CORRECTION article

Front. Mar. Sci., 06 September 2019

Sec. Ocean Observation

Volume 6 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00549

Corrigendum: Detecting Change in the Indonesian Seas

  • 1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States

  • 2. Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States

  • 3. Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, United States

  • 4. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Hobart, TAS, Australia

  • 5. Centre for Southern Hemisphere Oceans Research, Hobart, TAS, Australia

  • 6. Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves, Institute of Oceanology, Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China

  • 7. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China

  • 8. Laboratory of Studies on Spatial Geophysics and Oceanography (LEGOS), Toulouse, France

  • 9. Mercator-Océan, Ramonville-Saint-Agne, France

  • 10. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia

  • 11. Agency of Research and Development for Marine and Fisheries, Jakarta, Indonesia

  • 12. Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

  • 13. Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia

  • 14. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States

  • 15. Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysical Agency (BMKG), Jakarta, Indonesia

  • 16. Research Center for Oceanography, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia

  • 17. Department of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

  • 18. Department of Mathematics, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana

  • 19. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States

In the original article, there was a mistake in the both the figure and legend for Figure 7 as published. Velocity anomalies were shown incorrectly, we now show absolute velocity. The correct legend appears below.

Figure 7

Furthermore, there was a mistake in the legends for Figure 12 and Figure 13 as published. In the Authors Proof, the authors had asked that the complete Figures 12, 13 be swapped. The figures were swapped but the legends were not. The correct legend appears below.

Figure 12 | The baroclinic tides (cm) from (A) along-track TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason satellite altimeter data (1992–2009) (B) the NEMO 1/12° INDESO model configuration (Nugroho et al., 2017) and (C) the HYCOM 1/12° model configuration (Ansong et al., 2015) and (D) the MITgcm (1/100°, Nagai and Hibiya, 2015). Details of the approach used to extract baroclinic tides from the HYCOM output and along-track altimeter data are provided in Shriver et al. (2012). Model output are interpolated to the altimeter tracks. For models and altimeter output, spatial band-pass filtering along the altimeter tracks is used to extract the M2 internal tide signals with wavelengths in the 50–400 km range. Only locations with sea floor depth greater than 1500 m are plotted (Figure from Ansong et al., 2015).

Figure 13 | Semi-major axis of the velocity (cm s−1) for the (A) M2, (B) K1, (C) S2, and (D) O1 tidal constituents in the NEMO 1/12° INDESO model configuration (Figure from Nugroho, 2017. Permission obtained from author).

Lastly, “Beatriz Peña Molino” was not included as an author in the published article. The corrected Author Contributions Statement appears below.

JS led the writing, editing, and organization of the manuscript. AG, SW, MF, and SH led and wrote sections. AK-L and HP led and wrote significant subsections. DN, AN, KP, RS, BS, BP-M, DY, NR, SS, AK, ZA, AW, HZ, TN, JA, RB-B, JC, FL, BA, AR, and AS contributed to the writing of sections. All authors contributed comments.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

  • 1

    AnsongJ. K.ArbicB. K.BuijsmanM. C.RichmanJ. G.ShriverJ. F.WallcraftA. J. (2015). Indirect evidence for substantial damping of low-mode internal tides in the open ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans120, 60576071. 10.1002/2015JC010998

  • 2

    NagaiT.HibiyaT. (2015). Internal tides and associated vertical mixing in the Indonesian Archipelago. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans120, 33733390. 10.1002/2014jc010592

  • 3

    NugrohoD. (2017). Tides in a OGCM in the Indonesian Seas.Toulouse: Paul Sabatier University.

  • 4

    NugrohoY.Koch-LarrouyA.GasparP.LyardF.ReffrayG.TranchantB.et al. (2017). Modelling explicit tides in the Indonesian seas: an important process for surface sea water properties. Mar. Pollut. Bull.131(Pt B), 718. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.033

  • 5

    ShriverJ. F.ArbicB. K.RichmanJ. G.RayR. D.MetzgerE. J.WallcraftA. J.et al. (2012). An evaluation of the barotropic and internal tides in a high-resolution global ocean circulation model. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans117, 114.

Summary

Keywords

Indonesian throughflow, observing system, intraseasonal, ENSO, transport variability, planetary waves

Citation

Sprintall J, Gordon AL, Wijffels SE, Feng M, Hu S, Koch-Larrouy A, Phillips H, Nugroho D, Napitu A, Pujiana K, Susanto RD, Sloyan B, Peña-Molino B, Yuan D, Riama NF, Siswanto S, Kuswardani A, Arifin Z, Wahyudi AJ, Zhou H, Nagai T, Ansong JK, Bourdalle-Badié R, Chanut J, Lyard F, Arbic BK, Ramdhani A and Setiawan A (2019) Corrigendum: Detecting Change in the Indonesian Seas. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:549. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00549

Received

10 July 2019

Accepted

20 August 2019

Published

06 September 2019

Volume

6 - 2019

Edited and reviewed by

Gilles Reverdin, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Janet Sprintall

This article was submitted to Ocean Observation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics