of CO2 (∼90–95%) considerably reduces the seawater pH which negatively affects calcifying organisms (Cigliano et al., 2010; Donnarumma et al., 2014; Lucey et al., 2016; Teixidó et al., 2018).

A few kilometers away from Ischia Island, in the Campi Flegrei caldera, Di Napoli et al. (2016) reported a remarkable variation in seawater pH (∼7.3–8.3) due to the gas-rich hydrothermal fluids occurring in a shallow submarine relief, namely Secca delle Fumose. This area was only recently investigated from a geological (e.g., Tedesco et al., 1990; Passaro et al., 2013) and microbiological (Maugeri et al., 2010), point of view. High-resolution morpho-bathymetric data and archeological surveys indicate that the relief is largely anthropogenic, consisting of a dense aggregation of pillars of the Roman age (first century BC), with a perimeter of 9 m × 9 m and a height of 7 m, mostly standing on a seafloor at 12 m depth where hydrothermal vents occur. Since there is a lack of information concerning the other biological and ecological components, the aims of this paper are: (i) to evaluate the spatial variation of macrobenthic community at the Secca delle Fumose, (ii) to assess the most important abiotic parameters affecting soft-bottom assemblage structure and (iii) to estimate the taxonomic diversity among hydrothermal vents and non-vent sites. To our knowledge, this study represents the first investigation of macrobenthic assemblages inhabiting the shallow hydrothermal systems of Campi Flegrei.

Materials and Methods

Site Description

“Secca delle Fumose” (SdF) belongs to the largest degassing structure offshore of the Campi Flegrei caldera. With an extension of approximately 0.14 km2, is located about 800 m off the coastline in the north-western part of Pozzuoli Bay (Gulf of Naples, Italy) (40°49′23 ′′N 14°05′15′′E) (Tedesco et al., 1990; Passaro et al., 2013; Di Napoli et al., 2016). In this area, four sampling sites were selected (Figure 1), two control sites (CN; CS) and two in proximity of very different vents: a first characterized by white bacterial mats (H) and a second by yellow substrate around a solitary geyser opening (G). The control sites were distant about 65 m each other and 100 m away, in the hydrothermal area, the other two sites were sampled at the same distance from each other.

FIGURE 1

Sampling Collection and Analytical Procedures

In each site (H, G, CN, and CS) in November 2016, environmental parameters were measured (temperature and pH) and samples for interstitial water chemistry, grain size, total organic carbon (TOC) and sediment macrofauna were collected in triplicate.

Sediment temperature was measured in situ by means of an underwater thermometer. Water samples at water/sediment interface were collected for pH evaluation (pH/ORP Meter, HI98171, and probe HI 1230, Hanna instr.). Interstitial water (20 ml) for ions and metals determination was sampled using syringes and kept frozen until analyses; sediment samples were collected for the grain size and TOC analysis, by means of a cylindrical corer (5.5 cm diameter) pushed 10 cm into the sediment.

In the laboratory, interstitial water was filtered with cellulose filters (0.20 μm) and treated with H2O2 (100 μl in 10 ml of sample) for the digestion of organic content; samples were then fractioned in two aliquots for ions and metals determination.

For the analysis of major ions concentration, interstitial water samples were analyzed through ICS1100 ion chromatographic system, equipped with a double column system for simultaneous analyses of both anions and cations (Chianese et al., 2019); anions were detected with an AS22 column working with a cell volume of 100 μl and a solution 3.5 mM of sodium carbonate/bicarbonate as eluent, while cations were determined with a CS12A column working with a cell volume of 25 μl and 20 mM methanesulfonic acid solution as eluent. For both anions and cations, calibration curves were calculated using certified multistandard solutions; anions and cations detectable with this method are respectively: Cl, F, Br, , , , (as inorganic species), HCOO, CH3COO, (as organic species) and Li+, Na+, K+, , Ca2+, and Mg2+. In addition the S2– ion was estimated using a chromatographic method, converting it in sulfate ion after oxidation with H2O2. Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn) were estimated by means of a polarographic method, with a Metrohm 797 VA Computrace; this system uses a multimode working Mercury electrode and an Ag/AgCl electrode as reference. Using this method, metals that are soluble in mercury such as zinc, cadmium, lead, and copper are simultaneously determinable (Chianese et al., 2019). Also in this case, calibration curves were calculated using certified multistandard solutions.

For the grain size analysis (Eleftheriou and McIntyre, 2008), sediment was sieved over a series of 11 sieves with mesh size ranging from 1 cm to 63 μm. Fractions were dried in oven at 60°C for 48 h and weighed; data were expressed as percentages of the total sediment dry weight, differencing it in three size classes: gravel (>2 mm), sand (2 mm <Ø> 0.063 mm), and mud (<0.063 mm). TOC was determined according to Schumacher (2002) and expressed as% of sediment.

As for macrofauna community, samples were collected at each site by scuba-diving operators using an air-lift pump equipped with a 0.5 mm nylon mesh size bag (Benson, 1989; Chemello and Russo, 1997) within a 50 cm × 50 cm frame, reaching a depth of 10 cm in the sediment. In the laboratory, the samples were fixed in 70% ethanol and macrofauna was sorted and analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Macrofauna organisms were analyzed up to the lowest taxonomic level, when possible, and their identification was cross-checked with the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS Editorial Board, 2018).

Data Analysis

Multivariate ordination by principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on normalized environmental variables in order to determine their distribution patterns among the four sampling sites.

Sinecological indices, such as number of individuals (N) per 25 dm3, species richness (SR), Shannon-Weaver diversity (H′: log2) and Pielou’s evenness (J) were calculated based on three replicate samples for each site. The quantitative (DI, percentage of individuals of a given species upon total individuals collected in the sample) and qualitative dominances (DQ, percentage of species of a given taxon upon the total of species collected in the sample) were also calculated. Differences of sinecological variable among sites were detected by permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; Anderson, 2001a), based on Euclidean distance (Terlizzi et al., 2007). A one-way experimental design with n = 3 was involved with the fixed factor Site (four levels). PERMANOVA analysis, based on Bray–Curtis similarity, was also performed in order to assess differences in the structure of community assemblages among sites. 4999 permutations were always applied (Anderson, 2001b) and a PERMANOVA pairwise t-test was used in order to evaluate differences between pairs of sites. Prior to analysis, data were log (x + 1) transformed (Clarke and Warwick, 2001) in order to normalize the data.

To examine the structural variation of benthic communities among sites, canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP; Anderson and Willis, 2003) was used and similarity percentage (SIMPER) was calculated among the replicates for each site and, then, it was applied to identify those species that contributed more to the similarity among sites. Only species that cumulatively contributed to 50% to similarity were considered.

Relationships between macrobenthic community composition and environmental variables were tested by distance-based linear modeling analysis routine (distLM, Anderson, 2004). The aim was to identify which variables were mostly related with assemblages and to better explain the biological pattern among sites. Then, distance based redundancy analysis (dbRDA, Legendre and Anderson, 1999) was used to visualize the influence of variables identified by distLM. For distLM analysis, interstitial water variables, expressed in ppm and ppb, were log10 transformed to better compare different scales (Underwood, 1997). All multivariate analyses were undertaken using the PRIMER-PERMANOVA + v.6 software package (Anderson et al., 2008).

Results

Environmental Variables

Environmental characteristics of SdF are summarized in Table 1. A solitary hydrothermal vent (geyser) at G site is present at 10 m depth. The vent opening was about 10 cm in diameter; the hydrothermal fluid temperature reaches ∼80°C at the outlet, while a lower temperature (29.1 ± 2.81°C) and a moderate pH value (8) occurred in the sediment at a distance of 20 cm from the vent center. Rocky substrate surrounding the geyser was covered by yellow sulfur deposits (Figure 2), while soft substrate among the rocks presented a TOC content of 30.03%. Interstitial water had a sulfur ion S2– concentration of 130.58 ppm. Here, the most abundant ions were sulfate , with a concentration of 2658.500 ± 6.5 ppm, and Mg, with a concentration of 954.705 ± 3.8 ppm, furthermore, relevant values of metals such as Zn (34.56 ± 3.86 ppb) and Pb (31.29 ± 0.52 ppb) were detected. About 1 m from the vent, where macrofauna was collected, the sediment was composed by sand (83.40%), gravel (13.96%), and mud (2.64%).

TABLE 1

VARIABLESHGCNCS
Sediment variables
Temperatures (°C)37.53 ± 2.2829.1 ± 2.8121.821.8
pH7.56 ± 0.0588.18.1
TOC (%)34.7830.0317.0518.14
Gravel (%)7.4113.9617.8421.52
Sand (%)90.1283.4079.6076.67
Mud (%)2.472.642.571.81
Interstitial water variables
Ions (ppm)Na+8668.260 ± 4.59973.210 ± 10.510776.925 ± 12.511120.825 ± 18.7
Cl19512.965 ± 20.523726.385 ± 15.726039.500 ± 17.525976.560 ± 18.6
K+317.855 ± 7.6426.340 ± 10.2407.405 ± 8.5399.125 ± 6.2
Mg2+805.000 ± 7.3954.705 ± 3.81219.475 ± 8.81179.500 ± 5.2
Ca2+327.500 ± 8.3472.200 ± 9.5503.290 ± 9.2385.725 ± 7.3
NO328.77 ± 0.0625.50 ± 0.0626.07 ± 0.0325.68 ± 0.32
SO42–3152.300 ± 3.62658.500 ± 6.53369.880 ± 3.13888.500 ± 5.9
S2–<lod130.58<lod<lod
Metals (ppb)Zn33.66 ± 0.5134.56 ± 3.8639.09 ± 0.5033.55 ± 0.50
Pb62.02 ± 0.1631.29 ± 0.5218.31 ± 0.6060.02 ± 0.71
Cd4.42 ± 0.19<lod<lod4.42 ± 0.18
Cu<lod8.88 ± 0.215.25 ± 0.21<lod

Environmental condition of the study area. Data were expressed as percentages or averaged (±S.D.) among three replicates at each site (H; G; CN; CS).

lod (limit of detection): 2 ppm for S2−; 0.8 ppb for Cd; 0.1 ppb for Cu.

FIGURE 2

The H site was approximately 65 m from the G site, at a depth of 14 m. The sediment temperature was about 37.53 ± 2.28°C and the pH value 7.56 ± 0.05, indicating an acidified condition, where some gas bubbling occurred. This site was characterized by a soft bottom covered by a white microbial mat (Figure 3), with a TOC content of 34.78%. Sediment was mainly composed by sand (90.12%), gravel (7.41%) and mud (2.47%), while interstitial water showed the highest mean value of (28.77 ± 0.06 ppm) respect to the other sites, and a high mean value of Pb (62.02 ± 0.16 ppb) among metals.

FIGURE 3

The two control sampling sites (CN and CS) were located respectively to the north and south of Roman pillars and 100 m from G and H at a depth of 9.8 and 12.1 m respectively. In these sites, the gas emissions and the white microbial mat were absent, while the sediment temperature of 21.8°C was comparable to that of sea water column; the pH values (average 8.1) were within the range of normal conditions. The content of the TOC in the sediment varied from 17.05 to 18.14%. The sediment grain size was characterized by a high percentage of sand (CN 79.60%; CS 76.67%) and a lower content of gravel (CN 17.84%; CS 21.52%) and mud (CN 2.57%; CS 1.81%). High concentrations of heavy metals occurred in the interstitial water in both sites: the CN site was mainly characterized by a Zn content of 39.09 ± 0.50 ppb, while CS by Pb concentrations of 60.02 ± 0.71 ppb. This latter site presented also the highest mean value of (3888.500 ± 5.9 ppm).

The sediment quality characteristics from sampling sites were shown by multivariate PCA (Figure 4). In particular, PC1 accounted for 47.5% of variation among sites, and PC1 and PC2 together accounted for 84.5% (Table 2). Along the PC1 axis, hydrothermal vent sites (H and G) were separated from the control sites (CN and CS), according to temperature and ion , that were high at the active sites; on the contrary other ions (e.g., Mg2+; Na+) and pH, were high at control sites (Figure 4 – PC1). Along the PC2 axis, the graph showed a clear separation between southern (H and CS) and northern (G and CN) sites; the former sites were displaced on the graph according to heavy metals content such as Cd and Pb and the ion; the latter sites according to Cu, S2– ion and% of mud (Figure 4 – PC2).

FIGURE 4

TABLE 2

PCEigenvalues%VariationCum.%Variation
18.5447.547.5
26.663784.5

Environmental variablesPC1PC2

pH0.317−0.081
T (°C)0.3350.015
TOC (%)−0.250−0.221
Na+0.3370.041
Cl0.1890.056
Ca2+0.229−0.274
K+0.269−0.202
Mg2+0.3330.058
0.2900.135
0.1670.337
S2–−0.0280.322
Zn0.185−0.104
Pb−0.1590.299
Cd−0.1320.345
Cu0.0800.376
Gravel (%)0.2530.251
Sand (%)−0.256−0.244
Mud (%)−0.1200.319

Principal component loadings for hydrothermal and control sites from PCA of environmental data from four sites sampled at the Secca delle Fumose hydrothermal zone.

Bold values were considered high (≥ |0.290|).

Macrofauna Diversity and Community Structure

A total number of 1,954 individuals, belonging to 164 taxa grouped in eight macrobenthic groups, were classified to different taxonomic levels as follows: Mollusca (610 ind.), Sipuncula (606 ind.), Polychaeta (513 ind.), Crustacea (172 ind.), Echinodermata (40 ind.), Chordata (7 ind.), Nemertea (5 ind.), and Platyhelminthes (1 ind.) (Table 3). The whole benthic community drastically increased in abundance and species richness away from the vent sites (H: DI = 0.97% – DQ = 5.49%; G: DI = 13.20% – DQ = 29.88%) to control sites (CN: DI = 31.58% – DQ = 68.29%; CS: DI = 54.25% – DQ = 48.78%).

TABLE 3

TAXAHGCNCS
Nemertea5
Sipuncula7158477
Polychaeta
Amphictene auricoma (O. F. Müller, 1776)1
Aphelochaeta marioni (Saint-Joseph, 1894)7
Aphelochaeta multibranchis (Grube, 1863)4
Aponuphis bilineata (Baird, 1870)132653
Capitella capitata (Fabricius, 1780)4
Chrysopetalum debile (Grube, 1855)11
Dialychone acustica (Claparède, 1870)9
Diplocirrus glaucus (Malmgren, 1867)1
Drilonereis filum (Claparède, 1868)1
Eteone longa (Fabricius, 1780)4
Euclymene oerstedi (Claparède, 1863)5
Eulalia sp.32
Eunice pennata (Müller, 1776)45
Eunice vittata (Delle Chiaje, 1828)118116
Exogone sp.3
Glycera unicornis (Lamarck, 1818)122
Harmothoe longisetis (Grube, 1863)223
Hesionidae indet.7
Hydroides dianthus (Verrill, 1873)1
Hydroides uncinata (Phillipi, 1844)1
Laonice cirrata (M. Sars, 1851)1
Lepidonotus clava (Montagu, 1808)2
Levinsenia gracilis (Tauber, 1879)7
Lumbrineris latreilli (Audouin and Milne-Edwards, 1834)7
Lysidice unicornis (Grube, 1840)4420
Malmgrenia andreapolis (McIntosh, 1874)3
Mysta picta (Quatrefages, 1866)7
Neanthes kerguelensis (McIntosh, 1885)5
Nereis rava (Ehlers, 1868)614
Notomastus latericeus (Sars, 1851)161
Owenia fusiformis (Delle Chiaje, 1844)20
Perinereis cultrifera (Grube, 1840)7
Phyllodoce lineata (Claparède, 1870)5
Pista cristata (Müller, 1776)18
Platynereis dumerilii (Audouin and Milne Edwards, 1833)19
Pontogenia chrysocoma (Baird, 1865)1
Protocirrineris chrysoderma (Claparède, 1868)4
Protodorvillea kefersteini (McIntosh, 1869)9
Pseudoleiocapitella fauveli (Harmelin, 1964)1
Sabellidae indet.4
Serpula vermicularis (Linnaeus, 1767)31
Sigambra tentaculata (Treadwell, 1941)3
Spio filicornis (Müller, 1776)1
Spiophanes bombyx (Claparède, 1870)1
Spirobranchus triqueter (Linnaeus, 1758)5
Sthenelais limicola (Ehlers, 1864)1
Syllidae indet.163
Polyplacophora
Acanthochitona crinita (Pennant, 1777)1
Acanthochitona fascicularis (Linnaeus, 1767)11
Callochiton septemvalvis (Montagu, 1803)1
Leptochiton scabridus (Jeffreys, 1880)1
Lepidochitona sp.11021
Gastropoda
Alvania cancellata (da Costa, 1778)1
Alvania discors (Allan, 1818)131
Alvania lineata (Risso, 1826)5
Alvania pagodula (Bucquoy, Dautzenberg, and Dollfus, 1884)1
Aplysia parvula (Mörch, 1863)1
Ascobulla fragilis (Jeffreys, 1856)16
Bela nebula (Montagu, 1803)1
Bittium latreillii (Payraudeau, 1826)519
Bolma rugosa (Linnaeus, 1767)1
Bulla striata (Bruguière, 1792)1
Caecum auriculatum (de Folin, 1868)16
Caecum glabrum (Montagu, 1803)1
Caecum sp.26
Caecum trachea (Montagu, 1803)14
Calyptraea chinensis (Linnaeus, 1758)138
Cerithium vulgatum (Bruguière, 1792)111
Chrysallida indistincta (Henn and Brazier, 1894)1
Eulimella sp.1
Euspira nitida (Donovan, 1804)1
Fusinus sp.3
Gibbula ardens (Salis Marschlins, 1793)11
Gibbula fanulum (Gmelin, 1791)1
Gibbula guttadauri (Philippi, 1836)31
Gibbula sp.1
Haminoea sp.110
Hexaplex trunculus (Linnaeus, 1758)5
Mangelia costulata (Risso, 1826)2
Mangelia scabrida (Monterosato, 1890)1
Manzonia crassa (Kanmacher, 1798)1
Odostomia sp.1
Ondina vitrea (Brusina, 1866)2
Philine sp.14
Rissoa splendida (Eichwald, 1830)1
Tectura virginea (O. F. Müller, 1776)1
Tritia cuvierii (Payraudeau, 1826)815
Tritia incrassata (Strøm, 1768)7
Pusia savignyi (Payraudeau, 1826)2
Pusia tricolor (Gmelin, 1791)1
Vitreolina sp.1
Weinkauffia turgidula (Forbes, 1844)1
Williamia gussoni (Costa O. G., 1829)2
Bivalvia
Arca noae (Linnaeus, 1758)11
Asbjornsenia pygmaea (Lovén, 1846)10
Cardites antiquatus (Linnaeus, 1758)3
Centrocardita aculeata (Poli, 1795)22
Centrocardita sp.12824
Ctena decussata (O. G. Costa, 1829)49
Dosinia exoleta (Linnaeus, 1758)1
Flexopecten hyalinus (Poli, 1795)1
Gari costulata (W. Turton, 1822)52
Gari tellinella (Lamarck, 1818)1
Glans trapezia (Linnaeus, 1767)110
Gouldia minima (Montagu, 1803)1521
Gregariella semigranata (Reeve, 1858)1219
Hiatella arctica (Linnaeus, 1767)40571
Kurtiella bidentata (Montagu, 1803)178
Laevicardium crassum (Gmelin, 1791)1
Limaria tuberculata (Olivi, 1792)11
Loripinus fragilis (Philippi, 1836)12
Lucinella divaricata (Linnaeus, 1758)1
Modiolula phaseolina (Philippi, 1844)1
Moerella donacina (Linnaeus, 1758)52
Musculus costulatus (Risso, 1826)7
Musculus subpictus (Cantraine, 1835)43
Papillicardium papillosum (Poli, 1791)1
Peronidia albicans (Gmelin, 1791)1
Polititapes aureus (Gmelin, 1791)135
Rocellaria dubia (Pennant, 1777)213
Striarca lactea (Linnaeus, 1758)5311
Thracia villosiuscula (MacGillivray, 1827)1
Venus verrucosa (Linnaeus, 1758)8714
Amphipoda
Ampithoe ramondi (Audouin, 1826)1
Apherusa chiereghinii (Giordani- Soika, 1949)1
Caprellidae4
Dexamine spinosa (Montagu, 1813)37
Gammarus sp.29
Microdeutopus anomalus (Rathke, 1843)1
Microdeutopus spp.21
Pereionotus testudo (Montagu, 1808)612
Pseudolirius kroyeri (Haller, 1897)1
Perioculodes sp.1
Decapoda
Alpheus glaber (Olivi, 1792)1
Anapagurus bicorniger (A. Milne-Edwards and Bouvier, 1892)2135
Athanas nitescens (Leach, 1813)2
Clibanarius erythropus (Latreille, 1818)4
Ebalia deshayesi (Lucas, 1846)15
Eriphia verrucosa (Forskål, 1775)1
Galathea sp.23
Lysmata seticaudata (Risso, 1816)2
Necallianassa truncata (Giard and Bonnier, 1890)1
Paguristes eremita (Linnaeus, 1767)1
Pagurus cuaensis (Bell, 1844)3
Pagurus sp.1
Pisa armata (Latreille, 1803)1
Processa macrophthalma (Nouvel and Holthuis, 1957)11
Sirpus zariquieyi (Gordon, 1953)12
Synalpheus gambarelloides (Nardo, 1847)1
Upogebia stellata (Montagu, 1808)2
Xantho pilipes (A. Milne-Edwards, 1867)4
Isopoda
Anthuridae316
Cymodoce truncata (Leach, 1814)1147
Kupellonura mediterranea (Barnard, 1925)12
Tanaidacea
Chondrochelia savignyi (Kroyer, 1842)210
Cumacea
ind.5
Echinoidea
Echinocyamus pusillus (O. F. Müller, 1776)77
Holothuroidea
indet.22
Ophiuroidea
Ophiothrix sp.13
Amphipholis sp.3411
Platyhelminthes1
Chordata
Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Pallas, 1774)61

Taxonomic list of total fauna occurring at Secca delle Fumose, with abundance (N) of each taxon at each site (H - White hydrothermal vent; G - Geyser; CN - Control North; CS - Control South).

Dashes indicate absence.

The main taxa structuring the benthic community were Mollusca, Sipuncula, Polychaeta and Crustacea, reaching a dominance of 97.28%. With the only exception of Sipuncula, three taxa were detected at all sites, differentially contributing to the communities living at each site (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5

Mollusca showed the highest species richness, being represented by 76 species, belonging to the classes Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, and Bivalvia. Bivalvia was the dominant group in term of abundance (Figure 5A), with 400 individuals (65.57%) belonging to 30 species (39.47%). Gastropods were the dominant group in term of species richness (Figure 5B), with 41 species (53.94%) and an abundance of 173 individuals (28.36%). Polyplacophores were poorly represented, both in abundance (37 ind.; 6.06%) and species richness (5 sp.; 6.57%).

The highest percentage of mollusks abundance mainly occurred in the control site CS (52.46%), where bivalves were mainly represented by the species Hiatella arctica (76 ind.), gastropods by Caecum sp. (26 ind.) and polyplacophores by Lepidochitona sp. (31 ind.). On the other hand, the lowest percentage of mollusks occurred in H (DI 1.64%) with only three species: Tritia cuvierii (8 ind.), Haminoea sp. (1 ind.), and Alvania discors (1 ind.).

Polychaeta, with a total of 513 individuals belonging to 47 species, were mainly represented by the species Eunice vittata (108 ind., 21.05%) and Aponuphis bilineata (83 ind., 16.18%). This group was dominant in the control site CN (Figures 5C,D), both in abundance (307 ind., 59.84%) and in species richness (36 sp., 76%). The opposite occurred in H, where a total of only seven individuals belonging to four species, among which four individuals of the polychaete Capitella capitata, were recorded.

Crustacea were represented by 172 individuals belonging to 33 species, grouped in five orders: Decapoda, Isopoda, Tanaidacea, Amphipoda, and Cumacea. Only five species, represented by the decapod Anapagurus bicorniger, the amphipods Dexamine spinosa and Pereionotus testudo, the isopods Cymodoce truncata and Anthuridae indet., reached a dominance of 52.35% of the total crustacean assemblage. The highest percentage of crustaceans individuals was detected in CS (84 ind., 48.84%; Figure 5E) and species richness in CN (20 sp., 60.61%; Figure 5F), while only 2 species, the decapod Pagurus sp. and the amphipod Perioculodes sp., occurred in H with only 1 individual.

Among the sinecological indices (Table 4), the highest density (N) and species richness (SR) values were recorded in CN and CS, while the lowest values in H, which also showed the lowest values of diversity (H′) and evenness (J). For each index, PERMANOVA test highlighted significant differences among sites, except for Pielou’s evenness (J) (Table 4). A significant difference was also detected analyzing macrofauna composition (PERMANOVA: F = 3.411, p = 0.0004). In particular, pairwise comparisons showed differences between hydrothermal vents (G; H) and non-vents (CN; CS) sites, with the highest average similarity among these latter sites (Average similarity 38.30%; Table 5). These differences were also evident in the plot of CAP analysis (Figure 6), where the three replicates formed consistent clusters for each site. Along the CAP1 axis, vent sites (H and G) were separated from control ones (CN and CS), while along the CAP2 axis the graph showed a clear separation between the southern (H and CS) and northern (G and CN) sites. In particular, H and G were strongly polarized respectively in the positive and negative part of CAP2, while CN and CS were aggregated around the zero value of CAP2, respectively in the positive and negative part. The average multivariate similarity of macrofaunal assemblage composition for each site ranged from 11.94 to 59.92% (Table 6), while the similarity of dominant species among sites was 19.62%, attributable to sipunculans, mollusks, and polychaetes (Table 7).

TABLE 4

SiteSRNJH′
H3.33 ± 2.086.33 ± 5.030.56 ± 0.481.22 ± 1.07
G24 ± 12.1686 ± 50.680.78 ± 0.053.47 ± 0.82
CN63 ± 5.29205.66 ± 50.520.87 ± 0.015.23 ± 0.18
CS51.33 ± 10.78353.33 ± 107.770.64 ± 0.053.63 ± 0.37
F29.3116.3140.95816.28
p(perm)0.00060.00040.4730.001

Macrofauna assemblage.

Number of individuals (N) per 25 dm3, species richness (SR), Shannon-Weaver diversity (H′) and Pielou’s evenness (J) measured for each site (H; G; CN; CS) (mean ± SD), and results of PERMANOVA test on Euclidean distance [F: F-value, p(perm): calculated probability value, Unique perms: the number of unique permutations].

TABLE 5

SitetUnique permsp(MC)Average similarity (%)
H, G1.4325100.12867.66
H, CN1.9607100.03440.75
H, CS2.013100.03781.28
G, CN1.9645100.03818.83
G, CS1.8827100.041624.18
CN, CS2.0479100.023638.30

Results of PERMANOVA pairwise comparisons among sites, using 4999 permutations, and average similarity between sites.

FIGURE 6

TABLE 6

Average similarityTaxaAv.AbundAv.SimSim/SDContrib%Cum.%
CS – 59.92%SIPUNCULA5.046.9712.3511.6311.63
Hiatella arctica3.073.759.606.2517.88
Aponuphis bilineata2.773.333.495.5623.44
Centrocardita sp.2.182.9313.484.8928.34
Eunice pennata2.442.651.324.4332.77
Lysidice unicornis1.952.392.713.9936.75
Gouldia minima1.972.259.983.7540.51
Lepidochitona sp.1.871.895.463.1543.66
Amphipholis sp.1.501.843.873.0746.73
Haminoea cf hydatis1.441.818.193.0249.75
CN – 54.53%Eunice vittata3.253.8856.627.117.11
SIPUNCULA2.993.7671.546.9014.01
Centrocardita sp.2.302.815.435.1419.16
Aponuphis bilineata2.192.5057.024.5923.75
Owenia fusiformis2.022.5057.024.5928.34
Pista cristata1.922.306.524.2232.56
Polititapes aureus1.651.956.693.5836.14
Cymodoce truncata1.691.9456.623.5539.69
Glycera unicornis1.571.8513.343.3943.08
Hesionidae indet.1.191.4613.342.6845.77
Musculus costulatus1.191.4613.342.6848.45
S – 32.10%SIPUNCULA2.938.685.9627.0527.05
Hiatella arctica2.234.491.5913.9941.04
H – 11.94%Tritia cuvierii1.0711.940.58100100

Results of similarity of percentages test, showing dominant species mostly responsible for the similarity among replicates for each site (Cum%-50% cut-off).

TABLE 7

TaxaAv.AbundAv.SimSim/SDContrib%Cum.%
SIPUNCULA2.742.98115.1915.19
MOLLUSCA
Tritia cuvierii (Payraudeau, 1826)0.61.440.267.3422.53
Hiatella arctica (Linnaeus, 1767)1.521.270.676.4829.01
POLYCHAETA
Aponuphis bilineata (Baird, 1870)1.451.260.976.4335.44
Eunice vittata (Delle Chiaje, 1828)1.450.950.644.8440.28
MOLLUSCA
Centrocardita sp.1.180.780.633.9744.25
POLYCHAETA
Lysidice unicornis (Grube, 1840)0.870.690.743.5247.76

Results of similarity of percentages test, showing taxa that mostly contributed to similarity among sites.

Average similarity: 19.62%; Cum%-50% cut-off.

Relationship Between Environmental Variables and Macrobenthic Community

The pattern of community structure was significantly correlated with some environmental parameters of sediments and interstitial waters (Table 8) and visualized in the dbRDA (Figure 7), where vectors indicate the direction of increasing influence of each variable on community changes.

TABLE 8

VARIABLESMarginal testsSequential tests


Pseudo-FpProportion of variation explainedPseudo-FpProportion of variation explainedCumulative variation
(A) Sediment variables
Gravel (%)3.30230.00280.248253.30230.00240.248250.24825
Sand (%)3.35470.00320.25121.61020.09540.114090.36234
Mud (%)1.56940.09560.1356501 1.45E-150.36234
pH3.4080.00680.254182.79840.00420.165250.52759
Temperatures (°C)4.72660.00020.320961.99710.06220.104860.63245
TOC (%)3.10830.00560.237130.672690.7442 3.71E-020.6695
(B) Interstitial water variables
Ca2+2.33120.02580.189052.33120.02440.189050.18905
K+3.26560.00840.246172.29430.02740.164740.35379
Mg2+4.56980.00060.313653.84570.00140.209790.56358
NO3.37080.0090.25211.01310.398 5.52E-020.61876
SO42−2.18550.0340.179350.896090.5072 4.95E-020.6683
S2–1.70780.07960.145870.503820.8168 3.04E-020.69866
Zn1.61870.10720.139321.30740.2978 7.42E-020.77289
Pb1.63850.10180.140781.35530.302 7.07E-020.84356
Cd1.43940.14820.125831.17870.3936 5.80E-020.90157
Cu1.39340.15560.12230.769510.5662 4.28E-020.94438

DistLM results comparing benthic community data and environmental variables (A,B).

Bold data are significantly different at α = 0.05.

FIGURE 7

Concerning the first group of variables (Table 8A – Marginal tests), gravel, sand, pH, temperature, and TOC explained a significant variation in benthic community when tested individually. In particular, only gravel and pH represented the most important driving factors influencing benthic community distribution among sites (Table 8A – Sequential tests), explaining 52.76% of community variation.

As for interstitial water variables, all the investigated ions, with the only exception of S2– in the site G, had a significant effect on community variability (Table 8B – Marginal tests), even though the greatest influence was due to the Mg2+, K2+, and Ca2+ ions (Table 8B – Sequential tests), which explained 56.63% of community variation.

Discussion

The hydrothermal vent system at Pozzuoli Bay provides an opportunity to study the macrobenthic assemblages and composition in a shallow extreme environment. Through this work, the macrobenthic community at Secca delle Fumose was investigated for the first time. The results highlighted a strong change in density, species richness and diversity between two non-vent (CN and CS) and two different vent (H and G) sites.

When compared to the hydrothermal sites, the control sites showed higher abundance and species richness, and the environment was characterized by normal pH and ions concentrations (e.g., Ca2+, K2+, and Mg2+), and by a significant percentage of gravelly sediment that markedly affected the macrobenthic composition (DistLM Table 6; dbRDA Figure 7).

It is well-known that benthic species are functionally and structurally related to the main features of the habitat they reside (e.g., Woodin, 1978; Thrush et al., 1991; Desprez, 2000; Riera et al., 2012; Donnarumma et al., 2018; Casoli et al., 2019). In particular, the taxa composition recorded in the control sites was consistent with a marked occurrence of gravel, which offers microhabitats suitable for settlement and refuge. This is also proven by the high dominance of the byssate bivalve H. arctica, which is commonly found on hard substrates, where become strictly aggregated in dense groups (Purchon, 1977). The occurrence of high abundance of gastropod Caecum spp. is probably due to the presence of sand in the sediment with only tracks of mud (Fretter and Graham, 1978). Species belonging to the genus Eunice (Annelida, Polychaeta) also occurred with a very high abundance in the control area, in agreement with their cosmopolitan nature (George and Hartmann-Schröder, 1985; Dounas and Koukouras, 1989; Gusso et al., 2001; Fauchald et al., 2009), as well as for the crevice-dwelling isopod C. truncata and sipunculans, capable of hiding in the narrow cracks of rocks and in empty or fragmented shells (Ferrero-Vicente et al., 2013).

In addition to the relationship between benthic assemblages and structural characteristics of the substrate, the understanding of environment state is also related to the occurrence of sensitive or tolerant species to the environmental changes (Simboura and Zenetos, 2002; Washburn et al., 2016). For instance, the high abundance of C. truncata restricted only in the control area might be related to the suitable habitat conditions, as reported for the normal pH conditions at Ischia Island by Cigliano et al. (2010). Conversely, the absence of this species at the geyser site (G) may be due to the crustaceans sulfide sensitivity (Gray et al., 2002), as well as its absence in the white hydrothermal vent (H) could be also related to the metabolic sensitivity of C. truncata to high pCO2 condition (Turner et al., 2016).

Heavy metals (Zn, Cd, Pb, and Cu) occurred in the interstitial waters of sediments at all sampling sites (Table 1). However, their low quantity is compatible with the existence of a well-structured macrobenthic assemblage in the control sites, as reported in previous investigations (Bryan, 1976; Yoshida et al., 2002; Raghukumar et al., 2008). Moreover, the presence only in the control sites of the cephalochordate Branchiostoma lanceolatum attests to the good quality of the sites, since it is a species sensitive to organic enrichment and polluted water (Simboura and Zenetos, 2002; Rota et al., 2009).

At the two hydrothermal sites (G and H), a drastic decrease of benthic biodiversity was observed. This can be mainly attributable to environmental conditions, in particular to presence of sulfide, high temperatures and seawater pH variations generated by volcanic activity. Moreover, as observed by Tarasov et al. (2005), the hydrothermal fluids in these sites produced a slight reduction of water salinity, measured as Na+ and Cl ions.

Several studies (e.g., Thiermann et al., 1997; Tarasov et al., 1999; Dando, 2010) have reported a decrease of both density and diversity of benthic communities as corresponding to the occurrence of high temperatures and sulfide concentrations, leading to an increase of temperature- and/or sulfide-tolerant species. The same result was also found in the present study where high sediment temperatures and sulfide ions (S2–) occurred at the geyser site (G), resulting in a 69% reduction of taxonomic richness and a 73% reduction in number of individuals compared to control sites. At this geyser site we observed the absence of obligate vent-associated species, which were previously reported for deep-sea vent systems (Tarasov et al., 2005 and reference therein; Schander et al., 2010; Stevens et al., 2015). Our data are consistent with results from other coastal shallow water hydrothermal vents (Dando, 2010; Bianchi et al., 2011). In particular, the fauna around the geyser at the Secca delle Fumose was composed by the most representative species inhabiting the ‘background’ area (e.g., the polychaetes E. vittata and A. bilineata, the bivalves H. arctica and Venus verrucosa, the ophiuroid Amphipholis sp.), but with a very low number of individuals. This benthic assemblage may represent a “simplified” community as suggested by Dando (2010), who defined the living fauna around hydrothermal vent and cold seep sites as a subset of the background biota.

According to Thiermann et al. (1997), the harsh hydrothermal conditions drastically affect the macrobenthic composition, as also observed at the “white” hydrothermal site (H). Here, the lowest species richness (9 sp.) and abundance (19 ind.) are mainly due to the seawater acidification (pH ∼7.6), in agreement with Di Napoli et al. (2016) who recently detected acidic CO2-rich fluids in the SdF area, and to the high sediment temperature (37.53 ± 2.28°C), that was almost the double of that detected in the control sites (21.8°C). These factors produced a reduction of 83.64% in taxonomic richness and 86.29% in number of individuals if compared with those found around the geyser and a reduction of 93.92 and 97.75% respectively if compared with control sites.

The dominant species in H site were the gastropod T. cuvierii (8 ind.) and the opportunistic polychaete C. capitata (4 ind.), while the other species, each occurring with only one individual, could be considered very rare in the hydrothermal area. The occurrence of the vagile nassariid gastropod T. cuvierii and the sediment-dwelling polychaete C. capitata clearly underlines the faunal similarity of our study area with other shallow-water hydrothermal vents. Indeed, nassariid species Tritia neritea (= Cyclope neritea Linnaeus, 1758), was among the dominant organisms in hydrothermal vents off Milos in the Aegean Sea (Dando et al., 1995; Southward et al., 1997; Thiermann et al., 1997) and in the Papua New Guinea (Tarasov et al., 1999). Population density of nassarids species is often influenced by food availability (Zhao et al., 2011), similarly the high abundance of T. cuvierii in the white hydrothermal site (H) may be due to the high food source consisting in the microbial mat (Cardigos et al., 2005), so as also occurs for the congeneric species T. neritea in other vent systems. High TOC concentration in the sediment (Table 1) might represent a further food source of this gastropod. The organic enrichment could be responsible for the dominance of the opportunistic polychaete C. capitata (Grassle and Grassle, 1976), which is a tolerant species to high temperatures and sulfide concentrations (Gamenick et al., 1998a). This work does not address directly the genetics of C. capitata complex (Blake, 2009; Nygren, 2014) that is also reported in hydrothermal vents and sulfidic habitats (Gamenick et al., 1998a, b), nevertheless such complex of sibling species so as for gastropods (e.g., Colognola et al., 1986) will be the focus of future research on its genetic variation under the extreme environmental conditions occurring in the study area.

Conclusion

This work represents the first study describing the particular environmental conditions and species composition of macrofauna at the Secca delle Fumose shallow hydrothermal system, an easily accessible coastal area, to evaluate the biological responses in an extreme habitat (i.e., characterized by high temperature, sulfide concentration and low pH condition). The results showed that the studied macrobenthic community appears to be strongly driven by high sediment temperatures, by sulfide concentration around the geyser and by low pH value in the white microbial mat area with the occurrence of some CO2 gas bubbling. These key factors led to a drastic reduction of biodiversity, compared to the surrounding non-vent area, highlighting the great importance of environmental state in structuring benthic systems. Future studies should also take into account other key elements of ecosystem functioning, such as meiofauna and microfauna communities, for a better understanding of the complex characteristics related to this very shallow extreme environment of the Campi Flegrei area.

Statements

Data availability statement

This manuscript contains previously unpublished data. The name of the repository and accession number are not available.

Ethics statement

The study present in the manuscript involve macrobenthos communities without endangered animal species.

Author contributions

DZ and RS conceived the study. LD wrote the manuscript. LD, LA, EB, RB, DZ, and RS provided samples from the field. EB and RB performed the samples pretreatment. EC provided chemical analysis. LD and RG provided taxonomic analysis. LD and LA performed statistical analysis. DZ, RS, and GR provided the sampling design and improved the manuscript. All the authors read, edited and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the project “Prokaryote-nematode Interaction in marine extreme envirONments: a uniquE source for ExploRation of innovative biomedical applications” (PIONEER) funded by the Total Foundation and IFREMER (2016–2019), and by the project Boost Europe – ERC “Extreme marine nematoDes: moDel orgAnisms for a Journey toward the origin and Evolution of metazoan life in our changing planet” (EDDAJE) funded by the Brittany Region and IFREMER (2019).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Soprintendenza of the Underwater Archeological Park of Baia (prot. 5667, 24/10/2016) for the authorization to sampling. We are thankful to Dr. Guido Villani for assistance during the underwater sampling and permission to use photos that enriched the manuscript. Thanks are also due to the diving center Centro SUB Pozzuoli (Guglielmo Fragale) for support field activities and Dr. Aurélie Tasiemski and Dr. Céline Boidin-Wichlacz for helping in sampling activities. We also thank the reviewers for the suggestions and comments. We are indebted to Dr. Jeroen Ingels (Florida State University) for useful discussions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AndersonM.GorleyR. N.ClarkeR. K. (2008). Permanova+ for Primer: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods: Primer-E Limited, 1st Edn. Plymouth: PRIMER-E Ltd.

  • 2

    AndersonM. J. (2001a). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance.Austral. Ecol.263246. 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

  • 3

    AndersonM. J. (2001b). Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.58626639. 10.1139/f01-004

  • 4

    AndersonM. J. (2004). DISTLM v. 5: a FORTRAN Computer Program to Calculate a Distance-Based Multivariate Analysis for a Linear Model.Auckland: University of Auckland.

  • 5

    AndersonM. J.WillisT. J. (2003). Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology.Ecology84511525. 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084%5B0511:caopca%5D2.0.co;2

  • 6

    ArribasL. P.DonnarummaL.PalomoM. G.ScrosatiR. A. (2014). Intertidal mussels as ecosystem engineers: their associated invertebrate biodiversity under contrasting wave exposures.Mar. Biodivers.44203211. 10.1007/s12526-014-0201-z

  • 7

    BensonB. L. (1989). Airlift sampler: applications for hard substrata.Bull. Mar. Sci.44752756.

  • 8

    BianchiC. N.DandoP. R.MorriC. (2011). Increased diversity of sessile epibenthos at subtidal hydrothermal vents: seven hypotheses based on observations at milos island Aegean Sea.Adv. Oceanogr. Limnol.2131. 10.1080/19475721.2011.565804

  • 9

    BlakeJ. A. (2009). Redescription of capitella capitata (Fabricius) from west greenland and designation of a neotype (Polychaeta, Capitellidae).Zoosymposia25580.

  • 10

    BryanG. W. (1976). Some Aspects of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Aquatic Organisms.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • 11

    CaldwellR. S. (1975). Hydrogen Sulfide Effects on Selected Larval and Adult Marine Invertebrates.Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.

  • 12

    CardigosF.ColaçoA.DandoP. R.ÁvilaS. P.SarradinP. M.TemperaF.et al (2005). Shallow water hydrothermal vent field fluids and communities of the D. João de Castro Seamount (Azores).Chem. Geol.224153168. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.019

  • 13

    CasoliE.BonifaziA.ArdizzoneG.GravinaM. F.RussoG. F.SandulliR.et al (2019). Comparative analysis of mollusc assemblages from different hard bottom habitats in the central tyrrhenian sea.Diversity11:74. 10.3390/d11050074

  • 14

    ChemelloR.RussoG. F. (1997). The molluscan taxocoene of photophilic algae from the island of lampedusa (strait of sicily, southern mediterranean).Boll. Malacol.3395104.

  • 15

    ChianeseE.TrimberioG.RiccioA. (2019). PM2.5 and PM10 in the urban area of naples: chemical composition, chemical properties and influence of air masses origin.J. Atmos. Chem. Inpress.76151169. 10.1007/s10874-019-09392-3

  • 16

    CiglianoM.GambiM. C.Rodolfo-MetalpaR.PattiF. P.Hall-SpencerJ. M. (2010). Effects of ocean acidification on invertebrate settlement at volcanic CO2 vents.Mar. Biol.15724892502. 10.1007/s00227-010-1513-6

  • 17

    ClarkeK. R.WarwickR. M. (2001). Change in Marine Communities - an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd Edn. Plymouth: Primer-E Ldt.

  • 18

    ColognolaR.MasturzoP.RussoG. F.ScardiM.VlnciD.FresiE. (1986). Biometric and genetic analysis of the marine rissoid rissoa auriscalpium (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) and its ecological implications.Mar. Ecol.7265285. 10.1111/j.1439-0485.1986.tb00163.x

  • 19

    DandoP. R. (2010). “Biological communities at marine shallow-water vent and seep sites,” in The Vent and Seep Biota, ed.KielS. (Dordrecht: Springer), 333378. 10.1007/978-90-481-9572-5_11

  • 20

    DandoP. R.AlianiS.ArabH.BianchiC. N.BrehmerM.CocitoS.et al (2000). Hydrothermal studies in the aegean sea.Phys. Chem. Earth Part B Hydrol. Ocean. Atmos.2518. 10.1016/S1464-1909(99)00112-4

  • 21

    DandoP. R.HughesJ. A.ThiermannF. (1995). Preliminary observations on biological communities at shallow hydrothermal vents in the aegean Sea.Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ.87303317. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.087.01.23

  • 22

    DandoP. R.StübenD.VarnavasS. P. (1999). Hydrothermalism in the mediterranean sea.Prog. Oceanogr.44333367. 10.1016/S0079-6611(99)00032-4

  • 23

    DesprezM. (2000). Physical and biological impact of marine aggregate extraction along the french coast of the eastern english channel: short-and long-term post-dredging restoration.ICES J. Mar. Sci.5714281438. 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0926

  • 24

    Di NapoliR.AiuppaA.SulliA.CaliroS.ChiodiniG.AcocellaV.et al (2016). Hydrothermal fluid venting in the offshore sector of Campi Flegrei caldera: a geochemical, geophysical, and volcanological study.Geochemistry. Geophys. Geosyst.1741534178. 10.1002/2016GC006494

  • 25

    DoneyS. C.FabryV. J.FeelyR. A.KleypasJ. A. (2009). Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem.Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.1169192. 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834

  • 26

    DonnarummaL.LombardiC.CocitoS.GambiM. C. (2014). Settlement pattern of Posidonia oceanica epibionts along a gradient of ocean acidification: an approach with mimics.Mediterr. Mar. Sci.15498509. 10.12681/mms.677

  • 27

    DonnarummaL.SandulliR.AppolloniL.RussoG. F. (2018). Assessing molluscs functional diversity within different coastal habitats of marine protected areas.Ecol. Quest.293551. 10.12775/eq.2018.021

  • 28

    DounasC.KoukourasA. (1989). Sorne observations on the possible synonyrny of Eunice vittata (Delle Chiaje, 1825) and E. indica Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida, Polychaeta.).Cah. Biol. Mar.30227234.

  • 29

    EleftheriouA.McIntyreA. (eds) (2008). Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos, 3rd Edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • 30

    EllingsenK. E. (2002). Soft-sediment benthic biodiversity.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.2321527. 10.3354/meps232015

  • 31

    FabryV. J.SeibelB. A.FeelyR. A.OrrJ. C. (2008). Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes.ICES J. Mar. Sci.65414432. 10.1093/icesjms/fsn048

  • 32

    FauchaldK.Granados-BarbaA.Solís-WeissV. (2009). “Polychaeta (Annelida) of the gulf of mexico,” in Gulf of Mexico–Origins, Waters, and Biota. Biodiversity, edsFelderD. L.CampD. K. (College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press), 751788.

  • 33

    FederH. M.NaiduA. S.JewettS. C.HameediJ. M.JohnsonW. R.WhitledgeT. E. (1994). The northeastern chukchi sea: benthos-environmental interactions.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.111171190. 10.3354/meps111171

  • 34

    Ferrero-VicenteL. M.Marco-MéndezC.Loya-FernándezA.Sánchez-LizasoJ. L. (2013). Limiting factors on the distribution of shell/tube-dwelling sipunculans.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.446345354. 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.06.011

  • 35

    FretterV.GrahamA. (1978). The prosobranch molluscs of britain and Denmark. Part 4 –Marine rissoacea.J. Molluscan Stud.suppl. 6153241.

  • 36

    GamenickI.AbbiatiM.GiereO. (1998a). Field distribution and sulphide tolerance of Capitella capitata (Annelida: Polychaeta) around shallow water hydrothermal vents off milos (aegean sea). a new sibling species?Mar. Biol.130447453. 10.1007/s002270050265

  • 37

    GamenickI.VismannB.GrieshaberM. K.GiereO. (1998b). Ecophysiological differentiation of Capitella capitata (Polychaeta). Sibling species from different sulfidic habitats.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.175155166. 10.3354/meps175155

  • 38

    GeorgeJ. D.Hartmann-SchröderG. (1985). “Polychaetes: british amphinomida, spintherida and eunicida: keys and notes for the identification of the species,” in Synopses of the British Fauna, edsKermackM.BarnesR. S. K. (London: Brill Archive), 1221.

  • 39

    GrassleJ.GrassleJ. F. (1976). Sibling species in the marine pollution indicator Capitella (Polychaeta).Science192567569. 10.1126/science.1257794

  • 40

    GrayJ. S.WuR. S. S.YingY. O. (2002). Effects of hypoxia and organic enrichment on the coastal marine environment.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.238249279. 10.3354/meps238249

  • 41

    GussoC. C.GravinaM. F.MaggioreF. R. (2001). Temporal variations in soft bottom benthic communities in central tyrrhenian sea (Italy).Archo. Ocean. Limnol.22175182.

  • 42

    Hall-SpencerJ. M.Rodolfo-MetalpaR.MartinS.RansomeE.FineM.TurnerS. M.et al (2008). Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification.Nature454:96. 10.1038/nature07051

  • 43

    LegendreP.AndersonM. J. (1999). Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multicfacorial ecological experiments.Ecol. Monogr.69124. 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069

  • 44

    LloretJ.MarínA. (2009). The role of benthic macrophytes and their associated macroinvertebrate community in coastal lagoon resistance to eutrophication.Mar. Poll. Bull.5818271834. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.08.001

  • 45

    LuceyN. M.LombardiC.FlorioM.DeMarchiL.NanniniM.RundleS.et al (2016). An in situ assessment of local adaptation in a calcifying polychaete from a shallow CO2 vent system.Evol. Appl.910541071. 10.1111/eva.12400

  • 46

    LutzR. A.KennishM. J. (1993). Ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities: a review.Rev. Geophys.31211242.

  • 47

    MartinW.BarossJ.KelleyD.RussellM. J. (2008). Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.6805814. 10.1038/nrmicro1991

  • 48

    MaugeriT. L.BianconiG.CanganellaF.DanovaroR.GugliandoloC.ItalianoF.et al (2010). Shallow hydrothermal vents in the southern tyrrhenian sea.Chem. Ecol.26285298. 10.1080/02757541003693250

  • 49

    MicheliF.PetersonC. H.MullineauxL. S.FisherC. R.MillsS. W.SanchoG.et al (2002). Predation structures communities at deep-sea hydrothermal vents.Ecol. Monogr.72365382. 10.1111/1462-2920.14806

  • 50

    NygrenA. (2014). Cryptic polychaete diversity: a review.Zool. Scr.43172183. 10.1111/zsc.12044

  • 51

    ParsonL. M.WalkerC. L.DixonD. R. (1995). Hydrothermal vents and processes.Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.8712.

  • 52

    PassaroS.BarraM.SaggiomoR.Di GiacomoS.LeottaA.UhlenH.et al (2013). Multi-resolution morpho-bathymetric survey results at the Pozzuoli-Baia underwater archaeological site (Naples. Italy).J. Archaeol. Sci.4012681278. 10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.035

  • 53

    PurchonR. D. (1977). The Biology of the Mollusca, 2nd Edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • 54

    RaghukumarC.MohandassC.CardigosF.DeCostaP. M.SantosR. S.ColacoA. (2008). Assemblage of benthic diatoms and culturable heterotrophs in shallow-water hydrothermal vent of the D. Joao de Castro seamount, azores in the atlantic ocean.Curr. Sci.9517151723.

  • 55

    RieraR.MonterrosoÓ.NúñezJ. (2012). Effects of granulometric gradient on macrofaunal assemblages in Los Cristianos harbour (tenerife, canary islands). arquipélago.Life Mar. Sci.293341.

  • 56

    RotaE.PerraG.FocardiS. (2009). The European lancelet Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Pallas) as an indicator of environmental quality of tuscan archipelago (western mediterranean sea).Chem. Ecol.256169. 10.1080/02757540802641361

  • 57

    SchanderC.RappH. T.KongsrudJ. A.BakkenT.BergeJ.CochraneS.et al (2010). The fauna of hydrothermal vents on the mohn ridge (North Atlantic).Mar. Biol. Res.6155171. 10.1080/17451000903147450

  • 58

    SchumacherB. A. (2002). Methods for the Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soils and Sediments.Washington, DC:United States Environmental Protection Agency, National ESD (Exposure Research Laboratory).

  • 59

    SimbouraN.ZenetosA. (2002). Benthic indicators to use in ecological quality classification of mediterranean soft bottom ecosystems, including a new biotic index.Mediterr. Mar. Sci.377112.

  • 60

    SouthwardA. J.SouthwardE. C.DandoP. R.HughesJ. A.KennicuttM. C.Herrera-AlcalaJ.et al (1997). Behaviour and feeding of the nassariid gastropod cyclope neritea, abundant at hydrothermal brine seeps off milos (aegean sea).J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.77753771. 10.1017/s0025315400036171

  • 61

    StevensC. J.JuniperS. K.LiménH.PondD. W.MetaxasA.GélinasY. (2015). Obligate hydrothermal vent fauna at East Diamante submarine volcano (mariana arc) exploit photosynthetic and chemosynthetic carbon sources.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.5252539. 10.3354/meps11229

  • 62

    TarasovV. G.GebrukA. V.MironovA. N.MoskalevL. I. (2005). Deep-sea and shallow-water hydrothermal vent communities: two different phenomena?Chem. Geol.224539. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.021

  • 63

    TarasovV. G.GebrukA. V.ShulkinV. M.KamenevG. M.FadeevV. I.KosmyninV. N.et al (1999). Effect of shallow-water hydrothermal venting on the biota of matupi harbour (Rabaul Caldera, New Britain Island, Papua New Guinea).Cont. Shelf Res.1979116. 10.1016/S0278-4343(98)00073-9

  • 64

    TedescoD.AllardP.SanoY.WakitaH.PeceR. (1990). Helium-3 in subaerial and submarine fumaroles of Campi Flegrei caldera, Italy.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta5411051116. 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90442-N

  • 65

    TeixidóN.GambiM. C.ParravaciniV.KroekerK.MicheliF.VillégerS.et al (2018). Functional biodiversity loss along natural CO2 gradients.Nat. Commun.9:5149. 10.1038/s41467-018-07592-1

  • 66

    TerlizziA.AndersonM. J.FraschettiS.Benedetti-CecchiL. (2007). Scales of spatial variation in Mediterranean subtidal sessile assemblages at different depths.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.3322539. 10.3354/meps332025

  • 67

    ThiermannF.AkoumianakiI.HughesJ. A.GiereO. (1997). Benthic fauna of a shallow-water gaseohydrothermal vent area in the aegean sea (Milos, Greece).Mar. Biol.128149159. 10.1007/s002270050078

  • 68

    ThrushS. F.PridmoreR. D.HewittJ. E.CummingsV. J. (1991). Impact of ray feeding disturbances on sandflat macrobenthos: do communities dominated by polychaetes or shellfish respond differently?Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.69245252. 10.3354/meps069245

  • 69

    TurnerL. M.RicevutoE.Massa GallucciA.LorentiM.GambiM. C.CalosiP. (2016). Metabolic responses to high pCO2 conditions at a CO2 vent site in juveniles of a marine isopod species assemblage.Mar. Biol.163:211. 10.1007/s00227-016-2984-x

  • 70

    UnderwoodA. J. (1997). Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • 71

    Van DoverC. L.FryB. (1989). Stable isotopic compositions of hydrothermal vent organisms.Mar. Biol.102257263. 10.1007/BF00428287

  • 72

    Vaquer-SunyerR.DuarteC. M. (2010). Sulfide exposure accelerates hypoxia-driven mortality.Limnol. Oceanogr.5510751082. 10.4319/lo.2010.55.3.1075

  • 73

    Vaquer-SunyerR.DuarteC. M. (2011). Temperature effects on thresholds of hypoxia for marine organisms.Glob. Chang. Biol.1717881797. 10.1007/s11356-017-8908-6

  • 74

    VismannB. (1991). Sulfide tolerance: physiological mechanisms and ecological implications.Ophelia34127. 10.1080/00785326.1991.10429703

  • 75

    WangF.ChapmanP. M. (1999). Biological implications of sulfide in sediment - a review focusing on sediment toxicity.Environ. Toxicol. Chem.1825262532. 10.1002/etc.5620181120

  • 76

    WashburnT.RhodesA. C. E.MontagnaP. A. (2016). Benthic taxa as potential indicators of a deep-sea oil spill.Ecol. Indic.71587597. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.045

  • 77

    WicksL. C.RobertsM. J. (2012). “Benthic invertebrates in a high-CO2 world,” in Oceanography and Marine Biology - An Annual Review, edsGibsonR. N.AtkinsonR. J. A.GordonJ. D. M.HughesR. N. (Milton Park: Taylor & Francis), 127188.

  • 78

    WoodinS. A. N. N. (1978). Refuges, disturbance, and community structure: a marine soft-bottom example.Ecology59274284.

  • 79

    WoRMS Editorial Board (2018). World Register of Marine Species. Available at: http://www.marinespecies.orgat VLIZ (accessed June 19, 2018).

  • 80

    YaoH.DaoM.ImholtT.HuangJ.WheelerK.BonillaA.et al (2010). Protection mechanisms of the iron-plated armor of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent gastropod.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107987992. 10.1073/pnas.0912988107

  • 81

    YoshidaM.HamdiH.Abdul NasserI.JedidiN. (2002). Contamination of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in bizerte lagoon bottom sediments, surface sediment and sediment repository.Rpp Sepmcl.1348.

  • 82

    ZhaoQ.CheungS. G.ShinP. K. S.ChiuJ. M. Y. (2011). Effects of starvation on the physiology and foraging behaviour of two subtidal nassariid scavengers.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.4095361. 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.08.003

Summary

Keywords

shallow hydrothermal vents, interstitial water, sediments, macrofauna, benthos, extreme habitats, Mediterranean Sea

Citation

Donnarumma L, Appolloni L, Chianese E, Bruno R, Baldrighi E, Guglielmo R, Russo GF, Zeppilli D and Sandulli R (2019) Environmental and Benthic Community Patterns of the Shallow Hydrothermal Area of Secca Delle Fumose (Baia, Naples, Italy). Front. Mar. Sci. 6:685. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00685

Received

23 April 2019

Accepted

24 October 2019

Published

08 November 2019

Volume

6 - 2019

Edited by

Rui Rosa, University of Lisbon, Portugal

Reviewed by

Ana Colaço, Marine Research Institute (IMAR), Portugal; Clara Rodrigues, University of Aveiro, Portugal

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Luigia Donnarumma,

This article was submitted to Global Change and the Future Ocean, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics